This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-12_CI_UMa-13-Q1b1x1_022450_TTUQ1b1x1_1656078_YENUflAT
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 12.2982 2461203.7982 13.11 11:29:29.80 +38:09:14.1
175.07243 69.60045 galactic UMa Second-epoch detections are separated by 3.0" and 2.7 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
online_id | target | 11:29:29.80 +38:09:14.1 (user input) | T | P | (position from user input) J-Ks=0.385+/-0.031 (G)
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-13-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_01-16-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0324.fits at 11:29:29.80 +38:09:14.1: 14.02 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-13-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-30-09_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0212.fits at 11:29:29.80 +38:09:14.1: 14.02 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.02 +/- 0.04
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 06 12.2982* 11 29 29.80 +38 09 14.1 13.1 U UMa 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
target,2461203.7982,13.11,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
target 20260612.2982 13.11CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 12.2982 2461203.7982 13.23 11:39:35.58 +33:57:54.6
184.67312 73.12025 galactic UMa Second-epoch detections are separated by 3.1" and 2.9 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
online_id | target | 11:39:35.58 +33:57:54.6 (user input) | T | P | (position from user input) SpType: G5 (LAMOST DR5) J-Ks=0.748+/-0.031 (K)
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-13-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_01-16-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0324.fits at 11:39:35.58 +33:57:54.6: 14.20 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-13-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-30-09_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0212.fits at 11:39:35.58 +33:57:54.6: 14.11 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.15 +/- 0.04
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 06 12.2982* 11 39 35.58 +33 57 54.6 13.2 U UMa 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
target,2461203.7982,13.23,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
target 20260612.2982 13.23CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 12.2982 2461203.7982 13.15 12:36:13.99 +34:42:59.4
145.23035 81.74278 galactic CVn Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.6" and 3.7 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
online_id | target | 12:36:13.99 +34:42:59.4 (user input) | T | P | (position from user input) SpType: G7 (LAMOST DR5) J-Ks=0.454+/-0.032 (G)
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-13-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_01-16-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0324.fits at 12:36:13.99 +34:42:59.4: 14.06 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-13-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-30-09_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0212.fits at 12:36:13.99 +34:42:59.4: 14.12 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.09 +/- 0.05
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
target,2461203.7982,13.15,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
target 20260612.2982 13.15CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 12.2982 2461203.7982 13.17 11:25:18.37 +38:44:48.4
174.61444 68.60149 galactic UMa Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.5" and 3.0 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
online_id | target | 11:25:18.37 +38:44:48.4 (user input) | T | P | (position from user input) SpType: G3 (LAMOST DR5) J-Ks=0.415+/-0.033 (G)
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-13-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_01-16-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0324.fits at 11:25:18.37 +38:44:48.4: 14.13 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-13-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-30-09_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0212.fits at 11:25:18.37 +38:44:48.4: 14.14 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.13 +/- 0.04
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 06 12.2982* 11 25 18.37 +38 44 48.4 13.2 U UMa 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
target,2461203.7982,13.17,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
target 20260612.2982 13.17CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 12.2982 2461203.7982 12.93 11:22:13.10 +38:45:60.0
175.27800 68.05129 galactic UMa Second-epoch detections are separated by 2.7" and 2.8 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
online_id | ATO J170.5548+38.7670 | 11:22:13.10 +38:45:60.0 (user input) | dubious (ATLAS) | (ATLAS) | (position from user input) SpType: G3 (LAMOST DR5) J-Ks=0.335+/-0.045 (G)
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-13-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_01-16-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0324.fits at 11:22:13.10 +38:45:60.0: 13.82 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-13-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-30-09_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0212.fits at 11:22:13.10 +38:45:60.0: 13.94 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.87 +/- 0.04
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 06 12.2982* 11 22 13.10 +38 45 60.0 12.9 U UMa 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ATO J170.5548+38.7670,2461203.7982,12.93,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ATO J170.5548+38.7670 20260612.2982 12.93CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 12.2982 2461203.7982 12.95 11:22:51.01 +39:55:13.2
172.39969 67.64128 galactic UMa Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.3" and 3.3 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
online_id | target | 11:22:51.01 +39:55:13.2 (user input) | T | P | (position from user input) SpType: G1 (LAMOST DR5) J-Ks=0.349+/-0.031 (G)
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-13-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_01-16-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0324.fits at 11:22:51.01 +39:55:13.2: 13.80 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-13-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-30-09_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0212.fits at 11:22:51.01 +39:55:13.2: 13.88 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.83 +/- 0.04
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 06 12.2982* 11 22 51.01 +39 55 13.2 12.9 U UMa 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
target,2461203.7982,12.95,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
target 20260612.2982 12.95CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 12.2982 2461203.7982 13.09 11:24:45.47 +41:55:47.4
167.44277 66.92925 galactic UMa Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.1" and 3.0 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
online_id | target | 11:24:45.47 +41:55:47.4 (user input) | T | P | (position from user input) SpType: F9 (LAMOST DR5) J-Ks=0.428+/-0.033 (G)
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-13-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_01-16-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0324.fits at 11:24:45.47 +41:55:47.4: 14.10 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-13-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-30-09_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0212.fits at 11:24:45.47 +41:55:47.4: 14.01 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.06 +/- 0.05
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 06 12.2982* 11 24 45.47 +41 55 47.4 13.1 U UMa 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
target,2461203.7982,13.09,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
target 20260612.2982 13.09CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 12.2982 2461203.7982 13.16 11:28:57.35 +41:02:54.6
168.25660 68.06846 galactic UMa Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.1" and 3.1 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
online_id | target | 11:28:57.35 +41:02:54.6 (user input) | T | P | (position from user input) SpType: G3 (LAMOST DR5) J-Ks=0.349+/-0.031 (G)
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-13-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_01-16-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0324.fits at 11:28:57.35 +41:02:54.6: 14.08 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-13-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-30-09_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0212.fits at 11:28:57.35 +41:02:54.6: 14.09 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.08 +/- 0.04
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 06 12.2982* 11 28 57.35 +41 02 54.6 13.2 U UMa 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
target,2461203.7982,13.16,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
target 20260612.2982 13.16CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 12.2982 2461203.7982 13.07 12:34:27.06 +36:26:14.2
143.03533 80.01871 galactic CVn Second-epoch detections are separated by 2.2" and 3.9 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
online_id | target | 12:34:27.06 +36:26:14.2 (user input) | T | P | (position from user input) SpType: G2 (LAMOST DR5) J-Ks=0.413+/-0.035 (G)
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-13-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_01-16-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0324.fits at 12:34:27.06 +36:26:14.2: 13.99 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-13-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-30-09_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0212.fits at 12:34:27.06 +36:26:14.2: 14.10 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.03 +/- 0.04
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
target,2461203.7982,13.07,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
target 20260612.2982 13.07CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 12.2982 2461203.7982 13.04 11:22:55.07 +37:51:17.6
177.36991 68.55344 galactic UMa Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.7" and 3.3 pix
The object was found in VSX 2" HAT-183-0001932
Type: VAR
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
13.961 V Y 0.016 V 20.049482000000
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-13-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_01-16-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0324.fits at 11:22:55.07 +37:51:17.6: 13.97 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-13-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-30-09_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0212.fits at 11:22:55.07 +37:51:17.6: 13.95 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.96 +/- 0.04
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 06 12.2982* 11 22 55.07 +37 51 17.6 13.0 U UMa 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
HAT-183-0001932,2461203.7982,13.04,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
HAT-183-0001932 20260612.2982 13.04CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461093.80339146 22.02.2026 07:16:43.022 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-13-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_01-16-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0324.fits
First image: 2461093.80339146 22.02.2026 07:16:43.022 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-13-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_01-16-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0324.fits
Last image: 2461203.79838520 12.06.2026 07:09:30.481 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-12_CI_UMa-13-Q1b1x1_022450_TTUQ1b1x1_1656078_YENUflAT/fd_UMa-13-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-09-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 0
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.48
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 7 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 5407
Objects passed selection criteria: 5397
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.8 2.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.8 2.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 4047.75
Average stars matched: 3927.5 (97.0292 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 111696 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Wed Jun 10 15:05:04 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-96-gc6da043e
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-06-10)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Fri Jun 12 06:27:58 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461093.80339146 22.02.2026 07:16:43.022 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-13-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_01-16-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0324.fits
First image: 2461093.80339146 22.02.2026 07:16:43.022 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-13-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_01-16-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0324.fits
Last image: 2461203.79838520 12.06.2026 07:09:30.481 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-12_CI_UMa-13-Q1b1x1_022450_TTUQ1b1x1_1656078_YENUflAT/fd_UMa-13-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-09-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 58
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.23
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 20 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 25611
Objects passed selection criteria: 25556
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.9 3.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.9 3.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 20119
Average stars matched: 19495 (96.8985 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 130172 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Wed Jun 10 15:05:04 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-96-gc6da043e
