This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-13_CI_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_222231_TTUQ1b1x1_339501_eVYAeQS3
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 14.1400 2461205.6400 10.05 15:59:22.51 -29:51:14.1
344.58890 17.43323 galactic Sco Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.2" and 7.7 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.29 Amphitrite -0 0 0 9.9 0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-54-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0173.fits at 15:59:22.51 -29:51:14.1: 14.14 +/- 0.26 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-36-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0255.fits at 15:59:22.51 -29:51:14.1: 14.27 +/- 0.25 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.20 +/- 0.18
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461205.6400,10.05,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260614.1400 10.05CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 14.1400 2461205.6400 11.75 16:17:45.58 -21:59:09.6
353.57027 20.00612 galactic Sco Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.5" and 7.7 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.24 Themis 0 -0 0 11.9 -0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-54-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0173.fits at 16:17:45.58 -21:59:09.6: 14.88 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-36-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0255.fits at 16:17:45.58 -21:59:09.6: 15.01 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461205.6400,11.75,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260614.1400 11.75CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 14.1400 2461205.6400 12.23 16:10:24.52 -25:17:27.0
349.79013 18.97778 galactic Sco Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.2" and 7.6 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.674 Rachele 2 -0 2 12.4 0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-54-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0173.fits at 16:10:24.52 -25:17:27.0: 14.88 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-36-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0255.fits at 16:10:24.52 -25:17:27.0: 15.05 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461205.6400,12.23,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260614.1400 12.23CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 14.1400 2461205.6400 12.76 16:48:42.21 -26:30:21.7
354.74082 11.70768 galactic Sco Second-epoch detections are separated by 2.4" and 7.7 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.175 Andromache 1 1 1 12.7 0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-54-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0173.fits at 16:48:42.21 -26:30:21.7: 14.59 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-36-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0255.fits at 16:48:42.21 -26:30:21.7: 14.84 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461205.6400,12.76,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260614.1400 12.76CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 14.1400 2461205.6400 12.85 16:46:08.33 -22:53:40.3
357.27278 14.40951 galactic Oph Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.0" and 7.7 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.121 Hermione 2 -0 2 12.5 -0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-54-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0173.fits at 16:46:08.33 -22:53:40.3: 14.73 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-36-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0255.fits at 16:46:08.33 -22:53:40.3: 14.90 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461205.6400,12.85,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260614.1400 12.85CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 14.1400 2461205.6400 13.06 15:57:44.54 -25:25:55.9
347.52613 20.89561 galactic Sco Second-epoch detections are separated by 2.8" and 7.4 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.556 Phyllis -2 -3 3 13.4 -0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-54-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0173.fits at 15:57:44.54 -25:25:55.9: 14.82 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-36-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0255.fits at 15:57:44.54 -25:25:55.9: 14.99 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461205.6400,13.06,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260614.1400 13.06CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 14.1400 2461205.6400 13.27 16:33:50.92 -23:55:50.8
354.59335 15.93798 galactic Oph Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.5" and 7.7 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.481 Emita 1 1 2 13.3 0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-54-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0173.fits at 16:33:50.92 -23:55:50.8: 14.92 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-36-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0255.fits at 16:33:50.92 -23:55:50.8: 15.14 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461205.6400,13.27,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260614.1400 13.27CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 14.1400 2461205.6400 13.06 16:44:46.27 -28:35:02.3
352.53432 11.07611 galactic Sco Second-epoch detections are separated by 2.5" and 7.6 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.108 Hecuba 0 -1 1 12.4 0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-54-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0173.fits at 16:44:46.27 -28:35:02.3: 14.56 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-36-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0255.fits at 16:44:46.27 -28:35:02.3: 14.78 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461205.6400,13.06,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260614.1400 13.06CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461147.78803603 17.04.2026 06:54:36.313 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-54-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0173.fits
First image: 2461147.78803603 17.04.2026 06:54:36.313 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-54-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0173.fits
Last image: 2461205.64024388 14.06.2026 03:21:47.071 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-13_CI_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_222231_TTUQ1b1x1_339501_eVYAeQS3/fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-21-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 17
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -8.33
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 3 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 5642
Objects passed selection criteria: 5639
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.7 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.7 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 5488
Average stars matched: 5172.75 (94.2556 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 111492 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Wed Jun 10 15:05:04 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-96-gc6da043e
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-06-10)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Sat Jun 13 22:23:40 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461147.78803603 17.04.2026 06:54:36.313 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-54-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0173.fits
First image: 2461147.78803603 17.04.2026 06:54:36.313 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-54-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0173.fits
Last image: 2461205.64024388 14.06.2026 03:21:47.071 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-13_CI_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_222231_TTUQ1b1x1_339501_eVYAeQS3/fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-21-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 114
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -8.02
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 15 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 55400
Objects passed selection criteria: 55330
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.3 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.3 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 49967.8
Average stars matched: 45990.2 (92.0399 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 158080 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Wed Jun 10 15:05:04 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-96-gc6da043e
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-06-10)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Sat Jun 13 22:25:46 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 3.5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-54-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0173.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-36-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0255.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-13_CI_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_222231_TTUQ1b1x1_339501_eVYAeQS3/fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-21-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0000.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-13_CI_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_222231_TTUQ1b1x1_339501_eVYAeQS3/fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-21-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-54-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0173.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-36-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0255.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-54-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0173.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-36-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0255.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-13_CI_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_222231_TTUQ1b1x1_339501_eVYAeQS3/fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-21-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0000.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-13_CI_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_222231_TTUQ1b1x1_339501_eVYAeQS3/fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-21-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461205.63976508
Plate-solving the images
'tocp_transients_list.txt' -> '../tocp_transients_list.txt'
'asassn_transients_list.txt' -> '../asassn_transients_list.txt'
'tns_transients_list.txt' -> '../tns_transients_list.txt'
wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-54-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0173.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-54-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0173.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-54-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0173.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-54-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0173.fits'
wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-36-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0255.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-36-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0255.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-36-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0255.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-36-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0255.fits'
wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-21-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0000.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-21-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0000.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-21-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0000.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-21-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0000.fits'
wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-21-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-21-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-21-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-21-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001.fits'
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-54-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0173.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-54-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0173.fits
Image size: 942.0'x627.1' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 16:19:12.067 -26:00:18.90 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-21-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0000.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-21-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0000.fits
Image size: 941.3'x626.9' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 16:19:12.867 -26:00:02.25 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 16:19:12.067 -26:00:18.90
Second-epoch image center 16:19:12.867 -26:00:02.25
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0055 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-21-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-21-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001.fits
Image size: 941.2'x626.9' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 16:19:15.459 -25:59:34.11 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 16:19:12.067 -26:00:18.90
Second-epoch image center 16:19:15.459 -25:59:34.11
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0178 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 16:19:12.867 -26:00:02.25
Second-epoch second image center 16:19:15.459 -25:59:34.11
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01246 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-54-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0173.fits &> /tmp/tmp.b7GHzCt3ZW
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-54-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0173.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-36-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0255.fits &> /tmp/tmp.jk6dvVY8Ml
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-36-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0255.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-13_CI_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_222231_TTUQ1b1x1_339501_eVYAeQS3/fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-21-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0000.fits &> /tmp/tmp.2gFzHYMgFk
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-13_CI_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_222231_TTUQ1b1x1_339501_eVYAeQS3/fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-21-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0000.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-13_CI_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_222231_TTUQ1b1x1_339501_eVYAeQS3/fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-21-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001.fits &> /tmp/tmp.MRNOOUbtbh
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-13_CI_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_222231_TTUQ1b1x1_339501_eVYAeQS3/fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-21-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-54-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0173.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-54-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0173.fits and wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-54-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0173.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-54-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0173.fits and wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-54-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0173.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-54-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0173.fits and wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-54-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0173.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-54-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0173.fits) and catalog (wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-54-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0173.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-54-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0173.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 5279 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 235.3887 to 253.5849 deg, Dec -31.5354 to -20.0792 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 235.3887 to 253.5849 deg, Dec -31.5354 to -20.0792 deg
