This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-09_CI_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_030211_TTUQ1b1x1_3651090_xvZ6Veek
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 09.3261 2461200.8261 11.66 19:39:47.34 -26:24:05.3
13.42838 -21.69654 galactic Sgr Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.1" and 6.5 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.451 Patientia -1 -0 1 11.8 0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits at 19:39:47.34 -26:24:05.3: 14.88 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_05-02-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits at 19:39:47.34 -26:24:05.3: 14.77 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461200.8261,11.66,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260609.3261 11.66CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 09.3261 2461200.8261 12.27 20:03:40.63 -28:52:14.3
12.75614 -27.50187 galactic Sgr Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.4" and 6.2 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.455 Bruchsalia 0 -1 1 12.2 0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits at 20:03:40.63 -28:52:14.3: 15.00 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_05-02-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits at 20:03:40.63 -28:52:14.3: 14.96 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461200.8261,12.27,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260609.3261 12.27CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 09.3261 2461200.8261 13.24 19:55:06.50 -29:03:35.2
11.91417 -25.77498 galactic Sgr Second-epoch detections are separated by 3.7" and 5.7 pix
The object was found in VSX 6" ASASSN-V J195506.12-290338.8
Type: L
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
14.310 V 14.970 V
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits at 19:55:06.50 -29:03:35.2: 14.15 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_05-02-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits at 19:55:06.50 -29:03:35.2: 14.34 +/- 0.23 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.21 +/- 0.13
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ASASSN-V J195506.12-290338.8,2461200.8261,13.24,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ASASSN-V J195506.12-290338.8 20260609.3261 13.24CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 09.3261 2461200.8261 11.10 19:38:57.56 -24:53:27.2
14.87293 -20.98486 galactic Sgr Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.1" and 6.5 pix
The object was found in VSX 3" ASAS J193857-2453.5
Type: MISC
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
11.910 V Y 2.020 V 2452418.10000 194.975601000000
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits at 19:38:57.56 -24:53:27.2: 12.10 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_05-02-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits at 19:38:57.56 -24:53:27.2: 12.06 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.08 +/- 0.02
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ASAS J193857-2453.5,2461200.8261,11.10,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ASAS J193857-2453.5 20260609.3261 11.10CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 09.3261 2461200.8261 12.29 19:53:18.05 -23:41:51.2
17.33503 -23.61434 galactic Sgr Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.3" and 6.3 pix
The object was found in VSX 2" ASAS J195318-2341.8
Type: MISC
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
9.417 Ic Y 0.567 Ic 2452510.50000 85.420000000000
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits at 19:53:18.05 -23:41:51.2: 13.34 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_05-02-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits at 19:53:18.05 -23:41:51.2: 13.37 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.35 +/- 0.06
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ASAS J195318-2341.8,2461200.8261,12.29,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ASAS J195318-2341.8 20260609.3261 12.29CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 09.3261 2461200.8261 11.86 19:47:09.53 -28:08:20.6
12.25980 -23.82722 galactic Sgr Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.2" and 6.5 pix
The object was found in VSX 1" ASASSN-V J194709.42-280820.9
Type: L
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
13.100 V 13.680 V
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits at 19:47:09.53 -28:08:20.6: 12.81 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_05-02-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits at 19:47:09.53 -28:08:20.6: 12.87 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.84 +/- 0.04
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ASASSN-V J194709.42-280820.9,2461200.8261,11.86,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ASASSN-V J194709.42-280820.9 20260609.3261 11.86CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461172.91960030 12.05.2026 10:04:03.466 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits
First image: 2461172.91960030 12.05.2026 10:04:03.466 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits
Last image: 2461200.82633530 09.06.2026 07:49:45.370 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-09_CI_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_030211_TTUQ1b1x1_3651090_xvZ6Veek/fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-49-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 28
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -8.29
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 8 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 7419
Objects passed selection criteria: 7414
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.6 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.6 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 6935.5
Average stars matched: 6746.5 (97.2749 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 112956 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Mon Jun 8 11:26:26 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-95-g079870fa
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-06-08)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Tue Jun 9 03:06:33 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461172.91960030 12.05.2026 10:04:03.466 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits
First image: 2461172.91960030 12.05.2026 10:04:03.466 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits
Last image: 2461200.82633530 09.06.2026 07:49:45.370 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-09_CI_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_030211_TTUQ1b1x1_3651090_xvZ6Veek/fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-49-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 90
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.98
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 28 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 54213
Objects passed selection criteria: 54127
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.3 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.3 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 47885.8
Average stars matched: 46502.8 (97.1119 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 154620 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Mon Jun 8 11:26:26 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-95-g079870fa
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-06-08)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Tue Jun 9 03:10:16 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 3.5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_05-02-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-09_CI_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_030211_TTUQ1b1x1_3651090_xvZ6Veek/fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-49-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0166.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-09_CI_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_030211_TTUQ1b1x1_3651090_xvZ6Veek/fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-49-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_05-02-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_05-02-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-09_CI_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_030211_TTUQ1b1x1_3651090_xvZ6Veek/fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-49-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0166.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-09_CI_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_030211_TTUQ1b1x1_3651090_xvZ6Veek/fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-49-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461200.82585904
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits'
wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_05-02-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_05-02-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_05-02-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_05-02-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits'
wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-49-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0166.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-49-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0166.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-49-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0166.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-49-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0166.fits'
wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-49-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-49-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-49-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-49-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167.fits'
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits
Image size: 937.4'x624.6' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.87"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 20:09:38.992 -25:59:45.66 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.87"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-49-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0166.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-49-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0166.fits
Image size: 941.1'x626.9' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 20:09:38.352 -25:59:50.22 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 20:09:38.992 -25:59:45.66
Second-epoch image center 20:09:38.352 -25:59:50.22
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0027 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-49-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-49-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167.fits
Image size: 941.1'x626.9' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 20:09:35.591 -25:59:55.70 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 20:09:38.992 -25:59:45.66
Second-epoch image center 20:09:35.591 -25:59:55.70
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0130 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 20:09:38.352 -25:59:50.22
Second-epoch second image center 20:09:35.591 -25:59:55.70
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01045 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits &> /tmp/tmp.EWHab6CJIY
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_05-02-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits &> /tmp/tmp.kpI44wUjYS
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_05-02-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-09_CI_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_030211_TTUQ1b1x1_3651090_xvZ6Veek/fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-49-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0166.fits &> /tmp/tmp.BDgFyXjo8j
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-09_CI_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_030211_TTUQ1b1x1_3651090_xvZ6Veek/fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-49-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0166.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-09_CI_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_030211_TTUQ1b1x1_3651090_xvZ6Veek/fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-49-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167.fits &> /tmp/tmp.b6177I69ak
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-09_CI_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_030211_TTUQ1b1x1_3651090_xvZ6Veek/fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-49-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits and wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits and wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits and wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits) and catalog (wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 7487 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 293.3532 to 311.4449 deg, Dec -31.2591 to -20.5808 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 293.3532 to 311.4449 deg, Dec -31.2591 to -20.5808 deg
Loaded 9410 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 5874 out of 6007 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 6007 out of 7487 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.601900
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.601900
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -8.29
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.31
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.31
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 7487 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 293.3532 to 311.4449 deg, Dec -31.2591 to -20.5808 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 293.3532 to 311.4449 deg, Dec -31.2591 to -20.5808 deg
Loaded 9410 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 5874 out of 6007 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 6007 out of 7487 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits (aperture=6.3)
Read 6777 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 293.3531 to 311.4448 deg, Dec -31.2697 to -20.5709 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 293.3531 to 311.4448 deg, Dec -31.2697 to -20.5709 deg
Loaded 9431 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 5463 out of 5572 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 5572 out of 6777 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_05-02-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_05-02-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_05-02-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_05-02-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits (aperture=6.3)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 26 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 8000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.3 pix Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits
2.3 pix Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_05-02-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits
