This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-09_CI_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_225134_TTUQ1b1x1_1780180_cvirAVKk
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 10.1595 2461201.6595 10.71 18:10:39.07 -06:14:33.8
22.67608 6.14439 galactic Ser Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.0" and 9.7 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.51 Nemausa 1 -0 1 10.9 -0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits at 18:10:39.07 -06:14:33.8: 15.46 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits at 18:10:39.07 -06:14:33.8: 15.47 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 06 10.1595* 18 10 39.07 -06 14 33.8 10.7 U Ser 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461201.6595,10.71,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260610.1595 10.71CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 10.1595 2461201.6595 11.56 18:13:06.24 -07:50:52.1
21.54517 4.84845 galactic Ser Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.6" and 9.6 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.216 Kleopatra 0 -0 0 11.6 -0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits at 18:13:06.24 -07:50:52.1: 15.61 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits at 18:13:06.24 -07:50:52.1: 15.63 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 06 10.1595* 18 13 06.24 -07 50 52.1 11.6 U Ser 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461201.6595,11.56,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260610.1595 11.56CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461201.6595,13.68,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260610.1595 13.68CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 10.1595 2461201.6595 12.66 17:53:59.77 -14:38:20.8
13.29996 5.64297 galactic Ser Second-epoch detections are separated by 2.7" and 9.3 pix
The object was found in VSX 3" NSVS J1753596-143823
Type: L:
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
10.834 R1 Y 0.435 R1 150.000000000000
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits at 17:53:59.77 -14:38:20.8: 13.58 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits at 17:53:59.77 -14:38:20.8: 13.74 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.64 +/- 0.05
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 06 10.1595* 17 53 59.77 -14 38 20.8 12.7 U Ser 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
NSVS J1753596-143823,2461201.6595,12.66,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
NSVS J1753596-143823 20260610.1595 12.66CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461176.83459459 16.05.2026 08:01:38.973 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits
First image: 2461176.83459459 16.05.2026 08:01:38.973 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits
Last image: 2461201.65982884 10.06.2026 03:49:59.212 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-09_CI_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_225134_TTUQ1b1x1_1780180_cvirAVKk/fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 26
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.96
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 3 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 9785
Objects passed selection criteria: 9736
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.6 2.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.6 2.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 6859.25
Average stars matched: 6615.75 (96.45 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 115396 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Mon Jun 8 11:26:26 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-95-g079870fa
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-06-08)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Tue Jun 9 22:54:48 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461176.83459459 16.05.2026 08:01:38.973 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits
First image: 2461176.83459459 16.05.2026 08:01:38.973 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits
Last image: 2461201.65982884 10.06.2026 03:49:59.212 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-09_CI_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_225134_TTUQ1b1x1_1780180_cvirAVKk/fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 203
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.64
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 17 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 87629
Objects passed selection criteria: 87453
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.7 2.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.7 2.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 65615.8
Average stars matched: 62428 (95.1418 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 2812084 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Mon Jun 8 11:26:26 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-95-g079870fa
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-06-08)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Tue Jun 9 22:57:15 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 3.5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-09_CI_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_225134_TTUQ1b1x1_1780180_cvirAVKk/fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-49-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0010.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-09_CI_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_225134_TTUQ1b1x1_1780180_cvirAVKk/fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-09_CI_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_225134_TTUQ1b1x1_1780180_cvirAVKk/fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-49-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0010.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-09_CI_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_225134_TTUQ1b1x1_1780180_cvirAVKk/fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461201.65926172
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits'
wcs_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits'
wcs_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-49-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0010.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-49-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0010.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-49-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0010.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-49-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0010.fits'
wcs_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011.fits'
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits
Image size: 937.4'x624.3' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 17:59:59.128 -09:59:33.92 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.87"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-49-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0010.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-49-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0010.fits
Image size: 942.3'x626.8' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 17:59:55.528 -10:00:16.67 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 17:59:59.128 -09:59:33.92
Second-epoch image center 17:59:55.528 -10:00:16.67
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0190 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011.fits
Image size: 942.2'x626.8' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 17:59:58.383 -09:59:38.28 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 17:59:59.128 -09:59:33.92
Second-epoch image center 17:59:58.383 -09:59:38.28
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0033 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 17:59:55.528 -10:00:16.67
Second-epoch second image center 17:59:58.383 -09:59:38.28
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01584 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits &> /tmp/tmp.1HffRwzGq1
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits &> /tmp/tmp.zny7o3yZa4
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-09_CI_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_225134_TTUQ1b1x1_1780180_cvirAVKk/fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-49-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0010.fits &> /tmp/tmp.ewwa7H8yUG
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-09_CI_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_225134_TTUQ1b1x1_1780180_cvirAVKk/fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-49-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0010.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-09_CI_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_225134_TTUQ1b1x1_1780180_cvirAVKk/fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011.fits &> /tmp/tmp.t05jBz9ObZ
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-09_CI_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_225134_TTUQ1b1x1_1780180_cvirAVKk/fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits and wcs_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits and wcs_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits and wcs_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits) and catalog (wcs_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 10482 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 261.9712 to 278.0974 deg, Dec -15.2568 to -4.6948 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 261.9712 to 278.0974 deg, Dec -15.2568 to -4.6948 deg
Loaded 6275 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4878 out of 5154 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 5154 out of 10482 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.720450
