This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_012128_TTUQ2b1x1_1290139_hdmX4lW2
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 08.2542 2461199.7542 12.64 15:24:51.34 +02:04:21.8
5.26204 45.55743 galactic Ser Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.4" and 6.2 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.173 Ino 2 -1 3 12.8 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits at 15:24:51.34 +02:04:21.8: 15.92 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-04-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0254.fits at 15:24:51.34 +02:04:21.8: 15.94 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 06 08.2542* 15 24 51.34 +02 04 21.8 12.6 U Ser 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461199.7542,12.64,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260608.2542 12.64CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 08.2542 2461199.7542 14.78 15:30:30.91 -00:59:48.5
3.15838 42.53435 galactic Ser Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.2" and 6.1 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.1196 Sheba 3 -2 4 14.6 0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits at 15:30:30.91 -00:59:48.5: 15.96 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-04-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0254.fits at 15:30:30.91 -00:59:48.5: 15.92 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 06 08.2542* 15 30 30.91 +00 59 48.5 14.8 U Ser 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461199.7542,14.78,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260608.2542 14.78CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461172.79409781 12.05.2026 07:03:20.051 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits
First image: 2461172.79409781 12.05.2026 07:03:20.051 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits
Last image: 2461199.75445162 08.06.2026 06:06:14.620 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_012128_TTUQ2b1x1_1290139_hdmX4lW2/fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-06-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0174.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 3
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.63
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 5 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 6044
Objects passed selection criteria: 6042
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.8 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.8 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 5818.25
Average stars matched: 5714 (98.2082 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 112352 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Sun Jun 7 22:21:29 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-90-g333d5534
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-06-07)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Mon Jun 8 01:24:20 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461172.79409781 12.05.2026 07:03:20.051 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits
First image: 2461172.79409781 12.05.2026 07:03:20.051 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits
Last image: 2461199.75445162 08.06.2026 06:06:14.620 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_012128_TTUQ2b1x1_1290139_hdmX4lW2/fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-06-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0174.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 96
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.38
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 27 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 39019
Objects passed selection criteria: 38952
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.8 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.8 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 37890.8
Average stars matched: 36377.5 (96.0063 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 141020 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Sun Jun 7 22:21:29 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-90-g333d5534
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-06-07)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Mon Jun 8 01:26:23 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/TTUQ2_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 4 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-04-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0254.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_012128_TTUQ2b1x1_1290139_hdmX4lW2/fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-05-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0173.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_012128_TTUQ2b1x1_1290139_hdmX4lW2/fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-06-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0174.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-04-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0254.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-04-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0254.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_012128_TTUQ2b1x1_1290139_hdmX4lW2/fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-05-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0173.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_012128_TTUQ2b1x1_1290139_hdmX4lW2/fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-06-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0174.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461199.75393514
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
'tocp_transients_list.txt' -> '../tocp_transients_list.txt'
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits'
wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-04-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0254.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-04-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0254.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-04-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0254.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-04-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0254.fits'
wcs_fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-05-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0173.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-05-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0173.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-05-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0173.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-05-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0173.fits'
wcs_fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-06-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0174.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-06-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0174.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-06-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0174.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-06-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0174.fits'
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits
Image size: 937.1'x624.1' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 15:25:42.825 -01:59:55.09 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.87"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-05-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0173.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-05-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0173.fits
Image size: 937.1'x624.1' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 15:25:42.833 -01:59:49.27 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 15:25:42.825 -01:59:55.09
Second-epoch image center 15:25:42.833 -01:59:49.27
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0016 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-06-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0174.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-06-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0174.fits
Image size: 937.1'x624.1' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 15:25:40.462 -01:59:38.99 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 15:25:42.825 -01:59:55.09
Second-epoch image center 15:25:40.462 -01:59:38.99
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0108 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 15:25:42.833 -01:59:49.27
Second-epoch second image center 15:25:40.462 -01:59:38.99
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01028 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits &> /tmp/tmp.Hadr0UbxAu
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-04-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0254.fits &> /tmp/tmp.4eIwTyp3y9
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-04-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0254.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_012128_TTUQ2b1x1_1290139_hdmX4lW2/fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-05-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0173.fits &> /tmp/tmp.bXX9N5Almw
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_012128_TTUQ2b1x1_1290139_hdmX4lW2/fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-05-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0173.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_012128_TTUQ2b1x1_1290139_hdmX4lW2/fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-06-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0174.fits &> /tmp/tmp.ktygqlpqby
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_012128_TTUQ2b1x1_1290139_hdmX4lW2/fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-06-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0174.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits and wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits.cat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits and wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits.cat
Found non-empty wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits and wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits.cat
The reference image (wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits) and catalog (wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits.cat) found
'wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits.cat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 7872 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 223.5808 to 239.3007 deg, Dec -7.2524 to +3.2613 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 223.5808 to 239.3007 deg, Dec -7.2524 to 3.2613 deg
Loaded 4367 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3741 out of 3883 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3883 out of 7872 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.782700
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.782700
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.63
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.15
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.15
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 7872 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 223.5808 to 239.3007 deg, Dec -7.2524 to +3.2613 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 223.5808 to 239.3007 deg, Dec -7.2524 to 3.2613 deg
Loaded 4367 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3741 out of 3883 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3883 out of 7872 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits (aperture=6.2)
Read 7902 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 223.5849 to 239.3174 deg, Dec -7.2524 to +3.2636 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 223.5849 to 239.3174 deg, Dec -7.2524 to 3.2636 deg
Loaded 4371 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3740 out of 3886 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3886 out of 7902 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-04-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0254.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-04-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0254.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-04-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0254.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-04-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0254.fits (aperture=6.2)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 3 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 8000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.3 pix Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits
2.3 pix Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-04-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0254.fits
2.2 pix fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-05-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0173.fits
2.2 pix fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-06-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0174.fits
2.3 pix wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits
2.3 pix wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-04-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0254.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.2 mag. Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits
15.2 mag. Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-04-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0254.fits
15.0 mag. fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-05-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0173.fits
15.1 mag. fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-06-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0174.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 15.0 (SNR ) 12.1 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.Hadr0UbxAu (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-08_CI_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_012128_TTUQ2b1x1_1290139_hdmX4lW2/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits' -> 'wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=486, passed=7872
Got 7872 stars (including 7376 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 7872 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.1'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.1 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013015 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010412 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 974 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 973 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 968 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 973 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7836 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 974 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 973 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7834 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 973 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7834 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.47"
Excluding outliers - 973 stars left (next iteration limit 1070)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits N_match=973 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.463 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.323 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.610 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.361 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.686 n_q1=256 n_q2=255 n_q3=227 n_q4=235 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.480
The image catalog is written to wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits -region wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.4eIwTyp3y9 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-08_CI_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_012128_TTUQ2b1x1_1290139_hdmX4lW2/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-04-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0254.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-04-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0254.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-04-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0254.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-04-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0254.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-04-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0254.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-04-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0254.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-04-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0254.fits' -> 'wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-04-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0254.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-04-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0254.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-04-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0254.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-04-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0254.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-04-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0254.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-04-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0254.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-04-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0254.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-04-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0254.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-04-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0254.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-04-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0254.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-04-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0254.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=491, passed=7902
Got 7902 stars (including 7404 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-04-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0254.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 7902 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.1'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.1 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013015 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010412 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 974 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 972 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 966 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 972 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7863 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 974 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 972 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7862 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 972 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7862 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45"
Excluding outliers - 972 stars left (next iteration limit 1069)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-04-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0254.fits N_match=972 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.434 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.305 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.614 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.356 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.660 n_q1=254 n_q2=258 n_q3=223 n_q4=237 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.519
The image catalog is written to wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-04-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0254.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-04-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0254.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-04-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0254.fits -region wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-04-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0254.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-04-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0254.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.bXX9N5Almw (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-08_CI_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_012128_TTUQ2b1x1_1290139_hdmX4lW2/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_012128_TTUQ2b1x1_1290139_hdmX4lW2/fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-05-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0173.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_012128_TTUQ2b1x1_1290139_hdmX4lW2/fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-05-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0173.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_012128_TTUQ2b1x1_1290139_hdmX4lW2/fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-05-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0173.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_012128_TTUQ2b1x1_1290139_hdmX4lW2/fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-05-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0173.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_012128_TTUQ2b1x1_1290139_hdmX4lW2/fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-05-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0173.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_012128_TTUQ2b1x1_1290139_hdmX4lW2/fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-05-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0173.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-05-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0173.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-05-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0173.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-05-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0173.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-05-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0173.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-05-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0173.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-05-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0173.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-05-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0173.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_012128_TTUQ2b1x1_1290139_hdmX4lW2/fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-05-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0173.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-05-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0173.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=430, passed=7218
Got 7218 stars (including 6783 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-05-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0173.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 7218 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.1'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.1 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013015 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010412 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 974 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 972 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 966 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 972 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7186 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 974 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 972 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7185 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 972 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7185 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Excluding outliers - 972 stars left (next iteration limit 1069)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-05-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0173.fits N_match=972 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.400 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.304 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.524 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.348 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.506 n_q1=232 n_q2=268 n_q3=228 n_q4=244 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.307
