This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-10_CI_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_230032_TTUQ1b1x1_1033498_90kv8SQy
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 11.1657 2461202.6657 10.67 10:36:57.28 +02:53:24.9
244.08987 49.74360 galactic Sex Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.9" and 2.0 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.7 Iris 0 0 0 11.1 -0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_01-02-23_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0153.fits at 10:36:57.28 +02:53:24.9: 15.58 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-10-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits at 10:36:57.28 +02:53:24.9: 15.66 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 06 11.1657* 10 36 57.28 +02 53 24.9 10.7 U Sex 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461202.6657,10.67,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260611.1657 10.67CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 11.1657 2461202.6657 11.83 10:07:31.40 +11:04:32.6
227.46746 48.32968 galactic Leo Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.4" and 1.9 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.41 Daphne -0 -0 0 12.3 -0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_01-02-23_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0153.fits at 10:07:31.40 +11:04:32.6: 15.72 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-10-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits at 10:07:31.40 +11:04:32.6: 15.81 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 06 11.1657* 10 07 31.40 +11 04 32.6 11.8 U Leo 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461202.6657,11.83,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260611.1657 11.83CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 11.1657 2461202.6657 13.52 09:52:07.99 +03:55:16.6
233.34825 41.37068 galactic Sex Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.8" and 2.1 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.156 Xanthippe -1 0 1 13.6 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_01-02-23_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0153.fits at 09:52:07.99 +03:55:16.6: 15.78 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-10-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits at 09:52:07.99 +03:55:16.6: 15.90 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 06 11.1657* 09 52 07.99 +03 55 16.6 13.5 U Sex 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461202.6657,13.52,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260611.1657 13.52CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 11.1657 2461202.6657 14.00 10:44:36.44 +04:57:34.2
243.52092 52.53595 galactic Sex Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.9" and 2.1 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.554 Peraga -0 1 1 14.4 -0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_01-02-23_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0153.fits at 10:44:36.44 +04:57:34.2: 15.67 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-10-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits at 10:44:36.44 +04:57:34.2: 15.73 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 06 11.1657* 10 44 36.44 +04 57 34.2 14.0 U Sex 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461202.6657,14.00,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260611.1657 14.00CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 11.1657 2461202.6657 14.04 09:49:05.76 +04:29:13.0
232.17012 41.04235 galactic Sex Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.3" and 1.9 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.403 Cyane 1 0 1 14.3 -0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_01-02-23_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0153.fits at 09:49:05.76 +04:29:13.0: 15.76 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-10-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits at 09:49:05.76 +04:29:13.0: 15.86 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 06 11.1657* 09 49 05.76 +04 29 13.0 14.0 U Sex 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461202.6657,14.04,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260611.1657 14.04CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 11.1657 2461202.6657 13.85 10:10:06.38 +08:15:23.1
231.58239 47.46667 galactic Leo Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.1" and 1.8 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.67 Asia -1 0 1 13.8 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_01-02-23_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0153.fits at 10:10:06.38 +08:15:23.1: 15.98 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-10-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits at 10:10:06.38 +08:15:23.1: 16.03 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 06 11.1657* 10 10 06.38 +08 15 23.1 13.8 U Leo 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461202.6657,13.85,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260611.1657 13.85CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461139.75178127 09.04.2026 06:02:23.902 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_01-02-23_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0153.fits
First image: 2461139.75178127 09.04.2026 06:02:23.902 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_01-02-23_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0153.fits
Last image: 2461202.66595440 11.06.2026 03:58:48.460 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-10_CI_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_230032_TTUQ1b1x1_1033498_90kv8SQy/fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_22-58-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 4
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.65
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 4 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 6119
Objects passed selection criteria: 6113
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.5 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.5 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 5503.5
Average stars matched: 5369.25 (97.5606 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 112196 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Wed Jun 10 15:05:04 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-96-gc6da043e
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-06-10)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Wed Jun 10 23:03:01 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461139.75178127 09.04.2026 06:02:23.902 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_01-02-23_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0153.fits
First image: 2461139.75178127 09.04.2026 06:02:23.902 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_01-02-23_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0153.fits
Last image: 2461202.66595440 11.06.2026 03:58:48.460 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-10_CI_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_230032_TTUQ1b1x1_1033498_90kv8SQy/fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_22-58-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 143
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.35
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 13 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 35965
Objects passed selection criteria: 35885
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.5 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.5 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 33228.5
Average stars matched: 32045.2 (96.4391 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 138252 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Wed Jun 10 15:05:04 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-96-gc6da043e
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-06-10)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Wed Jun 10 23:04:46 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 3.5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_01-02-23_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0153.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-10-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-10_CI_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_230032_TTUQ1b1x1_1033498_90kv8SQy/fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_22-58-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0072.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-10_CI_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_230032_TTUQ1b1x1_1033498_90kv8SQy/fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_22-58-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_01-02-23_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0153.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-10-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_01-02-23_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0153.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-10-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-10_CI_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_230032_TTUQ1b1x1_1033498_90kv8SQy/fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_22-58-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0072.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-10_CI_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_230032_TTUQ1b1x1_1033498_90kv8SQy/fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_22-58-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461202.66554301
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_01-02-23_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0153.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_01-02-23_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0153.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_01-02-23_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0153.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_01-02-23_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0153.fits'
wcs_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-10-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-10-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-10-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-10-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits'
wcs_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_22-58-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0072.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_22-58-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0072.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_22-58-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0072.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_22-58-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0072.fits'
wcs_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_22-58-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_22-58-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_22-58-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_22-58-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073.fits'
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_01-02-23_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0153.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_01-02-23_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0153.fits
Image size: 941.4'x626.8' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 10:17:18.750 +06:01:19.26 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_22-58-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0072.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_22-58-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0072.fits
util/fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh: line 144: echo: write error: Broken pipe
Image size: 941.5'x626.7' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 10:17:11.432 +05:57:18.75 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 10:17:18.750 +06:01:19.26
Second-epoch image center 10:17:11.432 +05:57:18.75
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0734 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_22-58-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_22-58-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073.fits
Image size: 941.5'x626.7' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 10:17:11.075 +05:57:08.90 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 10:17:18.750 +06:01:19.26
Second-epoch image center 10:17:11.075 +05:57:08.90
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0765 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 10:17:11.432 +05:57:18.75
Second-epoch second image center 10:17:11.075 +05:57:08.90
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00311 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_01-02-23_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0153.fits &> /tmp/tmp.NdyMLEXexZ
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_01-02-23_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0153.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-10-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits &> /tmp/tmp.CmLC0a0cgB
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-10-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-10_CI_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_230032_TTUQ1b1x1_1033498_90kv8SQy/fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_22-58-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0072.fits &> /tmp/tmp.ERMFQRgL8Z
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-10_CI_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_230032_TTUQ1b1x1_1033498_90kv8SQy/fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_22-58-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0072.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-10_CI_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_230032_TTUQ1b1x1_1033498_90kv8SQy/fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_22-58-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073.fits &> /tmp/tmp.5WujLSfqEm