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.720450
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.96
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.76
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.76
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 10482 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 261.9712 to 278.0974 deg, Dec -15.2568 to -4.6948 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 261.9712 to 278.0974 deg, Dec -15.2568 to -4.6948 deg
Loaded 6275 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4878 out of 5154 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 5154 out of 10482 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits (aperture=6.5)
Read 10473 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 261.9847 to 278.0962 deg, Dec -15.2534 to -4.6915 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 261.9847 to 278.0962 deg, Dec -15.2534 to -4.6915 deg
Loaded 6271 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4878 out of 5146 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 5146 out of 10473 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits (aperture=6.5)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 11 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 8000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.5 pix Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits
2.5 pix Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits
2.6 pix fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-49-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0010.fits
2.7 pix fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011.fits
2.5 pix wcs_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits
2.5 pix wcs_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
14.8 mag. Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits
14.8 mag. Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits
13.8 mag. fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-49-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0010.fits
13.8 mag. fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 13.8 (SNR ) 11.0 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.1HffRwzGq1 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-09_CI_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_225134_TTUQ1b1x1_1780180_cvirAVKk/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits' -> 'wcs_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits.wcscat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=794, passed=10482
Got 10482 stars (including 9676 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 10482 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013019 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010416 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 917 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 915 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 877 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.57"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 915 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 9859 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.61"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 917 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 915 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 9860 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.61"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 915 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 9860 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.66"
Excluding outliers - 915 stars left (next iteration limit 1006)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits N_match=915 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.691 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.535 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.816 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.626 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.543 n_q1=230 n_q2=416 n_q3=133 n_q4=136 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.180
The image catalog is written to wcs_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits -region wcs_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.zny7o3yZa4 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-09_CI_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_225134_TTUQ1b1x1_1780180_cvirAVKk/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits' -> 'wcs_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits.wcscat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=789, passed=10473
Got 10473 stars (including 9672 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 10473 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013019 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010416 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 921 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 919 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 879 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.57"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 919 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 9899 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.60"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 921 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 919 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 9897 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.60"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 919 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 9898 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.65"
Excluding outliers - 919 stars left (next iteration limit 1010)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits N_match=919 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.684 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.588 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.932 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.652 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.504 n_q1=234 n_q2=413 n_q3=131 n_q4=141 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.363
The image catalog is written to wcs_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits -region wcs_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.ewwa7H8yUG (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-09_CI_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_225134_TTUQ1b1x1_1780180_cvirAVKk/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-09_CI_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_225134_TTUQ1b1x1_1780180_cvirAVKk/fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-49-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0010.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-09_CI_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_225134_TTUQ1b1x1_1780180_cvirAVKk/fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-49-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0010.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-09_CI_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_225134_TTUQ1b1x1_1780180_cvirAVKk/fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-49-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0010.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-09_CI_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_225134_TTUQ1b1x1_1780180_cvirAVKk/fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-49-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0010.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-09_CI_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_225134_TTUQ1b1x1_1780180_cvirAVKk/fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-49-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0010.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-09_CI_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_225134_TTUQ1b1x1_1780180_cvirAVKk/fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-49-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0010.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-49-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0010.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-49-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0010.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-49-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0010.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-49-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0010.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-49-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0010.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-49-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0010.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-49-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0010.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-09_CI_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_225134_TTUQ1b1x1_1780180_cvirAVKk/fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-49-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0010.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-49-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0010.fits.wcscat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=155, passed=3185
