This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-09_CI_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_023607_TTUQ1b1x1_1353025_lFc4Bj1M
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 09.3108 2461200.8108 12.28 15:47:41.59 +06:31:13.7
14.93471 43.40562 galactic Ser Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.9" and 3.3 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.660 Crescentia 0 0 0 12.5 0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_01-41-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits at 15:47:41.59 +06:31:13.7: 15.95 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-08-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0258.fits at 15:47:41.59 +06:31:13.7: 15.78 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 06 09.3108* 15 47 41.59 +06 31 13.7 12.3 U Ser 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461200.8108,12.28,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260609.3108 12.28CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 09.3108 2461200.8108 12.71 15:24:08.40 +02:03:40.7
5.09180 45.69131 galactic Ser Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.5" and 3.4 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.173 Ino 0 -0 0 12.8 -0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_01-41-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits at 15:24:08.40 +02:03:40.7: 16.10 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-08-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0258.fits at 15:24:08.40 +02:03:40.7: 15.91 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 06 09.3108* 15 24 08.40 +02 03 40.7 12.7 U Ser 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461200.8108,12.71,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260609.3108 12.71CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 09.3108 2461200.8108 13.15 15:34:54.82 +07:55:06.5
14.26717 46.83757 galactic Ser Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.6" and 3.3 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.304 Olga 0 1 1 13.4 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_01-41-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits at 15:34:54.82 +07:55:06.5: 16.24 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-08-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0258.fits at 15:34:54.82 +07:55:06.5: 16.06 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 06 09.3108* 15 34 54.82 +07 55 06.5 13.2 U Ser 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461200.8108,13.15,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260609.3108 13.15CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 09.3108 2461200.8108 13.37 14:59:37.49 +05:53:01.2
3.87728 52.85750 galactic Vir Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.3" and 3.5 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.472 Roma 0 0 0 13.3 0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_01-41-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits at 14:59:37.49 +05:53:01.2: 15.96 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-08-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0258.fits at 14:59:37.49 +05:53:01.2: 15.92 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 06 09.3108* 14 59 37.49 +05 53 01.2 13.4 U Vir 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461200.8108,13.37,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260609.3108 13.37CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 09.3108 2461200.8108 14.33 15:55:04.13 +04:11:34.0
13.59499 40.61316 galactic Ser Second-epoch detections are separated by 2.1" and 3.8 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.491 Carina 1 1 1 14.3 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_01-41-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits at 15:55:04.13 +04:11:34.0: 15.93 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-08-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0258.fits at 15:55:04.13 +04:11:34.0: 15.73 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 06 09.3108* 15 55 04.13 +04 11 34.0 14.3 U Ser 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461200.8108,14.33,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260609.3108 14.33CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 09.3108 2461200.8108 14.37 15:50:52.56 +07:38:27.6
16.81498 43.30535 galactic Ser Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.4" and 3.7 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.781 Kartvelia 0 -0 0 14.1 -0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_01-41-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits at 15:50:52.56 +07:38:27.6: 15.99 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-08-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0258.fits at 15:50:52.56 +07:38:27.6: 15.82 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 06 09.3108* 15 50 52.56 +07 38 27.6 14.4 U Ser 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461200.8108,14.37,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260609.3108 14.37CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461171.77913396 11.05.2026 06:41:47.174 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_01-41-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits
First image: 2461171.77913396 11.05.2026 06:41:47.174 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_01-41-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits
Last image: 2461200.81101450 09.06.2026 07:27:41.653 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-09_CI_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_023607_TTUQ1b1x1_1353025_lFc4Bj1M/fd_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-27-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0139.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 11
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.34
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 33 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 9023
Objects passed selection criteria: 9020
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.7 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.7 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 8604.75
Average stars matched: 8441.25 (98.0999 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 114364 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Mon Jun 8 11:26:26 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-95-g079870fa
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-06-08)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Tue Jun 9 06:15:08 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461171.77913396 11.05.2026 06:41:47.174 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_01-41-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits
First image: 2461171.77913396 11.05.2026 06:41:47.174 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_01-41-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits
Last image: 2461200.81101450 09.06.2026 07:27:41.653 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-09_CI_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_023607_TTUQ1b1x1_1353025_lFc4Bj1M/fd_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-27-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0139.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 80
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.07
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 154 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 47823
Objects passed selection criteria: 47748
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.6 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.6 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 45254.5
Average stars matched: 43847.2 (96.8904 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 148320 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Mon Jun 8 11:26:26 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-95-g079870fa
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-06-08)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Tue Jun 9 06:21:07 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 3.5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_01-41-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-08-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0258.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-09_CI_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_023607_TTUQ1b1x1_1353025_lFc4Bj1M/fd_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-27-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0138.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-09_CI_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_023607_TTUQ1b1x1_1353025_lFc4Bj1M/fd_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-27-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0139.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_01-41-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-08-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0258.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_01-41-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-08-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0258.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-09_CI_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_023607_TTUQ1b1x1_1353025_lFc4Bj1M/fd_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-27-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0138.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-09_CI_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_023607_TTUQ1b1x1_1353025_lFc4Bj1M/fd_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-27-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0139.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461200.81058373
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_01-41-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_01-41-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_01-41-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_01-41-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits'
wcs_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-08-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0258.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-08-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0258.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-08-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0258.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-08-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0258.fits'
wcs_fd_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-27-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0138.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-27-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0138.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-27-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0138.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-27-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0138.fits'
wcs_fd_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-27-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0139.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-27-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0139.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-27-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0139.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-27-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0139.fits'
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_01-41-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_01-41-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits
Image size: 937.3'x624.2' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 15:25:43.591 +06:00:11.90 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.87"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-27-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0138.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-27-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0138.fits
Image size: 941.0'x626.6' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 15:25:51.562 +06:02:24.04 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 15:25:43.591 +06:00:11.90
Second-epoch image center 15:25:51.562 +06:02:24.04
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0494 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-27-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0139.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-27-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0139.fits
Image size: 941.0'x626.6' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 15:25:50.409 +06:02:13.10 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 15:25:43.591 +06:00:11.90
Second-epoch image center 15:25:50.409 +06:02:13.10
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0440 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 15:25:51.562 +06:02:24.04
Second-epoch second image center 15:25:50.409 +06:02:13.10
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00566 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_01-41-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits &> /tmp/tmp.Q7kj0TI2R4
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_01-41-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-08-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0258.fits &> /tmp/tmp.8QBraaHzJs
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-08-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0258.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-09_CI_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_023607_TTUQ1b1x1_1353025_lFc4Bj1M/fd_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-27-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0138.fits &> /tmp/tmp.SgiI4zxKnD
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-09_CI_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_023607_TTUQ1b1x1_1353025_lFc4Bj1M/fd_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-27-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0138.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-09_CI_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_023607_TTUQ1b1x1_1353025_lFc4Bj1M/fd_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-27-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0139.fits &> /tmp/tmp.avp1PjbQIH
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-09_CI_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_023607_TTUQ1b1x1_1353025_lFc4Bj1M/fd_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-27-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0139.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_01-41-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_01-41-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits and wcs_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_01-41-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_01-41-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits and wcs_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_01-41-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_01-41-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits and wcs_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_01-41-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_01-41-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits) and catalog (wcs_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_01-41-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_01-41-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 9347 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 223.4677 to 239.3571 deg, Dec +0.7206 to +11.2696 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 223.4677 to 239.3571 deg, Dec 0.7206 to 11.2696 deg
