This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-10_CI_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_233839_TTUQ1b1x1_2288956_y5zlhd3T
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 11.1835 2461202.6835 12.57 11:33:33.27 +05:14:43.7
259.18199 61.31407 galactic Leo Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.4" and 1.6 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.65 Cybele 0 0 0 12.7 0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits at 11:33:33.27 +05:14:43.7: 15.72 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-29-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0148.fits at 11:33:33.27 +05:14:43.7: 15.73 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 06 11.1835* 11 33 33.27 +05 14 43.7 12.6 U Leo 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461202.6835,12.57,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260611.1835 12.57CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 11.1835 2461202.6835 12.56 11:18:09.13 +03:51:12.6
255.11691 57.78692 galactic Leo Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.2" and 1.5 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.19 Fortuna 1 -0 1 12.8 0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits at 11:18:09.13 +03:51:12.6: 15.85 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-29-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0148.fits at 11:18:09.13 +03:51:12.6: 15.80 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 06 11.1835* 11 18 09.13 +03 51 12.6 12.6 U Leo 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461202.6835,12.56,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260611.1835 12.56CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 11.1835 2461202.6835 12.81 10:48:51.37 +01:48:41.0
248.47448 51.23507 galactic Sex Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.2" and 1.6 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.88 Thisbe 0 0 0 13.0 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits at 10:48:51.37 +01:48:41.0: 15.77 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-29-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0148.fits at 10:48:51.37 +01:48:41.0: 15.72 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 06 11.1835* 10 48 51.37 +01 48 41.0 12.8 U Sex 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461202.6835,12.81,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260611.1835 12.81CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 11.1835 2461202.6835 13.29 10:54:21.66 +04:37:02.9
246.61765 54.15002 galactic Leo Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.6" and 1.5 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.35 Leukothea 0 0 1 13.5 -0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits at 10:54:21.66 +04:37:02.9: 15.91 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-29-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0148.fits at 10:54:21.66 +04:37:02.9: 15.87 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 06 11.1835* 10 54 21.66 +04 37 02.9 13.3 U Leo 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461202.6835,13.29,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260611.1835 13.29CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 11.1835 2461202.6835 13.45 11:09:54.20 +02:54:58.3
253.47054 55.71274 galactic Leo Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.4" and 1.4 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.270 Anahita 0 -0 1 13.7 -0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits at 11:09:54.20 +02:54:58.3: 15.88 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-29-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0148.fits at 11:09:54.20 +02:54:58.3: 15.85 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 06 11.1835* 11 09 54.20 +02 54 58.3 13.4 U Leo 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461202.6835,13.45,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260611.1835 13.45CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 11.1835 2461202.6835 13.87 11:34:17.41 +08:10:03.9
255.43106 63.67590 galactic Leo Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.8" and 1.4 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.595 Polyxena 0 0 1 13.9 -0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits at 11:34:17.41 +08:10:03.9: 15.68 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-29-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0148.fits at 11:34:17.41 +08:10:03.9: 15.72 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 06 11.1835* 11 34 17.41 +08 10 03.9 13.9 U Leo 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461202.6835,13.87,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260611.1835 13.87CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 11.1835 2461202.6835 13.84 11:00:10.16 +04:39:13.6
248.26754 55.23957 galactic Leo Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.5" and 1.5 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.356 Liguria 1 0 1 13.9 -0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits at 11:00:10.16 +04:39:13.6: 15.93 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-29-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0148.fits at 11:00:10.16 +04:39:13.6: 15.96 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 06 11.1835* 11 00 10.16 +04 39 13.6 13.8 U Leo 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461202.6835,13.84,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260611.1835 13.84CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 11.1835 2461202.6835 14.09 11:11:53.38 +08:41:21.6
246.34482 60.10783 galactic Leo Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.2" and 1.5 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.140 Siwa 1 1 1 14.0 -0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits at 11:11:53.38 +08:41:21.6: 15.92 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-29-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0148.fits at 11:11:53.38 +08:41:21.6: 15.95 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 06 11.1835* 11 11 53.38 +08 41 21.6 14.1 U Leo 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461202.6835,14.09,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260611.1835 14.09CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 11.1835 2461202.6835 14.07 10:44:37.66 +04:57:26.5
243.52895 52.53847 galactic Sex Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.5" and 1.4 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.554 Peraga 1 -0 1 14.4 -0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits at 10:44:37.66 +04:57:26.5: 15.77 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-29-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0148.fits at 10:44:37.66 +04:57:26.5: 15.74 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 06 11.1835* 10 44 37.66 +04 57 26.5 14.1 U Sex 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461202.6835,14.07,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260611.1835 14.07CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 11.1835 2461202.6835 14.28 11:22:27.34 +03:01:17.9
257.66496 57.84777 galactic Leo Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.4" and 1.7 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.189 Phthia 1 0 1 14.3 0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits at 11:22:27.34 +03:01:17.9: 15.78 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-29-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0148.fits at 11:22:27.34 +03:01:17.9: 15.76 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 06 11.1835* 11 22 27.34 +03 01 17.9 14.3 U Leo 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461202.6835,14.28,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260611.1835 14.28CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 11.1835 2461202.6835 14.32 10:51:22.31 +02:45:15.7
248.06482 52.33956 galactic Sex Second-epoch detections are separated by 2.0" and 1.5 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.336 Lacadiera 1 1 1 14.4 0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits at 10:51:22.31 +02:45:15.7: 15.79 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-29-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0148.fits at 10:51:22.31 +02:45:15.7: 15.78 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 06 11.1835* 10 51 22.31 +02 45 15.7 14.3 U Sex 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461202.6835,14.32,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260611.1835 14.32CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 11.1835 2461202.6835 14.60 11:03:59.19 +10:51:36.8
240.51300 59.95630 galactic Leo Second-epoch detections are separated by 8.4" and 0.6 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
online_id | target | 11:03:59.19 +10:51:36.8 (user input) | T | P | (position from user input)
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits at 11:03:59.19 +10:51:36.8: 15.88 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-29-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0148.fits at 11:03:59.19 +10:51:36.8: 15.92 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 06 11.1835* 11 03 59.19 +10 51 36.8 14.6 U Leo 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
target,2461202.6835,14.60,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
target 20260611.1835 14.60CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 11.1835 2461202.6835 14.45 11:11:09.24 +07:29:35.8
247.86411 59.17284 galactic Leo Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.9" and 1.5 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.90 Antiope 1 1 1 14.6 -0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits at 11:11:09.24 +07:29:35.8: 15.96 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-29-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0148.fits at 11:11:09.24 +07:29:35.8: 15.72 +/- 0.29 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.72 +/- 0.29
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 06 11.1835* 11 11 09.24 +07 29 35.8 14.4 U Leo 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461202.6835,14.45,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260611.1835 14.45CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 11.1835 2461202.6835 14.43 11:05:37.10 +06:30:33.0
247.47653 57.49539 galactic Leo Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.3" and 1.5 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.136 Austria 0 -0 0 14.6 -0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits at 11:05:37.10 +06:30:33.0: 16.00 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-29-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0148.fits at 11:05:37.10 +06:30:33.0: 15.93 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 06 11.1835* 11 05 37.10 +06 30 33.0 14.4 U Leo 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461202.6835,14.43,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260611.1835 14.43CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461149.73290969 19.04.2026 05:35:13.397 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits
First image: 2461149.73290969 19.04.2026 05:35:13.397 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits
Last image: 2461202.68373043 11.06.2026 04:24:24.309 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-10_CI_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_233839_TTUQ1b1x1_2288956_y5zlhd3T/fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-24-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 1
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.65
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 3 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 5493
Objects passed selection criteria: 5486
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.5 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.5 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 4988.75
Average stars matched: 4857.25 (97.3641 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 111408 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Wed Jun 10 15:05:04 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-96-gc6da043e
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-06-10)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Wed Jun 10 23:41:01 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461149.73290969 19.04.2026 05:35:13.397 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits
First image: 2461149.73290969 19.04.2026 05:35:13.397 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits
Last image: 2461202.68373043 11.06.2026 04:24:24.309 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-10_CI_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_233839_TTUQ1b1x1_2288956_y5zlhd3T/fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-24-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 150
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.38
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 10 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 29056
Objects passed selection criteria: 28999
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.6 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.6 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 27553
Average stars matched: 26482.2 (96.1139 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 131004 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Wed Jun 10 15:05:04 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-96-gc6da043e
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-06-10)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Wed Jun 10 23:42:22 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 3.5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-29-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0148.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-10_CI_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_233839_TTUQ1b1x1_2288956_y5zlhd3T/fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-23-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0102.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-10_CI_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_233839_TTUQ1b1x1_2288956_y5zlhd3T/fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-24-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-29-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0148.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-29-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0148.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-10_CI_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_233839_TTUQ1b1x1_2288956_y5zlhd3T/fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-23-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0102.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-10_CI_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_233839_TTUQ1b1x1_2288956_y5zlhd3T/fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-24-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461202.68333307
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits'
wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-29-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0148.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-29-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0148.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-29-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0148.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-29-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0148.fits'
wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-23-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0102.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-23-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0102.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-23-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0102.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-23-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0102.fits'
wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-24-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-24-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-24-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-24-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103.fits'
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits
Image size: 937.4'x624.2' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 11:08:41.744 +05:57:39.30 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.87"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-23-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0102.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-23-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0102.fits
Image size: 941.4'x626.7' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 11:08:44.641 +05:56:38.28 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 11:08:41.744 +05:57:39.30
Second-epoch image center 11:08:44.641 +05:56:38.28
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0208 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-24-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-24-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103.fits
Image size: 941.4'x626.7' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 11:08:44.060 +05:56:36.69 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 11:08:41.744 +05:57:39.30
Second-epoch image center 11:08:44.060 +05:56:36.69
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0199 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 11:08:44.641 +05:56:38.28
Second-epoch second image center 11:08:44.060 +05:56:36.69
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00245 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits &> /tmp/tmp.5UQvW0UT70
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-29-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0148.fits &> /tmp/tmp.xXPcaI8udX
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-29-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0148.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-10_CI_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_233839_TTUQ1b1x1_2288956_y5zlhd3T/fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-23-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0102.fits &> /tmp/tmp.hduA6cdrhJ
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-10_CI_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_233839_TTUQ1b1x1_2288956_y5zlhd3T/fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-23-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0102.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-10_CI_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_233839_TTUQ1b1x1_2288956_y5zlhd3T/fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-24-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103.fits &> /tmp/tmp.ax2e3wLSQZ
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-10_CI_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_233839_TTUQ1b1x1_2288956_y5zlhd3T/fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-24-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits and wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits and wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits and wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits) and catalog (wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 5626 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 159.1365 to 175.0745 deg, Dec +0.5737 to +11.2590 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 159.1365 to 175.0745 deg, Dec 0.5737 to 11.2590 deg
Loaded 3954 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3201 out of 3312 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3312 out of 5626 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.762800
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.762800
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.65
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.11
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.11
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 5626 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 159.1365 to 175.0745 deg, Dec +0.5737 to +11.2590 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 159.1365 to 175.0745 deg, Dec 0.5737 to 11.2590 deg
Loaded 3954 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3201 out of 3312 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3312 out of 5626 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits (aperture=6.5)
Read 5579 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 159.1771 to 175.0846 deg, Dec +0.7335 to +11.2823 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 159.1771 to 175.0846 deg, Dec 0.7335 to 11.2823 deg
Loaded 3902 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3209 out of 3301 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3301 out of 5579 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-29-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0148.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-29-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0148.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-29-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0148.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-29-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0148.fits (aperture=6.5)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 1 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 8000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.4 pix Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits
2.3 pix Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-29-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0148.fits
2.2 pix fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-23-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0102.fits
2.2 pix fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-24-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103.fits
2.4 pix wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits
2.3 pix wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-29-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0148.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.1 mag. Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits
15.1 mag. Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-29-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0148.fits
14.9 mag. fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-23-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0102.fits
14.9 mag. fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-24-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.9 (SNR ) 11.9 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.5UQvW0UT70 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-10_CI_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_233839_TTUQ1b1x1_2288956_y5zlhd3T/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits 570.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits' -> 'wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits.wcscat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=364, passed=5626
Got 5626 stars (including 5255 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 5626 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013019 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010416 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 452 to 508 (Dec 0.6 to 11.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 943 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 943 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 930 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.47"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 943 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5542 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.46"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 452 to 508 (Dec 0.6 to 11.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 943 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 943 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5543 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.46"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 943 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5543 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.47"
Excluding outliers - 943 stars left (next iteration limit 1037)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits N_match=943 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.504 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.515 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.520 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.509 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.476 n_q1=239 n_q2=269 n_q3=213 n_q4=222 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.031
The image catalog is written to wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits -region wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.xXPcaI8udX (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-29-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0148.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-10_CI_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_233839_TTUQ1b1x1_2288956_y5zlhd3T/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-29-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0148.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-29-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0148.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-29-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0148.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-29-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0148.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-29-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0148.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-29-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0148.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-29-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0148.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-29-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0148.fits' -> 'wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-29-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0148.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-29-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0148.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-29-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0148.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-29-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0148.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-29-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0148.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-29-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0148.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-29-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0148.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-29-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0148.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-29-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0148.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-29-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0148.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-29-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0148.fits.wcscat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=3, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=329, passed=5576
Got 5576 stars (including 5240 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-29-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0148.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 5576 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013017 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010413 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 453 to 508 (Dec 0.7 to 11.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 943 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 943 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 929 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 943 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5488 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 453 to 508 (Dec 0.7 to 11.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 943 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 943 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5486 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 943 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5486 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44"
Excluding outliers - 943 stars left (next iteration limit 1037)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-29-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0148.fits N_match=943 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.495 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.435 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.571 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.403 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.600 n_q1=234 n_q2=264 n_q3=218 n_q4=227 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.212
