This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-09_CI_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_025410_TTUQ1b1x1_3113971_92d27GC8
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 09.3086 2461200.8086 11.43 16:31:17.62 -08:07:23.4
7.53093 26.19180 galactic Oph Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.3" and 3.0 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.28 Bellona 0 1 1 11.5 -0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits at 16:31:17.62 -08:07:23.4: 15.72 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits at 16:31:17.62 -08:07:23.4: 15.71 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461200.8086,11.43,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260609.3086 11.43CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 09.3086 2461200.8086 11.61 16:39:32.45 -13:16:22.6
4.29381 21.51584 galactic Oph Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.3" and 2.9 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.48 Doris 0 1 1 11.9 -0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits at 16:39:32.45 -13:16:22.6: 14.34 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits at 16:39:32.45 -13:16:22.6: 14.48 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.40 +/- 0.11
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461200.8086,11.61,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260609.3086 11.61CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 09.3086 2461200.8086 13.45 16:25:39.22 -12:14:55.9
2.94949 24.83047 galactic Oph Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.8" and 2.8 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.512 Taurinensis 0 1 1 13.3 0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits at 16:25:39.22 -12:14:55.9: 15.87 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits at 16:25:39.22 -12:14:55.9: 15.88 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461200.8086,13.45,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260609.3086 13.45CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 09.3086 2461200.8086 13.76 16:22:50.28 -14:47:55.2
0.29349 23.77650 galactic Sco Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.5" and 2.7 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.741 Botolphia -1 1 2 13.8 -0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits at 16:22:50.28 -14:47:55.2: 15.76 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits at 16:22:50.28 -14:47:55.2: 15.77 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461200.8086,13.76,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260609.3086 13.76CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 09.3086 2461200.8086 14.47 16:21:49.09 -05:18:33.7
8.57055 29.74265 galactic Oph Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.4" and 3.2 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.1723 Klemola 0 2 2 14.6 0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits at 16:21:49.09 -05:18:33.7: 15.98 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits at 16:21:49.09 -05:18:33.7: 15.96 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461200.8086,14.47,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260609.3086 14.47CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461174.84044517 14.05.2026 08:10:04.463 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits
First image: 2461174.84044517 14.05.2026 08:10:04.463 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits
Last image: 2461200.80879317 09.06.2026 07:24:29.730 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-09_CI_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_025410_TTUQ1b1x1_3113971_92d27GC8/fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-24-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0135.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 23
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.77
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 4 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 8603
Objects passed selection criteria: 8602
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.8 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.8 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 8305
Average stars matched: 8040 (96.8092 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 113940 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Mon Jun 8 11:26:26 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-95-g079870fa
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-06-08)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Tue Jun 9 04:32:00 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461174.84044517 14.05.2026 08:10:04.463 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits
First image: 2461174.84044517 14.05.2026 08:10:04.463 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits
Last image: 2461200.80879317 09.06.2026 07:24:29.730 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-09_CI_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_025410_TTUQ1b1x1_3113971_92d27GC8/fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-24-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0135.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 91
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.41
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 29 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 62862
Objects passed selection criteria: 62723
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.6 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.6 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 59726.5
Average stars matched: 57939 (97.0072 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 164284 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Mon Jun 8 11:26:26 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-95-g079870fa
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-06-08)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Tue Jun 9 04:34:49 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 3.5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-09_CI_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_025410_TTUQ1b1x1_3113971_92d27GC8/fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-23-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0134.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-09_CI_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_025410_TTUQ1b1x1_3113971_92d27GC8/fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-24-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0135.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-09_CI_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_025410_TTUQ1b1x1_3113971_92d27GC8/fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-23-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0134.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-09_CI_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_025410_TTUQ1b1x1_3113971_92d27GC8/fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-24-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0135.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461200.80838111
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits'
wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits'
wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-23-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0134.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-23-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0134.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-23-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0134.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-23-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0134.fits'
wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-24-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0135.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-24-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0135.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-24-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0135.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-24-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0135.fits'
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits
util/fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh: line 144: echo: write error: Broken pipe
Image size: 941.3'x626.9' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 16:17:07.938 -09:59:23.16 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-23-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0134.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-23-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0134.fits
Image size: 941.0'x626.7' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 16:17:14.521 -09:57:29.38 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 16:17:07.938 -09:59:23.16
Second-epoch image center 16:17:14.521 -09:57:29.38
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0416 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-24-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0135.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-24-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0135.fits
Image size: 941.0'x626.7' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 16:17:15.594 -09:57:36.21 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 16:17:07.938 -09:59:23.16
Second-epoch image center 16:17:15.594 -09:57:36.21
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0432 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 16:17:14.521 -09:57:29.38
Second-epoch second image center 16:17:15.594 -09:57:36.21
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00479 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits &> /tmp/tmp.RfWTQEowov
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits &> /tmp/tmp.GFhvaGGq6j
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-09_CI_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_025410_TTUQ1b1x1_3113971_92d27GC8/fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-23-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0134.fits &> /tmp/tmp.bpooYnN83Z
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-09_CI_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_025410_TTUQ1b1x1_3113971_92d27GC8/fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-23-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0134.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-09_CI_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_025410_TTUQ1b1x1_3113971_92d27GC8/fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-24-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0135.fits &> /tmp/tmp.ixikqY039W
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-09_CI_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_025410_TTUQ1b1x1_3113971_92d27GC8/fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-24-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0135.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits and wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits and wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits and wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits) and catalog (wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 8279 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 235.9003 to 252.4570 deg, Dec -15.5991 to -4.3253 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 235.9003 to 252.4570 deg, Dec -15.5991 to -4.3253 deg
Loaded 5208 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4041 out of 4212 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 4212 out of 8279 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.855300
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.855300
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.77
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.09
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.09
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 8279 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 235.9003 to 252.4570 deg, Dec -15.5991 to -4.3253 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 235.9003 to 252.4570 deg, Dec -15.5991 to -4.3253 deg
Loaded 5208 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4041 out of 4212 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 4212 out of 8279 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits (aperture=6.2)
Read 8296 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 235.9003 to 252.4983 deg, Dec -15.5992 to -4.3253 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 235.9003 to 252.4983 deg, Dec -15.5992 to -4.3253 deg
Loaded 5222 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4038 out of 4215 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 4215 out of 8296 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits (aperture=6.2)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 23 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 8000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.2 pix Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits
2.2 pix Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits
3.0 pix fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-23-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0134.fits
3.0 pix fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-24-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0135.fits
2.2 pix wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits
2.2 pix wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.1 mag. Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits
15.1 mag. Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits
14.9 mag. fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-23-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0134.fits
14.9 mag. fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-24-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0135.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.9 (SNR ) 12.1 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.RfWTQEowov (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-09_CI_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_025410_TTUQ1b1x1_3113971_92d27GC8/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits 574.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits' -> 'wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits.wcscat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=513, passed=8279
