## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref.  image: 2461173.83300455 13.05.2026 07:59:21.593   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_02-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0313.fits
First image: 2461173.83300455 13.05.2026 07:59:21.593   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_02-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0313.fits
Last  image: 2461199.78556432 08.06.2026 06:51:02.757   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_015530_TTUQ2b1x1_193279_NrOSfNaW/fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-51-02_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0222.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 1
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.:  -7.37
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 6 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA  10.0             # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH   10.0             #  or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0             #  or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL     55000.0         # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN            0.37            # detector gain in e-/ADU
Total objects detected (at least 2 times):  6625
Objects passed selection criteria:  6625
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max):    3.8    4.0    2    4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max):    3.8    4.0    2    4
Average stars detected per image: 6435
Average stars matched: 6312.75 (98.1002 %)
Memory usage VmPeak:   112800 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on  Sun Jun  7 22:21:29 CDT 2026
VaST build number  1.0rc89-90-g333d5534
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-06-07)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on  Mon Jun  8 02:01:56 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref.  image: 2461173.83300455 13.05.2026 07:59:21.593   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_02-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0313.fits
First image: 2461173.83300455 13.05.2026 07:59:21.593   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_02-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0313.fits
Last  image: 2461199.78556432 08.06.2026 06:51:02.757   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_015530_TTUQ2b1x1_193279_NrOSfNaW/fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-51-02_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0222.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 112
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.:  -7.08
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 23 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA  2.0             # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH   3.0             #  or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0             #  or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL     57000.0         # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN            0.83            # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
Total objects detected (at least 2 times):  36911
Objects passed selection criteria:  36806
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max):    3.8    4.0    2    4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max):    3.8    4.0    2    4
Average stars detected per image: 35796.2
Average stars matched: 34578 (96.5967 %)
Memory usage VmPeak:   139104 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on  Sun Jun  7 22:21:29 CDT 2026
VaST build number  1.0rc89-90-g333d5534
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-06-07)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on  Mon Jun  8 02:03:56 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################

######## Processing parameters ########
AAVSO_COMMENT_STRING= NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
ASTCHECK_ASTEROID_SEARCH_RADIUS_ARCSEC= 
BAD_REGION_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/TTUQ2_bad_region.lst
CAMERA_SETTINGS= TTUQ2b1x1
CHECK_POINTING_ACCURACY= yes
DARK_FRAMES_DIR_OR_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks
EXCLUSION_LIST= ../exclusion_list_TTUQ2.txt
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MAX_APERTURE_STAR_SIZE_PIX= 12.5
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MAX_ELONGATION_AminusB_PIX= 0.55
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MIN_APERTURE_STAR_SIZE_PIX= 2.0
FILTER_BRIGHT_MAG_CUTOFF_TRANSIENT_SEARCH= -5
FILTER_FAINT_MAG_CUTOFF_TRANSIENT_SEARCH= 15.0
FLAT_FIELD_DIR_OR_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats
FRAME_EDGE_OFFSET_PIX= 600
GAIA_BAND_FOR_CATALOGED_SOURCE_CHECK= 
MAX_NEW_TO_REF_MEAN_IMG_VALUE_RATIO= 100
MAX_NEW_IMG_MEAN_VALUE= 25000
MAX_SD_RATIO_OF_SECOND_EPOCH_IMGS= 0.18
MAX_SD_RATIO_OF_SECOND_EPOCH_IMGS_SOFT_LIMIT= 0.12
MPC_CODE= V36
NMW_CALIBRATION= /var/www/nmw_calibration
NUMBER_OF_DETECTED_TRANSIENTS_BEFORE_FILTERING_HARD_LIMIT= 8000
NUMBER_OF_DETECTED_TRANSIENTS_BEFORE_FILTERING_SOFT_LIMIT= 4000
OMP_NUM_THREADS= 
ONLINE_MPCHECKER_BUTTON_ASTEROID_SEARCH_RADIUS_ARCMIN= 
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION= 
REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES= yes
SEXTRACTOR_CONFIG_BRIGHTSTARPASS= default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
SEXTRACTOR_CONFIG_FILES= default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
STARMATCH_RADIUS_PIX= 4
SYSREM_ITERATIONS= 0
TELESCOP= 
TELESCOP_NAME_KNOWN_TO_VaST_FOR_FOV_DETERMINATION= 
UCAC5_PLATESOLVE_ITERATIONS= 2
FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE= no
#######################################
HOSTNAME= tau
USER= 
HOME= 
#######################################
SExtractor catalog cache: enabled, directory /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/vast_sextractor_cache
Reference image directory is set to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs
VIZIER_SITE=vizier.cds.unistra.fr
GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=vizquery (lib/vizquery -> VizieR vizier.cds.unistra.fr)
INFO: MAKE_PNG_PLOTS is set to yes
FITS_FILE_EXT=fits
CALIBRATION_STATUS_PREFIX=
Fields in the data directory: 
Dra-09-Q2b1x1
#######################################
########### Starting Dra-09-Q2b1x1 ###########
Processing Dra-09-Q2b1x1
server tau has sufficient free disk space available: 226607 MB at /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir
server tau has sufficient free disk space available: 226607 MB at .
Checking input images (2 new)
REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE= /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_02-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0313.fits
REFERENCE_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE= /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_03-00-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits
Small preview (one of the new images): 

Large previews of the second-epoch (new) images:

MAKE_PNG_PLOTS=yes


renamed 'Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-50-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0221.png' -> 'transient_report/Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-50-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0221.fits_preview.png'

Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-50-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0221.fits


renamed 'Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-51-02_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0222.png' -> 'transient_report/Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-51-02_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0222.fits_preview.png'

Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-51-02_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0222.fits




Read-check the input FITS images... read-check OK
Blank image check the input FITS images... blank-image-check OK
Read date check the input FITS images... read-date-check OK
Mean value check the input FITS images... OK, at least two new images have mean values below the threshold.
----------------------------------------------
INFO: REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 385.2809
INFO:         REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_SD= 474.2397
INFO:    SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 883.1360
INFO:            SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_SD= 493.5003
INFO:   SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 883.8451
INFO:           SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE_SD= 493.1081
----------------------------------------------
INFO:      ref_to_second_epoch_img_mean_ratio= 2.29219
INFO:                  SECOND_EPOCH__SD_ratio= 0.001
----------------------------------------------
Calibration settings: DARK_FRAMES_DIR_OR_FILE=/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks FLAT_FIELD_DIR_OR_FILE=/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats
EXPTIME =                 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration
SET-TEMP=                  5.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint
CCD-TEMP=                  5.0 / [degC] CCD temperature
FOCTEMP =     25.0799999237061 / [degC] Focuser temperature
AMBTEMP =                 25.3 / [degC] Ambient air temperature
Exploring image header: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_015530_TTUQ2b1x1_193279_NrOSfNaW/Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-50-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0221.fits 
CCD-TEMP= 5.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_015530_TTUQ2b1x1_193279_NrOSfNaW/Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-50-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0221.fits
SET-TEMP= 5.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_015530_TTUQ2b1x1_193279_NrOSfNaW/Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-50-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0221.fits
Header: 74 keys total, 33 keys left
Record 0: "" status=0
Record 1: "SIMPLE  =                    T / C# FITS" status=0
Record 2: "BITPIX  =                   16" status=0
Record 3: "NAXIS   =                    2 / Dimensionality" status=0
Record 4: "NAXIS1  =                 9576" status=0
Record 5: "NAXIS2  =                 6388" status=0
Record 6: "BZERO   =                32768" status=0
Record 7: "EXTEND  =                    T / Extensions are permitted" status=0
Record 8: "IMAGETYP= 'LIGHT'              / Type of exposure" status=0
Record 9: "EXPOSURE=                 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0
Record 10: "EXPTIME =                 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0
Record 11: "DATE-LOC= '2026-06-08T01:50:23.8582494' / Time of observation (local)" status=0
Record 12: "DATE-OBS= '2026-06-08T06:50:23.8582494' / Time of observation (UTC)" status=0
Record 13: "MJD-OBS =     61199.2849983564 / Modified Julian Date of observation" status=0
Record 14: "DATE-AVG= '2026-06-08T06:50:33.7611485' / Averaged midpoint time (UTC)" status=0
Record 15: "MJD-AVG =     61199.2851129747 / Modified Julian Date of averaged midpoint" status=0
Record 16: "XBINNING=                    1 / X axis binning factor" status=0
Record 17: "YBINNING=                    1 / Y axis binning factor" status=0
Record 18: "GAIN    =                   30 / Sensor gain" status=0
Record 19: "OFFSET  =                   30 / Sensor gain offset" status=0
Record 20: "XPIXSZ  =                 3.76 / [um] Pixel X axis size" status=0
Record 21: "YPIXSZ  =                 3.76 / [um] Pixel Y axis size" status=0
Record 22: "INSTRUME= 'QHY600M'            / Imaging instrument name" status=0
Record 23: "CAMERAID= 'QHY600M-84137c4dbbbd119a9' / Imaging instrument identifier" status=0
Record 24: "SET-TEMP=                  5.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint" status=0
Record 25: "CCD-TEMP=                  5.0 / [degC] CCD temperature" status=0
Record 26: "READOUTM= '2CMS-0'             / Sensor readout mode" status=0
Record 27: "USBLIMIT=                   50 / Camera-specific USB setting" status=0
Record 28: "TELESCOP= 'QHY600M-TTU2'       / Name of telescope" status=0
Record 29: "FOCALLEN=                135.0 / [mm] Focal length" status=0
Record 30: "FOCRATIO=                  2.2 / Focal ratio" status=0
Record 31: "RA      =     232.940721282599 / [deg] RA of telescope" status=0
Record 32: "DEC     =     54.0001860415722 / [deg] Declination of telescope" status=0
Record 33: "CENTALT =     63.5616666666667 / [deg] Altitude of telescope" status=0
Record 34: "CENTAZ  =     327.051666666667 / [deg] Azimuth of telescope" status=0
Record 35: "AIRMASS =      1.1164563778896 / Airmass at frame center (Gueymard 1993)" status=0
Record 36: "PIERSIDE= 'East'               / Telescope pointing state" status=0
Record 37: "SITEELEV=               1009.5 / [m] Observation site elevation" status=0
Record 38: "SITELAT =           33.7482925 / [deg] Observation site latitude" status=0
Record 39: "SITELONG=          -101.958319 / [deg] Observation site longitude" status=0
Record 40: "OBSERVER= 'Sokolovsky'         / Observer name" status=0
Record 41: "OBSERVAT= 'TTU Skyview'        / Observatory name" status=0
Record 42: "SITENAME= ''                   / Observatory site name" status=0
Record 43: "FWHEEL  = 'Simulator'          / Filter Wheel name" status=0
Record 44: "FILTER  = 'CV'                 / Active filter name" status=0
Record 45: "OBJECT  = 'Dra-09'             / Name of the object of interest" status=0
Record 46: "OBJCTRA = '15 31 46'           / [H M S] RA of imaged object" status=0
Record 47: "OBJCTDEC= '+54 00 00'          / [D M S] Declination of imaged object" status=0
Record 48: "OBJCTROT=                  0.0 / [deg] planned rotation of imaged object" status=0
Record 49: "FOCNAME = 'ZWO Focuser'        / Focusing equipment name" status=0
Record 50: "FOCPOS  =                20437 / [step] Focuser position" status=0
Record 51: "FOCUSPOS=                20437 / [step] Focuser position" status=0
Record 52: "FOCUSSZ =                  0.0 / [um] Focuser step size" status=0
Record 53: "FOCTEMP =     25.0799999237061 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0
Record 54: "FOCUSTEM=     25.0799999237061 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0
Record 55: "DEWPOINT=                 17.5 / [degC] Dew point" status=0
Record 56: "HUMIDITY=                 62.0 / [percent] Relative humidity" status=0
Record 57: "PRESSURE=               894.01 / [hPa] Air pressure" status=0
Record 58: "AMBTEMP =                 25.3 / [degC] Ambient air temperature" status=0
Record 59: "WINDDIR =                 61.0 / [deg] Wind direction: 0=N, 180=S, 90=E, 270=W" status=0
Record 60: "WINDGUST=            25.602048 / [kph] Wind gust" status=0
Record 61: "WINDSPD =             20.50164 / [kph] Wind speed" status=0
Record 62: "ROWORDER= 'TOP-DOWN'           / FITS Image Orientation" status=0
Record 63: "EQUINOX =               2000.0 / Equinox of celestial coordinate system" status=0
Record 64: "SWCREATE= 'N.I.N.A. 3.2.0.9001 (x64)' / Software that created this file" status=0
Record 65: "QHY_EXP =            20.000096 / [s] Actual exposure time" status=0
Record 66: "QHY_PP  =              13888.0 / [ps] pixelPeriod" status=0
Record 67: "QHY_LP  =              85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0
Record 68: "GPS_LP  =              85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0
Record 69: "QHY_FP  =           20000160.0 / [us] framePeriod" status=0
Record 70: "QHY_CPL =               6120.0 / clocksPerLine" status=0
Record 71: "QHY_LPF =             235295.0 / linesPerFrame" status=0
Record 72: "QHY_AET =           20000096.0 / [us] actualExposureTime" status=0
Record 73: "QHY_LEM =                    T / isLongExposureMode" status=0
Record 74: "QHY_OFF0=             3767.777 / [us] RollingShutterEndOffset row 0" status=0
Allocating memory for image, dark and result arrays...
Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_015530_TTUQ2b1x1_193279_NrOSfNaW/Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-50-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0221.fits 9576 6388  16 bitpix
SET-TEMP= 5.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_015530_TTUQ2b1x1_193279_NrOSfNaW/Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-50-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0221.fits
SET-TEMP= 5.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_5C_20s_2026-05-30.fit
CCD-TEMP= 5.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_015530_TTUQ2b1x1_193279_NrOSfNaW/Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-50-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0221.fits
CCD-TEMP= 4.800000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_5C_20s_2026-05-30.fit
Reading dark frame /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_5C_20s_2026-05-30.fit 9576 6388  16 bitpix
Dark frame is subtracted, output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_015530_TTUQ2b1x1_193279_NrOSfNaW/d_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-50-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0221.fits :)

