This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-09_CI_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_035009_TTUQ2b1x1_3685422_jqSY9MA0
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 09.3291 2461200.8291 12.66 15:24:07.64 +02:03:39.6
5.08867 45.69362 galactic Ser Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.0" and 7.4 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.173 Ino 0 -0 0 12.8 -0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits at 15:24:07.64 +02:03:39.6: 15.91 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-04-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0254.fits at 15:24:07.64 +02:03:39.6: 15.92 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 06 09.3291* 15 24 07.64 +02 03 39.6 12.7 U Ser 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461200.8291,12.66,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260609.3291 12.66CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 09.3291 2461200.8291 14.54 15:29:38.79 -01:03:59.4
2.89771 42.65756 galactic Ser Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.6" and 7.3 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.1196 Sheba 0 0 0 14.6 -0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits at 15:29:38.79 -01:03:59.4: 15.98 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-04-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0254.fits at 15:29:38.79 -01:03:59.4: 15.99 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 06 09.3291* 15 29 38.79 -01 03 59.4 14.5 U Ser 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461200.8291,14.54,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260609.3291 14.54CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461172.79409781 12.05.2026 07:03:20.051 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits
First image: 2461172.79409781 12.05.2026 07:03:20.051 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits
Last image: 2461200.82940446 09.06.2026 07:54:10.545 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-09_CI_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_035009_TTUQ2b1x1_3685422_jqSY9MA0/fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-09_02-54-10_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0165.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 3
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.63
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 5 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 5907
Objects passed selection criteria: 5901
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.6 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.6 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 5505.25
Average stars matched: 5411 (98.288 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 112352 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Mon Jun 8 11:26:26 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-95-g079870fa
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-06-08)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Tue Jun 9 04:38:48 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461172.79409781 12.05.2026 07:03:20.051 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits
First image: 2461172.79409781 12.05.2026 07:03:20.051 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits
Last image: 2461200.82940446 09.06.2026 07:54:10.545 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-09_CI_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_035009_TTUQ2b1x1_3685422_jqSY9MA0/fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-09_02-54-10_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0165.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 51
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.38
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 21 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 37221
Objects passed selection criteria: 37151
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.7 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.7 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 35825
Average stars matched: 34748.5 (96.9951 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 140156 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Mon Jun 8 11:26:26 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-95-g079870fa
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-06-08)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Tue Jun 9 04:40:58 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/TTUQ2_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 4 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-04-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0254.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-09_CI_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_035009_TTUQ2b1x1_3685422_jqSY9MA0/fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-09_02-53-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-09_CI_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_035009_TTUQ2b1x1_3685422_jqSY9MA0/fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-09_02-54-10_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0165.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-04-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0254.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-04-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0254.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-09_CI_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_035009_TTUQ2b1x1_3685422_jqSY9MA0/fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-09_02-53-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-09_CI_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_035009_TTUQ2b1x1_3685422_jqSY9MA0/fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-09_02-54-10_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0165.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461200.82887490
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits'
wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-04-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0254.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-04-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0254.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-04-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0254.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-04-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0254.fits'
wcs_fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-09_02-53-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-09_02-53-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-09_02-53-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-09_02-53-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits'
wcs_fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-09_02-54-10_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0165.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-09_02-54-10_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0165.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-09_02-54-10_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0165.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-09_02-54-10_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0165.fits'
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits
Image size: 937.1'x624.1' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 15:25:42.825 -01:59:55.09 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.87"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-09_02-53-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-09_02-53-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits
Image size: 937.2'x624.1' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 15:25:43.234 -01:59:51.90 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 15:25:42.825 -01:59:55.09
Second-epoch image center 15:25:43.234 -01:59:51.90
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0019 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-09_02-54-10_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0165.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-09_02-54-10_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0165.fits
Image size: 937.2'x624.1' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 15:25:40.365 -01:59:43.19 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 15:25:42.825 -01:59:55.09
Second-epoch image center 15:25:40.365 -01:59:43.19
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0108 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 15:25:43.234 -01:59:51.90
Second-epoch second image center 15:25:40.365 -01:59:43.19
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01219 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits &> /tmp/tmp.RzGkWoPeDc
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-04-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0254.fits &> /tmp/tmp.YpYfq4npg5
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-04-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0254.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-09_CI_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_035009_TTUQ2b1x1_3685422_jqSY9MA0/fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-09_02-53-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits &> /tmp/tmp.GX8iwPZkZ5
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-09_CI_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_035009_TTUQ2b1x1_3685422_jqSY9MA0/fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-09_02-53-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-09_CI_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_035009_TTUQ2b1x1_3685422_jqSY9MA0/fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-09_02-54-10_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0165.fits &> /tmp/tmp.0obS4BUfy6
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-09_CI_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_035009_TTUQ2b1x1_3685422_jqSY9MA0/fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-09_02-54-10_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0165.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits and wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits and wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits and wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits) and catalog (wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 7872 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 223.5808 to 239.3007 deg, Dec -7.2524 to +3.2613 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 223.5808 to 239.3007 deg, Dec -7.2524 to 3.2613 deg
Loaded 4367 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3741 out of 3883 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3883 out of 7872 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.782700
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.782700
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.63
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.15
