This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-13_CI_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_222529_TTUQ1b1x1_373514_LcbDMYNn
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 14.1419 2461205.6419 12.12 16:51:49.40 -05:01:54.9
13.50725 23.70281 galactic Oph Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.6" and 7.6 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.258 Tyche -0 -0 0 12.0 0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits at 16:51:49.40 -05:01:54.9: 15.73 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits at 16:51:49.40 -05:01:54.9: 15.48 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461205.6419,12.12,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260614.1419 12.12CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 14.1419 2461205.6419 13.62 16:46:19.20 -11:46:42.9
6.63504 21.05620 galactic Oph Second-epoch detections are separated by 2.2" and 7.0 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.740 Cantabia -1 -0 1 13.5 0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits at 16:46:19.20 -11:46:42.9: 15.62 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits at 16:46:19.20 -11:46:42.9: 15.40 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461205.6419,13.62,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260614.1419 13.62CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461205.6419,13.73,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260614.1419 13.73CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 06 14.1419* 17 34 54.18 -14 23 15.8 12.9 U Ser 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
PNV J17345432-1423182,2461205.6419,12.94,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
PNV J17345432-1423182 20260614.1419 12.94CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 14.1419 2461205.6419 12.70 16:55:07.88 -11:43:25.5
7.99916 19.31977 galactic Oph Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.4" and 7.6 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.412 Elisabetha -0 -2 2 12.9 0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits at 16:55:07.88 -11:43:25.5: 15.30 +/- 0.24 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits at 16:55:07.88 -11:43:25.5: 15.02 +/- 0.23 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.16 +/- 0.17
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461205.6419,12.70,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260614.1419 12.70CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 14.1419 2461205.6419 12.03 16:53:59.91 -09:25:22.1
9.85887 20.84336 galactic Oph Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.4" and 7.4 pix
The object was found in VSX 1" ASAS J165400-0925.4
Type: MISC
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
9.071 Ic Y 0.256 Ic 2452542.50000 58.480000000000
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits at 16:53:59.91 -09:25:22.1: 13.14 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits at 16:53:59.91 -09:25:22.1: 13.12 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.13 +/- 0.02
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ASAS J165400-0925.4,2461205.6419,12.03,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ASAS J165400-0925.4 20260614.1419 12.03CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461174.80897943 14.05.2026 07:24:45.823 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits
First image: 2461174.80897943 14.05.2026 07:24:45.823 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits
Last image: 2461205.64219419 14.06.2026 03:24:35.578 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-13_CI_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_222529_TTUQ1b1x1_373514_LcbDMYNn/fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-24-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 7
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.89
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 3 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 6544
Objects passed selection criteria: 6529
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.4 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.4 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 5858
Average stars matched: 5766.75 (98.4423 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 112676 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Wed Jun 10 15:05:04 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-96-gc6da043e
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-06-10)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Sat Jun 13 22:27:43 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461174.80897943 14.05.2026 07:24:45.823 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits
First image: 2461174.80897943 14.05.2026 07:24:45.823 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits
Last image: 2461205.64219419 14.06.2026 03:24:35.578 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-13_CI_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_222529_TTUQ1b1x1_373514_LcbDMYNn/fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-24-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 111
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.52
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 15 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 60340
Objects passed selection criteria: 60261
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.1 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.1 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 51244
Average stars matched: 49865.2 (97.3094 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 162596 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Wed Jun 10 15:05:04 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-96-gc6da043e
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-06-10)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Sat Jun 13 22:29:28 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 3.5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-13_CI_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_222529_TTUQ1b1x1_373514_LcbDMYNn/fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-23-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0004.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-13_CI_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_222529_TTUQ1b1x1_373514_LcbDMYNn/fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-24-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-13_CI_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_222529_TTUQ1b1x1_373514_LcbDMYNn/fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-23-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0004.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-13_CI_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_222529_TTUQ1b1x1_373514_LcbDMYNn/fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-24-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461205.64168331
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits'
wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits'
wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-23-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0004.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-23-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0004.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-23-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0004.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-23-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0004.fits'
wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-24-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-24-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-24-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-24-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005.fits'
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits
Image size: 937.3'x624.3' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 17:08:38.023 -09:59:09.18 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.87"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-23-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0004.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-23-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0004.fits
Image size: 941.3'x626.6' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 17:08:28.531 -09:59:57.53 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 17:08:38.023 -09:59:09.18
Second-epoch image center 17:08:28.531 -09:59:57.53
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0412 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-24-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-24-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005.fits
Image size: 941.3'x626.6' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 17:08:31.421 -10:00:09.81 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 17:08:38.023 -09:59:09.18
Second-epoch image center 17:08:31.421 -10:00:09.81
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0319 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 17:08:28.531 -09:59:57.53
Second-epoch second image center 17:08:31.421 -10:00:09.81
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01234 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits &> /tmp/tmp.xQuahg7BGD
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits &> /tmp/tmp.lpGInkc3xk
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-13_CI_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_222529_TTUQ1b1x1_373514_LcbDMYNn/fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-23-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0004.fits &> /tmp/tmp.yAcsgfRRG4
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-13_CI_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_222529_TTUQ1b1x1_373514_LcbDMYNn/fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-23-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0004.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-13_CI_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_222529_TTUQ1b1x1_373514_LcbDMYNn/fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-24-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005.fits &> /tmp/tmp.jVpO1oMCfo
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-13_CI_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_222529_TTUQ1b1x1_373514_LcbDMYNn/fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-24-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits and wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits and wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits and wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits) and catalog (wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 7619 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 249.0959 to 265.2508 deg, Dec -15.2525 to -4.6764 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 249.0959 to 265.2508 deg, Dec -15.2525 to -4.6764 deg
Loaded 4104 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3395 out of 3508 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3508 out of 7619 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.830900
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.830900
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.89
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.94
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.94
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 7619 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 249.0959 to 265.2508 deg, Dec -15.2525 to -4.6764 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 249.0959 to 265.2508 deg, Dec -15.2525 to -4.6764 deg