Loaded 8611 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4075 out of 4161 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 4161 out of 5279 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.386900
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.386900
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -8.33
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.06
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.06
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 5279 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 235.3887 to 253.5849 deg, Dec -31.5354 to -20.0792 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 235.3887 to 253.5849 deg, Dec -31.5354 to -20.0792 deg
Loaded 8611 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4075 out of 4161 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 4161 out of 5279 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-54-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0173.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-54-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0173.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-54-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0173.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-54-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0173.fits (aperture=6.0)
Read 6303 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 235.3727 to 253.6268 deg, Dec -31.4687 to -20.1177 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 235.3727 to 253.6268 deg, Dec -31.4687 to -20.1177 deg
Loaded 8547 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4618 out of 4781 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 4781 out of 6303 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-36-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0255.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-36-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0255.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-36-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0255.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-36-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0255.fits (aperture=6.1)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 16 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 8000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.2 pix Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-54-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0173.fits
2.1 pix Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-36-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0255.fits
3.8 pix fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-21-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0000.fits
3.8 pix fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-21-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001.fits
2.2 pix wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-54-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0173.fits
2.1 pix wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-36-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0255.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
14.1 mag. Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-54-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0173.fits
14.3 mag. Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-36-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0255.fits
13.7 mag. fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-21-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0000.fits
13.7 mag. fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-21-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 13.7 (SNR ) 11.1 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.b7GHzCt3ZW (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-13_CI_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_222231_TTUQ1b1x1_339501_eVYAeQS3/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-54-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0173.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-54-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0173.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-54-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0173.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-54-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0173.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-54-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0173.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-54-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0173.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-54-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0173.fits' -> 'wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-54-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0173.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-54-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0173.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-54-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0173.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-54-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0173.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-54-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0173.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-54-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0173.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-54-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0173.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-54-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0173.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-54-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0173.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-54-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0173.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-54-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0173.fits.wcscat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=390, passed=5279
Got 5279 stars (including 4876 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-54-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0173.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 5279 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 942.0'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 942.0 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013083 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010467 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 292 to 351 (Dec -31.5 to -20.1)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 964 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 962 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 939 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 962 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5166 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 292 to 351 (Dec -31.5 to -20.1)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 964 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 962 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5167 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 962 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5167 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Excluding outliers - 962 stars left (next iteration limit 1058)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-54-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0173.fits N_match=962 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.347 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.267 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.423 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.325 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.458 n_q1=289 n_q2=245 n_q3=272 n_q4=156 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.321
The image catalog is written to wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-54-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0173.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-54-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0173.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-54-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0173.fits -region wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-54-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0173.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-54-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0173.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.jk6dvVY8Ml (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-13_CI_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_222231_TTUQ1b1x1_339501_eVYAeQS3/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-36-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0255.fits 574.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-36-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0255.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-36-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0255.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-36-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0255.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-36-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0255.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-36-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0255.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-36-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0255.fits' -> 'wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-36-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0255.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-36-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0255.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-36-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0255.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-36-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0255.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-36-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0255.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-36-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0255.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-36-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0255.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-36-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0255.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-36-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0255.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-36-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0255.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-36-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0255.fits.wcscat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=573, passed=6303
Got 6303 stars (including 5717 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-36-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0255.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 6303 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 942.0'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 942.0 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013083 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010467 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 292 to 351 (Dec -31.5 to -20.1)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 959 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 959 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 935 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 959 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6161 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 292 to 351 (Dec -31.5 to -20.1)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 960 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 959 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6163 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 959 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6163 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
Excluding outliers - 959 stars left (next iteration limit 1054)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-36-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0255.fits N_match=959 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.461 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.405 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.478 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.403 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.650 n_q1=299 n_q2=250 n_q3=255 n_q4=155 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.410
The image catalog is written to wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-36-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0255.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-36-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0255.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-36-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0255.fits -region wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-36-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0255.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-36-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0255.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.2gFzHYMgFk (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-13_CI_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_222231_TTUQ1b1x1_339501_eVYAeQS3/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-13_CI_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_222231_TTUQ1b1x1_339501_eVYAeQS3/fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-21-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0000.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-13_CI_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_222231_TTUQ1b1x1_339501_eVYAeQS3/fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-21-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0000.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-13_CI_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_222231_TTUQ1b1x1_339501_eVYAeQS3/fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-21-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0000.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-13_CI_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_222231_TTUQ1b1x1_339501_eVYAeQS3/fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-21-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0000.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-13_CI_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_222231_TTUQ1b1x1_339501_eVYAeQS3/fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-21-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0000.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-13_CI_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_222231_TTUQ1b1x1_339501_eVYAeQS3/fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-21-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0000.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-21-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0000.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-21-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0000.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-21-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0000.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-21-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0000.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-21-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0000.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-21-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0000.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-21-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0000.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-13_CI_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_222231_TTUQ1b1x1_339501_eVYAeQS3/fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-21-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0000.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-21-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0000.fits.wcscat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=254, passed=5244
