######## Processing parameters ########
AAVSO_COMMENT_STRING= NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
ASTCHECK_ASTEROID_SEARCH_RADIUS_ARCSEC=
BAD_REGION_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/TTUQ2_bad_region.lst
CAMERA_SETTINGS= TTUQ2b1x1
CHECK_POINTING_ACCURACY= yes
DARK_FRAMES_DIR_OR_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks
EXCLUSION_LIST= ../exclusion_list_TTUQ2.txt
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MAX_APERTURE_STAR_SIZE_PIX= 12.5
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MAX_ELONGATION_AminusB_PIX= 0.55
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MIN_APERTURE_STAR_SIZE_PIX= 2.0
FILTER_BRIGHT_MAG_CUTOFF_TRANSIENT_SEARCH= -5
FILTER_FAINT_MAG_CUTOFF_TRANSIENT_SEARCH= 15.0
FLAT_FIELD_DIR_OR_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats
FRAME_EDGE_OFFSET_PIX= 600
GAIA_BAND_FOR_CATALOGED_SOURCE_CHECK=
MAX_NEW_TO_REF_MEAN_IMG_VALUE_RATIO= 100
MAX_NEW_IMG_MEAN_VALUE= 25000
MAX_SD_RATIO_OF_SECOND_EPOCH_IMGS= 0.18
MAX_SD_RATIO_OF_SECOND_EPOCH_IMGS_SOFT_LIMIT= 0.12
MPC_CODE= V36
NMW_CALIBRATION= /var/www/nmw_calibration
NUMBER_OF_DETECTED_TRANSIENTS_BEFORE_FILTERING_HARD_LIMIT= 8000
NUMBER_OF_DETECTED_TRANSIENTS_BEFORE_FILTERING_SOFT_LIMIT= 4000
OMP_NUM_THREADS=
ONLINE_MPCHECKER_BUTTON_ASTEROID_SEARCH_RADIUS_ARCMIN=
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=
REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES= yes
SEXTRACTOR_CONFIG_BRIGHTSTARPASS= default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
SEXTRACTOR_CONFIG_FILES= default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
STARMATCH_RADIUS_PIX= 4
SYSREM_ITERATIONS= 0
TELESCOP=
TELESCOP_NAME_KNOWN_TO_VaST_FOR_FOV_DETERMINATION=
UCAC5_PLATESOLVE_ITERATIONS= 2
FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE= no
#######################################
HOSTNAME= tau
USER=
HOME=
#######################################
SExtractor catalog cache: enabled, directory /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/vast_sextractor_cache
Reference image directory is set to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs
VIZIER_SITE=vizier.cds.unistra.fr
GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=vizquery (lib/vizquery -> VizieR vizier.cds.unistra.fr)
INFO: MAKE_PNG_PLOTS is set to yes
FITS_FILE_EXT=fits
CALIBRATION_STATUS_PREFIX=
Fields in the data directory:
Boo-09-Q2b1x1
#######################################
########### Starting Boo-09-Q2b1x1 ###########
Processing Boo-09-Q2b1x1
server tau has sufficient free disk space available: 249819 MB at /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir
server tau has sufficient free disk space available: 249819 MB at .
Checking input images (2 new)
REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE= /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_02-16-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0277.fits
REFERENCE_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE= /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-42-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits
Small preview (one of the new images): 
Large previews of the second-epoch (new) images:
MAKE_PNG_PLOTS=yes
renamed 'Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-03-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0171.png' -> 'transient_report/Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-03-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits_preview.png'
Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-03-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits
renamed 'Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-04-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0172.png' -> 'transient_report/Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-04-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits_preview.png'
Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-04-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits
Read-check the input FITS images... read-check OK
Blank image check the input FITS images... blank-image-check OK
Read date check the input FITS images... read-date-check OK
Mean value check the input FITS images... OK, at least two new images have mean values below the threshold.
----------------------------------------------
INFO: REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 513.4187
INFO: REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_SD= 511.1084
INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 981.1803
INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_SD= 514.9131
INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 981.8558
INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE_SD= 514.4472
----------------------------------------------
INFO: ref_to_second_epoch_img_mean_ratio= 1.91107
INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__SD_ratio= 0.001
----------------------------------------------
Calibration settings: DARK_FRAMES_DIR_OR_FILE=/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks FLAT_FIELD_DIR_OR_FILE=/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats
EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration
SET-TEMP= 5.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint
CCD-TEMP= 5.0 / [degC] CCD temperature
FOCTEMP = 25.2099990844727 / [degC] Focuser temperature
AMBTEMP = 25.6 / [degC] Ambient air temperature
Exploring image header: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_011535_TTUQ2b1x1_900446_EgJGBJo2/Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-03-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits
CCD-TEMP= 5.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_011535_TTUQ2b1x1_900446_EgJGBJo2/Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-03-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits
SET-TEMP= 5.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_011535_TTUQ2b1x1_900446_EgJGBJo2/Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-03-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits
Header: 74 keys total, 33 keys left
Record 0: "" status=0
Record 1: "SIMPLE = T / C# FITS" status=0
Record 2: "BITPIX = 16" status=0
Record 3: "NAXIS = 2 / Dimensionality" status=0
Record 4: "NAXIS1 = 9576" status=0
Record 5: "NAXIS2 = 6388" status=0
Record 6: "BZERO = 32768" status=0
Record 7: "EXTEND = T / Extensions are permitted" status=0
Record 8: "IMAGETYP= 'LIGHT' / Type of exposure" status=0
Record 9: "EXPOSURE= 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0
Record 10: "EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0
Record 11: "DATE-LOC= '2026-06-08T01:03:51.8238111' / Time of observation (local)" status=0
Record 12: "DATE-OBS= '2026-06-08T06:03:51.8238111' / Time of observation (UTC)" status=0
Record 13: "MJD-OBS = 61199.2526831366 / Modified Julian Date of observation" status=0
Record 14: "DATE-AVG= '2026-06-08T06:04:01.7262592' / Averaged midpoint time (UTC)" status=0
Record 15: "MJD-AVG = 61199.2527977545 / Modified Julian Date of averaged midpoint" status=0
Record 16: "XBINNING= 1 / X axis binning factor" status=0
Record 17: "YBINNING= 1 / Y axis binning factor" status=0
Record 18: "GAIN = 30 / Sensor gain" status=0
Record 19: "OFFSET = 30 / Sensor gain offset" status=0
Record 20: "XPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel X axis size" status=0
Record 21: "YPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel Y axis size" status=0
Record 22: "INSTRUME= 'QHY600M' / Imaging instrument name" status=0
Record 23: "CAMERAID= 'QHY600M-84137c4dbbbd119a9' / Imaging instrument identifier" status=0
Record 24: "SET-TEMP= 5.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint" status=0
Record 25: "CCD-TEMP= 5.0 / [degC] CCD temperature" status=0
Record 26: "READOUTM= '2CMS-0' / Sensor readout mode" status=0
Record 27: "USBLIMIT= 50 / Camera-specific USB setting" status=0
Record 28: "TELESCOP= 'QHY600M-TTU2' / Name of telescope" status=0
Record 29: "FOCALLEN= 135.0 / [mm] Focal length" status=0
Record 30: "FOCRATIO= 2.2 / Focal ratio" status=0
Record 31: "RA = 213.329411679706 / [deg] RA of telescope" status=0
Record 32: "DEC = 13.9996619360475 / [deg] Declination of telescope" status=0
Record 33: "CENTALT = 54.8030555555556 / [deg] Altitude of telescope" status=0
Record 34: "CENTAZ = 243.458055555556 / [deg] Azimuth of telescope" status=0
Record 35: "AIRMASS = 1.22307440615144 / Airmass at frame center (Gueymard 1993)" status=0
Record 36: "PIERSIDE= 'East' / Telescope pointing state" status=0
Record 37: "SITEELEV= 1009.5 / [m] Observation site elevation" status=0
Record 38: "SITELAT = 33.7482925 / [deg] Observation site latitude" status=0
Record 39: "SITELONG= -101.958319 / [deg] Observation site longitude" status=0
Record 40: "OBSERVER= 'Sokolovsky' / Observer name" status=0
Record 41: "OBSERVAT= 'TTU Skyview' / Observatory name" status=0
Record 42: "SITENAME= '' / Observatory site name" status=0
Record 43: "FWHEEL = 'Simulator' / Filter Wheel name" status=0
Record 44: "FILTER = 'CV' / Active filter name" status=0
Record 45: "OBJECT = 'Boo-09' / Name of the object of interest" status=0
Record 46: "OBJCTRA = '14 13 20' / [H M S] RA of imaged object" status=0
Record 47: "OBJCTDEC= '+14 00 00' / [D M S] Declination of imaged object" status=0
Record 48: "OBJCTROT= 0.0 / [deg] planned rotation of imaged object" status=0
Record 49: "FOCNAME = 'ZWO Focuser' / Focusing equipment name" status=0
Record 50: "FOCPOS = 20448 / [step] Focuser position" status=0
Record 51: "FOCUSPOS= 20448 / [step] Focuser position" status=0
Record 52: "FOCUSSZ = 0.0 / [um] Focuser step size" status=0
Record 53: "FOCTEMP = 25.2099990844727 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0
Record 54: "FOCUSTEM= 25.2099990844727 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0
Record 55: "DEWPOINT= 17.3 / [degC] Dew point" status=0
Record 56: "HUMIDITY= 60.0 / [percent] Relative humidity" status=0
Record 57: "PRESSURE= 894.11 / [hPa] Air pressure" status=0
Record 58: "AMBTEMP = 25.6 / [degC] Ambient air temperature" status=0
Record 59: "WINDDIR = 56.0 / [deg] Wind direction: 0=N, 180=S, 90=E, 270=W" status=0
Record 60: "WINDGUST= 22.00176 / [kph] Wind gust" status=0
Record 61: "WINDSPD = 17.601408 / [kph] Wind speed" status=0
Record 62: "ROWORDER= 'TOP-DOWN' / FITS Image Orientation" status=0
Record 63: "EQUINOX = 2000.0 / Equinox of celestial coordinate system" status=0
Record 64: "SWCREATE= 'N.I.N.A. 3.2.0.9001 (x64)' / Software that created this file" status=0
Record 65: "QHY_EXP = 20.000096 / [s] Actual exposure time" status=0
Record 66: "QHY_PP = 13888.0 / [ps] pixelPeriod" status=0
Record 67: "QHY_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0
Record 68: "GPS_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0
Record 69: "QHY_FP = 20000160.0 / [us] framePeriod" status=0
Record 70: "QHY_CPL = 6120.0 / clocksPerLine" status=0
Record 71: "QHY_LPF = 235295.0 / linesPerFrame" status=0
Record 72: "QHY_AET = 20000096.0 / [us] actualExposureTime" status=0
Record 73: "QHY_LEM = T / isLongExposureMode" status=0
Record 74: "QHY_OFF0= 3767.777 / [us] RollingShutterEndOffset row 0" status=0
Allocating memory for image, dark and result arrays...
Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_011535_TTUQ2b1x1_900446_EgJGBJo2/Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-03-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix
SET-TEMP= 5.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_011535_TTUQ2b1x1_900446_EgJGBJo2/Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-03-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits
SET-TEMP= 5.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_5C_20s_2026-05-30.fit
CCD-TEMP= 5.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_011535_TTUQ2b1x1_900446_EgJGBJo2/Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-03-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits
CCD-TEMP= 4.800000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_5C_20s_2026-05-30.fit
Reading dark frame /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_5C_20s_2026-05-30.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix
Dark frame is subtracted, output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_011535_TTUQ2b1x1_900446_EgJGBJo2/d_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-03-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits :)
Spent 0.699097 seconds
renamed 'mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_5C_20s_2026-05-30.png' -> 'transient_report/dark.png'
try_to_calibrate_the_input_frame(): selected flat field /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ2b1x1_2026-05-30.fit from directory /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats
MegaDivider v7
Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_011535_TTUQ2b1x1_900446_EgJGBJo2/d_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-03-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix
Reading flat /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ2b1x1_2026-05-30.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix
Avarage count on flat field image: 20659.746399
Minimal real count (from overscan): 5
Output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_011535_TTUQ2b1x1_900446_EgJGBJo2/fd_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-03-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits :)
No overscan detected - all values seem high! (left_median=14784.5, right_median=14894.5)
renamed 'mff_TTUQ2b1x1_2026-05-30.png' -> 'transient_report/flat.png'
Using calibrated image CALIBRATED_SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_011535_TTUQ2b1x1_900446_EgJGBJo2/fd_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-03-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits
EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration
SET-TEMP= 5.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint
CCD-TEMP= 5.0 / [degC] CCD temperature
FOCTEMP = 25.2099990844727 / [degC] Focuser temperature
AMBTEMP = 25.6 / [degC] Ambient air temperature
Exploring image header: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_011535_TTUQ2b1x1_900446_EgJGBJo2/Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-04-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits
CCD-TEMP= 5.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_011535_TTUQ2b1x1_900446_EgJGBJo2/Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-04-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits
SET-TEMP= 5.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_011535_TTUQ2b1x1_900446_EgJGBJo2/Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-04-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits
Header: 74 keys total, 33 keys left
Record 0: "" status=0
Record 1: "SIMPLE = T / C# FITS" status=0
Record 2: "BITPIX = 16" status=0
Record 3: "NAXIS = 2 / Dimensionality" status=0
Record 4: "NAXIS1 = 9576" status=0
Record 5: "NAXIS2 = 6388" status=0
Record 6: "BZERO = 32768" status=0
Record 7: "EXTEND = T / Extensions are permitted" status=0
Record 8: "IMAGETYP= 'LIGHT' / Type of exposure" status=0
Record 9: "EXPOSURE= 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0
Record 10: "EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0
Record 11: "DATE-LOC= '2026-06-08T01:04:36.2028308' / Time of observation (local)" status=0
Record 12: "DATE-OBS= '2026-06-08T06:04:36.2028308' / Time of observation (UTC)" status=0
Record 13: "MJD-OBS = 61199.2531967824 / Modified Julian Date of observation" status=0
Record 14: "DATE-AVG= '2026-06-08T06:04:46.1065592' / Averaged midpoint time (UTC)" status=0
Record 15: "MJD-AVG = 61199.2533114119 / Modified Julian Date of averaged midpoint" status=0
Record 16: "XBINNING= 1 / X axis binning factor" status=0
Record 17: "YBINNING= 1 / Y axis binning factor" status=0
Record 18: "GAIN = 30 / Sensor gain" status=0
Record 19: "OFFSET = 30 / Sensor gain offset" status=0
Record 20: "XPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel X axis size" status=0
Record 21: "YPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel Y axis size" status=0
Record 22: "INSTRUME= 'QHY600M' / Imaging instrument name" status=0
Record 23: "CAMERAID= 'QHY600M-84137c4dbbbd119a9' / Imaging instrument identifier" status=0
Record 24: "SET-TEMP= 5.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint" status=0
Record 25: "CCD-TEMP= 5.0 / [degC] CCD temperature" status=0
Record 26: "READOUTM= '2CMS-0' / Sensor readout mode" status=0
Record 27: "USBLIMIT= 50 / Camera-specific USB setting" status=0
Record 28: "TELESCOP= 'QHY600M-TTU2' / Name of telescope" status=0
Record 29: "FOCALLEN= 135.0 / [mm] Focal length" status=0
Record 30: "FOCRATIO= 2.2 / Focal ratio" status=0
Record 31: "RA = 213.329411700674 / [deg] RA of telescope" status=0
Record 32: "DEC = 13.9996619144464 / [deg] Declination of telescope" status=0
Record 33: "CENTALT = 54.6658333333333 / [deg] Altitude of telescope" status=0
Record 34: "CENTAZ = 243.656666666667 / [deg] Azimuth of telescope" status=0
Record 35: "AIRMASS = 1.22514201945659 / Airmass at frame center (Gueymard 1993)" status=0
Record 36: "PIERSIDE= 'East' / Telescope pointing state" status=0
Record 37: "SITEELEV= 1009.5 / [m] Observation site elevation" status=0
Record 38: "SITELAT = 33.7482925 / [deg] Observation site latitude" status=0
Record 39: "SITELONG= -101.958319 / [deg] Observation site longitude" status=0
Record 40: "OBSERVER= 'Sokolovsky' / Observer name" status=0
Record 41: "OBSERVAT= 'TTU Skyview' / Observatory name" status=0
Record 42: "SITENAME= '' / Observatory site name" status=0
Record 43: "FWHEEL = 'Simulator' / Filter Wheel name" status=0
Record 44: "FILTER = 'CV' / Active filter name" status=0
Record 45: "OBJECT = 'Boo-09' / Name of the object of interest" status=0
Record 46: "OBJCTRA = '14 13 20' / [H M S] RA of imaged object" status=0
Record 47: "OBJCTDEC= '+14 00 00' / [D M S] Declination of imaged object" status=0
Record 48: "OBJCTROT= 0.0 / [deg] planned rotation of imaged object" status=0
Record 49: "FOCNAME = 'ZWO Focuser' / Focusing equipment name" status=0
Record 50: "FOCPOS = 20448 / [step] Focuser position" status=0
Record 51: "FOCUSPOS= 20448 / [step] Focuser position" status=0
Record 52: "FOCUSSZ = 0.0 / [um] Focuser step size" status=0
Record 53: "FOCTEMP = 25.2099990844727 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0
Record 54: "FOCUSTEM= 25.2099990844727 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0
Record 55: "DEWPOINT= 17.3 / [degC] Dew point" status=0
Record 56: "HUMIDITY= 60.0 / [percent] Relative humidity" status=0
Record 57: "PRESSURE= 894.11 / [hPa] Air pressure" status=0
Record 58: "AMBTEMP = 25.6 / [degC] Ambient air temperature" status=0
Record 59: "WINDDIR = 56.0 / [deg] Wind direction: 0=N, 180=S, 90=E, 270=W" status=0
Record 60: "WINDGUST= 22.00176 / [kph] Wind gust" status=0
Record 61: "WINDSPD = 17.601408 / [kph] Wind speed" status=0
Record 62: "ROWORDER= 'TOP-DOWN' / FITS Image Orientation" status=0
Record 63: "EQUINOX = 2000.0 / Equinox of celestial coordinate system" status=0
Record 64: "SWCREATE= 'N.I.N.A. 3.2.0.9001 (x64)' / Software that created this file" status=0
Record 65: "QHY_EXP = 20.000096 / [s] Actual exposure time" status=0
Record 66: "QHY_PP = 13888.0 / [ps] pixelPeriod" status=0
Record 67: "QHY_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0
Record 68: "GPS_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0
Record 69: "QHY_FP = 20000160.0 / [us] framePeriod" status=0
Record 70: "QHY_CPL = 6120.0 / clocksPerLine" status=0
Record 71: "QHY_LPF = 235295.0 / linesPerFrame" status=0
Record 72: "QHY_AET = 20000096.0 / [us] actualExposureTime" status=0
Record 73: "QHY_LEM = T / isLongExposureMode" status=0
Record 74: "QHY_OFF0= 3767.777 / [us] RollingShutterEndOffset row 0" status=0
Allocating memory for image, dark and result arrays...
Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_011535_TTUQ2b1x1_900446_EgJGBJo2/Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-04-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix
SET-TEMP= 5.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_011535_TTUQ2b1x1_900446_EgJGBJo2/Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-04-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits
SET-TEMP= 5.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_5C_20s_2026-05-30.fit
CCD-TEMP= 5.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_011535_TTUQ2b1x1_900446_EgJGBJo2/Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-04-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits
CCD-TEMP= 4.800000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_5C_20s_2026-05-30.fit
Reading dark frame /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_5C_20s_2026-05-30.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix
Dark frame is subtracted, output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_011535_TTUQ2b1x1_900446_EgJGBJo2/d_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-04-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits :)
Spent 0.669769 seconds
renamed 'mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_5C_20s_2026-05-30.png' -> 'transient_report/dark.png'
try_to_calibrate_the_input_frame(): selected flat field /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ2b1x1_2026-05-30.fit from directory /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats
MegaDivider v7
Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_011535_TTUQ2b1x1_900446_EgJGBJo2/d_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-04-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix
Reading flat /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ2b1x1_2026-05-30.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix
Avarage count on flat field image: 20659.746399
Minimal real count (from overscan): 5
Output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_011535_TTUQ2b1x1_900446_EgJGBJo2/fd_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-04-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits :)
No overscan detected - all values seem high! (left_median=14784.5, right_median=14894.5)
renamed 'mff_TTUQ2b1x1_2026-05-30.png' -> 'transient_report/flat.png'
Using calibrated image CALIBRATED_SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_011535_TTUQ2b1x1_900446_EgJGBJo2/fd_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-04-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits
Dark frame used to calibrate the second-epoch images:
Flat field used to calibrate the second-epoch images:
after the calibration attempt:
SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_011535_TTUQ2b1x1_900446_EgJGBJo2/fd_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-03-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits
SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_011535_TTUQ2b1x1_900446_EgJGBJo2/fd_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-04-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits
Previews of the CALIBRATED second-epoch images:
fd_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-03-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits
fd_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-04-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/TTUQ2_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 4 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_02-16-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0277.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-42-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_011535_TTUQ2b1x1_900446_EgJGBJo2/fd_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-03-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_011535_TTUQ2b1x1_900446_EgJGBJo2/fd_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-04-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_02-16-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0277.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-42-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_02-16-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0277.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-42-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_011535_TTUQ2b1x1_900446_EgJGBJo2/fd_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-03-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_011535_TTUQ2b1x1_900446_EgJGBJo2/fd_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-04-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461199.75279888
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
wcs_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_02-16-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0277.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_02-16-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0277.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_02-16-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0277.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_02-16-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0277.fits'
wcs_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-42-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-42-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-42-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-42-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits'
wcs_fd_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-03-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-03-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-03-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-03-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits'
wcs_fd_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-04-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-04-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-04-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-04-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits'
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_02-16-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0277.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_02-16-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0277.fits
Image size: 937.2'x624.1' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 14:13:17.386 +14:00:45.07 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.87"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-03-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-03-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits
Image size: 937.1'x624.0' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 14:13:20.044 +13:59:56.34 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 14:13:17.386 +14:00:45.07
Second-epoch image center 14:13:20.044 +13:59:56.34
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0173 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-04-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-04-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits
Image size: 937.1'x624.0' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 14:13:17.591 +14:00:44.43 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 14:13:17.386 +14:00:45.07
Second-epoch image center 14:13:17.591 +14:00:44.43
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0008 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 14:13:20.044 +13:59:56.34
Second-epoch second image center 14:13:17.591 +14:00:44.43
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01664 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_02-16-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0277.fits &> /tmp/tmp.g3dUiBFXBm
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_02-16-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0277.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-42-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits &> /tmp/tmp.BFK8rjTks4
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-42-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_011535_TTUQ2b1x1_900446_EgJGBJo2/fd_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-03-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits &> /tmp/tmp.TSX4X8Rnal
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_011535_TTUQ2b1x1_900446_EgJGBJo2/fd_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-03-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_011535_TTUQ2b1x1_900446_EgJGBJo2/fd_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-04-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits &> /tmp/tmp.RVmS5a9wDz
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_011535_TTUQ2b1x1_900446_EgJGBJo2/fd_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-04-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_02-16-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0277.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_02-16-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0277.fits and wcs_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_02-16-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0277.fits.cat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_02-16-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0277.fits and wcs_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_02-16-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0277.fits.cat
Found non-empty wcs_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_02-16-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0277.fits and wcs_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_02-16-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0277.fits.cat
The reference image (wcs_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_02-16-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0277.fits) and catalog (wcs_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_02-16-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0277.fits.cat) found
'wcs_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_02-16-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0277.fits.cat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 6086 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 205.0631 to 221.5649 deg, Dec +8.7089 to +19.2738 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 205.0631 to 221.5649 deg, Dec 8.7089 to 19.2738 deg
Loaded 3959 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3241 out of 3336 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3336 out of 6086 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.796800
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.796800
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.50
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.30
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.30
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 6086 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 205.0631 to 221.5649 deg, Dec +8.7089 to +19.2738 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 205.0631 to 221.5649 deg, Dec 8.7089 to 19.2738 deg
Loaded 3959 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3241 out of 3336 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3336 out of 6086 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_02-16-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0277.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_02-16-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0277.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_02-16-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0277.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_02-16-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0277.fits (aperture=6.2)
Read 6128 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 205.0632 to 221.5648 deg, Dec +8.6829 to +19.2632 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 205.0632 to 221.5648 deg, Dec 8.6829 to 19.2632 deg
Loaded 3960 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3259 out of 3337 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3337 out of 6128 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-42-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-42-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-42-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-42-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits (aperture=6.2)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 0 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 8000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.3 pix Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_02-16-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0277.fits
2.3 pix Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-42-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits
2.3 pix fd_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-03-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits
2.3 pix fd_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-04-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits
2.3 pix wcs_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_02-16-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0277.fits
2.3 pix wcs_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-42-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.3 mag. Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_02-16-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0277.fits
15.3 mag. Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-42-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits
15.2 mag. fd_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-03-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits
15.2 mag. fd_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-04-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 15.2 (SNR ) 12.2 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.g3dUiBFXBm (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-08_CI_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_011535_TTUQ2b1x1_900446_EgJGBJo2/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_02-16-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0277.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_02-16-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0277.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_02-16-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0277.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_02-16-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0277.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_02-16-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0277.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_02-16-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0277.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_02-16-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0277.fits' -> 'wcs_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_02-16-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0277.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_02-16-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0277.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_02-16-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0277.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_02-16-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0277.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_02-16-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0277.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_02-16-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0277.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_02-16-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0277.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_02-16-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0277.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_02-16-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0277.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_02-16-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0277.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_02-16-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0277.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=329, passed=6086
Got 6086 stars (including 5750 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_02-16-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0277.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 6086 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013017 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010413 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 493 to 548 (Dec 8.7 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 969 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 969 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 963 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 969 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6027 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 493 to 548 (Dec 8.7 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 969 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 969 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6027 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 969 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6027 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.46"
Excluding outliers - 969 stars left (next iteration limit 1065)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_02-16-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0277.fits N_match=969 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.455 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.401 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.505 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.430 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.556 n_q1=233 n_q2=251 n_q3=248 n_q4=237 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.224
The image catalog is written to wcs_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_02-16-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0277.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_02-16-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0277.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_02-16-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0277.fits -region wcs_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_02-16-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0277.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_02-16-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0277.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.BFK8rjTks4 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-08_CI_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_011535_TTUQ2b1x1_900446_EgJGBJo2/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-42-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-42-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-42-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-42-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-42-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-42-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-42-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits' -> 'wcs_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-42-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-42-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-42-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-42-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-42-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-42-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-42-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-42-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-42-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-42-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-42-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=303, passed=6128
Got 6128 stars (including 5817 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-42-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 6128 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.0'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.0 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013014 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010411 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 493 to 548 (Dec 8.7 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 967 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 967 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 961 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 967 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6068 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 493 to 548 (Dec 8.7 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 967 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 967 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6066 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 967 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6066 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44"
Excluding outliers - 967 stars left (next iteration limit 1063)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-42-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits N_match=967 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.453 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.404 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.505 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.385 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.517 n_q1=240 n_q2=243 n_q3=248 n_q4=236 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.141
The image catalog is written to wcs_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-42-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-42-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-42-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits -region wcs_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-42-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-42-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.TSX4X8Rnal (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-08_CI_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_011535_TTUQ2b1x1_900446_EgJGBJo2/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_011535_TTUQ2b1x1_900446_EgJGBJo2/fd_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-03-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_011535_TTUQ2b1x1_900446_EgJGBJo2/fd_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-03-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_011535_TTUQ2b1x1_900446_EgJGBJo2/fd_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-03-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_011535_TTUQ2b1x1_900446_EgJGBJo2/fd_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-03-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_011535_TTUQ2b1x1_900446_EgJGBJo2/fd_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-03-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_011535_TTUQ2b1x1_900446_EgJGBJo2/fd_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-03-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-03-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-03-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-03-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-03-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-03-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-03-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-03-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_011535_TTUQ2b1x1_900446_EgJGBJo2/fd_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-03-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-03-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=286, passed=5688
