This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_024531_TTUQ2b1x1_2476375_AID26ygS
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 08.3091 2461199.8091 13.27 16:16:27.64 -15:26:10.5
358.67798 24.55306 galactic Sco Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.6" and 4.5 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.364 Isara 3 -0 3 13.3 -0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits at 16:16:27.64 -15:26:10.5: 15.53 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-31-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits at 16:16:27.64 -15:26:10.5: 15.49 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461199.8091,13.27,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260608.3091 13.27CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 08.3091 2461199.8091 13.19 15:45:25.23 -19:55:58.4
349.41615 26.83932 galactic Lib Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.7" and 4.5 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.363 Padua 3 -1 3 13.1 0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits at 15:45:25.23 -19:55:58.4: 15.34 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-31-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits at 15:45:25.23 -19:55:58.4: 15.41 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461199.8091,13.19,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260608.3091 13.19CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 08.3091 2461199.8091 14.21 16:07:00.51 -17:33:57.6
355.27090 24.84969 galactic Sco Second-epoch detections are separated by 2.3" and 4.3 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.291 Alice 3 -0 3 14.4 -0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits at 16:07:00.51 -17:33:57.6: 15.65 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-31-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits at 16:07:00.51 -17:33:57.6: 15.62 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461199.8091,14.21,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260608.3091 14.21CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 08.3091 2461199.8091 14.34 15:47:42.94 -15:45:24.2
353.16864 29.44591 galactic Lib Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.0" and 4.6 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.851 Zeissia 2 0 2 14.4 -0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits at 15:47:42.94 -15:45:24.2: 15.50 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-31-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits at 15:47:42.94 -15:45:24.2: 15.50 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461199.8091,14.34,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260608.3091 14.34CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461169.81328752 09.05.2026 07:30:58.042 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits
First image: 2461169.81328752 09.05.2026 07:30:58.042 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits
Last image: 2461199.80932468 08.06.2026 07:25:15.652 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_024531_TTUQ2b1x1_2476375_AID26ygS/fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_02-25-15_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0264.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 11
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.98
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 6 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 7457
Objects passed selection criteria: 7434
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.1 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.1 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 5974.25
Average stars matched: 5493 (91.9446 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 112632 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Sun Jun 7 22:21:29 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-90-g333d5534
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-06-07)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Mon Jun 8 02:48:58 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461169.81328752 09.05.2026 07:30:58.042 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits
First image: 2461169.81328752 09.05.2026 07:30:58.042 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits
Last image: 2461199.80932468 08.06.2026 07:25:15.652 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_024531_TTUQ2b1x1_2476375_AID26ygS/fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_02-25-15_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0264.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 130
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.62
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 31 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 57405
Objects passed selection criteria: 57281
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.1 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.1 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 47197.8
Average stars matched: 42859.5 (90.8084 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 151776 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Sun Jun 7 22:21:29 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-90-g333d5534
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-06-07)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Mon Jun 8 02:51:47 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/TTUQ2_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 4 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-31-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_024531_TTUQ2b1x1_2476375_AID26ygS/fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_02-24-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0263.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_024531_TTUQ2b1x1_2476375_AID26ygS/fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_02-25-15_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0264.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-31-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-31-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_024531_TTUQ2b1x1_2476375_AID26ygS/fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_02-24-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0263.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_024531_TTUQ2b1x1_2476375_AID26ygS/fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_02-25-15_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0264.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461199.80879213
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits'
wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-31-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-31-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-31-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-31-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits'
wcs_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_02-24-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0263.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_02-24-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0263.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_02-24-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0263.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_02-24-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0263.fits'
wcs_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_02-25-15_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0264.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_02-25-15_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0264.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_02-25-15_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0264.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_02-25-15_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0264.fits'
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits
Image size: 937.4'x624.4' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 15:59:59.569 -17:59:42.51 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.87"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_02-24-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0263.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_02-24-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0263.fits
Image size: 937.0'x624.2' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 15:59:58.684 -18:00:51.28 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 15:59:59.569 -17:59:42.51
Second-epoch image center 15:59:58.684 -18:00:51.28
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0194 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_02-25-15_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0264.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_02-25-15_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0264.fits
Image size: 937.0'x624.2' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 15:59:56.873 -18:00:59.34 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 15:59:59.569 -17:59:42.51
Second-epoch image center 15:59:56.873 -18:00:59.34
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0239 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 15:59:58.684 -18:00:51.28
Second-epoch second image center 15:59:56.873 -18:00:59.34
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00752 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits &> /tmp/tmp.2lkpsgq7Kw
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-31-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits &> /tmp/tmp.gYy93VjbA3
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-31-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_024531_TTUQ2b1x1_2476375_AID26ygS/fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_02-24-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0263.fits &> /tmp/tmp.IVrjH6LhaB
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_024531_TTUQ2b1x1_2476375_AID26ygS/fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_02-24-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0263.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_024531_TTUQ2b1x1_2476375_AID26ygS/fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_02-25-15_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0264.fits &> /tmp/tmp.vyRpOC6oTb
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_024531_TTUQ2b1x1_2476375_AID26ygS/fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_02-25-15_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0264.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits and wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits.cat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits and wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits.cat
Found non-empty wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits and wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits.cat
The reference image (wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits) and catalog (wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits.cat) found
'wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits.cat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 7602 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 231.5352 to 248.4577 deg, Dec -23.2486 to -12.6560 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 231.5352 to 248.4577 deg, Dec -23.2486 to -12.6560 deg
Loaded 5891 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4657 out of 4797 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 4797 out of 7602 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.710400
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.710400
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.98
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.73
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.73
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 7602 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 231.5352 to 248.4577 deg, Dec -23.2486 to -12.6560 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 231.5352 to 248.4577 deg, Dec -23.2486 to -12.6560 deg
Loaded 5891 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4657 out of 4797 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 4797 out of 7602 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits (aperture=6.3)
Read 7612 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 231.5352 to 248.4577 deg, Dec -23.2541 to -12.6560 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 231.5352 to 248.4577 deg, Dec -23.2541 to -12.6560 deg
Loaded 5895 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4659 out of 4800 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 4800 out of 7612 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-31-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-31-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-31-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-31-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits (aperture=6.3)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 9 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 8000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.3 pix Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits
2.3 pix Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-31-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits
2.4 pix fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_02-24-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0263.fits
2.4 pix fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_02-25-15_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0264.fits
2.3 pix wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits
2.3 pix wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-31-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
14.7 mag. Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits
14.7 mag. Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-31-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits
14.7 mag. fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_02-24-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0263.fits
14.7 mag. fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_02-25-15_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0264.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.7 (SNR ) 11.8 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.2lkpsgq7Kw (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-08_CI_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_024531_TTUQ2b1x1_2476375_AID26ygS/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits 572.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits' -> 'wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=468, passed=7602
