This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-09_CI_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_224940_TTUQ1b1x1_1733333_xzVddMeb
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 10.1585 2461201.6585 11.84 16:38:53.29 -13:14:57.9
4.21213 21.65729 galactic Oph Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.8" and 6.8 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.48 Doris -1 -1 1 11.9 -0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits at 16:38:53.29 -13:14:57.9: 15.41 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits at 16:38:53.29 -13:14:57.9: 15.21 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461201.6585,11.84,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260610.1585 11.84CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 10.1585 2461201.6585 12.10 16:55:26.25 -05:19:54.3
13.75817 22.78277 galactic Oph Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.8" and 6.8 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.258 Tyche -0 -0 0 12.0 0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits at 16:55:26.25 -05:19:54.3: 15.76 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits at 16:55:26.25 -05:19:54.3: 15.54 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461201.6585,12.10,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260610.1585 12.10CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 10.1585 2461201.6585 12.93 16:58:48.51 -11:29:10.0
8.74325 18.70947 galactic Oph Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.1" and 6.6 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.412 Elisabetha -0 -0 1 12.8 0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits at 16:58:48.51 -11:29:10.0: 15.80 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits at 16:58:48.51 -11:29:10.0: 15.56 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461201.6585,12.93,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260610.1585 12.93CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461174.80897943 14.05.2026 07:24:45.823 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits
First image: 2461174.80897943 14.05.2026 07:24:45.823 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits
Last image: 2461201.65877262 10.06.2026 03:48:27.954 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-09_CI_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_224940_TTUQ1b1x1_1733333_xzVddMeb/fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-48-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 2
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.89
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 3 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 6438
Objects passed selection criteria: 6418
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.2 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.2 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 5440
Average stars matched: 5363.75 (98.5983 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 112676 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Mon Jun 8 11:26:26 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-95-g079870fa
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-06-08)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Tue Jun 9 22:51:50 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461174.80897943 14.05.2026 07:24:45.823 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits
First image: 2461174.80897943 14.05.2026 07:24:45.823 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits
Last image: 2461201.65877262 10.06.2026 03:48:27.954 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-09_CI_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_224940_TTUQ1b1x1_1733333_xzVddMeb/fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-48-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 73
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.52
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 15 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 60262
Objects passed selection criteria: 60187
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.2 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.2 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 52035.2
Average stars matched: 50719.5 (97.4714 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 162600 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Mon Jun 8 11:26:26 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-95-g079870fa
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-06-08)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Tue Jun 9 22:53:42 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 3.5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-09_CI_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_224940_TTUQ1b1x1_1733333_xzVddMeb/fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-47-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0008.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-09_CI_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_224940_TTUQ1b1x1_1733333_xzVddMeb/fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-48-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-09_CI_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_224940_TTUQ1b1x1_1733333_xzVddMeb/fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-47-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0008.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-09_CI_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_224940_TTUQ1b1x1_1733333_xzVddMeb/fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-48-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461201.65829119
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits'
wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits'
wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-47-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0008.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-47-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0008.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-47-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0008.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-47-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0008.fits'
wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-48-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-48-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-48-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-48-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009.fits'
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits
Image size: 937.3'x624.3' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 17:08:38.023 -09:59:09.18 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.87"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-47-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0008.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-47-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0008.fits
Image size: 941.3'x626.7' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 17:08:27.840 -09:59:40.27 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 17:08:38.023 -09:59:09.18
Second-epoch image center 17:08:27.840 -09:59:40.27
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0427 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-48-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-48-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009.fits
Image size: 941.3'x626.7' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 17:08:25.159 -09:59:46.75 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 17:08:38.023 -09:59:09.18
Second-epoch image center 17:08:25.159 -09:59:46.75
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0538 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 17:08:27.840 -09:59:40.27
Second-epoch second image center 17:08:25.159 -09:59:46.75
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01115 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits &> /tmp/tmp.VSXnfMjpoZ
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits &> /tmp/tmp.c2mjIPG0oP
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-09_CI_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_224940_TTUQ1b1x1_1733333_xzVddMeb/fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-47-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0008.fits &> /tmp/tmp.LxT3Dgz5O1
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-09_CI_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_224940_TTUQ1b1x1_1733333_xzVddMeb/fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-47-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0008.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-09_CI_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_224940_TTUQ1b1x1_1733333_xzVddMeb/fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-48-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009.fits &> /tmp/tmp.pLOWTYni2P
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-09_CI_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_224940_TTUQ1b1x1_1733333_xzVddMeb/fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-48-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits and wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits and wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits and wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits) and catalog (wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 7619 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 249.0959 to 265.2508 deg, Dec -15.2525 to -4.6764 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 249.0959 to 265.2508 deg, Dec -15.2525 to -4.6764 deg
Loaded 4104 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3395 out of 3508 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3508 out of 7619 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.830900
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.830900
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.89
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.94
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.94
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 7619 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 249.0959 to 265.2508 deg, Dec -15.2525 to -4.6764 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 249.0959 to 265.2508 deg, Dec -15.2525 to -4.6764 deg
Loaded 4104 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3395 out of 3508 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3508 out of 7619 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits (aperture=6.5)
Read 6368 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 249.0956 to 265.2325 deg, Dec -15.2667 to -4.7383 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 249.0956 to 265.2325 deg, Dec -15.2667 to -4.7383 deg
Loaded 4081 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3316 out of 3413 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3413 out of 6368 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits (aperture=6.4)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 2 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 8000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.4 pix Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits
