This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-12_CI_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_035835_TTUQ2b1x1_2232682_iOR8vpxL
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 12.3438 2461203.8438 12.91 16:13:52.95 -04:24:10.4
8.08464 31.87694 galactic Oph Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.9" and 9.4 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.97 Klotho -0 -1 1 12.9 -0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_04-03-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits at 16:13:52.95 -04:24:10.4: 15.97 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_04-36-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits at 16:13:52.95 -04:24:10.4: 15.87 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461203.8438,12.91,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260612.3438 12.91CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 12.3438 2461203.8438 13.44 16:22:01.62 -01:31:16.4
12.23721 31.84873 galactic Ser Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.4" and 9.4 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.276 Adelheid -0 0 0 13.5 -0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_04-03-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits at 16:22:01.62 -01:31:16.4: 15.91 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_04-36-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits at 16:22:01.62 -01:31:16.4: 15.90 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 06 12.3438* 16 22 01.62 -01 31 16.4 13.4 U Ser 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461203.8438,13.44,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260612.3438 13.44CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 12.3438 2461203.8438 13.56 16:20:23.85 -03:26:15.9
10.10985 31.10894 galactic Ser Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.9" and 9.3 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.323 Brucia 0 -0 0 13.7 -0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_04-03-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits at 16:20:23.85 -03:26:15.9: 15.90 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_04-36-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits at 16:20:23.85 -03:26:15.9: 15.91 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 06 12.3438* 16 20 23.85 -03 26 15.9 13.6 U Ser 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461203.8438,13.56,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260612.3438 13.56CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 12.3438 2461203.8438 14.26 16:19:33.88 -05:19:23.1
8.18063 30.19070 galactic Oph Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.7" and 9.5 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.1723 Klemola -0 2 2 14.6 0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_04-03-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits at 16:19:33.88 -05:19:23.1: 15.86 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_04-36-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits at 16:19:33.88 -05:19:23.1: 15.86 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461203.8438,14.26,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260612.3438 14.26CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461171.87744498 11.05.2026 09:03:21.246 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_04-03-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits
First image: 2461171.87744498 11.05.2026 09:03:21.246 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_04-03-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits
Last image: 2461203.84412171 12.06.2026 08:15:22.116 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-12_CI_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_035835_TTUQ2b1x1_2232682_iOR8vpxL/fd_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_03-15-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0167.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 2
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.51
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 8 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 7094
Objects passed selection criteria: 7093
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.5 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.5 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 6362
Average stars matched: 6239.75 (98.0784 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 113540 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Wed Jun 10 15:05:04 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-96-gc6da043e
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-06-10)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Fri Jun 12 04:53:54 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461171.87744498 11.05.2026 09:03:21.246 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_04-03-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits
First image: 2461171.87744498 11.05.2026 09:03:21.246 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_04-03-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits
Last image: 2461203.84412171 12.06.2026 08:15:22.116 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-12_CI_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_035835_TTUQ2b1x1_2232682_iOR8vpxL/fd_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_03-15-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0167.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 63
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.19
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 26 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 51405
Objects passed selection criteria: 51304
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.6 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.6 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 48605.5
Average stars matched: 47210.5 (97.13 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 153268 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Wed Jun 10 15:05:04 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-96-gc6da043e
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-06-10)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Fri Jun 12 04:56:10 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/TTUQ2_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 4 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_04-03-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_04-36-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-12_CI_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_035835_TTUQ2b1x1_2232682_iOR8vpxL/fd_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_03-14-26_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0166.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-12_CI_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_035835_TTUQ2b1x1_2232682_iOR8vpxL/fd_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_03-15-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0167.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_04-03-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_04-36-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_04-03-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_04-36-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-12_CI_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_035835_TTUQ2b1x1_2232682_iOR8vpxL/fd_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_03-14-26_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0166.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-12_CI_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_035835_TTUQ2b1x1_2232682_iOR8vpxL/fd_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_03-15-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0167.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461203.84348157
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_04-03-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_04-03-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_04-03-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_04-03-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits'
wcs_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_04-36-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_04-36-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_04-36-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_04-36-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits'
wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_03-14-26_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0166.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_03-14-26_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0166.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_03-14-26_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0166.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_03-14-26_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0166.fits'
wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_03-15-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0167.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_03-15-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0167.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_03-15-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0167.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_03-15-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0167.fits'
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_04-03-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_04-03-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits
Image size: 937.3'x624.2' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 16:17:08.453 -01:59:57.20 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.87"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_03-14-26_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0166.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_03-14-26_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0166.fits
Image size: 937.3'x624.2' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 16:17:08.784 -01:59:49.67 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 16:17:08.453 -01:59:57.20
Second-epoch image center 16:17:08.784 -01:59:49.67
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0025 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_03-15-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0167.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_03-15-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0167.fits
Image size: 937.3'x624.2' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 16:17:06.012 -01:59:11.55 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 16:17:08.453 -01:59:57.20
Second-epoch image center 16:17:06.012 -01:59:11.55
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0163 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 16:17:08.784 -01:59:49.67
Second-epoch second image center 16:17:06.012 -01:59:11.55
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01566 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_04-03-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits &> /tmp/tmp.zKhl3Psp0V
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_04-03-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_04-36-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits &> /tmp/tmp.9xt3yC6BNO
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_04-36-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-12_CI_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_035835_TTUQ2b1x1_2232682_iOR8vpxL/fd_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_03-14-26_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0166.fits &> /tmp/tmp.jk6ONwc19a
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-12_CI_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_035835_TTUQ2b1x1_2232682_iOR8vpxL/fd_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_03-14-26_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0166.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-12_CI_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_035835_TTUQ2b1x1_2232682_iOR8vpxL/fd_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_03-15-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0167.fits &> /tmp/tmp.AOSJSstHup
