This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-10_CI_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_052415_TTUQ2b1x1_2608063_UpvDL3EC
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 10.4282 2461201.9282 10.05 20:36:33.84 -03:42:33.7
42.06841 -25.00802 galactic Aql Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.2" and 7.0 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.3 Juno 0 -0 1 10.1 -0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_04-46-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0427.fits at 20:36:33.84 -03:42:33.7: 15.44 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_04-47-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0428.fits at 20:36:33.84 -03:42:33.7: 15.47 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461201.9282,10.05,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260610.4282 10.05CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 10.4282 2461201.9282 11.15 20:23:55.02 +00:56:40.6
44.82655 -19.99225 galactic Aql Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.5" and 7.0 pix
The object was found in VSX 7" V0865 Aql
Type: M
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
9.500 V < 12.600 V 2454694.00000 369.000000000000 M6-M7(S7,5e:)
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_04-46-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0427.fits at 20:23:55.02 +00:56:40.6: 12.24 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_04-47-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0428.fits at 20:23:55.02 +00:56:40.6: 12.32 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.28 +/- 0.01
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
V0865 Aql,2461201.9282,11.15,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
V0865 Aql 20260610.4282 11.15CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 10.4282 2461201.9282 12.81 20:24:47.88 -04:52:17.8
39.44349 -22.95770 galactic Aql Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.1" and 7.0 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.345 Tercidina 0 -0 1 13.1 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_04-46-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0427.fits at 20:24:47.88 -04:52:17.8: 15.52 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_04-47-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0428.fits at 20:24:47.88 -04:52:17.8: 15.52 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461201.9282,12.81,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260610.4282 12.81CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 10.4282 2461201.9282 13.88 20:33:48.39 -03:56:47.3
41.48041 -24.51380 galactic Aql Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.4" and 6.9 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.313 Chaldaea 1 -0 1 13.8 -0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_04-46-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0427.fits at 20:33:48.39 -03:56:47.3: 15.59 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_04-47-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0428.fits at 20:33:48.39 -03:56:47.3: 15.62 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461201.9282,13.88,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260610.4282 13.88CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 10.4282 2461201.9282 14.26 20:38:42.77 -01:42:44.6
44.28082 -24.51817 galactic Aqr Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.9" and 7.1 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.365 Corduba 2 -0 2 14.0 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_04-46-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0427.fits at 20:38:42.77 -01:42:44.6: 15.63 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_04-47-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0428.fits at 20:38:42.77 -01:42:44.6: 15.70 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461201.9282,14.26,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260610.4282 14.26CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 10.4282 2461201.9282 11.29 20:34:51.69 -02:42:53.6
42.80717 -24.16052 galactic Aql Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.1" and 7.0 pix
The object was found in VSX 1" V1661 Aql
Type: SR:
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
12.600 V 13.600 V 2452402.30000 301.045227000000 M7
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_04-46-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0427.fits at 20:34:51.69 -02:42:53.6: 12.20 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_04-47-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0428.fits at 20:34:51.69 -02:42:53.6: 12.25 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.22 +/- 0.01
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
V1661 Aql,2461201.9282,11.29,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
V1661 Aql 20260610.4282 11.29CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 10.4282 2461201.9282 13.39 20:29:35.79 +01:30:06.4
46.09317 -20.95011 galactic Aql Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.7" and 7.1 pix
The object was found in VSX 1" NSVS 14279892
Type: RRAB
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
14.130 R1 Y 0.840 R1 0.524274890000
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_04-46-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0427.fits at 20:29:35.79 +01:30:06.4: 14.34 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_04-47-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0428.fits at 20:29:35.79 +01:30:06.4: 14.35 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.34 +/- 0.08
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
NSVS 14279892,2461201.9282,13.39,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
NSVS 14279892 20260610.4282 13.39CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 10.4282 2461201.9282 12.12 20:21:17.91 +01:19:17.8
44.83386 -19.23697 galactic Aql Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.6" and 7.0 pix
The object was found in VSX 2" V0335 Aql
Type: M
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
10.300 V 15.000 : V 2455126.00000 174.600000000000 M1III:e
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_04-46-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0427.fits at 20:21:17.91 +01:19:17.8: 13.96 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_04-47-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0428.fits at 20:21:17.91 +01:19:17.8: 14.01 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.99 +/- 0.06
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
V0335 Aql,2461201.9282,12.12,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
V0335 Aql 20260610.4282 12.12CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 10.4282 2461201.9282 11.72 20:29:21.66 +00:50:53.7
45.45392 -21.22365 galactic Aql Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.4" and 7.0 pix
The object was found in VSX 3" V0845 Aql
Type: M
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
10.400 V < 13.500 V 2453893.00000 229.400000000000
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_04-46-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0427.fits at 20:29:21.66 +00:50:53.7: 13.15 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_04-47-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0428.fits at 20:29:21.66 +00:50:53.7: 13.14 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.15 +/- 0.03
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
V0845 Aql,2461201.9282,11.72,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
V0845 Aql 20260610.4282 11.72CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461173.90747294 13.05.2026 09:46:35.662 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_04-46-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0427.fits
First image: 2461173.90747294 13.05.2026 09:46:35.662 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_04-46-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0427.fits
Last image: 2461201.92851492 10.06.2026 10:16:53.689 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-10_CI_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_052415_TTUQ2b1x1_2608063_UpvDL3EC/fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-10_05-16-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0230.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 17
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.88
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 8 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 13764
Objects passed selection criteria: 13720
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.1 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.1 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 10878.5
Average stars matched: 9870.75 (90.7363 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 117512 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Mon Jun 8 11:26:26 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-95-g079870fa
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-06-08)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Wed Jun 10 05:26:43 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461173.90747294 13.05.2026 09:46:35.662 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_04-46-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0427.fits
First image: 2461173.90747294 13.05.2026 09:46:35.662 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_04-46-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0427.fits
Last image: 2461201.92851492 10.06.2026 10:16:53.689 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-10_CI_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_052415_TTUQ2b1x1_2608063_UpvDL3EC/fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-10_05-16-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0230.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 217
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.57
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 58 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 99421
Objects passed selection criteria: 99160
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.1 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.1 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 80340
Average stars matched: 72857.8 (90.6868 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 2012404 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Mon Jun 8 11:26:26 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-95-g079870fa
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-06-08)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Wed Jun 10 05:30:02 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/TTUQ2_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 4 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_04-46-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0427.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_04-47-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0428.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-10_CI_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_052415_TTUQ2b1x1_2608063_UpvDL3EC/fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-10_05-16-01_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-10_CI_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_052415_TTUQ2b1x1_2608063_UpvDL3EC/fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-10_05-16-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0230.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_04-46-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0427.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_04-47-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0428.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_04-46-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0427.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_04-47-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0428.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-10_CI_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_052415_TTUQ2b1x1_2608063_UpvDL3EC/fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-10_05-16-01_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-10_CI_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_052415_TTUQ2b1x1_2608063_UpvDL3EC/fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-10_05-16-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0230.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461201.92790848
