This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-10_CI_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_050548_TTUQ1b1x1_922872_CS9tNqdE
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 10.4095 2461201.9095 11.00 06:22:07.33 +73:57:21.4
140.39408 24.00683 galactic Cam Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.5" and 7.7 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
online_id | Gaia DR3 1114305423585886208 | 06:22:04.16 +73:57:41.0 (Gaia DR3) | T | P | Gaia3var=NOT_AVAILABLE
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits at 06:22:07.33 +73:57:21.4: 12.52 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_00-01-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0368.fits at 06:22:07.33 +73:57:21.4: 12.48 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.50 +/- 0.01
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
Gaia DR3 1114305423585886208,2461201.9095,11.00,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
Gaia DR3 1114305423585886208 20260610.4095 11.00CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 10.4095 2461201.9095 10.46 06:28:23.60 +71:20:32.4
143.28861 23.79340 galactic Cam Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.2" and 8.1 pix
The object was found in VSX16" NSVS J0628215+712020
Type: L:
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
9.851 R1 Y 0.640 R1 92.000000000000 M5/6
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits at 06:28:23.60 +71:20:32.4: 11.54 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_00-01-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0368.fits at 06:28:23.60 +71:20:32.4: 11.22 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.37 +/- 0.01
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
NSVS J0628215+712020,2461201.9095,10.46,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
NSVS J0628215+712020 20260610.4095 10.46CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 10.4095 2461201.9095 11.57 08:10:04.03 +74:19:45.7
140.25582 31.32564 galactic Cam Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.4" and 7.1 pix
The object was found in VSX 3" NSVS J0810044+741943
Type: L:
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
10.629 R1 Y 0.658 R1 730.000000000000 M6/7
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits at 08:10:04.03 +74:19:45.7: 12.74 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_00-01-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0368.fits at 08:10:04.03 +74:19:45.7: 12.48 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.62 +/- 0.01
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
NSVS J0810044+741943,2461201.9095,11.57,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
NSVS J0810044+741943 20260610.4095 11.57CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461119.71967594 20.03.2026 05:16:10.001 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits
First image: 2461119.71967594 20.03.2026 05:16:10.001 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits
Last image: 2461201.90977573 10.06.2026 09:49:54.623 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-10_CI_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_050548_TTUQ1b1x1_922872_CS9tNqdE/fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_04-49-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0191.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 7
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.65
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 7 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 9990
Objects passed selection criteria: 9969
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.3 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.3 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 8802.25
Average stars matched: 8723.5 (99.1053 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 116140 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Mon Jun 8 11:26:26 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-95-g079870fa
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-06-08)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Wed Jun 10 05:08:22 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461119.71967594 20.03.2026 05:16:10.001 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits
First image: 2461119.71967594 20.03.2026 05:16:10.001 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits
Last image: 2461201.90977573 10.06.2026 09:49:54.623 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-10_CI_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_050548_TTUQ1b1x1_922872_CS9tNqdE/fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_04-49-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0191.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 67
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.37
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 16 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 55326
Objects passed selection criteria: 55173
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.0 3.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.0 3.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 44426.2
Average stars matched: 43712.5 (98.3934 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 158080 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Mon Jun 8 11:26:26 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-95-g079870fa
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-06-08)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Wed Jun 10 05:10:18 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 3.5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_00-01-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0368.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-10_CI_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_050548_TTUQ1b1x1_922872_CS9tNqdE/fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_04-49-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0190.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-10_CI_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_050548_TTUQ1b1x1_922872_CS9tNqdE/fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_04-49-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0191.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_00-01-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0368.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_00-01-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0368.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-10_CI_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_050548_TTUQ1b1x1_922872_CS9tNqdE/fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_04-49-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0190.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-10_CI_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_050548_TTUQ1b1x1_922872_CS9tNqdE/fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_04-49-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0191.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461201.90927064
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits'
wcs_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_00-01-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0368.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_00-01-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0368.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_00-01-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0368.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_00-01-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0368.fits'
wcs_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_04-49-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0190.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_04-49-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0190.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_04-49-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0190.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_04-49-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0190.fits'
wcs_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_04-49-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0191.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_04-49-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0191.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_04-49-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0191.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_04-49-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0191.fits'
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits
Image size: 937.3'x624.2' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 08:00:02.055 +77:29:57.05 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.87"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_04-49-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0190.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_04-49-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0190.fits
Image size: 940.5'x627.3' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.89"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 07:59:17.852 +77:28:39.33 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 08:00:02.055 +77:29:57.05
Second-epoch image center 07:59:17.852 +77:28:39.33
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0454 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_04-49-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0191.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_04-49-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0191.fits
Image size: 940.5'x627.3' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.89"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 07:59:20.942 +77:27:58.12 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 08:00:02.055 +77:29:57.05
Second-epoch image center 07:59:20.942 +77:27:58.12
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0497 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 07:59:17.852 +77:28:39.33
Second-epoch second image center 07:59:20.942 +77:27:58.12
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01178 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits &> /tmp/tmp.EZH8w6Vrr6
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_00-01-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0368.fits &> /tmp/tmp.XvYdc7OQEP
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_00-01-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0368.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-10_CI_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_050548_TTUQ1b1x1_922872_CS9tNqdE/fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_04-49-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0190.fits &> /tmp/tmp.C9FyQBSsam
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-10_CI_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_050548_TTUQ1b1x1_922872_CS9tNqdE/fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_04-49-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0190.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-10_CI_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_050548_TTUQ1b1x1_922872_CS9tNqdE/fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_04-49-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0191.fits &> /tmp/tmp.ffJEwGIOwC
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-10_CI_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_050548_TTUQ1b1x1_922872_CS9tNqdE/fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_04-49-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0191.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits and wcs_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits and wcs_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits and wcs_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits) and catalog (wcs_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 12435 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 73.1573 to 167.1070 deg, Dec +70.6354 to +82.7620 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 73.1573 to 167.1070 deg, Dec 70.6354 to 82.7620 deg
Loaded 13335 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 7093 out of 7406 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 7406 out of 12435 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.878800
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.878800
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.65
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.23
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.23
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 12435 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 73.1573 to 167.1070 deg, Dec +70.6354 to +82.7620 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 73.1573 to 167.1070 deg, Dec 70.6354 to 82.7620 deg
Loaded 13335 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 7093 out of 7406 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 7406 out of 12435 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits (aperture=6.6)