Loaded 4612 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3905 out of 4067 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 4067 out of 9347 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.714400
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.714400
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.34
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.37
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.37
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 9347 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 223.4677 to 239.3571 deg, Dec +0.7206 to +11.2696 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 223.4677 to 239.3571 deg, Dec 0.7206 to 11.2696 deg
Loaded 4612 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3905 out of 4067 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 4067 out of 9347 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_01-41-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_01-41-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_01-41-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_01-41-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits (aperture=6.4)
Read 8606 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 223.4675 to 239.3569 deg, Dec +0.7513 to +11.2730 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 223.4675 to 239.3569 deg, Dec 0.7513 to 11.2730 deg
Loaded 4602 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3919 out of 4066 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 4066 out of 8606 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-08-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0258.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-08-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0258.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-08-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0258.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-08-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0258.fits (aperture=6.3)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 11 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 8000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.3 pix Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_01-41-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits
2.2 pix Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-08-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0258.fits
3.1 pix fd_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-27-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0138.fits
3.1 pix fd_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-27-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0139.fits
2.3 pix wcs_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_01-41-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits
2.2 pix wcs_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-08-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0258.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.4 mag. Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_01-41-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits
15.3 mag. Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-08-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0258.fits
15.0 mag. fd_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-27-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0138.fits
15.0 mag. fd_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-27-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0139.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 15.0 (SNR ) 12.3 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.Q7kj0TI2R4 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_01-41-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-09_CI_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_023607_TTUQ1b1x1_1353025_lFc4Bj1M/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_01-41-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_01-41-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_01-41-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_01-41-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_01-41-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_01-41-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_01-41-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_01-41-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits' -> 'wcs_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_01-41-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_01-41-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_01-41-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_01-41-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_01-41-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_01-41-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_01-41-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_01-41-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_01-41-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_01-41-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_01-41-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits.wcscat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=545, passed=9347
Got 9347 stars (including 8797 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_01-41-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 9347 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013018 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010414 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 453 to 508 (Dec 0.7 to 11.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 973 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 973 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 966 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 973 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 9164 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 453 to 508 (Dec 0.7 to 11.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 973 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 973 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 9163 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 973 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 9163 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44"
Excluding outliers - 973 stars left (next iteration limit 1070)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_01-41-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits N_match=973 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.448 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.303 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.527 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.428 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.563 n_q1=210 n_q2=276 n_q3=216 n_q4=271 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.257
The image catalog is written to wcs_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_01-41-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_01-41-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_01-41-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits -region wcs_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_01-41-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_01-41-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.8QBraaHzJs (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-08-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0258.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-09_CI_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_023607_TTUQ1b1x1_1353025_lFc4Bj1M/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-08-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0258.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-08-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0258.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-08-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0258.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-08-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0258.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-08-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0258.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-08-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0258.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-08-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0258.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-08-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0258.fits' -> 'wcs_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-08-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0258.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-08-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0258.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-08-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0258.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-08-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0258.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-08-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0258.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-08-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0258.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-08-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0258.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-08-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0258.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-08-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0258.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-08-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0258.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-08-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0258.fits.wcscat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=477, passed=8606
Got 8606 stars (including 8121 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-08-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0258.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 8606 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.1'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.1 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013015 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010412 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 453 to 508 (Dec 0.8 to 11.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 975 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 975 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 963 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 975 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8505 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 453 to 508 (Dec 0.8 to 11.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 975 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 975 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8506 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 975 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8506 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
Excluding outliers - 975 stars left (next iteration limit 1072)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-08-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0258.fits N_match=975 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.439 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.339 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.668 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.373 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.584 n_q1=262 n_q2=238 n_q3=253 n_q4=222 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.523
The image catalog is written to wcs_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-08-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0258.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-08-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0258.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-08-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0258.fits -region wcs_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-08-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0258.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-08-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0258.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.SgiI4zxKnD (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-09_CI_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_023607_TTUQ1b1x1_1353025_lFc4Bj1M/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-09_CI_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_023607_TTUQ1b1x1_1353025_lFc4Bj1M/fd_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-27-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0138.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-09_CI_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_023607_TTUQ1b1x1_1353025_lFc4Bj1M/fd_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-27-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0138.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-09_CI_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_023607_TTUQ1b1x1_1353025_lFc4Bj1M/fd_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-27-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0138.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-09_CI_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_023607_TTUQ1b1x1_1353025_lFc4Bj1M/fd_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-27-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0138.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-09_CI_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_023607_TTUQ1b1x1_1353025_lFc4Bj1M/fd_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-27-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0138.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-09_CI_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_023607_TTUQ1b1x1_1353025_lFc4Bj1M/fd_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-27-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0138.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-27-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0138.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-27-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0138.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-27-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0138.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-27-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0138.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-27-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0138.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-27-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0138.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-27-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0138.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-09_CI_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_023607_TTUQ1b1x1_1353025_lFc4Bj1M/fd_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-27-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0138.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-27-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0138.fits.wcscat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=384, passed=8336
