## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref.  image: 2461093.78748612 22.02.2026 06:53:48.801   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits
First image: 2461093.78748612 22.02.2026 06:53:48.801   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits
Last  image: 2461202.76927057 11.06.2026 06:27:34.977   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-11_CI_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_014747_TTUQ2b1x1_1174719_V0GFyhNF/fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_01-27-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.:  -7.44
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 3 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA  10.0             # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH   10.0             #  or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0             #  or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL     55000.0         # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN            0.37            # detector gain in e-/ADU
Total objects detected (at least 2 times):  4325
Objects passed selection criteria:  4325
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max):    3.3    4.0    2    4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max):    3.3    4.0    2    4
Average stars detected per image: 4176.5
Average stars matched: 3815.75 (91.3624 %)
Memory usage VmPeak:   111404 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on  Wed Jun 10 15:05:04 CDT 2026
VaST build number  1.0rc89-96-gc6da043e
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-06-10)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on  Thu Jun 11 01:52:51 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref.  image: 2461093.78748612 22.02.2026 06:53:48.801   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits
First image: 2461093.78748612 22.02.2026 06:53:48.801   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits
Last  image: 2461202.76927057 11.06.2026 06:27:34.977   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-11_CI_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_014747_TTUQ2b1x1_1174719_V0GFyhNF/fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_01-27-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 46
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.:  -7.15
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 16 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA  2.0             # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH   3.0             #  or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0             #  or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL     57000.0         # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN            0.83            # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
Total objects detected (at least 2 times):  22698
Objects passed selection criteria:  22628
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max):    3.2    3.0    2    4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max):    3.2    3.0    2    4
Average stars detected per image: 21183.8
Average stars matched: 19371.2 (91.4439 %)
Memory usage VmPeak:   130048 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on  Wed Jun 10 15:05:04 CDT 2026
VaST build number  1.0rc89-96-gc6da043e
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-06-10)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on  Thu Jun 11 01:55:00 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################

######## Processing parameters ########
AAVSO_COMMENT_STRING= NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
ASTCHECK_ASTEROID_SEARCH_RADIUS_ARCSEC= 
BAD_REGION_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/TTUQ2_bad_region.lst
CAMERA_SETTINGS= TTUQ2b1x1
CHECK_POINTING_ACCURACY= yes
DARK_FRAMES_DIR_OR_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks
EXCLUSION_LIST= ../exclusion_list_TTUQ2.txt
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MAX_APERTURE_STAR_SIZE_PIX= 12.5
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MAX_ELONGATION_AminusB_PIX= 0.55
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MIN_APERTURE_STAR_SIZE_PIX= 2.0
FILTER_BRIGHT_MAG_CUTOFF_TRANSIENT_SEARCH= -5
FILTER_FAINT_MAG_CUTOFF_TRANSIENT_SEARCH= 15.0
FLAT_FIELD_DIR_OR_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats
FRAME_EDGE_OFFSET_PIX= 600
GAIA_BAND_FOR_CATALOGED_SOURCE_CHECK= 
MAX_NEW_TO_REF_MEAN_IMG_VALUE_RATIO= 100
MAX_NEW_IMG_MEAN_VALUE= 25000
MAX_SD_RATIO_OF_SECOND_EPOCH_IMGS= 0.18
MAX_SD_RATIO_OF_SECOND_EPOCH_IMGS_SOFT_LIMIT= 0.12
MPC_CODE= V36
NMW_CALIBRATION= /var/www/nmw_calibration
NUMBER_OF_DETECTED_TRANSIENTS_BEFORE_FILTERING_HARD_LIMIT= 8000
NUMBER_OF_DETECTED_TRANSIENTS_BEFORE_FILTERING_SOFT_LIMIT= 4000
OMP_NUM_THREADS= 
ONLINE_MPCHECKER_BUTTON_ASTEROID_SEARCH_RADIUS_ARCMIN= 
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION= 
REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES= yes
SEXTRACTOR_CONFIG_BRIGHTSTARPASS= default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
SEXTRACTOR_CONFIG_FILES= default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
STARMATCH_RADIUS_PIX= 4
SYSREM_ITERATIONS= 0
TELESCOP= 
TELESCOP_NAME_KNOWN_TO_VaST_FOR_FOV_DETERMINATION= 
UCAC5_PLATESOLVE_ITERATIONS= 2
FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE= no
#######################################
HOSTNAME= tau
USER= 
HOME= 
#######################################
SExtractor catalog cache: enabled, directory /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/vast_sextractor_cache
Reference image directory is set to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs
VIZIER_SITE=vizier.cds.unistra.fr
GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=vizquery (lib/vizquery -> VizieR vizier.cds.unistra.fr)
INFO: MAKE_PNG_PLOTS is set to yes
FITS_FILE_EXT=fits
CALIBRATION_STATUS_PREFIX=
Fields in the data directory: 
UMa-10-Q2b1x1
#######################################
########### Starting UMa-10-Q2b1x1 ###########
Processing UMa-10-Q2b1x1
server tau has sufficient free disk space available: 626516 MB at /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir
server tau has sufficient free disk space available: 626516 MB at .
Checking input images (2 new)
REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE= /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits
REFERENCE_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE= /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-03-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0183.fits
Small preview (one of the new images): 

Large previews of the second-epoch (new) images:

MAKE_PNG_PLOTS=yes


renamed 'UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_01-26-56_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0128.png' -> 'transient_report/UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_01-26-56_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0128.fits_preview.png'

UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_01-26-56_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0128.fits


renamed 'UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_01-27-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0129.png' -> 'transient_report/UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_01-27-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits_preview.png'

UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_01-27-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits




Read-check the input FITS images... read-check OK
Blank image check the input FITS images... blank-image-check OK
Read date check the input FITS images... read-date-check OK
Mean value check the input FITS images... OK, at least two new images have mean values below the threshold.
----------------------------------------------
INFO: REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 431.5825
INFO:         REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_SD= 529.1146
INFO:    SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 1136.1031
INFO:            SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_SD= 436.7387
INFO:   SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 1138.0120
INFO:           SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE_SD= 448.8453
----------------------------------------------
INFO:      ref_to_second_epoch_img_mean_ratio= 2.63241
INFO:                  SECOND_EPOCH__SD_ratio= 0.027
----------------------------------------------
Calibration settings: DARK_FRAMES_DIR_OR_FILE=/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks FLAT_FIELD_DIR_OR_FILE=/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats
EXPTIME =                 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration
SET-TEMP=                  5.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint
CCD-TEMP=                  5.0 / [degC] CCD temperature
FOCTEMP =     25.2099990844727 / [degC] Focuser temperature
AMBTEMP =                 25.4 / [degC] Ambient air temperature
Exploring image header: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-11_CI_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_014747_TTUQ2b1x1_1174719_V0GFyhNF/UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_01-26-56_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0128.fits 
CCD-TEMP= 5.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-11_CI_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_014747_TTUQ2b1x1_1174719_V0GFyhNF/UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_01-26-56_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0128.fits
SET-TEMP= 5.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-11_CI_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_014747_TTUQ2b1x1_1174719_V0GFyhNF/UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_01-26-56_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0128.fits
Header: 74 keys total, 33 keys left
Record 0: "" status=0
Record 1: "SIMPLE  =                    T / C# FITS" status=0
Record 2: "BITPIX  =                   16" status=0
Record 3: "NAXIS   =                    2 / Dimensionality" status=0
Record 4: "NAXIS1  =                 9576" status=0
Record 5: "NAXIS2  =                 6388" status=0
Record 6: "BZERO   =                32768" status=0
Record 7: "EXTEND  =                    T / Extensions are permitted" status=0
Record 8: "IMAGETYP= 'LIGHT'              / Type of exposure" status=0
Record 9: "EXPOSURE=                 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0
Record 10: "EXPTIME =                 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0
Record 11: "DATE-LOC= '2026-06-11T01:26:56.2556810' / Time of observation (local)" status=0
Record 12: "DATE-OBS= '2026-06-11T06:26:56.2556810' / Time of observation (UTC)" status=0
Record 13: "MJD-OBS =     61202.2687066551 / Modified Julian Date of observation" status=0
Record 14: "DATE-AVG= '2026-06-11T06:27:06.1553878' / Averaged midpoint time (UTC)" status=0
Record 15: "MJD-AVG =     61202.2688212385 / Modified Julian Date of averaged midpoint" status=0
Record 16: "XBINNING=                    1 / X axis binning factor" status=0
Record 17: "YBINNING=                    1 / Y axis binning factor" status=0
Record 18: "GAIN    =                   30 / Sensor gain" status=0
Record 19: "OFFSET  =                   30 / Sensor gain offset" status=0
Record 20: "XPIXSZ  =                 3.76 / [um] Pixel X axis size" status=0
Record 21: "YPIXSZ  =                 3.76 / [um] Pixel Y axis size" status=0
Record 22: "INSTRUME= 'QHY600M'            / Imaging instrument name" status=0
Record 23: "CAMERAID= 'QHY600M-84137c4dbbbd119a9' / Imaging instrument identifier" status=0
Record 24: "SET-TEMP=                  5.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint" status=0
Record 25: "CCD-TEMP=                  5.0 / [degC] CCD temperature" status=0
Record 26: "READOUTM= '2CMS-0'             / Sensor readout mode" status=0
Record 27: "USBLIMIT=                   50 / Camera-specific USB setting" status=0
Record 28: "TELESCOP= 'QHY600M-TTU2'       / Name of telescope" status=0
Record 29: "FOCALLEN=                135.0 / [mm] Focal length" status=0
Record 30: "FOCRATIO=                  2.2 / Focal ratio" status=0
Record 31: "RA      =     161.999314537444 / [deg] RA of telescope" status=0
Record 32: "DEC     =     46.0001144735486 / [deg] Declination of telescope" status=0
Record 33: "CENTALT =     22.1852777777778 / [deg] Altitude of telescope" status=0
Record 34: "CENTAZ  =     311.275555555556 / [deg] Azimuth of telescope" status=0
Record 35: "AIRMASS =     2.63277035946124 / Airmass at frame center (Gueymard 1993)" status=0
Record 36: "PIERSIDE= 'East'               / Telescope pointing state" status=0
Record 37: "SITEELEV=               1009.5 / [m] Observation site elevation" status=0
Record 38: "SITELAT =           33.7482925 / [deg] Observation site latitude" status=0
Record 39: "SITELONG=          -101.958319 / [deg] Observation site longitude" status=0
Record 40: "OBSERVER= 'Sokolovsky'         / Observer name" status=0
Record 41: "OBSERVAT= 'TTU Skyview'        / Observatory name" status=0
Record 42: "SITENAME= ''                   / Observatory site name" status=0
Record 43: "FWHEEL  = 'Simulator'          / Filter Wheel name" status=0
Record 44: "FILTER  = 'CV'                 / Active filter name" status=0
Record 45: "OBJECT  = 'UMa-10'             / Name of the object of interest" status=0
Record 46: "OBJCTRA = '10 48 00'           / [H M S] RA of imaged object" status=0
Record 47: "OBJCTDEC= '+46 00 00'          / [D M S] Declination of imaged object" status=0
Record 48: "OBJCTROT=                  0.0 / [deg] planned rotation of imaged object" status=0
Record 49: "FOCNAME = 'ZWO Focuser'        / Focusing equipment name" status=0
Record 50: "FOCPOS  =                20423 / [step] Focuser position" status=0
Record 51: "FOCUSPOS=                20423 / [step] Focuser position" status=0
Record 52: "FOCUSSZ =                  0.0 / [um] Focuser step size" status=0
Record 53: "FOCTEMP =     25.2099990844727 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0
Record 54: "FOCUSTEM=     25.2099990844727 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0
Record 55: "DEWPOINT=                 17.6 / [degC] Dew point" status=0
Record 56: "HUMIDITY=                 62.0 / [percent] Relative humidity" status=0
Record 57: "PRESSURE=               894.01 / [hPa] Air pressure" status=0
Record 58: "AMBTEMP =                 25.4 / [degC] Ambient air temperature" status=0
Record 59: "WINDDIR =                 63.0 / [deg] Wind direction: 0=N, 180=S, 90=E, 270=W" status=0
Record 60: "WINDGUST=            33.102648 / [kph] Wind gust" status=0
Record 61: "WINDSPD =            21.201696 / [kph] Wind speed" status=0
Record 62: "ROWORDER= 'TOP-DOWN'           / FITS Image Orientation" status=0
Record 63: "EQUINOX =               2000.0 / Equinox of celestial coordinate system" status=0
Record 64: "SWCREATE= 'N.I.N.A. 3.2.0.9001 (x64)' / Software that created this file" status=0
Record 65: "QHY_EXP =            20.000096 / [s] Actual exposure time" status=0
Record 66: "QHY_PP  =              13888.0 / [ps] pixelPeriod" status=0
Record 67: "QHY_LP  =              85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0
Record 68: "GPS_LP  =              85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0
Record 69: "QHY_FP  =           20000160.0 / [us] framePeriod" status=0
Record 70: "QHY_CPL =               6120.0 / clocksPerLine" status=0
Record 71: "QHY_LPF =             235295.0 / linesPerFrame" status=0
Record 72: "QHY_AET =           20000096.0 / [us] actualExposureTime" status=0
Record 73: "QHY_LEM =                    T / isLongExposureMode" status=0
Record 74: "QHY_OFF0=             3767.777 / [us] RollingShutterEndOffset row 0" status=0
Allocating memory for image, dark and result arrays...
Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-11_CI_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_014747_TTUQ2b1x1_1174719_V0GFyhNF/UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_01-26-56_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0128.fits 9576 6388  16 bitpix
SET-TEMP= 5.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-11_CI_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_014747_TTUQ2b1x1_1174719_V0GFyhNF/UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_01-26-56_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0128.fits
SET-TEMP= 5.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_5C_20s_2026-05-30.fit
CCD-TEMP= 5.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-11_CI_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_014747_TTUQ2b1x1_1174719_V0GFyhNF/UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_01-26-56_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0128.fits
CCD-TEMP= 4.800000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_5C_20s_2026-05-30.fit
Reading dark frame /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_5C_20s_2026-05-30.fit 9576 6388  16 bitpix
Dark frame is subtracted, output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-11_CI_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_014747_TTUQ2b1x1_1174719_V0GFyhNF/d_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_01-26-56_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0128.fits :)