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
'tocp_transients_list.txt' -> '../tocp_transients_list.txt'
wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_04-46-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0427.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_04-46-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0427.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_04-46-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0427.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_04-46-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0427.fits'
wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_04-47-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0428.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_04-47-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0428.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_04-47-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0428.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_04-47-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0428.fits'
wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-10_05-16-01_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-10_05-16-01_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-10_05-16-01_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-10_05-16-01_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits'
wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-10_05-16-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0230.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-10_05-16-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0230.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-10_05-16-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0230.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-10_05-16-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0230.fits'
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_04-46-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0427.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_04-46-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0427.fits
Image size: 937.3'x624.2' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 20:34:16.509 -01:59:53.13 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.87"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-10_05-16-01_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-10_05-16-01_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits
Image size: 937.0'x624.0' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 20:34:16.545 -02:00:50.76 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 20:34:16.509 -01:59:53.13
Second-epoch image center 20:34:16.545 -02:00:50.76
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0160 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-10_05-16-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0230.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-10_05-16-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0230.fits
Image size: 937.0'x624.0' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 20:34:16.375 -02:00:09.08 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 20:34:16.509 -01:59:53.13
Second-epoch image center 20:34:16.375 -02:00:09.08
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0045 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 20:34:16.545 -02:00:50.76
Second-epoch second image center 20:34:16.375 -02:00:09.08
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01160 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_04-46-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0427.fits &> /tmp/tmp.6KygKyeasL
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_04-46-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0427.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_04-47-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0428.fits &> /tmp/tmp.9dqnXcEiL8
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_04-47-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0428.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-10_CI_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_052415_TTUQ2b1x1_2608063_UpvDL3EC/fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-10_05-16-01_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits &> /tmp/tmp.scCdzuv0dc
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-10_CI_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_052415_TTUQ2b1x1_2608063_UpvDL3EC/fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-10_05-16-01_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-10_CI_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_052415_TTUQ2b1x1_2608063_UpvDL3EC/fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-10_05-16-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0230.fits &> /tmp/tmp.PzHwo8jB5b
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-10_CI_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_052415_TTUQ2b1x1_2608063_UpvDL3EC/fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-10_05-16-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0230.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_04-46-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0427.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_04-46-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0427.fits and wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_04-46-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0427.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_04-46-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0427.fits and wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_04-46-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0427.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_04-46-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0427.fits and wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_04-46-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0427.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_04-46-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0427.fits) and catalog (wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_04-46-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0427.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_04-46-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0427.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 13701 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 300.7076 to 316.4624 deg, Dec -7.2648 to +3.2766 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 300.7076 to 316.4624 deg, Dec -7.2648 to 3.2766 deg
Loaded 10847 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 8704 out of 9052 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 9052 out of 13701 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.694350
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.694350
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.88
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.81
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.81
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 13701 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 300.7076 to 316.4624 deg, Dec -7.2648 to +3.2766 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 300.7076 to 316.4624 deg, Dec -7.2648 to 3.2766 deg
Loaded 10847 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 8704 out of 9052 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 9052 out of 13701 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_04-46-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0427.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_04-46-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0427.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_04-46-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0427.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_04-46-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0427.fits (aperture=6.3)
Read 13571 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 300.7075 to 316.4624 deg, Dec -7.2712 to +3.2758 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 300.7075 to 316.4624 deg, Dec -7.2712 to 3.2758 deg
Loaded 10853 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 8626 out of 9004 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 9004 out of 13571 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_04-47-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0428.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_04-47-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0428.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_04-47-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0428.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_04-47-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0428.fits (aperture=6.2)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 14 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 8000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.4 pix Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_04-46-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0427.fits
2.3 pix Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_04-47-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0428.fits
2.6 pix fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-10_05-16-01_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits
2.6 pix fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-10_05-16-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0230.fits
2.4 pix wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_04-46-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0427.fits
2.3 pix wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_04-47-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0428.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
14.8 mag. Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_04-46-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0427.fits
14.8 mag. Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_04-47-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0428.fits
14.8 mag. fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-10_05-16-01_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits
14.8 mag. fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-10_05-16-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0230.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.8 (SNR ) 11.9 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.6KygKyeasL (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-10_CI_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_052415_TTUQ2b1x1_2608063_UpvDL3EC/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_04-46-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0427.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_04-46-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0427.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_04-46-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0427.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_04-46-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0427.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_04-46-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0427.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_04-46-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0427.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_04-46-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0427.fits' -> 'wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_04-46-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0427.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_04-46-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0427.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_04-46-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0427.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_04-46-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0427.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_04-46-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0427.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_04-46-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0427.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_04-46-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0427.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_04-46-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0427.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_04-46-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0427.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_04-46-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0427.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_04-46-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0427.fits.wcscat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=818, passed=13701