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-06-10)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Fri Jun 12 06:30:51 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 3.5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-13-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_01-16-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0324.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-13-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-30-09_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0212.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-12_CI_UMa-13-Q1b1x1_022450_TTUQ1b1x1_1656078_YENUflAT/fd_UMa-13-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-08-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0072.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-12_CI_UMa-13-Q1b1x1_022450_TTUQ1b1x1_1656078_YENUflAT/fd_UMa-13-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-09-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved UMa-13-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_01-16-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0324.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved UMa-13-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-30-09_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0212.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-13-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_01-16-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0324.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-13-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-30-09_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0212.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-12_CI_UMa-13-Q1b1x1_022450_TTUQ1b1x1_1656078_YENUflAT/fd_UMa-13-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-08-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0072.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-12_CI_UMa-13-Q1b1x1_022450_TTUQ1b1x1_1656078_YENUflAT/fd_UMa-13-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-09-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461203.79795896
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_UMa-13-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_01-16-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0324.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_UMa-13-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_01-16-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0324.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_UMa-13-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_01-16-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0324.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_UMa-13-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_01-16-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0324.fits'
wcs_UMa-13-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-30-09_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0212.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_UMa-13-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-30-09_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0212.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_UMa-13-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-30-09_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0212.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_UMa-13-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-30-09_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0212.fits'
wcs_fd_UMa-13-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-08-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0072.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_UMa-13-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-08-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0072.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_UMa-13-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-08-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0072.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_UMa-13-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-08-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0072.fits'
wcs_fd_UMa-13-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-09-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_UMa-13-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-09-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_UMa-13-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-09-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_UMa-13-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-09-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073.fits'
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_UMa-13-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_01-16-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0324.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_UMa-13-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_01-16-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0324.fits
Image size: 941.7'x627.1' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 12:00:01.705 +38:00:21.68 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_UMa-13-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-08-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0072.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_UMa-13-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-08-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0072.fits
Image size: 941.9'x626.7' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 12:00:00.724 +37:59:09.05 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 12:00:01.705 +38:00:21.68
Second-epoch image center 12:00:00.724 +37:59:09.05
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0204 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_UMa-13-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-09-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_UMa-13-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-09-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073.fits
Image size: 941.9'x626.7' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 12:00:01.722 +37:59:25.26 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 12:00:01.705 +38:00:21.68
Second-epoch image center 12:00:01.722 +37:59:25.26
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0157 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 12:00:00.724 +37:59:09.05
Second-epoch second image center 12:00:01.722 +37:59:25.26
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00557 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-13-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_01-16-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0324.fits &> /tmp/tmp.DXNCna1040
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-13-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_01-16-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0324.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-13-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-30-09_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0212.fits &> /tmp/tmp.pl0Sqjn78j
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-13-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-30-09_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0212.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-12_CI_UMa-13-Q1b1x1_022450_TTUQ1b1x1_1656078_YENUflAT/fd_UMa-13-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-08-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0072.fits &> /tmp/tmp.8YuwdUqzAK
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-12_CI_UMa-13-Q1b1x1_022450_TTUQ1b1x1_1656078_YENUflAT/fd_UMa-13-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-08-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0072.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-12_CI_UMa-13-Q1b1x1_022450_TTUQ1b1x1_1656078_YENUflAT/fd_UMa-13-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-09-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073.fits &> /tmp/tmp.XifXkH7Zf7
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-12_CI_UMa-13-Q1b1x1_022450_TTUQ1b1x1_1656078_YENUflAT/fd_UMa-13-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-09-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_UMa-13-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_01-16-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0324.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_UMa-13-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_01-16-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0324.fits and wcs_UMa-13-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_01-16-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0324.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_UMa-13-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_01-16-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0324.fits and wcs_UMa-13-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_01-16-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0324.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_UMa-13-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_01-16-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0324.fits and wcs_UMa-13-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_01-16-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0324.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_UMa-13-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_01-16-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0324.fits) and catalog (wcs_UMa-13-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_01-16-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0324.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_UMa-13-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_01-16-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0324.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 5969 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 169.1632 to 190.3056 deg, Dec +32.0987 to +43.3761 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 169.1632 to 190.3056 deg, Dec 32.0987 to 43.3761 deg
Loaded 4130 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 2955 out of 3138 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3138 out of 5969 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.926000
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.926000
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.48
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.45
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.45
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 5969 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 169.1632 to 190.3056 deg, Dec +32.0987 to +43.3761 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 169.1632 to 190.3056 deg, Dec 32.0987 to 43.3761 deg
Loaded 4130 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 2955 out of 3138 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3138 out of 5969 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_UMa-13-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_01-16-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0324.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_UMa-13-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_01-16-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0324.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_UMa-13-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_01-16-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0324.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_UMa-13-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_01-16-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0324.fits (aperture=6.5)
Read 5691 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 169.4150 to 190.6298 deg, Dec +32.4430 to +43.2831 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 169.4150 to 190.6298 deg, Dec 32.4430 to 43.2831 deg
Loaded 3977 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 2997 out of 3107 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3107 out of 5691 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_UMa-13-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-30-09_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0212.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_UMa-13-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-30-09_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0212.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_UMa-13-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-30-09_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0212.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_UMa-13-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-30-09_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0212.fits (aperture=6.5)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 0 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 8000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.2 pix UMa-13-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_01-16-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0324.fits
2.4 pix UMa-13-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-30-09_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0212.fits
2.5 pix fd_UMa-13-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-08-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0072.fits
2.5 pix fd_UMa-13-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-09-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073.fits
2.2 pix wcs_UMa-13-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_01-16-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0324.fits
2.4 pix wcs_UMa-13-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-30-09_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0212.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.4 mag. UMa-13-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_01-16-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0324.fits
15.3 mag. UMa-13-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-30-09_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0212.fits
14.1 mag. fd_UMa-13-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-08-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0072.fits
