This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-12_CI_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_034651_TTUQ1b1x1_1011115_ZQg9RJLY
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 12.3462 2461203.8462 10.19 20:33:10.41 -23:40:12.5
20.79011 -32.21725 galactic Cap Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.4" and 9.0 pix
The object was found in VSX 2" CO Cap
Type: SRB
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
10.400 V 12.800 V 2454417.00000 249.000000000000 M5e
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits at 20:33:10.41 -23:40:12.5: 11.16 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_05-02-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits at 20:33:10.41 -23:40:12.5: 11.09 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.13 +/- 0.01
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 06 12.3462* 20 33 10.41 -23 40 12.5 10.2 U Cap 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
CO Cap,2461203.8462,10.19,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
CO Cap 20260612.3462 10.19CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 12.3462 2461203.8462 11.66 19:38:14.02 -26:41:25.7
13.00619 -21.47207 galactic Sgr Second-epoch detections are separated by 2.0" and 9.3 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.451 Patientia -0 -1 1 11.8 0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits at 19:38:14.02 -26:41:25.7: 14.84 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_05-02-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits at 19:38:14.02 -26:41:25.7: 14.77 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461203.8462,11.66,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260612.3462 11.66CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 12.3462 2461203.8462 12.29 20:03:33.06 -29:21:16.6
12.22577 -27.61983 galactic Sgr Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.1" and 9.1 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.455 Bruchsalia -0 -1 1 12.1 0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits at 20:03:33.06 -29:21:16.6: 15.00 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_05-02-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits at 20:03:33.06 -29:21:16.6: 14.93 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461203.8462,12.29,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260612.3462 12.29CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 12.3462 2461203.8462 11.98 19:51:27.50 -27:54:12.4
12.84415 -24.64694 galactic Sgr Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.4" and 9.1 pix
The object was found in VSX 2" ASAS J195127-2754.2
Type: MISC
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
12.750 V Y 0.530 V 2452094.40000 62.500000000000
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits at 19:51:27.50 -27:54:12.4: 13.20 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_05-02-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits at 19:51:27.50 -27:54:12.4: 12.86 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.98 +/- 0.04
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ASAS J195127-2754.2,2461203.8462,11.98,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ASAS J195127-2754.2 20260612.3462 11.98CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 12.3462 2461203.8462 12.26 19:42:31.23 -22:06:14.2
17.96796 -20.72316 galactic Sgr Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.4" and 9.5 pix
The object was found in VSX 4" V5551 Sgr
Type: M
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
11.200 V 15.000 V 2452513.00000 276.000000000000 Me
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits at 19:42:31.23 -22:06:14.2: 13.45 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_05-02-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits at 19:42:31.23 -22:06:14.2: 13.40 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.43 +/- 0.07
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
V5551 Sgr,2461203.8462,12.26,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
V5551 Sgr 20260612.3462 12.26CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 12.3462 2461203.8462 9.65 20:40:02.70 -28:47:30.2
15.40458 -35.13817 galactic Mic Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.8" and 8.7 pix
The object was found in VSX 4" R Mic
Type: M
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
8.300 V 13.800 V 2443311.00000 138.620000000000 M4e
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits at 20:40:02.70 -28:47:30.2: 11.02 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_05-02-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits at 20:40:02.70 -28:47:30.2: 11.02 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.02 +/- 0.01
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 06 12.3462* 20 40 02.70 -28 47 30.2 9.7 U Mic 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
R Mic,2461203.8462,9.65,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
R Mic 20260612.3462 9.65CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 12.3462 2461203.8462 11.52 20:41:51.34 -29:50:32.8
14.27028 -35.77545 galactic Mic Second-epoch detections are separated by 4.3" and 8.5 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
online_id | Gaia DR3 6795152356975555328 | 20:41:51.47 -29:50:34.5 (Gaia DR3) | T | P | Gaia3var=NOT_AVAILABLE J-Ks=0.684+/-0.030 (K)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits at 20:41:51.34 -29:50:32.8: 12.45 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_05-02-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits at 20:41:51.34 -29:50:32.8: 12.47 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.46 +/- 0.03
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 06 12.3462* 20 41 51.34 -29 50 32.8 11.5 U Mic 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
Gaia DR3 6795152356975555328,2461203.8462,11.52,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
Gaia DR3 6795152356975555328 20260612.3462 11.52CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 12.3462 2461203.8462 11.49 20:05:22.12 -25:27:10.3
16.53670 -26.79019 galactic Sgr Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.9" and 9.3 pix
The object was found in VSX 0" ASAS J200522-2527.1
Type: MISC
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
12.660 V Y 0.300 V 2452102.30000 53.228294000000
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits at 20:05:22.12 -25:27:10.3: 12.45 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_05-02-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits at 20:05:22.12 -25:27:10.3: 12.47 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.46 +/- 0.02
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ASAS J200522-2527.1,2461203.8462,11.49,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ASAS J200522-2527.1 20260612.3462 11.49CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 12.3462 2461203.8462 10.46 19:37:02.94 -25:51:25.1
13.74151 -20.92868 galactic Sgr Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.3" and 9.4 pix
The object was found in VSX 4" V6529 Sgr
Type: SRB
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
11.700 V 13.200 V 2452660.90000 208.087677000000
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits at 19:37:02.94 -25:51:25.1: 11.43 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_05-02-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits at 19:37:02.94 -25:51:25.1: 11.45 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.44 +/- 0.01
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
V6529 Sgr,2461203.8462,10.46,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
V6529 Sgr 20260612.3462 10.46CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461172.91960030 12.05.2026 10:04:03.466 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits
First image: 2461172.91960030 12.05.2026 10:04:03.466 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits
Last image: 2461203.84648431 12.06.2026 08:18:46.244 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-12_CI_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_034651_TTUQ1b1x1_1011115_ZQg9RJLY/fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_03-18-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0149.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 36
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -8.29
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 7 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 7002
Objects passed selection criteria: 6997
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.3 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.3 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 5988.25
Average stars matched: 5872.25 (98.0629 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 112748 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Wed Jun 10 15:05:04 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-96-gc6da043e
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-06-10)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Fri Jun 12 03:52:33 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461172.91960030 12.05.2026 10:04:03.466 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits
First image: 2461172.91960030 12.05.2026 10:04:03.466 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits
Last image: 2461203.84648431 12.06.2026 08:18:46.244 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-12_CI_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_034651_TTUQ1b1x1_1011115_ZQg9RJLY/fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_03-18-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0149.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 69
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.98
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 34 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 53404
Objects passed selection criteria: 53308
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.1 3.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.1 3.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 43634.2
Average stars matched: 42363.8 (97.0883 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 154620 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Wed Jun 10 15:05:04 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-96-gc6da043e
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-06-10)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Fri Jun 12 03:56:57 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 3.5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_05-02-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-12_CI_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_034651_TTUQ1b1x1_1011115_ZQg9RJLY/fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_03-17-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0148.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-12_CI_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_034651_TTUQ1b1x1_1011115_ZQg9RJLY/fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_03-18-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0149.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_05-02-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_05-02-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-12_CI_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_034651_TTUQ1b1x1_1011115_ZQg9RJLY/fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_03-17-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0148.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-12_CI_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_034651_TTUQ1b1x1_1011115_ZQg9RJLY/fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_03-18-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0149.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461203.84587769
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits'
wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_05-02-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_05-02-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_05-02-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_05-02-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits'
wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_03-17-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0148.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_03-17-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0148.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_03-17-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0148.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_03-17-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0148.fits'
wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_03-18-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0149.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_03-18-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0149.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_03-18-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0149.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_03-18-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0149.fits'
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits
Image size: 937.4'x624.6' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.87"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 20:09:38.992 -25:59:45.66 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.87"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_03-17-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0148.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_03-17-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0148.fits
Image size: 940.8'x626.8' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.89"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 20:09:30.648 -25:58:32.56 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 20:09:38.992 -25:59:45.66
Second-epoch image center 20:09:30.648 -25:58:32.56
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0373 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_03-18-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0149.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_03-18-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0149.fits
Image size: 940.8'x626.8' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.89"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 20:09:27.910 -25:59:12.02 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 20:09:38.992 -25:59:45.66
Second-epoch image center 20:09:27.910 -25:59:12.02
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0425 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 20:09:30.648 -25:58:32.56
Second-epoch second image center 20:09:27.910 -25:59:12.02
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01501 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits &> /tmp/tmp.BBBA4gIPh1
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_05-02-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits &> /tmp/tmp.l9n6GOvhlM
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_05-02-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-12_CI_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_034651_TTUQ1b1x1_1011115_ZQg9RJLY/fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_03-17-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0148.fits &> /tmp/tmp.0CgJaJbc6u
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-12_CI_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_034651_TTUQ1b1x1_1011115_ZQg9RJLY/fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_03-17-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0148.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-12_CI_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_034651_TTUQ1b1x1_1011115_ZQg9RJLY/fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_03-18-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0149.fits &> /tmp/tmp.vacr4yefnF
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-12_CI_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_034651_TTUQ1b1x1_1011115_ZQg9RJLY/fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_03-18-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0149.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits and wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits and wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits and wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits) and catalog (wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 7487 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 293.3532 to 311.4449 deg, Dec -31.2591 to -20.5808 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 293.3532 to 311.4449 deg, Dec -31.2591 to -20.5808 deg