Got 5688 stars (including 5396 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-03-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 5688 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.1'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.1 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013015 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010412 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 493 to 548 (Dec 8.7 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 968 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 968 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 964 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 968 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5635 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 493 to 548 (Dec 8.7 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 968 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 968 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5635 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 968 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5635 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Excluding outliers - 968 stars left (next iteration limit 1064)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-03-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits N_match=968 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.433 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.400 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.449 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.376 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.507 n_q1=228 n_q2=252 n_q3=245 n_q4=243 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.172
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-03-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-03-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_011535_TTUQ2b1x1_900446_EgJGBJo2/fd_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-03-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits -region wcs_fd_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-03-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-03-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.RVmS5a9wDz (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-08_CI_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_011535_TTUQ2b1x1_900446_EgJGBJo2/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_011535_TTUQ2b1x1_900446_EgJGBJo2/fd_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-04-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_011535_TTUQ2b1x1_900446_EgJGBJo2/fd_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-04-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_011535_TTUQ2b1x1_900446_EgJGBJo2/fd_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-04-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_011535_TTUQ2b1x1_900446_EgJGBJo2/fd_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-04-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_011535_TTUQ2b1x1_900446_EgJGBJo2/fd_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-04-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_011535_TTUQ2b1x1_900446_EgJGBJo2/fd_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-04-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-04-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-04-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-04-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-04-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-04-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-04-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-04-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_011535_TTUQ2b1x1_900446_EgJGBJo2/fd_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-04-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-04-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=291, passed=5666
Got 5666 stars (including 5370 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-04-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 5666 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.1'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.1 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013015 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010412 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 493 to 548 (Dec 8.7 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 968 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 968 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 963 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 968 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5612 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 493 to 548 (Dec 8.7 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 968 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 968 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5612 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 968 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5612 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
Excluding outliers - 968 stars left (next iteration limit 1064)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-04-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits N_match=968 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.442 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.427 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.432 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.411 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.507 n_q1=232 n_q2=253 n_q3=245 n_q4=238 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.147
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-04-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-04-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_011535_TTUQ2b1x1_900446_EgJGBJo2/fd_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-04-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits -region wcs_fd_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-04-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-04-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_02-16-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0277.fits sigma_overall=0.455 worst_q_ratio=1.224
ref2=Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-42-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits sigma_overall=0.453 worst_q_ratio=1.141
new1=fd_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-03-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits sigma_overall=0.433 worst_q_ratio=1.172
new2=fd_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-04-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits sigma_overall=0.442 worst_q_ratio=1.147
reference average sigma_overall=0.454 worst_q_ratio=1.1825
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: numpy/matplotlib unavailable (No module named 'matplotlib') -- falling back to the C plotter
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy: wrote wcs_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_02-16-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0277_astrometric_residuals.png (969 matched stars from wcs_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_02-16-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0277.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: numpy/matplotlib unavailable (No module named 'matplotlib') -- falling back to the C plotter
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy: wrote wcs_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-42-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0232_astrometric_residuals.png (967 matched stars from wcs_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-42-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: numpy/matplotlib unavailable (No module named 'matplotlib') -- falling back to the C plotter
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy: PGPLOT /PNG device reported success but no file appeared at wcs_fd_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-03-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0171_astrometric_residuals.png -- no plot produced
WARNING: no astrometric residual plot produced for wcs_fd_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-03-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits -- both lib/plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py and lib/plot_astrometric_residuals_xy failed to create wcs_fd_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-03-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0171_astrometric_residuals.png (see messages above)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: numpy/matplotlib unavailable (No module named 'matplotlib') -- falling back to the C plotter
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy: PGPLOT /PNG device reported success but no file appeared at wcs_fd_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-04-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0172_astrometric_residuals.png -- no plot produced
WARNING: no astrometric residual plot produced for wcs_fd_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-04-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits -- both lib/plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py and lib/plot_astrometric_residuals_xy failed to create wcs_fd_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-04-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0172_astrometric_residuals.png (see messages above)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-03-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-03-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_011535_TTUQ2b1x1_900446_EgJGBJo2/wcs_fd_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-03-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-04-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-04-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_011535_TTUQ2b1x1_900446_EgJGBJo2/wcs_fd_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-04-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Boo-09-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
No candidates found here
Prepared the HTML report for the field Boo-09-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 4 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_02-16-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0277.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-42-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_011535_TTUQ2b1x1_900446_EgJGBJo2/fd_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-03-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_011535_TTUQ2b1x1_900446_EgJGBJo2/fd_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-04-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_02-16-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0277.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-42-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_02-16-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0277.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-42-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_011535_TTUQ2b1x1_900446_EgJGBJo2/fd_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-03-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_011535_TTUQ2b1x1_900446_EgJGBJo2/fd_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-04-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_02-16-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0277.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-42-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-03-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-04-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/exclusion_list.txt
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_02-16-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0277.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-42-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-03-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-04-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_02-16-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0277.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_02-16-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0277.fits
Image size: 937.2'x624.1' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 14:13:17.386 +14:00:45.07 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.87"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-03-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-03-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits
Image size: 937.1'x624.0' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 14:13:20.044 +13:59:56.34 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 14:13:17.386 +14:00:45.07
Second-epoch image center 14:13:20.044 +13:59:56.34
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0173 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-04-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-04-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits
Image size: 937.1'x624.0' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 14:13:17.591 +14:00:44.43 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 14:13:17.386 +14:00:45.07
Second-epoch image center 14:13:17.591 +14:00:44.43
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0008 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 14:13:20.044 +13:59:56.34
Second-epoch second image center 14:13:17.591 +14:00:44.43
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01664 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_02-16-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0277.fits &> /tmp/tmp.5QCwgNPP7F
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_02-16-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0277.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-42-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits &> /tmp/tmp.S0qJQXtDZ7
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-42-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_011535_TTUQ2b1x1_900446_EgJGBJo2/fd_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-03-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits &> /tmp/tmp.gYxLfCtHz1
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_011535_TTUQ2b1x1_900446_EgJGBJo2/fd_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-03-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_011535_TTUQ2b1x1_900446_EgJGBJo2/fd_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-04-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits &> /tmp/tmp.Yu9fPhD1u7
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_011535_TTUQ2b1x1_900446_EgJGBJo2/fd_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-04-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_02-16-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0277.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_02-16-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0277.fits and wcs_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_02-16-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0277.fits.cat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_02-16-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0277.fits and wcs_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_02-16-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0277.fits.cat
Found non-empty wcs_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_02-16-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0277.fits and wcs_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_02-16-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0277.fits.cat
The reference image (wcs_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_02-16-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0277.fits) and catalog (wcs_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_02-16-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0277.fits.cat) found
'wcs_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_02-16-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0277.fits.cat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 32198 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 205.0631 to 221.5649 deg, Dec +8.6894 to +19.2767 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 205.0631 to 221.5649 deg, Dec 8.6894 to 19.2767 deg
Loaded 3965 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3124 out of 3352 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3352 out of 32198 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.667050
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.667050
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.22
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.45
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.45
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 32198 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 205.0631 to 221.5649 deg, Dec +8.6894 to +19.2767 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 205.0631 to 221.5649 deg, Dec 8.6894 to 19.2767 deg
Loaded 3965 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3124 out of 3352 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3352 out of 32198 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_02-16-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0277.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_02-16-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0277.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_02-16-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0277.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_02-16-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0277.fits (aperture=4.8)
Read 31729 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 205.0632 to 221.5648 deg, Dec +8.6829 to +19.2673 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 205.0632 to 221.5648 deg, Dec 8.6829 to 19.2673 deg
Loaded 3962 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3128 out of 3348 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3348 out of 31729 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-42-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-42-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-42-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-42-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits (aperture=4.9)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 23 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 8000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.1 pix Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_02-16-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0277.fits
2.2 pix Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-42-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits
2.2 pix fd_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-03-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits
2.2 pix fd_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-04-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits
2.1 pix wcs_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_02-16-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0277.fits
2.2 pix wcs_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-42-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.4 mag. Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_02-16-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0277.fits
15.4 mag. Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-42-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits
15.3 mag. fd_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-03-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits
15.3 mag. fd_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-04-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 15.3 (SNR ) 14.7 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.5QCwgNPP7F (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-08_CI_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_011535_TTUQ2b1x1_900446_EgJGBJo2/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_02-16-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0277.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_02-16-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0277.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_02-16-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0277.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_02-16-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0277.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_02-16-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0277.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_02-16-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0277.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_02-16-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0277.fits' -> 'wcs_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_02-16-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0277.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_02-16-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0277.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_02-16-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0277.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_02-16-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0277.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_02-16-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0277.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_02-16-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0277.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_02-16-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0277.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_02-16-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0277.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_02-16-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0277.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_02-16-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0277.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_02-16-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0277.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=6, blended=1413, passed=32192