Spent 0.652318 seconds 
renamed 'mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_5C_20s_2026-05-30.png' -> 'transient_report/dark.png'
try_to_calibrate_the_input_frame(): selected flat field /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ2b1x1_2026-05-30.fit from directory /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats
MegaDivider v7
Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_015530_TTUQ2b1x1_193279_NrOSfNaW/d_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-50-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0221.fits 9576 6388  16 bitpix
Reading flat /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ2b1x1_2026-05-30.fit 9576 6388  16 bitpix
Avarage count on flat field image: 20659.746399
Minimal real count (from overscan): 5
Output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_015530_TTUQ2b1x1_193279_NrOSfNaW/fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-50-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0221.fits :)


No overscan detected - all values seem high! (left_median=14784.5, right_median=14894.5)
renamed 'mff_TTUQ2b1x1_2026-05-30.png' -> 'transient_report/flat.png'
Using calibrated image CALIBRATED_SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_015530_TTUQ2b1x1_193279_NrOSfNaW/fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-50-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0221.fits
EXPTIME =                 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration
SET-TEMP=                  5.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint
CCD-TEMP=                  4.9 / [degC] CCD temperature
FOCTEMP =     25.0300006866455 / [degC] Focuser temperature
AMBTEMP =                 25.3 / [degC] Ambient air temperature
Exploring image header: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_015530_TTUQ2b1x1_193279_NrOSfNaW/Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-51-02_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0222.fits 
CCD-TEMP= 4.900000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_015530_TTUQ2b1x1_193279_NrOSfNaW/Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-51-02_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0222.fits
SET-TEMP= 5.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_015530_TTUQ2b1x1_193279_NrOSfNaW/Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-51-02_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0222.fits
Header: 74 keys total, 33 keys left
Record 0: "" status=0
Record 1: "SIMPLE  =                    T / C# FITS" status=0
Record 2: "BITPIX  =                   16" status=0
Record 3: "NAXIS   =                    2 / Dimensionality" status=0
Record 4: "NAXIS1  =                 9576" status=0
Record 5: "NAXIS2  =                 6388" status=0
Record 6: "BZERO   =                32768" status=0
Record 7: "EXTEND  =                    T / Extensions are permitted" status=0
Record 8: "IMAGETYP= 'LIGHT'              / Type of exposure" status=0
Record 9: "EXPOSURE=                 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0
Record 10: "EXPTIME =                 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0
Record 11: "DATE-LOC= '2026-06-08T01:51:02.7571232' / Time of observation (local)" status=0
Record 12: "DATE-OBS= '2026-06-08T06:51:02.7571232' / Time of observation (UTC)" status=0
Record 13: "MJD-OBS =     61199.2854485763 / Modified Julian Date of observation" status=0
Record 14: "DATE-AVG= '2026-06-08T06:51:12.6623180' / Averaged midpoint time (UTC)" status=0
Record 15: "MJD-AVG =     61199.2855632175 / Modified Julian Date of averaged midpoint" status=0
Record 16: "XBINNING=                    1 / X axis binning factor" status=0
Record 17: "YBINNING=                    1 / Y axis binning factor" status=0
Record 18: "GAIN    =                   30 / Sensor gain" status=0
Record 19: "OFFSET  =                   30 / Sensor gain offset" status=0
Record 20: "XPIXSZ  =                 3.76 / [um] Pixel X axis size" status=0
Record 21: "YPIXSZ  =                 3.76 / [um] Pixel Y axis size" status=0
Record 22: "INSTRUME= 'QHY600M'            / Imaging instrument name" status=0
Record 23: "CAMERAID= 'QHY600M-84137c4dbbbd119a9' / Imaging instrument identifier" status=0
Record 24: "SET-TEMP=                  5.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint" status=0
Record 25: "CCD-TEMP=                  4.9 / [degC] CCD temperature" status=0
Record 26: "READOUTM= '2CMS-0'             / Sensor readout mode" status=0
Record 27: "USBLIMIT=                   50 / Camera-specific USB setting" status=0
Record 28: "TELESCOP= 'QHY600M-TTU2'       / Name of telescope" status=0
Record 29: "FOCALLEN=                135.0 / [mm] Focal length" status=0
Record 30: "FOCRATIO=                  2.2 / Focal ratio" status=0
Record 31: "RA      =     232.940721302384 / [deg] RA of telescope" status=0
Record 32: "DEC     =     54.0001860065332 / [deg] Declination of telescope" status=0
Record 33: "CENTALT =                63.49 / [deg] Altitude of telescope" status=0
Record 34: "CENTAZ  =     326.917777777778 / [deg] Azimuth of telescope" status=0
Record 35: "AIRMASS =     1.11715047317769 / Airmass at frame center (Gueymard 1993)" status=0
Record 36: "PIERSIDE= 'East'               / Telescope pointing state" status=0
Record 37: "SITEELEV=               1009.5 / [m] Observation site elevation" status=0
Record 38: "SITELAT =           33.7482925 / [deg] Observation site latitude" status=0
Record 39: "SITELONG=          -101.958319 / [deg] Observation site longitude" status=0
Record 40: "OBSERVER= 'Sokolovsky'         / Observer name" status=0
Record 41: "OBSERVAT= 'TTU Skyview'        / Observatory name" status=0
Record 42: "SITENAME= ''                   / Observatory site name" status=0
Record 43: "FWHEEL  = 'Simulator'          / Filter Wheel name" status=0
Record 44: "FILTER  = 'CV'                 / Active filter name" status=0
Record 45: "OBJECT  = 'Dra-09'             / Name of the object of interest" status=0
Record 46: "OBJCTRA = '15 31 46'           / [H M S] RA of imaged object" status=0
Record 47: "OBJCTDEC= '+54 00 00'          / [D M S] Declination of imaged object" status=0
Record 48: "OBJCTROT=                  0.0 / [deg] planned rotation of imaged object" status=0
Record 49: "FOCNAME = 'ZWO Focuser'        / Focusing equipment name" status=0
Record 50: "FOCPOS  =                20437 / [step] Focuser position" status=0
Record 51: "FOCUSPOS=                20437 / [step] Focuser position" status=0
Record 52: "FOCUSSZ =                  0.0 / [um] Focuser step size" status=0
Record 53: "FOCTEMP =     25.0300006866455 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0
Record 54: "FOCUSTEM=     25.0300006866455 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0
Record 55: "DEWPOINT=                 17.5 / [degC] Dew point" status=0
Record 56: "HUMIDITY=                 62.0 / [percent] Relative humidity" status=0
Record 57: "PRESSURE=               894.01 / [hPa] Air pressure" status=0
Record 58: "AMBTEMP =                 25.3 / [degC] Ambient air temperature" status=0
Record 59: "WINDDIR =                 61.0 / [deg] Wind direction: 0=N, 180=S, 90=E, 270=W" status=0
Record 60: "WINDGUST=            25.602048 / [kph] Wind gust" status=0
Record 61: "WINDSPD =             20.50164 / [kph] Wind speed" status=0
Record 62: "ROWORDER= 'TOP-DOWN'           / FITS Image Orientation" status=0
Record 63: "EQUINOX =               2000.0 / Equinox of celestial coordinate system" status=0
Record 64: "SWCREATE= 'N.I.N.A. 3.2.0.9001 (x64)' / Software that created this file" status=0
Record 65: "QHY_EXP =            20.000096 / [s] Actual exposure time" status=0
Record 66: "QHY_PP  =              13888.0 / [ps] pixelPeriod" status=0
Record 67: "QHY_LP  =              85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0
Record 68: "GPS_LP  =              85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0
Record 69: "QHY_FP  =           20000160.0 / [us] framePeriod" status=0
Record 70: "QHY_CPL =               6120.0 / clocksPerLine" status=0
Record 71: "QHY_LPF =             235295.0 / linesPerFrame" status=0
Record 72: "QHY_AET =           20000096.0 / [us] actualExposureTime" status=0
Record 73: "QHY_LEM =                    T / isLongExposureMode" status=0
Record 74: "QHY_OFF0=             3767.777 / [us] RollingShutterEndOffset row 0" status=0
Allocating memory for image, dark and result arrays...
Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_015530_TTUQ2b1x1_193279_NrOSfNaW/Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-51-02_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0222.fits 9576 6388  16 bitpix
SET-TEMP= 5.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_015530_TTUQ2b1x1_193279_NrOSfNaW/Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-51-02_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0222.fits
SET-TEMP= 5.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_5C_20s_2026-05-30.fit
CCD-TEMP= 4.900000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_015530_TTUQ2b1x1_193279_NrOSfNaW/Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-51-02_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0222.fits
CCD-TEMP= 4.800000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_5C_20s_2026-05-30.fit
Reading dark frame /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_5C_20s_2026-05-30.fit 9576 6388  16 bitpix
Dark frame is subtracted, output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_015530_TTUQ2b1x1_193279_NrOSfNaW/d_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-51-02_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0222.fits :)

Spent 0.662371 seconds 
renamed 'mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_5C_20s_2026-05-30.png' -> 'transient_report/dark.png'
try_to_calibrate_the_input_frame(): selected flat field /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ2b1x1_2026-05-30.fit from directory /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats
MegaDivider v7
Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_015530_TTUQ2b1x1_193279_NrOSfNaW/d_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-51-02_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0222.fits 9576 6388  16 bitpix
Reading flat /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ2b1x1_2026-05-30.fit 9576 6388  16 bitpix
Avarage count on flat field image: 20659.746399
Minimal real count (from overscan): 5
Output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_015530_TTUQ2b1x1_193279_NrOSfNaW/fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-51-02_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0222.fits :)


No overscan detected - all values seem high! (left_median=14784.5, right_median=14894.5)
renamed 'mff_TTUQ2b1x1_2026-05-30.png' -> 'transient_report/flat.png'
Using calibrated image CALIBRATED_SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_015530_TTUQ2b1x1_193279_NrOSfNaW/fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-51-02_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0222.fits
Dark frame used to calibrate the second-epoch images:



Flat field used to calibrate the second-epoch images:



after the calibration attempt:
SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_015530_TTUQ2b1x1_193279_NrOSfNaW/fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-50-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0221.fits
SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_015530_TTUQ2b1x1_193279_NrOSfNaW/fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-51-02_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0222.fits
Previews of the CALIBRATED second-epoch images:


fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-50-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0221.fits



fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-51-02_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0222.fits




Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/TTUQ2_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1