The image catalog is written to wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-29-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0148.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-29-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0148.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-29-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0148.fits -region wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-29-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0148.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-29-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0148.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.hduA6cdrhJ (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-10_CI_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_233839_TTUQ1b1x1_2288956_y5zlhd3T/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-10_CI_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_233839_TTUQ1b1x1_2288956_y5zlhd3T/fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-23-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0102.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-10_CI_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_233839_TTUQ1b1x1_2288956_y5zlhd3T/fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-23-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0102.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-10_CI_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_233839_TTUQ1b1x1_2288956_y5zlhd3T/fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-23-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0102.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-10_CI_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_233839_TTUQ1b1x1_2288956_y5zlhd3T/fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-23-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0102.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-10_CI_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_233839_TTUQ1b1x1_2288956_y5zlhd3T/fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-23-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0102.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-10_CI_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_233839_TTUQ1b1x1_2288956_y5zlhd3T/fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-23-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0102.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-23-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0102.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-23-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0102.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-23-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0102.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-23-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0102.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-23-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0102.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-23-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0102.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-23-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0102.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-10_CI_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_233839_TTUQ1b1x1_2288956_y5zlhd3T/fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-23-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0102.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-23-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0102.fits.wcscat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=3, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=275, passed=4445
Got 4445 stars (including 4163 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-23-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0102.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 4445 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013075 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010460 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 451 to 509 (Dec 0.3 to 11.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 940 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 940 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 927 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 940 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4380 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 451 to 509 (Dec 0.3 to 11.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 940 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 940 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4379 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 940 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4379 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
Excluding outliers - 940 stars left (next iteration limit 1034)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-23-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0102.fits N_match=940 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.315 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.313 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.349 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.317 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.283 n_q1=233 n_q2=256 n_q3=236 n_q4=215 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.106
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-23-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0102.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-23-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0102.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-10_CI_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_233839_TTUQ1b1x1_2288956_y5zlhd3T/fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-23-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0102.fits -region wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-23-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0102.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-23-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0102.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.ax2e3wLSQZ (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-10_CI_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_233839_TTUQ1b1x1_2288956_y5zlhd3T/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-10_CI_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_233839_TTUQ1b1x1_2288956_y5zlhd3T/fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-24-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-10_CI_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_233839_TTUQ1b1x1_2288956_y5zlhd3T/fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-24-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-10_CI_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_233839_TTUQ1b1x1_2288956_y5zlhd3T/fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-24-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-10_CI_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_233839_TTUQ1b1x1_2288956_y5zlhd3T/fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-24-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-10_CI_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_233839_TTUQ1b1x1_2288956_y5zlhd3T/fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-24-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-10_CI_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_233839_TTUQ1b1x1_2288956_y5zlhd3T/fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-24-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-24-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-24-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-24-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-24-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-24-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-24-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-24-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-10_CI_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_233839_TTUQ1b1x1_2288956_y5zlhd3T/fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-24-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-24-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103.fits.wcscat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=271, passed=4432
Got 4432 stars (including 4155 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-24-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 4432 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013075 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010460 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 451 to 509 (Dec 0.3 to 11.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 940 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 940 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 928 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 940 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4367 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 451 to 509 (Dec 0.3 to 11.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 940 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 940 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4368 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 940 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4368 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
Excluding outliers - 940 stars left (next iteration limit 1034)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-24-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103.fits N_match=940 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.314 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.348 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.350 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.276 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.302 n_q1=236 n_q2=255 n_q3=235 n_q4=214 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.115
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-24-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-24-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-10_CI_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_233839_TTUQ1b1x1_2288956_y5zlhd3T/fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-24-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103.fits -region wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-24-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-24-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits sigma_overall=0.504 worst_q_ratio=1.031
ref2=Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-29-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0148.fits sigma_overall=0.495 worst_q_ratio=1.212
new1=fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-23-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0102.fits sigma_overall=0.315 worst_q_ratio=1.106
new2=fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-24-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103.fits sigma_overall=0.314 worst_q_ratio=1.115
reference average sigma_overall=0.4995 worst_q_ratio=1.1215
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0503_astrometric_residuals.png (943 matched stars from wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.46 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-29-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0148_astrometric_residuals.png (943 matched stars from wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-29-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0148.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.43 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-23-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0102_astrometric_residuals.png (940 matched stars from wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-23-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0102.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.29 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-24-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103_astrometric_residuals.png (940 matched stars from wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-24-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.29 arcsec)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-23-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0102.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-23-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0102.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-10_CI_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_233839_TTUQ1b1x1_2288956_y5zlhd3T/wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-23-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0102.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-24-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-24-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-10_CI_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_233839_TTUQ1b1x1_2288956_y5zlhd3T/wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-24-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Leo-07-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits at 11:33:01.16 +09:37:21.1: 11.02 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-29-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0148.fits at 11:33:01.16 +09:37:21.1: 11.14 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.07 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 11:33:01.16 +09:37:21.1: ref_mag=11.07 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=11.3907 delta=-0.32 (need > 0.90)
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 0s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 1s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20410_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-24-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103
The candidate 20410_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-24-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103 did not pass the final checks
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 1s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Leo-07-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 3.5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-29-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0148.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-10_CI_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_233839_TTUQ1b1x1_2288956_y5zlhd3T/fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-23-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0102.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-10_CI_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_233839_TTUQ1b1x1_2288956_y5zlhd3T/fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-24-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-29-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0148.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-29-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0148.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-10_CI_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_233839_TTUQ1b1x1_2288956_y5zlhd3T/fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-23-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0102.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-10_CI_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_233839_TTUQ1b1x1_2288956_y5zlhd3T/fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-24-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-29-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0148.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-23-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0102.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-24-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/exclusion_list.txt
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-29-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0148.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-23-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0102.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-24-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits
Image size: 937.4'x624.2' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 11:08:41.744 +05:57:39.30 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.87"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-23-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0102.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-23-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0102.fits
Image size: 941.4'x626.7' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 11:08:44.641 +05:56:38.28 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 11:08:41.744 +05:57:39.30
Second-epoch image center 11:08:44.641 +05:56:38.28
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0208 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-24-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-24-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103.fits
util/fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh: line 144: echo: write error: Broken pipe
Image size: 941.4'x626.7' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 11:08:44.060 +05:56:36.69 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 11:08:41.744 +05:57:39.30
Second-epoch image center 11:08:44.060 +05:56:36.69
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0199 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 11:08:44.641 +05:56:38.28
Second-epoch second image center 11:08:44.060 +05:56:36.69
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00245 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits &> /tmp/tmp.NRWGfcUDbj
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-29-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0148.fits &> /tmp/tmp.vsAb25vYdv
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-29-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0148.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-10_CI_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_233839_TTUQ1b1x1_2288956_y5zlhd3T/fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-23-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0102.fits &> /tmp/tmp.tH94Rem4pw
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-10_CI_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_233839_TTUQ1b1x1_2288956_y5zlhd3T/fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-23-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0102.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-10_CI_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_233839_TTUQ1b1x1_2288956_y5zlhd3T/fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-24-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103.fits &> /tmp/tmp.mFY4jFbVuf
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-10_CI_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_233839_TTUQ1b1x1_2288956_y5zlhd3T/fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-24-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits and wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits and wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits and wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits) and catalog (wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 29706 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 159.1354 to 175.0757 deg, Dec +0.5737 to +11.2606 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 159.1354 to 175.0757 deg, Dec 0.5737 to 11.2606 deg
Loaded 3956 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3140 out of 3393 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3393 out of 29706 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.644950
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.644950
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.38
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.26
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.26
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 29706 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 159.1354 to 175.0757 deg, Dec +0.5737 to +11.2606 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 159.1354 to 175.0757 deg, Dec 0.5737 to 11.2606 deg
Loaded 3956 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3140 out of 3393 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3393 out of 29706 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits (aperture=5.1)
Read 29098 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 159.1771 to 175.0866 deg, Dec +0.7306 to +11.2850 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 159.1771 to 175.0866 deg, Dec 0.7306 to 11.2850 deg
Loaded 3903 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3156 out of 3385 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3385 out of 29098 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-29-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0148.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-29-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0148.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-29-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0148.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-29-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0148.fits (aperture=5.1)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 127 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 8000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.2 pix Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits
2.2 pix Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-29-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0148.fits
2.1 pix fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-23-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0102.fits
2.1 pix fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-24-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103.fits
2.2 pix wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits
2.2 pix wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-29-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0148.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.3 mag. Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits
15.2 mag. Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-29-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0148.fits
15.0 mag. fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-23-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0102.fits
15.0 mag. fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-24-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 15.0 (SNR ) 14.4 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.NRWGfcUDbj (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-10_CI_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_233839_TTUQ1b1x1_2288956_y5zlhd3T/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits 570.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits' -> 'wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits.wcscat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=20, blended=1187, passed=29686
Got 29686 stars (including 28458 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 29686 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013019 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010416 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 452 to 508 (Dec 0.6 to 11.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 946 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 946 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 937 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.46"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 946 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 29428 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 452 to 508 (Dec 0.6 to 11.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 946 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 946 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 29427 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 946 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 29427 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45"
Excluding outliers - 946 stars left (next iteration limit 1040)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits N_match=946 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.483 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.430 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.505 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.478 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.477 n_q1=229 n_q2=272 n_q3=219 n_q4=226 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.046
The image catalog is written to wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits -region wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.vsAb25vYdv (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-29-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0148.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-10_CI_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_233839_TTUQ1b1x1_2288956_y5zlhd3T/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-29-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0148.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-29-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0148.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-29-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0148.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-29-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0148.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-29-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0148.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-29-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0148.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-29-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0148.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-29-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0148.fits' -> 'wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-29-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0148.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-29-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0148.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-29-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0148.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-29-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0148.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-29-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0148.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-29-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0148.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-29-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0148.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-29-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0148.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-29-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0148.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-29-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0148.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-29-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0148.fits.wcscat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=17, blended=1226, passed=29081
Got 29081 stars (including 27823 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-29-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0148.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 29081 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013017 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010413 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 453 to 508 (Dec 0.7 to 11.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 948 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 948 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 936 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 948 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 28828 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 453 to 508 (Dec 0.7 to 11.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 948 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 948 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 28824 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 948 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 28824 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
Excluding outliers - 948 stars left (next iteration limit 1042)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-29-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0148.fits N_match=948 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.488 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.360 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.564 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.418 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.607 n_q1=232 n_q2=262 n_q3=224 n_q4=230 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.244
The image catalog is written to wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-29-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0148.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-29-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0148.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-29-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0148.fits -region wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-29-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0148.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-29-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0148.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.tH94Rem4pw (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-10_CI_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_233839_TTUQ1b1x1_2288956_y5zlhd3T/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-10_CI_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_233839_TTUQ1b1x1_2288956_y5zlhd3T/fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-23-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0102.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-10_CI_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_233839_TTUQ1b1x1_2288956_y5zlhd3T/fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-23-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0102.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-10_CI_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_233839_TTUQ1b1x1_2288956_y5zlhd3T/fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-23-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0102.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-10_CI_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_233839_TTUQ1b1x1_2288956_y5zlhd3T/fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-23-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0102.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-10_CI_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_233839_TTUQ1b1x1_2288956_y5zlhd3T/fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-23-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0102.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-10_CI_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_233839_TTUQ1b1x1_2288956_y5zlhd3T/fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-23-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0102.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-23-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0102.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-23-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0102.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-23-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0102.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-23-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0102.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-23-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0102.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-23-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0102.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-23-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0102.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-10_CI_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_233839_TTUQ1b1x1_2288956_y5zlhd3T/fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-23-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0102.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-23-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0102.fits.wcscat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=1, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=5, blended=821, passed=26212
