This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_010132_TTUQ2b1x1_3844423_UNiVOuZe
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 08.2451 2461199.7451 13.18 14:43:26.96 -05:32:22.6
346.77228 47.57018 galactic Vir Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.2" and 6.7 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.498 Tokio 3 -1 3 13.1 -0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits at 14:43:26.96 -05:32:22.6: 15.92 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_02-01-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0262.fits at 14:43:26.96 -05:32:22.6: 15.88 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 06 08.2451* 14 43 26.96 -05 32 22.6 13.2 U Vir 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461199.7451,13.18,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260608.2451 13.18CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 08.2451 2461199.7451 14.81 14:20:34.23 -02:36:43.0
342.27686 53.31093 galactic Vir Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.4" and 6.9 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.1278 Kenya 2 -1 2 14.6 0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits at 14:20:34.23 -02:36:43.0: 16.10 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_02-01-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0262.fits at 14:20:34.23 -02:36:43.0: 15.96 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 06 08.2451* 14 20 34.23 -02 36 43.0 14.8 U Vir 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461199.7451,14.81,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260608.2451 14.81CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 08.2451 2461199.7451 14.97 14:29:36.60 -02:47:16.6
345.13010 51.85408 galactic Vir Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.1" and 6.8 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.598 Octavia 1 -1 2 15.0 -0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits at 14:29:36.60 -02:47:16.6: 16.06 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_02-01-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0262.fits at 14:29:36.60 -02:47:16.6: 16.02 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 06 08.2451* 14 29 36.60 -02 47 16.6 15.0 U Vir 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461199.7451,14.97,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260608.2451 14.97CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 08.2451 2461199.7451 14.72 14:35:02.86 -00:27:53.1
349.23595 52.83074 galactic Vir Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.0" and 6.8 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.1926 Demiddelaer 3 -1 3 14.9 0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits at 14:35:02.86 -00:27:53.1: 16.12 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_02-01-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0262.fits at 14:35:02.86 -00:27:53.1: 16.00 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 06 08.2451* 14 35 02.86 +00 27 53.1 14.7 U Vir 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461199.7451,14.72,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260608.2451 14.72CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461146.84997773 16.04.2026 08:23:48.076 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits
First image: 2461146.84997773 16.04.2026 08:23:48.076 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits
Last image: 2461199.74538366 08.06.2026 05:53:11.148 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_010132_TTUQ2b1x1_3844423_UNiVOuZe/fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_00-53-11_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0158.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.68
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 7 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 5269
Objects passed selection criteria: 5268
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.7 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.7 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 5114.75
Average stars matched: 4961 (96.994 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 111708 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Sun Jun 7 22:21:29 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-90-g333d5534
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-06-07)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Mon Jun 8 01:13:26 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461146.84997773 16.04.2026 08:23:48.076 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits
First image: 2461146.84997773 16.04.2026 08:23:48.076 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits
Last image: 2461199.74538366 08.06.2026 05:53:11.148 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_010132_TTUQ2b1x1_3844423_UNiVOuZe/fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_00-53-11_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0158.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 53
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.33
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 16 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 33049
Objects passed selection criteria: 32981
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.7 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.7 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 32224.2
Average stars matched: 31095.2 (96.4964 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 136848 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Sun Jun 7 22:21:29 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-90-g333d5534
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-06-07)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Mon Jun 8 01:15:20 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/TTUQ2_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 4 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_02-01-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0262.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_010132_TTUQ2b1x1_3844423_UNiVOuZe/fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_00-52-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0157.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_010132_TTUQ2b1x1_3844423_UNiVOuZe/fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_00-53-11_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0158.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_02-01-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0262.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_02-01-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0262.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_010132_TTUQ2b1x1_3844423_UNiVOuZe/fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_00-52-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0157.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_010132_TTUQ2b1x1_3844423_UNiVOuZe/fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_00-53-11_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0158.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461199.74483628
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits'
wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_02-01-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0262.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_02-01-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0262.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_02-01-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0262.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_02-01-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0262.fits'
wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_00-52-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0157.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_00-52-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0157.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_00-52-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0157.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_00-52-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0157.fits'
wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_00-53-11_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0158.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_00-53-11_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0158.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_00-53-11_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0158.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_00-53-11_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0158.fits'
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits
Image size: 941.5'x626.9' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 14:34:24.038 -02:00:26.77 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_00-52-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0157.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_00-52-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0157.fits
Image size: 937.1'x624.1' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 14:34:16.965 -01:59:50.51 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 14:34:24.038 -02:00:26.77
Second-epoch image center 14:34:16.965 -01:59:50.51
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0311 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_00-53-11_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0158.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_00-53-11_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0158.fits
Image size: 937.1'x624.1' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 14:34:14.772 -01:59:28.00 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 14:34:24.038 -02:00:26.77
Second-epoch image center 14:34:14.772 -01:59:28.00
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0419 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 14:34:16.965 -01:59:50.51
Second-epoch second image center 14:34:14.772 -01:59:28.00
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01107 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits &> /tmp/tmp.2timfpq68P
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_02-01-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0262.fits &> /tmp/tmp.fmVxETCega
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_02-01-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0262.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_010132_TTUQ2b1x1_3844423_UNiVOuZe/fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_00-52-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0157.fits &> /tmp/tmp.VzJL341fnt