Loaded 9410 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 5874 out of 6007 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 6007 out of 7487 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.601900
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.601900
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -8.29
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.31
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.31
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 7487 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 293.3532 to 311.4449 deg, Dec -31.2591 to -20.5808 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 293.3532 to 311.4449 deg, Dec -31.2591 to -20.5808 deg
Loaded 9410 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 5874 out of 6007 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 6007 out of 7487 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits (aperture=6.3)
Read 6777 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 293.3531 to 311.4448 deg, Dec -31.2697 to -20.5709 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 293.3531 to 311.4448 deg, Dec -31.2697 to -20.5709 deg
Loaded 9431 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 5463 out of 5572 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 5572 out of 6777 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_05-02-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_05-02-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_05-02-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_05-02-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits (aperture=6.3)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 35 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 8000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.3 pix Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits
2.3 pix Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_05-02-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits
4.6 pix fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_03-17-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0148.fits
4.5 pix fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_03-18-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0149.fits
2.3 pix wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits
2.3 pix wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_05-02-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
14.3 mag. Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits
14.2 mag. Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_05-02-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits
13.5 mag. fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_03-17-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0148.fits
13.4 mag. fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_03-18-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0149.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 13.4 (SNR ) 11.1 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.BBBA4gIPh1 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-12_CI_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_034651_TTUQ1b1x1_1011115_ZQg9RJLY/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits 572.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits' -> 'wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits.wcscat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=461, passed=7487
Got 7487 stars (including 7021 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 7487 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013019 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010416 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 349 (Dec -31.3 to -20.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 967 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 967 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 963 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.54"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 967 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7415 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.53"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 349 (Dec -31.3 to -20.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 967 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 967 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7415 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.53"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 967 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7415 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.56"
Excluding outliers - 967 stars left (next iteration limit 1063)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits N_match=967 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.544 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.429 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.671 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.521 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.715 n_q1=238 n_q2=214 n_q3=259 n_q4=256 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.314
The image catalog is written to wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits -region wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.l9n6GOvhlM (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_05-02-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-12_CI_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_034651_TTUQ1b1x1_1011115_ZQg9RJLY/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_05-02-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits 572.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_05-02-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_05-02-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_05-02-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_05-02-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_05-02-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_05-02-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_05-02-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits' -> 'wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_05-02-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_05-02-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_05-02-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_05-02-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_05-02-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_05-02-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_05-02-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_05-02-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_05-02-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_05-02-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_05-02-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits.wcscat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=434, passed=6777
Got 6777 stars (including 6336 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_05-02-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 6777 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013019 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010416 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 349 (Dec -31.3 to -20.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 970 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 970 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 965 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.51"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 970 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6720 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.51"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 349 (Dec -31.3 to -20.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 970 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 970 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6721 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.51"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 970 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6721 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.53"
Excluding outliers - 970 stars left (next iteration limit 1067)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_05-02-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits N_match=970 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.498 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.410 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.598 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.505 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.620 n_q1=240 n_q2=208 n_q3=266 n_q4=256 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.246
The image catalog is written to wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_05-02-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_05-02-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_05-02-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits -region wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_05-02-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_05-02-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.0CgJaJbc6u (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-12_CI_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_034651_TTUQ1b1x1_1011115_ZQg9RJLY/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-12_CI_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_034651_TTUQ1b1x1_1011115_ZQg9RJLY/fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_03-17-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0148.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-12_CI_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_034651_TTUQ1b1x1_1011115_ZQg9RJLY/fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_03-17-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0148.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-12_CI_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_034651_TTUQ1b1x1_1011115_ZQg9RJLY/fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_03-17-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0148.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-12_CI_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_034651_TTUQ1b1x1_1011115_ZQg9RJLY/fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_03-17-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0148.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-12_CI_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_034651_TTUQ1b1x1_1011115_ZQg9RJLY/fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_03-17-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0148.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-12_CI_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_034651_TTUQ1b1x1_1011115_ZQg9RJLY/fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_03-17-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0148.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_03-17-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0148.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_03-17-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0148.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_03-17-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0148.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_03-17-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0148.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_03-17-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0148.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_03-17-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0148.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_03-17-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0148.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-12_CI_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_034651_TTUQ1b1x1_1011115_ZQg9RJLY/fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_03-17-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0148.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_03-17-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0148.fits.wcscat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=200, passed=5064
Got 5064 stars (including 4861 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_03-17-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0148.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 5064 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 940.8'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 940.8 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013067 (47.0 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010453 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 351 (Dec -31.4 to -20.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 970 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 970 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 940 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 970 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4965 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 351 (Dec -31.4 to -20.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 970 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 970 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4961 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 970 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4961 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Excluding outliers - 970 stars left (next iteration limit 1067)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_03-17-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0148.fits N_match=970 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.409 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.547 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.542 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.367 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.333 n_q1=220 n_q2=116 n_q3=349 n_q4=285 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.335
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_03-17-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0148.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_03-17-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0148.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-12_CI_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_034651_TTUQ1b1x1_1011115_ZQg9RJLY/fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_03-17-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0148.fits -region wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_03-17-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0148.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_03-17-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0148.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.vacr4yefnF (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-12_CI_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_034651_TTUQ1b1x1_1011115_ZQg9RJLY/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-12_CI_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_034651_TTUQ1b1x1_1011115_ZQg9RJLY/fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_03-18-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0149.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-12_CI_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_034651_TTUQ1b1x1_1011115_ZQg9RJLY/fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_03-18-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0149.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-12_CI_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_034651_TTUQ1b1x1_1011115_ZQg9RJLY/fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_03-18-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0149.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-12_CI_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_034651_TTUQ1b1x1_1011115_ZQg9RJLY/fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_03-18-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0149.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-12_CI_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_034651_TTUQ1b1x1_1011115_ZQg9RJLY/fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_03-18-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0149.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-12_CI_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_034651_TTUQ1b1x1_1011115_ZQg9RJLY/fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_03-18-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0149.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_03-18-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0149.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_03-18-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0149.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_03-18-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0149.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_03-18-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0149.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_03-18-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0149.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_03-18-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0149.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_03-18-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0149.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-12_CI_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_034651_TTUQ1b1x1_1011115_ZQg9RJLY/fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_03-18-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0149.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_03-18-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0149.fits.wcscat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=173, passed=4781