Got 3185 stars (including 3024 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-49-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0010.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 3185 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 942.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 942.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013088 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010470 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 372 to 430 (Dec -15.6 to -4.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 919 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 918 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 891 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 918 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3075 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 372 to 430 (Dec -15.6 to -4.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 919 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 917 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3079 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 917 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3079 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Excluding outliers - 917 stars left (next iteration limit 1009)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-49-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0010.fits N_match=917 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.337 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.378 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.398 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.269 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.275 n_q1=313 n_q2=241 n_q3=207 n_q4=156 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.181
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-49-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0010.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-49-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0010.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-09_CI_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_225134_TTUQ1b1x1_1780180_cvirAVKk/fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-49-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0010.fits -region wcs_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-49-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0010.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-49-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0010.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.t05jBz9ObZ (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-09_CI_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_225134_TTUQ1b1x1_1780180_cvirAVKk/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-09_CI_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_225134_TTUQ1b1x1_1780180_cvirAVKk/fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-09_CI_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_225134_TTUQ1b1x1_1780180_cvirAVKk/fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-09_CI_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_225134_TTUQ1b1x1_1780180_cvirAVKk/fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-09_CI_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_225134_TTUQ1b1x1_1780180_cvirAVKk/fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-09_CI_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_225134_TTUQ1b1x1_1780180_cvirAVKk/fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-09_CI_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_225134_TTUQ1b1x1_1780180_cvirAVKk/fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-09_CI_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_225134_TTUQ1b1x1_1780180_cvirAVKk/fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011.fits.wcscat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=177, passed=3564
Got 3564 stars (including 3383 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 3564 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 942.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 942.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013086 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010469 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 372 to 430 (Dec -15.6 to -4.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 918 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 917 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 887 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 917 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3410 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 372 to 430 (Dec -15.6 to -4.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 918 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 917 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3412 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 917 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3412 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Excluding outliers - 917 stars left (next iteration limit 1008)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011.fits N_match=917 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.365 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.438 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.402 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.271 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.293 n_q1=288 n_q2=283 n_q3=190 n_q4=156 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.199
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-09_CI_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_225134_TTUQ1b1x1_1780180_cvirAVKk/fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011.fits -region wcs_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits sigma_overall=0.691 worst_q_ratio=1.180
ref2=Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits sigma_overall=0.684 worst_q_ratio=1.363
new1=fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-49-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0010.fits sigma_overall=0.337 worst_q_ratio=1.181
new2=fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011.fits sigma_overall=0.365 worst_q_ratio=1.199
reference average sigma_overall=0.6875 worst_q_ratio=1.2715
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209_astrometric_residuals.png (915 matched stars from wcs_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.61 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0210_astrometric_residuals.png (919 matched stars from wcs_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.62 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-49-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0010_astrometric_residuals.png (917 matched stars from wcs_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-49-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0010.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.30 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011_astrometric_residuals.png (917 matched stars from wcs_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.33 arcsec)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-49-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0010.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-49-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0010.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-09_CI_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_225134_TTUQ1b1x1_1780180_cvirAVKk/wcs_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-49-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0010.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-09_CI_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_225134_TTUQ1b1x1_1780180_cvirAVKk/wcs_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Oph-06-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits at 18:10:39.07 -06:14:33.8: 15.46 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits at 18:10:39.07 -06:14:33.8: 15.47 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out20830.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 5s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 1s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20734_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011
The candidate 20734_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:29:11.91 -14:33:56.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20776_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011
The candidate 20776_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:35:30.50 -05:55:25.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20781_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011
The candidate 20781_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:27:13.97 -14:41:50.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_tycho2.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20783_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011
The candidate 20783_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:28:03.15 -14:39:36.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20808_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011
The candidate 20808_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:29:53.97 -14:04:16.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_tycho2.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20811_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011
The candidate 20811_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:18:42.27 -13:46:50.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20830_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011
Preparing report for the candidate 20830_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20838_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011
The candidate 20838_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:28:06.72 -14:50:16.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20854_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011
The candidate 20854_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:28:00.75 -14:42:24.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20886_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011
