######## Processing parameters ########
AAVSO_COMMENT_STRING= NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
ASTCHECK_ASTEROID_SEARCH_RADIUS_ARCSEC=
BAD_REGION_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/TTUQ2_bad_region.lst
CAMERA_SETTINGS= TTUQ2b1x1
CHECK_POINTING_ACCURACY= yes
DARK_FRAMES_DIR_OR_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks
EXCLUSION_LIST= ../exclusion_list_TTUQ2.txt
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MAX_APERTURE_STAR_SIZE_PIX= 12.5
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MAX_ELONGATION_AminusB_PIX= 0.55
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MIN_APERTURE_STAR_SIZE_PIX= 2.0
FILTER_BRIGHT_MAG_CUTOFF_TRANSIENT_SEARCH= -5
FILTER_FAINT_MAG_CUTOFF_TRANSIENT_SEARCH= 15.0
FLAT_FIELD_DIR_OR_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats
FRAME_EDGE_OFFSET_PIX= 600
GAIA_BAND_FOR_CATALOGED_SOURCE_CHECK=
MAX_NEW_TO_REF_MEAN_IMG_VALUE_RATIO= 100
MAX_NEW_IMG_MEAN_VALUE= 25000
MAX_SD_RATIO_OF_SECOND_EPOCH_IMGS= 0.18
MAX_SD_RATIO_OF_SECOND_EPOCH_IMGS_SOFT_LIMIT= 0.12
MPC_CODE= V36
NMW_CALIBRATION= /var/www/nmw_calibration
NUMBER_OF_DETECTED_TRANSIENTS_BEFORE_FILTERING_HARD_LIMIT= 8000
NUMBER_OF_DETECTED_TRANSIENTS_BEFORE_FILTERING_SOFT_LIMIT= 4000
OMP_NUM_THREADS=
ONLINE_MPCHECKER_BUTTON_ASTEROID_SEARCH_RADIUS_ARCMIN=
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=
REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES= yes
SEXTRACTOR_CONFIG_BRIGHTSTARPASS= default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
SEXTRACTOR_CONFIG_FILES= default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
STARMATCH_RADIUS_PIX= 4
SYSREM_ITERATIONS= 0
TELESCOP=
TELESCOP_NAME_KNOWN_TO_VaST_FOR_FOV_DETERMINATION=
UCAC5_PLATESOLVE_ITERATIONS= 2
FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE= no
#######################################
HOSTNAME= tau
USER=
HOME=
#######################################
SExtractor catalog cache: enabled, directory /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/vast_sextractor_cache
Reference image directory is set to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs
VIZIER_SITE=vizier.cds.unistra.fr
GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=vizquery (lib/vizquery -> VizieR vizier.cds.unistra.fr)
INFO: MAKE_PNG_PLOTS is set to yes
FITS_FILE_EXT=fits
CALIBRATION_STATUS_PREFIX=
Fields in the data directory:
UMa-11-Q2b1x1
#######################################
########### Starting UMa-11-Q2b1x1 ###########
Processing UMa-11-Q2b1x1
server tau has sufficient free disk space available: 654064 MB at /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir
server tau has sufficient free disk space available: 654064 MB at .
Checking input images (2 new)
REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE= /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-18-11_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0318.fits
REFERENCE_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE= /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_02-36-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0330.fits
Small preview (one of the new images): 
Large previews of the second-epoch (new) images:
MAKE_PNG_PLOTS=yes
renamed 'UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_00-19-56_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0044.png' -> 'transient_report/UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_00-19-56_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0044.fits_preview.png'
UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_00-19-56_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0044.fits
renamed 'UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_00-20-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0045.png' -> 'transient_report/UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_00-20-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0045.fits_preview.png'
UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_00-20-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0045.fits
Read-check the input FITS images... read-check OK
Blank image check the input FITS images... blank-image-check OK
Read date check the input FITS images... read-date-check OK
Mean value check the input FITS images... OK, at least two new images have mean values below the threshold.
----------------------------------------------
INFO: REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 438.2398
INFO: REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_SD= 482.5375
INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 955.9511
INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_SD= 435.1610
INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 957.3104
INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE_SD= 435.0223
----------------------------------------------
INFO: ref_to_second_epoch_img_mean_ratio= 2.18134
INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__SD_ratio= 0.000
----------------------------------------------
Calibration settings: DARK_FRAMES_DIR_OR_FILE=/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks FLAT_FIELD_DIR_OR_FILE=/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats
EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration
SET-TEMP= 5.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint
CCD-TEMP= 5.0 / [degC] CCD temperature
FOCTEMP = 25.3400001525879 / [degC] Focuser temperature
AMBTEMP = 26.4 / [degC] Ambient air temperature
Exploring image header: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-11_CI_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_002744_TTUQ2b1x1_2826318_QVhrGAXj/UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_00-19-56_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0044.fits
CCD-TEMP= 5.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-11_CI_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_002744_TTUQ2b1x1_2826318_QVhrGAXj/UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_00-19-56_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0044.fits
SET-TEMP= 5.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-11_CI_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_002744_TTUQ2b1x1_2826318_QVhrGAXj/UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_00-19-56_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0044.fits
Header: 74 keys total, 33 keys left
Record 0: "" status=0
Record 1: "SIMPLE = T / C# FITS" status=0
Record 2: "BITPIX = 16" status=0
Record 3: "NAXIS = 2 / Dimensionality" status=0
Record 4: "NAXIS1 = 9576" status=0
Record 5: "NAXIS2 = 6388" status=0
Record 6: "BZERO = 32768" status=0
Record 7: "EXTEND = T / Extensions are permitted" status=0
Record 8: "IMAGETYP= 'LIGHT' / Type of exposure" status=0
Record 9: "EXPOSURE= 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0
Record 10: "EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0
Record 11: "DATE-LOC= '2026-06-11T00:19:56.3552038' / Time of observation (local)" status=0
Record 12: "DATE-OBS= '2026-06-11T05:19:56.3552038' / Time of observation (UTC)" status=0
Record 13: "MJD-OBS = 61202.2221800345 / Modified Julian Date of observation" status=0
Record 14: "DATE-AVG= '2026-06-11T05:20:06.2558484' / Averaged midpoint time (UTC)" status=0
Record 15: "MJD-AVG = 61202.2222946179 / Modified Julian Date of averaged midpoint" status=0
Record 16: "XBINNING= 1 / X axis binning factor" status=0
Record 17: "YBINNING= 1 / Y axis binning factor" status=0
Record 18: "GAIN = 30 / Sensor gain" status=0
Record 19: "OFFSET = 30 / Sensor gain offset" status=0
Record 20: "XPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel X axis size" status=0
Record 21: "YPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel Y axis size" status=0
Record 22: "INSTRUME= 'QHY600M' / Imaging instrument name" status=0
Record 23: "CAMERAID= 'QHY600M-84137c4dbbbd119a9' / Imaging instrument identifier" status=0
Record 24: "SET-TEMP= 5.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint" status=0
Record 25: "CCD-TEMP= 5.0 / [degC] CCD temperature" status=0
Record 26: "READOUTM= '2CMS-0' / Sensor readout mode" status=0
Record 27: "USBLIMIT= 50 / Camera-specific USB setting" status=0
Record 28: "TELESCOP= 'QHY600M-TTU2' / Name of telescope" status=0
Record 29: "FOCALLEN= 135.0 / [mm] Focal length" status=0
Record 30: "FOCRATIO= 2.2 / Focal ratio" status=0
Record 31: "RA = 179.998049776786 / [deg] RA of telescope" status=0
Record 32: "DEC = 45.999821463364 / [deg] Declination of telescope" status=0
Record 33: "CENTALT = 45.3311111111111 / [deg] Altitude of telescope" status=0
Record 34: "CENTAZ = 303.484166666667 / [deg] Azimuth of telescope" status=0
Record 35: "AIRMASS = 1.40475974936181 / Airmass at frame center (Gueymard 1993)" status=0
Record 36: "PIERSIDE= 'East' / Telescope pointing state" status=0
Record 37: "SITEELEV= 1009.5 / [m] Observation site elevation" status=0
Record 38: "SITELAT = 33.7482925 / [deg] Observation site latitude" status=0
Record 39: "SITELONG= -101.958319 / [deg] Observation site longitude" status=0
Record 40: "OBSERVER= 'Sokolovsky' / Observer name" status=0
Record 41: "OBSERVAT= 'TTU Skyview' / Observatory name" status=0
Record 42: "SITENAME= '' / Observatory site name" status=0
Record 43: "FWHEEL = 'Simulator' / Filter Wheel name" status=0
Record 44: "FILTER = 'CV' / Active filter name" status=0
Record 45: "OBJECT = 'UMa-11' / Name of the object of interest" status=0
Record 46: "OBJCTRA = '12 00 00' / [H M S] RA of imaged object" status=0
Record 47: "OBJCTDEC= '+46 00 00' / [D M S] Declination of imaged object" status=0
Record 48: "OBJCTROT= 0.0 / [deg] planned rotation of imaged object" status=0
Record 49: "FOCNAME = 'ZWO Focuser' / Focusing equipment name" status=0
Record 50: "FOCPOS = 20436 / [step] Focuser position" status=0
Record 51: "FOCUSPOS= 20436 / [step] Focuser position" status=0
Record 52: "FOCUSSZ = 0.0 / [um] Focuser step size" status=0
Record 53: "FOCTEMP = 25.3400001525879 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0
Record 54: "FOCUSTEM= 25.3400001525879 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0
Record 55: "DEWPOINT= 18.0 / [degC] Dew point" status=0
Record 56: "HUMIDITY= 60.0 / [percent] Relative humidity" status=0
Record 57: "PRESSURE= 894.21 / [hPa] Air pressure" status=0
Record 58: "AMBTEMP = 26.4 / [degC] Ambient air temperature" status=0
Record 59: "WINDDIR = 38.0 / [deg] Wind direction: 0=N, 180=S, 90=E, 270=W" status=0
Record 60: "WINDGUST= 33.102648 / [kph] Wind gust" status=0
Record 61: "WINDSPD = 27.00216 / [kph] Wind speed" status=0
Record 62: "ROWORDER= 'TOP-DOWN' / FITS Image Orientation" status=0
Record 63: "EQUINOX = 2000.0 / Equinox of celestial coordinate system" status=0
Record 64: "SWCREATE= 'N.I.N.A. 3.2.0.9001 (x64)' / Software that created this file" status=0
Record 65: "QHY_EXP = 20.000096 / [s] Actual exposure time" status=0
Record 66: "QHY_PP = 13888.0 / [ps] pixelPeriod" status=0
Record 67: "QHY_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0
Record 68: "GPS_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0
Record 69: "QHY_FP = 20000160.0 / [us] framePeriod" status=0
Record 70: "QHY_CPL = 6120.0 / clocksPerLine" status=0
Record 71: "QHY_LPF = 235295.0 / linesPerFrame" status=0
Record 72: "QHY_AET = 20000096.0 / [us] actualExposureTime" status=0
Record 73: "QHY_LEM = T / isLongExposureMode" status=0
Record 74: "QHY_OFF0= 3767.777 / [us] RollingShutterEndOffset row 0" status=0
Allocating memory for image, dark and result arrays...
Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-11_CI_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_002744_TTUQ2b1x1_2826318_QVhrGAXj/UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_00-19-56_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0044.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix
SET-TEMP= 5.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-11_CI_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_002744_TTUQ2b1x1_2826318_QVhrGAXj/UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_00-19-56_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0044.fits
SET-TEMP= 5.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_5C_20s_2026-05-30.fit
CCD-TEMP= 5.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-11_CI_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_002744_TTUQ2b1x1_2826318_QVhrGAXj/UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_00-19-56_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0044.fits
CCD-TEMP= 4.800000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_5C_20s_2026-05-30.fit
Reading dark frame /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_5C_20s_2026-05-30.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix
Dark frame is subtracted, output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-11_CI_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_002744_TTUQ2b1x1_2826318_QVhrGAXj/d_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_00-19-56_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0044.fits :)
Spent 0.792857 seconds
renamed 'mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_5C_20s_2026-05-30.png' -> 'transient_report/dark.png'
try_to_calibrate_the_input_frame(): selected flat field /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ2b1x1_2026-05-30.fit from directory /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats
MegaDivider v7
Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-11_CI_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_002744_TTUQ2b1x1_2826318_QVhrGAXj/d_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_00-19-56_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0044.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix
Reading flat /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ2b1x1_2026-05-30.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix
Avarage count on flat field image: 20659.746399
Minimal real count (from overscan): 5
Output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-11_CI_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_002744_TTUQ2b1x1_2826318_QVhrGAXj/fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_00-19-56_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0044.fits :)
No overscan detected - all values seem high! (left_median=14784.5, right_median=14894.5)
renamed 'mff_TTUQ2b1x1_2026-05-30.png' -> 'transient_report/flat.png'
Using calibrated image CALIBRATED_SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-11_CI_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_002744_TTUQ2b1x1_2826318_QVhrGAXj/fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_00-19-56_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0044.fits
EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration
SET-TEMP= 5.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint
CCD-TEMP= 5.0 / [degC] CCD temperature
FOCTEMP = 25.25 / [degC] Focuser temperature
AMBTEMP = 26.4 / [degC] Ambient air temperature
Exploring image header: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-11_CI_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_002744_TTUQ2b1x1_2826318_QVhrGAXj/UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_00-20-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0045.fits
CCD-TEMP= 5.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-11_CI_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_002744_TTUQ2b1x1_2826318_QVhrGAXj/UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_00-20-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0045.fits
SET-TEMP= 5.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-11_CI_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_002744_TTUQ2b1x1_2826318_QVhrGAXj/UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_00-20-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0045.fits
Header: 74 keys total, 33 keys left
Record 0: "" status=0
Record 1: "SIMPLE = T / C# FITS" status=0
Record 2: "BITPIX = 16" status=0
Record 3: "NAXIS = 2 / Dimensionality" status=0
Record 4: "NAXIS1 = 9576" status=0
Record 5: "NAXIS2 = 6388" status=0
Record 6: "BZERO = 32768" status=0
Record 7: "EXTEND = T / Extensions are permitted" status=0
Record 8: "IMAGETYP= 'LIGHT' / Type of exposure" status=0
Record 9: "EXPOSURE= 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0
Record 10: "EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0
Record 11: "DATE-LOC= '2026-06-11T00:20:37.3226749' / Time of observation (local)" status=0
Record 12: "DATE-OBS= '2026-06-11T05:20:37.3226749' / Time of observation (UTC)" status=0
Record 13: "MJD-OBS = 61202.2226541899 / Modified Julian Date of observation" status=0
Record 14: "DATE-AVG= '2026-06-11T05:20:47.2254683' / Averaged midpoint time (UTC)" status=0
Record 15: "MJD-AVG = 61202.2227688078 / Modified Julian Date of averaged midpoint" status=0
Record 16: "XBINNING= 1 / X axis binning factor" status=0
Record 17: "YBINNING= 1 / Y axis binning factor" status=0
Record 18: "GAIN = 30 / Sensor gain" status=0
Record 19: "OFFSET = 30 / Sensor gain offset" status=0
Record 20: "XPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel X axis size" status=0
Record 21: "YPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel Y axis size" status=0
Record 22: "INSTRUME= 'QHY600M' / Imaging instrument name" status=0
Record 23: "CAMERAID= 'QHY600M-84137c4dbbbd119a9' / Imaging instrument identifier" status=0
Record 24: "SET-TEMP= 5.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint" status=0
Record 25: "CCD-TEMP= 5.0 / [degC] CCD temperature" status=0
Record 26: "READOUTM= '2CMS-0' / Sensor readout mode" status=0
Record 27: "USBLIMIT= 50 / Camera-specific USB setting" status=0
Record 28: "TELESCOP= 'QHY600M-TTU2' / Name of telescope" status=0
Record 29: "FOCALLEN= 135.0 / [mm] Focal length" status=0
Record 30: "FOCRATIO= 2.2 / Focal ratio" status=0
Record 31: "RA = 179.998049827527 / [deg] RA of telescope" status=0
Record 32: "DEC = 45.9998214519896 / [deg] Declination of telescope" status=0
Record 33: "CENTALT = 45.2152777777778 / [deg] Altitude of telescope" status=0
Record 34: "CENTAZ = 303.499444444444 / [deg] Azimuth of telescope" status=0
Record 35: "AIRMASS = 1.4075654932055 / Airmass at frame center (Gueymard 1993)" status=0
Record 36: "PIERSIDE= 'East' / Telescope pointing state" status=0
Record 37: "SITEELEV= 1009.5 / [m] Observation site elevation" status=0
Record 38: "SITELAT = 33.7482925 / [deg] Observation site latitude" status=0
Record 39: "SITELONG= -101.958319 / [deg] Observation site longitude" status=0
Record 40: "OBSERVER= 'Sokolovsky' / Observer name" status=0
Record 41: "OBSERVAT= 'TTU Skyview' / Observatory name" status=0
Record 42: "SITENAME= '' / Observatory site name" status=0
Record 43: "FWHEEL = 'Simulator' / Filter Wheel name" status=0
Record 44: "FILTER = 'CV' / Active filter name" status=0
Record 45: "OBJECT = 'UMa-11' / Name of the object of interest" status=0
Record 46: "OBJCTRA = '12 00 00' / [H M S] RA of imaged object" status=0
Record 47: "OBJCTDEC= '+46 00 00' / [D M S] Declination of imaged object" status=0
Record 48: "OBJCTROT= 0.0 / [deg] planned rotation of imaged object" status=0
Record 49: "FOCNAME = 'ZWO Focuser' / Focusing equipment name" status=0
Record 50: "FOCPOS = 20436 / [step] Focuser position" status=0
Record 51: "FOCUSPOS= 20436 / [step] Focuser position" status=0
Record 52: "FOCUSSZ = 0.0 / [um] Focuser step size" status=0
Record 53: "FOCTEMP = 25.25 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0
Record 54: "FOCUSTEM= 25.25 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0
Record 55: "DEWPOINT= 18.0 / [degC] Dew point" status=0
Record 56: "HUMIDITY= 60.0 / [percent] Relative humidity" status=0
Record 57: "PRESSURE= 894.21 / [hPa] Air pressure" status=0
Record 58: "AMBTEMP = 26.4 / [degC] Ambient air temperature" status=0
Record 59: "WINDDIR = 38.0 / [deg] Wind direction: 0=N, 180=S, 90=E, 270=W" status=0
Record 60: "WINDGUST= 33.102648 / [kph] Wind gust" status=0
Record 61: "WINDSPD = 27.00216 / [kph] Wind speed" status=0
Record 62: "ROWORDER= 'TOP-DOWN' / FITS Image Orientation" status=0
Record 63: "EQUINOX = 2000.0 / Equinox of celestial coordinate system" status=0
Record 64: "SWCREATE= 'N.I.N.A. 3.2.0.9001 (x64)' / Software that created this file" status=0
Record 65: "QHY_EXP = 20.000096 / [s] Actual exposure time" status=0
Record 66: "QHY_PP = 13888.0 / [ps] pixelPeriod" status=0
Record 67: "QHY_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0
Record 68: "GPS_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0
Record 69: "QHY_FP = 20000160.0 / [us] framePeriod" status=0
Record 70: "QHY_CPL = 6120.0 / clocksPerLine" status=0
Record 71: "QHY_LPF = 235295.0 / linesPerFrame" status=0
Record 72: "QHY_AET = 20000096.0 / [us] actualExposureTime" status=0
Record 73: "QHY_LEM = T / isLongExposureMode" status=0
Record 74: "QHY_OFF0= 3767.777 / [us] RollingShutterEndOffset row 0" status=0
Allocating memory for image, dark and result arrays...
Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-11_CI_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_002744_TTUQ2b1x1_2826318_QVhrGAXj/UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_00-20-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0045.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix
SET-TEMP= 5.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-11_CI_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_002744_TTUQ2b1x1_2826318_QVhrGAXj/UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_00-20-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0045.fits
SET-TEMP= 5.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_5C_20s_2026-05-30.fit
CCD-TEMP= 5.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-11_CI_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_002744_TTUQ2b1x1_2826318_QVhrGAXj/UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_00-20-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0045.fits
CCD-TEMP= 4.800000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_5C_20s_2026-05-30.fit
Reading dark frame /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_5C_20s_2026-05-30.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix
Dark frame is subtracted, output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-11_CI_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_002744_TTUQ2b1x1_2826318_QVhrGAXj/d_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_00-20-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0045.fits :)
Spent 0.751726 seconds
renamed 'mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_5C_20s_2026-05-30.png' -> 'transient_report/dark.png'
try_to_calibrate_the_input_frame(): selected flat field /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ2b1x1_2026-05-30.fit from directory /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats
MegaDivider v7
Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-11_CI_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_002744_TTUQ2b1x1_2826318_QVhrGAXj/d_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_00-20-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0045.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix
Reading flat /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ2b1x1_2026-05-30.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix
Avarage count on flat field image: 20659.746399
Minimal real count (from overscan): 5
Output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-11_CI_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_002744_TTUQ2b1x1_2826318_QVhrGAXj/fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_00-20-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0045.fits :)
No overscan detected - all values seem high! (left_median=14784.5, right_median=14894.5)
renamed 'mff_TTUQ2b1x1_2026-05-30.png' -> 'transient_report/flat.png'
Using calibrated image CALIBRATED_SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-11_CI_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_002744_TTUQ2b1x1_2826318_QVhrGAXj/fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_00-20-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0045.fits
Dark frame used to calibrate the second-epoch images:
Flat field used to calibrate the second-epoch images:
after the calibration attempt:
SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-11_CI_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_002744_TTUQ2b1x1_2826318_QVhrGAXj/fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_00-19-56_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0044.fits
SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-11_CI_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_002744_TTUQ2b1x1_2826318_QVhrGAXj/fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_00-20-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0045.fits
Previews of the CALIBRATED second-epoch images:
fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_00-19-56_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0044.fits
fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_00-20-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0045.fits
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/TTUQ2_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 4 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-18-11_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0318.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_02-36-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0330.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-11_CI_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_002744_TTUQ2b1x1_2826318_QVhrGAXj/fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_00-19-56_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0044.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-11_CI_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_002744_TTUQ2b1x1_2826318_QVhrGAXj/fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_00-20-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0045.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-18-11_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0318.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_02-36-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0330.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-18-11_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0318.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_02-36-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0330.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-11_CI_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_002744_TTUQ2b1x1_2826318_QVhrGAXj/fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_00-19-56_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0044.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-11_CI_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_002744_TTUQ2b1x1_2826318_QVhrGAXj/fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_00-20-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0045.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461202.72229578
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
'asassn_transients_list.txt' -> '../asassn_transients_list.txt'
'tns_transients_list.txt' -> '../tns_transients_list.txt'
wcs_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-18-11_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0318.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-18-11_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0318.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-18-11_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0318.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-18-11_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0318.fits'
wcs_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_02-36-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0330.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_02-36-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0330.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_02-36-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0330.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_02-36-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0330.fits'
wcs_fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_00-19-56_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0044.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_00-19-56_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0044.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_00-19-56_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0044.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_00-19-56_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0044.fits'
wcs_fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_00-20-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0045.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_00-20-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0045.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_00-20-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0045.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_00-20-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0045.fits'
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-18-11_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0318.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-18-11_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0318.fits
Image size: 937.7'x624.8' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.88"/pix along the X axis and 5.87"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 11:59:59.723 +46:00:17.32 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.88"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_00-19-56_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0044.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_00-19-56_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0044.fits
Image size: 937.0'x623.9' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 12:00:02.682 +45:59:26.65 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 11:59:59.723 +46:00:17.32
Second-epoch image center 12:00:02.682 +45:59:26.65
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0165 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_00-20-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0045.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_00-20-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0045.fits
Image size: 937.0'x623.9' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 12:00:04.941 +45:59:21.94 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 11:59:59.723 +46:00:17.32
Second-epoch image center 12:00:04.941 +45:59:21.94
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0216 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 12:00:02.682 +45:59:26.65
Second-epoch second image center 12:00:04.941 +45:59:21.94
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00667 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-18-11_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0318.fits &> /tmp/tmp.tgh70HxxVv
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-18-11_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0318.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_02-36-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0330.fits &> /tmp/tmp.73XxMkRE7F
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_02-36-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0330.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-11_CI_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_002744_TTUQ2b1x1_2826318_QVhrGAXj/fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_00-19-56_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0044.fits &> /tmp/tmp.Psm0qPrdlG
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-11_CI_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_002744_TTUQ2b1x1_2826318_QVhrGAXj/fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_00-19-56_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0044.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-11_CI_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_002744_TTUQ2b1x1_2826318_QVhrGAXj/fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_00-20-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0045.fits &> /tmp/tmp.ajfNEZuJDw
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-11_CI_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_002744_TTUQ2b1x1_2826318_QVhrGAXj/fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_00-20-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0045.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-18-11_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0318.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-18-11_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0318.fits and wcs_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-18-11_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0318.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-18-11_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0318.fits and wcs_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-18-11_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0318.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-18-11_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0318.fits and wcs_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-18-11_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0318.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-18-11_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0318.fits) and catalog (wcs_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-18-11_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0318.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-18-11_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0318.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 6698 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 168.5377 to 192.8200 deg, Dec +39.5500 to +51.5816 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 168.5377 to 192.8200 deg, Dec 39.5500 to 51.5816 deg
Loaded 4074 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 2781 out of 2891 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 2891 out of 6698 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.980100
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.980100
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.48
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.50
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.50
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 6698 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 168.5377 to 192.8200 deg, Dec +39.5500 to +51.5816 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 168.5377 to 192.8200 deg, Dec 39.5500 to 51.5816 deg
Loaded 4074 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 2781 out of 2891 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 2891 out of 6698 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-18-11_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0318.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-18-11_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0318.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-18-11_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0318.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-18-11_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0318.fits (aperture=6.7)
Read 6611 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 167.6881 to 192.2402 deg, Dec +40.2976 to +51.2870 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 167.6881 to 192.2402 deg, Dec 40.2976 to 51.2870 deg
Loaded 3720 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 2822 out of 2916 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 2916 out of 6611 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_02-36-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0330.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_02-36-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0330.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_02-36-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0330.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_02-36-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0330.fits (aperture=6.7)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 0 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 8000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.4 pix UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-18-11_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0318.fits
2.4 pix UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_02-36-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0330.fits
2.4 pix fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_00-19-56_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0044.fits
2.4 pix fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_00-20-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0045.fits
2.4 pix wcs_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-18-11_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0318.fits
2.4 pix wcs_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_02-36-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0330.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.5 mag. UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-18-11_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0318.fits
15.4 mag. UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_02-36-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0330.fits
15.2 mag. fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_00-19-56_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0044.fits
15.2 mag. fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_00-20-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0045.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 15.2 (SNR ) 12.3 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.tgh70HxxVv (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-11_CI_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_002744_TTUQ2b1x1_2826318_QVhrGAXj/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-18-11_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0318.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-18-11_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0318.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-18-11_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0318.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-18-11_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0318.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-18-11_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0318.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-18-11_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0318.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-18-11_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0318.fits' -> 'wcs_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-18-11_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0318.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-18-11_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0318.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-18-11_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0318.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-18-11_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0318.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-18-11_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0318.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-18-11_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0318.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-18-11_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0318.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-18-11_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0318.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-18-11_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0318.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-18-11_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0318.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-18-11_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0318.fits.wcscat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=384, passed=6698
Got 6698 stars (including 6310 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-18-11_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0318.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 6698 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.7'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.7 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013024 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010419 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 647 to 709 (Dec 39.5 to 51.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 969 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 969 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 962 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 969 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6627 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 647 to 709 (Dec 39.5 to 51.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 969 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 969 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6627 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 969 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6627 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
Excluding outliers - 969 stars left (next iteration limit 1065)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-18-11_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0318.fits N_match=969 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.371 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.284 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.510 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.356 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.384 n_q1=257 n_q2=244 n_q3=247 n_q4=221 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.373
The image catalog is written to wcs_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-18-11_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0318.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-18-11_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0318.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-18-11_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0318.fits -region wcs_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-18-11_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0318.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-18-11_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0318.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.73XxMkRE7F (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-11_CI_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_002744_TTUQ2b1x1_2826318_QVhrGAXj/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_02-36-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0330.fits 570.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_02-36-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0330.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_02-36-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0330.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_02-36-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0330.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_02-36-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0330.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_02-36-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0330.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_02-36-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0330.fits' -> 'wcs_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_02-36-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0330.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_02-36-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0330.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_02-36-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0330.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_02-36-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0330.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_02-36-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0330.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_02-36-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0330.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_02-36-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0330.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_02-36-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0330.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_02-36-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0330.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_02-36-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0330.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_02-36-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0330.fits.wcscat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=340, passed=6611
Got 6611 stars (including 6267 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_02-36-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0330.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 6611 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013018 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010414 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 651 to 708 (Dec 40.3 to 51.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 970 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 970 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 961 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 970 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6573 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 651 to 708 (Dec 40.3 to 51.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 970 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 970 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6573 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 970 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6573 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Excluding outliers - 970 stars left (next iteration limit 1067)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_02-36-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0330.fits N_match=970 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.333 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.290 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.382 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.342 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.333 n_q1=227 n_q2=277 n_q3=219 n_q4=247 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.146
