NMW transient search results

This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-10_CI_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_235431_TTUQ1b1x1_3372965_dlUmItl7

The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.

Processing fields Leo-06-Q1b1x1

Date (UTC) JD(UTC) mag. R.A. & Dec.(J2000) X & Y (pix) Image
Discovery image 1   2026 06 11.19664    2461202.69664    14.66    11:40:26.59 +11:24:45.3   3634 4691   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-10_CI_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_235431_TTUQ1b1x1_3372965_dlUmItl7/fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-42-59_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0124.fits
Discovery image 2   2026 06 11.19710    2461202.69710    14.81    11:40:26.76 +11:24:43.4   3627 4693   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-10_CI_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_235431_TTUQ1b1x1_3372965_dlUmItl7/fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-43-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0125.fits
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images: 
                   2026 06 11.1969  2461202.6969  14.73  11:40:26.68 +11:24:44.3
252.80386  67.08665 galactic  Leo  Second-epoch detections are separated by 3.2" and 6.9 pix   
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.  
680 Genoveva                -0      2       2  15.0    -0    0
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 11:40:26.68 +11:24:44.3:  16.12 +/- 99.00  upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits at 11:40:26.68 +11:24:44.3:  16.15 +/- 99.00  upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.                         Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!
Search this object in SIMBAD.
Search this object in VizieR catalogs.  WISE atlas  Aladin Lite  SNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.

Full images (clouds? trees? ice on chip?)   Leo-06-Q1b1x1 field processing log
Platesolve and blink FITS with VaST+ds9 VaST command line Re-run transient search script Stub MPC report (for online MPChecker) Stub TOCP report Stub variable star reports

Processing complete!

Total number of candidates identified: 1

Processing log:

Filtering log:

######## Processing parameters ########
AAVSO_COMMENT_STRING= NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
ASTCHECK_ASTEROID_SEARCH_RADIUS_ARCSEC= 
BAD_REGION_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst
CAMERA_SETTINGS= TTUQ1b1x1
CHECK_POINTING_ACCURACY= yes
DARK_FRAMES_DIR_OR_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks
EXCLUSION_LIST= ../exclusion_list_TTUQ1.txt
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MAX_APERTURE_STAR_SIZE_PIX= 12.5
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MAX_ELONGATION_AminusB_PIX= 0.55
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MIN_APERTURE_STAR_SIZE_PIX= 2.0
FILTER_BRIGHT_MAG_CUTOFF_TRANSIENT_SEARCH= -5
FILTER_FAINT_MAG_CUTOFF_TRANSIENT_SEARCH= 15.0
FLAT_FIELD_DIR_OR_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats
FRAME_EDGE_OFFSET_PIX= 100
GAIA_BAND_FOR_CATALOGED_SOURCE_CHECK= 
MAX_NEW_TO_REF_MEAN_IMG_VALUE_RATIO= 100
MAX_NEW_IMG_MEAN_VALUE= 25000
MAX_SD_RATIO_OF_SECOND_EPOCH_IMGS= 0.18
MAX_SD_RATIO_OF_SECOND_EPOCH_IMGS_SOFT_LIMIT= 0.12
MPC_CODE= V36
NMW_CALIBRATION= /var/www/nmw_calibration
NUMBER_OF_DETECTED_TRANSIENTS_BEFORE_FILTERING_HARD_LIMIT= 8000
NUMBER_OF_DETECTED_TRANSIENTS_BEFORE_FILTERING_SOFT_LIMIT= 4000
OMP_NUM_THREADS= 
ONLINE_MPCHECKER_BUTTON_ASTEROID_SEARCH_RADIUS_ARCMIN= 
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION= 
REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES= yes
SEXTRACTOR_CONFIG_BRIGHTSTARPASS= default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
SEXTRACTOR_CONFIG_FILES= default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
STARMATCH_RADIUS_PIX= 3.5
SYSREM_ITERATIONS= 0
TELESCOP= 
TELESCOP_NAME_KNOWN_TO_VaST_FOR_FOV_DETERMINATION= 
UCAC5_PLATESOLVE_ITERATIONS= 2
FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE= no
#######################################
HOSTNAME= tau
USER= 
HOME= 
#######################################
SExtractor catalog cache: enabled, directory /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/vast_sextractor_cache
Reference image directory is set to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs
VIZIER_SITE=vizier.cds.unistra.fr
GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=vizquery (lib/vizquery -> VizieR vizier.cds.unistra.fr)
INFO: MAKE_PNG_PLOTS is set to yes
FITS_FILE_EXT=fits
CALIBRATION_STATUS_PREFIX=
Fields in the data directory: 
Leo-06-Q1b1x1
#######################################
########### Starting Leo-06-Q1b1x1 ###########
Processing Leo-06-Q1b1x1
server tau has sufficient free disk space available: 674492 MB at /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir
server tau has sufficient free disk space available: 674492 MB at .
Checking input images (2 new)
REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE= /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
REFERENCE_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE= /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits
Small preview (one of the new images): 
Large previews of the second-epoch (new) images:
MAKE_PNG_PLOTS=yes
renamed 'Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-42-59_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0124.png' -> 'transient_report/Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-42-59_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0124.fits_preview.png'
Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-42-59_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0124.fits

renamed 'Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-43-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0125.png' -> 'transient_report/Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-43-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0125.fits_preview.png'
Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-43-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0125.fits