The candidate 20886_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:28:56.32 -14:33:54.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20899_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011
The candidate 20899_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:28:45.24 -14:11:20.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 6s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Oph-06-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
18:10:39.07 -06:14:33.8
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 3.5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-09_CI_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_225134_TTUQ1b1x1_1780180_cvirAVKk/fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-49-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0010.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-09_CI_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_225134_TTUQ1b1x1_1780180_cvirAVKk/fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-09_CI_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_225134_TTUQ1b1x1_1780180_cvirAVKk/fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-49-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0010.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-09_CI_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_225134_TTUQ1b1x1_1780180_cvirAVKk/fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-49-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0010.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/exclusion_list.txt
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-49-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0010.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits
Image size: 937.4'x624.3' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 17:59:59.128 -09:59:33.92 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.87"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-49-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0010.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-49-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0010.fits
Image size: 942.3'x626.8' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 17:59:55.528 -10:00:16.67 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 17:59:59.128 -09:59:33.92
Second-epoch image center 17:59:55.528 -10:00:16.67
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0190 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011.fits
Image size: 942.2'x626.8' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 17:59:58.383 -09:59:38.28 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 17:59:59.128 -09:59:33.92
Second-epoch image center 17:59:58.383 -09:59:38.28
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0033 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 17:59:55.528 -10:00:16.67
Second-epoch second image center 17:59:58.383 -09:59:38.28
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01584 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits &> /tmp/tmp.Ul2nWlAAJn
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits &> /tmp/tmp.C89ZbM184A
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-09_CI_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_225134_TTUQ1b1x1_1780180_cvirAVKk/fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-49-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0010.fits &> /tmp/tmp.TcX04OyWrc
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-09_CI_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_225134_TTUQ1b1x1_1780180_cvirAVKk/fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-49-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0010.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-09_CI_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_225134_TTUQ1b1x1_1780180_cvirAVKk/fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011.fits &> /tmp/tmp.44Uaf6F6Gz
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-09_CI_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_225134_TTUQ1b1x1_1780180_cvirAVKk/fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits and wcs_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits and wcs_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits and wcs_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits) and catalog (wcs_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 98551 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 261.9293 to 278.0974 deg, Dec -15.2608 to -4.6871 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 261.9293 to 278.0974 deg, Dec -15.2608 to -4.6871 deg
Loaded 6295 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4581 out of 5549 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 5549 out of 98551 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.525300
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.525300
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.64
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.89
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.89
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 98551 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 261.9293 to 278.0974 deg, Dec -15.2608 to -4.6871 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 261.9293 to 278.0974 deg, Dec -15.2608 to -4.6871 deg
Loaded 6295 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4581 out of 5549 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 5549 out of 98551 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits (aperture=4.6)
Read 98094 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 261.9349 to 278.1088 deg, Dec -15.2533 to -4.6750 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 261.9349 to 278.1088 deg, Dec -15.2533 to -4.6750 deg
Loaded 6299 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4565 out of 5541 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 5541 out of 98094 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits (aperture=4.6)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 110 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 8000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.2 pix Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits
2.2 pix Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits
2.5 pix fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-49-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0010.fits
2.4 pix fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011.fits
2.2 pix wcs_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits
2.2 pix wcs_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
14.9 mag. Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits
14.9 mag. Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits
13.9 mag. fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-49-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0010.fits
13.9 mag. fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 13.9 (SNR ) 13.5 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.Ul2nWlAAJn (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-09_CI_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_225134_TTUQ1b1x1_1780180_cvirAVKk/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits' -> 'wcs_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits.wcscat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=16, blended=8119, passed=98535
Got 98535 stars (including 90264 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 98535 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013019 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010416 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 929 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 928 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 899 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.58"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 928 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 93815 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.55"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 929 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 928 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 93816 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.55"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 928 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 93816 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.60"
Excluding outliers - 928 stars left (next iteration limit 1020)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits N_match=928 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.657 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.525 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.823 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.568 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.581 n_q1=245 n_q2=390 n_q3=141 n_q4=152 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.252
The image catalog is written to wcs_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits -region wcs_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.C89ZbM184A (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-09_CI_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_225134_TTUQ1b1x1_1780180_cvirAVKk/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits' -> 'wcs_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits.wcscat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=17, blended=8187, passed=98077