2.4 pix Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits
2.6 pix fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-47-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0008.fits
2.6 pix fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-48-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009.fits
2.4 pix wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits
2.4 pix wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
14.9 mag. Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits
14.8 mag. Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits
14.2 mag. fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-47-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0008.fits
14.2 mag. fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-48-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.2 (SNR ) 11.4 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.VSXnfMjpoZ (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-09_CI_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_224940_TTUQ1b1x1_1733333_xzVddMeb/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits' -> 'wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits.wcscat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=425, passed=7619
Got 7619 stars (including 7188 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 7619 stars from the SExtractor catalog
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-09_CI_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_224940_TTUQ1b1x1_1733333_xzVddMeb/util/fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh: line 144: echo: write error: Broken pipe
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013018 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010414 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 939 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 937 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 922 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.53"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 937 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7489 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.52"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 939 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 937 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7489 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.53"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 937 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7489 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.54"
Excluding outliers - 937 stars left (next iteration limit 1030)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits N_match=937 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.568 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.416 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.927 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.432 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.573 n_q1=177 n_q2=358 n_q3=213 n_q4=189 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.633
The image catalog is written to wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits -region wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.c2mjIPG0oP (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-09_CI_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_224940_TTUQ1b1x1_1733333_xzVddMeb/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits' -> 'wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits.wcscat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=363, passed=6368
Got 6368 stars (including 5993 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 6368 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013018 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010414 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 942 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 939 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 927 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.53"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 939 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6258 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.53"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 942 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 939 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6257 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.54"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 939 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6257 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.55"
Excluding outliers - 939 stars left (next iteration limit 1032)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits N_match=939 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.558 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.417 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.846 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.469 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.530 n_q1=180 n_q2=359 n_q3=207 n_q4=193 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.517
The image catalog is written to wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits -region wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.LxT3Dgz5O1 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-09_CI_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_224940_TTUQ1b1x1_1733333_xzVddMeb/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-09_CI_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_224940_TTUQ1b1x1_1733333_xzVddMeb/fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-47-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0008.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-09_CI_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_224940_TTUQ1b1x1_1733333_xzVddMeb/fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-47-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0008.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-09_CI_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_224940_TTUQ1b1x1_1733333_xzVddMeb/fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-47-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0008.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-09_CI_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_224940_TTUQ1b1x1_1733333_xzVddMeb/fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-47-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0008.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-09_CI_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_224940_TTUQ1b1x1_1733333_xzVddMeb/fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-47-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0008.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-09_CI_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_224940_TTUQ1b1x1_1733333_xzVddMeb/fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-47-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0008.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-47-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0008.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-47-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0008.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-47-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0008.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-47-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0008.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-47-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0008.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-47-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0008.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-47-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0008.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-09_CI_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_224940_TTUQ1b1x1_1733333_xzVddMeb/fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-47-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0008.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-47-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0008.fits.wcscat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=200, passed=3990
Got 3990 stars (including 3786 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-47-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0008.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 3990 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013074 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010459 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 372 to 430 (Dec -15.6 to -4.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 939 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 934 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 920 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 934 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3929 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 372 to 430 (Dec -15.6 to -4.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 939 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 934 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3931 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 934 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3931 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Excluding outliers - 934 stars left (next iteration limit 1027)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-47-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0008.fits N_match=934 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.328 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.358 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.396 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.249 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.333 n_q1=186 n_q2=327 n_q3=235 n_q4=186 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.208
