This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-09_CI_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_224553_TTUQ1b1x1_1682325_5sCGLNWV
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 10.1551 2461201.6551 10.05 16:03:03.82 -30:03:15.3
345.05343 16.73947 galactic Lup Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.7" and 4.5 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.29 Amphitrite 1 -0 1 9.9 0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-54-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0173.fits at 16:03:03.82 -30:03:15.3: 14.51 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-36-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0255.fits at 16:03:03.82 -30:03:15.3: 14.70 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin Lite
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461201.6551,10.05,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260610.1551 10.05CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 10.1551 2461201.6551 11.35 16:23:23.71 -26:31:00.1
350.94984 16.01001 galactic Sco Second-epoch detections are separated by 6.9" and 4.7 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
online_id | ATO J245.8291-26.5214 | 16:23:21.38 -26:31:09.8 (Gaia DR3) | dubious (ATLAS) | (ATLAS) | Gaia3var=NOT_AVAILABLE
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-54-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0173.fits at 16:23:23.71 -26:31:00.1: 13.67 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-36-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0255.fits at 16:23:23.71 -26:31:00.1: 13.62 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ATO J245.8291-26.5214,2461201.6551,11.35,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ATO J245.8291-26.5214 20260610.1551 11.35CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 10.1551 2461201.6551 11.72 16:20:49.10 -22:06:04.6
353.98168 19.40145 galactic Sco Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.6" and 5.0 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.24 Themis 0 -0 0 11.8 -0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-54-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0173.fits at 16:20:49.10 -22:06:04.6: 14.95 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-36-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0255.fits at 16:20:49.10 -22:06:04.6: 15.12 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461201.6551,11.72,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260610.1551 11.72CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 10.1551 2461201.6551 12.40 16:49:16.72 -22:52:54.6
357.74294 13.84805 galactic Oph Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.4" and 5.0 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.121 Hermione 2 -0 2 12.4 -0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-54-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0173.fits at 16:49:16.72 -22:52:54.6: 14.64 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-36-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0255.fits at 16:49:16.72 -22:52:54.6: 14.85 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461201.6551,12.40,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260610.1551 12.40CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 10.1551 2461201.6551 12.27 16:13:51.90 -25:16:25.0
350.37431 18.42590 galactic Sco Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.1" and 4.8 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.674 Rachele 1 -0 1 12.3 0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-54-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0173.fits at 16:13:51.90 -25:16:25.0: 14.94 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-36-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0255.fits at 16:13:51.90 -25:16:25.0: 15.14 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461201.6551,12.27,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260610.1551 12.27CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 10.1551 2461201.6551 12.49 16:52:17.02 -26:34:09.4
355.19692 11.04041 galactic Sco Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.0" and 5.1 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.175 Andromache 1 -1 1 12.6 0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-54-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0173.fits at 16:52:17.02 -26:34:09.4: 14.53 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-36-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0255.fits at 16:52:17.02 -26:34:09.4: 14.77 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461201.6551,12.49,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260610.1551 12.49CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 10.1551 2461201.6551 13.05 16:37:36.68 -23:53:57.5
355.19156 15.29883 galactic Oph Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.1" and 4.8 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.481 Emita 1 -0 1 13.2 0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-54-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0173.fits at 16:37:36.68 -23:53:57.5: 14.86 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-36-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0255.fits at 16:37:36.68 -23:53:57.5: 15.02 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461201.6551,13.05,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260610.1551 13.05CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 10.1551 2461201.6551 12.07 16:07:24.86 -26:56:48.7
348.04687 18.29544 galactic Sco Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.3" and 4.6 pix
The object was found in VSX 2" ASASSN-V J160724.73-265648.4
Type: SR
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
13.360 V 13.950 V 2457854.70000 61.100000000000
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-54-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0173.fits at 16:07:24.86 -26:56:48.7: 12.99 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-36-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0255.fits at 16:07:24.86 -26:56:48.7: 13.01 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.00 +/- 0.04
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ASASSN-V J160724.73-265648.4,2461201.6551,12.07,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ASASSN-V J160724.73-265648.4 20260610.1551 12.07CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 10.1551 2461201.6551 11.79 15:59:29.37 -29:42:20.0
344.71406 17.52475 galactic Sco Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.9" and 4.6 pix
The object was found in VSX 2" ASASSN-V J155929.24-294221.2
Type: SR
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
13.470 V 13.920 V 2456835.60000 65.500000000000
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-54-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0173.fits at 15:59:29.37 -29:42:20.0: 12.62 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-36-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0255.fits at 15:59:29.37 -29:42:20.0: 13.11 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.81 +/- 0.04
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ASASSN-V J155929.24-294221.2,2461201.6551,11.79,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ASASSN-V J155929.24-294221.2 20260610.1551 11.79CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461147.78803603 17.04.2026 06:54:36.313 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-54-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0173.fits
First image: 2461147.78803603 17.04.2026 06:54:36.313 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-54-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0173.fits
Last image: 2461201.65529101 10.06.2026 03:43:27.143 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-09_CI_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_224553_TTUQ1b1x1_1682325_5sCGLNWV/fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-43-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 9
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -8.33
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 3 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 5207
Objects passed selection criteria: 5203
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.5 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.5 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 4868.5
Average stars matched: 4583.25 (94.1409 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 111492 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Mon Jun 8 11:26:26 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-95-g079870fa
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-06-08)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Tue Jun 9 22:48:01 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461147.78803603 17.04.2026 06:54:36.313 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-54-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0173.fits
First image: 2461147.78803603 17.04.2026 06:54:36.313 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-54-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0173.fits
Last image: 2461201.65529101 10.06.2026 03:43:27.143 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-09_CI_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_224553_TTUQ1b1x1_1682325_5sCGLNWV/fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-43-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 87
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -8.02
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 13 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 54346
Objects passed selection criteria: 54272
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.0 3.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.0 3.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 44995.5
Average stars matched: 41172.8 (91.5042 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 158200 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Mon Jun 8 11:26:26 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-95-g079870fa
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-06-08)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Tue Jun 9 22:50:18 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 3.5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-54-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0173.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-36-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0255.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-09_CI_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_224553_TTUQ1b1x1_1682325_5sCGLNWV/fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-42-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0004.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-09_CI_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_224553_TTUQ1b1x1_1682325_5sCGLNWV/fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-43-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-54-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0173.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-36-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0255.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-54-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0173.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-36-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0255.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-09_CI_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_224553_TTUQ1b1x1_1682325_5sCGLNWV/fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-42-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0004.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-09_CI_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_224553_TTUQ1b1x1_1682325_5sCGLNWV/fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-43-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461201.65484358
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-54-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0173.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-54-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0173.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-54-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0173.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-54-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0173.fits'
wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-36-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0255.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-36-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0255.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-36-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0255.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-36-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0255.fits'
wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-42-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0004.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-42-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0004.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-42-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0004.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-42-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0004.fits'
wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-43-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-43-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-43-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-43-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005.fits'
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-54-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0173.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-54-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0173.fits
util/fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh: line 144: echo: write error: Broken pipe
Image size: 942.0'x627.1' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 16:19:12.067 -26:00:18.90 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-42-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0004.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-42-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0004.fits