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-10_CI_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_230032_TTUQ1b1x1_1033498_90kv8SQy/fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_22-58-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_01-02-23_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0153.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_01-02-23_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0153.fits and wcs_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_01-02-23_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0153.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_01-02-23_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0153.fits and wcs_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_01-02-23_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0153.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_01-02-23_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0153.fits and wcs_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_01-02-23_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0153.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_01-02-23_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0153.fits) and catalog (wcs_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_01-02-23_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0153.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_01-02-23_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0153.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 6357 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 146.2448 to 162.6264 deg, Dec +0.2902 to +11.6576 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 146.2448 to 162.6264 deg, Dec 0.2902 to 11.6576 deg
Loaded 5162 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3747 out of 3906 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3906 out of 6357 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.787500
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.787500
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.65
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.14
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.14
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 6357 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 146.2448 to 162.6264 deg, Dec +0.2902 to +11.6576 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 146.2448 to 162.6264 deg, Dec 0.2902 to 11.6576 deg
Loaded 5162 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3747 out of 3906 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3906 out of 6357 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_01-02-23_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0153.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_01-02-23_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0153.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_01-02-23_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0153.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_01-02-23_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0153.fits (aperture=6.4)
Read 6613 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 146.1402 to 162.6215 deg, Dec +0.1984 to +11.5941 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 146.1402 to 162.6215 deg, Dec 0.1984 to 11.5941 deg
Loaded 5210 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3754 out of 3927 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3927 out of 6613 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-10-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-10-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-10-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-10-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits (aperture=6.2)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 4 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 8000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.2 pix Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_01-02-23_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0153.fits
2.1 pix Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-10-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits
2.2 pix fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_22-58-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0072.fits
2.2 pix fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_22-58-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073.fits
2.2 pix wcs_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_01-02-23_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0153.fits
2.1 pix wcs_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-10-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.1 mag. Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_01-02-23_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0153.fits
15.2 mag. Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-10-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits
14.7 mag. fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_22-58-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0072.fits
14.7 mag. fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_22-58-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.7 (SNR ) 11.7 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.NdyMLEXexZ (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-10_CI_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_230032_TTUQ1b1x1_1033498_90kv8SQy/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_01-02-23_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0153.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_01-02-23_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0153.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_01-02-23_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0153.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_01-02-23_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0153.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_01-02-23_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0153.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_01-02-23_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0153.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_01-02-23_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0153.fits' -> 'wcs_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_01-02-23_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0153.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_01-02-23_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0153.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_01-02-23_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0153.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_01-02-23_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0153.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_01-02-23_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0153.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_01-02-23_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0153.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_01-02-23_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0153.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_01-02-23_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0153.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_01-02-23_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0153.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_01-02-23_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0153.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_01-02-23_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0153.fits.wcscat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=443, passed=6357
Got 6357 stars (including 5904 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_01-02-23_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0153.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 6357 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013075 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010460 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 451 to 510 (Dec 0.3 to 11.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 914 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 914 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 902 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 914 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6157 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 451 to 510 (Dec 0.3 to 11.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 914 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 914 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6161 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 914 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6161 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Excluding outliers - 914 stars left (next iteration limit 1005)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_01-02-23_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0153.fits N_match=914 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.360 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.386 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.369 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.349 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.339 n_q1=222 n_q2=212 n_q3=231 n_q4=249 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.074
The image catalog is written to wcs_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_01-02-23_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0153.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_01-02-23_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0153.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_01-02-23_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0153.fits -region wcs_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_01-02-23_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0153.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_01-02-23_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0153.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.CmLC0a0cgB (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-10_CI_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_230032_TTUQ1b1x1_1033498_90kv8SQy/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-10-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-10-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-10-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-10-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-10-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-10-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-10-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits' -> 'wcs_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-10-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-10-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-10-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-10-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-10-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-10-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-10-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-10-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-10-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-10-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-10-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits.wcscat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=465, passed=6613
Got 6613 stars (including 6136 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-10-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 6613 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013075 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010460 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 450 to 509 (Dec 0.2 to 11.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 915 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 915 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 905 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 915 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6416 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 450 to 509 (Dec 0.2 to 11.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 915 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 915 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6416 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 915 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6416 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Excluding outliers - 915 stars left (next iteration limit 1006)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-10-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits N_match=915 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.329 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.376 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.356 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.310 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.300 n_q1=220 n_q2=207 n_q3=235 n_q4=253 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.144