Got 8279 stars (including 7758 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 8279 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013074 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010459 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 372 to 430 (Dec -15.6 to -4.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 966 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 966 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 953 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 966 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8107 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 372 to 430 (Dec -15.6 to -4.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 967 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 966 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8113 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 966 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8113 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Excluding outliers - 966 stars left (next iteration limit 1062)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits N_match=966 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.340 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.380 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.347 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.264 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.334 n_q1=229 n_q2=245 n_q3=218 n_q4=274 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.118
The image catalog is written to wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits -region wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.GFhvaGGq6j (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-09_CI_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_025410_TTUQ1b1x1_3113971_92d27GC8/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits 574.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits' -> 'wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits.wcscat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=538, passed=8296
Got 8296 stars (including 7747 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 8296 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013074 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010459 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 372 to 430 (Dec -15.6 to -4.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 969 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 969 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 955 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 969 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8131 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 372 to 430 (Dec -15.6 to -4.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 970 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 969 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8133 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 969 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8133 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Excluding outliers - 969 stars left (next iteration limit 1065)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits N_match=969 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.350 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.444 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.413 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.264 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.314 n_q1=234 n_q2=244 n_q3=214 n_q4=277 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.267
The image catalog is written to wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits -region wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.bpooYnN83Z (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-09_CI_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_025410_TTUQ1b1x1_3113971_92d27GC8/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-09_CI_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_025410_TTUQ1b1x1_3113971_92d27GC8/fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-23-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0134.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-09_CI_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_025410_TTUQ1b1x1_3113971_92d27GC8/fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-23-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0134.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-09_CI_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_025410_TTUQ1b1x1_3113971_92d27GC8/fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-23-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0134.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-09_CI_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_025410_TTUQ1b1x1_3113971_92d27GC8/fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-23-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0134.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-09_CI_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_025410_TTUQ1b1x1_3113971_92d27GC8/fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-23-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0134.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-09_CI_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_025410_TTUQ1b1x1_3113971_92d27GC8/fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-23-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0134.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-23-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0134.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-23-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0134.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-23-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0134.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-23-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0134.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-23-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0134.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-23-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0134.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-23-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0134.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-09_CI_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_025410_TTUQ1b1x1_3113971_92d27GC8/fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-23-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0134.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-23-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0134.fits.wcscat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=374, passed=8454
Got 8454 stars (including 8077 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-23-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0134.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 8454 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.0'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.0 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013069 (47.0 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010456 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 372 to 430 (Dec -15.6 to -4.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 966 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 966 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 950 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 966 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8277 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 372 to 430 (Dec -15.6 to -4.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 968 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 966 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8281 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 966 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8282 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Excluding outliers - 966 stars left (next iteration limit 1062)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-23-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0134.fits N_match=966 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.371 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.443 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.366 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.284 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.364 n_q1=223 n_q2=261 n_q3=217 n_q4=265 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.194
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-23-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0134.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-23-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0134.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-09_CI_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_025410_TTUQ1b1x1_3113971_92d27GC8/fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-23-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0134.fits -region wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-23-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0134.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-23-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0134.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.ixikqY039W (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-09_CI_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_025410_TTUQ1b1x1_3113971_92d27GC8/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-09_CI_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_025410_TTUQ1b1x1_3113971_92d27GC8/fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-24-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0135.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-09_CI_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_025410_TTUQ1b1x1_3113971_92d27GC8/fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-24-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0135.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-09_CI_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_025410_TTUQ1b1x1_3113971_92d27GC8/fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-24-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0135.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-09_CI_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_025410_TTUQ1b1x1_3113971_92d27GC8/fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-24-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0135.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-09_CI_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_025410_TTUQ1b1x1_3113971_92d27GC8/fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-24-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0135.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-09_CI_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_025410_TTUQ1b1x1_3113971_92d27GC8/fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-24-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0135.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-24-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0135.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-24-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0135.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-24-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0135.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-24-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0135.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-24-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0135.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-24-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0135.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-24-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0135.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-09_CI_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_025410_TTUQ1b1x1_3113971_92d27GC8/fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-24-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0135.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-24-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0135.fits.wcscat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=364, passed=8442
Got 8442 stars (including 8072 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-24-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0135.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 8442 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.0'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.0 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013069 (47.0 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010456 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 372 to 430 (Dec -15.6 to -4.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 967 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 967 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 953 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 967 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8265 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 372 to 430 (Dec -15.6 to -4.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 968 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 967 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8264 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 967 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8264 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Excluding outliers - 967 stars left (next iteration limit 1063)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-24-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0135.fits N_match=967 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.373 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.442 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.355 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.292 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.363 n_q1=224 n_q2=259 n_q3=216 n_q4=268 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.187
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-24-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0135.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-24-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0135.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-09_CI_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_025410_TTUQ1b1x1_3113971_92d27GC8/fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-24-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0135.fits -region wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-24-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0135.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-24-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0135.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits sigma_overall=0.340 worst_q_ratio=1.118
ref2=Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits sigma_overall=0.350 worst_q_ratio=1.267
new1=fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-23-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0134.fits sigma_overall=0.371 worst_q_ratio=1.194
new2=fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-24-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0135.fits sigma_overall=0.373 worst_q_ratio=1.187
reference average sigma_overall=0.345 worst_q_ratio=1.1925