Got 26212 stars (including 25349 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-23-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0102.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 26212 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013075 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010460 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 451 to 509 (Dec 0.2 to 11.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 942 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 942 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 927 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 942 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 25876 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 451 to 509 (Dec 0.2 to 11.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 942 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 942 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 25880 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 942 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 25880 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
Excluding outliers - 942 stars left (next iteration limit 1036)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-23-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0102.fits N_match=942 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.305 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.302 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.349 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.302 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.266 n_q1=238 n_q2=258 n_q3=233 n_q4=213 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.145
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-23-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0102.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-23-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0102.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-10_CI_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_233839_TTUQ1b1x1_2288956_y5zlhd3T/fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-23-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0102.fits -region wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-23-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0102.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-23-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0102.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.mFY4jFbVuf (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-10_CI_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_233839_TTUQ1b1x1_2288956_y5zlhd3T/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-10_CI_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_233839_TTUQ1b1x1_2288956_y5zlhd3T/fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-24-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-10_CI_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_233839_TTUQ1b1x1_2288956_y5zlhd3T/fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-24-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-10_CI_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_233839_TTUQ1b1x1_2288956_y5zlhd3T/fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-24-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-10_CI_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_233839_TTUQ1b1x1_2288956_y5zlhd3T/fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-24-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-10_CI_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_233839_TTUQ1b1x1_2288956_y5zlhd3T/fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-24-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-10_CI_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_233839_TTUQ1b1x1_2288956_y5zlhd3T/fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-24-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-24-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-24-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-24-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-24-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-24-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-24-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-24-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-10_CI_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_233839_TTUQ1b1x1_2288956_y5zlhd3T/fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-24-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-24-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103.fits.wcscat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=5, blended=755, passed=26095
Got 26095 stars (including 25294 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-24-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 26095 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013075 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010460 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 451 to 509 (Dec 0.2 to 11.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 941 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 941 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 929 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 941 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 25803 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 451 to 509 (Dec 0.2 to 11.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 941 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 941 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 25805 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 941 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 25805 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
Excluding outliers - 941 stars left (next iteration limit 1035)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-24-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103.fits N_match=941 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.311 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.335 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.338 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.273 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.316 n_q1=237 n_q2=255 n_q3=233 n_q4=216 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.086
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-24-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-24-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-10_CI_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_233839_TTUQ1b1x1_2288956_y5zlhd3T/fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-24-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103.fits -region wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-24-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-24-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-23-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0102.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-10_CI_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_233839_TTUQ1b1x1_2288956_y5zlhd3T/wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-23-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0102.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-24-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-10_CI_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_233839_TTUQ1b1x1_2288956_y5zlhd3T/wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-24-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Leo-07-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits at 11:33:53.36 +06:03:50.5: 14.09 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits at 11:33:01.16 +09:37:21.1: 11.28 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits at 10:44:17.14 +10:46:41.3: 14.36 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits at 10:48:51.37 +01:48:41.0: 15.77 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits at 11:33:33.27 +05:14:43.7: 15.72 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits at 11:18:09.13 +03:51:12.6: 15.85 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-29-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0148.fits at 11:33:01.16 +09:37:21.1: 11.33 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-29-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0148.fits at 11:33:53.36 +06:03:50.5: 14.38 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-29-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0148.fits at 10:44:17.14 +10:46:41.3: 14.44 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.30 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.20 +/- 0.07
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 11:33:01.16 +09:37:21.1: ref_mag=11.30 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=11.5711 delta=-0.27 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 11:33:53.36 +06:03:50.5: ref_mag=14.20 +/- 0.07 new_mean_mag=14.4055 delta=-0.20 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.39 +/- 0.07
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:44:17.14 +10:46:41.3: ref_mag=14.39 +/- 0.07 new_mean_mag=14.1910 delta=0.20 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-29-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0148.fits at 11:18:09.13 +03:51:12.6: 15.80 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-29-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0148.fits at 10:48:51.37 +01:48:41.0: 15.72 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-29-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0148.fits at 11:33:33.27 +05:14:43.7: 15.73 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits at 11:17:48.38 +03:51:37.2: 13.13 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits at 10:54:21.66 +04:37:02.9: 15.91 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits at 10:39:45.16 +06:01:50.5: 13.38 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-29-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0148.fits at 11:17:48.38 +03:51:37.2: 13.04 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.08 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 11:17:48.38 +03:51:37.2: ref_mag=13.08 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.3447 delta=-0.26 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits at 11:09:54.20 +02:54:58.3: 15.88 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-29-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0148.fits at 10:54:21.66 +04:37:02.9: 15.87 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits at 10:51:31.59 +05:28:00.8: 13.45 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-29-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0148.fits at 10:39:45.16 +06:01:50.5: 13.36 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.37 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:39:45.16 +06:01:50.5: ref_mag=13.37 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.3554 delta=0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-29-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0148.fits at 11:09:54.20 +02:54:58.3: 15.85 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits at 10:39:59.21 +01:27:52.0: 13.84 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits at 10:38:16.74 +08:24:36.1: 13.71 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-29-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0148.fits at 10:51:31.59 +05:28:00.8: 13.63 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.53 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:51:31.59 +05:28:00.8: ref_mag=13.53 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.5861 delta=-0.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits at 11:34:17.41 +08:10:03.9: 15.68 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-29-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0148.fits at 10:39:59.21 +01:27:52.0: 13.88 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.86 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:39:59.21 +01:27:52.0: ref_mag=13.86 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=13.6361 delta=0.22 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-29-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0148.fits at 10:38:16.74 +08:24:36.1: 13.72 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.71 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:38:16.74 +08:24:36.1: ref_mag=13.71 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.7075 delta=0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-29-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0148.fits at 11:34:17.41 +08:10:03.9: 15.72 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits at 11:00:10.16 +04:39:13.6: 15.93 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-29-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0148.fits at 11:00:10.16 +04:39:13.6: 15.96 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits at 11:11:53.38 +08:41:21.6: 15.92 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits at 10:44:37.66 +04:57:26.5: 15.77 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits at 10:38:22.45 +02:31:41.7: 13.99 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-29-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0148.fits at 11:11:53.38 +08:41:21.6: 15.95 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-29-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0148.fits at 10:44:37.66 +04:57:26.5: 15.74 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-29-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0148.fits at 10:38:22.45 +02:31:41.7: 14.01 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.00 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:38:22.45 +02:31:41.7: ref_mag=14.00 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=13.7833 delta=0.22 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits at 11:22:27.34 +03:01:17.9: 15.78 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-29-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0148.fits