Got 4781 stars (including 4606 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_03-18-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0149.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 4781 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 940.8'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 940.8 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013067 (47.0 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010453 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 351 (Dec -31.4 to -20.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 969 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 969 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 937 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 969 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4640 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 351 (Dec -31.4 to -20.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 970 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 969 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4639 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 969 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4639 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Excluding outliers - 969 stars left (next iteration limit 1065)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_03-18-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0149.fits N_match=969 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.378 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.490 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.522 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.353 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.305 n_q1=206 n_q2=113 n_q3=343 n_q4=307 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.380
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_03-18-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0149.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_03-18-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0149.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-12_CI_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_034651_TTUQ1b1x1_1011115_ZQg9RJLY/fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_03-18-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0149.fits -region wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_03-18-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0149.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_03-18-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0149.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits sigma_overall=0.544 worst_q_ratio=1.314
ref2=Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_05-02-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits sigma_overall=0.498 worst_q_ratio=1.246
new1=fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_03-17-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0148.fits sigma_overall=0.409 worst_q_ratio=1.335
new2=fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_03-18-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0149.fits sigma_overall=0.378 worst_q_ratio=1.380
reference average sigma_overall=0.521 worst_q_ratio=1.28
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446_astrometric_residuals.png (967 matched stars from wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.49 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_05-02-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0447_astrometric_residuals.png (970 matched stars from wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_05-02-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.47 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_03-17-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0148_astrometric_residuals.png (970 matched stars from wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_03-17-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0148.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.37 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_03-18-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0149_astrometric_residuals.png (969 matched stars from wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_03-18-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0149.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.35 arcsec)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_03-17-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0148.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_03-17-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0148.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-12_CI_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_034651_TTUQ1b1x1_1011115_ZQg9RJLY/wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_03-17-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0148.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_03-18-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0149.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_03-18-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0149.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-12_CI_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_034651_TTUQ1b1x1_1011115_ZQg9RJLY/wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_03-18-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0149.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Cap-04-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits at 19:51:21.30 -21:24:43.2: 11.52 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits at 20:11:43.62 -22:10:24.4: 11.65 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits at 20:26:34.99 -22:07:38.9: 11.50 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits at 19:45:29.24 -24:51:34.2: 11.40 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits at 20:06:47.96 -27:12:41.3: 10.69 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits at 20:13:32.88 -21:19:40.1: 11.60 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits at 19:47:33.18 -21:08:44.8: 11.86 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits at 19:51:24.39 -20:42:11.1: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_05-02-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits at 20:11:43.62 -22:10:24.4: 11.62 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.64 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:11:43.62 -22:10:24.4: ref_mag=11.64 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.1601 delta=0.48 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_05-02-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits at 20:26:34.99 -22:07:38.9: 11.49 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.49 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:26:34.99 -22:07:38.9: ref_mag=11.49 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.1776 delta=0.32 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_05-02-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits at 19:45:29.24 -24:51:34.2: 11.42 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.41 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:45:29.24 -24:51:34.2: ref_mag=11.41 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.2125 delta=0.19 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_05-02-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits at 20:13:32.88 -21:19:40.1: 11.59 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.59 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:13:32.88 -21:19:40.1: ref_mag=11.59 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.2921 delta=0.30 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_05-02-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits at 19:51:24.39 -20:42:11.1: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:51:24.39 -20:42:11.1: at least one reference image reported edge (off-image or aperture/annulus past image boundary); cannot perform the forced-photometry cross-check
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_05-02-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits at 19:47:33.18 -21:08:44.8: 11.81 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.84 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:47:33.18 -21:08:44.8: ref_mag=11.84 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=11.2068 delta=0.63 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_05-02-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits at 19:51:21.30 -21:24:43.2: 11.53 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits at 20:19:34.25 -22:00:46.6: 11.50 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.53 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits at 20:00:11.18 -24:17:54.7: 11.55 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:51:21.30 -21:24:43.2: ref_mag=11.53 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.2258 delta=0.30 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_05-02-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits at 20:06:47.96 -27:12:41.3: 10.74 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 10.71 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:06:47.96 -27:12:41.3: ref_mag=10.71 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=10.3645 delta=0.35 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_05-02-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits at 20:19:34.25 -22:00:46.6: 11.52 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_05-02-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits at 20:00:11.18 -24:17:54.7: 11.54 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.51 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:19:34.25 -22:00:46.6: ref_mag=11.51 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.3562 delta=0.15 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.55 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:00:11.18 -24:17:54.7: ref_mag=11.55 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.3504 delta=0.20 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits at 20:12:42.95 -22:36:15.2: 11.61 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits at 20:20:01.22 -21:37:10.9: 11.71 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits at 19:39:25.49 -22:02:43.3: 11.82 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits at 20:35:17.70 -22:40:23.4: 11.74 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits at 19:51:45.73 -22:05:28.7: 11.64 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits at 19:52:10.56 -22:47:36.3: 11.67 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits at 20:09:09.85 -23:55:15.8: 11.61 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits at 20:05:40.12 -22:48:50.9: 11.65 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_05-02-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits at 20:12:42.95 -22:36:15.2: 11.64 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_05-02-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits at 20:20:01.22 -21:37:10.9: 11.70 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.62 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.70 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:12:42.95 -22:36:15.2: ref_mag=11.62 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.3972 delta=0.23 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:20:01.22 -21:37:10.9: ref_mag=11.70 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.3915 delta=0.31 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_05-02-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits at 20:35:17.70 -22:40:23.4: 11.71 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_05-02-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits at 19:39:25.49 -22:02:43.3: 11.93 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.72 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:35:17.70 -22:40:23.4: ref_mag=11.72 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.4140 delta=0.31 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.86 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:39:25.49 -22:02:43.3: ref_mag=11.86 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=11.4021 delta=0.46 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits at 19:54:08.53 -21:36:49.8: 11.75 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_05-02-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits at 19:51:45.73 -22:05:28.7: 11.70 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_05-02-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits at 19:52:10.56 -22:47:36.3: 11.65 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.66 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:52:10.56 -22:47:36.3: ref_mag=11.66 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.4055 delta=0.26 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.67 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:51:45.73 -22:05:28.7: ref_mag=11.67 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.4061 delta=0.26 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_05-02-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits at 20:05:40.12 -22:48:50.9: 11.62 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_05-02-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits at 20:09:09.85 -23:55:15.8: 11.59 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.63 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:05:40.12 -22:48:50.9: ref_mag=11.63 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.4093 delta=0.23 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.60 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:09:09.85 -23:55:15.8: ref_mag=11.60 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.4084 delta=0.19 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits at 20:19:19.78 -23:14:54.8: 11.60 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_05-02-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits at 19:54:08.53 -21:36:49.8: 11.73 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.74 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:54:08.53 -21:36:49.8: ref_mag=11.74 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.4401 delta=0.30 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_05-02-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits at 20:19:19.78 -23:14:54.8: 11.61 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.60 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:19:19.78 -23:14:54.8: ref_mag=11.60 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.4229 delta=0.18 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits at 19:58:05.06 -21:11:39.4: 11.75 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits at 19:44:26.55 -21:23:29.3: 11.76 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits at 19:48:13.88 -20:43:09.1: 11.73 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits at 20:11:03.84 -22:46:20.2: 11.73 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_05-02-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits at 19:44:26.55 -21:23:29.3: 11.78 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.77 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:44:26.55 -21:23:29.3: ref_mag=11.77 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=11.4891 delta=0.28 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_05-02-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits at 19:58:05.06 -21:11:39.4: 11.84 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.79 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:58:05.06 -21:11:39.4: ref_mag=11.79 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.4650 delta=0.32 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits at 19:50:26.78 -21:29:54.7: 11.73 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits at 20:23:30.52 -21:18:26.7: 11.80 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits at 19:49:25.17 -21:40:09.8: 11.73 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_05-02-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits at 19:48:13.88 -20:43:09.1: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:48:13.88 -20:43:09.1: at least one reference image reported edge (off-image or aperture/annulus past image boundary); cannot perform the forced-photometry cross-check