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_010132_TTUQ2b1x1_3844423_UNiVOuZe/fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_00-52-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0157.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_010132_TTUQ2b1x1_3844423_UNiVOuZe/fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_00-53-11_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0158.fits &> /tmp/tmp.WPVtfIs6fl
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_010132_TTUQ2b1x1_3844423_UNiVOuZe/fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_00-53-11_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0158.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits and wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits.cat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits and wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits.cat
Found non-empty wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits and wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits.cat
The reference image (wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits) and catalog (wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits.cat) found
'wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits.cat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 6865 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 210.3753 to 226.8090 deg, Dec -7.7656 to +3.7684 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 210.3753 to 226.8090 deg, Dec -7.7656 to 3.7684 deg
Loaded 4534 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3368 out of 3527 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3527 out of 6865 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.858600
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.858600
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.68
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.18
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.18
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 6865 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 210.3753 to 226.8090 deg, Dec -7.7656 to +3.7684 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 210.3753 to 226.8090 deg, Dec -7.7656 to 3.7684 deg
Loaded 4534 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3368 out of 3527 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3527 out of 6865 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits (aperture=6.4)
Read 6937 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 210.7082 to 226.4333 deg, Dec -7.2531 to +3.2679 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 210.7082 to 226.4333 deg, Dec -7.2531 to 3.2679 deg
Loaded 3939 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3364 out of 3482 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3482 out of 6937 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_02-01-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0262.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_02-01-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0262.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_02-01-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0262.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_02-01-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0262.fits (aperture=6.1)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 0 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 8000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.2 pix Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits
2.2 pix Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_02-01-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0262.fits
2.2 pix fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_00-52-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0157.fits
2.2 pix fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_00-53-11_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0158.fits
2.2 pix wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits
2.2 pix wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_02-01-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0262.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.2 mag. Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits
15.2 mag. Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_02-01-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0262.fits
15.0 mag. fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_00-52-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0157.fits
15.0 mag. fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_00-53-11_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0158.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 15.0 (SNR ) 12.0 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.2timfpq68P (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-08_CI_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_010132_TTUQ2b1x1_3844423_UNiVOuZe/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits' -> 'wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=506, passed=6865
Got 6865 stars (including 6349 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 6865 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013076 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010461 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 411 to 470 (Dec -7.8 to 3.8)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 935 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 935 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 923 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 935 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6717 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 411 to 470 (Dec -7.8 to 3.8)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 935 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 935 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6718 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 935 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6718 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Excluding outliers - 935 stars left (next iteration limit 1028)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits N_match=935 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.335 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.365 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.375 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.281 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.330 n_q1=272 n_q2=182 n_q3=211 n_q4=270 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.118
The image catalog is written to wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits -region wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.fmVxETCega (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-08_CI_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_010132_TTUQ2b1x1_3844423_UNiVOuZe/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_02-01-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0262.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_02-01-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0262.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_02-01-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0262.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_02-01-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0262.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_02-01-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0262.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_02-01-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0262.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_02-01-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0262.fits' -> 'wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_02-01-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0262.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_02-01-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0262.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_02-01-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0262.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_02-01-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0262.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_02-01-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0262.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_02-01-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0262.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_02-01-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0262.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_02-01-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0262.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_02-01-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0262.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_02-01-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0262.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_02-01-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0262.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=419, passed=6937
Got 6937 stars (including 6512 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_02-01-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0262.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 6937 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013017 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010413 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 931 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 931 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 919 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 931 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6805 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 931 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 931 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6805 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 931 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6805 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
Excluding outliers - 931 stars left (next iteration limit 1024)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_02-01-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0262.fits N_match=931 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.435 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.253 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.581 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.368 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.613 n_q1=256 n_q2=207 n_q3=193 n_q4=275 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.410