Got 7602 stars (including 7123 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 7602 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013019 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010416 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 388 (Dec -23.2 to -12.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 971 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 971 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 958 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.47"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 971 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7464 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.46"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 388 (Dec -23.2 to -12.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 971 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 971 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7462 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.46"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 971 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7462 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.49"
Excluding outliers - 971 stars left (next iteration limit 1068)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits N_match=971 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.491 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.389 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.638 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.508 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.516 n_q1=269 n_q2=242 n_q3=233 n_q4=227 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.300
The image catalog is written to wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits -region wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.gYy93VjbA3 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-08_CI_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_024531_TTUQ2b1x1_2476375_AID26ygS/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-31-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits 572.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-31-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-31-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-31-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-31-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-31-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-31-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits' -> 'wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-31-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-31-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-31-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-31-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-31-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-31-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-31-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-31-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-31-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-31-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-31-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=459, passed=7612
Got 7612 stars (including 7147 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-31-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 7612 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013019 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010416 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 388 (Dec -23.3 to -12.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 972 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 972 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 957 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.46"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 972 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7473 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 388 (Dec -23.3 to -12.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 972 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 972 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7473 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 972 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7473 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45"
Excluding outliers - 972 stars left (next iteration limit 1069)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-31-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits N_match=972 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.481 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.359 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.591 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.477 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.536 n_q1=271 n_q2=241 n_q3=233 n_q4=227 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.228
The image catalog is written to wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-31-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-31-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-31-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits -region wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-31-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-31-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.IVrjH6LhaB (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-08_CI_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_024531_TTUQ2b1x1_2476375_AID26ygS/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_024531_TTUQ2b1x1_2476375_AID26ygS/fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_02-24-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0263.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_024531_TTUQ2b1x1_2476375_AID26ygS/fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_02-24-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0263.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_024531_TTUQ2b1x1_2476375_AID26ygS/fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_02-24-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0263.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_024531_TTUQ2b1x1_2476375_AID26ygS/fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_02-24-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0263.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_024531_TTUQ2b1x1_2476375_AID26ygS/fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_02-24-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0263.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_024531_TTUQ2b1x1_2476375_AID26ygS/fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_02-24-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0263.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_02-24-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0263.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_02-24-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0263.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_02-24-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0263.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_02-24-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0263.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_02-24-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0263.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_02-24-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0263.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_02-24-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0263.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_024531_TTUQ2b1x1_2476375_AID26ygS/fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_02-24-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0263.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_02-24-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0263.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=415, passed=7543
Got 7543 stars (including 7119 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_02-24-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0263.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 7543 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.0'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.0 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013014 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010411 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 388 (Dec -23.3 to -12.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 974 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 974 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 958 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.51"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 974 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7426 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.49"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 388 (Dec -23.3 to -12.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 974 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 974 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7428 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.49"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 974 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7428 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.51"
Excluding outliers - 974 stars left (next iteration limit 1071)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_02-24-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0263.fits N_match=974 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.549 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.423 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.741 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.445 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.767 n_q1=219 n_q2=269 n_q3=212 n_q4=274 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.397
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_02-24-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0263.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_02-24-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0263.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_024531_TTUQ2b1x1_2476375_AID26ygS/fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_02-24-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0263.fits -region wcs_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_02-24-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0263.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_02-24-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0263.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.vyRpOC6oTb (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-08_CI_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_024531_TTUQ2b1x1_2476375_AID26ygS/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_024531_TTUQ2b1x1_2476375_AID26ygS/fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_02-25-15_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0264.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_024531_TTUQ2b1x1_2476375_AID26ygS/fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_02-25-15_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0264.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_024531_TTUQ2b1x1_2476375_AID26ygS/fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_02-25-15_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0264.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_024531_TTUQ2b1x1_2476375_AID26ygS/fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_02-25-15_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0264.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_024531_TTUQ2b1x1_2476375_AID26ygS/fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_02-25-15_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0264.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_024531_TTUQ2b1x1_2476375_AID26ygS/fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_02-25-15_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0264.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_02-25-15_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0264.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_02-25-15_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0264.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_02-25-15_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0264.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_02-25-15_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0264.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_02-25-15_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0264.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_02-25-15_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0264.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_02-25-15_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0264.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_024531_TTUQ2b1x1_2476375_AID26ygS/fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_02-25-15_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0264.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_02-25-15_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0264.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=419, passed=7509
Got 7509 stars (including 7087 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_02-25-15_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0264.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 7509 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.0'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.0 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013014 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010411 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 388 (Dec -23.3 to -12.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 974 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 974 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 960 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.50"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 974 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7403 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.49"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 388 (Dec -23.3 to -12.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 975 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 975 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7404 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.50"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 975 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7404 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.52"