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-47-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0008.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-47-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0008.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-09_CI_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_224940_TTUQ1b1x1_1733333_xzVddMeb/fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-47-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0008.fits -region wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-47-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0008.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-47-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0008.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.pLOWTYni2P (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-09_CI_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_224940_TTUQ1b1x1_1733333_xzVddMeb/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-09_CI_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_224940_TTUQ1b1x1_1733333_xzVddMeb/fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-48-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-09_CI_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_224940_TTUQ1b1x1_1733333_xzVddMeb/fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-48-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-09_CI_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_224940_TTUQ1b1x1_1733333_xzVddMeb/fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-48-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-09_CI_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_224940_TTUQ1b1x1_1733333_xzVddMeb/fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-48-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-09_CI_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_224940_TTUQ1b1x1_1733333_xzVddMeb/fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-48-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-09_CI_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_224940_TTUQ1b1x1_1733333_xzVddMeb/fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-48-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-48-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-48-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-48-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-48-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-48-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-48-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-48-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-09_CI_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_224940_TTUQ1b1x1_1733333_xzVddMeb/fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-48-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-48-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009.fits.wcscat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=202, passed=3945
Got 3945 stars (including 3740 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-48-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 3945 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013074 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010459 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 372 to 430 (Dec -15.6 to -4.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 940 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 937 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 924 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 937 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3884 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 372 to 430 (Dec -15.6 to -4.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 940 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 937 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3883 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 937 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3883 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Excluding outliers - 937 stars left (next iteration limit 1030)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-48-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009.fits N_match=937 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.346 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.390 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.431 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.251 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.314 n_q1=186 n_q2=329 n_q3=236 n_q4=186 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.244
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-48-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-48-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-09_CI_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_224940_TTUQ1b1x1_1733333_xzVddMeb/fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-48-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009.fits -region wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-48-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-48-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits sigma_overall=0.568 worst_q_ratio=1.633
ref2=Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits sigma_overall=0.558 worst_q_ratio=1.517
new1=fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-47-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0008.fits sigma_overall=0.328 worst_q_ratio=1.208
new2=fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-48-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009.fits sigma_overall=0.346 worst_q_ratio=1.244
reference average sigma_overall=0.563 worst_q_ratio=1.575
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081_astrometric_residuals.png (937 matched stars from wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.51 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049_astrometric_residuals.png (939 matched stars from wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.50 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-47-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0008_astrometric_residuals.png (934 matched stars from wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-47-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0008.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.30 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-48-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009_astrometric_residuals.png (937 matched stars from wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-48-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.31 arcsec)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-47-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0008.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-47-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0008.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-09_CI_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_224940_TTUQ1b1x1_1733333_xzVddMeb/wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-47-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0008.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-48-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-48-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-09_CI_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_224940_TTUQ1b1x1_1733333_xzVddMeb/wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-48-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Oph-05-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 0s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 1s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20169_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-48-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009
The candidate 20169_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-48-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:42:27.09 -06:23:48.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20251_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-48-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009
The candidate 20251_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-48-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:53:06.92 -04:55:45.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 1s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Oph-05-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 3.5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-09_CI_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_224940_TTUQ1b1x1_1733333_xzVddMeb/fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-47-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0008.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-09_CI_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_224940_TTUQ1b1x1_1733333_xzVddMeb/fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-48-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-09_CI_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_224940_TTUQ1b1x1_1733333_xzVddMeb/fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-47-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0008.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-09_CI_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_224940_TTUQ1b1x1_1733333_xzVddMeb/fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-48-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-47-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0008.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-48-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/exclusion_list.txt
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-47-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0008.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-48-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits
util/fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh: line 144: echo: write error: Broken pipe
Image size: 937.3'x624.3' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 17:08:38.023 -09:59:09.18 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.87"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-47-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0008.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-47-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0008.fits
util/fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh: line 144: echo: write error: Broken pipe
util/fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh: line 144: echo: write error: Broken pipe
Image size: 941.3'x626.7' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 17:08:27.840 -09:59:40.27 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 17:08:38.023 -09:59:09.18
Second-epoch image center 17:08:27.840 -09:59:40.27
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0427 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-48-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-48-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009.fits
Image size: 941.3'x626.7' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 17:08:25.159 -09:59:46.75 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 17:08:38.023 -09:59:09.18
Second-epoch image center 17:08:25.159 -09:59:46.75
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0538 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 17:08:27.840 -09:59:40.27
Second-epoch second image center 17:08:25.159 -09:59:46.75
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01115 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits &> /tmp/tmp.UOFSV72EYh
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits &> /tmp/tmp.a6MH61rDmC
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-09_CI_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_224940_TTUQ1b1x1_1733333_xzVddMeb/fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-47-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0008.fits &> /tmp/tmp.rDoPVPgCxY
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-09_CI_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_224940_TTUQ1b1x1_1733333_xzVddMeb/fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-47-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0008.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-09_CI_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_224940_TTUQ1b1x1_1733333_xzVddMeb/fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-48-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009.fits &> /tmp/tmp.Oi6UI9sfzy