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162_astrometric_residuals.png (966 matched stars from wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.32 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163_astrometric_residuals.png (969 matched stars from wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.32 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-23-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0134_astrometric_residuals.png (966 matched stars from wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-23-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0134.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.34 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-24-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0135_astrometric_residuals.png (967 matched stars from wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-24-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0135.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.34 arcsec)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-23-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0134.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-23-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0134.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-09_CI_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_025410_TTUQ1b1x1_3113971_92d27GC8/wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-23-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0134.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-24-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0135.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-24-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0135.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-09_CI_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_025410_TTUQ1b1x1_3113971_92d27GC8/wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-24-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0135.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Sco-01-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits at 16:39:32.45 -13:16:22.6: 14.34 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits at 16:31:29.11 -13:56:24.6: 12.12 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits at 16:26:55.00 -09:51:38.4: 12.07 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits at 16:26:33.92 -09:43:48.2: 12.07 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits at 16:31:17.62 -08:07:23.4: 15.72 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits at 16:13:59.46 -08:07:31.1: 11.92 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits at 16:12:37.02 -05:31:05.7: 12.23 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits at 16:22:35.46 -10:18:49.5: 12.19 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits at 16:20:10.52 -10:25:13.0: 12.18 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits at 16:13:44.03 -09:39:06.2: 12.25 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits at 16:39:32.45 -13:16:22.6: 14.48 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.40 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 16:39:32.45 -13:16:22.6: ref_mag=14.40 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=11.6062 delta=2.79 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits at 16:31:29.11 -13:56:24.6: 12.14 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.13 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits at 16:26:55.00 -09:51:38.4: 12.07 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:31:29.11 -13:56:24.6: ref_mag=12.13 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.2512 delta=-0.12 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits at 16:26:33.92 -09:43:48.2: 12.05 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.07 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:26:55.00 -09:51:38.4: ref_mag=12.07 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.0413 delta=0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.06 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits at 16:13:59.46 -08:07:31.1: 11.91 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits at 16:22:35.46 -10:18:49.5: 12.22 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:26:33.92 -09:43:48.2: ref_mag=12.06 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.0471 delta=0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits at 16:31:17.62 -08:07:23.4: 15.71 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.92 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.20 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:13:59.46 -08:07:31.1: ref_mag=11.92 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.8585 delta=0.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:22:35.46 -10:18:49.5: ref_mag=12.20 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.1690 delta=0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits at 16:12:37.02 -05:31:05.7: 12.22 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.22 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:12:37.02 -05:31:05.7: ref_mag=12.22 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.1860 delta=0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits at 16:13:44.03 -09:39:06.2: 12.21 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits at 16:20:10.52 -10:25:13.0: 12.21 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.23 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:13:44.03 -09:39:06.2: ref_mag=12.23 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.1833 delta=0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.19 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:20:10.52 -10:25:13.0: ref_mag=12.19 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.1843 delta=0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits at 16:19:25.51 -08:29:52.6: 12.22 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits at 16:18:51.34 -06:39:35.5: 12.21 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits at 16:09:44.11 -06:39:36.8: 12.35 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits at 16:13:42.20 -04:51:40.9: 12.56 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits at 16:19:28.49 -08:12:14.2: 12.20 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits at 16:15:51.18 -06:27:42.5: 12.26 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits at 16:22:20.72 -08:21:39.8: 12.25 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits at 16:09:09.75 -08:53:55.5: 12.27 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits at 16:19:28.49 -08:12:14.2: 12.22 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits at 16:19:25.51 -08:29:52.6: 12.24 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits at 16:18:51.34 -06:39:35.5: 12.21 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits at 16:13:42.20 -04:51:40.9: 12.61 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.21 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:18:51.34 -06:39:35.5: ref_mag=12.21 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.1712 delta=0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.23 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:19:25.51 -08:29:52.6: ref_mag=12.23 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.2192 delta=0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.58 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits at 16:15:51.18 -06:27:42.5: 12.28 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.21 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:19:28.49 -08:12:14.2: ref_mag=12.21 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.2123 delta=-0.00 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits at 16:09:44.11 -06:39:36.8: 12.34 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.27 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:13:42.20 -04:51:40.9: ref_mag=12.58 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.2123 delta=0.37 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:15:51.18 -06:27:42.5: ref_mag=12.27 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.2346 delta=0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits at 16:22:20.72 -08:21:39.8: 12.29 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.35 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:09:44.11 -06:39:36.8: ref_mag=12.35 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.2322 delta=0.11 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.27 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:22:20.72 -08:21:39.8: ref_mag=12.27 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.2441 delta=0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits at 16:09:09.75 -08:53:55.5: 12.26 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.26 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:09:09.75 -08:53:55.5: ref_mag=12.26 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.2371 delta=0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits at 16:14:26.49 -09:13:04.3: 12.28 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits at 16:14:26.49 -09:13:04.3: 12.28 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.28 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:14:26.49 -09:13:04.3: ref_mag=12.28 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.2453 delta=0.03 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out20515.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out20518.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 18s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 2s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20505_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-24-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0135
The candidate 20505_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-24-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0135 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20515_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-24-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0135
Preparing report for the candidate 20515_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-24-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0135
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20518_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-24-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0135
Preparing report for the candidate 20518_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-24-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0135
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20521_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-24-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0135
The candidate 20521_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-24-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0135 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20523_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-24-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0135
The candidate 20523_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-24-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0135 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:44:50.35 -06:11:06.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20524_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-24-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0135
The candidate 20524_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-24-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0135 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20525_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-24-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0135
The candidate 20525_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-24-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0135 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20526_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-24-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0135
The candidate 20526_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-24-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0135 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:44:41.84 -14:41:18.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20530_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-24-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0135
The candidate 20530_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-24-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0135 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20531_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-24-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0135
The candidate 20531_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-24-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0135 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20532_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-24-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0135
The candidate 20532_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-24-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0135 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20533_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-24-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0135
The candidate 20533_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-24-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0135 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20534_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-24-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0135
The candidate 20534_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-24-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0135 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20535_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-24-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0135
The candidate 20535_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-24-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0135 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20536_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-24-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0135
The candidate 20536_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-24-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0135 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20537_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-24-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0135
The candidate 20537_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-24-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0135 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 15:54:08.79 -10:50:36.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20538_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-24-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0135