Image size: 941.2'x626.9' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 16:19:12.872 -25:59:42.50 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 16:19:12.067 -26:00:18.90
Second-epoch image center 16:19:12.872 -25:59:42.50
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0106 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-43-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-43-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005.fits
Image size: 941.2'x626.9' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 16:19:14.423 -26:00:02.19 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 16:19:12.067 -26:00:18.90
Second-epoch image center 16:19:14.423 -26:00:02.19
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0100 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 16:19:12.872 -25:59:42.50
Second-epoch second image center 16:19:14.423 -26:00:02.19
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00798 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-54-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0173.fits &> /tmp/tmp.tH3oHT7awA
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-54-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0173.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-36-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0255.fits &> /tmp/tmp.L52HT1lQtS
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-36-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0255.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-09_CI_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_224553_TTUQ1b1x1_1682325_5sCGLNWV/fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-42-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0004.fits &> /tmp/tmp.Po7IK98bSE
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-09_CI_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_224553_TTUQ1b1x1_1682325_5sCGLNWV/fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-42-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0004.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-09_CI_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_224553_TTUQ1b1x1_1682325_5sCGLNWV/fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-43-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005.fits &> /tmp/tmp.NZYGMKtLlx
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-09_CI_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_224553_TTUQ1b1x1_1682325_5sCGLNWV/fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-43-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-54-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0173.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-54-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0173.fits and wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-54-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0173.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-54-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0173.fits and wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-54-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0173.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-54-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0173.fits and wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-54-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0173.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-54-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0173.fits) and catalog (wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-54-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0173.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-54-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0173.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 5279 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 235.3887 to 253.5849 deg, Dec -31.5354 to -20.0792 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 235.3887 to 253.5849 deg, Dec -31.5354 to -20.0792 deg
Loaded 8611 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4075 out of 4161 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 4161 out of 5279 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.386900
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.386900
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -8.33
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.06
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.06
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 5279 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 235.3887 to 253.5849 deg, Dec -31.5354 to -20.0792 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 235.3887 to 253.5849 deg, Dec -31.5354 to -20.0792 deg
Loaded 8611 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4075 out of 4161 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 4161 out of 5279 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-54-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0173.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-54-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0173.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-54-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0173.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-54-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0173.fits (aperture=6.0)
Read 6303 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 235.3727 to 253.6268 deg, Dec -31.4687 to -20.1177 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 235.3727 to 253.6268 deg, Dec -31.4687 to -20.1177 deg
Loaded 8547 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4618 out of 4781 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 4781 out of 6303 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-36-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0255.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-36-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0255.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-36-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0255.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-36-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0255.fits (aperture=6.1)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 9 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 8000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.2 pix Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-54-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0173.fits
2.1 pix Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-36-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0255.fits
4.2 pix fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-42-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0004.fits
4.2 pix fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-43-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005.fits
2.2 pix wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-54-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0173.fits
2.1 pix wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-36-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0255.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
14.1 mag. Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-54-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0173.fits
14.3 mag. Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-36-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0255.fits
13.3 mag. fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-42-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0004.fits
13.3 mag. fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-43-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 13.3 (SNR ) 10.9 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.tH3oHT7awA (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-09_CI_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_224553_TTUQ1b1x1_1682325_5sCGLNWV/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-54-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0173.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-54-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0173.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-54-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0173.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-54-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0173.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-54-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0173.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-54-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0173.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-54-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0173.fits' -> 'wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-54-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0173.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-54-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0173.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-54-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0173.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-54-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0173.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-54-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0173.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-54-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0173.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-54-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0173.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-54-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0173.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-54-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0173.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-54-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0173.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-54-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0173.fits.wcscat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=390, passed=5279
Got 5279 stars (including 4876 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-54-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0173.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 5279 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 942.0'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 942.0 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013083 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010467 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 292 to 351 (Dec -31.5 to -20.1)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 964 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 962 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 939 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 962 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5166 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 292 to 351 (Dec -31.5 to -20.1)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 964 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 962 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5167 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 962 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5167 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Excluding outliers - 962 stars left (next iteration limit 1058)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-54-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0173.fits N_match=962 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.347 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.267 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.423 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.325 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.458 n_q1=289 n_q2=245 n_q3=272 n_q4=156 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.321
The image catalog is written to wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-54-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0173.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-54-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0173.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-54-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0173.fits -region wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-54-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0173.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-54-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0173.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.L52HT1lQtS (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-09_CI_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_224553_TTUQ1b1x1_1682325_5sCGLNWV/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-36-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0255.fits 574.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-36-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0255.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-36-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0255.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-36-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0255.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-36-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0255.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-36-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0255.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-36-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0255.fits' -> 'wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-36-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0255.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-36-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0255.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-36-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0255.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-36-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0255.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-36-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0255.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-36-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0255.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-36-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0255.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-36-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0255.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-36-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0255.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-36-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0255.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-36-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0255.fits.wcscat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=573, passed=6303
