This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-09_CI_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_040216_TTUQ2b1x1_1623962_mrLUV3iW
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 09.3303 2461200.8303 11.46 16:31:16.53 -08:07:23.8
7.52790 26.19538 galactic Oph Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.7" and 8.0 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.28 Bellona 0 0 1 11.5 -0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits at 16:31:16.53 -08:07:23.8: 15.73 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits at 16:31:16.53 -08:07:23.8: 15.72 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461200.8303,11.46,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260609.3303 11.46CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 09.3303 2461200.8303 11.59 16:39:31.44 -13:16:20.8
4.29162 21.51942 galactic Oph Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.3" and 7.8 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.48 Doris 0 0 0 11.9 -0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits at 16:39:31.44 -13:16:20.8: 13.89 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits at 16:39:31.44 -13:16:20.8: 14.01 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.94 +/- 0.07
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461200.8303,11.59,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260609.3303 11.59CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 09.3303 2461200.8303 13.45 16:25:37.65 -12:14:59.3
2.94434 24.83493 galactic Oph Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.5" and 7.9 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.512 Taurinensis 1 -1 1 13.3 0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits at 16:25:37.65 -12:14:59.3: 15.88 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits at 16:25:37.65 -12:14:59.3: 15.92 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461200.8303,13.45,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260609.3303 13.45CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 09.3303 2461200.8303 13.71 16:26:54.25 -09:46:05.0
5.33924 26.09284 galactic Oph Second-epoch detections are separated by 2.4" and 7.4 pix
The object was found in VSX 1" V0704 Oph
Type: M
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
13.000 pg 16.000 pg 2437370.00000 203.700000000000
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits at 16:26:54.25 -09:46:05.0: 14.92 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits at 16:26:54.25 -09:46:05.0: 14.81 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.86 +/- 0.09
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
V0704 Oph,2461200.8303,13.71,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
V0704 Oph 20260609.3303 13.71CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461174.84044517 14.05.2026 08:10:04.463 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits
First image: 2461174.84044517 14.05.2026 08:10:04.463 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits
Last image: 2461200.83054096 09.06.2026 07:55:48.739 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-09_CI_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_040216_TTUQ2b1x1_1623962_mrLUV3iW/fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-09_02-55-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0167.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 9
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.75
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 6 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 6298
Objects passed selection criteria: 6293
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.6 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.6 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 5799
Average stars matched: 5636 (97.1892 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 112652 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Mon Jun 8 11:26:26 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-95-g079870fa
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-06-08)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Tue Jun 9 04:06:44 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461174.84044517 14.05.2026 08:10:04.463 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits
First image: 2461174.84044517 14.05.2026 08:10:04.463 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits
Last image: 2461200.83054096 09.06.2026 07:55:48.739 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-09_CI_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_040216_TTUQ2b1x1_1623962_mrLUV3iW/fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-09_02-55-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0167.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 111
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.37
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 57 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 52999
Objects passed selection criteria: 52883
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.6 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.6 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 49539.8
Average stars matched: 47682.8 (96.2515 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 154972 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Mon Jun 8 11:26:26 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-95-g079870fa
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-06-08)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Tue Jun 9 04:10:20 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/TTUQ2_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 4 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-09_CI_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_040216_TTUQ2b1x1_1623962_mrLUV3iW/fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-09_02-55-04_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-09_CI_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_040216_TTUQ2b1x1_1623962_mrLUV3iW/fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-09_02-55-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0167.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-09_CI_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_040216_TTUQ2b1x1_1623962_mrLUV3iW/fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-09_02-55-04_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-09_CI_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_040216_TTUQ2b1x1_1623962_mrLUV3iW/fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-09_02-55-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0167.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461200.83003117
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits'
wcs_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits'
wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-09_02-55-04_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-09_02-55-04_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-09_02-55-04_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-09_02-55-04_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits'
wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-09_02-55-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0167.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-09_02-55-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0167.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-09_02-55-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0167.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-09_02-55-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0167.fits'
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits
Image size: 941.3'x626.9' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 16:17:07.938 -09:59:23.16 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-09_02-55-04_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-09_02-55-04_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits
Image size: 937.2'x624.2' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 16:17:09.424 -10:00:02.57 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 16:17:07.938 -09:59:23.16
Second-epoch image center 16:17:09.424 -10:00:02.57
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0125 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-09_02-55-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0167.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-09_02-55-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0167.fits
Image size: 937.2'x624.2' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 16:17:12.538 -09:59:55.44 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 16:17:07.938 -09:59:23.16
Second-epoch image center 16:17:12.538 -09:59:55.44
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0209 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 16:17:09.424 -10:00:02.57
Second-epoch second image center 16:17:12.538 -09:59:55.44
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01293 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits &> /tmp/tmp.qdyFGyOu43
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits &> /tmp/tmp.QxrcTLc9q6
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-09_CI_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_040216_TTUQ2b1x1_1623962_mrLUV3iW/fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-09_02-55-04_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits &> /tmp/tmp.3757OHSdLK
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-09_CI_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_040216_TTUQ2b1x1_1623962_mrLUV3iW/fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-09_02-55-04_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-09_CI_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_040216_TTUQ2b1x1_1623962_mrLUV3iW/fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-09_02-55-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0167.fits &> /tmp/tmp.Vq9eCudK5s
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-09_CI_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_040216_TTUQ2b1x1_1623962_mrLUV3iW/fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-09_02-55-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0167.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits and wcs_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits and wcs_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits and wcs_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits) and catalog (wcs_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 8279 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 235.9003 to 252.4570 deg, Dec -15.5991 to -4.3253 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 235.9003 to 252.4570 deg, Dec -15.5991 to -4.3253 deg
Loaded 5208 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4041 out of 4212 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 4212 out of 8279 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.849000
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.849000
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.75
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.10
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.10
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 8279 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 235.9003 to 252.4570 deg, Dec -15.5991 to -4.3253 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 235.9003 to 252.4570 deg, Dec -15.5991 to -4.3253 deg
Loaded 5208 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4041 out of 4212 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 4212 out of 8279 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits (aperture=6.1)
Read 8296 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 235.9003 to 252.4983 deg, Dec -15.5992 to -4.3253 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 235.9003 to 252.4983 deg, Dec -15.5992 to -4.3253 deg
Loaded 5222 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4038 out of 4215 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 4215 out of 8296 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits (aperture=6.1)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 8 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 8000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.2 pix Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits
2.2 pix Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits
2.3 pix fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-09_02-55-04_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits
2.3 pix fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-09_02-55-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0167.fits
2.2 pix wcs_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits
2.2 pix wcs_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.1 mag. Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits
15.1 mag. Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits
14.8 mag. fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-09_02-55-04_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits
14.8 mag. fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-09_02-55-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0167.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.8 (SNR ) 11.9 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.qdyFGyOu43 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-09_CI_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_040216_TTUQ2b1x1_1623962_mrLUV3iW/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits 574.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits' -> 'wcs_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits.wcscat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=513, passed=8279