Got 32192 stars (including 30735 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_02-16-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0277.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 32192 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013017 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010413 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 493 to 548 (Dec 8.7 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 967 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 967 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 957 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 967 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 31838 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 493 to 548 (Dec 8.7 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 967 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 967 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 31837 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 967 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 31837 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.48"
Excluding outliers - 967 stars left (next iteration limit 1063)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_02-16-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0277.fits N_match=967 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.503 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.423 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.519 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.452 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.634 n_q1=237 n_q2=239 n_q3=252 n_q4=239 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.260
The image catalog is written to wcs_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_02-16-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0277.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_02-16-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0277.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_02-16-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0277.fits -region wcs_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_02-16-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0277.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_02-16-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0277.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.S0qJQXtDZ7 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-08_CI_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_011535_TTUQ2b1x1_900446_EgJGBJo2/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-42-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-42-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-42-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-42-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-42-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-42-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-42-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits' -> 'wcs_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-42-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-42-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-42-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-42-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-42-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-42-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-42-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-42-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-42-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-42-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-42-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=4, blended=1394, passed=31725
Got 31725 stars (including 30282 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-42-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 31725 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.0'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.0 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013014 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010411 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 493 to 548 (Dec 8.7 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 966 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 966 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 955 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 966 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 31370 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 493 to 548 (Dec 8.7 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 966 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 966 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 31370 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 966 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 31370 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.46"
Excluding outliers - 966 stars left (next iteration limit 1062)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-42-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits N_match=966 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.475 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.415 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.546 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.408 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.554 n_q1=243 n_q2=230 n_q3=262 n_q4=231 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.166
The image catalog is written to wcs_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-42-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-42-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-42-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits -region wcs_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-42-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-42-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.gYxLfCtHz1 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-08_CI_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_011535_TTUQ2b1x1_900446_EgJGBJo2/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_011535_TTUQ2b1x1_900446_EgJGBJo2/fd_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-03-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_011535_TTUQ2b1x1_900446_EgJGBJo2/fd_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-03-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_011535_TTUQ2b1x1_900446_EgJGBJo2/fd_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-03-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_011535_TTUQ2b1x1_900446_EgJGBJo2/fd_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-03-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_011535_TTUQ2b1x1_900446_EgJGBJo2/fd_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-03-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_011535_TTUQ2b1x1_900446_EgJGBJo2/fd_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-03-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-03-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-03-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-03-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-03-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-03-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-03-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-03-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_011535_TTUQ2b1x1_900446_EgJGBJo2/fd_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-03-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-03-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=11, blended=1183, passed=30480
Got 30480 stars (including 29257 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-03-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 30480 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.1'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.1 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013015 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010412 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 493 to 548 (Dec 8.7 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 967 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 967 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 960 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 967 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 30159 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 493 to 548 (Dec 8.7 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 967 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 967 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 30161 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 967 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 30161 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
Excluding outliers - 967 stars left (next iteration limit 1063)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-03-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits N_match=967 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.419 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.393 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.409 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.375 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.476 n_q1=230 n_q2=247 n_q3=246 n_q4=244 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.136
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-03-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-03-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_011535_TTUQ2b1x1_900446_EgJGBJo2/fd_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-03-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits -region wcs_fd_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-03-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-03-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.Yu9fPhD1u7 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-08_CI_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_011535_TTUQ2b1x1_900446_EgJGBJo2/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_011535_TTUQ2b1x1_900446_EgJGBJo2/fd_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-04-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_011535_TTUQ2b1x1_900446_EgJGBJo2/fd_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-04-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_011535_TTUQ2b1x1_900446_EgJGBJo2/fd_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-04-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_011535_TTUQ2b1x1_900446_EgJGBJo2/fd_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-04-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_011535_TTUQ2b1x1_900446_EgJGBJo2/fd_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-04-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_011535_TTUQ2b1x1_900446_EgJGBJo2/fd_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-04-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-04-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-04-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-04-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-04-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-04-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-04-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-04-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_011535_TTUQ2b1x1_900446_EgJGBJo2/fd_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-04-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-04-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=6, blended=1189, passed=30434
Got 30434 stars (including 29208 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-04-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 30434 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.1'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.1 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013015 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010412 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 493 to 548 (Dec 8.7 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 966 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 966 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 959 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 966 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 30092 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 493 to 548 (Dec 8.7 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 966 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 966 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 30092 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 966 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 30092 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
Excluding outliers - 966 stars left (next iteration limit 1062)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-04-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits N_match=966 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.468 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.442 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.497 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.445 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.520 n_q1=231 n_q2=246 n_q3=247 n_q4=242 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.111
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-04-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-04-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_011535_TTUQ2b1x1_900446_EgJGBJo2/fd_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-04-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits -region wcs_fd_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-04-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-04-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-03-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_011535_TTUQ2b1x1_900446_EgJGBJo2/wcs_fd_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-03-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-04-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_011535_TTUQ2b1x1_900446_EgJGBJo2/wcs_fd_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-04-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Boo-09-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_02-16-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0277.fits at 14:18:02.66 +15:46:30.8: 12.86 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_02-16-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0277.fits at 13:58:36.03 +12:49:30.1: 13.74 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_02-16-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0277.fits at 14:06:55.27 +11:47:24.3: 13.80 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_02-16-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0277.fits at 14:00:04.46 +14:20:57.7: 13.92 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_02-16-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0277.fits at 14:38:47.33 +15:02:46.0: 11.23 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_02-16-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0277.fits at 14:11:33.27 +14:05:24.2: 12.91 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_02-16-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0277.fits at 14:00:48.14 +13:10:30.7: 14.25 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_02-16-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0277.fits at 14:04:58.07 +16:57:29.1: 14.53 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-42-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits at 13:58:36.03 +12:49:30.1: 13.64 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.69 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 13:58:36.03 +12:49:30.1: ref_mag=13.69 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.8467 delta=-0.16 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-42-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits at 14:18:02.66 +15:46:30.8: 12.77 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-42-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits at 14:06:55.27 +11:47:24.3: 13.76 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_02-16-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0277.fits at 14:31:31.05 +11:49:56.6: 14.74 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.81 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.78 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry on wcs_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-42-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits at 14:38:47.33 +15:02:46.0: 11.23 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:06:55.27 +11:47:24.3: ref_mag=13.78 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.6628 delta=0.12 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:18:02.66 +15:46:30.8: ref_mag=12.81 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=13.0357 delta=-0.22 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.23 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:38:47.33 +15:02:46.0: ref_mag=11.23 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=11.3606 delta=-0.13 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-42-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits at 14:00:04.46 +14:20:57.7: 14.03 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-42-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits at 14:11:33.27 +14:05:24.2: 12.92 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.97 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:00:04.46 +14:20:57.7: ref_mag=13.97 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=14.0497 delta=-0.08 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.92 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:11:33.27 +14:05:24.2: ref_mag=12.92 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=13.0617 delta=-0.15 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-42-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits at 14:00:48.14 +13:10:30.7: 14.30 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.28 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:00:48.14 +13:10:30.7: ref_mag=14.28 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.5044 delta=-0.23 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_02-16-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0277.fits at 14:33:14.87 +17:27:50.3: 14.53 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-42-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits at 14:04:58.07 +16:57:29.1: 14.71 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.61 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:04:58.07 +16:57:29.1: ref_mag=14.61 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=14.5813 delta=0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-42-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits at 14:31:31.05 +11:49:56.6: 14.56 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.64 +/- 0.08
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:31:31.05 +11:49:56.6: ref_mag=14.64 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=14.5187 delta=0.12 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-42-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits at 14:33:14.87 +17:27:50.3: 14.56 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.54 +/- 0.07
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:33:14.87 +17:27:50.3: ref_mag=14.54 +/- 0.07 new_mean_mag=14.6348 delta=-0.09 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_02-16-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0277.fits at 14:07:51.62 +10:21:55.9: 15.76 +/- 0.30 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_02-16-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0277.fits at 14:21:30.21 +16:55:54.1: 14.70 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_02-16-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0277.fits at 13:55:23.24 +12:44:24.1: 14.98 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_02-16-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0277.fits at 14:03:29.96 +11:12:20.3: 15.22 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_02-16-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0277.fits at 14:36:18.28 +17:30:25.5: 15.93 +/- 0.36 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_02-16-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0277.fits at 14:39:07.35 +14:51:43.7: 14.83 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_02-16-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0277.fits at 14:41:29.20 +17:41:27.3: 15.69 +/- 0.31 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-42-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits at 14:07:51.62 +10:21:55.9: 15.39 +/- 0.22 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.51 +/- 0.18
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:07:51.62 +10:21:55.9: ref_mag=15.51 +/- 0.18 new_mean_mag=14.9843 delta=0.53 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_02-16-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0277.fits at 14:40:25.82 +09:52:52.6: 15.41 +/- 0.27 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-42-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits at 14:03:29.96 +11:12:20.3: 15.27 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-42-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits at 13:55:23.24 +12:44:24.1: 14.90 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.24 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:03:29.96 +11:12:20.3: ref_mag=15.24 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.9989 delta=0.24 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.94 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 13:55:23.24 +12:44:24.1: ref_mag=14.94 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.9024 delta=0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-42-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits at 14:21:30.21 +16:55:54.1: 14.62 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.66 +/- 0.07
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:21:30.21 +16:55:54.1: ref_mag=14.66 +/- 0.07 new_mean_mag=14.7734 delta=-0.11 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-42-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits at 14:36:18.28 +17:30:25.5: 15.29 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.45 +/- 0.18
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:36:18.28 +17:30:25.5: ref_mag=15.45 +/- 0.18 new_mean_mag=14.9374 delta=0.51 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-42-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits at 14:39:07.35 +14:51:43.7: 15.19 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.94 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:39:07.35 +14:51:43.7: ref_mag=14.94 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.8909 delta=0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-42-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits at 14:41:29.20 +17:41:27.3: 15.11 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.27 +/- 0.16