4.1 pix fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-49-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0166.fits
4.1 pix fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-49-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167.fits
2.3 pix wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits
2.3 pix wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_05-02-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
14.3 mag. Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits
14.2 mag. Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_05-02-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits
13.9 mag. fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-49-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0166.fits
13.9 mag. fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-49-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 13.9 (SNR ) 11.3 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.EWHab6CJIY (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-09_CI_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_030211_TTUQ1b1x1_3651090_xvZ6Veek/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits 572.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits' -> 'wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits.wcscat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=461, passed=7487
Got 7487 stars (including 7021 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 7487 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013019 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010416 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 349 (Dec -31.3 to -20.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 967 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 967 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 963 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.54"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 967 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7415 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.53"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 349 (Dec -31.3 to -20.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 967 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 967 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7415 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.53"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 967 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7415 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.56"
Excluding outliers - 967 stars left (next iteration limit 1063)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits N_match=967 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.544 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.429 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.671 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.521 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.715 n_q1=238 n_q2=214 n_q3=259 n_q4=256 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.314
The image catalog is written to wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits -region wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.kpI44wUjYS (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_05-02-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-09_CI_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_030211_TTUQ1b1x1_3651090_xvZ6Veek/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_05-02-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits 572.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_05-02-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_05-02-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_05-02-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_05-02-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_05-02-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_05-02-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_05-02-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits' -> 'wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_05-02-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_05-02-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_05-02-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_05-02-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_05-02-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_05-02-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_05-02-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_05-02-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_05-02-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_05-02-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_05-02-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits.wcscat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=434, passed=6777
Got 6777 stars (including 6336 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_05-02-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 6777 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013019 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010416 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 349 (Dec -31.3 to -20.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 970 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 970 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 965 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.51"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 970 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6720 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.51"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 349 (Dec -31.3 to -20.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 970 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 970 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6721 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.51"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 970 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6721 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.53"
Excluding outliers - 970 stars left (next iteration limit 1067)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_05-02-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits N_match=970 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.498 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.410 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.598 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.505 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.620 n_q1=240 n_q2=208 n_q3=266 n_q4=256 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.246
The image catalog is written to wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_05-02-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_05-02-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_05-02-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits -region wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_05-02-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_05-02-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.BDgFyXjo8j (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-09_CI_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_030211_TTUQ1b1x1_3651090_xvZ6Veek/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-09_CI_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_030211_TTUQ1b1x1_3651090_xvZ6Veek/fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-49-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0166.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-09_CI_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_030211_TTUQ1b1x1_3651090_xvZ6Veek/fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-49-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0166.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-09_CI_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_030211_TTUQ1b1x1_3651090_xvZ6Veek/fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-49-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0166.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-09_CI_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_030211_TTUQ1b1x1_3651090_xvZ6Veek/fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-49-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0166.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-09_CI_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_030211_TTUQ1b1x1_3651090_xvZ6Veek/fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-49-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0166.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-09_CI_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_030211_TTUQ1b1x1_3651090_xvZ6Veek/fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-49-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0166.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-49-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0166.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-49-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0166.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-49-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0166.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-49-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0166.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-49-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0166.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-49-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0166.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-49-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0166.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-09_CI_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_030211_TTUQ1b1x1_3651090_xvZ6Veek/fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-49-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0166.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-49-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0166.fits.wcscat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=266, passed=6824
Got 6824 stars (including 6557 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-49-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0166.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 6824 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.1'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.1 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013071 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010457 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 292 to 351 (Dec -31.5 to -20.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 969 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 969 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 966 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 969 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6788 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 292 to 351 (Dec -31.5 to -20.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 969 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 969 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6787 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 969 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6787 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Excluding outliers - 969 stars left (next iteration limit 1065)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-49-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0166.fits N_match=969 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.371 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.455 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.394 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.351 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.281 n_q1=247 n_q2=203 n_q3=273 n_q4=246 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.226
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-49-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0166.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-49-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0166.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-09_CI_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_030211_TTUQ1b1x1_3651090_xvZ6Veek/fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-49-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0166.fits -region wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-49-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0166.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-49-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0166.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.b6177I69ak (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-09_CI_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_030211_TTUQ1b1x1_3651090_xvZ6Veek/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-09_CI_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_030211_TTUQ1b1x1_3651090_xvZ6Veek/fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-49-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-09_CI_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_030211_TTUQ1b1x1_3651090_xvZ6Veek/fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-49-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-09_CI_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_030211_TTUQ1b1x1_3651090_xvZ6Veek/fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-49-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-09_CI_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_030211_TTUQ1b1x1_3651090_xvZ6Veek/fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-49-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-09_CI_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_030211_TTUQ1b1x1_3651090_xvZ6Veek/fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-49-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-09_CI_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_030211_TTUQ1b1x1_3651090_xvZ6Veek/fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-49-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-49-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-49-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-49-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-49-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-49-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-49-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-49-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-09_CI_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_030211_TTUQ1b1x1_3651090_xvZ6Veek/fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-49-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-49-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167.fits.wcscat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=267, passed=6822