Got 6303 stars (including 5717 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-36-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0255.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 6303 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 942.0'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 942.0 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013083 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010467 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 292 to 351 (Dec -31.5 to -20.1)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 959 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 959 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 935 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 959 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6161 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 292 to 351 (Dec -31.5 to -20.1)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 960 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 959 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6163 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 959 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6163 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
Excluding outliers - 959 stars left (next iteration limit 1054)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-36-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0255.fits N_match=959 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.461 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.405 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.478 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.403 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.650 n_q1=299 n_q2=250 n_q3=255 n_q4=155 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.410
The image catalog is written to wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-36-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0255.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-36-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0255.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-36-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0255.fits -region wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-36-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0255.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-36-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0255.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.Po7IK98bSE (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-09_CI_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_224553_TTUQ1b1x1_1682325_5sCGLNWV/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-09_CI_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_224553_TTUQ1b1x1_1682325_5sCGLNWV/fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-42-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0004.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-09_CI_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_224553_TTUQ1b1x1_1682325_5sCGLNWV/fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-42-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0004.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-09_CI_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_224553_TTUQ1b1x1_1682325_5sCGLNWV/fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-42-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0004.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-09_CI_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_224553_TTUQ1b1x1_1682325_5sCGLNWV/fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-42-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0004.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-09_CI_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_224553_TTUQ1b1x1_1682325_5sCGLNWV/fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-42-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0004.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-09_CI_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_224553_TTUQ1b1x1_1682325_5sCGLNWV/fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-42-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0004.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-42-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0004.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-42-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0004.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-42-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0004.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-42-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0004.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-42-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0004.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-42-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0004.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-42-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0004.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-09_CI_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_224553_TTUQ1b1x1_1682325_5sCGLNWV/fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-42-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0004.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-42-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0004.fits.wcscat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=178, passed=4017
Got 4017 stars (including 3837 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-42-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0004.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 4017 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013072 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010458 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 292 to 351 (Dec -31.5 to -20.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 958 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 957 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 936 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.47"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 957 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3907 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.47"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 292 to 351 (Dec -31.5 to -20.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 958 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 956 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3903 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.47"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 956 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3903 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.47"
Excluding outliers - 956 stars left (next iteration limit 1052)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-42-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0004.fits N_match=956 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.445 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.427 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.617 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.307 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.461 n_q1=285 n_q2=251 n_q3=260 n_q4=160 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.388
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-42-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0004.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-42-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0004.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-09_CI_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_224553_TTUQ1b1x1_1682325_5sCGLNWV/fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-42-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0004.fits -region wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-42-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0004.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-42-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0004.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.NZYGMKtLlx (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-09_CI_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_224553_TTUQ1b1x1_1682325_5sCGLNWV/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-09_CI_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_224553_TTUQ1b1x1_1682325_5sCGLNWV/fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-43-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-09_CI_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_224553_TTUQ1b1x1_1682325_5sCGLNWV/fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-43-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-09_CI_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_224553_TTUQ1b1x1_1682325_5sCGLNWV/fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-43-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-09_CI_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_224553_TTUQ1b1x1_1682325_5sCGLNWV/fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-43-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-09_CI_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_224553_TTUQ1b1x1_1682325_5sCGLNWV/fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-43-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-09_CI_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_224553_TTUQ1b1x1_1682325_5sCGLNWV/fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-43-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-43-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-43-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-43-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-43-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-43-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-43-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-43-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-09_CI_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_224553_TTUQ1b1x1_1682325_5sCGLNWV/fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-43-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-43-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005.fits.wcscat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=183, passed=4015
Got 4015 stars (including 3830 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-43-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 4015 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013072 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010458 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 292 to 351 (Dec -31.5 to -20.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 960 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 959 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 940 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.47"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 959 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3910 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.47"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 292 to 351 (Dec -31.5 to -20.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 960 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 958 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3909 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.47"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 958 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3909 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.49"
Excluding outliers - 958 stars left (next iteration limit 1054)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-43-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005.fits N_match=958 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.451 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.442 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.646 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.313 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.426 n_q1=283 n_q2=252 n_q3=259 n_q4=164 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.431
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-43-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-43-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-09_CI_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_224553_TTUQ1b1x1_1682325_5sCGLNWV/fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-43-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005.fits -region wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-43-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-43-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-54-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0173.fits sigma_overall=0.347 worst_q_ratio=1.321
ref2=Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-36-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0255.fits sigma_overall=0.461 worst_q_ratio=1.410
new1=fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-42-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0004.fits sigma_overall=0.445 worst_q_ratio=1.388
new2=fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-43-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005.fits sigma_overall=0.451 worst_q_ratio=1.431
reference average sigma_overall=0.404 worst_q_ratio=1.3655