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-05-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0173.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-05-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0173.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_012128_TTUQ2b1x1_1290139_hdmX4lW2/fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-05-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0173.fits -region wcs_fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-05-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0173.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-05-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0173.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.ktygqlpqby (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-08_CI_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_012128_TTUQ2b1x1_1290139_hdmX4lW2/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_012128_TTUQ2b1x1_1290139_hdmX4lW2/fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-06-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0174.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_012128_TTUQ2b1x1_1290139_hdmX4lW2/fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-06-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0174.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_012128_TTUQ2b1x1_1290139_hdmX4lW2/fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-06-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0174.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_012128_TTUQ2b1x1_1290139_hdmX4lW2/fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-06-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0174.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_012128_TTUQ2b1x1_1290139_hdmX4lW2/fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-06-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0174.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_012128_TTUQ2b1x1_1290139_hdmX4lW2/fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-06-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0174.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-06-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0174.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-06-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0174.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-06-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0174.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-06-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0174.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-06-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0174.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-06-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0174.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-06-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0174.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_012128_TTUQ2b1x1_1290139_hdmX4lW2/fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-06-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0174.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-06-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0174.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=406, passed=7155
Got 7155 stars (including 6740 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-06-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0174.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 7155 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.1'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.1 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013015 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010412 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 972 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 970 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 962 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 970 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7118 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 972 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 970 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7119 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 970 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7119 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
Excluding outliers - 970 stars left (next iteration limit 1067)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-06-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0174.fits N_match=970 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.428 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.317 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.516 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.365 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.511 n_q1=232 n_q2=265 n_q3=228 n_q4=245 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.206
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-06-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0174.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-06-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0174.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_012128_TTUQ2b1x1_1290139_hdmX4lW2/fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-06-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0174.fits -region wcs_fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-06-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0174.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-06-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0174.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits sigma_overall=0.463 worst_q_ratio=1.480
ref2=Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-04-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0254.fits sigma_overall=0.434 worst_q_ratio=1.519
new1=fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-05-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0173.fits sigma_overall=0.400 worst_q_ratio=1.307
new2=fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-06-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0174.fits sigma_overall=0.428 worst_q_ratio=1.206
reference average sigma_overall=0.4485 worst_q_ratio=1.4995
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: numpy/matplotlib unavailable (No module named 'matplotlib') -- falling back to the C plotter
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy: wrote wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0253_astrometric_residuals.png (973 matched stars from wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: numpy/matplotlib unavailable (No module named 'matplotlib') -- falling back to the C plotter
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy: wrote wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-04-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0254_astrometric_residuals.png (972 matched stars from wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-04-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0254.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: numpy/matplotlib unavailable (No module named 'matplotlib') -- falling back to the C plotter
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy: PGPLOT /PNG device reported success but no file appeared at wcs_fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-05-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0173_astrometric_residuals.png -- no plot produced
WARNING: no astrometric residual plot produced for wcs_fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-05-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0173.fits -- both lib/plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py and lib/plot_astrometric_residuals_xy failed to create wcs_fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-05-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0173_astrometric_residuals.png (see messages above)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: numpy/matplotlib unavailable (No module named 'matplotlib') -- falling back to the C plotter
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy: PGPLOT /PNG device reported success but no file appeared at wcs_fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-06-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0174_astrometric_residuals.png -- no plot produced
WARNING: no astrometric residual plot produced for wcs_fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-06-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0174.fits -- both lib/plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py and lib/plot_astrometric_residuals_xy failed to create wcs_fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-06-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0174_astrometric_residuals.png (see messages above)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-05-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0173.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-05-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0173.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_012128_TTUQ2b1x1_1290139_hdmX4lW2/wcs_fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-05-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0173.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-06-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0174.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-06-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0174.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_012128_TTUQ2b1x1_1290139_hdmX4lW2/wcs_fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-06-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0174.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Ser-05-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits at 15:26:34.27 -06:13:20.8: 12.28 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits at 15:11:43.65 -05:28:31.6: 9.45 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-04-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0254.fits at 15:26:34.27 -06:13:20.8: 12.27 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-04-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0254.fits at 15:11:43.65 -05:28:31.6: 9.45 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.27 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:26:34.27 -06:13:20.8: ref_mag=12.27 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.2902 delta=-0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 9.45 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:11:43.65 -05:28:31.6: ref_mag=9.45 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=9.6201 delta=-0.17 (need > 0.90)
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 1s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 0s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20351_fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-06-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0174
The candidate 20351_fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-06-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0174 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20352_fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-06-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0174
The candidate 20352_fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-06-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0174 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 15:18:35.44 +02:06:27.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20356_fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-06-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0174
The candidate 20356_fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-06-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0174 did not pass the final checks
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 1s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 2s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Ser-05-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 4 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-04-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0254.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_012128_TTUQ2b1x1_1290139_hdmX4lW2/fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-05-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0173.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_012128_TTUQ2b1x1_1290139_hdmX4lW2/fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-06-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0174.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-04-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0254.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-04-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0254.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_012128_TTUQ2b1x1_1290139_hdmX4lW2/fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-05-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0173.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_012128_TTUQ2b1x1_1290139_hdmX4lW2/fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-06-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0174.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-04-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0254.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-05-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0173.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-06-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0174.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/exclusion_list.txt
