This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-11_CI_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_052640_TTUQ1b1x1_3528018_tD5rFToW
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461202.9053,7.21,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260611.4053 7.21CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 11.4053 2461202.9053 10.17 00:49:37.73 +03:47:33.4
122.05374 -59.07605 galactic Psc Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.1" and 4.9 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.2 Pallas 0 -0 0 10.1 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits at 00:49:37.73 +03:47:33.4: 15.89 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-57-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0070.fits at 00:49:37.73 +03:47:33.4: 15.87 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461202.9053,10.17,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260611.4053 10.17CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461202.9053,7.34,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260611.4053 7.34CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461202.9053,12.41,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260611.4053 12.41CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461202.9053,12.84,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260611.4053 12.84CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 11.4053 2461202.9053 12.69 00:42:13.16 +05:08:30.8
118.63901 -57.65300 galactic Psc Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.1" and 4.9 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.101 Helena -1 -1 1 13.2 -0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits at 00:42:13.16 +05:08:30.8: 14.30 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-57-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0070.fits at 00:42:13.16 +05:08:30.8: 14.24 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.27 +/- 0.05
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461202.9053,12.69,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260611.4053 12.69CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 11.4053 2461202.9053 12.95 00:35:44.74 +04:36:05.1
115.52863 -58.04459 galactic Psc Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.0" and 5.0 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.46 Hestia -0 -0 0 13.1 -0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits at 00:35:44.74 +04:36:05.1: 15.93 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-57-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0070.fits at 00:35:44.74 +04:36:05.1: 15.95 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461202.9053,12.95,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260611.4053 12.95CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 11.4053 2461202.9053 13.19 00:52:36.85 +06:19:27.5
123.46211 -56.54623 galactic Psc Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.2" and 4.9 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.124 Alkeste -0 -1 1 13.5 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits at 00:52:36.85 +06:19:27.5: 16.11 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-57-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0070.fits at 00:52:36.85 +06:19:27.5: 16.08 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461202.9053,13.19,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260611.4053 13.19CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 11.4053 2461202.9053 13.48 00:45:12.62 +07:39:13.2
120.22856 -55.18539 galactic Psc Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.3" and 4.8 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.385 Ilmatar -0 -0 1 13.9 -0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits at 00:45:12.62 +07:39:13.2: 16.07 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-57-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0070.fits at 00:45:12.62 +07:39:13.2: 16.11 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461202.9053,13.48,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260611.4053 13.48CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 11.4053 2461202.9053 13.78 00:51:54.32 +08:30:30.1
123.13027 -54.36321 galactic Psc Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.5" and 5.0 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.212 Medea 0 -0 0 14.3 -0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits at 00:51:54.32 +08:30:30.1: 16.09 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-57-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0070.fits at 00:51:54.32 +08:30:30.1: 16.07 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461202.9053,13.78,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260611.4053 13.78CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461049.62262976 09.01.2026 02:56:25.211 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits
First image: 2461049.62262976 09.01.2026 02:56:25.211 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits
Last image: 2461202.90556192 11.06.2026 09:43:50.550 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-11_CI_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_052640_TTUQ1b1x1_3528018_tD5rFToW/fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_04-43-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0453.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 10
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.65
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 4 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 5969
Objects passed selection criteria: 5953
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.0 3.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.0 3.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 4654.25
Average stars matched: 4543.5 (97.6205 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 111936 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Wed Jun 10 15:05:04 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-96-gc6da043e
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-06-10)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Thu Jun 11 05:31:10 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461049.62262976 09.01.2026 02:56:25.211 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits
First image: 2461049.62262976 09.01.2026 02:56:25.211 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits
Last image: 2461202.90556192 11.06.2026 09:43:50.550 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-11_CI_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_052640_TTUQ1b1x1_3528018_tD5rFToW/fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_04-43-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0453.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 72
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.42
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 16 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 32181
Objects passed selection criteria: 32101
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.0 3.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.0 3.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 25191
Average stars matched: 24445 (97.0386 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 134948 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Wed Jun 10 15:05:04 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-96-gc6da043e
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-06-10)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Thu Jun 11 05:33:36 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 3.5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-57-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0070.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-11_CI_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_052640_TTUQ1b1x1_3528018_tD5rFToW/fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_04-43-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0452.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-11_CI_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_052640_TTUQ1b1x1_3528018_tD5rFToW/fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_04-43-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0453.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-57-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0070.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-57-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0070.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-11_CI_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_052640_TTUQ1b1x1_3528018_tD5rFToW/fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_04-43-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0452.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-11_CI_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_052640_TTUQ1b1x1_3528018_tD5rFToW/fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_04-43-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0453.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461202.90513039
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits'
wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-57-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0070.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-57-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0070.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-57-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0070.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-57-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0070.fits'
wcs_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_04-43-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0452.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_04-43-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0452.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_04-43-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0452.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_04-43-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0452.fits'
wcs_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_04-43-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0453.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_04-43-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0453.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_04-43-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0453.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_04-43-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0453.fits'
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits
Image size: 941.5'x627.0' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 00:51:32.310 +05:59:46.72 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_04-43-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0452.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_04-43-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0452.fits
Image size: 942.7'x626.8' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.91"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 00:51:23.667 +06:02:19.54 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 00:51:32.310 +05:59:46.72
Second-epoch image center 00:51:23.667 +06:02:19.54
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0555 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_04-43-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0453.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_04-43-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0453.fits
Image size: 942.7'x626.8' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.91"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 00:51:21.760 +06:02:14.08 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 00:51:32.310 +05:59:46.72
Second-epoch image center 00:51:21.760 +06:02:14.08
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0599 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 00:51:23.667 +06:02:19.54
Second-epoch second image center 00:51:21.760 +06:02:14.08
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00805 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits &> /tmp/tmp.hRTYHON26i
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-57-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0070.fits &> /tmp/tmp.fFT2DTzZUI
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-57-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0070.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-11_CI_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_052640_TTUQ1b1x1_3528018_tD5rFToW/fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_04-43-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0452.fits &> /tmp/tmp.jcsjdTmnSB
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-11_CI_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_052640_TTUQ1b1x1_3528018_tD5rFToW/fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_04-43-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0452.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-11_CI_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_052640_TTUQ1b1x1_3528018_tD5rFToW/fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_04-43-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0453.fits &> /tmp/tmp.qBtbEVU6R6
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-11_CI_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_052640_TTUQ1b1x1_3528018_tD5rFToW/fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_04-43-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0453.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits and wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits and wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits and wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits) and catalog (wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 6274 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 4.9081 to 20.8681 deg, Dec +0.7095 to +11.2754 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 4.9081 to 20.8681 deg, Dec 0.7095 to 11.2754 deg
Loaded 4466 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3642 out of 3799 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3799 out of 6274 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.877250
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.877250
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.65
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.23
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.23
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 6274 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 4.9081 to 20.8681 deg, Dec +0.7095 to +11.2754 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 4.9081 to 20.8681 deg, Dec 0.7095 to 11.2754 deg