Got 5244 stars (including 4987 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-21-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0000.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 5244 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013074 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010459 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 292 to 351 (Dec -31.5 to -20.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 962 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 961 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 944 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 961 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5121 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 292 to 351 (Dec -31.5 to -20.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 962 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 960 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5122 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 960 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5122 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.48"
Excluding outliers - 960 stars left (next iteration limit 1057)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-21-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0000.fits N_match=960 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.434 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.378 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.582 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.313 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.456 n_q1=287 n_q2=253 n_q3=258 n_q4=162 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.340
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-21-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0000.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-21-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0000.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-13_CI_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_222231_TTUQ1b1x1_339501_eVYAeQS3/fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-21-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0000.fits -region wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-21-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0000.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-21-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0000.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.MRNOOUbtbh (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-13_CI_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_222231_TTUQ1b1x1_339501_eVYAeQS3/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-13_CI_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_222231_TTUQ1b1x1_339501_eVYAeQS3/fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-21-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-13_CI_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_222231_TTUQ1b1x1_339501_eVYAeQS3/fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-21-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-13_CI_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_222231_TTUQ1b1x1_339501_eVYAeQS3/fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-21-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-13_CI_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_222231_TTUQ1b1x1_339501_eVYAeQS3/fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-21-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-13_CI_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_222231_TTUQ1b1x1_339501_eVYAeQS3/fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-21-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-13_CI_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_222231_TTUQ1b1x1_339501_eVYAeQS3/fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-21-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-21-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-21-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-21-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-21-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-21-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-21-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-21-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-13_CI_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_222231_TTUQ1b1x1_339501_eVYAeQS3/fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-21-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-21-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001.fits.wcscat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=263, passed=5292
Got 5292 stars (including 5023 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-21-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 5292 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013072 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010458 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 292 to 351 (Dec -31.5 to -20.1)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 961 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 960 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 939 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 960 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5168 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 292 to 351 (Dec -31.5 to -20.1)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 961 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 959 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5169 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.46"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 959 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5168 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.49"
Excluding outliers - 959 stars left (next iteration limit 1056)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-21-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001.fits N_match=959 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.440 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.408 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.615 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.314 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.467 n_q1=288 n_q2=256 n_q3=255 n_q4=160 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.399
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-21-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-21-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-13_CI_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_222231_TTUQ1b1x1_339501_eVYAeQS3/fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-21-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001.fits -region wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-21-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-21-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-54-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0173.fits sigma_overall=0.347 worst_q_ratio=1.321
ref2=Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-36-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0255.fits sigma_overall=0.461 worst_q_ratio=1.410
new1=fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-21-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0000.fits sigma_overall=0.434 worst_q_ratio=1.340
new2=fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-21-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001.fits sigma_overall=0.440 worst_q_ratio=1.399
reference average sigma_overall=0.404 worst_q_ratio=1.3655
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-54-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0173_astrometric_residuals.png (962 matched stars from wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-54-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0173.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.31 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-36-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0255_astrometric_residuals.png (959 matched stars from wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-36-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0255.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.43 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-21-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0000_astrometric_residuals.png (960 matched stars from wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-21-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0000.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.39 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-21-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001_astrometric_residuals.png (959 matched stars from wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-21-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.40 arcsec)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-21-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0000.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-21-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0000.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-13_CI_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_222231_TTUQ1b1x1_339501_eVYAeQS3/wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-21-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0000.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-21-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-21-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-13_CI_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_222231_TTUQ1b1x1_339501_eVYAeQS3/wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-21-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Sco-02-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-54-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0173.fits at 16:07:34.66 -22:46:31.6: 11.61 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-54-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0173.fits at 16:39:13.01 -23:29:03.7: 11.65 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-54-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0173.fits at 16:07:42.66 -26:45:08.1: 11.62 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-54-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0173.fits at 15:59:22.51 -29:51:14.1: 14.14 +/- 0.26 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-54-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0173.fits at 16:25:16.13 -22:27:50.6: 11.75 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-36-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0255.fits at 16:07:34.66 -22:46:31.6: 11.82 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-36-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0255.fits at 16:39:13.01 -23:29:03.7: 11.74 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-36-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0255.fits at 16:07:42.66 -26:45:08.1: 11.66 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-36-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0255.fits at 15:59:22.51 -29:51:14.1: 14.27 +/- 0.25 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.72 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.70 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:07:34.66 -22:46:31.6: ref_mag=11.72 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.1160 delta=0.60 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:39:13.01 -23:29:03.7: ref_mag=11.70 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=11.1695 delta=0.53 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.20 +/- 0.18
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.64 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 15:59:22.51 -29:51:14.1: ref_mag=14.20 +/- 0.18 new_mean_mag=10.0501 delta=4.15 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:07:42.66 -26:45:08.1: ref_mag=11.64 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.1375 delta=0.51 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-36-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0255.fits at 16:25:16.13 -22:27:50.6: 11.88 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.81 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:25:16.13 -22:27:50.6: ref_mag=11.81 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=11.2558 delta=0.56 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out21132.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 6s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 1s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21132_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-21-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
Preparing report for the candidate 21132_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-21-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21133_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-21-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
The candidate 21133_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-21-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:11:41.48 -27:03:32.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21134_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-21-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
The candidate 21134_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-21-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:08:31.96 -21:31:50.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21135_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-21-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
The candidate 21135_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-21-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:05:30.88 -23:28:38.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21137_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-21-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
The candidate 21137_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-21-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21138_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-21-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
The candidate 21138_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-21-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:29:45.63 -29:45:30.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21139_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-21-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
The candidate 21139_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-21-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21141_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-21-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
The candidate 21141_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-21-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21142_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-21-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
The candidate 21142_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-21-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:52:19.75 -29:13:02.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21143_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-21-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
The candidate 21143_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-21-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21144_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-21-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
The candidate 21144_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-21-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 15:55:38.37 -29:15:40.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21145_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-21-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