  ./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 4 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_02-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0313.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_03-00-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_015530_TTUQ2b1x1_193279_NrOSfNaW/fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-50-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0221.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_015530_TTUQ2b1x1_193279_NrOSfNaW/fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-51-02_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0222.fits
  
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_02-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0313.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_03-00-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_02-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0313.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_03-00-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_015530_TTUQ2b1x1_193279_NrOSfNaW/fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-50-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0221.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_015530_TTUQ2b1x1_193279_NrOSfNaW/fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-51-02_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0222.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461199.78511410
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
wcs_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_02-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0313.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_02-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0313.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_02-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0313.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_02-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0313.fits'
wcs_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_03-00-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_03-00-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_03-00-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_03-00-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits'
wcs_fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-50-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0221.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-50-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0221.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-50-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0221.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-50-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0221.fits'
wcs_fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-51-02_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0222.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-51-02_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0222.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-51-02_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0222.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-51-02_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0222.fits'
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_02-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0313.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_02-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0313.fits
Image size: 937.2'x624.1'  15.6(deg)x10.4(deg)  9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 15:31:47.843 +54:00:02.05 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 
###################################
The image scale is 5.87"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-50-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0221.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-50-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0221.fits
Image size: 937.0'x624.0'  15.6(deg)x10.4(deg)  9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 15:31:44.818 +54:00:55.78 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 15:31:47.843 +54:00:02.05
Second-epoch image center 15:31:44.818 +54:00:55.78
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0167 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg.  Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-51-02_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0222.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-51-02_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0222.fits
Image size: 937.1'x624.0'  15.6(deg)x10.4(deg)  9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 15:31:44.479 +54:00:37.25 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 15:31:47.843 +54:00:02.05
Second-epoch image center 15:31:44.479 +54:00:37.25
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0128 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center  15:31:44.818 +54:00:55.78
Second-epoch second image center 15:31:44.479 +54:00:37.25
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00521 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running  util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2  /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_02-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0313.fits &> /tmp/tmp.OZCZcRTMY8
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_02-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0313.fits
Running  util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2  /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_03-00-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits &> /tmp/tmp.PuZcVQQBaD
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_03-00-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits
Running  util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2  /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_015530_TTUQ2b1x1_193279_NrOSfNaW/fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-50-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0221.fits &> /tmp/tmp.qxDgkaIblL
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_015530_TTUQ2b1x1_193279_NrOSfNaW/fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-50-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0221.fits
Running  util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2  /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_015530_TTUQ2b1x1_193279_NrOSfNaW/fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-51-02_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0222.fits &> /tmp/tmp.PpBk5EZd7p
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_015530_TTUQ2b1x1_193279_NrOSfNaW/fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-51-02_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0222.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_02-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0313.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_02-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0313.fits and wcs_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_02-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0313.fits.cat 
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_02-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0313.fits and wcs_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_02-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0313.fits.cat 
Found non-empty wcs_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_02-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0313.fits and wcs_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_02-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0313.fits.cat
The reference image (wcs_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_02-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0313.fits) and catalog (wcs_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_02-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0313.fits.cat) found
'wcs_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_02-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0313.fits.cat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 8363 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 218.1988 to 247.8637 deg, Dec +48.2439 to +59.2440 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 218.1988 to 247.8637 deg, Dec 48.2439 to 59.2440 deg
Loaded 6135 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4420 out of 4572 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 4572 out of 8363 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.754000
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.754000
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.:  -7.37
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.:  15.38

Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed!  =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.:  15.38

Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:


Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 8363 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 218.1988 to 247.8637 deg, Dec +48.2439 to +59.2440 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 218.1988 to 247.8637 deg, Dec 48.2439 to 59.2440 deg
Loaded 6135 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4420 out of 4572 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 4572 out of 8363 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_02-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0313.fits via Tycho-2

Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_02-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0313.fits:


Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_02-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0313.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_02-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0313.fits (aperture=6.4)
Read 8357 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 218.1988 to 247.8636 deg, Dec +48.2439 to +59.2440 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 218.1988 to 247.8636 deg, Dec 48.2439 to 59.2440 deg
Loaded 6135 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4426 out of 4576 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 4576 out of 8357 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_03-00-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits via Tycho-2

Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_03-00-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits:


Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_03-00-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_03-00-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits (aperture=6.4)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 1 candidate transients before the final filtering.  (Hard limit: 8000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
 2.3 pix  Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_02-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0313.fits
 2.3 pix  Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_03-00-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits
 2.3 pix  fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-50-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0221.fits
 2.3 pix  fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-51-02_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0222.fits
 2.3 pix  wcs_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_02-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0313.fits
 2.3 pix  wcs_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_03-00-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
 15.4 mag.  Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_02-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0313.fits
 15.4 mag.  Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_03-00-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits
 15.3 mag.  fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-50-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0221.fits
 15.3 mag.  fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-51-02_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0222.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate:  15.3 (SNR )  12.3 (80% of stars)  with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of  following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50). 
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image. 
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.OZCZcRTMY8 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-08_CI_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_015530_TTUQ2b1x1_193279_NrOSfNaW/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_02-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0313.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_02-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0313.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_02-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0313.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_02-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0313.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_02-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0313.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_02-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0313.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_02-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0313.fits' -> 'wcs_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_02-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0313.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_02-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0313.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_02-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0313.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_02-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0313.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_02-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0313.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_02-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0313.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_02-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0313.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_02-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0313.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_02-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0313.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_02-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0313.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_02-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0313.fits.cat 
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=459, passed=8363
Got 8363 stars (including 7897 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_02-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0313.fits.cat 
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 8363 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013017 (46.9 arcsec)
                    catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
                    catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010413 (37.5 arcsec)

ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 691 to 748 (Dec 48.2 to 59.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 950 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 950 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 940 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38" 
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 950 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8276 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36" 

ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 691 to 748 (Dec 48.2 to 59.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 950 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 950 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8275 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36" 
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 950 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8275 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36" 
Excluding outliers - 950 stars left (next iteration limit 1045)
Stop iterations.


 The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)

WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_02-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0313.fits N_match=950 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.390 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.271 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.448 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.446 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.447 n_q1=264 n_q2=215 n_q3=251 n_q4=220 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.149
The image catalog is written to wcs_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_02-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0313.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_02-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0313.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
 ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_02-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0313.fits -region wcs_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_02-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0313.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_02-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0313.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.PuZcVQQBaD (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-08_CI_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_015530_TTUQ2b1x1_193279_NrOSfNaW/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_03-00-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_03-00-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_03-00-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_03-00-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_03-00-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_03-00-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_03-00-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits' -> 'wcs_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_03-00-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_03-00-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_03-00-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_03-00-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_03-00-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_03-00-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_03-00-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_03-00-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_03-00-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_03-00-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_03-00-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits.cat 
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=460, passed=8357
Got 8357 stars (including 7883 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_03-00-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits.cat 
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 8357 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013017 (46.9 arcsec)
                    catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
                    catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010413 (37.5 arcsec)

ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 691 to 748 (Dec 48.2 to 59.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 949 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 949 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 943 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39" 
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 949 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8269 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38" 

ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 691 to 748 (Dec 48.2 to 59.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 949 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 949 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8269 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38" 
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 949 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8269 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38" 
Excluding outliers - 949 stars left (next iteration limit 1043)
Stop iterations.


 The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)

WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_03-00-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits N_match=949 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.396 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.288 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.510 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.418 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.461 n_q1=264 n_q2=213 n_q3=249 n_q4=223 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.286
The image catalog is written to wcs_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_03-00-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_03-00-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
 ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_03-00-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits -region wcs_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_03-00-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_03-00-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.qxDgkaIblL (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-08_CI_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_015530_TTUQ2b1x1_193279_NrOSfNaW/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_015530_TTUQ2b1x1_193279_NrOSfNaW/fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-50-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0221.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_015530_TTUQ2b1x1_193279_NrOSfNaW/fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-50-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0221.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_015530_TTUQ2b1x1_193279_NrOSfNaW/fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-50-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0221.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_015530_TTUQ2b1x1_193279_NrOSfNaW/fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-50-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0221.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_015530_TTUQ2b1x1_193279_NrOSfNaW/fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-50-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0221.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_015530_TTUQ2b1x1_193279_NrOSfNaW/fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-50-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0221.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-50-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0221.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-50-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0221.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-50-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0221.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-50-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0221.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-50-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0221.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-50-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0221.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-50-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0221.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_015530_TTUQ2b1x1_193279_NrOSfNaW/fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-50-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0221.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-50-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0221.fits.cat 
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=456, passed=8019
Got 8019 stars (including 7555 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-50-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0221.fits.cat 
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 8019 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.0'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.0 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013014 (46.9 arcsec)
                    catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
                    catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010411 (37.5 arcsec)

ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 691 to 748 (Dec 48.2 to 59.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 951 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 951 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 945 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39" 
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 951 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7931 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38" 

ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 691 to 748 (Dec 48.2 to 59.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 951 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 951 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7927 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38" 
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 951 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7927 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38" 
Excluding outliers - 951 stars left (next iteration limit 1046)
Stop iterations.


 The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)

WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-50-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0221.fits N_match=951 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.391 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.293 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.488 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.445 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.460 n_q1=258 n_q2=220 n_q3=244 n_q4=229 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.249
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-50-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0221.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-50-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0221.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
 ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_015530_TTUQ2b1x1_193279_NrOSfNaW/fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-50-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0221.fits -region wcs_fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-50-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0221.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-50-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0221.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.PpBk5EZd7p (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-08_CI_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_015530_TTUQ2b1x1_193279_NrOSfNaW/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_015530_TTUQ2b1x1_193279_NrOSfNaW/fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-51-02_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0222.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_015530_TTUQ2b1x1_193279_NrOSfNaW/fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-51-02_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0222.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_015530_TTUQ2b1x1_193279_NrOSfNaW/fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-51-02_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0222.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_015530_TTUQ2b1x1_193279_NrOSfNaW/fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-51-02_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0222.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_015530_TTUQ2b1x1_193279_NrOSfNaW/fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-51-02_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0222.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_015530_TTUQ2b1x1_193279_NrOSfNaW/fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-51-02_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0222.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-51-02_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0222.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-51-02_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0222.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-51-02_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0222.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-51-02_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0222.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-51-02_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0222.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-51-02_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0222.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-51-02_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0222.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_015530_TTUQ2b1x1_193279_NrOSfNaW/fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-51-02_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0222.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-51-02_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0222.fits.cat 
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=442, passed=8026
Got 8026 stars (including 7574 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-51-02_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0222.fits.cat 
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 8026 stars from the SExtractor catalog
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-08_CI_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_015530_TTUQ2b1x1_193279_NrOSfNaW/util/fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh: line 144: echo: write error: Broken pipe
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.1'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.1 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013015 (46.9 arcsec)
                    catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
                    catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010412 (37.5 arcsec)

ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 691 to 748 (Dec 48.2 to 59.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 949 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 949 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 935 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38" 
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 949 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7936 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37" 

ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 691 to 748 (Dec 48.2 to 59.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 949 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 949 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7937 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37" 
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 949 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7937 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36" 
Excluding outliers - 949 stars left (next iteration limit 1043)
Stop iterations.