Loaded 4104 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3395 out of 3508 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3508 out of 7619 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits (aperture=6.5)
Read 6368 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 249.0956 to 265.2325 deg, Dec -15.2667 to -4.7383 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 249.0956 to 265.2325 deg, Dec -15.2667 to -4.7383 deg
Loaded 4081 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3316 out of 3413 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3413 out of 6368 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits (aperture=6.4)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 7 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 8000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.4 pix Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits
2.4 pix Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits
3.4 pix fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-23-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0004.fits
3.4 pix fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-24-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005.fits
2.4 pix wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits
2.4 pix wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
14.9 mag. Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits
14.8 mag. Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits
14.1 mag. fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-23-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0004.fits
14.2 mag. fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-24-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.1 (SNR ) 11.6 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.xQuahg7BGD (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-13_CI_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_222529_TTUQ1b1x1_373514_LcbDMYNn/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits' -> 'wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits.wcscat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=425, passed=7619
Got 7619 stars (including 7188 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 7619 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013018 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010414 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 939 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 937 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 922 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.53"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 937 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7489 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.52"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 939 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 937 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7489 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.53"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 937 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7489 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.54"
Excluding outliers - 937 stars left (next iteration limit 1030)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits N_match=937 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.568 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.416 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.927 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.432 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.573 n_q1=177 n_q2=358 n_q3=213 n_q4=189 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.633
The image catalog is written to wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits -region wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.lpGInkc3xk (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-13_CI_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_222529_TTUQ1b1x1_373514_LcbDMYNn/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits' -> 'wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits.wcscat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=363, passed=6368
Got 6368 stars (including 5993 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 6368 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013018 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010414 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 942 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 939 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 927 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.53"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 939 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6258 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.53"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 942 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 939 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6257 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.54"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 939 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6257 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.55"
Excluding outliers - 939 stars left (next iteration limit 1032)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits N_match=939 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.558 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.417 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.846 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.469 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.530 n_q1=180 n_q2=359 n_q3=207 n_q4=193 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.517
The image catalog is written to wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits -region wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.yAcsgfRRG4 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-13_CI_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_222529_TTUQ1b1x1_373514_LcbDMYNn/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-13_CI_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_222529_TTUQ1b1x1_373514_LcbDMYNn/fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-23-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0004.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-13_CI_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_222529_TTUQ1b1x1_373514_LcbDMYNn/fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-23-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0004.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-13_CI_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_222529_TTUQ1b1x1_373514_LcbDMYNn/fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-23-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0004.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-13_CI_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_222529_TTUQ1b1x1_373514_LcbDMYNn/fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-23-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0004.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-13_CI_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_222529_TTUQ1b1x1_373514_LcbDMYNn/fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-23-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0004.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-13_CI_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_222529_TTUQ1b1x1_373514_LcbDMYNn/fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-23-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0004.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-23-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0004.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-23-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0004.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-23-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0004.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-23-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0004.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-23-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0004.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-23-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0004.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-23-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0004.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-13_CI_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_222529_TTUQ1b1x1_373514_LcbDMYNn/fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-23-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0004.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-23-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0004.fits.wcscat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=198, passed=4740
Got 4740 stars (including 4539 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-23-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0004.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 4740 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013074 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010459 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 372 to 430 (Dec -15.6 to -4.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 936 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 933 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 917 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 933 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4667 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 372 to 430 (Dec -15.6 to -4.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 936 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 933 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4668 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 933 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4668 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
Excluding outliers - 933 stars left (next iteration limit 1026)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-23-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0004.fits N_match=933 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.407 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.472 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.603 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.247 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.371 n_q1=190 n_q2=331 n_q3=236 n_q4=176 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.482