Got 98077 stars (including 89709 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 98077 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013019 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010416 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 929 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 928 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 895 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.58"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 928 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 93462 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.54"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 929 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 928 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 93464 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.54"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 928 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 93466 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.57"
Excluding outliers - 928 stars left (next iteration limit 1020)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits N_match=928 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.654 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.546 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.824 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.627 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.558 n_q1=238 n_q2=390 n_q3=141 n_q4=159 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.260
The image catalog is written to wcs_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits -region wcs_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.TcX04OyWrc (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-09_CI_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_225134_TTUQ1b1x1_1780180_cvirAVKk/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-09_CI_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_225134_TTUQ1b1x1_1780180_cvirAVKk/fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-49-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0010.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-09_CI_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_225134_TTUQ1b1x1_1780180_cvirAVKk/fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-49-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0010.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-09_CI_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_225134_TTUQ1b1x1_1780180_cvirAVKk/fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-49-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0010.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-09_CI_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_225134_TTUQ1b1x1_1780180_cvirAVKk/fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-49-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0010.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-09_CI_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_225134_TTUQ1b1x1_1780180_cvirAVKk/fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-49-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0010.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-09_CI_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_225134_TTUQ1b1x1_1780180_cvirAVKk/fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-49-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0010.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-49-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0010.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-49-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0010.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-49-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0010.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-49-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0010.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-49-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0010.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-49-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0010.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-49-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0010.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-09_CI_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_225134_TTUQ1b1x1_1780180_cvirAVKk/fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-49-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0010.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-49-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0010.fits.wcscat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=1, blended=967, passed=32515
Got 32515 stars (including 31485 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-49-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0010.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 32515 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 942.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 942.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013088 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010470 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 371 to 430 (Dec -15.6 to -4.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 922 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 921 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 896 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 921 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 31742 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 371 to 430 (Dec -15.6 to -4.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 922 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 921 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 31742 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 921 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 31742 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Excluding outliers - 921 stars left (next iteration limit 1013)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-49-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0010.fits N_match=921 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.320 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.388 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.391 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.253 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.250 n_q1=314 n_q2=232 n_q3=212 n_q4=163 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.221
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-49-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0010.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-49-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0010.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-09_CI_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_225134_TTUQ1b1x1_1780180_cvirAVKk/fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-49-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0010.fits -region wcs_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-49-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0010.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-49-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0010.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.44Uaf6F6Gz (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-09_CI_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_225134_TTUQ1b1x1_1780180_cvirAVKk/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-09_CI_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_225134_TTUQ1b1x1_1780180_cvirAVKk/fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-09_CI_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_225134_TTUQ1b1x1_1780180_cvirAVKk/fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-09_CI_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_225134_TTUQ1b1x1_1780180_cvirAVKk/fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-09_CI_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_225134_TTUQ1b1x1_1780180_cvirAVKk/fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-09_CI_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_225134_TTUQ1b1x1_1780180_cvirAVKk/fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-09_CI_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_225134_TTUQ1b1x1_1780180_cvirAVKk/fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-09_CI_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_225134_TTUQ1b1x1_1780180_cvirAVKk/fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011.fits.wcscat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=4, blended=1119, passed=36186
Got 36186 stars (including 35009 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 36186 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 942.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 942.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013086 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010469 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 372 to 430 (Dec -15.6 to -4.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 920 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 919 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 898 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 919 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 34933 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 372 to 430 (Dec -15.6 to -4.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 920 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 919 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 34930 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 919 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 34930 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Excluding outliers - 919 stars left (next iteration limit 1010)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011.fits N_match=919 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.359 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.428 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.392 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.282 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.306 n_q1=293 n_q2=272 n_q3=197 n_q4=157 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.190