Got 6822 stars (including 6552 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-49-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 6822 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.1'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.1 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013071 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010457 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 292 to 351 (Dec -31.5 to -20.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 970 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 970 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 967 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 970 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6780 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 292 to 351 (Dec -31.5 to -20.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 970 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 970 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6778 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 970 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6778 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Excluding outliers - 970 stars left (next iteration limit 1067)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-49-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167.fits N_match=970 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.394 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.490 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.443 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.358 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.340 n_q1=242 n_q2=205 n_q3=276 n_q4=247 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.243
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-49-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-49-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-09_CI_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_030211_TTUQ1b1x1_3651090_xvZ6Veek/fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-49-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167.fits -region wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-49-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-49-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits sigma_overall=0.544 worst_q_ratio=1.314
ref2=Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_05-02-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits sigma_overall=0.498 worst_q_ratio=1.246
new1=fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-49-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0166.fits sigma_overall=0.371 worst_q_ratio=1.226
new2=fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-49-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167.fits sigma_overall=0.394 worst_q_ratio=1.243
reference average sigma_overall=0.521 worst_q_ratio=1.28
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446_astrometric_residuals.png (967 matched stars from wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.49 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_05-02-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0447_astrometric_residuals.png (970 matched stars from wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_05-02-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.47 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-49-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0166_astrometric_residuals.png (969 matched stars from wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-49-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0166.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.36 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-49-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167_astrometric_residuals.png (970 matched stars from wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-49-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.35 arcsec)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-49-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0166.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-49-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0166.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-09_CI_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_030211_TTUQ1b1x1_3651090_xvZ6Veek/wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-49-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0166.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-49-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-49-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-09_CI_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_030211_TTUQ1b1x1_3651090_xvZ6Veek/wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-49-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Cap-04-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits at 19:51:21.25 -21:24:44.2: 11.56 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits at 19:47:33.19 -21:08:45.4: 11.85 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits at 19:51:24.42 -20:42:11.2: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits at 19:45:29.31 -24:51:34.9: 11.39 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits at 20:12:15.58 -23:20:53.6: 11.47 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits at 19:38:57.56 -24:53:27.3: 12.01 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits at 20:06:47.76 -27:12:40.4: 10.71 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits at 19:41:38.77 -20:53:44.3: 11.79 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits at 19:58:31.02 -26:05:28.3: 11.53 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_05-02-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits at 19:45:29.31 -24:51:34.9: 11.42 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_05-02-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits at 20:12:15.58 -23:20:53.6: 11.50 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.40 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_05-02-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits at 19:51:24.42 -20:42:11.2: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:51:24.42 -20:42:11.2: at least one reference image reported edge (off-image or aperture/annulus past image boundary); cannot perform the forced-photometry cross-check
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:45:29.31 -24:51:34.9: ref_mag=11.40 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.2913 delta=0.11 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.48 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_05-02-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits at 19:47:33.19 -21:08:45.4: 11.80 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:12:15.58 -23:20:53.6: ref_mag=11.48 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.4143 delta=0.07 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_05-02-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits at 19:41:38.77 -20:53:44.3: 11.79 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_05-02-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits at 20:06:47.76 -27:12:40.4: 10.77 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.79 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.83 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:41:38.77 -20:53:44.3: ref_mag=11.79 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=11.2705 delta=0.52 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:47:33.19 -21:08:45.4: ref_mag=11.83 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=11.2840 delta=0.54 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 10.74 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:06:47.76 -27:12:40.4: ref_mag=10.74 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=10.2172 delta=0.52 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits at 20:11:43.71 -22:10:24.8: 11.67 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_05-02-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits at 19:38:57.56 -24:53:27.3: 11.93 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.97 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:38:57.56 -24:53:27.3: ref_mag=11.97 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=11.1160 delta=0.86 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_05-02-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits at 19:58:31.02 -26:05:28.3: 11.55 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.54 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:58:31.02 -26:05:28.3: ref_mag=11.54 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.4911 delta=0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_05-02-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits at 19:51:21.25 -21:24:44.2: 11.56 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.56 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:51:21.25 -21:24:44.2: ref_mag=11.56 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.3204 delta=0.24 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_05-02-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits at 20:11:43.71 -22:10:24.8: 11.63 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.65 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:11:43.71 -22:10:24.8: ref_mag=11.65 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.4267 delta=0.22 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits at 20:00:11.17 -24:17:54.9: 11.55 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits at 20:05:34.67 -24:47:06.6: 11.56 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits at 20:08:17.22 -25:53:27.9: 11.50 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits at 19:54:21.21 -24:17:25.0: 11.79 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits at 19:39:25.51 -22:02:43.3: 11.82 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits at 20:05:40.12 -22:48:51.5: 11.64 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits at 20:09:03.20 -23:52:03.9: 11.53 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits at 20:01:44.27 -24:17:40.8: 11.57 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_05-02-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits at 20:05:34.67 -24:47:06.6: 11.57 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits at 20:19:19.78 -23:14:55.2: 11.59 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.56 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_05-02-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits at 20:00:11.17 -24:17:54.9: 11.54 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:05:34.67 -24:47:06.6: ref_mag=11.56 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.5115 delta=0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.55 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:00:11.17 -24:17:54.9: ref_mag=11.55 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.4813 delta=0.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_05-02-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits at 20:08:17.22 -25:53:27.9: 11.51 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.50 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:08:17.22 -25:53:27.9: ref_mag=11.50 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.5301 delta=-0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits at 20:02:20.35 -25:01:49.6: 11.58 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_05-02-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits at 19:54:21.21 -24:17:25.0: 11.74 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.77 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:54:21.21 -24:17:25.0: ref_mag=11.77 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.5270 delta=0.24 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_05-02-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits at 19:39:25.51 -22:02:43.3: 11.93 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.86 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_05-02-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits at 20:09:03.20 -23:52:03.9: 11.54 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:39:25.51 -22:02:43.3: ref_mag=11.86 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=11.5152 delta=0.34 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.53 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:09:03.20 -23:52:03.9: ref_mag=11.53 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.5143 delta=0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_05-02-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits at 20:05:40.12 -22:48:51.5: 11.62 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.63 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:05:40.12 -22:48:51.5: ref_mag=11.63 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.5462 delta=0.08 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_05-02-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits at 20:01:44.27 -24:17:40.8: 11.58 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.57 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:01:44.27 -24:17:40.8: ref_mag=11.57 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.4867 delta=0.09 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_05-02-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits at 20:19:19.78 -23:14:55.2: 11.61 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.60 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:19:19.78 -23:14:55.2: ref_mag=11.60 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.5230 delta=0.08 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_05-02-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits at 20:02:20.35 -25:01:49.6: 11.56 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.57 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:02:20.35 -25:01:49.6: ref_mag=11.57 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.5297 delta=0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits at 20:09:09.86 -23:55:16.0: 11.61 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits at 19:42:28.00 -24:59:15.9: 11.70 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_05-02-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits at 19:42:28.00 -24:59:15.9: 11.73 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_05-02-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits at 20:09:09.86 -23:55:16.0: 11.58 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.71 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:42:28.00 -24:59:15.9: ref_mag=11.71 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=11.5228 delta=0.19 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.60 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:09:09.86 -23:55:16.0: ref_mag=11.60 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.5486 delta=0.05 (need > 0.90)
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 3s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 1s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20162_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-49-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167
The candidate 20162_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-49-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:39:44.62 -22:18:04.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20204_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-49-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167