Spent 0.543687 seconds 
renamed 'mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_5C_20s_2026-05-30.png' -> 'transient_report/dark.png'
try_to_calibrate_the_input_frame(): selected flat field /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ2b1x1_2026-05-30.fit from directory /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats
MegaDivider v7
Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-11_CI_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_014747_TTUQ2b1x1_1174719_V0GFyhNF/d_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_01-26-56_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0128.fits 9576 6388  16 bitpix
Reading flat /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ2b1x1_2026-05-30.fit 9576 6388  16 bitpix
Avarage count on flat field image: 20659.746399
Minimal real count (from overscan): 5
Output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-11_CI_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_014747_TTUQ2b1x1_1174719_V0GFyhNF/fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_01-26-56_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0128.fits :)


No overscan detected - all values seem high! (left_median=14784.5, right_median=14894.5)
renamed 'mff_TTUQ2b1x1_2026-05-30.png' -> 'transient_report/flat.png'
Using calibrated image CALIBRATED_SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-11_CI_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_014747_TTUQ2b1x1_1174719_V0GFyhNF/fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_01-26-56_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0128.fits
EXPTIME =                 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration
SET-TEMP=                  5.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint
CCD-TEMP=                  5.0 / [degC] CCD temperature
FOCTEMP =     25.2099990844727 / [degC] Focuser temperature
AMBTEMP =                 25.4 / [degC] Ambient air temperature
Exploring image header: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-11_CI_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_014747_TTUQ2b1x1_1174719_V0GFyhNF/UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_01-27-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits 
CCD-TEMP= 5.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-11_CI_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_014747_TTUQ2b1x1_1174719_V0GFyhNF/UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_01-27-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits
SET-TEMP= 5.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-11_CI_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_014747_TTUQ2b1x1_1174719_V0GFyhNF/UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_01-27-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits
Header: 74 keys total, 33 keys left
Record 0: "" status=0
Record 1: "SIMPLE  =                    T / C# FITS" status=0
Record 2: "BITPIX  =                   16" status=0
Record 3: "NAXIS   =                    2 / Dimensionality" status=0
Record 4: "NAXIS1  =                 9576" status=0
Record 5: "NAXIS2  =                 6388" status=0
Record 6: "BZERO   =                32768" status=0
Record 7: "EXTEND  =                    T / Extensions are permitted" status=0
Record 8: "IMAGETYP= 'LIGHT'              / Type of exposure" status=0
Record 9: "EXPOSURE=                 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0
Record 10: "EXPTIME =                 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0
Record 11: "DATE-LOC= '2026-06-11T01:27:34.9778486' / Time of observation (local)" status=0
Record 12: "DATE-OBS= '2026-06-11T06:27:34.9778486' / Time of observation (UTC)" status=0
Record 13: "MJD-OBS =     61202.2691548262 / Modified Julian Date of observation" status=0
Record 14: "DATE-AVG= '2026-06-11T06:27:44.8829553' / Averaged midpoint time (UTC)" status=0
Record 15: "MJD-AVG =     61202.2692694678 / Modified Julian Date of averaged midpoint" status=0
Record 16: "XBINNING=                    1 / X axis binning factor" status=0
Record 17: "YBINNING=                    1 / Y axis binning factor" status=0
Record 18: "GAIN    =                   30 / Sensor gain" status=0
Record 19: "OFFSET  =                   30 / Sensor gain offset" status=0
Record 20: "XPIXSZ  =                 3.76 / [um] Pixel X axis size" status=0
Record 21: "YPIXSZ  =                 3.76 / [um] Pixel Y axis size" status=0
Record 22: "INSTRUME= 'QHY600M'            / Imaging instrument name" status=0
Record 23: "CAMERAID= 'QHY600M-84137c4dbbbd119a9' / Imaging instrument identifier" status=0
Record 24: "SET-TEMP=                  5.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint" status=0
Record 25: "CCD-TEMP=                  5.0 / [degC] CCD temperature" status=0
Record 26: "READOUTM= '2CMS-0'             / Sensor readout mode" status=0
Record 27: "USBLIMIT=                   50 / Camera-specific USB setting" status=0
Record 28: "TELESCOP= 'QHY600M-TTU2'       / Name of telescope" status=0
Record 29: "FOCALLEN=                135.0 / [mm] Focal length" status=0
Record 30: "FOCRATIO=                  2.2 / Focal ratio" status=0
Record 31: "RA      =     161.999314583776 / [deg] RA of telescope" status=0
Record 32: "DEC     =     46.0001144735991 / [deg] Declination of telescope" status=0
Record 33: "CENTALT =     22.0861111111111 / [deg] Altitude of telescope" status=0
Record 34: "CENTAZ  =     311.328333333333 / [deg] Azimuth of telescope" status=0
Record 35: "AIRMASS =     2.64383638184984 / Airmass at frame center (Gueymard 1993)" status=0
Record 36: "PIERSIDE= 'East'               / Telescope pointing state" status=0
Record 37: "SITEELEV=               1009.5 / [m] Observation site elevation" status=0
Record 38: "SITELAT =           33.7482925 / [deg] Observation site latitude" status=0
Record 39: "SITELONG=          -101.958319 / [deg] Observation site longitude" status=0
Record 40: "OBSERVER= 'Sokolovsky'         / Observer name" status=0
Record 41: "OBSERVAT= 'TTU Skyview'        / Observatory name" status=0
Record 42: "SITENAME= ''                   / Observatory site name" status=0
Record 43: "FWHEEL  = 'Simulator'          / Filter Wheel name" status=0
Record 44: "FILTER  = 'CV'                 / Active filter name" status=0
Record 45: "OBJECT  = 'UMa-10'             / Name of the object of interest" status=0
Record 46: "OBJCTRA = '10 48 00'           / [H M S] RA of imaged object" status=0
Record 47: "OBJCTDEC= '+46 00 00'          / [D M S] Declination of imaged object" status=0
Record 48: "OBJCTROT=                  0.0 / [deg] planned rotation of imaged object" status=0
Record 49: "FOCNAME = 'ZWO Focuser'        / Focusing equipment name" status=0
Record 50: "FOCPOS  =                20423 / [step] Focuser position" status=0
Record 51: "FOCUSPOS=                20423 / [step] Focuser position" status=0
Record 52: "FOCUSSZ =                  0.0 / [um] Focuser step size" status=0
Record 53: "FOCTEMP =     25.2099990844727 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0
Record 54: "FOCUSTEM=     25.2099990844727 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0
Record 55: "DEWPOINT=                 17.6 / [degC] Dew point" status=0
Record 56: "HUMIDITY=                 62.0 / [percent] Relative humidity" status=0
Record 57: "PRESSURE=               894.01 / [hPa] Air pressure" status=0
Record 58: "AMBTEMP =                 25.4 / [degC] Ambient air temperature" status=0
Record 59: "WINDDIR =                 63.0 / [deg] Wind direction: 0=N, 180=S, 90=E, 270=W" status=0
Record 60: "WINDGUST=            33.102648 / [kph] Wind gust" status=0
Record 61: "WINDSPD =            21.201696 / [kph] Wind speed" status=0
Record 62: "ROWORDER= 'TOP-DOWN'           / FITS Image Orientation" status=0
Record 63: "EQUINOX =               2000.0 / Equinox of celestial coordinate system" status=0
Record 64: "SWCREATE= 'N.I.N.A. 3.2.0.9001 (x64)' / Software that created this file" status=0
Record 65: "QHY_EXP =            20.000096 / [s] Actual exposure time" status=0
Record 66: "QHY_PP  =              13888.0 / [ps] pixelPeriod" status=0
Record 67: "QHY_LP  =              85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0
Record 68: "GPS_LP  =              85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0
Record 69: "QHY_FP  =           20000160.0 / [us] framePeriod" status=0
Record 70: "QHY_CPL =               6120.0 / clocksPerLine" status=0
Record 71: "QHY_LPF =             235295.0 / linesPerFrame" status=0
Record 72: "QHY_AET =           20000096.0 / [us] actualExposureTime" status=0
Record 73: "QHY_LEM =                    T / isLongExposureMode" status=0
Record 74: "QHY_OFF0=             3767.777 / [us] RollingShutterEndOffset row 0" status=0
Allocating memory for image, dark and result arrays...
Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-11_CI_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_014747_TTUQ2b1x1_1174719_V0GFyhNF/UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_01-27-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits 9576 6388  16 bitpix
SET-TEMP= 5.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-11_CI_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_014747_TTUQ2b1x1_1174719_V0GFyhNF/UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_01-27-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits
SET-TEMP= 5.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_5C_20s_2026-05-30.fit
CCD-TEMP= 5.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-11_CI_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_014747_TTUQ2b1x1_1174719_V0GFyhNF/UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_01-27-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits
CCD-TEMP= 4.800000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_5C_20s_2026-05-30.fit
Reading dark frame /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_5C_20s_2026-05-30.fit 9576 6388  16 bitpix
Dark frame is subtracted, output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-11_CI_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_014747_TTUQ2b1x1_1174719_V0GFyhNF/d_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_01-27-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits :)