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-09_CI_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_225134_TTUQ1b1x1_1780180_cvirAVKk/fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011.fits -region wcs_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-49-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0010.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-09_CI_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_225134_TTUQ1b1x1_1780180_cvirAVKk/wcs_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-49-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0010.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-09_CI_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_225134_TTUQ1b1x1_1780180_cvirAVKk/wcs_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Oph-06-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits at 18:19:59.21 -14:07:25.1: 11.80 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits at 18:15:51.66 -14:56:08.9: 12.37 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits at 18:21:12.48 -13:29:10.7: 11.94 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits at 18:05:14.49 -07:23:30.4: 12.04 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits at 17:36:16.72 -11:32:26.0: 12.36 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits at 18:05:14.49 -07:23:30.4: 12.01 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits at 18:21:12.48 -13:29:10.7: 11.95 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits at 18:15:51.66 -14:56:08.9: 12.38 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits at 17:36:16.72 -11:32:26.0: 12.31 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits at 18:19:59.21 -14:07:25.1: 11.85 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.03 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.94 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.37 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.33 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 18:05:14.49 -07:23:30.4: ref_mag=12.03 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.9473 delta=-0.92 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 18:21:12.48 -13:29:10.7: ref_mag=11.94 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.1908 delta=-0.25 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.82 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 18:15:51.66 -14:56:08.9: ref_mag=12.37 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.5969 delta=-0.22 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:36:16.72 -11:32:26.0: ref_mag=12.33 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.5992 delta=-0.26 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 18:19:59.21 -14:07:25.1: ref_mag=11.82 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.2898 delta=-0.46 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits at 17:48:25.19 -05:26:11.0: 11.23 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits at 17:48:25.19 -05:26:11.0: 11.25 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.24 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:48:25.19 -05:26:11.0: ref_mag=11.24 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.2957 delta=-0.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits at 18:13:06.24 -07:50:52.1: 15.61 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits at 18:10:45.69 -15:13:11.2: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits at 18:13:06.24 -07:50:52.1: 15.63 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits at 17:34:21.40 -14:30:59.4: 12.48 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits at 18:10:45.69 -15:13:11.2: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 18:10:45.69 -15:13:11.2: at least one reference image reported edge (off-image or aperture/annulus past image boundary); cannot perform the forced-photometry cross-check
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits at 17:31:16.62 -11:44:23.7: 12.73 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits at 17:34:21.40 -14:30:59.4: 12.53 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.50 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:34:21.40 -14:30:59.4: ref_mag=12.50 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.3830 delta=0.12 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits at 17:31:16.62 -11:44:23.7: 12.70 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.71 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:31:16.62 -11:44:23.7: ref_mag=12.71 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.8001 delta=-0.09 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits at 18:00:28.53 -07:57:24.8: 13.43 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits at 17:51:41.03 -06:50:45.4: 13.57 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits at 17:44:45.46 -12:13:57.0: 14.40 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits at 17:51:41.03 -06:50:45.4: 13.53 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.55 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:51:41.03 -06:50:45.4: ref_mag=13.55 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=13.3951 delta=0.16 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits at 18:00:28.53 -07:57:24.8: 13.41 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.42 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 18:00:28.53 -07:57:24.8: ref_mag=13.42 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.1364 delta=0.29 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits at 17:44:45.46 -12:13:57.0: 14.24 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.31 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:44:45.46 -12:13:57.0: ref_mag=14.31 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=13.4303 delta=0.88 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits at 17:31:50.78 -08:07:53.8: 14.62 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits at 17:42:44.26 -09:26:19.5: 14.76 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits at 17:31:50.78 -08:07:53.8: 14.47 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.53 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:31:50.78 -08:07:53.8: ref_mag=14.53 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=13.9211 delta=0.61 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits at 17:42:44.26 -09:26:19.5: 14.84 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.80 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:42:44.26 -09:26:19.5: ref_mag=14.80 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.1716 delta=0.63 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits at 17:53:59.77 -14:38:20.8: 13.58 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits at 17:53:59.77 -14:38:20.8: 13.74 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.64 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 17:53:59.77 -14:38:20.8: ref_mag=13.64 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=12.6662 delta=0.98 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out10302.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out119613.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 8s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 3s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 119334_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011
The candidate 119334_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:38:18.59 -08:01:59.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 119336_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011
The candidate 119336_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 119342_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011
The candidate 119342_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 119343_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011
The candidate 119343_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 119345_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011
The candidate 119345_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 119346_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011
The candidate 119346_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:38:16.69 -13:21:45.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 119347_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011
The candidate 119347_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 119348_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011
The candidate 119348_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:32:51.76 -06:14:04.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 119349_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011
The candidate 119349_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:38:02.45 -11:36:12.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 119350_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011
The candidate 119350_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 119354_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011
The candidate 119354_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:29:11.91 -14:33:56.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 119395_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011
The candidate 119395_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:35:30.52 -05:55:26.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 119401_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011
The candidate 119401_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:27:14.01 -14:41:51.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_tycho2.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 119404_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011