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.15
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 7872 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 223.5808 to 239.3007 deg, Dec -7.2524 to +3.2613 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 223.5808 to 239.3007 deg, Dec -7.2524 to 3.2613 deg
Loaded 4367 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3741 out of 3883 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3883 out of 7872 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits (aperture=6.2)
Read 7902 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 223.5849 to 239.3174 deg, Dec -7.2524 to +3.2636 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 223.5849 to 239.3174 deg, Dec -7.2524 to 3.2636 deg
Loaded 4371 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3740 out of 3886 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3886 out of 7902 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-04-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0254.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-04-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0254.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-04-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0254.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-04-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0254.fits (aperture=6.2)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 3 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 8000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.3 pix Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits
2.3 pix Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-04-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0254.fits
2.3 pix fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-09_02-53-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits
2.3 pix fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-09_02-54-10_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0165.fits
2.3 pix wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits
2.3 pix wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-04-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0254.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.2 mag. Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits
15.2 mag. Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-04-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0254.fits
14.9 mag. fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-09_02-53-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits
14.9 mag. fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-09_02-54-10_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0165.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.9 (SNR ) 12.0 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.RzGkWoPeDc (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-09_CI_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_035009_TTUQ2b1x1_3685422_jqSY9MA0/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits' -> 'wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits.wcscat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=486, passed=7872
Got 7872 stars (including 7376 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 7872 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.1'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.1 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013015 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010412 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 974 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 973 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 968 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 973 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7836 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 974 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 973 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7834 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 973 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7834 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.47"
Excluding outliers - 973 stars left (next iteration limit 1070)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits N_match=973 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.463 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.323 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.610 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.361 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.686 n_q1=256 n_q2=255 n_q3=227 n_q4=235 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.480
The image catalog is written to wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits -region wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.YpYfq4npg5 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-09_CI_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_035009_TTUQ2b1x1_3685422_jqSY9MA0/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-04-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0254.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-04-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0254.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-04-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0254.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-04-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0254.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-04-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0254.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-04-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0254.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-04-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0254.fits' -> 'wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-04-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0254.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-04-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0254.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-04-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0254.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-04-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0254.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-04-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0254.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-04-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0254.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-04-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0254.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-04-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0254.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-04-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0254.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-04-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0254.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-04-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0254.fits.wcscat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=491, passed=7902
Got 7902 stars (including 7404 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-04-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0254.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 7902 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.1'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.1 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013015 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010412 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 974 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 972 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 966 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 972 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7863 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 974 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 972 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7862 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 972 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7862 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45"
Excluding outliers - 972 stars left (next iteration limit 1069)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-04-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0254.fits N_match=972 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.434 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.305 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.614 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.356 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.660 n_q1=254 n_q2=258 n_q3=223 n_q4=237 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.519
The image catalog is written to wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-04-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0254.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-04-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0254.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-04-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0254.fits -region wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-04-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0254.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-04-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0254.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.GX8iwPZkZ5 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-09_CI_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_035009_TTUQ2b1x1_3685422_jqSY9MA0/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-09_CI_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_035009_TTUQ2b1x1_3685422_jqSY9MA0/fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-09_02-53-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-09_CI_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_035009_TTUQ2b1x1_3685422_jqSY9MA0/fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-09_02-53-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-09_CI_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_035009_TTUQ2b1x1_3685422_jqSY9MA0/fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-09_02-53-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-09_CI_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_035009_TTUQ2b1x1_3685422_jqSY9MA0/fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-09_02-53-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-09_CI_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_035009_TTUQ2b1x1_3685422_jqSY9MA0/fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-09_02-53-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-09_CI_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_035009_TTUQ2b1x1_3685422_jqSY9MA0/fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-09_02-53-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-09_02-53-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-09_02-53-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-09_02-53-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-09_02-53-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-09_02-53-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-09_02-53-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-09_02-53-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-09_CI_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_035009_TTUQ2b1x1_3685422_jqSY9MA0/fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-09_02-53-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-09_02-53-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits.wcscat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=386, passed=6242