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-04-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0254.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-05-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0173.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-06-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0174.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits
Image size: 937.1'x624.1' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 15:25:42.825 -01:59:55.09 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.87"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-05-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0173.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-05-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0173.fits
Image size: 937.1'x624.1' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 15:25:42.833 -01:59:49.27 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 15:25:42.825 -01:59:55.09
Second-epoch image center 15:25:42.833 -01:59:49.27
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0016 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-06-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0174.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-06-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0174.fits
Image size: 937.1'x624.1' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 15:25:40.462 -01:59:38.99 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 15:25:42.825 -01:59:55.09
Second-epoch image center 15:25:40.462 -01:59:38.99
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0108 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 15:25:42.833 -01:59:49.27
Second-epoch second image center 15:25:40.462 -01:59:38.99
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01028 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits &> /tmp/tmp.ARdhYGazHO
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-04-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0254.fits &> /tmp/tmp.v4jJcnGrsG
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-04-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0254.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_012128_TTUQ2b1x1_1290139_hdmX4lW2/fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-05-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0173.fits &> /tmp/tmp.te3sKy5mc6
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_012128_TTUQ2b1x1_1290139_hdmX4lW2/fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-05-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0173.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_012128_TTUQ2b1x1_1290139_hdmX4lW2/fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-06-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0174.fits &> /tmp/tmp.HvwQmYFPyD
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_012128_TTUQ2b1x1_1290139_hdmX4lW2/fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-06-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0174.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits and wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits.cat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits and wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits.cat
Found non-empty wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits and wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits.cat
The reference image (wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits) and catalog (wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits.cat) found
'wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits.cat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 44768 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 223.5637 to 239.3007 deg, Dec -7.2623 to +3.2655 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 223.5637 to 239.3007 deg, Dec -7.2623 to 3.2655 deg
Loaded 4374 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3590 out of 3908 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3908 out of 44768 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.657400
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.657400
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.38
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.28
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.28
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 44768 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 223.5637 to 239.3007 deg, Dec -7.2623 to +3.2655 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 223.5637 to 239.3007 deg, Dec -7.2623 to 3.2655 deg
Loaded 4374 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3590 out of 3908 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3908 out of 44768 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits (aperture=4.9)
Read 44929 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 223.5762 to 239.3172 deg, Dec -7.2589 to +3.2684 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 223.5762 to 239.3172 deg, Dec -7.2589 to 3.2684 deg
Loaded 4375 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3591 out of 3912 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3912 out of 44929 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-04-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0254.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-04-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0254.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-04-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0254.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-04-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0254.fits (aperture=4.9)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 53 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 8000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.3 pix Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits
2.3 pix Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-04-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0254.fits
2.1 pix fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-05-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0173.fits
2.1 pix fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-06-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0174.fits
2.3 pix wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits
2.3 pix wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-04-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0254.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.3 mag. Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits
15.3 mag. Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-04-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0254.fits
15.2 mag. fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-05-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0173.fits
15.2 mag. fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-06-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0174.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 15.2 (SNR ) 14.6 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.ARdhYGazHO (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-08_CI_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_012128_TTUQ2b1x1_1290139_hdmX4lW2/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits' -> 'wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=6, blended=2413, passed=44762
Got 44762 stars (including 42284 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 44762 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.1'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.1 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013015 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010412 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 968 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 967 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 957 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 967 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 44446 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 968 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 967 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 44447 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 967 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 44447 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
Excluding outliers - 967 stars left (next iteration limit 1063)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits N_match=967 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.444 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.326 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.555 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.370 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.697 n_q1=265 n_q2=244 n_q3=236 n_q4=222 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.570
The image catalog is written to wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits -region wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.v4jJcnGrsG (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-08_CI_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_012128_TTUQ2b1x1_1290139_hdmX4lW2/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-04-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0254.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-04-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0254.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-04-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0254.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-04-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0254.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-04-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0254.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-04-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0254.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-04-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0254.fits' -> 'wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-04-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0254.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-04-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0254.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-04-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0254.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-04-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0254.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-04-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0254.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-04-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0254.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-04-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0254.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-04-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0254.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-04-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0254.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-04-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0254.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-04-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0254.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=10, blended=2430, passed=44919
Got 44919 stars (including 42424 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-04-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0254.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 44919 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.1'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.1 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013015 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010412 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 970 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 968 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 960 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 968 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 44638 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 970 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 968 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 44638 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 968 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 44638 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