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-54-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0173_astrometric_residuals.png (962 matched stars from wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-54-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0173.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.31 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-36-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0255_astrometric_residuals.png (959 matched stars from wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-36-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0255.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.43 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-42-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0004_astrometric_residuals.png (956 matched stars from wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-42-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0004.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.41 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-43-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005_astrometric_residuals.png (958 matched stars from wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-43-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.42 arcsec)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-42-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0004.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-42-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0004.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-09_CI_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_224553_TTUQ1b1x1_1682325_5sCGLNWV/wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-42-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0004.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-43-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-43-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-09_CI_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_224553_TTUQ1b1x1_1682325_5sCGLNWV/wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-43-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Sco-02-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-54-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0173.fits at 16:39:13.00 -23:29:03.9: 11.65 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-54-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0173.fits at 16:03:03.82 -30:03:15.3: 14.51 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-36-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0255.fits at 16:39:13.00 -23:29:03.9: 11.74 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-36-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0255.fits at 16:03:03.82 -30:03:15.3: 14.70 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.70 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:39:13.00 -23:29:03.9: ref_mag=11.70 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=11.0871 delta=0.61 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out21132.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 5s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 1s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21132_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-43-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
Preparing report for the candidate 21132_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-43-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21133_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-43-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 21133_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-43-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:11:41.51 -27:03:32.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21134_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-43-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 21134_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-43-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:05:30.89 -23:28:38.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21135_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-43-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 21135_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-43-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:08:31.95 -21:31:50.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21139_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-43-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 21139_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-43-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20898_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-43-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 20898_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-43-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:46:35.07 -27:23:16.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20444_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-43-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 20444_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-43-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:17:39.22 -22:56:39.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20295_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-43-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 20295_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-43-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 15:59:23.75 -23:46:24.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20349_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-43-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 20349_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-43-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:41:01.28 -27:26:44.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 6s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Sco-02-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
16:03:03.82 -30:03:15.3
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 3.5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-54-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0173.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-36-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0255.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-09_CI_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_224553_TTUQ1b1x1_1682325_5sCGLNWV/fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-42-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0004.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-09_CI_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_224553_TTUQ1b1x1_1682325_5sCGLNWV/fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-43-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-54-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0173.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-36-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0255.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-54-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0173.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-36-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0255.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-09_CI_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_224553_TTUQ1b1x1_1682325_5sCGLNWV/fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-42-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0004.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-09_CI_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_224553_TTUQ1b1x1_1682325_5sCGLNWV/fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-43-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-54-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0173.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-36-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0255.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-42-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0004.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-43-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/exclusion_list.txt
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-54-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0173.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-36-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0255.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-42-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0004.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-43-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-54-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0173.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-54-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0173.fits
Image size: 942.0'x627.1' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 16:19:12.067 -26:00:18.90 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-42-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0004.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-42-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0004.fits
Image size: 941.2'x626.9' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 16:19:12.872 -25:59:42.50 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 16:19:12.067 -26:00:18.90
Second-epoch image center 16:19:12.872 -25:59:42.50
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0106 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-43-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-43-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005.fits
Image size: 941.2'x626.9' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 16:19:14.423 -26:00:02.19 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 16:19:12.067 -26:00:18.90
Second-epoch image center 16:19:14.423 -26:00:02.19
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0100 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 16:19:12.872 -25:59:42.50
Second-epoch second image center 16:19:14.423 -26:00:02.19
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00798 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-54-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0173.fits &> /tmp/tmp.wcC4QoKLlo
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-54-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0173.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-36-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0255.fits &> /tmp/tmp.saFNPjict5
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-36-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0255.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-09_CI_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_224553_TTUQ1b1x1_1682325_5sCGLNWV/fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-42-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0004.fits &> /tmp/tmp.7VpzEkrZS1
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-09_CI_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_224553_TTUQ1b1x1_1682325_5sCGLNWV/fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-42-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0004.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-09_CI_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_224553_TTUQ1b1x1_1682325_5sCGLNWV/fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-43-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005.fits &> /tmp/tmp.IzE3KRc0Oh
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-09_CI_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_224553_TTUQ1b1x1_1682325_5sCGLNWV/fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-43-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-54-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0173.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-54-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0173.fits and wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-54-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0173.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-54-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0173.fits and wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-54-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0173.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-54-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0173.fits and wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-54-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0173.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-54-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0173.fits) and catalog (wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-54-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0173.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-54-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0173.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 57338 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 235.3307 to 253.5861 deg, Dec -31.5421 to -20.0424 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 235.3307 to 253.5861 deg, Dec -31.5421 to -20.0424 deg
Loaded 8684 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 6494 out of 7000 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 7000 out of 57338 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.178000
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.178000
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -8.02
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.16
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.16
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 57338 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 235.3307 to 253.5861 deg, Dec -31.5421 to -20.0424 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 235.3307 to 253.5861 deg, Dec -31.5421 to -20.0424 deg
Loaded 8684 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 6494 out of 7000 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 7000 out of 57338 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-54-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0173.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-54-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0173.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-54-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0173.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-54-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0173.fits (aperture=4.4)