Excluding outliers - 975 stars left (next iteration limit 1071)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_02-25-15_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0264.fits N_match=975 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.563 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.444 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.708 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.473 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.756 n_q1=217 n_q2=271 n_q3=214 n_q4=273 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.342
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_02-25-15_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0264.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_02-25-15_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0264.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_024531_TTUQ2b1x1_2476375_AID26ygS/fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_02-25-15_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0264.fits -region wcs_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_02-25-15_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0264.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_02-25-15_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0264.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits sigma_overall=0.491 worst_q_ratio=1.300
ref2=Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-31-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits sigma_overall=0.481 worst_q_ratio=1.228
new1=fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_02-24-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0263.fits sigma_overall=0.549 worst_q_ratio=1.397
new2=fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_02-25-15_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0264.fits sigma_overall=0.563 worst_q_ratio=1.342
reference average sigma_overall=0.486 worst_q_ratio=1.264
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: numpy/matplotlib unavailable (No module named 'matplotlib') -- falling back to the C plotter
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy: wrote wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258_astrometric_residuals.png (971 matched stars from wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: numpy/matplotlib unavailable (No module named 'matplotlib') -- falling back to the C plotter
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy: wrote wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-31-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0259_astrometric_residuals.png (972 matched stars from wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-31-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: numpy/matplotlib unavailable (No module named 'matplotlib') -- falling back to the C plotter
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy: PGPLOT /PNG device reported success but no file appeared at wcs_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_02-24-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0263_astrometric_residuals.png -- no plot produced
WARNING: no astrometric residual plot produced for wcs_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_02-24-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0263.fits -- both lib/plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py and lib/plot_astrometric_residuals_xy failed to create wcs_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_02-24-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0263_astrometric_residuals.png (see messages above)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: numpy/matplotlib unavailable (No module named 'matplotlib') -- falling back to the C plotter
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy: PGPLOT /PNG device reported success but no file appeared at wcs_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_02-25-15_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0264_astrometric_residuals.png -- no plot produced
WARNING: no astrometric residual plot produced for wcs_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_02-25-15_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0264.fits -- both lib/plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py and lib/plot_astrometric_residuals_xy failed to create wcs_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_02-25-15_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0264_astrometric_residuals.png (see messages above)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_02-24-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0263.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_02-24-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0263.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_024531_TTUQ2b1x1_2476375_AID26ygS/wcs_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_02-24-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0263.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_02-25-15_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0264.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_02-25-15_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0264.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_024531_TTUQ2b1x1_2476375_AID26ygS/wcs_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_02-25-15_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0264.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Lib-04-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits at 15:53:48.17 -17:00:12.3: 11.94 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits at 16:00:54.80 -16:28:32.0: 12.11 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits at 16:02:26.98 -15:29:34.8: 12.05 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits at 16:00:11.48 -16:55:15.5: 11.89 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits at 15:53:48.81 -18:26:45.6: 11.95 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-31-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits at 15:53:48.17 -17:00:12.3: 11.94 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-31-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits at 16:00:54.80 -16:28:32.0: 12.10 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.94 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:53:48.17 -17:00:12.3: ref_mag=11.94 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.9258 delta=0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.11 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:00:54.80 -16:28:32.0: ref_mag=12.11 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.7733 delta=0.33 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-31-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits at 16:02:26.98 -15:29:34.8: 12.10 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-31-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits at 16:00:11.48 -16:55:15.5: 11.89 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.07 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:02:26.98 -15:29:34.8: ref_mag=12.07 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.9046 delta=0.17 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.89 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:00:11.48 -16:55:15.5: ref_mag=11.89 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.8353 delta=0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-31-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits at 15:53:48.81 -18:26:45.6: 11.99 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.97 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:53:48.81 -18:26:45.6: ref_mag=11.97 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.9084 delta=0.06 (need > 0.90)
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 1s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 1s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20799_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_02-25-15_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0264
The candidate 20799_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_02-25-15_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0264 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:08:31.91 -21:31:49.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21013_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_02-25-15_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0264
The candidate 21013_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_02-25-15_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0264 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:10:44.91 -16:36:03.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21021_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_02-25-15_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0264
The candidate 21021_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_02-25-15_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0264 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 15:49:04.56 -20:06:54.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21194_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_02-25-15_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0264
The candidate 21194_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_02-25-15_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0264 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21269_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_02-25-15_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0264
The candidate 21269_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_02-25-15_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0264 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21291_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_02-25-15_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0264
The candidate 21291_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_02-25-15_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0264 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21304_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_02-25-15_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0264
The candidate 21304_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_02-25-15_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0264 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21306_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_02-25-15_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0264
The candidate 21306_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_02-25-15_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0264 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 03712_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_02-25-15_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0264
The candidate 03712_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_02-25-15_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0264 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 15:56:23.75 -18:18:14.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 2s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Lib-04-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 4 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-31-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_024531_TTUQ2b1x1_2476375_AID26ygS/fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_02-24-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0263.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_024531_TTUQ2b1x1_2476375_AID26ygS/fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_02-25-15_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0264.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-31-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-31-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_024531_TTUQ2b1x1_2476375_AID26ygS/fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_02-24-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0263.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_024531_TTUQ2b1x1_2476375_AID26ygS/fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_02-25-15_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0264.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-31-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_02-24-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0263.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_02-25-15_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0264.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/exclusion_list.txt
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-31-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_02-24-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0263.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_02-25-15_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0264.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits
Image size: 937.4'x624.4' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 15:59:59.569 -17:59:42.51 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.87"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_02-24-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0263.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_02-24-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0263.fits
util/fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh: line 144: echo: write error: Broken pipe
Image size: 937.0'x624.2' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 15:59:58.684 -18:00:51.28 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 15:59:59.569 -17:59:42.51
Second-epoch image center 15:59:58.684 -18:00:51.28
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0194 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_02-25-15_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0264.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_02-25-15_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0264.fits
Image size: 937.0'x624.2' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 15:59:56.873 -18:00:59.34 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 15:59:59.569 -17:59:42.51
Second-epoch image center 15:59:56.873 -18:00:59.34
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0239 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 15:59:58.684 -18:00:51.28
Second-epoch second image center 15:59:56.873 -18:00:59.34
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00752 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits &> /tmp/tmp.5lnIRbjIdy