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-12_CI_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_035835_TTUQ2b1x1_2232682_iOR8vpxL/fd_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_03-15-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0167.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_04-03-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_04-03-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits and wcs_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_04-03-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_04-03-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits and wcs_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_04-03-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_04-03-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits and wcs_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_04-03-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_04-03-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits) and catalog (wcs_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_04-03-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_04-03-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 9303 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 236.4196 to 252.1657 deg, Dec -7.2619 to +3.2555 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 236.4196 to 252.1657 deg, Dec -7.2619 to 3.2555 deg
Loaded 5100 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4363 out of 4531 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 4531 out of 9303 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.641200
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.641200
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.51
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.13
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.13
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 9303 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 236.4196 to 252.1657 deg, Dec -7.2619 to +3.2555 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 236.4196 to 252.1657 deg, Dec -7.2619 to 3.2555 deg
Loaded 5100 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4363 out of 4531 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 4531 out of 9303 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_04-03-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_04-03-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_04-03-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_04-03-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits (aperture=6.2)
Read 9216 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 236.4229 to 252.1676 deg, Dec -7.2619 to +3.2557 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 236.4229 to 252.1676 deg, Dec -7.2619 to 3.2557 deg
Loaded 5101 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4301 out of 4502 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 4502 out of 9216 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_04-36-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_04-36-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_04-36-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_04-36-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits (aperture=6.2)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 2 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 8000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.3 pix Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_04-03-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits
2.2 pix Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_04-36-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits
2.3 pix fd_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_03-14-26_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0166.fits
2.3 pix fd_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_03-15-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0167.fits
2.3 pix wcs_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_04-03-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits
2.2 pix wcs_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_04-36-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.1 mag. Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_04-03-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits
15.1 mag. Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_04-36-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits
14.8 mag. fd_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_03-14-26_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0166.fits
14.8 mag. fd_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_03-15-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0167.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.8 (SNR ) 11.8 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.zKhl3Psp0V (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-12_CI_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_035835_TTUQ2b1x1_2232682_iOR8vpxL/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_04-03-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_04-03-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_04-03-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_04-03-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_04-03-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_04-03-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_04-03-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits' -> 'wcs_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_04-03-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_04-03-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_04-03-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_04-03-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_04-03-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_04-03-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_04-03-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_04-03-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_04-03-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_04-03-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_04-03-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits.wcscat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=532, passed=9303
Got 9303 stars (including 8762 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_04-03-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 9303 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013018 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010414 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 967 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 966 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 956 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 966 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 9144 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 967 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 966 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 9147 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 966 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 9148 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
Excluding outliers - 966 stars left (next iteration limit 1062)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_04-03-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits N_match=966 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.439 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.343 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.540 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.418 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.580 n_q1=304 n_q2=239 n_q3=204 n_q4=219 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.321
The image catalog is written to wcs_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_04-03-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_04-03-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_04-03-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits -region wcs_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_04-03-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_04-03-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.9xt3yC6BNO (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-12_CI_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_035835_TTUQ2b1x1_2232682_iOR8vpxL/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_04-36-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_04-36-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_04-36-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_04-36-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_04-36-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_04-36-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_04-36-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits' -> 'wcs_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_04-36-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_04-36-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_04-36-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_04-36-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_04-36-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_04-36-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_04-36-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_04-36-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_04-36-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_04-36-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_04-36-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits.wcscat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=594, passed=9216
Got 9216 stars (including 8610 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_04-36-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 9216 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013017 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010413 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 964 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 963 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 955 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 963 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 9075 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 964 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 963 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 9075 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 963 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 9075 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.46"
Excluding outliers - 963 stars left (next iteration limit 1059)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_04-36-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits N_match=963 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.479 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.350 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.637 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.450 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.676 n_q1=306 n_q2=238 n_q3=206 n_q4=213 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.411