The image catalog is written to wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_02-01-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0262.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_02-01-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0262.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_02-01-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0262.fits -region wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_02-01-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0262.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_02-01-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0262.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.VzJL341fnt (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-08_CI_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_010132_TTUQ2b1x1_3844423_UNiVOuZe/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_010132_TTUQ2b1x1_3844423_UNiVOuZe/fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_00-52-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0157.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_010132_TTUQ2b1x1_3844423_UNiVOuZe/fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_00-52-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0157.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_010132_TTUQ2b1x1_3844423_UNiVOuZe/fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_00-52-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0157.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_010132_TTUQ2b1x1_3844423_UNiVOuZe/fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_00-52-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0157.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_010132_TTUQ2b1x1_3844423_UNiVOuZe/fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_00-52-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0157.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_010132_TTUQ2b1x1_3844423_UNiVOuZe/fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_00-52-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0157.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_00-52-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0157.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_00-52-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0157.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_00-52-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0157.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_00-52-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0157.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_00-52-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0157.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_00-52-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0157.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_00-52-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0157.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_010132_TTUQ2b1x1_3844423_UNiVOuZe/fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_00-52-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0157.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_00-52-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0157.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=343, passed=6205
Got 6205 stars (including 5856 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_00-52-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0157.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 6205 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.1'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.1 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013015 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010412 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 934 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 934 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 922 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 934 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6063 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 934 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 934 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6064 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 934 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6064 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Excluding outliers - 934 stars left (next iteration limit 1027)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_00-52-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0157.fits N_match=934 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.417 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.305 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.497 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.383 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.546 n_q1=243 n_q2=214 n_q3=196 n_q4=281 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.310
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_00-52-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0157.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_00-52-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0157.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_010132_TTUQ2b1x1_3844423_UNiVOuZe/fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_00-52-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0157.fits -region wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_00-52-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0157.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_00-52-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0157.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.WPVtfIs6fl (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-08_CI_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_010132_TTUQ2b1x1_3844423_UNiVOuZe/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_010132_TTUQ2b1x1_3844423_UNiVOuZe/fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_00-53-11_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0158.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_010132_TTUQ2b1x1_3844423_UNiVOuZe/fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_00-53-11_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0158.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_010132_TTUQ2b1x1_3844423_UNiVOuZe/fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_00-53-11_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0158.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_010132_TTUQ2b1x1_3844423_UNiVOuZe/fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_00-53-11_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0158.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_010132_TTUQ2b1x1_3844423_UNiVOuZe/fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_00-53-11_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0158.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_010132_TTUQ2b1x1_3844423_UNiVOuZe/fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_00-53-11_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0158.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_00-53-11_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0158.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_00-53-11_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0158.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_00-53-11_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0158.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_00-53-11_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0158.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_00-53-11_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0158.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_00-53-11_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0158.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_00-53-11_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0158.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_010132_TTUQ2b1x1_3844423_UNiVOuZe/fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_00-53-11_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0158.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_00-53-11_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0158.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=355, passed=6227
Got 6227 stars (including 5864 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_00-53-11_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0158.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 6227 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.1'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.1 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013015 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010412 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.2 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 933 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 933 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 922 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 933 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6087 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.2 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 933 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 933 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6088 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 933 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6088 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Excluding outliers - 933 stars left (next iteration limit 1026)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_00-53-11_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0158.fits N_match=933 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.411 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.326 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.536 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.352 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.483 n_q1=243 n_q2=214 n_q3=193 n_q4=283 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.305
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_00-53-11_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0158.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_00-53-11_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0158.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_010132_TTUQ2b1x1_3844423_UNiVOuZe/fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_00-53-11_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0158.fits -region wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_00-53-11_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0158.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_00-53-11_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0158.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits sigma_overall=0.335 worst_q_ratio=1.118