Read 9856 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 73.1549 to 167.1050 deg, Dec +70.6351 to +82.7619 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 73.1549 to 167.1050 deg, Dec 70.6351 to 82.7619 deg
Loaded 13336 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 6885 out of 7110 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 7110 out of 9856 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_00-01-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0368.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_00-01-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0368.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_00-01-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0368.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_00-01-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0368.fits (aperture=6.7)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 7 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 8000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.4 pix Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits
2.5 pix Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_00-01-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0368.fits
4.8 pix fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_04-49-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0190.fits
4.7 pix fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_04-49-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0191.fits
2.4 pix wcs_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits
2.5 pix wcs_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_00-01-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0368.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.2 mag. Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits
14.9 mag. Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_00-01-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0368.fits
14.0 mag. fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_04-49-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0190.fits
14.0 mag. fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_04-49-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0191.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.0 (SNR ) 11.6 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.EZH8w6Vrr6 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-10_CI_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_050548_TTUQ1b1x1_922872_CS9tNqdE/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits' -> 'wcs_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits.wcscat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=759, passed=12435
Got 12435 stars (including 11671 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 12435 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013018 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010414 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 803 to 865 (Dec 70.6 to 82.8)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 968 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 967 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 959 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.51"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 967 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 12247 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.50"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 803 to 865 (Dec 70.6 to 82.8)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 968 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 967 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 12246 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.49"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 967 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 12246 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.48"
Excluding outliers - 967 stars left (next iteration limit 1063)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits N_match=967 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.475 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.310 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.694 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.500 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.556 n_q1=236 n_q2=298 n_q3=207 n_q4=226 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.461
The image catalog is written to wcs_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits -region wcs_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.XvYdc7OQEP (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_00-01-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0368.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-10_CI_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_050548_TTUQ1b1x1_922872_CS9tNqdE/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_00-01-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0368.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_00-01-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0368.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_00-01-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0368.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_00-01-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0368.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_00-01-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0368.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_00-01-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0368.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_00-01-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0368.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_00-01-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0368.fits' -> 'wcs_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_00-01-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0368.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_00-01-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0368.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_00-01-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0368.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_00-01-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0368.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_00-01-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0368.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_00-01-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0368.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_00-01-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0368.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_00-01-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0368.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_00-01-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0368.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_00-01-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0368.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_00-01-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0368.fits.wcscat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=585, passed=9856
Got 9856 stars (including 9267 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_00-01-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0368.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 9856 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013022 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010418 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 803 to 865 (Dec 70.6 to 82.8)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 972 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 971 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 965 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.49"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 971 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 9721 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.48"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 803 to 865 (Dec 70.6 to 82.8)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 972 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 971 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 9721 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.48"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 971 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 9721 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.46"
Excluding outliers - 971 stars left (next iteration limit 1068)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_00-01-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0368.fits N_match=971 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.472 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.342 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.640 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.522 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.495 n_q1=226 n_q2=292 n_q3=221 n_q4=232 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.357
The image catalog is written to wcs_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_00-01-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0368.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_00-01-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0368.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_00-01-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0368.fits -region wcs_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_00-01-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0368.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_00-01-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0368.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.C9FyQBSsam (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-10_CI_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_050548_TTUQ1b1x1_922872_CS9tNqdE/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-10_CI_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_050548_TTUQ1b1x1_922872_CS9tNqdE/fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_04-49-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0190.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-10_CI_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_050548_TTUQ1b1x1_922872_CS9tNqdE/fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_04-49-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0190.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-10_CI_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_050548_TTUQ1b1x1_922872_CS9tNqdE/fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_04-49-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0190.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-10_CI_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_050548_TTUQ1b1x1_922872_CS9tNqdE/fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_04-49-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0190.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-10_CI_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_050548_TTUQ1b1x1_922872_CS9tNqdE/fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_04-49-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0190.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-10_CI_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_050548_TTUQ1b1x1_922872_CS9tNqdE/fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_04-49-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0190.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_04-49-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0190.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_04-49-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0190.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_04-49-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0190.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_04-49-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0190.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_04-49-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0190.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_04-49-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0190.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_04-49-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0190.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-10_CI_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_050548_TTUQ1b1x1_922872_CS9tNqdE/fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_04-49-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0190.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_04-49-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0190.fits.wcscat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=254, passed=6649