Spent 0.541639 seconds 
renamed 'mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_5C_20s_2026-05-30.png' -> 'transient_report/dark.png'
try_to_calibrate_the_input_frame(): selected flat field /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ2b1x1_2026-05-30.fit from directory /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats
MegaDivider v7
Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-11_CI_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_014747_TTUQ2b1x1_1174719_V0GFyhNF/d_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_01-27-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits 9576 6388  16 bitpix
Reading flat /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ2b1x1_2026-05-30.fit 9576 6388  16 bitpix
Avarage count on flat field image: 20659.746399
Minimal real count (from overscan): 5
Output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-11_CI_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_014747_TTUQ2b1x1_1174719_V0GFyhNF/fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_01-27-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits :)


No overscan detected - all values seem high! (left_median=14784.5, right_median=14894.5)
renamed 'mff_TTUQ2b1x1_2026-05-30.png' -> 'transient_report/flat.png'
Using calibrated image CALIBRATED_SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-11_CI_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_014747_TTUQ2b1x1_1174719_V0GFyhNF/fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_01-27-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits
Dark frame used to calibrate the second-epoch images:



Flat field used to calibrate the second-epoch images:



after the calibration attempt:
SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-11_CI_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_014747_TTUQ2b1x1_1174719_V0GFyhNF/fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_01-26-56_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0128.fits
SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-11_CI_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_014747_TTUQ2b1x1_1174719_V0GFyhNF/fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_01-27-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits
Previews of the CALIBRATED second-epoch images:


fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_01-26-56_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0128.fits



fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_01-27-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits




Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/TTUQ2_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1

  ./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 4 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-03-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0183.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-11_CI_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_014747_TTUQ2b1x1_1174719_V0GFyhNF/fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_01-26-56_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0128.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-11_CI_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_014747_TTUQ2b1x1_1174719_V0GFyhNF/fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_01-27-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits
  
SExtractor catalog cache: saved UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-03-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0183.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-03-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0183.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-11_CI_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_014747_TTUQ2b1x1_1174719_V0GFyhNF/fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_01-26-56_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0128.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-11_CI_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_014747_TTUQ2b1x1_1174719_V0GFyhNF/fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_01-27-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461202.76882240
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits'
wcs_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-03-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0183.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-03-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0183.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-03-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0183.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-03-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0183.fits'
wcs_fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_01-26-56_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0128.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_01-26-56_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0128.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_01-26-56_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0128.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_01-26-56_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0128.fits'
wcs_fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_01-27-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_01-27-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_01-27-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_01-27-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits'
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits
Image size: 941.7'x627.1'  15.7(deg)x10.5(deg)  9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 10:48:01.354 +46:00:05.88 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_01-26-56_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0128.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_01-26-56_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0128.fits
Image size: 937.8'x624.0'  15.6(deg)x10.4(deg)  9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.88"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 10:48:02.194 +46:00:04.09 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 10:48:01.354 +46:00:05.88
Second-epoch image center 10:48:02.194 +46:00:04.09
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0025 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg.  Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_01-27-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_01-27-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits
Image size: 937.8'x624.0'  15.6(deg)x10.4(deg)  9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.88"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 10:48:03.417 +46:00:03.63 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 10:48:01.354 +46:00:05.88
Second-epoch image center 10:48:03.417 +46:00:03.63
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0060 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center  10:48:02.194 +46:00:04.09
Second-epoch second image center 10:48:03.417 +46:00:03.63
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00354 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running  util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2  /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits &> /tmp/tmp.QL8PnGyId0
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits
Running  util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2  /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-03-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0183.fits &> /tmp/tmp.C89D7uTOiX
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-03-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0183.fits
Running  util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2  /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-11_CI_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_014747_TTUQ2b1x1_1174719_V0GFyhNF/fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_01-26-56_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0128.fits &> /tmp/tmp.YbcMNSpov6
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-11_CI_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_014747_TTUQ2b1x1_1174719_V0GFyhNF/fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_01-26-56_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0128.fits
Running  util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2  /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-11_CI_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_014747_TTUQ2b1x1_1174719_V0GFyhNF/fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_01-27-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits &> /tmp/tmp.CZS5PdH3Jn
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-11_CI_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_014747_TTUQ2b1x1_1174719_V0GFyhNF/fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_01-27-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits and wcs_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits.wcscat 
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits and wcs_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits.wcscat 
Found non-empty wcs_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits and wcs_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits) and catalog (wcs_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 6977 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 149.2907 to 173.9078 deg, Dec +39.8246 to +51.3881 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 149.2907 to 173.9078 deg, Dec 39.8246 to 51.3881 deg
Loaded 4560 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3127 out of 3305 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3305 out of 6977 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.924200
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.924200
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.:  -7.44
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.:  15.48

Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed!  =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.:  15.48

Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:


Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 6977 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 149.2907 to 173.9078 deg, Dec +39.8246 to +51.3881 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 149.2907 to 173.9078 deg, Dec 39.8246 to 51.3881 deg
Loaded 4560 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3127 out of 3305 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3305 out of 6977 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits via Tycho-2

Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits:


Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits (aperture=6.4)
Read 6367 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 149.7479 to 174.3135 deg, Dec +40.3419 to +51.2583 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 149.7479 to 174.3135 deg, Dec 40.3419 to 51.2583 deg
Loaded 4269 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3196 out of 3285 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3285 out of 6367 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-03-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0183.fits via Tycho-2

Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-03-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0183.fits:


Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-03-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0183.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-03-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0183.fits (aperture=6.4)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 0 candidate transients before the final filtering.  (Hard limit: 8000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
 2.2 pix  UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits
 2.4 pix  UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-03-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0183.fits
 2.5 pix  fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_01-26-56_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0128.fits
 2.5 pix  fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_01-27-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits
 2.2 pix  wcs_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits
 2.4 pix  wcs_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-03-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0183.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
 15.5 mag.  UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits
 15.3 mag.  UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-03-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0183.fits
 14.5 mag.  fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_01-26-56_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0128.fits
 14.4 mag.  fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_01-27-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate:  14.4 (SNR )  11.8 (80% of stars)  with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of  following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50). 
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image. 
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.QL8PnGyId0 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-11_CI_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_014747_TTUQ2b1x1_1174719_V0GFyhNF/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits' -> 'wcs_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits.wcscat 
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=476, passed=6977
Got 6977 stars (including 6493 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits.wcscat 
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 6977 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.7'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.7 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013079 (47.1 arcsec)
                    catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
                    catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010463 (37.7 arcsec)

ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 649 to 708 (Dec 39.8 to 51.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 956 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 956 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 944 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35" 
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 956 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6892 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34" 

ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 649 to 708 (Dec 39.8 to 51.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 956 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 956 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6891 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34" 
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 956 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6891 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34" 
Excluding outliers - 956 stars left (next iteration limit 1051)
Stop iterations.


 The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)

WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits N_match=956 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.383 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.478 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.372 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.386 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.313 n_q1=223 n_q2=254 n_q3=246 n_q4=233 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.248
The image catalog is written to wcs_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
 ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits -region wcs_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.C89D7uTOiX (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-11_CI_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_014747_TTUQ2b1x1_1174719_V0GFyhNF/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-03-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0183.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-03-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0183.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-03-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0183.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-03-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0183.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-03-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0183.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-03-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0183.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-03-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0183.fits' -> 'wcs_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-03-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0183.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-03-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0183.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-03-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0183.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-03-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0183.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-03-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0183.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-03-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0183.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-03-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0183.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-03-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0183.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-03-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0183.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-03-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0183.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-03-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0183.fits.wcscat 
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=355, passed=6367
Got 6367 stars (including 6003 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-03-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0183.fits.wcscat 
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 6367 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013017 (46.9 arcsec)
                    catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
                    catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010413 (37.5 arcsec)

ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 651 to 708 (Dec 40.3 to 51.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 958 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 958 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 947 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42" 
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 958 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6283 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43" 

ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 651 to 708 (Dec 40.3 to 51.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 958 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 958 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6282 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43" 
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 958 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6282 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43" 
Excluding outliers - 958 stars left (next iteration limit 1053)
Stop iterations.