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-23-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0004.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-23-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0004.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-13_CI_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_222529_TTUQ1b1x1_373514_LcbDMYNn/fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-23-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0004.fits -region wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-23-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0004.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-23-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0004.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.jVpO1oMCfo (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-13_CI_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_222529_TTUQ1b1x1_373514_LcbDMYNn/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-13_CI_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_222529_TTUQ1b1x1_373514_LcbDMYNn/fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-24-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-13_CI_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_222529_TTUQ1b1x1_373514_LcbDMYNn/fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-24-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-13_CI_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_222529_TTUQ1b1x1_373514_LcbDMYNn/fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-24-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-13_CI_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_222529_TTUQ1b1x1_373514_LcbDMYNn/fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-24-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-13_CI_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_222529_TTUQ1b1x1_373514_LcbDMYNn/fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-24-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-13_CI_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_222529_TTUQ1b1x1_373514_LcbDMYNn/fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-24-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-24-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-24-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-24-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-24-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-24-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-24-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-24-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-13_CI_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_222529_TTUQ1b1x1_373514_LcbDMYNn/fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-24-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-24-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005.fits.wcscat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=202, passed=4880
Got 4880 stars (including 4675 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-24-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 4880 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013074 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010459 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 371 to 430 (Dec -15.6 to -4.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 934 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 931 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 917 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 931 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4815 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 371 to 430 (Dec -15.6 to -4.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 934 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 931 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4814 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 931 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4814 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
Excluding outliers - 931 stars left (next iteration limit 1024)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-24-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005.fits N_match=931 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.380 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.448 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.587 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.231 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.328 n_q1=187 n_q2=330 n_q3=239 n_q4=175 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.543
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-24-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-24-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-13_CI_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_222529_TTUQ1b1x1_373514_LcbDMYNn/fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-24-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005.fits -region wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-24-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-24-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits sigma_overall=0.568 worst_q_ratio=1.633
ref2=Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits sigma_overall=0.558 worst_q_ratio=1.517
new1=fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-23-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0004.fits sigma_overall=0.407 worst_q_ratio=1.482
new2=fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-24-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005.fits sigma_overall=0.380 worst_q_ratio=1.543
reference average sigma_overall=0.563 worst_q_ratio=1.575
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081_astrometric_residuals.png (937 matched stars from wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.51 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049_astrometric_residuals.png (939 matched stars from wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.50 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-23-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0004_astrometric_residuals.png (933 matched stars from wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-23-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0004.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.34 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-24-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005_astrometric_residuals.png (931 matched stars from wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-24-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.34 arcsec)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-23-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0004.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-23-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0004.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-13_CI_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_222529_TTUQ1b1x1_373514_LcbDMYNn/wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-23-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0004.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-24-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-24-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-13_CI_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_222529_TTUQ1b1x1_373514_LcbDMYNn/wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-24-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Oph-05-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 0s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 1s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20166_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-24-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 20166_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-24-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:42:27.10 -06:23:48.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20210_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-24-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 20210_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-24-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:53:06.89 -04:55:45.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20241_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-24-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 20241_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-24-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:26:07.59 -14:16:58.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20272_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-24-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 20272_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-24-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:26:45.73 -14:35:25.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20289_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-24-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 20289_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-24-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:37:46.04 -11:05:38.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 04525_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-24-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 04525_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-24-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:15:05.14 -09:57:08.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 04280_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-24-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 04280_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-24-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:56:45.79 -10:24:36.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 1s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Oph-05-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 3.5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-13_CI_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_222529_TTUQ1b1x1_373514_LcbDMYNn/fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-23-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0004.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-13_CI_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_222529_TTUQ1b1x1_373514_LcbDMYNn/fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-24-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-13_CI_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_222529_TTUQ1b1x1_373514_LcbDMYNn/fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-23-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0004.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-13_CI_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_222529_TTUQ1b1x1_373514_LcbDMYNn/fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-24-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-23-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0004.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-24-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/exclusion_list.txt
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-23-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0004.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-24-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits
Image size: 937.3'x624.3' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 17:08:38.023 -09:59:09.18 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.87"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-23-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0004.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-23-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0004.fits
Image size: 941.3'x626.6' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 17:08:28.531 -09:59:57.53 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 17:08:38.023 -09:59:09.18
Second-epoch image center 17:08:28.531 -09:59:57.53
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0412 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-24-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-24-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005.fits
Image size: 941.3'x626.6' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 17:08:31.421 -10:00:09.81 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 17:08:38.023 -09:59:09.18
Second-epoch image center 17:08:31.421 -10:00:09.81
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0319 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 17:08:28.531 -09:59:57.53
Second-epoch second image center 17:08:31.421 -10:00:09.81
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01234 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits &> /tmp/tmp.ap7UGIhTHd
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits &> /tmp/tmp.pMeLyis64k