Excluding outliers - 968 stars left (next iteration limit 1064)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-04-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0254.fits N_match=968 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.405 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.279 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.548 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.347 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.685 n_q1=267 n_q2=248 n_q3=232 n_q4=221 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.689
The image catalog is written to wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-04-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0254.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-04-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0254.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-04-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0254.fits -region wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-04-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0254.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-04-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0254.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.te3sKy5mc6 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-08_CI_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_012128_TTUQ2b1x1_1290139_hdmX4lW2/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_012128_TTUQ2b1x1_1290139_hdmX4lW2/fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-05-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0173.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_012128_TTUQ2b1x1_1290139_hdmX4lW2/fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-05-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0173.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_012128_TTUQ2b1x1_1290139_hdmX4lW2/fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-05-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0173.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_012128_TTUQ2b1x1_1290139_hdmX4lW2/fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-05-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0173.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_012128_TTUQ2b1x1_1290139_hdmX4lW2/fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-05-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0173.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_012128_TTUQ2b1x1_1290139_hdmX4lW2/fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-05-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0173.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-05-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0173.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-05-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0173.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-05-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0173.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-05-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0173.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-05-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0173.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-05-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0173.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-05-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0173.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_012128_TTUQ2b1x1_1290139_hdmX4lW2/fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-05-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0173.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-05-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0173.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=9, blended=1903, passed=44426
Got 44426 stars (including 42450 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-05-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0173.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 44426 stars from the SExtractor catalog
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-08_CI_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_012128_TTUQ2b1x1_1290139_hdmX4lW2/util/fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh: line 144: echo: write error: Broken pipe
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.1'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.1 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013015 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010412 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 971 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 970 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 964 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 970 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 44291 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 971 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 970 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 44291 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 970 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 44291 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Excluding outliers - 970 stars left (next iteration limit 1067)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-05-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0173.fits N_match=970 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.413 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.318 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.506 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.365 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.546 n_q1=241 n_q2=264 n_q3=229 n_q4=236 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.322
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-05-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0173.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-05-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0173.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_012128_TTUQ2b1x1_1290139_hdmX4lW2/fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-05-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0173.fits -region wcs_fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-05-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0173.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-05-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0173.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.HvwQmYFPyD (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-08_CI_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_012128_TTUQ2b1x1_1290139_hdmX4lW2/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_012128_TTUQ2b1x1_1290139_hdmX4lW2/fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-06-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0174.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_012128_TTUQ2b1x1_1290139_hdmX4lW2/fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-06-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0174.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_012128_TTUQ2b1x1_1290139_hdmX4lW2/fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-06-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0174.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_012128_TTUQ2b1x1_1290139_hdmX4lW2/fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-06-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0174.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_012128_TTUQ2b1x1_1290139_hdmX4lW2/fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-06-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0174.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_012128_TTUQ2b1x1_1290139_hdmX4lW2/fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-06-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0174.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-06-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0174.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-06-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0174.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-06-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0174.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-06-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0174.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-06-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0174.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-06-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0174.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-06-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0174.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_012128_TTUQ2b1x1_1290139_hdmX4lW2/fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-06-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0174.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-06-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0174.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=12, blended=1991, passed=44588
Got 44588 stars (including 42539 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-06-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0174.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 44588 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.1'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.1 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013015 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010412 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 972 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 971 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 963 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 971 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 44398 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 972 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 971 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 44401 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 971 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 44401 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Excluding outliers - 971 stars left (next iteration limit 1068)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-06-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0174.fits N_match=971 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.427 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.312 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.503 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.383 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.535 n_q1=243 n_q2=261 n_q3=232 n_q4=235 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.254
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-06-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0174.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-06-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0174.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_012128_TTUQ2b1x1_1290139_hdmX4lW2/fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-06-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0174.fits -region wcs_fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-06-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0174.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-06-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0174.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-05-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0173.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_012128_TTUQ2b1x1_1290139_hdmX4lW2/wcs_fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-05-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0173.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-06-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0174.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_012128_TTUQ2b1x1_1290139_hdmX4lW2/wcs_fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-06-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0174.