 The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)

WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-03-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0183.fits N_match=958 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.472 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.343 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.518 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.434 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.550 n_q1=214 n_q2=261 n_q3=242 n_q4=241 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.166
The image catalog is written to wcs_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-03-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0183.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-03-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0183.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
 ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-03-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0183.fits -region wcs_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-03-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0183.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-03-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0183.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.YbcMNSpov6 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-11_CI_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_014747_TTUQ2b1x1_1174719_V0GFyhNF/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-11_CI_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_014747_TTUQ2b1x1_1174719_V0GFyhNF/fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_01-26-56_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0128.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-11_CI_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_014747_TTUQ2b1x1_1174719_V0GFyhNF/fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_01-26-56_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0128.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-11_CI_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_014747_TTUQ2b1x1_1174719_V0GFyhNF/fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_01-26-56_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0128.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-11_CI_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_014747_TTUQ2b1x1_1174719_V0GFyhNF/fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_01-26-56_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0128.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-11_CI_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_014747_TTUQ2b1x1_1174719_V0GFyhNF/fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_01-26-56_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0128.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-11_CI_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_014747_TTUQ2b1x1_1174719_V0GFyhNF/fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_01-26-56_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0128.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_01-26-56_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0128.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_01-26-56_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0128.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_01-26-56_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0128.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_01-26-56_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0128.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_01-26-56_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0128.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_01-26-56_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0128.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_01-26-56_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0128.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-11_CI_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_014747_TTUQ2b1x1_1174719_V0GFyhNF/fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_01-26-56_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0128.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_01-26-56_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0128.fits.wcscat 
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=274, passed=4173
Got 4173 stars (including 3894 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_01-26-56_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0128.fits.wcscat 
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 4173 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.8'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.8 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013025 (46.9 arcsec)
                    catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
                    catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010420 (37.5 arcsec)

ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 651 to 708 (Dec 40.3 to 51.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 955 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 955 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 944 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40" 
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 955 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4090 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40" 

ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 651 to 708 (Dec 40.3 to 51.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 956 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 956 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4090 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40" 
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 956 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4090 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41" 
Excluding outliers - 956 stars left (next iteration limit 1050)
Stop iterations.


 The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)

WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_01-26-56_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0128.fits N_match=956 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.436 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.398 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.543 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.354 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.579 n_q1=249 n_q2=236 n_q3=268 n_q4=203 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.330
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_01-26-56_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0128.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_01-26-56_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0128.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
 ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-11_CI_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_014747_TTUQ2b1x1_1174719_V0GFyhNF/fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_01-26-56_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0128.fits -region wcs_fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_01-26-56_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0128.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_01-26-56_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0128.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.CZS5PdH3Jn (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-11_CI_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_014747_TTUQ2b1x1_1174719_V0GFyhNF/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-11_CI_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_014747_TTUQ2b1x1_1174719_V0GFyhNF/fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_01-27-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-11_CI_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_014747_TTUQ2b1x1_1174719_V0GFyhNF/fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_01-27-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-11_CI_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_014747_TTUQ2b1x1_1174719_V0GFyhNF/fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_01-27-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-11_CI_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_014747_TTUQ2b1x1_1174719_V0GFyhNF/fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_01-27-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-11_CI_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_014747_TTUQ2b1x1_1174719_V0GFyhNF/fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_01-27-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-11_CI_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_014747_TTUQ2b1x1_1174719_V0GFyhNF/fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_01-27-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_01-27-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_01-27-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_01-27-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_01-27-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_01-27-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_01-27-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_01-27-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-11_CI_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_014747_TTUQ2b1x1_1174719_V0GFyhNF/fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_01-27-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_01-27-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits.wcscat 
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=263, passed=4186
Got 4186 stars (including 3919 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_01-27-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits.wcscat 
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 4186 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.8'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.8 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013025 (46.9 arcsec)
                    catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
                    catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010420 (37.5 arcsec)

ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 651 to 708 (Dec 40.3 to 51.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 955 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 955 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 943 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38" 
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 955 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4101 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39" 

ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 651 to 708 (Dec 40.3 to 51.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 955 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 955 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4102 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39" 
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 955 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4102 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39" 
Excluding outliers - 955 stars left (next iteration limit 1050)
Stop iterations.


 The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)

WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_01-27-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits N_match=955 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.419 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.368 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.516 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.328 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.599 n_q1=251 n_q2=238 n_q3=268 n_q4=198 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.430
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_01-27-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_01-27-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
 ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-11_CI_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_014747_TTUQ2b1x1_1174719_V0GFyhNF/fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_01-27-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits -region wcs_fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_01-27-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_01-27-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits sigma_overall=0.383 worst_q_ratio=1.248
ref2=UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-03-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0183.fits sigma_overall=0.472 worst_q_ratio=1.166
new1=fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_01-26-56_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0128.fits sigma_overall=0.436 worst_q_ratio=1.330
new2=fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_01-27-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits sigma_overall=0.419 worst_q_ratio=1.430
reference average sigma_overall=0.4275 worst_q_ratio=1.207
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################

Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):

plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300_astrometric_residuals.png (956 matched stars from wcs_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.34 arcsec)


plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-03-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0183_astrometric_residuals.png (958 matched stars from wcs_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-03-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0183.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.41 arcsec)


plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_01-26-56_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0128_astrometric_residuals.png (956 matched stars from wcs_fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_01-26-56_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0128.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.39 arcsec)


plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_01-27-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0129_astrometric_residuals.png (955 matched stars from wcs_fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_01-27-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.38 arcsec)


Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_01-26-56_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0128.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_01-26-56_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0128.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-11_CI_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_014747_TTUQ2b1x1_1174719_V0GFyhNF/wcs_fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_01-26-56_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0128.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_01-27-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_01-27-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-11_CI_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_014747_TTUQ2b1x1_1174719_V0GFyhNF/wcs_fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_01-27-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field UMa-10-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
No candidates found here
Prepared the HTML report for the field UMa-10-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL

  ./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 4 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-03-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0183.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-11_CI_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_014747_TTUQ2b1x1_1174719_V0GFyhNF/fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_01-26-56_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0128.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-11_CI_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_014747_TTUQ2b1x1_1174719_V0GFyhNF/fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_01-27-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits
  
SExtractor catalog cache: saved UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-03-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0183.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-03-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0183.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-11_CI_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_014747_TTUQ2b1x1_1174719_V0GFyhNF/fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_01-26-56_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0128.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-11_CI_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_014747_TTUQ2b1x1_1174719_V0GFyhNF/fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_01-27-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-03-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0183.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_01-26-56_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0128.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_01-27-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/exclusion_list.txt
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-03-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0183.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_01-26-56_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0128.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_01-27-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits
Image size: 941.7'x627.1'  15.7(deg)x10.5(deg)  9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 10:48:01.354 +46:00:05.88 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_01-26-56_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0128.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_01-26-56_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0128.fits
Image size: 937.8'x624.0'  15.6(deg)x10.4(deg)  9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.88"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 10:48:02.194 +46:00:04.09 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 10:48:01.354 +46:00:05.88
Second-epoch image center 10:48:02.194 +46:00:04.09
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0025 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg.  Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_01-27-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_01-27-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits
Image size: 937.8'x624.0'  15.6(deg)x10.4(deg)  9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.88"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 10:48:03.417 +46:00:03.63 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 10:48:01.354 +46:00:05.88
Second-epoch image center 10:48:03.417 +46:00:03.63
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0060 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center  10:48:02.194 +46:00:04.09
Second-epoch second image center 10:48:03.417 +46:00:03.63
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00354 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running  util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2  /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits &> /tmp/tmp.doadRw3VMc
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits
Running  util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2  /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-03-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0183.fits &> /tmp/tmp.T2pZ2rCVrg
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-03-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0183.fits
Running  util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2  /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-11_CI_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_014747_TTUQ2b1x1_1174719_V0GFyhNF/fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_01-26-56_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0128.fits &> /tmp/tmp.SWSLGA7ExV
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-11_CI_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_014747_TTUQ2b1x1_1174719_V0GFyhNF/fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_01-26-56_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0128.fits
Running  util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2  /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-11_CI_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_014747_TTUQ2b1x1_1174719_V0GFyhNF/fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_01-27-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits &> /tmp/tmp.4GlDL4wSOb
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-11_CI_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_014747_TTUQ2b1x1_1174719_V0GFyhNF/fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_01-27-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits and wcs_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits.wcscat 
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits and wcs_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits.wcscat 
Found non-empty wcs_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits and wcs_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits) and catalog (wcs_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 34182 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 149.2627 to 173.9078 deg, Dec +39.8246 to +51.4078 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 149.2627 to 173.9078 deg, Dec 39.8246 to 51.4078 deg
Loaded 4573 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 2964 out of 3314 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3314 out of 34182 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.810550
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.810550
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.:  -7.15
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.:  15.66

Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed!  =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.:  15.66

Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:


Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 34182 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 149.2627 to 173.9078 deg, Dec +39.8246 to +51.4078 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 149.2627 to 173.9078 deg, Dec 39.8246 to 51.4078 deg
Loaded 4573 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 2964 out of 3314 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3314 out of 34182 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits via Tycho-2

Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits:


Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits (aperture=5.0)
Read 30481 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 149.6976 to 174.3134 deg, Dec +40.3159 to +51.2658 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 149.6976 to 174.3134 deg, Dec 40.3159 to 51.2658 deg
Loaded 4298 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3062 out of 3297 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3297 out of 30481 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-03-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0183.fits via Tycho-2

Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-03-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0183.fits:


Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-03-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0183.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-03-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0183.fits (aperture=5.0)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 33 candidate transients before the final filtering.  (Hard limit: 8000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
 2.1 pix  UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits
 2.2 pix  UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-03-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0183.fits
 2.4 pix  fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_01-26-56_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0128.fits
 2.5 pix  fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_01-27-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits
 2.1 pix  wcs_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits
 2.2 pix  wcs_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-03-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0183.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
 15.7 mag.  UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits
 15.5 mag.  UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-03-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0183.fits
 14.7 mag.  fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_01-26-56_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0128.fits
 14.7 mag.  fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_01-27-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate:  14.7 (SNR )  14.2 (80% of stars)  with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of  following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50). 
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image. 
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.doadRw3VMc (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-11_CI_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_014747_TTUQ2b1x1_1174719_V0GFyhNF/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits' -> 'wcs_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits.wcscat 
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=16, blended=1513, passed=34166
Got 34166 stars (including 32583 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits.wcscat 
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 34166 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.7'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.7 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013079 (47.1 arcsec)
                    catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
                    catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010463 (37.7 arcsec)

ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 649 to 709 (Dec 39.8 to 51.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 960 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 960 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 949 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35" 
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 960 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 33869 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35" 

ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 649 to 709 (Dec 39.8 to 51.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 960 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 960 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 33871 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35" 
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 960 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 33871 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35" 
Excluding outliers - 960 stars left (next iteration limit 1056)
Stop iterations.