Read-check the input FITS images... read-check OK Blank image check the input FITS images... blank-image-check OK Read date check the input FITS images... read-date-check OK Mean value check the input FITS images... OK, at least two new images have mean values below the threshold. ---------------------------------------------- INFO: REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 532.6367 INFO: REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_SD= 471.1419 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 1151.6224 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_SD= 464.5106 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 1152.4935 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE_SD= 464.5269 ---------------------------------------------- INFO: ref_to_second_epoch_img_mean_ratio= 2.16212 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__SD_ratio= 0.000 ---------------------------------------------- Calibration settings: DARK_FRAMES_DIR_OR_FILE=/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks FLAT_FIELD_DIR_OR_FILE=/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration SET-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint CCD-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature FOCTEMP = 28.2999992370605 / [degC] Focuser temperature AMBTEMP = 27.0 / [degC] Ambient air temperature Exploring image header: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-10_CI_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_235431_TTUQ1b1x1_3372965_dlUmItl7/Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-42-59_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0124.fits CCD-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-10_CI_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_235431_TTUQ1b1x1_3372965_dlUmItl7/Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-42-59_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0124.fits SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-10_CI_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_235431_TTUQ1b1x1_3372965_dlUmItl7/Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-42-59_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0124.fits Header: 74 keys total, 33 keys left Record 0: "" status=0 Record 1: "SIMPLE = T / C# FITS" status=0 Record 2: "BITPIX = 16" status=0 Record 3: "NAXIS = 2 / Dimensionality" status=0 Record 4: "NAXIS1 = 9576" status=0 Record 5: "NAXIS2 = 6388" status=0 Record 6: "BZERO = 32768" status=0 Record 7: "EXTEND = T / Extensions are permitted" status=0 Record 8: "IMAGETYP= 'LIGHT' / Type of exposure" status=0 Record 9: "EXPOSURE= 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0 Record 10: "EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0 Record 11: "DATE-LOC= '2026-06-10T23:42:59.8436451' / Time of observation (local)" status=0 Record 12: "DATE-OBS= '2026-06-11T04:42:59.8436451' / Time of observation (UTC)" status=0 Record 13: "MJD-OBS = 61202.1965259607 / Modified Julian Date of observation" status=0 Record 14: "DATE-AVG= '2026-06-11T04:43:09.7462855' / Averaged midpoint time (UTC)" status=0 Record 15: "MJD-AVG = 61202.1966405786 / Modified Julian Date of averaged midpoint" status=0 Record 16: "XBINNING= 1 / X axis binning factor" status=0 Record 17: "YBINNING= 1 / Y axis binning factor" status=0 Record 18: "GAIN = 30 / Sensor gain" status=0 Record 19: "OFFSET = 30 / Sensor gain offset" status=0 Record 20: "XPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel X axis size" status=0 Record 21: "YPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel Y axis size" status=0 Record 22: "INSTRUME= 'QHY600M' / Imaging instrument name" status=0 Record 23: "CAMERAID= 'QHY600M-33d3d743814b8b447' / Imaging instrument identifier" status=0 Record 24: "SET-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint" status=0 Record 25: "CCD-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature" status=0 Record 26: "READOUTM= '2CMS-0' / Sensor readout mode" status=0 Record 27: "USBLIMIT= 50 / Camera-specific USB setting" status=0 Record 28: "TELESCOP= 'QHY600M-TTU1' / Name of telescope" status=0 Record 29: "FOCALLEN= 135.0 / [mm] Focal length" status=0 Record 30: "FOCRATIO= 2.2 / Focal ratio" status=0 Record 31: "RA = 173.329509938836 / [deg] RA of telescope" status=0 Record 32: "DEC = 14.0002403508386 / [deg] Declination of telescope" status=0 Record 33: "CENTALT = 36.8005555555556 / [deg] Altitude of telescope" status=0 Record 34: "CENTAZ = 261.941666666667 / [deg] Azimuth of telescope" status=0 Record 35: "AIRMASS = 1.66651170002862 / Airmass at frame center (Gueymard 1993)" status=0 Record 36: "PIERSIDE= 'East' / Telescope pointing state" status=0 Record 37: "SITEELEV= 1015.0 / [m] Observation site elevation" status=0 Record 38: "SITELAT = 33.7480555555556 / [deg] Observation site latitude" status=0 Record 39: "SITELONG= -101.958333333333 / [deg] Observation site longitude" status=0 Record 40: "OBSERVER= 'Sokolovsky' / Observer name" status=0 Record 41: "OBSERVAT= 'TTU Skyview' / Observatory name" status=0 Record 42: "SITENAME= '' / Observatory site name" status=0 Record 43: "FWHEEL = 'Simulator' / Filter Wheel name" status=0 Record 44: "FILTER = 'CV' / Active filter name" status=0 Record 45: "OBJECT = 'Leo-06' / Name of the object of interest" status=0 Record 46: "OBJCTRA = '11 33 20' / [H M S] RA of imaged object" status=0 Record 47: "OBJCTDEC= '+14 00 00' / [D M S] Declination of imaged object" status=0 Record 48: "OBJCTROT= 0.0 / [deg] planned rotation of imaged object" status=0 Record 49: "FOCNAME = 'ZWO Focuser' / Focusing equipment name" status=0 Record 50: "FOCPOS = 29494 / [step] Focuser position" status=0 Record 51: "FOCUSPOS= 29494 / [step] Focuser position" status=0 Record 52: "FOCUSSZ = 0.0 / [um] Focuser step size" status=0 Record 53: "FOCTEMP = 28.2999992370605 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0 Record 54: "FOCUSTEM= 28.2999992370605 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0 Record 55: "DEWPOINT= 18.0 / [degC] Dew point" status=0 Record 56: "HUMIDITY= 58.0 / [percent] Relative humidity" status=0 Record 57: "PRESSURE= 894.11 / [hPa] Air pressure" status=0 Record 58: "AMBTEMP = 27.0 / [degC] Ambient air temperature" status=0 Record 59: "WINDDIR = 44.0 / [deg] Wind direction: 0=N, 180=S, 90=E, 270=W" status=0 Record 60: "WINDGUST= 40.303224 / [kph] Wind gust" status=0 Record 61: "WINDSPD = 32.802624 / [kph] Wind speed" status=0 Record 62: "ROWORDER= 'TOP-DOWN' / FITS Image Orientation" status=0 Record 63: "EQUINOX = 2000.0 / Equinox of celestial coordinate system" status=0 Record 64: "SWCREATE= 'N.I.N.A. 3.2.0.9001 (x64)' / Software that created this file" status=0 Record 65: "QHY_EXP = 20.000096 / [s] Actual exposure time" status=0 Record 66: "QHY_PP = 13888.0 / [ps] pixelPeriod" status=0 Record 67: "QHY_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0 Record 68: "GPS_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0 Record 69: "QHY_FP = 20000160.0 / [us] framePeriod" status=0 Record 70: "QHY_CPL = 6120.0 / clocksPerLine" status=0 Record 71: "QHY_LPF = 235295.0 / linesPerFrame" status=0 Record 72: "QHY_AET = 20000096.0 / [us] actualExposureTime" status=0 Record 73: "QHY_LEM = T / isLongExposureMode" status=0 Record 74: "QHY_OFF0= 3767.777 / [us] RollingShutterEndOffset row 0" status=0 Allocating memory for image, dark and result arrays... Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-10_CI_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_235431_TTUQ1b1x1_3372965_dlUmItl7/Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-42-59_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0124.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-10_CI_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_235431_TTUQ1b1x1_3372965_dlUmItl7/Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-42-59_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0124.fits SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_5C_20s_2026-05-30.fit CCD-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-10_CI_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_235431_TTUQ1b1x1_3372965_dlUmItl7/Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-42-59_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0124.fits CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_5C_20s_2026-05-30.fit Reading dark frame /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_5C_20s_2026-05-30.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix Dark frame is subtracted, output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-10_CI_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_235431_TTUQ1b1x1_3372965_dlUmItl7/d_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-42-59_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0124.fits :) Spent 0.636700 seconds renamed 'mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_5C_20s_2026-05-30.png' -> 'transient_report/dark.png' try_to_calibrate_the_input_frame(): selected flat field /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-05-30.fit from directory /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats MegaDivider v7 Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-10_CI_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_235431_TTUQ1b1x1_3372965_dlUmItl7/d_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-42-59_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0124.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix Reading flat /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-05-30.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix Avarage count on flat field image: 31267.409145 Minimal real count (from overscan): 5 Output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-10_CI_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_235431_TTUQ1b1x1_3372965_dlUmItl7/fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-42-59_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0124.fits :) No overscan detected - all values seem high! (left_median=21677.0, right_median=21704.0) renamed 'mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-05-30.png' -> 'transient_report/flat.png' Using calibrated image CALIBRATED_SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-10_CI_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_235431_TTUQ1b1x1_3372965_dlUmItl7/fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-42-59_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0124.fits EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration SET-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint CCD-TEMP= -0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature FOCTEMP = 28.2999992370605 / [degC] Focuser temperature AMBTEMP = 27.0 / [degC] Ambient air temperature Exploring image header: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-10_CI_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_235431_TTUQ1b1x1_3372965_dlUmItl7/Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-43-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0125.fits CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-10_CI_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_235431_TTUQ1b1x1_3372965_dlUmItl7/Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-43-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0125.fits SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-10_CI_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_235431_TTUQ1b1x1_3372965_dlUmItl7/Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-43-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0125.fits Header: 74 keys total, 33 keys left Record 0: "" status=0 Record 1: "SIMPLE = T / C# FITS" status=0 Record 2: "BITPIX = 16" status=0 Record 3: "NAXIS = 2 / Dimensionality" status=0 Record 4: "NAXIS1 = 9576" status=0 Record 5: "NAXIS2 = 6388" status=0 Record 6: "BZERO = 32768" status=0 Record 7: "EXTEND = T / Extensions are permitted" status=0 Record 8: "IMAGETYP= 'LIGHT' / Type of exposure" status=0 Record 9: "EXPOSURE= 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0 Record 10: "EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0 Record 11: "DATE-LOC= '2026-06-10T23:43:39.6301322' / Time of observation (local)" status=0 Record 12: "DATE-OBS= '2026-06-11T04:43:39.6301322' / Time of observation (UTC)" status=0 Record 13: "MJD-OBS = 61202.1969864583 / Modified Julian Date of observation" status=0 Record 14: "DATE-AVG= '2026-06-11T04:43:49.5320253' / Averaged midpoint time (UTC)" status=0 Record 15: "MJD-AVG = 61202.197101065 / Modified Julian Date of averaged midpoint" status=0 Record 16: "XBINNING= 1 / X axis binning factor" status=0 Record 17: "YBINNING= 1 / Y axis binning factor" status=0 Record 18: "GAIN = 30 / Sensor gain" status=0 Record 19: "OFFSET = 30 / Sensor gain offset" status=0 Record 20: "XPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel X axis size" status=0 Record 21: "YPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel Y axis size" status=0 Record 22: "INSTRUME= 'QHY600M' / Imaging instrument name" status=0 Record 23: "CAMERAID= 'QHY600M-33d3d743814b8b447' / Imaging instrument identifier" status=0 Record 24: "SET-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint" status=0 Record 25: "CCD-TEMP= -0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature" status=0 Record 26: "READOUTM= '2CMS-0' / Sensor readout mode" status=0 Record 27: "USBLIMIT= 50 / Camera-specific USB setting" status=0 Record 28: "TELESCOP= 'QHY600M-TTU1' / Name of telescope" status=0 Record 29: "FOCALLEN= 135.0 / [mm] Focal length" status=0 Record 30: "FOCRATIO= 2.2 / Focal ratio" status=0 Record 31: "RA = 173.329509967806 / [deg] RA of telescope" status=0 Record 32: "DEC = 14.0002403403846 / [deg] Declination of telescope" status=0 Record 33: "CENTALT = 36.6630555555556 / [deg] Altitude of telescope" status=0 Record 34: "CENTAZ = 262.048888888889 / [deg] Azimuth of telescope" status=0 Record 35: "AIRMASS = 1.67185135852426 / Airmass at frame center (Gueymard 1993)" status=0 Record 36: "PIERSIDE= 'East' / Telescope pointing state" status=0 Record 37: "SITEELEV= 1015.0 / [m] Observation site elevation" status=0 Record 38: "SITELAT = 33.7480555555556 / [deg] Observation site latitude" status=0 Record 39: "SITELONG= -101.958333333333 / [deg] Observation site longitude" status=0 Record 40: "OBSERVER= 'Sokolovsky' / Observer name" status=0 Record 41: "OBSERVAT= 'TTU Skyview' / Observatory name" status=0 Record 42: "SITENAME= '' / Observatory site name" status=0 Record 43: "FWHEEL = 'Simulator' / Filter Wheel name" status=0 Record 44: "FILTER = 'CV' / Active filter name" status=0 Record 45: "OBJECT = 'Leo-06' / Name of the object of interest" status=0 Record 46: "OBJCTRA = '11 33 20' / [H M S] RA of imaged object" status=0 Record 47: "OBJCTDEC= '+14 00 00' / [D M S] Declination of imaged object" status=0 Record 48: "OBJCTROT= 0.0 / [deg] planned rotation of imaged object" status=0 Record 49: "FOCNAME = 'ZWO Focuser' / Focusing equipment name" status=0 Record 50: "FOCPOS = 29494 / [step] Focuser position" status=0 Record 51: "FOCUSPOS= 29494 / [step] Focuser position" status=0 Record 52: "FOCUSSZ = 0.0 / [um] Focuser step size" status=0 Record 53: "FOCTEMP = 28.2999992370605 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0 Record 54: "FOCUSTEM= 28.2999992370605 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0 Record 55: "DEWPOINT= 18.0 / [degC] Dew point" status=0 Record 56: "HUMIDITY= 58.0 / [percent] Relative humidity" status=0 Record 57: "PRESSURE= 894.11 / [hPa] Air pressure" status=0 Record 58: "AMBTEMP = 27.0 / [degC] Ambient air temperature" status=0 Record 59: "WINDDIR = 44.0 / [deg] Wind direction: 0=N, 180=S, 90=E, 270=W" status=0 Record 60: "WINDGUST= 40.303224 / [kph] Wind gust" status=0 Record 61: "WINDSPD = 32.802624 / [kph] Wind speed" status=0 Record 62: "ROWORDER= 'TOP-DOWN' / FITS Image Orientation" status=0 Record 63: "EQUINOX = 2000.0 / Equinox of celestial coordinate system" status=0 Record 64: "SWCREATE= 'N.I.N.A. 3.2.0.9001 (x64)' / Software that created this file" status=0 Record 65: "QHY_EXP = 20.000096 / [s] Actual exposure time" status=0 Record 66: "QHY_PP = 13888.0 / [ps] pixelPeriod" status=0 Record 67: "QHY_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0 Record 68: "GPS_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0 Record 69: "QHY_FP = 20000160.0 / [us] framePeriod" status=0 Record 70: "QHY_CPL = 6120.0 / clocksPerLine" status=0 Record 71: "QHY_LPF = 235295.0 / linesPerFrame" status=0 Record 72: "QHY_AET = 20000096.0 / [us] actualExposureTime" status=0 Record 73: "QHY_LEM = T / isLongExposureMode" status=0 Record 74: "QHY_OFF0= 3767.777 / [us] RollingShutterEndOffset row 0" status=0 Allocating memory for image, dark and result arrays... Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-10_CI_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_235431_TTUQ1b1x1_3372965_dlUmItl7/Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-43-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0125.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-10_CI_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_235431_TTUQ1b1x1_3372965_dlUmItl7/Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-43-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0125.fits SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_5C_20s_2026-05-30.fit CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-10_CI_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_235431_TTUQ1b1x1_3372965_dlUmItl7/Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-43-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0125.fits CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_5C_20s_2026-05-30.fit Reading dark frame /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_5C_20s_2026-05-30.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix Dark frame is subtracted, output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-10_CI_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_235431_TTUQ1b1x1_3372965_dlUmItl7/d_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-43-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0125.fits :) Spent 0.655612 seconds renamed 'mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_5C_20s_2026-05-30.png' -> 'transient_report/dark.png' try_to_calibrate_the_input_frame(): selected flat field /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-05-30.fit from directory /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats MegaDivider v7 Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-10_CI_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_235431_TTUQ1b1x1_3372965_dlUmItl7/d_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-43-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0125.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix Reading flat /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-05-30.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix Avarage count on flat field image: 31267.409145 Minimal real count (from overscan): 5 Output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-10_CI_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_235431_TTUQ1b1x1_3372965_dlUmItl7/fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-43-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0125.fits :) No overscan detected - all values seem high! (left_median=21677.0, right_median=21704.0) renamed 'mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-05-30.png' -> 'transient_report/flat.png' Using calibrated image CALIBRATED_SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-10_CI_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_235431_TTUQ1b1x1_3372965_dlUmItl7/fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-43-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0125.fits Dark frame used to calibrate the second-epoch images:

Flat field used to calibrate the second-epoch images:

after the calibration attempt: SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-10_CI_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_235431_TTUQ1b1x1_3372965_dlUmItl7/fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-42-59_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0124.fits SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-10_CI_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_235431_TTUQ1b1x1_3372965_dlUmItl7/fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-43-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0125.fits Previews of the CALIBRATED second-epoch images:

fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-42-59_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0124.fits


fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-43-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0125.fits


Updating neverexclude_list.txt '/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt' Choosing bad regions list '/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst' wait *------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------* 'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex' Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 3.5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-10_CI_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_235431_TTUQ1b1x1_3372965_dlUmItl7/fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-42-59_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0124.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-10_CI_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_235431_TTUQ1b1x1_3372965_dlUmItl7/fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-43-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0125.fits SExtractor catalog cache: saved Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.cat to cache SExtractor catalog cache: saved Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits.cat to cache VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-10_CI_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_235431_TTUQ1b1x1_3372965_dlUmItl7/fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-42-59_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0124.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-10_CI_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_235431_TTUQ1b1x1_3372965_dlUmItl7/fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-43-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0125.fits Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461202.69664170 Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt '../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt' Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt '../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt' Plate-solving the images 'tocp_transients_list.txt' -> '../tocp_transients_list.txt' wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits exists and is non-empty Saving wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits to local_wcs_cache/ 'wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits' wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits exists and is non-empty Saving wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits to local_wcs_cache/ 'wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits' wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-42-59_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0124.fits exists and is non-empty Saving wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-42-59_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0124.fits to local_wcs_cache/ 'wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-42-59_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0124.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-42-59_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0124.fits' wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-43-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0125.fits exists and is non-empty Saving wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-43-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0125.fits to local_wcs_cache/ 'wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-43-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0125.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-43-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0125.fits' ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits (1st reference image) verification OK: wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits Image size: 941.7'x627.1' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 11:33:20.692 +14:00:05.86 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9" ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-42-59_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0124.fits (1st new image) verification OK: wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-42-59_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0124.fits Image size: 941.3'x626.6' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 11:33:15.745 +14:00:53.30 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy) Reference image center 11:33:20.692 +14:00:05.86 Second-epoch image center 11:33:15.745 +14:00:53.30 Angular distance between the image centers 0.0240 deg. Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg. ################################### ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-43-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0125.fits (2nd new image) verification OK: wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-43-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0125.fits Image size: 941.3'x626.6' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 11:33:13.227 +14:01:03.30 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy) Reference image center 11:33:20.692 +14:00:05.86 Second-epoch image center 11:33:13.227 +14:01:03.30 Angular distance between the image centers 0.0341 deg. ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images) Second-epoch first image center 11:33:15.745 +14:00:53.30 Second-epoch second image center 11:33:13.227 +14:01:03.30 Angular distance between the image centers 0.01055 deg. ################################### Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5... Preparing for ar aprallel run Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits &> /tmp/tmp.VSsnyn8Y5M Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits &> /tmp/tmp.0dt30sUnQp Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-10_CI_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_235431_TTUQ1b1x1_3372965_dlUmItl7/fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-42-59_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0124.fits &> /tmp/tmp.PAzQzOVy0b Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-10_CI_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_235431_TTUQ1b1x1_3372965_dlUmItl7/fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-42-59_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0124.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-10_CI_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_235431_TTUQ1b1x1_3372965_dlUmItl7/fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-43-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0125.fits &> /tmp/tmp.4hOFmQesg9 Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-10_CI_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_235431_TTUQ1b1x1_3372965_dlUmItl7/fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-43-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0125.fits Calibrating the magnitude scale Found non-empty wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits ____ Start of magnitude calibration ____ PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits and wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race) Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2 Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits and wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat Found non-empty wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits and wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat The reference image (wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits) and catalog (wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat) found 'wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat' Read 5845 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 164.9322 to 181.4966 deg, Dec +8.4844 to +19.3112 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 164.9322 to 181.4966 deg, Dec 8.4844 to 19.3112 deg Loaded 3827 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 2957 out of 3146 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 3146 out of 5845 detected stars. The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.922700 a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.922700 From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.58 Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.34 Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes Working... Please, PLEASE, be patient!!! All lightcurves processed! =) Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.34
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:

Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V) Read 5845 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 164.9322 to 181.4966 deg, Dec +8.4844 to +19.3112 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 164.9322 to 181.4966 deg, Dec 8.4844 to 19.3112 deg Loaded 3827 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 2957 out of 3146 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 3146 out of 5845 detected stars. util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits:

Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits (aperture=6.4) Read 5851 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 164.9329 to 181.4972 deg, Dec +8.5231 to +19.3318 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 164.9329 to 181.4972 deg, Dec 8.5231 to 19.3318 deg Loaded 3815 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 2962 out of 3141 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 3141 out of 5851 detected stars. util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits:

Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits (aperture=6.4) ____ End of magnitude calibration ____ Applying consolidated magnitude filters... Preparing the exclusion lists for this field Done with filtering Found 3 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 8000) Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars: 2.2 pix Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits 2.2 pix Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits 2.2 pix fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-42-59_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0124.fits 2.2 pix fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-43-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0125.fits 2.2 pix wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits 2.2 pix wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits Limiting magnitude estimates: 15.3 mag. Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits 15.3 mag. Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits 15.0 mag. fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-42-59_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0124.fits 15.0 mag. fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-43-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0125.fits All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 15.0 (SNR ) 12.0 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50). This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image. The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here. The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images. This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list. The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag. Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver wait ############ /tmp/tmp.VSsnyn8Y5M (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The guess is based on the existing WCS header. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-10_CI_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_235431_TTUQ1b1x1_3372965_dlUmItl7/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits 573.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good. The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good... '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits' -> 'wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits' FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=451, passed=5845 Got 5845 stars (including 5387 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 5845 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.7' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.7 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013079 (47.1 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010463 (37.7 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 492 to 548 (Dec 8.5 to 19.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 978 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 978 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 965 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 978 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5754 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 492 to 548 (Dec 8.5 to 19.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 978 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 978 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5755 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 978 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5755 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39" Excluding outliers - 978 stars left (next iteration limit 1075) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits N_match=978 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.420 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.465 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.410 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.409 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.383 n_q1=249 n_q2=272 n_q3=235 n_q4=222 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.107 The image catalog is written to wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits -region wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations ############ /tmp/tmp.0dt30sUnQp (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The guess is based on the existing WCS header. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-10_CI_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_235431_TTUQ1b1x1_3372965_dlUmItl7/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits 573.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good. The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good... '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits' -> 'wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits' FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits.wcscat SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=436, passed=5851 Got 5851 stars (including 5411 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 5851 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.7' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.7 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013079 (47.1 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010463 (37.7 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 492 to 548 (Dec 8.5 to 19.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 978 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 977 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 964 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 977 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5764 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 492 to 548 (Dec 8.5 to 19.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 978 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 977 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5763 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 977 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5763 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39" Excluding outliers - 977 stars left (next iteration limit 1074) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits N_match=977 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.420 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.475 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.391 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.455 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.378 n_q1=257 n_q2=269 n_q3=229 n_q4=222 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.131 The image catalog is written to wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits -region wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations ############ /tmp/tmp.PAzQzOVy0b (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um Internal estimated FoV 605.3' The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-10_CI_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_235431_TTUQ1b1x1_3372965_dlUmItl7/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-10_CI_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_235431_TTUQ1b1x1_3372965_dlUmItl7/fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-42-59_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0124.fits 605.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-10_CI_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_235431_TTUQ1b1x1_3372965_dlUmItl7/fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-42-59_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0124.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-10_CI_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_235431_TTUQ1b1x1_3372965_dlUmItl7/fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-42-59_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0124.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-10_CI_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_235431_TTUQ1b1x1_3372965_dlUmItl7/fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-42-59_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0124.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-10_CI_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_235431_TTUQ1b1x1_3372965_dlUmItl7/fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-42-59_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0124.fits It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve! FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-10_CI_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_235431_TTUQ1b1x1_3372965_dlUmItl7/fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-42-59_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0124.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-42-59_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0124.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-42-59_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0124.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-42-59_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0124.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-42-59_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0124.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-42-59_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0124.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-42-59_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0124.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-42-59_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0124.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-10_CI_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_235431_TTUQ1b1x1_3372965_dlUmItl7/fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-42-59_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0124.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-42-59_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0124.fits.wcscat SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=268, passed=4649 Got 4649 stars (including 4371 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-42-59_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0124.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 4649 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.3' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.3 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013074 (47.1 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010459 (37.7 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 491 to 549 (Dec 8.3 to 19.6) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 973 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 972 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 963 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 972 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4561 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 491 to 549 (Dec 8.3 to 19.6) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 973 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 972 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4561 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 972 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4561 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26" Excluding outliers - 972 stars left (next iteration limit 1069) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-42-59_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0124.fits N_match=972 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.276 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.305 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.325 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.245 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.266 n_q1=210 n_q2=213 n_q3=278 n_q4=271 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.175 The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-42-59_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0124.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-42-59_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0124.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-10_CI_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_235431_TTUQ1b1x1_3372965_dlUmItl7/fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-42-59_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0124.fits -region wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-42-59_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0124.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-42-59_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0124.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations ############ /tmp/tmp.4hOFmQesg9 (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um Internal estimated FoV 605.3' The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-10_CI_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_235431_TTUQ1b1x1_3372965_dlUmItl7/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-10_CI_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_235431_TTUQ1b1x1_3372965_dlUmItl7/fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-43-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0125.fits 605.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-10_CI_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_235431_TTUQ1b1x1_3372965_dlUmItl7/fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-43-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0125.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-10_CI_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_235431_TTUQ1b1x1_3372965_dlUmItl7/fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-43-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0125.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-10_CI_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_235431_TTUQ1b1x1_3372965_dlUmItl7/fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-43-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0125.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-10_CI_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_235431_TTUQ1b1x1_3372965_dlUmItl7/fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-43-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0125.fits It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve! FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-10_CI_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_235431_TTUQ1b1x1_3372965_dlUmItl7/fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-43-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0125.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-43-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0125.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-43-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0125.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-43-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0125.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-43-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0125.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-43-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0125.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-43-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0125.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-43-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0125.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-10_CI_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_235431_TTUQ1b1x1_3372965_dlUmItl7/fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-43-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0125.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-43-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0125.fits.wcscat SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=271, passed=4601 Got 4601 stars (including 4319 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-43-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0125.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 4601 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.3' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.3 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013074 (47.1 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010459 (37.7 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 491 to 549 (Dec 8.3 to 19.6) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 972 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 971 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 962 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 971 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4512 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 491 to 549 (Dec 8.3 to 19.6) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 973 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 972 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4512 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 972 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4512 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28" Excluding outliers - 972 stars left (next iteration limit 1068) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-43-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0125.fits N_match=972 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.295 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.362 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.348 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.270 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.261 n_q1=208 n_q2=214 n_q3=276 n_q4=274 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.227 The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-43-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0125.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-43-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0125.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-10_CI_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_235431_TTUQ1b1x1_3372965_dlUmItl7/fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-43-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0125.fits -region wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-43-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0125.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-43-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0125.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations ################################### # Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above) ref1=Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits sigma_overall=0.420 worst_q_ratio=1.107 ref2=Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits sigma_overall=0.420 worst_q_ratio=1.131 new1=fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-42-59_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0124.fits sigma_overall=0.276 worst_q_ratio=1.175 new2=fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-43-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0125.fits sigma_overall=0.295 worst_q_ratio=1.227 reference average sigma_overall=0.42 worst_q_ratio=1.119 warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference ###################################
Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378_astrometric_residuals.png (978 matched stars from wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.38 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379_astrometric_residuals.png (977 matched stars from wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.38 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-42-59_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0124_astrometric_residuals.png (972 matched stars from wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-42-59_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0124.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.24 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-43-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0125_astrometric_residuals.png (972 matched stars from wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-43-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0125.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.27 arcsec)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-42-59_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0124.fits INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image) 'wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-42-59_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0124.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-10_CI_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_235431_TTUQ1b1x1_3372965_dlUmItl7/wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-42-59_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0124.fits' Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-43-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0125.fits INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image) 'wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-43-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0125.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-10_CI_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_235431_TTUQ1b1x1_3372965_dlUmItl7/wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-43-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0125.fits' Preparing the HTML report for the field Leo-06-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 0s Pre-generating preview images in parallel... Done pre-generating preview images. Pre-generating finding charts in parallel... Done pre-generating finding charts. make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 1s xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 20316_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-43-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0125 The candidate 20316_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-43-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0125 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 06 11.19710    2461202.69710    10.78    11:25:36.49 +16:28:17.9   5978 1782   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-10_CI_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_235431_TTUQ1b1x1_3372965_dlUmItl7/fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-43-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0125.fits **** FOUND 11:25:36.49 +16:28:18.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 20448_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-43-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0125 The candidate 20448_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-43-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0125 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 06 11.19710    2461202.69710    12.40    11:39:38.24 +16:33:09.6   3959 1610   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-10_CI_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_235431_TTUQ1b1x1_3372965_dlUmItl7/fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-43-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0125.fits **** FOUND 11:39:38.25 +16:33:09.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 04578_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-43-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0125 The candidate 04578_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-43-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0125 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 3   2026 06 11.19710    2461202.69710    9.56    11:23:40.06 +16:51:05.5   6270 1567   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-10_CI_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_235431_TTUQ1b1x1_3372965_dlUmItl7/fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-43-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0125.fits **** FOUND 11:23:40.07 +16:51:05.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 1s Prepared the HTML report for the field Leo-06-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 *------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------* #### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt #### wait *------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------* 'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex' Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 3.5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-10_CI_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_235431_TTUQ1b1x1_3372965_dlUmItl7/fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-42-59_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0124.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-10_CI_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_235431_TTUQ1b1x1_3372965_dlUmItl7/fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-43-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0125.fits SExtractor catalog cache: saved Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.cat to cache SExtractor catalog cache: saved Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits.cat to cache VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-10_CI_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_235431_TTUQ1b1x1_3372965_dlUmItl7/fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-42-59_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0124.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-10_CI_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_235431_TTUQ1b1x1_3372965_dlUmItl7/fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-43-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0125.fits Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-42-59_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0124.fits Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-43-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0125.fits Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/exclusion_list.txt Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images Plate-solving the images wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits exists and is non-empty wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits exists and is non-empty wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-42-59_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0124.fits exists and is non-empty wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-43-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0125.fits exists and is non-empty ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits (1st reference image) verification OK: wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits Image size: 941.7'x627.1' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 11:33:20.692 +14:00:05.86 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9" ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-42-59_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0124.fits (1st new image) verification OK: wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-42-59_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0124.fits Image size: 941.3'x626.6' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 11:33:15.745 +14:00:53.30 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy) Reference image center 11:33:20.692 +14:00:05.86 Second-epoch image center 11:33:15.745 +14:00:53.30 Angular distance between the image centers 0.0240 deg. Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg. ################################### ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-43-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0125.fits (2nd new image) verification OK: wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-43-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0125.fits Image size: 941.3'x626.6' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 11:33:13.227 +14:01:03.30 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy) Reference image center 11:33:20.692 +14:00:05.86 Second-epoch image center 11:33:13.227 +14:01:03.30 Angular distance between the image centers 0.0341 deg. ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images) Second-epoch first image center 11:33:15.745 +14:00:53.30 Second-epoch second image center 11:33:13.227 +14:01:03.30 Angular distance between the image centers 0.01055 deg. ################################### Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5... Preparing for ar aprallel run Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits &> /tmp/tmp.1CE81NHrMm Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits &> /tmp/tmp.PXHfaFGKjv Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-10_CI_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_235431_TTUQ1b1x1_3372965_dlUmItl7/fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-42-59_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0124.fits &> /tmp/tmp.DRAKGziPm2 Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-10_CI_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_235431_TTUQ1b1x1_3372965_dlUmItl7/fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-42-59_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0124.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-10_CI_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_235431_TTUQ1b1x1_3372965_dlUmItl7/fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-43-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0125.fits &> /tmp/tmp.xQ51YwBHE0 Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-10_CI_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_235431_TTUQ1b1x1_3372965_dlUmItl7/fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-43-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0125.fits Calibrating the magnitude scale Found non-empty wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits ____ Start of magnitude calibration ____ PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits and wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race) Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2 Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits and wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat Found non-empty wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits and wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat The reference image (wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits) and catalog (wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat) found 'wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat' Read 30089 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 164.9322 to 181.5060 deg, Dec +8.4661 to +19.3314 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 164.9322 to 181.5060 deg, Dec 8.4661 to 19.3314 deg Loaded 3838 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 2863 out of 3171 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 3171 out of 30089 detected stars. The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.808900 a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.808900 From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.31 Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.50 Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes Working... Please, PLEASE, be patient!!! All lightcurves processed! =) Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.50
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:

Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V) Read 30089 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 164.9322 to 181.5060 deg, Dec +8.4661 to +19.3314 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 164.9322 to 181.5060 deg, Dec 8.4661 to 19.3314 deg Loaded 3838 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 2863 out of 3171 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 3171 out of 30089 detected stars. util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits:

Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits (aperture=5.0) Read 30117 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 164.9329 to 181.5106 deg, Dec +8.4752 to +19.3348 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 164.9329 to 181.5106 deg, Dec 8.4752 to 19.3348 deg Loaded 3840 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 2876 out of 3175 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 3175 out of 30117 detected stars. util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits:

Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits (aperture=5.1) ____ End of magnitude calibration ____ Applying consolidated magnitude filters... Preparing the exclusion lists for this field Done with filtering Found 31 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 8000) Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars: 2.0 pix Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits 2.1 pix Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits 2.1 pix fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-42-59_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0124.fits 2.1 pix fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-43-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0125.fits 2.0 pix wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits 2.1 pix wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits Limiting magnitude estimates: 15.5 mag. Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits 15.5 mag. Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits 15.1 mag. fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-42-59_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0124.fits 15.2 mag. fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-43-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0125.fits All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 15.1 (SNR ) 14.5 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50). This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image. The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here. The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images. This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list. The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag. Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver wait ############ /tmp/tmp.1CE81NHrMm (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The guess is based on the existing WCS header. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-10_CI_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_235431_TTUQ1b1x1_3372965_dlUmItl7/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits 573.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good. The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good... '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits' -> 'wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits' FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=15, blended=1260, passed=30074 Got 30074 stars (including 28759 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 30074 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.7' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.7 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013079 (47.1 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010463 (37.7 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 492 to 548 (Dec 8.5 to 19.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 978 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 978 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 971 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 978 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 29780 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 492 to 548 (Dec 8.5 to 19.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 978 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 978 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 29780 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 978 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 29780 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38" Excluding outliers - 978 stars left (next iteration limit 1075) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits N_match=978 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.400 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.427 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.382 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.396 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.366 n_q1=244 n_q2=273 n_q3=235 n_q4=226 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.069 The image catalog is written to wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits -region wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations ############ /tmp/tmp.PXHfaFGKjv (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The guess is based on the existing WCS header. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-10_CI_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_235431_TTUQ1b1x1_3372965_dlUmItl7/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits 573.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good. The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good... '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits' -> 'wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits' FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits.wcscat SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=18, blended=1200, passed=30099 Got 30099 stars (including 28847 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 30099 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.7' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.7 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013079 (47.1 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010463 (37.7 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 492 to 548 (Dec 8.5 to 19.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 979 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 979 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 967 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 979 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 29751 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 492 to 548 (Dec 8.5 to 19.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 979 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 979 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 29752 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 979 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 29752 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39" Excluding outliers - 979 stars left (next iteration limit 1076) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits N_match=979 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.412 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.467 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.380 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.417 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.372 n_q1=252 n_q2=273 n_q3=231 n_q4=223 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.135 The image catalog is written to wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits -region wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations ############ /tmp/tmp.DRAKGziPm2 (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um Internal estimated FoV 605.3' The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-10_CI_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_235431_TTUQ1b1x1_3372965_dlUmItl7/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-10_CI_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_235431_TTUQ1b1x1_3372965_dlUmItl7/fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-42-59_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0124.fits 605.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-10_CI_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_235431_TTUQ1b1x1_3372965_dlUmItl7/fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-42-59_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0124.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-10_CI_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_235431_TTUQ1b1x1_3372965_dlUmItl7/fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-42-59_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0124.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-10_CI_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_235431_TTUQ1b1x1_3372965_dlUmItl7/fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-42-59_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0124.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-10_CI_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_235431_TTUQ1b1x1_3372965_dlUmItl7/fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-42-59_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0124.fits It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve! FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-10_CI_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_235431_TTUQ1b1x1_3372965_dlUmItl7/fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-42-59_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0124.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-42-59_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0124.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-42-59_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0124.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-42-59_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0124.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-42-59_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0124.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-42-59_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0124.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-42-59_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0124.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-42-59_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0124.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-10_CI_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_235431_TTUQ1b1x1_3372965_dlUmItl7/fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-42-59_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0124.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-42-59_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0124.fits.wcscat SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=6, blended=713, passed=24749 Got 24749 stars (including 23982 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-42-59_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0124.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 24749 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.3' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.3 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013074 (47.1 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010459 (37.7 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 491 to 549 (Dec 8.2 to 19.6) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 972 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 972 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 961 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 972 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 24243 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 491 to 549 (Dec 8.2 to 19.6) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 972 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 972 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 24243 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 972 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 24243 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27" Excluding outliers - 972 stars left (next iteration limit 1069) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-42-59_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0124.fits N_match=972 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.279 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.313 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.329 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.242 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.260 n_q1=210 n_q2=213 n_q3=283 n_q4=266 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.180 The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-42-59_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0124.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-42-59_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0124.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-10_CI_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_235431_TTUQ1b1x1_3372965_dlUmItl7/fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-42-59_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0124.fits -region wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-42-59_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0124.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-42-59_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0124.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations ############ /tmp/tmp.xQ51YwBHE0 (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um Internal estimated FoV 605.3' The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-10_CI_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_235431_TTUQ1b1x1_3372965_dlUmItl7/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-10_CI_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_235431_TTUQ1b1x1_3372965_dlUmItl7/fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-43-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0125.fits 605.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-10_CI_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_235431_TTUQ1b1x1_3372965_dlUmItl7/fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-43-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0125.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-10_CI_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_235431_TTUQ1b1x1_3372965_dlUmItl7/fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-43-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0125.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-10_CI_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_235431_TTUQ1b1x1_3372965_dlUmItl7/fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-43-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0125.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-10_CI_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_235431_TTUQ1b1x1_3372965_dlUmItl7/fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-43-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0125.fits It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve! FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-10_CI_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_235431_TTUQ1b1x1_3372965_dlUmItl7/fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-43-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0125.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-43-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0125.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-43-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0125.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-43-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0125.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-43-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0125.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-43-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0125.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-43-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0125.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-43-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0125.