The candidate 119404_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:28:03.13 -14:39:35.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 119429_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011
The candidate 119429_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:29:53.96 -14:04:15.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_tycho2.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 119439_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011
The candidate 119439_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:10:39.06 -06:14:33.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_local.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 119455_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011
The candidate 119455_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:28:06.74 -14:50:16.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 119465_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011
The candidate 119465_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 119480_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011
The candidate 119480_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:28:00.75 -14:42:24.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 119512_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011
The candidate 119512_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:28:56.30 -14:33:53.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 119526_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011
The candidate 119526_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:28:45.23 -14:11:20.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 119580_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011
The candidate 119580_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:27:22.62 -15:01:10.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 119582_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011
The candidate 119582_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:28:32.68 -14:45:07.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 119595_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011
The candidate 119595_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:30:27.92 -13:52:12.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 119600_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011
The candidate 119600_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:29:19.15 -14:17:37.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 119606_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011
The candidate 119606_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:29:15.27 -14:07:07.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 119613_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011
Preparing report for the candidate 119613_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 119661_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011
The candidate 119661_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:28:07.87 -14:58:59.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 119665_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011
The candidate 119665_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:28:39.16 -14:19:23.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 119704_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011
The candidate 119704_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:28:04.19 -15:03:20.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 119707_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011
The candidate 119707_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:27:54.39 -14:57:38.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 119715_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011
The candidate 119715_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:27:25.83 -14:42:08.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 119742_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011
The candidate 119742_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:28:21.70 -14:36:56.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 119751_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011
The candidate 119751_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:28:29.73 -14:49:29.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 119761_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011
The candidate 119761_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:30:16.90 -13:52:55.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 119771_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011
The candidate 119771_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:28:32.82 -10:00:48.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 119772_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011
The candidate 119772_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:26:58.96 -14:41:47.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 119773_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011
The candidate 119773_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 119777_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011
The candidate 119777_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:27:56.42 -15:02:35.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 119778_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011
The candidate 119778_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:27:59.75 -14:58:02.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 119780_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011
The candidate 119780_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:27:23.31 -14:38:16.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 119781_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011
The candidate 119781_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:27:15.42 -14:43:46.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 119791_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011
The candidate 119791_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:29:20.51 -14:10:15.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 119818_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011
The candidate 119818_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:28:47.91 -14:44:13.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 119836_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011
The candidate 119836_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:27:39.70 -14:47:35.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 119853_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011
The candidate 119853_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:28:42.66 -14:14:46.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 119858_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011
The candidate 119858_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:34:42.89 -11:13:28.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 119885_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011
The candidate 119885_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 119891_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011
The candidate 119891_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:28:35.92 -14:43:14.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 119898_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011
The candidate 119898_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:29:13.03 -14:49:02.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 119914_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011
The candidate 119914_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:29:10.98 -14:13:24.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 119941_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011
The candidate 119941_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:28:21.19 -14:14:53.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 119946_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011
The candidate 119946_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:27:31.88 -15:06:19.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 119951_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011
The candidate 119951_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:47:43.91 -09:36:41.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 119966_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011
The candidate 119966_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:09:24.29 -07:22:13.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 119972_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011
The candidate 119972_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:27:52.31 -14:57:53.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 119979_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011
The candidate 119979_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:28:03.53 -14:24:11.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 119999_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011
The candidate 119999_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:27:16.14 -14:33:03.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 120022_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011
The candidate 120022_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 120057_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011
The candidate 120057_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:44:29.01 -08:04:11.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 120060_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011
The candidate 120060_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:27:54.30 -14:58:51.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 120062_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011