The image catalog is written to wcs_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_02-36-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0330.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_02-36-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0330.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_02-36-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0330.fits -region wcs_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_02-36-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0330.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_02-36-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0330.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.Psm0qPrdlG (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-11_CI_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_002744_TTUQ2b1x1_2826318_QVhrGAXj/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-11_CI_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_002744_TTUQ2b1x1_2826318_QVhrGAXj/fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_00-19-56_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0044.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-11_CI_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_002744_TTUQ2b1x1_2826318_QVhrGAXj/fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_00-19-56_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0044.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-11_CI_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_002744_TTUQ2b1x1_2826318_QVhrGAXj/fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_00-19-56_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0044.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-11_CI_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_002744_TTUQ2b1x1_2826318_QVhrGAXj/fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_00-19-56_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0044.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-11_CI_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_002744_TTUQ2b1x1_2826318_QVhrGAXj/fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_00-19-56_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0044.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-11_CI_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_002744_TTUQ2b1x1_2826318_QVhrGAXj/fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_00-19-56_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0044.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_00-19-56_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0044.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_00-19-56_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0044.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_00-19-56_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0044.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_00-19-56_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0044.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_00-19-56_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0044.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_00-19-56_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0044.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_00-19-56_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0044.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-11_CI_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_002744_TTUQ2b1x1_2826318_QVhrGAXj/fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_00-19-56_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0044.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_00-19-56_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0044.fits.wcscat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=264, passed=5419
Got 5419 stars (including 5152 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_00-19-56_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0044.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 5419 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.0'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.0 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013014 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010411 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 651 to 708 (Dec 40.3 to 51.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 969 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 969 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 960 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 969 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5377 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 651 to 708 (Dec 40.3 to 51.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 969 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 969 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5379 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 969 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5379 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Excluding outliers - 969 stars left (next iteration limit 1065)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_00-19-56_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0044.fits N_match=969 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.424 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.350 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.485 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.353 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.501 n_q1=217 n_q2=268 n_q3=221 n_q4=263 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.181
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_00-19-56_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0044.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_00-19-56_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0044.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-11_CI_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_002744_TTUQ2b1x1_2826318_QVhrGAXj/fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_00-19-56_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0044.fits -region wcs_fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_00-19-56_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0044.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_00-19-56_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0044.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.ajfNEZuJDw (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-11_CI_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_002744_TTUQ2b1x1_2826318_QVhrGAXj/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-11_CI_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_002744_TTUQ2b1x1_2826318_QVhrGAXj/fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_00-20-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0045.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-11_CI_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_002744_TTUQ2b1x1_2826318_QVhrGAXj/fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_00-20-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0045.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-11_CI_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_002744_TTUQ2b1x1_2826318_QVhrGAXj/fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_00-20-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0045.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-11_CI_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_002744_TTUQ2b1x1_2826318_QVhrGAXj/fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_00-20-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0045.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-11_CI_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_002744_TTUQ2b1x1_2826318_QVhrGAXj/fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_00-20-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0045.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-11_CI_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_002744_TTUQ2b1x1_2826318_QVhrGAXj/fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_00-20-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0045.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_00-20-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0045.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_00-20-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0045.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_00-20-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0045.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_00-20-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0045.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_00-20-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0045.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_00-20-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0045.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_00-20-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0045.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-11_CI_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_002744_TTUQ2b1x1_2826318_QVhrGAXj/fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_00-20-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0045.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_00-20-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0045.fits.wcscat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=266, passed=5379
Got 5379 stars (including 5110 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_00-20-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0045.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 5379 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.0'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.0 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013014 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010411 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 651 to 708 (Dec 40.3 to 51.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 969 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 969 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 960 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 969 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5338 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 651 to 708 (Dec 40.3 to 51.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 969 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 969 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5336 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 969 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5336 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Excluding outliers - 969 stars left (next iteration limit 1065)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_00-20-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0045.fits N_match=969 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.418 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.355 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.540 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.361 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.485 n_q1=215 n_q2=271 n_q3=218 n_q4=265 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.294
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_00-20-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0045.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_00-20-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0045.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-11_CI_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_002744_TTUQ2b1x1_2826318_QVhrGAXj/fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_00-20-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0045.fits -region wcs_fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_00-20-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0045.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_00-20-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0045.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-18-11_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0318.fits sigma_overall=0.371 worst_q_ratio=1.373
ref2=UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_02-36-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0330.fits sigma_overall=0.333 worst_q_ratio=1.146
new1=fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_00-19-56_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0044.fits sigma_overall=0.424 worst_q_ratio=1.181
new2=fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_00-20-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0045.fits sigma_overall=0.418 worst_q_ratio=1.294
reference average sigma_overall=0.352 worst_q_ratio=1.2595
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-18-11_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0318_astrometric_residuals.png (969 matched stars from wcs_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-18-11_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0318.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.32 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_02-36-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0330_astrometric_residuals.png (970 matched stars from wcs_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_02-36-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0330.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.31 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_00-19-56_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0044_astrometric_residuals.png (969 matched stars from wcs_fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_00-19-56_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0044.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.37 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_00-20-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0045_astrometric_residuals.png (969 matched stars from wcs_fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_00-20-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0045.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.37 arcsec)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_00-19-56_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0044.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_00-19-56_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0044.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-11_CI_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_002744_TTUQ2b1x1_2826318_QVhrGAXj/wcs_fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_00-19-56_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0044.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_00-20-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0045.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_00-20-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0045.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-11_CI_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_002744_TTUQ2b1x1_2826318_QVhrGAXj/wcs_fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_00-20-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0045.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field UMa-11-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
No candidates found here
Prepared the HTML report for the field UMa-11-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 4 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-18-11_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0318.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_02-36-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0330.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-11_CI_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_002744_TTUQ2b1x1_2826318_QVhrGAXj/fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_00-19-56_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0044.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-11_CI_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_002744_TTUQ2b1x1_2826318_QVhrGAXj/fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_00-20-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0045.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-18-11_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0318.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_02-36-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0330.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-18-11_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0318.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_02-36-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0330.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-11_CI_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_002744_TTUQ2b1x1_2826318_QVhrGAXj/fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_00-19-56_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0044.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-11_CI_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_002744_TTUQ2b1x1_2826318_QVhrGAXj/fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_00-20-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0045.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-18-11_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0318.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_02-36-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0330.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_00-19-56_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0044.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_00-20-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0045.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/exclusion_list.txt
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-18-11_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0318.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_02-36-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0330.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_00-19-56_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0044.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_00-20-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0045.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-18-11_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0318.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-18-11_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0318.fits
Image size: 937.7'x624.8' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.88"/pix along the X axis and 5.87"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 11:59:59.723 +46:00:17.32 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.88"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_00-19-56_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0044.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_00-19-56_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0044.fits
Image size: 937.0'x623.9' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 12:00:02.682 +45:59:26.65 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 11:59:59.723 +46:00:17.32
Second-epoch image center 12:00:02.682 +45:59:26.65
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0165 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_00-20-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0045.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_00-20-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0045.fits
Image size: 937.0'x623.9' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 12:00:04.941 +45:59:21.94 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 11:59:59.723 +46:00:17.32
Second-epoch image center 12:00:04.941 +45:59:21.94
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0216 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 12:00:02.682 +45:59:26.65
Second-epoch second image center 12:00:04.941 +45:59:21.94
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00667 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-18-11_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0318.fits &> /tmp/tmp.EZSHjfbXxh
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-18-11_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0318.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_02-36-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0330.fits &> /tmp/tmp.D3CFQfBC3k
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_02-36-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0330.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-11_CI_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_002744_TTUQ2b1x1_2826318_QVhrGAXj/fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_00-19-56_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0044.fits &> /tmp/tmp.xACtvfP3MH
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-11_CI_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_002744_TTUQ2b1x1_2826318_QVhrGAXj/fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_00-19-56_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0044.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-11_CI_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_002744_TTUQ2b1x1_2826318_QVhrGAXj/fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_00-20-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0045.fits &> /tmp/tmp.NnXFPPuisw
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-11_CI_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_002744_TTUQ2b1x1_2826318_QVhrGAXj/fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_00-20-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0045.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-18-11_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0318.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-18-11_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0318.fits and wcs_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-18-11_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0318.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-18-11_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0318.fits and wcs_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-18-11_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0318.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-18-11_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0318.fits and wcs_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-18-11_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0318.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-18-11_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0318.fits) and catalog (wcs_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-18-11_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0318.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-18-11_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0318.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 30081 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 168.4661 to 192.8545 deg, Dec +39.5499 to +51.6047 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 168.4661 to 192.8545 deg, Dec 39.5499 to 51.6047 deg
Loaded 4090 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 2669 out of 2891 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 2891 out of 30081 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.884800
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.884800
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.21
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.67
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.67
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 30081 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 168.4661 to 192.8545 deg, Dec +39.5499 to +51.6047 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 168.4661 to 192.8545 deg, Dec 39.5499 to 51.6047 deg
Loaded 4090 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 2669 out of 2891 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 2891 out of 30081 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-18-11_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0318.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-18-11_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0318.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-18-11_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0318.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-18-11_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0318.fits (aperture=5.3)
Read 29523 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 167.6881 to 192.2892 deg, Dec +40.2976 to +51.3053 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 167.6881 to 192.2892 deg, Dec 40.2976 to 51.3053 deg
Loaded 3734 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 2675 out of 2915 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 2915 out of 29523 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_02-36-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0330.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_02-36-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0330.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_02-36-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0330.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_02-36-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0330.fits (aperture=5.3)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 32 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 8000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.3 pix UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-18-11_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0318.fits
2.3 pix UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_02-36-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0330.fits
2.2 pix fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_00-19-56_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0044.fits
2.2 pix fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_00-20-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0045.fits
2.3 pix wcs_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-18-11_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0318.fits
2.3 pix wcs_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_02-36-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0330.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.7 mag. UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-18-11_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0318.fits
15.6 mag. UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_02-36-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0330.fits
15.3 mag. fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_00-19-56_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0044.fits