Got 6649 stars (including 6390 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_04-49-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0190.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 6649 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 940.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 940.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013063 (47.0 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010450 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 803 to 865 (Dec 70.7 to 82.8)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 967 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 966 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 954 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 966 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6582 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 803 to 865 (Dec 70.7 to 82.8)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 967 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 966 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6582 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 966 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6582 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
Excluding outliers - 966 stars left (next iteration limit 1062)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_04-49-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0190.fits N_match=966 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.416 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.518 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.528 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.372 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.317 n_q1=199 n_q2=209 n_q3=316 n_q4=242 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.268
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_04-49-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0190.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_04-49-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0190.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-10_CI_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_050548_TTUQ1b1x1_922872_CS9tNqdE/fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_04-49-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0190.fits -region wcs_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_04-49-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0190.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_04-49-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0190.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.ffJEwGIOwC (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-10_CI_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_050548_TTUQ1b1x1_922872_CS9tNqdE/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-10_CI_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_050548_TTUQ1b1x1_922872_CS9tNqdE/fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_04-49-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0191.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-10_CI_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_050548_TTUQ1b1x1_922872_CS9tNqdE/fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_04-49-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0191.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-10_CI_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_050548_TTUQ1b1x1_922872_CS9tNqdE/fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_04-49-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0191.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-10_CI_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_050548_TTUQ1b1x1_922872_CS9tNqdE/fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_04-49-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0191.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-10_CI_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_050548_TTUQ1b1x1_922872_CS9tNqdE/fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_04-49-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0191.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-10_CI_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_050548_TTUQ1b1x1_922872_CS9tNqdE/fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_04-49-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0191.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_04-49-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0191.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_04-49-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0191.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_04-49-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0191.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_04-49-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0191.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_04-49-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0191.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_04-49-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0191.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_04-49-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0191.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-10_CI_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_050548_TTUQ1b1x1_922872_CS9tNqdE/fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_04-49-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0191.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_04-49-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0191.fits.wcscat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=210, passed=6566
Got 6566 stars (including 6355 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_04-49-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0191.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 6566 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 940.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 940.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013063 (47.0 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010450 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 802 to 865 (Dec 70.5 to 82.8)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 967 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 966 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 954 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 966 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6487 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 802 to 865 (Dec 70.5 to 82.8)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 967 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 966 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6487 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 966 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6487 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44"
Excluding outliers - 966 stars left (next iteration limit 1062)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_04-49-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0191.fits N_match=966 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.444 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.514 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.600 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.388 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.347 n_q1=201 n_q2=206 n_q3=321 n_q4=238 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.350
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_04-49-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0191.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_04-49-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0191.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-10_CI_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_050548_TTUQ1b1x1_922872_CS9tNqdE/fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_04-49-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0191.fits -region wcs_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_04-49-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0191.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_04-49-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0191.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits sigma_overall=0.475 worst_q_ratio=1.461
ref2=Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_00-01-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0368.fits sigma_overall=0.472 worst_q_ratio=1.357
new1=fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_04-49-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0190.fits sigma_overall=0.416 worst_q_ratio=1.268
new2=fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_04-49-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0191.fits sigma_overall=0.444 worst_q_ratio=1.350
reference average sigma_overall=0.4735 worst_q_ratio=1.409
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206_astrometric_residuals.png (967 matched stars from wcs_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.43 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_00-01-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0368_astrometric_residuals.png (971 matched stars from wcs_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_00-01-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0368.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.42 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_04-49-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0190_astrometric_residuals.png (966 matched stars from wcs_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_04-49-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0190.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.39 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_04-49-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0191_astrometric_residuals.png (966 matched stars from wcs_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_04-49-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0191.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.41 arcsec)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_04-49-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0190.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_04-49-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0190.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-10_CI_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_050548_TTUQ1b1x1_922872_CS9tNqdE/wcs_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_04-49-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0190.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_04-49-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0191.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_04-49-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0191.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-10_CI_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_050548_TTUQ1b1x1_922872_CS9tNqdE/wcs_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_04-49-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0191.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Cam-04-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits at 09:25:21.57 +71:16:57.7: 11.64 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits at 08:48:10.39 +71:55:25.5: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits at 06:22:07.12 +73:57:21.9: 11.75 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_00-01-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0368.fits at 08:48:10.39 +71:55:25.5: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 08:48:10.39 +71:55:25.5: at least one reference image reported edge (off-image or aperture/annulus past image boundary); cannot perform the forced-photometry cross-check
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_00-01-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0368.fits at 06:22:07.12 +73:57:21.9: 11.69 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_00-01-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0368.fits at 09:25:21.57 +71:16:57.7: 11.66 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.73 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.64 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:22:07.12 +73:57:21.9: ref_mag=11.73 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=10.9443 delta=0.78 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 09:25:21.57 +71:16:57.7: ref_mag=11.64 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.3458 delta=0.30 (need > 0.90)
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 1s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 0s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20080_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_04-49-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0191
The candidate 20080_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_04-49-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0191 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20136_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_04-49-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0191
The candidate 20136_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_04-49-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0191 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:25:56.92 +75:27:04.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20176_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_04-49-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0191
The candidate 20176_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_04-49-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0191 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20235_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_04-49-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0191