Loaded 4466 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3642 out of 3799 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3799 out of 6274 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits (aperture=5.9)
Read 6217 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 4.8906 to 20.8646 deg, Dec +0.7094 to +11.2737 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 4.8906 to 20.8646 deg, Dec 0.7094 to 11.2737 deg
Loaded 4467 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3635 out of 3795 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3795 out of 6217 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-57-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0070.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-57-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0070.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-57-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0070.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-57-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0070.fits (aperture=5.9)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 10 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 8000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.0 pix Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits
2.0 pix Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-57-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0070.fits
2.5 pix fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_04-43-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0452.fits
2.5 pix fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_04-43-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0453.fits
2.0 pix wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits
2.0 pix wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-57-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0070.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.2 mag. Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits
15.2 mag. Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-57-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0070.fits
14.0 mag. fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_04-43-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0452.fits
14.1 mag. fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_04-43-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0453.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.0 (SNR ) 11.4 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.hRTYHON26i (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-11_CI_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_052640_TTUQ1b1x1_3528018_tD5rFToW/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits' -> 'wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits.wcscat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=428, passed=6274
Got 6274 stars (including 5838 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 6274 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013076 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010461 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 453 to 508 (Dec 0.7 to 11.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 979 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 979 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 971 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 979 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6184 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 453 to 508 (Dec 0.7 to 11.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 979 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 979 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6184 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 979 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6184 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
Excluding outliers - 979 stars left (next iteration limit 1076)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits N_match=979 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.291 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.359 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.275 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.267 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.273 n_q1=207 n_q2=265 n_q3=258 n_q4=249 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.235
The image catalog is written to wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits -region wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.fFT2DTzZUI (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-11_CI_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_052640_TTUQ1b1x1_3528018_tD5rFToW/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-57-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0070.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-57-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0070.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-57-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0070.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-57-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0070.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-57-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0070.fits
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-11_CI_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_052640_TTUQ1b1x1_3528018_tD5rFToW/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh: line 136: echo: write error: Broken pipe
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-57-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0070.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-57-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0070.fits' -> 'wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-57-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0070.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-57-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0070.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-57-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0070.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-57-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0070.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-57-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0070.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-57-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0070.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-57-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0070.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-57-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0070.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-57-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0070.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-57-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0070.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-57-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0070.fits.wcscat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=435, passed=6217
Got 6217 stars (including 5773 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-57-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0070.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 6217 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013076 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010461 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 453 to 508 (Dec 0.7 to 11.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 980 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 980 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 971 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 980 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6112 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 453 to 508 (Dec 0.7 to 11.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 980 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 980 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6111 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 980 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6111 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
Excluding outliers - 980 stars left (next iteration limit 1078)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-57-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0070.fits N_match=980 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.288 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.400 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.286 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.253 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.236 n_q1=208 n_q2=264 n_q3=255 n_q4=253 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.387
The image catalog is written to wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-57-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0070.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-57-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0070.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-57-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0070.fits -region wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-57-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0070.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-57-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0070.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.jcsjdTmnSB (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-11_CI_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_052640_TTUQ1b1x1_3528018_tD5rFToW/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-11_CI_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_052640_TTUQ1b1x1_3528018_tD5rFToW/fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_04-43-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0452.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-11_CI_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_052640_TTUQ1b1x1_3528018_tD5rFToW/fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_04-43-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0452.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-11_CI_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_052640_TTUQ1b1x1_3528018_tD5rFToW/fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_04-43-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0452.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-11_CI_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_052640_TTUQ1b1x1_3528018_tD5rFToW/fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_04-43-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0452.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-11_CI_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_052640_TTUQ1b1x1_3528018_tD5rFToW/fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_04-43-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0452.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-11_CI_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_052640_TTUQ1b1x1_3528018_tD5rFToW/fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_04-43-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0452.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_04-43-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0452.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_04-43-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0452.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_04-43-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0452.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_04-43-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0452.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_04-43-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0452.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_04-43-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0452.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_04-43-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0452.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-11_CI_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_052640_TTUQ1b1x1_3528018_tD5rFToW/fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_04-43-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0452.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_04-43-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0452.fits.wcscat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=162, passed=3096
Got 3096 stars (including 2932 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_04-43-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0452.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 3096 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 942.7'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 942.7 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013093 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010474 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 451 to 510 (Dec 0.4 to 11.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 975 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 975 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 957 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 975 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3017 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 451 to 510 (Dec 0.4 to 11.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 975 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 975 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3016 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 975 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3016 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
Excluding outliers - 975 stars left (next iteration limit 1072)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_04-43-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0452.fits N_match=975 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.297 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.268 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.382 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.236 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.328 n_q1=302 n_q2=188 n_q3=308 n_q4=177 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.285