at 11:22:27.34 +03:01:17.9: 15.76 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits at 10:38:26.21 +08:12:33.7: 14.93 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits at 10:43:42.25 +04:37:44.4: 14.01 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-29-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0148.fits at 10:38:26.21 +08:12:33.7: 14.63 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.74 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:38:26.21 +08:12:33.7: ref_mag=14.74 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.2375 delta=0.50 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits at 10:37:51.02 +02:21:38.4: 14.89 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-29-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0148.fits at 10:43:42.25 +04:37:44.4: 14.12 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.06 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:43:42.25 +04:37:44.4: ref_mag=14.06 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.0642 delta=-0.00 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-29-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0148.fits at 10:37:51.02 +02:21:38.4: 14.85 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits at 10:39:14.30 +09:32:43.8: 15.01 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.87 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:37:51.02 +02:21:38.4: ref_mag=14.87 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.2868 delta=0.59 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits at 10:51:22.31 +02:45:15.7: 15.79 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-29-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0148.fits at 10:39:14.30 +09:32:43.8: 14.58 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.72 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:39:14.30 +09:32:43.8: ref_mag=14.72 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.2838 delta=0.43 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits at 11:38:45.91 +06:22:56.9: 15.10 +/- 0.23 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits at 10:38:04.70 +07:02:41.1: 14.73 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-29-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0148.fits at 10:51:22.31 +02:45:15.7: 15.78 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits at 10:40:10.76 +01:20:13.1: 15.01 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-29-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0148.fits at 11:38:45.91 +06:22:56.9: 15.02 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.05 +/- 0.16
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 11:38:45.91 +06:22:56.9: ref_mag=15.05 +/- 0.16 new_mean_mag=14.6779 delta=0.37 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-29-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0148.fits at 10:38:04.70 +07:02:41.1: 14.83 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.77 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:38:04.70 +07:02:41.1: ref_mag=14.77 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.3451 delta=0.43 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-29-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0148.fits at 10:40:10.76 +01:20:13.1: 14.44 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits at 11:03:59.19 +10:51:36.8: 15.88 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.60 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:40:10.76 +01:20:13.1: ref_mag=14.60 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.2162 delta=0.38 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits at 11:11:09.24 +07:29:35.8: 15.96 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-29-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0148.fits at 11:03:59.19 +10:51:36.8: 15.92 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-29-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0148.fits at 11:11:09.24 +07:29:35.8: 15.72 +/- 0.29 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.72 +/- 0.29
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 11:11:09.24 +07:29:35.8: ref_mag=15.72 +/- 0.29 new_mean_mag=14.4372 delta=1.28 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits at 11:27:11.19 +08:43:51.6: 14.90 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits at 11:05:37.10 +06:30:33.0: 16.00 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits at 11:36:22.97 +07:19:32.3: 14.67 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits at 10:40:26.77 +09:39:31.7: 14.44 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits at 11:37:41.12 +09:52:30.4: 14.97 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits at 11:29:34.36 +07:03:33.1: 14.89 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-29-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0148.fits at 11:05:37.10 +06:30:33.0: 15.93 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-29-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0148.fits at 11:27:11.19 +08:43:51.6: 14.59 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.71 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 11:27:11.19 +08:43:51.6: ref_mag=14.71 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.7284 delta=-0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-29-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0148.fits at 11:36:22.97 +07:19:32.3: 14.98 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-29-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0148.fits at 11:37:41.12 +09:52:30.4: 15.13 +/- 0.24 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-29-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0148.fits at 10:40:26.77 +09:39:31.7: 14.68 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.78 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 11:36:22.97 +07:19:32.3: ref_mag=14.78 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.6280 delta=0.15 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.04 +/- 0.16
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.54 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 11:37:41.12 +09:52:30.4: ref_mag=15.04 +/- 0.16 new_mean_mag=14.7506 delta=0.29 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:40:26.77 +09:39:31.7: ref_mag=14.54 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=14.4563 delta=0.09 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-29-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0148.fits at 11:29:34.36 +07:03:33.1: 15.08 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.97 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 11:29:34.36 +07:03:33.1: ref_mag=14.97 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.8100 delta=0.16 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits at 11:36:17.29 +02:38:10.4: 14.88 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits at 11:00:00.72 +10:39:12.4: 14.71 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits at 10:40:47.38 +02:42:23.2: 14.66 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits at 10:42:21.52 +11:00:03.3: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits at 11:21:40.42 +03:57:21.7: 14.95 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-29-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0148.fits at 11:36:17.29 +02:38:10.4: 15.00 +/- 0.22 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.93 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 11:36:17.29 +02:38:10.4: ref_mag=14.93 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=14.7948 delta=0.13 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-29-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0148.fits at 11:00:00.72 +10:39:12.4: 14.78 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.74 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 11:00:00.72 +10:39:12.4: ref_mag=14.74 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=14.7233 delta=0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-29-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0148.fits at 10:40:47.38 +02:42:23.2: 14.96 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.77 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:40:47.38 +02:42:23.2: ref_mag=14.77 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.4223 delta=0.35 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-29-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0148.fits at 11:21:40.42 +03:57:21.7: 15.19 +/- 0.22 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-29-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0148.fits at 10:42:21.52 +11:00:03.3: 15.11 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:42:21.52 +11:00:03.3: at least one reference image reported edge (off-image or aperture/annulus past image boundary); cannot perform the forced-photometry cross-check
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.04 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 11:21:40.42 +03:57:21.7: ref_mag=15.04 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.8135 delta=0.23 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits at 10:50:54.42 +10:51:02.3: 15.01 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-29-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0148.fits at 10:50:54.42 +10:51:02.3: 15.17 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.08 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:50:54.42 +10:51:02.3: ref_mag=15.08 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.6728 delta=0.40 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits at 10:39:58.41 +10:23:59.1: 14.96 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits at 10:38:53.18 +08:06:41.2: 14.64 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits at 10:38:18.14 +05:11:56.7: 13.79 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-29-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0148.fits at 10:39:58.41 +10:23:59.1: 15.04 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-29-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0148.fits at 10:38:53.18 +08:06:41.2: 14.95 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.00 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:39:58.41 +10:23:59.1: ref_mag=15.00 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.5443 delta=0.46 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.75 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:38:53.18 +08:06:41.2: ref_mag=14.75 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.5424 delta=0.21 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-29-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0148.fits at 10:38:18.14 +05:11:56.7: 14.25 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.92 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:38:18.14 +05:11:56.7: ref_mag=13.92 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=13.7700 delta=0.15 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out32689.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out32701.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out32774.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out32869.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out32891.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out33010.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out33021.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out33091.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out33120.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out33169.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out33293.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out33346.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out33356.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out33424.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 22s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 10s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32459_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-24-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103
The candidate 32459_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-24-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32460_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-24-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103
The candidate 32460_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-24-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 11:26:20.08 +10:18:16.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32461_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-24-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103
The candidate 32461_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-24-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32519_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-24-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103
The candidate 32519_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-24-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32565_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-24-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103
The candidate 32565_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-24-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32572_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-24-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103
The candidate 32572_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-24-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32583_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-24-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103
The candidate 32583_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-24-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (8.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32614_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-24-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103
The candidate 32614_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-24-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (8.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32628_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-24-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103
The candidate 32628_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-24-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (8.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32678_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-24-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103
The candidate 32678_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-24-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32689_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-24-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103
Preparing report for the candidate 32689_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-24-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32701_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-24-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103
Preparing report for the candidate 32701_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-24-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32707_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-24-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103