Got 8279 stars (including 7758 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 8279 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013074 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010459 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 372 to 430 (Dec -15.6 to -4.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 966 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 966 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 953 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 966 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8107 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 372 to 430 (Dec -15.6 to -4.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 967 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 966 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8111 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 966 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8111 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Excluding outliers - 966 stars left (next iteration limit 1062)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits N_match=966 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.340 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.379 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.347 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.264 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.334 n_q1=229 n_q2=245 n_q3=218 n_q4=274 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.115
The image catalog is written to wcs_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits -region wcs_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.QxrcTLc9q6 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-09_CI_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_040216_TTUQ2b1x1_1623962_mrLUV3iW/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits 574.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits' -> 'wcs_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits.wcscat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=538, passed=8296
Got 8296 stars (including 7747 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 8296 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013074 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010459 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 372 to 430 (Dec -15.6 to -4.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 969 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 969 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 955 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 969 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8131 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 372 to 430 (Dec -15.6 to -4.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 970 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 969 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8132 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 969 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8132 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Excluding outliers - 969 stars left (next iteration limit 1065)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits N_match=969 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.349 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.444 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.413 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.264 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.314 n_q1=234 n_q2=244 n_q3=214 n_q4=277 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.270
The image catalog is written to wcs_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits -region wcs_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.3757OHSdLK (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-09_CI_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_040216_TTUQ2b1x1_1623962_mrLUV3iW/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-09_CI_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_040216_TTUQ2b1x1_1623962_mrLUV3iW/fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-09_02-55-04_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-09_CI_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_040216_TTUQ2b1x1_1623962_mrLUV3iW/fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-09_02-55-04_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-09_CI_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_040216_TTUQ2b1x1_1623962_mrLUV3iW/fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-09_02-55-04_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-09_CI_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_040216_TTUQ2b1x1_1623962_mrLUV3iW/fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-09_02-55-04_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-09_CI_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_040216_TTUQ2b1x1_1623962_mrLUV3iW/fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-09_02-55-04_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-09_CI_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_040216_TTUQ2b1x1_1623962_mrLUV3iW/fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-09_02-55-04_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-09_02-55-04_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-09_02-55-04_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-09_02-55-04_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-09_02-55-04_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-09_02-55-04_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-09_02-55-04_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-09_02-55-04_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-09_CI_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_040216_TTUQ2b1x1_1623962_mrLUV3iW/fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-09_02-55-04_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-09_02-55-04_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits.wcscat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=356, passed=7059
Got 7059 stars (including 6693 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-09_02-55-04_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 7059 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013017 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010413 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 970 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 970 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 956 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 970 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6848 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 971 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 970 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6847 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.46"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 970 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6847 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.49"
Excluding outliers - 970 stars left (next iteration limit 1067)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-09_02-55-04_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits N_match=970 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.501 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.378 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.558 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.436 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.600 n_q1=199 n_q2=289 n_q3=203 n_q4=279 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.196
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-09_02-55-04_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-09_02-55-04_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-09_CI_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_040216_TTUQ2b1x1_1623962_mrLUV3iW/fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-09_02-55-04_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits -region wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-09_02-55-04_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-09_02-55-04_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.Vq9eCudK5s (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-09_CI_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_040216_TTUQ2b1x1_1623962_mrLUV3iW/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-09_CI_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_040216_TTUQ2b1x1_1623962_mrLUV3iW/fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-09_02-55-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0167.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-09_CI_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_040216_TTUQ2b1x1_1623962_mrLUV3iW/fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-09_02-55-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0167.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-09_CI_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_040216_TTUQ2b1x1_1623962_mrLUV3iW/fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-09_02-55-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0167.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-09_CI_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_040216_TTUQ2b1x1_1623962_mrLUV3iW/fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-09_02-55-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0167.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-09_CI_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_040216_TTUQ2b1x1_1623962_mrLUV3iW/fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-09_02-55-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0167.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-09_CI_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_040216_TTUQ2b1x1_1623962_mrLUV3iW/fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-09_02-55-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0167.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-09_02-55-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0167.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-09_02-55-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0167.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-09_02-55-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0167.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-09_02-55-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0167.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-09_02-55-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0167.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-09_02-55-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0167.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-09_02-55-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0167.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-09_CI_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_040216_TTUQ2b1x1_1623962_mrLUV3iW/fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-09_02-55-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0167.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-09_02-55-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0167.fits.wcscat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=380, passed=7002
Got 7002 stars (including 6617 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-09_02-55-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0167.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 7002 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013017 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010413 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 969 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 969 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 956 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.47"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 969 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6789 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.47"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 970 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 969 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6789 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.47"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 969 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6789 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.51"
Excluding outliers - 969 stars left (next iteration limit 1065)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-09_02-55-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0167.fits N_match=969 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.542 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.438 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.616 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.420 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.686 n_q1=204 n_q2=288 n_q3=199 n_q4=278 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.266