 The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)

WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-51-02_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0222.fits N_match=949 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.377 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.277 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.466 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.379 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.440 n_q1=255 n_q2=216 n_q3=244 n_q4=234 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.236
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-51-02_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0222.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-51-02_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0222.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
 ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_015530_TTUQ2b1x1_193279_NrOSfNaW/fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-51-02_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0222.fits -region wcs_fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-51-02_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0222.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-51-02_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0222.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_02-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0313.fits sigma_overall=0.390 worst_q_ratio=1.149
ref2=Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_03-00-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits sigma_overall=0.396 worst_q_ratio=1.286
new1=fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-50-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0221.fits sigma_overall=0.391 worst_q_ratio=1.249
new2=fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-51-02_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0222.fits sigma_overall=0.377 worst_q_ratio=1.236
reference average sigma_overall=0.393 worst_q_ratio=1.2175
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################

Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):

plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: numpy/matplotlib unavailable (No module named 'matplotlib') -- falling back to the C plotter
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy: wrote wcs_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_02-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0313_astrometric_residuals.png (950 matched stars from wcs_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_02-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0313.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388)


plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: numpy/matplotlib unavailable (No module named 'matplotlib') -- falling back to the C plotter
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy: wrote wcs_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_03-00-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0314_astrometric_residuals.png (949 matched stars from wcs_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_03-00-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388)


plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: numpy/matplotlib unavailable (No module named 'matplotlib') -- falling back to the C plotter
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy: PGPLOT /PNG device reported success but no file appeared at wcs_fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-50-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0221_astrometric_residuals.png -- no plot produced
WARNING: no astrometric residual plot produced for wcs_fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-50-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0221.fits -- both lib/plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py and lib/plot_astrometric_residuals_xy failed to create wcs_fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-50-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0221_astrometric_residuals.png (see messages above)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: numpy/matplotlib unavailable (No module named 'matplotlib') -- falling back to the C plotter
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy: PGPLOT /PNG device reported success but no file appeared at wcs_fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-51-02_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0222_astrometric_residuals.png -- no plot produced
WARNING: no astrometric residual plot produced for wcs_fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-51-02_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0222.fits -- both lib/plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py and lib/plot_astrometric_residuals_xy failed to create wcs_fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-51-02_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0222_astrometric_residuals.png (see messages above)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-50-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0221.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-50-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0221.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_015530_TTUQ2b1x1_193279_NrOSfNaW/wcs_fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-50-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0221.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-51-02_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0222.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-51-02_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0222.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_015530_TTUQ2b1x1_193279_NrOSfNaW/wcs_fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-51-02_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0222.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Dra-09-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
Forced photometry on wcs_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_02-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0313.fits at 15:04:20.79 +53:27:10.3:  12.56 +/- 0.02  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_03-00-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits at 15:04:20.79 +53:27:10.3:  12.56 +/- 0.01  detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  12.56 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:04:20.79 +53:27:10.3: ref_mag=12.56 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.4842 delta=0.07 (need > 0.90)
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 1s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 1s
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20341_fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-51-02_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0222
The candidate 20341_fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-51-02_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0222 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 06 08.28511    2461199.78511    12.49    15:04:20.80 +53:27:10.4   7253 3445   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_015530_TTUQ2b1x1_193279_NrOSfNaW/fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-50-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0221.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 06 08.28556    2461199.78556    12.48    15:04:20.77 +53:27:10.2   7252 3442   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_015530_TTUQ2b1x1_193279_NrOSfNaW/fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-51-02_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0222.fits

make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 2s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Dra-09-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL

  ./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 4 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_02-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0313.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_03-00-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_015530_TTUQ2b1x1_193279_NrOSfNaW/fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-50-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0221.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_015530_TTUQ2b1x1_193279_NrOSfNaW/fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-51-02_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0222.fits
  
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_02-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0313.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_03-00-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_02-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0313.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_03-00-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_015530_TTUQ2b1x1_193279_NrOSfNaW/fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-50-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0221.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_015530_TTUQ2b1x1_193279_NrOSfNaW/fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-51-02_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0222.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_02-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0313.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_03-00-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-50-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0221.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-51-02_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0222.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/exclusion_list.txt
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_02-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0313.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_03-00-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-50-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0221.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-51-02_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0222.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_02-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0313.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_02-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0313.fits
Image size: 937.2'x624.1'  15.6(deg)x10.4(deg)  9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 15:31:47.843 +54:00:02.05 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 
###################################
The image scale is 5.87"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-50-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0221.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-50-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0221.fits
Image size: 937.0'x624.0'  15.6(deg)x10.4(deg)  9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 15:31:44.818 +54:00:55.78 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 15:31:47.843 +54:00:02.05
Second-epoch image center 15:31:44.818 +54:00:55.78
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0167 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg.  Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-51-02_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0222.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-51-02_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0222.fits
Image size: 937.1'x624.0'  15.6(deg)x10.4(deg)  9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 15:31:44.479 +54:00:37.25 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 15:31:47.843 +54:00:02.05
Second-epoch image center 15:31:44.479 +54:00:37.25
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0128 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center  15:31:44.818 +54:00:55.78
Second-epoch second image center 15:31:44.479 +54:00:37.25
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00521 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running  util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2  /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_02-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0313.fits &> /tmp/tmp.hoJxaYIyRp
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_02-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0313.fits
Running  util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2  /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_03-00-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits &> /tmp/tmp.cDBMttybF7
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_03-00-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits
Running  util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2  /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_015530_TTUQ2b1x1_193279_NrOSfNaW/fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-50-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0221.fits &> /tmp/tmp.RxdVOTKotg
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_015530_TTUQ2b1x1_193279_NrOSfNaW/fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-50-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0221.fits
Running  util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2  /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_015530_TTUQ2b1x1_193279_NrOSfNaW/fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-51-02_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0222.fits &> /tmp/tmp.zH3HTgjWdx
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_015530_TTUQ2b1x1_193279_NrOSfNaW/fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-51-02_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0222.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_02-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0313.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_02-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0313.fits and wcs_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_02-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0313.fits.cat 
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_02-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0313.fits and wcs_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_02-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0313.fits.cat 
Found non-empty wcs_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_02-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0313.fits and wcs_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_02-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0313.fits.cat
The reference image (wcs_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_02-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0313.fits) and catalog (wcs_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_02-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0313.fits.cat) found
'wcs_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_02-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0313.fits.cat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 43365 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 218.1484 to 248.0262 deg, Dec +48.1644 to +59.2687 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 218.1484 to 248.0262 deg, Dec 48.1644 to 59.2687 deg
Loaded 6233 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4200 out of 4603 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 4603 out of 43365 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.630100
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.630100
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.:  -7.08
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.:  15.55

Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed!  =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.:  15.55

Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:


Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 43365 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 218.1484 to 248.0262 deg, Dec +48.1644 to +59.2687 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 218.1484 to 248.0262 deg, Dec 48.1644 to 59.2687 deg
Loaded 6233 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4200 out of 4603 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 4603 out of 43365 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_02-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0313.fits via Tycho-2

Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_02-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0313.fits:


Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_02-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0313.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_02-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0313.fits (aperture=4.9)
Read 43531 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 218.1483 to 248.0272 deg, Dec +48.1643 to +59.2726 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 218.1483 to 248.0272 deg, Dec 48.1643 to 59.2726 deg
Loaded 6237 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4222 out of 4601 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 4601 out of 43531 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_03-00-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits via Tycho-2

Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_03-00-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits:


Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_03-00-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_03-00-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits (aperture=4.9)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 44 candidate transients before the final filtering.  (Hard limit: 8000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
 2.2 pix  Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_02-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0313.fits
 2.2 pix  Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_03-00-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits
 2.2 pix  fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-50-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0221.fits
 2.2 pix  fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-51-02_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0222.fits
 2.2 pix  wcs_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_02-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0313.fits
 2.2 pix  wcs_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_03-00-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
 15.5 mag.  Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_02-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0313.fits
 15.5 mag.  Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_03-00-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits
 15.5 mag.  fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-50-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0221.fits
 15.5 mag.  fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-51-02_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0222.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate:  15.5 (SNR )  14.8 (80% of stars)  with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of  following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50). 
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image. 
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.hoJxaYIyRp (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-08_CI_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_015530_TTUQ2b1x1_193279_NrOSfNaW/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_02-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0313.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_02-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0313.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_02-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0313.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_02-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0313.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_02-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0313.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_02-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0313.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_02-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0313.fits' -> 'wcs_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_02-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0313.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_02-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0313.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_02-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0313.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_02-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0313.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_02-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0313.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_02-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0313.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_02-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0313.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_02-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0313.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_02-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0313.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_02-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0313.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_02-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0313.fits.cat 
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=23, blended=1952, passed=43342
Got 43342 stars (including 41326 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_02-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0313.fits.cat 
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 43342 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013017 (46.9 arcsec)
                    catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
                    catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010413 (37.5 arcsec)

ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 690 to 748 (Dec 48.2 to 59.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 949 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 949 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 937 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41" 
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 949 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 42935 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39" 

ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 690 to 748 (Dec 48.2 to 59.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 949 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 949 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 42934 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39" 
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 949 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 42934 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40" 
Excluding outliers - 949 stars left (next iteration limit 1043)
Stop iterations.


 The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)

WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_02-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0313.fits N_match=949 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.398 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.279 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.428 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.469 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.495 n_q1=266 n_q2=212 n_q3=242 n_q4=229 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.245
The image catalog is written to wcs_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_02-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0313.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_02-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0313.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
 ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_02-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0313.fits -region wcs_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_02-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0313.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_02-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0313.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.cDBMttybF7 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-08_CI_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_015530_TTUQ2b1x1_193279_NrOSfNaW/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_03-00-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_03-00-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_03-00-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_03-00-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_03-00-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_03-00-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_03-00-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits' -> 'wcs_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_03-00-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_03-00-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_03-00-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_03-00-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_03-00-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_03-00-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_03-00-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_03-00-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_03-00-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_03-00-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_03-00-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits.cat 
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=15, blended=1994, passed=43516
Got 43516 stars (including 41453 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_03-00-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits.cat 
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 43516 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013017 (46.9 arcsec)
                    catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
                    catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010413 (37.5 arcsec)

ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 690 to 748 (Dec 48.2 to 59.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 948 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 948 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 938 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43" 
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 948 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 43132 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41" 

ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 690 to 748 (Dec 48.2 to 59.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 948 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 948 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 43131 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41" 
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 948 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 43131 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41" 
Excluding outliers - 948 stars left (next iteration limit 1042)
Stop iterations.


 The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)

WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_03-00-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits N_match=948 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.409 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.297 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.469 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.418 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.487 n_q1=262 n_q2=215 n_q3=241 n_q4=230 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.193
The image catalog is written to wcs_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_03-00-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_03-00-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
 ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_03-00-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits -region wcs_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_03-00-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_03-00-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.RxdVOTKotg (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-08_CI_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_015530_TTUQ2b1x1_193279_NrOSfNaW/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_015530_TTUQ2b1x1_193279_NrOSfNaW/fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-50-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0221.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_015530_TTUQ2b1x1_193279_NrOSfNaW/fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-50-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0221.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_015530_TTUQ2b1x1_193279_NrOSfNaW/fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-50-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0221.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_015530_TTUQ2b1x1_193279_NrOSfNaW/fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-50-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0221.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_015530_TTUQ2b1x1_193279_NrOSfNaW/fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-50-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0221.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_015530_TTUQ2b1x1_193279_NrOSfNaW/fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-50-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0221.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-50-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0221.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-50-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0221.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-50-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0221.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-50-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0221.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-50-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0221.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-50-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0221.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-50-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0221.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_015530_TTUQ2b1x1_193279_NrOSfNaW/fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-50-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0221.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-50-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0221.fits.cat 
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=24, blended=1902, passed=42184
Got 42184 stars (including 40228 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-50-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0221.fits.cat 
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 42184 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.0'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.0 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013014 (46.9 arcsec)
                    catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
                    catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010411 (37.5 arcsec)

ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 690 to 748 (Dec 48.2 to 59.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 946 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 946 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 938 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41" 
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 946 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 41836 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40" 

ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 690 to 748 (Dec 48.2 to 59.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 946 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 946 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 41835 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40" 
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 946 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 41835 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41" 
Excluding outliers - 946 stars left (next iteration limit 1040)
Stop iterations.


 The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)

WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-50-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0221.fits N_match=946 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.411 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.287 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.471 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.461 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.501 n_q1=254 n_q2=219 n_q3=239 n_q4=234 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.220
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-50-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0221.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-50-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0221.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
 ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_015530_TTUQ2b1x1_193279_NrOSfNaW/fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-50-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0221.fits -region wcs_fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-50-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0221.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-50-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0221.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.zH3HTgjWdx (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-08_CI_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_015530_TTUQ2b1x1_193279_NrOSfNaW/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_015530_TTUQ2b1x1_193279_NrOSfNaW/fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-51-02_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0222.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_015530_TTUQ2b1x1_193279_NrOSfNaW/fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-51-02_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0222.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_015530_TTUQ2b1x1_193279_NrOSfNaW/fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-51-02_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0222.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_015530_TTUQ2b1x1_193279_NrOSfNaW/fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-51-02_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0222.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_015530_TTUQ2b1x1_193279_NrOSfNaW/fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-51-02_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0222.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_015530_TTUQ2b1x1_193279_NrOSfNaW/fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-51-02_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0222.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-51-02_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0222.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-51-02_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0222.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-51-02_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0222.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-51-02_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0222.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-51-02_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0222.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-51-02_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0222.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-51-02_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0222.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_015530_TTUQ2b1x1_193279_NrOSfNaW/fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-51-02_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0222.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-51-02_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0222.fits.cat 
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=15, blended=1859, passed=41879
Got 41879 stars (including 39974 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-51-02_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0222.fits.cat 
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 41879 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.1'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.1 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013015 (46.9 arcsec)
                    catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
                    catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010412 (37.5 arcsec)

ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 690 to 748 (Dec 48.2 to 59.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 948 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 948 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 934 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40" 
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 948 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 41512 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38" 

ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 690 to 748 (Dec 48.2 to 59.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 948 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 948 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 41512 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38" 
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 948 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 41512 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39" 
Excluding outliers - 948 stars left (next iteration limit 1042)
Stop iterations.