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-31-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits &> /tmp/tmp.60ukS3Hmu0
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-31-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_024531_TTUQ2b1x1_2476375_AID26ygS/fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_02-24-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0263.fits &> /tmp/tmp.IzRl1cQZXU
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_024531_TTUQ2b1x1_2476375_AID26ygS/fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_02-24-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0263.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_024531_TTUQ2b1x1_2476375_AID26ygS/fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_02-25-15_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0264.fits &> /tmp/tmp.gdLDeXHZZB
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_024531_TTUQ2b1x1_2476375_AID26ygS/fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_02-25-15_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0264.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits and wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits.cat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits and wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits.cat
Found non-empty wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits and wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits.cat
The reference image (wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits) and catalog (wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits.cat) found
'wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits.cat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 59419 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 231.5352 to 248.4793 deg, Dec -23.2633 to -12.6204 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 231.5352 to 248.4793 deg, Dec -23.2633 to -12.6204 deg
Loaded 5923 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4701 out of 5206 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 5206 out of 59419 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.536600
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.536600
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.62
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.92
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.92
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 59419 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 231.5352 to 248.4793 deg, Dec -23.2633 to -12.6204 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 231.5352 to 248.4793 deg, Dec -23.2633 to -12.6204 deg
Loaded 5923 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4701 out of 5206 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 5206 out of 59419 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits (aperture=4.6)
Read 58808 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 231.5351 to 248.5023 deg, Dec -23.2663 to -12.6225 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 231.5351 to 248.5023 deg, Dec -23.2663 to -12.6225 deg
Loaded 5929 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4737 out of 5215 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 5215 out of 58808 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-31-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-31-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-31-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-31-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits (aperture=4.6)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 72 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 8000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.1 pix Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits
2.1 pix Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-31-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits
2.3 pix fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_02-24-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0263.fits
2.2 pix fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_02-25-15_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0264.fits
2.1 pix wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits
2.1 pix wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-31-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
14.9 mag. Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits
14.9 mag. Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-31-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits
14.8 mag. fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_02-24-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0263.fits
14.8 mag. fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_02-25-15_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0264.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.8 (SNR ) 14.2 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.5lnIRbjIdy (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-08_CI_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_024531_TTUQ2b1x1_2476375_AID26ygS/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits 572.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits' -> 'wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=12, blended=2882, passed=59407
Got 59407 stars (including 56426 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 59407 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013019 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010416 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 388 (Dec -23.3 to -12.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 973 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 973 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 958 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 973 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 58535 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 388 (Dec -23.3 to -12.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 973 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 973 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 58535 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 973 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 58535 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.46"
Excluding outliers - 973 stars left (next iteration limit 1070)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits N_match=973 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.483 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.365 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.616 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.463 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.547 n_q1=285 n_q2=237 n_q3=224 n_q4=227 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.277
The image catalog is written to wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits -region wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.60ukS3Hmu0 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-08_CI_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_024531_TTUQ2b1x1_2476375_AID26ygS/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-31-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits 572.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-31-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-31-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-31-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-31-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-31-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-31-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits' -> 'wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-31-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-31-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-31-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-31-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-31-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-31-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-31-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-31-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-31-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-31-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-31-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=11, blended=2840, passed=58797
Got 58797 stars (including 55880 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-31-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 58797 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013019 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010416 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 388 (Dec -23.3 to -12.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 971 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 971 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 957 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 971 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 57962 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 388 (Dec -23.3 to -12.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 971 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 971 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 57961 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 971 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 57961 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44"
Excluding outliers - 971 stars left (next iteration limit 1068)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-31-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits N_match=971 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.443 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.342 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.568 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.428 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.513 n_q1=287 n_q2=240 n_q3=218 n_q4=226 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.283
The image catalog is written to wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-31-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-31-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-31-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits -region wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-31-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-31-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.IzRl1cQZXU (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-08_CI_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_024531_TTUQ2b1x1_2476375_AID26ygS/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_024531_TTUQ2b1x1_2476375_AID26ygS/fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_02-24-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0263.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_024531_TTUQ2b1x1_2476375_AID26ygS/fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_02-24-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0263.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_024531_TTUQ2b1x1_2476375_AID26ygS/fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_02-24-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0263.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_024531_TTUQ2b1x1_2476375_AID26ygS/fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_02-24-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0263.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_024531_TTUQ2b1x1_2476375_AID26ygS/fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_02-24-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0263.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_024531_TTUQ2b1x1_2476375_AID26ygS/fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_02-24-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0263.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_02-24-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0263.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_02-24-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0263.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_02-24-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0263.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_02-24-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0263.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_02-24-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0263.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_02-24-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0263.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_02-24-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0263.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_024531_TTUQ2b1x1_2476375_AID26ygS/fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_02-24-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0263.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_02-24-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0263.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=7, blended=2774, passed=52776
Got 52776 stars (including 49937 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_02-24-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0263.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 52776 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.0'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.0 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013014 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010411 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 388 (Dec -23.3 to -12.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 974 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 974 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 959 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.50"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 974 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 51915 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.46"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 388 (Dec -23.3 to -12.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 974 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 974 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 51915 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.46"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 974 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 51915 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.50"