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-09_02-55-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0167.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-09_02-55-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0167.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-09_CI_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_040216_TTUQ2b1x1_1623962_mrLUV3iW/fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-09_02-55-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0167.fits -region wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-09_02-55-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0167.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-09_02-55-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0167.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits sigma_overall=0.340 worst_q_ratio=1.115
ref2=Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits sigma_overall=0.349 worst_q_ratio=1.270
new1=fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-09_02-55-04_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits sigma_overall=0.501 worst_q_ratio=1.196
new2=fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-09_02-55-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0167.fits sigma_overall=0.542 worst_q_ratio=1.266
reference average sigma_overall=0.3445 worst_q_ratio=1.1925
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162_astrometric_residuals.png (966 matched stars from wcs_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.31 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163_astrometric_residuals.png (969 matched stars from wcs_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.32 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-09_02-55-04_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0166_astrometric_residuals.png (970 matched stars from wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-09_02-55-04_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.45 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-09_02-55-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0167_astrometric_residuals.png (969 matched stars from wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-09_02-55-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0167.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.47 arcsec)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-09_02-55-04_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-09_02-55-04_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-09_CI_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_040216_TTUQ2b1x1_1623962_mrLUV3iW/wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-09_02-55-04_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-09_02-55-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0167.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-09_02-55-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0167.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-09_CI_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_040216_TTUQ2b1x1_1623962_mrLUV3iW/wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-09_02-55-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0167.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Sco-01-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits at 16:13:59.48 -08:07:31.4: 11.92 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits at 16:39:31.44 -13:16:20.8: 13.89 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits at 16:31:16.53 -08:07:23.8: 15.73 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits at 16:15:51.22 -06:27:43.0: 12.26 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits at 16:19:28.51 -08:12:14.3: 12.20 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits at 16:22:35.46 -10:18:49.9: 12.19 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits at 16:09:44.12 -06:39:37.1: 12.35 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits at 16:26:55.03 -09:51:39.0: 12.07 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits at 16:13:59.48 -08:07:31.4: 11.91 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.91 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:13:59.48 -08:07:31.4: ref_mag=11.91 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.8187 delta=0.10 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits at 16:39:31.44 -13:16:20.8: 14.01 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits at 16:31:16.53 -08:07:23.8: 15.72 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.94 +/- 0.07
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 16:39:31.44 -13:16:20.8: ref_mag=13.94 +/- 0.07 new_mean_mag=11.5858 delta=2.35 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits at 16:19:28.51 -08:12:14.3: 12.22 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.21 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:19:28.51 -08:12:14.3: ref_mag=12.21 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.1604 delta=0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits at 16:22:35.46 -10:18:49.9: 12.22 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.20 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:22:35.46 -10:18:49.9: ref_mag=12.20 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.1497 delta=0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits at 16:15:51.22 -06:27:43.0: 12.28 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.27 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits at 16:09:44.12 -06:39:37.1: 12.34 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:15:51.22 -06:27:43.0: ref_mag=12.27 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.1888 delta=0.08 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.34 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:09:44.12 -06:39:37.1: ref_mag=12.34 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.1862 delta=0.16 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits at 16:26:55.03 -09:51:39.0: 12.07 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.07 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:26:55.03 -09:51:39.0: ref_mag=12.07 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.0408 delta=0.03 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out20484.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out20490.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 9s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 2s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20484_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-09_02-55-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0167
Preparing report for the candidate 20484_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-09_02-55-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0167
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20490_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-09_02-55-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0167
Preparing report for the candidate 20490_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-09_02-55-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0167
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20516_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-09_02-55-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0167
The candidate 20516_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-09_02-55-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0167 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20545_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-09_02-55-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0167
The candidate 20545_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-09_02-55-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0167 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20553_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-09_02-55-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0167
The candidate 20553_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-09_02-55-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0167 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20558_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-09_02-55-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0167
The candidate 20558_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-09_02-55-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0167 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20561_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-09_02-55-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0167
The candidate 20561_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-09_02-55-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0167 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20564_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-09_02-55-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0167
The candidate 20564_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-09_02-55-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0167 did not pass the final checks
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 1s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 12s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Sco-01-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
16:31:16.53 -08:07:23.8
16:39:31.44 -13:16:20.8
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 4 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-09_CI_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_040216_TTUQ2b1x1_1623962_mrLUV3iW/fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-09_02-55-04_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-09_CI_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_040216_TTUQ2b1x1_1623962_mrLUV3iW/fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-09_02-55-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0167.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-09_CI_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_040216_TTUQ2b1x1_1623962_mrLUV3iW/fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-09_02-55-04_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-09_CI_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_040216_TTUQ2b1x1_1623962_mrLUV3iW/fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-09_02-55-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0167.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-09_02-55-04_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-09_02-55-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0167.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/exclusion_list.txt
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-09_02-55-04_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-09_02-55-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0167.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits
Image size: 941.3'x626.9' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 16:17:07.938 -09:59:23.16 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-09_02-55-04_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-09_02-55-04_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits
Image size: 937.2'x624.2' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 16:17:09.424 -10:00:02.57 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 16:17:07.938 -09:59:23.16
Second-epoch image center 16:17:09.424 -10:00:02.57
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0125 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-09_02-55-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0167.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-09_02-55-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0167.fits
Image size: 937.2'x624.2' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 16:17:12.538 -09:59:55.44 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 16:17:07.938 -09:59:23.16
Second-epoch image center 16:17:12.538 -09:59:55.44
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0209 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 16:17:09.424 -10:00:02.57
Second-epoch second image center 16:17:12.538 -09:59:55.44
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01293 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits &> /tmp/tmp.LlzcKDYhlP
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits &> /tmp/tmp.PC3ox0P7ja
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-09_CI_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_040216_TTUQ2b1x1_1623962_mrLUV3iW/fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-09_02-55-04_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits &> /tmp/tmp.EtAqK5gisy
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-09_CI_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_040216_TTUQ2b1x1_1623962_mrLUV3iW/fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-09_02-55-04_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-09_CI_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_040216_TTUQ2b1x1_1623962_mrLUV3iW/fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-09_02-55-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0167.fits &> /tmp/tmp.iJjKBBwfeC
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-09_CI_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_040216_TTUQ2b1x1_1623962_mrLUV3iW/fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-09_02-55-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0167.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits and wcs_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits and wcs_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits and wcs_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits) and catalog (wcs_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 66506 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 235.8525 to 252.4884 deg, Dec -15.6149 to -4.1928 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 235.8525 to 252.4884 deg, Dec -15.6149 to -4.1928 deg