Read 69536 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 235.3645 to 253.6286 deg, Dec -31.4708 to -20.1109 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 235.3645 to 253.6286 deg, Dec -31.4708 to -20.1109 deg
Loaded 8557 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 6303 out of 6992 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 6992 out of 69536 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-36-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0255.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-36-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0255.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-36-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0255.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-36-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0255.fits (aperture=4.4)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 74 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 8000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.1 pix Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-54-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0173.fits
2.0 pix Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-36-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0255.fits
3.5 pix fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-42-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0004.fits
3.5 pix fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-43-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005.fits
2.1 pix wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-54-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0173.fits
2.0 pix wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-36-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0255.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
14.2 mag. Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-54-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0173.fits
14.3 mag. Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-36-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0255.fits
13.4 mag. fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-42-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0004.fits
13.4 mag. fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-43-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 13.4 (SNR ) 12.9 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.wcC4QoKLlo (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-09_CI_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_224553_TTUQ1b1x1_1682325_5sCGLNWV/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-54-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0173.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-54-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0173.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-54-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0173.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-54-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0173.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-54-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0173.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-54-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0173.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-54-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0173.fits' -> 'wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-54-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0173.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-54-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0173.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-54-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0173.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-54-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0173.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-54-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0173.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-54-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0173.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-54-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0173.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-54-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0173.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-54-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0173.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-54-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0173.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-54-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0173.fits.wcscat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=6, blended=2322, passed=57332
Got 57332 stars (including 54899 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-54-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0173.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 57332 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 942.0'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 942.0 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013083 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010467 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 292 to 351 (Dec -31.5 to -20.0)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 968 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 965 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 946 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 965 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 55902 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 292 to 351 (Dec -31.5 to -20.0)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 968 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 965 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 55899 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 965 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 55899 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Excluding outliers - 965 stars left (next iteration limit 1061)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-54-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0173.fits N_match=965 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.347 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.290 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.421 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.343 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.386 n_q1=300 n_q2=253 n_q3=262 n_q4=150 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.213
The image catalog is written to wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-54-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0173.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-54-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0173.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-54-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0173.fits -region wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-54-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0173.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-54-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0173.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.saFNPjict5 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-09_CI_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_224553_TTUQ1b1x1_1682325_5sCGLNWV/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-36-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0255.fits 574.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-36-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0255.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-36-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0255.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-36-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0255.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-36-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0255.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-36-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0255.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-36-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0255.fits' -> 'wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-36-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0255.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-36-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0255.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-36-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0255.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-36-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0255.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-36-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0255.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-36-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0255.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-36-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0255.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-36-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0255.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-36-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0255.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-36-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0255.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-36-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0255.fits.wcscat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=8, blended=3494, passed=69528
Got 69528 stars (including 65904 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-36-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0255.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 69528 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 942.0'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 942.0 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013083 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010467 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 292 to 351 (Dec -31.5 to -20.1)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 968 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 966 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 939 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 966 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 67636 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 292 to 351 (Dec -31.5 to -20.1)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 969 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 966 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 67642 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 966 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 67642 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
Excluding outliers - 966 stars left (next iteration limit 1062)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-36-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0255.fits N_match=966 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.453 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.372 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.495 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.429 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.642 n_q1=307 n_q2=265 n_q3=249 n_q4=145 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.418
The image catalog is written to wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-36-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0255.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-36-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0255.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-36-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0255.fits -region wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-36-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0255.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-36-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0255.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.7VpzEkrZS1 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-09_CI_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_224553_TTUQ1b1x1_1682325_5sCGLNWV/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-09_CI_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_224553_TTUQ1b1x1_1682325_5sCGLNWV/fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-42-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0004.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-09_CI_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_224553_TTUQ1b1x1_1682325_5sCGLNWV/fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-42-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0004.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-09_CI_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_224553_TTUQ1b1x1_1682325_5sCGLNWV/fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-42-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0004.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-09_CI_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_224553_TTUQ1b1x1_1682325_5sCGLNWV/fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-42-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0004.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-09_CI_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_224553_TTUQ1b1x1_1682325_5sCGLNWV/fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-42-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0004.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-09_CI_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_224553_TTUQ1b1x1_1682325_5sCGLNWV/fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-42-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0004.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-42-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0004.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-42-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0004.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-42-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0004.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-42-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0004.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-42-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0004.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-42-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0004.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-42-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0004.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-09_CI_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_224553_TTUQ1b1x1_1682325_5sCGLNWV/fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-42-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0004.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-42-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0004.fits.wcscat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=7, blended=1129, passed=27495