 The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)

WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-51-02_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0222.fits N_match=948 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.393 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.274 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.460 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.414 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.471 n_q1=255 n_q2=218 n_q3=238 n_q4=237 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.198
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-51-02_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0222.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-51-02_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0222.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
 ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_015530_TTUQ2b1x1_193279_NrOSfNaW/fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-51-02_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0222.fits -region wcs_fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-51-02_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0222.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-51-02_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0222.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-50-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0221.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_015530_TTUQ2b1x1_193279_NrOSfNaW/wcs_fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-50-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0221.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-51-02_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0222.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_015530_TTUQ2b1x1_193279_NrOSfNaW/wcs_fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-51-02_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0222.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Dra-09-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_02-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0313.fits at 15:39:36.14 +54:19:45.1:  14.34 +/- 0.06  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_02-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0313.fits at 16:13:54.26 +55:17:43.3:  14.29 +/- 0.08  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_02-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0313.fits at 15:50:47.24 +49:42:09.1:  14.10 +/- 0.06  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_02-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0313.fits at 16:12:18.55 +49:24:01.0:  14.71 +/- 0.12  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_03-00-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits at 15:39:36.14 +54:19:45.1:  14.27 +/- 0.06  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_02-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0313.fits at 16:15:26.01 +51:20:50.1:  14.92 +/- 0.15  detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  14.30 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:39:36.14 +54:19:45.1: ref_mag=14.30 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=14.5383 delta=-0.24 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_03-00-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits at 16:13:54.26 +55:17:43.3:  14.44 +/- 0.09  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_03-00-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits at 15:50:47.24 +49:42:09.1:  14.09 +/- 0.06  detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  14.35 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:13:54.26 +55:17:43.3: ref_mag=14.35 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=14.3158 delta=0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  14.09 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:50:47.24 +49:42:09.1: ref_mag=14.09 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=14.0895 delta=0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_03-00-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits at 16:12:18.55 +49:24:01.0:  14.67 +/- 0.12  detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  14.69 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:12:18.55 +49:24:01.0: ref_mag=14.69 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=14.5495 delta=0.14 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_03-00-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits at 16:15:26.01 +51:20:50.1:  14.82 +/- 0.14  detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  14.86 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:15:26.01 +51:20:50.1: ref_mag=14.86 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.8180 delta=0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_02-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0313.fits at 16:05:00.04 +52:46:37.1:  14.42 +/- 0.08  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_02-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0313.fits at 16:01:27.43 +53:37:52.8:  14.94 +/- 0.13  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_02-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0313.fits at 16:14:02.61 +54:06:54.0:  15.19 +/- 0.18  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_02-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0313.fits at 15:24:42.13 +57:52:33.8:  15.30 +/- 0.16  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_02-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0313.fits at 16:10:58.89 +56:13:32.0:  15.11 +/- 0.17  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_03-00-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits at 16:05:00.04 +52:46:37.1:  14.44 +/- 0.08  detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  14.43 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:05:00.04 +52:46:37.1: ref_mag=14.43 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=14.6463 delta=-0.22 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_03-00-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits at 16:01:27.43 +53:37:52.8:  15.16 +/- 0.16  detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  15.02 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:01:27.43 +53:37:52.8: ref_mag=15.02 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.8350 delta=0.19 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_02-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0313.fits at 16:13:39.14 +49:25:43.7:  15.11 +/- 0.19  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_02-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0313.fits at 15:40:47.15 +57:29:08.6:  14.81 +/- 0.11  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_03-00-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits at 16:14:02.61 +54:06:54.0:  14.82 +/- 0.12  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_03-00-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits at 15:24:42.13 +57:52:33.8:  15.02 +/- 0.12  detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  15.12 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  14.93 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:24:42.13 +57:52:33.8: ref_mag=15.12 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.9402 delta=0.18 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:14:02.61 +54:06:54.0: ref_mag=14.93 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.8997 delta=0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_03-00-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits at 16:10:58.89 +56:13:32.0:  14.96 +/- 0.15  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_02-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0313.fits at 16:12:01.23 +55:19:01.1:  15.00 +/- 0.13  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_02-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0313.fits at 16:13:14.93 +51:03:11.4:  15.28 +/- 0.20  detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  15.03 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:10:58.89 +56:13:32.0: ref_mag=15.03 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.8762 delta=0.15 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_02-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0313.fits at 16:05:35.50 +49:33:41.9:  15.24 +/- 0.19  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_03-00-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits at 15:40:47.15 +57:29:08.6:  14.97 +/- 0.13  detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  14.88 +/- 0.08
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:40:47.15 +57:29:08.6: ref_mag=14.88 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=14.8616 delta=0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_03-00-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits at 16:13:39.14 +49:25:43.7:  14.88 +/- 0.15  detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  14.97 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:13:39.14 +49:25:43.7: ref_mag=14.97 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.8822 delta=0.09 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_03-00-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits at 16:12:01.23 +55:19:01.1:  15.11 +/- 0.15  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_03-00-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits at 16:13:14.93 +51:03:11.4:  15.12 +/- 0.17  detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  15.05 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:12:01.23 +55:19:01.1: ref_mag=15.05 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.9443 delta=0.10 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  15.19 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry on wcs_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_02-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0313.fits at 16:02:51.27 +56:28:17.8:  14.88 +/- 0.13  detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:13:14.93 +51:03:11.4: ref_mag=15.19 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.8194 delta=0.37 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_02-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0313.fits at 15:49:11.61 +57:07:04.5:  15.12 +/- 0.14  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_03-00-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits at 16:05:35.50 +49:33:41.9:  14.94 +/- 0.14  detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  15.05 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:05:35.50 +49:33:41.9: ref_mag=15.05 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.9809 delta=0.07 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_03-00-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits at 16:02:51.27 +56:28:17.8:  14.94 +/- 0.13  detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  14.91 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:02:51.27 +56:28:17.8: ref_mag=14.91 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=14.8901 delta=0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_03-00-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits at 15:49:11.61 +57:07:04.5:  14.67 +/- 0.10  detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  14.82 +/- 0.08
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:49:11.61 +57:07:04.5: ref_mag=14.82 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=14.8219 delta=0.00 (need > 0.90)
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 2s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 0s
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52693_fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-51-02_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0222
The candidate 52693_fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-51-02_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0222 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 06 08.28556    2461199.78556    14.83    16:20:53.55 +57:00:53.3   0757 0960   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_015530_TTUQ2b1x1_193279_NrOSfNaW/fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-51-02_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0222.fits

**** FOUND  16:20:53.52 +57:00:53.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52696_fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-51-02_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0222
The candidate 52696_fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-51-02_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0222 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 06 08.28556    2461199.78556    14.81    15:58:00.34 +53:25:12.2   2420 3416   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_015530_TTUQ2b1x1_193279_NrOSfNaW/fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-51-02_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0222.fits

**** FOUND  15:58:00.35 +53:25:12.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52702_fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-51-02_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0222
The candidate 52702_fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-51-02_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0222 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 06 08.28511    2461199.78511    14.53    15:39:36.13 +54:19:45.4   4099 2988   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_015530_TTUQ2b1x1_193279_NrOSfNaW/fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-50-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0221.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 06 08.28556    2461199.78556    14.54    15:39:36.15 +54:19:44.7   4099 2985   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_015530_TTUQ2b1x1_193279_NrOSfNaW/fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-51-02_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0222.fits

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52709_fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-51-02_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0222
The candidate 52709_fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-51-02_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0222 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 06 08.28556    2461199.78556    10.59    15:04:00.92 +56:35:09.8   7119 1546   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_015530_TTUQ2b1x1_193279_NrOSfNaW/fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-51-02_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0222.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.7") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52712_fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-51-02_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0222
The candidate 52712_fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-51-02_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0222 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 06 08.28556    2461199.78556    11.57    15:48:21.01 +54:21:42.0   3330 2923   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_015530_TTUQ2b1x1_193279_NrOSfNaW/fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-51-02_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0222.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.8") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52728_fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-51-02_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0222
The candidate 52728_fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-51-02_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0222 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 06 08.28556    2461199.78556    12.82    15:11:53.38 +55:49:52.1   6488 2053   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_015530_TTUQ2b1x1_193279_NrOSfNaW/fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-51-02_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0222.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.0") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52729_fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-51-02_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0222
The candidate 52729_fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-51-02_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0222 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 06 08.28556    2461199.78556    12.88    15:05:52.62 +51:12:23.6   7224 4812   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_015530_TTUQ2b1x1_193279_NrOSfNaW/fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-51-02_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0222.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.1") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52734_fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-51-02_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0222
The candidate 52734_fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-51-02_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0222 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 06 08.28556    2461199.78556    13.39    15:17:28.99 +50:06:09.8   6148 5544   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_015530_TTUQ2b1x1_193279_NrOSfNaW/fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-51-02_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0222.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.9") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52735_fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-51-02_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0222
The candidate 52735_fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-51-02_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0222 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 06 08.28556    2461199.78556    13.18    16:05:20.36 +50:08:46.4   1498 5316   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_015530_TTUQ2b1x1_193279_NrOSfNaW/fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-51-02_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0222.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.4") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52747_fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-51-02_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0222
The candidate 52747_fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-51-02_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0222 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 06 08.28556    2461199.78556    13.65    16:15:44.94 +56:58:58.0   1179 1058   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_015530_TTUQ2b1x1_193279_NrOSfNaW/fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-51-02_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0222.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.7") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52749_fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-51-02_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0222
The candidate 52749_fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-51-02_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0222 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 06 08.28556    2461199.78556    13.83    15:40:52.26 +50:28:13.9   3885 5314   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_015530_TTUQ2b1x1_193279_NrOSfNaW/fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-51-02_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0222.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.7") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52751_fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-51-02_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0222
The candidate 52751_fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-51-02_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0222 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 06 08.28556    2461199.78556    13.71    15:09:09.22 +50:18:59.8   6950 5374   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_015530_TTUQ2b1x1_193279_NrOSfNaW/fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-51-02_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0222.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.8") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52753_fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-51-02_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0222
The candidate 52753_fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-51-02_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0222 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 06 08.28556    2461199.78556    13.91    15:47:13.70 +55:05:42.6   3458 2487   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_015530_TTUQ2b1x1_193279_NrOSfNaW/fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-51-02_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0222.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.8") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52757_fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-51-02_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0222
The candidate 52757_fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-51-02_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0222 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 06 08.28511    2461199.78511    14.03    15:50:47.28 +49:42:10.3   2892 5728   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_015530_TTUQ2b1x1_193279_NrOSfNaW/fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-50-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0221.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 06 08.28556    2461199.78556    14.16    15:50:47.21 +49:42:07.8   2892 5725   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_015530_TTUQ2b1x1_193279_NrOSfNaW/fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-51-02_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0222.fits

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52773_fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-51-02_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0222
The candidate 52773_fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-51-02_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0222 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 06 08.28556    2461199.78556    14.48    15:59:53.35 +49:49:21.1   2007 5573   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_015530_TTUQ2b1x1_193279_NrOSfNaW/fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-51-02_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0222.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.2") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52777_fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-51-02_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0222
The candidate 52777_fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-51-02_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0222 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 06 08.28511    2461199.78511    14.35    16:13:54.23 +55:17:43.1   1168 2103   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_015530_TTUQ2b1x1_193279_NrOSfNaW/fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-50-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0221.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 06 08.28556    2461199.78556    14.29    16:13:54.28 +55:17:43.6   1168 2100   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_015530_TTUQ2b1x1_193279_NrOSfNaW/fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-51-02_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0222.fits