Loaded 5302 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3766 out of 4287 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 4287 out of 66506 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.684850
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.684850
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.37
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.31
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.31
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 66506 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 235.8525 to 252.4884 deg, Dec -15.6149 to -4.1928 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 235.8525 to 252.4884 deg, Dec -15.6149 to -4.1928 deg
Loaded 5302 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3766 out of 4287 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 4287 out of 66506 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits (aperture=4.4)
Read 66556 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 235.8754 to 252.4982 deg, Dec -15.6070 to -4.1798 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 235.8754 to 252.4982 deg, Dec -15.6070 to -4.1798 deg
Loaded 5296 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3783 out of 4283 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 4283 out of 66556 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits (aperture=4.4)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 74 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 8000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
1.9 pix Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits
1.9 pix Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits
2.1 pix fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-09_02-55-04_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits
2.1 pix fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-09_02-55-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0167.fits
1.9 pix wcs_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits
1.9 pix wcs_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.3 mag. Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits
15.3 mag. Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits
15.0 mag. fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-09_02-55-04_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits
15.0 mag. fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-09_02-55-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0167.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 15.0 (SNR ) 14.5 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.LlzcKDYhlP (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-09_CI_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_040216_TTUQ2b1x1_1623962_mrLUV3iW/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits 574.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits' -> 'wcs_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits.wcscat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=15, blended=3301, passed=66491
Got 66491 stars (including 63079 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 66491 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013074 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010459 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 371 to 431 (Dec -15.6 to -4.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 968 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 968 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 952 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 968 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 65380 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 371 to 431 (Dec -15.6 to -4.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 968 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 968 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 65380 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 968 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 65380 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Excluding outliers - 968 stars left (next iteration limit 1064)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits N_match=968 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.344 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.394 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.353 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.276 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.348 n_q1=231 n_q2=251 n_q3=219 n_q4=267 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.146
The image catalog is written to wcs_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits -region wcs_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.PC3ox0P7ja (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-09_CI_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_040216_TTUQ2b1x1_1623962_mrLUV3iW/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits 574.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits' -> 'wcs_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits.wcscat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=21, blended=3301, passed=66535
Got 66535 stars (including 63103 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 66535 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013074 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010459 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 371 to 431 (Dec -15.6 to -4.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 968 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 968 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 954 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 968 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 65393 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 371 to 431 (Dec -15.6 to -4.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 969 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 968 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 65393 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 968 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 65393 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Excluding outliers - 968 stars left (next iteration limit 1064)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits N_match=968 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.358 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.412 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.390 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.279 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.319 n_q1=235 n_q2=248 n_q3=217 n_q4=268 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.151
The image catalog is written to wcs_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits -region wcs_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.EtAqK5gisy (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-09_CI_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_040216_TTUQ2b1x1_1623962_mrLUV3iW/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-09_CI_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_040216_TTUQ2b1x1_1623962_mrLUV3iW/fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-09_02-55-04_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-09_CI_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_040216_TTUQ2b1x1_1623962_mrLUV3iW/fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-09_02-55-04_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-09_CI_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_040216_TTUQ2b1x1_1623962_mrLUV3iW/fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-09_02-55-04_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-09_CI_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_040216_TTUQ2b1x1_1623962_mrLUV3iW/fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-09_02-55-04_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-09_CI_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_040216_TTUQ2b1x1_1623962_mrLUV3iW/fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-09_02-55-04_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-09_CI_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_040216_TTUQ2b1x1_1623962_mrLUV3iW/fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-09_02-55-04_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-09_02-55-04_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-09_02-55-04_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-09_02-55-04_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-09_02-55-04_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-09_02-55-04_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-09_02-55-04_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-09_02-55-04_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-09_CI_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_040216_TTUQ2b1x1_1623962_mrLUV3iW/fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-09_02-55-04_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-09_02-55-04_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits.wcscat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=8, blended=2517, passed=52421
Got 52421 stars (including 49843 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-09_02-55-04_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 52421 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013017 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010413 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 972 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 972 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 955 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.47"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 972 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 50646 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 972 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 972 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 50646 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 972 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 50646 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.48"
Excluding outliers - 972 stars left (next iteration limit 1069)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-09_02-55-04_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits N_match=972 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.510 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.390 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.576 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.453 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.550 n_q1=218 n_q2=284 n_q3=206 n_q4=264 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.129
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-09_02-55-04_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-09_02-55-04_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-09_CI_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_040216_TTUQ2b1x1_1623962_mrLUV3iW/fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-09_02-55-04_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits -region wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-09_02-55-04_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-09_02-55-04_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.iJjKBBwfeC (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-09_CI_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_040216_TTUQ2b1x1_1623962_mrLUV3iW/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-09_CI_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_040216_TTUQ2b1x1_1623962_mrLUV3iW/fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-09_02-55-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0167.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-09_CI_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_040216_TTUQ2b1x1_1623962_mrLUV3iW/fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-09_02-55-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0167.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-09_CI_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_040216_TTUQ2b1x1_1623962_mrLUV3iW/fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-09_02-55-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0167.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-09_CI_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_040216_TTUQ2b1x1_1623962_mrLUV3iW/fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-09_02-55-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0167.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-09_CI_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_040216_TTUQ2b1x1_1623962_mrLUV3iW/fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-09_02-55-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0167.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-09_CI_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_040216_TTUQ2b1x1_1623962_mrLUV3iW/fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-09_02-55-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0167.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-09_02-55-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0167.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-09_02-55-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0167.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-09_02-55-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0167.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-09_02-55-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0167.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-09_02-55-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0167.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-09_02-55-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0167.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-09_02-55-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0167.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-09_CI_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_040216_TTUQ2b1x1_1623962_mrLUV3iW/fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-09_02-55-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0167.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-09_02-55-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0167.fits.wcscat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=6, blended=2627, passed=52889