Got 8336 stars (including 7945 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-27-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0138.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 8336 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.0'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.0 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013069 (47.0 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010456 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 451 to 510 (Dec 0.3 to 11.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 975 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 975 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 968 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 975 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8212 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 451 to 510 (Dec 0.3 to 11.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 975 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 975 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8211 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 975 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8211 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Excluding outliers - 975 stars left (next iteration limit 1072)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-27-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0138.fits N_match=975 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.307 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.325 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.355 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.253 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.296 n_q1=271 n_q2=228 n_q3=268 n_q4=208 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.159
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-27-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0138.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-27-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0138.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-09_CI_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_023607_TTUQ1b1x1_1353025_lFc4Bj1M/fd_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-27-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0138.fits -region wcs_fd_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-27-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0138.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-27-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0138.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.avp1PjbQIH (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-09_CI_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_023607_TTUQ1b1x1_1353025_lFc4Bj1M/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-09_CI_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_023607_TTUQ1b1x1_1353025_lFc4Bj1M/fd_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-27-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0139.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-09_CI_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_023607_TTUQ1b1x1_1353025_lFc4Bj1M/fd_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-27-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0139.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-09_CI_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_023607_TTUQ1b1x1_1353025_lFc4Bj1M/fd_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-27-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0139.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-09_CI_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_023607_TTUQ1b1x1_1353025_lFc4Bj1M/fd_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-27-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0139.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-09_CI_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_023607_TTUQ1b1x1_1353025_lFc4Bj1M/fd_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-27-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0139.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-09_CI_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_023607_TTUQ1b1x1_1353025_lFc4Bj1M/fd_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-27-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0139.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-27-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0139.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-27-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0139.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-27-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0139.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-27-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0139.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-27-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0139.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-27-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0139.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-27-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0139.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-09_CI_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_023607_TTUQ1b1x1_1353025_lFc4Bj1M/fd_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-27-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0139.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-27-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0139.fits.wcscat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=376, passed=8325
Got 8325 stars (including 7939 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-27-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0139.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 8325 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.0'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.0 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013069 (47.0 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010456 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 451 to 510 (Dec 0.3 to 11.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 976 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 976 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 970 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 976 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8177 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 451 to 510 (Dec 0.3 to 11.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 976 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 976 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8175 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 976 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8175 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Excluding outliers - 976 stars left (next iteration limit 1073)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-27-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0139.fits N_match=976 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.306 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.324 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.351 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.262 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.301 n_q1=269 n_q2=224 n_q3=273 n_q4=210 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.146
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-27-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0139.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-27-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0139.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-09_CI_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_023607_TTUQ1b1x1_1353025_lFc4Bj1M/fd_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-27-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0139.fits -region wcs_fd_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-27-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0139.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-27-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0139.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_01-41-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits sigma_overall=0.448 worst_q_ratio=1.257
ref2=Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-08-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0258.fits sigma_overall=0.439 worst_q_ratio=1.523
new1=fd_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-27-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0138.fits sigma_overall=0.307 worst_q_ratio=1.159
new2=fd_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-27-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0139.fits sigma_overall=0.306 worst_q_ratio=1.146
reference average sigma_overall=0.4435 worst_q_ratio=1.39
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_01-41-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0289_astrometric_residuals.png (973 matched stars from wcs_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_01-41-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.39 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-08-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0258_astrometric_residuals.png (975 matched stars from wcs_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-08-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0258.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.39 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-27-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0138_astrometric_residuals.png (975 matched stars from wcs_fd_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-27-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0138.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.27 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-27-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0139_astrometric_residuals.png (976 matched stars from wcs_fd_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-27-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0139.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.28 arcsec)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-27-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0138.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-27-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0138.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-09_CI_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_023607_TTUQ1b1x1_1353025_lFc4Bj1M/wcs_fd_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-27-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0138.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-27-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0139.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-27-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0139.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-09_CI_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_023607_TTUQ1b1x1_1353025_lFc4Bj1M/wcs_fd_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-27-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0139.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Ser-03-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_01-41-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits at 15:28:39.10 +06:53:53.4: 12.33 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_01-41-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits at 15:18:29.20 +02:02:13.7: 12.37 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_01-41-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits at 15:18:24.63 +02:02:07.0: 12.46 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_01-41-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits at 15:23:33.22 +06:47:06.3: 12.50 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_01-41-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits at 15:47:41.59 +06:31:13.7: 15.95 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_01-41-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits at 15:01:31.58 +02:26:19.9: 13.14 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_01-41-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits at 15:11:16.73 +05:54:56.3: 12.52 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-08-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0258.fits at 15:28:39.10 +06:53:53.4: 12.36 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.34 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:28:39.10 +06:53:53.4: ref_mag=12.34 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.3572 delta=-0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-08-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0258.fits at 15:23:33.22 +06:47:06.3: 12.52 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-08-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0258.fits at 15:18:29.20 +02:02:13.7: 12.42 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-08-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0258.fits at 15:18:24.63 +02:02:07.0: 12.52 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.49 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.39 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:18:24.63 +02:02:07.0: ref_mag=12.49 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=12.1010 delta=0.39 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:18:29.20 +02:02:13.7: ref_mag=12.39 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=11.9955 delta=0.40 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.50 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:23:33.22 +06:47:06.3: ref_mag=12.50 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.4998 delta=0.00 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-08-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0258.fits at 15:47:41.59 +06:31:13.7: 15.78 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_01-41-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits at 14:58:01.38 +09:24:07.3: 11.89 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-08-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0258.fits at 15:01:31.58 +02:26:19.9: 13.20 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.17 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:01:31.58 +02:26:19.9: ref_mag=13.17 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.3628 delta=0.81 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-08-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0258.fits at 15:11:16.73 +05:54:56.3: 12.53 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.52 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:11:16.73 +05:54:56.3: ref_mag=12.52 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.5516 delta=-0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-08-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0258.fits at 14:58:01.38 +09:24:07.3: 11.93 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.91 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:58:01.38 +09:24:07.3: ref_mag=11.91 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.0436 delta=-0.13 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out20450.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 15s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 2s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20241_fd_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-27-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0139