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-10_CI_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_235431_TTUQ1b1x1_3372965_dlUmItl7/fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-43-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0125.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-43-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0125.fits.wcscat SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=14, blended=780, passed=24947 Got 24947 stars (including 24117 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-43-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0125.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 24947 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.3' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.3 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013074 (47.1 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010459 (37.7 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 491 to 549 (Dec 8.2 to 19.6) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 974 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 974 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 963 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 974 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 24420 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 491 to 549 (Dec 8.2 to 19.6) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 974 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 974 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 24421 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 974 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 24421 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28" Excluding outliers - 974 stars left (next iteration limit 1071) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-43-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0125.fits N_match=974 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.282 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.325 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.318 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.251 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.237 n_q1=208 n_q2=214 n_q3=283 n_q4=269 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.149 The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-43-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0125.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-43-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0125.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-10_CI_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_235431_TTUQ1b1x1_3372965_dlUmItl7/fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-43-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0125.fits -region wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-43-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0125.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-43-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0125.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL) Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-42-59_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0124.fits INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image) The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-10_CI_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_235431_TTUQ1b1x1_3372965_dlUmItl7/wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-42-59_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0124.fits Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-43-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0125.fits INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image) The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-10_CI_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_235431_TTUQ1b1x1_3372965_dlUmItl7/wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-43-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0125.fits Preparing the HTML report for the field Leo-06-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 11:03:33.11 +12:20:27.0: 13.45 +/- 0.04 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 11:51:17.56 +11:59:15.2: 12.34 +/- 0.01 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits at 11:03:33.11 +12:20:27.0: 13.53 +/- 0.04 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.49 +/- 0.03 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 11:03:33.11 +12:20:27.0: ref_mag=13.49 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.4267 delta=0.06 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits at 11:51:17.56 +11:59:15.2: 12.34 +/- 0.01 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.34 +/- 0.01 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 11:51:17.56 +11:59:15.2: ref_mag=12.34 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.7416 delta=-0.40 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 12:03:58.67 +11:50:42.0: 13.18 +/- 0.03 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits at 12:03:58.67 +11:50:42.0: 13.18 +/- 0.03 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.18 +/- 0.02 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 12:03:58.67 +11:50:42.0: ref_mag=13.18 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.4793 delta=-0.30 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 11:40:26.68 +11:24:44.3: 16.12 +/- 99.00 upperlimit Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 11:44:07.10 +11:32:36.8: 15.68 +/- 0.25 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 11:54:58.58 +16:36:56.7: 15.29 +/- 0.18 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits at 11:40:26.68 +11:24:44.3: 16.15 +/- 99.00 upperlimit Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits at 11:44:07.10 +11:32:36.8: 15.68 +/- 0.24 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.68 +/- 0.17 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 11:44:07.10 +11:32:36.8: ref_mag=15.68 +/- 0.17 new_mean_mag=14.8506 delta=0.83 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits at 11:54:58.58 +16:36:56.7: 15.42 +/- 0.21 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.34 +/- 0.14 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 11:54:58.58 +16:36:56.7: ref_mag=15.34 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=14.9981 delta=0.34 (need > 0.90) Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out53014.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 9s Pre-generating preview images in parallel... Done pre-generating preview images. Pre-generating finding charts in parallel... Done pre-generating finding charts. make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 1s xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52099_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-43-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0125 The candidate 52099_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-43-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0125 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 06 11.19710    2461202.69710    14.36    12:05:10.77 +17:35:29.7   0305 0656   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-10_CI_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_235431_TTUQ1b1x1_3372965_dlUmItl7/fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-43-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0125.fits **** FOUND 12:05:10.69 +17:35:30.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52101_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-43-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0125 The candidate 52101_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-43-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0125 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 06 11.19710    2461202.69710    13.69    12:04:35.05 +12:35:55.2   0105 3695   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-10_CI_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_235431_TTUQ1b1x1_3372965_dlUmItl7/fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-43-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0125.fits **** FOUND 12:04:35.12 +12:35:55.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52102_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-43-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0125 The candidate 52102_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-43-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0125 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 06 11.19710    2461202.69710    13.63    11:58:47.15 +12:23:17.8   0959 3898   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-10_CI_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_235431_TTUQ1b1x1_3372965_dlUmItl7/fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-43-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0125.fits **** FOUND 11:58:47.19 +12:23:18.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52104_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-43-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0125 The candidate 52104_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-43-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0125 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 06 11.19664    2461202.69664    13.44    11:03:33.12 +12:20:27.4   9123 4412   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-10_CI_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_235431_TTUQ1b1x1_3372965_dlUmItl7/fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-42-59_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0124.fits Discovery image 2   2026 06 11.19710    2461202.69710    13.41    11:03:33.11 +12:20:26.5   9116 4413   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-10_CI_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_235431_TTUQ1b1x1_3372965_dlUmItl7/fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-43-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0125.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52156_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-43-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0125 The candidate 52156_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-43-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0125 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 06 11.19710    2461202.69710    10.81    11:25:36.48 +16:28:17.9   5978 1782   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-10_CI_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_235431_TTUQ1b1x1_3372965_dlUmItl7/fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-43-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0125.fits **** FOUND 11:25:36.48 +16:28:18.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52346_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-43-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0125 The candidate 52346_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-43-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0125 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 06 11.19664    2461202.69664    12.68    11:51:17.59 +11:59:15.6   2057 4229   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-10_CI_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_235431_TTUQ1b1x1_3372965_dlUmItl7/fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-42-59_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0124.fits Discovery image 2   2026 06 11.19710    2461202.69710    12.82    11:51:17.52 +11:59:14.9   2051 4230   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-10_CI_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_235431_TTUQ1b1x1_3372965_dlUmItl7/fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-43-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0125.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52416_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-43-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0125 The candidate 52416_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-43-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0125 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 06 11.19710    2461202.69710    13.09    11:15:56.21 +12:49:01.8   7283 4051   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-10_CI_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_235431_TTUQ1b1x1_3372965_dlUmItl7/fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-43-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0125.fits **** FOUND 11:15:56.20 +12:49:01.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52447_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-43-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0125 The candidate 52447_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-43-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0125 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 06 11.19710    2461202.69710    13.22    11:52:39.72 +15:26:06.6   2020 2137   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-10_CI_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_235431_TTUQ1b1x1_3372965_dlUmItl7/fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-43-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0125.fits **** FOUND 11:52:39.73 +15:26:06.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52459_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-43-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0125 The candidate 52459_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-43-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0125 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 06 11.19710    2461202.69710    13.35    11:54:05.83 +18:11:16.1   1949 0454   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-10_CI_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_235431_TTUQ1b1x1_3372965_dlUmItl7/fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-43-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0125.fits **** FOUND 11:54:05.82 +18:11:16.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52472_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-43-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0125 The candidate 52472_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-43-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0125 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 06 11.19710    2461202.69710    13.29    11:38:01.98 +12:59:06.5   4046 3770   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-10_CI_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_235431_TTUQ1b1x1_3372965_dlUmItl7/fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-43-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0125.fits **** FOUND 11:38:01.99 +12:59:06.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52474_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-43-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0125 The candidate 52474_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-43-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0125 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 06 11.19710    2461202.69710    13.36    11:56:28.18 +12:20:25.3   1301 3956   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-10_CI_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_235431_TTUQ1b1x1_3372965_dlUmItl7/fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-43-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0125.fits **** FOUND 11:56:28.15 +12:20:24.