The candidate 20538_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-24-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0135 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20539_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-24-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0135
The candidate 20539_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-24-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0135 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20540_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-24-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0135
The candidate 20540_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-24-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0135 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20542_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-24-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0135
The candidate 20542_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-24-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0135 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20543_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-24-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0135
The candidate 20543_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-24-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0135 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20544_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-24-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0135
The candidate 20544_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-24-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0135 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20242_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-24-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0135
The candidate 20242_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-24-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0135 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:20:54.22 -09:07:10.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 20s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Sco-01-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
16:31:17.62 -08:07:23.4
16:39:32.45 -13:16:22.6
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 3.5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-09_CI_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_025410_TTUQ1b1x1_3113971_92d27GC8/fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-23-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0134.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-09_CI_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_025410_TTUQ1b1x1_3113971_92d27GC8/fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-24-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0135.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-09_CI_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_025410_TTUQ1b1x1_3113971_92d27GC8/fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-23-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0134.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-09_CI_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_025410_TTUQ1b1x1_3113971_92d27GC8/fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-24-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0135.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-23-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0134.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-24-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0135.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/exclusion_list.txt
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-23-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0134.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-24-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0135.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits
Image size: 941.3'x626.9' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 16:17:07.938 -09:59:23.16 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-23-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0134.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-23-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0134.fits
Image size: 941.0'x626.7' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 16:17:14.521 -09:57:29.38 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 16:17:07.938 -09:59:23.16
Second-epoch image center 16:17:14.521 -09:57:29.38
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0416 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-24-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0135.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-24-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0135.fits
Image size: 941.0'x626.7' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 16:17:15.594 -09:57:36.21 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 16:17:07.938 -09:59:23.16
Second-epoch image center 16:17:15.594 -09:57:36.21
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0432 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 16:17:14.521 -09:57:29.38
Second-epoch second image center 16:17:15.594 -09:57:36.21
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00479 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits &> /tmp/tmp.ct57H3A8tH
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits &> /tmp/tmp.dSUAnMuie9
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-09_CI_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_025410_TTUQ1b1x1_3113971_92d27GC8/fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-23-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0134.fits &> /tmp/tmp.Ld7sfB5OHc
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-09_CI_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_025410_TTUQ1b1x1_3113971_92d27GC8/fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-23-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0134.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-09_CI_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_025410_TTUQ1b1x1_3113971_92d27GC8/fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-24-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0135.fits &> /tmp/tmp.1rmr6bnl1I
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-09_CI_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_025410_TTUQ1b1x1_3113971_92d27GC8/fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-24-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0135.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits and wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits and wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits and wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits) and catalog (wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 66506 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 235.8525 to 252.4884 deg, Dec -15.6149 to -4.1928 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 235.8525 to 252.4884 deg, Dec -15.6149 to -4.1928 deg
Loaded 5302 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3766 out of 4287 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 4287 out of 66506 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.698250
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.698250
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.41
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.29
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.29
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 66506 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 235.8525 to 252.4884 deg, Dec -15.6149 to -4.1928 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 235.8525 to 252.4884 deg, Dec -15.6149 to -4.1928 deg
Loaded 5302 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3766 out of 4287 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 4287 out of 66506 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits (aperture=4.5)
Read 66556 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 235.8754 to 252.4982 deg, Dec -15.6070 to -4.1798 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 235.8754 to 252.4982 deg, Dec -15.6070 to -4.1798 deg
Loaded 5296 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3783 out of 4283 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 4283 out of 66556 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits (aperture=4.5)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 86 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 8000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
1.9 pix Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits
1.9 pix Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits
2.7 pix fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-23-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0134.fits
2.7 pix fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-24-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0135.fits
1.9 pix wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits
1.9 pix wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.3 mag. Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits
15.3 mag. Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits
15.0 mag. fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-23-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0134.fits
15.0 mag. fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-24-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0135.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 15.0 (SNR ) 14.4 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.ct57H3A8tH (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-09_CI_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_025410_TTUQ1b1x1_3113971_92d27GC8/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits 574.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits' -> 'wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits.wcscat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=19, blended=3301, passed=66487
Got 66487 stars (including 63075 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 66487 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013074 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010459 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 371 to 431 (Dec -15.6 to -4.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 969 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 969 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 953 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 969 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 65344 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 371 to 431 (Dec -15.6 to -4.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 969 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 969 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 65347 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 969 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 65347 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Excluding outliers - 969 stars left (next iteration limit 1065)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits N_match=969 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.342 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.377 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.356 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.274 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.346 n_q1=231 n_q2=251 n_q3=220 n_q4=267 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.105
The image catalog is written to wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits -region wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.dSUAnMuie9 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-09_CI_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_025410_TTUQ1b1x1_3113971_92d27GC8/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits 574.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits' -> 'wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits.wcscat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=27, blended=3301, passed=66529
Got 66529 stars (including 63097 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 66529 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013074 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010459 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 371 to 431 (Dec -15.6 to -4.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 968 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 968 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 955 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 968 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 65405 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 371 to 431 (Dec -15.6 to -4.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 969 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 968 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 65405 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 968 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 65405 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Excluding outliers - 968 stars left (next iteration limit 1064)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits N_match=968 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.356 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.412 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.391 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.276 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.315 n_q1=233 n_q2=248 n_q3=220 n_q4=267 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.156