The image catalog is written to wcs_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_04-36-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_04-36-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_04-36-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits -region wcs_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_04-36-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_04-36-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.jk6ONwc19a (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-12_CI_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_035835_TTUQ2b1x1_2232682_iOR8vpxL/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-12_CI_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_035835_TTUQ2b1x1_2232682_iOR8vpxL/fd_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_03-14-26_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0166.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-12_CI_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_035835_TTUQ2b1x1_2232682_iOR8vpxL/fd_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_03-14-26_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0166.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-12_CI_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_035835_TTUQ2b1x1_2232682_iOR8vpxL/fd_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_03-14-26_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0166.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-12_CI_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_035835_TTUQ2b1x1_2232682_iOR8vpxL/fd_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_03-14-26_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0166.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-12_CI_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_035835_TTUQ2b1x1_2232682_iOR8vpxL/fd_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_03-14-26_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0166.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-12_CI_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_035835_TTUQ2b1x1_2232682_iOR8vpxL/fd_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_03-14-26_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0166.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_03-14-26_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0166.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_03-14-26_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0166.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_03-14-26_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0166.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_03-14-26_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0166.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_03-14-26_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0166.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_03-14-26_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0166.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_03-14-26_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0166.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-12_CI_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_035835_TTUQ2b1x1_2232682_iOR8vpxL/fd_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_03-14-26_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0166.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_03-14-26_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0166.fits.wcscat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=377, passed=6806
Got 6806 stars (including 6422 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_03-14-26_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0166.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 6806 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013018 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010414 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 964 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 963 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 943 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 963 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6615 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 964 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 963 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6618 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 963 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6618 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
Excluding outliers - 963 stars left (next iteration limit 1059)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_03-14-26_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0166.fits N_match=963 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.490 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.423 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.551 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.478 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.523 n_q1=333 n_q2=254 n_q3=218 n_q4=158 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.126
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_03-14-26_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0166.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_03-14-26_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0166.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-12_CI_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_035835_TTUQ2b1x1_2232682_iOR8vpxL/fd_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_03-14-26_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0166.fits -region wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_03-14-26_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0166.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_03-14-26_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0166.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.AOSJSstHup (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-12_CI_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_035835_TTUQ2b1x1_2232682_iOR8vpxL/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-12_CI_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_035835_TTUQ2b1x1_2232682_iOR8vpxL/fd_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_03-15-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0167.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-12_CI_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_035835_TTUQ2b1x1_2232682_iOR8vpxL/fd_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_03-15-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0167.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-12_CI_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_035835_TTUQ2b1x1_2232682_iOR8vpxL/fd_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_03-15-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0167.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-12_CI_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_035835_TTUQ2b1x1_2232682_iOR8vpxL/fd_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_03-15-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0167.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-12_CI_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_035835_TTUQ2b1x1_2232682_iOR8vpxL/fd_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_03-15-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0167.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-12_CI_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_035835_TTUQ2b1x1_2232682_iOR8vpxL/fd_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_03-15-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0167.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_03-15-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0167.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_03-15-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0167.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_03-15-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0167.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_03-15-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0167.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_03-15-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0167.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_03-15-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0167.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_03-15-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0167.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-12_CI_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_035835_TTUQ2b1x1_2232682_iOR8vpxL/fd_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_03-15-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0167.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_03-15-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0167.fits.wcscat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=349, passed=5975
Got 5975 stars (including 5619 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_03-15-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0167.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 5975 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013018 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010414 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.2 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 967 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 966 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 944 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 966 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5761 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.2 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 967 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 966 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5760 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 966 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5760 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
Excluding outliers - 966 stars left (next iteration limit 1062)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_03-15-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0167.fits N_match=966 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.440 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.375 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.492 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.486 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.678 n_q1=359 n_q2=248 n_q3=224 n_q4=135 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.543
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_03-15-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0167.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_03-15-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0167.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-12_CI_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_035835_TTUQ2b1x1_2232682_iOR8vpxL/fd_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_03-15-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0167.fits -region wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_03-15-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0167.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_03-15-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0167.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_04-03-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits sigma_overall=0.439 worst_q_ratio=1.321
ref2=Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_04-36-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits sigma_overall=0.479 worst_q_ratio=1.411
new1=fd_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_03-14-26_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0166.fits sigma_overall=0.490 worst_q_ratio=1.126
new2=fd_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_03-15-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0167.fits sigma_overall=0.440 worst_q_ratio=1.543
reference average sigma_overall=0.459 worst_q_ratio=1.366
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_04-03-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0439_astrometric_residuals.png (966 matched stars from wcs_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_04-03-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.39 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_04-36-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0414_astrometric_residuals.png (963 matched stars from wcs_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_04-36-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.42 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_03-14-26_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0166_astrometric_residuals.png (963 matched stars from wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_03-14-26_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0166.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.42 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_03-15-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0167_astrometric_residuals.png (966 matched stars from wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_03-15-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0167.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.41 arcsec)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_03-14-26_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0166.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_03-14-26_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0166.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-12_CI_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_035835_TTUQ2b1x1_2232682_iOR8vpxL/wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_03-14-26_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0166.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_03-15-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0167.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_03-15-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0167.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-12_CI_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_035835_TTUQ2b1x1_2232682_iOR8vpxL/wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_03-15-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0167.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Ser-06-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 1s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 0s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20469_fd_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_03-15-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0167