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_04-43-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0452.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_04-43-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0452.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-11_CI_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_052640_TTUQ1b1x1_3528018_tD5rFToW/fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_04-43-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0452.fits -region wcs_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_04-43-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0452.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_04-43-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0452.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.qBtbEVU6R6 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-11_CI_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_052640_TTUQ1b1x1_3528018_tD5rFToW/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-11_CI_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_052640_TTUQ1b1x1_3528018_tD5rFToW/fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_04-43-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0453.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-11_CI_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_052640_TTUQ1b1x1_3528018_tD5rFToW/fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_04-43-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0453.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-11_CI_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_052640_TTUQ1b1x1_3528018_tD5rFToW/fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_04-43-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0453.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-11_CI_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_052640_TTUQ1b1x1_3528018_tD5rFToW/fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_04-43-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0453.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-11_CI_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_052640_TTUQ1b1x1_3528018_tD5rFToW/fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_04-43-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0453.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-11_CI_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_052640_TTUQ1b1x1_3528018_tD5rFToW/fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_04-43-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0453.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_04-43-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0453.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_04-43-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0453.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_04-43-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0453.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_04-43-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0453.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_04-43-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0453.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_04-43-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0453.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_04-43-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0453.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-11_CI_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_052640_TTUQ1b1x1_3528018_tD5rFToW/fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_04-43-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0453.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_04-43-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0453.fits.wcscat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=163, passed=3140
Got 3140 stars (including 2973 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_04-43-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0453.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 3140 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 942.7'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 942.7 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013093 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010474 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 451 to 510 (Dec 0.4 to 11.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 978 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 978 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 961 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 978 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3081 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 451 to 510 (Dec 0.4 to 11.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 978 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 978 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3081 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 978 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3081 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26"
Excluding outliers - 978 stars left (next iteration limit 1075)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_04-43-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0453.fits N_match=978 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.272 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.271 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.320 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.243 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.290 n_q1=297 n_q2=195 n_q3=302 n_q4=184 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.177
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_04-43-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0453.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_04-43-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0453.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-11_CI_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_052640_TTUQ1b1x1_3528018_tD5rFToW/fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_04-43-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0453.fits -region wcs_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_04-43-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0453.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_04-43-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0453.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits sigma_overall=0.291 worst_q_ratio=1.235
ref2=Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-57-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0070.fits sigma_overall=0.288 worst_q_ratio=1.387
new1=fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_04-43-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0452.fits sigma_overall=0.297 worst_q_ratio=1.285
new2=fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_04-43-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0453.fits sigma_overall=0.272 worst_q_ratio=1.177
reference average sigma_overall=0.2895 worst_q_ratio=1.311
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069_astrometric_residuals.png (979 matched stars from wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.27 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-57-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0070_astrometric_residuals.png (980 matched stars from wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-57-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0070.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.27 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_04-43-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0452_astrometric_residuals.png (975 matched stars from wcs_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_04-43-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0452.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.26 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_04-43-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0453_astrometric_residuals.png (978 matched stars from wcs_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_04-43-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0453.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.26 arcsec)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_04-43-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0452.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_04-43-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0452.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-11_CI_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_052640_TTUQ1b1x1_3528018_tD5rFToW/wcs_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_04-43-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0452.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_04-43-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0453.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_04-43-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0453.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-11_CI_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_052640_TTUQ1b1x1_3528018_tD5rFToW/wcs_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_04-43-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0453.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Psc-05-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits at 00:49:37.73 +03:47:33.4: 15.89 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits at 01:21:06.69 +01:05:00.4: 10.23 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits at 01:20:58.84 +01:12:32.3: 10.22 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits at 01:18:40.46 +01:11:09.7: 11.38 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits at 01:18:45.67 +01:14:03.9: 11.31 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits at 01:18:49.76 +01:19:20.5: 11.41 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits at 01:19:22.06 +01:25:11.3: 11.39 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits at 01:18:41.27 +00:47:13.8: 11.27 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-57-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0070.fits at 01:20:58.84 +01:12:32.3: 10.24 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-57-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0070.fits at 01:21:06.69 +01:05:00.4: 10.22 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 10.23 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:20:58.84 +01:12:32.3: ref_mag=10.23 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=10.6572 delta=-0.43 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 10.23 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:21:06.69 +01:05:00.4: ref_mag=10.23 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=10.7962 delta=-0.57 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-57-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0070.fits at 00:49:37.73 +03:47:33.4: 15.87 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-57-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0070.fits at 01:18:45.67 +01:14:03.9: 11.30 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-57-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0070.fits at 01:18:41.27 +00:47:13.8: 11.25 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.31 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:18:45.67 +01:14:03.9: ref_mag=11.31 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.5359 delta=-0.23 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-57-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0070.fits at 01:18:49.76 +01:19:20.5: 11.45 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.26 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:18:41.27 +00:47:13.8: ref_mag=11.26 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.6455 delta=-0.38 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.43 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:18:49.76 +01:19:20.5: ref_mag=11.43 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.7113 delta=-0.29 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-57-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0070.fits at 01:19:22.06 +01:25:11.3: 11.40 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.39 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:19:22.06 +01:25:11.3: ref_mag=11.39 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.7488 delta=-0.35 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-57-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0070.fits at 01:18:40.46 +01:11:09.7: 11.38 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.38 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:18:40.46 +01:11:09.7: ref_mag=11.38 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.7590 delta=-0.38 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out20342.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 10s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 3s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20320_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_04-43-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0453
Preparing report for the candidate 20320_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_04-43-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0453
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20332_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_04-43-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0453
The candidate 20332_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_04-43-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0453 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 01:18:28.21 +00:58:15.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_tycho2.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20342_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_04-43-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0453
Preparing report for the candidate 20342_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_04-43-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0453
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20354_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_04-43-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0453
The candidate 20354_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_04-43-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0453 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20361_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_04-43-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0453
The candidate 20361_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_04-43-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0453 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20407_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_04-43-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0453