The image catalog is written to wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits -region wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.Ld7sfB5OHc (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-09_CI_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_025410_TTUQ1b1x1_3113971_92d27GC8/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-09_CI_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_025410_TTUQ1b1x1_3113971_92d27GC8/fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-23-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0134.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-09_CI_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_025410_TTUQ1b1x1_3113971_92d27GC8/fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-23-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0134.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-09_CI_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_025410_TTUQ1b1x1_3113971_92d27GC8/fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-23-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0134.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-09_CI_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_025410_TTUQ1b1x1_3113971_92d27GC8/fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-23-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0134.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-09_CI_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_025410_TTUQ1b1x1_3113971_92d27GC8/fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-23-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0134.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-09_CI_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_025410_TTUQ1b1x1_3113971_92d27GC8/fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-23-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0134.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-23-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0134.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-23-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0134.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-23-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0134.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-23-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0134.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-23-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0134.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-23-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0134.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-23-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0134.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-09_CI_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_025410_TTUQ1b1x1_3113971_92d27GC8/fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-23-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0134.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-23-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0134.fits.wcscat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=11, blended=2313, passed=53872
Got 53872 stars (including 51483 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-23-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0134.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 53872 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.0'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.0 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013069 (47.0 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010456 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 372 to 431 (Dec -15.6 to -4.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 968 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 968 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 956 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 968 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 52840 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 372 to 431 (Dec -15.6 to -4.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 968 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 968 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 52845 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 968 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 52844 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
Excluding outliers - 968 stars left (next iteration limit 1064)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-23-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0134.fits N_match=968 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.386 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.468 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.358 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.304 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.374 n_q1=223 n_q2=258 n_q3=217 n_q4=270 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.213
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-23-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0134.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-23-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0134.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-09_CI_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_025410_TTUQ1b1x1_3113971_92d27GC8/fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-23-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0134.fits -region wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-23-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0134.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-23-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0134.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.1rmr6bnl1I (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-09_CI_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_025410_TTUQ1b1x1_3113971_92d27GC8/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-09_CI_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_025410_TTUQ1b1x1_3113971_92d27GC8/fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-24-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0135.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-09_CI_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_025410_TTUQ1b1x1_3113971_92d27GC8/fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-24-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0135.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-09_CI_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_025410_TTUQ1b1x1_3113971_92d27GC8/fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-24-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0135.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-09_CI_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_025410_TTUQ1b1x1_3113971_92d27GC8/fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-24-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0135.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-09_CI_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_025410_TTUQ1b1x1_3113971_92d27GC8/fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-24-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0135.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-09_CI_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_025410_TTUQ1b1x1_3113971_92d27GC8/fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-24-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0135.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-24-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0135.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-24-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0135.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-24-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0135.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-24-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0135.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-24-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0135.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-24-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0135.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-24-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0135.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-09_CI_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_025410_TTUQ1b1x1_3113971_92d27GC8/fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-24-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0135.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-24-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0135.fits.wcscat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=4, blended=2216, passed=53685
Got 53685 stars (including 51396 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-24-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0135.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 53685 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.0'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.0 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013069 (47.0 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010456 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 372 to 431 (Dec -15.6 to -4.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 966 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 966 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 954 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 966 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 52786 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 372 to 431 (Dec -15.6 to -4.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 966 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 966 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 52789 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 966 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 52787 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Excluding outliers - 966 stars left (next iteration limit 1062)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-24-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0135.fits N_match=966 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.375 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.464 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.358 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.299 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.376 n_q1=221 n_q2=255 n_q3=219 n_q4=271 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.239
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-24-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0135.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-24-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0135.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-09_CI_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_025410_TTUQ1b1x1_3113971_92d27GC8/fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-24-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0135.fits -region wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-24-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0135.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-24-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0135.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-23-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0134.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-09_CI_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_025410_TTUQ1b1x1_3113971_92d27GC8/wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-23-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0134.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-24-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0135.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-09_CI_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_025410_TTUQ1b1x1_3113971_92d27GC8/wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-24-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0135.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Sco-01-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits at 16:40:10.92 -11:25:48.9: 14.35 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits at 16:32:26.71 -12:37:47.7: 13.87 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits at 16:00:46.68 -13:34:01.4: 13.17 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits at 15:48:54.44 -07:32:29.6: 13.98 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits at 16:29:18.02 -10:06:32.0: 14.11 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits at 16:00:03.48 -14:10:36.2: 13.74 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits at 16:28:44.40 -06:20:25.5: 13.12 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits at 16:40:10.92 -11:25:48.9: 14.31 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits at 16:29:18.02 -10:06:32.0: 14.12 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits at 15:48:54.44 -07:32:29.6: 13.98 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.33 +/- 0.07
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits at 16:00:46.68 -13:34:01.4: 13.22 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.11 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:40:10.92 -11:25:48.9: ref_mag=14.33 +/- 0.07 new_mean_mag=14.3347 delta=-0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:29:18.02 -10:06:32.0: ref_mag=14.11 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.0820 delta=0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.98 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits at 16:32:26.71 -12:37:47.7: 13.99 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits at 16:00:03.48 -14:10:36.2: 13.90 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits at 16:28:44.40 -06:20:25.5: 13.14 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:48:54.44 -07:32:29.6: ref_mag=13.98 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.1796 delta=-0.20 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.19 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:00:46.68 -13:34:01.4: ref_mag=13.19 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.3910 delta=-0.20 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.92 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.82 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.13 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:32:26.71 -12:37:47.7: ref_mag=13.92 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.1729 delta=-0.25 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:00:03.48 -14:10:36.2: ref_mag=13.82 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=14.1381 delta=-0.32 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:28:44.40 -06:20:25.5: ref_mag=13.13 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.2218 delta=-0.09 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits at 15:45:54.61 -10:03:56.5: 13.23 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits at 16:19:59.17 -14:38:20.2: 13.42 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits at 16:25:39.22 -12:14:55.9: 15.87 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits at 16:21:52.00 -07:08:15.4: 13.67 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits at 16:45:31.57 -10:54:57.9: 13.64 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits at 16:32:05.49 -12:08:22.4: 13.96 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits at 15:57:38.36 -12:27:33.2: 13.89 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits at 16:22:50.28 -14:47:55.2: 15.76 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits at 15:45:54.61 -10:03:56.5: 13.23 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.23 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:45:54.61 -10:03:56.5: ref_mag=13.23 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.2863 delta=-0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits at 16:19:59.17 -14:38:20.2: 13.38 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits at 16:27:25.08 -08:34:34.2: 13.84 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.40 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:19:59.17 -14:38:20.2: ref_mag=13.40 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.4186 delta=-0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits at 16:21:52.00 -07:08:15.4: 13.64 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits at 16:32:05.49 -12:08:22.4: 13.87 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits at 16:25:39.22 -12:14:55.9: 15.88 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits at 16:45:31.57 -10:54:57.9: 13.63 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.66 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:21:52.00 -07:08:15.4: ref_mag=13.66 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.5284 delta=0.13 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.91 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits at 15:57:38.36 -12:27:33.2: 13.94 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits at 16:22:50.28 -14:47:55.2: 15.77 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.63 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:32:05.49 -12:08:22.4: ref_mag=13.91 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=13.6928 delta=0.22 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:45:31.57 -10:54:57.9: ref_mag=13.63 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=13.6940 delta=-0.