Got 13701 stars (including 12869 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_04-46-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0427.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 13701 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013018 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010414 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 949 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 948 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 938 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.49"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 948 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 13442 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.51"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 949 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 948 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 13440 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.51"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 948 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 13440 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.52"
Excluding outliers - 948 stars left (next iteration limit 1042)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_04-46-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0427.fits N_match=948 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.524 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.411 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.620 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.493 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.622 n_q1=233 n_q2=229 n_q3=238 n_q4=248 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.188
The image catalog is written to wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_04-46-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0427.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_04-46-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0427.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_04-46-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0427.fits -region wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_04-46-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0427.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_04-46-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0427.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.9dqnXcEiL8 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-10_CI_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_052415_TTUQ2b1x1_2608063_UpvDL3EC/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_04-47-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0428.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_04-47-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0428.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_04-47-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0428.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_04-47-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0428.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_04-47-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0428.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_04-47-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0428.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_04-47-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0428.fits' -> 'wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_04-47-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0428.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_04-47-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0428.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_04-47-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0428.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_04-47-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0428.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_04-47-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0428.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_04-47-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0428.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_04-47-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0428.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_04-47-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0428.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_04-47-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0428.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_04-47-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0428.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_04-47-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0428.fits.wcscat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=853, passed=13571
Got 13571 stars (including 12699 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_04-47-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0428.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 13571 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013018 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010414 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 951 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 950 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 941 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.53"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 950 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 13314 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.52"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 951 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 950 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 13315 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.52"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 950 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 13315 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.56"
Excluding outliers - 950 stars left (next iteration limit 1045)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_04-47-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0428.fits N_match=950 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.559 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.449 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.692 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.563 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.647 n_q1=241 n_q2=233 n_q3=230 n_q4=246 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.237
The image catalog is written to wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_04-47-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0428.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_04-47-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0428.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_04-47-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0428.fits -region wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_04-47-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0428.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_04-47-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0428.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.scCdzuv0dc (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-10_CI_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_052415_TTUQ2b1x1_2608063_UpvDL3EC/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-10_CI_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_052415_TTUQ2b1x1_2608063_UpvDL3EC/fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-10_05-16-01_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-10_CI_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_052415_TTUQ2b1x1_2608063_UpvDL3EC/fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-10_05-16-01_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-10_CI_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_052415_TTUQ2b1x1_2608063_UpvDL3EC/fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-10_05-16-01_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-10_CI_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_052415_TTUQ2b1x1_2608063_UpvDL3EC/fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-10_05-16-01_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-10_CI_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_052415_TTUQ2b1x1_2608063_UpvDL3EC/fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-10_05-16-01_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-10_CI_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_052415_TTUQ2b1x1_2608063_UpvDL3EC/fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-10_05-16-01_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-10_05-16-01_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-10_05-16-01_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-10_05-16-01_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-10_05-16-01_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-10_05-16-01_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-10_05-16-01_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-10_05-16-01_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-10_CI_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_052415_TTUQ2b1x1_2608063_UpvDL3EC/fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-10_05-16-01_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-10_05-16-01_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits.wcscat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=859, passed=14607
Got 14607 stars (including 13735 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-10_05-16-01_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 14607 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.0'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.0 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013014 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010411 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 952 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 950 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 942 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.52"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 950 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 14416 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.58"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 952 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 950 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 14415 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.58"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 950 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 14415 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.63"
Excluding outliers - 950 stars left (next iteration limit 1045)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-10_05-16-01_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits N_match=950 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.563 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.357 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.711 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.520 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.752 n_q1=218 n_q2=278 n_q3=202 n_q4=252 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.336