15.3 mag. fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_00-20-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0045.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 15.3 (SNR ) 14.7 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.EZSHjfbXxh (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-11_CI_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_002744_TTUQ2b1x1_2826318_QVhrGAXj/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-18-11_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0318.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-18-11_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0318.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-18-11_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0318.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-18-11_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0318.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-18-11_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0318.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-18-11_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0318.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-18-11_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0318.fits' -> 'wcs_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-18-11_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0318.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-18-11_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0318.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-18-11_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0318.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-18-11_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0318.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-18-11_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0318.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-18-11_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0318.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-18-11_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0318.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-18-11_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0318.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-18-11_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0318.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-18-11_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0318.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-18-11_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0318.fits.wcscat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=20, blended=1274, passed=30061
Got 30061 stars (including 28752 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-18-11_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0318.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 30061 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.7'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.7 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013024 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010419 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 647 to 710 (Dec 39.5 to 51.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 971 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 971 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 963 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 971 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 29746 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 647 to 710 (Dec 39.5 to 51.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 971 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 971 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 29746 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 971 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 29746 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
Excluding outliers - 971 stars left (next iteration limit 1068)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-18-11_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0318.fits N_match=971 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.390 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.304 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.537 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.358 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.394 n_q1=258 n_q2=248 n_q3=240 n_q4=225 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.376
The image catalog is written to wcs_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-18-11_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0318.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-18-11_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0318.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-18-11_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0318.fits -region wcs_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-18-11_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0318.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-18-11_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0318.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.D3CFQfBC3k (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-11_CI_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_002744_TTUQ2b1x1_2826318_QVhrGAXj/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_02-36-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0330.fits 570.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_02-36-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0330.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_02-36-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0330.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_02-36-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0330.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_02-36-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0330.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_02-36-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0330.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_02-36-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0330.fits' -> 'wcs_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_02-36-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0330.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_02-36-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0330.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_02-36-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0330.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_02-36-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0330.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_02-36-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0330.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_02-36-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0330.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_02-36-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0330.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_02-36-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0330.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_02-36-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0330.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_02-36-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0330.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_02-36-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0330.fits.wcscat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=13, blended=1282, passed=29510
Got 29510 stars (including 28198 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_02-36-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0330.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 29510 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013018 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010414 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 651 to 708 (Dec 40.3 to 51.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 974 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 974 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 964 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 974 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 29281 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 651 to 708 (Dec 40.3 to 51.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 974 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 974 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 29280 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 974 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 29280 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Excluding outliers - 974 stars left (next iteration limit 1071)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_02-36-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0330.fits N_match=974 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.348 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.293 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.421 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.345 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.361 n_q1=229 n_q2=284 n_q3=208 n_q4=253 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.211
The image catalog is written to wcs_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_02-36-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0330.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_02-36-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0330.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_02-36-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0330.fits -region wcs_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_02-36-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0330.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_02-36-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0330.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.xACtvfP3MH (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-11_CI_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_002744_TTUQ2b1x1_2826318_QVhrGAXj/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-11_CI_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_002744_TTUQ2b1x1_2826318_QVhrGAXj/fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_00-19-56_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0044.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-11_CI_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_002744_TTUQ2b1x1_2826318_QVhrGAXj/fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_00-19-56_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0044.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-11_CI_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_002744_TTUQ2b1x1_2826318_QVhrGAXj/fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_00-19-56_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0044.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-11_CI_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_002744_TTUQ2b1x1_2826318_QVhrGAXj/fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_00-19-56_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0044.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-11_CI_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_002744_TTUQ2b1x1_2826318_QVhrGAXj/fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_00-19-56_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0044.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-11_CI_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_002744_TTUQ2b1x1_2826318_QVhrGAXj/fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_00-19-56_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0044.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_00-19-56_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0044.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_00-19-56_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0044.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_00-19-56_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0044.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_00-19-56_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0044.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_00-19-56_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0044.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_00-19-56_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0044.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_00-19-56_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0044.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-11_CI_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_002744_TTUQ2b1x1_2826318_QVhrGAXj/fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_00-19-56_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0044.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_00-19-56_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0044.fits.wcscat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=5, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=13, blended=1138, passed=24763
Got 24763 stars (including 23598 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_00-19-56_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0044.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 24763 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.0'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.0 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013014 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010411 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 651 to 708 (Dec 40.3 to 51.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 970 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 970 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 963 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 970 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 24592 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 651 to 708 (Dec 40.3 to 51.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 970 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 970 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 24592 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 970 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 24592 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Excluding outliers - 970 stars left (next iteration limit 1067)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_00-19-56_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0044.fits N_match=970 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.418 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.361 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.521 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.347 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.488 n_q1=222 n_q2=254 n_q3=230 n_q4=264 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.246
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_00-19-56_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0044.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_00-19-56_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0044.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-11_CI_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_002744_TTUQ2b1x1_2826318_QVhrGAXj/fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_00-19-56_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0044.fits -region wcs_fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_00-19-56_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0044.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_00-19-56_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0044.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.NnXFPPuisw (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-11_CI_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_002744_TTUQ2b1x1_2826318_QVhrGAXj/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-11_CI_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_002744_TTUQ2b1x1_2826318_QVhrGAXj/fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_00-20-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0045.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-11_CI_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_002744_TTUQ2b1x1_2826318_QVhrGAXj/fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_00-20-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0045.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-11_CI_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_002744_TTUQ2b1x1_2826318_QVhrGAXj/fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_00-20-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0045.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-11_CI_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_002744_TTUQ2b1x1_2826318_QVhrGAXj/fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_00-20-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0045.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-11_CI_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_002744_TTUQ2b1x1_2826318_QVhrGAXj/fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_00-20-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0045.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-11_CI_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_002744_TTUQ2b1x1_2826318_QVhrGAXj/fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_00-20-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0045.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_00-20-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0045.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_00-20-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0045.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_00-20-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0045.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_00-20-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0045.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_00-20-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0045.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_00-20-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0045.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_00-20-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0045.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-11_CI_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_002744_TTUQ2b1x1_2826318_QVhrGAXj/fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_00-20-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0045.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_00-20-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0045.fits.wcscat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=11, blended=1170, passed=24798
Got 24798 stars (including 23598 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_00-20-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0045.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 24798 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.0'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.0 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013014 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010411 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 651 to 708 (Dec 40.3 to 51.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 971 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 971 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 961 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 971 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 24574 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 651 to 708 (Dec 40.3 to 51.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 971 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 971 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 24573 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 971 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 24573 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
Excluding outliers - 971 stars left (next iteration limit 1068)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_00-20-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0045.fits N_match=971 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.411 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.340 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.518 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.362 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.476 n_q1=221 n_q2=257 n_q3=225 n_q4=268 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.262
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_00-20-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0045.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_00-20-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0045.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-11_CI_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_002744_TTUQ2b1x1_2826318_QVhrGAXj/fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_00-20-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0045.fits -region wcs_fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_00-20-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0045.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_00-20-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0045.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_00-19-56_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0044.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-11_CI_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_002744_TTUQ2b1x1_2826318_QVhrGAXj/wcs_fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_00-19-56_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0044.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_00-20-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0045.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-11_CI_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_002744_TTUQ2b1x1_2826318_QVhrGAXj/wcs_fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_00-20-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0045.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field UMa-11-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-18-11_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0318.fits at 12:09:58.47 +46:27:27.0: 13.51 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-18-11_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0318.fits at 11:58:51.46 +44:50:20.7: 14.77 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-18-11_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0318.fits at 12:22:51.76 +46:04:00.5: 13.78 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-18-11_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0318.fits at 12:15:37.70 +45:32:43.4: 13.89 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-18-11_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0318.fits at 12:10:17.90 +48:31:33.1: 12.79 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-18-11_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0318.fits at 11:55:55.57 +42:12:52.7: 13.79 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-18-11_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0318.fits at 12:00:44.00 +48:36:14.5: 13.41 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-18-11_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0318.fits at 12:03:48.41 +42:38:09.9: 13.47 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_02-36-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0330.fits at 12:09:58.47 +46:27:27.0: 13.51 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_02-36-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0330.fits at 12:15:37.70 +45:32:43.4: 13.96 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.51 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 12:09:58.47 +46:27:27.0: ref_mag=13.51 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.5060 delta=0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.92 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 12:15:37.70 +45:32:43.4: ref_mag=13.92 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=14.3568 delta=-0.43 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_02-36-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0330.fits at 12:22:51.76 +46:04:00.5: 13.95 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_02-36-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0330.fits at 12:10:17.90 +48:31:33.1: 12.80 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_02-36-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0330.fits at 11:58:51.46 +44:50:20.7: 14.86 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_02-36-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0330.fits at 11:55:55.57 +42:12:52.7: 13.85 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.85 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.80 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 12:22:51.76 +46:04:00.5: ref_mag=13.85 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=14.2538 delta=-0.40 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 12:10:17.90 +48:31:33.1: ref_mag=12.80 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.9143 delta=-0.12 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.81 +/- 0.07
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.82 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 11:55:55.57 +42:12:52.7: ref_mag=13.82 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.9822 delta=-0.16 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 11:58:51.46 +44:50:20.7: ref_mag=14.81 +/- 0.07 new_mean_mag=14.9266 delta=-0.12 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_02-36-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0330.fits at 12:03:48.41 +42:38:09.9: 13.27 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_02-36-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0330.fits at 12:00:44.00 +48:36:14.5: 13.40 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.36 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 12:03:48.41 +42:38:09.9: ref_mag=13.36 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.4885 delta=-0.13 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.40 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 12:00:44.00 +48:36:14.5: ref_mag=13.40 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.6832 delta=-0.28 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-18-11_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0318.fits at 12:22:26.41 +42:54:46.0: 15.08 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_02-36-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0330.fits at 12:22:26.41 +42:54:46.0: 15.22 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.14 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 12:22:26.41 +42:54:46.0: ref_mag=15.14 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.8213 delta=0.31 (need > 0.90)
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 2s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 1s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56927_fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_00-20-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0045
The candidate 56927_fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_00-20-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0045 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 1 | 2026 06 11.22230 | 2461202.72230 | 14.91 | 11:58:51.41 +44:50:22.3 | 4919 3890 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-11_CI_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_002744_TTUQ2b1x1_2826318_QVhrGAXj/fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_00-19-56_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0044.fits |