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Ser-05-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits at 15:27:13.49 -01:13:36.6: 12.97 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits at 15:12:33.34 -06:00:19.2: 14.62 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits at 15:08:57.48 -01:08:21.6: 13.93 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits at 15:35:48.15 -04:57:03.4: 12.84 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits at 15:40:45.12 -03:48:24.7: 14.71 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits at 15:48:37.28 -06:02:11.5: 13.76 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits at 15:11:19.05 +01:55:13.1: 14.43 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits at 15:35:49.27 -06:10:49.1: 13.37 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-04-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0254.fits at 15:27:13.49 -01:13:36.6: 12.93 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-04-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0254.fits at 15:12:33.34 -06:00:19.2: 14.82 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.95 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:27:13.49 -01:13:36.6: ref_mag=12.95 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.4463 delta=-0.49 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.70 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:12:33.34 -06:00:19.2: ref_mag=14.70 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=14.6986 delta=0.00 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-04-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0254.fits at 15:35:48.15 -04:57:03.4: 12.77 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.80 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:35:48.15 -04:57:03.4: ref_mag=12.80 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.1355 delta=-0.33 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits at 15:22:05.00 -00:23:21.0: 13.14 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-04-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0254.fits at 15:48:37.28 -06:02:11.5: 13.89 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.82 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:48:37.28 -06:02:11.5: ref_mag=13.82 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.0200 delta=-0.20 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-04-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0254.fits at 15:40:45.12 -03:48:24.7: 14.76 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-04-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0254.fits at 15:11:19.05 +01:55:13.1: 14.26 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.73 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-04-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0254.fits at 15:35:49.27 -06:10:49.1: 13.35 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.33 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:40:45.12 -03:48:24.7: ref_mag=14.73 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=14.7355 delta=-0.00 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.36 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:35:49.27 -06:10:49.1: ref_mag=13.36 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.4658 delta=-0.11 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:11:19.05 +01:55:13.1: ref_mag=14.33 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=14.4267 delta=-0.09 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits at 15:11:43.64 -05:28:31.7: 9.65 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-04-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0254.fits at 15:08:57.48 -01:08:21.6: 13.98 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.95 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:08:57.48 -01:08:21.6: ref_mag=13.95 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=14.3188 delta=-0.36 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-04-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0254.fits at 15:22:05.00 -00:23:21.0: 13.32 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.21 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:22:05.00 -00:23:21.0: ref_mag=13.21 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.3059 delta=-0.09 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-04-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0254.fits at 15:11:43.64 -05:28:31.7: 9.67 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 9.66 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:11:43.64 -05:28:31.7: ref_mag=9.66 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=9.7360 delta=-0.08 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits at 15:24:51.34 +02:04:21.8: 15.92 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits at 15:18:20.02 +02:03:33.2: 13.15 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits at 15:37:50.60 -05:35:52.2: 13.81 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits at 15:20:13.86 -00:04:54.2: 13.88 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits at 15:21:10.61 -00:41:56.6: 13.45 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-04-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0254.fits at 15:18:20.02 +02:03:33.2: 13.00 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.05 +/- 0.08
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:18:20.02 +02:03:33.2: ref_mag=13.05 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=12.9339 delta=0.12 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits at 15:45:21.01 -05:29:03.2: 14.45 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-04-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0254.fits at 15:24:51.34 +02:04:21.8: 15.94 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-04-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0254.fits at 15:37:50.60 -05:35:52.2: 13.94 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.87 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:37:50.60 -05:35:52.2: ref_mag=13.87 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=14.1436 delta=-0.28 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits at 15:47:27.48 +01:00:25.2: 14.31 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-04-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0254.fits at 15:20:13.86 -00:04:54.2: 13.78 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-04-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0254.fits at 15:21:10.61 -00:41:56.6: 13.43 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.83 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:20:13.86 -00:04:54.2: ref_mag=13.83 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.9085 delta=-0.08 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.44 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:21:10.61 -00:41:56.6: ref_mag=13.44 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.4297 delta=0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits at 15:15:12.89 +00:04:49.6: 14.35 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits at 15:53:18.34 -05:46:11.2: 14.32 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits at 15:18:12.67 +00:16:58.9: 14.56 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-04-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0254.fits at 15:45:21.01 -05:29:03.2: 14.36 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.40 +/- 0.08
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:45:21.01 -05:29:03.2: ref_mag=14.40 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=14.2705 delta=0.13 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-04-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0254.fits at 15:47:27.48 +01:00:25.2: 14.41 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.36 +/- 0.07
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:47:27.48 +01:00:25.2: ref_mag=14.36 +/- 0.07 new_mean_mag=14.2414 delta=0.11 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-04-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0254.fits at 15:15:12.89 +00:04:49.6: 14.20 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.26 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:15:12.89 +00:04:49.6: ref_mag=14.26 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.4358 delta=-0.17 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-04-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0254.fits at 15:53:18.34 -05:46:11.2: 14.34 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.33 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:53:18.34 -05:46:11.2: ref_mag=14.33 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=14.3474 delta=-0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-04-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0254.fits at 15:18:12.67 +00:16:58.9: 14.45 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.50 +/- 0.07
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:18:12.67 +00:16:58.9: ref_mag=14.50 +/- 0.07 new_mean_mag=14.4411 delta=0.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits at 15:13:48.88 -05:35:41.0: 14.98 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits at 15:13:41.59 -00:57:13.3: 14.85 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits at 15:08:09.16 +01:11:37.5: 14.98 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits at 15:19:33.43 +02:05:08.0: 15.31 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-04-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0254.fits at 15:13:48.88 -05:35:41.0: 14.96 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.97 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:13:48.88 -05:35:41.0: ref_mag=14.97 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.6132 delta=0.36 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-04-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0254.fits at 15:13:41.59 -00:57:13.3: 14.76 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits at 15:18:52.41 +02:03:55.3: 14.26 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.80 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:13:41.59 -00:57:13.3: ref_mag=14.80 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=14.6087 delta=0.19 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-04-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0254.fits at 15:08:09.16 +01:11:37.5: 14.96 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.97 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:08:09.16 +01:11:37.5: ref_mag=14.97 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.7348 delta=0.24 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits at 15:19:02.33 +02:04:58.1: 14.62 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits at 15:18:21.77 +01:57:35.5: 14.76 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-04-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0254.fits at 15:19:33.43 +02:05:08.0: 15.40 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.35 +/- 0.15
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:19:33.43 +02:05:08.0: ref_mag=15.35 +/- 0.15 new_mean_mag=14.7057 delta=0.64 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits at 15:39:05.44 +01:03:29.7: 14.61 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-04-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0254.fits at 15:18:52.41 +02:03:55.3: 14.52 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits at 15:12:23.16 -03:06:50.0: 14.92 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.35 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:18:52.41 +02:03:55.3: ref_mag=14.35 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.5502 delta=-0.20 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-04-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0254.fits at 15:19:02.33 +02:04:58.1: 14.57 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.59 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:19:02.33 +02:04:58.1: ref_mag=14.59 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=14.6291 delta=-0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-04-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0254.fits at 15:18:21.77 +01:57:35.5: 15.05 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.87 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:18:21.77 +01:57:35.5: ref_mag=14.87 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.6472 delta=0.22 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-04-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0254.fits at 15:39:05.44 +01:03:29.7: 14.47 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.53 +/- 0.07