The candidate 20469_fd_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_03-15-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0167 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:30:56.18 +01:57:04.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bbsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 01177_fd_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_03-15-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0167
The candidate 01177_fd_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_03-15-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0167 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:00:58.16 +02:10:26.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 1s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Ser-06-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 4 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_04-03-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_04-36-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-12_CI_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_035835_TTUQ2b1x1_2232682_iOR8vpxL/fd_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_03-14-26_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0166.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-12_CI_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_035835_TTUQ2b1x1_2232682_iOR8vpxL/fd_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_03-15-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0167.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_04-03-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_04-36-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_04-03-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_04-36-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-12_CI_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_035835_TTUQ2b1x1_2232682_iOR8vpxL/fd_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_03-14-26_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0166.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-12_CI_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_035835_TTUQ2b1x1_2232682_iOR8vpxL/fd_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_03-15-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0167.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_04-03-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_04-36-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_03-14-26_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0166.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_03-15-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0167.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/exclusion_list.txt
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_04-03-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_04-36-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_03-14-26_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0166.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_03-15-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0167.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_04-03-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_04-03-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits
Image size: 937.3'x624.2' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 16:17:08.453 -01:59:57.20 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.87"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_03-14-26_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0166.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_03-14-26_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0166.fits
Image size: 937.3'x624.2' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 16:17:08.784 -01:59:49.67 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 16:17:08.453 -01:59:57.20
Second-epoch image center 16:17:08.784 -01:59:49.67
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0025 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_03-15-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0167.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_03-15-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0167.fits
Image size: 937.3'x624.2' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 16:17:06.012 -01:59:11.55 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 16:17:08.453 -01:59:57.20
Second-epoch image center 16:17:06.012 -01:59:11.55
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0163 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 16:17:08.784 -01:59:49.67
Second-epoch second image center 16:17:06.012 -01:59:11.55
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01566 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_04-03-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits &> /tmp/tmp.MeRHbuKsDg
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_04-03-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_04-36-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits &> /tmp/tmp.Z5TDbHjcSA
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_04-36-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-12_CI_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_035835_TTUQ2b1x1_2232682_iOR8vpxL/fd_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_03-14-26_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0166.fits &> /tmp/tmp.qaeCu8H69Y
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-12_CI_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_035835_TTUQ2b1x1_2232682_iOR8vpxL/fd_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_03-14-26_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0166.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-12_CI_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_035835_TTUQ2b1x1_2232682_iOR8vpxL/fd_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_03-15-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0167.fits &> /tmp/tmp.3ygdGLyKoT
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-12_CI_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_035835_TTUQ2b1x1_2232682_iOR8vpxL/fd_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_03-15-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0167.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_04-03-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_04-03-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits and wcs_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_04-03-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_04-03-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits and wcs_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_04-03-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_04-03-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits and wcs_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_04-03-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_04-03-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits) and catalog (wcs_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_04-03-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_04-03-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 62856 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 236.4193 to 252.1657 deg, Dec -7.2637 to +3.2670 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 236.4193 to 252.1657 deg, Dec -7.2637 to 3.2670 deg
Loaded 5105 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4080 out of 4577 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 4577 out of 62856 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.478950
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.478950
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.19
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.29
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.29
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 62856 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 236.4193 to 252.1657 deg, Dec -7.2637 to +3.2670 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 236.4193 to 252.1657 deg, Dec -7.2637 to 3.2670 deg
Loaded 5105 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4080 out of 4577 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 4577 out of 62856 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_04-03-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_04-03-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_04-03-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_04-03-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits (aperture=4.6)
Read 59865 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 236.4230 to 252.1675 deg, Dec -7.2646 to +3.2660 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 236.4230 to 252.1675 deg, Dec -7.2646 to 3.2660 deg
Loaded 5107 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4056 out of 4537 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 4537 out of 59865 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_04-36-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_04-36-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_04-36-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_04-36-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits (aperture=4.7)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 42 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 8000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.1 pix Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_04-03-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits
2.1 pix Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_04-36-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits
2.0 pix fd_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_03-14-26_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0166.fits
2.1 pix fd_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_03-15-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0167.fits
2.1 pix wcs_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_04-03-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits
2.1 pix wcs_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_04-36-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.3 mag. Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_04-03-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits
15.3 mag. Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_04-36-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits
15.0 mag. fd_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_03-14-26_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0166.fits
15.0 mag. fd_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_03-15-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0167.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 15.0 (SNR ) 14.4 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.MeRHbuKsDg (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-12_CI_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_035835_TTUQ2b1x1_2232682_iOR8vpxL/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_04-03-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_04-03-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_04-03-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_04-03-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_04-03-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_04-03-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_04-03-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits' -> 'wcs_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_04-03-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_04-03-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_04-03-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_04-03-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_04-03-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_04-03-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_04-03-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_04-03-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_04-03-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_04-03-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_04-03-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits.wcscat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=7, blended=3582, passed=62849