The candidate 20407_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_04-43-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0453 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20417_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_04-43-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0453
The candidate 20417_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_04-43-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0453 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20426_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_04-43-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0453
The candidate 20426_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_04-43-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0453 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20427_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_04-43-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0453
The candidate 20427_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_04-43-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0453 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20428_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_04-43-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0453
The candidate 20428_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_04-43-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0453 did not pass the final checks
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 1s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 14s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Psc-05-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
00:49:37.73 +03:47:33.4
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 3.5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-57-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0070.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-11_CI_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_052640_TTUQ1b1x1_3528018_tD5rFToW/fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_04-43-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0452.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-11_CI_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_052640_TTUQ1b1x1_3528018_tD5rFToW/fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_04-43-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0453.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-57-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0070.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-57-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0070.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-11_CI_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_052640_TTUQ1b1x1_3528018_tD5rFToW/fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_04-43-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0452.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-11_CI_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_052640_TTUQ1b1x1_3528018_tD5rFToW/fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_04-43-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0453.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-57-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0070.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_04-43-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0452.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_04-43-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0453.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/exclusion_list.txt
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-57-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0070.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_04-43-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0452.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_04-43-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0453.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits
Image size: 941.5'x627.0' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 00:51:32.310 +05:59:46.72 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_04-43-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0452.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_04-43-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0452.fits
Image size: 942.7'x626.8' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.91"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 00:51:23.667 +06:02:19.54 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 00:51:32.310 +05:59:46.72
Second-epoch image center 00:51:23.667 +06:02:19.54
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0555 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_04-43-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0453.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_04-43-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0453.fits
Image size: 942.7'x626.8' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.91"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 00:51:21.760 +06:02:14.08 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 00:51:32.310 +05:59:46.72
Second-epoch image center 00:51:21.760 +06:02:14.08
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0599 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 00:51:23.667 +06:02:19.54
Second-epoch second image center 00:51:21.760 +06:02:14.08
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00805 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits &> /tmp/tmp.QTm1Sw8Wvb
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-57-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0070.fits &> /tmp/tmp.hKv6vNl9Qj
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-57-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0070.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-11_CI_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_052640_TTUQ1b1x1_3528018_tD5rFToW/fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_04-43-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0452.fits &> /tmp/tmp.sc8raIaH3y
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-11_CI_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_052640_TTUQ1b1x1_3528018_tD5rFToW/fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_04-43-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0452.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-11_CI_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_052640_TTUQ1b1x1_3528018_tD5rFToW/fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_04-43-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0453.fits &> /tmp/tmp.BPfe3VQEuu
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-11_CI_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_052640_TTUQ1b1x1_3528018_tD5rFToW/fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_04-43-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0453.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits and wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits and wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits and wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits) and catalog (wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 34129 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 4.8906 to 20.8698 deg, Dec +0.7073 to +11.2841 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 4.8906 to 20.8698 deg, Dec 0.7073 to 11.2841 deg
Loaded 4478 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3588 out of 3910 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3910 out of 34129 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.782000
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.782000
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.42
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.36
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.36
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 34129 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 4.8906 to 20.8698 deg, Dec +0.7073 to +11.2841 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 4.8906 to 20.8698 deg, Dec 0.7073 to 11.2841 deg
Loaded 4478 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3588 out of 3910 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3910 out of 34129 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits (aperture=4.8)
Read 34111 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 4.8822 to 20.8645 deg, Dec +0.7037 to +11.2806 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 4.8822 to 20.8645 deg, Dec 0.7037 to 11.2806 deg
Loaded 4474 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3580 out of 3908 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3908 out of 34111 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-57-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0070.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-57-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0070.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-57-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0070.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-57-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0070.fits (aperture=4.8)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 62 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 8000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
1.9 pix Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits
1.9 pix Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-57-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0070.fits
2.5 pix fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_04-43-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0452.fits
2.5 pix fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_04-43-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0453.fits
1.9 pix wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits
1.9 pix wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-57-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0070.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.4 mag. Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits
15.4 mag. Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-57-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0070.fits
14.2 mag. fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_04-43-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0452.fits
14.3 mag. fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_04-43-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0453.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.2 (SNR ) 13.7 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.QTm1Sw8Wvb (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-11_CI_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_052640_TTUQ1b1x1_3528018_tD5rFToW/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits' -> 'wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits.wcscat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=20, blended=1306, passed=34109
Got 34109 stars (including 32755 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 34109 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013076 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010461 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 453 to 508 (Dec 0.7 to 11.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 979 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 979 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 966 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 979 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 33583 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 453 to 508 (Dec 0.7 to 11.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 979 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 979 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 33584 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 979 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 33584 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
Excluding outliers - 979 stars left (next iteration limit 1076)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits N_match=979 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.282 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.374 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.261 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.272 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.248 n_q1=210 n_q2=257 n_q3=258 n_q4=254 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.325
The image catalog is written to wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits -region wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.hKv6vNl9Qj (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-11_CI_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_052640_TTUQ1b1x1_3528018_tD5rFToW/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-57-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0070.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-57-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0070.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-57-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0070.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-57-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0070.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-57-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0070.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-57-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0070.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-57-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0070.fits' -> 'wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-57-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0070.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-57-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0070.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-57-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0070.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-57-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0070.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-57-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0070.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-57-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0070.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-57-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0070.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-57-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0070.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-57-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0070.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-57-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0070.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-57-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0070.fits.wcscat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=26, blended=1297, passed=34085