The image catalog is written to wcs_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-10-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-10-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-10-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits -region wcs_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-10-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-10-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.ERMFQRgL8Z (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-10_CI_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_230032_TTUQ1b1x1_1033498_90kv8SQy/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-10_CI_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_230032_TTUQ1b1x1_1033498_90kv8SQy/fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_22-58-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0072.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-10_CI_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_230032_TTUQ1b1x1_1033498_90kv8SQy/fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_22-58-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0072.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-10_CI_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_230032_TTUQ1b1x1_1033498_90kv8SQy/fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_22-58-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0072.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-10_CI_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_230032_TTUQ1b1x1_1033498_90kv8SQy/fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_22-58-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0072.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-10_CI_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_230032_TTUQ1b1x1_1033498_90kv8SQy/fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_22-58-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0072.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-10_CI_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_230032_TTUQ1b1x1_1033498_90kv8SQy/fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_22-58-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0072.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_22-58-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0072.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_22-58-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0072.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_22-58-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0072.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_22-58-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0072.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_22-58-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0072.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_22-58-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0072.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_22-58-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0072.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-10_CI_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_230032_TTUQ1b1x1_1033498_90kv8SQy/fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_22-58-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0072.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_22-58-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0072.fits.wcscat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=3, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=269, passed=4617
Got 4617 stars (including 4342 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_22-58-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0072.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 4617 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013076 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010461 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 451 to 509 (Dec 0.3 to 11.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 915 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 915 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 903 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 915 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4507 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 451 to 509 (Dec 0.3 to 11.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 915 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 915 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4510 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 915 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4510 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Excluding outliers - 915 stars left (next iteration limit 1006)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_22-58-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0072.fits N_match=915 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.290 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.285 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.340 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.230 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.285 n_q1=234 n_q2=225 n_q3=226 n_q4=230 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.174
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_22-58-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0072.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_22-58-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0072.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-10_CI_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_230032_TTUQ1b1x1_1033498_90kv8SQy/fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_22-58-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0072.fits -region wcs_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_22-58-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0072.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_22-58-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0072.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.5WujLSfqEm (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-10_CI_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_230032_TTUQ1b1x1_1033498_90kv8SQy/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-10_CI_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_230032_TTUQ1b1x1_1033498_90kv8SQy/fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_22-58-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-10_CI_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_230032_TTUQ1b1x1_1033498_90kv8SQy/fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_22-58-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-10_CI_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_230032_TTUQ1b1x1_1033498_90kv8SQy/fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_22-58-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-10_CI_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_230032_TTUQ1b1x1_1033498_90kv8SQy/fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_22-58-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-10_CI_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_230032_TTUQ1b1x1_1033498_90kv8SQy/fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_22-58-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-10_CI_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_230032_TTUQ1b1x1_1033498_90kv8SQy/fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_22-58-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_22-58-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_22-58-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_22-58-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_22-58-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_22-58-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_22-58-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_22-58-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-10_CI_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_230032_TTUQ1b1x1_1033498_90kv8SQy/fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_22-58-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_22-58-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073.fits.wcscat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=286, passed=4569
Got 4569 stars (including 4276 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_22-58-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 4569 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013076 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010461 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 451 to 509 (Dec 0.3 to 11.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 912 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 912 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 902 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 912 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4462 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 451 to 509 (Dec 0.3 to 11.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 912 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 912 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4462 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 912 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4462 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Excluding outliers - 912 stars left (next iteration limit 1003)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_22-58-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073.fits N_match=912 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.321 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.335 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.345 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.280 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.307 n_q1=228 n_q2=223 n_q3=228 n_q4=233 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.073
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_22-58-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_22-58-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-10_CI_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_230032_TTUQ1b1x1_1033498_90kv8SQy/fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_22-58-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073.fits -region wcs_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_22-58-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_22-58-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_01-02-23_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0153.fits sigma_overall=0.360 worst_q_ratio=1.074
ref2=Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-10-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits sigma_overall=0.329 worst_q_ratio=1.144
new1=fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_22-58-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0072.fits sigma_overall=0.290 worst_q_ratio=1.174
new2=fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_22-58-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073.fits sigma_overall=0.321 worst_q_ratio=1.073
reference average sigma_overall=0.3445 worst_q_ratio=1.109
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_01-02-23_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0153_astrometric_residuals.png (914 matched stars from wcs_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_01-02-23_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0153.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.32 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-10-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145_astrometric_residuals.png (915 matched stars from wcs_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-10-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.30 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_22-58-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0072_astrometric_residuals.png (915 matched stars from wcs_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_22-58-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0072.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.27 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_22-58-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073_astrometric_residuals.png (912 matched stars from wcs_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_22-58-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.29 arcsec)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_22-58-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0072.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_22-58-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0072.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-10_CI_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_230032_TTUQ1b1x1_1033498_90kv8SQy/wcs_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_22-58-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0072.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_22-58-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_22-58-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-10_CI_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_230032_TTUQ1b1x1_1033498_90kv8SQy/wcs_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_22-58-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Sex-01-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
Forced photometry on wcs_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_01-02-23_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0153.fits at 10:07:31.40 +11:04:32.6: 15.72 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_01-02-23_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0153.fits at 09:45:23.32 +01:24:15.2: 11.08 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_01-02-23_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0153.fits at 10:36:57.28 +02:53:24.9: 15.58 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-10-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits at 10:07:31.40 +11:04:32.6: 15.81 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-10-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits at 09:45:23.32 +01:24:15.2: 11.11 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-10-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits at 10:36:57.28 +02:53:24.9: 15.66 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.10 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 09:45:23.32 +01:24:15.2: ref_mag=11.10 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=11.2749 delta=-0.18 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out20516.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out20528.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 7s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 1s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20516_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_22-58-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073