13.9 mag. fd_UMa-13-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-09-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 13.9 (SNR ) 11.3 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.DXNCna1040 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-12_CI_UMa-13-Q1b1x1_022450_TTUQ1b1x1_1656078_YENUflAT/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-13-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_01-16-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0324.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-13-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_01-16-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0324.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-13-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_01-16-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0324.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-13-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_01-16-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0324.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-13-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_01-16-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0324.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-13-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_01-16-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0324.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-13-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_01-16-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0324.fits' -> 'wcs_UMa-13-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_01-16-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0324.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-13-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_01-16-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0324.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_UMa-13-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_01-16-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0324.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_UMa-13-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_01-16-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0324.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_UMa-13-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_01-16-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0324.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-13-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_01-16-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0324.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_UMa-13-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_01-16-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0324.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-13-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_01-16-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0324.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_UMa-13-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_01-16-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0324.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-13-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_01-16-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0324.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_UMa-13-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_01-16-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0324.fits.wcscat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=429, passed=5969
Got 5969 stars (including 5538 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_UMa-13-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_01-16-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0324.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 5969 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.7'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.7 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013079 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010463 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 610 to 668 (Dec 32.1 to 43.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 974 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 973 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 966 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 973 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5902 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 610 to 668 (Dec 32.1 to 43.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 974 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 973 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5901 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 973 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5901 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Excluding outliers - 973 stars left (next iteration limit 1070)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=UMa-13-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_01-16-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0324.fits N_match=973 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.429 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.472 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.433 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.433 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.375 n_q1=225 n_q2=244 n_q3=276 n_q4=228 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.100
The image catalog is written to wcs_UMa-13-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_01-16-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0324.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_UMa-13-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_01-16-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0324.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-13-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_01-16-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0324.fits -region wcs_UMa-13-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_01-16-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0324.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_UMa-13-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_01-16-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0324.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.pl0Sqjn78j (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-13-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-30-09_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0212.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-12_CI_UMa-13-Q1b1x1_022450_TTUQ1b1x1_1656078_YENUflAT/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-13-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-30-09_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0212.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-13-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-30-09_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0212.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-13-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-30-09_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0212.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-13-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-30-09_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0212.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-13-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-30-09_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0212.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-13-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-30-09_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0212.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-13-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-30-09_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0212.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-13-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-30-09_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0212.fits' -> 'wcs_UMa-13-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-30-09_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0212.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-13-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-30-09_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0212.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_UMa-13-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-30-09_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0212.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_UMa-13-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-30-09_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0212.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_UMa-13-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-30-09_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0212.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-13-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-30-09_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0212.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_UMa-13-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-30-09_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0212.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-13-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-30-09_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0212.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_UMa-13-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-30-09_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0212.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-13-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-30-09_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0212.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_UMa-13-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-30-09_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0212.fits.wcscat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=343, passed=5691
Got 5691 stars (including 5342 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_UMa-13-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-30-09_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0212.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 5691 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013018 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010414 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 612 to 668 (Dec 32.4 to 43.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 972 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 972 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 968 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 972 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5662 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 612 to 668 (Dec 32.4 to 43.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 972 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 972 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5661 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 972 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5661 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Excluding outliers - 972 stars left (next iteration limit 1069)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=UMa-13-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-30-09_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0212.fits N_match=972 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.421 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.334 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.428 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.427 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.487 n_q1=213 n_q2=296 n_q3=221 n_q4=242 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.157
The image catalog is written to wcs_UMa-13-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-30-09_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0212.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_UMa-13-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-30-09_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0212.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-13-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-30-09_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0212.fits -region wcs_UMa-13-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-30-09_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0212.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_UMa-13-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-30-09_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0212.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.8YuwdUqzAK (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-12_CI_UMa-13-Q1b1x1_022450_TTUQ1b1x1_1656078_YENUflAT/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-12_CI_UMa-13-Q1b1x1_022450_TTUQ1b1x1_1656078_YENUflAT/fd_UMa-13-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-08-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0072.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-12_CI_UMa-13-Q1b1x1_022450_TTUQ1b1x1_1656078_YENUflAT/fd_UMa-13-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-08-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0072.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-12_CI_UMa-13-Q1b1x1_022450_TTUQ1b1x1_1656078_YENUflAT/fd_UMa-13-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-08-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0072.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-12_CI_UMa-13-Q1b1x1_022450_TTUQ1b1x1_1656078_YENUflAT/fd_UMa-13-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-08-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0072.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-12_CI_UMa-13-Q1b1x1_022450_TTUQ1b1x1_1656078_YENUflAT/fd_UMa-13-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-08-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0072.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-12_CI_UMa-13-Q1b1x1_022450_TTUQ1b1x1_1656078_YENUflAT/fd_UMa-13-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-08-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0072.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_UMa-13-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-08-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0072.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_UMa-13-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-08-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0072.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_UMa-13-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-08-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0072.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-13-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-08-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0072.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_UMa-13-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-08-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0072.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-13-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-08-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0072.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_UMa-13-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-08-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0072.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-12_CI_UMa-13-Q1b1x1_022450_TTUQ1b1x1_1656078_YENUflAT/fd_UMa-13-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-08-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0072.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_UMa-13-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-08-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0072.fits.wcscat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=114, passed=2296