Got 6242 stars (including 5851 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-09_02-53-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 6242 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013017 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010413 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 970 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 968 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 958 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 968 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6198 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 970 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 968 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6199 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 968 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6199 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45"
Excluding outliers - 968 stars left (next iteration limit 1064)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-09_02-53-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits N_match=968 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.461 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.361 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.568 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.418 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.523 n_q1=239 n_q2=261 n_q3=232 n_q4=236 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.232
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-09_02-53-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-09_02-53-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-09_CI_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_035009_TTUQ2b1x1_3685422_jqSY9MA0/fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-09_02-53-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits -region wcs_fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-09_02-53-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-09_02-53-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.0obS4BUfy6 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-09_CI_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_035009_TTUQ2b1x1_3685422_jqSY9MA0/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-09_CI_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_035009_TTUQ2b1x1_3685422_jqSY9MA0/fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-09_02-54-10_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0165.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-09_CI_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_035009_TTUQ2b1x1_3685422_jqSY9MA0/fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-09_02-54-10_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0165.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-09_CI_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_035009_TTUQ2b1x1_3685422_jqSY9MA0/fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-09_02-54-10_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0165.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-09_CI_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_035009_TTUQ2b1x1_3685422_jqSY9MA0/fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-09_02-54-10_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0165.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-09_CI_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_035009_TTUQ2b1x1_3685422_jqSY9MA0/fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-09_02-54-10_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0165.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-09_CI_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_035009_TTUQ2b1x1_3685422_jqSY9MA0/fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-09_02-54-10_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0165.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-09_02-54-10_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0165.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-09_02-54-10_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0165.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-09_02-54-10_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0165.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-09_02-54-10_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0165.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-09_02-54-10_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0165.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-09_02-54-10_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0165.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-09_02-54-10_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0165.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-09_CI_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_035009_TTUQ2b1x1_3685422_jqSY9MA0/fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-09_02-54-10_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0165.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-09_02-54-10_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0165.fits.wcscat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=376, passed=6208
Got 6208 stars (including 5826 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-09_02-54-10_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0165.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 6208 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013017 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010413 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 971 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 969 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 957 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 969 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6164 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 971 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 969 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6167 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 969 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6167 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44"
Excluding outliers - 969 stars left (next iteration limit 1065)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-09_02-54-10_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0165.fits N_match=969 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.442 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.360 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.553 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.377 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.554 n_q1=237 n_q2=261 n_q3=230 n_q4=241 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.253
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-09_02-54-10_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0165.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-09_02-54-10_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0165.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-09_CI_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_035009_TTUQ2b1x1_3685422_jqSY9MA0/fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-09_02-54-10_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0165.fits -region wcs_fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-09_02-54-10_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0165.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-09_02-54-10_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0165.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits sigma_overall=0.463 worst_q_ratio=1.480
ref2=Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-04-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0254.fits sigma_overall=0.434 worst_q_ratio=1.519
new1=fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-09_02-53-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits sigma_overall=0.461 worst_q_ratio=1.232
new2=fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-09_02-54-10_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0165.fits sigma_overall=0.442 worst_q_ratio=1.253
reference average sigma_overall=0.4485 worst_q_ratio=1.4995
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0253_astrometric_residuals.png (973 matched stars from wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.40 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-04-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0254_astrometric_residuals.png (972 matched stars from wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-04-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0254.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.38 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-09_02-53-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0164_astrometric_residuals.png (968 matched stars from wcs_fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-09_02-53-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.40 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-09_02-54-10_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0165_astrometric_residuals.png (969 matched stars from wcs_fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-09_02-54-10_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0165.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.39 arcsec)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-09_02-53-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-09_02-53-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-09_CI_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_035009_TTUQ2b1x1_3685422_jqSY9MA0/wcs_fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-09_02-53-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-09_02-54-10_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0165.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-09_02-54-10_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0165.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-09_CI_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_035009_TTUQ2b1x1_3685422_jqSY9MA0/wcs_fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-09_02-54-10_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0165.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Ser-05-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits at 15:11:43.65 -05:28:31.1: 9.46 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits at 15:09:42.09 -05:40:40.1: 12.80 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-04-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0254.fits at 15:11:43.65 -05:28:31.1: 9.47 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-04-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0254.fits at 15:09:42.09 -05:40:40.1: 12.80 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 9.47 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:11:43.65 -05:28:31.1: ref_mag=9.47 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=9.6741 delta=-0.21 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.80 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:09:42.09 -05:40:40.1: ref_mag=12.80 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.3042 delta=0.49 (need > 0.90)