Excluding outliers - 974 stars left (next iteration limit 1071)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_02-24-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0263.fits N_match=974 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.547 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.387 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.609 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.529 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.641 n_q1=232 n_q2=257 n_q3=222 n_q4=263 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.172
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_02-24-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0263.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_02-24-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0263.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_024531_TTUQ2b1x1_2476375_AID26ygS/fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_02-24-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0263.fits -region wcs_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_02-24-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0263.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_02-24-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0263.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.gdLDeXHZZB (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-08_CI_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_024531_TTUQ2b1x1_2476375_AID26ygS/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_024531_TTUQ2b1x1_2476375_AID26ygS/fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_02-25-15_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0264.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_024531_TTUQ2b1x1_2476375_AID26ygS/fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_02-25-15_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0264.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_024531_TTUQ2b1x1_2476375_AID26ygS/fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_02-25-15_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0264.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_024531_TTUQ2b1x1_2476375_AID26ygS/fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_02-25-15_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0264.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_024531_TTUQ2b1x1_2476375_AID26ygS/fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_02-25-15_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0264.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_024531_TTUQ2b1x1_2476375_AID26ygS/fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_02-25-15_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0264.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_02-25-15_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0264.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_02-25-15_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0264.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_02-25-15_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0264.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_02-25-15_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0264.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_02-25-15_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0264.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_02-25-15_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0264.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_02-25-15_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0264.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_024531_TTUQ2b1x1_2476375_AID26ygS/fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_02-25-15_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0264.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_02-25-15_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0264.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=2, blended=2952, passed=53086
Got 53086 stars (including 50074 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_02-25-15_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0264.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 53086 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.0'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.0 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013014 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010411 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 388 (Dec -23.3 to -12.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 974 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 974 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 959 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.50"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 974 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 52197 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.46"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 388 (Dec -23.3 to -12.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 974 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 974 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 52197 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.47"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 974 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 52197 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.51"
Excluding outliers - 974 stars left (next iteration limit 1071)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_02-25-15_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0264.fits N_match=974 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.557 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.428 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.702 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.489 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.642 n_q1=229 n_q2=256 n_q3=228 n_q4=261 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.259
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_02-25-15_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0264.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_02-25-15_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0264.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_024531_TTUQ2b1x1_2476375_AID26ygS/fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_02-25-15_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0264.fits -region wcs_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_02-25-15_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0264.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_02-25-15_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0264.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_02-24-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0263.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_024531_TTUQ2b1x1_2476375_AID26ygS/wcs_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_02-24-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0263.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_02-25-15_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0264.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_024531_TTUQ2b1x1_2476375_AID26ygS/wcs_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_02-25-15_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0264.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Lib-04-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits at 16:11:19.93 -21:08:50.1: 14.33 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits at 16:14:28.31 -20:21:33.0: 13.84 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits at 15:56:46.72 -14:29:19.4: 12.86 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits at 16:15:40.00 -21:44:50.7: 14.33 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits at 16:16:27.64 -15:26:10.5: 15.53 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits at 15:50:41.88 -16:54:31.8: 13.42 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits at 15:52:42.68 -21:33:58.2: 13.77 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits at 15:58:10.12 -14:28:11.9: 11.83 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits at 15:45:25.23 -19:55:58.4: 15.34 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-31-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits at 16:11:19.93 -21:08:50.1: 14.31 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.32 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:11:19.93 -21:08:50.1: ref_mag=14.32 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=14.2205 delta=0.10 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-31-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits at 15:56:46.72 -14:29:19.4: 12.91 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-31-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits at 16:14:28.31 -20:21:33.0: 13.89 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits at 16:11:15.47 -16:04:31.6: 13.39 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-31-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits at 16:15:40.00 -21:44:50.7: 14.28 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.88 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-31-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits at 15:50:41.88 -16:54:31.8: 13.53 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-31-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits at 15:58:10.12 -14:28:11.9: 11.82 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-31-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits at 15:52:42.68 -21:33:58.2: 13.89 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.86 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:56:46.72 -14:29:19.4: ref_mag=12.88 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.0555 delta=-0.17 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-31-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits at 16:16:27.64 -15:26:10.5: 15.49 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-31-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits at 15:45:25.23 -19:55:58.4: 15.41 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:14:28.31 -20:21:33.0: ref_mag=13.86 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=13.9582 delta=-0.10 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.31 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.47 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.82 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.82 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:50:41.88 -16:54:31.8: ref_mag=13.47 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.7751 delta=-0.30 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:58:10.12 -14:28:11.9: ref_mag=11.82 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.0787 delta=-0.25 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:15:40.00 -21:44:50.7: ref_mag=14.31 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=14.0870 delta=0.22 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:52:42.68 -21:33:58.2: ref_mag=13.82 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=13.9432 delta=-0.12 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-31-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits at 16:11:15.47 -16:04:31.6: 13.42 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.40 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:11:15.47 -16:04:31.6: ref_mag=13.40 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.4821 delta=-0.08 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits at 16:14:20.33 -19:06:51.4: 15.25 +/- 0.28 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits at 15:42:00.76 -19:28:14.6: 13.52 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits at 15:45:19.55 -19:06:36.3: 13.62 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits at 15:41:38.89 -15:32:44.9: 13.59 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits at 16:18:06.97 -14:09:19.0: 13.79 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits at 15:56:01.95 -13:55:04.7: 14.31 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits at 15:51:42.10 -14:52:33.8: 13.92 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-31-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits at 15:42:00.76 -19:28:14.6: 13.63 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits at 16:02:46.39 -22:15:02.7: 14.12 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.57 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:42:00.76 -19:28:14.6: ref_mag=13.57 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=13.7449 delta=-0.18 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-31-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits at 16:14:20.33 -19:06:51.4: 15.36 +/- 0.30 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.30 +/- 0.20
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-31-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits at 15:45:19.55 -19:06:36.3: 13.70 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 16:14:20.33 -19:06:51.4: ref_mag=15.30 +/- 0.20 new_mean_mag=13.8442 delta=1.46 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.66 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:45:19.55 -19:06:36.3: ref_mag=13.66 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=13.7426 delta=-0.08 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-31-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits at 15:41:38.89 -15:32:44.9: 13.78 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.67 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:41:38.89 -15:32:44.9: ref_mag=13.67 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=13.8233 delta=-0.16 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-31-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits at 16:18:06.97 -14:09:19.0: 13.88 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-31-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits at 15:56:01.95 -13:55:04.7: 14.39 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.35 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.83 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:18:06.97 -14:09:19.0: ref_mag=13.83 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=13.9910 delta=-0.16 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:56:01.95 -13:55:04.7: ref_mag=14.35 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=14.0770 delta=0.27 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-31-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits at 15:51:42.10 -14:52:33.8: 13.76 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.84 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-31-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits at 16:02:46.39 -22:15:02.7: 14.04 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:51:42.10 -14:52:33.8: ref_mag=13.84 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=14.0090 delta=-0.17 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.08 +/- 0.07