Got 62849 stars (including 59200 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_04-03-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 62849 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013018 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010414 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 970 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 969 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 962 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 969 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 62278 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 970 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 969 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 62278 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 969 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 62278 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Excluding outliers - 969 stars left (next iteration limit 1065)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_04-03-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits N_match=969 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.410 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.315 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.504 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.357 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.599 n_q1=307 n_q2=238 n_q3=207 n_q4=217 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.462
The image catalog is written to wcs_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_04-03-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_04-03-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_04-03-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits -region wcs_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_04-03-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_04-03-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.Z5TDbHjcSA (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-12_CI_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_035835_TTUQ2b1x1_2232682_iOR8vpxL/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_04-36-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_04-36-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_04-36-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_04-36-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_04-36-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_04-36-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_04-36-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits' -> 'wcs_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_04-36-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_04-36-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_04-36-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_04-36-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_04-36-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_04-36-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_04-36-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_04-36-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_04-36-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_04-36-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_04-36-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits.wcscat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=8, blended=3984, passed=59857
Got 59857 stars (including 55799 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_04-36-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 59857 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013017 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010413 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 968 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 967 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 959 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 967 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 58918 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 968 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 967 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 58918 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 967 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 58918 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44"
Excluding outliers - 967 stars left (next iteration limit 1063)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_04-36-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits N_match=967 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.446 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.359 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.520 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.451 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.648 n_q1=317 n_q2=228 n_q3=224 n_q4=198 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.452
The image catalog is written to wcs_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_04-36-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_04-36-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_04-36-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits -region wcs_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_04-36-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_04-36-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.qaeCu8H69Y (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-12_CI_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_035835_TTUQ2b1x1_2232682_iOR8vpxL/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-12_CI_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_035835_TTUQ2b1x1_2232682_iOR8vpxL/fd_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_03-14-26_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0166.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-12_CI_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_035835_TTUQ2b1x1_2232682_iOR8vpxL/fd_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_03-14-26_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0166.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-12_CI_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_035835_TTUQ2b1x1_2232682_iOR8vpxL/fd_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_03-14-26_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0166.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-12_CI_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_035835_TTUQ2b1x1_2232682_iOR8vpxL/fd_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_03-14-26_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0166.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-12_CI_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_035835_TTUQ2b1x1_2232682_iOR8vpxL/fd_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_03-14-26_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0166.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-12_CI_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_035835_TTUQ2b1x1_2232682_iOR8vpxL/fd_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_03-14-26_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0166.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_03-14-26_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0166.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_03-14-26_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0166.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_03-14-26_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0166.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_03-14-26_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0166.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_03-14-26_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0166.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_03-14-26_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0166.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_03-14-26_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0166.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-12_CI_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_035835_TTUQ2b1x1_2232682_iOR8vpxL/fd_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_03-14-26_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0166.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_03-14-26_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0166.fits.wcscat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=18, blended=2389, passed=51387
Got 51387 stars (including 48912 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_03-14-26_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0166.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 51387 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013018 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010414 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 969 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 968 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 950 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 968 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 50499 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 969 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 968 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 50501 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 968 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 50501 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45"
Excluding outliers - 968 stars left (next iteration limit 1064)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_03-14-26_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0166.fits N_match=968 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.500 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.442 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.528 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.508 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.558 n_q1=329 n_q2=254 n_q3=225 n_q4=160 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.116
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_03-14-26_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0166.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_03-14-26_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0166.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-12_CI_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_035835_TTUQ2b1x1_2232682_iOR8vpxL/fd_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_03-14-26_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0166.fits -region wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_03-14-26_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0166.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_03-14-26_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0166.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.3ygdGLyKoT (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-12_CI_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_035835_TTUQ2b1x1_2232682_iOR8vpxL/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-12_CI_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_035835_TTUQ2b1x1_2232682_iOR8vpxL/fd_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_03-15-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0167.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-12_CI_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_035835_TTUQ2b1x1_2232682_iOR8vpxL/fd_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_03-15-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0167.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-12_CI_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_035835_TTUQ2b1x1_2232682_iOR8vpxL/fd_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_03-15-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0167.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-12_CI_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_035835_TTUQ2b1x1_2232682_iOR8vpxL/fd_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_03-15-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0167.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-12_CI_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_035835_TTUQ2b1x1_2232682_iOR8vpxL/fd_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_03-15-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0167.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-12_CI_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_035835_TTUQ2b1x1_2232682_iOR8vpxL/fd_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_03-15-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0167.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_03-15-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0167.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_03-15-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0167.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_03-15-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0167.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_03-15-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0167.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_03-15-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0167.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_03-15-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0167.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_03-15-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0167.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-12_CI_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_035835_TTUQ2b1x1_2232682_iOR8vpxL/fd_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_03-15-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0167.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_03-15-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0167.fits.wcscat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=20, blended=2123, passed=46177