The candidate 20204_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-49-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20279_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-49-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167
The candidate 20279_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-49-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20311_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-49-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167
The candidate 20311_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-49-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20312_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-49-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167
The candidate 20312_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-49-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20314_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-49-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167
The candidate 20314_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-49-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20315_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-49-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167
The candidate 20315_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-49-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20327_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-49-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167
The candidate 20327_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-49-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20345_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-49-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167
The candidate 20345_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-49-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20349_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-49-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167
The candidate 20349_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-49-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20352_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-49-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167
The candidate 20352_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-49-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20353_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-49-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167
The candidate 20353_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-49-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20357_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-49-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167
The candidate 20357_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-49-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20358_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-49-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167
The candidate 20358_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-49-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20363_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-49-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167
The candidate 20363_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-49-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20365_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-49-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167
The candidate 20365_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-49-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20366_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-49-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167
The candidate 20366_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-49-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20368_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-49-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167
The candidate 20368_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-49-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20369_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-49-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167
The candidate 20369_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-49-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20370_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-49-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167
The candidate 20370_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-49-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20376_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-49-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167
The candidate 20376_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-49-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20378_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-49-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167
The candidate 20378_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-49-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20379_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-49-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167
The candidate 20379_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-49-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 01380_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-49-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167
The candidate 01380_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-49-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:55:56.50 -29:11:23.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 03628_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-49-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167
The candidate 03628_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-49-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:43:48.70 -25:46:56.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 01584_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-49-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167
The candidate 01584_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-49-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:40:02.76 -28:47:30.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 4s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Cap-04-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 3.5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_05-02-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-09_CI_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_030211_TTUQ1b1x1_3651090_xvZ6Veek/fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-49-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0166.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-09_CI_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_030211_TTUQ1b1x1_3651090_xvZ6Veek/fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-49-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_05-02-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_05-02-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-09_CI_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_030211_TTUQ1b1x1_3651090_xvZ6Veek/fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-49-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0166.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-09_CI_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_030211_TTUQ1b1x1_3651090_xvZ6Veek/fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-49-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_05-02-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-49-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0166.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-49-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/exclusion_list.txt
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_05-02-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-49-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0166.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-49-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits
Image size: 937.4'x624.6' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.87"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 20:09:38.992 -25:59:45.66 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.87"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-49-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0166.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-49-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0166.fits
Image size: 941.1'x626.9' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 20:09:38.352 -25:59:50.22 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 20:09:38.992 -25:59:45.66
Second-epoch image center 20:09:38.352 -25:59:50.22
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0027 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-49-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-49-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167.fits
Image size: 941.1'x626.9' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 20:09:35.591 -25:59:55.70 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 20:09:38.992 -25:59:45.66
Second-epoch image center 20:09:35.591 -25:59:55.70
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0130 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 20:09:38.352 -25:59:50.22
Second-epoch second image center 20:09:35.591 -25:59:55.70
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01045 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits &> /tmp/tmp.cLaDaE3BrD
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_05-02-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits &> /tmp/tmp.xXoitEVdFh
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_05-02-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-09_CI_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_030211_TTUQ1b1x1_3651090_xvZ6Veek/fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-49-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0166.fits &> /tmp/tmp.Z2vNTT1UXY
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-09_CI_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_030211_TTUQ1b1x1_3651090_xvZ6Veek/fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-49-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0166.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-09_CI_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_030211_TTUQ1b1x1_3651090_xvZ6Veek/fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-49-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167.fits &> /tmp/tmp.yP4WrOgqBB
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-09_CI_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_030211_TTUQ1b1x1_3651090_xvZ6Veek/fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-49-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits and wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits and wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits and wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits) and catalog (wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 59775 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 293.3219 to 311.5256 deg, Dec -31.2659 to -20.5417 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 293.3219 to 311.5256 deg, Dec -31.2659 to -20.5417 deg
Loaded 9495 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 7512 out of 8123 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 8123 out of 59775 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.442600
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.442600
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.98
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.46
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.46
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 59775 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 293.3219 to 311.5256 deg, Dec -31.2659 to -20.5417 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 293.3219 to 311.5256 deg, Dec -31.2659 to -20.5417 deg
Loaded 9495 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 7512 out of 8123 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 8123 out of 59775 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits (aperture=4.8)
Read 55853 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 293.3400 to 311.4447 deg, Dec -31.2749 to -20.5514 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 293.3400 to 311.4447 deg, Dec -31.2749 to -20.5514 deg
Loaded 9461 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 7592 out of 8135 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 8135 out of 55853 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_05-02-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_05-02-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_05-02-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_05-02-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits (aperture=4.7)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 72 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 8000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.2 pix Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits
2.2 pix Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_05-02-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits
3.7 pix fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-49-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0166.fits
3.7 pix fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-49-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167.fits
2.2 pix wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits
2.2 pix wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_05-02-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
14.5 mag. Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits
14.4 mag. Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_05-02-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits
14.0 mag. fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-49-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0166.fits
14.0 mag. fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-49-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.0 (SNR ) 13.3 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.cLaDaE3BrD (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-09_CI_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_030211_TTUQ1b1x1_3651090_xvZ6Veek/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits 572.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits' -> 'wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits.wcscat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=7, blended=2722, passed=59768