ref2=Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_02-01-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0262.fits sigma_overall=0.435 worst_q_ratio=1.410
new1=fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_00-52-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0157.fits sigma_overall=0.417 worst_q_ratio=1.310
new2=fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_00-53-11_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0158.fits sigma_overall=0.411 worst_q_ratio=1.305
reference average sigma_overall=0.385 worst_q_ratio=1.264
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: numpy/matplotlib unavailable (No module named 'matplotlib') -- falling back to the C plotter
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy: PGPLOT /PNG device reported success but no file appeared at wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267_astrometric_residuals.png -- no plot produced
WARNING: no astrometric residual plot produced for wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits -- both lib/plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py and lib/plot_astrometric_residuals_xy failed to create wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267_astrometric_residuals.png (see messages above)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: numpy/matplotlib unavailable (No module named 'matplotlib') -- falling back to the C plotter
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy: wrote wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_02-01-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0262_astrometric_residuals.png (931 matched stars from wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_02-01-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0262.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: numpy/matplotlib unavailable (No module named 'matplotlib') -- falling back to the C plotter
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy: PGPLOT /PNG device reported success but no file appeared at wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_00-52-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0157_astrometric_residuals.png -- no plot produced
WARNING: no astrometric residual plot produced for wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_00-52-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0157.fits -- both lib/plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py and lib/plot_astrometric_residuals_xy failed to create wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_00-52-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0157_astrometric_residuals.png (see messages above)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: numpy/matplotlib unavailable (No module named 'matplotlib') -- falling back to the C plotter
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy: PGPLOT /PNG device reported success but no file appeared at wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_00-53-11_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0158_astrometric_residuals.png -- no plot produced
WARNING: no astrometric residual plot produced for wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_00-53-11_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0158.fits -- both lib/plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py and lib/plot_astrometric_residuals_xy failed to create wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_00-53-11_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0158_astrometric_residuals.png (see messages above)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_00-52-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0157.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_00-52-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0157.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_010132_TTUQ2b1x1_3844423_UNiVOuZe/wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_00-52-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0157.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_00-53-11_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0158.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_00-53-11_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0158.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_010132_TTUQ2b1x1_3844423_UNiVOuZe/wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_00-53-11_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0158.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Vir-09-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
No candidates found here
Prepared the HTML report for the field Vir-09-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 4 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_02-01-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0262.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_010132_TTUQ2b1x1_3844423_UNiVOuZe/fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_00-52-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0157.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_010132_TTUQ2b1x1_3844423_UNiVOuZe/fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_00-53-11_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0158.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_02-01-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0262.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_02-01-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0262.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_010132_TTUQ2b1x1_3844423_UNiVOuZe/fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_00-52-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0157.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_010132_TTUQ2b1x1_3844423_UNiVOuZe/fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_00-53-11_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0158.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_02-01-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0262.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_00-52-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0157.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_00-53-11_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0158.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/exclusion_list.txt
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_02-01-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0262.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_00-52-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0157.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_00-53-11_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0158.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits
Image size: 941.5'x626.9' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 14:34:24.038 -02:00:26.77 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_00-52-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0157.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_00-52-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0157.fits
Image size: 937.1'x624.1' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 14:34:16.965 -01:59:50.51 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 14:34:24.038 -02:00:26.77
Second-epoch image center 14:34:16.965 -01:59:50.51
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0311 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_00-53-11_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0158.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_00-53-11_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0158.fits
Image size: 937.1'x624.1' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 14:34:14.772 -01:59:28.00 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 14:34:24.038 -02:00:26.77
Second-epoch image center 14:34:14.772 -01:59:28.00
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0419 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 14:34:16.965 -01:59:50.51
Second-epoch second image center 14:34:14.772 -01:59:28.00
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01107 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits &> /tmp/tmp.QKVlLToL5Q
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_02-01-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0262.fits &> /tmp/tmp.NkCeLeBYcn
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_02-01-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0262.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_010132_TTUQ2b1x1_3844423_UNiVOuZe/fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_00-52-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0157.fits &> /tmp/tmp.SSVJRMUEoU
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_010132_TTUQ2b1x1_3844423_UNiVOuZe/fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_00-52-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0157.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_010132_TTUQ2b1x1_3844423_UNiVOuZe/fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_00-53-11_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0158.fits &> /tmp/tmp.g8hXNDjAEI
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_010132_TTUQ2b1x1_3844423_UNiVOuZe/fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_00-53-11_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0158.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits and wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits.cat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits and wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits.cat
Found non-empty wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits and wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits.cat
The reference image (wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits) and catalog (wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits.cat) found
'wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits.cat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 43198 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 210.3729 to 226.8089 deg, Dec -7.7694 to +3.7692 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 210.3729 to 226.8089 deg, Dec -7.7694 to 3.7692 deg
Loaded 4538 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3208 out of 3567 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3567 out of 43198 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.715350
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.715350
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.33
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.39
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.39