The candidate 20235_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_04-49-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0191 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 10491_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_04-49-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0191
The candidate 10491_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_04-49-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0191 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 08:00:11.69 +73:55:06.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20014_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_04-49-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0191
The candidate 20014_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_04-49-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0191 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 08:03:59.61 +73:24:31.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 09090_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_04-49-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0191
The candidate 09090_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_04-49-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0191 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:30:29.96 +75:03:46.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 1s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Cam-04-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 3.5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_00-01-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0368.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-10_CI_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_050548_TTUQ1b1x1_922872_CS9tNqdE/fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_04-49-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0190.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-10_CI_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_050548_TTUQ1b1x1_922872_CS9tNqdE/fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_04-49-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0191.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_00-01-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0368.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_00-01-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0368.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-10_CI_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_050548_TTUQ1b1x1_922872_CS9tNqdE/fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_04-49-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0190.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-10_CI_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_050548_TTUQ1b1x1_922872_CS9tNqdE/fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_04-49-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0191.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_00-01-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0368.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_04-49-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0190.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_04-49-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0191.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/exclusion_list.txt
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_00-01-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0368.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_04-49-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0190.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_04-49-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0191.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits
Image size: 937.3'x624.2' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 08:00:02.055 +77:29:57.05 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.87"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_04-49-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0190.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_04-49-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0190.fits
Image size: 940.5'x627.3' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.89"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 07:59:17.852 +77:28:39.33 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 08:00:02.055 +77:29:57.05
Second-epoch image center 07:59:17.852 +77:28:39.33
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0454 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_04-49-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0191.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_04-49-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0191.fits
Image size: 940.5'x627.3' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.89"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 07:59:20.942 +77:27:58.12 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 08:00:02.055 +77:29:57.05
Second-epoch image center 07:59:20.942 +77:27:58.12
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0497 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 07:59:17.852 +77:28:39.33
Second-epoch second image center 07:59:20.942 +77:27:58.12
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01178 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits &> /tmp/tmp.YWNWnyTWu4
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_00-01-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0368.fits &> /tmp/tmp.EUBlsvLGoU
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_00-01-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0368.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-10_CI_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_050548_TTUQ1b1x1_922872_CS9tNqdE/fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_04-49-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0190.fits &> /tmp/tmp.spE63TXKS9
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-10_CI_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_050548_TTUQ1b1x1_922872_CS9tNqdE/fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_04-49-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0190.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-10_CI_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_050548_TTUQ1b1x1_922872_CS9tNqdE/fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_04-49-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0191.fits &> /tmp/tmp.afXh7pGAXJ
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-10_CI_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_050548_TTUQ1b1x1_922872_CS9tNqdE/fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_04-49-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0191.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits and wcs_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits and wcs_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits and wcs_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits) and catalog (wcs_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 66718 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 72.9511 to 167.1942 deg, Dec +70.6184 to +82.7648 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 72.9511 to 167.1942 deg, Dec 70.6184 to 82.7648 deg
Loaded 13420 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 6512 out of 7463 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 7463 out of 66718 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.764900
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.764900
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.37
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.39
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.39
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 66718 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 72.9511 to 167.1942 deg, Dec +70.6184 to +82.7648 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 72.9511 to 167.1942 deg, Dec 70.6184 to 82.7648 deg
Loaded 13420 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 6512 out of 7463 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 7463 out of 66718 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits (aperture=5.2)
Read 56378 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 72.9417 to 167.1049 deg, Dec +70.6176 to +82.7620 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 72.9417 to 167.1049 deg, Dec 70.6176 to 82.7620 deg
Loaded 13403 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 6663 out of 7458 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 7458 out of 56378 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_00-01-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0368.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_00-01-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0368.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_00-01-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0368.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_00-01-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0368.fits (aperture=5.1)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 52 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 8000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.3 pix Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits
2.2 pix Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_00-01-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0368.fits
4.2 pix fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_04-49-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0190.fits
4.2 pix fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_04-49-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0191.fits
2.3 pix wcs_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits
2.2 pix wcs_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_00-01-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0368.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.4 mag. Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits
15.1 mag. Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_00-01-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0368.fits
14.1 mag. fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_04-49-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0190.fits
14.0 mag. fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_04-49-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0191.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.0 (SNR ) 13.5 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.YWNWnyTWu4 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-10_CI_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_050548_TTUQ1b1x1_922872_CS9tNqdE/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits' -> 'wcs_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits.wcscat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=24, blended=4412, passed=66694
Got 66694 stars (including 62211 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 66694 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013018 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010414 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 803 to 865 (Dec 70.6 to 82.8)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 972 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 971 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 963 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.51"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 971 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 65976 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.48"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 803 to 865 (Dec 70.6 to 82.8)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 972 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 971 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 65975 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.49"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 971 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 65975 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.49"
Excluding outliers - 971 stars left (next iteration limit 1068)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits N_match=971 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.494 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.329 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.687 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.491 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.601 n_q1=240 n_q2=289 n_q3=205 n_q4=237 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.391