Got 59768 stars (including 56970 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 59768 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013019 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010416 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 349 (Dec -31.3 to -20.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 969 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 969 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 964 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.54"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 969 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 59240 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.50"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 349 (Dec -31.3 to -20.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 969 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 969 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 59239 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.51"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 969 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 59239 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.53"
Excluding outliers - 969 stars left (next iteration limit 1065)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits N_match=969 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.558 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.477 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.636 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.498 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.690 n_q1=249 n_q2=208 n_q3=247 n_q4=265 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.236
The image catalog is written to wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits -region wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.xXoitEVdFh (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_05-02-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-09_CI_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_030211_TTUQ1b1x1_3651090_xvZ6Veek/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_05-02-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits 572.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_05-02-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_05-02-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_05-02-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_05-02-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_05-02-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_05-02-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_05-02-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits' -> 'wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_05-02-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_05-02-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_05-02-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_05-02-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_05-02-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_05-02-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_05-02-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_05-02-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_05-02-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_05-02-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_05-02-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits.wcscat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=9, blended=2424, passed=55844
Got 55844 stars (including 53347 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_05-02-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 55844 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013019 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010416 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 349 (Dec -31.3 to -20.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 971 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 971 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 964 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.51"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 971 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 55202 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.49"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 349 (Dec -31.3 to -20.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 971 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 971 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 55202 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.49"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 971 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 55202 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.51"
Excluding outliers - 971 stars left (next iteration limit 1068)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_05-02-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits N_match=971 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.514 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.430 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.580 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.525 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.615 n_q1=249 n_q2=207 n_q3=250 n_q4=265 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.198
The image catalog is written to wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_05-02-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_05-02-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_05-02-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits -region wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_05-02-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_05-02-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.Z2vNTT1UXY (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-09_CI_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_030211_TTUQ1b1x1_3651090_xvZ6Veek/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-09_CI_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_030211_TTUQ1b1x1_3651090_xvZ6Veek/fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-49-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0166.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-09_CI_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_030211_TTUQ1b1x1_3651090_xvZ6Veek/fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-49-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0166.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-09_CI_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_030211_TTUQ1b1x1_3651090_xvZ6Veek/fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-49-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0166.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-09_CI_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_030211_TTUQ1b1x1_3651090_xvZ6Veek/fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-49-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0166.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-09_CI_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_030211_TTUQ1b1x1_3651090_xvZ6Veek/fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-49-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0166.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-09_CI_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_030211_TTUQ1b1x1_3651090_xvZ6Veek/fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-49-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0166.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-49-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0166.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-49-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0166.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-49-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0166.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-49-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0166.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-49-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0166.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-49-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0166.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-49-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0166.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-09_CI_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_030211_TTUQ1b1x1_3651090_xvZ6Veek/fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-49-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0166.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-49-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0166.fits.wcscat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=4, blended=1811, passed=38785
Got 38785 stars (including 36929 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-49-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0166.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 38785 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.1'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.1 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013071 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010457 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 292 to 351 (Dec -31.5 to -20.1)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 967 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 967 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 961 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 967 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 38501 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 292 to 351 (Dec -31.5 to -20.1)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 967 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 967 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 38501 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 967 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 38501 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Excluding outliers - 967 stars left (next iteration limit 1063)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-49-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0166.fits N_match=967 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.368 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.406 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.450 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.354 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.321 n_q1=233 n_q2=198 n_q3=279 n_q4=257 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.221
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-49-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0166.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-49-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0166.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-09_CI_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_030211_TTUQ1b1x1_3651090_xvZ6Veek/fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-49-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0166.fits -region wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-49-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0166.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-49-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0166.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.yP4WrOgqBB (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-09_CI_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_030211_TTUQ1b1x1_3651090_xvZ6Veek/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-09_CI_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_030211_TTUQ1b1x1_3651090_xvZ6Veek/fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-49-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-09_CI_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_030211_TTUQ1b1x1_3651090_xvZ6Veek/fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-49-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-09_CI_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_030211_TTUQ1b1x1_3651090_xvZ6Veek/fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-49-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-09_CI_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_030211_TTUQ1b1x1_3651090_xvZ6Veek/fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-49-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-09_CI_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_030211_TTUQ1b1x1_3651090_xvZ6Veek/fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-49-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-09_CI_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_030211_TTUQ1b1x1_3651090_xvZ6Veek/fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-49-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-49-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-49-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-49-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-49-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-49-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-49-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-49-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-09_CI_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_030211_TTUQ1b1x1_3651090_xvZ6Veek/fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-49-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-49-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167.fits.wcscat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=3, blended=1841, passed=38733
Got 38733 stars (including 36847 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-49-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 38733 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.1'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.1 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013071 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010457 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 292 to 351 (Dec -31.5 to -20.1)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 970 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 970 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 962 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 970 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 38482 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 292 to 351 (Dec -31.5 to -20.1)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 970 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 970 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 38482 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 970 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 38482 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Excluding outliers - 970 stars left (next iteration limit 1067)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-49-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167.fits N_match=970 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.378 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.464 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.444 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.322 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.331 n_q1=232 n_q2=200 n_q3=285 n_q4=253 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.225