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 43198 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 210.3729 to 226.8089 deg, Dec -7.7694 to +3.7692 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 210.3729 to 226.8089 deg, Dec -7.7694 to 3.7692 deg
Loaded 4538 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3208 out of 3567 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3567 out of 43198 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits (aperture=4.7)
Read 39131 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 210.7070 to 226.4491 deg, Dec -7.2616 to +3.2687 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 210.7070 to 226.4491 deg, Dec -7.2616 to 3.2687 deg
Loaded 3946 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3223 out of 3509 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3509 out of 39131 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_02-01-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0262.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_02-01-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0262.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_02-01-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0262.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_02-01-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0262.fits (aperture=4.8)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 31 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 8000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.1 pix Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits
2.1 pix Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_02-01-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0262.fits
2.1 pix fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_00-52-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0157.fits
2.1 pix fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_00-53-11_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0158.fits
2.1 pix wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits
2.1 pix wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_02-01-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0262.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.4 mag. Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits
15.3 mag. Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_02-01-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0262.fits
15.2 mag. fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_00-52-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0157.fits
15.2 mag. fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_00-53-11_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0158.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 15.2 (SNR ) 14.6 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.QKVlLToL5Q (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-08_CI_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_010132_TTUQ2b1x1_3844423_UNiVOuZe/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits' -> 'wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=24, blended=1997, passed=43174
Got 43174 stars (including 41107 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 43174 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013076 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010461 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 411 to 470 (Dec -7.8 to 3.8)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 930 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 930 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 920 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 930 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 42190 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 411 to 470 (Dec -7.8 to 3.8)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 930 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 930 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 42189 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 930 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 42189 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Excluding outliers - 930 stars left (next iteration limit 1023)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits N_match=930 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.334 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.365 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.365 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.285 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.309 n_q1=266 n_q2=181 n_q3=215 n_q4=268 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.094
The image catalog is written to wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits -region wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.NkCeLeBYcn (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-08_CI_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_010132_TTUQ2b1x1_3844423_UNiVOuZe/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_02-01-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0262.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_02-01-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0262.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_02-01-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0262.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_02-01-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0262.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_02-01-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0262.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_02-01-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0262.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_02-01-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0262.fits' -> 'wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_02-01-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0262.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_02-01-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0262.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_02-01-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0262.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_02-01-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0262.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_02-01-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0262.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_02-01-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0262.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_02-01-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0262.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_02-01-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0262.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_02-01-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0262.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_02-01-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0262.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_02-01-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0262.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=6, blended=2022, passed=39125
Got 39125 stars (including 37054 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_02-01-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0262.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 39125 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013017 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010413 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 922 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 922 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 911 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 922 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 38261 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 922 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 922 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 38260 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 922 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 38260 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Excluding outliers - 922 stars left (next iteration limit 1014)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_02-01-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0262.fits N_match=922 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.418 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.284 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.586 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.390 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.573 n_q1=270 n_q2=190 n_q3=207 n_q4=255 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.402
The image catalog is written to wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_02-01-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0262.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_02-01-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0262.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_02-01-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0262.fits -region wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_02-01-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0262.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_02-01-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0262.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.SSVJRMUEoU (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-08_CI_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_010132_TTUQ2b1x1_3844423_UNiVOuZe/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_010132_TTUQ2b1x1_3844423_UNiVOuZe/fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_00-52-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0157.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_010132_TTUQ2b1x1_3844423_UNiVOuZe/fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_00-52-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0157.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_010132_TTUQ2b1x1_3844423_UNiVOuZe/fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_00-52-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0157.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_010132_TTUQ2b1x1_3844423_UNiVOuZe/fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_00-52-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0157.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_010132_TTUQ2b1x1_3844423_UNiVOuZe/fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_00-52-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0157.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_010132_TTUQ2b1x1_3844423_UNiVOuZe/fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_00-52-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0157.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_00-52-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0157.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_00-52-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0157.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_00-52-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0157.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_00-52-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0157.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_00-52-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0157.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_00-52-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0157.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_00-52-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0157.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_010132_TTUQ2b1x1_3844423_UNiVOuZe/fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_00-52-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0157.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_00-52-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0157.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=5, blended=1466, passed=36198