The image catalog is written to wcs_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits -region wcs_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.EUBlsvLGoU (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_00-01-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0368.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-10_CI_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_050548_TTUQ1b1x1_922872_CS9tNqdE/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_00-01-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0368.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_00-01-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0368.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_00-01-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0368.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_00-01-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0368.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_00-01-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0368.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_00-01-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0368.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_00-01-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0368.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_00-01-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0368.fits' -> 'wcs_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_00-01-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0368.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_00-01-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0368.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_00-01-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0368.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_00-01-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0368.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_00-01-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0368.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_00-01-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0368.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_00-01-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0368.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_00-01-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0368.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_00-01-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0368.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_00-01-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0368.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_00-01-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0368.fits.wcscat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=27, blended=3289, passed=56351
Got 56351 stars (including 52998 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_00-01-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0368.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 56351 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013022 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010418 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 803 to 865 (Dec 70.6 to 82.8)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 973 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 972 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 963 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.52"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 972 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 55866 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.50"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 803 to 865 (Dec 70.6 to 82.8)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 973 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 972 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 55868 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.50"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 972 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 55868 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.49"
Excluding outliers - 972 stars left (next iteration limit 1069)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_00-01-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0368.fits N_match=972 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.505 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.372 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.640 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.533 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.575 n_q1=226 n_q2=295 n_q3=200 n_q4=251 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.268
The image catalog is written to wcs_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_00-01-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0368.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_00-01-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0368.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_00-01-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0368.fits -region wcs_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_00-01-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0368.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_00-01-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0368.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.spE63TXKS9 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-10_CI_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_050548_TTUQ1b1x1_922872_CS9tNqdE/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-10_CI_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_050548_TTUQ1b1x1_922872_CS9tNqdE/fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_04-49-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0190.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-10_CI_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_050548_TTUQ1b1x1_922872_CS9tNqdE/fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_04-49-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0190.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-10_CI_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_050548_TTUQ1b1x1_922872_CS9tNqdE/fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_04-49-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0190.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-10_CI_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_050548_TTUQ1b1x1_922872_CS9tNqdE/fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_04-49-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0190.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-10_CI_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_050548_TTUQ1b1x1_922872_CS9tNqdE/fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_04-49-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0190.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-10_CI_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_050548_TTUQ1b1x1_922872_CS9tNqdE/fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_04-49-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0190.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_04-49-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0190.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_04-49-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0190.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_04-49-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0190.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_04-49-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0190.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_04-49-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0190.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_04-49-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0190.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_04-49-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0190.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-10_CI_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_050548_TTUQ1b1x1_922872_CS9tNqdE/fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_04-49-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0190.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_04-49-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0190.fits.wcscat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=6, blended=1682, passed=28259
Got 28259 stars (including 26555 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_04-49-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0190.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 28259 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 940.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 940.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013063 (47.0 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010450 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 802 to 865 (Dec 70.4 to 82.8)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 966 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 966 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 955 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 966 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 27976 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 802 to 865 (Dec 70.4 to 82.8)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 966 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 966 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 27976 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 966 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 27976 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
Excluding outliers - 966 stars left (next iteration limit 1062)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_04-49-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0190.fits N_match=966 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.421 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.497 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.573 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.364 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.334 n_q1=190 n_q2=201 n_q3=325 n_q4=250 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.360
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_04-49-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0190.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_04-49-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0190.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-10_CI_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_050548_TTUQ1b1x1_922872_CS9tNqdE/fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_04-49-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0190.fits -region wcs_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_04-49-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0190.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_04-49-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0190.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.afXh7pGAXJ (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-10_CI_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_050548_TTUQ1b1x1_922872_CS9tNqdE/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-10_CI_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_050548_TTUQ1b1x1_922872_CS9tNqdE/fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_04-49-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0191.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-10_CI_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_050548_TTUQ1b1x1_922872_CS9tNqdE/fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_04-49-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0191.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-10_CI_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_050548_TTUQ1b1x1_922872_CS9tNqdE/fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_04-49-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0191.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-10_CI_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_050548_TTUQ1b1x1_922872_CS9tNqdE/fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_04-49-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0191.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-10_CI_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_050548_TTUQ1b1x1_922872_CS9tNqdE/fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_04-49-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0191.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-10_CI_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_050548_TTUQ1b1x1_922872_CS9tNqdE/fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_04-49-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0191.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_04-49-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0191.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_04-49-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0191.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_04-49-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0191.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_04-49-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0191.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_04-49-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0191.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_04-49-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0191.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_04-49-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0191.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-10_CI_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_050548_TTUQ1b1x1_922872_CS9tNqdE/fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_04-49-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0191.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_04-49-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0191.fits.wcscat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=9, blended=1655, passed=28224