Got 27495 stars (including 26334 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-42-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0004.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 27495 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013072 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010458 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 292 to 351 (Dec -31.5 to -20.1)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 960 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 958 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 946 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 958 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 26821 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 292 to 351 (Dec -31.5 to -20.1)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 960 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 958 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 26821 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 958 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 26821 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
Excluding outliers - 958 stars left (next iteration limit 1053)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-42-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0004.fits N_match=958 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.433 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.467 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.569 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.312 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.431 n_q1=273 n_q2=239 n_q3=276 n_q4=170 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.315
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-42-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0004.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-42-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0004.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-09_CI_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_224553_TTUQ1b1x1_1682325_5sCGLNWV/fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-42-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0004.fits -region wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-42-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0004.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-42-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0004.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.IzE3KRc0Oh (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-09_CI_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_224553_TTUQ1b1x1_1682325_5sCGLNWV/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-09_CI_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_224553_TTUQ1b1x1_1682325_5sCGLNWV/fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-43-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-09_CI_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_224553_TTUQ1b1x1_1682325_5sCGLNWV/fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-43-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-09_CI_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_224553_TTUQ1b1x1_1682325_5sCGLNWV/fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-43-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-09_CI_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_224553_TTUQ1b1x1_1682325_5sCGLNWV/fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-43-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-09_CI_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_224553_TTUQ1b1x1_1682325_5sCGLNWV/fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-43-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-09_CI_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_224553_TTUQ1b1x1_1682325_5sCGLNWV/fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-43-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-43-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-43-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-43-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-43-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-43-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-43-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-43-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-09_CI_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_224553_TTUQ1b1x1_1682325_5sCGLNWV/fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-43-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-43-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005.fits.wcscat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=6, blended=1105, passed=27184
Got 27184 stars (including 26044 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-43-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 27184 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013072 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010458 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 292 to 351 (Dec -31.5 to -20.1)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 962 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 960 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 946 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.46"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 960 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 26404 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 292 to 351 (Dec -31.5 to -20.1)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 962 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 960 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 26403 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 960 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 26403 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45"
Excluding outliers - 960 stars left (next iteration limit 1056)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-43-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005.fits N_match=960 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.441 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.458 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.624 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.330 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.458 n_q1=271 n_q2=240 n_q3=277 n_q4=172 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.415
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-43-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-43-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-09_CI_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_224553_TTUQ1b1x1_1682325_5sCGLNWV/fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-43-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005.fits -region wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-43-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-43-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-42-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0004.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-09_CI_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_224553_TTUQ1b1x1_1682325_5sCGLNWV/wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-42-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0004.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-43-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-09_CI_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_224553_TTUQ1b1x1_1682325_5sCGLNWV/wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-43-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Sco-02-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-54-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0173.fits at 15:43:36.88 -30:15:06.8: 12.19 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-54-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0173.fits at 16:41:55.57 -31:12:24.2: 12.13 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-54-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0173.fits at 15:51:31.99 -21:30:22.3: 13.05 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-54-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0173.fits at 16:49:38.46 -30:25:16.5: 12.02 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-54-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0173.fits at 16:50:58.39 -29:19:32.6: 11.76 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-54-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0173.fits at 16:46:22.83 -28:11:45.5: 12.74 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-54-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0173.fits at 16:23:23.71 -26:31:00.1: 13.67 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-54-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0173.fits at 16:20:49.10 -22:06:04.6: 14.95 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-36-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0255.fits at 15:43:36.88 -30:15:06.8: 12.19 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-36-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0255.fits at 16:49:38.46 -30:25:16.5: 11.82 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-36-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0255.fits at 16:41:55.57 -31:12:24.2: 11.81 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.19 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-36-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0255.fits at 15:51:31.99 -21:30:22.3: 12.98 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-36-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0255.fits at 16:50:58.39 -29:19:32.6: 11.54 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.88 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:43:36.88 -30:15:06.8: ref_mag=12.19 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=11.6875 delta=0.50 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.90 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:49:38.46 -30:25:16.5: ref_mag=11.88 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=11.9070 delta=-0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-36-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0255.fits at 16:46:22.83 -28:11:45.5: 12.53 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:41:55.57 -31:12:24.2: ref_mag=11.90 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.0534 delta=-0.15 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.00 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.61 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:51:31.99 -21:30:22.3: ref_mag=13.00 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=12.9687 delta=0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:50:58.39 -29:19:32.6: ref_mag=11.61 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=11.7007 delta=-0.09 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.60 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:46:22.83 -28:11:45.5: ref_mag=12.60 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=12.5127 delta=0.09 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-54-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0173.fits at 15:52:58.73 -20:46:57.6: 12.04 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-36-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0255.fits at 16:23:23.71 -26:31:00.1: 13.62 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-36-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0255.fits at 16:20:49.10 -22:06:04.6: 15.12 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-36-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0255.fits at 15:52:58.73 -20:46:57.6: 12.02 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.02 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:52:58.73 -20:46:57.6: ref_mag=12.02 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=11.9259 delta=0.10 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-54-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0173.fits at 16:13:51.90 -25:16:25.0: 14.94 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-54-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0173.fits at 16:52:17.02 -26:34:09.4: 14.53 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-54-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0173.fits at 16:48:12.78 -24:32:55.4: 12.54 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-54-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0173.fits at 16:49:16.72 -22:52:54.6: 14.64 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-36-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0255.fits at 16:52:17.02 -26:34:09.4: 14.77 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-36-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0255.fits at 16:48:12.78 -24:32:55.4: 12.39 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-36-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0255.fits at 16:49:16.72 -22:52:54.6: 14.85 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-36-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0255.fits at 16:13:51.90 -25:16:25.0: 15.14 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.44 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:48:12.78 -24:32:55.4: ref_mag=12.44 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=12.4567 delta=-0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-54-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0173.fits at 16:37:36.68 -23:53:57.5: 14.86 