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 1s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 1s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20350_fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-09_02-54-10_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0165
The candidate 20350_fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-09_02-54-10_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0165 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20359_fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-09_02-54-10_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0165
The candidate 20359_fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-09_02-54-10_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0165 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 15:18:42.73 +02:07:27.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20364_fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-09_02-54-10_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0165
The candidate 20364_fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-09_02-54-10_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0165 did not pass the final checks
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 2s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Ser-05-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 4 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-04-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0254.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-09_CI_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_035009_TTUQ2b1x1_3685422_jqSY9MA0/fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-09_02-53-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-09_CI_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_035009_TTUQ2b1x1_3685422_jqSY9MA0/fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-09_02-54-10_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0165.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-04-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0254.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-04-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0254.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-09_CI_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_035009_TTUQ2b1x1_3685422_jqSY9MA0/fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-09_02-53-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-09_CI_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_035009_TTUQ2b1x1_3685422_jqSY9MA0/fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-09_02-54-10_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0165.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-04-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0254.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-09_02-53-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-09_02-54-10_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0165.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/exclusion_list.txt
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-04-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0254.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-09_02-53-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-09_02-54-10_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0165.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits
Image size: 937.1'x624.1' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 15:25:42.825 -01:59:55.09 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.87"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-09_02-53-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-09_02-53-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits
Image size: 937.2'x624.1' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 15:25:43.234 -01:59:51.90 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 15:25:42.825 -01:59:55.09
Second-epoch image center 15:25:43.234 -01:59:51.90
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0019 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-09_02-54-10_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0165.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-09_02-54-10_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0165.fits
Image size: 937.2'x624.1' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 15:25:40.365 -01:59:43.19 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 15:25:42.825 -01:59:55.09
Second-epoch image center 15:25:40.365 -01:59:43.19
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0108 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 15:25:43.234 -01:59:51.90
Second-epoch second image center 15:25:40.365 -01:59:43.19
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01219 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits &> /tmp/tmp.n7YLweITwN
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-04-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0254.fits &> /tmp/tmp.m0tA10XYko
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-04-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0254.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-09_CI_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_035009_TTUQ2b1x1_3685422_jqSY9MA0/fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-09_02-53-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits &> /tmp/tmp.WkfvUsiW7D
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-09_CI_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_035009_TTUQ2b1x1_3685422_jqSY9MA0/fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-09_02-53-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-09_CI_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_035009_TTUQ2b1x1_3685422_jqSY9MA0/fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-09_02-54-10_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0165.fits &> /tmp/tmp.jN6zMd2yF9
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-09_CI_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_035009_TTUQ2b1x1_3685422_jqSY9MA0/fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-09_02-54-10_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0165.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits and wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits and wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits and wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits) and catalog (wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 44768 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 223.5637 to 239.3007 deg, Dec -7.2623 to +3.2655 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 223.5637 to 239.3007 deg, Dec -7.2623 to 3.2655 deg
Loaded 4374 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3590 out of 3908 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3908 out of 44768 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.657400
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.657400
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.38
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.28
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.28
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 44768 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 223.5637 to 239.3007 deg, Dec -7.2623 to +3.2655 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 223.5637 to 239.3007 deg, Dec -7.2623 to 3.2655 deg
Loaded 4374 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3590 out of 3908 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3908 out of 44768 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits (aperture=4.9)
Read 44929 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 223.5762 to 239.3172 deg, Dec -7.2589 to +3.2684 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 223.5762 to 239.3172 deg, Dec -7.2589 to 3.2684 deg
Loaded 4375 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3591 out of 3912 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3912 out of 44929 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-04-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0254.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-04-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0254.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-04-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0254.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-04-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0254.fits (aperture=4.9)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 35 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 8000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.3 pix Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits
2.3 pix Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-04-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0254.fits
2.1 pix fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-09_02-53-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits
2.1 pix fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-09_02-54-10_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0165.fits
2.3 pix wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits
2.3 pix wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-04-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0254.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.3 mag. Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits
15.3 mag. Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-04-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0254.fits
15.1 mag. fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-09_02-53-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits
15.1 mag. fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-09_02-54-10_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0165.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 15.1 (SNR ) 14.4 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.n7YLweITwN (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-09_CI_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_035009_TTUQ2b1x1_3685422_jqSY9MA0/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits' -> 'wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits.wcscat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=6, blended=2413, passed=44762