The candidate 20241_fd_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-27-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0139 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 14:57:48.00 +08:15:34.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20316_fd_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-27-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0139
The candidate 20316_fd_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-27-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0139 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 15:56:29.55 +09:01:47.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20406_fd_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-27-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0139
The candidate 20406_fd_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-27-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0139 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20413_fd_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-27-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0139
The candidate 20413_fd_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-27-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0139 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20426_fd_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-27-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0139
The candidate 20426_fd_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-27-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0139 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20450_fd_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-27-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0139
Preparing report for the candidate 20450_fd_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-27-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0139
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20458_fd_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-27-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0139
The candidate 20458_fd_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-27-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0139 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20464_fd_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-27-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0139
The candidate 20464_fd_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-27-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0139 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20484_fd_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-27-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0139
The candidate 20484_fd_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-27-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0139 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20498_fd_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-27-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0139
The candidate 20498_fd_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-27-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0139 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 05299_fd_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-27-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0139
The candidate 05299_fd_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-27-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0139 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 14:59:06.49 +06:31:44.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 1s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 18s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Ser-03-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
15:47:41.59 +06:31:13.7
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 3.5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_01-41-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-08-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0258.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-09_CI_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_023607_TTUQ1b1x1_1353025_lFc4Bj1M/fd_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-27-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0138.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-09_CI_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_023607_TTUQ1b1x1_1353025_lFc4Bj1M/fd_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-27-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0139.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_01-41-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-08-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0258.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_01-41-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-08-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0258.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-09_CI_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_023607_TTUQ1b1x1_1353025_lFc4Bj1M/fd_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-27-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0138.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-09_CI_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_023607_TTUQ1b1x1_1353025_lFc4Bj1M/fd_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-27-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0139.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_01-41-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-08-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0258.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-27-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0138.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-27-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0139.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/exclusion_list.txt
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_01-41-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-08-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0258.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-27-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0138.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-27-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0139.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_01-41-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_01-41-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits
Image size: 937.3'x624.2' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 15:25:43.591 +06:00:11.90 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.87"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-27-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0138.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-27-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0138.fits
Image size: 941.0'x626.6' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 15:25:51.562 +06:02:24.04 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 15:25:43.591 +06:00:11.90
Second-epoch image center 15:25:51.562 +06:02:24.04
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0494 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-27-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0139.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-27-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0139.fits
Image size: 941.0'x626.6' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 15:25:50.409 +06:02:13.10 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 15:25:43.591 +06:00:11.90
Second-epoch image center 15:25:50.409 +06:02:13.10
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0440 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 15:25:51.562 +06:02:24.04
Second-epoch second image center 15:25:50.409 +06:02:13.10
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00566 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_01-41-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits &> /tmp/tmp.75w8mNFYEp
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_01-41-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-08-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0258.fits &> /tmp/tmp.U6sm8XUKHn
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-08-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0258.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-09_CI_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_023607_TTUQ1b1x1_1353025_lFc4Bj1M/fd_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-27-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0138.fits &> /tmp/tmp.hSFJ1JsM7f
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-09_CI_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_023607_TTUQ1b1x1_1353025_lFc4Bj1M/fd_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-27-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0138.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-09_CI_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_023607_TTUQ1b1x1_1353025_lFc4Bj1M/fd_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-27-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0139.fits &> /tmp/tmp.BSii2yAMYD
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-09_CI_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_023607_TTUQ1b1x1_1353025_lFc4Bj1M/fd_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-27-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0139.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_01-41-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_01-41-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits and wcs_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_01-41-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_01-41-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits and wcs_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_01-41-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_01-41-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits and wcs_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_01-41-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_01-41-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits) and catalog (wcs_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_01-41-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_01-41-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 52266 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 223.4564 to 239.3740 deg, Dec +0.7180 to +11.2709 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 223.4564 to 239.3740 deg, Dec 0.7180 to 11.2709 deg
Loaded 4623 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3684 out of 4071 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 4071 out of 52266 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.601700
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.601700
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.07
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.53
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.53
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 52266 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 223.4564 to 239.3740 deg, Dec +0.7180 to +11.2709 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 223.4564 to 239.3740 deg, Dec 0.7180 to 11.2709 deg
Loaded 4623 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3684 out of 4071 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 4071 out of 52266 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_01-41-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_01-41-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_01-41-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_01-41-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits (aperture=5.0)
Read 48109 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 223.4676 to 239.3758 deg, Dec +0.7481 to +11.2767 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 223.4676 to 239.3758 deg, Dec 0.7481 to 11.2767 deg
Loaded 4608 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3712 out of 4078 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 4078 out of 48109 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-08-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0258.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-08-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0258.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-08-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0258.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-08-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0258.fits (aperture=5.0)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 70 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 8000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.2 pix Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_01-41-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits
2.2 pix Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-08-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0258.fits
2.9 pix fd_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-27-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0138.fits
2.9 pix fd_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-27-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0139.fits
2.2 pix wcs_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_01-41-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits
2.2 pix wcs_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-08-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0258.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.5 mag. Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_01-41-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits
15.4 mag. Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-08-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0258.fits
15.1 mag. fd_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-27-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0138.fits
15.1 mag. fd_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-27-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0139.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 15.1 (SNR ) 14.5 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.75w8mNFYEp (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_01-41-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-09_CI_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_023607_TTUQ1b1x1_1353025_lFc4Bj1M/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_01-41-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_01-41-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_01-41-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_01-41-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_01-41-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_01-41-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_01-41-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_01-41-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits' -> 'wcs_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_01-41-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_01-41-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_01-41-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_01-41-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_01-41-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_01-41-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_01-41-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_01-41-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_01-41-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_01-41-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_01-41-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits.wcscat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=21, blended=2645, passed=52245