The candidate 21145_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-21-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20898_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-21-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
The candidate 20898_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-21-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:46:35.09 -27:23:17.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20444_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-21-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
The candidate 20444_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-21-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:17:39.23 -22:56:39.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20349_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-21-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
The candidate 20349_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-21-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:41:01.30 -27:26:44.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20295_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-21-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
The candidate 20295_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-21-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 15:59:23.74 -23:46:24.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 7s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Sco-02-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
15:59:22.51 -29:51:14.1
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 3.5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-54-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0173.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-36-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0255.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-13_CI_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_222231_TTUQ1b1x1_339501_eVYAeQS3/fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-21-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0000.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-13_CI_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_222231_TTUQ1b1x1_339501_eVYAeQS3/fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-21-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-54-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0173.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-36-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0255.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-54-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0173.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-36-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0255.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-13_CI_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_222231_TTUQ1b1x1_339501_eVYAeQS3/fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-21-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0000.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-13_CI_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_222231_TTUQ1b1x1_339501_eVYAeQS3/fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-21-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-54-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0173.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-36-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0255.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-21-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0000.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-21-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/exclusion_list.txt
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-54-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0173.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-36-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0255.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-21-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0000.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-21-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-54-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0173.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-54-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0173.fits
Image size: 942.0'x627.1' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 16:19:12.067 -26:00:18.90 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-21-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0000.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-21-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0000.fits
Image size: 941.3'x626.9' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 16:19:12.867 -26:00:02.25 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 16:19:12.067 -26:00:18.90
Second-epoch image center 16:19:12.867 -26:00:02.25
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0055 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-21-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-21-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001.fits
Image size: 941.2'x626.9' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 16:19:15.459 -25:59:34.11 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 16:19:12.067 -26:00:18.90
Second-epoch image center 16:19:15.459 -25:59:34.11
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0178 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 16:19:12.867 -26:00:02.25
Second-epoch second image center 16:19:15.459 -25:59:34.11
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01246 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-54-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0173.fits &> /tmp/tmp.m1ZpdXfCgc
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-54-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0173.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-36-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0255.fits &> /tmp/tmp.I4TDzv0ZOa
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-36-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0255.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-13_CI_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_222231_TTUQ1b1x1_339501_eVYAeQS3/fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-21-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0000.fits &> /tmp/tmp.LHJ2Ls0sjz
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-13_CI_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_222231_TTUQ1b1x1_339501_eVYAeQS3/fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-21-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0000.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-13_CI_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_222231_TTUQ1b1x1_339501_eVYAeQS3/fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-21-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001.fits &> /tmp/tmp.QVmRKsBt1Q
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-13_CI_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_222231_TTUQ1b1x1_339501_eVYAeQS3/fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-21-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-54-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0173.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-54-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0173.fits and wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-54-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0173.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-54-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0173.fits and wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-54-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0173.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-54-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0173.fits and wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-54-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0173.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-54-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0173.fits) and catalog (wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-54-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0173.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-54-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0173.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 57338 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 235.3307 to 253.5861 deg, Dec -31.5421 to -20.0424 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 235.3307 to 253.5861 deg, Dec -31.5421 to -20.0424 deg
Loaded 8684 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 6494 out of 7000 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 7000 out of 57338 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.178000
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.178000
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -8.02
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.16
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.16
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 57338 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 235.3307 to 253.5861 deg, Dec -31.5421 to -20.0424 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 235.3307 to 253.5861 deg, Dec -31.5421 to -20.0424 deg
Loaded 8684 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 6494 out of 7000 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 7000 out of 57338 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-54-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0173.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-54-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0173.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-54-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0173.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-54-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0173.fits (aperture=4.4)
Read 69536 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 235.3645 to 253.6286 deg, Dec -31.4708 to -20.1109 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 235.3645 to 253.6286 deg, Dec -31.4708 to -20.1109 deg
Loaded 8557 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 6303 out of 6992 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 6992 out of 69536 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-36-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0255.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-36-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0255.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-36-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0255.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-36-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0255.fits (aperture=4.4)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 101 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 8000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.1 pix Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-54-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0173.fits
2.0 pix Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-36-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0255.fits
3.2 pix fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-21-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0000.fits
3.2 pix fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-21-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001.fits
2.1 pix wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-54-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0173.fits
2.0 pix wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-36-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0255.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
14.2 mag. Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-54-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0173.fits
14.3 mag. Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-36-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0255.fits
13.8 mag. fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-21-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0000.fits
13.8 mag. fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-21-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 13.8 (SNR ) 13.2 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.m1ZpdXfCgc (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-13_CI_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_222231_TTUQ1b1x1_339501_eVYAeQS3/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-54-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0173.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-54-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0173.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-54-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0173.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-54-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0173.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-54-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0173.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-54-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0173.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-54-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0173.fits' -> 'wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-54-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0173.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-54-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0173.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-54-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0173.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-54-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0173.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-54-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0173.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-54-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0173.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-54-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0173.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-54-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0173.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-54-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0173.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-54-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0173.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-54-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0173.fits.wcscat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=6, blended=2322, passed=57332
Got 57332 stars (including 54899 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-54-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0173.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 57332 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 942.0'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 942.0 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013083 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010467 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 292 to 351 (Dec -31.5 to -20.0)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 968 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 965 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 946 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 965 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 55902 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 292 to 351 (Dec -31.5 to -20.0)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 968 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 965 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 55899 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 965 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 55899 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Excluding outliers - 965 stars left (next iteration limit 1061)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-54-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0173.fits N_match=965 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.347 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.290 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.421 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.343 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.386 n_q1=300 n_q2=253 n_q3=262 n_q4=150 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.213