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 06 11.22277 | 2461202.72277 | 14.95 | 11:58:51.51 +44:50:19.1 | 4923 3890 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-11_CI_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_002744_TTUQ2b1x1_2826318_QVhrGAXj/fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_00-20-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0045.fits |
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56931_fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_00-20-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0045
The candidate 56931_fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_00-20-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0045 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 1 | 2026 06 11.22230 | 2461202.72230 | 14.33 | 12:15:37.69 +45:32:43.3 | 3140 3431 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-11_CI_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_002744_TTUQ2b1x1_2826318_QVhrGAXj/fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_00-19-56_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0044.fits |
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 06 11.22277 | 2461202.72277 | 14.39 | 12:15:37.72 +45:32:43.5 | 3144 3430 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-11_CI_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_002744_TTUQ2b1x1_2826318_QVhrGAXj/fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_00-20-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0045.fits |
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56932_fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_00-20-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0045
The candidate 56932_fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_00-20-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0045 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 1 | 2026 06 11.22230 | 2461202.72230 | 14.25 | 12:22:51.76 +46:04:00.4 | 2394 3073 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-11_CI_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_002744_TTUQ2b1x1_2826318_QVhrGAXj/fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_00-19-56_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0044.fits |
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 06 11.22277 | 2461202.72277 | 14.25 | 12:22:51.77 +46:04:00.7 | 2398 3073 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-11_CI_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_002744_TTUQ2b1x1_2826318_QVhrGAXj/fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_00-20-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0045.fits |
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56933_fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_00-20-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0045
The candidate 56933_fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_00-20-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0045 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 1 | 2026 06 11.22230 | 2461202.72230 | 14.00 | 11:55:55.60 +42:12:52.6 | 5260 5477 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-11_CI_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_002744_TTUQ2b1x1_2826318_QVhrGAXj/fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_00-19-56_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0044.fits |
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 06 11.22277 | 2461202.72277 | 13.97 | 11:55:55.54 +42:12:52.7 | 5264 5476 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-11_CI_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_002744_TTUQ2b1x1_2826318_QVhrGAXj/fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_00-20-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0045.fits |
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56945_fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_00-20-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0045
The candidate 56945_fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_00-20-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0045 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 06 11.22277 | 2461202.72277 | 10.68 | 11:36:46.58 +48:33:00.8 | 7119 1546 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-11_CI_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_002744_TTUQ2b1x1_2826318_QVhrGAXj/fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_00-20-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0045.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56947_fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_00-20-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0045
The candidate 56947_fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_00-20-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0045 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 06 11.22277 | 2461202.72277 | 10.84 | 12:07:35.38 +47:37:05.8 | 4020 2204 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-11_CI_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_002744_TTUQ2b1x1_2826318_QVhrGAXj/fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_00-20-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0045.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56963_fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_00-20-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0045
The candidate 56963_fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_00-20-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0045 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 1 | 2026 06 11.22230 | 2461202.72230 | 12.91 | 12:10:17.89 +48:31:33.2 | 3755 1648 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-11_CI_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_002744_TTUQ2b1x1_2826318_QVhrGAXj/fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_00-19-56_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0044.fits |
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 06 11.22277 | 2461202.72277 | 12.92 | 12:10:17.91 +48:31:33.0 | 3759 1647 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-11_CI_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_002744_TTUQ2b1x1_2826318_QVhrGAXj/fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_00-20-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0045.fits |
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56964_fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_00-20-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0045
The candidate 56964_fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_00-20-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0045 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 06 11.22277 | 2461202.72277 | 12.95 | 11:43:19.12 +47:47:22.1 | 6488 2053 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-11_CI_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_002744_TTUQ2b1x1_2826318_QVhrGAXj/fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_00-20-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0045.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56986_fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_00-20-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0045
The candidate 56986_fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_00-20-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0045 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 06 11.22277 | 2461202.72277 | 13.32 | 12:15:51.24 +47:05:41.3 | 3163 2492 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-11_CI_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_002744_TTUQ2b1x1_2826318_QVhrGAXj/fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_00-20-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0045.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56997_fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_00-20-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0045
The candidate 56997_fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_00-20-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0045 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 1 | 2026 06 11.22230 | 2461202.72230 | 13.50 | 12:09:58.38 +46:27:26.4 | 3754 2901 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-11_CI_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_002744_TTUQ2b1x1_2826318_QVhrGAXj/fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_00-19-56_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0044.fits |
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 06 11.22277 | 2461202.72277 | 13.52 | 12:09:58.57 +46:27:27.6 | 3758 2900 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-11_CI_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_002744_TTUQ2b1x1_2826318_QVhrGAXj/fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_00-20-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0045.fits |
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 57002_fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_00-20-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0045
The candidate 57002_fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_00-20-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0045 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 1 | 2026 06 11.22230 | 2461202.72230 | 13.46 | 12:03:48.47 +42:38:09.9 | 4378 5225 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-11_CI_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_002744_TTUQ2b1x1_2826318_QVhrGAXj/fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_00-19-56_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0044.fits |
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 06 11.22277 | 2461202.72277 | 13.52 | 12:03:48.36 +42:38:09.8 | 4383 5224 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-11_CI_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_002744_TTUQ2b1x1_2826318_QVhrGAXj/fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_00-20-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0045.fits |
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 57011_fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_00-20-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0045
The candidate 57011_fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_00-20-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0045 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 1 | 2026 06 11.22230 | 2461202.72230 | 13.67 | 12:00:44.01 +48:36:14.7 | 4714 1614 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-11_CI_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_002744_TTUQ2b1x1_2826318_QVhrGAXj/fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_00-19-56_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0044.fits |
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 06 11.22277 | 2461202.72277 | 13.69 | 12:00:43.98 +48:36:14.2 | 4717 1613 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-11_CI_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_002744_TTUQ2b1x1_2826318_QVhrGAXj/fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_00-20-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0045.fits |
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 57023_fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_00-20-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0045
The candidate 57023_fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_00-20-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0045 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 06 11.22277 | 2461202.72277 | 13.80 | 12:07:00.81 +42:38:43.5 | 4025 5214 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-11_CI_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_002744_TTUQ2b1x1_2826318_QVhrGAXj/fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_00-20-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0045.fits |
**** FOUND 12:07:00.83 +42:38:43.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 57024_fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_00-20-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0045
The candidate 57024_fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_00-20-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0045 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 06 11.22277 | 2461202.72277 | 13.88 | 12:22:42.09 +44:50:20.7 | 2365 3817 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-11_CI_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_002744_TTUQ2b1x1_2826318_QVhrGAXj/fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_00-20-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0045.fits |
**** FOUND 12:22:42.01 +44:50:21.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 57033_fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_00-20-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0045
The candidate 57033_fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_00-20-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0045 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 06 11.22277 | 2461202.72277 | 14.43 | 12:05:56.87 +48:44:57.1 | 4197 1522 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-11_CI_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_002744_TTUQ2b1x1_2826318_QVhrGAXj/fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_00-20-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0045.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 57036_fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_00-20-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0045
The candidate 57036_fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_00-20-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0045 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 06 11.22277 | 2461202.72277 | 13.93 | 12:12:59.74 +47:07:27.2 | 3458 2487 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-11_CI_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_002744_TTUQ2b1x1_2826318_QVhrGAXj/fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_00-20-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0045.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 57037_fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_00-20-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0045
The candidate 57037_fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_00-20-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0045 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 06 11.22277 | 2461202.72277 | 13.94 | 11:37:20.14 +46:07:37.0 | 7173 3017 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-11_CI_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_002744_TTUQ2b1x1_2826318_QVhrGAXj/fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_00-20-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0045.fits |
**** FOUND 11:37:20.11 +46:07:35.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 57042_fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_00-20-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0045
The candidate 57042_fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_00-20-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0045 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 06 11.22277 | 2461202.72277 | 13.94 | 11:37:36.58 +49:11:03.8 | 7007 1168 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-11_CI_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_002744_TTUQ2b1x1_2826318_QVhrGAXj/fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_00-20-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0045.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 57054_fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_00-20-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0045
The candidate 57054_fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_00-20-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0045 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 06 11.22277 | 2461202.72277 | 14.20 | 12:14:04.14 +46:23:46.3 | 3330 2923 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-11_CI_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_002744_TTUQ2b1x1_2826318_QVhrGAXj/fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_00-20-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0045.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 57057_fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_00-20-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0045
The candidate 57057_fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_00-20-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0045 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 06 11.22277 | 2461202.72277 | 14.33 | 12:00:38.89 +43:36:34.2 | 4733 4635 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-11_CI_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_002744_TTUQ2b1x1_2826318_QVhrGAXj/fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_00-20-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0045.fits |
**** FOUND 12:00:38.82 +43:36:35.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 57083_fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_00-20-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0045
The candidate 57083_fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_00-20-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0045 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 06 11.22277 | 2461202.72277 | 14.49 | 11:48:23.23 +49:24:45.7 | 5933 1095 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-11_CI_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_002744_TTUQ2b1x1_2826318_QVhrGAXj/fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_00-20-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0045.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 57088_fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_00-20-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0045
The candidate 57088_fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_00-20-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0045 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 06 11.22277 | 2461202.72277 | 14.30 | 11:41:58.77 +49:46:32.4 | 6552 0840 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-11_CI_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_002744_TTUQ2b1x1_2826318_QVhrGAXj/fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_00-20-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0045.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 57093_fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_00-20-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0045
The candidate 57093_fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_00-20-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0045 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 06 11.22277 | 2461202.72277 | 14.39 | 11:56:14.20 +42:00:43.9 | 5232 5600 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-11_CI_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_002744_TTUQ2b1x1_2826318_QVhrGAXj/fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_00-20-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0045.fits |
**** FOUND 11:56:14.24 +42:00:44.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 57108_fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_00-20-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0045
The candidate 57108_fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_00-20-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0045 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 06 11.22277 | 2461202.72277 | 14.38 | 12:21:46.63 +46:24:21.1 | 2525 2875 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-11_CI_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_002744_TTUQ2b1x1_2826318_QVhrGAXj/fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_00-20-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0045.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 57121_fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_00-20-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0045
The candidate 57121_fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_00-20-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0045 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 06 11.22277 | 2461202.72277 | 15.03 | 12:16:48.43 +50:02:47.7 | 3150 0697 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-11_CI_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_002744_TTUQ2b1x1_2826318_QVhrGAXj/fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_00-20-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0045.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 57125_fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_00-20-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0045
The candidate 57125_fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_00-20-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0045 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 06 11.22277 | 2461202.72277 | 14.42 | 12:24:21.11 +47:47:45.9 | 2316 2015 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-11_CI_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_002744_TTUQ2b1x1_2826318_QVhrGAXj/fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_00-20-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0045.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 57126_fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_00-20-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0045
The candidate 57126_fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_00-20-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0045 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 06 11.22277 | 2461202.72277 | 14.71 | 12:06:32.92 +42:22:21.4 | 4074 5381 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-11_CI_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_002744_TTUQ2b1x1_2826318_QVhrGAXj/fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_00-20-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0045.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 57130_fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_00-20-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0045
The candidate 57130_fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_00-20-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0045 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 06 11.22277 | 2461202.72277 | 14.46 | 11:40:48.16 +46:07:23.1 | 6809 3045 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-11_CI_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_002744_TTUQ2b1x1_2826318_QVhrGAXj/fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_00-20-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0045.fits |
**** FOUND 11:40:48.14 +46:07:21.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 57156_fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_00-20-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0045
The candidate 57156_fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_00-20-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0045 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 06 11.22277 | 2461202.72277 | 15.03 | 12:14:52.38 +49:42:19.7 | 3330 0914 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-11_CI_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_002744_TTUQ2b1x1_2826318_QVhrGAXj/fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_00-20-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0045.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 57190_fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_00-20-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0045
The candidate 57190_fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_00-20-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0045 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 1 | 2026 06 11.22230 | 2461202.72230 | 14.77 | 12:22:26.40 +42:54:46.5 | 2310 4986 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-11_CI_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_002744_TTUQ2b1x1_2826318_QVhrGAXj/fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_00-19-56_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0044.fits |
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 06 11.22277 | 2461202.72277 | 14.93 | 12:22:26.42 +42:54:45.5 | 2315 4986 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-11_CI_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_002744_TTUQ2b1x1_2826318_QVhrGAXj/fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_00-20-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0045.fits |
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 57228_fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_00-20-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0045
The candidate 57228_fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_00-20-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0045 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 06 11.22277 | 2461202.72277 | 14.73 | 12:15:56.51 +48:43:28.3 | 3198 1505 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-11_CI_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_002744_TTUQ2b1x1_2826318_QVhrGAXj/fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_00-20-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0045.fits |
**** FOUND 12:15:56.60 +48:43:28.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 57355_fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_00-20-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0045
The candidate 57355_fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_00-20-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0045 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 06 11.22277 | 2461202.72277 | 14.88 | 12:16:50.66 +49:49:34.4 | 3140 0831 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-11_CI_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_002744_TTUQ2b1x1_2826318_QVhrGAXj/fd_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_00-20-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0045.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.6") between the two second-epoch detections
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 3s
Prepared the HTML report for the field UMa-11-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
########### Completed UMa-11-Q2b1x1 ###########
The analysis was running at tau
We are allowed to update the exclusion list at tau host
Found ../exclusion_list_TTUQ2.txt
#### The exclusion list before filtering-out asteroids, bad pixels and adding Gaia sources ####
###################################################################################
renamed 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt_noasteroids' -> 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt'
renamed 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt_nohotpixels' -> 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt'
# Count candidates with no identification (that also don't look like hot pix)
Found 0 unidentified candidates (excluding asteroids, hot pixels and known variable stars).