Got 52245 stars (including 49535 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_01-41-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 52245 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013018 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010414 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 453 to 508 (Dec 0.7 to 11.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 971 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 971 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 961 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 971 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 51531 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 453 to 508 (Dec 0.7 to 11.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 971 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 971 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 51532 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 971 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 51532 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
Excluding outliers - 971 stars left (next iteration limit 1068)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_01-41-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits N_match=971 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.441 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.302 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.533 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.414 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.572 n_q1=221 n_q2=271 n_q3=216 n_q4=263 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.297
The image catalog is written to wcs_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_01-41-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_01-41-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_01-41-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits -region wcs_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_01-41-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_01-41-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.U6sm8XUKHn (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-08-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0258.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-09_CI_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_023607_TTUQ1b1x1_1353025_lFc4Bj1M/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-08-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0258.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-08-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0258.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-08-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0258.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-08-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0258.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-08-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0258.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-08-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0258.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-08-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0258.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-08-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0258.fits' -> 'wcs_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-08-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0258.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-08-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0258.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-08-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0258.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-08-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0258.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-08-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0258.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-08-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0258.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-08-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0258.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-08-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0258.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-08-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0258.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-08-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0258.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-08-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0258.fits.wcscat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=12, blended=2468, passed=48097
Got 48097 stars (including 45572 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-08-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0258.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 48097 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.1'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.1 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013015 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010412 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 453 to 508 (Dec 0.7 to 11.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 974 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 974 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 960 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 974 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 47610 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 453 to 508 (Dec 0.7 to 11.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 974 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 974 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 47612 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 974 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 47612 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Excluding outliers - 974 stars left (next iteration limit 1071)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-08-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0258.fits N_match=974 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.405 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.335 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.617 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.360 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.504 n_q1=268 n_q2=241 n_q3=250 n_q4=215 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.523
The image catalog is written to wcs_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-08-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0258.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-08-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0258.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-08-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0258.fits -region wcs_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-08-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0258.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-08-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0258.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.hSFJ1JsM7f (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-09_CI_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_023607_TTUQ1b1x1_1353025_lFc4Bj1M/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-09_CI_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_023607_TTUQ1b1x1_1353025_lFc4Bj1M/fd_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-27-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0138.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-09_CI_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_023607_TTUQ1b1x1_1353025_lFc4Bj1M/fd_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-27-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0138.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-09_CI_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_023607_TTUQ1b1x1_1353025_lFc4Bj1M/fd_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-27-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0138.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-09_CI_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_023607_TTUQ1b1x1_1353025_lFc4Bj1M/fd_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-27-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0138.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-09_CI_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_023607_TTUQ1b1x1_1353025_lFc4Bj1M/fd_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-27-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0138.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-09_CI_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_023607_TTUQ1b1x1_1353025_lFc4Bj1M/fd_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-27-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0138.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-27-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0138.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-27-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0138.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-27-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0138.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-27-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0138.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-27-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0138.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-27-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0138.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-27-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0138.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-09_CI_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_023607_TTUQ1b1x1_1353025_lFc4Bj1M/fd_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-27-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0138.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-27-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0138.fits.wcscat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=7, blended=1561, passed=40975
Got 40975 stars (including 39364 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-27-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0138.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 40975 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.0'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.0 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013069 (47.0 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010456 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 451 to 510 (Dec 0.3 to 11.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 973 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 973 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 963 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 973 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 40268 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 451 to 510 (Dec 0.3 to 11.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 973 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 973 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 40270 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 973 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 40269 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Excluding outliers - 973 stars left (next iteration limit 1070)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-27-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0138.fits N_match=973 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.303 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.322 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.320 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.262 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.308 n_q1=270 n_q2=226 n_q3=262 n_q4=215 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.064
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-27-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0138.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-27-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0138.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-09_CI_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_023607_TTUQ1b1x1_1353025_lFc4Bj1M/fd_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-27-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0138.fits -region wcs_fd_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-27-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0138.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-27-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0138.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.BSii2yAMYD (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-09_CI_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_023607_TTUQ1b1x1_1353025_lFc4Bj1M/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-09_CI_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_023607_TTUQ1b1x1_1353025_lFc4Bj1M/fd_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-27-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0139.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-09_CI_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_023607_TTUQ1b1x1_1353025_lFc4Bj1M/fd_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-27-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0139.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-09_CI_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_023607_TTUQ1b1x1_1353025_lFc4Bj1M/fd_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-27-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0139.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-09_CI_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_023607_TTUQ1b1x1_1353025_lFc4Bj1M/fd_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-27-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0139.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-09_CI_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_023607_TTUQ1b1x1_1353025_lFc4Bj1M/fd_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-27-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0139.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-09_CI_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_023607_TTUQ1b1x1_1353025_lFc4Bj1M/fd_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-27-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0139.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-27-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0139.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-27-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0139.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-27-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0139.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-27-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0139.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-27-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0139.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-27-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0139.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-27-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0139.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-09_CI_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_023607_TTUQ1b1x1_1353025_lFc4Bj1M/fd_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-27-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0139.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-27-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0139.fits.wcscat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=8, blended=1528, passed=40999