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-10_05-16-01_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-10_05-16-01_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-10_CI_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_052415_TTUQ2b1x1_2608063_UpvDL3EC/fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-10_05-16-01_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits -region wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-10_05-16-01_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-10_05-16-01_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.PzHwo8jB5b (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-10_CI_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_052415_TTUQ2b1x1_2608063_UpvDL3EC/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-10_CI_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_052415_TTUQ2b1x1_2608063_UpvDL3EC/fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-10_05-16-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0230.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-10_CI_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_052415_TTUQ2b1x1_2608063_UpvDL3EC/fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-10_05-16-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0230.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-10_CI_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_052415_TTUQ2b1x1_2608063_UpvDL3EC/fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-10_05-16-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0230.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-10_CI_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_052415_TTUQ2b1x1_2608063_UpvDL3EC/fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-10_05-16-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0230.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-10_CI_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_052415_TTUQ2b1x1_2608063_UpvDL3EC/fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-10_05-16-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0230.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-10_CI_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_052415_TTUQ2b1x1_2608063_UpvDL3EC/fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-10_05-16-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0230.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-10_05-16-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0230.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-10_05-16-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0230.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-10_05-16-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0230.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-10_05-16-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0230.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-10_05-16-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0230.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-10_05-16-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0230.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-10_05-16-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0230.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-10_CI_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_052415_TTUQ2b1x1_2608063_UpvDL3EC/fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-10_05-16-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0230.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-10_05-16-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0230.fits.wcscat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=866, passed=14461
Got 14461 stars (including 13582 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-10_05-16-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0230.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 14461 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.0'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.0 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013014 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010411 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 953 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 953 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 943 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.55"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 953 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 14265 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.60"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 953 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 953 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 14261 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.61"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 953 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 14261 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.66"
Excluding outliers - 953 stars left (next iteration limit 1048)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-10_05-16-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0230.fits N_match=953 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.559 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.374 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.785 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.497 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.723 n_q1=224 n_q2=280 n_q3=198 n_q4=251 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.404
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-10_05-16-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0230.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-10_05-16-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0230.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-10_CI_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_052415_TTUQ2b1x1_2608063_UpvDL3EC/fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-10_05-16-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0230.fits -region wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-10_05-16-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0230.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-10_05-16-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0230.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_04-46-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0427.fits sigma_overall=0.524 worst_q_ratio=1.188
ref2=Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_04-47-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0428.fits sigma_overall=0.559 worst_q_ratio=1.237
new1=fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-10_05-16-01_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits sigma_overall=0.563 worst_q_ratio=1.336
new2=fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-10_05-16-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0230.fits sigma_overall=0.559 worst_q_ratio=1.404
reference average sigma_overall=0.5415 worst_q_ratio=1.2125
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_04-46-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0427_astrometric_residuals.png (948 matched stars from wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_04-46-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0427.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.47 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_04-47-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0428_astrometric_residuals.png (950 matched stars from wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_04-47-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0428.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.50 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-10_05-16-01_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0229_astrometric_residuals.png (950 matched stars from wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-10_05-16-01_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.52 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-10_05-16-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0230_astrometric_residuals.png (953 matched stars from wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-10_05-16-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0230.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.52 arcsec)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-10_05-16-01_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-10_05-16-01_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-10_CI_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_052415_TTUQ2b1x1_2608063_UpvDL3EC/wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-10_05-16-01_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-10_05-16-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0230.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-10_05-16-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0230.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-10_CI_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_052415_TTUQ2b1x1_2608063_UpvDL3EC/wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-10_05-16-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0230.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Aql-05-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_04-46-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0427.fits at 20:29:21.70 +00:50:55.2: 12.92 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_04-46-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0427.fits at 20:23:55.02 +00:56:40.6: 12.24 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_04-46-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0427.fits at 20:41:00.43 -00:11:26.0: 11.95 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_04-46-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0427.fits at 20:34:13.69 +01:15:49.5: 11.88 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_04-46-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0427.fits at 20:43:09.06 -01:36:06.8: 11.85 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_04-46-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0427.fits at 20:36:33.84 -03:42:33.7: 15.44 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_04-46-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0427.fits at 20:30:07.81 -01:44:16.2: 11.89 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_04-46-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0427.fits at 20:31:58.06 +02:08:53.9: 11.83 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_04-46-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0427.fits at 20:30:44.80 +00:41:48.3: 11.96 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_04-46-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0427.fits at 20:38:34.72 -02:11:54.4: 11.92 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_04-47-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0428.fits at 20:29:21.70 +00:50:55.2: 12.91 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.91 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_04-47-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0428.fits at 20:23:55.02 +00:56:40.6: 12.32 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 20:29:21.70 +00:50:55.2: ref_mag=12.91 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=11.6248 delta=1.29 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.28 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 20:23:55.02 +00:56:40.6: ref_mag=12.28 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.1506 delta=1.13 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_04-47-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0428.fits at 20:41:00.43 -00:11:26.0: 11.93 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.94 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:41:00.43 -00:11:26.0: ref_mag=11.94 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.9300 delta=0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_04-47-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0428.fits at 20:31:58.06 +02:08:53.9: 