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-09_CI_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_224940_TTUQ1b1x1_1733333_xzVddMeb/fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-48-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits and wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits and wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits and wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits) and catalog (wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 72440 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 249.0959 to 265.2606 deg, Dec -15.2524 to -4.6668 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 249.0959 to 265.2606 deg, Dec -15.2524 to -4.6668 deg
Loaded 4113 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3162 out of 3606 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3606 out of 72440 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.641150
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.641150
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.52
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.12
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.12
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 72440 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 249.0959 to 265.2606 deg, Dec -15.2524 to -4.6668 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 249.0959 to 265.2606 deg, Dec -15.2524 to -4.6668 deg
Loaded 4113 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3162 out of 3606 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3606 out of 72440 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits (aperture=4.6)
Read 62008 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 249.0757 to 265.2415 deg, Dec -15.2678 to -4.6866 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 249.0757 to 265.2415 deg, Dec -15.2678 to -4.6866 deg
Loaded 4114 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3200 out of 3606 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3606 out of 62008 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits (aperture=4.6)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 71 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 8000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.2 pix Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits
2.2 pix Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits
2.4 pix fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-47-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0008.fits
2.4 pix fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-48-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009.fits
2.2 pix wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits
2.2 pix wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.1 mag. Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits
14.9 mag. Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits
14.4 mag. fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-47-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0008.fits
14.4 mag. fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-48-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.4 (SNR ) 13.8 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.UOFSV72EYh (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-09_CI_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_224940_TTUQ1b1x1_1733333_xzVddMeb/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits' -> 'wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits.wcscat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=20, blended=4399, passed=72420
Got 72420 stars (including 67925 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 72420 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013018 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010414 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 940 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 938 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 927 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.56"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 938 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 71593 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.53"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 940 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 938 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 71592 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.53"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 938 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 71592 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.57"
Excluding outliers - 938 stars left (next iteration limit 1031)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits N_match=938 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.590 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.421 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.894 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.502 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.571 n_q1=197 n_q2=343 n_q3=200 n_q4=198 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.515
The image catalog is written to wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits -region wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.a6MH61rDmC (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-09_CI_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_224940_TTUQ1b1x1_1733333_xzVddMeb/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits' -> 'wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits.wcscat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=10, blended=3287, passed=61998
Got 61998 stars (including 58620 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 61998 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013018 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010414 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 938 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 935 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 923 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.54"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 935 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 61292 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.52"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 938 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 935 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 61292 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.52"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 935 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 61291 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.54"
Excluding outliers - 935 stars left (next iteration limit 1028)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits N_match=935 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.578 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.453 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.828 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.483 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.528 n_q1=194 n_q2=352 n_q3=194 n_q4=195 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.433
The image catalog is written to wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits -region wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.rDoPVPgCxY (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-09_CI_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_224940_TTUQ1b1x1_1733333_xzVddMeb/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-09_CI_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_224940_TTUQ1b1x1_1733333_xzVddMeb/fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-47-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0008.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-09_CI_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_224940_TTUQ1b1x1_1733333_xzVddMeb/fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-47-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0008.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-09_CI_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_224940_TTUQ1b1x1_1733333_xzVddMeb/fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-47-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0008.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-09_CI_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_224940_TTUQ1b1x1_1733333_xzVddMeb/fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-47-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0008.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-09_CI_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_224940_TTUQ1b1x1_1733333_xzVddMeb/fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-47-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0008.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-09_CI_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_224940_TTUQ1b1x1_1733333_xzVddMeb/fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-47-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0008.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-47-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0008.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-47-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0008.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-47-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0008.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-47-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0008.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-47-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0008.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-47-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0008.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-47-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0008.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-09_CI_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_224940_TTUQ1b1x1_1733333_xzVddMeb/fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-47-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0008.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-47-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0008.fits.wcscat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=5, blended=1140, passed=37709
Got 37709 stars (including 36512 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-47-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0008.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 37709 stars from the SExtractor catalog
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-09_CI_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_224940_TTUQ1b1x1_1733333_xzVddMeb/util/fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh: line 144: echo: write error: Broken pipe