Got 44762 stars (including 42284 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 44762 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.1'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.1 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013015 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010412 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 968 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 967 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 957 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 967 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 44446 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 968 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 967 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 44447 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 967 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 44447 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
Excluding outliers - 967 stars left (next iteration limit 1063)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits N_match=967 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.444 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.326 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.555 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.370 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.697 n_q1=265 n_q2=244 n_q3=236 n_q4=222 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.570
The image catalog is written to wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits -region wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.m0tA10XYko (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-09_CI_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_035009_TTUQ2b1x1_3685422_jqSY9MA0/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-04-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0254.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-04-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0254.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-04-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0254.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-04-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0254.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-04-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0254.fits
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-09_CI_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_035009_TTUQ2b1x1_3685422_jqSY9MA0/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh: line 136: echo: write error: Broken pipe
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-04-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0254.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-04-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0254.fits' -> 'wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-04-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0254.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-04-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0254.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-04-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0254.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-04-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0254.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-04-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0254.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-04-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0254.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-04-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0254.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-04-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0254.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-04-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0254.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-04-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0254.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-04-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0254.fits.wcscat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=10, blended=2430, passed=44919
Got 44919 stars (including 42424 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-04-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0254.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 44919 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.1'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.1 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013015 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010412 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 970 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 968 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 960 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 968 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 44638 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 970 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 968 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 44638 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 968 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 44638 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
Excluding outliers - 968 stars left (next iteration limit 1064)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-04-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0254.fits N_match=968 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.405 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.279 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.548 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.347 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.685 n_q1=267 n_q2=248 n_q3=232 n_q4=221 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.689
The image catalog is written to wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-04-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0254.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-04-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0254.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-04-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0254.fits -region wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-04-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0254.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-04-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0254.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.WkfvUsiW7D (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-09_CI_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_035009_TTUQ2b1x1_3685422_jqSY9MA0/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-09_CI_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_035009_TTUQ2b1x1_3685422_jqSY9MA0/fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-09_02-53-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-09_CI_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_035009_TTUQ2b1x1_3685422_jqSY9MA0/fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-09_02-53-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-09_CI_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_035009_TTUQ2b1x1_3685422_jqSY9MA0/fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-09_02-53-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-09_CI_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_035009_TTUQ2b1x1_3685422_jqSY9MA0/fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-09_02-53-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-09_CI_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_035009_TTUQ2b1x1_3685422_jqSY9MA0/fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-09_02-53-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-09_CI_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_035009_TTUQ2b1x1_3685422_jqSY9MA0/fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-09_02-53-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-09_02-53-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-09_02-53-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-09_02-53-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-09_02-53-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-09_02-53-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-09_02-53-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-09_02-53-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-09_CI_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_035009_TTUQ2b1x1_3685422_jqSY9MA0/fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-09_02-53-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-09_02-53-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits.wcscat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=5, blended=1766, passed=38871
Got 38871 stars (including 37054 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-09_02-53-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 38871 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013017 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010413 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 970 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 969 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 960 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 969 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 38627 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 970 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 969 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 38626 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 969 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 38626 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
Excluding outliers - 969 stars left (next iteration limit 1065)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-09_02-53-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits N_match=969 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.462 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.378 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.523 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.429 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.542 n_q1=253 n_q2=250 n_q3=237 n_q4=229 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.174