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits at 20:35:30.46 -22:18:48.9: 11.75 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_05-02-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits at 20:11:03.84 -22:46:20.2: 11.73 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.73 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:11:03.84 -22:46:20.2: ref_mag=11.73 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.4773 delta=0.25 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits at 19:50:17.43 -22:25:12.7: 11.77 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_05-02-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits at 19:50:26.78 -21:29:54.7: 11.78 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits at 20:19:10.19 -21:07:40.8: 11.72 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_05-02-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits at 19:49:25.17 -21:40:09.8: 11.83 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_05-02-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits at 20:23:30.52 -21:18:26.7: 11.81 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.75 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:50:26.78 -21:29:54.7: ref_mag=11.75 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.4490 delta=0.30 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.80 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.77 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:49:25.17 -21:40:09.8: ref_mag=11.77 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=11.4606 delta=0.31 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:23:30.52 -21:18:26.7: ref_mag=11.80 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.4478 delta=0.35 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_05-02-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits at 20:35:30.46 -22:18:48.9: 11.67 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.71 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:35:30.46 -22:18:48.9: ref_mag=11.71 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.4750 delta=0.24 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_05-02-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits at 19:50:17.43 -22:25:12.7: 11.77 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.77 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:50:17.43 -22:25:12.7: ref_mag=11.77 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.5028 delta=0.27 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_05-02-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits at 20:19:10.19 -21:07:40.8: 11.74 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.73 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:19:10.19 -21:07:40.8: ref_mag=11.73 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.4875 delta=0.24 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits at 20:33:10.41 -23:40:12.5: 11.16 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_05-02-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits at 20:33:10.41 -23:40:12.5: 11.09 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.13 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 20:33:10.41 -23:40:12.5: ref_mag=11.13 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=10.1859 delta=0.94 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out05214.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 11s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 2s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20159_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_03-18-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0149
The candidate 20159_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_03-18-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0149 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:39:44.62 -22:18:04.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20215_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_03-18-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0149
The candidate 20215_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_03-18-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0149 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20259_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_03-18-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0149
The candidate 20259_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_03-18-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0149 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:38:57.60 -24:53:27.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20289_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_03-18-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0149
The candidate 20289_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_03-18-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0149 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20293_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_03-18-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0149
The candidate 20293_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_03-18-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0149 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20294_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_03-18-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0149
The candidate 20294_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_03-18-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0149 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20300_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_03-18-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0149
The candidate 20300_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_03-18-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0149 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20302_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_03-18-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0149
The candidate 20302_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_03-18-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0149 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20307_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_03-18-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0149
The candidate 20307_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_03-18-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0149 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20310_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_03-18-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0149
The candidate 20310_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_03-18-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0149 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20317_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_03-18-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0149
The candidate 20317_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_03-18-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0149 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20318_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_03-18-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0149
The candidate 20318_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_03-18-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0149 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20321_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_03-18-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0149
The candidate 20321_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_03-18-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0149 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20322_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_03-18-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0149
The candidate 20322_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_03-18-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0149 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20323_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_03-18-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0149
The candidate 20323_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_03-18-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0149 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20326_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_03-18-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0149
The candidate 20326_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_03-18-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0149 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20327_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_03-18-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0149
The candidate 20327_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_03-18-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0149 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20330_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_03-18-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0149
The candidate 20330_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_03-18-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0149 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20331_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_03-18-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0149
The candidate 20331_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_03-18-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0149 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20333_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_03-18-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0149
The candidate 20333_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_03-18-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0149 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20334_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_03-18-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0149
The candidate 20334_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_03-18-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0149 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20338_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_03-18-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0149
The candidate 20338_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_03-18-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0149 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20344_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_03-18-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0149
The candidate 20344_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_03-18-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0149 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20348_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_03-18-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0149
The candidate 20348_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_03-18-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0149 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20349_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_03-18-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0149
The candidate 20349_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_03-18-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0149 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20351_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_03-18-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0149
The candidate 20351_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_03-18-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0149 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20353_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_03-18-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0149
The candidate 20353_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_03-18-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0149 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20360_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_03-18-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0149
The candidate 20360_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_03-18-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0149 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20362_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_03-18-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0149
The candidate 20362_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_03-18-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0149 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20363_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_03-18-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0149
The candidate 20363_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_03-18-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0149 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20364_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_03-18-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0149
The candidate 20364_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_03-18-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0149 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20370_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_03-18-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0149
The candidate 20370_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_03-18-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0149 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20372_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_03-18-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0149
The candidate 20372_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_03-18-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0149 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:56:20.76 -22:07:52.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 01380_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_03-18-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0149
The candidate 01380_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_03-18-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0149 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:55:56.46 -29:11:23.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 05214_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_03-18-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0149
Preparing report for the candidate 05214_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_03-18-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0149
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 13s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Cap-04-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
20:33:10.41 -23:40:12.5
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 3.5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_05-02-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-12_CI_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_034651_TTUQ1b1x1_1011115_ZQg9RJLY/fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_03-17-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0148.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-12_CI_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_034651_TTUQ1b1x1_1011115_ZQg9RJLY/fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_03-18-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0149.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_05-02-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_05-02-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-12_CI_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_034651_TTUQ1b1x1_1011115_ZQg9RJLY/fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_03-17-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0148.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-12_CI_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_034651_TTUQ1b1x1_1011115_ZQg9RJLY/fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_03-18-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0149.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_05-02-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_03-17-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0148.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_03-18-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0149.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/exclusion_list.txt
