######## Processing parameters ########
AAVSO_COMMENT_STRING= NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
ASTCHECK_ASTEROID_SEARCH_RADIUS_ARCSEC=
BAD_REGION_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/TTUQ2_bad_region.lst
CAMERA_SETTINGS= TTUQ2b1x1
CHECK_POINTING_ACCURACY= yes
DARK_FRAMES_DIR_OR_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks
EXCLUSION_LIST= ../exclusion_list_TTUQ2.txt
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MAX_APERTURE_STAR_SIZE_PIX= 12.5
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MAX_ELONGATION_AminusB_PIX= 0.55
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MIN_APERTURE_STAR_SIZE_PIX= 2.0
FILTER_BRIGHT_MAG_CUTOFF_TRANSIENT_SEARCH= -5
FILTER_FAINT_MAG_CUTOFF_TRANSIENT_SEARCH= 15.0
FLAT_FIELD_DIR_OR_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats
FRAME_EDGE_OFFSET_PIX= 600
GAIA_BAND_FOR_CATALOGED_SOURCE_CHECK=
MAX_NEW_TO_REF_MEAN_IMG_VALUE_RATIO= 100
MAX_NEW_IMG_MEAN_VALUE= 25000
MAX_SD_RATIO_OF_SECOND_EPOCH_IMGS= 0.18
MAX_SD_RATIO_OF_SECOND_EPOCH_IMGS_SOFT_LIMIT= 0.12
MPC_CODE= V36
NMW_CALIBRATION= /var/www/nmw_calibration
NUMBER_OF_DETECTED_TRANSIENTS_BEFORE_FILTERING_HARD_LIMIT= 8000
NUMBER_OF_DETECTED_TRANSIENTS_BEFORE_FILTERING_SOFT_LIMIT= 4000
OMP_NUM_THREADS=
ONLINE_MPCHECKER_BUTTON_ASTEROID_SEARCH_RADIUS_ARCMIN=
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=
REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES= yes
SEXTRACTOR_CONFIG_BRIGHTSTARPASS= default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
SEXTRACTOR_CONFIG_FILES= default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
STARMATCH_RADIUS_PIX= 4
SYSREM_ITERATIONS= 0
TELESCOP=
TELESCOP_NAME_KNOWN_TO_VaST_FOR_FOV_DETERMINATION=
UCAC5_PLATESOLVE_ITERATIONS= 2
FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE= no
#######################################
HOSTNAME= tau
USER=
HOME=
#######################################
SExtractor catalog cache: enabled, directory /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/vast_sextractor_cache
Reference image directory is set to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs
VIZIER_SITE=vizier.cds.unistra.fr
GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=vizquery (lib/vizquery -> VizieR vizier.cds.unistra.fr)
INFO: MAKE_PNG_PLOTS is set to yes
FITS_FILE_EXT=fits
CALIBRATION_STATUS_PREFIX=
Fields in the data directory:
Sco-02-Q2b1x1
#######################################
########### Starting Sco-02-Q2b1x1 ###########
Processing Sco-02-Q2b1x1
server tau has sufficient free disk space available: 496991 MB at /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir
server tau has sufficient free disk space available: 496991 MB at .
Checking input images (2 new)
REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE= /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_01-54-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0173.fits
REFERENCE_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE= /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-36-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0255.fits
Small preview (one of the new images): 
Large previews of the second-epoch (new) images:
MAKE_PNG_PLOTS=yes
renamed 'Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-57-43_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0002.png' -> 'transient_report/Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-57-43_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0002.fits_preview.png'
Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-57-43_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0002.fits

renamed 'Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-58-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0003.png' -> 'transient_report/Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-58-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0003.fits_preview.png'
Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-58-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0003.fits

Read-check the input FITS images... read-check OK
Blank image check the input FITS images... blank-image-check OK
Read date check the input FITS images... read-date-check OK
Mean value check the input FITS images... OK, at least two new images have mean values below the threshold.
----------------------------------------------
INFO: REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 2405.9228
INFO: REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_SD= 677.4620
INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 2647.3493
INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_SD= 1003.4973
INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 2669.3878
INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE_SD= 1005.7169
----------------------------------------------
INFO: ref_to_second_epoch_img_mean_ratio= 1.10035
INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__SD_ratio= 0.002
----------------------------------------------
Calibration settings: DARK_FRAMES_DIR_OR_FILE=/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks FLAT_FIELD_DIR_OR_FILE=/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats
EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration
SET-TEMP= 5.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint
CCD-TEMP= 4.9 / [degC] CCD temperature
FOCTEMP = 22.0799999237061 / [degC] Focuser temperature
AMBTEMP = 22.6 / [degC] Ambient air temperature
Exploring image header: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-12_CI_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_010340_TTUQ2b1x1_1074405_j7ANGGFC/Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-57-43_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0002.fits
CCD-TEMP= 4.900000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-12_CI_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_010340_TTUQ2b1x1_1074405_j7ANGGFC/Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-57-43_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0002.fits
SET-TEMP= 5.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-12_CI_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_010340_TTUQ2b1x1_1074405_j7ANGGFC/Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-57-43_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0002.fits
Header: 74 keys total, 33 keys left
Record 0: "" status=0
Record 1: "SIMPLE = T / C# FITS" status=0
Record 2: "BITPIX = 16" status=0
Record 3: "NAXIS = 2 / Dimensionality" status=0
Record 4: "NAXIS1 = 9576" status=0
Record 5: "NAXIS2 = 6388" status=0
Record 6: "BZERO = 32768" status=0
Record 7: "EXTEND = T / Extensions are permitted" status=0
Record 8: "IMAGETYP= 'LIGHT' / Type of exposure" status=0
Record 9: "EXPOSURE= 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0
Record 10: "EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0
Record 11: "DATE-LOC= '2026-06-12T00:57:43.0914494' / Time of observation (local)" status=0
Record 12: "DATE-OBS= '2026-06-12T05:57:43.0914494' / Time of observation (UTC)" status=0
Record 13: "MJD-OBS = 61203.2484154049 / Modified Julian Date of observation" status=0
Record 14: "DATE-AVG= '2026-06-12T05:57:52.9934469' / Averaged midpoint time (UTC)" status=0
Record 15: "MJD-AVG = 61203.2485300116 / Modified Julian Date of averaged midpoint" status=0
Record 16: "XBINNING= 1 / X axis binning factor" status=0
Record 17: "YBINNING= 1 / Y axis binning factor" status=0
Record 18: "GAIN = 30 / Sensor gain" status=0
Record 19: "OFFSET = 30 / Sensor gain offset" status=0
Record 20: "XPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel X axis size" status=0
Record 21: "YPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel Y axis size" status=0
Record 22: "INSTRUME= 'QHY600M' / Imaging instrument name" status=0
Record 23: "CAMERAID= 'QHY600M-84137c4dbbbd119a9' / Imaging instrument identifier" status=0
Record 24: "SET-TEMP= 5.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint" status=0
Record 25: "CCD-TEMP= 4.9 / [degC] CCD temperature" status=0
Record 26: "READOUTM= '2CMS-0' / Sensor readout mode" status=0
Record 27: "USBLIMIT= 50 / Camera-specific USB setting" status=0
Record 28: "TELESCOP= 'QHY600M-TTU2' / Name of telescope" status=0
Record 29: "FOCALLEN= 135.0 / [mm] Focal length" status=0
Record 30: "FOCRATIO= 2.2 / Focal ratio" status=0
Record 31: "RA = 244.796741261326 / [deg] RA of telescope" status=0
Record 32: "DEC = -25.9998048401884 / [deg] Declination of telescope" status=0
Record 33: "CENTALT = 30.1219444444444 / [deg] Altitude of telescope" status=0
Record 34: "CENTAZ = 183.040555555556 / [deg] Azimuth of telescope" status=0
Record 35: "AIRMASS = 1.98699766858306 / Airmass at frame center (Gueymard 1993)" status=0
Record 36: "PIERSIDE= 'East' / Telescope pointing state" status=0
Record 37: "SITEELEV= 1009.5 / [m] Observation site elevation" status=0
Record 38: "SITELAT = 33.7482925 / [deg] Observation site latitude" status=0
Record 39: "SITELONG= -101.958319 / [deg] Observation site longitude" status=0
Record 40: "OBSERVER= 'Sokolovsky' / Observer name" status=0
Record 41: "OBSERVAT= 'TTU Skyview' / Observatory name" status=0
Record 42: "SITENAME= '' / Observatory site name" status=0
Record 43: "FWHEEL = 'Simulator' / Filter Wheel name" status=0
Record 44: "FILTER = 'CV' / Active filter name" status=0
Record 45: "OBJECT = 'Sco-02' / Name of the object of interest" status=0
Record 46: "OBJCTRA = '16 19 12' / [H M S] RA of imaged object" status=0
Record 47: "OBJCTDEC= '-26 00 00' / [D M S] Declination of imaged object" status=0
Record 48: "OBJCTROT= 0.0 / [deg] planned rotation of imaged object" status=0
Record 49: "FOCNAME = 'ZWO Focuser' / Focusing equipment name" status=0
Record 50: "FOCPOS = 20427 / [step] Focuser position" status=0
Record 51: "FOCUSPOS= 20427 / [step] Focuser position" status=0
Record 52: "FOCUSSZ = 0.0 / [um] Focuser step size" status=0
Record 53: "FOCTEMP = 22.0799999237061 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0
Record 54: "FOCUSTEM= 22.0799999237061 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0
Record 55: "DEWPOINT= 15.2 / [degC] Dew point" status=0
Record 56: "HUMIDITY= 63.0 / [percent] Relative humidity" status=0
Record 57: "PRESSURE= 899.29 / [hPa] Air pressure" status=0
Record 58: "AMBTEMP = 22.6 / [degC] Ambient air temperature" status=0
Record 59: "WINDDIR = 233.0 / [deg] Wind direction: 0=N, 180=S, 90=E, 270=W" status=0
Record 60: "WINDGUST= 13.00104 / [kph] Wind gust" status=0
Record 61: "WINDSPD = 6.100488 / [kph] Wind speed" status=0
Record 62: "ROWORDER= 'TOP-DOWN' / FITS Image Orientation" status=0
Record 63: "EQUINOX = 2000.0 / Equinox of celestial coordinate system" status=0
Record 64: "SWCREATE= 'N.I.N.A. 3.2.0.9001 (x64)' / Software that created this file" status=0
Record 65: "QHY_EXP = 20.000096 / [s] Actual exposure time" status=0
Record 66: "QHY_PP = 13888.0 / [ps] pixelPeriod" status=0
Record 67: "QHY_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0
Record 68: "GPS_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0
Record 69: "QHY_FP = 20000160.0 / [us] framePeriod" status=0
Record 70: "QHY_CPL = 6120.0 / clocksPerLine" status=0
Record 71: "QHY_LPF = 235295.0 / linesPerFrame" status=0
Record 72: "QHY_AET = 20000096.0 / [us] actualExposureTime" status=0
Record 73: "QHY_LEM = T / isLongExposureMode" status=0
Record 74: "QHY_OFF0= 3767.777 / [us] RollingShutterEndOffset row 0" status=0
Allocating memory for image, dark and result arrays...
Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-12_CI_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_010340_TTUQ2b1x1_1074405_j7ANGGFC/Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-57-43_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0002.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix
SET-TEMP= 5.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-12_CI_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_010340_TTUQ2b1x1_1074405_j7ANGGFC/Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-57-43_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0002.fits
SET-TEMP= 5.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_5C_20s_2026-05-30.fit
CCD-TEMP= 4.900000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-12_CI_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_010340_TTUQ2b1x1_1074405_j7ANGGFC/Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-57-43_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0002.fits
CCD-TEMP= 4.800000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_5C_20s_2026-05-30.fit
Reading dark frame /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_5C_20s_2026-05-30.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix
Dark frame is subtracted, output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-12_CI_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_010340_TTUQ2b1x1_1074405_j7ANGGFC/d_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-57-43_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0002.fits :)
Spent 0.473806 seconds
renamed 'mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_5C_20s_2026-05-30.png' -> 'transient_report/dark.png'
try_to_calibrate_the_input_frame(): selected flat field /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ2b1x1_2026-05-30.fit from directory /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats
MegaDivider v7
Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-12_CI_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_010340_TTUQ2b1x1_1074405_j7ANGGFC/d_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-57-43_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0002.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix
Reading flat /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ2b1x1_2026-05-30.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix
Avarage count on flat field image: 20659.746399
Minimal real count (from overscan): 5
Output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-12_CI_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_010340_TTUQ2b1x1_1074405_j7ANGGFC/fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-57-43_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0002.fits :)
No overscan detected - all values seem high! (left_median=14784.5, right_median=14894.5)
renamed 'mff_TTUQ2b1x1_2026-05-30.png' -> 'transient_report/flat.png'
Using calibrated image CALIBRATED_SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-12_CI_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_010340_TTUQ2b1x1_1074405_j7ANGGFC/fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-57-43_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0002.fits
EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration
SET-TEMP= 5.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint
CCD-TEMP= 4.9 / [degC] CCD temperature
FOCTEMP = 22.0100002288818 / [degC] Focuser temperature
AMBTEMP = 22.6 / [degC] Ambient air temperature
Exploring image header: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-12_CI_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_010340_TTUQ2b1x1_1074405_j7ANGGFC/Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-58-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0003.fits
CCD-TEMP= 4.900000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-12_CI_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_010340_TTUQ2b1x1_1074405_j7ANGGFC/Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-58-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0003.fits
SET-TEMP= 5.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-12_CI_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_010340_TTUQ2b1x1_1074405_j7ANGGFC/Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-58-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0003.fits
Header: 74 keys total, 33 keys left
Record 0: "" status=0
Record 1: "SIMPLE = T / C# FITS" status=0
Record 2: "BITPIX = 16" status=0
Record 3: "NAXIS = 2 / Dimensionality" status=0
Record 4: "NAXIS1 = 9576" status=0
Record 5: "NAXIS2 = 6388" status=0
Record 6: "BZERO = 32768" status=0
Record 7: "EXTEND = T / Extensions are permitted" status=0
Record 8: "IMAGETYP= 'LIGHT' / Type of exposure" status=0
Record 9: "EXPOSURE= 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0
Record 10: "EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0
Record 11: "DATE-LOC= '2026-06-12T00:58:27.9189991' / Time of observation (local)" status=0
Record 12: "DATE-OBS= '2026-06-12T05:58:27.9189991' / Time of observation (UTC)" status=0
Record 13: "MJD-OBS = 61203.2489342359 / Modified Julian Date of observation" status=0
Record 14: "DATE-AVG= '2026-06-12T05:58:37.8215473' / Averaged midpoint time (UTC)" status=0
Record 15: "MJD-AVG = 61203.2490488542 / Modified Julian Date of averaged midpoint" status=0
Record 16: "XBINNING= 1 / X axis binning factor" status=0
Record 17: "YBINNING= 1 / Y axis binning factor" status=0
Record 18: "GAIN = 30 / Sensor gain" status=0
Record 19: "OFFSET = 30 / Sensor gain offset" status=0
Record 20: "XPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel X axis size" status=0
Record 21: "YPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel Y axis size" status=0
Record 22: "INSTRUME= 'QHY600M' / Imaging instrument name" status=0
Record 23: "CAMERAID= 'QHY600M-84137c4dbbbd119a9' / Imaging instrument identifier" status=0
Record 24: "SET-TEMP= 5.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint" status=0
Record 25: "CCD-TEMP= 4.9 / [degC] CCD temperature" status=0
Record 26: "READOUTM= '2CMS-0' / Sensor readout mode" status=0
Record 27: "USBLIMIT= 50 / Camera-specific USB setting" status=0
Record 28: "TELESCOP= 'QHY600M-TTU2' / Name of telescope" status=0
Record 29: "FOCALLEN= 135.0 / [mm] Focal length" status=0
Record 30: "FOCRATIO= 2.2 / Focal ratio" status=0
Record 31: "RA = 244.796741241844 / [deg] RA of telescope" status=0
Record 32: "DEC = -25.999804843196 / [deg] Declination of telescope" status=0
Record 33: "CENTALT = 30.1136111111111 / [deg] Altitude of telescope" status=0
Record 34: "CENTAZ = 183.231111111111 / [deg] Azimuth of telescope" status=0
Record 35: "AIRMASS = 1.98749205974224 / Airmass at frame center (Gueymard 1993)" status=0
Record 36: "PIERSIDE= 'East' / Telescope pointing state" status=0
Record 37: "SITEELEV= 1009.5 / [m] Observation site elevation" status=0
Record 38: "SITELAT = 33.7482925 / [deg] Observation site latitude" status=0
Record 39: "SITELONG= -101.958319 / [deg] Observation site longitude" status=0
Record 40: "OBSERVER= 'Sokolovsky' / Observer name" status=0
Record 41: "OBSERVAT= 'TTU Skyview' / Observatory name" status=0
Record 42: "SITENAME= '' / Observatory site name" status=0
Record 43: "FWHEEL = 'Simulator' / Filter Wheel name" status=0
Record 44: "FILTER = 'CV' / Active filter name" status=0
Record 45: "OBJECT = 'Sco-02' / Name of the object of interest" status=0
Record 46: "OBJCTRA = '16 19 12' / [H M S] RA of imaged object" status=0
Record 47: "OBJCTDEC= '-26 00 00' / [D M S] Declination of imaged object" status=0
Record 48: "OBJCTROT= 0.0 / [deg] planned rotation of imaged object" status=0
Record 49: "FOCNAME = 'ZWO Focuser' / Focusing equipment name" status=0
Record 50: "FOCPOS = 20427 / [step] Focuser position" status=0
Record 51: "FOCUSPOS= 20427 / [step] Focuser position" status=0
Record 52: "FOCUSSZ = 0.0 / [um] Focuser step size" status=0
Record 53: "FOCTEMP = 22.0100002288818 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0
Record 54: "FOCUSTEM= 22.0100002288818 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0
Record 55: "DEWPOINT= 15.2 / [degC] Dew point" status=0
Record 56: "HUMIDITY= 63.0 / [percent] Relative humidity" status=0
Record 57: "PRESSURE= 899.29 / [hPa] Air pressure" status=0
Record 58: "AMBTEMP = 22.6 / [degC] Ambient air temperature" status=0
Record 59: "WINDDIR = 233.0 / [deg] Wind direction: 0=N, 180=S, 90=E, 270=W" status=0
Record 60: "WINDGUST= 13.00104 / [kph] Wind gust" status=0
Record 61: "WINDSPD = 6.100488 / [kph] Wind speed" status=0
Record 62: "ROWORDER= 'TOP-DOWN' / FITS Image Orientation" status=0
Record 63: "EQUINOX = 2000.0 / Equinox of celestial coordinate system" status=0
Record 64: "SWCREATE= 'N.I.N.A. 3.2.0.9001 (x64)' / Software that created this file" status=0
Record 65: "QHY_EXP = 20.000096 / [s] Actual exposure time" status=0
Record 66: "QHY_PP = 13888.0 / [ps] pixelPeriod" status=0
Record 67: "QHY_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0
Record 68: "GPS_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0
Record 69: "QHY_FP = 20000160.0 / [us] framePeriod" status=0
Record 70: "QHY_CPL = 6120.0 / clocksPerLine" status=0
Record 71: "QHY_LPF = 235295.0 / linesPerFrame" status=0
Record 72: "QHY_AET = 20000096.0 / [us] actualExposureTime" status=0
Record 73: "QHY_LEM = T / isLongExposureMode" status=0
Record 74: "QHY_OFF0= 3767.777 / [us] RollingShutterEndOffset row 0" status=0
Allocating memory for image, dark and result arrays...
Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-12_CI_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_010340_TTUQ2b1x1_1074405_j7ANGGFC/Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-58-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0003.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix
SET-TEMP= 5.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-12_CI_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_010340_TTUQ2b1x1_1074405_j7ANGGFC/Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-58-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0003.fits
SET-TEMP= 5.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_5C_20s_2026-05-30.fit
CCD-TEMP= 4.900000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-12_CI_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_010340_TTUQ2b1x1_1074405_j7ANGGFC/Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-58-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0003.fits
CCD-TEMP= 4.800000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_5C_20s_2026-05-30.fit
Reading dark frame /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_5C_20s_2026-05-30.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix
Dark frame is subtracted, output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-12_CI_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_010340_TTUQ2b1x1_1074405_j7ANGGFC/d_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-58-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0003.fits :)
Spent 0.468019 seconds
renamed 'mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_5C_20s_2026-05-30.png' -> 'transient_report/dark.png'
try_to_calibrate_the_input_frame(): selected flat field /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ2b1x1_2026-05-30.fit from directory /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats
MegaDivider v7
Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-12_CI_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_010340_TTUQ2b1x1_1074405_j7ANGGFC/d_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-58-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0003.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix
Reading flat /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ2b1x1_2026-05-30.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix
Avarage count on flat field image: 20659.746399
Minimal real count (from overscan): 5
Output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-12_CI_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_010340_TTUQ2b1x1_1074405_j7ANGGFC/fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-58-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0003.fits :)
No overscan detected - all values seem high! (left_median=14784.5, right_median=14894.5)
renamed 'mff_TTUQ2b1x1_2026-05-30.png' -> 'transient_report/flat.png'
Using calibrated image CALIBRATED_SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-12_CI_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_010340_TTUQ2b1x1_1074405_j7ANGGFC/fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-58-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0003.fits
Dark frame used to calibrate the second-epoch images:

Flat field used to calibrate the second-epoch images:

after the calibration attempt:
SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-12_CI_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_010340_TTUQ2b1x1_1074405_j7ANGGFC/fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-57-43_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0002.fits
SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-12_CI_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_010340_TTUQ2b1x1_1074405_j7ANGGFC/fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-58-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0003.fits
Previews of the CALIBRATED second-epoch images:
fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-57-43_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0002.fits

fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-58-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0003.fits

Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/TTUQ2_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 4 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_01-54-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0173.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-36-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0255.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-12_CI_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_010340_TTUQ2b1x1_1074405_j7ANGGFC/fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-57-43_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0002.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-12_CI_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_010340_TTUQ2b1x1_1074405_j7ANGGFC/fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-58-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0003.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_01-54-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0173.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-36-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0255.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_01-54-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0173.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-36-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0255.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-12_CI_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_010340_TTUQ2b1x1_1074405_j7ANGGFC/fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-57-43_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0002.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-12_CI_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_010340_TTUQ2b1x1_1074405_j7ANGGFC/fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-58-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0003.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461203.74853115
Plate-solving the images
'tocp_transients_list.txt' -> '../tocp_transients_list.txt'
'asassn_transients_list.txt' -> '../asassn_transients_list.txt'
'tns_transients_list.txt' -> '../tns_transients_list.txt'
wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_01-54-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0173.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_01-54-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0173.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_01-54-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0173.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_01-54-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0173.fits'
wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-36-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0255.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-36-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0255.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-36-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0255.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-36-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0255.fits'
wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-57-43_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0002.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-57-43_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0002.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-57-43_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0002.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-57-43_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0002.fits'
wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-58-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0003.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-58-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0003.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-58-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0003.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-58-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0003.fits'
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_01-54-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0173.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_01-54-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0173.fits
Image size: 942.0'x627.1' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 16:19:12.067 -26:00:18.90 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-57-43_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0002.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-57-43_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0002.fits
Image size: 936.9'x624.3' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 16:19:12.602 -25:59:52.03 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 16:19:12.067 -26:00:18.90
Second-epoch image center 16:19:12.602 -25:59:52.03
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0077 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-58-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0003.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-58-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0003.fits
Image size: 936.9'x624.3' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 16:19:11.258 -26:00:13.97 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 16:19:12.067 -26:00:18.90
Second-epoch image center 16:19:11.258 -26:00:13.97
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0033 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 16:19:12.602 -25:59:52.03
Second-epoch second image center 16:19:11.258 -26:00:13.97
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00790 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_01-54-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0173.fits &> /tmp/tmp.FrVKLMMYyb
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_01-54-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0173.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-36-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0255.fits &> /tmp/tmp.jZioFDqMmC
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-36-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0255.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-12_CI_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_010340_TTUQ2b1x1_1074405_j7ANGGFC/fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-57-43_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0002.fits &> /tmp/tmp.OfwWCbgEa7
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-12_CI_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_010340_TTUQ2b1x1_1074405_j7ANGGFC/fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-57-43_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0002.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-12_CI_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_010340_TTUQ2b1x1_1074405_j7ANGGFC/fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-58-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0003.fits &> /tmp/tmp.sytdDcGsTw
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-12_CI_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_010340_TTUQ2b1x1_1074405_j7ANGGFC/fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-58-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0003.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_01-54-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0173.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_01-54-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0173.fits and wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_01-54-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0173.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_01-54-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0173.fits and wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_01-54-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0173.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_01-54-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0173.fits and wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_01-54-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0173.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_01-54-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0173.fits) and catalog (wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_01-54-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0173.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_01-54-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0173.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 5279 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 235.3887 to 253.5849 deg, Dec -31.5354 to -20.0792 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 235.3887 to 253.5849 deg, Dec -31.5354 to -20.0792 deg
Loaded 8611 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4075 out of 4161 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 4161 out of 5279 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.386900
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.386900
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -8.33
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.06
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.06
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:

Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 5279 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 235.3887 to 253.5849 deg, Dec -31.5354 to -20.0792 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 235.3887 to 253.5849 deg, Dec -31.5354 to -20.0792 deg
Loaded 8611 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4075 out of 4161 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 4161 out of 5279 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_01-54-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0173.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_01-54-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0173.fits:

Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_01-54-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0173.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_01-54-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0173.fits (aperture=6.0)
Read 6303 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 235.3727 to 253.6268 deg, Dec -31.4687 to -20.1177 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 235.3727 to 253.6268 deg, Dec -31.4687 to -20.1177 deg
Loaded 8547 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4618 out of 4781 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 4781 out of 6303 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-36-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0255.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-36-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0255.fits:

Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-36-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0255.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-36-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0255.fits (aperture=6.1)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 4 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 8000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.2 pix Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_01-54-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0173.fits
2.1 pix Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-36-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0255.fits
2.8 pix fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-57-43_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0002.fits
2.8 pix fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-58-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0003.fits
2.2 pix wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_01-54-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0173.fits
2.1 pix wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-36-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0255.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
14.1 mag. Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_01-54-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0173.fits
14.2 mag. Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-36-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0255.fits
13.9 mag. fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-57-43_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0002.fits
14.0 mag. fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-58-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0003.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 13.9 (SNR ) 11.1 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.FrVKLMMYyb (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_01-54-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0173.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-12_CI_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_010340_TTUQ2b1x1_1074405_j7ANGGFC/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_01-54-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0173.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_01-54-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0173.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_01-54-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0173.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_01-54-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0173.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_01-54-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0173.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_01-54-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0173.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_01-54-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0173.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_01-54-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0173.fits' -> 'wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_01-54-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0173.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_01-54-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0173.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_01-54-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0173.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_01-54-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0173.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_01-54-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0173.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_01-54-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0173.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_01-54-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0173.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_01-54-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0173.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_01-54-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0173.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_01-54-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0173.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_01-54-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0173.fits.wcscat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=390, passed=5279
Got 5279 stars (including 4876 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_01-54-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0173.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 5279 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 942.0'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 942.0 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013083 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010467 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 292 to 351 (Dec -31.5 to -20.1)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 964 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 962 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 939 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 962 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5166 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 292 to 351 (Dec -31.5 to -20.1)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 964 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 962 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5167 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 962 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5167 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Excluding outliers - 962 stars left (next iteration limit 1058)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_01-54-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0173.fits N_match=962 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.347 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.267 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.423 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.325 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.458 n_q1=289 n_q2=245 n_q3=272 n_q4=156 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.321
The image catalog is written to wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_01-54-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0173.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_01-54-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0173.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_01-54-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0173.fits -region wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_01-54-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0173.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_01-54-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0173.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.jZioFDqMmC (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-36-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0255.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-12_CI_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_010340_TTUQ2b1x1_1074405_j7ANGGFC/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-36-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0255.fits 574.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-36-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0255.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-36-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0255.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-36-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0255.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-36-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0255.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-36-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0255.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-36-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0255.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-36-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0255.fits' -> 'wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-36-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0255.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-36-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0255.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-36-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0255.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-36-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0255.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-36-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0255.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-36-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0255.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-36-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0255.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-36-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0255.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-36-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0255.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-36-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0255.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-36-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0255.fits.wcscat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=573, passed=6303
Got 6303 stars (including 5717 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-36-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0255.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 6303 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 942.0'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 942.0 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013083 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010467 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 292 to 351 (Dec -31.5 to -20.1)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 959 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 959 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 935 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 959 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6161 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 292 to 351 (Dec -31.5 to -20.1)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 960 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 959 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6163 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 959 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6163 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
Excluding outliers - 959 stars left (next iteration limit 1054)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-36-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0255.fits N_match=959 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.461 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.405 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.478 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.403 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.650 n_q1=299 n_q2=250 n_q3=255 n_q4=155 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.410
The image catalog is written to wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-36-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0255.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-36-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0255.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-36-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0255.fits -region wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-36-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0255.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-36-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0255.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.OfwWCbgEa7 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-12_CI_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_010340_TTUQ2b1x1_1074405_j7ANGGFC/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-12_CI_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_010340_TTUQ2b1x1_1074405_j7ANGGFC/fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-57-43_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0002.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-12_CI_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_010340_TTUQ2b1x1_1074405_j7ANGGFC/fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-57-43_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0002.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-12_CI_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_010340_TTUQ2b1x1_1074405_j7ANGGFC/fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-57-43_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0002.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-12_CI_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_010340_TTUQ2b1x1_1074405_j7ANGGFC/fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-57-43_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0002.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-12_CI_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_010340_TTUQ2b1x1_1074405_j7ANGGFC/fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-57-43_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0002.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-12_CI_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_010340_TTUQ2b1x1_1074405_j7ANGGFC/fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-57-43_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0002.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-57-43_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0002.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-57-43_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0002.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-57-43_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0002.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-57-43_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0002.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-57-43_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0002.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-57-43_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0002.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-57-43_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0002.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-12_CI_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_010340_TTUQ2b1x1_1074405_j7ANGGFC/fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-57-43_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0002.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-57-43_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0002.fits.wcscat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=314, passed=5561
Got 5561 stars (including 5238 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-57-43_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0002.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 5561 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 936.9'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 936.9 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013013 (46.8 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010410 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 349 (Dec -31.3 to -20.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 954 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 953 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 933 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.84"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 953 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5435 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.85"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 349 (Dec -31.3 to -20.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 954 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 953 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5433 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.87"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 953 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5433 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.97"
Excluding outliers - 953 stars left (next iteration limit 1048)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-57-43_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0002.fits N_match=953 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.907 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.638 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.973 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.881 sigma_q4_arcsec=1.174 n_q1=175 n_q2=208 n_q3=283 n_q4=287 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.295
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-57-43_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0002.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-57-43_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0002.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-12_CI_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_010340_TTUQ2b1x1_1074405_j7ANGGFC/fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-57-43_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0002.fits -region wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-57-43_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0002.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-57-43_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0002.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.sytdDcGsTw (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-12_CI_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_010340_TTUQ2b1x1_1074405_j7ANGGFC/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-12_CI_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_010340_TTUQ2b1x1_1074405_j7ANGGFC/fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-58-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0003.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-12_CI_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_010340_TTUQ2b1x1_1074405_j7ANGGFC/fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-58-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0003.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-12_CI_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_010340_TTUQ2b1x1_1074405_j7ANGGFC/fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-58-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0003.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-12_CI_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_010340_TTUQ2b1x1_1074405_j7ANGGFC/fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-58-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0003.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-12_CI_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_010340_TTUQ2b1x1_1074405_j7ANGGFC/fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-58-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0003.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-12_CI_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_010340_TTUQ2b1x1_1074405_j7ANGGFC/fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-58-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0003.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-58-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0003.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-58-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0003.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-58-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0003.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-58-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0003.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-58-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0003.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-58-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0003.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-58-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0003.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-12_CI_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_010340_TTUQ2b1x1_1074405_j7ANGGFC/fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-58-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0003.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-58-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0003.fits.wcscat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=319, passed=5507
Got 5507 stars (including 5183 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-58-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0003.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 5507 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 936.9'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 936.9 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013013 (46.8 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010410 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 349 (Dec -31.3 to -20.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 959 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 957 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 930 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.85"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 957 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5362 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.86"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 349 (Dec -31.3 to -20.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 960 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 956 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5363 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.87"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 956 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5363 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.94"
Excluding outliers - 956 stars left (next iteration limit 1052)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-58-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0003.fits N_match=956 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.852 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.639 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.936 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.801 sigma_q4_arcsec=1.039 n_q1=155 n_q2=201 n_q3=283 n_q4=317 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.218
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-58-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0003.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-58-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0003.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-12_CI_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_010340_TTUQ2b1x1_1074405_j7ANGGFC/fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-58-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0003.fits -region wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-58-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0003.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-58-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0003.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_01-54-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0173.fits sigma_overall=0.347 worst_q_ratio=1.321
ref2=Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-36-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0255.fits sigma_overall=0.461 worst_q_ratio=1.410
new1=fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-57-43_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0002.fits sigma_overall=0.907 worst_q_ratio=1.295
new2=fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-58-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0003.fits sigma_overall=0.852 worst_q_ratio=1.218
reference average sigma_overall=0.404 worst_q_ratio=1.3655
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
WCS_QUALITY_RETRY: 1st new image (fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-57-43_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0002.fits) flagged: sigma=0.907 (ref avg 0.404), ratio=1.295 (ref avg 1.3655), threshold=2.0x. Retrying with --tweak-order 2.
Running with VAST_TWEAK_ORDER=2: util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-12_CI_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_010340_TTUQ2b1x1_1074405_j7ANGGFC/fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-57-43_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0002.fits
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-12_CI_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_010340_TTUQ2b1x1_1074405_j7ANGGFC/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-12_CI_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_010340_TTUQ2b1x1_1074405_j7ANGGFC/fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-57-43_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0002.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-12_CI_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_010340_TTUQ2b1x1_1074405_j7ANGGFC/fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-57-43_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0002.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-12_CI_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_010340_TTUQ2b1x1_1074405_j7ANGGFC/fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-57-43_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0002.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-12_CI_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_010340_TTUQ2b1x1_1074405_j7ANGGFC/fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-57-43_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0002.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-12_CI_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_010340_TTUQ2b1x1_1074405_j7ANGGFC/fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-57-43_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0002.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-12_CI_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_010340_TTUQ2b1x1_1074405_j7ANGGFC/fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-57-43_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0002.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-57-43_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0002.fits
No image with WCS calibration found for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-12_CI_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_010340_TTUQ2b1x1_1074405_j7ANGGFC/fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-57-43_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0002.fits .... Determining astrometry method...
Using the local copy of Astrometry.net software...
Choosing aperture...
Using the catalog image00003.cat SExtracted earlier from the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-12_CI_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_010340_TTUQ2b1x1_1074405_j7ANGGFC/fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-57-43_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0002.fits
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-12_CI_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_010340_TTUQ2b1x1_1074405_j7ANGGFC/lib/make_outxyls_for_astrometric_calibration found 5120 high-SNR stars for plate solving
This service uses tools provided by Astrometry.net.
For more information visit http://astrometry.net/
######### Trying to solve plate assuming 605' field of view #########
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-12_CI_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_010340_TTUQ2b1x1_1074405_j7ANGGFC/fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-57-43_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0002.fits
Using the local copy of Astrometry.net code
IMAGE_SIZE= --width 9576 --height 6388 SCALE_LOW=544.5 SCALE_HIGH=3025.0
Using solve-field binary
/usr/local/astrometry/bin/solve-field
Reading input file 1 of 1: "out1085540.xyls"...
Reading sort column "FLUX_APER"
Sorting sort column
mmapping input file
Copying table header.
Writing row 0
Done
Solving...
Reading file "./out1085540.axy"...
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4119.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4118.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4117.fits, field objects 1-10).
log-odds ratio 28.1346 (1.65455e+12), 4 match, 0 conflict, 11 distractors, 21 index.
RA,Dec = (244.806,-25.9872), pixel scale 5.93945 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: ---+-----++---+(best)-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Field 1: solved with index index-4116.fits.
Field 1 solved: writing to file ./out1085540.solved to indicate this.
Field: out1085540.xyls
Field center: (RA,Dec) = (244.804037, -25.997789) deg.
Field center: (RA H:M:S, Dec D:M:S) = (16:19:12.969, -25:59:52.039).
Field size: 15.7277 x 10.5377 degrees
Field rotation angle: up is -179.995 degrees E of N
Field parity: neg
Inserting WCS header... '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-12_CI_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_010340_TTUQ2b1x1_1074405_j7ANGGFC/fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-57-43_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0002.fits' -> 'fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-57-43_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0002.fits'
WCS keywords have been successfully stripped from all HDUs in the file.
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 117M Jun 12 01:06 fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-57-43_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0002.fits
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 12K Jun 12 01:06 out1085540.wcs
Inserting WCS header (1st iteration local)... Opening FITS image file fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-57-43_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0002.fits for reading... done!
Creating new image file (wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-57-43_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0002.fits)... done!
done!
All done!
done
The WCS header appears to be added with no errors in /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-12_CI_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_010340_TTUQ2b1x1_1074405_j7ANGGFC/fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-57-43_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0002.fits (fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-57-43_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0002.fits)
Keyword does not exist
Keyword has been changed to:
VAST001 = 'wcs_image_calibration.sh' / VaST script name
Keyword does not exist
Keyword has been changed to:
VAST002 = 'local ' / ASTROMETRYNET_LOCAL_OR_REMOTE
Keyword does not exist
Keyword has been changed to:
VAST003 = 'local ' / PLATE_SOLVE_SERVER
Keyword does not exist
Keyword has been changed to:
VAST004 = 'iteration01' / astrometry.net run
Reading input file 1 of 1: "out1085540.xyls"...
Reading sort column "FLUX_APER"
Sorting sort column
mmapping input file
Copying table header.
Writing row 0
Done
Solving...
Reading file "./out1085540.axy"...
Only searching for solutions within 15.6617 degrees of RA,Dec (244.803,-25.9986)
log-odds ratio 28.1346 (1.65455e+12), 4 match, 0 conflict, 11 distractors, 21 index.
RA,Dec = (244.806,-25.9872), pixel scale 5.93945 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: ---+-----++---+(best)-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Field 1: solved with index index-4116.fits.
Field 1 solved: writing to file ./out1085540.solved to indicate this.
Field: out1085540.xyls
Field center: (RA,Dec) = (244.804037, -25.997789) deg.
Field center: (RA H:M:S, Dec D:M:S) = (16:19:12.969, -25:59:52.039).
Field size: 15.7277 x 10.5377 degrees
Field rotation angle: up is -179.995 degrees E of N
Field parity: neg
WCS keywords have been successfully stripped from all HDUs in the file.
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 117M Jun 12 01:06 fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-57-43_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0002.fits
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 12K Jun 12 01:06 out1085540.wcs
Inserting WCS header (2nd iteration local)... Opening FITS image file fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-57-43_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0002.fits for reading... done!
Creating new image file (wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-57-43_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0002.fits)... done!
done!
All done!
The WCS header appears to be added with no errors.
Keyword does not exist
Keyword has been changed to:
VAST001 = 'wcs_image_calibration.sh' / VaST script name
Keyword does not exist
Keyword has been changed to:
VAST002 = 'local ' / ASTROMETRYNET_LOCAL_OR_REMOTE
Keyword does not exist
Keyword has been changed to:
VAST003 = 'local ' / PLATE_SOLVE_SERVER
Keyword does not exist
Keyword has been changed to:
VAST004 = 'iteration02' / astrometry.net run
The field of view is large: we'll try to run Astromety.net code on the image itself rather than a star list
Reading input file "wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-57-43_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0002.fits"...
Found an existing WCS header, will try to verify it.
Extracting sources...
simplexy: found 34245 sources.
Solving...
Reading file "./wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-57-43_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0002.axy"...
Verifying WCS using indices with quads of size [63.3768, 950.057] arcmin
Verifying WCS with index 39 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4117.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
log-odds ratio 30.963 (2.79938e+13), 9 match, 0 conflict, 219 distractors, 9 index.
RA,Dec = (244.805,-25.997), pixel scale 5.95274 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: -----------+-++------------+-------------------------+----------------------------------------------
--> log-odds 30.963
Verifying WCS with index 40 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4116.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
log-odds ratio 120.675 (2.56205e+52), 20 match, 0 conflict, 208 distractors, 21 index.
RA,Dec = (244.805,-25.997), pixel scale 5.95274 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: -----------+-++------------+------+------------------++--------------+------------------------------
--> log-odds 120.675
Verifying WCS with index 41 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4115.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
log-odds ratio 272.957 (3.49644e+118), 39 match, 0 conflict, 259 distractors, 47 index.
RA,Dec = (244.805,-25.997), pixel scale 5.95274 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: -----------+-+++-----------+------+---------+---+----++--------------+--------------------++--------
--> log-odds 272.957
Verifying WCS with index 42 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4114.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
log-odds ratio 527.25 (9.58707e+228), 68 match, 0 conflict, 230 distractors, 87 index.
RA,Dec = (244.805,-25.997), pixel scale 5.95274 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: ------+----+-+++-----------+---+-++--------++---+-+-+++----------++--+--------+-+---------++---+--+-
--> log-odds 527.25
Verifying WCS with index 43 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4113.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
log-odds ratio 1152.75 (inf), 145 match, 0 conflict, 360 distractors, 187 index.