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:41:29.20 +17:41:27.3: ref_mag=15.27 +/- 0.16 new_mean_mag=14.8979 delta=0.37 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-42-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits at 14:40:25.82 +09:52:52.6: 15.17 +/- 0.22 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.27 +/- 0.17
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:40:25.82 +09:52:52.6: ref_mag=15.27 +/- 0.17 new_mean_mag=14.9520 delta=0.32 (need > 0.90)
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 2s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 1s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51923_fd_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-04-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0172
The candidate 51923_fd_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-04-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0172 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 1 | 2026 06 08.25280 | 2461199.75280 | 14.54 | 14:00:48.13 +13:10:30.9 | 6636 3675 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_011535_TTUQ2b1x1_900446_EgJGBJo2/fd_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-03-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits |
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 06 08.25331 | 2461199.75331 | 14.48 | 14:00:48.15 +13:10:30.5 | 6630 3684 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_011535_TTUQ2b1x1_900446_EgJGBJo2/fd_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-04-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits |
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51926_fd_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-04-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0172
The candidate 51926_fd_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-04-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0172 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 1 | 2026 06 08.25280 | 2461199.75280 | 13.85 | 13:58:35.99 +12:49:29.3 | 6966 3882 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_011535_TTUQ2b1x1_900446_EgJGBJo2/fd_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-03-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits |
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 06 08.25331 | 2461199.75331 | 13.85 | 13:58:36.07 +12:49:31.0 | 6960 3890 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_011535_TTUQ2b1x1_900446_EgJGBJo2/fd_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-04-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits |
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51927_fd_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-04-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0172
The candidate 51927_fd_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-04-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0172 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 1 | 2026 06 08.25280 | 2461199.75280 | 13.64 | 14:06:55.22 +11:47:24.4 | 5743 4525 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_011535_TTUQ2b1x1_900446_EgJGBJo2/fd_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-03-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits |
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 06 08.25331 | 2461199.75331 | 13.69 | 14:06:55.32 +11:47:24.3 | 5737 4533 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_011535_TTUQ2b1x1_900446_EgJGBJo2/fd_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-04-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits |
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51928_fd_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-04-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0172
The candidate 51928_fd_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-04-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0172 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 1 | 2026 06 08.25280 | 2461199.75280 | 13.07 | 14:18:02.64 +15:46:30.9 | 4101 2122 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_011535_TTUQ2b1x1_900446_EgJGBJo2/fd_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-03-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits |
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 06 08.25331 | 2461199.75331 | 13.01 | 14:18:02.68 +15:46:30.7 | 4095 2130 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_011535_TTUQ2b1x1_900446_EgJGBJo2/fd_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-04-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits |
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51929_fd_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-04-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0172
The candidate 51929_fd_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-04-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0172 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 1 | 2026 06 08.25280 | 2461199.75280 | 12.99 | 14:11:33.26 +14:05:24.0 | 5050 3139 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_011535_TTUQ2b1x1_900446_EgJGBJo2/fd_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-03-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits |
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 06 08.25331 | 2461199.75331 | 13.15 | 14:11:33.29 +14:05:24.4 | 5044 3147 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_011535_TTUQ2b1x1_900446_EgJGBJo2/fd_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-04-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits |
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51930_fd_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-04-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0172
The candidate 51930_fd_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-04-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0172 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 1 | 2026 06 08.25280 | 2461199.75280 | 11.36 | 14:38:47.33 +15:02:46.1 | 1052 2520 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_011535_TTUQ2b1x1_900446_EgJGBJo2/fd_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-03-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits |
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 06 08.25331 | 2461199.75331 | 11.36 | 14:38:47.33 +15:02:45.9 | 1046 2528 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_011535_TTUQ2b1x1_900446_EgJGBJo2/fd_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-04-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits |
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51955_fd_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-04-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0172
The candidate 51955_fd_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-04-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0172 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 06 08.25331 | 2461199.75331 | 13.74 | 14:23:14.78 +10:34:34.2 | 3314 5274 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_011535_TTUQ2b1x1_900446_EgJGBJo2/fd_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-04-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits |
**** FOUND 14:23:14.71 +10:34:35.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51958_fd_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-04-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0172
The candidate 51958_fd_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-04-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0172 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 06 08.25331 | 2461199.75331 | 13.74 | 14:20:06.76 +15:19:11.5 | 3792 2404 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_011535_TTUQ2b1x1_900446_EgJGBJo2/fd_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-04-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits |
**** FOUND 14:20:06.74 +15:19:11.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51961_fd_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-04-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0172
The candidate 51961_fd_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-04-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0172 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 06 08.25331 | 2461199.75331 | 13.98 | 14:08:09.63 +17:57:21.7 | 5522 0802 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_011535_TTUQ2b1x1_900446_EgJGBJo2/fd_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-04-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits |
**** FOUND 14:08:09.62 +17:57:22.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51966_fd_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-04-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0172
The candidate 51966_fd_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-04-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0172 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 1 | 2026 06 08.25280 | 2461199.75280 | 14.07 | 14:00:04.43 +14:20:57.9 | 6732 2963 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_011535_TTUQ2b1x1_900446_EgJGBJo2/fd_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-03-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits |
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 06 08.25331 | 2461199.75331 | 14.04 | 14:00:04.49 +14:20:57.5 | 6725 2971 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_011535_TTUQ2b1x1_900446_EgJGBJo2/fd_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-04-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits |
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51989_fd_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-04-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0172
The candidate 51989_fd_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-04-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0172 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 06 08.25331 | 2461199.75331 | 14.40 | 13:58:04.79 +16:23:03.9 | 6996 1732 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_011535_TTUQ2b1x1_900446_EgJGBJo2/fd_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-04-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits |
**** FOUND 13:58:04.90 +16:23:04.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51997_fd_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-04-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0172
The candidate 51997_fd_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-04-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0172 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 1 | 2026 06 08.25280 | 2461199.75280 | 14.58 | 14:04:58.06 +16:57:29.9 | 5995 1394 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_011535_TTUQ2b1x1_900446_EgJGBJo2/fd_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-03-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits |
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 06 08.25331 | 2461199.75331 | 14.59 | 14:04:58.08 +16:57:28.3 | 5989 1402 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_011535_TTUQ2b1x1_900446_EgJGBJo2/fd_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-04-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits |
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52004_fd_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-04-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0172
The candidate 52004_fd_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-04-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0172 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 1 | 2026 06 08.25280 | 2461199.75280 | 14.52 | 14:31:31.01 +11:49:57.0 | 2095 4493 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_011535_TTUQ2b1x1_900446_EgJGBJo2/fd_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-03-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits |
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 06 08.25331 | 2461199.75331 | 14.52 | 14:31:31.09 +11:49:56.3 | 2089 4502 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_011535_TTUQ2b1x1_900446_EgJGBJo2/fd_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-04-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits |
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52027_fd_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-04-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0172
The candidate 52027_fd_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-04-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0172 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 1 | 2026 06 08.25280 | 2461199.75280 | 14.67 | 14:33:14.88 +17:27:50.8 | 1897 1067 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_011535_TTUQ2b1x1_900446_EgJGBJo2/fd_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-03-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits |
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 06 08.25331 | 2461199.75331 | 14.61 | 14:33:14.86 +17:27:49.8 | 1891 1075 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_011535_TTUQ2b1x1_900446_EgJGBJo2/fd_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-04-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits |
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52047_fd_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-04-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0172
The candidate 52047_fd_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-04-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0172 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 1 | 2026 06 08.25280 | 2461199.75280 | 14.79 | 14:21:30.18 +16:55:54.2 | 3600 1418 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_011535_TTUQ2b1x1_900446_EgJGBJo2/fd_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-03-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits |
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 06 08.25331 | 2461199.75331 | 14.76 | 14:21:30.24 +16:55:54.1 | 3594 1426 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_011535_TTUQ2b1x1_900446_EgJGBJo2/fd_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-04-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits |
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52053_fd_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-04-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0172
The candidate 52053_fd_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-04-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0172 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 1 | 2026 06 08.25280 | 2461199.75280 | 14.97 | 14:07:51.64 +10:21:56.8 | 5612 5390 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_011535_TTUQ2b1x1_900446_EgJGBJo2/fd_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-03-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits |
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 06 08.25331 | 2461199.75331 | 15.02 | 14:07:51.60 +10:21:55.0 | 5606 5398 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_011535_TTUQ2b1x1_900446_EgJGBJo2/fd_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-04-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits |
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52054_fd_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-04-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0172
The candidate 52054_fd_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-04-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0172 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 1 | 2026 06 08.25280 | 2461199.75280 | 14.90 | 13:55:23.22 +12:44:23.3 | 7443 3925 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_011535_TTUQ2b1x1_900446_EgJGBJo2/fd_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-03-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits |
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 06 08.25331 | 2461199.75331 | 14.90 | 13:55:23.26 +12:44:25.0 | 7437 3933 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_011535_TTUQ2b1x1_900446_EgJGBJo2/fd_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-04-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits |
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52069_fd_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-04-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0172
The candidate 52069_fd_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-04-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0172 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 1 | 2026 06 08.25280 | 2461199.75280 | 14.86 | 14:39:07.20 +14:51:42.7 | 1001 2631 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_011535_TTUQ2b1x1_900446_EgJGBJo2/fd_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-03-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits |
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 06 08.25331 | 2461199.75331 | 14.95 | 14:39:07.50 +14:51:44.7 | 0994 2639 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_011535_TTUQ2b1x1_900446_EgJGBJo2/fd_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-04-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits |
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52073_fd_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-04-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0172
The candidate 52073_fd_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-04-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0172 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 1 | 2026 06 08.25280 | 2461199.75280 | 15.00 | 14:03:30.03 +11:12:20.6 | 6255 4874 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_011535_TTUQ2b1x1_900446_EgJGBJo2/fd_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-03-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits |
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 06 08.25331 | 2461199.75331 | 15.00 | 14:03:29.89 +11:12:19.9 | 6249 4882 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_011535_TTUQ2b1x1_900446_EgJGBJo2/fd_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-04-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits |
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52087_fd_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-04-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0172
The candidate 52087_fd_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-04-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0172 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 1 | 2026 06 08.25280 | 2461199.75280 | 14.84 | 14:36:18.24 +17:30:26.0 | 1450 1029 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_011535_TTUQ2b1x1_900446_EgJGBJo2/fd_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-03-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits |
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 06 08.25331 | 2461199.75331 | 15.08 | 14:36:18.32 +17:30:25.0 | 1444 1037 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_011535_TTUQ2b1x1_900446_EgJGBJo2/fd_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-04-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits |
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52097_fd_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-04-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0172
The candidate 52097_fd_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-04-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0172 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 1 | 2026 06 08.25280 | 2461199.75280 | 14.91 | 14:41:29.16 +17:41:27.3 | 0692 0892 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_011535_TTUQ2b1x1_900446_EgJGBJo2/fd_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-03-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits |
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 06 08.25331 | 2461199.75331 | 14.88 | 14:41:29.24 +17:41:27.4 | 0686 0900 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_011535_TTUQ2b1x1_900446_EgJGBJo2/fd_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-04-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits |
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52129_fd_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-04-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0172
The candidate 52129_fd_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-04-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0172 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 1 | 2026 06 08.25280 | 2461199.75280 | 14.90 | 14:40:25.90 +09:52:53.4 | 0726 5667 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_011535_TTUQ2b1x1_900446_EgJGBJo2/fd_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-03-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits |
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 06 08.25331 | 2461199.75331 | 15.03 | 14:40:25.74 +09:52:51.8 | 0720 5675 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_011535_TTUQ2b1x1_900446_EgJGBJo2/fd_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-04-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits |
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52143_fd_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-04-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0172
The candidate 52143_fd_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-04-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0172 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 06 08.25331 | 2461199.75331 | 14.95 | 14:30:09.80 +10:12:56.3 | 2276 5488 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_011535_TTUQ2b1x1_900446_EgJGBJo2/fd_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-04-36_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits |
**** FOUND 14:30:09.79 +10:12:56.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 3s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Boo-09-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
########### Completed Boo-09-Q2b1x1 ###########
The analysis was running at tau
We are allowed to update the exclusion list at tau host
Found ../exclusion_list_TTUQ2.txt
#### The exclusion list before filtering-out asteroids, bad pixels and adding Gaia sources ####
###################################################################################
renamed 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt_noasteroids' -> 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt'
renamed 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt_nohotpixels' -> 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt'
# Count candidates with no identification (that also don't look like hot pix)
Found 0 unidentified candidates (excluding asteroids, hot pixels and known variable stars).