Preparing report for the candidate 20516_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_22-58-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20523_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_22-58-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073
The candidate 20523_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_22-58-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20528_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_22-58-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073
Preparing report for the candidate 20528_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_22-58-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20535_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_22-58-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073
The candidate 20535_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_22-58-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 10:46:17.21 +02:07:33.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 1s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 9s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Sex-01-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
10:36:57.28 +02:53:24.9
10:07:31.40 +11:04:32.6
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 3.5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_01-02-23_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0153.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-10-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-10_CI_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_230032_TTUQ1b1x1_1033498_90kv8SQy/fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_22-58-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0072.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-10_CI_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_230032_TTUQ1b1x1_1033498_90kv8SQy/fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_22-58-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_01-02-23_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0153.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-10-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_01-02-23_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0153.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-10-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-10_CI_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_230032_TTUQ1b1x1_1033498_90kv8SQy/fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_22-58-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0072.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-10_CI_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_230032_TTUQ1b1x1_1033498_90kv8SQy/fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_22-58-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_01-02-23_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0153.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-10-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_22-58-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0072.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_22-58-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/exclusion_list.txt
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_01-02-23_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0153.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-10-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_22-58-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0072.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_22-58-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_01-02-23_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0153.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_01-02-23_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0153.fits
Image size: 941.4'x626.8' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 10:17:18.750 +06:01:19.26 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_22-58-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0072.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_22-58-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0072.fits
Image size: 941.5'x626.7' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 10:17:11.432 +05:57:18.75 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 10:17:18.750 +06:01:19.26
Second-epoch image center 10:17:11.432 +05:57:18.75
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0734 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_22-58-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_22-58-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073.fits
Image size: 941.5'x626.7' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 10:17:11.075 +05:57:08.90 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 10:17:18.750 +06:01:19.26
Second-epoch image center 10:17:11.075 +05:57:08.90
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0765 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 10:17:11.432 +05:57:18.75
Second-epoch second image center 10:17:11.075 +05:57:08.90
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00311 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_01-02-23_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0153.fits &> /tmp/tmp.e30MOzzyub
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_01-02-23_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0153.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-10-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits &> /tmp/tmp.JfFxrapsUK
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-10-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-10_CI_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_230032_TTUQ1b1x1_1033498_90kv8SQy/fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_22-58-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0072.fits &> /tmp/tmp.ACH88zOXBr
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-10_CI_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_230032_TTUQ1b1x1_1033498_90kv8SQy/fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_22-58-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0072.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-10_CI_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_230032_TTUQ1b1x1_1033498_90kv8SQy/fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_22-58-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073.fits &> /tmp/tmp.0n304WzF8e
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-10_CI_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_230032_TTUQ1b1x1_1033498_90kv8SQy/fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_22-58-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_01-02-23_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0153.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_01-02-23_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0153.fits and wcs_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_01-02-23_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0153.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_01-02-23_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0153.fits and wcs_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_01-02-23_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0153.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_01-02-23_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0153.fits and wcs_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_01-02-23_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0153.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_01-02-23_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0153.fits) and catalog (wcs_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_01-02-23_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0153.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_01-02-23_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0153.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 37544 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 146.1667 to 162.6529 deg, Dec +0.2272 to +11.7209 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 146.1667 to 162.6529 deg, Dec 0.2272 to 11.7209 deg
Loaded 5243 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3702 out of 4065 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 4065 out of 37544 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.660100
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.660100
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.35
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.31
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.31
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 37544 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 146.1667 to 162.6529 deg, Dec +0.2272 to +11.7209 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 146.1667 to 162.6529 deg, Dec 0.2272 to 11.7209 deg
Loaded 5243 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3702 out of 4065 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 4065 out of 37544 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_01-02-23_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0153.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_01-02-23_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0153.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_01-02-23_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0153.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_01-02-23_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0153.fits (aperture=4.9)
Read 39278 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 146.1293 to 162.6351 deg, Dec +0.1788 to +11.6671 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 146.1293 to 162.6351 deg, Dec 0.1788 to 11.6671 deg
Loaded 5262 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3705 out of 4075 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 4075 out of 39278 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-10-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-10-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-10-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-10-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits (aperture=4.8)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 118 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 8000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.1 pix Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_01-02-23_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0153.fits
2.0 pix Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-10-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits
2.1 pix fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_22-58-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0072.fits
2.1 pix fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_22-58-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073.fits
2.1 pix wcs_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_01-02-23_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0153.fits
2.0 pix wcs_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-10-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.3 mag. Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_01-02-23_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0153.fits
15.4 mag. Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-10-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits
14.8 mag. fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_22-58-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0072.fits
14.8 mag. fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_22-58-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.8 (SNR ) 14.3 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.e30MOzzyub (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-10_CI_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_230032_TTUQ1b1x1_1033498_90kv8SQy/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_01-02-23_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0153.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_01-02-23_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0153.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_01-02-23_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0153.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_01-02-23_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0153.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_01-02-23_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0153.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_01-02-23_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0153.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_01-02-23_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0153.fits' -> 'wcs_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_01-02-23_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0153.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_01-02-23_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0153.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_01-02-23_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0153.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_01-02-23_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0153.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_01-02-23_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0153.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_01-02-23_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0153.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_01-02-23_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0153.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_01-02-23_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0153.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_01-02-23_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0153.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_01-02-23_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0153.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_01-02-23_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0153.fits.wcscat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=14, blended=1594, passed=37530