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-13_CI_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_222529_TTUQ1b1x1_373514_LcbDMYNn/fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-23-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0004.fits &> /tmp/tmp.lkrMofSri8
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-13_CI_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_222529_TTUQ1b1x1_373514_LcbDMYNn/fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-23-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0004.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-13_CI_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_222529_TTUQ1b1x1_373514_LcbDMYNn/fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-24-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005.fits &> /tmp/tmp.HYgepE14ip
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-13_CI_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_222529_TTUQ1b1x1_373514_LcbDMYNn/fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-24-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits and wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits and wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits and wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits) and catalog (wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 72440 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 249.0959 to 265.2606 deg, Dec -15.2524 to -4.6668 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 249.0959 to 265.2606 deg, Dec -15.2524 to -4.6668 deg
Loaded 4113 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3162 out of 3606 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3606 out of 72440 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.641150
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.641150
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.52
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.12
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.12
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 72440 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 249.0959 to 265.2606 deg, Dec -15.2524 to -4.6668 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 249.0959 to 265.2606 deg, Dec -15.2524 to -4.6668 deg
Loaded 4113 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3162 out of 3606 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3606 out of 72440 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits (aperture=4.6)
Read 62008 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 249.0757 to 265.2415 deg, Dec -15.2678 to -4.6866 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 249.0757 to 265.2415 deg, Dec -15.2678 to -4.6866 deg
Loaded 4114 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3200 out of 3606 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3606 out of 62008 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits (aperture=4.6)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 103 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 8000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.2 pix Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits
2.2 pix Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits
3.0 pix fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-23-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0004.fits
3.0 pix fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-24-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005.fits
2.2 pix wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits
2.2 pix wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.1 mag. Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits
14.9 mag. Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits
14.3 mag. fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-23-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0004.fits
14.4 mag. fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-24-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.3 (SNR ) 13.8 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.ap7UGIhTHd (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-13_CI_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_222529_TTUQ1b1x1_373514_LcbDMYNn/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits' -> 'wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits.wcscat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=20, blended=4399, passed=72420
Got 72420 stars (including 67925 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 72420 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013018 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010414 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 940 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 938 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 927 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.56"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 938 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 71593 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.53"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 940 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 938 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 71592 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.53"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 938 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 71592 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.57"
Excluding outliers - 938 stars left (next iteration limit 1031)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits N_match=938 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.590 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.421 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.894 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.502 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.571 n_q1=197 n_q2=343 n_q3=200 n_q4=198 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.515
The image catalog is written to wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits -region wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.pMeLyis64k (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-13_CI_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_222529_TTUQ1b1x1_373514_LcbDMYNn/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits' -> 'wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits.wcscat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=10, blended=3287, passed=61998
Got 61998 stars (including 58620 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 61998 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013018 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010414 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 938 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 935 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 923 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.54"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 935 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 61292 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.52"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 938 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 935 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 61292 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.52"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 935 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 61291 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.54"
Excluding outliers - 935 stars left (next iteration limit 1028)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits N_match=935 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.578 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.453 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.828 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.483 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.528 n_q1=194 n_q2=352 n_q3=194 n_q4=195 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.433
The image catalog is written to wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits -region wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.lkrMofSri8 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-13_CI_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_222529_TTUQ1b1x1_373514_LcbDMYNn/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-13_CI_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_222529_TTUQ1b1x1_373514_LcbDMYNn/fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-23-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0004.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-13_CI_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_222529_TTUQ1b1x1_373514_LcbDMYNn/fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-23-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0004.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-13_CI_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_222529_TTUQ1b1x1_373514_LcbDMYNn/fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-23-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0004.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-13_CI_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_222529_TTUQ1b1x1_373514_LcbDMYNn/fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-23-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0004.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-13_CI_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_222529_TTUQ1b1x1_373514_LcbDMYNn/fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-23-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0004.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-13_CI_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_222529_TTUQ1b1x1_373514_LcbDMYNn/fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-23-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0004.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-23-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0004.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-23-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0004.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-23-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0004.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-23-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0004.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-23-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0004.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-23-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0004.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-23-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0004.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-13_CI_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_222529_TTUQ1b1x1_373514_LcbDMYNn/fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-23-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0004.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-23-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0004.fits.wcscat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=6, blended=1450, passed=35868