Got 36198 stars (including 34666 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_00-52-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0157.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 36198 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.1'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.1 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013015 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010412 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 928 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 928 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 918 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 928 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 35397 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 928 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 928 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 35396 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 928 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 35396 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
Excluding outliers - 928 stars left (next iteration limit 1020)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_00-52-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0157.fits N_match=928 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.422 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.300 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.529 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.377 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.524 n_q1=258 n_q2=201 n_q3=201 n_q4=268 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.254
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_00-52-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0157.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_00-52-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0157.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_010132_TTUQ2b1x1_3844423_UNiVOuZe/fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_00-52-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0157.fits -region wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_00-52-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0157.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_00-52-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0157.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.g8hXNDjAEI (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-08_CI_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_010132_TTUQ2b1x1_3844423_UNiVOuZe/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_010132_TTUQ2b1x1_3844423_UNiVOuZe/fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_00-53-11_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0158.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_010132_TTUQ2b1x1_3844423_UNiVOuZe/fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_00-53-11_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0158.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_010132_TTUQ2b1x1_3844423_UNiVOuZe/fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_00-53-11_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0158.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_010132_TTUQ2b1x1_3844423_UNiVOuZe/fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_00-53-11_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0158.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_010132_TTUQ2b1x1_3844423_UNiVOuZe/fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_00-53-11_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0158.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_010132_TTUQ2b1x1_3844423_UNiVOuZe/fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_00-53-11_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0158.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_00-53-11_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0158.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_00-53-11_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0158.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_00-53-11_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0158.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_00-53-11_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0158.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_00-53-11_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0158.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_00-53-11_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0158.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_00-53-11_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0158.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_010132_TTUQ2b1x1_3844423_UNiVOuZe/fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_00-53-11_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0158.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_00-53-11_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0158.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=4, blended=1585, passed=36035
Got 36035 stars (including 34394 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_00-53-11_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0158.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 36035 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.1'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.1 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013015 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010412 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 927 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 927 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 918 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 927 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 35215 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 927 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 927 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 35214 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 927 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 35213 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
Excluding outliers - 927 stars left (next iteration limit 1019)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_00-53-11_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0158.fits N_match=927 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.415 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.322 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.571 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.340 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.495 n_q1=259 n_q2=201 n_q3=200 n_q4=267 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.375
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_00-53-11_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0158.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_00-53-11_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0158.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_010132_TTUQ2b1x1_3844423_UNiVOuZe/fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_00-53-11_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0158.fits -region wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_00-53-11_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0158.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_00-53-11_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0158.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_00-52-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0157.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_010132_TTUQ2b1x1_3844423_UNiVOuZe/wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_00-52-23_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0157.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_00-53-11_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0158.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_010132_TTUQ2b1x1_3844423_UNiVOuZe/wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_00-53-11_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0158.