Got 37530 stars (including 35884 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_01-02-23_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0153.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 37530 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013075 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010460 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 451 to 510 (Dec 0.2 to 11.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 913 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 913 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 901 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 913 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 36391 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 451 to 510 (Dec 0.2 to 11.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 913 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 913 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 36391 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 913 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 36391 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Excluding outliers - 913 stars left (next iteration limit 1004)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_01-02-23_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0153.fits N_match=913 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.359 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.406 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.356 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.327 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.340 n_q1=222 n_q2=211 n_q3=225 n_q4=255 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.131
The image catalog is written to wcs_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_01-02-23_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0153.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_01-02-23_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0153.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_01-02-23_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0153.fits -region wcs_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_01-02-23_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0153.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_01-02-23_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0153.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.JfFxrapsUK (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-10_CI_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_230032_TTUQ1b1x1_1033498_90kv8SQy/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-10-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-10-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-10-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-10-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-10-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-10-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-10-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits' -> 'wcs_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-10-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-10-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-10-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-10-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-10-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-10-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-10-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-10-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-10-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-10-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-10-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits.wcscat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=20, blended=1637, passed=39258
Got 39258 stars (including 37533 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-10-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 39258 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013075 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010460 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 450 to 510 (Dec 0.2 to 11.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 916 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 916 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 905 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 916 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 38411 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 450 to 510 (Dec 0.2 to 11.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 916 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 916 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 38411 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 916 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 38411 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Excluding outliers - 916 stars left (next iteration limit 1007)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-10-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits N_match=916 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.330 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.375 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.354 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.311 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.293 n_q1=221 n_q2=212 n_q3=225 n_q4=258 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.139
The image catalog is written to wcs_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-10-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-10-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-10-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits -region wcs_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-10-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-10-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.ACH88zOXBr (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-10_CI_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_230032_TTUQ1b1x1_1033498_90kv8SQy/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-10_CI_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_230032_TTUQ1b1x1_1033498_90kv8SQy/fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_22-58-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0072.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-10_CI_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_230032_TTUQ1b1x1_1033498_90kv8SQy/fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_22-58-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0072.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-10_CI_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_230032_TTUQ1b1x1_1033498_90kv8SQy/fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_22-58-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0072.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-10_CI_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_230032_TTUQ1b1x1_1033498_90kv8SQy/fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_22-58-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0072.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-10_CI_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_230032_TTUQ1b1x1_1033498_90kv8SQy/fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_22-58-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0072.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-10_CI_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_230032_TTUQ1b1x1_1033498_90kv8SQy/fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_22-58-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0072.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_22-58-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0072.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_22-58-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0072.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_22-58-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0072.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_22-58-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0072.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_22-58-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0072.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_22-58-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0072.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_22-58-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0072.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-10_CI_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_230032_TTUQ1b1x1_1033498_90kv8SQy/fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_22-58-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0072.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_22-58-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0072.fits.wcscat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=7, blended=810, passed=28155
Got 28155 stars (including 27303 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_22-58-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0072.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 28155 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013076 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010461 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 451 to 509 (Dec 0.2 to 11.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 911 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 911 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 903 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 911 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 27661 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 451 to 509 (Dec 0.2 to 11.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 911 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 911 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 27660 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 911 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 27660 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Excluding outliers - 911 stars left (next iteration limit 1002)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_22-58-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0072.fits N_match=911 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.282 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.270 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.332 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.235 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.302 n_q1=237 n_q2=222 n_q3=226 n_q4=226 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.177
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_22-58-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0072.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_22-58-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0072.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-10_CI_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_230032_TTUQ1b1x1_1033498_90kv8SQy/fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_22-58-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0072.fits -region wcs_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_22-58-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0072.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_22-58-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0072.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.0n304WzF8e (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-10_CI_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_230032_TTUQ1b1x1_1033498_90kv8SQy/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-10_CI_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_230032_TTUQ1b1x1_1033498_90kv8SQy/fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_22-58-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-10_CI_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_230032_TTUQ1b1x1_1033498_90kv8SQy/fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_22-58-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-10_CI_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_230032_TTUQ1b1x1_1033498_90kv8SQy/fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_22-58-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-10_CI_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_230032_TTUQ1b1x1_1033498_90kv8SQy/fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_22-58-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-10_CI_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_230032_TTUQ1b1x1_1033498_90kv8SQy/fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_22-58-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-10_CI_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_230032_TTUQ1b1x1_1033498_90kv8SQy/fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_22-58-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_22-58-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_22-58-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_22-58-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_22-58-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_22-58-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_22-58-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_22-58-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-10_CI_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_230032_TTUQ1b1x1_1033498_90kv8SQy/fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_22-58-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_22-58-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073.fits.wcscat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=6, blended=1028, passed=29093