Got 2296 stars (including 2180 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_UMa-13-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-08-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0072.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 2296 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.9'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.9 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013082 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010466 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 610 to 668 (Dec 32.0 to 43.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 971 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 971 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 955 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 971 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 2267 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 610 to 668 (Dec 32.0 to 43.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 971 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 971 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 2267 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 971 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 2267 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Excluding outliers - 971 stars left (next iteration limit 1068)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_UMa-13-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-08-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0072.fits N_match=971 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.400 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.374 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.415 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.365 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.471 n_q1=228 n_q2=278 n_q3=234 n_q4=231 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.178
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_UMa-13-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-08-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0072.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_UMa-13-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-08-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0072.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-12_CI_UMa-13-Q1b1x1_022450_TTUQ1b1x1_1656078_YENUflAT/fd_UMa-13-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-08-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0072.fits -region wcs_fd_UMa-13-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-08-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0072.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_UMa-13-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-08-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0072.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.XifXkH7Zf7 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-12_CI_UMa-13-Q1b1x1_022450_TTUQ1b1x1_1656078_YENUflAT/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-12_CI_UMa-13-Q1b1x1_022450_TTUQ1b1x1_1656078_YENUflAT/fd_UMa-13-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-09-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-12_CI_UMa-13-Q1b1x1_022450_TTUQ1b1x1_1656078_YENUflAT/fd_UMa-13-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-09-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-12_CI_UMa-13-Q1b1x1_022450_TTUQ1b1x1_1656078_YENUflAT/fd_UMa-13-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-09-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-12_CI_UMa-13-Q1b1x1_022450_TTUQ1b1x1_1656078_YENUflAT/fd_UMa-13-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-09-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-12_CI_UMa-13-Q1b1x1_022450_TTUQ1b1x1_1656078_YENUflAT/fd_UMa-13-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-09-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-12_CI_UMa-13-Q1b1x1_022450_TTUQ1b1x1_1656078_YENUflAT/fd_UMa-13-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-09-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_UMa-13-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-09-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_UMa-13-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-09-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_UMa-13-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-09-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-13-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-09-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_UMa-13-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-09-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-13-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-09-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_UMa-13-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-09-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-12_CI_UMa-13-Q1b1x1_022450_TTUQ1b1x1_1656078_YENUflAT/fd_UMa-13-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-09-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_UMa-13-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-09-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073.fits.wcscat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=117, passed=2318
Got 2318 stars (including 2199 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_UMa-13-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-09-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 2318 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.9'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.9 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013082 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010466 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 610 to 668 (Dec 32.0 to 43.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 972 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 972 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 948 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 972 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 2262 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 610 to 668 (Dec 32.0 to 43.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 972 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 972 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 2264 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 972 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 2264 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Excluding outliers - 972 stars left (next iteration limit 1069)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_UMa-13-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-09-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073.fits N_match=972 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.403 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.332 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.464 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.349 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.464 n_q1=244 n_q2=277 n_q3=220 n_q4=231 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.152
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_UMa-13-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-09-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_UMa-13-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-09-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-12_CI_UMa-13-Q1b1x1_022450_TTUQ1b1x1_1656078_YENUflAT/fd_UMa-13-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-09-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073.fits -region wcs_fd_UMa-13-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-09-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_UMa-13-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-09-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=UMa-13-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_01-16-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0324.fits sigma_overall=0.429 worst_q_ratio=1.100
ref2=UMa-13-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-30-09_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0212.fits sigma_overall=0.421 worst_q_ratio=1.157
new1=fd_UMa-13-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-08-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0072.fits sigma_overall=0.400 worst_q_ratio=1.178
new2=fd_UMa-13-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-09-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073.fits sigma_overall=0.403 worst_q_ratio=1.152
reference average sigma_overall=0.425 worst_q_ratio=1.1285
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_UMa-13-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_01-16-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0324_astrometric_residuals.png (973 matched stars from wcs_UMa-13-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_01-16-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0324.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.38 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_UMa-13-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-30-09_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0212_astrometric_residuals.png (972 matched stars from wcs_UMa-13-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-30-09_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0212.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.37 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_UMa-13-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-08-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0072_astrometric_residuals.png (971 matched stars from wcs_fd_UMa-13-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-08-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0072.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.38 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_UMa-13-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-09-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073_astrometric_residuals.png (972 matched stars from wcs_fd_UMa-13-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-09-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.39 arcsec)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_UMa-13-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-08-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0072.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_UMa-13-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-08-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0072.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-12_CI_UMa-13-Q1b1x1_022450_TTUQ1b1x1_1656078_YENUflAT/wcs_fd_UMa-13-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-08-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0072.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_UMa-13-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-09-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_UMa-13-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-09-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-12_CI_UMa-13-Q1b1x1_022450_TTUQ1b1x1_1656078_YENUflAT/wcs_fd_UMa-13-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-09-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field UMa-13-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
No candidates found here
Prepared the HTML report for the field UMa-13-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 3.5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-13-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_01-16-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0324.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-13-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-30-09_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0212.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-12_CI_UMa-13-Q1b1x1_022450_TTUQ1b1x1_1656078_YENUflAT/fd_UMa-13-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-08-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0072.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-12_CI_UMa-13-Q1b1x1_022450_TTUQ1b1x1_1656078_YENUflAT/fd_UMa-13-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-09-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved UMa-13-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_01-16-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0324.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved UMa-13-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-30-09_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0212.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-13-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_01-16-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0324.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-13-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-30-09_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0212.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-12_CI_UMa-13-Q1b1x1_022450_TTUQ1b1x1_1656078_YENUflAT/fd_UMa-13-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-08-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0072.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-12_CI_UMa-13-Q1b1x1_022450_TTUQ1b1x1_1656078_YENUflAT/fd_UMa-13-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-09-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_UMa-13-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_01-16-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0324.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_UMa-13-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-30-09_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0212.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_UMa-13-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-08-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0072.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_UMa-13-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-09-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/exclusion_list.txt