The image catalog is written to wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-54-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0173.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-54-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0173.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-54-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0173.fits -region wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-54-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0173.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-54-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0173.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.I4TDzv0ZOa (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-13_CI_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_222231_TTUQ1b1x1_339501_eVYAeQS3/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-36-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0255.fits 574.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-36-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0255.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-36-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0255.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-36-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0255.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-36-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0255.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-36-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0255.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-36-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0255.fits' -> 'wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-36-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0255.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-36-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0255.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-36-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0255.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-36-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0255.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-36-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0255.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-36-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0255.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-36-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0255.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-36-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0255.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-36-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0255.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-36-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0255.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-36-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0255.fits.wcscat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=8, blended=3494, passed=69528
Got 69528 stars (including 65904 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-36-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0255.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 69528 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 942.0'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 942.0 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013083 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010467 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 292 to 351 (Dec -31.5 to -20.1)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 968 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 966 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 939 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 966 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 67636 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 292 to 351 (Dec -31.5 to -20.1)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 969 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 966 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 67642 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 966 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 67642 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
Excluding outliers - 966 stars left (next iteration limit 1062)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-36-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0255.fits N_match=966 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.453 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.372 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.495 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.429 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.642 n_q1=307 n_q2=265 n_q3=249 n_q4=145 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.418
The image catalog is written to wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-36-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0255.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-36-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0255.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-36-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0255.fits -region wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-36-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0255.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-36-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0255.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.LHJ2Ls0sjz (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-13_CI_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_222231_TTUQ1b1x1_339501_eVYAeQS3/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-13_CI_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_222231_TTUQ1b1x1_339501_eVYAeQS3/fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-21-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0000.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-13_CI_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_222231_TTUQ1b1x1_339501_eVYAeQS3/fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-21-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0000.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-13_CI_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_222231_TTUQ1b1x1_339501_eVYAeQS3/fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-21-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0000.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-13_CI_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_222231_TTUQ1b1x1_339501_eVYAeQS3/fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-21-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0000.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-13_CI_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_222231_TTUQ1b1x1_339501_eVYAeQS3/fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-21-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0000.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-13_CI_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_222231_TTUQ1b1x1_339501_eVYAeQS3/fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-21-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0000.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-21-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0000.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-21-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0000.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-21-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0000.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-21-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0000.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-21-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0000.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-21-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0000.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-21-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0000.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-13_CI_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_222231_TTUQ1b1x1_339501_eVYAeQS3/fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-21-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0000.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-21-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0000.fits.wcscat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=8, blended=1615, passed=37423
Got 37423 stars (including 35749 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-21-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0000.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 37423 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013074 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010459 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 292 to 351 (Dec -31.5 to -20.1)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 963 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 961 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 948 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 961 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 36417 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 292 to 351 (Dec -31.5 to -20.1)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 963 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 961 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 36418 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 961 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 36417 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
Excluding outliers - 961 stars left (next iteration limit 1057)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-21-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0000.fits N_match=961 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.420 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.407 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.577 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.300 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.447 n_q1=270 n_q2=240 n_q3=279 n_q4=172 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.376
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-21-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0000.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-21-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0000.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-13_CI_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_222231_TTUQ1b1x1_339501_eVYAeQS3/fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-21-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0000.fits -region wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-21-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0000.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-21-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0000.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.QVmRKsBt1Q (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-13_CI_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_222231_TTUQ1b1x1_339501_eVYAeQS3/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-13_CI_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_222231_TTUQ1b1x1_339501_eVYAeQS3/fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-21-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-13_CI_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_222231_TTUQ1b1x1_339501_eVYAeQS3/fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-21-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-13_CI_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_222231_TTUQ1b1x1_339501_eVYAeQS3/fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-21-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-13_CI_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_222231_TTUQ1b1x1_339501_eVYAeQS3/fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-21-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-13_CI_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_222231_TTUQ1b1x1_339501_eVYAeQS3/fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-21-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-13_CI_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_222231_TTUQ1b1x1_339501_eVYAeQS3/fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-21-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-21-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-21-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-21-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-21-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-21-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-21-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-21-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-13_CI_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_222231_TTUQ1b1x1_339501_eVYAeQS3/fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-21-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-21-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001.fits.wcscat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=9, blended=1655, passed=37296
Got 37296 stars (including 35601 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-21-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 37296 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013072 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010458 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 292 to 351 (Dec -31.5 to -20.1)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 966 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 964 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 950 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 964 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 36242 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 292 to 351 (Dec -31.5 to -20.1)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 966 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 964 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 36246 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 964 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 36245 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44"
Excluding outliers - 964 stars left (next iteration limit 1060)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-21-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001.fits N_match=964 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.436 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.399 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.601 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.309 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.458 n_q1=279 n_q2=242 n_q3=275 n_q4=168 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.379