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_05-02-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_03-17-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0148.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_03-18-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0149.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits
Image size: 937.4'x624.6' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.87"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 20:09:38.992 -25:59:45.66 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.87"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_03-17-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0148.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_03-17-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0148.fits
Image size: 940.8'x626.8' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.89"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 20:09:30.648 -25:58:32.56 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 20:09:38.992 -25:59:45.66
Second-epoch image center 20:09:30.648 -25:58:32.56
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0373 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_03-18-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0149.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_03-18-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0149.fits
Image size: 940.8'x626.8' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.89"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 20:09:27.910 -25:59:12.02 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 20:09:38.992 -25:59:45.66
Second-epoch image center 20:09:27.910 -25:59:12.02
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0425 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 20:09:30.648 -25:58:32.56
Second-epoch second image center 20:09:27.910 -25:59:12.02
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01501 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits &> /tmp/tmp.Xaw1YZZxoC
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_05-02-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits &> /tmp/tmp.s9ROmpGHuG
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_05-02-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-12_CI_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_034651_TTUQ1b1x1_1011115_ZQg9RJLY/fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_03-17-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0148.fits &> /tmp/tmp.ibVzMmh0xd
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-12_CI_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_034651_TTUQ1b1x1_1011115_ZQg9RJLY/fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_03-17-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0148.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-12_CI_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_034651_TTUQ1b1x1_1011115_ZQg9RJLY/fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_03-18-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0149.fits &> /tmp/tmp.grHjYS8ini
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-12_CI_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_034651_TTUQ1b1x1_1011115_ZQg9RJLY/fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_03-18-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0149.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits and wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits and wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits and wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits) and catalog (wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 59775 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 293.3219 to 311.5256 deg, Dec -31.2659 to -20.5417 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 293.3219 to 311.5256 deg, Dec -31.2659 to -20.5417 deg
Loaded 9495 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 7512 out of 8123 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 8123 out of 59775 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.442600
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.442600
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.98
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.46
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.46
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 59775 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 293.3219 to 311.5256 deg, Dec -31.2659 to -20.5417 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 293.3219 to 311.5256 deg, Dec -31.2659 to -20.5417 deg
Loaded 9495 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 7512 out of 8123 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 8123 out of 59775 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits (aperture=4.8)
Read 55853 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 293.3400 to 311.4447 deg, Dec -31.2749 to -20.5514 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 293.3400 to 311.4447 deg, Dec -31.2749 to -20.5514 deg
Loaded 9461 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 7592 out of 8135 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 8135 out of 55853 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_05-02-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_05-02-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_05-02-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_05-02-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits (aperture=4.7)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 62 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 8000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.2 pix Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits
2.2 pix Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_05-02-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits
4.0 pix fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_03-17-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0148.fits
3.9 pix fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_03-18-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0149.fits
2.2 pix wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits
2.2 pix wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_05-02-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
14.5 mag. Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits
14.4 mag. Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_05-02-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits
13.9 mag. fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_03-17-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0148.fits
13.9 mag. fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_03-18-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0149.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 13.9 (SNR ) 13.3 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.Xaw1YZZxoC (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-12_CI_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_034651_TTUQ1b1x1_1011115_ZQg9RJLY/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits 572.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits' -> 'wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits.wcscat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=7, blended=2722, passed=59768
Got 59768 stars (including 56970 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 59768 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013019 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010416 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 349 (Dec -31.3 to -20.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 969 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 969 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 964 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.54"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 969 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 59240 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.50"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 349 (Dec -31.3 to -20.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 969 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 969 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 59239 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.51"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 969 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 59239 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.53"
Excluding outliers - 969 stars left (next iteration limit 1065)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits N_match=969 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.558 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.477 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.636 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.498 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.690 n_q1=249 n_q2=208 n_q3=247 n_q4=265 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.236
The image catalog is written to wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits -region wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.s9ROmpGHuG (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_05-02-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-12_CI_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_034651_TTUQ1b1x1_1011115_ZQg9RJLY/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_05-02-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits 572.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_05-02-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_05-02-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_05-02-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_05-02-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_05-02-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_05-02-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_05-02-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits' -> 'wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_05-02-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_05-02-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_05-02-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_05-02-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_05-02-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_05-02-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_05-02-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_05-02-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_05-02-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_05-02-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_05-02-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits.wcscat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=9, blended=2424, passed=55844
Got 55844 stars (including 53347 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_05-02-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 55844 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013019 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010416 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 349 (Dec -31.3 to -20.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 971 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 971 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 964 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.51"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 971 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 55202 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.49"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 349 (Dec -31.3 to -20.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 971 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 971 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 55202 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.49"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 971 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 55202 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.51"
Excluding outliers - 971 stars left (next iteration limit 1068)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_05-02-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits N_match=971 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.514 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.430 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.580 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.525 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.615 n_q1=249 n_q2=207 n_q3=250 n_q4=265 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.198
The image catalog is written to wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_05-02-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_05-02-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_05-02-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits -region wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_05-02-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_05-02-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.ibVzMmh0xd (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-12_CI_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_034651_TTUQ1b1x1_1011115_ZQg9RJLY/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-12_CI_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_034651_TTUQ1b1x1_1011115_ZQg9RJLY/fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_03-17-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0148.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-12_CI_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_034651_TTUQ1b1x1_1011115_ZQg9RJLY/fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_03-17-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0148.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-12_CI_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_034651_TTUQ1b1x1_1011115_ZQg9RJLY/fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_03-17-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0148.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-12_CI_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_034651_TTUQ1b1x1_1011115_ZQg9RJLY/fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_03-17-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0148.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-12_CI_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_034651_TTUQ1b1x1_1011115_ZQg9RJLY/fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_03-17-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0148.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-12_CI_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_034651_TTUQ1b1x1_1011115_ZQg9RJLY/fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_03-17-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0148.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_03-17-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0148.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_03-17-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0148.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_03-17-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0148.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_03-17-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0148.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_03-17-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0148.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_03-17-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0148.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_03-17-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0148.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-12_CI_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_034651_TTUQ1b1x1_1011115_ZQg9RJLY/fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_03-17-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0148.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_03-17-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0148.fits.wcscat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=8, blended=1398, passed=30657