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52785_fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-51-02_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0222
The candidate 52785_fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-51-02_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0222 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 06 08.28556    2461199.78556    14.59    16:02:14.53 +49:51:54.6   1779 5522   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_015530_TTUQ2b1x1_193279_NrOSfNaW/fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-51-02_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0222.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.3") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52786_fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-51-02_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0222
The candidate 52786_fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-51-02_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0222 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 06 08.28556    2461199.78556    15.02    15:07:21.96 +54:18:58.3   6941 2942   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_015530_TTUQ2b1x1_193279_NrOSfNaW/fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-51-02_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0222.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.2") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52792_fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-51-02_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0222
The candidate 52792_fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-51-02_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0222 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 06 08.28511    2461199.78511    14.57    16:12:18.40 +49:23:59.7   0747 5681   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_015530_TTUQ2b1x1_193279_NrOSfNaW/fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-50-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0221.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 06 08.28556    2461199.78556    14.53    16:12:18.70 +49:24:02.3   0747 5677   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_015530_TTUQ2b1x1_193279_NrOSfNaW/fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-51-02_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0222.fits

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52801_fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-51-02_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0222
The candidate 52801_fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-51-02_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0222 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 06 08.28556    2461199.78556    15.06    15:17:59.84 +57:27:14.3   5933 1095   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_015530_TTUQ2b1x1_193279_NrOSfNaW/fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-51-02_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0222.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.7") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52808_fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-51-02_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0222
The candidate 52808_fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-51-02_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0222 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 06 08.28556    2461199.78556    14.94    15:15:15.28 +52:59:04.8   6282 3789   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_015530_TTUQ2b1x1_193279_NrOSfNaW/fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-51-02_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0222.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.1") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52811_fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-51-02_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0222
The candidate 52811_fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-51-02_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0222 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 06 08.28556    2461199.78556    14.69    16:15:23.80 +54:36:33.4   0970 2491   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_015530_TTUQ2b1x1_193279_NrOSfNaW/fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-51-02_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0222.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.6") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52815_fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-51-02_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0222
The candidate 52815_fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-51-02_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0222 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 06 08.28556    2461199.78556    15.11    16:07:47.97 +57:19:52.9   1865 0953   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_015530_TTUQ2b1x1_193279_NrOSfNaW/fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-51-02_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0222.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.7") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52818_fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-51-02_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0222
The candidate 52818_fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-51-02_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0222 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 06 08.28511    2461199.78511    14.71    16:15:26.05 +51:20:49.1   0637 4456   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_015530_TTUQ2b1x1_193279_NrOSfNaW/fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-50-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0221.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 06 08.28556    2461199.78556    14.98    16:15:25.96 +51:20:51.1   0636 4453   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_015530_TTUQ2b1x1_193279_NrOSfNaW/fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-51-02_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0222.fits

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52820_fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-51-02_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0222
The candidate 52820_fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-51-02_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0222 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 06 08.28556    2461199.78556    14.77    15:57:27.98 +54:19:33.1   2525 2875   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_015530_TTUQ2b1x1_193279_NrOSfNaW/fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-51-02_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0222.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.4") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52831_fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-51-02_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0222
The candidate 52831_fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-51-02_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0222 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 06 08.28556    2461199.78556    15.12    15:57:21.06 +52:40:20.3   2433 3873   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_015530_TTUQ2b1x1_193279_NrOSfNaW/fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-51-02_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0222.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.2") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52836_fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-51-02_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0222
The candidate 52836_fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-51-02_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0222 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 06 08.28556    2461199.78556    14.96    16:06:53.63 +53:55:28.1   1660 3017   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_015530_TTUQ2b1x1_193279_NrOSfNaW/fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-51-02_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0222.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.5") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52841_fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-51-02_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0222
The candidate 52841_fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-51-02_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0222 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 06 08.28556    2461199.78556    14.85    15:49:47.04 +52:17:38.7   3110 4162   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_015530_TTUQ2b1x1_193279_NrOSfNaW/fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-51-02_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0222.fits

**** FOUND  15:49:46.97 +52:17:38.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52850_fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-51-02_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0222
The candidate 52850_fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-51-02_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0222 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 06 08.28511    2461199.78511    14.84    16:01:27.38 +53:37:51.9   2124 3258   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_015530_TTUQ2b1x1_193279_NrOSfNaW/fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-50-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0221.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 06 08.28556    2461199.78556    14.83    16:01:27.47 +53:37:53.7   2124 3255   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_015530_TTUQ2b1x1_193279_NrOSfNaW/fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-51-02_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0222.fits

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52858_fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-51-02_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0222
The candidate 52858_fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-51-02_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0222 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 06 08.28511    2461199.78511    14.82    16:04:59.99 +52:46:36.7   1739 3734   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_015530_TTUQ2b1x1_193279_NrOSfNaW/fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-50-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0221.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 06 08.28556    2461199.78556    14.55    16:05:00.08 +52:46:37.5   1739 3730   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_015530_TTUQ2b1x1_193279_NrOSfNaW/fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-51-02_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0222.fits

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52861_fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-51-02_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0222
The candidate 52861_fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-51-02_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0222 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 06 08.28511    2461199.78511    14.94    15:24:42.24 +57:52:33.4   5384 0856   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_015530_TTUQ2b1x1_193279_NrOSfNaW/fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-50-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0221.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 06 08.28556    2461199.78556    14.94    15:24:42.01 +57:52:34.3   5383 0853   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_015530_TTUQ2b1x1_193279_NrOSfNaW/fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-51-02_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0222.fits

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52864_fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-51-02_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0222
The candidate 52864_fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-51-02_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0222 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 06 08.28511    2461199.78511    14.86    16:14:02.60 +54:06:54.9   1041 2811   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_015530_TTUQ2b1x1_193279_NrOSfNaW/fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-50-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0221.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 06 08.28556    2461199.78556    14.95    16:14:02.61 +54:06:53.1   1040 2808   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_015530_TTUQ2b1x1_193279_NrOSfNaW/fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-51-02_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0222.fits

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52870_fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-51-02_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0222
The candidate 52870_fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-51-02_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0222 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 06 08.28511    2461199.78511    14.87    16:10:58.86 +56:13:31.8   1505 1583   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_015530_TTUQ2b1x1_193279_NrOSfNaW/fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-50-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0221.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 06 08.28556    2461199.78556    14.88    16:10:58.92 +56:13:32.1   1504 1580   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_015530_TTUQ2b1x1_193279_NrOSfNaW/fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-51-02_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0222.fits

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52871_fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-51-02_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0222
The candidate 52871_fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-51-02_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0222 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 06 08.28556    2461199.78556    14.64    16:00:54.64 +55:41:51.7   2316 2015   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_015530_TTUQ2b1x1_193279_NrOSfNaW/fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-51-02_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0222.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.7") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52875_fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-51-02_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0222
The candidate 52875_fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-51-02_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0222 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 06 08.28556    2461199.78556    14.94    15:52:30.03 +57:59:44.8   3150 0697   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_015530_TTUQ2b1x1_193279_NrOSfNaW/fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-51-02_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0222.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.8") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52880_fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-51-02_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0222
The candidate 52880_fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-51-02_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0222 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 06 08.28511    2461199.78511    14.89    16:13:39.15 +49:25:43.1   0617 5644   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_015530_TTUQ2b1x1_193279_NrOSfNaW/fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-50-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0221.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 06 08.28556    2461199.78556    14.88    16:13:39.13 +49:25:44.4   0616 5640   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_015530_TTUQ2b1x1_193279_NrOSfNaW/fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-51-02_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0222.fits

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52884_fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-51-02_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0222
The candidate 52884_fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-51-02_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0222 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 06 08.28511    2461199.78511    14.89    15:40:47.07 +57:29:09.4   4078 1074   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_015530_TTUQ2b1x1_193279_NrOSfNaW/fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-50-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0221.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 06 08.28556    2461199.78556    14.84    15:40:47.23 +57:29:07.7   4077 1071   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_015530_TTUQ2b1x1_193279_NrOSfNaW/fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-51-02_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0222.fits

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52886_fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-51-02_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0222
The candidate 52886_fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-51-02_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0222 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 06 08.28511    2461199.78511    14.95    16:12:01.13 +55:19:00.7   1333 2116   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_015530_TTUQ2b1x1_193279_NrOSfNaW/fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-50-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0221.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 06 08.28556    2461199.78556    14.94    16:12:01.33 +55:19:01.5   1332 2113   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_015530_TTUQ2b1x1_193279_NrOSfNaW/fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-51-02_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0222.fits

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52892_fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-51-02_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0222
The candidate 52892_fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-51-02_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0222 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 06 08.28511    2461199.78511    14.92    16:13:15.00 +51:03:11.2   0815 4666   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_015530_TTUQ2b1x1_193279_NrOSfNaW/fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-50-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0221.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 06 08.28556    2461199.78556    14.74    16:13:14.86 +51:03:11.5   0815 4663   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_015530_TTUQ2b1x1_193279_NrOSfNaW/fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-51-02_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0222.fits

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52904_fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-51-02_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0222
The candidate 52904_fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-51-02_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0222 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 06 08.28511    2461199.78511    14.96    16:05:35.56 +49:33:43.4   1426 5671   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_015530_TTUQ2b1x1_193279_NrOSfNaW/fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-50-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0221.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 06 08.28556    2461199.78556    15.00    16:05:35.43 +49:33:40.5   1426 5668   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_015530_TTUQ2b1x1_193279_NrOSfNaW/fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-51-02_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0222.fits

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52931_fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-51-02_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0222
The candidate 52931_fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-51-02_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0222 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 06 08.28511    2461199.78511    14.95    16:02:51.20 +56:28:19.0   2207 1531   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_015530_TTUQ2b1x1_193279_NrOSfNaW/fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-50-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0221.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 06 08.28556    2461199.78556    14.86    16:02:51.34 +56:28:16.6   2207 1528   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_015530_TTUQ2b1x1_193279_NrOSfNaW/fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-51-02_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0222.fits

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52937_fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-51-02_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0222
The candidate 52937_fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-51-02_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0222 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 06 08.28511    2461199.78511    15.00    15:49:11.62 +57:07:03.7   3377 1255   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_015530_TTUQ2b1x1_193279_NrOSfNaW/fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-50-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0221.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 06 08.28556    2461199.78556    14.73    15:49:11.59 +57:07:05.3   3377 1252   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_015530_TTUQ2b1x1_193279_NrOSfNaW/fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-51-02_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0222.fits

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 25328_fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-51-02_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0222
The candidate 25328_fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-51-02_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0222 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 3     2026 06 08.28556    2461199.78556    12.65    15:53:25.78 +53:09:24.3   2819 3614   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_015530_TTUQ2b1x1_193279_NrOSfNaW/fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-51-02_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0222.fits

**** FOUND  15:53:25.82 +53:09:24.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 41236_fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-51-02_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0222
The candidate 41236_fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-51-02_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0222 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 3     2026 06 08.28556    2461199.78556    13.12    15:04:27.32 +51:52:03.9   7325 4401   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_015530_TTUQ2b1x1_193279_NrOSfNaW/fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-51-02_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0222.fits