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-21-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-21-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-13_CI_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_222231_TTUQ1b1x1_339501_eVYAeQS3/fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-21-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001.fits -region wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-21-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-21-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-21-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0000.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-13_CI_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_222231_TTUQ1b1x1_339501_eVYAeQS3/wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-21-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0000.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-21-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-13_CI_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_222231_TTUQ1b1x1_339501_eVYAeQS3/wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-21-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Sco-02-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-54-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0173.fits at 16:26:31.21 -29:54:19.7: 12.77 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-54-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0173.fits at 16:38:45.64 -31:15:10.5: 12.62 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-54-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0173.fits at 16:49:08.05 -28:39:46.5: 13.06 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-54-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0173.fits at 16:32:55.67 -30:04:42.9: 13.27 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-54-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0173.fits at 16:23:38.61 -26:29:21.0: 11.91 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-54-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0173.fits at 16:44:00.08 -29:27:05.4: 13.15 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-54-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0173.fits at 16:17:45.58 -21:59:09.6: 14.88 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-54-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0173.fits at 15:52:58.75 -20:46:57.3: 12.04 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-36-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0255.fits at 16:26:31.21 -29:54:19.7: 12.75 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.76 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-36-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0255.fits at 16:38:45.64 -31:15:10.5: 12.34 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:26:31.21 -29:54:19.7: ref_mag=12.76 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=12.6267 delta=0.13 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-36-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0255.fits at 16:32:55.67 -30:04:42.9: 13.27 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-36-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0255.fits at 16:49:08.05 -28:39:46.5: 13.05 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-36-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0255.fits at 16:23:38.61 -26:29:21.0: 11.88 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-36-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0255.fits at 16:44:00.08 -29:27:05.4: 12.90 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.42 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:38:45.64 -31:15:10.5: ref_mag=12.42 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=12.4900 delta=-0.07 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.06 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.27 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.98 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:49:08.05 -28:39:46.5: ref_mag=13.06 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=12.4870 delta=0.57 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.89 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:32:55.67 -30:04:42.9: ref_mag=13.27 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=12.9776 delta=0.29 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:44:00.08 -29:27:05.4: ref_mag=12.98 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=12.8654 delta=0.11 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:23:38.61 -26:29:21.0: ref_mag=11.89 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=11.7918 delta=0.10 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-36-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0255.fits at 16:17:45.58 -21:59:09.6: 15.01 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-36-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0255.fits at 15:52:58.75 -20:46:57.3: 12.02 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.02 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:52:58.75 -20:46:57.3: ref_mag=12.02 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.0399 delta=-0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-54-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0173.fits at 16:10:24.52 -25:17:27.0: 14.88 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-54-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0173.fits at 16:48:12.76 -24:32:57.7: 12.57 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-54-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0173.fits at 16:48:42.21 -26:30:21.7: 14.59 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-36-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0255.fits at 16:10:24.52 -25:17:27.0: 15.05 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-54-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0173.fits at 16:46:08.33 -22:53:40.3: 14.73 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-36-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0255.fits at 16:48:12.76 -24:32:57.7: 12.43 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-36-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0255.fits at 16:48:42.21 -26:30:21.7: 14.84 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.48 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:48:12.76 -24:32:57.7: ref_mag=12.48 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=12.5709 delta=-0.09 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-54-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0173.fits at 16:05:42.80 -21:49:27.3: 12.90 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-54-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0173.fits at 16:30:32.85 -27:09:34.4: 12.75 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-36-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0255.fits at 16:46:08.33 -22:53:40.3: 14.90 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-54-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0173.fits at 16:18:19.48 -23:17:44.5: 13.09 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-36-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0255.fits at 16:05:42.80 -21:49:27.3: 13.15 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.02 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:05:42.80 -21:49:27.3: ref_mag=13.02 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=12.8307 delta=0.19 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-36-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0255.fits at 16:30:32.85 -27:09:34.4: 12.61 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.66 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:30:32.85 -27:09:34.4: ref_mag=12.66 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=12.8067 delta=-0.15 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-54-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0173.fits at 16:05:54.12 -21:08:16.5: 13.25 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-54-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0173.fits at 16:50:01.47 -21:46:25.5: 13.38 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-36-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0255.fits at 16:18:19.48 -23:17:44.5: 13.08 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.08 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:18:19.48 -23:17:44.5: ref_mag=13.08 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=12.9219 delta=0.16 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-36-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0255.fits at 16:05:54.12 -21:08:16.5: 13.25 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-36-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0255.fits at 16:50:01.47 -21:46:25.5: 13.76 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.25 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:05:54.12 -21:08:16.5: ref_mag=13.25 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=13.1407 delta=0.11 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.54 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:50:01.47 -21:46:25.5: ref_mag=13.54 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=13.2850 delta=0.25 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-54-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0173.fits at 15:57:44.54 -25:25:55.9: 14.82 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-36-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0255.fits at 15:57:44.54 -25:25:55.9: 14.99 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-54-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0173.fits at 16:33:50.92 -23:55:50.8: 14.92 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-54-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0173.fits at 16:44:46.27 -28:35:02.3: 14.56 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-54-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0173.fits at 16:52:29.43 -21:20:02.5: 13.83 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-54-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0173.fits at 16:51:23.96 -26:00:17.5: 13.65 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-54-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0173.fits at 16:50:05.29 -25:01:54.5: 13.75 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-36-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0255.fits at 16:33:50.92 -23:55:50.8: 15.14 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-36-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0255.fits at 16:44:46.27 -28:35:02.3: 14.78 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-36-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0255.fits at 16:51:23.96 -26:00:17.5: 13.91 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-36-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0255.fits at 16:52:29.43 -21:20:02.5: 13.73 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.77 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.77 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:51:23.96 -26:00:17.5: ref_mag=13.77 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=13.3540 delta=0.42 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:52:29.43 -21:20:02.5: ref_mag=13.77 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=13.3875 delta=0.38 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-36-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0255.fits at 16:50:05.29 -25:01:54.5: 13.80 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.77 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:50:05.29 -25:01:54.5: ref_mag=13.77 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=13.4284 delta=0.34 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-54-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0173.fits at 16:17:49.85 -23:28:31.8: 14.16 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-54-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0173.fits at 16:41:28.46 -23:03:23.8: 13.85 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-54-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0173.fits at 16:42:07.51 -21:55:07.5: 14.15 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-36-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0255.fits at 16:41:28.46 -23:03:23.8: 14.05 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-36-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0255.fits at 16:17:49.85 -23:28:31.8: 14.27 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.95 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:41:28.46 -23:03:23.8: ref_mag=13.95 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=13.5134 delta=0.44 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.21 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:17:49.85 -23:28:31.8: ref_mag=14.21 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=13.3954 delta=0.82 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-36-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0255.fits at 16:42:07.51 -21:55:07.5: 14.14 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.15 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:42:07.51 -21:55:07.5: ref_mag=14.15 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=13.3233 delta=0.82 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-54-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0173.fits at 16:49:57.12 -25:27:17.7: 14.16 +/- 0.24 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-36-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0255.fits at 16:49:57.12 -25:27:17.7: 14.17 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.17 +/- 0.16
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:49:57.12 -25:27:17.7: ref_mag=14.17 +/- 0.16 new_mean_mag=13.4939 delta=0.67 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-54-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0173.fits at 16:48:15.58 -25:14:19.9: 13.84 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-54-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0173.fits at 16:17:14.68 -25:04:15.9: 14.95 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-36-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0255.fits at 16:48:15.58 -25:14:19.9: 13.68 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.73 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:48:15.58 -25:14:19.9: ref_mag=13.73 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=13.4712 delta=0.26 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-36-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0255.fits at 16:17:14.68 -25:04:15.9: 15.08 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-54-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0173.fits at 16:38:37.17 -21:49:29.3: 13.85 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-36-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0255.fits at 16:38:37.17 -21:49:29.3: 13.91 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.88 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:38:37.17 -21:49:29.3: ref_mag=13.88 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=13.6690 delta=0.22 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-54-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0173.fits at 16:48:05.80 -21:10:18.2: 14.21 +/- 0.24 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-54-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0173.fits at 16:45:40.40 -23:11:29.6: 14.03 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-36-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0255.fits at 16:48:05.80 -21:10:18.2: 14.21 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.21 +/- 0.15
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:48:05.80 -21:10:18.2: ref_mag=14.21 +/- 0.15 new_mean_mag=13.6070 delta=0.60 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-36-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0255.fits at 16:45:40.40 -23:11:29.6: 14.10 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.07 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:45:40.40 -23:11:29.6: ref_mag=14.07 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=13.6208 delta=0.45 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-54-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0173.fits at 16:42:00.61 -21:43:37.5: 13.88 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-54-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0173.fits at 16:12:00.55 -21:24:23.2: 14.21 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-36-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0255.fits at 16:42:00.61 -21:43:37.5: 14.02 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.95 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:42:00.61 -21:43:37.5: ref_mag=13.95 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=13.6274 delta=0.33 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-36-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0255.fits at 16:12:00.55 -21:24:23.2: 14.10 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.14 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:12:00.55 -21:24:23.2: ref_mag=14.14 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=13.6997 delta=0.44 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-54-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0173.fits at 15:59:17.03 -22:17:24.8: 14.01 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-36-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0255.fits at 15:59:17.03 -22:17:24.8: 14.00 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.01 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:59:17.03 -22:17:24.8: ref_mag=14.01 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=13.3874 delta=0.62 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-54-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0173.fits at 16:36:15.13 -24:38:20.9: 13.96 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-54-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0173.fits at 16:05:14.39 -21:25:47.2: 14.17 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-54-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0173.fits at 16:05:42.72 -21:45:37.0: 13.97 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-36-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0255.fits at 16:36:15.13 -24:38:20.9: 14.42 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.14 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-36-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0255.fits at 16:05:42.72 -21:45:37.0: 14.27 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:36:15.13 -24:38:20.9: ref_mag=14.14 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=13.6590 delta=0.48 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.10 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:05:42.72 -21:45:37.0: ref_mag=14.10 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=13.8431 delta=0.26 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-36-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0255.fits at 16:05:14.39 -21:25:47.2: 14.61 +/- 0.26 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.34 +/- 0.16