The candidate 32707_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-24-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 10:40:59.66 +05:47:49.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32709_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-24-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103
The candidate 32709_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-24-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32758_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-24-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103
The candidate 32758_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-24-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32774_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-24-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103
Preparing report for the candidate 32774_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-24-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32793_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-24-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103
The candidate 32793_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-24-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32809_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-24-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103
The candidate 32809_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-24-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 11:36:34.95 +06:07:50.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32810_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-24-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103
The candidate 32810_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-24-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32841_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-24-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103
The candidate 32841_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-24-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (8.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32844_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-24-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103
The candidate 32844_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-24-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 11:28:24.01 +09:24:26.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32846_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-24-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103
The candidate 32846_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-24-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32848_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-24-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103
The candidate 32848_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-24-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (8.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32861_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-24-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103
The candidate 32861_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-24-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 11:21:16.96 +06:01:26.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bbsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32869_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-24-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103
Preparing report for the candidate 32869_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-24-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32870_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-24-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103
The candidate 32870_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-24-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32878_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-24-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103
The candidate 32878_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-24-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32883_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-24-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103
The candidate 32883_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-24-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 11:04:58.17 +07:22:12.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32891_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-24-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103
Preparing report for the candidate 32891_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-24-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32926_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-24-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103
The candidate 32926_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-24-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32943_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-24-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103
The candidate 32943_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-24-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 11:10:21.03 +11:03:09.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32990_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-24-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103
The candidate 32990_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-24-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32993_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-24-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103
The candidate 32993_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-24-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33001_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-24-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103
The candidate 33001_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-24-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33002_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-24-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103
The candidate 33002_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-24-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33007_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-24-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103
The candidate 33007_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-24-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33008_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-24-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103
The candidate 33008_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-24-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33010_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-24-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103
Preparing report for the candidate 33010_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-24-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33014_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-24-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103
The candidate 33014_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-24-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33015_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-24-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103
The candidate 33015_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-24-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33020_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-24-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103
The candidate 33020_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-24-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33021_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-24-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103
Preparing report for the candidate 33021_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-24-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33049_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-24-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103
The candidate 33049_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-24-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (8.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33051_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-24-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103
The candidate 33051_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-24-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 11:37:07.95 +03:02:06.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33063_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-24-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103
The candidate 33063_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-24-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33076_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-24-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103
The candidate 33076_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-24-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (8.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33079_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-24-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103
The candidate 33079_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-24-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33081_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-24-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103
The candidate 33081_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-24-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33084_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-24-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103
The candidate 33084_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-24-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33087_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-24-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103
The candidate 33087_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-24-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.1 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33091_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-24-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103
Preparing report for the candidate 33091_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-24-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33099_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-24-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103
The candidate 33099_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-24-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33120_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-24-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103
Preparing report for the candidate 33120_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-24-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33130_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-24-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103
The candidate 33130_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-24-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33131_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-24-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103
The candidate 33131_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-24-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 11:21:07.39 +07:22:40.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33139_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-24-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103
The candidate 33139_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-24-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33158_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-24-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103
The candidate 33158_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-24-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33168_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-24-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103
The candidate 33168_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-24-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.2 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33169_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-24-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103
Preparing report for the candidate 33169_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-24-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33182_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-24-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103
The candidate 33182_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-24-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33187_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-24-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103
The candidate 33187_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-24-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33191_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-24-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103
The candidate 33191_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-24-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33192_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-24-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103
The candidate 33192_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-24-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33198_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-24-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103
The candidate 33198_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-24-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33202_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-24-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103
The candidate 33202_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-24-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33213_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-24-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103
The candidate 33213_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-24-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33240_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-24-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103
The candidate 33240_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-24-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33244_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-24-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103
The candidate 33244_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-24-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (8.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33258_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-24-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103