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:39:05.44 +01:03:29.7: ref_mag=14.53 +/- 0.07 new_mean_mag=14.6141 delta=-0.08 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits at 15:35:28.76 -05:52:58.9: 14.72 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-04-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0254.fits at 15:12:23.16 -03:06:50.0: 15.04 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.97 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:12:23.16 -03:06:50.0: ref_mag=14.97 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.7868 delta=0.19 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits at 15:12:37.65 -05:54:27.1: 15.55 +/- 0.28 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits at 15:10:35.83 -00:45:30.9: 15.06 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-04-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0254.fits at 15:35:28.76 -05:52:58.9: 14.77 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits at 15:51:05.37 -03:06:47.1: 14.53 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.74 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-04-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0254.fits at 15:12:37.65 -05:54:27.1: 14.71 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:35:28.76 -05:52:58.9: ref_mag=14.74 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.5497 delta=0.20 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.88 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits at 15:26:35.74 +01:50:56.2: 14.72 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:12:37.65 -05:54:27.1: ref_mag=14.88 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.7824 delta=0.10 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-04-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0254.fits at 15:10:35.83 -00:45:30.9: 14.88 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits at 15:49:30.10 +00:48:37.9: 14.92 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.95 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:10:35.83 -00:45:30.9: ref_mag=14.95 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.6728 delta=0.28 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-04-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0254.fits at 15:51:05.37 -03:06:47.1: 14.58 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits at 15:47:49.72 -00:04:09.6: 14.85 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.55 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:51:05.37 -03:06:47.1: ref_mag=14.55 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.5321 delta=0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-04-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0254.fits at 15:26:35.74 +01:50:56.2: 14.92 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits at 15:27:47.54 +00:09:20.2: 14.39 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.80 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:26:35.74 +01:50:56.2: ref_mag=14.80 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=14.7992 delta=-0.00 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-04-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0254.fits at 15:49:30.10 +00:48:37.9: 14.88 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits at 15:16:25.15 +00:15:39.5: 14.89 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.90 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:49:30.10 +00:48:37.9: ref_mag=14.90 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.6202 delta=0.28 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-04-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0254.fits at 15:47:49.72 -00:04:09.6: 14.99 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.91 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:47:49.72 -00:04:09.6: ref_mag=14.91 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.6768 delta=0.24 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits at 15:30:30.91 -00:59:48.5: 15.96 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-04-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0254.fits at 15:27:47.54 +00:09:20.2: 14.45 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.42 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:27:47.54 +00:09:20.2: ref_mag=14.42 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=14.6196 delta=-0.20 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-04-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0254.fits at 15:16:25.15 +00:15:39.5: 14.74 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.81 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits at 15:14:54.01 -05:35:43.4: 14.96 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:16:25.15 +00:15:39.5: ref_mag=14.81 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=14.7540 delta=0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits at 15:50:32.62 -00:06:15.3: 15.43 +/- 0.28 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-04-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0254.fits at 15:30:30.91 -00:59:48.5: 15.92 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits at 15:31:00.60 +00:05:35.8: 14.77 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-04-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0254.fits at 15:14:54.01 -05:35:43.4: 14.88 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.92 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:14:54.01 -05:35:43.4: ref_mag=14.92 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.7716 delta=0.14 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits at 15:46:46.01 -05:19:45.5: 14.99 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-04-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0254.fits at 15:50:32.62 -00:06:15.3: 14.92 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.06 +/- 0.15
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:50:32.62 -00:06:15.3: ref_mag=15.06 +/- 0.15 new_mean_mag=14.7060 delta=0.35 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits at 15:41:36.70 +00:25:47.5: 15.00 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits at 15:42:35.47 -06:02:24.1: 14.99 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-04-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0254.fits at 15:31:00.60 +00:05:35.8: 14.91 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.83 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:31:00.60 +00:05:35.8: ref_mag=14.83 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=14.7416 delta=0.09 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits at 15:44:50.82 +01:38:52.6: 14.98 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits at 15:41:38.13 +00:47:37.6: 15.08 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-04-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0254.fits at 15:46:46.01 -05:19:45.5: 14.90 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.94 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:46:46.01 -05:19:45.5: ref_mag=14.94 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.7287 delta=0.21 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-04-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0254.fits at 15:41:36.70 +00:25:47.5: 15.11 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-04-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0254.fits at 15:42:35.47 -06:02:24.1: 15.53 +/- 0.32 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.14 +/- 0.17
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.05 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:42:35.47 -06:02:24.1: ref_mag=15.14 +/- 0.17 new_mean_mag=14.8431 delta=0.30 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:41:36.70 +00:25:47.5: ref_mag=15.05 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.8551 delta=0.19 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-04-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0254.fits at 15:44:50.82 +01:38:52.6: 15.02 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.00 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:44:50.82 +01:38:52.6: ref_mag=15.00 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.8037 delta=0.19 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-04-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0254.fits at 15:41:38.13 +00:47:37.6: 15.18 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.13 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:41:38.13 +00:47:37.6: ref_mag=15.13 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=14.8088 delta=0.32 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits at 15:16:42.38 -02:29:19.0: 15.41 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-04-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0254.fits at 15:16:42.38 -02:29:19.0: 15.40 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.41 +/- 0.15
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 15:16:42.38 -02:29:19.0: ref_mag=15.41 +/- 0.15 new_mean_mag=14.2286 delta=1.18 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out52570.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out53229.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out53458.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 9s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 3s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53182_fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-06-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0174
The candidate 53182_fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-06-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0174 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53184_fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-06-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0174
The candidate 53184_fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-06-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0174 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53194_fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-06-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0174
The candidate 53194_fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-06-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0174 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53196_fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-06-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0174
The candidate 53196_fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-06-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0174 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53201_fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-06-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0174
The candidate 53201_fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-06-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0174 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53203_fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-06-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0174
The candidate 53203_fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-06-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0174 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 15:48:44.29 -06:11:12.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53205_fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-06-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0174
The candidate 53205_fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-06-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0174 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53212_fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-06-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0174
The candidate 53212_fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-06-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0174 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53214_fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-06-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0174
The candidate 53214_fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-06-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0174 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53216_fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-06-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0174
The candidate 53216_fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-06-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0174 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53217_fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-06-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0174
The candidate 53217_fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-06-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0174 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53219_fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-06-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0174
The candidate 53219_fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-06-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0174 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53229_fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-06-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0174