 The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)

WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits N_match=960 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.373 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.442 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.360 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.382 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.309 n_q1=222 n_q2=251 n_q3=249 n_q4=238 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.184
The image catalog is written to wcs_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
 ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits -region wcs_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.T2pZ2rCVrg (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-11_CI_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_014747_TTUQ2b1x1_1174719_V0GFyhNF/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-03-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0183.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-03-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0183.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-03-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0183.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-03-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0183.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-03-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0183.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-03-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0183.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-03-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0183.fits' -> 'wcs_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-03-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0183.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-03-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0183.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-03-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0183.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-03-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0183.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-03-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0183.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-03-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0183.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-03-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0183.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-03-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0183.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-03-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0183.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-03-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0183.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-03-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0183.fits.wcscat 
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=15, blended=1294, passed=30466
Got 30466 stars (including 29138 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-03-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0183.fits.wcscat 
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 30466 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013017 (46.9 arcsec)
                    catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
                    catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010413 (37.5 arcsec)

ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 651 to 708 (Dec 40.3 to 51.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 959 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 959 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 946 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42" 
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 959 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 30160 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42" 

ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 651 to 708 (Dec 40.3 to 51.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 959 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 959 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 30161 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42" 
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 959 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 30161 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44" 
Excluding outliers - 959 stars left (next iteration limit 1054)
Stop iterations.


 The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)

WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-03-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0183.fits N_match=959 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.474 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.345 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.521 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.447 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.532 n_q1=223 n_q2=262 n_q3=240 n_q4=234 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.124
The image catalog is written to wcs_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-03-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0183.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-03-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0183.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
 ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-03-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0183.fits -region wcs_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-03-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0183.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-03-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0183.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.SWSLGA7ExV (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-11_CI_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_014747_TTUQ2b1x1_1174719_V0GFyhNF/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-11_CI_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_014747_TTUQ2b1x1_1174719_V0GFyhNF/fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_01-26-56_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0128.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-11_CI_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_014747_TTUQ2b1x1_1174719_V0GFyhNF/fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_01-26-56_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0128.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-11_CI_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_014747_TTUQ2b1x1_1174719_V0GFyhNF/fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_01-26-56_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0128.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-11_CI_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_014747_TTUQ2b1x1_1174719_V0GFyhNF/fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_01-26-56_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0128.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-11_CI_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_014747_TTUQ2b1x1_1174719_V0GFyhNF/fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_01-26-56_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0128.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-11_CI_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_014747_TTUQ2b1x1_1174719_V0GFyhNF/fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_01-26-56_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0128.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_01-26-56_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0128.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_01-26-56_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0128.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_01-26-56_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0128.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_01-26-56_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0128.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_01-26-56_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0128.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_01-26-56_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0128.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_01-26-56_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0128.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-11_CI_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_014747_TTUQ2b1x1_1174719_V0GFyhNF/fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_01-26-56_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0128.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_01-26-56_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0128.fits.wcscat 
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=6, blended=1144, passed=19470
Got 19470 stars (including 18308 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_01-26-56_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0128.fits.wcscat 
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 19470 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.8'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.8 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013025 (46.9 arcsec)
                    catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
                    catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010420 (37.5 arcsec)

ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 651 to 708 (Dec 40.3 to 51.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 954 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 954 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 943 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39" 
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 954 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 19074 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39" 

ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 651 to 708 (Dec 40.3 to 51.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 954 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 954 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 19076 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39" 
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 954 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 19076 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40" 
Excluding outliers - 954 stars left (next iteration limit 1049)
Stop iterations.


 The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)

WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_01-26-56_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0128.fits N_match=954 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.444 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.407 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.569 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.367 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.632 n_q1=263 n_q2=225 n_q3=276 n_q4=190 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.421
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_01-26-56_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0128.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_01-26-56_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0128.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
 ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-11_CI_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_014747_TTUQ2b1x1_1174719_V0GFyhNF/fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_01-26-56_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0128.fits -region wcs_fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_01-26-56_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0128.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_01-26-56_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0128.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.4GlDL4wSOb (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-11_CI_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_014747_TTUQ2b1x1_1174719_V0GFyhNF/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-11_CI_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_014747_TTUQ2b1x1_1174719_V0GFyhNF/fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_01-27-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-11_CI_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_014747_TTUQ2b1x1_1174719_V0GFyhNF/fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_01-27-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-11_CI_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_014747_TTUQ2b1x1_1174719_V0GFyhNF/fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_01-27-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-11_CI_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_014747_TTUQ2b1x1_1174719_V0GFyhNF/fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_01-27-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-11_CI_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_014747_TTUQ2b1x1_1174719_V0GFyhNF/fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_01-27-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-11_CI_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_014747_TTUQ2b1x1_1174719_V0GFyhNF/fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_01-27-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_01-27-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_01-27-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_01-27-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_01-27-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_01-27-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_01-27-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_01-27-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-11_CI_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_014747_TTUQ2b1x1_1174719_V0GFyhNF/fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_01-27-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_01-27-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits.wcscat 
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=9, blended=1076, passed=19100
Got 19100 stars (including 18005 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_01-27-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits.wcscat 
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 19100 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.8'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.8 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013025 (46.9 arcsec)
                    catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
                    catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010420 (37.5 arcsec)

ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 651 to 708 (Dec 40.3 to 51.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 954 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 954 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 941 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38" 
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 954 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 18719 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37" 

ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 651 to 708 (Dec 40.3 to 51.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 954 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 954 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 18719 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37" 
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 954 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 18719 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37" 
Excluding outliers - 954 stars left (next iteration limit 1049)
Stop iterations.


 The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)

WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_01-27-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits N_match=954 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.427 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.364 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.515 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.355 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.541 n_q1=259 n_q2=229 n_q3=277 n_q4=189 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.268
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_01-27-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_01-27-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
 ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-11_CI_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_014747_TTUQ2b1x1_1174719_V0GFyhNF/fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_01-27-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits -region wcs_fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_01-27-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_01-27-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_01-26-56_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0128.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-11_CI_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_014747_TTUQ2b1x1_1174719_V0GFyhNF/wcs_fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_01-26-56_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0128.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_01-27-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-11_CI_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_014747_TTUQ2b1x1_1174719_V0GFyhNF/wcs_fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_01-27-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field UMa-10-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 3s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 1s
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56765_fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_01-27-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0129
The candidate 56765_fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_01-27-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0129 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 06 11.26927    2461202.76927    10.57    10:55:27.09 +47:38:50.3   4020 2204   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-11_CI_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_014747_TTUQ2b1x1_1174719_V0GFyhNF/fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_01-27-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.5") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56767_fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_01-27-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0129
The candidate 56767_fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_01-27-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0129 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 06 11.26927    2461202.76927    10.73    11:09:56.48 +44:28:31.9   2442 4080   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-11_CI_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_014747_TTUQ2b1x1_1174719_V0GFyhNF/fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_01-27-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits

**** FOUND  11:09:56.48 +44:28:31.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bbsc.txt ****
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56797_fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_01-27-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0129
The candidate 56797_fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_01-27-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0129 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 06 11.26927    2461202.76927    12.51    10:24:32.90 +48:30:26.3   7119 1546   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-11_CI_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_014747_TTUQ2b1x1_1174719_V0GFyhNF/fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_01-27-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.6") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56803_fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_01-27-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0129
The candidate 56803_fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_01-27-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0129 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 06 11.26927    2461202.76927    12.50    10:31:08.96 +47:45:43.0   6488 2053   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-11_CI_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_014747_TTUQ2b1x1_1174719_V0GFyhNF/fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_01-27-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.2") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56804_fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_01-27-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0129
The candidate 56804_fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_01-27-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0129 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 06 11.26927    2461202.76927    12.74    10:42:03.18 +43:33:32.2   5470 4654   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-11_CI_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_014747_TTUQ2b1x1_1174719_V0GFyhNF/fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_01-27-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.6") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56811_fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_01-27-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0129
The candidate 56811_fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_01-27-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0129 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 06 11.26927    2461202.76927    13.06    10:30:27.37 +43:36:41.9   6738 4555   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-11_CI_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_014747_TTUQ2b1x1_1174719_V0GFyhNF/fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_01-27-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.0") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56813_fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_01-27-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0129
The candidate 56813_fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_01-27-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0129 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 06 11.26927    2461202.76927    13.01    10:29:48.99 +45:09:18.8   6739 3617   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-11_CI_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_014747_TTUQ2b1x1_1174719_V0GFyhNF/fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_01-27-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.8") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56822_fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_01-27-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0129
The candidate 56822_fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_01-27-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0129 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 06 11.26927    2461202.76927    12.96    10:32:12.76 +45:20:49.9   6476 3519   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-11_CI_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_014747_TTUQ2b1x1_1174719_V0GFyhNF/fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_01-27-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.9") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56838_fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_01-27-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0129
The candidate 56838_fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_01-27-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0129 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 06 11.26927    2461202.76927    13.28    10:43:52.83 +46:12:45.4   5223 3057   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-11_CI_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_014747_TTUQ2b1x1_1174719_V0GFyhNF/fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_01-27-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits

**** FOUND  10:43:52.85 +46:12:45.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56850_fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_01-27-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0129
The candidate 56850_fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_01-27-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0129 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 06 11.26927    2461202.76927    13.51    10:56:28.31 +42:30:28.4   3885 5314   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-11_CI_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_014747_TTUQ2b1x1_1174719_V0GFyhNF/fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_01-27-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.4") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56860_fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_01-27-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0129
The candidate 56860_fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_01-27-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0129 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 06 11.26927    2461202.76927    13.35    10:27:52.94 +42:58:49.8   7051 4916   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-11_CI_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_014747_TTUQ2b1x1_1174719_V0GFyhNF/fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_01-27-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits

**** FOUND  10:27:52.87 +42:58:50.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56883_fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_01-27-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0129
The candidate 56883_fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_01-27-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0129 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 06 11.26927    2461202.76927    13.40    10:25:19.87 +49:08:36.7   7007 1168   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-11_CI_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_014747_TTUQ2b1x1_1174719_V0GFyhNF/fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_01-27-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.2") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56888_fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_01-27-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0129
The candidate 56888_fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_01-27-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0129 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 06 11.26927    2461202.76927    13.76    11:00:54.02 +47:09:56.4   3458 2487   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-11_CI_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_014747_TTUQ2b1x1_1174719_V0GFyhNF/fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_01-27-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.6") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56901_fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_01-27-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0129
The candidate 56901_fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_01-27-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0129 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 06 11.26927    2461202.76927    13.84    10:54:31.71 +45:27:52.4   4109 3524   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-11_CI_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_014747_TTUQ2b1x1_1174719_V0GFyhNF/fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_01-27-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits

**** FOUND  10:54:31.77 +45:27:51.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56905_fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_01-27-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0129
The candidate 56905_fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_01-27-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0129 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 06 11.26927    2461202.76927    13.84    10:56:05.59 +43:25:23.4   3932 4759   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-11_CI_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_014747_TTUQ2b1x1_1174719_V0GFyhNF/fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_01-27-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits

**** FOUND  10:56:05.57 +43:25:23.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56906_fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_01-27-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0129
The candidate 56906_fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_01-27-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0129 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 06 11.26927    2461202.76927    14.00    10:53:43.16 +48:46:27.0   4197 1522   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-11_CI_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_014747_TTUQ2b1x1_1174719_V0GFyhNF/fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_01-27-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.1") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56923_fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_01-27-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0129
The candidate 56923_fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_01-27-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0129 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 06 11.26927    2461202.76927    14.24    10:43:07.40 +42:59:21.9   5364 5003   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-11_CI_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_014747_TTUQ2b1x1_1174719_V0GFyhNF/fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_01-27-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.4") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56925_fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_01-27-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0129
The candidate 56925_fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_01-27-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0129 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 06 11.26927    2461202.76927    13.91    10:57:24.64 +43:55:58.1   3792 4449   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-11_CI_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_014747_TTUQ2b1x1_1174719_V0GFyhNF/fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_01-27-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits

**** FOUND  10:57:24.63 +43:55:56.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56949_fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_01-27-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0129
The candidate 56949_fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_01-27-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0129 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 06 11.26927    2461202.76927    14.60    11:12:13.45 +47:51:48.8   2316 2015   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-11_CI_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_014747_TTUQ2b1x1_1174719_V0GFyhNF/fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_01-27-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.3") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56963_fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_01-27-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0129
The candidate 56963_fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_01-27-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0129 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 06 11.26927    2461202.76927    14.70    11:06:16.47 +42:01:10.8   2777 5588   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-11_CI_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_014747_TTUQ2b1x1_1174719_V0GFyhNF/fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_01-27-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.7") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56980_fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_01-27-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0129
The candidate 56980_fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_01-27-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0129 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 06 11.26927    2461202.76927    14.09    10:44:16.14 +44:41:00.8   5208 3982   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-11_CI_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_014747_TTUQ2b1x1_1174719_V0GFyhNF/fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_01-27-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits

**** FOUND  10:44:16.39 +44:41:00.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56987_fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_01-27-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0129
The candidate 56987_fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_01-27-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0129 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 06 11.26927    2461202.76927    14.76    11:10:07.38 +44:48:56.4   2433 3873   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-11_CI_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_014747_TTUQ2b1x1_1174719_V0GFyhNF/fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_01-27-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.7") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56991_fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_01-27-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0129
The candidate 56991_fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_01-27-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0129 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 06 11.26927    2461202.76927    14.37    11:02:01.75 +46:26:24.1   3330 2923   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-11_CI_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_014747_TTUQ2b1x1_1174719_V0GFyhNF/fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_01-27-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.0") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56993_fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_01-27-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0129
The candidate 56993_fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_01-27-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0129 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 06 11.26927    2461202.76927    14.29    10:27:25.38 +46:14:25.4   6941 2942   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-11_CI_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_014747_TTUQ2b1x1_1174719_V0GFyhNF/fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_01-27-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.8") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 57013_fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_01-27-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0129
The candidate 57013_fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_01-27-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0129 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 06 11.26927    2461202.76927    14.90    11:13:22.54 +43:59:54.2   2051 4349   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-11_CI_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_014747_TTUQ2b1x1_1174719_V0GFyhNF/fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_01-27-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.0") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 57018_fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_01-27-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0129
The candidate 57018_fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_01-27-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0129 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 06 11.26927    2461202.76927    14.69    10:32:39.06 +46:10:43.9   6397 3020   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-11_CI_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_014747_TTUQ2b1x1_1174719_V0GFyhNF/fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_01-27-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.9") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 57034_fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_01-27-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0129
The candidate 57034_fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_01-27-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0129 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 06 11.26927    2461202.76927    14.60    10:58:30.02 +41:52:11.7   3652 5700   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-11_CI_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_014747_TTUQ2b1x1_1174719_V0GFyhNF/fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_01-27-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.5") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 57038_fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_01-27-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0129
The candidate 57038_fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_01-27-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0129 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 06 11.26927    2461202.76927    14.56    11:09:44.90 +46:28:02.3   2525 2875   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-11_CI_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_014747_TTUQ2b1x1_1174719_V0GFyhNF/fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_01-27-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.4") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 57053_fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_01-27-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0129
The candidate 57053_fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_01-27-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0129 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 06 11.26927    2461202.76927    14.49    10:29:39.07 +49:44:42.9   6552 0840   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-11_CI_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_014747_TTUQ2b1x1_1174719_V0GFyhNF/fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_01-27-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.2") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 57070_fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_01-27-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0129
The candidate 57070_fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_01-27-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0129 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 06 11.26927    2461202.76927    14.79    11:04:29.24 +50:05:48.4   3150 0697   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-11_CI_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_014747_TTUQ2b1x1_1174719_V0GFyhNF/fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_01-27-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.2") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 57083_fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_01-27-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0129
The candidate 57083_fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_01-27-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0129 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 06 11.26927    2461202.76927    14.87    10:56:51.08 +46:35:20.4   3870 2843   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-11_CI_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_014747_TTUQ2b1x1_1174719_V0GFyhNF/fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_01-27-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.5") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 04386_fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_01-27-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0129
The candidate 04386_fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_01-27-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0129 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 3     2026 06 11.26927    2461202.76927    12.61    10:36:18.73 +42:02:45.5   6148 5544   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-11_CI_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_014747_TTUQ2b1x1_1174719_V0GFyhNF/fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_01-27-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.2") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56107_fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_01-27-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0129
The candidate 56107_fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_01-27-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0129 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 3     2026 06 11.26927    2461202.76927    13.25    11:21:29.87 +44:18:35.4   1177 4097   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-11_CI_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_014747_TTUQ2b1x1_1174719_V0GFyhNF/fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_01-27-34_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits