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-09_02-53-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-09_02-53-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-09_CI_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_035009_TTUQ2b1x1_3685422_jqSY9MA0/fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-09_02-53-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits -region wcs_fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-09_02-53-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-09_02-53-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.jN6zMd2yF9 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-09_CI_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_035009_TTUQ2b1x1_3685422_jqSY9MA0/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-09_CI_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_035009_TTUQ2b1x1_3685422_jqSY9MA0/fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-09_02-54-10_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0165.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-09_CI_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_035009_TTUQ2b1x1_3685422_jqSY9MA0/fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-09_02-54-10_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0165.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-09_CI_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_035009_TTUQ2b1x1_3685422_jqSY9MA0/fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-09_02-54-10_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0165.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-09_CI_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_035009_TTUQ2b1x1_3685422_jqSY9MA0/fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-09_02-54-10_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0165.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-09_CI_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_035009_TTUQ2b1x1_3685422_jqSY9MA0/fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-09_02-54-10_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0165.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-09_CI_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_035009_TTUQ2b1x1_3685422_jqSY9MA0/fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-09_02-54-10_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0165.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-09_02-54-10_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0165.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-09_02-54-10_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0165.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-09_02-54-10_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0165.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-09_02-54-10_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0165.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-09_02-54-10_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0165.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-09_02-54-10_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0165.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-09_02-54-10_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0165.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-09_CI_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_035009_TTUQ2b1x1_3685422_jqSY9MA0/fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-09_02-54-10_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0165.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-09_02-54-10_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0165.fits.wcscat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=6, blended=1827, passed=38830
Got 38830 stars (including 36953 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-09_02-54-10_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0165.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 38830 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013017 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010413 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 969 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 968 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 959 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 968 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 38587 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 969 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 968 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 38588 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 968 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 38588 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
Excluding outliers - 968 stars left (next iteration limit 1064)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-09_02-54-10_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0165.fits N_match=968 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.446 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.340 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.551 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.390 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.586 n_q1=253 n_q2=254 n_q3=232 n_q4=229 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.315
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-09_02-54-10_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0165.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-09_02-54-10_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0165.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-09_CI_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_035009_TTUQ2b1x1_3685422_jqSY9MA0/fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-09_02-54-10_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0165.fits -region wcs_fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-09_02-54-10_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0165.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-09_02-54-10_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0165.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-09_02-53-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-09_CI_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_035009_TTUQ2b1x1_3685422_jqSY9MA0/wcs_fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-09_02-53-24_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-09_02-54-10_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0165.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-09_CI_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_035009_TTUQ2b1x1_3685422_jqSY9MA0/wcs_fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-09_02-54-10_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0165.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Ser-05-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits at 15:22:05.01 -00:23:20.6: 13.12 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits at 15:35:46.54 +01:43:41.2: 14.16 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits at 15:13:58.10 +00:32:09.2: 13.89 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits at 15:35:49.27 -06:10:48.3: 13.35 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits at 15:24:07.64 +02:03:39.6: 15.91 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits at 15:36:16.68 -04:41:25.3: 14.83 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits at 15:18:54.84 +00:44:42.6: 13.79 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits at 15:18:19.95 +02:03:33.7: 13.12 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits at 15:10:23.53 -01:27:03.8: 14.41 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-04-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0254.fits at 15:35:46.54 +01:43:41.2: 14.30 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.22 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-04-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0254.fits at 15:13:58.10 +00:32:09.2: 13.94 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:35:46.54 +01:43:41.2: ref_mag=14.22 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.4268 delta=-0.21 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-04-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0254.fits at 15:18:19.95 +02:03:33.7: 13.00 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-04-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0254.fits at 15:35:49.27 -06:10:48.3: 13.34 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-04-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0254.fits at 15:36:16.68 -04:41:25.3: 14.53 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-04-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0254.fits at 15:22:05.01 -00:23:20.6: 13.29 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.35 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.92 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-04-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0254.fits at 15:24:07.64 +02:03:39.6: 15.92 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.05 +/- 0.07
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:35:49.27 -06:10:48.3: ref_mag=13.35 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.5146 delta=-0.17 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:13:58.10 +00:32:09.2: ref_mag=13.92 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=14.1971 delta=-0.28 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:18:19.95 +02:03:33.7: ref_mag=13.05 +/- 0.07 new_mean_mag=12.9643 delta=0.08 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-04-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0254.fits at 15:10:23.53 -01:27:03.8: 14.38 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.64 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.19 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:36:16.68 -04:41:25.3: ref_mag=14.64 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=14.6409 delta=-0.00 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:22:05.01 -00:23:20.6: ref_mag=13.19 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.2520 delta=-0.