Got 52889 stars (including 50207 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-09_02-55-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0167.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 52889 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013017 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010413 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 971 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 971 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 954 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.48"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 971 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 51198 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.46"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 971 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 971 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 51198 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.46"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 971 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 51198 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.48"
Excluding outliers - 971 stars left (next iteration limit 1068)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-09_02-55-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0167.fits N_match=971 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.525 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.382 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.611 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.460 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.606 n_q1=218 n_q2=279 n_q3=206 n_q4=268 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.162
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-09_02-55-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0167.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-09_02-55-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0167.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-09_CI_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_040216_TTUQ2b1x1_1623962_mrLUV3iW/fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-09_02-55-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0167.fits -region wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-09_02-55-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0167.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-09_02-55-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0167.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-09_02-55-04_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-09_CI_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_040216_TTUQ2b1x1_1623962_mrLUV3iW/wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-09_02-55-04_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0166.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-09_02-55-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0167.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-09_CI_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_040216_TTUQ2b1x1_1623962_mrLUV3iW/wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-09_02-55-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0167.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Sco-01-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits at 16:37:22.36 -12:31:17.1: 14.48 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits at 16:24:42.40 -11:19:45.7: 14.98 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits at 16:18:53.39 -08:03:04.1: 14.66 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits at 16:44:57.96 -13:41:55.7: 13.16 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits at 16:15:30.23 -12:11:28.7: 14.58 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits at 16:43:11.14 -08:52:57.0: 14.30 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits at 16:37:38.26 -09:14:11.3: 13.46 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits at 16:25:27.19 -10:47:55.1: 14.77 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits at 16:37:22.36 -12:31:17.1: 14.60 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.54 +/- 0.08
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:37:22.36 -12:31:17.1: ref_mag=14.54 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=14.5756 delta=-0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits at 16:24:42.40 -11:19:45.7: 15.05 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.02 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits at 16:43:11.14 -08:52:57.0: 14.58 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:24:42.40 -11:19:45.7: ref_mag=15.02 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.6288 delta=0.39 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits at 16:15:30.23 -12:11:28.7: 14.54 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.40 +/- 0.08
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:43:11.14 -08:52:57.0: ref_mag=14.40 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=14.5941 delta=-0.19 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.56 +/- 0.07
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits at 16:44:57.96 -13:41:55.7: 13.21 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:15:30.23 -12:11:28.7: ref_mag=14.56 +/- 0.07 new_mean_mag=14.6989 delta=-0.14 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.18 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits at 16:18:53.39 -08:03:04.1: 14.66 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:44:57.96 -13:41:55.7: ref_mag=13.18 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.4042 delta=-0.22 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits at 16:37:38.26 -09:14:11.3: 13.51 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits at 16:25:27.19 -10:47:55.1: 14.60 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.66 +/- 0.07
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.48 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:18:53.39 -08:03:04.1: ref_mag=14.66 +/- 0.07 new_mean_mag=14.5366 delta=0.12 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.68 +/- 0.08
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:37:38.26 -09:14:11.3: ref_mag=13.48 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.6893 delta=-0.21 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:25:27.19 -10:47:55.1: ref_mag=14.68 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=14.5563 delta=0.12 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits at 16:27:08.80 -13:07:30.3: 11.86 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits at 16:27:08.80 -13:07:30.3: 11.80 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.82 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:27:08.80 -13:07:30.3: ref_mag=11.82 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.9696 delta=-0.15 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits at 16:21:40.86 -10:06:06.2: 12.45 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits at 16:25:37.65 -12:14:59.3: 15.88 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits at 16:26:48.73 -09:50:38.7: 13.72 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits at 16:21:52.05 -07:08:17.6: 13.67 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits at 16:21:40.86 -10:06:06.2: 12.49 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.47 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:21:40.86 -10:06:06.2: ref_mag=12.47 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.6276 delta=-0.16 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits at 16:25:37.65 -12:14:59.3: 15.92 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits at 16:26:39.11 -08:42:28.0: 13.98 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits at 16:32:05.40 -12:08:23.3: 13.98 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits at 16:26:48.73 -09:50:38.7: 13.80 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.75 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:26:48.73 -09:50:38.7: ref_mag=13.75 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=13.8276 delta=-0.07 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits at 15:59:58.96 -07:06:44.9: 14.20 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits at 16:21:52.05 -07:08:17.6: 13.63 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits at 16:06:46.01 -13:55:50.2: 13.88 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits at 16:36:27.01 -12:35:08.7: 14.08 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.65 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits at 16:13:17.54 -10:21:37.1: 14.04 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:21:52.05 -07:08:17.6: ref_mag=13.65 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.5846 delta=0.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits at 16:32:05.40 -12:08:23.3: 13.87 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.92 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:32:05.40 -12:08:23.3: ref_mag=13.92 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=13.9460 delta=-0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits at 16:26:39.11 -08:42:28.0: 13.92 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.95 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:26:39.11 -08:42:28.0: ref_mag=13.95 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.9299 delta=0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits at 16:06:46.01 -13:55:50.2: 13.86 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits at 16:08:58.30 -08:14:10.6: 14.06 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.87 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:06:46.01 -13:55:50.2: ref_mag=13.87 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=14.0894 delta=-0.22 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits at 16:36:27.01 -12:35:08.7: 14.27 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits at 15:59:58.96 -07:06:44.9: 14.23 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.16 +/- 0.07
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:36:27.01 -12:35:08.7: ref_mag=14.16 +/- 0.07 new_mean_mag=14.2105 delta=-0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.21 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:59:58.96 -07:06:44.9: ref_mag=14.21 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=14.2867 delta=-0.07 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits at 16:13:17.54 -10:21:37.1: 13.96 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.00 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:13:17.54 -10:21:37.1: ref_mag=14.00 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.0302 delta=-0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits at 16:08:58.30 -08:14:10.6: 14.09 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.07 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:08:58.30 -08:14:10.6: ref_mag=14.07 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.2437 delta=-0.17 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits at 16:09:16.26 -11:32:05.8: 14.29 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits at 16:24:18.29 -07:50:56.1: 14.19 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits at 16:39:22.03 -13:52:31.1: 14.62 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits at 16:09:18.64 -13:59:40.6: 14.94 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits at 16:35:46.38 -13:25:58.4: 14.97 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits at 16:09:16.26 -11:32:05.8: 14.09 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.18 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:09:16.26 -11:32:05.8: ref_mag=14.18 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=14.2655 delta=-0.08 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits at 16:39:22.03 -13:52:31.1: 14.54 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.58 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:39:22.03 -13:52:31.1: ref_mag=14.58 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.3829 delta=0.19 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits at 16:18:00.02 -12:34:59.4: 14.38 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits at 16:24:18.29 -07:50:56.1: 14.27 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.23 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:24:18.29 -07:50:56.1: ref_mag=14.23 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.3046 delta=-0.08 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits at 16:11:59.48 -12:57:40.2: 14.88 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits at 16:27:04.96 -13:35:43.1: 14.61 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits at 16:28:49.10 -10:47:29.5: 15.31 +/- 0.22 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits at 16:18:00.02 -12:34:59.4: 14.54 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.45 +/- 0.08