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Vir-09-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits at 14:43:26.96 -05:32:22.6: 15.92 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits at 14:59:03.67 -05:36:00.4: 14.59 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits at 15:00:58.79 -06:03:43.3: 14.79 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits at 15:00:34.81 +01:18:38.0: 14.58 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits at 14:50:48.86 +00:12:43.3: 14.33 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits at 14:51:44.23 -05:29:54.1: 14.87 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits at 14:27:59.61 +00:05:53.9: 15.28 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits at 14:36:43.59 +00:59:06.3: 13.92 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits at 14:46:10.40 -00:47:58.2: 14.91 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits at 14:59:38.95 -06:03:10.5: 15.01 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_02-01-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0262.fits at 14:59:03.67 -05:36:00.4: 14.52 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.56 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:59:03.67 -05:36:00.4: ref_mag=14.56 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=14.4335 delta=0.12 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_02-01-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0262.fits at 14:43:26.96 -05:32:22.6: 15.88 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_02-01-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0262.fits at 15:00:58.79 -06:03:43.3: 14.83 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_02-01-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0262.fits at 14:36:43.59 +00:59:06.3: 14.12 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_02-01-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0262.fits at 14:51:44.23 -05:29:54.1: 14.60 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_02-01-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0262.fits at 14:50:48.86 +00:12:43.3: 14.32 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.81 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_02-01-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0262.fits at 15:00:34.81 +01:18:38.0: 14.64 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_02-01-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0262.fits at 14:27:59.61 +00:05:53.9: 15.02 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:00:58.79 -06:03:43.3: ref_mag=14.81 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.3609 delta=0.45 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.99 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.71 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:36:43.59 +00:59:06.3: ref_mag=13.99 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=14.3610 delta=-0.37 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.32 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:51:44.23 -05:29:54.1: ref_mag=14.71 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.5162 delta=0.19 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.13 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.61 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:50:48.86 +00:12:43.3: ref_mag=14.32 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=14.5830 delta=-0.26 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:27:59.61 +00:05:53.9: ref_mag=15.13 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.4993 delta=0.63 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:00:34.81 +01:18:38.0: ref_mag=14.61 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=14.4986 delta=0.11 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_02-01-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0262.fits at 14:59:38.95 -06:03:10.5: 14.97 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_02-01-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0262.fits at 14:46:10.40 -00:47:58.2: 15.08 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.99 +/- 0.15
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.97 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:59:38.95 -06:03:10.5: ref_mag=14.99 +/- 0.15 new_mean_mag=14.5821 delta=0.41 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:46:10.40 -00:47:58.2: ref_mag=14.97 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.7077 delta=0.26 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits at 14:40:57.75 -02:25:16.8: 14.67 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits at 14:48:33.70 -01:08:53.4: 14.93 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits at 14:47:41.16 -05:59:16.8: 15.39 +/- 0.25 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits at 14:29:36.60 -02:47:16.6: 16.06 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits at 14:20:34.23 -02:36:43.0: 16.10 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits at 14:50:06.19 -05:10:54.9: 15.21 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits at 14:58:46.07 -04:26:29.8: 14.86 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits at 14:35:02.86 -00:27:53.1: 16.12 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits at 14:57:50.28 +02:12:54.6: 15.07 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_02-01-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0262.fits at 14:40:57.75 -02:25:16.8: 14.81 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.73 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_02-01-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0262.fits at 14:48:33.70 -01:08:53.4: 14.91 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_02-01-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0262.fits at 14:29:36.60 -02:47:16.6: 16.02 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:40:57.75 -02:25:16.8: ref_mag=14.73 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=14.7972 delta=-0.07 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_02-01-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0262.fits at 14:50:06.19 -05:10:54.9: 15.07 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_02-01-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0262.fits at 14:47:41.16 -05:59:16.8: 15.01 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_02-01-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0262.fits at 14:20:34.23 -02:36:43.0: 15.96 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.92 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.14 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:48:33.70 -01:08:53.4: ref_mag=14.92 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.7277 delta=0.19 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.15 +/- 0.15
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:50:06.19 -05:10:54.9: ref_mag=15.14 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.7720 delta=0.36 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:47:41.16 -05:59:16.8: ref_mag=15.15 +/- 0.15 new_mean_mag=14.7184 delta=0.43 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_02-01-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0262.fits at 14:58:46.07 -04:26:29.8: 14.90 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.88 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:58:46.07 -04:26:29.8: ref_mag=14.88 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.7958 delta=0.08 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_02-01-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0262.fits at 14:35:02.86 -00:27:53.1: 16.00 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_02-01-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0262.fits at 14:57:50.28 +02:12:54.6: 15.15 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.11 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:57:50.28 +02:12:54.6: ref_mag=15.11 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.9366 delta=0.17 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits at 14:50:01.19 -05:34:06.2: 15.21 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits at 14:56:02.91 +00:34:26.8: 15.11 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits at 14:59:43.19 -04:23:19.8: 14.78 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits at 14:54:18.86 -06:12:14.5: 15.26 +/- 0.24 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits at 14:46:50.92 -02:56:04.1: 15.12 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits at 14:58:19.81 -05:16:00.6: 15.15 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_02-01-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0262.fits at 14:50:01.19 -05:34:06.2: 15.05 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.12 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:50:01.19 -05:34:06.2: ref_mag=15.12 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=14.9493 delta=0.17 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_02-01-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0262.fits at 14:54:18.86 -06:12:14.5: 15.24 +/- 0.24 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_02-01-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0262.fits at 14:59:43.19 -04:23:19.8: 15.25 +/- 0.24 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_02-01-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0262.fits at 14:56:02.91 +00:34:26.8: 15.14 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.25 +/- 0.17
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.90 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:54:18.86 -06:12:14.5: ref_mag=15.25 +/- 0.17 new_mean_mag=14.7710 delta=0.48 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:59:43.19 -04:23:19.8: ref_mag=14.90 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.9085 delta=-0.00 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.12 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:56:02.91 +00:34:26.8: ref_mag=15.12 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=14.8035 delta=0.32 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_02-01-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0262.fits at 14:46:50.92 -02:56:04.1: 15.19 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.15 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:46:50.92 -02:56:04.1: ref_mag=15.15 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=14.9567 delta=0.19 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_02-01-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0262.fits at 14:58:19.81 -05:16:00.6: 14.92 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.02 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:58:19.81 -05:16:00.6: ref_mag=15.02 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=14.7420 delta=0.28 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits at 14:51:47.28 -03:38:44.0: 15.01 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits at 15:00:48.51 -00:55:52.4: 15.11 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits at 14:57:32.13 -02:19:46.7: 15.19 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_02-01-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0262.fits at 14:51:47.28 -03:38:44.0: 15.39 +/- 0.24 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.14 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_02-01-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0262.fits at 15:00:48.51 -00:55:52.4: 15.32 +/- 0.25 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:51:47.28 -03:38:44.0: ref_mag=15.14 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=14.8323 delta=0.30 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_02-01-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0262.fits at 14:57:32.13 -02:19:46.7: 14.98 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.19 +/- 0.16