Got 35868 stars (including 34369 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-23-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0004.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 35868 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013074 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010459 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 371 to 430 (Dec -15.6 to -4.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 937 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 934 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 920 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 934 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 35475 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 371 to 430 (Dec -15.6 to -4.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 937 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 934 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 35477 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 934 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 35477 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Excluding outliers - 934 stars left (next iteration limit 1027)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-23-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0004.fits N_match=934 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.422 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.515 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.589 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.256 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.380 n_q1=185 n_q2=308 n_q3=255 n_q4=186 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.394
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-23-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0004.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-23-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0004.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-13_CI_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_222529_TTUQ1b1x1_373514_LcbDMYNn/fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-23-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0004.fits -region wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-23-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0004.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-23-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0004.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.HYgepE14ip (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-13_CI_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_222529_TTUQ1b1x1_373514_LcbDMYNn/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-13_CI_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_222529_TTUQ1b1x1_373514_LcbDMYNn/fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-24-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-13_CI_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_222529_TTUQ1b1x1_373514_LcbDMYNn/fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-24-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-13_CI_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_222529_TTUQ1b1x1_373514_LcbDMYNn/fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-24-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-13_CI_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_222529_TTUQ1b1x1_373514_LcbDMYNn/fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-24-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-13_CI_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_222529_TTUQ1b1x1_373514_LcbDMYNn/fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-24-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-13_CI_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_222529_TTUQ1b1x1_373514_LcbDMYNn/fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-24-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-24-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-24-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-24-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-24-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-24-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-24-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-24-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-13_CI_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_222529_TTUQ1b1x1_373514_LcbDMYNn/fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-24-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-24-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005.fits.wcscat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=8, blended=1496, passed=36766
Got 36766 stars (including 35220 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-24-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 36766 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013074 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010459 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 371 to 430 (Dec -15.6 to -4.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 933 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 930 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 923 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 930 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 36405 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 371 to 430 (Dec -15.6 to -4.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 933 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 930 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 36401 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 930 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 36401 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Excluding outliers - 930 stars left (next iteration limit 1023)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-24-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005.fits N_match=930 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.404 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.493 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.625 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.262 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.357 n_q1=182 n_q2=312 n_q3=253 n_q4=183 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.549
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-24-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-24-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-13_CI_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_222529_TTUQ1b1x1_373514_LcbDMYNn/fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-24-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005.fits -region wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-24-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-24-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-23-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0004.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-13_CI_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_222529_TTUQ1b1x1_373514_LcbDMYNn/wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-23-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0004.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-24-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-13_CI_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_222529_TTUQ1b1x1_373514_LcbDMYNn/wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-24-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Oph-05-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits at 17:11:10.12 -13:05:15.9: 13.41 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits at 17:38:09.05 -14:12:57.6: 13.31 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits at 16:48:24.36 -05:23:50.6: 14.46 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits at 16:58:37.40 -04:44:34.9: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits at 16:51:49.40 -05:01:54.9: 15.73 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits at 17:02:58.59 -06:22:17.0: 13.11 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits at 17:38:09.05 -14:12:57.6: 13.19 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits at 16:48:24.36 -05:23:50.6: 14.62 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits at 17:11:10.12 -13:05:15.9: 13.59 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.25 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.51 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:38:09.05 -14:12:57.6: ref_mag=13.25 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.2391 delta=0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.47 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:48:24.36 -05:23:50.6: ref_mag=14.51 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=13.9773 delta=0.54 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:11:10.12 -13:05:15.9: ref_mag=13.47 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.3891 delta=0.08 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits at 17:34:50.21 -12:14:48.1: 12.98 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits at 16:58:37.40 -04:44:34.9: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:58:37.40 -04:44:34.9: at least one reference image reported edge (off-image or aperture/annulus past image boundary); cannot perform the forced-photometry cross-check
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits at 16:51:49.40 -05:01:54.9: 15.48 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits at 17:02:58.59 -06:22:17.0: 13.13 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.12 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:02:58.59 -06:22:17.0: ref_mag=13.12 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.0184 delta=0.10 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits at 17:28:54.35 -15:02:56.6: 13.09 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits at 17:34:50.21 -12:14:48.1: 12.97 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.98 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:34:50.21 -12:14:48.1: ref_mag=12.98 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=12.6790 delta=0.30 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits at 17:28:54.35 -15:02:56.6: 13.10 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.09 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:28:54.35 -15:02:56.6: ref_mag=13.09 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=12.7707 delta=0.32 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits at 16:46:19.20 -11:46:42.9: 15.62 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits at 16:38:52.48 -10:28:38.1: 14.24 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits at 16:41:22.19 -05:51:29.0: 14.46 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits at 16:38:52.48 -10:28:38.1: 14.22 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits at 16:46:19.20 -11:46:42.9: 15.40 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.23 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:38:52.48 -10:28:38.1: ref_mag=14.23 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=13.6808 delta=0.55 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits at 16:43:57.15 -05:27:15.2: 14.59 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits at 17:21:56.99 -14:10:03.9: 15.57 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits at 17:06:34.43 -12:57:31.0: 15.00 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits at 17:03:23.47 -08:12:47.8: 15.33 +/- 0.23 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits at 16:55:00.54 -05:25:02.8: 14.71 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits at 16:41:22.19 -05:51:29.0: 14.56 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.50 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:41:22.19 -05:51:29.0: ref_mag=14.50 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.2378 delta=0.26 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits at 16:43:57.15 -05:27:15.2: 14.69 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.63 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits at 17:21:56.99 -14:10:03.9: 15.39 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits at 17:06:34.43 -12:57:31.0: 14.88 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:43:57.15 -05:27:15.2: ref_mag=14.63 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.2400 delta=0.39 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.94 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 17:06:34.43 -12:57:31.0: ref_mag=14.94 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=13.9742 delta=0.97 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits at 17:03:23.47 -08:12:47.8: 15.50 +/- 0.33 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.38 +/- 0.19