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.91 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:57:38.36 -12:27:33.2: ref_mag=13.91 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=13.9531 delta=-0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits at 16:11:36.45 -13:58:29.3: 13.86 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits at 16:27:25.08 -08:34:34.2: 13.87 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.86 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:27:25.08 -08:34:34.2: ref_mag=13.86 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.8310 delta=0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits at 16:11:36.45 -13:58:29.3: 13.89 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.88 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:11:36.45 -13:58:29.3: ref_mag=13.88 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=13.9096 delta=-0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits at 15:59:59.26 -07:06:44.0: 14.11 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits at 16:06:46.07 -13:55:51.3: 13.86 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits at 16:13:17.52 -10:21:34.3: 14.00 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits at 16:21:02.11 -12:48:37.3: 13.91 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits at 16:40:34.93 -08:01:21.8: 13.99 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits at 15:59:59.26 -07:06:44.0: 14.17 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.14 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:59:59.26 -07:06:44.0: ref_mag=14.14 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=14.0098 delta=0.13 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits at 16:06:46.07 -13:55:51.3: 13.87 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.86 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:06:46.07 -13:55:51.3: ref_mag=13.86 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=14.0093 delta=-0.15 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits at 16:21:02.11 -12:48:37.3: 13.90 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits at 16:13:17.52 -10:21:34.3: 13.91 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.91 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:21:02.11 -12:48:37.3: ref_mag=13.91 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.0078 delta=-0.10 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.95 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits at 16:40:34.93 -08:01:21.8: 13.98 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:13:17.52 -10:21:34.3: ref_mag=13.95 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.0173 delta=-0.07 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.98 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:40:34.93 -08:01:21.8: ref_mag=13.98 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=13.9620 delta=0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits at 16:26:48.65 -09:50:37.9: 13.71 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits at 16:05:57.04 -08:47:09.6: 14.44 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits at 16:15:25.54 -11:01:31.0: 14.36 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits at 16:26:48.65 -09:50:37.9: 13.78 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.75 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:26:48.65 -09:50:37.9: ref_mag=13.75 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.0769 delta=-0.33 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits at 16:11:25.47 -14:54:40.8: 14.77 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits at 16:31:21.86 -14:55:21.6: 14.73 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits at 16:30:19.13 -10:24:28.5: 14.71 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits at 16:05:57.04 -08:47:09.6: 14.35 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.39 +/- 0.07
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:05:57.04 -08:47:09.6: ref_mag=14.39 +/- 0.07 new_mean_mag=14.3192 delta=0.07 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits at 16:11:21.07 -14:54:54.1: 14.96 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits at 16:05:26.95 -10:10:02.7: 14.50 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits at 16:15:25.54 -11:01:31.0: 14.40 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.38 +/- 0.07
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:15:25.54 -11:01:31.0: ref_mag=14.38 +/- 0.07 new_mean_mag=14.2962 delta=0.08 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits at 16:31:21.86 -14:55:21.6: 14.94 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.82 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits at 16:30:19.13 -10:24:28.5: 14.64 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits at 16:11:25.47 -14:54:40.8: 14.60 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:31:21.86 -14:55:21.6: ref_mag=14.82 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.3465 delta=0.47 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.67 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.67 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:30:19.13 -10:24:28.5: ref_mag=14.67 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=14.4678 delta=0.20 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:11:25.47 -14:54:40.8: ref_mag=14.67 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=14.4389 delta=0.23 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits at 16:11:21.07 -14:54:54.1: 14.55 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits at 16:05:26.95 -10:10:02.7: 14.61 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.68 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.55 +/- 0.07
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:11:21.07 -14:54:54.1: ref_mag=14.68 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.5137 delta=0.17 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:05:26.95 -10:10:02.7: ref_mag=14.55 +/- 0.07 new_mean_mag=14.4580 delta=0.09 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits at 16:18:00.04 -12:34:57.8: 14.39 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits at 16:21:49.09 -05:18:33.7: 15.98 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits at 16:35:26.97 -10:37:54.4: 15.14 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits at 16:18:00.04 -12:34:57.8: 14.55 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.46 +/- 0.08
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:18:00.04 -12:34:57.8: ref_mag=14.46 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=14.4118 delta=0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits at 16:09:13.45 -13:17:07.9: 14.90 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits at 16:26:26.38 -06:56:25.5: 15.32 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits at 16:21:49.09 -05:18:33.7: 15.96 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits at 16:38:31.42 -07:11:08.5: 14.67 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits at 16:35:26.97 -10:37:54.4: 15.00 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.06 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:35:26.97 -10:37:54.4: ref_mag=15.06 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.4859 delta=0.58 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits at 15:50:45.63 -05:29:41.8: 15.03 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits at 16:09:13.45 -13:17:07.9: 14.90 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits at 16:26:26.38 -06:56:25.5: 14.88 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.90 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:09:13.45 -13:17:07.9: ref_mag=14.90 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.5908 delta=0.30 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.03 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:26:26.38 -06:56:25.5: ref_mag=15.03 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.4025 delta=0.62 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits at 15:50:55.68 -14:16:38.3: 14.81 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits at 16:38:31.42 -07:11:08.5: 14.64 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.66 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:38:31.42 -07:11:08.5: ref_mag=14.66 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.4705 delta=0.19 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits at 16:18:00.20 -11:44:58.7: 14.61 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits at 15:50:45.63 -05:29:41.8: 15.24 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.12 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:50:45.63 -05:29:41.8: ref_mag=15.12 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=14.6075 delta=0.51 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits at 15:50:55.68 -14:16:38.3: 14.75 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.78 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:50:55.68 -14:16:38.3: ref_mag=14.78 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.6031 delta=0.18 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits at 15:57:48.49 -08:24:10.4: 15.07 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits at 16:18:00.20 -11:44:58.7: 14.93 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.73 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:18:00.20 -11:44:58.7: ref_mag=14.73 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.6498 delta=0.08 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits at 16:43:39.26 -15:00:14.9: 14.61 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits at 16:34:32.79 -13:33:58.7: 14.94 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits at 15:57:48.49 -08:24:10.4: 15.02 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.04 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:57:48.49 -08:24:10.4: ref_mag=15.04 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.7079 delta=0.33 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits at 15:52:37.98 -12:30:21.6: 14.94 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits at 16:42:48.24 -12:35:53.9: 14.80 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits at 16:43:39.26 -15:00:14.9: 15.43 +/- 0.36 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.76 +/- 0.16
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:43:39.26 -15:00:14.9: ref_mag=14.76 +/- 0.16 new_mean_mag=14.3373 delta=0.43 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits at 16:03:28.98 -13:13:00.7: 14.93 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits at 16:34:32.79 -13:33:58.7: 14.88 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.91 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:34:32.79 -13:33:58.7: ref_mag=14.91 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.5835 delta=0.33 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits at 15:52:37.98 -12:30:21.6: 15.02 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.98 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:52:37.98 -12:30:21.6: ref_mag=14.98 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.6840 delta=0.29 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits at 16:42:48.24 -12:35:53.9: 14.96 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits at 15:49:54.51 -12:20:19.8: 14.98 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.86 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:42:48.24 -12:35:53.9: ref_mag=14.86 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.6457 delta=0.22 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits at 16:03:28.98 -13:13:00.7: 14.92 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.93 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:03:28.98 -13:13:00.7: ref_mag=14.93 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.6460 delta=0.28 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits at 15:49:25.18 -07:59:54.9: 14.83 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits at 15:49:54.51 -12:20:19.8: 14.77 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.85 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:49:54.51 -12:20:19.8: ref_mag=14.85 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.5515 delta=0.30 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits at 15:50:46.63 -08:31:54.1: 15.06 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits at 16:46:03.23 -05:41:35.3: 14.82 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits at 15:49:25.18 -07:59:54.9: 15.43 +/- 0.26 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits at 16:10:17.90 -08:39:09.1: 15.02 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.97 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:49:25.18 -07:59:54.9: ref_mag=14.97 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.6000 delta=0.37 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits at 16:34:32.84 -14:21:56.2: 14.87 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits at 15:50:46.63 -08:31:54.1: 14.91 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.97 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:50:46.63 -08:31:54.1: ref_mag=14.97 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.6337 delta=0.34 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits at 15:57:56.31 -09:23:03.9: 14.79 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits at 16:46:03.23 -05:41:35.3: 14.75 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.78 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:46:03.23 -05:41:35.3: ref_mag=14.78 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.5984 delta=0.18 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits at 16:10:17.90 -08:39:09.1: 14.88 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.94 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:10:17.90 -08:39:09.1: ref_mag=14.94 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.7600 delta=0.18 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits at 16:34:32.84 -14:21:56.2: 14.74 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.80 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:34:32.84 -14:21:56.2: ref_mag=14.80 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.4611 delta=0.33 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits at 16:24:27.44 -13:50:13.8: 14.99 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits at 15:57:56.31 -09:23:03.9: 15.06 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.89 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:57:56.31 -09:23:03.9: ref_mag=14.89 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.6357 delta=0.25 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits at 15:47:58.61 -09:35:32.3: 15.19 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits at 16:24:27.44 -13:50:13.8: 15.05 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.02 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:24:27.44 -13:50:13.8: ref_mag=15.02 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.7972 delta=0.22 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits at 15:57:29.46 -07:35:58.3: 15.72 +/- 0.31 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits at 15:47:58.61 -09:35:32.3: 14.88 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.99 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:47:58.61 -09:35:32.3: ref_mag=14.99 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.8646 delta=0.12 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits at 15:57:29.46 -07:35:58.3: 15.58 +/- 0.26 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.64 +/- 0.20