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_UMa-13-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_01-16-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0324.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_UMa-13-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-30-09_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0212.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_UMa-13-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-08-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0072.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_UMa-13-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-09-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_UMa-13-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_01-16-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0324.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_UMa-13-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_01-16-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0324.fits
Image size: 941.7'x627.1' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 12:00:01.705 +38:00:21.68 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_UMa-13-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-08-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0072.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_UMa-13-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-08-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0072.fits
Image size: 941.9'x626.7' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 12:00:00.724 +37:59:09.05 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 12:00:01.705 +38:00:21.68
Second-epoch image center 12:00:00.724 +37:59:09.05
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0204 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_UMa-13-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-09-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_UMa-13-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-09-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073.fits
Image size: 941.9'x626.7' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 12:00:01.722 +37:59:25.26 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 12:00:01.705 +38:00:21.68
Second-epoch image center 12:00:01.722 +37:59:25.26
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0157 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 12:00:00.724 +37:59:09.05
Second-epoch second image center 12:00:01.722 +37:59:25.26
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00557 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-13-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_01-16-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0324.fits &> /tmp/tmp.w4RpL8llg4
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-13-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_01-16-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0324.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-13-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-30-09_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0212.fits &> /tmp/tmp.KRNIjN0kFI
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-13-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-30-09_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0212.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-12_CI_UMa-13-Q1b1x1_022450_TTUQ1b1x1_1656078_YENUflAT/fd_UMa-13-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-08-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0072.fits &> /tmp/tmp.r6XiOM6hnJ
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-12_CI_UMa-13-Q1b1x1_022450_TTUQ1b1x1_1656078_YENUflAT/fd_UMa-13-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-08-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0072.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-12_CI_UMa-13-Q1b1x1_022450_TTUQ1b1x1_1656078_YENUflAT/fd_UMa-13-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-09-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073.fits &> /tmp/tmp.ZSWTasu2ML
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-12_CI_UMa-13-Q1b1x1_022450_TTUQ1b1x1_1656078_YENUflAT/fd_UMa-13-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-09-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_UMa-13-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_01-16-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0324.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_UMa-13-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_01-16-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0324.fits and wcs_UMa-13-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_01-16-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0324.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_UMa-13-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_01-16-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0324.fits and wcs_UMa-13-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_01-16-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0324.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_UMa-13-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_01-16-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0324.fits and wcs_UMa-13-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_01-16-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0324.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_UMa-13-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_01-16-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0324.fits) and catalog (wcs_UMa-13-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_01-16-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0324.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_UMa-13-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_01-16-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0324.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 29244 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 169.0319 to 190.3757 deg, Dec +32.0566 to +43.3845 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 169.0319 to 190.3757 deg, Dec 32.0566 to 43.3845 deg
Loaded 4193 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 2861 out of 3150 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3150 out of 29244 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.815800
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.815800
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.23
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.59
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.59
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 29244 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 169.0319 to 190.3757 deg, Dec +32.0566 to +43.3845 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 169.0319 to 190.3757 deg, Dec 32.0566 to 43.3845 deg
Loaded 4193 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 2861 out of 3150 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3150 out of 29244 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_UMa-13-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_01-16-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0324.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_UMa-13-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_01-16-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0324.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_UMa-13-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_01-16-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0324.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_UMa-13-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_01-16-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0324.fits (aperture=5.1)
Read 27154 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 169.3715 to 190.6752 deg, Dec +32.4430 to +43.2831 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 169.3715 to 190.6752 deg, Dec 32.4430 to 43.2831 deg
Loaded 3994 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 2932 out of 3131 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3131 out of 27154 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_UMa-13-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-30-09_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0212.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_UMa-13-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-30-09_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0212.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_UMa-13-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-30-09_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0212.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_UMa-13-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-30-09_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0212.fits (aperture=5.2)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 44 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 8000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.1 pix UMa-13-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_01-16-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0324.fits
2.2 pix UMa-13-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-30-09_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0212.fits
2.4 pix fd_UMa-13-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-08-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0072.fits
2.4 pix fd_UMa-13-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-09-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073.fits
2.1 pix wcs_UMa-13-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_01-16-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0324.fits
2.2 pix wcs_UMa-13-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-30-09_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0212.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.6 mag. UMa-13-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_01-16-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0324.fits
15.5 mag. UMa-13-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-30-09_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0212.fits
13.9 mag. fd_UMa-13-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-08-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0072.fits
13.9 mag. fd_UMa-13-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-09-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 13.9 (SNR ) 13.4 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.w4RpL8llg4 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-12_CI_UMa-13-Q1b1x1_022450_TTUQ1b1x1_1656078_YENUflAT/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-13-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_01-16-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0324.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-13-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_01-16-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0324.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-13-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_01-16-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0324.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-13-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_01-16-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0324.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-13-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_01-16-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0324.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-13-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_01-16-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0324.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-13-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_01-16-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0324.fits' -> 'wcs_UMa-13-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_01-16-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0324.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-13-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_01-16-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0324.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_UMa-13-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_01-16-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0324.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_UMa-13-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_01-16-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0324.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_UMa-13-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_01-16-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0324.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-13-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_01-16-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0324.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_UMa-13-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_01-16-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0324.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-13-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_01-16-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0324.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_UMa-13-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_01-16-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0324.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-13-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_01-16-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0324.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_UMa-13-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_01-16-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0324.fits.wcscat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=18, blended=1139, passed=29226
Got 29226 stars (including 28025 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_UMa-13-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_01-16-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0324.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 29226 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.7'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.7 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013079 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010463 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 610 to 668 (Dec 32.1 to 43.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 971 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 971 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 963 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 971 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 28936 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 610 to 668 (Dec 32.1 to 43.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 971 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 971 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 28935 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 971 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 28935 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Excluding outliers - 971 stars left (next iteration limit 1068)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=UMa-13-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_01-16-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0324.fits N_match=971 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.406 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.444 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.408 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.390 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.360 n_q1=223 n_q2=236 n_q3=276 n_q4=236 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.094