Got 46177 stars (including 43993 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_03-15-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0167.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 46177 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013018 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010414 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 967 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 966 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 952 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 966 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 45287 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 967 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 966 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 45287 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 966 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 45287 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
Excluding outliers - 966 stars left (next iteration limit 1062)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_03-15-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0167.fits N_match=966 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.459 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.383 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.470 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.489 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.631 n_q1=346 n_q2=250 n_q3=226 n_q4=144 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.375
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_03-15-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0167.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_03-15-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0167.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-12_CI_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_035835_TTUQ2b1x1_2232682_iOR8vpxL/fd_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_03-15-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0167.fits -region wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_03-15-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0167.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_03-15-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0167.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_03-14-26_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0166.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-12_CI_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_035835_TTUQ2b1x1_2232682_iOR8vpxL/wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_03-14-26_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0166.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_03-15-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0167.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-12_CI_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_035835_TTUQ2b1x1_2232682_iOR8vpxL/wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_03-15-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0167.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Ser-06-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_04-03-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits at 16:14:24.29 -00:45:12.5: 13.62 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_04-03-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits at 16:24:43.95 +02:03:06.2: 14.82 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_04-03-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits at 16:12:11.54 -01:11:26.3: 13.66 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_04-03-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits at 16:26:59.83 -00:34:34.7: 13.73 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_04-03-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits at 16:21:25.26 +00:07:34.2: 13.85 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_04-03-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits at 16:35:01.97 +01:45:13.6: 14.01 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_04-03-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits at 16:17:14.45 -02:57:50.4: 14.44 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_04-03-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits at 16:32:20.43 +01:43:51.5: 14.32 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_04-03-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits at 16:41:55.84 -01:54:08.6: 14.08 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_04-36-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits at 16:14:24.29 -00:45:12.5: 13.60 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_04-03-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits at 16:18:20.26 -00:16:04.8: 13.95 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_04-36-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits at 16:24:43.95 +02:03:06.2: 14.85 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.61 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:14:24.29 -00:45:12.5: ref_mag=13.61 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.9231 delta=-0.31 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.83 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:24:43.95 +02:03:06.2: ref_mag=14.83 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=14.7282 delta=0.11 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_04-36-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits at 16:12:11.54 -01:11:26.3: 13.62 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_04-36-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits at 16:26:59.83 -00:34:34.7: 13.70 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.64 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:12:11.54 -01:11:26.3: ref_mag=13.64 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.9893 delta=-0.35 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.71 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:26:59.83 -00:34:34.7: ref_mag=13.71 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=14.0111 delta=-0.30 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_04-36-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits at 16:35:01.97 +01:45:13.6: 13.89 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.94 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:35:01.97 +01:45:13.6: ref_mag=13.94 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.2660 delta=-0.32 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_04-36-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits at 16:32:20.43 +01:43:51.5: 14.39 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_04-36-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits at 16:17:14.45 -02:57:50.4: 14.33 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.35 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:32:20.43 +01:43:51.5: ref_mag=14.35 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=14.3898 delta=-0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.38 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:17:14.45 -02:57:50.4: ref_mag=14.38 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=14.6048 delta=-0.23 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_04-36-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits at 16:41:55.84 -01:54:08.6: 13.96 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.02 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:41:55.84 -01:54:08.6: ref_mag=14.02 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=14.4981 delta=-0.48 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_04-36-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits at 16:21:25.26 +00:07:34.2: 13.90 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.87 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:21:25.26 +00:07:34.2: ref_mag=13.87 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=14.1015 delta=-0.23 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_04-36-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits at 16:18:20.26 -00:16:04.8: 13.84 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.89 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:18:20.26 -00:16:04.8: ref_mag=13.89 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.9298 delta=-0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_04-03-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits at 16:32:43.56 +01:31:20.7: 13.29 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_04-03-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits at 16:09:47.74 -00:33:22.9: 13.16 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_04-03-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits at 16:36:51.40 +01:13:03.7: 12.98 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_04-03-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits at 16:10:26.19 -03:49:16.5: 13.16 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_04-03-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits at 15:59:32.99 -00:37:02.6: 13.00 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_04-03-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits at 16:01:06.85 -00:12:52.9: 13.50 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_04-03-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits at 15:59:25.24 -01:30:24.5: 11.00 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_04-03-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits at 16:13:52.95 -04:24:10.4: 15.97 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_04-03-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits at 16:20:23.85 -03:26:15.9: 15.90 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_04-03-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits at 16:22:01.62 -01:31:16.4: 15.91 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_04-36-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits at 16:36:51.40 +01:13:03.7: 12.90 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.94 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:36:51.40 +01:13:03.7: ref_mag=12.94 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.3711 delta=-0.43 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_04-36-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits at 16:32:43.56 +01:31:20.7: 13.09 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.18 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:32:43.56 +01:31:20.7: ref_mag=13.18 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.4870 delta=-0.31 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_04-36-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits at 16:10:26.19 -03:49:16.5: 13.11 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_04-36-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits at 15:59:32.99 -00:37:02.6: 13.07 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.03 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:59:32.99 -00:37:02.6: ref_mag=13.03 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.0409 delta=-0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.14 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:10:26.19 -03:49:16.5: ref_mag=13.14 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.5305 delta=-0.39 