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013074 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010459 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 372 to 430 (Dec -15.6 to -4.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 938 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 935 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 923 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 935 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 37294 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 372 to 430 (Dec -15.6 to -4.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 938 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 935 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 37292 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 935 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 37291 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Excluding outliers - 935 stars left (next iteration limit 1028)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-47-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0008.fits N_match=935 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.327 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.359 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.404 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.248 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.319 n_q1=184 n_q2=318 n_q3=242 n_q4=191 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.235
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-47-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0008.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-47-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0008.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-09_CI_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_224940_TTUQ1b1x1_1733333_xzVddMeb/fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-47-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0008.fits -region wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-47-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0008.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-47-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0008.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.Oi6UI9sfzy (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-09_CI_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_224940_TTUQ1b1x1_1733333_xzVddMeb/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-09_CI_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_224940_TTUQ1b1x1_1733333_xzVddMeb/fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-48-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-09_CI_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_224940_TTUQ1b1x1_1733333_xzVddMeb/fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-48-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-09_CI_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_224940_TTUQ1b1x1_1733333_xzVddMeb/fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-48-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-09_CI_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_224940_TTUQ1b1x1_1733333_xzVddMeb/fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-48-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-09_CI_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_224940_TTUQ1b1x1_1733333_xzVddMeb/fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-48-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-09_CI_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_224940_TTUQ1b1x1_1733333_xzVddMeb/fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-48-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-48-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-48-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-48-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-48-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-48-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-48-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-48-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-09_CI_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_224940_TTUQ1b1x1_1733333_xzVddMeb/fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-48-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-48-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009.fits.wcscat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=3, blended=1129, passed=37893
Got 37893 stars (including 36711 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-48-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 37893 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013074 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010459 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 372 to 430 (Dec -15.6 to -4.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 938 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 935 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 926 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 935 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 37498 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 372 to 430 (Dec -15.6 to -4.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 938 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 935 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 37498 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 935 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 37498 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Excluding outliers - 935 stars left (next iteration limit 1028)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-48-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009.fits N_match=935 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.372 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.424 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.457 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.265 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.344 n_q1=183 n_q2=318 n_q3=242 n_q4=192 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.227
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-48-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-48-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-09_CI_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_224940_TTUQ1b1x1_1733333_xzVddMeb/fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-48-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009.fits -region wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-48-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-48-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-47-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0008.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-09_CI_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_224940_TTUQ1b1x1_1733333_xzVddMeb/wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-47-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0008.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-48-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-09_CI_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_224940_TTUQ1b1x1_1733333_xzVddMeb/wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-48-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Oph-05-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits at 17:34:07.74 -08:45:28.3: 13.42 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits at 17:12:48.22 -08:01:51.8: 13.54 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits at 16:55:53.98 -12:37:39.1: 13.62 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits at 17:19:01.62 -14:36:26.9: 12.49 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits at 16:55:26.25 -05:19:54.3: 15.76 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits at 16:38:53.29 -13:14:57.9: 15.41 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits at 16:58:37.40 -04:44:35.0: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits at 16:55:53.98 -12:37:39.1: 13.59 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.61 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:55:53.98 -12:37:39.1: ref_mag=13.61 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.7848 delta=-0.18 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits at 17:19:01.62 -14:36:26.9: 12.41 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits at 17:12:48.22 -08:01:51.8: 13.55 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.46 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.54 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:19:01.62 -14:36:26.9: ref_mag=12.46 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.6253 delta=-0.17 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:12:48.22 -08:01:51.8: ref_mag=13.54 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.8401 delta=-0.30 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits at 17:34:07.74 -08:45:28.3: 13.41 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.41 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:34:07.74 -08:45:28.3: ref_mag=13.41 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.3965 delta=0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits at 16:58:48.51 -11:29:10.0: 15.80 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits at 16:55:26.25 -05:19:54.3: 15.54 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits at 16:38:53.29 -13:14:57.9: 15.21 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits at 16:58:37.40 -04:44:35.0: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:58:37.40 -04:44:35.0: at least one reference image reported edge (off-image or aperture/annulus past image boundary); cannot perform the forced-photometry cross-check
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits at 16:58:48.51 -11:29:10.0: 15.56 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits at 17:21:39.76 -11:02:15.5: 13.59 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits at 16:58:07.58 -10:32:20.5: 13.89 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits at 16:38:52.49 -10:28:38.8: 14.25 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits at 16:43:57.17 -05:27:16.3: 14.57 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits at 17:02:35.55 -08:44:39.9: 14.15 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits at 17:21:39.76 -11:02:15.5: 13.58 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.59 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:21:39.76 -11:02:15.5: ref_mag=13.59 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.6696 delta=-0.08 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits at 16:41:06.22 -04:50:52.1: 14.65 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits at 16:58:07.58 -10:32:20.5: 13.97 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.92 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:58:07.58 -10:32:20.5: ref_mag=13.92 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=13.8739 delta=0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits at 16:38:52.49 -10:28:38.8: 14.24 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.25 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits at 17:02:35.55 -08:44:39.9: 14.11 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits at 16:43:57.17 -05:27:16.3: 14.71 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:38:52.49 -10:28:38.8: ref_mag=14.25 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=13.7877 delta=0.46 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.13 +/- 0.07