Got 34085 stars (including 32721 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-57-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0070.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 34085 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013076 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010461 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 453 to 508 (Dec 0.7 to 11.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 980 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 980 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 969 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 980 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 33452 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 453 to 508 (Dec 0.7 to 11.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 980 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 980 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 33454 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 980 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 33454 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
Excluding outliers - 980 stars left (next iteration limit 1078)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-57-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0070.fits N_match=980 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.288 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.390 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.254 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.249 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.255 n_q1=213 n_q2=257 n_q3=253 n_q4=257 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.355
The image catalog is written to wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-57-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0070.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-57-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0070.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-57-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0070.fits -region wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-57-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0070.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-57-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0070.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.sc8raIaH3y (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-11_CI_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_052640_TTUQ1b1x1_3528018_tD5rFToW/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-11_CI_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_052640_TTUQ1b1x1_3528018_tD5rFToW/fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_04-43-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0452.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-11_CI_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_052640_TTUQ1b1x1_3528018_tD5rFToW/fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_04-43-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0452.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-11_CI_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_052640_TTUQ1b1x1_3528018_tD5rFToW/fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_04-43-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0452.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-11_CI_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_052640_TTUQ1b1x1_3528018_tD5rFToW/fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_04-43-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0452.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-11_CI_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_052640_TTUQ1b1x1_3528018_tD5rFToW/fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_04-43-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0452.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-11_CI_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_052640_TTUQ1b1x1_3528018_tD5rFToW/fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_04-43-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0452.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_04-43-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0452.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_04-43-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0452.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_04-43-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0452.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_04-43-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0452.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_04-43-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0452.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_04-43-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0452.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_04-43-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0452.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-11_CI_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_052640_TTUQ1b1x1_3528018_tD5rFToW/fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_04-43-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0452.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_04-43-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0452.fits.wcscat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=2, blended=400, passed=16291
Got 16291 stars (including 15867 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_04-43-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0452.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 16291 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 942.7'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 942.7 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013093 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010474 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 451 to 510 (Dec 0.3 to 11.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 975 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 975 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 954 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 975 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 15909 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 451 to 510 (Dec 0.3 to 11.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 975 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 975 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 15910 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 975 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 15909 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
Excluding outliers - 975 stars left (next iteration limit 1072)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_04-43-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0452.fits N_match=975 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.300 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.269 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.391 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.229 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.350 n_q1=298 n_q2=190 n_q3=308 n_q4=179 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.304
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_04-43-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0452.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_04-43-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0452.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-11_CI_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_052640_TTUQ1b1x1_3528018_tD5rFToW/fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_04-43-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0452.fits -region wcs_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_04-43-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0452.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_04-43-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0452.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.BPfe3VQEuu (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-11_CI_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_052640_TTUQ1b1x1_3528018_tD5rFToW/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-11_CI_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_052640_TTUQ1b1x1_3528018_tD5rFToW/fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_04-43-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0453.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-11_CI_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_052640_TTUQ1b1x1_3528018_tD5rFToW/fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_04-43-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0453.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-11_CI_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_052640_TTUQ1b1x1_3528018_tD5rFToW/fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_04-43-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0453.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-11_CI_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_052640_TTUQ1b1x1_3528018_tD5rFToW/fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_04-43-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0453.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-11_CI_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_052640_TTUQ1b1x1_3528018_tD5rFToW/fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_04-43-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0453.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-11_CI_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_052640_TTUQ1b1x1_3528018_tD5rFToW/fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_04-43-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0453.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_04-43-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0453.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_04-43-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0453.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_04-43-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0453.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_04-43-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0453.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_04-43-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0453.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_04-43-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0453.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_04-43-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0453.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-11_CI_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_052640_TTUQ1b1x1_3528018_tD5rFToW/fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_04-43-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0453.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_04-43-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0453.fits.wcscat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=3, blended=471, passed=16998
Got 16998 stars (including 16500 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_04-43-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0453.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 16998 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 942.7'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 942.7 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013093 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010474 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 451 to 510 (Dec 0.3 to 11.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 979 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 979 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 960 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 979 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 16690 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 451 to 510 (Dec 0.3 to 11.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 979 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 979 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 16686 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 979 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 16686 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26"
Excluding outliers - 979 stars left (next iteration limit 1076)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_04-43-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0453.fits N_match=979 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.270 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.279 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.310 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.228 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.305 n_q1=292 n_q2=197 n_q3=304 n_q4=186 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.146