**** FOUND  11:21:29.91 +44:18:35.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 1s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 5s
Prepared the HTML report for the field UMa-10-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
########### Completed UMa-10-Q2b1x1 ###########
The analysis was running at tau
We are allowed to update the exclusion list at tau host
Found ../exclusion_list_TTUQ2.txt
#### The exclusion list before filtering-out asteroids, bad pixels and adding Gaia sources ####
###################################################################################
renamed 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt_noasteroids' -> 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt'
renamed 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt_nohotpixels' -> 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt'
# Count candidates with no identification (that also don't look like hot pix)
Found 0 unidentified candidates (excluding asteroids, hot pixels and known variable stars).
###################################################################################
0 candidates found (excluding asteroids and hot pixels)
This does not look like a test run
###################################################################################
exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt NOT FOUND
exclusion_list_apass.txt NOT FOUND
IS_THIS_TEST_RUN=NO  ALLOW_EXCLUSION_LIST_UPDATE= YES
#### Nothing to add to the exclusion list ####
The observatory MPC code is V36
############################################################
Positions of planets computed with util/planet_finder/main.py for JD(UT)2461202.76882240 -observatory V36
07:01:03.08 +24:21:05.2 Mercury (0.3mag)
07:58:14.39 +22:43:53.5 Venus (-4.0mag)
02:58:33.74 +16:23:43.3 Mars (1.3mag)
07:51:00.95 +21:24:54.0 Jupiter (-1.9mag)
00:50:13.73 +02:53:18.3 Saturn (0.8mag)
04:00:56.12 +20:27:33.0 Uranus (5.8mag)
00:16:18.85 +00:17:45.0 Neptune (7.8mag)
20:33:10.77 -23:05:43.1 Pluto (14.5mag)
01:33:04.63 +13:11:29.9 Moon (-9.4mag)
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 361 Jun 11 01:52 planets.txt
############################################################
Positions of selected moons from JPL HORIZONS for JD(UT)2461202.76882240:
07:50:55.43 +21:25:11.0 Io (6.0mag)
07:50:53.65 +21:25:18.1 Europa (6.2mag)
07:51:16.68 +21:24:08.8 Ganymede (5.6mag)
07:50:46.82 +21:25:31.1 Callisto (6.7mag)
07:51:07.22 +21:01:27.5 Himalia (15.6mag)
07:50:58.77 +21:25:02.0 Thebe (16.5mag)
07:51:01.54 +21:15:33.5 Elara (17.5mag)
07:53:21.06 +21:34:55.0 Pasiphae (17.7mag)
07:57:27.84 +21:26:50.7 Carme (18.9mag)
00:50:16.02 +02:52:54.6 Titan (8.6mag)
00:50:18.77 +02:53:21.3 Rhea (9.9mag)
00:50:43.59 +02:55:42.9 Iapetus (11.3mag)
00:50:21.10 +02:52:48.2 Hyperion (14.6mag)
00:50:52.20 +02:54:48.2 Phoebe (16.7mag)
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 568 Jun 11 01:52 moons.txt
############################################################
Positions of selected spacecraft from JPL HORIZONS for JD(UT)2461202.76882240:
17:27:14.92 -35:29:49.0 JWST
16:32:34.01 +48:48:49.8 Chandra
08:51:47.45 -50:03:57.4 XMM-Newton
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 96 Jun 11 01:52 spacecraft.txt
############################################################
Positions of bright comets computed with util/comet_finder/main.py for JD(UT)2461202.76882240 -observatory V36
18:41:20.37 -32:52:28.4 13.6mag P/2010 H2 (Vales)
05:56:30.39 -68:02:07.0 17.4mag C/2014 UN271 (Bernardinelli-Bernstein)
05:50:11.64 +32:00:30.8 17.5mag C/2017 K2 (PANSTARRS)
17:13:29.99 +15:29:52.4 17.8mag C/2021 G2 (ATLAS)
21:41:26.78 -47:34:45.0 16.6mag P/2021 N1 (ZTF)
23:11:54.33 +31:42:22.1 17.2mag C/2022 E2 (ATLAS)
05:37:48.52 +26:59:29.1 16.5mag C/2022 N2 (PANSTARRS)
09:31:57.87 +30:58:24.4 16.7mag C/2022 QE78 (ATLAS)
08:52:12.80 +04:04:30.4 17.7mag C/2022 R6 (PANSTARRS)
18:26:12.43 +21:39:11.9 17.8mag C/2023 A3 (Tsuchinshan-ATLAS)
15:18:17.69 -11:00:57.0 17.6mag P/2023 B1 (PANSTARRS)
22:13:17.75 +66:42:44.1 17.8mag C/2023 H5 (Lemmon)
17:38:45.69 -06:59:36.9 13.7mag C/2023 R1 (PANSTARRS)
13:16:56.07 +82:17:16.6 18.0mag C/2023 X2 (Lemmon)
07:14:44.01 +64:24:53.8 17.7mag C/2024 A1 (ATLAS)
06:51:54.80 +28:06:08.8 13.7mag C/2024 E1 (Wierzchos)
15:34:54.27 +13:47:12.0 17.4mag C/2024 G6 (ATLAS)
20:10:55.13 +32:02:40.1 14.0mag C/2024 J3 (ATLAS)
04:21:06.56 -15:41:12.2 16.0mag C/2024 T5 (ATLAS)
06:08:46.51 +33:57:31.8 17.9mag C/2025 J1 (Borisov)
11:33:37.38 +52:34:08.9 17.5mag C/2025 L1 (ATLAS)
06:48:34.71 -11:00:40.7 14.4mag C/2025 R3 (PANSTARRS)
09:26:43.65 +23:17:43.5 17.9mag C/2025 V2 (Rankin)
12:39:40.45 +04:40:30.3 17.2mag C/2025 Y1 (ATLAS)
18:07:42.25 +75:46:40.0 17.8mag C/2026 A2 (Bok)
02:05:56.13 +43:37:49.0 16.1mag C/2026 B2 (Sun-Gao)
11:12:01.00 -02:40:45.4 16.5mag A/2026 E1
20:29:13.33 -08:49:01.9 8.6mag 10P/Tempel
11:02:45.66 -01:00:56.7 16.0mag 29P/Schwassmann-Wachmann
03:16:28.55 +26:03:14.6 17.7mag 47P/Ashbrook-Jackson
09:06:32.32 +22:53:08.2 16.9mag 63P/Wild
00:29:31.48 -06:10:32.6 15.7mag 65P/Gunn
06:53:25.30 +33:43:03.5 17.0mag 76P/West-Kohoutek-Ikemura
03:16:37.44 +17:36:01.3 13.8mag 78P/Gehrels
01:27:22.49 +05:30:29.2 15.6mag 88P/Howell
05:04:32.51 +30:30:54.0 15.3mag 93P/Lovas
02:51:42.82 +28:06:27.5 17.5mag 114P/Wiseman-Skiff
06:57:53.98 +32:55:01.1 15.6mag 123P/West-Hartley
09:55:32.65 +13:19:22.7 16.5mag 124P/Mrkos
04:04:06.71 +19:27:04.5 16.3mag 128P/Shoemaker-Holt
04:39:40.55 +19:13:05.9 17.7mag 131P/Mueller
06:11:19.58 +18:17:20.6 15.0mag 141P/Machholz
06:14:08.04 +17:48:29.4 15.0mag 141P-A/Machholz
05:09:26.77 +16:33:40.9 11.9mag 141P-D/Machholz
02:59:49.77 -24:16:48.1 16.7mag 161P/Hartley-IRAS
03:51:42.62 +25:01:18.5 15.0mag 162P/SidingSpring
19:36:13.59 +02:39:25.7 16.7mag 169P/NEAT
00:26:35.95 +03:03:38.2 17.8mag 220P/McNaught
16:49:52.06 -08:20:18.8 16.4mag 235P/LINEAR
07:41:35.94 +35:21:20.7 17.6mag 240P/NEAT
00:40:26.29 -01:09:11.2 16.3mag 260P/McNaught
04:12:37.94 +33:01:44.3 17.5mag 295P/LINEAR
00:10:55.88 -05:55:25.6 17.7mag 320P/McNaught
15:13:53.72 +07:59:07.9 17.4mag 391P/Kowalski
08:09:36.25 +20:39:57.4 17.9mag 450P/LONEOS
07:04:59.27 +41:28:34.8 17.8mag 493P/LONEOS
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 2.7K Jun 11 01:52 comets.txt
############################################################
List of recent ASAS-SN transients from https://www.astronomy.ohio-state.edu/asassn/transients.html :
20:07:38.15 -21:07:05.40  SN2026mho  2026-05-25.18 -1.12
11:29:42.55 +79:01:03.10  AT2026min  2026-05-24.21 16.63
11:44:32.95 -68:48:30.00  ASASSN-26no  2026-05-24 8.41
19:00:42.82 -48:31:01.60  ASASSN-26dp  2026-05-22.31 -3.28
14:23:56.59 -58:37:47.40  ASASSN-26dn  2026-05-20.01 14.59
11:24:54.06 +47:57:01.60  AT2026nma  2026-05-20.29 15.46
21:27:08.58 +33:24:38.10  AT2026lli  2026-05-19.34 15.86
00:31:01.41 -13:38:51.70  AT2026nad  2026-05-19.39 15.34
15:16:06.61 -79:16:32.40  ASASSN-26dm  2026-05-19.03 14.44
11:24:25.21 -59:23:19.10  ASASSN-26dl  2026-05-18.02 13.55
13:45:51.52 -53:16:01.00  ASASSN-26dk  2026-05-18.16 12.96
02:05:49.69 -30:29:09.60  ASASSN-26dh  2026-05-18.43 15.37
17:50:22.87 -39:42:33.90  ASASSN-26dj  2026-05-17.05 15.7
01:13:11.60 -33:25:16.10  ASASSN-26dg  2026-05-13.41 16.8
16:44:31.77 -27:15:18.40  AT2026mhn  2026-05-12.33 15.8
09:46:31.08 -33:41:51.00  ASASSN-26di  2026-05-12.14 14.63
21:23:11.57 -19:09:45.00  AT2026kwu  2026-05-12.26 16.9
14:20:14.30 -30:20:51.90  AT2026ktm  2026-05-12.06 17.21
14:41:39.01 -37:13:46.40  AT2026lkm  2026-05-11.18 16.89
12:59:50.45 -10:58:38.80  SN2026kep  2026-05-9.06 17.5
13:37:29.61 -29:50:30.90  AT2026lkd  2026-05-9.09 17.23
09:46:42.01 -14:52:03.60  SN2026kmo  2026-05-8.99 17.51
15:03:05.28 +22:02:03.40  AT2026lxf  2026-05-8.07 13.88
10:23:49.41 -20:57:25.30  ASASSN-26df  2026-05-8.21 16.52
22:14:40.56 +05:04:51.60  2026lda  2026-05-7.56 16.2
21:35:33.81 -14:05:16.30  ASASSN-26de  2026-05-6.29 14.51
16:21:48.82 -61:36:13.20  ASASSN-26dd  2026-05-5.21 15.15
14:26:40.22 -24:48:37.50  AT2026lig  2026-05-4.27 14.63
13:17:51.04 +30:25:13.50  SN2026kcp  2026-05-4.46 16.43
11:27:55.57 -13:38:56.90  SN2026kza  2026-05-1.08 15.59
22:28:27.10 +30:17:54.30  SN 2026fov  2026-04-29.6 14.36
21:00:10.71 -32:17:03.90  AT2026kis  2026-04-27.36 16.15
14:32:57.37 -58:13:26.40  ASASSN-26dc  2026-04-27.27 13.42
15:32:05.35 -43:54:34.60  ASASSN-26db  2026-04-27.37 16.06
16:34:34.97 -54:34:58.00  ASASSN-26da  2026-04-25.32 16.11
10:06:55.04 -01:13:49.70  SN2026jsg  2026-04-24.99 16.28
15:15:57.17 +56:18:32.80  SN2026kid  2026-04-24.52 -3.65
07:58:28.45 +57:03:42.40  AT2026kcf  2026-04-24.2 16.89
11:38:21.80 -50:43:06.50  SN2026jkb  2026-04-24.24 15.38
10:06:11.41 -39:41:04.20  AT2026dil  2026-04-24.2 16.85
14:21:40.08 +13:13:46.30  SN2026jlm  2026-04-22.16 15.12
10:53:55.52 -16:06:06.00  ASASSN-26cz  2026-04-22.28 16.29
20:07:38.15 -21:07:05.40    2026-05-25.18 -1.12
13:45:02.03 +15:17:14.50  ASASSN-26cy  2026-04-21.27 15.78
13:20:52.22 -35:57:03.60  AT2026jcm  2026-04-19.01 16.65
13:36:15.66 -36:53:48.40  SN 2026iqy  2026-04-18.92 17.31
06:34:01.33 -40:07:34.00  ASASSN-26cx  2026-04-19.07 16.16
23:33:57.97 -45:12:11.90  SN 2026idu  2026-04-19.41 15.9
12:10:50.92 +66:55:31.20  SN 2026icv  2026-04-17.14 16.03
21:36:59.06 -60:43:35.90  ASASSN-26cv  2026-04-17.35 -1.18
08:13:26.26 -27:07:30.50  ASASSN-26cw  2026-04-17.07 -1.01
14:49:14.13 -27:29:20.60  ASASSN-26cu  2026-04-16.06 14.03
17:21:59.44 -38:54:04.60  ASASSN-26ct  2026-04-14.4 15.15
15:25:54.99 +07:49:24.50  SN2026huo  2026-04-12.14 16.96
20:07:38.15 -21:07:05.40    2026-05-25.18 -1.12
12:23:20.40 +04:53:39.10  AT2026ixd  2026-04-12.14 17.65
17:46:09.76 -61:19:50.40  SN2026icy  2026-04-12.2 17.03
09:25:46.42 +02:13:46.30  SN2026gud  2026-04-11.98 16.49
16:52:15.46 -60:27:45.90  ASASSN-26cs  2026-04-12.4 15.5
04:20:55.37 -51:15:31.10  ASASSN-26cr  2026-04-12.01 15.37
22:25:39.35 +36:45:06.90  AT2026ihl  2026-04-10.48 14.21
19:40:44.94 +00:41:03.80  AT2026imw  2026-04-10.32 16.06
19:52:04.70 +05:53:33.50  ASASSN-26cq  2026-04-9.31 14.98
16:08:18.39 -64:11:08.80  ASASSN-26cp  2026-04-9.29 13.32
09:22:22.90 -61:02:43.70  SN2026idh  2026-04-7.97 16.34
05:06:54.12 -19:42:26.40  AT2026imr  2026-04-8 17.49
07:14:55.34 -36:03:21.40  AT2026hei  2026-04-8.12 16.7
21:35:33.14 -19:01:34.80  AT2026ihm  2026-04-8.36 16.7
04:28:24.08 -32:25:35.30  AT2026imo  2026-04-8.02 16.81
05:10:35.79 -39:38:40.80  SN 2026hnn  2026-04-7.04 17.07
09:54:32.04 -01:17:25.80  ASASSN-26cn  2026-04-7.01 15.58
07:46:24.43 -77:29:35.90  ASASSN-26co  2026-04-7.15 14.93
05:00:45.52 -29:51:06.20  AT2026hvw  2026-04-6.03 16.51
19:49:33.10 -23:37:11.00  ASASSN-26cl  2026-04-5.29 14.98
19:32:43.55 -22:39:33.40  ASASSN-26cm  2026-04-4.3 13.88
18:08:57.38 +76:48:23.60  ASASSN-26ck  2026-04-2.37 15.38
16:16:36.10 +44:52:30.20  AT2026hyy  2026-04-2.58 13.81
21:55:23.31 -34:48:53.90  ASASSN-26cj  2026-03-30.4 -1.47
11:19:50.70 -27:51:49.80  SN2026gvk  2026-03-30 15.48
11:53:57.02 -23:09:46.20  SN2026gzx  2026-03-28.75 15.27
07:13:46.14 -33:10:15.70  ASASSN-26ci  2026-03-28.15 15.14
09:03:36.09 -67:58:13.00  SN2026hkg  2026-03-28.19 15.82
07:03:00.72 +39:14:43.00  SN2026fin  2026-03-28.27 15.82
05:35:42.80 -63:44:05.50  ASASSN-26ch  2026-03-27.86 13.02
11:23:19.04 +34:22:38.00  SN2026fwt  2026-03-27.3 16.56
19:03:49.79 +37:04:05.20  ASASSN-26ce  2026-03-26.56 16.3
20:26:56.07 -52:54:06.50  AT2026hiy  2026-03-26.35 16.95
05:25:54.76 -30:15:35.80  ASASSN-26cg  2026-03-25.07 16.88
06:57:16.49 -26:54:37.20  SN2026fzb  2026-03-25.14 15.8
14:37:38.23 -43:00:52.30  ASASSN-26cd  2026-03-24.24 12.52
17:34:53.03 +06:04:29.70  AT2026gzl  2026-03-23.27 15.82
08:30:02.60 -35:12:47.50  ASASSN-26cf  2026-03-23.2 14.82
16:54:25.33 +37:49:56.60  SN 2026evz  2026-03-21.32 17.54
17:06:19.20 -18:54:19.50  ASASSN-26bx  2026-03-21.25 16.39
19:01:16.28 -29:29:23.10  ASASSN-26bw  2026-03-21.33 15.81
08:46:05.75 +10:47:39.80  ASASSN-26ca  2026-03-21.13 14.27
12:14:58.16 +63:47:16.20  SN 2026fvx  2026-03-21.12 15.6
18:02:55.90 -75:23:02.60  ASASSN-26bz  2026-03-21.32 16.16
12:16:02.88 -53:16:33.80  ASASSN-26cc  2026-03-20.04 15.48
13:08:21.85 +29:13:44.20  SN 2026fmh  2026-03-20.16 -0.33
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 5.6K Jun 11 01:52 asassn_transients_list.txt
############################################################
Truncated list of TOCP transients from http://www.cbat.eps.harvard.edu/unconf/tocp.html :
09:55:38.83 +69:05:21.7  PNV J09553883+6905217  2026-04-01.893  19.4mag
19:32:43.67 -22:39:30.7  TCP J19324367-2239307  2026-04-05.4395  13.6mag
16:16:36.03 +44:52:28.9  TCP J16163603+4452289  2026-04-05.6655  14.2mag
00:43:38.36 +41:15:32.4  PNV J00433836+4115324  2026-04-08.079  17.2mag
15:41:11.68 +59:18:26.8  TCP J15411168+5918268  2026-04-12.9625  19.2mag
00:43:35.02 +41:46:28.0  PNV J00433502+4146280  2026-04-23.056  15.9mag
00:42:55.64 +41:14:12.2  PNV J00425564+4114122  2026-04-24.042  16.2mag
21:14:03.38 +56:46:44.1  TCP J21140338+5646441  2026-05-05.3534  16.7mag
15:03:05.19 +22:02:04.1  TCP J15030519+2202041  2026-05-08.3260  13.9mag
07:15:18.25 +47:53:16.7  TCP J07151825+4753167  2026-05-09.1599  14.4mag
16:00:18.44 -22:30:10.6  TCP J16001844-2230106  2026-05-09.6135  13.3mag
00:42:47.45 +41:16:58.5  PNV J00424745+4116585  2026-05-10.030  16.8mag
09:55:02.89 +69:02:13.8  PNV J09550289+6902138  2026-05-18.925  20.7mag
00:43:01.82 +41:18:16.6  PNV J00430182+4118166  2026-05-21.8651  18.83Cmag
00:42:51.20 +41:16:59.4  PNV J00425120+4116594  2022-10-26.135  19.3mag
12:24:25.10 +28:47:12.0  TCP J12242510+2847120  2026-05-31.6015  14.8mag
00:56:07.13 +43:01:40.6  TCP J00560713+4301406  2026-06-01.4135  12.2mag
00:42:41.64 +41:15:16.2  PNV J00424164+4115162  2026-06-02.029  17.4mag
00:42:38.68 +41:15:58.2  PNV J00423868+4115582  2026-06-05.1224  19.97Umag
19:00:42.95 -48:31:01.7  PNV J19004295-4831017  2026-05-25.0752  14.2mag
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 189K Jun 11 01:52 tocp_transients_list.txt
############################################################
Truncated list of recent TNS transients from https://www.wis-tns.org/ :
16:32:31.727 +65:39:51.90  AT 2026oei  2026-05-23.32 20.7631
16:04:39.925 -21:36:56.05  AT 2026oeh  2026-05-21.40 20.1751
15:27:47.338 +38:55:13.31  AT 2026oeg  2026-05-21.97 19.64
14:51:39.615 +45:21:56.05  AT 2026oef  2026-05-28.95 19.09
10:32:49.111 +46:46:00.48  AT 2026oee  2026-06-03.89 19.348
17:25:39.755 +21:57:18.90  SN 2026oed  2026-05-31.37 19.4457
09:59:38.199 +00:31:00.31  AT 2026oec  2026-05-30.97 22.39
09:27:53.984 +22:21:00.63  AT 2026oeb  2026-06-01.17 18.66
09:22:28.890 +11:30:25.73  AT 2026oea  2026-06-04.18 19.4125
12:42:23.918 -13:22:38.30  AT 2026odz  2026-06-02.21 20.0149
09:58:40.601 +01:27:22.46  AT 2026ody  2026-05-29.04 21.94
14:57:09.055 +33:12:55.31  AT 2026odx  2026-05-28.93 19.3
13:30:34.211 +08:18:17.60  AT 2026odw  2026-06-02.93 19.81
22:05:04.941 -08:18:56.22  SN 2026odv  2026-06-03.15 18.492
01:22:49.923 +43:28:14.10  AT 2026odu  2026-05-31.48 19.5762
09:01:08.906 -74:52:14.00  AT 2026odt  2026-06-03.00 17.911
12:00:27.833 -47:27:26.10  AT 2026ods  2026-06-03.09 18.497
01:23:02.862 -43:07:38.98  SN 2026odr  2026-05-31.37 17.272
12:45:42.624 -00:29:03.80  AT 2026odq  2026-05-31.19 19.8214
00:12:22.292 +51:55:38.27  AT 2026odp  2026-06-02.40 19.3385
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 30K Jun 11 01:52 tns_transients_list.txt