Got 28224 stars (including 26549 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_04-49-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0191.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 28224 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 940.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 940.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013063 (47.0 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010450 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 802 to 865 (Dec 70.4 to 82.8)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 966 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 965 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 951 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 965 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 27926 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 802 to 865 (Dec 70.4 to 82.8)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 966 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 965 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 27927 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 965 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 27927 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Excluding outliers - 965 stars left (next iteration limit 1061)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_04-49-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0191.fits N_match=965 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.428 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.480 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.597 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.380 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.335 n_q1=190 n_q2=200 n_q3=324 n_q4=251 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.395
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_04-49-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0191.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_04-49-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0191.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-10_CI_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_050548_TTUQ1b1x1_922872_CS9tNqdE/fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_04-49-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0191.fits -region wcs_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_04-49-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0191.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_04-49-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0191.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_04-49-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0190.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-10_CI_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_050548_TTUQ1b1x1_922872_CS9tNqdE/wcs_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_04-49-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0190.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_04-49-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0191.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-10_CI_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_050548_TTUQ1b1x1_922872_CS9tNqdE/wcs_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_04-49-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0191.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Cam-04-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits at 06:38:12.05 +79:34:33.2: 13.32 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits at 06:41:19.57 +82:15:58.7: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits at 08:52:05.03 +76:13:04.0: 13.26 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits at 09:49:39.56 +74:09:28.6: 13.29 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits at 06:51:30.95 +77:58:20.9: 13.68 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits at 08:48:10.38 +71:55:25.5: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits at 09:31:14.52 +70:57:42.0: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits at 05:34:40.59 +78:49:52.9: 13.69 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits at 07:12:36.94 +76:27:02.5: 13.60 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits at 07:05:11.55 +75:20:03.5: 13.25 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_00-01-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0368.fits at 05:34:40.59 +78:49:52.9: 13.73 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_00-01-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0368.fits at 07:12:36.94 +76:27:02.5: 13.48 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_00-01-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0368.fits at 08:52:05.03 +76:13:04.0: 13.37 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_00-01-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0368.fits at 06:51:30.95 +77:58:20.9: 13.71 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_00-01-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0368.fits at 09:49:39.56 +74:09:28.6: 13.50 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_00-01-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0368.fits at 06:41:19.57 +82:15:58.7: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:41:19.57 +82:15:58.7: at least one reference image reported edge (off-image or aperture/annulus past image boundary); cannot perform the forced-photometry cross-check
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_00-01-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0368.fits at 08:48:10.38 +71:55:25.5: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 08:48:10.38 +71:55:25.5: at least one reference image reported edge (off-image or aperture/annulus past image boundary); cannot perform the forced-photometry cross-check
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.71 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.55 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_00-01-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0368.fits at 07:05:11.55 +75:20:03.5: 13.26 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:34:40.59 +78:49:52.9: ref_mag=13.71 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.5220 delta=0.19 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.29 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.69 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:12:36.94 +76:27:02.5: ref_mag=13.55 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.5231 delta=0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_00-01-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0368.fits at 06:38:12.05 +79:34:33.2: 13.30 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_00-01-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0368.fits at 09:31:14.52 +70:57:42.0: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 09:31:14.52 +70:57:42.0: at least one reference image reported edge (off-image or aperture/annulus past image boundary); cannot perform the forced-photometry cross-check
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.35 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 08:52:05.03 +76:13:04.0: ref_mag=13.29 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.1368 delta=0.16 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:51:30.95 +77:58:20.9: ref_mag=13.69 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.6331 delta=0.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 09:49:39.56 +74:09:28.6: ref_mag=13.35 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.0681 delta=0.28 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.26 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:05:11.55 +75:20:03.5: ref_mag=13.26 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.2293 delta=0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.31 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:38:12.05 +79:34:33.2: ref_mag=13.31 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.9572 delta=0.35 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits at 06:22:07.33 +73:57:21.4: 12.52 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits at 05:20:10.46 +80:28:20.8: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits at 09:25:21.67 +71:16:56.8: 11.71 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits at 09:32:30.79 +70:55:40.9: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits at 05:20:03.01 +80:28:13.2: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits at 09:29:10.94 +75:24:27.1: 12.67 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits at 09:33:59.64 +71:09:35.4: 12.60 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits at 05:04:36.52 +79:22:42.0: 12.96 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits at 09:41:10.39 +75:26:54.3: 12.85 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits at 09:36:27.25 +81:21:23.4: 12.90 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_00-01-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0368.fits at 06:22:07.33 +73:57:21.4: 12.48 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_00-01-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0368.fits at 05:20:03.01 +80:28:13.2: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:20:03.01 +80:28:13.2: at least one reference image reported edge (off-image or aperture/annulus past image boundary); cannot perform the forced-photometry cross-check
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.50 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 06:22:07.33 +73:57:21.4: ref_mag=12.50 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=10.9930 delta=1.51 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_00-01-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0368.fits at 09:33:59.64 +71:09:35.4: 12.78 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_00-01-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0368.fits at 09:29:10.94 +75:24:27.1: 12.57 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_00-01-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0368.fits at 09:32:30.79 +70:55:40.9: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 09:32:30.79 +70:55:40.9: at least one reference image reported edge (off-image or aperture/annulus past image boundary); cannot perform the forced-photometry cross-check
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_00-01-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0368.fits at 09:25:21.67 +71:16:56.8: 11.77 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_00-01-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0368.fits at 05:20:10.46 +80:28:20.8: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:20:10.46 +80:28:20.8: at least one reference image reported edge (off-image or aperture/annulus past image boundary); cannot perform the forced-photometry cross-check