**** FOUND  15:04:27.31 +51:52:04.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 1s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 3s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Dra-09-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
########### Completed Dra-09-Q2b1x1 ###########
The analysis was running at tau
We are allowed to update the exclusion list at tau host
Found ../exclusion_list_TTUQ2.txt
#### The exclusion list before filtering-out asteroids, bad pixels and adding Gaia sources ####
###################################################################################
renamed 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt_noasteroids' -> 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt'
renamed 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt_nohotpixels' -> 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt'
# Count candidates with no identification (that also don't look like hot pix)
Found 0 unidentified candidates (excluding asteroids, hot pixels and known variable stars).
###################################################################################
0 candidates found (excluding asteroids and hot pixels)
This does not look like a test run
###################################################################################
exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt NOT FOUND
exclusion_list_apass.txt NOT FOUND
IS_THIS_TEST_RUN=NO  ALLOW_EXCLUSION_LIST_UPDATE= YES
#### Nothing to add to the exclusion list ####
The observatory MPC code is V36
############################################################
Positions of planets computed with util/planet_finder/main.py for JD(UT)2461199.78511410 -observatory V36
06:44:17.91 +24:59:03.1 Mercury (0.1mag)
07:43:19.47 +23:21:39.3 Venus (-4.0mag)
02:49:52.95 +15:44:06.3 Mars (1.3mag)
07:48:30.92 +21:31:15.2 Jupiter (-1.9mag)
00:49:24.07 +02:48:49.6 Saturn (0.9mag)
04:00:13.76 +20:25:31.5 Uranus (5.8mag)
00:16:08.88 +00:16:50.2 Neptune (7.8mag)
20:33:21.10 -23:04:35.0 Pluto (14.5mag)
23:08:15.59 -05:08:35.5 Moon (-10.4mag)
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 362 Jun  8 02:01 planets.txt
############################################################
Positions of selected moons from JPL HORIZONS for JD(UT)2461199.78511410:
07:48:34.21 +21:31:07.5 Io (6.0mag)
07:48:33.02 +21:31:11.1 Europa (6.2mag)
07:48:14.92 +21:32:03.4 Ganymede (5.6mag)
07:48:48.63 +21:30:17.6 Callisto (6.7mag)
07:48:47.94 +21:07:33.3 Himalia (15.6mag)
07:48:34.54 +21:31:03.5 Thebe (16.5mag)
07:48:47.23 +21:22:57.3 Elara (17.5mag)
07:50:41.91 +21:42:54.0 Pasiphae (17.7mag)
07:55:05.77 +21:32:58.1 Carme (18.9mag)
00:49:14.84 +02:48:47.3 Titan (8.7mag)
00:49:20.57 +02:49:01.9 Rhea (9.9mag)
00:49:56.29 +02:50:59.5 Iapetus (11.3mag)
00:49:20.39 +02:48:26.0 Hyperion (14.7mag)
00:50:06.21 +02:50:45.3 Phoebe (16.7mag)
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 568 Jun  8 02:02 moons.txt
############################################################
Positions of selected spacecraft from JPL HORIZONS for JD(UT)2461199.78511410:
17:26:14.57 -35:17:21.8 JWST
15:05:52.24 +55:12:38.1 Chandra
19:46:43.93 +13:50:34.7 XMM-Newton
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 96 Jun  8 02:02 spacecraft.txt
############################################################
Positions of bright comets computed with util/comet_finder/main.py for JD(UT)2461199.78511410 -observatory V36
18:43:26.84 -32:39:39.0 13.6mag P/2010 H2 (Vales)
05:53:33.66 -68:03:46.9 17.4mag C/2014 UN271 (Bernardinelli-Bernstein)
05:49:05.58 +31:58:09.0 17.5mag C/2017 K2 (PANSTARRS)
17:14:41.72 +15:21:23.5 17.8mag C/2021 G2 (ATLAS)
21:13:06.60 -49:26:49.6 16.9mag P/2021 N1 (ZTF)
23:12:36.86 +31:35:44.2 17.2mag C/2022 E2 (ATLAS)
05:34:09.26 +26:58:33.6 16.5mag C/2022 N2 (PANSTARRS)
09:29:47.57 +31:04:45.8 16.6mag C/2022 QE78 (ATLAS)
08:50:35.67 +03:56:10.7 17.7mag C/2022 R6 (PANSTARRS)
18:28:09.77 +21:36:15.0 17.8mag C/2023 A3 (Tsuchinshan-ATLAS)
15:19:20.39 -11:00:31.6 17.6mag P/2023 B1 (PANSTARRS)
22:14:24.20 +66:32:03.9 17.7mag C/2023 H5 (Lemmon)
17:46:09.74 -06:41:53.1 13.7mag C/2023 R1 (PANSTARRS)
13:18:02.50 +82:58:21.5 17.9mag C/2023 X2 (Lemmon)
07:10:32.47 +64:18:43.0 17.7mag C/2024 A1 (ATLAS)
06:47:24.60 +27:50:32.5 13.6mag C/2024 E1 (Wierzchos)
15:37:13.02 +13:32:03.8 17.4mag C/2024 G6 (ATLAS)
20:12:59.16 +31:09:45.2 14.0mag C/2024 J3 (ATLAS)
04:18:07.07 -15:56:35.0 16.0mag C/2024 T5 (ATLAS)
06:05:59.82 +34:28:32.4 17.9mag C/2025 J1 (Borisov)
11:34:51.59 +52:44:37.0 17.4mag C/2025 L1 (ATLAS)
06:45:03.37 -10:52:25.7 14.1mag C/2025 R3 (PANSTARRS)
09:24:14.13 +23:20:19.4 17.9mag C/2025 V2 (Rankin)
12:39:41.89 +04:41:26.8 17.2mag C/2025 Y1 (ATLAS)
18:12:44.37 +75:09:08.5 17.9mag C/2026 A2 (Bok)
02:00:49.52 +43:25:18.8 16.1mag C/2026 B2 (Sun-Gao)
11:11:19.78 -03:42:04.5 16.5mag A/2026 E1
20:23:48.77 -08:34:34.2 8.7mag 10P/Tempel
11:02:01.56 -00:58:09.3 16.0mag 29P/Schwassmann-Wachmann
03:11:51.74 +25:39:28.3 17.7mag 47P/Ashbrook-Jackson
09:00:10.40 +23:44:35.2 16.9mag 63P/Wild
00:27:00.36 -06:21:42.0 15.7mag 65P/Gunn
06:43:44.10 +33:26:20.4 16.9mag 76P/West-Kohoutek-Ikemura
03:09:24.09 +17:13:41.8 13.8mag 78P/Gehrels
01:20:57.48 +04:52:08.8 15.6mag 88P/Howell
04:54:56.04 +30:18:35.4 15.2mag 93P/Lovas
02:43:12.50 +27:38:26.4 17.6mag 114P/Wiseman-Skiff
06:50:45.86 +33:02:05.3 15.6mag 123P/West-Hartley
09:50:20.16 +14:35:54.8 16.5mag 124P/Mrkos
03:59:11.16 +19:15:23.5 16.4mag 128P/Shoemaker-Holt
04:33:44.70 +19:05:19.2 17.7mag 131P/Mueller
05:58:42.14 +18:39:17.6 14.7mag 141P/Machholz
06:01:20.63 +17:40:48.0 14.6mag 141P-A/Machholz
04:54:32.93 +16:11:10.1 11.6mag 141P-D/Machholz
02:57:44.63 -24:41:13.3 16.8mag 161P/Hartley-IRAS
03:41:50.80 +23:50:45.3 14.9mag 162P/SidingSpring
19:36:37.55 +01:45:21.3 16.9mag 169P/NEAT
00:18:34.92 +02:28:59.4 17.9mag 220P/McNaught
16:52:06.63 -08:28:17.0 16.4mag 235P/LINEAR
07:34:51.74 +35:29:16.8 17.5mag 240P/NEAT
00:32:35.40 -02:25:50.6 16.4mag 260P/McNaught
04:04:28.31 +32:29:50.9 17.6mag 295P/LINEAR
23:52:50.80 -09:35:42.0 17.6mag 320P/McNaught
15:15:11.77 +08:05:48.3 17.4mag 391P/Kowalski
08:07:12.54 +20:44:42.0 17.9mag 450P/LONEOS
07:00:07.26 +41:41:23.9 17.8mag 493P/LONEOS
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 2.7K Jun  8 02:01 comets.txt
############################################################
List of recent ASAS-SN transients from https://www.astronomy.ohio-state.edu/asassn/transients.html :
20:07:38.15 -21:07:05.40  SN2026mho  2026-05-25.18 -1.12
11:29:42.55 +79:01:03.10  AT2026min  2026-05-24.21 16.63
11:44:32.95 -68:48:30.00  ASASSN-26no  2026-05-24 8.41
19:00:42.82 -48:31:01.60  ASASSN-26dp  2026-05-22.31 -3.28
14:23:56.59 -58:37:47.40  ASASSN-26dn  2026-05-20.01 14.59
11:24:54.06 +47:57:01.60  AT2026nma  2026-05-20.29 15.46
21:27:08.58 +33:24:38.10  AT2026lli  2026-05-19.34 15.86
00:31:01.41 -13:38:51.70  AT2026nad  2026-05-19.39 15.34
15:16:06.61 -79:16:32.40  ASASSN-26dm  2026-05-19.03 14.44
11:24:25.21 -59:23:19.10  ASASSN-26dl  2026-05-18.02 13.55
13:45:51.52 -53:16:01.00  ASASSN-26dk  2026-05-18.16 12.96
02:05:49.69 -30:29:09.60  ASASSN-26dh  2026-05-18.43 15.37
17:50:22.87 -39:42:33.90  ASASSN-26dj  2026-05-17.05 15.7
01:13:11.60 -33:25:16.10  ASASSN-26dg  2026-05-13.41 16.8
16:44:31.77 -27:15:18.40  AT2026mhn  2026-05-12.33 15.8
09:46:31.08 -33:41:51.00  ASASSN-26di  2026-05-12.14 14.63
21:23:11.57 -19:09:45.00  AT2026kwu  2026-05-12.26 16.9
14:20:14.30 -30:20:51.90  AT2026ktm  2026-05-12.06 17.21
14:41:39.01 -37:13:46.40  AT2026lkm  2026-05-11.18 16.89
12:59:50.45 -10:58:38.80  SN2026kep  2026-05-9.06 17.5
13:37:29.61 -29:50:30.90  AT2026lkd  2026-05-9.09 17.23
09:46:42.01 -14:52:03.60  SN2026kmo  2026-05-8.99 17.51
15:03:05.28 +22:02:03.40  AT2026lxf  2026-05-8.07 13.88
10:23:49.41 -20:57:25.30  ASASSN-26df  2026-05-8.21 16.52
22:14:40.56 +05:04:51.60  2026lda  2026-05-7.56 16.2
21:35:33.81 -14:05:16.30  ASASSN-26de  2026-05-6.29 14.51
16:21:48.82 -61:36:13.20  ASASSN-26dd  2026-05-5.21 15.15
14:26:40.22 -24:48:37.50  AT2026lig  2026-05-4.27 14.63
13:17:51.04 +30:25:13.50  SN2026kcp  2026-05-4.46 16.43
11:27:55.57 -13:38:56.90  SN2026kza  2026-05-1.08 15.59
22:28:27.10 +30:17:54.30  SN 2026fov  2026-04-29.6 14.36
21:00:10.71 -32:17:03.90  AT2026kis  2026-04-27.36 16.15
14:32:57.37 -58:13:26.40  ASASSN-26dc  2026-04-27.27 13.42
15:32:05.35 -43:54:34.60  ASASSN-26db  2026-04-27.37 16.06
16:34:34.97 -54:34:58.00  ASASSN-26da  2026-04-25.32 16.11
10:06:55.04 -01:13:49.70  SN2026jsg  2026-04-24.99 16.28
15:15:57.17 +56:18:32.80  SN2026kid  2026-04-24.52 -3.65
07:58:28.45 +57:03:42.40  AT2026kcf  2026-04-24.2 16.89
11:38:21.80 -50:43:06.50  SN2026jkb  2026-04-24.24 15.38
10:06:11.41 -39:41:04.20  AT2026dil  2026-04-24.2 16.85
14:21:40.08 +13:13:46.30  SN2026jlm  2026-04-22.16 15.12
10:53:55.52 -16:06:06.00  ASASSN-26cz  2026-04-22.28 16.29
20:07:38.15 -21:07:05.40    2026-05-25.18 -1.12
13:45:02.03 +15:17:14.50  ASASSN-26cy  2026-04-21.27 15.78
13:20:52.22 -35:57:03.60  AT2026jcm  2026-04-19.01 16.65
13:36:15.66 -36:53:48.40  SN 2026iqy  2026-04-18.92 17.31
06:34:01.33 -40:07:34.00  ASASSN-26cx  2026-04-19.07 16.16
23:33:57.97 -45:12:11.90  SN 2026idu  2026-04-19.41 15.9
12:10:50.92 +66:55:31.20  SN 2026icv  2026-04-17.14 16.03
21:36:59.06 -60:43:35.90  ASASSN-26cv  2026-04-17.35 -1.18
08:13:26.26 -27:07:30.50  ASASSN-26cw  2026-04-17.07 -1.01
14:49:14.13 -27:29:20.60  ASASSN-26cu  2026-04-16.06 14.03
17:21:59.44 -38:54:04.60  ASASSN-26ct  2026-04-14.4 15.15
15:25:54.99 +07:49:24.50  SN2026huo  2026-04-12.14 16.96
20:07:38.15 -21:07:05.40    2026-05-25.18 -1.12
12:23:20.40 +04:53:39.10  AT2026ixd  2026-04-12.14 17.65
17:46:09.76 -61:19:50.40  SN2026icy  2026-04-12.2 17.03
09:25:46.42 +02:13:46.30  SN2026gud  2026-04-11.98 16.49
16:52:15.46 -60:27:45.90  ASASSN-26cs  2026-04-12.4 15.5
04:20:55.37 -51:15:31.10  ASASSN-26cr  2026-04-12.01 15.37
22:25:39.35 +36:45:06.90  AT2026ihl  2026-04-10.48 14.21
19:40:44.94 +00:41:03.80  AT2026imw  2026-04-10.32 16.06
19:52:04.70 +05:53:33.50  ASASSN-26cq  2026-04-9.31 14.98
16:08:18.39 -64:11:08.80  ASASSN-26cp  2026-04-9.29 13.32
09:22:22.90 -61:02:43.70  SN2026idh  2026-04-7.97 16.34
05:06:54.12 -19:42:26.40  AT2026imr  2026-04-8 17.49
07:14:55.34 -36:03:21.40  AT2026hei  2026-04-8.12 16.7
21:35:33.14 -19:01:34.80  AT2026ihm  2026-04-8.36 16.7
04:28:24.08 -32:25:35.30  AT2026imo  2026-04-8.02 16.81
05:10:35.79 -39:38:40.80  SN 2026hnn  2026-04-7.04 17.07
09:54:32.04 -01:17:25.80  ASASSN-26cn  2026-04-7.01 15.58
07:46:24.43 -77:29:35.90  ASASSN-26co  2026-04-7.15 14.93
05:00:45.52 -29:51:06.20  AT2026hvw  2026-04-6.03 16.51
19:49:33.10 -23:37:11.00  ASASSN-26cl  2026-04-5.29 14.98
19:32:43.55 -22:39:33.40  ASASSN-26cm  2026-04-4.3 13.88
18:08:57.38 +76:48:23.60  ASASSN-26ck  2026-04-2.37 15.38
16:16:36.10 +44:52:30.20  AT2026hyy  2026-04-2.58 13.81
21:55:23.31 -34:48:53.90  ASASSN-26cj  2026-03-30.4 -1.47
11:19:50.70 -27:51:49.80  SN2026gvk  2026-03-30 15.48
11:53:57.02 -23:09:46.20  SN2026gzx  2026-03-28.75 15.27
07:13:46.14 -33:10:15.70  ASASSN-26ci  2026-03-28.15 15.14
09:03:36.09 -67:58:13.00  SN2026hkg  2026-03-28.19 15.82
07:03:00.72 +39:14:43.00  SN2026fin  2026-03-28.27 15.82
05:35:42.80 -63:44:05.50  ASASSN-26ch  2026-03-27.86 13.02
11:23:19.04 +34:22:38.00  SN2026fwt  2026-03-27.3 16.56
19:03:49.79 +37:04:05.20  ASASSN-26ce  2026-03-26.56 16.3
20:26:56.07 -52:54:06.50  AT2026hiy  2026-03-26.35 16.95
05:25:54.76 -30:15:35.80  ASASSN-26cg  2026-03-25.07 16.88
06:57:16.49 -26:54:37.20  SN2026fzb  2026-03-25.14 15.8
14:37:38.23 -43:00:52.30  ASASSN-26cd  2026-03-24.24 12.52
17:34:53.03 +06:04:29.70  AT2026gzl  2026-03-23.27 15.82
08:30:02.60 -35:12:47.50  ASASSN-26cf  2026-03-23.2 14.82
16:54:25.33 +37:49:56.60  SN 2026evz  2026-03-21.32 17.54
17:06:19.20 -18:54:19.50  ASASSN-26bx  2026-03-21.25 16.39
19:01:16.28 -29:29:23.10  ASASSN-26bw  2026-03-21.33 15.81
08:46:05.75 +10:47:39.80  ASASSN-26ca  2026-03-21.13 14.27
12:14:58.16 +63:47:16.20  SN 2026fvx  2026-03-21.12 15.6
18:02:55.90 -75:23:02.60  ASASSN-26bz  2026-03-21.32 16.16
12:16:02.88 -53:16:33.80  ASASSN-26cc  2026-03-20.04 15.48
13:08:21.85 +29:13:44.20  SN 2026fmh  2026-03-20.16 -0.33
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 5.6K Jun  8 02:01 asassn_transients_list.txt
############################################################
Truncated list of TOCP transients from http://www.cbat.eps.harvard.edu/unconf/tocp.html :
09:55:38.83 +69:05:21.7  PNV J09553883+6905217  2026-04-01.893  19.4mag
19:32:43.67 -22:39:30.7  TCP J19324367-2239307  2026-04-05.4395  13.6mag
16:16:36.03 +44:52:28.9  TCP J16163603+4452289  2026-04-05.6655  14.2mag
00:43:38.36 +41:15:32.4  PNV J00433836+4115324  2026-04-08.079  17.2mag
15:41:11.68 +59:18:26.8  TCP J15411168+5918268  2026-04-12.9625  19.2mag
00:43:35.02 +41:46:28.0  PNV J00433502+4146280  2026-04-23.056  15.9mag
00:42:55.64 +41:14:12.2  PNV J00425564+4114122  2026-04-24.042  16.2mag
21:14:03.38 +56:46:44.1  TCP J21140338+5646441  2026-05-05.3534  16.7mag
15:03:05.19 +22:02:04.1  TCP J15030519+2202041  2026-05-08.3260  13.9mag
07:15:18.25 +47:53:16.7  TCP J07151825+4753167  2026-05-09.1599  14.4mag
16:00:18.44 -22:30:10.6  TCP J16001844-2230106  2026-05-09.6135  13.3mag
00:42:47.45 +41:16:58.5  PNV J00424745+4116585  2026-05-10.030  16.8mag
09:55:02.89 +69:02:13.8  PNV J09550289+6902138  2026-05-18.925  20.7mag
00:43:01.82 +41:18:16.6  PNV J00430182+4118166  2026-05-21.8651  18.83Cmag
00:42:51.20 +41:16:59.4  PNV J00425120+4116594  2022-10-26.135  19.3mag
12:24:25.10 +28:47:12.0  TCP J12242510+2847120  2026-05-31.6015  14.8mag
00:56:07.13 +43:01:40.6  TCP J00560713+4301406  2026-06-01.4135  12.2mag
00:42:41.64 +41:15:16.2  PNV J00424164+4115162  2026-06-02.029  17.4mag
00:42:38.68 +41:15:58.2  PNV J00423868+4115582  2026-06-05.1224  19.97Umag
19:00:42.95 -48:31:01.7  PNV J19004295-4831017  2026-05-25.0752  14.2mag
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 189K Jun  8 02:01 tocp_transients_list.txt
############################################################
Truncated list of recent TNS transients from https://www.wis-tns.org/ :
16:39:35.110 +15:17:58.28  AT 2026nsc  2026-05-09.80 20.76
16:42:48.680 +20:27:18.30  AT 2026nsb  2026-05-09.80 20.54
13:34:03.440 +31:37:31.73  AT 2026nsa  2026-05-07.80 21.26
13:50:28.150 +02:34:54.72  AT 2026nrz  2026-05-22.72 21.54
13:43:59.750 +03:47:21.63  AT 2026nry  2026-05-22.69 22.05
13:17:26.150 -01:26:00.12  AT 2026nrx  2026-05-21.64 21.7
00:35:20.216 -08:28:38.64  AT 2026nrw  2026-05-19.42 18.74
23:50:43.016 -01:09:12.25  AT 2026nrv  2026-05-23.48 19.5028
22:36:47.715 +37:31:34.81  AT 2026nru  2026-05-22.43 19.4626
23:58:04.247 +20:56:44.66  AT 2026nrt  2026-05-23.48 20.1237
16:08:58.229 +36:53:23.76  AT 2026nrs  2026-05-21.36 20.3819
19:44:04.734 +84:44:44.91  SN 2026nrr  2026-05-25.47 17.808
21:42:24.388 -20:21:08.51  SN 2026nrq  2026-05-25.56 18.623
22:03:20.669 -84:55:27.45  AT 2026nrp  2026-05-22.30 19.244
23:07:53.376 -39:04:26.84  AT 2026nro  2026-05-22.38 19.567
00:40:07.848 -39:10:21.32  AT 2026nrn  2026-05-12.41 18.737
23:05:28.381 -21:25:50.28  AT 2026nrm  2026-05-25.58 18.887
19:27:28.750 -48:42:52.35  AT 2026nrl  2026-05-22.24 19.107
12:33:38.422 +12:02:05.88  AT 2026nrk  2026-05-25.29 21.322
12:32:27.199 +02:39:54.51  AT 2026nrj  2026-05-25.29 21.0728
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 30K Jun  8 02:01 tns_transients_list.txt