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 17:03:23.47 -08:12:47.8: ref_mag=15.38 +/- 0.19 new_mean_mag=14.2314 delta=1.15 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits at 16:55:00.54 -05:25:02.8: 14.55 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.64 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:55:00.54 -05:25:02.8: ref_mag=14.64 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.3303 delta=0.30 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits at 16:50:41.42 -07:28:09.6: 15.12 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits at 16:48:42.64 -14:25:07.3: 14.77 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits at 16:47:32.28 -05:17:11.3: 14.60 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits at 16:50:41.42 -07:28:09.6: 15.48 +/- 0.34 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.22 +/- 0.18
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:50:41.42 -07:28:09.6: ref_mag=15.22 +/- 0.18 new_mean_mag=14.3499 delta=0.87 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits at 16:48:42.64 -14:25:07.3: 14.57 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.67 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:48:42.64 -14:25:07.3: ref_mag=14.67 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.1672 delta=0.50 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits at 16:47:32.28 -05:17:11.3: 14.68 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.63 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:47:32.28 -05:17:11.3: ref_mag=14.63 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.2629 delta=0.37 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits at 17:21:00.15 -12:08:11.2: 14.56 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits at 17:21:00.15 -12:08:11.2: 14.51 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.54 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 17:21:00.15 -12:08:11.2: ref_mag=14.54 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=13.4228 delta=1.12 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits at 16:55:07.88 -11:43:25.5: 15.30 +/- 0.24 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits at 16:53:59.91 -09:25:22.1: 13.14 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits at 16:55:07.88 -11:43:25.5: 15.02 +/- 0.23 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.16 +/- 0.17
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 16:55:07.88 -11:43:25.5: ref_mag=15.16 +/- 0.17 new_mean_mag=12.6936 delta=2.46 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits at 16:53:59.91 -09:25:22.1: 13.12 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.13 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 16:53:59.91 -09:25:22.1: ref_mag=13.13 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.0169 delta=1.11 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out25417.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out87198.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out87222.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out87257.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out29090.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out45266.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out86037.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out86933.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 6s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 3s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 85764_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-24-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 85764_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-24-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 85773_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-24-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 85773_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-24-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 85778_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-24-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 85778_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-24-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 85781_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-24-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 85781_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-24-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:00:13.26 -10:37:02.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 85789_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-24-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 85789_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-24-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:38:02.57 -11:36:15.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 85793_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-24-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 85793_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-24-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:37:54.70 -14:22:27.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 85794_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-24-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 85794_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-24-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:39:00.22 -14:36:03.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 85797_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-24-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 85797_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-24-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:37:32.78 -14:52:19.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 85798_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-24-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 85798_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-24-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:09:15.14 -05:27:26.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 85799_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-24-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 85799_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-24-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:32:43.50 -14:55:24.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 85838_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-24-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 85838_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-24-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 85874_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-24-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 85874_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-24-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:42:27.08 -06:23:48.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 86037_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-24-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
Preparing report for the candidate 86037_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-24-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 86194_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-24-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 86194_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-24-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:35:12.71 -14:40:37.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 86354_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-24-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 86354_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-24-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:18:04.20 -12:21:10.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 86373_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-24-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 86373_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-24-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:38:56.62 -06:07:11.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 86453_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-24-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 86453_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-24-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 86463_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-24-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 86463_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-24-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:55:44.09 -06:07:20.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 86482_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-24-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 86482_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-24-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 86486_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-24-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 86486_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-24-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:21:03.91 -14:39:34.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 86519_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-24-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 86519_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-24-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:47:40.54 -09:15:27.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 86521_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-24-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 86521_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-24-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:52:05.55 -08:52:07.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 86571_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-24-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 86571_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-24-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 86581_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-24-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 86581_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-24-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:00:03.66 -07:33:08.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 86591_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-24-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 86591_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-24-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:53:52.62 -08:58:18.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 86641_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-24-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 86641_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-24-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:38:11.60 -12:41:55.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 86688_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-24-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 86688_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-24-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:37:29.44 -11:51:08.