RA,Dec = (244.805,-25.997), pixel scale 5.95274 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: --+++-++---+-+++---+--++-+-++--++++--+++--++++-++-+++++-----++++++++-+---++-+++-++-+-++---+++-++-++-
--> log-odds 1152.75
Verifying WCS with index 44 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4112.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
log-odds ratio 2105.99 (inf), 281 match, 0 conflict, 707 distractors, 369 index.
RA,Dec = (244.805,-25.997), pixel scale 5.95274 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: --+++-++---+++++---+-+++-++++++++++-++++--+++++++-+++++-----++++++++++-+-+++++++++-+-+++--++++++-+++
--> log-odds 2105.99
Verifying WCS with index 45 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4111.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
log-odds ratio 3682.73 (inf), 525 match, 0 conflict, 854 distractors, 730 index.
RA,Dec = (244.805,-25.997), pixel scale 5.95274 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: --++++++---+-+++---+++++-++++++++++-++++--+++++++-++++++----++++++++++++-+++++++++-+++++--++++++-+++
--> log-odds 3682.73
Verifying WCS with index 46 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4110.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
log-odds ratio 6711.65 (inf), 1055 match, 1 conflict, 1868 distractors, 1439 index.
RA,Dec = (244.805,-25.997), pixel scale 5.95274 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: ---+++++---+-+++---+++++-++++++++++-++++--+++++++-++++++----++++++++++++-+++++++++-+++++--++++++-+++
--> log-odds 6711.65
Verifying WCS using indices with quads of size [63.3768, 950.057] arcmin
Verifying WCS with index 39 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4117.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
log-odds ratio 30.963 (2.79938e+13), 9 match, 0 conflict, 219 distractors, 9 index.
RA,Dec = (244.805,-25.997), pixel scale 5.95274 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: -----------+-++------------+-------------------------+----------------------------------------------
--> log-odds 30.963
Verifying WCS with index 40 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4116.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
log-odds ratio 120.675 (2.56205e+52), 20 match, 0 conflict, 208 distractors, 21 index.
RA,Dec = (244.805,-25.997), pixel scale 5.95274 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: -----------+-++------------+------+------------------++--------------+------------------------------
--> log-odds 120.675
Verifying WCS with index 41 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4115.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
log-odds ratio 272.957 (3.49644e+118), 39 match, 0 conflict, 259 distractors, 47 index.
RA,Dec = (244.805,-25.997), pixel scale 5.95274 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: -----------+-+++-----------+------+---------+---+----++--------------+--------------------++--------
--> log-odds 272.957
Verifying WCS with index 42 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4114.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
log-odds ratio 527.25 (9.58707e+228), 68 match, 0 conflict, 230 distractors, 87 index.
RA,Dec = (244.805,-25.997), pixel scale 5.95274 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: ------+----+-+++-----------+---+-++--------++---+-+-+++----------++--+--------+-+---------++---+--+-
--> log-odds 527.25
Verifying WCS with index 43 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4113.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
log-odds ratio 1152.75 (inf), 145 match, 0 conflict, 360 distractors, 187 index.
RA,Dec = (244.805,-25.997), pixel scale 5.95274 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: --+++-++---+-+++---+--++-+-++--++++--+++--++++-++-+++++-----++++++++-+---++-+++-++-+-++---+++-++-++-
--> log-odds 1152.75
Verifying WCS with index 44 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4112.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
log-odds ratio 2105.99 (inf), 281 match, 0 conflict, 707 distractors, 369 index.
RA,Dec = (244.805,-25.997), pixel scale 5.95274 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: --+++-++---+++++---+-+++-++++++++++-++++--+++++++-+++++-----++++++++++-+-+++++++++-+-+++--++++++-+++
--> log-odds 2105.99
Verifying WCS with index 45 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4111.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
log-odds ratio 3682.73 (inf), 525 match, 0 conflict, 854 distractors, 730 index.
RA,Dec = (244.805,-25.997), pixel scale 5.95274 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: --++++++---+-+++---+++++-++++++++++-++++--+++++++-++++++----++++++++++++-+++++++++-+++++--++++++-+++
--> log-odds 3682.73
Verifying WCS with index 46 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4110.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
log-odds ratio 6711.65 (inf), 1055 match, 1 conflict, 1868 distractors, 1439 index.
RA,Dec = (244.805,-25.997), pixel scale 5.95274 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: ---+++++---+-+++---+++++-++++++++++-++++--+++++++-++++++----++++++++++++-+++++++++-+++++--++++++-+++
--> log-odds 6711.65
Got 16 solutions.
Field: wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-57-43_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0002.fits
Field center: (RA,Dec) = (244.802392, -25.996782) deg.
Field center: (RA H:M:S, Dec D:M:S) = (16:19:12.574, -25:59:48.414).
Field size: 15.7213 x 10.5338 degrees
Field rotation angle: up is -179.994 degrees E of N
Field parity: neg
Creating new FITS file "./wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-57-43_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0002.new"...
renamed 'wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-57-43_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0002.new' -> 'wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-57-43_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0002.fits'
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-57-43_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0002.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-57-43_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0002.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-57-43_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0002.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-57-43_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0002.fits was not found.
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-12_CI_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_010340_TTUQ2b1x1_1074405_j7ANGGFC/fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-57-43_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0002.fits
verification OK: wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-57-43_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0002.fits
Generating wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-57-43_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0002.fits.wcscat from image00003.cat
Catalog wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-57-43_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0002.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-57-43_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0002.fits created.
verification OK: wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-57-43_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0002.fits
verification OK: wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-57-43_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0002.fits
Image size: 939.1'x626.2' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.88"/pix along the X axis and 5.88"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 16:19:12.354 -25:59:51.39 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
### Converting SExtractor-derived pixel positions to celestial coordinates using xy2sky from WCSTools ###
### Converted positions of 5561 stars ###
'wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-57-43_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0002.fits.wcscat' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_before_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-12_CI_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_010340_TTUQ2b1x1_1074405_j7ANGGFC/correct_sextractor_wcs_catalog_usingxy2sky1090911.tmp' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_after_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-57-43_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0002.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-12_CI_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_010340_TTUQ2b1x1_1074405_j7ANGGFC/fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-57-43_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0002.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-57-43_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0002.fits.wcscat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=314, passed=5561
Got 5561 stars (including 5238 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-57-43_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0002.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 5561 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 939.1'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 939.1 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013043 (47.0 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010434 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 349 (Dec -31.3 to -20.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 901 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 892 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 875 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 2.78"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 892 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5239 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 2.95"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 349 (Dec -31.3 to -20.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 941 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 928 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5243 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 2.69"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 928 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5382 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 1.68"
Excluding outliers - 928 stars left (next iteration limit 981)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-57-43_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0002.fits N_match=928 sigma_overall_arcsec=2.598 sigma_q1_arcsec=2.507 sigma_q2_arcsec=1.617 sigma_q3_arcsec=2.069 sigma_q4_arcsec=2.005 n_q1=167 n_q2=208 n_q3=267 n_q4=286 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=0.965
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-57-43_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0002.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-57-43_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0002.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-12_CI_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_010340_TTUQ2b1x1_1074405_j7ANGGFC/fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-57-43_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0002.fits -region wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-57-43_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0002.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-57-43_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0002.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
WCS_QUALITY_RETRY: --tweak-order 2 did NOT improve 1st new image (fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-57-43_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0002.fits): sigma 0.907->2.598, ratio 1.295->0.965; reverting to order 3
WCS_QUALITY_RETRY: 2nd new image (fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-58-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0003.fits) flagged: sigma=0.852 (ref avg 0.404), ratio=1.218 (ref avg 1.3655), threshold=2.0x. Retrying with --tweak-order 2.
Running with VAST_TWEAK_ORDER=2: util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-12_CI_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_010340_TTUQ2b1x1_1074405_j7ANGGFC/fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-58-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0003.fits
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-12_CI_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_010340_TTUQ2b1x1_1074405_j7ANGGFC/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-12_CI_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_010340_TTUQ2b1x1_1074405_j7ANGGFC/fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-58-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0003.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-12_CI_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_010340_TTUQ2b1x1_1074405_j7ANGGFC/fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-58-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0003.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-12_CI_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_010340_TTUQ2b1x1_1074405_j7ANGGFC/fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-58-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0003.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-12_CI_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_010340_TTUQ2b1x1_1074405_j7ANGGFC/fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-58-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0003.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-12_CI_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_010340_TTUQ2b1x1_1074405_j7ANGGFC/fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-58-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0003.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-12_CI_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_010340_TTUQ2b1x1_1074405_j7ANGGFC/fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-58-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0003.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-58-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0003.fits
No image with WCS calibration found for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-12_CI_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_010340_TTUQ2b1x1_1074405_j7ANGGFC/fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-58-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0003.fits .... Determining astrometry method...
Using the local copy of Astrometry.net software...
Choosing aperture...
Using the catalog image00004.cat SExtracted earlier from the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-12_CI_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_010340_TTUQ2b1x1_1074405_j7ANGGFC/fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-58-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0003.fits
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-12_CI_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_010340_TTUQ2b1x1_1074405_j7ANGGFC/lib/make_outxyls_for_astrometric_calibration found 5086 high-SNR stars for plate solving
This service uses tools provided by Astrometry.net.
For more information visit http://astrometry.net/
######### Trying to solve plate assuming 605' field of view #########
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-12_CI_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_010340_TTUQ2b1x1_1074405_j7ANGGFC/fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-58-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0003.fits
Using the local copy of Astrometry.net code
IMAGE_SIZE= --width 9576 --height 6388 SCALE_LOW=544.5 SCALE_HIGH=3025.0
Using solve-field binary
/usr/local/astrometry/bin/solve-field
Reading input file 1 of 1: "out1091218.xyls"...
Reading sort column "FLUX_APER"
Sorting sort column
mmapping input file
Copying table header.
Writing row 0
Done
Solving...
Reading file "./out1091218.axy"...
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4119.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4118.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4117.fits, field objects 1-10).
log-odds ratio 28.7003 (2.91341e+12), 4 match, 0 conflict, 11 distractors, 21 index.
RA,Dec = (244.801,-25.9936), pixel scale 5.93969 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: ---+-+--+-----+(best)-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Field 1: solved with index index-4116.fits.
Field 1 solved: writing to file ./out1091218.solved to indicate this.
Field: out1091218.xyls
Field center: (RA,Dec) = (244.798222, -26.004027) deg.
Field center: (RA H:M:S, Dec D:M:S) = (16:19:11.573, -26:00:14.497).
Field size: 15.7281 x 10.5376 degrees
Field rotation angle: up is -179.995 degrees E of N
Field parity: neg
Inserting WCS header... '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-12_CI_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_010340_TTUQ2b1x1_1074405_j7ANGGFC/fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-58-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0003.fits' -> 'fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-58-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0003.fits'
WCS keywords have been successfully stripped from all HDUs in the file.
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 117M Jun 12 01:07 fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-58-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0003.fits
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 12K Jun 12 01:07 out1091218.wcs
Inserting WCS header (1st iteration local)... Opening FITS image file fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-58-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0003.fits for reading... done!
Creating new image file (wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-58-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0003.fits)... done!
done!
All done!
done
The WCS header appears to be added with no errors in /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-12_CI_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_010340_TTUQ2b1x1_1074405_j7ANGGFC/fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-58-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0003.fits (fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-58-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0003.fits)
Keyword does not exist
Keyword has been changed to:
VAST001 = 'wcs_image_calibration.sh' / VaST script name
Keyword does not exist
Keyword has been changed to:
VAST002 = 'local ' / ASTROMETRYNET_LOCAL_OR_REMOTE
Keyword does not exist
Keyword has been changed to:
VAST003 = 'local ' / PLATE_SOLVE_SERVER
Keyword does not exist
Keyword has been changed to:
VAST004 = 'iteration01' / astrometry.net run
Reading input file 1 of 1: "out1091218.xyls"...
Reading sort column "FLUX_APER"
Sorting sort column
mmapping input file
Copying table header.
Writing row 0
Done
Solving...
Reading file "./out1091218.axy"...
Only searching for solutions within 15.6633 degrees of RA,Dec (244.797,-26.0049)
log-odds ratio 28.7003 (2.91341e+12), 4 match, 0 conflict, 11 distractors, 21 index.
RA,Dec = (244.801,-25.9936), pixel scale 5.93969 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: ---+-+--+-----+(best)-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Field 1: solved with index index-4116.fits.
Field 1 solved: writing to file ./out1091218.solved to indicate this.
Field: out1091218.xyls
Field center: (RA,Dec) = (244.798222, -26.004027) deg.
Field center: (RA H:M:S, Dec D:M:S) = (16:19:11.573, -26:00:14.497).
Field size: 15.7281 x 10.5376 degrees
Field rotation angle: up is -179.995 degrees E of N
Field parity: neg
WCS keywords have been successfully stripped from all HDUs in the file.
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 117M Jun 12 01:07 fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-58-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0003.fits
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 12K Jun 12 01:07 out1091218.wcs
Inserting WCS header (2nd iteration local)... Opening FITS image file fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-58-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0003.fits for reading... done!
Creating new image file (wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-58-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0003.fits)... done!
done!
All done!
The WCS header appears to be added with no errors.
Keyword does not exist
Keyword has been changed to:
VAST001 = 'wcs_image_calibration.sh' / VaST script name
Keyword does not exist
Keyword has been changed to:
VAST002 = 'local ' / ASTROMETRYNET_LOCAL_OR_REMOTE
Keyword does not exist
Keyword has been changed to:
VAST003 = 'local ' / PLATE_SOLVE_SERVER
Keyword does not exist
Keyword has been changed to:
VAST004 = 'iteration02' / astrometry.net run
The field of view is large: we'll try to run Astromety.net code on the image itself rather than a star list
Reading input file "wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-58-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0003.fits"...
Found an existing WCS header, will try to verify it.
Extracting sources...
simplexy: found 34027 sources.
Solving...
Reading file "./wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-58-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0003.axy"...
Verifying WCS using indices with quads of size [63.3772, 950.063] arcmin
Verifying WCS with index 39 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4117.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
log-odds ratio 30.9882 (2.87074e+13), 9 match, 0 conflict, 205 distractors, 9 index.
RA,Dec = (244.799,-26.0032), pixel scale 5.95278 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: --+----------++----------------------------------------------+-----+--------------------------------
--> log-odds 30.9882
Verifying WCS with index 40 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4116.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
log-odds ratio 133.829 (1.3217e+58), 20 match, 0 conflict, 194 distractors, 21 index.
RA,Dec = (244.799,-26.0032), pixel scale 5.95278 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: -++----------++----------------------------------------+--+--+-----+------+--+----------------------
--> log-odds 133.829
Verifying WCS with index 41 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4115.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
log-odds ratio 288.498 (1.96392e+125), 39 match, 0 conflict, 197 distractors, 47 index.
RA,Dec = (244.799,-26.0032), pixel scale 5.95278 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: -++----------+++------------+--------------------------+--+--+-----+------+--+---------------------+
--> log-odds 288.498
Verifying WCS with index 42 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4114.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
log-odds ratio 545.556 (8.54858e+236), 68 match, 0 conflict, 173 distractors, 87 index.
RA,Dec = (244.799,-26.0032), pixel scale 5.95278 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: -+++---------+++--------++--+----------+--++--------+--++-+--+-----+------+--+--+-------------+----+
--> log-odds 545.556
Verifying WCS with index 43 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4113.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
log-odds ratio 1155.92 (inf), 144 match, 0 conflict, 305 distractors, 187 index.
RA,Dec = (244.799,-26.0032), pixel scale 5.95278 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: -+++-+++-----+++-+---+--++-++-+---+-++-+--++++++---++++++++-+++-+--+-+-++++++++-+-+--+--+----+++---+
--> log-odds 1155.92
Verifying WCS with index 44 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4112.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
log-odds ratio 2077.68 (inf), 274 match, 0 conflict, 639 distractors, 369 index.
RA,Dec = (244.799,-26.0032), pixel scale 5.95278 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: -+++++++-----+++-+-+-+++++-+++++-++-++++--++++++-+-++++++++-+++-+--+++-++++++++++-+-+++++--+++++---+
--> log-odds 2077.68
Verifying WCS with index 45 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4111.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
log-odds ratio 3656.33 (inf), 524 match, 0 conflict, 924 distractors, 730 index.
RA,Dec = (244.799,-26.0032), pixel scale 5.95278 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: -++++++++----+++-+-+++++++-+++++-++-++++-+++++++-+-++++++++-+++++--++++++++++++++-+-+++++--+++++---+
--> log-odds 3656.33
Verifying WCS with index 46 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4110.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
log-odds ratio 6671.71 (inf), 1042 match, 1 conflict, 1804 distractors, 1439 index.
RA,Dec = (244.799,-26.0032), pixel scale 5.95278 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: -++++++++----+++---+++++++-+++++-++-++++-+++++++-+-+++++-++-+++++--++++++++++++++-+-+++++--+++++---+
--> log-odds 6671.71
Verifying WCS using indices with quads of size [63.3772, 950.063] arcmin
Verifying WCS with index 39 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4117.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
log-odds ratio 30.9882 (2.87074e+13), 9 match, 0 conflict, 205 distractors, 9 index.
RA,Dec = (244.799,-26.0032), pixel scale 5.95278 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: --+----------++----------------------------------------------+-----+--------------------------------
--> log-odds 30.9882
Verifying WCS with index 40 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4116.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
log-odds ratio 133.829 (1.3217e+58), 20 match, 0 conflict, 194 distractors, 21 index.
RA,Dec = (244.799,-26.0032), pixel scale 5.95278 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: -++----------++----------------------------------------+--+--+-----+------+--+----------------------
--> log-odds 133.829
Verifying WCS with index 41 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4115.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
log-odds ratio 288.498 (1.96392e+125), 39 match, 0 conflict, 197 distractors, 47 index.
RA,Dec = (244.799,-26.0032), pixel scale 5.95278 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: -++----------+++------------+--------------------------+--+--+-----+------+--+---------------------+
--> log-odds 288.498
Verifying WCS with index 42 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4114.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
log-odds ratio 545.556 (8.54858e+236), 68 match, 0 conflict, 173 distractors, 87 index.
RA,Dec = (244.799,-26.0032), pixel scale 5.95278 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: -+++---------+++--------++--+----------+--++--------+--++-+--+-----+------+--+--+-------------+----+
--> log-odds 545.556
Verifying WCS with index 43 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4113.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
log-odds ratio 1155.92 (inf), 144 match, 0 conflict, 305 distractors, 187 index.
RA,Dec = (244.799,-26.0032), pixel scale 5.95278 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: -+++-+++-----+++-+---+--++-++-+---+-++-+--++++++---++++++++-+++-+--+-+-++++++++-+-+--+--+----+++---+
--> log-odds 1155.92
Verifying WCS with index 44 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4112.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
log-odds ratio 2077.68 (inf), 274 match, 0 conflict, 639 distractors, 369 index.
RA,Dec = (244.799,-26.0032), pixel scale 5.95278 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: -+++++++-----+++-+-+-+++++-+++++-++-++++--++++++-+-++++++++-+++-+--+++-++++++++++-+-+++++--+++++---+
--> log-odds 2077.68
Verifying WCS with index 45 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4111.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
log-odds ratio 3656.33 (inf), 524 match, 0 conflict, 924 distractors, 730 index.
RA,Dec = (244.799,-26.0032), pixel scale 5.95278 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: -++++++++----+++-+-+++++++-+++++-++-++++-+++++++-+-++++++++-+++++--++++++++++++++-+-+++++--+++++---+
--> log-odds 3656.33
Verifying WCS with index 46 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4110.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
log-odds ratio 6671.71 (inf), 1042 match, 1 conflict, 1804 distractors, 1439 index.
RA,Dec = (244.799,-26.0032), pixel scale 5.95278 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: -++++++++----+++---+++++++-+++++-++-++++-+++++++-+-+++++-++-+++++--++++++++++++++-+-+++++--+++++---+
--> log-odds 6671.71
Got 16 solutions.
Field: wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-58-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0003.fits
Field center: (RA,Dec) = (244.796812, -26.002882) deg.
Field center: (RA H:M:S, Dec D:M:S) = (16:19:11.235, -26:00:10.375).
Field size: 15.7211 x 10.5337 degrees
Field rotation angle: up is -179.994 degrees E of N
Field parity: neg
Creating new FITS file "./wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-58-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0003.new"...
renamed 'wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-58-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0003.new' -> 'wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-58-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0003.fits'
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-58-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0003.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-58-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0003.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-58-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0003.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-58-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0003.fits was not found.
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-12_CI_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_010340_TTUQ2b1x1_1074405_j7ANGGFC/fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-58-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0003.fits
verification OK: wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-58-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0003.fits
Generating wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-58-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0003.fits.wcscat from image00004.cat
Catalog wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-58-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0003.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-58-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0003.fits created.
verification OK: wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-58-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0003.fits
verification OK: wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-58-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0003.fits
Image size: 939.1'x626.2' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.88"/pix along the X axis and 5.88"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 16:19:11.014 -26:00:13.35 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
### Converting SExtractor-derived pixel positions to celestial coordinates using xy2sky from WCSTools ###
### Converted positions of 5507 stars ###
'wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-58-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0003.fits.wcscat' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_before_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-12_CI_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_010340_TTUQ2b1x1_1074405_j7ANGGFC/correct_sextractor_wcs_catalog_usingxy2sky1093294.tmp' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_after_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-58-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0003.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-12_CI_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_010340_TTUQ2b1x1_1074405_j7ANGGFC/fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-58-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0003.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-58-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0003.fits.wcscat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=319, passed=5507
Got 5507 stars (including 5183 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-58-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0003.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 5507 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 939.1'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 939.1 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013043 (47.0 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010434 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 349 (Dec -31.3 to -20.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 909 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 895 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 876 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 2.50"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 895 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5177 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 2.75"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 349 (Dec -31.3 to -20.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 946 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 937 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5184 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 2.49"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 937 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5306 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 1.70"
Excluding outliers - 937 stars left (next iteration limit 984)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-58-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0003.fits N_match=937 sigma_overall_arcsec=2.724 sigma_q1_arcsec=2.862 sigma_q2_arcsec=1.648 sigma_q3_arcsec=2.038 sigma_q4_arcsec=1.822 n_q1=148 n_q2=201 n_q3=275 n_q4=313 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.051
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-58-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0003.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-58-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0003.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-12_CI_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_010340_TTUQ2b1x1_1074405_j7ANGGFC/fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-58-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0003.fits -region wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-58-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0003.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-58-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0003.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
WCS_QUALITY_RETRY: --tweak-order 2 did NOT improve 2nd new image (fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-58-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0003.fits): sigma 0.852->2.724, ratio 1.218->1.051; reverting to order 3
WARNING: 1st new image has sigma_overall_arcsec=2.598 -- 6.43x the reference average (0.404); plate solution may be of low accuracy
WARNING: 2nd new image has sigma_overall_arcsec=2.724 -- 6.74x the reference average (0.404); plate solution may be of low accuracy
Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_01-54-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0173_astrometric_residuals.png (962 matched stars from wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_01-54-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0173.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.31 arcsec)

plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-36-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0255_astrometric_residuals.png (959 matched stars from wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-36-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0255.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.43 arcsec)

plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-57-43_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0002_astrometric_residuals.png (953 matched stars from wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-57-43_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0002.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.82 arcsec)

plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-58-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0003_astrometric_residuals.png (956 matched stars from wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-58-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0003.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.78 arcsec)

Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-57-43_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0002.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-57-43_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0002.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-12_CI_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_010340_TTUQ2b1x1_1074405_j7ANGGFC/wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-57-43_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0002.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-58-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0003.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-58-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0003.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-12_CI_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_010340_TTUQ2b1x1_1074405_j7ANGGFC/wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-58-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0003.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Sco-02-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_01-54-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0173.fits at 16:01:05.31 -29:57:04.2: 14.51 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-36-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0255.fits at 16:01:05.31 -29:57:04.2: 14.68 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out21054.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 9s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 1s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21054_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-58-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0003
Preparing report for the candidate 21054_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-58-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0003
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21613_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-58-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0003
The candidate 21613_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-58-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0003 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 06 12.24905 | 2461203.74905 | 10.66 | 16:11:41.63 -27:03:31.7 | 5798 3840 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-12_CI_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_010340_TTUQ2b1x1_1074405_j7ANGGFC/fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-58-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0003.fits |
**** FOUND 16:11:41.61 -27:03:31.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21701_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-58-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0003
The candidate 21701_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-58-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0003 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 06 12.24905 | 2461203.74905 | 11.39 | 16:05:30.95 -23:28:38.5 | 6689 1689 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-12_CI_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_010340_TTUQ2b1x1_1074405_j7ANGGFC/fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-58-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0003.fits |
**** FOUND 16:05:30.93 -23:28:38.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20317_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-58-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0003
The candidate 20317_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-58-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0003 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 3 | 2026 06 12.24905 | 2461203.74905 | 9.62 | 16:17:39.25 -22:56:40.5 | 5003 1345 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-12_CI_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_010340_TTUQ2b1x1_1074405_j7ANGGFC/fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-58-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0003.fits |
**** FOUND 16:17:39.23 -22:56:40.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 10s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Sco-02-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
16:01:05.31 -29:57:04.2
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 4 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_01-54-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0173.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-36-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0255.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-12_CI_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_010340_TTUQ2b1x1_1074405_j7ANGGFC/fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-57-43_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0002.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-12_CI_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_010340_TTUQ2b1x1_1074405_j7ANGGFC/fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-58-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0003.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_01-54-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0173.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-36-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0255.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_01-54-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0173.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-36-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0255.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-12_CI_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_010340_TTUQ2b1x1_1074405_j7ANGGFC/fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-57-43_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0002.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-12_CI_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_010340_TTUQ2b1x1_1074405_j7ANGGFC/fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-58-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0003.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_01-54-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0173.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-36-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0255.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-57-43_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0002.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-58-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0003.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/exclusion_list.txt
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_01-54-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0173.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-36-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0255.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-57-43_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0002.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-58-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0003.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_01-54-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0173.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_01-54-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0173.fits
Image size: 942.0'x627.1' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 16:19:12.067 -26:00:18.90 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-57-43_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0002.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-57-43_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0002.fits
Image size: 936.9'x624.3' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 16:19:12.602 -25:59:52.03 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 16:19:12.067 -26:00:18.90
Second-epoch image center 16:19:12.602 -25:59:52.03
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0077 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-58-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0003.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-58-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0003.fits
Image size: 936.9'x624.3' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 16:19:11.258 -26:00:13.97 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 16:19:12.067 -26:00:18.90
Second-epoch image center 16:19:11.258 -26:00:13.97
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0033 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 16:19:12.602 -25:59:52.03
Second-epoch second image center 16:19:11.258 -26:00:13.97
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00790 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_01-54-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0173.fits &> /tmp/tmp.BScsgAZiOl
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_01-54-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0173.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-36-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0255.fits &> /tmp/tmp.lYPyfgrkcJ
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-36-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0255.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-12_CI_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_010340_TTUQ2b1x1_1074405_j7ANGGFC/fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-57-43_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0002.fits &> /tmp/tmp.Cc8TFBJdal
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-12_CI_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_010340_TTUQ2b1x1_1074405_j7ANGGFC/fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-57-43_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0002.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-12_CI_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_010340_TTUQ2b1x1_1074405_j7ANGGFC/fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-58-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0003.fits &> /tmp/tmp.pyCUdDgl0R
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-12_CI_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_010340_TTUQ2b1x1_1074405_j7ANGGFC/fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-58-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0003.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_01-54-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0173.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_01-54-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0173.fits and wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_01-54-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0173.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_01-54-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0173.fits and wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_01-54-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0173.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_01-54-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0173.fits and wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_01-54-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0173.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_01-54-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0173.fits) and catalog (wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_01-54-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0173.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_01-54-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0173.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 57338 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 235.3307 to 253.5861 deg, Dec -31.5421 to -20.0424 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 235.3307 to 253.5861 deg, Dec -31.5421 to -20.0424 deg
Loaded 8684 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 6494 out of 7000 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 7000 out of 57338 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.178000
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.178000
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.98
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.20
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.20
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:

Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 57338 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 235.3307 to 253.5861 deg, Dec -31.5421 to -20.0424 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 235.3307 to 253.5861 deg, Dec -31.5421 to -20.0424 deg
Loaded 8684 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 6494 out of 7000 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 7000 out of 57338 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_01-54-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0173.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_01-54-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0173.fits:

Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_01-54-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0173.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_01-54-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0173.fits (aperture=4.4)
Read 69536 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 235.3645 to 253.6286 deg, Dec -31.4708 to -20.1109 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 235.3645 to 253.6286 deg, Dec -31.4708 to -20.1109 deg
Loaded 8557 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 6303 out of 6992 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 6992 out of 69536 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-36-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0255.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-36-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0255.fits:

Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-36-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0255.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-36-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0255.fits (aperture=4.3)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 46 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 8000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.1 pix Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_01-54-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0173.fits
2.0 pix Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-36-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0255.fits
2.6 pix fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-57-43_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0002.fits
2.6 pix fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-58-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0003.fits
2.1 pix wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_01-54-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0173.fits
2.0 pix wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-36-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0255.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
14.2 mag. Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_01-54-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0173.fits
14.4 mag. Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-36-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0255.fits
14.1 mag. fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-57-43_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0002.fits
14.2 mag. fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-58-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0003.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.1 (SNR ) 13.5 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.BScsgAZiOl (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_01-54-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0173.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-12_CI_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_010340_TTUQ2b1x1_1074405_j7ANGGFC/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_01-54-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0173.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_01-54-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0173.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_01-54-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0173.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_01-54-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0173.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_01-54-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0173.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_01-54-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0173.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_01-54-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0173.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_01-54-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0173.fits' -> 'wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_01-54-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0173.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_01-54-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0173.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_01-54-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0173.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_01-54-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0173.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_01-54-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0173.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_01-54-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0173.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_01-54-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0173.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_01-54-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0173.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_01-54-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0173.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_01-54-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0173.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_01-54-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0173.fits.wcscat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=6, blended=2322, passed=57332
Got 57332 stars (including 54899 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_01-54-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0173.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 57332 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 942.0'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 942.0 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013083 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010467 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 292 to 351 (Dec -31.5 to -20.0)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 968 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 965 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 946 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 965 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 55902 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 292 to 351 (Dec -31.5 to -20.0)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 968 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 965 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 55899 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 965 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 55899 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Excluding outliers - 965 stars left (next iteration limit 1061)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_01-54-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0173.fits N_match=965 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.347 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.290 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.421 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.343 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.386 n_q1=300 n_q2=253 n_q3=262 n_q4=150 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.213
The image catalog is written to wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_01-54-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0173.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_01-54-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0173.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_01-54-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0173.fits -region wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_01-54-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0173.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_01-54-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0173.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.lYPyfgrkcJ (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-36-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0255.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-12_CI_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_010340_TTUQ2b1x1_1074405_j7ANGGFC/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-36-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0255.fits 574.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-36-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0255.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-36-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0255.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-36-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0255.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-36-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0255.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-36-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0255.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-36-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0255.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-36-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0255.fits' -> 'wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-36-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0255.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-36-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0255.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-36-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0255.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-36-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0255.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-36-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0255.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-36-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0255.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-36-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0255.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-36-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0255.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-36-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0255.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-36-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0255.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-36-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0255.fits.wcscat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=8, blended=3494, passed=69528
Got 69528 stars (including 65904 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-36-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0255.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 69528 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 942.0'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 942.0 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013083 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010467 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 292 to 351 (Dec -31.5 to -20.1)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 968 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 966 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 938 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 966 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 67452 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 292 to 351 (Dec -31.5 to -20.1)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 969 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 966 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 67455 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 966 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 67455 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
Excluding outliers - 966 stars left (next iteration limit 1062)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-36-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0255.fits N_match=966 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.457 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.374 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.493 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.431 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.638 n_q1=308 n_q2=266 n_q3=248 n_q4=144 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.396
The image catalog is written to wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-36-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0255.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-36-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0255.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-36-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0255.fits -region wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-36-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0255.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-36-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0255.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.Cc8TFBJdal (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-12_CI_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_010340_TTUQ2b1x1_1074405_j7ANGGFC/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-12_CI_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_010340_TTUQ2b1x1_1074405_j7ANGGFC/fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-57-43_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0002.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-12_CI_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_010340_TTUQ2b1x1_1074405_j7ANGGFC/fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-57-43_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0002.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-12_CI_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_010340_TTUQ2b1x1_1074405_j7ANGGFC/fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-57-43_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0002.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-12_CI_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_010340_TTUQ2b1x1_1074405_j7ANGGFC/fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-57-43_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0002.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-12_CI_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_010340_TTUQ2b1x1_1074405_j7ANGGFC/fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-57-43_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0002.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-12_CI_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_010340_TTUQ2b1x1_1074405_j7ANGGFC/fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-57-43_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0002.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-57-43_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0002.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-57-43_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0002.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-57-43_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0002.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-57-43_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0002.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-57-43_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0002.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-57-43_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0002.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-57-43_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0002.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-12_CI_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_010340_TTUQ2b1x1_1074405_j7ANGGFC/fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-57-43_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0002.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-57-43_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0002.fits.wcscat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=1, blended=2703, passed=47151
Got 47151 stars (including 44367 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-57-43_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0002.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 47151 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 936.9'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 936.9 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013013 (46.8 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010410 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 349 (Dec -31.3 to -20.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 957 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 955 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 932 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.78"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 955 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 45893 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.72"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 349 (Dec -31.3 to -20.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 957 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 955 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 45895 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.72"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 955 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 45895 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.86"
Excluding outliers - 955 stars left (next iteration limit 1050)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-57-43_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0002.fits N_match=955 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.886 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.550 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.917 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.881 sigma_q4_arcsec=1.111 n_q1=191 n_q2=201 n_q3=294 n_q4=269 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.254
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-57-43_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0002.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-57-43_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0002.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-12_CI_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_010340_TTUQ2b1x1_1074405_j7ANGGFC/fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-57-43_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0002.fits -region wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-57-43_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0002.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-57-43_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0002.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.pyCUdDgl0R (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-12_CI_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_010340_TTUQ2b1x1_1074405_j7ANGGFC/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-12_CI_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_010340_TTUQ2b1x1_1074405_j7ANGGFC/fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-58-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0003.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-12_CI_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_010340_TTUQ2b1x1_1074405_j7ANGGFC/fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-58-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0003.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-12_CI_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_010340_TTUQ2b1x1_1074405_j7ANGGFC/fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-58-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0003.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-12_CI_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_010340_TTUQ2b1x1_1074405_j7ANGGFC/fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-58-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0003.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-12_CI_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_010340_TTUQ2b1x1_1074405_j7ANGGFC/fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-58-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0003.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-12_CI_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_010340_TTUQ2b1x1_1074405_j7ANGGFC/fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-58-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0003.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-58-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0003.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-58-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0003.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-58-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0003.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-58-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0003.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-58-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0003.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-58-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0003.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-58-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0003.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-12_CI_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_010340_TTUQ2b1x1_1074405_j7ANGGFC/fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-58-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0003.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-58-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0003.fits.wcscat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=1, blended=2664, passed=46669
Got 46669 stars (including 43941 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-58-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0003.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 46669 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 936.9'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 936.9 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013013 (46.8 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010410 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 349 (Dec -31.3 to -20.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 964 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 962 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 932 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.79"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 962 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 45232 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.74"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 349 (Dec -31.3 to -20.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 965 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 961 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 45234 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.74"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 961 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 45230 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.85"
Excluding outliers - 961 stars left (next iteration limit 1058)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-58-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0003.fits N_match=961 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.818 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.636 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.967 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.790 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.985 n_q1=165 n_q2=196 n_q3=304 n_q4=296 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.204
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-58-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0003.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-58-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0003.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-12_CI_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_010340_TTUQ2b1x1_1074405_j7ANGGFC/fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-58-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0003.fits -region wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-58-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0003.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-58-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0003.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-57-43_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0002.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-12_CI_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_010340_TTUQ2b1x1_1074405_j7ANGGFC/wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-57-43_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0002.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-58-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0003.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-12_CI_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_010340_TTUQ2b1x1_1074405_j7ANGGFC/wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-58-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0003.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Sco-02-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_01-54-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0173.fits at 16:35:37.00 -23:54:59.5: 14.88 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_01-54-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0173.fits at 16:27:34.89 -28:54:15.9: 13.92 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_01-54-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0173.fits at 16:37:32.06 -28:01:14.2: 13.20 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_01-54-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0173.fits at 16:19:11.22 -22:02:25.9: 14.86 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_01-54-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0173.fits at 16:23:26.96 -26:31:29.4: 12.25 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_01-54-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0173.fits at 16:22:34.30 -22:26:09.3: 13.32 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_01-54-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0173.fits at 16:25:42.02 -29:34:13.9: 14.69 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_01-54-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0173.fits at 16:05:44.77 -29:25:26.4: 14.70 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-36-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0255.fits at 16:27:34.89 -28:54:15.9: 13.79 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.83 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:27:34.89 -28:54:15.9: ref_mag=13.83 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=13.5759 delta=0.26 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-36-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0255.fits at 16:19:11.22 -22:02:25.9: 15.06 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-36-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0255.fits at 16:23:26.96 -26:31:29.4: 12.30 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-36-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0255.fits at 16:35:37.00 -23:54:59.5: 15.10 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-36-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0255.fits at 16:37:32.06 -28:01:14.2: 13.10 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-36-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0255.fits at 16:22:34.30 -22:26:09.3: 13.64 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-36-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0255.fits at 16:25:42.02 -29:34:13.9: 14.94 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.27 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.14 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.47 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:23:26.96 -26:31:29.4: ref_mag=12.27 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=13.1102 delta=-0.84 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:37:32.06 -28:01:14.2: ref_mag=13.14 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=13.5453 delta=-0.41 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:22:34.30 -22:26:09.3: ref_mag=13.47 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=13.5692 delta=-0.10 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-36-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0255.fits at 16:05:44.77 -29:25:26.4: 14.71 +/- 0.31 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.71 +/- 0.31
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 16:05:44.77 -29:25:26.4: ref_mag=14.71 +/- 0.31 new_mean_mag=13.2612 delta=1.45 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_01-54-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0173.fits at 16:26:33.94 -28:23:15.5: 14.79 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_01-54-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0173.fits at 16:39:44.51 -21:48:46.8: 13.99 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_01-54-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0173.fits at 16:38:36.95 -21:49:28.0: 13.79 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_01-54-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0173.fits at 16:38:14.48 -21:40:36.6: 14.30 +/- 0.23 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_01-54-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0173.fits at 16:38:57.09 -21:50:22.2: 13.84 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_01-54-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0173.fits at 16:18:47.55 -28:45:09.0: 14.68 +/- 0.34 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-36-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0255.fits at 16:26:33.94 -28:23:15.5: 14.19 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.19 +/- 0.17
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:26:33.94 -28:23:15.5: ref_mag=14.19 +/- 0.17 new_mean_mag=13.4677 delta=0.72 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-36-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0255.fits at 16:38:14.48 -21:40:36.6: 14.27 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-36-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0255.fits at 16:39:44.51 -21:48:46.8: 99.00 +/- 99.00 bad_region
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-36-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0255.fits at 16:38:36.95 -21:49:28.0: 13.91 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.28 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-36-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0255.fits at 16:38:57.09 -21:50:22.2: 14.43 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-36-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0255.fits at 16:18:47.55 -28:45:09.0: 14.76 +/- 0.30 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.99 +/- 0.17
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:38:14.48 -21:40:36.6: ref_mag=14.28 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=13.6384 delta=0.65 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:39:44.51 -21:48:46.8: ref_mag=13.99 +/- 0.17 new_mean_mag=13.5341 delta=0.46 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.86 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.72 +/- 0.23
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.03 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:38:36.95 -21:49:28.0: ref_mag=13.86 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=13.6984 delta=0.16 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:38:57.09 -21:50:22.2: ref_mag=14.03 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=13.6545 delta=0.38 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 16:18:47.55 -28:45:09.0: ref_mag=14.72 +/- 0.23 new_mean_mag=13.5801 delta=1.14 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_01-54-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0173.fits at 16:38:03.76 -28:08:29.2: 14.10 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_01-54-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0173.fits at 16:27:14.63 -29:25:39.7: 13.86 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_01-54-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0173.fits at 16:17:49.68 -23:28:34.4: 14.19 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-36-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0255.fits at 16:38:03.76 -28:08:29.2: 14.36 +/- 0.22 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.22 +/- 0.15