Got 40999 stars (including 39414 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-27-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0139.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 40999 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.0'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.0 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013069 (47.0 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010456 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 451 to 510 (Dec 0.3 to 11.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 975 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 975 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 966 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 975 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 40336 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 451 to 510 (Dec 0.3 to 11.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 975 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 975 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 40336 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 975 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 40337 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Excluding outliers - 975 stars left (next iteration limit 1072)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-27-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0139.fits N_match=975 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.309 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.313 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.357 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.265 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.304 n_q1=270 n_q2=228 n_q3=264 n_q4=213 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.156
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-27-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0139.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-27-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0139.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-09_CI_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_023607_TTUQ1b1x1_1353025_lFc4Bj1M/fd_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-27-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0139.fits -region wcs_fd_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-27-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0139.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-27-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0139.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-27-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0138.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-09_CI_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_023607_TTUQ1b1x1_1353025_lFc4Bj1M/wcs_fd_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-27-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0138.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-27-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0139.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-09_CI_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_023607_TTUQ1b1x1_1353025_lFc4Bj1M/wcs_fd_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-27-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0139.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Ser-03-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_01-41-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits at 15:55:29.06 +06:17:58.3: 14.26 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_01-41-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits at 15:57:21.05 +08:38:39.7: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_01-41-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits at 14:57:34.20 +08:00:43.5: 13.63 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_01-41-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits at 15:10:49.97 +04:23:25.1: 13.43 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-08-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0258.fits at 15:55:29.06 +06:17:58.3: 14.06 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.16 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:55:29.06 +06:17:58.3: ref_mag=14.16 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.1558 delta=0.00 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-08-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0258.fits at 15:57:21.05 +08:38:39.7: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:57:21.05 +08:38:39.7: at least one reference image reported edge (off-image or aperture/annulus past image boundary); cannot perform the forced-photometry cross-check
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-08-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0258.fits at 15:10:49.97 +04:23:25.1: 13.56 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.48 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:10:49.97 +04:23:25.1: ref_mag=13.48 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.5702 delta=-0.09 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_01-41-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits at 15:24:08.40 +02:03:40.7: 16.10 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-08-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0258.fits at 14:57:34.20 +08:00:43.5: 13.72 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.67 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:57:34.20 +08:00:43.5: ref_mag=13.67 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.8715 delta=-0.20 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-08-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0258.fits at 15:24:08.40 +02:03:40.7: 15.91 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_01-41-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits at 15:34:54.82 +07:55:06.5: 16.24 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_01-41-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits at 14:59:37.49 +05:53:01.2: 15.96 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-08-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0258.fits at 15:34:54.82 +07:55:06.5: 16.06 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-08-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0258.fits at 14:59:37.49 +05:53:01.2: 15.92 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_01-41-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits at 15:49:10.76 +10:09:03.6: 14.02 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_01-41-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits at 15:11:24.78 +02:33:16.9: 13.82 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_01-41-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits at 15:44:37.26 +05:03:48.7: 14.01 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_01-41-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits at 15:55:17.22 +02:11:25.7: 14.38 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-08-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0258.fits at 15:49:10.76 +10:09:03.6: 14.06 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.04 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:49:10.76 +10:09:03.6: ref_mag=14.04 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.1443 delta=-0.11 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_01-41-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits at 15:53:59.05 +01:03:38.5: 14.55 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-08-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0258.fits at 15:11:24.78 +02:33:16.9: 14.03 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.90 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-08-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0258.fits at 15:55:17.22 +02:11:25.7: 14.21 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:11:24.78 +02:33:16.9: ref_mag=13.90 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.9106 delta=-0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.30 +/- 0.07
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:55:17.22 +02:11:25.7: ref_mag=14.30 +/- 0.07 new_mean_mag=14.0931 delta=0.21 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-08-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0258.fits at 15:44:37.26 +05:03:48.7: 13.82 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.92 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:44:37.26 +05:03:48.7: ref_mag=13.92 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=14.0687 delta=-0.15 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_01-41-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits at 15:55:04.13 +04:11:34.0: 15.93 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-08-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0258.fits at 15:53:59.05 +01:03:38.5: 14.52 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.54 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:53:59.05 +01:03:38.5: ref_mag=14.54 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=14.3021 delta=0.23 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_01-41-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits at 15:53:01.16 +02:03:54.7: 14.69 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-08-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0258.fits at 15:55:04.13 +04:11:34.0: 15.73 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-08-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0258.fits at 15:53:01.16 +02:03:54.7: 14.31 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.48 +/- 0.08
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:53:01.16 +02:03:54.7: ref_mag=14.48 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=14.3117 delta=0.17 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_01-41-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits at 15:54:34.59 +01:03:09.0: 15.20 +/- 0.22 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_01-41-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits at 15:09:09.01 +09:15:04.8: 14.15 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_01-41-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits at 15:50:52.56 +07:38:27.6: 15.99 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_01-41-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits at 15:09:20.76 +01:13:36.2: 15.39 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_01-41-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits at 15:57:06.73 +10:00:14.3: 15.31 +/- 0.23 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-08-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0258.fits at 15:54:34.59 +01:03:09.0: 14.81 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.98 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:54:34.59 +01:03:09.0: ref_mag=14.98 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=14.5101 delta=0.47 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-08-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0258.fits at 15:50:52.56 +07:38:27.6: 15.82 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_01-41-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits at 15:54:43.34 +01:04:11.5: 15.01 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-08-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0258.fits at 15:09:09.01 +09:15:04.8: 14.28 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-08-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0258.fits at 15:57:06.73 +10:00:14.3: 15.59 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.20 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:09:09.01 +09:15:04.8: ref_mag=14.20 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.3200 delta=-0.12 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.31 +/- 0.23
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:57:06.73 +10:00:14.3: ref_mag=15.31 +/- 0.23 new_mean_mag=14.6436 delta=0.66 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-08-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0258.fits at 15:54:43.34 +01:04:11.5: 14.97 +/- 0.22 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.00 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:54:43.34 +01:04:11.5: ref_mag=15.00 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=14.4656 delta=0.53 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-08-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0258.fits at 15:09:20.76 +01:13:36.2: 15.33 +/- 0.22 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.36 +/- 0.15
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:09:20.76 +01:13:36.2: ref_mag=15.36 +/- 0.15 new_mean_mag=14.4906 delta=0.87 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_01-41-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits at 15:52:23.34 +01:18:01.0: 15.48 +/- 0.27 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_01-41-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits at 15:47:10.04 +00:51:45.1: 15.10 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_01-41-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits at 14:55:40.19 +01:26:15.1: 15.25 +/- 0.24 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_01-41-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits at 14:59:54.94 +04:44:25.6: 14.96 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_01-41-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits at 15:55:22.34 +01:04:29.6: 15.03 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-08-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0258.fits at 15:52:23.34 +01:18:01.0: 14.95 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.14 +/- 0.16
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:52:23.34 +01:18:01.0: ref_mag=15.14 +/- 0.16 new_mean_mag=14.6864 delta=0.45 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-08-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0258.fits at 14:55:40.19 +01:26:15.1: 14.97 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.08 +/- 0.15
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:55:40.19 +01:26:15.1: ref_mag=15.08 +/- 0.15 new_mean_mag=14.4824 delta=0.59 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-08-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0258.fits at 15:55:22.34 +01:04:29.6: 14.70 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.85 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:55:22.34 +01:04:29.6: ref_mag=14.85 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.6152 delta=0.23 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-08-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0258.fits at 14:59:54.94 +04:44:25.6: 14.85 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.90 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:59:54.94 +04:44:25.6: ref_mag=14.90 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.5452 delta=0.35 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-08-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0258.fits at 15:47:10.04 +00:51:45.1: 14.83 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.96 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:47:10.04 +00:51:45.1: ref_mag=14.96 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.6024 delta=0.35 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_01-41-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits at 15:55:14.19 +00:58:24.7: 15.17 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_01-41-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits at 15:54:07.13 +09:47:34.6: 15.11 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_01-41-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits at 15:01:56.59 +05:50:16.4: 14.98 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_01-41-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits at 14:57:14.26 +07:20:27.9: 14.84 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-08-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0258.fits at 15:55:14.19 +00:58:24.7: 14.92 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.05 +/- 0.15