###################################################################################
0 candidates found (excluding asteroids and hot pixels)
This does not look like a test run
###################################################################################
exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt NOT FOUND
exclusion_list_apass.txt NOT FOUND
IS_THIS_TEST_RUN=NO ALLOW_EXCLUSION_LIST_UPDATE= YES
#### Nothing to add to the exclusion list ####
The observatory MPC code is V36
############################################################
Positions of planets computed with util/planet_finder/main.py for JD(UT)2461202.72229578 -observatory V36
07:00:48.31 +24:21:46.1 Mercury (0.3mag)
07:58:00.46 +22:44:32.0 Venus (-4.0mag)
02:58:25.54 +16:23:06.8 Mars (1.3mag)
07:50:58.59 +21:25:00.1 Jupiter (-1.9mag)
00:50:12.96 +02:53:14.3 Saturn (0.8mag)
04:00:55.46 +20:27:31.2 Uranus (5.8mag)
00:16:18.69 +00:17:44.1 Neptune (7.8mag)
20:33:10.94 -23:05:42.0 Pluto (14.5mag)
01:29:51.94 +12:53:00.2 Moon (-9.5mag)
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 361 Jun 11 00:40 planets.txt
############################################################
Positions of selected moons from JPL HORIZONS for JD(UT)2461202.72229578:
07:50:53.25 +21:25:16.2 Io (6.0mag)
07:50:50.77 +21:25:25.7 Europa (6.2mag)
07:51:13.94 +21:24:16.3 Ganymede (5.6mag)
07:50:44.90 +21:25:35.8 Callisto (6.7mag)
07:51:05.02 +21:01:33.3 Himalia (15.6mag)
07:50:56.29 +21:25:08.3 Thebe (16.5mag)
07:50:59.41 +21:15:40.6 Elara (17.5mag)
07:53:18.55 +21:35:02.7 Pasiphae (17.7mag)
07:57:25.60 +21:26:56.6 Carme (18.9mag)
00:50:15.05 +02:52:50.7 Titan (8.6mag)
00:50:18.12 +02:53:16.4 Rhea (9.9mag)
00:50:42.88 +02:55:38.7 Iapetus (11.3mag)
00:50:20.17 +02:52:44.1 Hyperion (14.6mag)
00:50:51.49 +02:54:44.5 Phoebe (16.7mag)
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 568 Jun 11 00:40 moons.txt
############################################################
Positions of selected spacecraft from JPL HORIZONS for JD(UT)2461202.72229578:
17:27:28.65 -35:29:05.9 JWST
16:28:50.70 +49:40:25.9 Chandra
08:37:00.76 -47:59:48.7 XMM-Newton
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 96 Jun 11 00:40 spacecraft.txt
############################################################
Positions of bright comets computed with util/comet_finder/main.py for JD(UT)2461202.72229578 -observatory V36
18:41:22.45 -32:52:16.3 13.6mag P/2010 H2 (Vales)
05:56:27.61 -68:02:08.4 17.4mag C/2014 UN271 (Bernardinelli-Bernstein)
05:50:10.60 +32:00:28.6 17.5mag C/2017 K2 (PANSTARRS)
17:13:31.13 +15:29:44.9 17.8mag C/2021 G2 (ATLAS)
21:40:59.63 -47:36:45.2 16.6mag P/2021 N1 (ZTF)
23:11:55.04 +31:42:15.9 17.2mag C/2022 E2 (ATLAS)
05:37:45.08 +26:59:28.4 16.5mag C/2022 N2 (PANSTARRS)
09:31:55.81 +30:58:30.6 16.7mag C/2022 QE78 (ATLAS)
08:52:11.26 +04:04:22.9 17.7mag C/2022 R6 (PANSTARRS)
18:26:14.28 +21:39:09.5 17.8mag C/2023 A3 (Tsuchinshan-ATLAS)
15:18:18.67 -11:00:56.4 17.6mag P/2023 B1 (PANSTARRS)
22:13:18.91 +66:42:34.0 17.8mag C/2023 H5 (Lemmon)
17:38:52.70 -06:59:20.0 13.7mag C/2023 R1 (PANSTARRS)
13:16:56.87 +82:17:55.6 18.0mag C/2023 X2 (Lemmon)
07:14:39.99 +64:24:48.2 17.7mag C/2024 A1 (ATLAS)
06:51:50.57 +28:05:54.8 13.7mag C/2024 E1 (Wierzchos)
15:34:56.44 +13:46:58.3 17.4mag C/2024 G6 (ATLAS)
20:10:57.18 +32:01:50.7 14.0mag C/2024 J3 (ATLAS)
04:21:03.74 -15:41:26.3 16.0mag C/2024 T5 (ATLAS)
06:08:43.88 +33:58:00.8 17.9mag C/2025 J1 (Borisov)
11:33:38.39 +52:34:19.5 17.5mag C/2025 L1 (ATLAS)
06:48:31.47 -11:00:33.0 14.4mag C/2025 R3 (PANSTARRS)
09:26:41.26 +23:17:46.4 17.9mag C/2025 V2 (Rankin)
12:39:40.45 +04:40:31.5 17.2mag C/2025 Y1 (ATLAS)
18:07:47.44 +75:46:05.8 17.8mag C/2026 A2 (Bok)
02:05:51.38 +43:37:37.3 16.1mag C/2026 B2 (Sun-Gao)
11:12:00.30 -02:41:41.1 16.5mag A/2026 E1
20:29:08.39 -08:48:46.2 8.6mag 10P/Tempel
11:02:44.94 -01:00:53.9 16.0mag 29P/Schwassmann-Wachmann
03:16:24.20 +26:02:52.5 17.7mag 47P/Ashbrook-Jackson
09:06:26.35 +22:53:57.0 16.9mag 63P/Wild
00:29:29.15 -06:10:42.7 15.7mag 65P/Gunn
06:53:16.18 +33:42:49.4 17.0mag 76P/West-Kohoutek-Ikemura
03:16:30.62 +17:35:40.8 13.8mag 78P/Gehrels
01:27:16.49 +05:29:53.8 15.6mag 88P/Howell
05:04:23.47 +30:30:43.6 15.3mag 93P/Lovas
02:51:34.74 +28:06:01.8 17.5mag 114P/Wiseman-Skiff
06:57:47.25 +32:55:08.6 15.6mag 123P/West-Hartley
09:55:27.75 +13:20:34.4 16.5mag 124P/Mrkos
04:04:02.06 +19:26:53.8 16.3mag 128P/Shoemaker-Holt
04:39:34.97 +19:12:59.1 17.7mag 131P/Mueller
06:11:07.89 +18:17:42.4 15.0mag 141P/Machholz
06:13:56.17 +17:48:23.9 15.0mag 141P-A/Machholz
05:09:12.89 +16:33:21.8 11.9mag 141P-D/Machholz
02:59:47.79 -24:17:10.5 16.7mag 161P/Hartley-IRAS
03:51:33.27 +25:00:13.7 14.9mag 162P/SidingSpring
19:36:14.25 +02:38:33.7 16.7mag 169P/NEAT
00:26:28.42 +03:03:06.2 17.8mag 220P/McNaught
16:49:54.23 -08:20:25.5 16.4mag 235P/LINEAR
07:41:29.61 +35:21:28.9 17.6mag 240P/NEAT
00:40:18.87 -01:10:23.4 16.3mag 260P/McNaught
04:12:30.19 +33:01:15.1 17.5mag 295P/LINEAR
00:10:39.61 -05:58:42.3 17.7mag 320P/McNaught
15:13:54.93 +07:59:14.6 17.4mag 391P/Kowalski
08:09:33.97 +20:40:02.1 17.9mag 450P/LONEOS
07:04:54.69 +41:28:47.1 17.8mag 493P/LONEOS
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 2.7K Jun 11 00:40 comets.txt
############################################################
List of recent ASAS-SN transients from https://www.astronomy.ohio-state.edu/asassn/transients.html :
20:07:38.15 -21:07:05.40 SN2026mho 2026-05-25.18 -1.12
11:29:42.55 +79:01:03.10 AT2026min 2026-05-24.21 16.63
11:44:32.95 -68:48:30.00 ASASSN-26no 2026-05-24 8.41
19:00:42.82 -48:31:01.60 ASASSN-26dp 2026-05-22.31 -3.28
14:23:56.59 -58:37:47.40 ASASSN-26dn 2026-05-20.01 14.59
11:24:54.06 +47:57:01.60 AT2026nma 2026-05-20.29 15.46
21:27:08.58 +33:24:38.10 AT2026lli 2026-05-19.34 15.86
00:31:01.41 -13:38:51.70 AT2026nad 2026-05-19.39 15.34
15:16:06.61 -79:16:32.40 ASASSN-26dm 2026-05-19.03 14.44
11:24:25.21 -59:23:19.10 ASASSN-26dl 2026-05-18.02 13.55
13:45:51.52 -53:16:01.00 ASASSN-26dk 2026-05-18.16 12.96
02:05:49.69 -30:29:09.60 ASASSN-26dh 2026-05-18.43 15.37
17:50:22.87 -39:42:33.90 ASASSN-26dj 2026-05-17.05 15.7
01:13:11.60 -33:25:16.10 ASASSN-26dg 2026-05-13.41 16.8
16:44:31.77 -27:15:18.40 AT2026mhn 2026-05-12.33 15.8
09:46:31.08 -33:41:51.00 ASASSN-26di 2026-05-12.14 14.63
21:23:11.57 -19:09:45.00 AT2026kwu 2026-05-12.26 16.9
14:20:14.30 -30:20:51.90 AT2026ktm 2026-05-12.06 17.21
14:41:39.01 -37:13:46.40 AT2026lkm 2026-05-11.18 16.89
12:59:50.45 -10:58:38.80 SN2026kep 2026-05-9.06 17.5
13:37:29.61 -29:50:30.90 AT2026lkd 2026-05-9.09 17.23
09:46:42.01 -14:52:03.60 SN2026kmo 2026-05-8.99 17.51
15:03:05.28 +22:02:03.40 AT2026lxf 2026-05-8.07 13.88
10:23:49.41 -20:57:25.30 ASASSN-26df 2026-05-8.21 16.52
22:14:40.56 +05:04:51.60 2026lda 2026-05-7.56 16.2
21:35:33.81 -14:05:16.30 ASASSN-26de 2026-05-6.29 14.51
16:21:48.82 -61:36:13.20 ASASSN-26dd 2026-05-5.21 15.15
14:26:40.22 -24:48:37.50 AT2026lig 2026-05-4.27 14.63
13:17:51.04 +30:25:13.50 SN2026kcp 2026-05-4.46 16.43
11:27:55.57 -13:38:56.90 SN2026kza 2026-05-1.08 15.59