Got 30657 stars (including 29230 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_03-17-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0148.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 30657 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 940.8'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 940.8 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013067 (47.0 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010453 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 292 to 351 (Dec -31.4 to -20.1)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 969 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 969 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 938 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 969 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 30108 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 292 to 351 (Dec -31.4 to -20.1)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 969 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 969 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 30111 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 969 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 30111 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Excluding outliers - 969 stars left (next iteration limit 1065)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_03-17-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0148.fits N_match=969 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.396 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.480 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.541 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.355 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.332 n_q1=212 n_q2=116 n_q3=344 n_q4=297 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.366
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_03-17-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0148.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_03-17-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0148.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-12_CI_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_034651_TTUQ1b1x1_1011115_ZQg9RJLY/fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_03-17-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0148.fits -region wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_03-17-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0148.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_03-17-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0148.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.grHjYS8ini (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-12_CI_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_034651_TTUQ1b1x1_1011115_ZQg9RJLY/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-12_CI_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_034651_TTUQ1b1x1_1011115_ZQg9RJLY/fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_03-18-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0149.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-12_CI_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_034651_TTUQ1b1x1_1011115_ZQg9RJLY/fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_03-18-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0149.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-12_CI_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_034651_TTUQ1b1x1_1011115_ZQg9RJLY/fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_03-18-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0149.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-12_CI_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_034651_TTUQ1b1x1_1011115_ZQg9RJLY/fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_03-18-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0149.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-12_CI_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_034651_TTUQ1b1x1_1011115_ZQg9RJLY/fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_03-18-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0149.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-12_CI_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_034651_TTUQ1b1x1_1011115_ZQg9RJLY/fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_03-18-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0149.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_03-18-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0149.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_03-18-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0149.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_03-18-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0149.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_03-18-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0149.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_03-18-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0149.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_03-18-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0149.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_03-18-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0149.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-12_CI_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_034651_TTUQ1b1x1_1011115_ZQg9RJLY/fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_03-18-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0149.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_03-18-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0149.fits.wcscat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=2, blended=1367, passed=29610
Got 29610 stars (including 28219 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_03-18-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0149.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 29610 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 940.8'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 940.8 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013067 (47.0 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010453 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 292 to 351 (Dec -31.4 to -20.1)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 969 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 969 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 939 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 969 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 28894 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 292 to 351 (Dec -31.4 to -20.1)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 969 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 969 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 28896 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 969 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 28896 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Excluding outliers - 969 stars left (next iteration limit 1065)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_03-18-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0149.fits N_match=969 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.366 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.423 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.496 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.348 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.315 n_q1=199 n_q2=112 n_q3=339 n_q4=319 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.355
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_03-18-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0149.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_03-18-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0149.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-12_CI_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_034651_TTUQ1b1x1_1011115_ZQg9RJLY/fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_03-18-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0149.fits -region wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_03-18-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0149.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_03-18-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0149.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_03-17-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0148.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-12_CI_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_034651_TTUQ1b1x1_1011115_ZQg9RJLY/wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_03-17-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0148.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_03-18-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0149.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-12_CI_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_034651_TTUQ1b1x1_1011115_ZQg9RJLY/wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_03-18-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0149.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Cap-04-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits at 19:38:14.02 -26:41:25.7: 14.84 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits at 20:06:47.70 -27:12:39.7: 10.91 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits at 20:42:55.66 -27:41:22.6: 11.58 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits at 19:43:48.90 -21:18:48.6: 13.65 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits at 19:43:39.04 -21:56:14.1: 12.40 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits at 19:37:08.17 -30:22:44.3: 9.84 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits at 19:40:53.49 -28:05:58.8: 12.87 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits at 20:34:42.40 -25:39:45.4: 12.93 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_05-02-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits at 20:06:47.70 -27:12:39.7: 10.98 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 10.94 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:06:47.70 -27:12:39.7: ref_mag=10.94 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=10.2342 delta=0.70 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_05-02-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits at 20:42:55.66 -27:41:22.6: 11.52 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_05-02-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits at 19:43:39.04 -21:56:14.1: 12.31 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_05-02-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits at 19:38:14.02 -26:41:25.7: 14.77 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.55 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_05-02-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits at 19:37:08.17 -30:22:44.3: 9.85 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.36 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:42:55.66 -27:41:22.6: ref_mag=11.55 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.2186 delta=-0.67 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:43:39.04 -21:56:14.1: ref_mag=12.36 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=12.4398 delta=-0.08 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 9.84 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_05-02-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits at 19:40:53.49 -28:05:58.8: 12.91 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:37:08.17 -30:22:44.3: ref_mag=9.84 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=11.9574 delta=-2.11 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.89 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:40:53.49 -28:05:58.8: ref_mag=12.89 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=12.7042 delta=0.18 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_05-02-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits at 19:43:48.90 -21:18:48.6: 13.69 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits at 19:43:33.14 -20:38:38.1: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.67 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:43:48.90 -21:18:48.6: ref_mag=13.67 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=13.5827 delta=0.09 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_05-02-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits at 20:34:42.40 -25:39:45.4: 12.81 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.87 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:34:42.40 -25:39:45.4: ref_mag=12.87 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=12.8520 delta=0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_05-02-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits at 19:43:33.14 -20:38:38.1: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:43:33.14 -20:38:38.1: at least one reference image reported edge (off-image or aperture/annulus past image boundary); cannot perform the forced-photometry cross-check
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits at 20:03:33.06 -29:21:16.6: 15.00 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits at 20:36:30.17 -22:41:24.9: 12.97 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits at 20:40:10.66 -22:37:44.2: 13.99 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits at 20:40:04.28 -22:40:00.3: 13.72 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits at 20:42:17.65 -21:56:26.8: 13.77 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits at 19:53:36.54 -20:58:41.3: 13.64 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits at 20:40:56.96 -21:15:04.3: 13.77 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits at 20:40:45.10 -21:14:53.1: 14.00 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_05-02-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits at 20:03:33.06 -29:21:16.6: 14.93 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits at 20:41:53.04 -21:34:37.0: 13.83 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_05-02-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits at 20:36:30.17 -22:41:24.9: 13.05 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.00 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:36:30.17 -22:41:24.9: ref_mag=13.00 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=12.9815 delta=0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_05-02-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits at 20:40:10.66 -22:37:44.2: 13.73 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.84 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:40:10.66 -22:37:44.2: ref_mag=13.84 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=13.2797 delta=0.56 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_05-02-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits at 20:40:04.28 -22:40:00.3: 13.63 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.67 +/- 0.08
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:40:04.28 -22:40:00.3: ref_mag=13.67 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=13.1587 delta=0.51 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_05-02-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits at 20:42:17.65 -21:56:26.8: 14.02 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.86 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:42:17.65 -21:56:26.8: ref_mag=13.86 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=13.3724 delta=0.49 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_05-02-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits at 20:40:56.96 -21:15:04.3: 14.22 +/- 0.22 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.89 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:40:56.96 -21:15:04.3: ref_mag=13.89 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=13.4053 delta=0.49 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_05-02-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits at 20:41:53.04 -21:34:37.0: 13.95 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_05-02-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits at 20:40:45.10 -21:14:53.1: 13.83 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.88 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.91 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_05-02-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits at 19:53:36.54 -20:58:41.3: 13.71 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:41:53.04 -21:34:37.0: ref_mag=13.88 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=13.4571 delta=0.42 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:40:45.10 -21:14:53.1: ref_mag=13.91 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=13.5854 delta=0.32 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.67 +/- 0.08