=== Transient Factory Profiling ===
Started: Thu Jun 11 01:52:18 CDT 2026
=======================================
TIMING SExtractor: 2 seconds
TIMING matching_and_photometry: 0 seconds
TIMING lightcurve_write: 0 seconds
TIMING select_aperture: 1 seconds
    VAST_RUN_default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1: 3s (0.05 min)
    WCS_CACHE_SETUP: 0s (0.00 min)
    WCS_CALIBRATION_AND_EPHEMERIS: 33s (0.55 min)
    PLATE_VERIFY_AND_POINTING: 1s (0.02 min)
    UCAC5_PLATE_SOLVING: 0s (0.00 min)
    MAGNITUDE_CALIBRATION: 65s (1.08 min)
    MAGCAL_SANITY_CHECK: 0s (0.00 min)
      FILTER_MAGNITUDE_CONSOLIDATED: 0s (0.00 min)
      FILTER_FRAME_EDGE: 0s (0.00 min)
      FILTER_SECOND_EPOCH_VERIFY: 0s (0.00 min)
    CANDIDATE_FILTERING_TOTAL: 0s (0.00 min)
    EXCLUSION_LIST_PREPARATION: 0s (0.00 min)
    SEEING_AND_LIMITING_MAG: 2s (0.03 min)
    WAIT_FOR_UCAC5: 5s (0.08 min)
    WCS_IMAGE_ARCHIVING: 0s (0.00 min)
    HTML_REPORT: 0s (0.00 min)
  SE_CONFIG_default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1: 111s (1.85 min)
TIMING SExtractor: 12 seconds
TIMING matching_and_photometry: 1 seconds
TIMING lightcurve_write: 1 seconds
TIMING select_aperture: 2 seconds
    VAST_RUN_default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL: 21s (0.35 min)
    WCS_CACHE_SETUP: 0s (0.00 min)
    WCS_CALIBRATION_AND_EPHEMERIS: 2s (0.03 min)
    PLATE_VERIFY_AND_POINTING: 0s (0.00 min)
    UCAC5_PLATE_SOLVING: 0s (0.00 min)
    MAGNITUDE_CALIBRATION: 74s (1.23 min)
    MAGCAL_SANITY_CHECK: 0s (0.00 min)
      FILTER_MAGNITUDE_CONSOLIDATED: 1s (0.02 min)
      FILTER_FRAME_EDGE: 0s (0.00 min)
      FILTER_SECOND_EPOCH_VERIFY: 0s (0.00 min)
    CANDIDATE_FILTERING_TOTAL: 1s (0.02 min)
    EXCLUSION_LIST_PREPARATION: 0s (0.00 min)
    SEEING_AND_LIMITING_MAG: 1s (0.02 min)
    WAIT_FOR_UCAC5: 0s (0.00 min)
    WCS_IMAGE_ARCHIVING: 0s (0.00 min)
    HTML_REPORT: 5s (0.08 min)
  SE_CONFIG_default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL: 104s (1.73 min)
FIELD_UMa-10-Q2b1x1: 228s (3.80 min)
=======================================
TOTAL_RUNTIME: 245s (4.08 min)
Finished: Thu Jun 11 01:56:23 CDT 2026