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-49-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-49-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-09_CI_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_030211_TTUQ1b1x1_3651090_xvZ6Veek/fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-49-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167.fits -region wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-49-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-49-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-49-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0166.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-09_CI_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_030211_TTUQ1b1x1_3651090_xvZ6Veek/wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-49-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0166.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-49-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-09_CI_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_030211_TTUQ1b1x1_3651090_xvZ6Veek/wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-49-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Cap-04-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits at 19:34:16.80 -29:41:09.5: 12.53 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits at 20:22:24.58 -21:46:11.5: 13.26 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits at 20:15:11.53 -28:27:49.5: 12.65 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits at 20:06:47.70 -27:12:40.2: 10.91 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits at 19:39:47.34 -26:24:05.3: 14.88 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits at 19:34:55.66 -29:11:43.7: 12.69 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits at 19:35:33.65 -28:37:12.3: 12.62 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits at 19:35:04.25 -28:36:58.9: 12.51 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits at 19:47:38.35 -21:33:10.7: 13.38 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_05-02-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits at 19:34:16.80 -29:41:09.5: 12.59 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits at 19:38:08.97 -20:35:41.5: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.56 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:34:16.80 -29:41:09.5: ref_mag=12.56 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=12.6114 delta=-0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_05-02-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits at 19:39:47.34 -26:24:05.3: 14.77 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_05-02-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits at 20:15:11.53 -28:27:49.5: 12.59 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_05-02-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits at 20:06:47.70 -27:12:40.2: 10.98 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.62 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:15:11.53 -28:27:49.5: ref_mag=12.62 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=12.6332 delta=-0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 10.94 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:06:47.70 -27:12:40.2: ref_mag=10.94 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=10.2451 delta=0.69 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_05-02-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits at 19:34:55.66 -29:11:43.7: 12.89 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_05-02-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits at 19:35:33.65 -28:37:12.3: 12.59 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_05-02-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits at 20:22:24.58 -21:46:11.5: 13.30 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.76 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:34:55.66 -29:11:43.7: ref_mag=12.76 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=12.7639 delta=-0.00 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.61 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.28 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:35:33.65 -28:37:12.3: ref_mag=12.61 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=12.6410 delta=-0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:22:24.58 -21:46:11.5: ref_mag=13.28 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=13.1570 delta=0.12 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_05-02-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits at 19:35:04.25 -28:36:58.9: 12.64 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.56 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:35:04.25 -28:36:58.9: ref_mag=12.56 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=12.6175 delta=-0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_05-02-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits at 19:47:38.35 -21:33:10.7: 13.42 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.40 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:47:38.35 -21:33:10.7: ref_mag=13.40 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=13.2441 delta=0.15 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_05-02-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits at 19:38:08.97 -20:35:41.5: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:38:08.97 -20:35:41.5: at least one reference image reported edge (off-image or aperture/annulus past image boundary); cannot perform the forced-photometry cross-check
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits at 19:43:39.05 -21:56:14.9: 12.43 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits at 20:03:40.63 -28:52:14.3: 15.00 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits at 20:36:46.69 -25:37:53.1: 12.88 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits at 19:39:40.27 -21:09:45.3: 13.11 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits at 20:36:30.20 -22:41:26.0: 12.94 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_05-02-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits at 19:43:39.05 -21:56:14.9: 12.32 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits at 20:42:45.44 -30:01:46.8: 13.54 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.37 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:43:39.05 -21:56:14.9: ref_mag=12.37 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=12.3878 delta=-0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_05-02-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits at 20:36:46.69 -25:37:53.1: 12.86 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_05-02-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits at 20:03:40.63 -28:52:14.3: 14.96 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.87 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_05-02-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits at 19:39:40.27 -21:09:45.3: 12.97 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:36:46.69 -25:37:53.1: ref_mag=12.87 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=12.7475 delta=0.12 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.03 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:39:40.27 -21:09:45.3: ref_mag=13.03 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=12.9948 delta=0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits at 20:39:26.13 -28:27:08.9: 13.80 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits at 20:07:23.45 -22:48:43.6: 14.36 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_05-02-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits at 20:36:30.20 -22:41:26.0: 13.05 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_05-02-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits at 20:42:45.44 -30:01:46.8: 13.15 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits at 20:43:16.23 -21:58:22.4: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.99 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:36:30.20 -22:41:26.0: ref_mag=12.99 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.0907 delta=-0.11 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.29 +/- 0.08
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:42:45.44 -30:01:46.8: ref_mag=13.29 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=12.7558 delta=0.53 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits at 19:55:06.50 -29:03:35.2: 14.15 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_05-02-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits at 20:07:23.45 -22:48:43.6: 14.09 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_05-02-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits at 20:39:26.13 -28:27:08.9: 13.67 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.21 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 20:07:23.45 -22:48:43.6: ref_mag=14.21 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=13.2687 delta=0.94 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.73 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:39:26.13 -28:27:08.9: ref_mag=13.73 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=13.1493 delta=0.58 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_05-02-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits at 20:43:16.23 -21:58:22.4: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:43:16.23 -21:58:22.4: at least one reference image reported edge (off-image or aperture/annulus past image boundary); cannot perform the forced-photometry cross-check
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits at 20:40:10.61 -22:37:42.5: 13.96 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits at 20:41:00.07 -22:19:00.0: 13.82 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits at 20:40:57.72 -21:42:25.0: 14.03 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits at 19:46:38.18 -20:50:27.4: 13.77 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_05-02-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits at 19:55:06.50 -29:03:35.2: 14.34 +/- 0.23 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.21 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 19:55:06.50 -29:03:35.2: ref_mag=14.21 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=13.2462 delta=0.97 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_05-02-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits at 20:41:00.07 -22:19:00.0: 13.90 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.85 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:41:00.07 -22:19:00.0: ref_mag=13.85 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=13.5111 delta=0.34 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_05-02-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits at 20:40:10.61 -22:37:42.5: 13.72 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.83 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:40:10.61 -22:37:42.5: ref_mag=13.83 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=13.3956 delta=0.43 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits at 20:41:09.40 -25:09:42.3: 14.05 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_05-02-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits at 19:46:38.18 -20:50:27.4: 14.12 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.88 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_05-02-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits at 20:40:57.72 -21:42:25.0: 13.97 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:46:38.18 -20:50:27.4: ref_mag=13.88 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=13.6052 delta=0.28 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.00 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:40:57.72 -21:42:25.0: ref_mag=14.00 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=13.6233 delta=0.38 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits at 20:37:47.30 -21:44:09.3: 14.00 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_05-02-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits at 20:41:09.40 -25:09:42.3: 14.35 +/- 0.23 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.15 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:41:09.40 -25:09:42.3: ref_mag=14.15 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=13.4246 delta=0.72 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_05-02-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits at 20:37:47.30 -21:44:09.3: 14.40 +/- 0.24 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.12 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:37:47.30 -21:44:09.3: ref_mag=14.12 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=13.6042 delta=0.52 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits at 19:45:21.24 -20:48:47.6: 13.86 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits at 19:58:21.58 -22:33:44.5: 13.91 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits at 19:38:14.25 -21:31:18.3: 13.56 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits at 20:38:38.20 -22:12:15.6: 13.97 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_05-02-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits at 19:45:21.24 -20:48:47.6: 13.85 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits at 20:41:37.76 -22:23:44.9: 13.90 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.86 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:45:21.24 -20:48:47.6: ref_mag=13.86 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=13.5334 delta=0.32 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_05-02-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits at 19:58:21.58 -22:33:44.5: 13.88 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.89 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:58:21.58 -22:33:44.5: ref_mag=13.89 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=13.5760 delta=0.32 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_05-02-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits at 20:38:38.20 -22:12:15.6: 13.97 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.97 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:38:38.20 -22:12:15.6: ref_mag=13.97 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=13.6333 delta=0.34 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_05-02-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits at 19:38:14.25 -21:31:18.3: 14.00 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits at 20:41:53.16 -21:34:38.6: 13.83 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.68 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:38:14.25 -21:31:18.3: ref_mag=13.68 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=13.6282 delta=0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_05-02-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits at 20:41:37.76 -22:23:44.9: 13.75 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.82 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:41:37.76 -22:23:44.9: ref_mag=13.82 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=13.7002 delta=0.12 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits at 20:40:59.37 -21:51:16.2: 13.88 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_05-02-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits at 20:41:53.16 -21:34:38.6: 13.96 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.88 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:41:53.16 -21:34:38.6: ref_mag=13.88 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=13.6499 delta=0.23 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits at 20:43:03.35 -21:31:21.8: 13.66 