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:53:36.54 -20:58:41.3: ref_mag=13.67 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=13.4935 delta=0.18 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits at 19:43:35.64 -21:05:33.5: 13.96 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits at 20:41:50.71 -21:11:49.7: 13.86 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits at 20:39:47.86 -21:07:55.8: 14.03 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits at 20:43:03.34 -21:31:22.0: 13.66 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits at 20:38:09.99 -22:18:48.8: 14.24 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits at 20:29:02.82 -23:21:15.5: 14.03 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits at 20:40:50.74 -21:19:07.9: 13.83 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits at 20:37:53.44 -21:10:10.4: 13.84 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_05-02-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits at 19:43:35.64 -21:05:33.5: 13.78 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.86 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:43:35.64 -21:05:33.5: ref_mag=13.86 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=13.7477 delta=0.11 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_05-02-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits at 20:41:50.71 -21:11:49.7: 14.34 +/- 0.27 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.98 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:41:50.71 -21:11:49.7: ref_mag=13.98 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=13.5918 delta=0.39 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_05-02-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits at 20:39:47.86 -21:07:55.8: 14.02 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.02 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_05-02-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits at 20:38:09.99 -22:18:48.8: 14.26 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:39:47.86 -21:07:55.8: ref_mag=14.02 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=13.6396 delta=0.38 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_05-02-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits at 20:29:02.82 -23:21:15.5: 13.93 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_05-02-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits at 20:37:53.44 -21:10:10.4: 14.55 +/- 0.27 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_05-02-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits at 20:43:03.34 -21:31:22.0: 13.91 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.25 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:38:09.99 -22:18:48.8: ref_mag=14.25 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=13.6251 delta=0.63 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.98 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_05-02-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits at 20:40:50.74 -21:19:07.9: 13.94 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.75 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:29:02.82 -23:21:15.5: ref_mag=13.98 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=13.4440 delta=0.53 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.98 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:43:03.34 -21:31:22.0: ref_mag=13.75 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=13.5986 delta=0.15 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:37:53.44 -21:10:10.4: ref_mag=13.98 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=13.9088 delta=0.07 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.87 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:40:50.74 -21:19:07.9: ref_mag=13.87 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=13.6925 delta=0.18 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits at 20:40:59.39 -21:51:17.4: 13.85 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits at 20:20:41.73 -21:40:45.0: 13.95 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits at 20:37:37.19 -22:13:52.4: 14.70 +/- 0.28 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits at 20:43:31.57 -29:53:20.6: 11.67 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_05-02-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits at 20:40:59.39 -21:51:17.4: 13.95 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits at 19:51:27.50 -27:54:12.4: 13.20 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.90 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:40:59.39 -21:51:17.4: ref_mag=13.90 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=13.7290 delta=0.17 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_05-02-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits at 20:20:41.73 -21:40:45.0: 13.96 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.96 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:20:41.73 -21:40:45.0: ref_mag=13.96 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=13.8540 delta=0.10 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_05-02-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits at 20:37:37.19 -22:13:52.4: 14.20 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.37 +/- 0.17
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:37:37.19 -22:13:52.4: ref_mag=14.37 +/- 0.17 new_mean_mag=13.8337 delta=0.54 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_05-02-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits at 20:43:31.57 -29:53:20.6: 11.67 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_05-02-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits at 19:51:27.50 -27:54:12.4: 12.86 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.98 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.67 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 19:51:27.50 -27:54:12.4: ref_mag=12.98 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=11.9872 delta=1.00 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:43:31.57 -29:53:20.6: ref_mag=11.67 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=10.9717 delta=0.70 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits at 20:43:05.06 -29:40:27.6: 13.17 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits at 20:41:30.16 -29:58:19.8: 11.74 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits at 20:43:15.84 -29:41:31.0: 11.86 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_05-02-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits at 20:43:05.06 -29:40:27.6: 13.20 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_05-02-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits at 20:41:30.16 -29:58:19.8: 11.71 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.18 +/- 0.07
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.72 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 20:43:05.06 -29:40:27.6: ref_mag=13.18 +/- 0.07 new_mean_mag=12.2364 delta=0.94 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:41:30.16 -29:58:19.8: ref_mag=11.72 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=11.0863 delta=0.64 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_05-02-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits at 20:43:15.84 -29:41:31.0: 11.89 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.87 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:43:15.84 -29:41:31.0: ref_mag=11.87 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=11.1543 delta=0.72 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits at 19:42:31.23 -22:06:14.2: 13.45 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits at 20:42:59.73 -30:00:53.7: 12.26 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits at 20:40:02.70 -28:47:30.2: 11.02 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_05-02-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits at 19:42:31.23 -22:06:14.2: 13.40 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.43 +/- 0.07
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 19:42:31.23 -22:06:14.2: ref_mag=13.43 +/- 0.07 new_mean_mag=12.2578 delta=1.17 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_05-02-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits at 20:42:59.73 -30:00:53.7: 12.11 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.19 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:42:59.73 -30:00:53.7: ref_mag=12.19 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=11.4309 delta=0.76 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_05-02-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits at 20:40:02.70 -28:47:30.2: 11.02 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.02 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 20:40:02.70 -28:47:30.2: ref_mag=11.02 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=9.6534 delta=1.36 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits at 20:43:02.05 -29:33:19.3: 12.73 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits at 20:41:51.86 -29:38:35.2: 12.64 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_05-02-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits at 20:43:02.05 -29:33:19.3: 12.77 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_05-02-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits at 20:41:51.86 -29:38:35.2: 12.66 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.75 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:43:02.05 -29:33:19.3: ref_mag=12.75 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=11.9177 delta=0.83 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.65 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:41:51.86 -29:38:35.2: ref_mag=12.65 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=11.8742 delta=0.78 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits at 20:41:51.34 -29:50:32.8: 12.45 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_05-02-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits at 20:41:51.34 -29:50:32.8: 12.47 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.46 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 20:41:51.34 -29:50:32.8: ref_mag=12.46 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=11.5186 delta=0.94 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits at 20:39:41.23 -30:09:32.2: 12.43 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits at 20:05:22.12 -25:27:10.3: 12.45 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_05-02-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits at 20:39:41.23 -30:09:32.2: 12.42 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.43 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:39:41.23 -30:09:32.2: ref_mag=12.43 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=11.8616 delta=0.56 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits at 20:43:14.49 -29:03:16.5: 12.12 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_05-02-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits at 20:05:22.12 -25:27:10.3: 12.47 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.46 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 20:05:22.12 -25:27:10.3: ref_mag=12.46 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=11.4944 delta=0.96 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits at 19:37:02.94 -25:51:25.1: 11.43 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_05-02-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits at 20:43:14.49 -29:03:16.5: 12.10 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.11 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:43:14.49 -29:03:16.5: ref_mag=12.11 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=11.6158 delta=0.50 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_05-02-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits at 19:37:02.94 -25:51:25.1: 11.45 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.44 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 19:37:02.94 -25:51:25.1: ref_mag=11.44 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=10.4617 delta=0.98 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out05158.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out04475.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out09371.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out14887.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out25680.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out29634.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out50115.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out73655.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out74013.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 21s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 4s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 73334_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_03-18-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0149
The candidate 73334_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_03-18-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0149 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 73344_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_03-18-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0149
The candidate 73344_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_03-18-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0149 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 73350_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_03-18-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0149
The candidate 73350_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_03-18-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0149 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 73352_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_03-18-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0149
The candidate 73352_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_03-18-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0149 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 73366_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_03-18-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0149
The candidate 73366_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_03-18-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0149 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 73458_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_03-18-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0149
The candidate 73458_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_03-18-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0149 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 73600_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_03-18-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0149
The candidate 73600_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_03-18-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0149 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:39:55.41 -23:25:42.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 73655_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_03-18-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0149
Preparing report for the candidate 73655_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_03-18-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0149
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 73800_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_03-18-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0149
The candidate 73800_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_03-18-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0149 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 73807_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_03-18-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0149
The candidate 73807_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_03-18-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0149 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:42:09.10 -28:46:10.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 73836_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_03-18-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0149
The candidate 73836_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_03-18-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0149 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 73865_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_03-18-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0149
The candidate 73865_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_03-18-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0149 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:03:01.04 -22:19:06.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 73971_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_03-18-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0149
The candidate 73971_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_03-18-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0149 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:40:39.30 -24:13:53.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 74013_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_03-18-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0149