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:38:03.76 -28:08:29.2: ref_mag=14.22 +/- 0.15 new_mean_mag=13.8570 delta=0.36 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_01-54-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0173.fits at 16:24:18.50 -29:11:07.0: 13.96 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_01-54-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0173.fits at 16:38:09.71 -29:52:08.8: 13.83 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-36-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0255.fits at 16:27:14.63 -29:25:39.7: 14.39 +/- 0.23 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.05 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:27:14.63 -29:25:39.7: ref_mag=14.05 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=13.7102 delta=0.34 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-36-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0255.fits at 16:17:49.68 -23:28:34.4: 14.40 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.29 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:17:49.68 -23:28:34.4: ref_mag=14.29 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=13.6501 delta=0.64 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-36-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0255.fits at 16:24:18.50 -29:11:07.0: 14.20 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-36-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0255.fits at 16:38:09.71 -29:52:08.8: 13.85 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.08 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:24:18.50 -29:11:07.0: ref_mag=14.08 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=13.5283 delta=0.55 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.84 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:38:09.71 -29:52:08.8: ref_mag=13.84 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=13.7099 delta=0.13 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_01-54-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0173.fits at 16:30:30.79 -30:12:55.1: 13.84 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_01-54-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0173.fits at 16:28:43.49 -28:20:23.7: 14.32 +/- 0.23 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_01-54-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0173.fits at 16:38:06.22 -29:38:47.3: 14.42 +/- 0.30 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-36-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0255.fits at 16:30:30.79 -30:12:55.1: 13.94 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.90 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_01-54-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0173.fits at 16:25:02.13 -29:24:06.2: 14.53 +/- 0.30 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:30:30.79 -30:12:55.1: ref_mag=13.90 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=13.7630 delta=0.13 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_01-54-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0173.fits at 16:18:04.25 -22:41:58.5: 13.84 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-36-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0255.fits at 16:28:43.49 -28:20:23.7: 14.92 +/- 0.33 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.52 +/- 0.19
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:28:43.49 -28:20:23.7: ref_mag=14.52 +/- 0.19 new_mean_mag=13.7651 delta=0.76 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-36-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0255.fits at 16:38:06.22 -29:38:47.3: 14.23 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.29 +/- 0.17
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:38:06.22 -29:38:47.3: ref_mag=14.29 +/- 0.17 new_mean_mag=13.8212 delta=0.47 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-36-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0255.fits at 16:25:02.13 -29:24:06.2: 13.93 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.04 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:25:02.13 -29:24:06.2: ref_mag=14.04 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=13.6479 delta=0.39 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-36-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0255.fits at 16:18:04.25 -22:41:58.5: 13.92 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.89 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:18:04.25 -22:41:58.5: ref_mag=13.89 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=13.6538 delta=0.23 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_01-54-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0173.fits at 16:38:27.63 -29:37:38.3: 14.13 +/- 0.24 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_01-54-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0173.fits at 16:30:33.08 -29:32:45.2: 14.16 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_01-54-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0173.fits at 16:24:41.59 -29:46:33.4: 13.89 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_01-54-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0173.fits at 16:31:45.30 -29:43:27.4: 14.58 +/- 0.35 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-36-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0255.fits at 16:30:33.08 -29:32:45.2: 14.03 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-36-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0255.fits at 16:38:27.63 -29:37:38.3: 13.99 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.08 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:30:33.08 -29:32:45.2: ref_mag=14.08 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=13.8340 delta=0.24 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.04 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:38:27.63 -29:37:38.3: ref_mag=14.04 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=13.8420 delta=0.20 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_01-54-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0173.fits at 16:30:39.87 -30:02:32.5: 13.82 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_01-54-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0173.fits at 16:13:04.61 -22:17:43.8: 13.96 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-36-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0255.fits at 16:24:41.59 -29:46:33.4: 14.18 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.02 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:24:41.59 -29:46:33.4: ref_mag=14.02 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=13.7980 delta=0.22 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-36-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0255.fits at 16:31:45.30 -29:43:27.4: 14.45 +/- 0.25 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.49 +/- 0.20
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:31:45.30 -29:43:27.4: ref_mag=14.49 +/- 0.20 new_mean_mag=13.9041 delta=0.59 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-36-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0255.fits at 16:13:04.61 -22:17:43.8: 14.34 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.12 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:13:04.61 -22:17:43.8: ref_mag=14.12 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=13.8790 delta=0.24 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-36-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0255.fits at 16:30:39.87 -30:02:32.5: 13.98 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.90 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:30:39.87 -30:02:32.5: ref_mag=13.90 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=13.8732 delta=0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_01-54-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0173.fits at 16:11:14.13 -29:21:36.1: 13.56 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-36-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0255.fits at 16:11:14.13 -29:21:36.1: 13.20 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.29 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:11:14.13 -29:21:36.1: ref_mag=13.29 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=12.4240 delta=0.86 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out89378.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out90773.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out79596.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out84480.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out87248.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 7s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 2s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 77718_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-58-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0003
The candidate 77718_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-58-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0003 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 1 | 2026 06 12.24853 | 2461203.74853 | 13.72 | 16:22:34.33 -22:26:10.7 | 4319 1041 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-12_CI_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_010340_TTUQ2b1x1_1074405_j7ANGGFC/fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-57-43_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0002.fits |
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 06 12.24905 | 2461203.74905 | 13.46 | 16:22:34.26 -22:26:08.0 | 4316 1037 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-12_CI_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_010340_TTUQ2b1x1_1074405_j7ANGGFC/fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-58-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0003.fits |
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 77722_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-58-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0003
The candidate 77722_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-58-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0003 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 06 12.24905 | 2461203.74905 | 13.42 | 16:33:49.01 -29:21:24.9 | 2855 5254 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-12_CI_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_010340_TTUQ2b1x1_1074405_j7ANGGFC/fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-58-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0003.fits |
**** FOUND 16:33:49.01 -29:21:25.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 77723_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-58-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0003
The candidate 77723_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-58-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0003 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 1 | 2026 06 12.24853 | 2461203.74853 | 13.56 | 16:27:34.95 -28:54:16.3 | 3679 4962 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-12_CI_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_010340_TTUQ2b1x1_1074405_j7ANGGFC/fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-57-43_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0002.fits |
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 06 12.24905 | 2461203.74905 | 13.59 | 16:27:34.82 -28:54:15.6 | 3676 4959 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-12_CI_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_010340_TTUQ2b1x1_1074405_j7ANGGFC/fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-58-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0003.fits |
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 77725_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-58-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0003
The candidate 77725_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-58-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0003 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 1 | 2026 06 12.24853 | 2461203.74853 | 13.51 | 16:37:32.00 -28:01:15.0 | 2338 4464 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-12_CI_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_010340_TTUQ2b1x1_1074405_j7ANGGFC/fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-57-43_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0002.fits |
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 06 12.24905 | 2461203.74905 | 13.59 | 16:37:32.11 -28:01:13.3 | 2334 4461 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-12_CI_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_010340_TTUQ2b1x1_1074405_j7ANGGFC/fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-58-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0003.fits |
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 78054_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-58-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0003
The candidate 78054_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-58-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0003 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 06 12.24905 | 2461203.74905 | 9.90 | 16:01:05.31 -29:57:03.9 | 7170 5633 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-12_CI_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_010340_TTUQ2b1x1_1074405_j7ANGGFC/fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-58-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0003.fits |
**** FOUND 16:01:05.32 -29:57:04.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_local.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 79596_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-58-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0003
Preparing report for the candidate 79596_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-58-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0003
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 84480_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-58-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0003
Preparing report for the candidate 84480_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-58-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0003
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 85286_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-58-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0003
The candidate 85286_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-58-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0003 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 06 12.24905 | 2461203.74905 | 13.21 | 16:18:19.27 -23:17:44.5 | 4909 1557 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-12_CI_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_010340_TTUQ2b1x1_1074405_j7ANGGFC/fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-58-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0003.fits |
**** FOUND 16:18:19.30 -23:17:44.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 86607_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-58-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0003
The candidate 86607_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-58-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0003 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 1 | 2026 06 12.24853 | 2461203.74853 | 13.10 | 16:23:26.96 -26:31:30.1 | 4216 3516 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-12_CI_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_010340_TTUQ2b1x1_1074405_j7ANGGFC/fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-57-43_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0002.fits |
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 06 12.24905 | 2461203.74905 | 13.12 | 16:23:26.95 -26:31:28.7 | 4213 3512 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-12_CI_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_010340_TTUQ2b1x1_1074405_j7ANGGFC/fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-58-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0003.fits |
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87248_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-58-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0003
Preparing report for the candidate 87248_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-58-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0003
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88466_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-58-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0003
The candidate 88466_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-58-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0003 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 06 12.24905 | 2461203.74905 | 13.04 | 16:09:34.86 -27:53:39.4 | 6073 4350 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-12_CI_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_010340_TTUQ2b1x1_1074405_j7ANGGFC/fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-58-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0003.fits |
**** FOUND 16:09:34.79 -27:53:38.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88687_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-58-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0003
The candidate 88687_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-58-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0003 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 06 12.24905 | 2461203.74905 | 13.64 | 16:38:05.14 -29:47:23.2 | 2298 5539 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-12_CI_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_010340_TTUQ2b1x1_1074405_j7ANGGFC/fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-58-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0003.fits |
**** FOUND 16:38:05.18 -29:47:25.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 89378_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-58-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0003
The candidate 89378_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-58-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0003 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 06 12.24905 | 2461203.74905 | 13.27 | 16:05:44.73 -29:25:27.0 | 6563 5290 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-12_CI_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_010340_TTUQ2b1x1_1074405_j7ANGGFC/fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-58-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0003.fits |
**** FOUND 16:05:44.77 -29:25:26.4 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.26, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.24)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 2.790 6041655732804425728 241.43589308593 -29.42453071477 11.8472 10.0071 VARIABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#2.790#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 89588_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-58-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0003
The candidate 89588_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-58-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0003 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 06 12.24905 | 2461203.74905 | 13.45 | 16:29:28.63 -27:58:08.6 | 3414 4397 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-12_CI_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_010340_TTUQ2b1x1_1074405_j7ANGGFC/fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-58-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0003.fits |
**** FOUND 16:29:28.68 -27:58:08.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 89736_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-58-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0003
The candidate 89736_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-58-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0003 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 06 12.24905 | 2461203.74905 | 13.49 | 16:27:36.73 -30:13:36.7 | 3685 5762 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-12_CI_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_010340_TTUQ2b1x1_1074405_j7ANGGFC/fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-58-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0003.fits |
**** FOUND 16:27:36.80 -30:13:37.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 90211_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-58-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0003
The candidate 90211_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-58-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0003 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 1 | 2026 06 12.24853 | 2461203.74853 | 13.48 | 16:26:33.98 -28:23:15.3 | 3810 4647 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-12_CI_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_010340_TTUQ2b1x1_1074405_j7ANGGFC/fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-57-43_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0002.fits |
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 06 12.24905 | 2461203.74905 | 13.46 | 16:26:33.89 -28:23:15.8 | 3807 4643 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-12_CI_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_010340_TTUQ2b1x1_1074405_j7ANGGFC/fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-58-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0003.fits |
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 90225_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-58-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0003
The candidate 90225_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-58-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0003 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 06 12.24905 | 2461203.74905 | 13.56 | 16:32:18.18 -22:11:59.5 | 2947 0911 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-12_CI_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_010340_TTUQ2b1x1_1074405_j7ANGGFC/fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-58-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0003.fits |
**** FOUND 16:32:18.17 -22:12:00.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 90242_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-58-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0003
The candidate 90242_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-58-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0003 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 1 | 2026 06 12.24853 | 2461203.74853 | 13.63 | 16:39:44.49 -21:48:46.9 | 1890 0706 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-12_CI_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_010340_TTUQ2b1x1_1074405_j7ANGGFC/fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-57-43_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0002.fits |
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 06 12.24905 | 2461203.74905 | 13.46 | 16:39:44.54 -21:48:46.8 | 1887 0703 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-12_CI_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_010340_TTUQ2b1x1_1074405_j7ANGGFC/fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-58-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0003.fits |
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 90494_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-58-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0003
The candidate 90494_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-58-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0003 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 1 | 2026 06 12.24853 | 2461203.74853 | 13.64 | 16:38:14.55 -21:40:37.6 | 2100 0617 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-12_CI_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_010340_TTUQ2b1x1_1074405_j7ANGGFC/fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-57-43_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0002.fits |
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 06 12.24905 | 2461203.74905 | 13.64 | 16:38:14.40 -21:40:35.6 | 2097 0613 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-12_CI_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_010340_TTUQ2b1x1_1074405_j7ANGGFC/fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-58-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0003.fits |
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 90562_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-58-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0003
The candidate 90562_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-58-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0003 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 1 | 2026 06 12.24853 | 2461203.74853 | 13.70 | 16:38:36.91 -21:49:28.1 | 2051 0708 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-12_CI_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_010340_TTUQ2b1x1_1074405_j7ANGGFC/fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-57-43_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0002.fits |
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 06 12.24905 | 2461203.74905 | 13.70 | 16:38:36.98 -21:49:27.8 | 2047 0705 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-12_CI_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_010340_TTUQ2b1x1_1074405_j7ANGGFC/fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-58-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0003.fits |
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 90681_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-58-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0003
The candidate 90681_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-58-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0003 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 1 | 2026 06 12.24853 | 2461203.74853 | 13.67 | 16:38:57.11 -21:50:23.2 | 2003 0719 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-12_CI_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_010340_TTUQ2b1x1_1074405_j7ANGGFC/fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-57-43_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0002.fits |
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 06 12.24905 | 2461203.74905 | 13.64 | 16:38:57.07 -21:50:21.2 | 2000 0715 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-12_CI_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_010340_TTUQ2b1x1_1074405_j7ANGGFC/fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-58-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0003.fits |
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 90773_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-58-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0003
The candidate 90773_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-58-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0003 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 06 12.24905 | 2461203.74905 | 13.73 | 16:18:47.60 -28:45:09.3 | 4841 4857 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-12_CI_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_010340_TTUQ2b1x1_1074405_j7ANGGFC/fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-58-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0003.fits |
**** FOUND 16:18:47.55 -28:45:09.0 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.61, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.59)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 2.963 6038902899278267648 244.69736374075 -28.75298163529 10.9115 9.1232 VARIABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#2.963#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 91109_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-58-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0003
The candidate 91109_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-58-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0003 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 1 | 2026 06 12.24853 | 2461203.74853 | 13.78 | 16:38:03.68 -28:08:28.9 | 2269 4540 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-12_CI_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_010340_TTUQ2b1x1_1074405_j7ANGGFC/fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-57-43_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0002.fits |
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 06 12.24905 | 2461203.74905 | 14.14 | 16:38:03.84 -28:08:29.4 | 2266 4537 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-12_CI_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_010340_TTUQ2b1x1_1074405_j7ANGGFC/fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-58-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0003.fits |
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 91202_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-58-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0003
The candidate 91202_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-58-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0003 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 06 12.24905 | 2461203.74905 | 13.89 | 16:33:23.77 -30:10:36.3 | 2924 5751 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-12_CI_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_010340_TTUQ2b1x1_1074405_j7ANGGFC/fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-58-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0003.fits |
**** FOUND 16:33:23.90 -30:10:35.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 91312_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-58-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0003
The candidate 91312_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-58-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0003 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 06 12.24905 | 2461203.74905 | 13.65 | 16:37:29.71 -29:47:36.4 | 2376 5538 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-12_CI_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_010340_TTUQ2b1x1_1074405_j7ANGGFC/fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-58-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0003.fits |
**** FOUND 16:37:29.79 -29:47:36.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 91353_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-58-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0003
The candidate 91353_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-58-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0003 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 1 | 2026 06 12.24853 | 2461203.74853 | 13.58 | 16:17:49.71 -23:28:34.6 | 4981 1671 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-12_CI_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_010340_TTUQ2b1x1_1074405_j7ANGGFC/fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-57-43_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0002.fits |
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 06 12.24905 | 2461203.74905 | 13.84 | 16:17:49.64 -23:28:34.2 | 4978 1667 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-12_CI_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_010340_TTUQ2b1x1_1074405_j7ANGGFC/fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-58-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0003.fits |
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 91409_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-58-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0003
The candidate 91409_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-58-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0003 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 1 | 2026 06 12.24853 | 2461203.74853 | 13.61 | 16:27:14.61 -29:25:39.6 | 3729 5279 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-12_CI_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_010340_TTUQ2b1x1_1074405_j7ANGGFC/fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-57-43_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0002.fits |
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 06 12.24905 | 2461203.74905 | 13.84 | 16:27:14.65 -29:25:39.8 | 3726 5276 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-12_CI_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_010340_TTUQ2b1x1_1074405_j7ANGGFC/fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-58-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0003.fits |
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 91436_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-58-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0003
The candidate 91436_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-58-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0003 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 1 | 2026 06 12.24853 | 2461203.74853 | 13.70 | 16:38:09.80 -29:52:09.1 | 2293 5591 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-12_CI_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_010340_TTUQ2b1x1_1074405_j7ANGGFC/fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-57-43_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0002.fits |
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 06 12.24905 | 2461203.74905 | 13.72 | 16:38:09.62 -29:52:08.4 | 2290 5588 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-12_CI_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_010340_TTUQ2b1x1_1074405_j7ANGGFC/fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-58-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0003.fits |
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 91524_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-58-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0003
The candidate 91524_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-58-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0003 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 1 | 2026 06 12.24853 | 2461203.74853 | 13.58 | 16:24:18.43 -29:11:07.5 | 4115 5127 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-12_CI_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_010340_TTUQ2b1x1_1074405_j7ANGGFC/fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-57-43_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0002.fits |