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:18:00.02 -12:34:59.4: ref_mag=14.45 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=14.5128 delta=-0.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits at 16:27:04.96 -13:35:43.1: 14.54 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits at 16:11:59.48 -12:57:40.2: 14.81 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.57 +/- 0.08
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:27:04.96 -13:35:43.1: ref_mag=14.57 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=14.4827 delta=0.09 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.84 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:11:59.48 -12:57:40.2: ref_mag=14.84 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.5326 delta=0.31 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits at 16:09:18.64 -13:59:40.6: 15.08 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits at 16:28:49.10 -10:47:29.5: 15.25 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.00 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:09:18.64 -13:59:40.6: ref_mag=15.00 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.5989 delta=0.40 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.28 +/- 0.15
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:28:49.10 -10:47:29.5: ref_mag=15.28 +/- 0.15 new_mean_mag=14.6432 delta=0.64 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits at 16:35:46.38 -13:25:58.4: 15.26 +/- 0.24 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.08 +/- 0.15
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:35:46.38 -13:25:58.4: ref_mag=15.08 +/- 0.15 new_mean_mag=14.5165 delta=0.57 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits at 16:32:20.60 -13:03:48.9: 14.64 +/- 0.26 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits at 16:25:39.29 -12:43:09.8: 14.72 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits at 16:42:00.94 -13:35:55.4: 14.62 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits at 16:25:29.76 -06:05:37.3: 15.02 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits at 16:32:36.60 -13:06:07.2: 14.68 +/- 0.22 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits at 16:32:20.60 -13:03:48.9: 14.43 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.51 +/- 0.17
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits at 16:25:39.29 -12:43:09.8: 14.79 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:32:20.60 -13:03:48.9: ref_mag=14.51 +/- 0.17 new_mean_mag=14.4169 delta=0.10 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.76 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits at 16:32:06.29 -13:26:43.0: 15.14 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:25:39.29 -12:43:09.8: ref_mag=14.76 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.4976 delta=0.26 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits at 16:42:00.94 -13:35:55.4: 15.12 +/- 0.23 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.76 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:42:00.94 -13:35:55.4: ref_mag=14.76 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.4035 delta=0.36 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits at 16:25:29.76 -06:05:37.3: 14.88 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.94 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:25:29.76 -06:05:37.3: ref_mag=14.94 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.6647 delta=0.28 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits at 16:32:36.60 -13:06:07.2: 14.55 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.61 +/- 0.15
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:32:36.60 -13:06:07.2: ref_mag=14.61 +/- 0.15 new_mean_mag=14.5208 delta=0.09 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits at 16:44:29.85 -12:11:07.2: 14.62 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits at 16:13:50.81 -14:13:13.4: 15.40 +/- 0.25 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits at 16:32:06.29 -13:26:43.0: 15.02 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits at 16:04:19.86 -06:17:10.1: 15.19 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.08 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:32:06.29 -13:26:43.0: ref_mag=15.08 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=14.7145 delta=0.36 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits at 16:13:50.81 -14:13:13.4: 14.78 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits at 16:44:29.85 -12:11:07.2: 14.62 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits at 16:04:19.86 -06:17:10.1: 15.16 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.62 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.94 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:44:29.85 -12:11:07.2: ref_mag=14.62 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.5994 delta=0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:13:50.81 -14:13:13.4: ref_mag=14.94 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.7345 delta=0.20 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.18 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:04:19.86 -06:17:10.1: ref_mag=15.18 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.8059 delta=0.37 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits at 16:19:56.33 -08:14:06.1: 15.31 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits at 16:42:22.72 -13:10:09.7: 14.70 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits at 16:13:39.56 -13:04:38.5: 14.97 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits at 16:29:55.57 -11:07:37.0: 14.55 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits at 16:08:26.99 -12:56:04.1: 15.38 +/- 0.22 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits at 16:13:39.56 -13:04:38.5: 15.09 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits at 16:19:56.33 -08:14:06.1: 14.99 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.03 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:13:39.56 -13:04:38.5: ref_mag=15.03 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.8410 delta=0.19 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.11 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:19:56.33 -08:14:06.1: ref_mag=15.11 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.6131 delta=0.49 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits at 16:29:55.57 -11:07:37.0: 14.70 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits at 16:08:26.99 -12:56:04.1: 15.32 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.61 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.35 +/- 0.15
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:29:55.57 -11:07:37.0: ref_mag=14.61 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=14.5828 delta=0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:08:26.99 -12:56:04.1: ref_mag=15.35 +/- 0.15 new_mean_mag=14.8327 delta=0.52 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits at 16:42:36.66 -10:10:21.8: 14.38 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits at 16:42:22.72 -13:10:09.7: 14.72 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.71 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:42:22.72 -13:10:09.7: ref_mag=14.71 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.5559 delta=0.16 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits at 16:40:21.98 -09:27:24.0: 14.72 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits at 16:37:33.49 -11:22:47.8: 14.52 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits at 16:20:48.87 -14:05:40.3: 14.99 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits at 16:42:36.66 -10:10:21.8: 14.81 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.53 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:42:36.66 -10:10:21.8: ref_mag=14.53 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=14.7196 delta=-0.19 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits at 16:40:21.98 -09:27:24.0: 14.81 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.75 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:40:21.98 -09:27:24.0: ref_mag=14.75 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.4187 delta=0.34 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits at 16:37:33.49 -11:22:47.8: 15.05 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.66 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:37:33.49 -11:22:47.8: ref_mag=14.66 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.6078 delta=0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits at 16:20:48.87 -14:05:40.3: 15.63 +/- 0.30 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.15 +/- 0.15
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:20:48.87 -14:05:40.3: ref_mag=15.15 +/- 0.15 new_mean_mag=14.7909 delta=0.36 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits at 16:21:05.65 -13:08:57.2: 14.99 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits at 16:18:00.20 -11:44:59.3: 14.63 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits at 16:40:13.39 -09:27:44.4: 15.36 +/- 0.30 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits at 16:01:57.72 -13:18:42.4: 14.89 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits at 16:24:27.59 -13:50:13.8: 14.95 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits at 16:21:05.65 -13:08:57.2: 14.73 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.84 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:21:05.65 -13:08:57.2: ref_mag=14.84 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.6898 delta=0.15 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits at 16:01:57.72 -13:18:42.4: 14.69 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits at 16:18:00.20 -11:44:59.3: 14.96 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.77 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:01:57.72 -13:18:42.4: ref_mag=14.77 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.7666 delta=0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.75 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:18:00.20 -11:44:59.3: ref_mag=14.75 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.7438 delta=0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits at 16:24:27.59 -13:50:13.8: 15.09 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits at 16:38:01.33 -12:20:16.9: 15.05 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.01 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:24:27.59 -13:50:13.8: ref_mag=15.01 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.6833 delta=0.33 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits at 16:40:13.39 -09:27:44.4: 15.28 +/- 0.31 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.32 +/- 0.21
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:40:13.39 -09:27:44.4: ref_mag=15.32 +/- 0.21 new_mean_mag=14.8179 delta=0.50 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits at 16:05:14.68 -13:35:14.0: 15.21 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits at 16:10:47.15 -09:27:13.8: 14.99 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits at 16:22:56.55 -12:14:01.4: 15.52 +/- 0.26 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits at 16:38:01.33 -12:20:16.9: 15.29 +/- 0.24 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits at 16:10:47.15 -09:27:13.8: 15.28 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.14 +/- 0.15