11.83 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.83 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:31:58.06 +02:08:53.9: ref_mag=11.83 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.8592 delta=-0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_04-47-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0428.fits at 20:34:13.69 +01:15:49.5: 11.89 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_04-47-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0428.fits at 20:43:09.06 -01:36:06.8: 11.84 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_04-47-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0428.fits at 20:30:07.81 -01:44:16.2: 11.91 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.88 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.84 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:34:13.69 +01:15:49.5: ref_mag=11.88 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.9094 delta=-0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_04-47-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0428.fits at 20:36:33.84 -03:42:33.7: 15.47 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:43:09.06 -01:36:06.8: ref_mag=11.84 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.8926 delta=-0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.90 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:30:07.81 -01:44:16.2: ref_mag=11.90 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.8734 delta=0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_04-47-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0428.fits at 20:30:44.80 +00:41:48.3: 11.97 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.96 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:30:44.80 +00:41:48.3: ref_mag=11.96 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.9645 delta=-0.00 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_04-47-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0428.fits at 20:38:34.72 -02:11:54.4: 11.90 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.91 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:38:34.72 -02:11:54.4: ref_mag=11.91 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.9464 delta=-0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_04-46-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0427.fits at 20:28:32.82 -00:40:17.2: 12.01 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_04-47-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0428.fits at 20:28:32.82 -00:40:17.2: 12.02 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.01 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:28:32.82 -00:40:17.2: ref_mag=12.01 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.0073 delta=0.01 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out21818.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out20749.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out21354.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 8s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 2s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20749_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-10_05-16-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0230
Preparing report for the candidate 20749_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-10_05-16-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0230
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21295_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-10_05-16-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0230
The candidate 21295_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-10_05-16-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0230 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:27:52.05 -01:49:24.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21354_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-10_05-16-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0230
Preparing report for the candidate 21354_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-10_05-16-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0230
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21818_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-10_05-16-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0230
The candidate 21818_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-10_05-16-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0230 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:29:21.70 +00:50:55.2 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=11.62, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=12.60)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 2.938 4230723110763856512 307.33960503855 +00.84857913739 10.0829 7.7742 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#2.938#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21852_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-10_05-16-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0230
The candidate 21852_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-10_05-16-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0230 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:23:47.67 -03:51:40.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 22136_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-10_05-16-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0230
The candidate 22136_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-10_05-16-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0230 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 22155_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-10_05-16-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0230
The candidate 22155_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-10_05-16-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0230 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 22203_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-10_05-16-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0230
The candidate 22203_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-10_05-16-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0230 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 22258_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-10_05-16-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0230
The candidate 22258_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-10_05-16-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0230 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 22267_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-10_05-16-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0230
The candidate 22267_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-10_05-16-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0230 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 22277_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-10_05-16-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0230
The candidate 22277_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-10_05-16-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0230 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 22349_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-10_05-16-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0230
The candidate 22349_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-10_05-16-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0230 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 22357_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-10_05-16-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0230
The candidate 22357_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-10_05-16-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0230 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 07850_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-10_05-16-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0230
The candidate 07850_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-10_05-16-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0230 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 116639_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-10_05-16-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0230
The candidate 116639_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-10_05-16-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0230 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 116655_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-10_05-16-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0230
The candidate 116655_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-10_05-16-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0230 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 116658_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-10_05-16-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0230
The candidate 116658_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-10_05-16-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0230 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 116660_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-10_05-16-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0230
The candidate 116660_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-10_05-16-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0230 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 116661_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-10_05-16-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0230
The candidate 116661_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-10_05-16-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0230 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 116662_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-10_05-16-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0230
The candidate 116662_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-10_05-16-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0230 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 116668_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-10_05-16-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0230
The candidate 116668_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-10_05-16-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0230 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 116674_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-10_05-16-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0230
The candidate 116674_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-10_05-16-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0230 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 116677_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-10_05-16-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0230
The candidate 116677_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-10_05-16-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0230 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 116680_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-10_05-16-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0230
The candidate 116680_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-10_05-16-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0230 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 116689_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-10_05-16-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0230
The candidate 116689_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-10_05-16-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0230 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 116701_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-10_05-16-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0230
The candidate 116701_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-10_05-16-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0230 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 116702_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-10_05-16-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0230