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-54-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0173.fits at 16:05:42.70 -21:49:26.6: 12.93 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-36-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0255.fits at 16:37:36.68 -23:53:57.5: 15.02 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-54-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0173.fits at 16:47:11.77 -22:57:08.9: 13.96 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-36-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0255.fits at 16:05:42.70 -21:49:26.6: 13.17 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.05 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:05:42.70 -21:49:26.6: ref_mag=13.05 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=12.8961 delta=0.15 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-54-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0173.fits at 16:49:29.31 -23:03:16.4: 13.86 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-54-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0173.fits at 16:05:54.17 -21:08:15.2: 13.26 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-36-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0255.fits at 16:47:11.77 -22:57:08.9: 14.37 +/- 0.22 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.12 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 16:47:11.77 -22:57:08.9: ref_mag=14.12 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=13.1878 delta=0.93 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-36-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0255.fits at 16:49:29.31 -23:03:16.4: 14.02 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-36-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0255.fits at 16:05:54.17 -21:08:15.2: 13.26 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.94 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:49:29.31 -23:03:16.4: ref_mag=13.94 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=13.2374 delta=0.70 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.26 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:05:54.17 -21:08:15.2: ref_mag=13.26 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=13.1993 delta=0.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-54-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0173.fits at 16:35:28.95 -26:18:51.3: 13.58 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-54-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0173.fits at 16:23:49.85 -24:41:30.0: 14.78 +/- 0.30 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-36-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0255.fits at 16:35:28.95 -26:18:51.3: 13.89 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.71 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:35:28.95 -26:18:51.3: ref_mag=13.71 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=13.2168 delta=0.49 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-36-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0255.fits at 16:23:49.85 -24:41:30.0: 14.58 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.64 +/- 0.17
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 16:23:49.85 -24:41:30.0: ref_mag=14.64 +/- 0.17 new_mean_mag=13.6372 delta=1.00 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-54-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0173.fits at 16:07:24.86 -26:56:48.7: 12.99 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-54-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0173.fits at 16:35:27.44 -30:01:31.8: 12.70 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-36-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0255.fits at 16:07:24.86 -26:56:48.7: 13.01 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.00 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 16:07:24.86 -26:56:48.7: ref_mag=13.00 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=12.0619 delta=0.94 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-36-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0255.fits at 16:35:27.44 -30:01:31.8: 12.80 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.75 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:35:27.44 -30:01:31.8: ref_mag=12.75 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=11.8962 delta=0.86 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-54-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0173.fits at 16:34:41.07 -24:24:27.9: 13.97 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-36-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0255.fits at 16:34:41.07 -24:24:27.9: 14.41 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.14 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 16:34:41.07 -24:24:27.9: ref_mag=14.14 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=12.9587 delta=1.18 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-54-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0173.fits at 15:59:29.37 -29:42:20.0: 12.62 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-36-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0255.fits at 15:59:29.37 -29:42:20.0: 13.11 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.81 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 15:59:29.37 -29:42:20.0: ref_mag=12.81 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=11.7882 delta=1.02 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out48318.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out82499.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out82539.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out07102.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out25656.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out82445.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out82449.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out82468.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out82470.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out82473.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out82486.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 15s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 5s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82401_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-43-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 82401_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-43-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82413_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-43-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 82413_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-43-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:28:36.30 -29:38:41.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82417_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-43-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 82417_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-43-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82427_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-43-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 82427_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-43-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82431_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-43-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 82431_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-43-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82434_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-43-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 82434_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-43-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:53:25.28 -30:46:24.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82435_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-43-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 82435_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-43-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:53:40.05 -30:53:04.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82436_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-43-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 82436_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-43-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82438_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-43-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 82438_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-43-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82439_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-43-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 82439_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-43-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:53:03.58 -31:07:16.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82441_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-43-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 82441_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-43-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:03:03.83 -30:03:15.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_local.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82445_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-43-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
Preparing report for the candidate 82445_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-43-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82449_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-43-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
Preparing report for the candidate 82449_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-43-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82451_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-43-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 82451_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-43-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 15:53:56.90 -27:54:20.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82456_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-43-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 82456_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-43-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82459_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-43-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 82459_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-43-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 15:53:41.69 -25:17:12.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82461_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-43-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 82461_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-43-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:51:49.13 -30:19:47.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82466_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-43-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 82466_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-43-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82467_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-43-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 82467_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-43-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:40:22.29 -23:17:57.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82468_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-43-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
Preparing report for the candidate 82468_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-43-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82470_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-43-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
Preparing report for the candidate 82470_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-43-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82473_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-43-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
Preparing report for the candidate 82473_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-43-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82474_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-43-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 82474_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-43-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:43:39.58 -29:23:13.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82475_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-43-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 82475_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-43-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:40:50.22 -29:42:30.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82479_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-43-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 82479_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-43-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:33:35.49 -21:20:52.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82480_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-43-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 82480_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-43-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:36:49.85 -25:16:34.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82481_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-43-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 82481_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-43-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:42:03.63 -31:17:40.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82482_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-43-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 82482_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-43-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:22:04.58 -21:50:46.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82484_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-43-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 82484_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-43-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:33:47.57 -26:44:52.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82485_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-43-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 82485_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-43-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:29:18.46 -25:52:12.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82486_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-43-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