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_04-36-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits at 16:09:47.74 -00:33:22.9: 13.11 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_04-36-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits at 16:13:52.95 -04:24:10.4: 15.87 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_04-36-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits at 16:01:06.85 -00:12:52.9: 13.48 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.13 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:09:47.74 -00:33:22.9: ref_mag=13.13 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.2799 delta=-0.15 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.49 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_04-36-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits at 16:20:23.85 -03:26:15.9: 15.91 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_04-36-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits at 15:59:25.24 -01:30:24.5: 11.02 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:01:06.85 -00:12:52.9: ref_mag=13.49 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.7688 delta=-0.28 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.01 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:59:25.24 -01:30:24.5: ref_mag=11.01 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=11.2843 delta=-0.28 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_04-36-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits at 16:22:01.62 -01:31:16.4: 15.90 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_04-03-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits at 16:24:20.43 -03:37:00.6: 14.08 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_04-03-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits at 16:21:00.85 -00:25:28.8: 14.48 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_04-03-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits at 16:19:33.88 -05:19:23.1: 15.86 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_04-03-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits at 16:09:27.22 -00:02:16.4: 14.61 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_04-03-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits at 16:31:47.31 -01:54:25.5: 14.28 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_04-03-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits at 16:07:52.17 +01:24:16.0: 14.74 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_04-03-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits at 15:59:52.69 -01:45:00.1: 14.72 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_04-36-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits at 16:24:20.43 -03:37:00.6: 14.17 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.13 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:24:20.43 -03:37:00.6: ref_mag=14.13 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.0990 delta=0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_04-36-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits at 16:19:33.88 -05:19:23.1: 15.86 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_04-36-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits at 16:31:47.31 -01:54:25.5: 14.19 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_04-36-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits at 16:21:00.85 -00:25:28.8: 14.43 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.23 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:31:47.31 -01:54:25.5: ref_mag=14.23 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=14.3939 delta=-0.17 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.45 +/- 0.07
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:21:00.85 -00:25:28.8: ref_mag=14.45 +/- 0.07 new_mean_mag=14.3932 delta=0.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_04-36-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits at 16:09:27.22 -00:02:16.4: 14.38 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.48 +/- 0.07
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:09:27.22 -00:02:16.4: ref_mag=14.48 +/- 0.07 new_mean_mag=14.5229 delta=-0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_04-36-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits at 15:59:52.69 -01:45:00.1: 14.60 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_04-36-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits at 16:07:52.17 +01:24:16.0: 14.93 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.66 +/- 0.08
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:59:52.69 -01:45:00.1: ref_mag=14.66 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=14.5558 delta=0.10 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.81 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:07:52.17 +01:24:16.0: ref_mag=14.81 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=14.5207 delta=0.29 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_04-03-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits at 16:26:29.48 +02:07:37.3: 14.84 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_04-03-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits at 16:13:05.14 -02:33:16.6: 14.77 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_04-03-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits at 16:14:16.40 +01:03:08.3: 14.29 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_04-03-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits at 16:21:45.49 +01:41:24.2: 14.60 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_04-03-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits at 16:03:45.65 -01:58:50.2: 14.93 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_04-03-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits at 16:26:24.33 +01:21:35.4: 14.70 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_04-36-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits at 16:26:29.48 +02:07:37.3: 14.87 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.86 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:26:29.48 +02:07:37.3: ref_mag=14.86 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.7380 delta=0.12 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_04-36-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits at 16:14:16.40 +01:03:08.3: 14.45 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.35 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:14:16.40 +01:03:08.3: ref_mag=14.35 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=14.6449 delta=-0.29 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_04-36-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits at 16:21:45.49 +01:41:24.2: 14.46 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_04-36-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits at 16:13:05.14 -02:33:16.6: 14.99 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.53 +/- 0.07
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:21:45.49 +01:41:24.2: ref_mag=14.53 +/- 0.07 new_mean_mag=14.7805 delta=-0.26 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.86 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:13:05.14 -02:33:16.6: ref_mag=14.86 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=14.6780 delta=0.18 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_04-36-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits at 16:26:24.33 +01:21:35.4: 14.88 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.77 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:26:24.33 +01:21:35.4: ref_mag=14.77 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=14.6908 delta=0.08 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_04-36-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits at 16:03:45.65 -01:58:50.2: 15.28 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.05 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:03:45.65 -01:58:50.2: ref_mag=15.05 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.7452 delta=0.31 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_04-03-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits at 16:20:29.25 -05:23:23.2: 15.06 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_04-03-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits at 16:09:32.80 -00:43:38.8: 14.81 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_04-36-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits at 16:20:29.25 -05:23:23.2: 15.29 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.15 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:20:29.25 -05:23:23.2: ref_mag=15.15 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=14.7965 delta=0.36 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_04-03-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits at 16:34:42.69 -01:22:51.5: 15.18 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_04-03-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits at 16:23:19.09 -05:20:31.5: 15.09 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_04-03-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits at 16:34:49.94 -03:02:54.3: 15.01 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_04-36-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits at 16:09:32.80 -00:43:38.8: 14.79 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.80 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:09:32.80 -00:43:38.8: ref_mag=14.80 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=14.8713 delta=-0.08 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_04-36-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits at 16:34:42.69 -01:22:51.5: 14.82 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.95 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:34:42.69 -01:22:51.5: ref_mag=14.95 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.8462 delta=0.11 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_04-03-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits at 16:37:39.94 -05:08:34.5: 11.93 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_04-36-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits at 16:23:19.09 -05:20:31.5: 15.14 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.11 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:23:19.09 -05:20:31.5: ref_mag=15.11 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.8402 delta=0.27 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_04-36-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits at 16:34:49.94 -03:02:54.3: 15.12 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.06 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:34:49.94 -03:02:54.3: ref_mag=15.06 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.9416 delta=0.12 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_04-36-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits at 16:37:39.94 -05:08:34.5: 11.79 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.86 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:37:39.94 -05:08:34.5: ref_mag=11.86 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.0102 delta=0.85 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out77145.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out77159.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out77163.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out77210.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 12s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 3s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 77053_fd_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_03-15-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0167
The candidate 77053_fd_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_03-15-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0167 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 77056_fd_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_03-15-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0167
The candidate 77056_fd_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_03-15-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0167 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 77063_fd_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_03-15-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0167
The candidate 77063_fd_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_03-15-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0167 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 77081_fd_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_03-15-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0167