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:55:14.19 +00:58:24.7: ref_mag=15.05 +/- 0.15 new_mean_mag=14.6574 delta=0.39 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-08-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0258.fits at 15:01:56.59 +05:50:16.4: 14.78 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.86 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:01:56.59 +05:50:16.4: ref_mag=14.86 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=14.5502 delta=0.31 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-08-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0258.fits at 15:54:07.13 +09:47:34.6: 15.28 +/- 0.23 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_01-41-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits at 15:50:10.29 +08:22:38.5: 15.38 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-08-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0258.fits at 14:57:14.26 +07:20:27.9: 14.93 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.17 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:54:07.13 +09:47:34.6: ref_mag=15.17 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=14.7701 delta=0.40 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.88 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:57:14.26 +07:20:27.9: ref_mag=14.88 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.6389 delta=0.24 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-08-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0258.fits at 15:50:10.29 +08:22:38.5: 15.25 +/- 0.22 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.33 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:50:10.29 +08:22:38.5: ref_mag=15.33 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=14.9375 delta=0.39 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_01-41-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits at 15:56:23.05 +09:11:36.1: 15.01 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_01-41-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits at 15:44:52.07 +02:36:22.8: 15.28 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-08-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0258.fits at 15:56:23.05 +09:11:36.1: 15.09 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.04 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:56:23.05 +09:11:36.1: ref_mag=15.04 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.8628 delta=0.17 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_01-41-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits at 15:52:33.67 +02:12:31.1: 14.85 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_01-41-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits at 15:53:28.55 +02:02:06.9: 15.18 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-08-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0258.fits at 15:44:52.07 +02:36:22.8: 15.10 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.20 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:44:52.07 +02:36:22.8: ref_mag=15.20 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.7859 delta=0.41 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_01-41-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits at 15:55:13.28 +08:54:35.1: 14.99 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-08-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0258.fits at 15:53:28.55 +02:02:06.9: 15.28 +/- 0.25 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-08-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0258.fits at 15:52:33.67 +02:12:31.1: 15.04 +/- 0.22 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.21 +/- 0.15
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:53:28.55 +02:02:06.9: ref_mag=15.21 +/- 0.15 new_mean_mag=14.8981 delta=0.32 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.91 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:52:33.67 +02:12:31.1: ref_mag=14.91 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.9428 delta=-0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-08-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0258.fits at 15:55:13.28 +08:54:35.1: 15.19 +/- 0.22 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.05 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:55:13.28 +08:54:35.1: ref_mag=15.05 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.8303 delta=0.22 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_01-41-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits at 15:54:41.32 +10:20:43.3: 14.58 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-08-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0258.fits at 15:54:41.32 +10:20:43.3: 14.66 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.61 +/- 0.08
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:54:41.32 +10:20:43.3: ref_mag=14.61 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=14.8184 delta=-0.21 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_01-41-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits at 15:50:00.13 +07:58:36.5: 15.21 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_01-41-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits at 15:18:02.06 +08:24:17.1: 15.14 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_01-41-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits at 15:00:41.58 +06:25:03.9: 15.39 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-08-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0258.fits at 15:50:00.13 +07:58:36.5: 15.21 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.21 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:50:00.13 +07:58:36.5: ref_mag=15.21 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.9879 delta=0.22 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-08-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0258.fits at 15:00:41.58 +06:25:03.9: 15.30 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.34 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:00:41.58 +06:25:03.9: ref_mag=15.34 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=14.8689 delta=0.47 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-08-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0258.fits at 15:18:02.06 +08:24:17.1: 15.49 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.25 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:18:02.06 +08:24:17.1: ref_mag=15.25 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.9151 delta=0.34 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_01-41-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits at 14:59:10.71 +10:52:49.2: 13.85 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-08-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0258.fits at 14:59:10.71 +10:52:49.2: 14.10 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.95 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:59:10.71 +10:52:49.2: ref_mag=13.95 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=13.6573 delta=0.29 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out66220.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out66350.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out66451.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out66868.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out66992.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 54s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 7s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 65919_fd_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-27-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0139
The candidate 65919_fd_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-27-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0139 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 65922_fd_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-27-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0139
The candidate 65922_fd_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-27-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0139 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 65923_fd_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-27-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0139
The candidate 65923_fd_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-27-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0139 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 65974_fd_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-27-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0139
The candidate 65974_fd_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-27-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0139 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 15:18:35.59 +02:06:31.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 65979_fd_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-27-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0139
The candidate 65979_fd_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-27-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0139 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 65999_fd_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-27-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0139
The candidate 65999_fd_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-27-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0139 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 66057_fd_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-27-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0139
The candidate 66057_fd_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-27-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0139 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 66095_fd_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-27-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0139
The candidate 66095_fd_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-27-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0139 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 66125_fd_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-27-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0139
The candidate 66125_fd_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-27-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0139 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 66134_fd_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-27-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0139
The candidate 66134_fd_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-27-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0139 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 15:47:41.59 +06:31:13.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_local.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 66162_fd_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-27-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0139
The candidate 66162_fd_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-27-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0139 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 66171_fd_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-27-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0139
The candidate 66171_fd_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-27-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0139 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 66179_fd_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-27-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0139
The candidate 66179_fd_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-27-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0139 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 66197_fd_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-27-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0139
The candidate 66197_fd_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-27-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0139 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 66220_fd_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-27-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0139
Preparing report for the candidate 66220_fd_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-27-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0139
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 66226_fd_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-27-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0139
The candidate 66226_fd_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-27-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0139 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 66280_fd_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-27-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0139
The candidate 66280_fd_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-27-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0139 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 66334_fd_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-27-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0139
The candidate 66334_fd_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-27-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0139 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 15:50:22.49 +02:13:07.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 66350_fd_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-27-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0139
Preparing report for the candidate 66350_fd_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-27-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0139
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 66409_fd_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-27-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0139
The candidate 66409_fd_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-27-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0139 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 15:18:38.85 +02:02:05.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 66430_fd_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-27-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0139
The candidate 66430_fd_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-27-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0139 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 15:44:08.42 +08:06:56.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 66451_fd_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-27-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0139