The candidate 116702_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-10_05-16-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0230 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 116704_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-10_05-16-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0230
The candidate 116704_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-10_05-16-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0230 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:32:42.92 +00:46:10.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 116712_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-10_05-16-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0230
The candidate 116712_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-10_05-16-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0230 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:49:03.50 -03:33:33.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 116717_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-10_05-16-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0230
The candidate 116717_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-10_05-16-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0230 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 116718_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-10_05-16-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0230
The candidate 116718_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-10_05-16-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0230 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 117027_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-10_05-16-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0230
The candidate 117027_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-10_05-16-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0230 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:36:33.84 -03:42:33.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_local.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 119779_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-10_05-16-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0230
The candidate 119779_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-10_05-16-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0230 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 119862_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-10_05-16-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0230
The candidate 119862_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-10_05-16-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0230 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 120183_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-10_05-16-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0230
The candidate 120183_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-10_05-16-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0230 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:51:42.08 -00:39:22.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 120533_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-10_05-16-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0230
The candidate 120533_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-10_05-16-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0230 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:51:23.23 -03:37:16.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 120661_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-10_05-16-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0230
Preparing report for the candidate 120661_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-10_05-16-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0230
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 120898_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-10_05-16-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0230
The candidate 120898_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-10_05-16-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0230 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:17:32.14 -02:03:36.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 122030_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-10_05-16-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0230
The candidate 122030_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-10_05-16-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0230 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 122194_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-10_05-16-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0230
The candidate 122194_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-10_05-16-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0230 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:35:30.64 +01:48:55.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 122854_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-10_05-16-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0230
The candidate 122854_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-10_05-16-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0230 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:31:57.61 +01:21:10.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 123102_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-10_05-16-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0230
The candidate 123102_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-10_05-16-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0230 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 123163_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-10_05-16-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0230
The candidate 123163_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-10_05-16-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0230 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 123307_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-10_05-16-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0230
The candidate 123307_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-10_05-16-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0230 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 123493_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-10_05-16-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0230
The candidate 123493_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-10_05-16-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0230 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 125593_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-10_05-16-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0230
The candidate 125593_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-10_05-16-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0230 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 125713_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-10_05-16-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0230
The candidate 125713_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-10_05-16-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0230 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 125821_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-10_05-16-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0230
The candidate 125821_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-10_05-16-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0230 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 126051_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-10_05-16-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0230
The candidate 126051_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-10_05-16-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0230 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:43:17.45 -04:18:35.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 126148_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-10_05-16-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0230
Preparing report for the candidate 126148_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-10_05-16-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0230
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 126177_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-10_05-16-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0230
The candidate 126177_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-10_05-16-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0230 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 126259_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-10_05-16-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0230
The candidate 126259_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-10_05-16-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0230 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 126352_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-10_05-16-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0230
The candidate 126352_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-10_05-16-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0230 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 126669_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-10_05-16-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0230
The candidate 126669_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-10_05-16-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0230 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 127104_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-10_05-16-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0230
The candidate 127104_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-10_05-16-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0230 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 127343_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-10_05-16-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0230
The candidate 127343_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-10_05-16-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0230 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 127455_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-10_05-16-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0230
The candidate 127455_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-10_05-16-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0230 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 127522_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-10_05-16-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0230
The candidate 127522_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-10_05-16-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0230 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 127526_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-10_05-16-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0230
The candidate 127526_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-10_05-16-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0230 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 127545_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-10_05-16-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0230
The candidate 127545_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-10_05-16-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0230 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 127560_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-10_05-16-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0230
The candidate 127560_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-10_05-16-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0230 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 127578_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-10_05-16-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0230
The candidate 127578_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-10_05-16-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0230 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 127818_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-10_05-16-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0230