Got 29093 stars (including 28018 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_22-58-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 29093 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013076 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010461 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 451 to 509 (Dec 0.2 to 11.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 909 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 909 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 899 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 909 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 28533 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 451 to 509 (Dec 0.2 to 11.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 909 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 909 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 28533 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 909 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 28533 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Excluding outliers - 909 stars left (next iteration limit 999)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_22-58-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073.fits N_match=909 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.313 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.312 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.360 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.265 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.304 n_q1=230 n_q2=221 n_q3=229 n_q4=229 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.150
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_22-58-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_22-58-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-10_CI_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_230032_TTUQ1b1x1_1033498_90kv8SQy/fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_22-58-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073.fits -region wcs_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_22-58-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_22-58-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_22-58-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0072.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-10_CI_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_230032_TTUQ1b1x1_1033498_90kv8SQy/wcs_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_22-58-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0072.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_22-58-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-10_CI_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_230032_TTUQ1b1x1_1033498_90kv8SQy/wcs_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_22-58-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Sex-01-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_01-02-23_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0153.fits at 09:45:23.29 +01:24:15.1: 11.09 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_01-02-23_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0153.fits at 09:45:25.40 +01:28:22.2: 12.51 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-10-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits at 09:45:23.29 +01:24:15.1: 11.11 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.10 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 09:45:23.29 +01:24:15.1: ref_mag=11.10 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=11.1374 delta=-0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_01-02-23_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0153.fits at 09:45:56.62 +01:34:44.5: 12.89 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_01-02-23_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0153.fits at 09:56:26.03 +10:39:53.6: 13.39 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_01-02-23_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0153.fits at 09:52:07.99 +03:55:16.6: 15.78 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-10-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits at 09:45:25.40 +01:28:22.2: 12.46 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.48 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 09:45:25.40 +01:28:22.2: ref_mag=12.48 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.4963 delta=-0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_01-02-23_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0153.fits at 10:44:48.37 +06:01:16.0: 13.78 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-10-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits at 09:45:56.62 +01:34:44.5: 12.91 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.90 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 09:45:56.62 +01:34:44.5: ref_mag=12.90 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.8253 delta=0.08 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_01-02-23_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0153.fits at 10:20:22.29 +08:41:40.6: 13.59 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-10-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits at 09:56:26.03 +10:39:53.6: 13.45 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.42 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 09:56:26.03 +10:39:53.6: ref_mag=13.42 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.5527 delta=-0.13 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-10-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits at 09:52:07.99 +03:55:16.6: 15.90 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-10-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits at 10:44:48.37 +06:01:16.0: 13.77 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.77 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:44:48.37 +06:01:16.0: ref_mag=13.77 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.7245 delta=0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-10-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits at 10:20:22.29 +08:41:40.6: 13.58 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.59 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:20:22.29 +08:41:40.6: ref_mag=13.59 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.6901 delta=-0.10 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_01-02-23_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0153.fits at 10:44:36.44 +04:57:34.2: 15.67 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_01-02-23_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0153.fits at 09:49:05.76 +04:29:13.0: 15.76 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-10-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits at 10:44:36.44 +04:57:34.2: 15.73 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_01-02-23_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0153.fits at 09:45:21.09 +01:45:21.5: 13.98 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_01-02-23_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0153.fits at 10:10:06.38 +08:15:23.1: 15.98 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_01-02-23_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0153.fits at 10:36:26.28 +07:04:40.1: 14.06 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-10-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits at 09:49:05.76 +04:29:13.0: 15.86 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-10-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits at 10:10:06.38 +08:15:23.1: 16.03 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-10-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits at 09:45:21.09 +01:45:21.5: 14.19 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.07 +/- 0.07
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 09:45:21.09 +01:45:21.5: ref_mag=14.07 +/- 0.07 new_mean_mag=13.8572 delta=0.21 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-10-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits at 10:36:26.28 +07:04:40.1: 14.24 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.14 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:36:26.28 +07:04:40.1: ref_mag=14.14 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=14.2221 delta=-0.08 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_01-02-23_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0153.fits at 10:30:39.80 +09:22:55.5: 13.90 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-10-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits at 10:30:39.80 +09:22:55.5: 13.98 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.94 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:30:39.80 +09:22:55.5: ref_mag=13.94 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=14.2605 delta=-0.32 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_01-02-23_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0153.fits at 09:45:38.69 +01:52:27.6: 14.19 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-10-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits at 09:45:38.69 +01:52:27.6: 14.27 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.23 +/- 0.07
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 09:45:38.69 +01:52:27.6: ref_mag=14.23 +/- 0.07 new_mean_mag=13.9523 delta=0.28 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_01-02-23_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0153.fits at 10:29:00.33 +09:34:16.1: 14.15 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-10-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits at 10:29:00.33 +09:34:16.1: 14.34 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.24 +/- 0.07
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:29:00.33 +09:34:16.1: ref_mag=14.24 +/- 0.07 new_mean_mag=14.4117 delta=-0.17 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out54011.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out54043.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out54068.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out54070.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 10s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 3s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53919_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_22-58-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073
The candidate 53919_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_22-58-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 10:14:44.99 +09:48:54.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53920_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_22-58-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073
The candidate 53920_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_22-58-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 09:47:07.55 +02:45:25.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53921_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_22-58-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073
The candidate 53921_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_22-58-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 10:36:22.30 +06:02:59.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53922_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_22-58-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073
The candidate 53922_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_22-58-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53923_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_22-58-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073
The candidate 53923_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_22-58-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53926_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_22-58-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073
The candidate 53926_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_22-58-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 10:36:57.28 +02:53:24.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_local.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53933_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_22-58-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073
The candidate 53933_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_22-58-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53934_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_22-58-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073
The candidate 53934_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_22-58-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53938_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_22-58-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073
The candidate 53938_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_22-58-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53940_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_22-58-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073
The candidate 53940_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_22-58-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53941_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_22-58-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073
The candidate 53941_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_22-58-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 10:07:31.40 +11:04:32.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_local.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53943_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_22-58-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073
The candidate 53943_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_22-58-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53952_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_22-58-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073