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:57:29.46 -07:35:58.3: ref_mag=15.64 +/- 0.20 new_mean_mag=14.8704 delta=0.77 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out82627.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out82662.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out82770.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 15s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 2s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82517_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-24-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0135
The candidate 82517_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-24-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0135 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82521_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-24-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0135
The candidate 82521_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-24-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0135 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82522_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-24-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0135
The candidate 82522_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-24-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0135 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82523_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-24-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0135
The candidate 82523_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-24-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0135 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82524_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-24-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0135
The candidate 82524_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-24-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0135 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82531_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-24-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0135
The candidate 82531_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-24-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0135 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82533_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-24-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0135
The candidate 82533_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-24-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0135 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82534_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-24-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0135
The candidate 82534_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-24-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0135 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 15:55:50.73 -13:20:30.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82542_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-24-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0135
The candidate 82542_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-24-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0135 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82545_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-24-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0135
The candidate 82545_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-24-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0135 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:31:17.62 -08:07:23.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_local.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82548_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-24-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0135
The candidate 82548_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-24-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0135 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:39:32.45 -13:16:22.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_local.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82549_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-24-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0135
The candidate 82549_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-24-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0135 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82557_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-24-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0135
The candidate 82557_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-24-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0135 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82558_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-24-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0135
The candidate 82558_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-24-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0135 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82565_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-24-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0135
The candidate 82565_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-24-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0135 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82571_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-24-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0135
The candidate 82571_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-24-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0135 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82573_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-24-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0135
The candidate 82573_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-24-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0135 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82574_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-24-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0135
The candidate 82574_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-24-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0135 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82581_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-24-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0135
The candidate 82581_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-24-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0135 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:32:12.56 -15:05:14.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82599_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-24-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0135
The candidate 82599_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-24-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0135 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82611_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-24-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0135
The candidate 82611_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-24-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0135 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82623_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-24-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0135
The candidate 82623_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-24-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0135 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82627_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-24-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0135
Preparing report for the candidate 82627_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-24-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0135
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82646_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-24-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0135
The candidate 82646_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-24-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0135 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82652_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-24-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0135
The candidate 82652_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-24-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0135 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82659_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-24-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0135
The candidate 82659_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-24-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0135 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 15:50:47.07 -11:44:49.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82660_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-24-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0135
The candidate 82660_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-24-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0135 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82662_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-24-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0135
Preparing report for the candidate 82662_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-24-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0135
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82663_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-24-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0135
The candidate 82663_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-24-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0135 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82665_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-24-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0135
The candidate 82665_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-24-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0135 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82667_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-24-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0135
The candidate 82667_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-24-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0135 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82668_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-24-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0135
The candidate 82668_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-24-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0135 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82677_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-24-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0135
The candidate 82677_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-24-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0135 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82684_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-24-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0135
The candidate 82684_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-24-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0135 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82686_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-24-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0135
The candidate 82686_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-24-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0135 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82687_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-24-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0135
The candidate 82687_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-24-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0135 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82691_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-24-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0135
The candidate 82691_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-24-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0135 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:41:48.77 -06:41:32.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82693_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-24-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0135
The candidate 82693_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-24-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0135 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82696_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-24-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0135
The candidate 82696_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-24-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0135 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82698_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-24-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0135