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_05-02-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits at 20:40:59.37 -21:51:16.2: 13.95 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.91 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:40:59.37 -21:51:16.2: ref_mag=13.91 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=13.7341 delta=0.18 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits at 20:41:50.66 -21:11:51.1: 13.88 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits at 19:38:42.33 -20:40:29.0: 13.95 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits at 20:40:04.47 -22:40:05.1: 13.73 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_05-02-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits at 20:43:03.35 -21:31:21.8: 13.91 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_05-02-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits at 20:41:50.66 -21:11:51.1: 14.33 +/- 0.26 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.75 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:43:03.35 -21:31:21.8: ref_mag=13.75 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=13.7167 delta=0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits at 20:18:58.57 -21:28:19.6: 14.02 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.00 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:41:50.66 -21:11:51.1: ref_mag=14.00 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=13.6139 delta=0.38 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_05-02-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits at 19:38:42.33 -20:40:29.0: 13.97 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.96 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:38:42.33 -20:40:29.0: ref_mag=13.96 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=13.6729 delta=0.28 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_05-02-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits at 20:40:04.47 -22:40:05.1: 13.74 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.74 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:40:04.47 -22:40:05.1: ref_mag=13.74 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=13.7082 delta=0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_05-02-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits at 20:18:58.57 -21:28:19.6: 14.06 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.04 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:18:58.57 -21:28:19.6: ref_mag=14.04 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=13.8044 delta=0.23 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits at 19:43:35.55 -21:05:35.9: 13.95 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits at 19:55:29.42 -20:55:01.6: 14.22 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits at 20:21:35.79 -22:34:28.3: 14.20 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits at 19:38:42.88 -21:17:52.5: 13.91 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits at 20:39:36.81 -22:02:53.7: 14.12 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_05-02-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits at 19:43:35.55 -21:05:35.9: 13.78 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.85 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:43:35.55 -21:05:35.9: ref_mag=13.85 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=13.7091 delta=0.15 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_05-02-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits at 19:55:29.42 -20:55:01.6: 14.21 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.21 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:55:29.42 -20:55:01.6: ref_mag=14.21 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=13.9114 delta=0.30 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits at 20:23:10.86 -23:47:58.8: 14.69 +/- 0.24 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_05-02-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits at 19:38:42.88 -21:17:52.5: 13.89 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.90 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:38:42.88 -21:17:52.5: ref_mag=13.90 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=13.8119 delta=0.08 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_05-02-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits at 20:39:36.81 -22:02:53.7: 14.27 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.18 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:39:36.81 -22:02:53.7: ref_mag=14.18 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=13.8939 delta=0.28 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_05-02-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits at 20:21:35.79 -22:34:28.3: 13.99 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.09 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:21:35.79 -22:34:28.3: ref_mag=14.09 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=13.9046 delta=0.18 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits at 20:41:30.17 -29:58:20.2: 11.74 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_05-02-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits at 20:23:10.86 -23:47:58.8: 14.61 +/- 0.24 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.65 +/- 0.17
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:23:10.86 -23:47:58.8: ref_mag=14.65 +/- 0.17 new_mean_mag=13.9540 delta=0.70 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_05-02-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits at 20:41:30.17 -29:58:20.2: 11.71 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.73 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:41:30.17 -29:58:20.2: ref_mag=11.73 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=11.4002 delta=0.33 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits at 20:43:19.16 -30:05:25.7: 12.20 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits at 20:39:41.27 -30:09:30.2: 12.44 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_05-02-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits at 20:43:19.16 -30:05:25.7: 12.08 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.13 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:43:19.16 -30:05:25.7: ref_mag=12.13 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=11.6056 delta=0.53 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_05-02-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits at 20:39:41.27 -30:09:30.2: 12.40 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.42 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:39:41.27 -30:09:30.2: ref_mag=12.42 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=12.0026 delta=0.42 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits at 19:38:57.56 -24:53:27.2: 12.10 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits at 20:41:57.12 -29:03:58.2: 12.97 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits at 20:43:07.80 -26:42:25.5: 13.05 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_05-02-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits at 19:38:57.56 -24:53:27.2: 12.06 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.08 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 19:38:57.56 -24:53:27.2: ref_mag=12.08 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=11.1015 delta=0.98 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_05-02-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits at 20:41:57.12 -29:03:58.2: 13.00 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.98 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:41:57.12 -29:03:58.2: ref_mag=12.98 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=12.3711 delta=0.61 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_05-02-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits at 20:43:07.80 -26:42:25.5: 13.05 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.05 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:43:07.80 -26:42:25.5: ref_mag=13.05 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=12.6506 delta=0.40 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits at 19:53:18.05 -23:41:51.2: 13.34 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_05-02-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits at 19:53:18.05 -23:41:51.2: 13.37 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.35 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 19:53:18.05 -23:41:51.2: ref_mag=13.35 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=12.2831 delta=1.07 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits at 20:38:56.30 -30:13:27.8: 12.58 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits at 19:43:01.35 -29:38:07.9: 12.71 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits at 20:43:14.43 -29:03:16.6: 12.12 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits at 19:47:09.53 -28:08:20.6: 12.81 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_05-02-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits at 20:38:56.30 -30:13:27.8: 12.44 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.51 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:38:56.30 -30:13:27.8: ref_mag=12.51 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=12.2394 delta=0.27 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_05-02-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits at 19:43:01.35 -29:38:07.9: 12.68 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.70 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:43:01.35 -29:38:07.9: ref_mag=12.70 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=12.1383 delta=0.56 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_05-02-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits at 20:43:14.43 -29:03:16.6: 12.10 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.11 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:43:14.43 -29:03:16.6: ref_mag=12.11 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=11.7553 delta=0.36 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_05-02-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits at 19:47:09.53 -28:08:20.6: 12.87 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.84 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 19:47:09.53 -28:08:20.6: ref_mag=12.84 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=11.8516 delta=0.99 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out74461.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out13383.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out32137.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out38707.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out73646.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out73920.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out74503.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 11s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 6s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 73336_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-49-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167
The candidate 73336_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-49-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 73342_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-49-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167
The candidate 73342_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-49-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 73343_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-49-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167
The candidate 73343_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-49-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 73344_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-49-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167
The candidate 73344_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-49-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 73346_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-49-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167
The candidate 73346_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-49-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 73348_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-49-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167
The candidate 73348_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-49-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 73350_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-49-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167
The candidate 73350_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-49-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 73433_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-49-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167
The candidate 73433_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-49-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 73640_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-49-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167
The candidate 73640_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-49-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:39:55.48 -23:25:41.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 73646_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-49-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167
Preparing report for the candidate 73646_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-49-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 73778_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-49-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167
The candidate 73778_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-49-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 73855_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-49-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167
The candidate 73855_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-49-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 73920_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-49-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167
Preparing report for the candidate 73920_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-49-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 73937_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-49-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167
The candidate 73937_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-49-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:03:01.21 -22:19:08.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 73970_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-49-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167
The candidate 73970_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-49-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:42:44.52 -29:54:37.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 73984_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-49-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167