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.09 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:10:47.15 -09:27:13.8: ref_mag=15.09 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.9059 delta=0.18 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:38:01.33 -12:20:16.9: ref_mag=15.14 +/- 0.15 new_mean_mag=14.8335 delta=0.31 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits at 16:05:14.68 -13:35:14.0: 14.92 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.03 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:05:14.68 -13:35:14.0: ref_mag=15.03 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.8239 delta=0.21 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits at 16:15:59.55 -12:43:40.0: 15.09 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits at 16:22:56.55 -12:14:01.4: 14.74 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.92 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:22:56.55 -12:14:01.4: ref_mag=14.92 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.7889 delta=0.13 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits at 16:40:41.84 -13:31:45.4: 14.71 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits at 16:24:58.77 -13:15:12.3: 15.22 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits at 16:11:10.06 -06:12:47.9: 14.95 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits at 16:25:15.31 -13:14:26.0: 15.42 +/- 0.24 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits at 16:15:59.55 -12:43:40.0: 15.17 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.12 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:15:59.55 -12:43:40.0: ref_mag=15.12 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=14.8359 delta=0.29 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits at 16:40:41.84 -13:31:45.4: 14.83 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.76 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:40:41.84 -13:31:45.4: ref_mag=14.76 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.6086 delta=0.15 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits at 16:11:10.06 -06:12:47.9: 15.08 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.01 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:11:10.06 -06:12:47.9: ref_mag=15.01 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.7961 delta=0.21 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits at 16:24:58.77 -13:15:12.3: 15.23 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits at 16:25:15.31 -13:14:26.0: 15.48 +/- 0.27 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.45 +/- 0.18
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.22 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:25:15.31 -13:14:26.0: ref_mag=15.45 +/- 0.18 new_mean_mag=14.9326 delta=0.51 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:24:58.77 -13:15:12.3: ref_mag=15.22 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=14.8575 delta=0.37 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits at 16:29:05.52 -08:13:03.8: 15.52 +/- 0.26 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits at 16:26:54.25 -09:46:05.0: 14.92 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits at 16:29:05.52 -08:13:03.8: 15.35 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.42 +/- 0.16
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:29:05.52 -08:13:03.8: ref_mag=15.42 +/- 0.16 new_mean_mag=14.9460 delta=0.47 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits at 16:26:54.25 -09:46:05.0: 14.81 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.86 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 16:26:54.25 -09:46:05.0: ref_mag=14.86 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=13.6928 delta=1.17 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out32325.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out82021.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 14s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 3s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 81587_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-09_02-55-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0167
The candidate 81587_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-09_02-55-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0167 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 81588_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-09_02-55-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0167
The candidate 81588_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-09_02-55-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0167 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 81590_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-09_02-55-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0167
The candidate 81590_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-09_02-55-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0167 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:40:30.29 -12:27:11.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 81592_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-09_02-55-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0167
The candidate 81592_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-09_02-55-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0167 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:22:34.71 -10:10:16.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 81594_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-09_02-55-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0167
The candidate 81594_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-09_02-55-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0167 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 81595_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-09_02-55-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0167
The candidate 81595_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-09_02-55-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0167 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 81596_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-09_02-55-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0167
The candidate 81596_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-09_02-55-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0167 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 81599_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-09_02-55-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0167
The candidate 81599_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-09_02-55-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0167 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 81609_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-09_02-55-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0167
The candidate 81609_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-09_02-55-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0167 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 81616_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-09_02-55-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0167
The candidate 81616_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-09_02-55-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0167 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 81622_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-09_02-55-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0167
The candidate 81622_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-09_02-55-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0167 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 81681_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-09_02-55-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0167
The candidate 81681_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-09_02-55-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0167 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:31:16.53 -08:07:23.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_local.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 81696_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-09_02-55-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0167
The candidate 81696_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-09_02-55-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0167 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:39:31.42 -13:16:20.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_local.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 81803_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-09_02-55-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0167
The candidate 81803_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-09_02-55-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0167 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 81841_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-09_02-55-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0167
The candidate 81841_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-09_02-55-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0167 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:02:58.20 -05:49:24.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 81854_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-09_02-55-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0167
The candidate 81854_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-09_02-55-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0167 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:22:34.16 -12:26:10.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82021_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-09_02-55-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0167
Preparing report for the candidate 82021_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-09_02-55-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0167
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82084_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-09_02-55-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0167
The candidate 82084_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-09_02-55-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0167 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82113_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-09_02-55-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0167
The candidate 82113_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-09_02-55-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0167 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:11:52.10 -10:03:55.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82184_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-09_02-55-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0167
The candidate 82184_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-09_02-55-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0167 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:15:44.92 -08:22:30.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82186_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-09_02-55-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0167
The candidate 82186_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-09_02-55-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0167 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:27:41.60 -08:21:15.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82190_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-09_02-55-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0167
The candidate 82190_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-09_02-55-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0167 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82234_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-09_02-55-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0167
The candidate 82234_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-09_02-55-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0167 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82241_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-09_02-55-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0167
The candidate 82241_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-09_02-55-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0167 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82248_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-09_02-55-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0167
The candidate 82248_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-09_02-55-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0167 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82253_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-09_02-55-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0167
The candidate 82253_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-09_02-55-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0167 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82341_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-09_02-55-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0167
The candidate 82341_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-09_02-55-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0167 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82394_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-09_02-55-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0167
The candidate 82394_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-09_02-55-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0167 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82432_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-09_02-55-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0167
The candidate 82432_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-09_02-55-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0167 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82436_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-09_02-55-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0167
The candidate 82436_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-09_02-55-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0167 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82437_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-09_02-55-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0167
The candidate 82437_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-09_02-55-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0167 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:13:59.37 -11:49:53.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82443_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-09_02-55-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0167