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_04-43-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0453.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_04-43-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0453.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-11_CI_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_052640_TTUQ1b1x1_3528018_tD5rFToW/fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_04-43-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0453.fits -region wcs_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_04-43-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0453.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_04-43-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0453.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_04-43-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0452.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-11_CI_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_052640_TTUQ1b1x1_3528018_tD5rFToW/wcs_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_04-43-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0452.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_04-43-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0453.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-11_CI_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_052640_TTUQ1b1x1_3528018_tD5rFToW/wcs_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_04-43-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0453.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Psc-05-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits at 01:21:06.69 +01:05:00.5: 10.24 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits at 00:38:43.33 +01:17:27.3: 13.33 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits at 01:20:06.67 +01:45:50.6: 10.12 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits at 01:19:37.08 +01:47:07.1: 10.98 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits at 01:20:58.83 +01:12:32.3: 10.21 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits at 00:27:12.84 +05:22:13.7: 12.95 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits at 01:17:52.04 +01:00:40.8: 11.22 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits at 01:18:49.76 +01:19:20.4: 11.40 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits at 01:18:45.67 +01:14:03.8: 11.31 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-57-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0070.fits at 01:20:06.67 +01:45:50.6: 10.15 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 10.14 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-57-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0070.fits at 00:38:43.33 +01:17:27.3: 13.32 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:20:06.67 +01:45:50.6: ref_mag=10.14 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=10.1602 delta=-0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.32 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-57-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0070.fits at 01:19:37.08 +01:47:07.1: 10.98 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:38:43.33 +01:17:27.3: ref_mag=13.32 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.4037 delta=-0.08 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-57-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0070.fits at 01:20:58.83 +01:12:32.3: 10.24 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 10.98 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-57-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0070.fits at 01:21:06.69 +01:05:00.5: 10.23 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 10.23 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:19:37.08 +01:47:07.1: ref_mag=10.98 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=10.8996 delta=0.08 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-57-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0070.fits at 00:27:12.84 +05:22:13.7: 12.98 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:20:58.83 +01:12:32.3: ref_mag=10.23 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=10.2172 delta=0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 10.23 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:21:06.69 +01:05:00.5: ref_mag=10.23 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=10.3414 delta=-0.11 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.97 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:27:12.84 +05:22:13.7: ref_mag=12.97 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.0569 delta=-0.09 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-57-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0070.fits at 01:18:45.67 +01:14:03.8: 11.30 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.30 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-57-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0070.fits at 01:18:49.76 +01:19:20.4: 11.44 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-57-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0070.fits at 01:17:52.04 +01:00:40.8: 11.23 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:18:45.67 +01:14:03.8: ref_mag=11.30 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=11.1422 delta=0.16 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.42 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.22 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:18:49.76 +01:19:20.4: ref_mag=11.42 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.3008 delta=0.12 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:17:52.04 +01:00:40.8: ref_mag=11.22 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=11.2875 delta=-0.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits at 01:19:22.05 +01:25:11.3: 11.38 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits at 01:18:40.46 +01:11:09.7: 11.38 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits at 01:18:41.25 +00:47:13.8: 11.27 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits at 01:18:53.39 +00:59:06.9: 11.46 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits at 01:19:48.63 +01:52:11.1: 11.77 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits at 01:19:17.52 +01:08:51.1: 11.58 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits at 01:20:46.29 +01:04:48.8: 11.60 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits at 01:19:45.47 +01:01:47.0: 11.53 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits at 01:20:36.07 +00:55:31.3: 11.51 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-57-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0070.fits at 01:18:40.46 +01:11:09.7: 11.37 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-57-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0070.fits at 01:18:53.39 +00:59:06.9: 11.51 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-57-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0070.fits at 01:19:48.63 +01:52:11.1: 11.80 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-57-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0070.fits at 01:18:41.25 +00:47:13.8: 11.25 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.48 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.38 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.79 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:18:40.46 +01:11:09.7: ref_mag=11.38 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=11.3299 delta=0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:18:53.39 +00:59:06.9: ref_mag=11.48 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.4976 delta=-0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:19:48.63 +01:52:11.1: ref_mag=11.79 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.6721 delta=0.11 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.26 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-57-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0070.fits at 01:19:22.05 +01:25:11.3: 11.40 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:18:41.25 +00:47:13.8: ref_mag=11.26 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=11.2046 delta=0.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.39 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:19:22.05 +01:25:11.3: ref_mag=11.39 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=11.3326 delta=0.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-57-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0070.fits at 01:19:17.52 +01:08:51.1: 11.63 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.60 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:19:17.52 +01:08:51.1: ref_mag=11.60 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.5799 delta=0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-57-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0070.fits at 01:20:36.07 +00:55:31.3: 11.48 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-57-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0070.fits at 01:20:46.29 +01:04:48.8: 11.61 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.50 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:20:36.07 +00:55:31.3: ref_mag=11.50 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.5207 delta=-0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.61 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-57-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0070.fits at 01:19:45.47 +01:01:47.0: 11.51 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:20:46.29 +01:04:48.8: ref_mag=11.61 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.6742 delta=-0.07 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.52 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:19:45.47 +01:01:47.0: ref_mag=11.52 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.6513 delta=-0.13 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits at 01:18:37.26 +01:30:29.7: 12.13 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits at 01:18:39.72 +00:58:49.7: 12.03 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits at 01:18:54.96 +01:38:16.3: 11.90 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits at 01:17:36.35 +01:15:33.2: 12.16 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits at 01:21:13.89 +01:52:10.2: 12.16 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits at 01:20:19.88 +01:49:18.6: 12.14 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits at 01:18:55.45 +01:21:19.4: 12.29 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits at 01:17:21.65 +01:19:23.5: 12.47 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-57-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0070.fits at 01:18:39.72 +00:58:49.7: 12.06 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-57-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0070.fits at 01:18:54.96 +01:38:16.3: 11.95 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.04 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:18:39.72 +00:58:49.7: ref_mag=12.04 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.9172 delta=0.13 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-57-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0070.fits at 01:18:37.26 +01:30:29.7: 12.20 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.92 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-57-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0070.fits at 01:17:36.35 +01:15:33.2: 12.15 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:18:54.96 +01:38:16.3: ref_mag=11.92 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.7916 delta=0.13 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.16 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-57-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0070.fits at 01:20:19.88 +01:49:18.6: 12.16 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:18:37.26 +01:30:29.7: ref_mag=12.16 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.0283 delta=0.13 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.15 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:17:36.35 +01:15:33.2: ref_mag=12.15 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.1047 delta=0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.15 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:20:19.88 +01:49:18.6: ref_mag=12.15 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.9823 delta=0.17 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-57-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0070.fits at 01:21:13.89 +01:52:10.2: 12.12 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.14 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:21:13.89 +01:52:10.2: ref_mag=12.14 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.0501 delta=0.09 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-57-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0070.fits at 01:18:55.45 +01:21:19.4: 12.24 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-57-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0070.fits at 01:17:21.65 +01:19:23.5: 12.48 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.26 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:18:55.45 +01:21:19.4: ref_mag=12.26 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.1313 delta=0.13 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.48 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:17:21.65 +01:19:23.5: ref_mag=12.48 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.3598 delta=0.12 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits at 01:20:58.34 +01:44:53.0: 12.32 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits at 01:18:52.72 +01:22:09.0: 12.49 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits at 00:42:13.16 +05:08:30.8: 14.30 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits at 01:17:59.69 +00:56:42.6: 12.72 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits at 01:18:01.63 +01:18:03.1: 12.34 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits at 01:19:32.07 +00:49:47.2: 12.43 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits at 01:20:44.56 +01:38:13.4: 12.50 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-57-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0070.fits at 01:20:58.34 +01:44:53.0: 12.31 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-57-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0070.fits at 01:18:52.72 +01:22:09.0: 12.49 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-57-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0070.fits at 01:17:59.69 +00:56:42.6: 12.70 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.31 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.49 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:20:58.34 +01:44:53.0: ref_mag=12.31 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.2320 delta=0.08 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:18:52.72 +01:22:09.0: ref_mag=12.49 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.3519 delta=0.14 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-57-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0070.fits at 01:18:01.63 +01:18:03.1: 12.30 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-57-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0070.fits at 00:42:13.16 +05:08:30.8: 14.24 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.71 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:17:59.69 +00:56:42.6: ref_mag=12.71 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.4475 delta=0.26 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.32 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:18:01.63 +01:18:03.1: ref_mag=12.32 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.3257 delta=-0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.27 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 00:42:13.16 +05:08:30.8: ref_mag=14.27 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=12.6850 delta=1.58 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-57-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0070.fits at 01:19:32.07 +00:49:47.2: 12.39 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.41 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:19:32.07 +00:49:47.2: ref_mag=12.41 