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:02:46.39 -22:15:02.7: ref_mag=14.08 +/- 0.07 new_mean_mag=13.9828 delta=0.10 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits at 16:10:26.15 -22:09:10.4: 14.12 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits at 15:54:02.57 -14:42:03.3: 14.32 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits at 16:07:44.45 -20:36:04.3: 14.65 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits at 16:12:39.55 -19:00:15.2: 14.06 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits at 16:07:03.45 -21:58:48.0: 14.81 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-31-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits at 16:10:26.15 -22:09:10.4: 14.21 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits at 16:05:43.66 -21:21:56.2: 14.58 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.16 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:10:26.15 -22:09:10.4: ref_mag=14.16 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=14.0735 delta=0.09 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-31-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits at 15:54:02.57 -14:42:03.3: 14.28 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-31-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits at 16:07:44.45 -20:36:04.3: 14.48 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.30 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.55 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:54:02.57 -14:42:03.3: ref_mag=14.30 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=14.2257 delta=0.08 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:07:44.45 -20:36:04.3: ref_mag=14.55 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.1615 delta=0.39 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits at 15:45:35.10 -14:41:10.7: 14.39 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-31-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits at 16:12:39.55 -19:00:15.2: 14.11 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.08 +/- 0.07
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:12:39.55 -19:00:15.2: ref_mag=14.08 +/- 0.07 new_mean_mag=14.1548 delta=-0.07 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-31-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits at 16:07:03.45 -21:58:48.0: 14.73 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.77 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:07:03.45 -21:58:48.0: ref_mag=14.77 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=14.2292 delta=0.54 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-31-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits at 16:05:43.66 -21:21:56.2: 14.42 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.48 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:05:43.66 -21:21:56.2: ref_mag=14.48 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.2924 delta=0.19 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-31-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits at 15:45:35.10 -14:41:10.7: 14.61 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.48 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:45:35.10 -14:41:10.7: ref_mag=14.48 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.3437 delta=0.13 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits at 15:52:24.52 -14:28:40.3: 14.59 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits at 16:18:02.03 -21:03:20.7: 14.53 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits at 16:00:03.83 -14:39:55.1: 14.17 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits at 16:15:51.63 -15:36:39.2: 14.71 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits at 16:07:00.51 -17:33:57.6: 15.65 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits at 16:13:40.86 -19:17:45.8: 14.83 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-31-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits at 15:52:24.52 -14:28:40.3: 14.96 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.71 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:52:24.52 -14:28:40.3: ref_mag=14.71 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.3653 delta=0.34 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-31-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits at 16:18:02.03 -21:03:20.7: 14.71 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.61 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-31-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits at 16:00:03.83 -14:39:55.1: 14.16 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:18:02.03 -21:03:20.7: ref_mag=14.61 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.2966 delta=0.31 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.16 +/- 0.07
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:00:03.83 -14:39:55.1: ref_mag=14.16 +/- 0.07 new_mean_mag=14.1973 delta=-0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-31-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits at 16:15:51.63 -15:36:39.2: 14.49 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.58 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:15:51.63 -15:36:39.2: ref_mag=14.58 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.3924 delta=0.19 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-31-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits at 16:13:40.86 -19:17:45.8: 14.72 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-31-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits at 16:07:00.51 -17:33:57.6: 15.62 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits at 15:46:42.05 -14:39:32.6: 14.64 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.77 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:13:40.86 -19:17:45.8: ref_mag=14.77 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.3547 delta=0.41 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits at 15:49:36.29 -16:14:17.6: 14.75 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-31-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits at 15:46:42.05 -14:39:32.6: 14.67 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits at 16:17:21.99 -19:56:00.9: 14.59 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.65 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:46:42.05 -14:39:32.6: ref_mag=14.65 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.4507 delta=0.20 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits at 15:44:29.76 -16:21:15.5: 14.56 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits at 16:10:56.63 -21:48:35.7: 14.69 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits at 15:53:42.74 -15:43:50.7: 15.20 +/- 0.26 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits at 16:18:07.00 -21:27:01.9: 14.46 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-31-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits at 15:49:36.29 -16:14:17.6: 14.75 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.75 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:49:36.29 -16:14:17.6: ref_mag=14.75 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.4425 delta=0.31 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-31-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits at 16:17:21.99 -19:56:00.9: 14.51 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.55 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:17:21.99 -19:56:00.9: ref_mag=14.55 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.3322 delta=0.22 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-31-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits at 15:44:29.76 -16:21:15.5: 14.34 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-31-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits at 16:10:56.63 -21:48:35.7: 14.88 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.43 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:44:29.76 -16:21:15.5: ref_mag=14.43 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.3056 delta=0.13 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.77 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:10:56.63 -21:48:35.7: ref_mag=14.77 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=14.3677 delta=0.41 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-31-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits at 16:18:07.00 -21:27:01.9: 14.60 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-31-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits at 15:53:42.74 -15:43:50.7: 14.62 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.52 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.76 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:18:07.00 -21:27:01.9: ref_mag=14.52 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.3618 delta=0.16 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:53:42.74 -15:43:50.7: ref_mag=14.76 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.4654 delta=0.30 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits at 16:18:50.26 -21:40:59.4: 14.39 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits at 15:58:04.49 -20:59:55.2: 14.50 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits at 16:06:19.12 -21:35:19.4: 14.85 +/- 0.22 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits at 16:17:32.30 -22:04:05.9: 14.56 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits at 16:14:36.27 -15:02:27.0: 14.84 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-31-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits at 16:18:50.26 -21:40:59.4: 14.90 +/- 0.25 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.52 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:18:50.26 -21:40:59.4: ref_mag=14.52 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.3710 delta=0.15 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits at 16:19:05.66 -21:03:22.8: 14.65 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits at 15:43:45.64 -14:36:41.6: 15.06 +/- 0.23 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-31-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits at 16:06:19.12 -21:35:19.4: 14.94 +/- 0.23 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.89 +/- 0.16
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:06:19.12 -21:35:19.4: ref_mag=14.89 +/- 0.16 new_mean_mag=14.3283 delta=0.57 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-31-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits at 16:17:32.30 -22:04:05.9: 14.26 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-31-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits at 15:58:04.49 -20:59:55.2: 14.48 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.37 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:17:32.30 -22:04:05.9: ref_mag=14.37 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.2711 delta=0.10 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.49 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:58:04.49 -20:59:55.2: ref_mag=14.49 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.4033 delta=0.08 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-31-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits at 16:19:05.66 -21:03:22.8: 14.38 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.49 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:19:05.66 -21:03:22.8: ref_mag=14.49 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.4384 delta=0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-31-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits at 16:14:36.27 -15:02:27.0: 14.63 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.72 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:14:36.27 -15:02:27.0: ref_mag=14.72 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.3925 delta=0.33 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-31-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits at 15:43:45.64 -14:36:41.6: 14.88 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.96 +/- 0.15
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:43:45.64 -14:36:41.6: ref_mag=14.96 +/- 0.15 new_mean_mag=14.5372 delta=0.42 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits at 16:01:35.47 -17:13:16.4: 15.02 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits at 16:12:02.23 -19:56:18.6: 14.47 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits at 16:07:03.15 -22:08:17.9: 14.62 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits at 16:05:58.47 -16:39:45.8: 14.68 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits at 16:10:14.51 -21:46:44.1: 14.84 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits at 16:09:45.44 -17:02:24.0: 14.49 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-31-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits at 16:01:35.47 -17:13:16.4: 15.20 +/- 0.25 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.10 +/- 0.16
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:01:35.47 -17:13:16.4: ref_mag=15.10 +/- 0.16 new_mean_mag=14.4841 delta=0.61 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits at 15:47:42.94 -15:45:24.2: 15.50 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-31-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits at 16:12:02.23 -19:56:18.6: 14.88 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.60 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:12:02.23 -19:56:18.6: ref_mag=14.60 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.5181 delta=0.08 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-31-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits at 16:07:03.15 -22:08:17.9: 14.41 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.49 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:07:03.15 -22:08:17.9: ref_mag=14.49 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.3088 delta=0.18 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-31-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits at 16:05:58.47 -16:39:45.8: 14.46 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.55 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:05:58.47 -16:39:45.8: ref_mag=14.55 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.4339 delta=0.12 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-31-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits at 16:10:14.51 -21:46:44.1: 14.56 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.67 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:10:14.51 -21:46:44.1: ref_mag=14.67 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.4100 delta=0.26 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-31-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits at 16:09:45.44 -17:02:24.0: 14.71 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.58 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:09:45.44 -17:02:24.0: ref_mag=14.58 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.4616 delta=0.12 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-31-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits at 15:47:42.94 -15:45:24.2: 15.50 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits at 16:04:26.66 -20:39:00.8: 15.23 +/- 0.28 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits at 16:18:17.03 -21:56:31.4: 14.62 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits at 16:16:07.11 -22:12:03.2: 14.65 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits at 16:18:58.94 -21:23:45.6: 14.70 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits at 16:07:17.50 -20:40:16.7: 14.60 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits at 16:05:25.00 -21:44:22.2: 14.46 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-31-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits at 16:04:26.66 -20:39:00.8: 15.16 +/- 0.27 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.20 +/- 0.19