###################################################################################
0 candidates found (excluding asteroids and hot pixels)
This does not look like a test run
###################################################################################
exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt NOT FOUND
exclusion_list_apass.txt NOT FOUND
IS_THIS_TEST_RUN=NO ALLOW_EXCLUSION_LIST_UPDATE= YES
#### Nothing to add to the exclusion list ####
The observatory MPC code is V36
############################################################
Positions of planets computed with util/planet_finder/main.py for JD(UT)2461199.75279888 -observatory V36
06:44:06.21 +24:59:24.5 Mercury (0.1mag)
07:43:09.66 +23:22:02.4 Venus (-4.0mag)
02:49:47.27 +15:43:40.0 Mars (1.3mag)
07:48:29.29 +21:31:19.3 Jupiter (-1.9mag)
00:49:23.51 +02:48:46.6 Saturn (0.9mag)
04:00:13.29 +20:25:30.2 Uranus (5.8mag)
00:16:08.76 +00:16:49.5 Neptune (7.8mag)
20:33:21.21 -23:04:34.2 Pluto (14.5mag)
23:06:40.95 -05:19:22.4 Moon (-10.4mag)
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 362 Jun 8 01:17 planets.txt
############################################################
Positions of selected moons from JPL HORIZONS for JD(UT)2461199.75279888:
07:48:31.83 +21:31:13.9 Io (6.0mag)
07:48:30.79 +21:31:17.0 Europa (6.2mag)
07:48:13.31 +21:32:07.3 Ganymede (5.6mag)
07:48:47.31 +21:30:20.9 Callisto (6.7mag)
07:48:46.43 +21:07:37.2 Himalia (15.6mag)
07:48:33.55 +21:31:05.7 Thebe (16.5mag)
07:48:45.77 +21:23:02.1 Elara (17.5mag)
07:50:40.18 +21:42:59.2 Pasiphae (17.7mag)
07:55:04.23 +21:33:02.0 Carme (18.9mag)
00:49:14.21 +02:48:44.6 Titan (8.7mag)
00:49:20.14 +02:48:59.1 Rhea (9.9mag)
00:49:55.75 +02:50:56.3 Iapetus (11.3mag)
00:49:19.71 +02:48:23.1 Hyperion (14.7mag)
00:50:05.70 +02:50:42.6 Phoebe (16.7mag)
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 568 Jun 8 01:18 moons.txt
############################################################
Positions of selected spacecraft from JPL HORIZONS for JD(UT)2461199.75279888:
17:26:24.07 -35:16:55.6 JWST
14:57:02.31 +55:59:01.4 Chandra
19:21:29.84 +00:12:26.6 XMM-Newton
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 96 Jun 8 01:17 spacecraft.txt
############################################################
Positions of bright comets computed with util/comet_finder/main.py for JD(UT)2461199.75279888 -observatory V36
18:43:28.21 -32:39:30.4 13.6mag P/2010 H2 (Vales)
05:53:31.73 -68:03:48.2 17.4mag C/2014 UN271 (Bernardinelli-Bernstein)
05:49:04.86 +31:58:07.5 17.5mag C/2017 K2 (PANSTARRS)
17:14:42.51 +15:21:17.6 17.8mag C/2021 G2 (ATLAS)
21:12:49.00 -49:27:44.0 16.9mag P/2021 N1 (ZTF)
23:12:37.28 +31:35:39.7 17.2mag C/2022 E2 (ATLAS)
05:34:06.86 +26:58:33.0 16.5mag C/2022 N2 (PANSTARRS)
09:29:46.17 +31:04:50.0 16.6mag C/2022 QE78 (ATLAS)
08:50:34.63 +03:56:05.1 17.7mag C/2022 R6 (PANSTARRS)
18:28:11.05 +21:36:12.8 17.8mag C/2023 A3 (Tsuchinshan-ATLAS)
15:19:21.10 -11:00:31.4 17.6mag P/2023 B1 (PANSTARRS)
22:14:24.84 +66:31:56.5 17.7mag C/2023 H5 (Lemmon)
17:46:14.56 -06:41:41.8 13.7mag C/2023 R1 (PANSTARRS)
13:18:03.61 +82:58:48.2 17.9mag C/2023 X2 (Lemmon)
07:10:29.75 +64:18:39.3 17.7mag C/2024 A1 (ATLAS)
06:47:21.62 +27:50:22.2 13.6mag C/2024 E1 (Wierzchos)
15:37:14.56 +13:31:53.6 17.4mag C/2024 G6 (ATLAS)
20:13:00.46 +31:09:10.4 14.0mag C/2024 J3 (ATLAS)
04:18:05.10 -15:56:45.2 16.0mag C/2024 T5 (ATLAS)
06:05:57.98 +34:28:52.7 17.9mag C/2025 J1 (Borisov)
11:34:52.54 +52:44:44.1 17.4mag C/2025 L1 (ATLAS)
06:45:00.94 -10:52:20.5 14.1mag C/2025 R3 (PANSTARRS)
09:24:12.54 +23:20:21.1 17.9mag C/2025 V2 (Rankin)
12:39:41.95 +04:41:27.2 17.2mag C/2025 Y1 (ATLAS)
18:12:47.55 +75:08:43.0 17.9mag C/2026 A2 (Bok)
02:00:46.10 +43:25:10.3 16.1mag C/2026 B2 (Sun-Gao)
11:11:19.39 -03:42:45.6 16.5mag A/2026 E1
20:23:45.32 -08:34:25.7 8.7mag 10P/Tempel
11:02:01.11 -00:58:07.7 16.0mag 29P/Schwassmann-Wachmann
03:11:48.71 +25:39:12.7 17.7mag 47P/Ashbrook-Jackson
09:00:06.25 +23:45:08.7 16.9mag 63P/Wild
00:26:58.68 -06:21:49.5 15.7mag 65P/Gunn
06:43:37.78 +33:26:08.8 16.9mag 76P/West-Kohoutek-Ikemura
03:09:19.37 +17:13:26.8 13.8mag 78P/Gehrels
01:20:53.23 +04:51:43.4 15.6mag 88P/Howell
04:54:49.75 +30:18:26.7 15.2mag 93P/Lovas
02:43:06.98 +27:38:07.6 17.6mag 114P/Wiseman-Skiff
06:50:41.21 +33:02:09.7 15.6mag 123P/West-Hartley
09:50:16.78 +14:36:44.8 16.5mag 124P/Mrkos
03:59:07.94 +19:15:15.7 16.4mag 128P/Shoemaker-Holt
04:33:40.81 +19:05:13.8 17.7mag 131P/Mueller
05:58:33.76 +18:39:31.1 14.7mag 141P/Machholz
06:01:12.16 +17:40:42.0 14.6mag 141P-A/Machholz
04:54:23.10 +16:10:54.1 11.6mag 141P-D/Machholz
02:57:43.23 -24:41:29.4 16.8mag 161P/Hartley-IRAS
03:41:44.38 +23:49:58.6 14.9mag 162P/SidingSpring
19:36:37.78 +01:44:47.1 16.9mag 169P/NEAT
00:18:29.66 +02:28:36.6 17.9mag 220P/McNaught
16:52:08.18 -08:28:22.7 16.4mag 235P/LINEAR
07:34:47.33 +35:29:21.8 17.5mag 240P/NEAT
00:32:30.29 -02:26:39.9 16.4mag 260P/McNaught
04:04:23.01 +32:29:29.7 17.6mag 295P/LINEAR
23:52:38.22 -09:38:10.2 17.6mag 320P/McNaught
15:15:12.67 +08:05:52.3 17.4mag 391P/Kowalski
08:07:10.99 +20:44:45.1 17.9mag 450P/LONEOS
07:00:04.07 +41:41:32.3 17.8mag 493P/LONEOS
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 2.7K Jun 8 01:17 comets.txt
############################################################
List of recent ASAS-SN transients from https://www.astronomy.ohio-state.edu/asassn/transients.html :
20:07:38.15 -21:07:05.40 SN2026mho 2026-05-25.18 -1.12
11:29:42.55 +79:01:03.10 AT2026min 2026-05-24.21 16.63
11:44:32.95 -68:48:30.00 ASASSN-26no 2026-05-24 8.41
19:00:42.82 -48:31:01.60 ASASSN-26dp 2026-05-22.31 -3.28
14:23:56.59 -58:37:47.40 ASASSN-26dn 2026-05-20.01 14.59
11:24:54.06 +47:57:01.60 AT2026nma 2026-05-20.29 15.46
21:27:08.58 +33:24:38.10 AT2026lli 2026-05-19.34 15.86
00:31:01.41 -13:38:51.70 AT2026nad 2026-05-19.39 15.34
15:16:06.61 -79:16:32.40 ASASSN-26dm 2026-05-19.03 14.44
11:24:25.21 -59:23:19.10 ASASSN-26dl 2026-05-18.02 13.55
13:45:51.52 -53:16:01.00 ASASSN-26dk 2026-05-18.16 12.96
02:05:49.69 -30:29:09.60 ASASSN-26dh 2026-05-18.43 15.37
17:50:22.87 -39:42:33.90 ASASSN-26dj 2026-05-17.05 15.7
01:13:11.60 -33:25:16.10 ASASSN-26dg 2026-05-13.41 16.8
16:44:31.77 -27:15:18.40 AT2026mhn 2026-05-12.33 15.8
09:46:31.08 -33:41:51.00 ASASSN-26di 2026-05-12.14 14.63
21:23:11.57 -19:09:45.00 AT2026kwu 2026-05-12.26 16.9
14:20:14.30 -30:20:51.90 AT2026ktm 2026-05-12.06 17.21
14:41:39.01 -37:13:46.40 AT2026lkm 2026-05-11.18 16.89
12:59:50.45 -10:58:38.80 SN2026kep 2026-05-9.06 17.5
13:37:29.61 -29:50:30.90 AT2026lkd 2026-05-9.09 17.23
09:46:42.01 -14:52:03.60 SN2026kmo 2026-05-8.99 17.51
15:03:05.28 +22:02:03.40 AT2026lxf 2026-05-8.07 13.88
10:23:49.41 -20:57:25.30 ASASSN-26df 2026-05-8.21 16.52
22:14:40.56 +05:04:51.60 2026lda 2026-05-7.56 16.2
21:35:33.81 -14:05:16.30 ASASSN-26de 2026-05-6.29 14.51
16:21:48.82 -61:36:13.20 ASASSN-26dd 2026-05-5.21 15.15
14:26:40.22 -24:48:37.50 AT2026lig 2026-05-4.27 14.63
13:17:51.04 +30:25:13.50 SN2026kcp 2026-05-4.46 16.43
11:27:55.57 -13:38:56.90 SN2026kza 2026-05-1.08 15.59