Preparing report for the candidate 74013_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_03-18-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0149
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 74053_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_03-18-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0149
The candidate 74053_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_03-18-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0149 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:59:58.10 -22:58:16.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 74143_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_03-18-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0149
The candidate 74143_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_03-18-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0149 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 74187_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_03-18-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0149
The candidate 74187_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_03-18-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0149 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:07:55.40 -22:18:14.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 74226_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_03-18-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0149
The candidate 74226_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_03-18-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0149 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:07:23.45 -22:48:43.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 74268_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_03-18-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0149
The candidate 74268_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_03-18-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0149 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:00:17.10 -27:05:37.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 74286_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_03-18-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0149
The candidate 74286_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_03-18-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0149 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 74287_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_03-18-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0149
The candidate 74287_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_03-18-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0149 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 74292_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_03-18-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0149
The candidate 74292_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_03-18-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0149 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 74307_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_03-18-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0149
The candidate 74307_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_03-18-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0149 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 74313_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_03-18-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0149
The candidate 74313_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_03-18-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0149 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 74363_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_03-18-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0149
The candidate 74363_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_03-18-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0149 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 74380_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_03-18-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0149
The candidate 74380_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_03-18-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0149 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 74382_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_03-18-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0149
The candidate 74382_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_03-18-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0149 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:48:13.34 -23:49:18.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 74436_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_03-18-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0149
The candidate 74436_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_03-18-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0149 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 74452_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_03-18-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0149
The candidate 74452_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_03-18-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0149 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 74457_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_03-18-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0149
The candidate 74457_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_03-18-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0149 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 74474_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_03-18-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0149
The candidate 74474_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_03-18-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0149 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 74485_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_03-18-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0149
The candidate 74485_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_03-18-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0149 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 74511_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_03-18-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0149
The candidate 74511_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_03-18-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0149 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 74541_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_03-18-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0149
The candidate 74541_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_03-18-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0149 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 74561_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_03-18-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0149
The candidate 74561_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_03-18-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0149 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 74568_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_03-18-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0149
The candidate 74568_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_03-18-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0149 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 74586_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_03-18-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0149
The candidate 74586_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_03-18-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0149 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 74593_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_03-18-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0149
The candidate 74593_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_03-18-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0149 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 43287_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_03-18-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0149
The candidate 43287_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_03-18-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0149 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:33:10.40 -23:40:12.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_local.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51053_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_03-18-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0149
The candidate 51053_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_03-18-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0149 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:39:44.61 -22:18:04.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32137_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_03-18-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0149
The candidate 32137_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_03-18-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0149 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:38:57.59 -24:53:27.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 14887_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_03-18-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0149
Preparing report for the candidate 14887_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_03-18-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0149
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 04155_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_03-18-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0149
The candidate 04155_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_03-18-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0149 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 05026_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_03-18-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0149
The candidate 05026_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_03-18-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0149 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 05158_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_03-18-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0149
The candidate 05158_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_03-18-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0149 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:43:05.06 -29:40:27.6 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=12.23, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=13.21)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 3.499 6795236877635301120 310.77077643730 -29.67339878026 12.2893 11.5998 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#3.499#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 03942_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_03-18-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0149
The candidate 03942_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_03-18-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0149 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 38707_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_03-18-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0149
The candidate 38707_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_03-18-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0149 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:53:18.02 -23:41:50.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 50115_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_03-18-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0149
Preparing report for the candidate 50115_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_03-18-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0149
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 03668_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_03-18-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0149
The candidate 03668_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_03-18-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0149 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 09371_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_03-18-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0149
Preparing report for the candidate 09371_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_03-18-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0149
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21222_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_03-18-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0149
The candidate 21222_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_03-18-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0149 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:41:33.29 -26:40:22.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 05658_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_03-18-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0149
The candidate 05658_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_03-18-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0149 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 05386_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_03-18-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0149
The candidate 05386_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_03-18-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0149 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 04475_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_03-18-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0149
Preparing report for the candidate 04475_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_03-18-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0149
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 08080_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_03-18-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0149
The candidate 08080_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_03-18-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0149 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:55:56.47 -29:11:23.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 69887_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_03-18-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0149
The candidate 69887_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_03-18-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0149 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 13383_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_03-18-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0149
The candidate 13383_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_03-18-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0149 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:47:09.52 -28:08:19.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 29634_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_03-18-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0149
Preparing report for the candidate 29634_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_03-18-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0149
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 07963_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_03-18-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0149
The candidate 07963_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_03-18-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0149 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 25680_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_03-18-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0149
Preparing report for the candidate 25680_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_03-18-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0149
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 30983_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_03-18-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0149
The candidate 30983_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_03-18-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0149 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:50:06.76 -25:11:38.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 15388_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_03-18-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0149
The candidate 15388_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_03-18-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0149 did not pass the final checks