The image catalog is written to wcs_UMa-13-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_01-16-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0324.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_UMa-13-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_01-16-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0324.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-13-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_01-16-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0324.fits -region wcs_UMa-13-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_01-16-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0324.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_UMa-13-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_01-16-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0324.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.KRNIjN0kFI (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-13-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-30-09_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0212.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-12_CI_UMa-13-Q1b1x1_022450_TTUQ1b1x1_1656078_YENUflAT/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-13-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-30-09_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0212.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-13-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-30-09_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0212.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-13-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-30-09_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0212.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-13-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-30-09_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0212.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-13-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-30-09_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0212.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-13-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-30-09_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0212.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-13-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-30-09_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0212.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-13-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-30-09_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0212.fits' -> 'wcs_UMa-13-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-30-09_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0212.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-13-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-30-09_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0212.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_UMa-13-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-30-09_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0212.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_UMa-13-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-30-09_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0212.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_UMa-13-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-30-09_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0212.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-13-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-30-09_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0212.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_UMa-13-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-30-09_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0212.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-13-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-30-09_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0212.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_UMa-13-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-30-09_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0212.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-13-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-30-09_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0212.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_UMa-13-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-30-09_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0212.fits.wcscat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=32, blended=983, passed=27122
Got 27122 stars (including 26111 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_UMa-13-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-30-09_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0212.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 27122 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013018 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010414 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 612 to 668 (Dec 32.4 to 43.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 970 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 970 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 966 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 970 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 26924 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 612 to 668 (Dec 32.4 to 43.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 970 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 970 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 26923 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 970 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 26923 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
Excluding outliers - 970 stars left (next iteration limit 1067)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=UMa-13-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-30-09_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0212.fits N_match=970 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.415 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.356 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.409 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.426 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.493 n_q1=216 n_q2=299 n_q3=207 n_q4=248 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.188
The image catalog is written to wcs_UMa-13-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-30-09_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0212.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_UMa-13-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-30-09_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0212.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-13-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-30-09_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0212.fits -region wcs_UMa-13-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-30-09_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0212.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_UMa-13-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-30-09_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0212.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.r6XiOM6hnJ (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-12_CI_UMa-13-Q1b1x1_022450_TTUQ1b1x1_1656078_YENUflAT/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-12_CI_UMa-13-Q1b1x1_022450_TTUQ1b1x1_1656078_YENUflAT/fd_UMa-13-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-08-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0072.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-12_CI_UMa-13-Q1b1x1_022450_TTUQ1b1x1_1656078_YENUflAT/fd_UMa-13-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-08-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0072.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-12_CI_UMa-13-Q1b1x1_022450_TTUQ1b1x1_1656078_YENUflAT/fd_UMa-13-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-08-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0072.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-12_CI_UMa-13-Q1b1x1_022450_TTUQ1b1x1_1656078_YENUflAT/fd_UMa-13-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-08-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0072.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-12_CI_UMa-13-Q1b1x1_022450_TTUQ1b1x1_1656078_YENUflAT/fd_UMa-13-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-08-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0072.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-12_CI_UMa-13-Q1b1x1_022450_TTUQ1b1x1_1656078_YENUflAT/fd_UMa-13-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-08-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0072.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_UMa-13-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-08-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0072.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_UMa-13-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-08-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0072.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_UMa-13-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-08-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0072.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-13-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-08-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0072.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_UMa-13-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-08-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0072.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-13-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-08-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0072.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_UMa-13-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-08-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0072.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-12_CI_UMa-13-Q1b1x1_022450_TTUQ1b1x1_1656078_YENUflAT/fd_UMa-13-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-08-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0072.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_UMa-13-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-08-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0072.fits.wcscat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=2, blended=251, passed=12317
Got 12317 stars (including 12050 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_UMa-13-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-08-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0072.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 12317 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.9'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.9 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013082 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010466 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 609 to 668 (Dec 32.0 to 43.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 970 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 970 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 954 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 970 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 12122 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 609 to 668 (Dec 32.0 to 43.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 970 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 970 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 12122 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 970 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 12122 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Excluding outliers - 970 stars left (next iteration limit 1067)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_UMa-13-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-08-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0072.fits N_match=970 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.387 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.355 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.394 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.373 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.455 n_q1=231 n_q2=277 n_q3=232 n_q4=230 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.177