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:04:26.66 -20:39:00.8: ref_mag=15.20 +/- 0.19 new_mean_mag=14.4793 delta=0.72 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-31-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits at 16:18:17.03 -21:56:31.4: 14.41 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-31-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits at 16:16:07.11 -22:12:03.2: 14.80 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.49 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:18:17.03 -21:56:31.4: ref_mag=14.49 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.3992 delta=0.09 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.72 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:16:07.11 -22:12:03.2: ref_mag=14.72 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=14.3963 delta=0.32 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-31-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits at 16:18:58.94 -21:23:45.6: 14.38 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.50 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:18:58.94 -21:23:45.6: ref_mag=14.50 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.4511 delta=0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-31-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits at 16:05:25.00 -21:44:22.2: 14.45 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-31-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits at 16:07:17.50 -20:40:16.7: 14.58 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.46 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:05:25.00 -21:44:22.2: ref_mag=14.46 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.5027 delta=-0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.59 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:07:17.50 -20:40:16.7: ref_mag=14.59 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.5342 delta=0.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits at 16:15:13.74 -21:50:28.0: 14.47 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits at 16:06:13.48 -22:15:17.3: 14.77 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits at 16:03:13.42 -21:55:36.3: 14.79 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-31-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits at 16:15:13.74 -21:50:28.0: 14.83 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.59 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:15:13.74 -21:50:28.0: ref_mag=14.59 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.5415 delta=0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-31-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits at 16:03:13.42 -21:55:36.3: 14.86 +/- 0.22 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.82 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:03:13.42 -21:55:36.3: ref_mag=14.82 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=14.4664 delta=0.35 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-31-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits at 16:06:13.48 -22:15:17.3: 14.57 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.66 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:06:13.48 -22:15:17.3: ref_mag=14.66 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.5582 delta=0.10 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out78920.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out76785.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out77002.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out81790.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out82688.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 11s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 3s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 73596_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_02-25-15_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0264
The candidate 73596_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_02-25-15_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0264 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 73599_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_02-25-15_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0264
The candidate 73599_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_02-25-15_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0264 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 73600_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_02-25-15_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0264
The candidate 73600_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_02-25-15_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0264 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 73601_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_02-25-15_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0264
The candidate 73601_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_02-25-15_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0264 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 73607_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_02-25-15_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0264
The candidate 73607_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_02-25-15_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0264 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 73609_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_02-25-15_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0264
The candidate 73609_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_02-25-15_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0264 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:16:54.63 -21:58:13.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 74703_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_02-25-15_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0264
The candidate 74703_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_02-25-15_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0264 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 76171_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_02-25-15_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0264
The candidate 76171_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_02-25-15_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0264 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 76785_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_02-25-15_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0264
Preparing report for the candidate 76785_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_02-25-15_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0264
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 77002_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_02-25-15_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0264
Preparing report for the candidate 77002_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_02-25-15_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0264
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 77241_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_02-25-15_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0264
The candidate 77241_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_02-25-15_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0264 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 77610_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_02-25-15_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0264
The candidate 77610_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_02-25-15_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0264 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:14:31.51 -20:40:39.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 77898_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_02-25-15_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0264
The candidate 77898_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_02-25-15_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0264 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 15:53:59.02 -18:30:17.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 78120_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_02-25-15_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0264
The candidate 78120_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_02-25-15_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0264 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 15:56:37.96 -14:50:54.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 78717_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_02-25-15_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0264
The candidate 78717_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_02-25-15_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0264 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 78920_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_02-25-15_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0264
The candidate 78920_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_02-25-15_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0264 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:14:20.33 -19:06:51.4 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.85, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.83)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 3.012 6245801816200921088 243.58450135983 -19.11346433011 14.1430 12.9027 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#3.012#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 79213_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_02-25-15_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0264
The candidate 79213_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_02-25-15_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0264 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 79303_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_02-25-15_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0264
The candidate 79303_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_02-25-15_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0264 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 79617_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_02-25-15_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0264
The candidate 79617_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_02-25-15_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0264 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 79684_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_02-25-15_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0264
The candidate 79684_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_02-25-15_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0264 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 79717_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_02-25-15_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0264
The candidate 79717_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_02-25-15_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0264 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 79914_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_02-25-15_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0264
The candidate 79914_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_02-25-15_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0264 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 80512_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_02-25-15_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0264
The candidate 80512_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_02-25-15_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0264 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 80838_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_02-25-15_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0264
The candidate 80838_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_02-25-15_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0264 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 80971_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_02-25-15_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0264
The candidate 80971_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_02-25-15_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0264 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 81000_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_02-25-15_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0264
The candidate 81000_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_02-25-15_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0264 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:02:11.42 -21:46:38.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 81072_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_02-25-15_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0264
The candidate 81072_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_02-25-15_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0264 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 81201_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_02-25-15_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0264