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52497_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-43-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0125 The candidate 52497_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-43-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0125 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 06 11.19710    2461202.69710    13.46    11:18:56.42 +10:11:22.9   6767 5619   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-10_CI_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_235431_TTUQ1b1x1_3372965_dlUmItl7/fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-43-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0125.fits **** FOUND 11:18:56.40 +10:11:23.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52527_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-43-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0125 The candidate 52527_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-43-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0125 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 06 11.19664    2461202.69664    13.48    12:03:58.67 +11:50:42.1   0158 4159   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-10_CI_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_235431_TTUQ1b1x1_3372965_dlUmItl7/fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-42-59_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0124.fits Discovery image 2   2026 06 11.19710    2461202.69710    13.48    12:03:58.68 +11:50:41.9   0152 4161   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-10_CI_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_235431_TTUQ1b1x1_3372965_dlUmItl7/fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-43-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0125.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52618_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-43-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0125 The candidate 52618_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-43-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0125 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 06 11.19710    2461202.69710    13.77    11:43:39.44 +10:42:04.2   3121 5089   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-10_CI_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_235431_TTUQ1b1x1_3372965_dlUmItl7/fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-43-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0125.fits **** FOUND 11:43:39.45 +10:42:04.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52647_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-43-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0125 The candidate 52647_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-43-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0125 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 06 11.19710    2461202.69710    14.12    11:31:23.73 +16:05:33.4   5129 1964   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-10_CI_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_235431_TTUQ1b1x1_3372965_dlUmItl7/fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-43-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0125.fits **** FOUND 11:31:23.71 +16:05:32.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52696_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-43-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0125 The candidate 52696_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-43-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0125 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 06 11.19710    2461202.69710    14.01    11:44:59.30 +17:08:47.7   3213 1195   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-10_CI_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_235431_TTUQ1b1x1_3372965_dlUmItl7/fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-43-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0125.fits **** FOUND 11:44:59.34 +17:08:47.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52732_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-43-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0125 The candidate 52732_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-43-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0125 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 06 11.19710    2461202.69710    13.95    11:53:10.95 +18:23:02.1   2090 0347   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-10_CI_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_235431_TTUQ1b1x1_3372965_dlUmItl7/fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-43-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0125.fits **** FOUND 11:53:10.97 +18:23:01.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52799_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-43-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0125 The candidate 52799_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-43-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0125 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 06 11.19710    2461202.69710    14.10    11:13:18.25 +12:13:46.0   7658 4424   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-10_CI_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_235431_TTUQ1b1x1_3372965_dlUmItl7/fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-43-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0125.fits **** FOUND 11:13:18.25 +12:13:45.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52801_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-43-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0125 The candidate 52801_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-43-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0125 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 06 11.19710    2461202.69710    14.14    11:35:35.98 +09:35:57.4   4271 5834   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-10_CI_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_235431_TTUQ1b1x1_3372965_dlUmItl7/fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-43-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0125.fits **** FOUND 11:35:35.92 +09:35:59.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52834_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-43-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0125 The candidate 52834_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-43-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0125 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 06 11.19710    2461202.69710    14.24    11:50:19.91 +10:24:34.2   2116 5195   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-10_CI_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_235431_TTUQ1b1x1_3372965_dlUmItl7/fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-43-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0125.fits **** FOUND 11:50:19.85 +10:24:34.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52861_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-43-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0125 The candidate 52861_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-43-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0125 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 06 11.19710    2461202.69710    14.42    11:42:16.99 +18:38:24.6   3666 0322   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-10_CI_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_235431_TTUQ1b1x1_3372965_dlUmItl7/fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-43-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0125.fits **** FOUND 11:42:17.07 +18:38:24.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52870_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-43-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0125 The candidate 52870_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-43-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0125 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 06 11.19710    2461202.69710    14.33    11:31:37.42 +14:21:15.5   5034 3007   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-10_CI_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_235431_TTUQ1b1x1_3372965_dlUmItl7/fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-43-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0125.fits **** FOUND 11:31:37.44 +14:21:14.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52954_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-43-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0125 The candidate 52954_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-43-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0125 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 06 11.19710    2461202.69710    14.53    11:29:54.67 +16:41:30.7   5365 1616   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-10_CI_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_235431_TTUQ1b1x1_3372965_dlUmItl7/fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-43-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0125.fits **** FOUND 11:29:54.62 +16:41:29.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52973_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-43-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0125 The candidate 52973_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-43-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0125 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 06 11.19710    2461202.69710    14.72    11:46:02.02 +12:19:59.7   2844 4080   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-10_CI_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_235431_TTUQ1b1x1_3372965_dlUmItl7/fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-43-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0125.fits **** FOUND 11:46:02.06 +12:19:59.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52983_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-43-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0125 The candidate 52983_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-43-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0125 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 06 11.19710    2461202.69710    14.63    11:37:28.72 +18:08:19.1   4333 0675   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-10_CI_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_235431_TTUQ1b1x1_3372965_dlUmItl7/fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-43-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0125.fits **** FOUND 11:37:28.74 +18:08:19.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 53014_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-43-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0125 Preparing report for the candidate 53014_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-43-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0125 xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 53041_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-43-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0125 The candidate 53041_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-43-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0125 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 06 11.19710    2461202.69710    14.62    12:01:36.68 +17:20:01.2   0813 0867   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-10_CI_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_235431_TTUQ1b1x1_3372965_dlUmItl7/fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-43-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0125.fits **** FOUND 12:01:36.70 +17:20:01.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 53073_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-43-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0125 The candidate 53073_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-43-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0125 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 06 11.19664    2461202.69664    14.74    11:44:07.09 +11:32:36.6   3097 4575   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-10_CI_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_235431_TTUQ1b1x1_3372965_dlUmItl7/fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-42-59_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0124.fits Discovery image 2   2026 06 11.19710    2461202.69710    15.02    11:44:07.10 +11:32:36.9   3091 4576   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-10_CI_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_235431_TTUQ1b1x1_3372965_dlUmItl7/fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-43-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0125.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 53180_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-43-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0125 The candidate 53180_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-43-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0125 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 06 11.19664    2461202.69664    14.99    11:54:58.49 +16:36:55.9   1749 1394   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-10_CI_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_235431_TTUQ1b1x1_3372965_dlUmItl7/fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-42-59_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0124.fits Discovery image 2   2026 06 11.19710    2461202.69710    15.00    11:54:58.66 +16:36:57.6   1742 1395   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-10_CI_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_235431_TTUQ1b1x1_3372965_dlUmItl7/fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-43-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0125.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 26067_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-43-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0125 The candidate 26067_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-43-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0125 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 3   2026 06 11.19710    2461202.69710    9.68    11:23:40.04 +16:51:05.6   6270 1567   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-10_CI_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_235431_TTUQ1b1x1_3372965_dlUmItl7/fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-43-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0125.fits **** FOUND 11:23:40.06 +16:51:05.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 13255_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-43-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0125 The candidate 13255_fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-43-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0125 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 3   2026 06 11.19710    2461202.69710    12.59    11:30:53.63 +13:19:27.9   5103 3632   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-10_CI_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_235431_TTUQ1b1x1_3372965_dlUmItl7/fd_Leo-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-43-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0125.fits **** FOUND 11:30:53.62 +13:19:28.