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 06 12.24905 | 2461203.74905 | 13.49 | 16:24:18.57 -29:11:06.5 | 4111 5123 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-12_CI_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_010340_TTUQ2b1x1_1074405_j7ANGGFC/fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-58-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0003.fits |
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 91533_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-58-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0003
The candidate 91533_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-58-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0003 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 1 | 2026 06 12.24853 | 2461203.74853 | 13.64 | 16:30:30.74 -30:12:55.3 | 3307 5767 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-12_CI_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_010340_TTUQ2b1x1_1074405_j7ANGGFC/fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-57-43_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0002.fits |
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 06 12.24905 | 2461203.74905 | 13.96 | 16:30:30.84 -30:12:54.9 | 3304 5764 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-12_CI_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_010340_TTUQ2b1x1_1074405_j7ANGGFC/fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-58-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0003.fits |
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 91625_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-58-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0003
The candidate 91625_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-58-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0003 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 1 | 2026 06 12.24853 | 2461203.74853 | 13.70 | 16:28:43.49 -28:20:24.9 | 3522 4623 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-12_CI_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_010340_TTUQ2b1x1_1074405_j7ANGGFC/fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-57-43_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0002.fits |
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 06 12.24905 | 2461203.74905 | 13.89 | 16:28:43.48 -28:20:22.5 | 3519 4619 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-12_CI_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_010340_TTUQ2b1x1_1074405_j7ANGGFC/fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-58-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0003.fits |
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 91751_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-58-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0003
The candidate 91751_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-58-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0003 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 1 | 2026 06 12.24853 | 2461203.74853 | 13.75 | 16:38:06.27 -29:38:48.2 | 2296 5455 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-12_CI_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_010340_TTUQ2b1x1_1074405_j7ANGGFC/fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-57-43_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0002.fits |
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 06 12.24905 | 2461203.74905 | 13.92 | 16:38:06.17 -29:38:46.4 | 2293 5452 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-12_CI_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_010340_TTUQ2b1x1_1074405_j7ANGGFC/fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-58-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0003.fits |
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 91759_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-58-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0003
The candidate 91759_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-58-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0003 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 1 | 2026 06 12.24853 | 2461203.74853 | 13.65 | 16:18:04.37 -22:41:59.6 | 4948 1200 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-12_CI_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_010340_TTUQ2b1x1_1074405_j7ANGGFC/fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-57-43_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0002.fits |
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 06 12.24905 | 2461203.74905 | 13.65 | 16:18:04.12 -22:41:57.4 | 4945 1196 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-12_CI_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_010340_TTUQ2b1x1_1074405_j7ANGGFC/fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-58-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0003.fits |
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 91999_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-58-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0003
The candidate 91999_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-58-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0003 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 1 | 2026 06 12.24853 | 2461203.74853 | 13.65 | 16:25:02.32 -29:24:05.3 | 4019 5259 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-12_CI_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_010340_TTUQ2b1x1_1074405_j7ANGGFC/fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-57-43_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0002.fits |
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 06 12.24905 | 2461203.74905 | 13.65 | 16:25:01.93 -29:24:07.0 | 4017 5256 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-12_CI_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_010340_TTUQ2b1x1_1074405_j7ANGGFC/fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-58-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0003.fits |
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 92011_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-58-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0003
The candidate 92011_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-58-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0003 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 06 12.24905 | 2461203.74905 | 13.64 | 16:32:48.23 -29:44:00.2 | 2995 5479 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-12_CI_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_010340_TTUQ2b1x1_1074405_j7ANGGFC/fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-58-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0003.fits |
**** FOUND 16:32:48.21 -29:44:01.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 92012_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-58-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0003
The candidate 92012_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-58-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0003 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 1 | 2026 06 12.24853 | 2461203.74853 | 13.77 | 16:38:27.64 -29:37:38.0 | 2248 5446 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-12_CI_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_010340_TTUQ2b1x1_1074405_j7ANGGFC/fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-57-43_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0002.fits |
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 06 12.24905 | 2461203.74905 | 13.95 | 16:38:27.61 -29:37:38.6 | 2245 5442 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-12_CI_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_010340_TTUQ2b1x1_1074405_j7ANGGFC/fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-58-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0003.fits |
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 92375_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-58-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0003
The candidate 92375_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-58-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0003 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 1 | 2026 06 12.24853 | 2461203.74853 | 13.74 | 16:30:33.15 -29:32:46.9 | 3293 5361 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-12_CI_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_010340_TTUQ2b1x1_1074405_j7ANGGFC/fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-57-43_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0002.fits |
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 06 12.24905 | 2461203.74905 | 13.98 | 16:30:33.02 -29:32:43.4 | 3290 5356 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-12_CI_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_010340_TTUQ2b1x1_1074405_j7ANGGFC/fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-58-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0003.fits |
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 92379_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-58-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0003
The candidate 92379_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-58-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0003 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 06 12.24905 | 2461203.74905 | 13.68 | 16:22:04.54 -21:51:07.7 | 4383 0682 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-12_CI_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_010340_TTUQ2b1x1_1074405_j7ANGGFC/fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-58-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0003.fits |
**** FOUND 16:22:04.57 -21:51:08.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 92390_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-58-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0003
The candidate 92390_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-58-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0003 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 1 | 2026 06 12.24853 | 2461203.74853 | 13.69 | 16:24:41.65 -29:46:35.2 | 4067 5486 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-12_CI_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_010340_TTUQ2b1x1_1074405_j7ANGGFC/fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-57-43_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0002.fits |
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 06 12.24905 | 2461203.74905 | 13.99 | 16:24:41.54 -29:46:31.5 | 4065 5482 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-12_CI_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_010340_TTUQ2b1x1_1074405_j7ANGGFC/fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-58-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0003.fits |
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 92451_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-58-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0003
The candidate 92451_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-58-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0003 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 1 | 2026 06 12.24853 | 2461203.74853 | 13.82 | 16:31:45.32 -29:43:27.3 | 3137 5473 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-12_CI_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_010340_TTUQ2b1x1_1074405_j7ANGGFC/fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-57-43_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0002.fits |
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 06 12.24905 | 2461203.74905 | 14.15 | 16:31:45.27 -29:43:27.5 | 3134 5470 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-12_CI_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_010340_TTUQ2b1x1_1074405_j7ANGGFC/fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-58-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0003.fits |
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 92672_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-58-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0003
The candidate 92672_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-58-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0003 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 06 12.24905 | 2461203.74905 | 13.46 | 16:04:26.49 -28:54:31.1 | 6745 4982 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-12_CI_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_010340_TTUQ2b1x1_1074405_j7ANGGFC/fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-58-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0003.fits |
**** FOUND 16:04:26.49 -28:54:30.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 92698_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-58-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0003
The candidate 92698_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-58-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0003 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 1 | 2026 06 12.24853 | 2461203.74853 | 13.76 | 16:30:39.90 -30:02:33.0 | 3285 5663 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-12_CI_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_010340_TTUQ2b1x1_1074405_j7ANGGFC/fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-57-43_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0002.fits |
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 06 12.24905 | 2461203.74905 | 14.05 | 16:30:39.83 -30:02:31.9 | 3282 5659 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-12_CI_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_010340_TTUQ2b1x1_1074405_j7ANGGFC/fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-58-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0003.fits |
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 93842_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-58-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0003
The candidate 93842_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-58-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0003 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 1 | 2026 06 12.24853 | 2461203.74853 | 13.80 | 16:13:04.53 -22:17:45.0 | 5650 0958 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-12_CI_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_010340_TTUQ2b1x1_1074405_j7ANGGFC/fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-57-43_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0002.fits |
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 06 12.24905 | 2461203.74905 | 14.05 | 16:13:04.68 -22:17:42.6 | 5646 0954 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-12_CI_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_010340_TTUQ2b1x1_1074405_j7ANGGFC/fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-58-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0003.fits |
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52502_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-58-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0003
The candidate 52502_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-58-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0003 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 3 | 2026 06 12.24905 | 2461203.74905 | 11.30 | 16:05:30.96 -23:28:38.5 | 6689 1689 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-12_CI_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_010340_TTUQ2b1x1_1074405_j7ANGGFC/fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-58-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0003.fits |
**** FOUND 16:05:30.94 -23:28:38.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 25529_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-58-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0003
The candidate 25529_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-58-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0003 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 06 12.24905 | 2461203.74905 | 10.70 | 16:11:41.65 -27:03:31.6 | 5798 3840 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-12_CI_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_010340_TTUQ2b1x1_1074405_j7ANGGFC/fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-58-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0003.fits |
**** FOUND 16:11:41.63 -27:03:31.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 11018_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-58-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0003
The candidate 11018_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-58-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0003 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 06 12.24853 | 2461203.74853 | 12.49 | 16:11:14.12 -29:21:36.7 | 5841 5238 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-12_CI_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_010340_TTUQ2b1x1_1074405_j7ANGGFC/fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-57-43_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0002.fits |
| Discovery image 3 | 2026 06 12.24905 | 2461203.74905 | 12.38 | 16:11:14.14 -29:21:35.6 | 5838 5234 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-12_CI_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_010340_TTUQ2b1x1_1074405_j7ANGGFC/fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-12_00-58-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0003.fits |
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 9s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Sco-02-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
16:01:05.31 -29:57:04.2
16:19:11.22 -22:02:25.9
16:35:37.00 -23:54:59.5
16:25:42.02 -29:34:13.9
########### Completed Sco-02-Q2b1x1 ###########
The analysis was running at tau
We are allowed to update the exclusion list at tau host
Found ../exclusion_list_TTUQ2.txt
#### The exclusion list before filtering-out asteroids, bad pixels and adding Gaia sources ####
16:01:05.31 -29:57:04.2
16:19:11.22 -22:02:25.9
16:35:37.00 -23:54:59.5
16:25:42.02 -29:34:13.9
###################################################################################
16:01:05.31 -29:57:04.2 -- asteroid (will NOT add it to exclusion list)
16:19:11.22 -22:02:25.9 -- asteroid (will NOT add it to exclusion list)
16:35:37.00 -23:54:59.5 -- asteroid (will NOT add it to exclusion list)
16:25:42.02 -29:34:13.9 -- asteroid (will NOT add it to exclusion list)
renamed 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt_noasteroids' -> 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt'
renamed 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt_nohotpixels' -> 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt'
# Count candidates with no identification (that also don't look like hot pix)
Found 0 unidentified candidates (excluding asteroids, hot pixels and known variable stars).
###################################################################################
0 candidates found (excluding asteroids and hot pixels)
This does not look like a test run
###################################################################################
Adding identified Gaia sources from exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
exclusion_list_apass.txt NOT FOUND
IS_THIS_TEST_RUN= NO ALLOW_EXCLUSION_LIST_UPDATE= YES
#### Adding the following to the exclusion list ####
16:05:44.77 -29:25:26.4
16:18:47.55 -28:45:09.0
####################################################
The observatory MPC code is V36
############################################################
Positions of planets computed with util/planet_finder/main.py for JD(UT)2461203.74853115 -observatory V36
07:06:03.84 +24:06:29.7 Mercury (0.3mag)
08:03:05.62 +22:30:19.2 Venus (-4.0mag)
03:01:25.04 +16:36:24.4 Mars (1.3mag)
07:51:50.65 +21:22:45.8 Jupiter (-1.8mag)
00:50:29.47 +02:54:42.7 Saturn (0.8mag)
04:01:09.94 +20:28:12.5 Uranus (5.8mag)
00:16:21.90 +00:18:01.5 Neptune (7.8mag)
20:33:07.20 -23:06:05.9 Pluto (14.5mag)
02:26:48.47 +18:33:58.9 Moon (-9.1mag)
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 361 Jun 12 01:05 planets.txt
############################################################
Positions of selected moons from JPL HORIZONS for JD(UT)2461203.74853115:
07:51:58.31 +21:22:22.2 Io (6.0mag)
07:51:59.45 +21:22:20.0 Europa (6.2mag)
07:52:08.04 +21:21:50.9 Ganymede (5.6mag)
07:51:28.37 +21:23:49.4 Callisto (6.7mag)
07:51:53.41 +20:59:25.7 Himalia (15.6mag)
07:51:55.36 +21:22:30.8 Thebe (16.5mag)
07:51:46.09 +21:13:06.7 Elara (17.6mag)
07:54:13.69 +21:32:14.8 Pasiphae (17.7mag)
07:58:14.87 +21:24:47.2 Carme (18.9mag)
00:50:35.97 +02:54:19.3 Titan (8.6mag)
00:50:28.98 +02:54:56.6 Rhea (9.9mag)
00:50:58.22 +02:57:10.5 Iapetus (11.3mag)
00:50:39.92 +02:54:14.8 Hyperion (14.6mag)
00:51:06.73 +02:56:04.1 Phoebe (16.7mag)
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 568 Jun 12 01:05 moons.txt
############################################################
Positions of selected spacecraft from JPL HORIZONS for JD(UT)2461203.74853115:
17:27:33.77 -35:32:32.8 JWST
18:22:51.60 +28:49:23.0 Chandra
19:25:29.84 +02:39:27.4 XMM-Newton
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 96 Jun 12 01:05 spacecraft.txt
############################################################
Positions of bright comets computed with util/comet_finder/main.py for JD(UT)2461203.74853115 -observatory V36
18:40:37.35 -32:56:34.5 13.6mag P/2010 H2 (Vales)
05:57:28.65 -68:01:39.8 17.3mag C/2014 UN271 (Bernardinelli-Bernstein)
05:50:33.39 +32:01:18.3 17.5mag C/2017 K2 (PANSTARRS)
17:13:06.50 +15:32:26.6 17.8mag C/2021 G2 (ATLAS)
21:51:05.75 -46:47:17.9 16.5mag P/2021 N1 (ZTF)
23:11:39.01 +31:44:27.3 17.2mag C/2022 E2 (ATLAS)
05:39:00.37 +26:59:44.0 16.5mag C/2022 N2 (PANSTARRS)
09:32:41.37 +30:56:16.1 16.7mag C/2022 QE78 (ATLAS)
08:52:45.22 +04:07:07.6 17.7mag C/2022 R6 (PANSTARRS)
18:25:33.69 +21:39:57.6 17.8mag C/2023 A3 (Tsuchinshan-ATLAS)
15:17:57.81 -11:01:09.6 17.6mag P/2023 B1 (PANSTARRS)
22:12:52.47 +66:46:06.0 17.8mag C/2023 H5 (Lemmon)
17:36:19.19 -07:05:33.2 13.7mag C/2023 R1 (PANSTARRS)
13:16:44.80 +82:03:38.1 18.0mag C/2023 X2 (Lemmon)
07:16:07.96 +64:27:00.1 17.7mag C/2024 A1 (ATLAS)
06:53:22.74 +28:11:04.0 13.8mag C/2024 E1 (Wierzchos)
15:34:09.47 +13:51:55.6 17.4mag C/2024 G6 (ATLAS)
20:10:11.86 +32:19:50.8 14.0mag C/2024 J3 (ATLAS)
04:22:05.44 -15:36:18.3 16.0mag C/2024 T5 (ATLAS)
06:09:41.02 +33:47:24.8 17.9mag C/2025 J1 (Borisov)
11:33:18.09 +52:30:36.9 17.6mag C/2025 L1 (ATLAS)
06:49:40.85 -11:03:26.7 14.5mag C/2025 R3 (PANSTARRS)
09:27:34.13 +23:16:45.5 17.9mag C/2025 V2 (Rankin)
12:39:41.25 +04:40:02.6 17.2mag C/2025 Y1 (ATLAS)
18:05:54.46 +75:58:23.0 17.8mag C/2026 A2 (Bok)
02:07:34.50 +43:41:48.0 16.1mag C/2026 B2 (Sun-Gao)
11:12:16.62 -02:21:26.4 16.5mag A/2026 E1
20:30:59.40 -08:54:34.9 8.5mag 10P/Tempel
11:03:01.09 -01:01:58.0 16.0mag 29P/Schwassmann-Wachmann
03:17:59.23 +26:10:57.4 17.7mag 47P/Ashbrook-Jackson
09:08:37.71 +22:36:05.6 16.9mag 63P/Wild
00:30:19.85 -06:07:02.8 15.7mag 65P/Gunn
06:56:36.38 +33:47:58.0 17.0mag 76P/West-Kohoutek-Ikemura
03:18:59.95 +17:43:06.5 13.8mag 78P/Gehrels
01:29:27.13 +05:42:48.1 15.6mag 88P/Howell
05:07:41.58 +30:34:25.6 15.3mag 93P/Lovas
02:54:32.11 +28:15:21.1 17.5mag 114P/Wiseman-Skiff
07:00:15.04 +32:52:26.1 15.5mag 123P/West-Hartley
09:57:15.76 +12:54:19.2 16.6mag 124P/Mrkos
04:05:43.74 +19:30:46.9 16.3mag 128P/Shoemaker-Holt
04:41:37.20 +19:15:27.7 17.7mag 131P/Mueller
06:15:23.21 +18:09:35.1 15.2mag 141P/Machholz
06:18:15.61 +17:50:16.9 15.1mag 141P-A/Machholz
05:14:16.59 +16:40:10.2 12.0mag 141P-D/Machholz
03:00:30.33 -24:08:59.3 16.7mag 161P/Hartley-IRAS
03:54:58.44 +25:23:55.0 15.0mag 162P/SidingSpring
19:36:00.99 +02:57:48.7 16.6mag 169P/NEAT
00:29:13.23 +03:14:47.8 17.8mag 220P/McNaught
16:49:09.09 -08:18:03.0 16.5mag 235P/LINEAR
07:43:48.26 +35:18:31.6 17.6mag 240P/NEAT
00:43:01.41 -00:43:44.8 16.3mag 260P/McNaught
04:15:20.15 +33:11:54.8 17.5mag 295P/LINEAR
00:16:26.34 -04:47:12.9 17.7mag 320P/McNaught
15:13:29.21 +07:56:42.1 17.4mag 391P/Kowalski
08:10:23.97 +20:38:20.5 17.9mag 450P/LONEOS
07:06:35.11 +41:24:19.3 17.8mag 493P/LONEOS
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 2.7K Jun 12 01:05 comets.txt
############################################################
List of recent ASAS-SN transients from https://www.astronomy.ohio-state.edu/asassn/transients.html :
20:07:38.15 -21:07:05.40 SN2026mho 2026-05-25.18 -1.12
11:29:42.55 +79:01:03.10 AT2026min 2026-05-24.21 16.63
11:44:32.95 -68:48:30.00 ASASSN-26no 2026-05-24 8.41
19:00:42.82 -48:31:01.60 ASASSN-26dp 2026-05-22.31 -3.28
14:23:56.59 -58:37:47.40 ASASSN-26dn 2026-05-20.01 14.59
11:24:54.06 +47:57:01.60 AT2026nma 2026-05-20.29 15.46
21:27:08.58 +33:24:38.10 AT2026lli 2026-05-19.34 15.86
00:31:01.41 -13:38:51.70 AT2026nad 2026-05-19.39 15.34
15:16:06.61 -79:16:32.40 ASASSN-26dm 2026-05-19.03 14.44
11:24:25.21 -59:23:19.10 ASASSN-26dl 2026-05-18.02 13.55
13:45:51.52 -53:16:01.00 ASASSN-26dk 2026-05-18.16 12.96
02:05:49.69 -30:29:09.60 ASASSN-26dh 2026-05-18.43 15.37
17:50:22.87 -39:42:33.90 ASASSN-26dj 2026-05-17.05 15.7
01:13:11.60 -33:25:16.10 ASASSN-26dg 2026-05-13.41 16.8
16:44:31.77 -27:15:18.40 AT2026mhn 2026-05-12.33 15.8
09:46:31.08 -33:41:51.00 ASASSN-26di 2026-05-12.14 14.63
21:23:11.57 -19:09:45.00 AT2026kwu 2026-05-12.26 16.9
14:20:14.30 -30:20:51.90 AT2026ktm 2026-05-12.06 17.21
14:41:39.01 -37:13:46.40 AT2026lkm 2026-05-11.18 16.89
12:59:50.45 -10:58:38.80 SN2026kep 2026-05-9.06 17.5
13:37:29.61 -29:50:30.90 AT2026lkd 2026-05-9.09 17.23
09:46:42.01 -14:52:03.60 SN2026kmo 2026-05-8.99 17.51
15:03:05.28 +22:02:03.40 AT2026lxf 2026-05-8.07 13.88
10:23:49.41 -20:57:25.30 ASASSN-26df 2026-05-8.21 16.52
22:14:40.56 +05:04:51.60 2026lda 2026-05-7.56 16.2
21:35:33.81 -14:05:16.30 ASASSN-26de 2026-05-6.29 14.51
16:21:48.82 -61:36:13.20 ASASSN-26dd 2026-05-5.21 15.15
14:26:40.22 -24:48:37.50 AT2026lig 2026-05-4.27 14.63
13:17:51.04 +30:25:13.50 SN2026kcp 2026-05-4.46 16.43
11:27:55.57 -13:38:56.90 SN2026kza 2026-05-1.08 15.59
22:28:27.10 +30:17:54.30 SN 2026fov 2026-04-29.6 14.36
21:00:10.71 -32:17:03.90 AT2026kis 2026-04-27.36 16.15
14:32:57.37 -58:13:26.40 ASASSN-26dc 2026-04-27.27 13.42
15:32:05.35 -43:54:34.60 ASASSN-26db 2026-04-27.37 16.06
16:34:34.97 -54:34:58.00 ASASSN-26da 2026-04-25.32 16.11
10:06:55.04 -01:13:49.70 SN2026jsg 2026-04-24.99 16.28
15:15:57.17 +56:18:32.80 SN2026kid 2026-04-24.52 -3.65
07:58:28.45 +57:03:42.40 AT2026kcf 2026-04-24.2 16.89
11:38:21.80 -50:43:06.50 SN2026jkb 2026-04-24.24 15.38
10:06:11.41 -39:41:04.20 AT2026dil 2026-04-24.2 16.85
14:21:40.08 +13:13:46.30 SN2026jlm 2026-04-22.16 15.12
10:53:55.52 -16:06:06.00 ASASSN-26cz 2026-04-22.28 16.29
20:07:38.15 -21:07:05.40 2026-05-25.18 -1.12
13:45:02.03 +15:17:14.50 ASASSN-26cy 2026-04-21.27 15.78
13:20:52.22 -35:57:03.60 AT2026jcm 2026-04-19.01 16.65
13:36:15.66 -36:53:48.40 SN 2026iqy 2026-04-18.92 17.31
06:34:01.33 -40:07:34.00 ASASSN-26cx 2026-04-19.07 16.16
23:33:57.97 -45:12:11.90 SN 2026idu 2026-04-19.41 15.9
12:10:50.92 +66:55:31.20 SN 2026icv 2026-04-17.14 16.03
21:36:59.06 -60:43:35.90 ASASSN-26cv 2026-04-17.35 -1.18
08:13:26.26 -27:07:30.50 ASASSN-26cw 2026-04-17.07 -1.01
14:49:14.13 -27:29:20.60 ASASSN-26cu 2026-04-16.06 14.03
17:21:59.44 -38:54:04.60 ASASSN-26ct 2026-04-14.4 15.15
15:25:54.99 +07:49:24.50 SN2026huo 2026-04-12.14 16.96
20:07:38.15 -21:07:05.40 2026-05-25.18 -1.12
12:23:20.40 +04:53:39.10 AT2026ixd 2026-04-12.14 17.65
17:46:09.76 -61:19:50.40 SN2026icy 2026-04-12.2 17.03
09:25:46.42 +02:13:46.30 SN2026gud 2026-04-11.98 16.49
16:52:15.46 -60:27:45.90 ASASSN-26cs 2026-04-12.4 15.5
04:20:55.37 -51:15:31.10 ASASSN-26cr 2026-04-12.01 15.37
22:25:39.35 +36:45:06.90 AT2026ihl 2026-04-10.48 14.21
19:40:44.94 +00:41:03.80 AT2026imw 2026-04-10.32 16.06
19:52:04.70 +05:53:33.50 ASASSN-26cq 2026-04-9.31 14.98
16:08:18.39 -64:11:08.80 ASASSN-26cp 2026-04-9.29 13.32
09:22:22.90 -61:02:43.70 SN2026idh 2026-04-7.97 16.34
05:06:54.12 -19:42:26.40 AT2026imr 2026-04-8 17.49
07:14:55.34 -36:03:21.40 AT2026hei 2026-04-8.12 16.7
21:35:33.14 -19:01:34.80 AT2026ihm 2026-04-8.36 16.7
04:28:24.08 -32:25:35.30 AT2026imo 2026-04-8.02 16.81
05:10:35.79 -39:38:40.80 SN 2026hnn 2026-04-7.04 17.07
09:54:32.04 -01:17:25.80 ASASSN-26cn 2026-04-7.01 15.58
07:46:24.43 -77:29:35.90 ASASSN-26co 2026-04-7.15 14.93
05:00:45.52 -29:51:06.20 AT2026hvw 2026-04-6.03 16.51
19:49:33.10 -23:37:11.00 ASASSN-26cl 2026-04-5.29 14.98
19:32:43.55 -22:39:33.40 ASASSN-26cm 2026-04-4.3 13.88
18:08:57.38 +76:48:23.60 ASASSN-26ck 2026-04-2.37 15.38
16:16:36.10 +44:52:30.20 AT2026hyy 2026-04-2.58 13.81
21:55:23.31 -34:48:53.90 ASASSN-26cj 2026-03-30.4 -1.47
11:19:50.70 -27:51:49.80 SN2026gvk 2026-03-30 15.48
11:53:57.02 -23:09:46.20 SN2026gzx 2026-03-28.75 15.27
07:13:46.14 -33:10:15.70 ASASSN-26ci 2026-03-28.15 15.14
09:03:36.09 -67:58:13.00 SN2026hkg 2026-03-28.19 15.82
07:03:00.72 +39:14:43.00 SN2026fin 2026-03-28.27 15.82
05:35:42.80 -63:44:05.50 ASASSN-26ch 2026-03-27.86 13.02
11:23:19.04 +34:22:38.00 SN2026fwt 2026-03-27.3 16.56
19:03:49.79 +37:04:05.20 ASASSN-26ce 2026-03-26.56 16.3
20:26:56.07 -52:54:06.50 AT2026hiy 2026-03-26.35 16.95
05:25:54.76 -30:15:35.80 ASASSN-26cg 2026-03-25.07 16.88
06:57:16.49 -26:54:37.20 SN2026fzb 2026-03-25.14 15.8
14:37:38.23 -43:00:52.30 ASASSN-26cd 2026-03-24.24 12.52
17:34:53.03 +06:04:29.70 AT2026gzl 2026-03-23.27 15.82
08:30:02.60 -35:12:47.50 ASASSN-26cf 2026-03-23.2 14.82
16:54:25.33 +37:49:56.60 SN 2026evz 2026-03-21.32 17.54
17:06:19.20 -18:54:19.50 ASASSN-26bx 2026-03-21.25 16.39
19:01:16.28 -29:29:23.10 ASASSN-26bw 2026-03-21.33 15.81
08:46:05.75 +10:47:39.80 ASASSN-26ca 2026-03-21.13 14.27
12:14:58.16 +63:47:16.20 SN 2026fvx 2026-03-21.12 15.6
18:02:55.90 -75:23:02.60 ASASSN-26bz 2026-03-21.32 16.16
12:16:02.88 -53:16:33.80 ASASSN-26cc 2026-03-20.04 15.48
13:08:21.85 +29:13:44.20 SN 2026fmh 2026-03-20.16 -0.33
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 5.6K Jun 12 01:05 asassn_transients_list.txt
############################################################
Truncated list of TOCP transients from http://www.cbat.eps.harvard.edu/unconf/tocp.html :
09:55:38.83 +69:05:21.7 PNV J09553883+6905217 2026-04-01.893 19.4mag
19:32:43.67 -22:39:30.7 TCP J19324367-2239307 2026-04-05.4395 13.6mag
16:16:36.03 +44:52:28.9 TCP J16163603+4452289 2026-04-05.6655 14.2mag
00:43:38.36 +41:15:32.4 PNV J00433836+4115324 2026-04-08.079 17.2mag
15:41:11.68 +59:18:26.8 TCP J15411168+5918268 2026-04-12.9625 19.2mag
00:43:35.02 +41:46:28.0 PNV J00433502+4146280 2026-04-23.056 15.9mag
00:42:55.64 +41:14:12.2 PNV J00425564+4114122 2026-04-24.042 16.2mag
21:14:03.38 +56:46:44.1 TCP J21140338+5646441 2026-05-05.3534 16.7mag
15:03:05.19 +22:02:04.1 TCP J15030519+2202041 2026-05-08.3260 13.9mag
07:15:18.25 +47:53:16.7 TCP J07151825+4753167 2026-05-09.1599 14.4mag
16:00:18.44 -22:30:10.6 TCP J16001844-2230106 2026-05-09.6135 13.3mag
00:42:47.45 +41:16:58.5 PNV J00424745+4116585 2026-05-10.030 16.8mag
09:55:02.89 +69:02:13.8 PNV J09550289+6902138 2026-05-18.925 20.7mag
00:43:01.82 +41:18:16.6 PNV J00430182+4118166 2026-05-21.8651 18.83Cmag
00:42:51.20 +41:16:59.4 PNV J00425120+4116594 2022-10-26.135 19.3mag
12:24:25.10 +28:47:12.0 TCP J12242510+2847120 2026-05-31.6015 14.8mag
00:56:07.13 +43:01:40.6 TCP J00560713+4301406 2026-06-01.4135 12.2mag
00:42:41.64 +41:15:16.2 PNV J00424164+4115162 2026-06-02.029 17.4mag
00:42:38.68 +41:15:58.2 PNV J00423868+4115582 2026-06-05.1224 19.97Umag
19:00:42.95 -48:31:01.7 PNV J19004295-4831017 2026-05-25.0752 14.2mag
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 189K Jun 12 01:05 tocp_transients_list.txt
############################################################
Truncated list of recent TNS transients from https://www.wis-tns.org/ :
14:07:51.250 +24:10:15.37 AT 2026ohe 2026-05-16.81 21.59
13:38:05.560 +19:24:23.06 AT 2026ohd 2026-05-16.80 21.01
14:00:47.770 +18:13:38.00 AT 2026ohc 2026-05-16.80 20.77
14:42:20.560 +46:34:25.14 AT 2026ohb 2026-05-12.86 21.63
15:37:36.080 +28:23:57.03 AT 2026oha 2026-05-12.85 21.38
13:11:47.430 +24:23:17.11 AT 2026ogz 2026-04-23.88 21.65
13:28:46.440 +04:10:17.43 AT 2026ogy 2026-05-22.72 21.45
13:19:13.090 +00:02:42.02 AT 2026ogx 2026-05-22.71 22.28
14:22:32.600 -00:42:16.67 AT 2026ogw 2026-05-22.70 21.87
13:41:54.970 +01:03:14.50 AT 2026ogv 2026-05-22.68 22.32
13:39:12.070 +02:04:49.22 AT 2026ogu 2026-05-21.69 22.02
14:31:27.720 +03:25:02.91 AT 2026ogt 2026-05-17.66 22.05
11:12:25.300 +01:12:09.84 AT 2026ogs 2026-05-17.60 22.13
10:57:06.470 -01:19:33.41 AT 2026ogr 2026-05-17.60 22.09
13:46:33.190 +02:44:41.49 AT 2026ogq 2026-05-11.62 22.84
11:13:33.080 +02:44:16.90 AT 2026ogp 2026-05-11.60 22.76
16:42:30.573 -13:46:07.58 AT 2026ogo 2026-05-24.19 21.5377
00:03:44.957 +08:28:44.28 AT 2026ogn 2026-06-05.44 19.2492
22:46:13.996 +03:59:51.65 AT 2026ogm 2026-06-04.43 18.9981
23:07:50.760 -12:36:34.14 AT 2026ogl 2026-06-05.45 19.2023
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 30K Jun 12 01:05 tns_transients_list.txt