22:28:27.10 +30:17:54.30 SN 2026fov 2026-04-29.6 14.36
21:00:10.71 -32:17:03.90 AT2026kis 2026-04-27.36 16.15
14:32:57.37 -58:13:26.40 ASASSN-26dc 2026-04-27.27 13.42
15:32:05.35 -43:54:34.60 ASASSN-26db 2026-04-27.37 16.06
16:34:34.97 -54:34:58.00 ASASSN-26da 2026-04-25.32 16.11
10:06:55.04 -01:13:49.70 SN2026jsg 2026-04-24.99 16.28
15:15:57.17 +56:18:32.80 SN2026kid 2026-04-24.52 -3.65
07:58:28.45 +57:03:42.40 AT2026kcf 2026-04-24.2 16.89
11:38:21.80 -50:43:06.50 SN2026jkb 2026-04-24.24 15.38
10:06:11.41 -39:41:04.20 AT2026dil 2026-04-24.2 16.85
14:21:40.08 +13:13:46.30 SN2026jlm 2026-04-22.16 15.12
10:53:55.52 -16:06:06.00 ASASSN-26cz 2026-04-22.28 16.29
20:07:38.15 -21:07:05.40 2026-05-25.18 -1.12
13:45:02.03 +15:17:14.50 ASASSN-26cy 2026-04-21.27 15.78
13:20:52.22 -35:57:03.60 AT2026jcm 2026-04-19.01 16.65
13:36:15.66 -36:53:48.40 SN 2026iqy 2026-04-18.92 17.31
06:34:01.33 -40:07:34.00 ASASSN-26cx 2026-04-19.07 16.16
23:33:57.97 -45:12:11.90 SN 2026idu 2026-04-19.41 15.9
12:10:50.92 +66:55:31.20 SN 2026icv 2026-04-17.14 16.03
21:36:59.06 -60:43:35.90 ASASSN-26cv 2026-04-17.35 -1.18
08:13:26.26 -27:07:30.50 ASASSN-26cw 2026-04-17.07 -1.01
14:49:14.13 -27:29:20.60 ASASSN-26cu 2026-04-16.06 14.03
17:21:59.44 -38:54:04.60 ASASSN-26ct 2026-04-14.4 15.15
15:25:54.99 +07:49:24.50 SN2026huo 2026-04-12.14 16.96
20:07:38.15 -21:07:05.40 2026-05-25.18 -1.12
12:23:20.40 +04:53:39.10 AT2026ixd 2026-04-12.14 17.65
17:46:09.76 -61:19:50.40 SN2026icy 2026-04-12.2 17.03
09:25:46.42 +02:13:46.30 SN2026gud 2026-04-11.98 16.49
16:52:15.46 -60:27:45.90 ASASSN-26cs 2026-04-12.4 15.5
04:20:55.37 -51:15:31.10 ASASSN-26cr 2026-04-12.01 15.37
22:25:39.35 +36:45:06.90 AT2026ihl 2026-04-10.48 14.21
19:40:44.94 +00:41:03.80 AT2026imw 2026-04-10.32 16.06
19:52:04.70 +05:53:33.50 ASASSN-26cq 2026-04-9.31 14.98
16:08:18.39 -64:11:08.80 ASASSN-26cp 2026-04-9.29 13.32
09:22:22.90 -61:02:43.70 SN2026idh 2026-04-7.97 16.34
05:06:54.12 -19:42:26.40 AT2026imr 2026-04-8 17.49
07:14:55.34 -36:03:21.40 AT2026hei 2026-04-8.12 16.7
21:35:33.14 -19:01:34.80 AT2026ihm 2026-04-8.36 16.7
04:28:24.08 -32:25:35.30 AT2026imo 2026-04-8.02 16.81
05:10:35.79 -39:38:40.80 SN 2026hnn 2026-04-7.04 17.07
09:54:32.04 -01:17:25.80 ASASSN-26cn 2026-04-7.01 15.58
07:46:24.43 -77:29:35.90 ASASSN-26co 2026-04-7.15 14.93
05:00:45.52 -29:51:06.20 AT2026hvw 2026-04-6.03 16.51
19:49:33.10 -23:37:11.00 ASASSN-26cl 2026-04-5.29 14.98
19:32:43.55 -22:39:33.40 ASASSN-26cm 2026-04-4.3 13.88
18:08:57.38 +76:48:23.60 ASASSN-26ck 2026-04-2.37 15.38
16:16:36.10 +44:52:30.20 AT2026hyy 2026-04-2.58 13.81
21:55:23.31 -34:48:53.90 ASASSN-26cj 2026-03-30.4 -1.47
11:19:50.70 -27:51:49.80 SN2026gvk 2026-03-30 15.48
11:53:57.02 -23:09:46.20 SN2026gzx 2026-03-28.75 15.27
07:13:46.14 -33:10:15.70 ASASSN-26ci 2026-03-28.15 15.14
09:03:36.09 -67:58:13.00 SN2026hkg 2026-03-28.19 15.82
07:03:00.72 +39:14:43.00 SN2026fin 2026-03-28.27 15.82
05:35:42.80 -63:44:05.50 ASASSN-26ch 2026-03-27.86 13.02
11:23:19.04 +34:22:38.00 SN2026fwt 2026-03-27.3 16.56
19:03:49.79 +37:04:05.20 ASASSN-26ce 2026-03-26.56 16.3
20:26:56.07 -52:54:06.50 AT2026hiy 2026-03-26.35 16.95
05:25:54.76 -30:15:35.80 ASASSN-26cg 2026-03-25.07 16.88
06:57:16.49 -26:54:37.20 SN2026fzb 2026-03-25.14 15.8
14:37:38.23 -43:00:52.30 ASASSN-26cd 2026-03-24.24 12.52
17:34:53.03 +06:04:29.70 AT2026gzl 2026-03-23.27 15.82
08:30:02.60 -35:12:47.50 ASASSN-26cf 2026-03-23.2 14.82
16:54:25.33 +37:49:56.60 SN 2026evz 2026-03-21.32 17.54
17:06:19.20 -18:54:19.50 ASASSN-26bx 2026-03-21.25 16.39
19:01:16.28 -29:29:23.10 ASASSN-26bw 2026-03-21.33 15.81
08:46:05.75 +10:47:39.80 ASASSN-26ca 2026-03-21.13 14.27
12:14:58.16 +63:47:16.20 SN 2026fvx 2026-03-21.12 15.6
18:02:55.90 -75:23:02.60 ASASSN-26bz 2026-03-21.32 16.16
12:16:02.88 -53:16:33.80 ASASSN-26cc 2026-03-20.04 15.48
13:08:21.85 +29:13:44.20 SN 2026fmh 2026-03-20.16 -0.33
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 5.6K Jun 8 01:17 asassn_transients_list.txt
############################################################
Truncated list of TOCP transients from http://www.cbat.eps.harvard.edu/unconf/tocp.html :
09:55:38.83 +69:05:21.7 PNV J09553883+6905217 2026-04-01.893 19.4mag
19:32:43.67 -22:39:30.7 TCP J19324367-2239307 2026-04-05.4395 13.6mag
16:16:36.03 +44:52:28.9 TCP J16163603+4452289 2026-04-05.6655 14.2mag
00:43:38.36 +41:15:32.4 PNV J00433836+4115324 2026-04-08.079 17.2mag
15:41:11.68 +59:18:26.8 TCP J15411168+5918268 2026-04-12.9625 19.2mag
00:43:35.02 +41:46:28.0 PNV J00433502+4146280 2026-04-23.056 15.9mag
00:42:55.64 +41:14:12.2 PNV J00425564+4114122 2026-04-24.042 16.2mag
21:14:03.38 +56:46:44.1 TCP J21140338+5646441 2026-05-05.3534 16.7mag
15:03:05.19 +22:02:04.1 TCP J15030519+2202041 2026-05-08.3260 13.9mag
07:15:18.25 +47:53:16.7 TCP J07151825+4753167 2026-05-09.1599 14.4mag
16:00:18.44 -22:30:10.6 TCP J16001844-2230106 2026-05-09.6135 13.3mag
00:42:47.45 +41:16:58.5 PNV J00424745+4116585 2026-05-10.030 16.8mag
09:55:02.89 +69:02:13.8 PNV J09550289+6902138 2026-05-18.925 20.7mag
00:43:01.82 +41:18:16.6 PNV J00430182+4118166 2026-05-21.8651 18.83Cmag
00:42:51.20 +41:16:59.4 PNV J00425120+4116594 2022-10-26.135 19.3mag
12:24:25.10 +28:47:12.0 TCP J12242510+2847120 2026-05-31.6015 14.8mag
00:56:07.13 +43:01:40.6 TCP J00560713+4301406 2026-06-01.4135 12.2mag
00:42:41.64 +41:15:16.2 PNV J00424164+4115162 2026-06-02.029 17.4mag
00:42:38.68 +41:15:58.2 PNV J00423868+4115582 2026-06-05.1224 19.97Umag
19:00:42.95 -48:31:01.7 PNV J19004295-4831017 2026-05-25.0752 14.2mag
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 189K Jun 8 01:17 tocp_transients_list.txt
############################################################
Truncated list of recent TNS transients from https://www.wis-tns.org/ :
16:39:35.110 +15:17:58.28 AT 2026nsc 2026-05-09.80 20.76
16:42:48.680 +20:27:18.30 AT 2026nsb 2026-05-09.80 20.54
13:34:03.440 +31:37:31.73 AT 2026nsa 2026-05-07.80 21.26
13:50:28.150 +02:34:54.72 AT 2026nrz 2026-05-22.72 21.54
13:43:59.750 +03:47:21.63 AT 2026nry 2026-05-22.69 22.05
13:17:26.150 -01:26:00.12 AT 2026nrx 2026-05-21.64 21.7
00:35:20.216 -08:28:38.64 AT 2026nrw 2026-05-19.42 18.74
23:50:43.016 -01:09:12.25 AT 2026nrv 2026-05-23.48 19.5028
22:36:47.715 +37:31:34.81 AT 2026nru 2026-05-22.43 19.4626
23:58:04.247 +20:56:44.66 AT 2026nrt 2026-05-23.48 20.1237
16:08:58.229 +36:53:23.76 AT 2026nrs 2026-05-21.36 20.3819
19:44:04.734 +84:44:44.91 SN 2026nrr 2026-05-25.47 17.808
21:42:24.388 -20:21:08.51 SN 2026nrq 2026-05-25.56 18.623
22:03:20.669 -84:55:27.45 AT 2026nrp 2026-05-22.30 19.244
23:07:53.376 -39:04:26.84 AT 2026nro 2026-05-22.38 19.567
00:40:07.848 -39:10:21.32 AT 2026nrn 2026-05-12.41 18.737
23:05:28.381 -21:25:50.28 AT 2026nrm 2026-05-25.58 18.887
19:27:28.750 -48:42:52.35 AT 2026nrl 2026-05-22.24 19.107
12:33:38.422 +12:02:05.88 AT 2026nrk 2026-05-25.29 21.322
12:32:27.199 +02:39:54.51 AT 2026nrj 2026-05-25.29 21.0728
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 30K Jun 8 01:17 tns_transients_list.txt