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_UMa-13-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-08-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0072.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_UMa-13-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-08-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0072.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-12_CI_UMa-13-Q1b1x1_022450_TTUQ1b1x1_1656078_YENUflAT/fd_UMa-13-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-08-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0072.fits -region wcs_fd_UMa-13-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-08-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0072.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_UMa-13-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-08-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0072.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.ZSWTasu2ML (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-12_CI_UMa-13-Q1b1x1_022450_TTUQ1b1x1_1656078_YENUflAT/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-12_CI_UMa-13-Q1b1x1_022450_TTUQ1b1x1_1656078_YENUflAT/fd_UMa-13-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-09-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-12_CI_UMa-13-Q1b1x1_022450_TTUQ1b1x1_1656078_YENUflAT/fd_UMa-13-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-09-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-12_CI_UMa-13-Q1b1x1_022450_TTUQ1b1x1_1656078_YENUflAT/fd_UMa-13-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-09-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-12_CI_UMa-13-Q1b1x1_022450_TTUQ1b1x1_1656078_YENUflAT/fd_UMa-13-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-09-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-12_CI_UMa-13-Q1b1x1_022450_TTUQ1b1x1_1656078_YENUflAT/fd_UMa-13-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-09-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-12_CI_UMa-13-Q1b1x1_022450_TTUQ1b1x1_1656078_YENUflAT/fd_UMa-13-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-09-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_UMa-13-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-09-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_UMa-13-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-09-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_UMa-13-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-09-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-13-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-09-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_UMa-13-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-09-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-13-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-09-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_UMa-13-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-09-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-12_CI_UMa-13-Q1b1x1_022450_TTUQ1b1x1_1656078_YENUflAT/fd_UMa-13-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-09-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_UMa-13-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-09-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073.fits.wcscat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=1, blended=256, passed=12364
Got 12364 stars (including 12090 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_UMa-13-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-09-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 12364 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.9'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.9 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013082 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010466 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 609 to 668 (Dec 32.0 to 43.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 970 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 970 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 948 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 970 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 12060 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 609 to 668 (Dec 32.0 to 43.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 970 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 970 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 12061 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 970 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 12061 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Excluding outliers - 970 stars left (next iteration limit 1067)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_UMa-13-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-09-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073.fits N_match=970 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.406 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.333 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.458 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.357 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.471 n_q1=246 n_q2=275 n_q3=218 n_q4=231 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.158
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_UMa-13-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-09-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_UMa-13-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-09-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-12_CI_UMa-13-Q1b1x1_022450_TTUQ1b1x1_1656078_YENUflAT/fd_UMa-13-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-09-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073.fits -region wcs_fd_UMa-13-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-09-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_UMa-13-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-09-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_UMa-13-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-08-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0072.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-12_CI_UMa-13-Q1b1x1_022450_TTUQ1b1x1_1656078_YENUflAT/wcs_fd_UMa-13-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-08-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0072.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_UMa-13-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-09-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-12_CI_UMa-13-Q1b1x1_022450_TTUQ1b1x1_1656078_YENUflAT/wcs_fd_UMa-13-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-09-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field UMa-13-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-13-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_01-16-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0324.fits at 12:24:35.86 +39:17:40.0: 13.09 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-13-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-30-09_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0212.fits at 12:24:35.86 +39:17:40.0: 13.04 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.07 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 12:24:35.86 +39:17:40.0: ref_mag=13.07 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.0283 delta=0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-13-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_01-16-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0324.fits at 11:20:07.19 +42:28:52.9: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-13-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_01-16-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0324.fits at 11:21:50.31 +42:41:26.3: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-13-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_01-16-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0324.fits at 11:20:13.01 +42:36:09.9: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-13-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_01-16-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0324.fits at 11:29:29.80 +38:09:14.1: 14.02 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-13-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_01-16-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0324.fits at 11:24:28.23 +39:46:07.2: 12.30 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-13-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_01-16-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0324.fits at 11:39:35.58 +33:57:54.6: 14.20 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-13-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_01-16-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0324.fits at 11:21:11.94 +39:13:29.7: 13.71 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-13-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_01-16-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0324.fits at 12:36:13.99 +34:42:59.4: 14.06 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-13-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-30-09_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0212.fits at 11:20:07.19 +42:28:52.9: 14.31 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 11:20:07.19 +42:28:52.9: at least one reference image reported edge (off-image or aperture/annulus past image boundary); cannot perform the forced-photometry cross-check
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-13-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-30-09_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0212.fits at 11:21:50.31 +42:41:26.3: 14.18 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 11:21:50.31 +42:41:26.3: at least one reference image reported edge (off-image or aperture/annulus past image boundary); cannot perform the forced-photometry cross-check
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-13-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-30-09_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0212.fits at 11:20:13.01 +42:36:09.9: 12.81 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 11:20:13.01 +42:36:09.9: at least one reference image reported edge (off-image or aperture/annulus past image boundary); cannot perform the forced-photometry cross-check
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-13-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-30-09_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0212.fits at 11:29:29.80 +38:09:14.1: 14.02 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.02 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-13-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_01-16-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0324.fits at 11:25:18.37 +38:44:48.4: 14.13 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 11:29:29.80 +38:09:14.1: ref_mag=14.02 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.1050 delta=0.91 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-13-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_01-16-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0324.fits at 11:22:13.10 +38:45:60.0: 13.82 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-13-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-30-09_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0212.fits at 11:24:28.23 +39:46:07.2: 12.39 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-13-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-30-09_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0212.fits at 11:39:35.58 +33:57:54.6: 14.11 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.34 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 11:24:28.23 +39:46:07.2: ref_mag=12.34 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.8284 delta=0.51 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.15 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 11:39:35.58 +33:57:54.6: ref_mag=14.15 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.2279 delta=0.92 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-13-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-30-09_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0212.fits at 11:21:11.94 +39:13:29.7: 13.89 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-13-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-30-09_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0212.fits at 12:36:13.99 +34:42:59.4: 14.12 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.77 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.09 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 11:21:11.94 +39:13:29.7: ref_mag=13.77 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=12.9284 delta=0.84 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 12:36:13.99 +34:42:59.4: ref_mag=14.09 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=13.1346 delta=0.95 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-13-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-30-09_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0212.fits at 11:25:18.37 +38:44:48.4: 14.14 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.13 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 11:25:18.37 +38:44:48.4: ref_mag=14.13 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.1694 delta=0.96 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-13-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-30-09_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0212.fits at 11:22:13.10 +38:45:60.0: 13.94 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.87 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 11:22:13.10 +38:45:60.0: ref_mag=13.87 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=12.9221 delta=0.95 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-13-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_01-16-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0324.fits at 11:28:57.35 +41:02:54.6: 14.08 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-13-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_01-16-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0324.fits at 11:24:45.47 +41:55:47.4: 14.10 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-13-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_01-16-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0324.fits at 11:22:51.01 +39:55:13.2: 13.80 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-13-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-30-09_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0212.fits at 11:28:57.35 +41:02:54.6: 14.09 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.08 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 11:28:57.35 +41:02:54.6: ref_mag=14.08 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.1614 delta=0.92 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-13-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_01-16-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0324.fits at 12:34:27.06 +36:26:14.2: 13.99 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-13-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-30-09_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0212.fits at 11:24:45.47 +41:55:47.4: 14.01 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.06 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-13-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_01-16-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0324.fits at 11:22:55.07 +37:51:17.6: 13.97 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 11:24:45.47 +41:55:47.4: ref_mag=14.06 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=13.0886 delta=0.97 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-13-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-30-09_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0212.fits at 11:22:51.01 +39:55:13.2: 13.88 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.83 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 11:22:51.01 +39:55:13.2: ref_mag=13.83 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=12.9148 delta=0.92 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-13-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-30-09_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0212.fits at 12:34:27.06 +36:26:14.2: 14.10 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.03 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 12:34:27.06 +36:26:14.2: ref_mag=14.03 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.0745 delta=0.96 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-13-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-30-09_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0212.fits at 11:22:55.07 +37:51:17.6: 13.95 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.96 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 11:22:55.07 +37:51:17.6: ref_mag=13.96 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.0192 delta=0.94 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-13-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_01-16-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0324.fits at 11:22:14.07 +41:22:12.8: 13.43 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-13-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-30-09_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0212.fits at 11:22:14.07 +41:22:12.8: 13.53 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.48 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 11:22:14.07 +41:22:12.8: ref_mag=13.48 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=12.6989 delta=0.78 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out04160.