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.40 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:10:23.53 -01:27:03.8: ref_mag=14.40 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=14.4020 delta=-0.00 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-04-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0254.fits at 15:18:54.84 +00:44:42.6: 13.79 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.79 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:18:54.84 +00:44:42.6: ref_mag=13.79 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.8774 delta=-0.08 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits at 15:20:13.82 -00:04:54.8: 13.90 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits at 15:40:40.27 -06:04:00.5: 14.99 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits at 15:21:09.51 -05:40:34.8: 14.17 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits at 15:29:38.79 -01:03:59.4: 15.98 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits at 15:18:52.39 +02:03:54.6: 14.26 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits at 15:49:46.37 +01:04:17.7: 15.18 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits at 15:35:28.77 -05:52:57.7: 14.73 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits at 15:51:03.13 -03:04:35.3: 14.81 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits at 15:31:12.73 -05:11:27.7: 14.09 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-04-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0254.fits at 15:40:40.27 -06:04:00.5: 15.07 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-04-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0254.fits at 15:35:28.77 -05:52:57.7: 14.76 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.03 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:40:40.27 -06:04:00.5: ref_mag=15.03 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=14.5297 delta=0.50 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.74 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-04-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0254.fits at 15:18:52.39 +02:03:54.6: 14.52 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:35:28.77 -05:52:57.7: ref_mag=14.74 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.4684 delta=0.27 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-04-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0254.fits at 15:20:13.82 -00:04:54.8: 13.78 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.35 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:18:52.39 +02:03:54.6: ref_mag=14.35 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.5739 delta=-0.23 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.84 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-04-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0254.fits at 15:29:38.79 -01:03:59.4: 15.99 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:20:13.82 -00:04:54.8: ref_mag=13.84 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.9407 delta=-0.11 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-04-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0254.fits at 15:49:46.37 +01:04:17.7: 15.56 +/- 0.30 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.30 +/- 0.17
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 15:49:46.37 +01:04:17.7: ref_mag=15.30 +/- 0.17 new_mean_mag=14.2618 delta=1.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-04-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0254.fits at 15:51:03.13 -03:04:35.3: 15.16 +/- 0.27 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-04-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0254.fits at 15:21:09.51 -05:40:34.8: 14.16 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.92 +/- 0.15
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-04-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0254.fits at 15:31:12.73 -05:11:27.7: 13.97 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:51:03.13 -03:04:35.3: ref_mag=14.92 +/- 0.15 new_mean_mag=14.5537 delta=0.37 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.17 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.02 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:21:09.51 -05:40:34.8: ref_mag=14.17 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.2958 delta=-0.13 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:31:12.73 -05:11:27.7: ref_mag=14.02 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=14.0364 delta=-0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits at 15:24:01.48 -00:50:02.1: 14.69 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits at 15:19:02.44 +02:04:59.3: 14.62 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits at 15:31:00.57 +00:05:36.5: 14.75 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits at 15:41:36.99 +02:11:03.5: 15.29 +/- 0.22 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits at 15:28:43.95 +01:32:32.0: 15.51 +/- 0.24 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits at 15:09:20.71 +01:13:36.6: 15.25 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits at 15:27:47.47 +00:09:20.4: 14.46 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-04-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0254.fits at 15:24:01.48 -00:50:02.1: 14.77 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.73 +/- 0.08
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-04-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0254.fits at 15:19:02.44 +02:04:59.3: 14.63 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:24:01.48 -00:50:02.1: ref_mag=14.73 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=14.7103 delta=0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-04-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0254.fits at 15:31:00.57 +00:05:36.5: 14.91 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.62 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:19:02.44 +02:04:59.3: ref_mag=14.62 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=14.6192 delta=0.00 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.82 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:31:00.57 +00:05:36.5: ref_mag=14.82 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=14.7437 delta=0.08 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-04-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0254.fits at 15:41:36.99 +02:11:03.5: 15.51 +/- 0.26 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.38 +/- 0.17
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:41:36.99 +02:11:03.5: ref_mag=15.38 +/- 0.17 new_mean_mag=14.7785 delta=0.60 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-04-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0254.fits at 15:28:43.95 +01:32:32.0: 15.24 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-04-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0254.fits at 15:09:20.71 +01:13:36.6: 15.76 +/- 0.30 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-04-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0254.fits at 15:27:47.47 +00:09:20.4: 14.53 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.34 +/- 0.15
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.49 +/- 0.07
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:28:43.95 +01:32:32.0: ref_mag=15.34 +/- 0.15 new_mean_mag=14.8557 delta=0.49 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.39 +/- 0.16
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:27:47.47 +00:09:20.4: ref_mag=14.49 +/- 0.07 new_mean_mag=14.6086 delta=-0.12 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 15:09:20.71 +01:13:36.6: ref_mag=15.39 +/- 0.16 new_mean_mag=14.4468 delta=0.95 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits at 15:52:30.77 -02:18:22.1: 14.68 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits at 15:33:20.43 -04:00:31.9: 14.73 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits at 15:41:17.49 -00:32:48.0: 15.07 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits at 15:39:05.69 -05:50:43.4: 15.09 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits at 15:40:29.33 -04:20:25.8: 14.77 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits at 15:38:51.97 +01:12:53.6: 15.11 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-04-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0254.fits at 15:52:30.77 -02:18:22.1: 14.66 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-04-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0254.fits at 15:33:20.43 -04:00:31.9: 14.62 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.67 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:52:30.77 -02:18:22.1: ref_mag=14.67 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.6512 delta=0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-04-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0254.fits at 15:41:17.49 -00:32:48.0: 15.07 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.67 +/- 0.08
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:33:20.43 -04:00:31.9: ref_mag=14.67 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=14.6956 delta=-0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.07 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:41:17.49 -00:32:48.0: ref_mag=15.07 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.8280 delta=0.24 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-04-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0254.fits at 15:39:05.69 -05:50:43.4: 14.92 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.99 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:39:05.69 -05:50:43.4: ref_mag=14.99 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.8154 delta=0.18 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-04-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0254.fits at 15:38:51.97 +01:12:53.6: 15.29 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-04-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0254.fits at 15:40:29.33 -04:20:25.8: 14.73 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.18 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.75 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:38:51.97 +01:12:53.6: ref_mag=15.18 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=14.8499 delta=0.33 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:40:29.33 -04:20:25.8: ref_mag=14.75 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.7305 delta=0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits at 15:48:13.16 -02:03:54.0: 15.70 +/- 0.33 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-04-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0254.fits at 15:48:13.16 -02:03:54.0: 15.20 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.35 +/- 0.18
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:48:13.16 -02:03:54.0: ref_mag=15.35 +/- 0.18 new_mean_mag=14.8324 delta=0.52 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out53297.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_apass.txt__out53340.dat to exclusion_list_apass.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out53217.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out53318.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 12s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 2s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53164_fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-09_02-54-10_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0165
The candidate 53164_fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-09_02-54-10_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0165 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53168_fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-09_02-54-10_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0165
The candidate 53168_fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-09_02-54-10_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0165 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 15:41:13.96 +01:27:47.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53170_fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-09_02-54-10_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0165
The candidate 53170_fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-09_02-54-10_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0165 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53174_fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-09_02-54-10_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0165