The candidate 127818_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-10_05-16-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0230 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 127859_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-10_05-16-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0230
The candidate 127859_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-10_05-16-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0230 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 127911_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-10_05-16-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0230
The candidate 127911_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-10_05-16-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0230 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 127913_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-10_05-16-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0230
The candidate 127913_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-10_05-16-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0230 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 127917_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-10_05-16-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0230
The candidate 127917_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-10_05-16-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0230 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 128256_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-10_05-16-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0230
The candidate 128256_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-10_05-16-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0230 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 128334_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-10_05-16-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0230
The candidate 128334_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-10_05-16-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0230 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 128355_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-10_05-16-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0230
The candidate 128355_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-10_05-16-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0230 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 128358_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-10_05-16-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0230
Preparing report for the candidate 128358_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-10_05-16-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0230
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 128457_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-10_05-16-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0230
The candidate 128457_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-10_05-16-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0230 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 128472_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-10_05-16-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0230
The candidate 128472_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-10_05-16-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0230 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 128577_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-10_05-16-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0230
The candidate 128577_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-10_05-16-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0230 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 128583_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-10_05-16-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0230
The candidate 128583_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-10_05-16-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0230 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 128584_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-10_05-16-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0230
The candidate 128584_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-10_05-16-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0230 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 128605_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-10_05-16-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0230
The candidate 128605_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-10_05-16-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0230 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 128655_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-10_05-16-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0230
The candidate 128655_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-10_05-16-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0230 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 128711_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-10_05-16-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0230
The candidate 128711_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-10_05-16-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0230 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 128840_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-10_05-16-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0230
The candidate 128840_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-10_05-16-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0230 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 128851_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-10_05-16-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0230
The candidate 128851_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-10_05-16-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0230 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 128961_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-10_05-16-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0230
The candidate 128961_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-10_05-16-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0230 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 129009_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-10_05-16-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0230
The candidate 129009_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-10_05-16-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0230 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 129016_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-10_05-16-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0230
The candidate 129016_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-10_05-16-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0230 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 129051_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-10_05-16-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0230
The candidate 129051_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-10_05-16-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0230 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 129111_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-10_05-16-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0230
The candidate 129111_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-10_05-16-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0230 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 129115_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-10_05-16-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0230
The candidate 129115_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-10_05-16-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0230 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 129151_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-10_05-16-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0230
The candidate 129151_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-10_05-16-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0230 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 129205_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-10_05-16-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0230
The candidate 129205_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-10_05-16-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0230 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 129220_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-10_05-16-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0230
The candidate 129220_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-10_05-16-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0230 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 129223_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-10_05-16-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0230
The candidate 129223_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-10_05-16-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0230 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 129225_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-10_05-16-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0230
The candidate 129225_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-10_05-16-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0230 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 129243_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-10_05-16-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0230
The candidate 129243_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-10_05-16-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0230 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 129288_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-10_05-16-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0230
The candidate 129288_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-10_05-16-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0230 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 129343_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-10_05-16-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0230
The candidate 129343_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-10_05-16-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0230 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 129360_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-10_05-16-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0230
The candidate 129360_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-10_05-16-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0230 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 129451_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-10_05-16-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0230
The candidate 129451_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-10_05-16-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0230 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 129453_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-10_05-16-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0230
The candidate 129453_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-10_05-16-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0230 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 129494_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-10_05-16-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0230
The candidate 129494_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-10_05-16-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0230 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 129559_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-10_05-16-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0230