The candidate 77081_fd_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_03-15-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0167 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 77086_fd_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_03-15-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0167
The candidate 77086_fd_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_03-15-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0167 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 77089_fd_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_03-15-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0167
The candidate 77089_fd_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_03-15-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0167 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 77090_fd_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_03-15-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0167
The candidate 77090_fd_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_03-15-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0167 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 77091_fd_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_03-15-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0167
The candidate 77091_fd_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_03-15-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0167 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 77094_fd_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_03-15-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0167
The candidate 77094_fd_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_03-15-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0167 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 77096_fd_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_03-15-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0167
The candidate 77096_fd_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_03-15-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0167 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 77100_fd_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_03-15-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0167
The candidate 77100_fd_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_03-15-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0167 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 77108_fd_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_03-15-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0167
The candidate 77108_fd_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_03-15-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0167 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 77111_fd_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_03-15-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0167
The candidate 77111_fd_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_03-15-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0167 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 77113_fd_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_03-15-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0167
The candidate 77113_fd_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_03-15-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0167 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 77115_fd_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_03-15-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0167
The candidate 77115_fd_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_03-15-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0167 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 77121_fd_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_03-15-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0167
The candidate 77121_fd_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_03-15-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0167 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 77144_fd_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_03-15-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0167
The candidate 77144_fd_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_03-15-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0167 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 77145_fd_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_03-15-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0167
Preparing report for the candidate 77145_fd_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_03-15-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0167
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 77159_fd_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_03-15-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0167
Preparing report for the candidate 77159_fd_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_03-15-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0167
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 77163_fd_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_03-15-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0167
Preparing report for the candidate 77163_fd_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_03-15-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0167
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 77173_fd_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_03-15-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0167
The candidate 77173_fd_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_03-15-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0167 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:02:58.20 -05:49:24.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 77175_fd_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_03-15-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0167
The candidate 77175_fd_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_03-15-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0167 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:20:56.85 -00:24:33.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 77199_fd_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_03-15-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0167
The candidate 77199_fd_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_03-15-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0167 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 77210_fd_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_03-15-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0167
Preparing report for the candidate 77210_fd_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_03-15-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0167
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 77214_fd_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_03-15-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0167
The candidate 77214_fd_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_03-15-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0167 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 77223_fd_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_03-15-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0167
The candidate 77223_fd_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_03-15-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0167 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 77226_fd_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_03-15-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0167
The candidate 77226_fd_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_03-15-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0167 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 77232_fd_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_03-15-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0167
The candidate 77232_fd_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_03-15-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0167 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 77241_fd_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_03-15-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0167
The candidate 77241_fd_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_03-15-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0167 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 77245_fd_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_03-15-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0167
The candidate 77245_fd_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_03-15-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0167 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 77251_fd_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_03-15-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0167
The candidate 77251_fd_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_03-15-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0167 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 77266_fd_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_03-15-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0167
The candidate 77266_fd_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_03-15-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0167 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 77289_fd_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_03-15-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0167
The candidate 77289_fd_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_03-15-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0167 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 77295_fd_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_03-15-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0167
The candidate 77295_fd_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_03-15-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0167 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 77311_fd_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_03-15-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0167
The candidate 77311_fd_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_03-15-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0167 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 77358_fd_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_03-15-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0167
The candidate 77358_fd_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_03-15-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0167 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 77379_fd_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_03-15-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0167
The candidate 77379_fd_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_03-15-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0167 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 77381_fd_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_03-15-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0167
The candidate 77381_fd_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_03-15-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0167 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 77392_fd_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_03-15-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0167
The candidate 77392_fd_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_03-15-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0167 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 77425_fd_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_03-15-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0167
The candidate 77425_fd_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_03-15-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0167 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51952_fd_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_03-15-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0167
The candidate 51952_fd_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_03-15-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0167 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 06356_fd_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_03-15-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0167
The candidate 06356_fd_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_03-15-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0167 did not pass the final checks