The candidate 33258_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-24-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33261_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-24-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103
The candidate 33261_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-24-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33269_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-24-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103
The candidate 33269_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-24-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33287_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-24-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103
The candidate 33287_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-24-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33291_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-24-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103
The candidate 33291_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-24-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.1 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33293_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-24-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103
Preparing report for the candidate 33293_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-24-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33301_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-24-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103
The candidate 33301_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-24-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (8.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33311_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-24-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103
The candidate 33311_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-24-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.2 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33313_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-24-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103
The candidate 33313_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-24-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33319_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-24-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103
The candidate 33319_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-24-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33321_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-24-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103
The candidate 33321_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-24-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33322_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-24-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103
The candidate 33322_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-24-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33326_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-24-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103
The candidate 33326_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-24-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33327_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-24-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103
The candidate 33327_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-24-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33340_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-24-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103
The candidate 33340_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-24-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33342_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-24-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103
The candidate 33342_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-24-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (8.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33346_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-24-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103
Preparing report for the candidate 33346_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-24-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33347_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-24-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103
The candidate 33347_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-24-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33356_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-24-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103
Preparing report for the candidate 33356_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-24-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33362_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-24-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103
The candidate 33362_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-24-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33363_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-24-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103
The candidate 33363_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-24-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33367_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-24-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103
The candidate 33367_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-24-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33381_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-24-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103
The candidate 33381_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-24-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33382_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-24-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103
The candidate 33382_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-24-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33391_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-24-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103
The candidate 33391_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-24-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.1 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33405_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-24-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103
The candidate 33405_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-24-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33414_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-24-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103
The candidate 33414_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-24-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33415_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-24-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103
The candidate 33415_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-24-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33417_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-24-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103
The candidate 33417_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-24-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33424_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-24-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103
Preparing report for the candidate 33424_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-24-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33436_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-24-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103
The candidate 33436_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-24-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33441_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-24-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103
The candidate 33441_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-24-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33442_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-24-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103
The candidate 33442_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-24-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33444_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-24-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103
The candidate 33444_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-24-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33449_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-24-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103
The candidate 33449_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-24-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33450_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-24-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103
The candidate 33450_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-24-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.3 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33451_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-24-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103
The candidate 33451_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-24-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (8.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33464_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-24-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103
The candidate 33464_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-24-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.2 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33467_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-24-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103
The candidate 33467_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-24-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33468_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-24-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103
The candidate 33468_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-24-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.2 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33473_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-24-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103
The candidate 33473_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-24-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33475_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-24-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103
The candidate 33475_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-24-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33479_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-24-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103
The candidate 33479_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-24-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33484_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-24-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103
The candidate 33484_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-24-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33497_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-24-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103
The candidate 33497_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-24-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33498_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-24-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103
The candidate 33498_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-24-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33507_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-24-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103
The candidate 33507_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-24-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33508_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-24-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103
The candidate 33508_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-24-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.2 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33512_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-24-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103
The candidate 33512_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-24-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33515_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-24-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103
The candidate 33515_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-24-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33521_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-24-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103
The candidate 33521_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-24-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33522_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-24-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103
The candidate 33522_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-24-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33550_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-24-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103
The candidate 33550_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-24-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33552_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-24-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103
The candidate 33552_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-24-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33553_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-24-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103
The candidate 33553_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-24-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33569_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-24-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103
The candidate 33569_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-24-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33592_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-24-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103
The candidate 33592_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-24-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33630_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-24-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103
The candidate 33630_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-24-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.3 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 30009_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-24-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103
The candidate 30009_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_23-24-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0103 did not pass the final checks