The candidate 73984_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-49-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:42:09.10 -28:46:10.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 74166_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-49-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167
The candidate 74166_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-49-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:40:39.23 -24:13:53.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 74175_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-49-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167
The candidate 74175_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-49-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 74212_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-49-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167
The candidate 74212_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-49-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 74305_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-49-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167
The candidate 74305_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-49-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:59:58.09 -22:58:15.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 74337_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-49-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167
The candidate 74337_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-49-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 74348_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-49-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167
The candidate 74348_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-49-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 74419_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-49-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167
The candidate 74419_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-49-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:00:17.07 -27:05:37.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 74434_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-49-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167
The candidate 74434_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-49-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:07:55.38 -22:18:14.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 74446_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-49-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167
The candidate 74446_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-49-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 74461_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-49-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167
The candidate 74461_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-49-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:07:23.45 -22:48:43.6 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.27, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.25)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 0.908 6853429080291371136 301.84779136340 -22.81235157981 12.5770 11.2381 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#0.908#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 74481_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-49-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167
The candidate 74481_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-49-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 74503_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-49-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167
Preparing report for the candidate 74503_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-49-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 74516_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-49-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167
The candidate 74516_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-49-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 74529_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-49-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167
The candidate 74529_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-49-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 74581_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-49-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167
The candidate 74581_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-49-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 74584_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-49-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167
The candidate 74584_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-49-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 74587_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-49-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167
The candidate 74587_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-49-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 74601_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-49-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167
The candidate 74601_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-49-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 74605_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-49-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167
The candidate 74605_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-49-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 74615_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-49-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167
The candidate 74615_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-49-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 74640_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-49-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167
The candidate 74640_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-49-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 74642_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-49-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167
The candidate 74642_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-49-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 74689_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-49-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167
The candidate 74689_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-49-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 74700_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-49-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167
The candidate 74700_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-49-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 74703_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-49-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167
The candidate 74703_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-49-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 74724_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-49-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167
The candidate 74724_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-49-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 74757_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-49-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167
The candidate 74757_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-49-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 74759_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-49-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167
The candidate 74759_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-49-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 74766_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-49-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167
The candidate 74766_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-49-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 74774_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-49-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167
The candidate 74774_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-49-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 74778_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-49-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167
The candidate 74778_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-49-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 74797_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-49-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167
The candidate 74797_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-49-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 74815_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-49-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167
The candidate 74815_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-49-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 74839_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-49-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167
The candidate 74839_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-49-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 74842_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-49-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167
The candidate 74842_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-49-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 74863_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-49-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167
The candidate 74863_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-49-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 03942_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-49-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167
The candidate 03942_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-49-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 03323_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-49-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167
The candidate 03323_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-49-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 30983_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-49-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167
The candidate 30983_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-49-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:50:06.79 -25:11:38.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 69887_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-49-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167
The candidate 69887_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-49-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 25958_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-49-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167
The candidate 25958_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-49-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:43:48.70 -25:46:56.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51053_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-49-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167
The candidate 51053_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-49-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:39:44.62 -22:18:04.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32137_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-49-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167
Preparing report for the candidate 32137_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-49-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 08028_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-49-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167
The candidate 08028_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-49-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 11495_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-49-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167
The candidate 11495_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-49-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:29:04.20 -28:31:05.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 02724_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-49-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167
The candidate 02724_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-49-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:34:28.48 -30:14:32.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20393_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-49-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167
The candidate 20393_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-49-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 38707_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-49-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167
Preparing report for the candidate 38707_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-49-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21222_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-49-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167
The candidate 21222_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-49-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:41:33.34 -26:40:23.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 50115_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-49-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167
The candidate 50115_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-49-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:42:31.20 -22:06:13.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 09371_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-49-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167
The candidate 09371_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-49-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:40:02.77 -28:47:30.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 03090_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-49-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167
The candidate 03090_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-49-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 05889_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-49-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167
The candidate 05889_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-49-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 08080_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-49-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167
The candidate 08080_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-49-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:55:56.51 -29:11:23.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 07963_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-49-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167
The candidate 07963_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-49-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167 did not pass the final checks