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_00-01-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0368.fits at 05:04:36.52 +79:22:42.0: 13.02 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.65 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.63 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.73 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 09:33:59.64 +71:09:35.4: ref_mag=12.65 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.1728 delta=0.48 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.98 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 09:29:10.94 +75:24:27.1: ref_mag=12.63 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.3147 delta=0.31 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 09:25:21.67 +71:16:56.8: ref_mag=11.73 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.3748 delta=0.36 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:04:36.52 +79:22:42.0: ref_mag=12.98 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.7232 delta=0.26 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_00-01-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0368.fits at 09:41:10.39 +75:26:54.3: 12.95 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.88 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 09:41:10.39 +75:26:54.3: ref_mag=12.88 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.6406 delta=0.24 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_00-01-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0368.fits at 09:36:27.25 +81:21:23.4: 12.90 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.90 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 09:36:27.25 +81:21:23.4: ref_mag=12.90 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=12.9972 delta=-0.10 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits at 09:23:54.74 +71:33:60.0: 12.64 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits at 05:07:57.75 +79:12:41.8: 13.30 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits at 10:05:58.11 +80:42:08.6: 13.90 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits at 09:11:00.18 +80:50:58.8: 13.47 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits at 07:54:31.53 +80:30:19.5: 13.48 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits at 09:33:39.10 +78:12:46.0: 13.46 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits at 05:08:03.34 +79:51:35.0: 14.27 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits at 06:18:49.46 +81:12:05.9: 14.06 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_00-01-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0368.fits at 05:07:57.75 +79:12:41.8: 13.37 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_00-01-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0368.fits at 09:23:54.74 +71:33:60.0: 12.62 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.32 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.63 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:07:57.75 +79:12:41.8: ref_mag=13.32 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=12.8816 delta=0.44 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 09:23:54.74 +71:33:60.0: ref_mag=12.63 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.6377 delta=-0.00 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_00-01-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0368.fits at 09:11:00.18 +80:50:58.8: 13.52 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_00-01-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0368.fits at 10:05:58.11 +80:42:08.6: 13.72 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_00-01-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0368.fits at 07:54:31.53 +80:30:19.5: 13.37 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.49 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.82 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:05:58.11 +80:42:08.6: ref_mag=13.82 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=13.4115 delta=0.41 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 09:11:00.18 +80:50:58.8: ref_mag=13.49 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.3100 delta=0.18 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.43 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:54:31.53 +80:30:19.5: ref_mag=13.43 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.3521 delta=0.08 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits at 05:18:43.58 +80:06:41.6: 14.51 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_00-01-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0368.fits at 09:33:39.10 +78:12:46.0: 13.55 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.49 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 09:33:39.10 +78:12:46.0: ref_mag=13.49 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.2867 delta=0.20 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_00-01-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0368.fits at 06:18:49.46 +81:12:05.9: 14.07 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_00-01-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0368.fits at 05:08:03.34 +79:51:35.0: 14.43 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.07 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:18:49.46 +81:12:05.9: ref_mag=14.07 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=13.7851 delta=0.28 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.32 +/- 0.08
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:08:03.34 +79:51:35.0: ref_mag=14.32 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=13.7003 delta=0.62 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_00-01-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0368.fits at 05:18:43.58 +80:06:41.6: 14.54 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.52 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:18:43.58 +80:06:41.6: ref_mag=14.52 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=13.9781 delta=0.54 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits at 05:01:01.49 +79:21:52.4: 13.09 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits at 09:29:09.33 +71:10:40.3: 12.28 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits at 06:28:23.60 +71:20:32.4: 11.54 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits at 05:27:50.29 +78:46:53.3: 14.03 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits at 07:48:10.28 +76:14:40.0: 13.25 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_00-01-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0368.fits at 05:01:01.49 +79:21:52.4: 13.12 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.10 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:01:01.49 +79:21:52.4: ref_mag=13.10 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=12.5254 delta=0.58 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_00-01-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0368.fits at 09:29:09.33 +71:10:40.3: 12.38 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_00-01-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0368.fits at 06:28:23.60 +71:20:32.4: 11.22 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.31 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 09:29:09.33 +71:10:40.3: ref_mag=12.31 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.8133 delta=0.50 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.37 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 06:28:23.60 +71:20:32.4: ref_mag=11.37 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=10.4505 delta=0.92 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits at 09:17:30.42 +72:53:52.9: 12.52 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits at 08:10:04.03 +74:19:45.7: 12.74 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_00-01-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0368.fits at 05:27:50.29 +78:46:53.3: 14.08 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.05 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:27:50.29 +78:46:53.3: ref_mag=14.05 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=13.3825 delta=0.67 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_00-01-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0368.fits at 07:48:10.28 +76:14:40.0: 13.17 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.21 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:48:10.28 +76:14:40.0: ref_mag=13.21 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.1179 delta=0.10 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits at 05:15:14.98 +78:38:03.1: 13.18 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_00-01-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0368.fits at 09:17:30.42 +72:53:52.9: 12.62 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.55 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 09:17:30.42 +72:53:52.9: ref_mag=12.55 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.1910 delta=0.36 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_00-01-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0368.fits at 08:10:04.03 +74:19:45.7: 12.48 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.62 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 08:10:04.03 +74:19:45.7: ref_mag=12.62 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.5696 delta=1.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits at 05:11:06.66 +79:43:02.2: 13.08 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits at 05:03:31.43 +79:22:17.9: 13.42 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_00-01-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0368.fits at 05:15:14.98 +78:38:03.1: 13.11 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.15 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:15:14.98 +78:38:03.1: ref_mag=13.15 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=12.7835 delta=0.37 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_00-01-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0368.fits at 05:11:06.66 +79:43:02.2: 13.15 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.11 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:11:06.66 +79:43:02.2: ref_mag=13.11 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=12.7959 delta=0.31 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_00-01-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0368.fits at 05:03:31.43 +79:22:17.9: 13.69 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.49 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:03:31.43 +79:22:17.9: ref_mag=13.49 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.0772 delta=0.41 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out43884.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out56282.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out78509.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 20s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 2s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 78303_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_04-49-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0191
The candidate 78303_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_04-49-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0191 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 78309_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_04-49-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0191
The candidate 78309_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_04-49-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0191 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 78311_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_04-49-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0191
The candidate 78311_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_04-49-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0191 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 78314_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_04-49-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0191
The candidate 78314_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_04-49-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0191 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 78318_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_04-49-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0191
The candidate 78318_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_04-49-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0191 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 78325_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_04-49-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0191
The candidate 78325_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_04-49-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0191 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 78352_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_04-49-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0191
The candidate 78352_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_04-49-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0191 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 78387_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_04-49-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0191
The candidate 78387_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_04-49-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0191 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 78402_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_04-49-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0191
The candidate 78402_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_04-49-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0191 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 78481_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_04-49-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0191
The candidate 78481_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_04-49-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0191 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 78509_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_04-49-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0191
Preparing report for the candidate 78509_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_04-49-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0191
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 78575_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_04-49-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0191
The candidate 78575_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_04-49-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0191 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 78631_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_04-49-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0191
The candidate 78631_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_04-49-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0191 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 78703_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_04-49-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0191