Preparing report for the candidate 66451_fd_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-27-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0139
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 66507_fd_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-27-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0139
The candidate 66507_fd_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-27-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0139 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 66622_fd_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-27-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0139
The candidate 66622_fd_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-27-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0139 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 66673_fd_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-27-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0139
The candidate 66673_fd_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-27-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0139 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 66731_fd_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-27-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0139
The candidate 66731_fd_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-27-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0139 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 66733_fd_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-27-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0139
The candidate 66733_fd_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-27-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0139 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 66736_fd_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-27-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0139
The candidate 66736_fd_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-27-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0139 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 66747_fd_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-27-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0139
The candidate 66747_fd_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-27-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0139 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 66748_fd_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-27-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0139
The candidate 66748_fd_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-27-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0139 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 66767_fd_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-27-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0139
The candidate 66767_fd_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-27-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0139 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 66775_fd_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-27-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0139
The candidate 66775_fd_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-27-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0139 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 66796_fd_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-27-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0139
The candidate 66796_fd_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-27-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0139 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 66828_fd_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-27-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0139
The candidate 66828_fd_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-27-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0139 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 66841_fd_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-27-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0139
The candidate 66841_fd_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-27-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0139 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 66868_fd_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-27-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0139
Preparing report for the candidate 66868_fd_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-27-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0139
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 66884_fd_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-27-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0139
The candidate 66884_fd_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-27-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0139 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 66931_fd_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-27-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0139
The candidate 66931_fd_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-27-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0139 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 66938_fd_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-27-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0139
The candidate 66938_fd_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-27-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0139 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 66989_fd_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-27-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0139
The candidate 66989_fd_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-27-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0139 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 66992_fd_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-27-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0139
Preparing report for the candidate 66992_fd_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-27-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0139
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 66994_fd_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-27-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0139
The candidate 66994_fd_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-27-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0139 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 67021_fd_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-27-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0139
The candidate 67021_fd_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-27-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0139 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 67052_fd_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-27-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0139
The candidate 67052_fd_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-27-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0139 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 67057_fd_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-27-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0139
The candidate 67057_fd_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-27-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0139 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 67087_fd_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-27-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0139
The candidate 67087_fd_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-27-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0139 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 67143_fd_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-27-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0139
The candidate 67143_fd_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-27-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0139 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 67179_fd_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-27-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0139
The candidate 67179_fd_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-27-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0139 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 67196_fd_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-27-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0139
The candidate 67196_fd_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-27-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0139 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 67202_fd_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-27-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0139
The candidate 67202_fd_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-27-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0139 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 67213_fd_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-27-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0139
The candidate 67213_fd_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-27-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0139 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 67227_fd_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-27-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0139
The candidate 67227_fd_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-27-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0139 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 67232_fd_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-27-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0139
The candidate 67232_fd_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-27-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0139 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 67247_fd_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-27-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0139
The candidate 67247_fd_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-27-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0139 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 67255_fd_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-27-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0139
The candidate 67255_fd_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-27-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0139 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 67257_fd_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-27-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0139
The candidate 67257_fd_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-27-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0139 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 67279_fd_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-27-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0139
The candidate 67279_fd_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-27-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0139 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 67282_fd_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-27-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0139
The candidate 67282_fd_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-27-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0139 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 67290_fd_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-27-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0139
The candidate 67290_fd_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-27-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0139 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 67318_fd_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-27-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0139
The candidate 67318_fd_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-27-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0139 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 67319_fd_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-27-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0139
The candidate 67319_fd_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-27-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0139 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 67362_fd_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-27-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0139
The candidate 67362_fd_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-27-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0139 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 67374_fd_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-27-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0139
The candidate 67374_fd_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-27-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0139 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 67378_fd_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-27-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0139
The candidate 67378_fd_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-27-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0139 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 67385_fd_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-27-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0139
The candidate 67385_fd_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-27-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0139 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 67428_fd_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-27-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0139
The candidate 67428_fd_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-27-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0139 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 29055_fd_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-27-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0139
The candidate 29055_fd_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-27-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0139 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 14:59:06.50 +06:31:44.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 62326_fd_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-27-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0139
The candidate 62326_fd_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-27-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0139 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 39993_fd_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-27-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0139
The candidate 39993_fd_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-27-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0139 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 15:56:29.55 +09:01:47.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 27809_fd_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-27-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0139
The candidate 27809_fd_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-09_02-27-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0139 did not pass the final checks