The candidate 120062_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:29:49.18 -14:03:00.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 120080_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011
The candidate 120080_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:51:34.52 -06:50:37.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 120082_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011
The candidate 120082_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:27:49.52 -14:31:51.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 120089_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011
The candidate 120089_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:38:01.57 -13:44:56.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 120125_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011
The candidate 120125_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:52:55.08 -05:22:18.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 120175_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011
The candidate 120175_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:30:29.93 -15:02:32.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 120186_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011
The candidate 120186_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:30:19.26 -14:57:33.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 120205_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011
The candidate 120205_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:28:18.72 -14:40:49.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 120222_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011
The candidate 120222_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:27:32.55 -14:51:06.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 120239_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011
The candidate 120239_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:30:15.85 -14:58:58.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 120268_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011
The candidate 120268_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:52:28.92 -13:12:41.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 120281_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011
The candidate 120281_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:27:30.56 -14:58:52.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 120288_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011
The candidate 120288_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:56:12.46 -07:23:08.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 120296_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011
The candidate 120296_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:34:58.04 -07:14:50.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 120309_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011
The candidate 120309_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:35:03.77 -05:58:01.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 120313_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011
The candidate 120313_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:29:40.24 -13:46:09.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 120316_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011
The candidate 120316_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:29:08.00 -14:24:50.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 120378_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011
The candidate 120378_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:29:05.46 -14:26:19.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 120389_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011
The candidate 120389_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:18:48.11 -14:54:04.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 120393_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011
The candidate 120393_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:33:57.23 -13:28:51.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 120425_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011
The candidate 120425_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 120435_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011
The candidate 120435_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:37:11.08 -13:33:40.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 120454_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011
The candidate 120454_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:56:32.24 -06:32:35.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 120485_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011
The candidate 120485_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:28:58.76 -14:32:30.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 120495_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011
The candidate 120495_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 120532_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011
The candidate 120532_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:43:15.30 -14:33:37.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 120542_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011
The candidate 120542_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:41:06.18 -09:14:49.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 120565_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011
The candidate 120565_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 120578_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011
The candidate 120578_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:40:43.99 -07:46:50.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 120588_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011
The candidate 120588_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:41:07.50 -12:35:08.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 120616_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011
The candidate 120616_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:49:46.47 -06:19:36.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 120618_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011
Preparing report for the candidate 120618_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 120651_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011
The candidate 120651_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:38:07.23 -06:03:57.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 120678_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011
The candidate 120678_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:53:52.80 -08:42:22.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 120701_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011
The candidate 120701_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:54:01.74 -13:26:16.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 120719_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011
The candidate 120719_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:56:36.23 -05:19:45.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 120740_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011
The candidate 120740_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:49:30.63 -11:31:48.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 120755_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011
The candidate 120755_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 120786_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011
The candidate 120786_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 84098_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011
The candidate 84098_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:56:49.52 -06:33:48.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 62442_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011
The candidate 62442_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:00:22.45 -10:31:22.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 49712_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011
The candidate 49712_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:02:44.09 -11:47:50.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 14306_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011
The candidate 14306_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:58:05.38 -14:23:24.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 22034_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011
The candidate 22034_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:40:18.45 -13:50:30.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 10302_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011
Preparing report for the candidate 10302_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 47547_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011
The candidate 47547_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:51:36.89 -11:59:18.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21982_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011
The candidate 21982_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:52:49.29 -13:52:56.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 43048_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011
The candidate 43048_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:41:43.73 -12:20:51.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 08084_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011
The candidate 08084_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-49-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011 did not pass the final checks