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out05025.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out09665.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out16088.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out16417.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out19134.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out23608.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out24109.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out26042.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out28949.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 31s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 11s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31990_fd_UMa-13-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-09-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073
The candidate 31990_fd_UMa-13-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-09-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32010_fd_UMa-13-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-09-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073
The candidate 32010_fd_UMa-13-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-09-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32030_fd_UMa-13-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-09-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073
The candidate 32030_fd_UMa-13-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-09-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32032_fd_UMa-13-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-09-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073
The candidate 32032_fd_UMa-13-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-09-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32050_fd_UMa-13-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-09-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073
The candidate 32050_fd_UMa-13-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-09-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32052_fd_UMa-13-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-09-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073
The candidate 32052_fd_UMa-13-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-09-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32074_fd_UMa-13-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-09-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073
The candidate 32074_fd_UMa-13-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-09-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32076_fd_UMa-13-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-09-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073
The candidate 32076_fd_UMa-13-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-09-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32082_fd_UMa-13-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-09-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073
The candidate 32082_fd_UMa-13-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-09-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32085_fd_UMa-13-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-09-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073
The candidate 32085_fd_UMa-13-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-09-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32089_fd_UMa-13-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-09-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073
The candidate 32089_fd_UMa-13-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-09-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32091_fd_UMa-13-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-09-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073
The candidate 32091_fd_UMa-13-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-09-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32095_fd_UMa-13-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-09-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073
The candidate 32095_fd_UMa-13-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-09-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32101_fd_UMa-13-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-09-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073
The candidate 32101_fd_UMa-13-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-09-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32116_fd_UMa-13-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-09-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073
The candidate 32116_fd_UMa-13-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-09-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32119_fd_UMa-13-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-09-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073
The candidate 32119_fd_UMa-13-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-09-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 12:31:47.77 +40:34:51.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32169_fd_UMa-13-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-09-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073
The candidate 32169_fd_UMa-13-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-09-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 11:38:37.74 +33:38:41.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32197_fd_UMa-13-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-09-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073
The candidate 32197_fd_UMa-13-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-09-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 11:40:13.63 +41:43:24.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32247_fd_UMa-13-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-09-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073
The candidate 32247_fd_UMa-13-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-09-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32253_fd_UMa-13-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-09-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073
The candidate 32253_fd_UMa-13-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-09-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32261_fd_UMa-13-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-09-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073
The candidate 32261_fd_UMa-13-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-09-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32276_fd_UMa-13-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-09-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073
The candidate 32276_fd_UMa-13-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-09-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32278_fd_UMa-13-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-09-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073
The candidate 32278_fd_UMa-13-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-09-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32353_fd_UMa-13-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-09-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073
The candidate 32353_fd_UMa-13-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-09-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32397_fd_UMa-13-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-09-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073
The candidate 32397_fd_UMa-13-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-09-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32408_fd_UMa-13-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-09-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073
The candidate 32408_fd_UMa-13-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-09-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32412_fd_UMa-13-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-09-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073
The candidate 32412_fd_UMa-13-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-09-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 16417_fd_UMa-13-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-09-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073
Preparing report for the candidate 16417_fd_UMa-13-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-09-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 27674_fd_UMa-13-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-09-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073
The candidate 27674_fd_UMa-13-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-09-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 30685_fd_UMa-13-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-09-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073
The candidate 30685_fd_UMa-13-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-09-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 04160_fd_UMa-13-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-09-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073
Preparing report for the candidate 04160_fd_UMa-13-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-09-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 26563_fd_UMa-13-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-09-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073
The candidate 26563_fd_UMa-13-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-09-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 30512_fd_UMa-13-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-09-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073
The candidate 30512_fd_UMa-13-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-09-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 05025_fd_UMa-13-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-09-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073
Preparing report for the candidate 05025_fd_UMa-13-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-09-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 24109_fd_UMa-13-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-09-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073
Preparing report for the candidate 24109_fd_UMa-13-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-09-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 28949_fd_UMa-13-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-09-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073
Preparing report for the candidate 28949_fd_UMa-13-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-09-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 30181_fd_UMa-13-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-09-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073
The candidate 30181_fd_UMa-13-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-09-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 26042_fd_UMa-13-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-09-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073
Preparing report for the candidate 26042_fd_UMa-13-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-09-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 19134_fd_UMa-13-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-09-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073
Preparing report for the candidate 19134_fd_UMa-13-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-09-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 23608_fd_UMa-13-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-09-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073
Preparing report for the candidate 23608_fd_UMa-13-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-09-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 09665_fd_UMa-13-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-09-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073
Preparing report for the candidate 09665_fd_UMa-13-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-09-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 16088_fd_UMa-13-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-09-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073
Preparing report for the candidate 16088_fd_UMa-13-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-09-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 30018_fd_UMa-13-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-09-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073
The candidate 30018_fd_UMa-13-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-09-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 16671_fd_UMa-13-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-09-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073
The candidate 16671_fd_UMa-13-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_02-09-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073 did not pass the final checks