The candidate 78703_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_04-49-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0191 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 78751_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_04-49-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0191
The candidate 78751_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_04-49-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0191 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 78763_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_04-49-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0191
The candidate 78763_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_04-49-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0191 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 08:09:41.98 +81:42:12.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 78770_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_04-49-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0191
The candidate 78770_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_04-49-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0191 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 78778_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_04-49-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0191
The candidate 78778_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_04-49-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0191 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 78801_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_04-49-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0191
The candidate 78801_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_04-49-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0191 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 78818_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_04-49-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0191
The candidate 78818_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_04-49-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0191 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:04:28.32 +75:13:35.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 78866_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_04-49-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0191
The candidate 78866_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_04-49-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0191 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 78872_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_04-49-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0191
The candidate 78872_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_04-49-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0191 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 78886_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_04-49-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0191
The candidate 78886_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_04-49-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0191 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 78922_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_04-49-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0191
The candidate 78922_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_04-49-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0191 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 78937_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_04-49-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0191
The candidate 78937_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_04-49-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0191 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 08:13:40.87 +81:44:19.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 79013_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_04-49-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0191
The candidate 79013_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_04-49-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0191 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:35:51.47 +80:33:21.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 79039_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_04-49-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0191
The candidate 79039_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_04-49-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0191 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 79047_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_04-49-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0191
The candidate 79047_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_04-49-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0191 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 79056_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_04-49-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0191
The candidate 79056_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_04-49-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0191 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 79073_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_04-49-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0191
The candidate 79073_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_04-49-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0191 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 79076_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_04-49-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0191
The candidate 79076_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_04-49-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0191 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:57:17.14 +81:19:36.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 79146_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_04-49-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0191
The candidate 79146_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_04-49-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0191 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 79238_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_04-49-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0191
The candidate 79238_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_04-49-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0191 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 79269_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_04-49-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0191
The candidate 79269_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_04-49-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0191 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53753_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_04-49-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0191
The candidate 53753_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_04-49-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0191 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 08:00:11.66 +73:55:06.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32413_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_04-49-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0191
The candidate 32413_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_04-49-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0191 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:00:06.32 +76:58:36.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 77021_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_04-49-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0191
The candidate 77021_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_04-49-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0191 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 43884_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_04-49-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0191
Preparing report for the candidate 43884_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_04-49-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0191
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 41723_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_04-49-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0191
The candidate 41723_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_04-49-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0191 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 61781_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_04-49-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0191
The candidate 61781_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_04-49-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0191 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:30:29.96 +75:03:46.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 09317_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_04-49-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0191
The candidate 09317_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_04-49-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0191 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 47500_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_04-49-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0191
The candidate 47500_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_04-49-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0191 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 39291_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_04-49-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0191
The candidate 39291_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_04-49-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0191 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:25:56.95 +75:27:04.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52816_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_04-49-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0191
The candidate 52816_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_04-49-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0191 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56282_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_04-49-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0191
Preparing report for the candidate 56282_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_04-49-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0191
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 62423_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_04-49-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0191
The candidate 62423_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_04-49-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0191 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:54:54.09 +74:41:58.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 76812_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_04-49-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0191
The candidate 76812_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_04-49-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0191 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 76805_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_04-49-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0191
The candidate 76805_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_04-49-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0191 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 76772_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_04-49-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0191
The candidate 76772_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_04-49-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0191 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 65102_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_04-49-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0191
The candidate 65102_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_04-49-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0191 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 08:19:31.98 +75:45:26.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 44024_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_04-49-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0191
The candidate 44024_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_04-49-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0191 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:40:32.92 +71:45:00.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 41892_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_04-49-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0191
The candidate 41892_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-10_04-49-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0191 did not pass the final checks