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:00:48.51 -00:55:52.4: ref_mag=15.19 +/- 0.16 new_mean_mag=14.7759 delta=0.42 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.07 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:57:32.13 -02:19:46.7: ref_mag=15.07 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.8509 delta=0.21 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out53200.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out53342.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out53366.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out53375.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 12s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 4s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53179_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_00-53-11_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0158
The candidate 53179_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_00-53-11_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0158 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53180_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_00-53-11_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0158
The candidate 53180_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_00-53-11_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0158 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 14:57:37.70 -04:21:48.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53200_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_00-53-11_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0158
Preparing report for the candidate 53200_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_00-53-11_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0158
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53201_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_00-53-11_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0158
The candidate 53201_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_00-53-11_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0158 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 14:57:06.28 -04:19:05.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53244_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_00-53-11_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0158
The candidate 53244_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_00-53-11_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0158 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53267_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_00-53-11_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0158
The candidate 53267_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_00-53-11_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0158 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53268_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_00-53-11_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0158
The candidate 53268_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_00-53-11_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0158 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53269_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_00-53-11_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0158
The candidate 53269_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_00-53-11_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0158 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53278_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_00-53-11_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0158
The candidate 53278_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_00-53-11_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0158 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53282_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_00-53-11_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0158
The candidate 53282_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_00-53-11_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0158 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53289_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_00-53-11_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0158
The candidate 53289_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_00-53-11_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0158 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53297_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_00-53-11_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0158
The candidate 53297_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_00-53-11_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0158 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53324_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_00-53-11_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0158
The candidate 53324_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_00-53-11_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0158 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 14:31:55.81 +02:11:51.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53327_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_00-53-11_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0158
The candidate 53327_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_00-53-11_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0158 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53329_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_00-53-11_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0158
The candidate 53329_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_00-53-11_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0158 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53339_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_00-53-11_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0158
The candidate 53339_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_00-53-11_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0158 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53342_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_00-53-11_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0158
Preparing report for the candidate 53342_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_00-53-11_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0158
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53348_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_00-53-11_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0158
The candidate 53348_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_00-53-11_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0158 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53366_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_00-53-11_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0158
Preparing report for the candidate 53366_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_00-53-11_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0158
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53369_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_00-53-11_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0158
The candidate 53369_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_00-53-11_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0158 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53375_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_00-53-11_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0158
Preparing report for the candidate 53375_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_00-53-11_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0158
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53413_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_00-53-11_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0158
The candidate 53413_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_00-53-11_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0158 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53427_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_00-53-11_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0158
The candidate 53427_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_00-53-11_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0158 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53429_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_00-53-11_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0158
The candidate 53429_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_00-53-11_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0158 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53432_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_00-53-11_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0158
The candidate 53432_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_00-53-11_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0158 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53434_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_00-53-11_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0158
The candidate 53434_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_00-53-11_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0158 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53457_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_00-53-11_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0158
The candidate 53457_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_00-53-11_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0158 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53458_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_00-53-11_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0158
The candidate 53458_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_00-53-11_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0158 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53462_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_00-53-11_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0158
The candidate 53462_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_00-53-11_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0158 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53465_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_00-53-11_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0158
The candidate 53465_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_00-53-11_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0158 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53514_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_00-53-11_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0158
The candidate 53514_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_00-53-11_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0158 did not pass the final checks