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.3441 delta=0.07 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-57-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0070.fits at 01:20:44.56 +01:38:13.4: 12.59 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.54 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:20:44.56 +01:38:13.4: ref_mag=12.54 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.4752 delta=0.07 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits at 01:21:06.44 +01:03:46.4: 12.61 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits at 00:35:44.74 +04:36:05.1: 15.93 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits at 01:18:30.66 +01:02:22.6: 12.55 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits at 01:18:03.19 +01:19:12.9: 12.69 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits at 01:19:35.24 +01:29:17.9: 12.81 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits at 01:18:26.66 +01:24:44.3: 12.64 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-57-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0070.fits at 01:21:06.44 +01:03:46.4: 12.56 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.59 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:21:06.44 +01:03:46.4: ref_mag=12.59 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.5012 delta=0.08 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-57-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0070.fits at 00:35:44.74 +04:36:05.1: 15.95 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-57-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0070.fits at 01:18:30.66 +01:02:22.6: 12.48 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-57-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0070.fits at 01:18:03.19 +01:19:12.9: 12.70 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.51 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:18:30.66 +01:02:22.6: ref_mag=12.51 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.5491 delta=-0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.70 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:18:03.19 +01:19:12.9: ref_mag=12.70 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.6012 delta=0.10 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits at 01:19:52.84 +01:25:33.9: 12.83 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-57-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0070.fits at 01:19:35.24 +01:29:17.9: 12.76 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-57-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0070.fits at 01:18:26.66 +01:24:44.3: 12.71 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.79 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.68 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:19:35.24 +01:29:17.9: ref_mag=12.79 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.4179 delta=0.37 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:18:26.66 +01:24:44.3: ref_mag=12.68 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.5974 delta=0.08 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-57-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0070.fits at 01:19:52.84 +01:25:33.9: 12.78 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits at 01:19:27.74 +00:59:11.6: 12.39 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.80 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:19:52.84 +01:25:33.9: ref_mag=12.80 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.5487 delta=0.25 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits at 00:57:57.62 +02:30:25.2: 12.96 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits at 01:19:38.86 +01:43:11.8: 12.77 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits at 01:18:44.43 +01:10:53.5: 12.94 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits at 01:18:59.15 +01:22:27.7: 13.04 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-57-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0070.fits at 01:19:27.74 +00:59:11.6: 12.41 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.40 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:19:27.74 +00:59:11.6: ref_mag=12.40 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.3820 delta=0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-57-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0070.fits at 00:57:57.62 +02:30:25.2: 13.00 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.98 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-57-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0070.fits at 01:19:38.86 +01:43:11.8: 12.82 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:57:57.62 +02:30:25.2: ref_mag=12.98 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.8581 delta=0.12 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.79 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:19:38.86 +01:43:11.8: ref_mag=12.79 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.7903 delta=0.00 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-57-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0070.fits at 01:18:59.15 +01:22:27.7: 13.00 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.02 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:18:59.15 +01:22:27.7: ref_mag=13.02 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.7925 delta=0.22 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-57-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0070.fits at 01:18:44.43 +01:10:53.5: 12.97 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits at 01:21:05.32 +01:19:53.5: 13.00 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.95 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:18:44.43 +01:10:53.5: ref_mag=12.95 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.7807 delta=0.17 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits at 01:20:32.52 +01:57:09.3: 13.02 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-57-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0070.fits at 01:21:05.32 +01:19:53.5: 12.93 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.97 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:21:05.32 +01:19:53.5: ref_mag=12.97 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.5801 delta=0.39 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits at 01:20:07.86 +01:51:14.4: 12.94 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits at 00:52:36.85 +06:19:27.5: 16.11 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits at 00:45:12.62 +07:39:13.2: 16.07 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits at 01:21:03.67 +01:27:53.7: 13.31 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-57-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0070.fits at 01:20:32.52 +01:57:09.3: 13.12 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.06 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:20:32.52 +01:57:09.3: ref_mag=13.06 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.9011 delta=0.16 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-57-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0070.fits at 01:20:07.86 +01:51:14.4: 12.97 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-57-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0070.fits at 00:52:36.85 +06:19:27.5: 16.08 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.95 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:20:07.86 +01:51:14.4: ref_mag=12.95 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.8734 delta=0.08 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-57-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0070.fits at 00:45:12.62 +07:39:13.2: 16.11 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits at 01:19:15.90 +00:54:44.5: 13.19 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-57-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0070.fits at 01:21:03.67 +01:27:53.7: 13.20 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.25 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:21:03.67 +01:27:53.7: ref_mag=13.25 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=12.9963 delta=0.26 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits at 00:20:30.88 +07:19:06.8: 13.87 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-57-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0070.fits at 01:19:15.90 +00:54:44.5: 13.13 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.16 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:19:15.90 +00:54:44.5: ref_mag=13.16 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=12.9795 delta=0.18 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits at 00:51:54.32 +08:30:30.1: 16.09 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-57-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0070.fits at 00:20:30.88 +07:19:06.8: 13.75 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.80 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:20:30.88 +07:19:06.8: ref_mag=13.80 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=13.8671 delta=-0.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-57-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0070.fits at 00:51:54.32 +08:30:30.1: 16.07 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out52514.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out52550.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out52658.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out52703.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out52809.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 11s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 6s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52248_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_04-43-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0453
The candidate 52248_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_04-43-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0453 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52250_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_04-43-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0453
The candidate 52250_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_04-43-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0453 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52251_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_04-43-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0453
Preparing report for the candidate 52251_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_04-43-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0453
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52259_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_04-43-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0453
The candidate 52259_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_04-43-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0453 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 01:17:42.59 +01:09:06.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_tycho2.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52265_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_04-43-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0453
The candidate 52265_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_04-43-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0453 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 01:18:28.19 +00:58:15.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_tycho2.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52275_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_04-43-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0453
The candidate 52275_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_04-43-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0453 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 00:49:37.73 +03:47:33.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_local.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52285_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_04-43-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0453
The candidate 52285_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_04-43-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0453 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52292_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_04-43-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0453
The candidate 52292_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_04-43-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0453 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52298_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_04-43-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0453
The candidate 52298_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_04-43-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0453 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52330_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_04-43-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0453
The candidate 52330_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_04-43-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0453 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52353_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_04-43-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0453
The candidate 52353_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_04-43-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0453 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52355_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_04-43-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0453
The candidate 52355_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_04-43-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0453 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52359_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_04-43-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0453
The candidate 52359_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_04-43-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0453 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52369_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_04-43-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0453
The candidate 52369_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_04-43-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0453 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52370_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_04-43-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0453