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 86696_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-24-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 86696_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-24-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:21:37.59 -14:03:37.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 86709_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-24-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 86709_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-24-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:35:27.61 -14:43:00.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 86742_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-24-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 86742_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-24-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:47:48.91 -06:46:08.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 86778_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-24-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 86778_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-24-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:04:56.70 -05:04:19.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 86779_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-24-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 86779_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-24-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 86789_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-24-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 86789_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-24-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:22:39.64 -15:09:26.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 86825_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-24-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 86825_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-24-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:36:01.49 -14:05:38.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 86842_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-24-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 86842_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-24-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:28:44.73 -05:37:38.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 86859_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-24-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 86859_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-24-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:08:19.59 -05:18:08.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 86891_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-24-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 86891_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-24-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:08:54.56 -09:41:45.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 86908_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-24-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 86908_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-24-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:55:06.99 -05:56:35.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 86933_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-24-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
Preparing report for the candidate 86933_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-24-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 86943_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-24-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 86943_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-24-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 86962_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-24-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 86962_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-24-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 86981_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-24-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
Preparing report for the candidate 86981_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-24-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 86983_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-24-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 86983_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-24-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:03:07.35 -11:05:33.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 86984_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-24-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 86984_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-24-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:55:33.81 -04:50:22.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87021_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-24-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 87021_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-24-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:56:19.57 -07:39:21.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87024_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-24-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 87024_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-24-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:45:46.38 -08:27:46.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87026_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-24-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 87026_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-24-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:46:09.39 -05:39:43.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87105_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-24-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 87105_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-24-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:19:19.01 -10:43:40.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87107_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-24-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 87107_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-24-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:01:00.02 -06:50:43.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87163_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-24-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 87163_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-24-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87175_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-24-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 87175_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-24-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87198_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-24-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 87198_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-24-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:21:56.99 -14:10:03.9 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.73, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.71)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.796 4138116091077644928 260.48753975383 -14.16824270855 13.2847 11.0413 VARIABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.796#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87222_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-24-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 87222_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-24-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:06:34.43 -12:57:31.0 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.97, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.95)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 2.879 4140751895332231680 256.64427430567 -12.95869677231 12.6000 11.0985 VARIABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#2.879#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87257_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-24-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 87257_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-24-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:03:23.47 -08:12:47.8 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.24, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.22)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.793 4336831854062890240 255.84828333423 -08.21338432954 12.7183 11.3863 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.793#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87262_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-24-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 87262_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-24-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87310_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-24-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 87310_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-24-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87312_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-24-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 87312_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-24-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87315_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-24-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 87315_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-24-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87317_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-24-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 87317_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-24-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:44:55.14 -06:22:33.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33097_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-24-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 33097_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-24-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:27:44.24 -11:12:35.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 06053_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-24-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