The candidate 53952_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_22-58-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 10:40:59.69 +05:47:50.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53953_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_22-58-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073
The candidate 53953_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_22-58-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53954_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_22-58-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073
The candidate 53954_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_22-58-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53957_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_22-58-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073
The candidate 53957_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_22-58-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53961_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_22-58-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073
The candidate 53961_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_22-58-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 10:41:28.22 +08:34:32.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53962_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_22-58-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073
The candidate 53962_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_22-58-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53972_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_22-58-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073
The candidate 53972_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_22-58-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 10:25:10.94 +09:35:50.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53973_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_22-58-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073
The candidate 53973_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_22-58-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53974_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_22-58-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073
The candidate 53974_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_22-58-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53975_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_22-58-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073
The candidate 53975_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_22-58-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53976_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_22-58-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073
The candidate 53976_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_22-58-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53982_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_22-58-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073
The candidate 53982_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_22-58-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53995_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_22-58-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073
The candidate 53995_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_22-58-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53999_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_22-58-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073
The candidate 53999_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_22-58-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 10:26:12.51 +03:57:01.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54000_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_22-58-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073
The candidate 54000_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_22-58-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54002_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_22-58-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073
The candidate 54002_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_22-58-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54005_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_22-58-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073
The candidate 54005_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_22-58-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 10:18:37.39 +07:19:13.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54010_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_22-58-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073
The candidate 54010_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_22-58-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54011_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_22-58-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073
Preparing report for the candidate 54011_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_22-58-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54013_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_22-58-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073
The candidate 54013_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_22-58-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 10:26:26.74 +05:17:10.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54014_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_22-58-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073
The candidate 54014_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_22-58-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54016_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_22-58-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073
The candidate 54016_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_22-58-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54018_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_22-58-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073
The candidate 54018_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_22-58-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54022_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_22-58-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073
The candidate 54022_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_22-58-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 10:41:48.51 +04:19:06.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54023_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_22-58-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073
The candidate 54023_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_22-58-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 10:22:15.51 +08:59:32.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54024_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_22-58-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073
The candidate 54024_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_22-58-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54026_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_22-58-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073
The candidate 54026_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_22-58-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 10:09:28.22 +02:22:09.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54030_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_22-58-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073
The candidate 54030_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_22-58-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 10:34:21.20 +02:46:02.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54034_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_22-58-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073
The candidate 54034_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_22-58-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54039_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_22-58-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073
The candidate 54039_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_22-58-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54040_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_22-58-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073
The candidate 54040_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_22-58-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 10:18:36.31 +01:34:19.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54042_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_22-58-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073
The candidate 54042_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_22-58-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54043_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_22-58-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073
Preparing report for the candidate 54043_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_22-58-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54045_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_22-58-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073
The candidate 54045_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_22-58-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54050_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_22-58-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073
The candidate 54050_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_22-58-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54054_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_22-58-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073
The candidate 54054_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_22-58-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54055_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_22-58-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073
The candidate 54055_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_22-58-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54056_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_22-58-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073
The candidate 54056_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_22-58-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54059_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_22-58-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073
The candidate 54059_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_22-58-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54060_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_22-58-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073
The candidate 54060_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_22-58-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54061_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_22-58-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073
The candidate 54061_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_22-58-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54063_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_22-58-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073
The candidate 54063_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_22-58-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54065_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_22-58-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073
The candidate 54065_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_22-58-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54066_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_22-58-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073
The candidate 54066_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_22-58-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54068_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_22-58-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073
Preparing report for the candidate 54068_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_22-58-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54070_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_22-58-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073
Preparing report for the candidate 54070_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_22-58-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54073_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_22-58-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073
The candidate 54073_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_22-58-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54074_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_22-58-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073
The candidate 54074_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_22-58-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 10:29:54.34 +08:02:24.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54076_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_22-58-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073
The candidate 54076_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_22-58-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54077_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_22-58-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073
The candidate 54077_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_22-58-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54079_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_22-58-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073
The candidate 54079_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_22-58-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54081_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_22-58-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073