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.62 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:02:35.55 -08:44:39.9: ref_mag=14.13 +/- 0.07 new_mean_mag=14.1483 delta=-0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:43:57.17 -05:27:16.3: ref_mag=14.62 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.2941 delta=0.32 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits at 16:41:06.22 -04:50:52.1: 14.71 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.67 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:41:06.22 -04:50:52.1: ref_mag=14.67 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.3469 delta=0.33 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out85994.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out86027.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out86386.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 7s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 2s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 85764_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-48-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009
The candidate 85764_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-48-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 85765_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-48-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009
The candidate 85765_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-48-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 85767_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-48-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009
The candidate 85767_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-48-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:00:13.19 -10:37:01.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 85774_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-48-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009
The candidate 85774_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-48-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 85777_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-48-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009
The candidate 85777_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-48-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:37:54.86 -14:22:28.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 85778_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-48-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009
The candidate 85778_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-48-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:38:02.62 -11:36:13.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 85779_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-48-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009
The candidate 85779_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-48-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:36:17.71 -11:32:34.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 85780_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-48-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009
The candidate 85780_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-48-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 85781_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-48-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009
The candidate 85781_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-48-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:32:51.76 -06:14:06.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 85782_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-48-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009
The candidate 85782_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-48-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:32:43.58 -14:55:25.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 85817_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-48-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009
The candidate 85817_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-48-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 85856_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-48-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009
The candidate 85856_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-48-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:42:27.08 -06:23:48.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 85994_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-48-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009
Preparing report for the candidate 85994_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-48-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 86027_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-48-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009
Preparing report for the candidate 86027_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-48-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 86138_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-48-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009
The candidate 86138_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-48-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:35:12.73 -14:40:37.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 86335_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-48-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009
The candidate 86335_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-48-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:32:55.00 -14:01:35.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 86355_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-48-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009
The candidate 86355_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-48-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:38:56.61 -06:07:11.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 86386_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-48-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009
Preparing report for the candidate 86386_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-48-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 86387_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-48-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009
The candidate 86387_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-48-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:39:56.67 -06:46:23.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 86402_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-48-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009
The candidate 86402_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-48-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:39:20.28 -08:32:20.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 86411_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-48-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009
The candidate 86411_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-48-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:25:21.09 -08:49:51.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 86445_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-48-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009
The candidate 86445_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-48-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:36:53.31 -14:47:09.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 86459_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-48-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009
The candidate 86459_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-48-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:18:04.31 -12:21:10.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 86524_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-48-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009
The candidate 86524_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-48-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:55:44.20 -06:07:20.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 86525_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-48-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009
The candidate 86525_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-48-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:52:05.57 -08:52:07.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 86535_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-48-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009
The candidate 86535_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-48-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:00:03.69 -07:33:09.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 86579_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-48-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009
The candidate 86579_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-48-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:47:40.68 -09:15:29.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 86611_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-48-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009
The candidate 86611_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-48-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:28:54.37 -15:02:48.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 86613_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-48-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009
The candidate 86613_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-48-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:19:00.48 -14:36:12.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 86663_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-48-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009
The candidate 86663_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-48-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:53:52.65 -08:58:16.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 86714_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-48-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009
The candidate 86714_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-48-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:35:38.44 -14:39:24.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 86739_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-48-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009
The candidate 86739_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-48-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:02:12.12 -07:32:22.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 86759_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-48-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009
The candidate 86759_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-48-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:30:57.40 -07:56:21.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 86766_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-48-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009
The candidate 86766_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-48-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:28:44.69 -05:37:37.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 86802_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-48-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009