Preparing report for the candidate 53229_fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-06-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0174
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53233_fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-06-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0174
The candidate 53233_fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-06-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0174 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53248_fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-06-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0174
The candidate 53248_fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-06-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0174 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53250_fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-06-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0174
The candidate 53250_fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-06-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0174 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53270_fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-06-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0174
The candidate 53270_fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-06-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0174 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 15:18:16.17 +02:04:34.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53288_fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-06-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0174
The candidate 53288_fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-06-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0174 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53310_fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-06-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0174
The candidate 53310_fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-06-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0174 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53317_fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-06-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0174
The candidate 53317_fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-06-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0174 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53318_fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-06-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0174
The candidate 53318_fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-06-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0174 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53324_fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-06-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0174
The candidate 53324_fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-06-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0174 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53330_fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-06-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0174
The candidate 53330_fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-06-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0174 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53339_fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-06-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0174
The candidate 53339_fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-06-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0174 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53343_fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-06-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0174
The candidate 53343_fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-06-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0174 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53350_fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-06-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0174
The candidate 53350_fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-06-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0174 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53353_fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-06-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0174
The candidate 53353_fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-06-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0174 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53365_fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-06-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0174
The candidate 53365_fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-06-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0174 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53373_fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-06-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0174
The candidate 53373_fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-06-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0174 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53377_fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-06-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0174
The candidate 53377_fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-06-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0174 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53379_fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-06-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0174
The candidate 53379_fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-06-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0174 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53383_fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-06-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0174
The candidate 53383_fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-06-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0174 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53386_fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-06-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0174
The candidate 53386_fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-06-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0174 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53388_fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-06-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0174
The candidate 53388_fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-06-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0174 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53391_fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-06-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0174
The candidate 53391_fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-06-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0174 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53395_fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-06-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0174
The candidate 53395_fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-06-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0174 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53399_fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-06-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0174
The candidate 53399_fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-06-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0174 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53401_fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-06-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0174
The candidate 53401_fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-06-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0174 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53411_fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-06-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0174
The candidate 53411_fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-06-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0174 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53413_fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-06-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0174
The candidate 53413_fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-06-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0174 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53420_fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-06-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0174
The candidate 53420_fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-06-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0174 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53422_fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-06-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0174
The candidate 53422_fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-06-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0174 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53436_fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-06-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0174
The candidate 53436_fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-06-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0174 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53458_fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-06-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0174
Preparing report for the candidate 53458_fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-06-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0174
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53466_fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-06-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0174
The candidate 53466_fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-06-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0174 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53477_fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-06-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0174
The candidate 53477_fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-06-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0174 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53498_fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-06-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0174
The candidate 53498_fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-06-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0174 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 15:46:56.32 -01:19:38.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53504_fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-06-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0174
The candidate 53504_fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-06-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0174 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53520_fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-06-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0174
The candidate 53520_fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-06-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0174 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53536_fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-06-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0174
The candidate 53536_fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-06-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0174 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53543_fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-06-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0174
The candidate 53543_fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-06-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0174 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53545_fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-06-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0174
The candidate 53545_fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-06-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0174 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52570_fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-06-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0174
The candidate 52570_fd_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-06-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0174 did not pass the final checks