The candidate 82443_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-09_02-55-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0167 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82462_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-09_02-55-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0167
The candidate 82462_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-09_02-55-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0167 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82520_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-09_02-55-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0167
The candidate 82520_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-09_02-55-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0167 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82522_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-09_02-55-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0167
The candidate 82522_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-09_02-55-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0167 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82525_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-09_02-55-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0167
The candidate 82525_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-09_02-55-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0167 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82533_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-09_02-55-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0167
The candidate 82533_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-09_02-55-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0167 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82572_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-09_02-55-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0167
The candidate 82572_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-09_02-55-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0167 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82597_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-09_02-55-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0167
The candidate 82597_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-09_02-55-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0167 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82604_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-09_02-55-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0167
The candidate 82604_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-09_02-55-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0167 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82608_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-09_02-55-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0167
The candidate 82608_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-09_02-55-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0167 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82621_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-09_02-55-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0167
The candidate 82621_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-09_02-55-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0167 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82628_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-09_02-55-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0167
The candidate 82628_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-09_02-55-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0167 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82635_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-09_02-55-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0167
The candidate 82635_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-09_02-55-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0167 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82636_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-09_02-55-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0167
The candidate 82636_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-09_02-55-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0167 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82638_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-09_02-55-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0167
The candidate 82638_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-09_02-55-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0167 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82646_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-09_02-55-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0167
The candidate 82646_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-09_02-55-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0167 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82652_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-09_02-55-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0167
The candidate 82652_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-09_02-55-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0167 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82653_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-09_02-55-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0167
The candidate 82653_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-09_02-55-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0167 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82664_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-09_02-55-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0167
The candidate 82664_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-09_02-55-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0167 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82667_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-09_02-55-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0167
The candidate 82667_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-09_02-55-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0167 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82695_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-09_02-55-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0167
The candidate 82695_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-09_02-55-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0167 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82697_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-09_02-55-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0167
The candidate 82697_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-09_02-55-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0167 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82702_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-09_02-55-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0167
The candidate 82702_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-09_02-55-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0167 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82710_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-09_02-55-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0167
The candidate 82710_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-09_02-55-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0167 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82737_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-09_02-55-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0167
The candidate 82737_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-09_02-55-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0167 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82742_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-09_02-55-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0167
The candidate 82742_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-09_02-55-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0167 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82751_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-09_02-55-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0167
The candidate 82751_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-09_02-55-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0167 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82755_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-09_02-55-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0167
The candidate 82755_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-09_02-55-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0167 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82762_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-09_02-55-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0167
The candidate 82762_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-09_02-55-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0167 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82769_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-09_02-55-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0167
The candidate 82769_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-09_02-55-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0167 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82784_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-09_02-55-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0167
The candidate 82784_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-09_02-55-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0167 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82789_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-09_02-55-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0167
The candidate 82789_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-09_02-55-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0167 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82800_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-09_02-55-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0167
The candidate 82800_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-09_02-55-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0167 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82809_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-09_02-55-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0167
The candidate 82809_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-09_02-55-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0167 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82822_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-09_02-55-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0167
The candidate 82822_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-09_02-55-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0167 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82824_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-09_02-55-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0167
The candidate 82824_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-09_02-55-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0167 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82827_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-09_02-55-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0167
The candidate 82827_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-09_02-55-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0167 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82847_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-09_02-55-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0167
The candidate 82847_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-09_02-55-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0167 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82850_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-09_02-55-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0167
The candidate 82850_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-09_02-55-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0167 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82893_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-09_02-55-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0167
The candidate 82893_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-09_02-55-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0167 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82922_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-09_02-55-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0167
The candidate 82922_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-09_02-55-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0167 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52307_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-09_02-55-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0167
The candidate 52307_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-09_02-55-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0167 did not pass the final checks