22:28:27.10 +30:17:54.30 SN 2026fov 2026-04-29.6 14.36
21:00:10.71 -32:17:03.90 AT2026kis 2026-04-27.36 16.15
14:32:57.37 -58:13:26.40 ASASSN-26dc 2026-04-27.27 13.42
15:32:05.35 -43:54:34.60 ASASSN-26db 2026-04-27.37 16.06
16:34:34.97 -54:34:58.00 ASASSN-26da 2026-04-25.32 16.11
10:06:55.04 -01:13:49.70 SN2026jsg 2026-04-24.99 16.28
15:15:57.17 +56:18:32.80 SN2026kid 2026-04-24.52 -3.65
07:58:28.45 +57:03:42.40 AT2026kcf 2026-04-24.2 16.89
11:38:21.80 -50:43:06.50 SN2026jkb 2026-04-24.24 15.38
10:06:11.41 -39:41:04.20 AT2026dil 2026-04-24.2 16.85
14:21:40.08 +13:13:46.30 SN2026jlm 2026-04-22.16 15.12
10:53:55.52 -16:06:06.00 ASASSN-26cz 2026-04-22.28 16.29
20:07:38.15 -21:07:05.40 2026-05-25.18 -1.12
13:45:02.03 +15:17:14.50 ASASSN-26cy 2026-04-21.27 15.78
13:20:52.22 -35:57:03.60 AT2026jcm 2026-04-19.01 16.65
13:36:15.66 -36:53:48.40 SN 2026iqy 2026-04-18.92 17.31
06:34:01.33 -40:07:34.00 ASASSN-26cx 2026-04-19.07 16.16
23:33:57.97 -45:12:11.90 SN 2026idu 2026-04-19.41 15.9
12:10:50.92 +66:55:31.20 SN 2026icv 2026-04-17.14 16.03
21:36:59.06 -60:43:35.90 ASASSN-26cv 2026-04-17.35 -1.18
08:13:26.26 -27:07:30.50 ASASSN-26cw 2026-04-17.07 -1.01
14:49:14.13 -27:29:20.60 ASASSN-26cu 2026-04-16.06 14.03
17:21:59.44 -38:54:04.60 ASASSN-26ct 2026-04-14.4 15.15
15:25:54.99 +07:49:24.50 SN2026huo 2026-04-12.14 16.96
20:07:38.15 -21:07:05.40 2026-05-25.18 -1.12
12:23:20.40 +04:53:39.10 AT2026ixd 2026-04-12.14 17.65
17:46:09.76 -61:19:50.40 SN2026icy 2026-04-12.2 17.03
09:25:46.42 +02:13:46.30 SN2026gud 2026-04-11.98 16.49
16:52:15.46 -60:27:45.90 ASASSN-26cs 2026-04-12.4 15.5
04:20:55.37 -51:15:31.10 ASASSN-26cr 2026-04-12.01 15.37
22:25:39.35 +36:45:06.90 AT2026ihl 2026-04-10.48 14.21
19:40:44.94 +00:41:03.80 AT2026imw 2026-04-10.32 16.06
19:52:04.70 +05:53:33.50 ASASSN-26cq 2026-04-9.31 14.98
16:08:18.39 -64:11:08.80 ASASSN-26cp 2026-04-9.29 13.32
09:22:22.90 -61:02:43.70 SN2026idh 2026-04-7.97 16.34
05:06:54.12 -19:42:26.40 AT2026imr 2026-04-8 17.49
07:14:55.34 -36:03:21.40 AT2026hei 2026-04-8.12 16.7
21:35:33.14 -19:01:34.80 AT2026ihm 2026-04-8.36 16.7
04:28:24.08 -32:25:35.30 AT2026imo 2026-04-8.02 16.81
05:10:35.79 -39:38:40.80 SN 2026hnn 2026-04-7.04 17.07
09:54:32.04 -01:17:25.80 ASASSN-26cn 2026-04-7.01 15.58
07:46:24.43 -77:29:35.90 ASASSN-26co 2026-04-7.15 14.93
05:00:45.52 -29:51:06.20 AT2026hvw 2026-04-6.03 16.51
19:49:33.10 -23:37:11.00 ASASSN-26cl 2026-04-5.29 14.98
19:32:43.55 -22:39:33.40 ASASSN-26cm 2026-04-4.3 13.88
18:08:57.38 +76:48:23.60 ASASSN-26ck 2026-04-2.37 15.38
16:16:36.10 +44:52:30.20 AT2026hyy 2026-04-2.58 13.81
21:55:23.31 -34:48:53.90 ASASSN-26cj 2026-03-30.4 -1.47
11:19:50.70 -27:51:49.80 SN2026gvk 2026-03-30 15.48
11:53:57.02 -23:09:46.20 SN2026gzx 2026-03-28.75 15.27
07:13:46.14 -33:10:15.70 ASASSN-26ci 2026-03-28.15 15.14
09:03:36.09 -67:58:13.00 SN2026hkg 2026-03-28.19 15.82
07:03:00.72 +39:14:43.00 SN2026fin 2026-03-28.27 15.82
05:35:42.80 -63:44:05.50 ASASSN-26ch 2026-03-27.86 13.02
11:23:19.04 +34:22:38.00 SN2026fwt 2026-03-27.3 16.56
19:03:49.79 +37:04:05.20 ASASSN-26ce 2026-03-26.56 16.3
20:26:56.07 -52:54:06.50 AT2026hiy 2026-03-26.35 16.95
05:25:54.76 -30:15:35.80 ASASSN-26cg 2026-03-25.07 16.88
06:57:16.49 -26:54:37.20 SN2026fzb 2026-03-25.14 15.8
14:37:38.23 -43:00:52.30 ASASSN-26cd 2026-03-24.24 12.52
17:34:53.03 +06:04:29.70 AT2026gzl 2026-03-23.27 15.82
08:30:02.60 -35:12:47.50 ASASSN-26cf 2026-03-23.2 14.82
16:54:25.33 +37:49:56.60 SN 2026evz 2026-03-21.32 17.54
17:06:19.20 -18:54:19.50 ASASSN-26bx 2026-03-21.25 16.39
19:01:16.28 -29:29:23.10 ASASSN-26bw 2026-03-21.33 15.81
08:46:05.75 +10:47:39.80 ASASSN-26ca 2026-03-21.13 14.27
12:14:58.16 +63:47:16.20 SN 2026fvx 2026-03-21.12 15.6
18:02:55.90 -75:23:02.60 ASASSN-26bz 2026-03-21.32 16.16
12:16:02.88 -53:16:33.80 ASASSN-26cc 2026-03-20.04 15.48
13:08:21.85 +29:13:44.20 SN 2026fmh 2026-03-20.16 -0.33
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 5.6K Jun 11 00:40 asassn_transients_list.txt
############################################################
Truncated list of TOCP transients from http://www.cbat.eps.harvard.edu/unconf/tocp.html :
09:55:38.83 +69:05:21.7 PNV J09553883+6905217 2026-04-01.893 19.4mag
19:32:43.67 -22:39:30.7 TCP J19324367-2239307 2026-04-05.4395 13.6mag
16:16:36.03 +44:52:28.9 TCP J16163603+4452289 2026-04-05.6655 14.2mag
00:43:38.36 +41:15:32.4 PNV J00433836+4115324 2026-04-08.079 17.2mag
15:41:11.68 +59:18:26.8 TCP J15411168+5918268 2026-04-12.9625 19.2mag
00:43:35.02 +41:46:28.0 PNV J00433502+4146280 2026-04-23.056 15.9mag
00:42:55.64 +41:14:12.2 PNV J00425564+4114122 2026-04-24.042 16.2mag
21:14:03.38 +56:46:44.1 TCP J21140338+5646441 2026-05-05.3534 16.7mag
15:03:05.19 +22:02:04.1 TCP J15030519+2202041 2026-05-08.3260 13.9mag
07:15:18.25 +47:53:16.7 TCP J07151825+4753167 2026-05-09.1599 14.4mag
16:00:18.44 -22:30:10.6 TCP J16001844-2230106 2026-05-09.6135 13.3mag
00:42:47.45 +41:16:58.5 PNV J00424745+4116585 2026-05-10.030 16.8mag
09:55:02.89 +69:02:13.8 PNV J09550289+6902138 2026-05-18.925 20.7mag
00:43:01.82 +41:18:16.6 PNV J00430182+4118166 2026-05-21.8651 18.83Cmag
00:42:51.20 +41:16:59.4 PNV J00425120+4116594 2022-10-26.135 19.3mag
12:24:25.10 +28:47:12.0 TCP J12242510+2847120 2026-05-31.6015 14.8mag
00:56:07.13 +43:01:40.6 TCP J00560713+4301406 2026-06-01.4135 12.2mag
00:42:41.64 +41:15:16.2 PNV J00424164+4115162 2026-06-02.029 17.4mag
00:42:38.68 +41:15:58.2 PNV J00423868+4115582 2026-06-05.1224 19.97Umag
19:00:42.95 -48:31:01.7 PNV J19004295-4831017 2026-05-25.0752 14.2mag
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 189K Jun 11 00:40 tocp_transients_list.txt
############################################################
Truncated list of recent TNS transients from https://www.wis-tns.org/ :
16:32:31.727 +65:39:51.90 AT 2026oei 2026-05-23.32 20.7631
16:04:39.925 -21:36:56.05 AT 2026oeh 2026-05-21.40 20.1751
15:27:47.338 +38:55:13.31 AT 2026oeg 2026-05-21.97 19.64
14:51:39.615 +45:21:56.05 AT 2026oef 2026-05-28.95 19.09
10:32:49.111 +46:46:00.48 AT 2026oee 2026-06-03.89 19.348
17:25:39.755 +21:57:18.90 SN 2026oed 2026-05-31.37 19.4457
09:59:38.199 +00:31:00.31 AT 2026oec 2026-05-30.97 22.39
09:27:53.984 +22:21:00.63 AT 2026oeb 2026-06-01.17 18.66
09:22:28.890 +11:30:25.73 AT 2026oea 2026-06-04.18 19.4125
12:42:23.918 -13:22:38.30 AT 2026odz 2026-06-02.21 20.0149
09:58:40.601 +01:27:22.46 AT 2026ody 2026-05-29.04 21.94
14:57:09.055 +33:12:55.31 AT 2026odx 2026-05-28.93 19.3
13:30:34.211 +08:18:17.60 AT 2026odw 2026-06-02.93 19.81
22:05:04.941 -08:18:56.22 SN 2026odv 2026-06-03.15 18.492
01:22:49.923 +43:28:14.10 AT 2026odu 2026-05-31.48 19.5762
09:01:08.906 -74:52:14.00 AT 2026odt 2026-06-03.00 17.911
12:00:27.833 -47:27:26.10 AT 2026ods 2026-06-03.09 18.497
01:23:02.862 -43:07:38.98 SN 2026odr 2026-05-31.37 17.272
12:45:42.624 -00:29:03.80 AT 2026odq 2026-05-31.19 19.8214
00:12:22.292 +51:55:38.27 AT 2026odp 2026-06-02.40 19.3385
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 30K Jun 11 00:40 tns_transients_list.txt