Preparing report for the candidate 82486_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-43-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82487_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-43-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 82487_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-43-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 15:44:41.25 -28:39:53.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82489_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-43-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 82489_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-43-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82491_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-43-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 82491_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-43-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 15:56:45.37 -23:11:55.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82492_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-43-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 82492_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-43-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:51:08.92 -22:07:12.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82497_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-43-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 82497_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-43-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:40:11.95 -30:10:20.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82499_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-43-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 82499_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-43-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:47:11.77 -22:57:08.9 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.20, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.18)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 0.799 4126438315527914496 251.79880082409 -22.95246815876 12.1710 10.7513 VARIABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#0.799#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82501_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-43-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 82501_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-43-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82502_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-43-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 82502_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-43-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82503_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-43-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 82503_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-43-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:47:49.62 -22:46:34.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82504_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-43-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 82504_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-43-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:32:18.25 -22:12:01.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82508_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-43-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 82508_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-43-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82539_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-43-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 82539_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-43-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:23:49.85 -24:41:30.0 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.63, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.61)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.332 6049223667026738944 245.95738397704 -24.69144285641 12.5543 11.1382 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.332#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 09145_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-43-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 09145_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-43-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 15:56:53.31 -29:12:52.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bbsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 01501_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-43-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 01501_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-43-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:19:32.67 -30:54:18.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 67783_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-43-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 67783_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-43-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:42:40.51 -24:24:51.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 25656_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-43-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
Preparing report for the candidate 25656_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-43-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 08827_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-43-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 08827_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-43-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 68178_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-43-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 68178_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-43-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 15:55:38.41 -29:15:40.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 17714_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-43-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 17714_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-43-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 15:59:34.39 -28:03:31.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 09397_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-43-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 09397_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-43-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 15:57:48.41 -29:18:11.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52502_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-43-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 52502_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-43-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:05:30.90 -23:28:38.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 78687_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-43-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 78687_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-43-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:18:59.99 -28:36:55.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 11389_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-43-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 11389_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-43-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 15:48:25.07 -28:43:30.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 23808_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-43-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 23808_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-43-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:25:53.08 -27:34:59.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 48318_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-43-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 48318_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-43-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:34:41.07 -24:24:27.9 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=12.96, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=13.94)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 3.825 6047555540385347072 248.67170654324 -24.40682873877 11.3731 9.8594 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#3.825#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 69287_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-43-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 69287_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-43-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:28:00.16 -30:24:12.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 01102_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-43-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 01102_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-43-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:09:26.62 -30:56:59.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 69253_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-43-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 69253_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-43-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:11:03.38 -25:39:32.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 25372_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-43-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 25372_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-43-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:41:01.29 -27:26:44.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31131_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-43-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 31131_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-43-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:23:32.14 -26:24:24.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21253_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-43-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 21253_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-43-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:12:21.26 -27:44:40.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51427_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-43-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 51427_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-43-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 15:48:10.34 -24:14:28.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 10064_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-43-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 10064_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-43-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:29:45.65 -29:45:29.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 11018_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-43-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 11018_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-43-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:11:14.17 -29:21:38.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 05270_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-43-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 05270_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-43-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:16:56.74 -30:22:32.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 07102_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-43-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
Preparing report for the candidate 07102_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-43-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 25529_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-43-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 25529_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-43-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:11:41.52 -27:03:33.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 50520_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-43-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 50520_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-43-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:23:22.02 -23:28:01.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 68332_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-43-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 68332_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-43-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:45:58.40 -25:11:58.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 25872_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-43-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 25872_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-43-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:46:35.07 -27:23:17.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 68166_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-43-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 68166_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-43-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:10:17.30 -30:14:11.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 07523_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-43-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 07523_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-43-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:26:09.13 -30:06:32.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 67739_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-43-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 67739_fd_Sco-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_22-43-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