The candidate 54081_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_22-58-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54083_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_22-58-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073
The candidate 54083_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_22-58-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54084_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_22-58-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073
The candidate 54084_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_22-58-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54087_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_22-58-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073
The candidate 54087_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_22-58-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54088_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_22-58-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073
The candidate 54088_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_22-58-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54090_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_22-58-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073
The candidate 54090_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_22-58-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54091_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_22-58-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073
The candidate 54091_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_22-58-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54092_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_22-58-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073
The candidate 54092_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_22-58-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 10:14:27.65 +10:46:35.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54095_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_22-58-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073
The candidate 54095_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_22-58-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54097_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_22-58-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073
The candidate 54097_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_22-58-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54100_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_22-58-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073
The candidate 54100_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_22-58-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54101_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_22-58-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073
The candidate 54101_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_22-58-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54105_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_22-58-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073
The candidate 54105_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_22-58-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54110_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_22-58-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073
The candidate 54110_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_22-58-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54111_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_22-58-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073
The candidate 54111_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_22-58-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54114_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_22-58-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073
The candidate 54114_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_22-58-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54119_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_22-58-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073
The candidate 54119_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_22-58-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54120_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_22-58-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073
The candidate 54120_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_22-58-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54121_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_22-58-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073
The candidate 54121_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_22-58-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54126_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_22-58-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073
The candidate 54126_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_22-58-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54128_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_22-58-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073
The candidate 54128_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_22-58-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 10:13:20.76 +05:15:33.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54132_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_22-58-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073
The candidate 54132_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_22-58-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54137_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_22-58-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073
The candidate 54137_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_22-58-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54147_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_22-58-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073
The candidate 54147_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_22-58-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54149_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_22-58-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073
The candidate 54149_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_22-58-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54150_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_22-58-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073
The candidate 54150_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_22-58-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54151_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_22-58-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073
The candidate 54151_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_22-58-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54153_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_22-58-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073
The candidate 54153_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_22-58-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54155_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_22-58-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073
The candidate 54155_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_22-58-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54158_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_22-58-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073
The candidate 54158_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_22-58-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54162_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_22-58-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073
The candidate 54162_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_22-58-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54172_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_22-58-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073
The candidate 54172_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_22-58-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54174_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_22-58-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073
The candidate 54174_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_22-58-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54178_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_22-58-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073
The candidate 54178_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_22-58-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54179_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_22-58-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073
The candidate 54179_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_22-58-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54187_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_22-58-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073
The candidate 54187_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_22-58-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54191_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_22-58-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073
The candidate 54191_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_22-58-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54192_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_22-58-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073
The candidate 54192_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_22-58-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54196_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_22-58-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073
The candidate 54196_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_22-58-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54198_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_22-58-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073
The candidate 54198_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_22-58-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54204_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_22-58-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073
The candidate 54204_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_22-58-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54206_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_22-58-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073
The candidate 54206_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_22-58-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54208_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_22-58-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073
The candidate 54208_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_22-58-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54212_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_22-58-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073
The candidate 54212_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_22-58-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54218_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_22-58-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073
The candidate 54218_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_22-58-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54223_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_22-58-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073
The candidate 54223_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_22-58-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54227_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_22-58-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073
The candidate 54227_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_22-58-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54228_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_22-58-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073
The candidate 54228_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_22-58-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54230_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_22-58-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073
The candidate 54230_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_22-58-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54241_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_22-58-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073
The candidate 54241_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_22-58-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54243_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_22-58-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073
The candidate 54243_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_22-58-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54246_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_22-58-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073
The candidate 54246_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_22-58-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54249_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_22-58-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073
The candidate 54249_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_22-58-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54261_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_22-58-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073
The candidate 54261_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_22-58-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33604_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_22-58-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073
The candidate 33604_fd_Sex-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_22-58-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073 did not pass the final checks