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:05:14.39 -21:25:47.2: ref_mag=14.34 +/- 0.16 new_mean_mag=13.7543 delta=0.59 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-54-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0173.fits at 15:52:56.57 -20:30:01.8: 13.88 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-54-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0173.fits at 16:03:48.27 -26:25:18.4: 13.82 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-36-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0255.fits at 15:52:56.57 -20:30:01.8: 13.98 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.94 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:52:56.57 -20:30:01.8: ref_mag=13.94 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=13.4771 delta=0.46 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-36-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0255.fits at 16:03:48.27 -26:25:18.4: 13.91 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.87 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:03:48.27 -26:25:18.4: ref_mag=13.87 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=13.7188 delta=0.15 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out82609.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out82453.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out82466.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out82485.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out82488.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out82554.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out82570.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out82575.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 7s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 4s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82410_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-21-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
The candidate 82410_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-21-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82414_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-21-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
The candidate 82414_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-21-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82415_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-21-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
The candidate 82415_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-21-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:00:43.74 -21:06:00.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82417_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-21-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
The candidate 82417_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-21-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:52:38.99 -21:21:13.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82432_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-21-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
The candidate 82432_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-21-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82435_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-21-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
The candidate 82435_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-21-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82437_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-21-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
The candidate 82437_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-21-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82442_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-21-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
The candidate 82442_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-21-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82444_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-21-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
The candidate 82444_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-21-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 15:59:22.50 -29:51:14.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_local.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82452_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-21-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
The candidate 82452_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-21-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 15:53:56.85 -27:54:19.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82453_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-21-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
Preparing report for the candidate 82453_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-21-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82457_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-21-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
The candidate 82457_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-21-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:29:16.00 -26:29:10.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bbsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82458_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-21-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
The candidate 82458_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-21-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 15:53:41.68 -25:17:13.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82460_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-21-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
The candidate 82460_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-21-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82462_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-21-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
The candidate 82462_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-21-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:51:49.22 -30:19:47.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82464_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-21-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
The candidate 82464_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-21-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:40:22.32 -23:17:56.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82466_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-21-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
Preparing report for the candidate 82466_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-21-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82469_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-21-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
The candidate 82469_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-21-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:40:50.21 -29:42:29.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82470_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-21-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
The candidate 82470_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-21-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:43:39.67 -29:23:13.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82474_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-21-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
The candidate 82474_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-21-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82477_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-21-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
The candidate 82477_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-21-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:42:03.69 -31:17:39.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82482_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-21-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
The candidate 82482_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-21-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:44:54.54 -27:27:06.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82485_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-21-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
Preparing report for the candidate 82485_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-21-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82486_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-21-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
The candidate 82486_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-21-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 15:56:45.35 -23:11:56.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82487_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-21-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
The candidate 82487_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-21-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:46:45.53 -30:08:28.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82488_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-21-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
Preparing report for the candidate 82488_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-21-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82489_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-21-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
The candidate 82489_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-21-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:36:49.91 -25:16:35.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82490_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-21-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
The candidate 82490_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-21-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:22:04.50 -21:50:47.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82491_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-21-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
The candidate 82491_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-21-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 15:44:41.39 -28:39:53.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82495_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-21-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
The candidate 82495_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-21-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:33:35.54 -21:20:52.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82496_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-21-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
The candidate 82496_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-21-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:33:47.59 -26:44:53.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82497_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-21-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
The candidate 82497_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-21-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82499_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-21-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
The candidate 82499_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-21-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:29:18.51 -25:52:12.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82502_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-21-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
The candidate 82502_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-21-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:51:50.44 -28:56:20.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82516_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-21-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
The candidate 82516_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-21-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:50:25.42 -25:33:38.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82517_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-21-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
The candidate 82517_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-21-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82519_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-21-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
The candidate 82519_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-21-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82523_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-21-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
The candidate 82523_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-21-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:05:44.77 -29:25:28.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82533_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-21-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
The candidate 82533_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-21-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:29:28.80 -27:58:08.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82536_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-21-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
The candidate 82536_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-21-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82537_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-21-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
The candidate 82537_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-21-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:16:59.07 -23:00:17.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82542_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-21-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
The candidate 82542_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-21-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82551_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-21-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
The candidate 82551_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-21-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:16:40.87 -29:53:32.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82554_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-21-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
Preparing report for the candidate 82554_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-21-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82559_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-21-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
The candidate 82559_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-21-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:51:09.08 -22:07:11.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82564_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-21-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