The candidate 52370_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_04-43-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0453 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52373_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_04-43-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0453
The candidate 52373_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_04-43-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0453 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52393_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_04-43-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0453
The candidate 52393_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_04-43-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0453 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52394_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_04-43-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0453
The candidate 52394_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_04-43-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0453 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52395_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_04-43-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0453
The candidate 52395_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_04-43-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0453 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52397_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_04-43-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0453
The candidate 52397_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_04-43-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0453 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52420_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_04-43-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0453
The candidate 52420_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_04-43-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0453 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52422_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_04-43-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0453
The candidate 52422_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_04-43-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0453 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52425_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_04-43-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0453
The candidate 52425_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_04-43-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0453 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52451_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_04-43-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0453
The candidate 52451_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_04-43-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0453 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52453_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_04-43-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0453
The candidate 52453_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_04-43-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0453 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52455_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_04-43-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0453
The candidate 52455_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_04-43-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0453 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52463_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_04-43-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0453
The candidate 52463_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_04-43-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0453 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52466_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_04-43-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0453
The candidate 52466_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_04-43-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0453 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52467_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_04-43-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0453
Preparing report for the candidate 52467_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_04-43-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0453
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52473_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_04-43-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0453
The candidate 52473_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_04-43-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0453 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52490_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_04-43-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0453
The candidate 52490_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_04-43-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0453 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52499_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_04-43-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0453
The candidate 52499_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_04-43-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0453 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52503_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_04-43-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0453
Preparing report for the candidate 52503_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_04-43-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0453
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52514_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_04-43-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0453
Preparing report for the candidate 52514_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_04-43-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0453
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52522_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_04-43-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0453
The candidate 52522_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_04-43-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0453 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52524_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_04-43-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0453
The candidate 52524_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_04-43-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0453 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52525_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_04-43-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0453
The candidate 52525_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_04-43-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0453 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52531_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_04-43-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0453
The candidate 52531_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_04-43-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0453 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52536_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_04-43-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0453
The candidate 52536_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_04-43-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0453 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52550_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_04-43-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0453
Preparing report for the candidate 52550_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_04-43-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0453
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52552_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_04-43-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0453
The candidate 52552_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_04-43-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0453 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52558_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_04-43-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0453
The candidate 52558_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_04-43-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0453 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52574_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_04-43-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0453
The candidate 52574_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_04-43-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0453 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52575_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_04-43-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0453
The candidate 52575_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_04-43-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0453 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52582_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_04-43-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0453
The candidate 52582_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_04-43-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0453 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52583_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_04-43-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0453
The candidate 52583_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_04-43-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0453 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52596_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_04-43-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0453
The candidate 52596_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_04-43-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0453 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52598_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_04-43-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0453
The candidate 52598_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_04-43-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0453 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52615_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_04-43-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0453
The candidate 52615_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_04-43-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0453 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52635_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_04-43-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0453
The candidate 52635_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_04-43-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0453 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52637_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_04-43-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0453
The candidate 52637_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_04-43-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0453 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52653_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_04-43-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0453
The candidate 52653_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_04-43-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0453 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52654_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_04-43-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0453
The candidate 52654_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_04-43-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0453 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52658_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_04-43-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0453
Preparing report for the candidate 52658_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_04-43-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0453
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52692_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_04-43-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0453
The candidate 52692_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_04-43-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0453 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52703_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_04-43-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0453
Preparing report for the candidate 52703_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_04-43-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0453
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52716_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_04-43-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0453
The candidate 52716_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_04-43-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0453 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52723_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_04-43-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0453
The candidate 52723_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_04-43-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0453 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52730_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_04-43-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0453
The candidate 52730_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_04-43-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0453 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 00:50:58.36 +09:13:17.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52757_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_04-43-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0453
The candidate 52757_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_04-43-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0453 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52766_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_04-43-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0453
The candidate 52766_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_04-43-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0453 did not pass the final checks