The candidate 81201_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_02-25-15_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0264 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 81403_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_02-25-15_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0264
The candidate 81403_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_02-25-15_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0264 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 81450_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_02-25-15_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0264
The candidate 81450_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_02-25-15_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0264 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 81493_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_02-25-15_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0264
The candidate 81493_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_02-25-15_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0264 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 81504_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_02-25-15_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0264
The candidate 81504_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_02-25-15_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0264 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 81629_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_02-25-15_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0264
The candidate 81629_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_02-25-15_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0264 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 81670_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_02-25-15_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0264
The candidate 81670_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_02-25-15_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0264 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 81790_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_02-25-15_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0264
Preparing report for the candidate 81790_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_02-25-15_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0264
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 81799_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_02-25-15_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0264
The candidate 81799_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_02-25-15_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0264 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 81805_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_02-25-15_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0264
The candidate 81805_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_02-25-15_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0264 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 81820_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_02-25-15_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0264
The candidate 81820_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_02-25-15_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0264 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 81827_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_02-25-15_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0264
The candidate 81827_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_02-25-15_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0264 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 81939_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_02-25-15_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0264
The candidate 81939_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_02-25-15_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0264 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 81952_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_02-25-15_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0264
The candidate 81952_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_02-25-15_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0264 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82019_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_02-25-15_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0264
The candidate 82019_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_02-25-15_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0264 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82105_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_02-25-15_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0264
The candidate 82105_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_02-25-15_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0264 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82106_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_02-25-15_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0264
The candidate 82106_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_02-25-15_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0264 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82267_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_02-25-15_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0264
The candidate 82267_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_02-25-15_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0264 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82323_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_02-25-15_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0264
The candidate 82323_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_02-25-15_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0264 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82394_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_02-25-15_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0264
The candidate 82394_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_02-25-15_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0264 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82419_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_02-25-15_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0264
The candidate 82419_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_02-25-15_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0264 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82428_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_02-25-15_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0264
The candidate 82428_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_02-25-15_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0264 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82465_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_02-25-15_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0264
The candidate 82465_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_02-25-15_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0264 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82485_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_02-25-15_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0264
The candidate 82485_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_02-25-15_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0264 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82531_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_02-25-15_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0264
The candidate 82531_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_02-25-15_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0264 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82604_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_02-25-15_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0264
The candidate 82604_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_02-25-15_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0264 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82649_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_02-25-15_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0264
The candidate 82649_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_02-25-15_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0264 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82669_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_02-25-15_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0264
The candidate 82669_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_02-25-15_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0264 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82670_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_02-25-15_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0264
The candidate 82670_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_02-25-15_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0264 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82688_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_02-25-15_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0264
Preparing report for the candidate 82688_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_02-25-15_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0264
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82789_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_02-25-15_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0264
The candidate 82789_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_02-25-15_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0264 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 83032_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_02-25-15_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0264
The candidate 83032_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_02-25-15_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0264 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 83064_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_02-25-15_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0264
The candidate 83064_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_02-25-15_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0264 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 83148_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_02-25-15_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0264
The candidate 83148_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_02-25-15_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0264 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 83180_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_02-25-15_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0264
The candidate 83180_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_02-25-15_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0264 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 83201_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_02-25-15_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0264
The candidate 83201_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_02-25-15_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0264 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 83219_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_02-25-15_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0264
The candidate 83219_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_02-25-15_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0264 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 83298_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_02-25-15_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0264
The candidate 83298_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_02-25-15_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0264 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 83313_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_02-25-15_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0264
The candidate 83313_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_02-25-15_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0264 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 09608_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_02-25-15_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0264
The candidate 09608_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_02-25-15_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0264 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:08:31.92 -21:31:49.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 07980_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_02-25-15_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0264
The candidate 07980_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_02-25-15_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0264 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 15:58:46.50 -21:49:48.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 17884_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_02-25-15_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0264
The candidate 17884_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_02-25-15_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0264 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 15:49:04.56 -20:06:55.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 46468_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_02-25-15_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0264
The candidate 46468_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_02-25-15_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0264 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:10:44.92 -16:36:03.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 28147_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_02-25-15_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0264
The candidate 28147_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_02-25-15_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0264 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 15:56:23.76 -18:18:15.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 22030_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_02-25-15_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0264
The candidate 22030_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_02-25-15_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0264 did not pass the final checks