The candidate 82564_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-21-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:22:48.98 -23:07:58.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82567_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-21-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
The candidate 82567_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-21-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:48:52.80 -26:10:18.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82568_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-21-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
The candidate 82568_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-21-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:47:11.69 -22:57:10.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82569_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-21-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
The candidate 82569_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-21-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:32:18.18 -22:12:00.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82570_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-21-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
Preparing report for the candidate 82570_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-21-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82573_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-21-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
The candidate 82573_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-21-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:18:47.33 -28:45:09.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82575_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-21-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
Preparing report for the candidate 82575_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-21-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82576_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-21-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
The candidate 82576_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-21-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82577_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-21-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
The candidate 82577_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-21-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82578_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-21-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
The candidate 82578_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-21-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82582_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-21-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
The candidate 82582_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-21-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82586_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-21-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
The candidate 82586_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-21-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82592_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-21-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
The candidate 82592_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-21-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82597_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-21-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
The candidate 82597_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-21-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82599_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-21-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
The candidate 82599_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-21-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:24:18.45 -29:11:05.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82603_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-21-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
The candidate 82603_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-21-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:32:48.22 -29:44:02.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82606_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-21-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
The candidate 82606_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-21-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:24:21.55 -25:47:47.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82608_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-21-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
The candidate 82608_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-21-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82609_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-21-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
The candidate 82609_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-21-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:17:14.68 -25:04:15.9 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.49, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.47)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 0.325 6048860248373535744 244.31110007393 -25.07115040421 12.2932 10.4850 VARIABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#0.325#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82612_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-21-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
The candidate 82612_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-21-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82613_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-21-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
The candidate 82613_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-21-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:49:24.26 -23:04:58.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82622_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-21-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
The candidate 82622_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-21-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82624_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-21-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
The candidate 82624_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-21-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82629_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-21-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
The candidate 82629_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-21-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:46:56.40 -28:49:33.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82632_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-21-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
The candidate 82632_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-21-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:13:37.76 -22:54:47.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82639_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-21-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
The candidate 82639_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-21-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82640_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-21-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
The candidate 82640_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-21-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:28:09.34 -21:10:08.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82642_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-21-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
The candidate 82642_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-21-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82647_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-21-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
The candidate 82647_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-21-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82648_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-21-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
The candidate 82648_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-21-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82672_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-21-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
The candidate 82672_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-21-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82681_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-21-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
The candidate 82681_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-21-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82693_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-21-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
The candidate 82693_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-21-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82707_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-21-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
The candidate 82707_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-21-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:27:48.92 -27:45:28.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82726_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-21-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
The candidate 82726_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-21-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 68178_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-21-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
The candidate 68178_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-21-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 15:55:38.38 -29:15:40.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 68332_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-21-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
The candidate 68332_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-21-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:45:58.35 -25:11:58.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 09397_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-21-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
The candidate 09397_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-21-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 15:57:48.34 -29:18:10.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 11389_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-21-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
The candidate 11389_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-21-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 15:48:25.08 -28:43:30.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 70576_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-21-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
The candidate 70576_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-21-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:13:08.01 -29:37:22.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 67783_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-21-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
The candidate 67783_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-21-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:42:40.53 -24:24:51.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52502_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-21-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
The candidate 52502_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-21-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:05:30.89 -23:28:38.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 67739_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-21-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
The candidate 67739_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-21-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:08:31.98 -21:31:50.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 25372_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-21-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
The candidate 25372_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-21-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:41:01.30 -27:26:44.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 23808_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-21-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
The candidate 23808_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-21-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:25:53.11 -27:34:57.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51427_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-21-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
The candidate 51427_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-21-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 15:48:10.28 -24:14:29.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 25872_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-21-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
The candidate 25872_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-21-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:46:35.09 -27:23:17.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 05270_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-21-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
The candidate 05270_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-21-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:16:56.75 -30:22:33.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 78687_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-21-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
The candidate 78687_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-21-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:19:00.02 -28:36:56.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 11018_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-21-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
The candidate 11018_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-21-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:11:14.12 -29:21:38.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 25529_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-21-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
The candidate 25529_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-21-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:11:41.49 -27:03:32.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 17714_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-21-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
The candidate 17714_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-21-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 15:59:34.34 -28:03:32.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 69287_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-21-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
The candidate 69287_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-21-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:28:00.14 -30:24:12.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 69253_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-21-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
The candidate 69253_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-21-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:11:03.41 -25:39:32.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 07523_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-21-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
The candidate 07523_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-21-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:26:09.15 -30:06:32.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 68166_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-21-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001
The candidate 68166_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-21-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0001 did not pass the final checks