The candidate 86802_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-48-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:04:56.85 -05:04:21.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 86806_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-48-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009
The candidate 86806_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-48-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 86836_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-48-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009
The candidate 86836_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-48-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:59:13.69 -05:54:09.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 86840_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-48-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009
The candidate 86840_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-48-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 86844_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-48-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009
The candidate 86844_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-48-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:46:18.56 -07:12:48.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 86847_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-48-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009
The candidate 86847_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-48-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:45:00.66 -07:07:12.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 86910_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-48-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009
The candidate 86910_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-48-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:07:29.50 -12:43:42.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 86943_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-48-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009
The candidate 86943_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-48-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:08:19.67 -05:18:08.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 86994_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-48-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009
The candidate 86994_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-48-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:21:03.88 -14:39:35.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 86995_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-48-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009
The candidate 86995_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-48-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:08:54.54 -09:41:46.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 86999_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-48-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009
The candidate 86999_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-48-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87012_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-48-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009
The candidate 87012_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-48-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:08:36.97 -07:37:29.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87022_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-48-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009
The candidate 87022_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-48-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:21:37.64 -14:03:37.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87026_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-48-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009
The candidate 87026_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-48-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:55:07.06 -05:56:33.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87047_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-48-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009
The candidate 87047_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-48-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87102_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-48-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009
The candidate 87102_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-48-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:47:48.77 -06:46:08.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87107_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-48-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009
The candidate 87107_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-48-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87111_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-48-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009
The candidate 87111_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-48-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:58:56.33 -07:46:26.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87187_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-48-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009
The candidate 87187_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-48-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87211_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-48-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009
The candidate 87211_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-48-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87222_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-48-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009
The candidate 87222_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-48-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 07208_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-48-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009
The candidate 07208_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-48-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:12:25.16 -14:20:26.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31298_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-48-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009
The candidate 31298_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-48-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:04:04.78 -11:28:34.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 25509_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-48-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009
The candidate 25509_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-48-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:09:01.92 -12:09:22.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 04858_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-48-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009
The candidate 04858_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-48-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:26:45.75 -14:35:25.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 49305_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-48-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009
The candidate 49305_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-48-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:53:06.93 -04:55:45.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 08453_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-48-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009
The candidate 08453_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-48-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:22:51.16 -14:09:44.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 07280_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-48-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009
The candidate 07280_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-48-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:26:07.63 -14:16:57.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53981_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-48-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009
The candidate 53981_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-48-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:51:17.70 -06:14:42.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 57575_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-48-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009
The candidate 57575_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-48-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:44:50.53 -06:11:03.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20975_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-48-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009
The candidate 20975_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-48-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:11:20.15 -12:40:07.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 41543_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-48-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009
The candidate 41543_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-48-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:28:32.66 -10:00:49.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 37010_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-48-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009
The candidate 37010_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-48-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:54:03.13 -10:42:37.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 37287_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-48-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009
The candidate 37287_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-48-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:25:01.63 -10:38:53.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 58746_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-48-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009
The candidate 58746_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-48-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:22:45.89 -08:33:58.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 45912_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-48-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009
The candidate 45912_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-48-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:03:23.17 -09:20:08.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33097_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-48-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009
The candidate 33097_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-48-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009 did not pass the final checks