Preparing report for the candidate 06053_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-24-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 41505_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-24-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 41505_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-24-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:00:48.86 -10:01:57.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 07761_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-24-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 07761_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-24-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:14:27.20 -14:16:42.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 37010_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-24-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 37010_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-24-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:54:03.18 -10:42:37.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 07280_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-24-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 07280_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-24-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:26:07.59 -14:16:58.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 38851_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-24-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 38851_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-24-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:46:29.59 -10:25:59.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53981_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-24-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 53981_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-24-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:51:17.76 -06:14:42.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 11927_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-24-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 11927_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-24-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:27:52.77 -13:41:03.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 04858_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-24-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 04858_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-24-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:26:45.72 -14:35:25.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 64682_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-24-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 64682_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-24-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:54:31.15 -07:33:38.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 25417_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-24-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 25417_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-24-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:21:00.15 -12:08:11.2 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.43, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.41)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.837 4141758803171910016 260.25109390649 -12.13666830660 12.2526 10.7661 VARIABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.837#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 49305_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-24-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 49305_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-24-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:53:06.90 -04:55:45.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20699_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-24-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 20699_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-24-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:02:10.20 -12:42:43.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31298_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-24-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 31298_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-24-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:04:04.77 -11:28:35.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 25509_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-24-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 25509_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-24-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:09:02.04 -12:09:21.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 26741_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-24-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 26741_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-24-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:17:50.34 -11:59:32.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 44714_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-24-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 44714_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-24-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:34:03.09 -09:27:26.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 57575_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-24-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 57575_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-24-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:44:50.53 -06:11:04.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 41427_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-24-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 41427_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-24-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:00:40.04 -10:04:57.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 07208_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-24-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 07208_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-24-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:12:25.16 -14:20:26.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 08453_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-24-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 08453_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-24-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:22:51.03 -14:09:45.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 38458_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-24-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 38458_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-24-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:56:45.78 -10:24:36.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 29090_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-24-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
Preparing report for the candidate 29090_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-24-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82600_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-24-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 82600_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-24-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:38:28.24 -14:48:26.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 01431_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-24-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 01431_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-24-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:14:09.87 -14:59:57.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 45912_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-24-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 45912_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-24-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:03:23.21 -09:20:08.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20975_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-24-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 20975_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-24-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:11:20.11 -12:40:06.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 45266_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-24-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
Preparing report for the candidate 45266_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-24-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 37287_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-24-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 37287_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-24-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:25:01.62 -10:38:54.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 58746_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-24-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 58746_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-24-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:22:45.88 -08:33:59.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 41543_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-24-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 41543_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-24-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:28:32.67 -10:00:49.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21785_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-24-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 21785_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-24-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:00:16.71 -12:34:32.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 41342_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-24-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 41342_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-24-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:15:05.14 -09:57:08.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 69978_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-24-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 69978_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-24-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:56:28.40 -05:46:30.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 67647_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-24-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 67647_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-24-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:19:21.46 -05:49:13.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 07152_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-24-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 07152_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-24-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:25:41.76 -14:14:53.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 29919_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-24-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 29919_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-24-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:47:51.37 -11:35:34.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 19792_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-24-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 19792_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-24-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:06:11.68 -12:48:41.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 11406_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-24-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 11406_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-24-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:58:31.54 -13:46:33.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52550_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-24-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 52550_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-24-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:25:49.55 -05:30:00.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 08771_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-24-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 08771_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-24-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:32:13.40 -14:02:49.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32504_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-24-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 32504_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-24-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:45:32.50 -11:18:16.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 37365_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-24-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 37365_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-24-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