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 10s Prepared the HTML report for the field Leo-06-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL *------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------* #### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt #### 11:40:26.68 +11:24:44.3 ########### Completed Leo-06-Q1b1x1 ########### The analysis was running at tau We are allowed to update the exclusion list at tau host Found ../exclusion_list_TTUQ1.txt #### The exclusion list before filtering-out asteroids, bad pixels and adding Gaia sources #### 11:40:26.68 +11:24:44.3 ################################################################################### 11:40:26.68 +11:24:44.3 -- asteroid (will NOT add it to exclusion list) renamed 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt_noasteroids' -> 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt' renamed 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt_nohotpixels' -> 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt' # Count candidates with no identification (that also don't look like hot pix) Found 0 unidentified candidates (excluding asteroids, hot pixels and known variable stars). ################################################################################### 0 candidates found (excluding asteroids and hot pixels) This does not look like a test run ################################################################################### exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt NOT FOUND exclusion_list_apass.txt NOT FOUND IS_THIS_TEST_RUN=NO ALLOW_EXCLUSION_LIST_UPDATE= YES #### Nothing to add to the exclusion list #### The observatory MPC code is V36 ############################################################ Positions of planets computed with util/planet_finder/main.py for JD(UT)2461202.69664170 -observatory V36 07:00:40.16 +24:22:08.6 Mercury (0.3mag) 07:57:52.79 +22:44:53.2 Venus (-4.0mag) 02:58:21.02 +16:22:46.8 Mars (1.3mag) 07:50:57.29 +21:25:03.5 Jupiter (-1.9mag) 00:50:12.53 +02:53:12.0 Saturn (0.8mag) 04:00:55.09 +20:27:30.2 Uranus (5.8mag) 00:16:18.61 +00:17:43.7 Neptune (7.8mag) 20:33:11.02 -23:05:41.3 Pluto (14.5mag) 01:28:02.15 +12:43:07.2 Moon (-9.5mag) -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 361 Jun 10 23:57 planets.txt ############################################################ Positions of selected moons from JPL HORIZONS for JD(UT)2461202.69664170: 07:50:52.13 +21:25:18.9 Io (6.0mag) 07:50:49.22 +21:25:29.8 Europa (6.2mag) 07:51:12.42 +21:24:20.5 Ganymede (5.6mag) 07:50:43.85 +21:25:38.4 Callisto (6.7mag) 07:51:03.81 +21:01:36.6 Himalia (15.6mag) 07:50:55.21 +21:25:10.8 Thebe (16.5mag) 07:50:58.24 +21:15:44.5 Elara (17.5mag) 07:53:17.17 +21:35:07.0 Pasiphae (17.7mag) 07:57:24.36 +21:26:59.9 Carme (18.9mag) 00:50:14.51 +02:52:48.5 Titan (8.6mag) 00:50:17.76 +02:53:13.8 Rhea (9.9mag) 00:50:42.48 +02:55:36.3 Iapetus (11.3mag) 00:50:19.66 +02:52:41.8 Hyperion (14.6mag) 00:50:51.10 +02:54:42.5 Phoebe (16.7mag) -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 568 Jun 10 23:57 moons.txt ############################################################ Positions of selected spacecraft from JPL HORIZONS for JD(UT)2461202.69664170: 17:27:35.42 -35:28:29.8 JWST 16:26:33.88 +50:05:32.8 Chandra 08:29:44.49 -46:48:19.4 XMM-Newton -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 96 Jun 10 23:57 spacecraft.txt ############################################################ Positions of bright comets computed with util/comet_finder/main.py for JD(UT)2461202.69664170 -observatory V36 18:41:23.59 -32:52:09.7 13.6mag P/2010 H2 (Vales) 05:56:26.07 -68:02:09.2 17.4mag C/2014 UN271 (Bernardinelli-Bernstein) 05:50:10.02 +32:00:27.4 17.5mag C/2017 K2 (PANSTARRS) 17:13:31.76 +15:29:40.7 17.8mag C/2021 G2 (ATLAS) 21:40:44.56 -47:37:51.2 16.6mag P/2021 N1 (ZTF) 23:11:55.42 +31:42:12.5 17.2mag C/2022 E2 (ATLAS) 05:37:43.19 +26:59:28.1 16.5mag C/2022 N2 (PANSTARRS) 09:31:54.68 +30:58:34.0 16.7mag C/2022 QE78 (ATLAS) 08:52:10.42 +04:04:18.7 17.7mag C/2022 R6 (PANSTARRS) 18:26:15.31 +21:39:08.1 17.8mag C/2023 A3 (Tsuchinshan-ATLAS) 15:18:19.21 -11:00:56.1 17.6mag P/2023 B1 (PANSTARRS) 22:13:19.53 +66:42:28.5 17.8mag C/2023 H5 (Lemmon) 17:38:56.55 -06:59:10.7 13.7mag C/2023 R1 (PANSTARRS) 13:16:57.33 +82:18:17.1 18.0mag C/2023 X2 (Lemmon) 07:14:37.79 +64:24:45.0 17.7mag C/2024 A1 (ATLAS) 06:51:48.25 +28:05:47.1 13.7mag C/2024 E1 (Wierzchos) 15:34:57.63 +13:46:50.8 17.4mag C/2024 G6 (ATLAS) 20:10:58.30 +32:01:23.5 14.0mag C/2024 J3 (ATLAS) 04:21:02.18 -15:41:34.0 16.0mag C/2024 T5 (ATLAS) 06:08:42.44 +33:58:16.8 17.9mag C/2025 J1 (Borisov) 11:33:38.96 +52:34:25.4 17.5mag C/2025 L1 (ATLAS) 06:48:29.69 -11:00:28.8 14.4mag C/2025 R3 (PANSTARRS) 09:26:39.95 +23:17:48.0 17.9mag C/2025 V2 (Rankin) 12:39:40.45 +04:40:32.2 17.2mag C/2025 Y1 (ATLAS) 18:07:50.29 +75:45:46.9 17.8mag C/2026 A2 (Bok) 02:05:48.75 +43:37:30.9 16.1mag C/2026 B2 (Sun-Gao) 11:11:59.92 -02:42:11.8 16.5mag A/2026 E1 20:29:05.64 -08:48:37.6 8.6mag 10P/Tempel 11:02:44.55 -01:00:52.3 16.0mag 29P/Schwassmann-Wachmann 03:16:21.80 +26:02:40.3 17.7mag 47P/Ashbrook-Jackson 09:06:23.07 +22:54:23.9 16.9mag 63P/Wild 00:29:27.85 -06:10:48.2 15.7mag 65P/Gunn 06:53:11.15 +33:42:41.6 17.0mag 76P/West-Kohoutek-Ikemura 03:16:26.86 +17:35:29.6 13.8mag 78P/Gehrels 01:27:13.18 +05:29:34.3 15.6mag 88P/Howell 05:04:18.49 +30:30:37.9 15.3mag 93P/Lovas 02:51:30.29 +28:05:47.6 17.5mag 114P/Wiseman-Skiff 06:57:43.54 +32:55:12.7 15.6mag 123P/West-Hartley 09:55:25.06 +13:21:14.0 16.5mag 124P/Mrkos 04:03:59.50 +19:26:48.0 16.3mag 128P/Shoemaker-Holt 04:39:31.89 +19:12:55.3 17.7mag 131P/Mueller 06:11:01.44 +18:17:54.5 15.0mag 141P/Machholz 06:13:49.62 +17:48:20.9 15.0mag 141P-A/Machholz 05:09:05.23 +16:33:11.3 11.9mag 141P-D/Machholz 02:59:46.69 -24:17:22.8 16.7mag 161P/Hartley-IRAS 03:51:28.11 +24:59:37.9 14.9mag 162P/SidingSpring 19:36:14.59 +02:38:05.1 16.7mag 169P/NEAT 00:26:24.26 +03:02:48.5 17.8mag 220P/McNaught 16:49:55.42 -08:20:29.1 16.4mag 235P/LINEAR 07:41:26.13 +35:21:33.4 17.6mag 240P/NEAT 00:40:14.77 -01:11:03.3 16.3mag 260P/McNaught 04:12:25.93 +33:00:59.0 17.5mag 295P/LINEAR 00:10:30.58 -06:00:31.0 17.7mag 320P/McNaught 15:13:55.60 +07:59:18.4 17.4mag 391P/Kowalski 08:09:32.72 +20:40:04.6 17.9mag 450P/LONEOS 07:04:52.17 +41:28:53.9 17.8mag 493P/LONEOS -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 2.7K Jun 10 23:57 comets.txt ############################################################ List of recent ASAS-SN transients from https://www.astronomy.ohio-state.edu/asassn/transients.html : 20:07:38.15 -21:07:05.40 SN2026mho 2026-05-25.18 -1.12 11:29:42.55 +79:01:03.10 AT2026min 2026-05-24.21 16.63 11:44:32.95 -68:48:30.00 ASASSN-26no 2026-05-24 8.41 19:00:42.82 -48:31:01.60 ASASSN-26dp 2026-05-22.31 -3.28 14:23:56.59 -58:37:47.40 ASASSN-26dn 2026-05-20.01 14.59 11:24:54.06 +47:57:01.60 AT2026nma 2026-05-20.29 15.46 21:27:08.58 +33:24:38.10 AT2026lli 2026-05-19.34 15.86 00:31:01.41 -13:38:51.70 AT2026nad 2026-05-19.39 15.34 15:16:06.61 -79:16:32.40 ASASSN-26dm 2026-05-19.03 14.44 11:24:25.21 -59:23:19.10 ASASSN-26dl 2026-05-18.02 13.55 13:45:51.52 -53:16:01.00 ASASSN-26dk 2026-05-18.16 12.96 02:05:49.69 -30:29:09.60 ASASSN-26dh 2026-05-18.43 15.37 17:50:22.87 -39:42:33.90 ASASSN-26dj 2026-05-17.05 15.7 01:13:11.60 -33:25:16.10 ASASSN-26dg 2026-05-13.41 16.8 16:44:31.77 -27:15:18.40 AT2026mhn 2026-05-12.33 15.8 09:46:31.08 -33:41:51.00 ASASSN-26di 2026-05-12.14 14.63 21:23:11.57 -19:09:45.00 AT2026kwu 2026-05-12.26 16.9 14:20:14.30 -30:20:51.90 AT2026ktm 2026-05-12.06 17.21 14:41:39.01 -37:13:46.40 AT2026lkm 2026-05-11.18 16.89 12:59:50.45 -10:58:38.80 SN2026kep 2026-05-9.06 17.5 13:37:29.61 -29:50:30.90 AT2026lkd 2026-05-9.09 17.23 09:46:42.01 -14:52:03.60 SN2026kmo 2026-05-8.99 17.51 15:03:05.28 +22:02:03.40 AT2026lxf 2026-05-8.07 13.88 10:23:49.41 -20:57:25.30 ASASSN-26df 2026-05-8.21 16.52 22:14:40.56 +05:04:51.60 2026lda 2026-05-7.56 16.2 21:35:33.81 -14:05:16.30 ASASSN-26de 2026-05-6.29 14.51 16:21:48.82 -61:36:13.20 ASASSN-26dd 2026-05-5.21 15.15 14:26:40.22 -24:48:37.50 AT2026lig 2026-05-4.27 14.63 13:17:51.04 +30:25:13.50 SN2026kcp 2026-05-4.46 16.43 11:27:55.57 -13:38:56.90 SN2026kza 2026-05-1.08 15.59 22:28:27.10 +30:17:54.30 SN 2026fov 2026-04-29.6 14.36 21:00:10.71 -32:17:03.90 AT2026kis 2026-04-27.36 16.15 14:32:57.37 -58:13:26.40 ASASSN-26dc 2026-04-27.27 13.42 15:32:05.35 -43:54:34.60 ASASSN-26db 2026-04-27.37 16.06 16:34:34.97 -54:34:58.00 ASASSN-26da 2026-04-25.32 16.11 10:06:55.04 -01:13:49.70 SN2026jsg 2026-04-24.99 16.28 15:15:57.17 +56:18:32.80 SN2026kid 2026-04-24.52 -3.65 07:58:28.45 +57:03:42.40 AT2026kcf 2026-04-24.2 16.89 11:38:21.80 -50:43:06.50 SN2026jkb 2026-04-24.24 15.38 10:06:11.41 -39:41:04.20 AT2026dil 2026-04-24.2 16.85 14:21:40.08 +13:13:46.30 SN2026jlm 2026-04-22.16 15.12 10:53:55.52 -16:06:06.00 ASASSN-26cz 2026-04-22.28 16.29 20:07:38.15 -21:07:05.40 2026-05-25.18 -1.12 13:45:02.03 +15:17:14.50 ASASSN-26cy 2026-04-21.27 15.78 13:20:52.22 -35:57:03.60 AT2026jcm 2026-04-19.01 16.65 13:36:15.66 -36:53:48.40 SN 2026iqy 2026-04-18.92 17.31 06:34:01.33 -40:07:34.00 ASASSN-26cx 2026-04-19.07 16.16 23:33:57.97 -45:12:11.90 SN 2026idu 2026-04-19.41 15.9 12:10:50.92 +66:55:31.20 SN 2026icv 2026-04-17.14 16.03 21:36:59.06 -60:43:35.90 ASASSN-26cv 2026-04-17.35 -1.18 08:13:26.26 -27:07:30.50 ASASSN-26cw 2026-04-17.07 -1.01 14:49:14.13 -27:29:20.60 ASASSN-26cu 2026-04-16.06 14.03 17:21:59.44 -38:54:04.60 ASASSN-26ct 2026-04-14.4 15.15 15:25:54.99 +07:49:24.50 SN2026huo 2026-04-12.14 16.96 20:07:38.15 -21:07:05.40 2026-05-25.18 -1.12 12:23:20.40 +04:53:39.10 AT2026ixd 2026-04-12.14 17.65 17:46:09.76 -61:19:50.40 SN2026icy 2026-04-12.2 17.03 09:25:46.42 +02:13:46.30 SN2026gud 2026-04-11.98 16.49 16:52:15.46 -60:27:45.90 ASASSN-26cs 2026-04-12.4 15.5 04:20:55.37 -51:15:31.10 ASASSN-26cr 2026-04-12.01 15.37 22:25:39.35 +36:45:06.90 AT2026ihl 2026-04-10.48 14.21 19:40:44.94 +00:41:03.80 AT2026imw 2026-04-10.32 16.06 19:52:04.70 +05:53:33.50 ASASSN-26cq 2026-04-9.31 14.98 16:08:18.39 -64:11:08.80 ASASSN-26cp 2026-04-9.29 13.32 09:22:22.90 -61:02:43.70 SN2026idh 2026-04-7.97 16.34 05:06:54.12 -19:42:26.40 AT2026imr 2026-04-8 17.49 07:14:55.34 -36:03:21.40 AT2026hei 2026-04-8.12 16.7 21:35:33.14 -19:01:34.80 AT2026ihm 2026-04-8.36 16.7 04:28:24.08 -32:25:35.30 AT2026imo 2026-04-8.02 16.81 05:10:35.79 -39:38:40.80 SN 2026hnn 2026-04-7.04 17.07 09:54:32.04 -01:17:25.80 ASASSN-26cn 2026-04-7.01 15.58 07:46:24.43 -77:29:35.90 ASASSN-26co 2026-04-7.15 14.93 05:00:45.52 -29:51:06.20 AT2026hvw 2026-04-6.03 16.51 19:49:33.10 -23:37:11.00 ASASSN-26cl 2026-04-5.29 14.98 19:32:43.55 -22:39:33.40 ASASSN-26cm 2026-04-4.3 13.88 18:08:57.38 +76:48:23.60 ASASSN-26ck 2026-04-2.37 15.38 16:16:36.10 +44:52:30.20 AT2026hyy 2026-04-2.58 13.81 21:55:23.31 -34:48:53.90 ASASSN-26cj 2026-03-30.4 -1.47 11:19:50.70 -27:51:49.80 SN2026gvk 2026-03-30 15.48 11:53:57.02 -23:09:46.20 SN2026gzx 2026-03-28.75 15.27 07:13:46.14 -33:10:15.70 ASASSN-26ci 2026-03-28.15 15.14 09:03:36.09 -67:58:13.00 SN2026hkg 2026-03-28.19 15.82 07:03:00.72 +39:14:43.00 SN2026fin 2026-03-28.27 15.82 05:35:42.80 -63:44:05.50 ASASSN-26ch 2026-03-27.86 13.02 11:23:19.04 +34:22:38.00 SN2026fwt 2026-03-27.3 16.56 19:03:49.79 +37:04:05.20 ASASSN-26ce 2026-03-26.56 16.3 20:26:56.07 -52:54:06.50 AT2026hiy 2026-03-26.35 16.95 05:25:54.76 -30:15:35.80 ASASSN-26cg 2026-03-25.07 16.88 06:57:16.49 -26:54:37.20 SN2026fzb 2026-03-25.14 15.8 14:37:38.23 -43:00:52.30 ASASSN-26cd 2026-03-24.24 12.52 17:34:53.03 +06:04:29.70 AT2026gzl 2026-03-23.27 15.82 08:30:02.60 -35:12:47.50 ASASSN-26cf 2026-03-23.2 14.82 16:54:25.33 +37:49:56.60 SN 2026evz 2026-03-21.32 17.54 17:06:19.20 -18:54:19.50 ASASSN-26bx 2026-03-21.25 16.39 19:01:16.28 -29:29:23.10 ASASSN-26bw 2026-03-21.33 15.81 08:46:05.75 +10:47:39.80 ASASSN-26ca 2026-03-21.13 14.27 12:14:58.16 +63:47:16.20 SN 2026fvx 2026-03-21.12 15.6 18:02:55.90 -75:23:02.60 ASASSN-26bz 2026-03-21.32 16.16 12:16:02.88 -53:16:33.80 ASASSN-26cc 2026-03-20.04 15.48 13:08:21.85 +29:13:44.20 SN 2026fmh 2026-03-20.16 -0.33 -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 5.6K Jun 10 23:57 asassn_transients_list.txt ############################################################ Truncated list of TOCP transients from http://www.cbat.eps.harvard.edu/unconf/tocp.html : 09:55:38.83 +69:05:21.7 PNV J09553883+6905217 2026-04-01.893 19.4mag 19:32:43.67 -22:39:30.7 TCP J19324367-2239307 2026-04-05.4395 13.6mag 16:16:36.03 +44:52:28.9 TCP J16163603+4452289 2026-04-05.6655 14.2mag 00:43:38.36 +41:15:32.4 PNV J00433836+4115324 2026-04-08.079 17.2mag 15:41:11.68 +59:18:26.8 TCP J15411168+5918268 2026-04-12.9625 19.2mag 00:43:35.02 +41:46:28.0 PNV J00433502+4146280 2026-04-23.056 15.9mag 00:42:55.64 +41:14:12.2 PNV J00425564+4114122 2026-04-24.042 16.2mag 21:14:03.38 +56:46:44.1 TCP J21140338+5646441 2026-05-05.3534 16.7mag 15:03:05.19 +22:02:04.1 TCP J15030519+2202041 2026-05-08.3260 13.9mag 07:15:18.25 +47:53:16.7 TCP J07151825+4753167 2026-05-09.1599 14.4mag 16:00:18.44 -22:30:10.6 TCP J16001844-2230106 2026-05-09.6135 13.3mag 00:42:47.45 +41:16:58.5 PNV J00424745+4116585 2026-05-10.030 16.8mag 09:55:02.89 +69:02:13.8 PNV J09550289+6902138 2026-05-18.925 20.7mag 00:43:01.82 +41:18:16.6 PNV J00430182+4118166 2026-05-21.8651 18.83Cmag 00:42:51.20 +41:16:59.4 PNV J00425120+4116594 2022-10-26.135 19.3mag 12:24:25.10 +28:47:12.0 TCP J12242510+2847120 2026-05-31.6015 14.8mag 00:56:07.13 +43:01:40.6 TCP J00560713+4301406 2026-06-01.4135 12.2mag 00:42:41.64 +41:15:16.2 PNV J00424164+4115162 2026-06-02.029 17.4mag 00:42:38.68 +41:15:58.2 PNV J00423868+4115582 2026-06-05.1224 19.97Umag 19:00:42.95 -48:31:01.7 PNV J19004295-4831017 2026-05-25.0752 14.2mag -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 189K Jun 10 23:57 tocp_transients_list.txt ############################################################ Truncated list of recent TNS transients from https://www.wis-tns.org/ : 16:32:31.727 +65:39:51.90 AT 2026oei 2026-05-23.32 20.7631 16:04:39.925 -21:36:56.05 AT 2026oeh 2026-05-21.40 20.1751 15:27:47.338 +38:55:13.31 AT 2026oeg 2026-05-21.97 19.64 14:51:39.615 +45:21:56.05 AT 2026oef 2026-05-28.95 19.09 10:32:49.111 +46:46:00.48 AT 2026oee 2026-06-03.89 19.348 17:25:39.755 +21:57:18.90 SN 2026oed 2026-05-31.37 19.4457 09:59:38.199 +00:31:00.31 AT 2026oec 2026-05-30.97 22.39 09:27:53.984 +22:21:00.63 AT 2026oeb 2026-06-01.17 18.66 09:22:28.890 +11:30:25.73 AT 2026oea 2026-06-04.18 19.4125 12:42:23.918 -13:22:38.30 AT 2026odz 2026-06-02.21 20.0149 09:58:40.601 +01:27:22.46 AT 2026ody 2026-05-29.04 21.94 14:57:09.055 +33:12:55.31 AT 2026odx 2026-05-28.93 19.3 13:30:34.211 +08:18:17.60 AT 2026odw 2026-06-02.93 19.81 22:05:04.941 -08:18:56.22 SN 2026odv 2026-06-03.15 18.492 01:22:49.923 +43:28:14.10 AT 2026odu 2026-05-31.48 19.5762 09:01:08.906 -74:52:14.00 AT 2026odt 2026-06-03.00 17.911 12:00:27.833 -47:27:26.10 AT 2026ods 2026-06-03.09 18.497 01:23:02.862 -43:07:38.98 SN 2026odr 2026-05-31.37 17.272 12:45:42.624 -00:29:03.80 AT 2026odq 2026-05-31.19 19.8214 00:12:22.292 +51:55:38.27 AT 2026odp 2026-06-02.40 19.3385 -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 30K Jun 10 23:57 tns_transients_list.txt

Profiling:

CPU temperature: 88 C