The candidate 129559_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-10_05-16-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0230 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 129562_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-10_05-16-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0230
The candidate 129562_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-10_05-16-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0230 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 129582_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-10_05-16-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0230
The candidate 129582_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-10_05-16-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0230 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 129618_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-10_05-16-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0230
The candidate 129618_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-10_05-16-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0230 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 129653_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-10_05-16-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0230
The candidate 129653_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-10_05-16-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0230 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 129668_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-10_05-16-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0230
The candidate 129668_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-10_05-16-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0230 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 129700_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-10_05-16-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0230
The candidate 129700_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-10_05-16-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0230 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 129751_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-10_05-16-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0230
The candidate 129751_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-10_05-16-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0230 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 129752_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-10_05-16-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0230
The candidate 129752_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-10_05-16-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0230 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 129776_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-10_05-16-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0230
The candidate 129776_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-10_05-16-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0230 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 129805_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-10_05-16-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0230
The candidate 129805_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-10_05-16-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0230 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 129810_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-10_05-16-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0230
The candidate 129810_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-10_05-16-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0230 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 129819_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-10_05-16-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0230
The candidate 129819_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-10_05-16-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0230 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 129822_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-10_05-16-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0230
The candidate 129822_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-10_05-16-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0230 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 129844_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-10_05-16-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0230
The candidate 129844_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-10_05-16-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0230 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 129845_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-10_05-16-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0230
The candidate 129845_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-10_05-16-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0230 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 129846_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-10_05-16-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0230
The candidate 129846_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-10_05-16-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0230 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 129860_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-10_05-16-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0230
The candidate 129860_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-10_05-16-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0230 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 129862_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-10_05-16-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0230
The candidate 129862_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-10_05-16-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0230 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 129874_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-10_05-16-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0230
The candidate 129874_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-10_05-16-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0230 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 129876_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-10_05-16-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0230
The candidate 129876_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-10_05-16-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0230 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 129881_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-10_05-16-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0230
The candidate 129881_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-10_05-16-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0230 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 129968_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-10_05-16-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0230
The candidate 129968_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-10_05-16-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0230 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 130012_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-10_05-16-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0230
The candidate 130012_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-10_05-16-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0230 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 130165_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-10_05-16-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0230
The candidate 130165_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-10_05-16-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0230 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 130180_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-10_05-16-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0230
The candidate 130180_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-10_05-16-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0230 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 130751_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-10_05-16-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0230
The candidate 130751_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-10_05-16-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0230 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 36882_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-10_05-16-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0230
Preparing report for the candidate 36882_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-10_05-16-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0230
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 26705_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-10_05-16-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0230
The candidate 26705_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-10_05-16-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0230 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:23:47.67 -03:51:40.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82295_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-10_05-16-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0230
Preparing report for the candidate 82295_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-10_05-16-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0230
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 83360_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-10_05-16-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0230
The candidate 83360_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-10_05-16-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0230 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:43:09.23 +01:23:03.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54049_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-10_05-16-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0230
The candidate 54049_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-10_05-16-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0230 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:46:36.76 -00:54:11.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 45573_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-10_05-16-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0230
The candidate 45573_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-10_05-16-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0230 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:27:52.04 -01:49:24.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 83788_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-10_05-16-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0230
Preparing report for the candidate 83788_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-10_05-16-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0230
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 86784_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-10_05-16-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0230
The candidate 86784_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-10_05-16-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0230 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:23:55.02 +00:56:40.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_local.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87684_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-10_05-16-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0230
Preparing report for the candidate 87684_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-10_05-16-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0230
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 12921_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-10_05-16-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0230
The candidate 12921_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-10_05-16-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0230 did not pass the final checks