The candidate 53174_fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-09_02-54-10_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0165 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53178_fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-09_02-54-10_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0165
The candidate 53178_fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-09_02-54-10_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0165 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53182_fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-09_02-54-10_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0165
The candidate 53182_fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-09_02-54-10_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0165 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53187_fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-09_02-54-10_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0165
The candidate 53187_fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-09_02-54-10_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0165 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53190_fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-09_02-54-10_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0165
The candidate 53190_fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-09_02-54-10_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0165 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53217_fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-09_02-54-10_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0165
Preparing report for the candidate 53217_fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-09_02-54-10_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0165
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53224_fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-09_02-54-10_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0165
The candidate 53224_fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-09_02-54-10_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0165 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53243_fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-09_02-54-10_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0165
The candidate 53243_fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-09_02-54-10_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0165 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 15:18:16.11 +02:04:33.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53253_fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-09_02-54-10_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0165
The candidate 53253_fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-09_02-54-10_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0165 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 15:18:08.24 +00:47:36.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53261_fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-09_02-54-10_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0165
The candidate 53261_fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-09_02-54-10_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0165 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53273_fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-09_02-54-10_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0165
The candidate 53273_fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-09_02-54-10_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0165 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53285_fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-09_02-54-10_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0165
The candidate 53285_fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-09_02-54-10_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0165 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53297_fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-09_02-54-10_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0165
The candidate 53297_fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-09_02-54-10_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0165 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 15:49:46.37 +01:04:17.7 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.27, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.25)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.128 4422714024411317120 237.44346168933 +01.07176779816 14.9310 14.5156 VARIABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.128#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53318_fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-09_02-54-10_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0165
Preparing report for the candidate 53318_fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-09_02-54-10_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0165
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53321_fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-09_02-54-10_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0165
The candidate 53321_fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-09_02-54-10_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0165 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53322_fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-09_02-54-10_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0165
The candidate 53322_fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-09_02-54-10_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0165 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53325_fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-09_02-54-10_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0165
The candidate 53325_fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-09_02-54-10_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0165 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53329_fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-09_02-54-10_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0165
The candidate 53329_fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-09_02-54-10_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0165 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53340_fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-09_02-54-10_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0165
The candidate 53340_fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-09_02-54-10_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0165 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 15:09:20.71 +01:13:36.6 in APASS (TIMEOUTCOMMAND_GAIA_VIZIER=#timeout 40 #, MAG_MEAN=14.51, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.49)
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53344_fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-09_02-54-10_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0165
The candidate 53344_fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-09_02-54-10_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0165 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53346_fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-09_02-54-10_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0165
The candidate 53346_fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-09_02-54-10_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0165 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53351_fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-09_02-54-10_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0165
The candidate 53351_fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-09_02-54-10_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0165 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53371_fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-09_02-54-10_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0165
The candidate 53371_fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-09_02-54-10_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0165 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53388_fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-09_02-54-10_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0165
The candidate 53388_fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-09_02-54-10_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0165 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53392_fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-09_02-54-10_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0165
The candidate 53392_fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-09_02-54-10_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0165 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53393_fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-09_02-54-10_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0165
The candidate 53393_fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-09_02-54-10_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0165 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53395_fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-09_02-54-10_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0165
The candidate 53395_fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-09_02-54-10_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0165 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53403_fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-09_02-54-10_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0165
The candidate 53403_fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-09_02-54-10_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0165 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53408_fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-09_02-54-10_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0165
The candidate 53408_fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-09_02-54-10_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0165 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53414_fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-09_02-54-10_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0165
The candidate 53414_fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-09_02-54-10_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0165 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53431_fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-09_02-54-10_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0165
The candidate 53431_fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-09_02-54-10_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0165 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53448_fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-09_02-54-10_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0165
The candidate 53448_fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-09_02-54-10_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0165 did not pass the final checks