=== Transient Factory Profiling ===
Started: Mon Jun  8 02:01:27 CDT 2026
=======================================
TIMING SExtractor: 3 seconds
TIMING matching_and_photometry: 0 seconds
TIMING lightcurve_write: 1 seconds
TIMING select_aperture: 0 seconds
    VAST_RUN_default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1: 6s (0.10 min)
    WCS_CACHE_SETUP: 1s (0.02 min)
    WCS_CALIBRATION_AND_EPHEMERIS: 39s (0.65 min)
    PLATE_VERIFY_AND_POINTING: 0s (0.00 min)
    UCAC5_PLATE_SOLVING: 0s (0.00 min)
    MAGNITUDE_CALIBRATION: 47s (0.78 min)
    MAGCAL_SANITY_CHECK: 0s (0.00 min)
      FILTER_MAGNITUDE_CONSOLIDATED: 0s (0.00 min)
      FILTER_FRAME_EDGE: 0s (0.00 min)
      FILTER_SECOND_EPOCH_VERIFY: 0s (0.00 min)
    CANDIDATE_FILTERING_TOTAL: 0s (0.00 min)
    EXCLUSION_LIST_PREPARATION: 0s (0.00 min)
    SEEING_AND_LIMITING_MAG: 0s (0.00 min)
    WAIT_FOR_UCAC5: 1s (0.02 min)
    WCS_IMAGE_ARCHIVING: 0s (0.00 min)
    HTML_REPORT: 2s (0.03 min)
  SE_CONFIG_default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1: 97s (1.62 min)
TIMING SExtractor: 14 seconds
TIMING matching_and_photometry: 3 seconds
TIMING lightcurve_write: 1 seconds
TIMING select_aperture: 4 seconds
    VAST_RUN_default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL: 30s (0.50 min)
    WCS_CACHE_SETUP: 0s (0.00 min)
    WCS_CALIBRATION_AND_EPHEMERIS: 1s (0.02 min)
    PLATE_VERIFY_AND_POINTING: 0s (0.00 min)
    UCAC5_PLATE_SOLVING: 0s (0.00 min)
    MAGNITUDE_CALIBRATION: 73s (1.22 min)
    MAGCAL_SANITY_CHECK: 0s (0.00 min)
      FILTER_MAGNITUDE_CONSOLIDATED: 1s (0.02 min)
      FILTER_FRAME_EDGE: 0s (0.00 min)
      FILTER_SECOND_EPOCH_VERIFY: 0s (0.00 min)
    CANDIDATE_FILTERING_TOTAL: 1s (0.02 min)
    EXCLUSION_LIST_PREPARATION: 0s (0.00 min)
    SEEING_AND_LIMITING_MAG: 1s (0.02 min)
    WAIT_FOR_UCAC5: 0s (0.00 min)
    WCS_IMAGE_ARCHIVING: 0s (0.00 min)
    HTML_REPORT: 3s (0.05 min)
  SE_CONFIG_default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL: 109s (1.82 min)
FIELD_Dra-09-Q2b1x1: 226s (3.77 min)
=======================================
TOTAL_RUNTIME: 228s (3.80 min)
Finished: Mon Jun  8 02:05:15 CDT 2026