The candidate 82698_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-24-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0135 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:46:13.88 -06:26:57.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82700_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-24-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0135
The candidate 82700_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-24-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0135 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82704_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-24-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0135
The candidate 82704_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-24-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0135 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82712_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-24-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0135
The candidate 82712_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-24-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0135 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82721_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-24-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0135
The candidate 82721_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-24-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0135 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82730_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-24-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0135
The candidate 82730_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-24-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0135 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82731_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-24-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0135
The candidate 82731_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-24-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0135 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82737_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-24-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0135
The candidate 82737_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-24-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0135 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82742_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-24-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0135
The candidate 82742_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-24-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0135 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82750_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-24-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0135
The candidate 82750_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-24-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0135 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82752_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-24-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0135
The candidate 82752_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-24-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0135 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82755_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-24-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0135
The candidate 82755_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-24-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0135 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82766_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-24-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0135
The candidate 82766_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-24-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0135 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82769_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-24-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0135
The candidate 82769_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-24-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0135 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82770_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-24-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0135
Preparing report for the candidate 82770_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-24-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0135
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82783_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-24-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0135
The candidate 82783_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-24-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0135 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82789_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-24-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0135
The candidate 82789_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-24-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0135 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:40:35.85 -10:42:10.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82790_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-24-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0135
The candidate 82790_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-24-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0135 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82801_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-24-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0135
The candidate 82801_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-24-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0135 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82813_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-24-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0135
The candidate 82813_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-24-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0135 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:38:14.40 -11:20:27.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82817_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-24-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0135
The candidate 82817_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-24-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0135 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82818_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-24-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0135
The candidate 82818_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-24-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0135 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82819_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-24-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0135
The candidate 82819_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-24-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0135 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82824_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-24-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0135
The candidate 82824_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-24-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0135 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82825_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-24-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0135
The candidate 82825_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-24-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0135 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82826_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-24-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0135
The candidate 82826_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-24-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0135 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82827_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-24-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0135
The candidate 82827_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-24-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0135 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82828_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-24-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0135
The candidate 82828_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-24-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0135 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82832_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-24-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0135
The candidate 82832_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-24-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0135 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82833_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-24-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0135
The candidate 82833_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-24-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0135 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82843_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-24-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0135
The candidate 82843_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-24-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0135 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82870_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-24-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0135
The candidate 82870_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-24-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0135 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82875_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-24-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0135
The candidate 82875_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-24-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0135 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82888_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-24-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0135
The candidate 82888_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-24-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0135 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82896_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-24-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0135
The candidate 82896_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-24-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0135 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82899_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-24-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0135
The candidate 82899_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-24-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0135 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82925_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-24-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0135
The candidate 82925_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-24-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0135 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82936_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-24-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0135
The candidate 82936_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-24-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0135 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82941_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-24-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0135
The candidate 82941_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-24-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0135 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82950_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-24-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0135
The candidate 82950_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-24-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0135 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82951_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-24-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0135
The candidate 82951_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-24-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0135 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 06268_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-24-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0135
The candidate 06268_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-24-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0135 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:44:50.34 -06:11:06.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 09726_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-24-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0135
The candidate 09726_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-24-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0135 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:47:48.70 -06:46:09.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32325_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-24-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0135
The candidate 32325_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-24-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0135 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:26:54.28 -09:46:05.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52307_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-24-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0135
The candidate 52307_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-24-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0135 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:29:13.66 -13:57:31.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 28248_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-24-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0135
The candidate 28248_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-24-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0135 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:20:54.22 -09:07:10.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 17754_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-24-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0135
The candidate 17754_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-24-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0135 did not pass the final checks