This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_010128_TTUQ1b1x1_3841380_cFX2BIGm
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 08.2486 2461199.7486 13.22 14:43:26.82 -05:32:23.2
346.77146 47.57041 galactic Vir Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.5" and 7.3 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.498 Tokio 3 -1 3 13.1 -0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits at 14:43:26.82 -05:32:23.2: 15.90 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-01-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0262.fits at 14:43:26.82 -05:32:23.2: 15.86 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 06 08.2486* 14 43 26.82 -05 32 23.2 13.2 U Vir 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461199.7486,13.22,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260608.2486 13.22CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 08.2486 2461199.7486 14.88 14:35:02.74 -00:27:54.4
349.23494 52.83079 galactic Vir Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.4" and 7.2 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.1926 Demiddelaer 2 -1 3 14.9 0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits at 14:35:02.74 -00:27:54.4: 16.12 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-01-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0262.fits at 14:35:02.74 -00:27:54.4: 15.98 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 06 08.2486* 14 35 02.74 +00 27 54.4 14.9 U Vir 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461199.7486,14.88,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260608.2486 14.88CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 08.2486 2461199.7486 14.84 14:20:34.14 -02:36:42.0
342.27661 53.31137 galactic Vir Second-epoch detections are separated by 2.4" and 7.2 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.1278 Kenya 2 1 2 14.6 0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits at 14:20:34.14 -02:36:42.0: 16.09 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-01-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0262.fits at 14:20:34.14 -02:36:42.0: 15.95 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 06 08.2486* 14 20 34.14 -02 36 42.0 14.8 U Vir 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461199.7486,14.84,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260608.2486 14.84CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461146.84997773 16.04.2026 08:23:48.076 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits
First image: 2461146.84997773 16.04.2026 08:23:48.076 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits
Last image: 2461199.74886859 08.06.2026 05:58:12.246 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_010128_TTUQ1b1x1_3841380_cFX2BIGm/fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-58-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0142.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 1
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.68
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 5 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 6859
Objects passed selection criteria: 6857
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.8 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.8 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 6669.25
Average stars matched: 6454.25 (96.7762 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 112588 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Sun Jun 7 22:21:29 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-90-g333d5534
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-06-07)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Mon Jun 8 01:19:20 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461146.84997773 16.04.2026 08:23:48.076 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits
First image: 2461146.84997773 16.04.2026 08:23:48.076 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits
Last image: 2461199.74886859 08.06.2026 05:58:12.246 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_010128_TTUQ1b1x1_3841380_cFX2BIGm/fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-58-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0142.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 73
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.36
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 23 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 40841
Objects passed selection criteria: 40757
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.7 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.7 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 39523
Average stars matched: 38223 (96.7108 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 141712 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Sun Jun 7 22:21:29 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-90-g333d5534
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-06-07)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Mon Jun 8 01:21:20 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 3.5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-01-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0262.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_010128_TTUQ1b1x1_3841380_cFX2BIGm/fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-57-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0141.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_010128_TTUQ1b1x1_3841380_cFX2BIGm/fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-58-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0142.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-01-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0262.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-01-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0262.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_010128_TTUQ1b1x1_3841380_cFX2BIGm/fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-57-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0141.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_010128_TTUQ1b1x1_3841380_cFX2BIGm/fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-58-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0142.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461199.74840505
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
wcs_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits'
wcs_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-01-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0262.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-01-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0262.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-01-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0262.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-01-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0262.fits'
wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-57-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0141.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-57-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0141.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-57-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0141.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-57-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0141.fits'
wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-58-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0142.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-58-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0142.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-58-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0142.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-58-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0142.fits'
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits
Image size: 941.5'x626.9' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 14:34:24.038 -02:00:26.77 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-57-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0141.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-57-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0141.fits
Image size: 941.1'x626.7' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 14:34:26.817 -01:58:22.01 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 14:34:24.038 -02:00:26.77
Second-epoch image center 14:34:26.817 -01:58:22.01
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0365 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-58-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0142.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-58-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0142.fits
Image size: 941.1'x626.7' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 14:34:29.760 -01:58:21.97 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 14:34:24.038 -02:00:26.77
Second-epoch image center 14:34:29.760 -01:58:21.97
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0421 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 14:34:26.817 -01:58:22.01
Second-epoch second image center 14:34:29.760 -01:58:21.97
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01226 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits &> /tmp/tmp.mfsDalp2cB
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-01-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0262.fits &> /tmp/tmp.XyL8ePdefS
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-01-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0262.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_010128_TTUQ1b1x1_3841380_cFX2BIGm/fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-57-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0141.fits &> /tmp/tmp.52e8Vrc9qh
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_010128_TTUQ1b1x1_3841380_cFX2BIGm/fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-57-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0141.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_010128_TTUQ1b1x1_3841380_cFX2BIGm/fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-58-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0142.fits &> /tmp/tmp.kz2bai2tAc
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_010128_TTUQ1b1x1_3841380_cFX2BIGm/fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-58-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0142.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits and wcs_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits.cat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits and wcs_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits.cat
Found non-empty wcs_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits and wcs_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits.cat
The reference image (wcs_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits) and catalog (wcs_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits.cat) found
'wcs_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits.cat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 6865 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 210.3753 to 226.8090 deg, Dec -7.7656 to +3.7684 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 210.3753 to 226.8090 deg, Dec -7.7656 to 3.7684 deg
Loaded 4534 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3368 out of 3527 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3527 out of 6865 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.858600
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.858600
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.68
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.18
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.18
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 6865 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 210.3753 to 226.8090 deg, Dec -7.7656 to +3.7684 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 210.3753 to 226.8090 deg, Dec -7.7656 to 3.7684 deg
Loaded 4534 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3368 out of 3527 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3527 out of 6865 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits (aperture=6.4)
Read 6937 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 210.7082 to 226.4333 deg, Dec -7.2531 to +3.2679 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 210.7082 to 226.4333 deg, Dec -7.2531 to 3.2679 deg
Loaded 3939 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3364 out of 3482 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3482 out of 6937 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-01-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0262.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-01-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0262.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-01-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0262.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-01-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0262.fits (aperture=6.4)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 0 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 8000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.2 pix Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits
2.2 pix Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-01-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0262.fits
2.4 pix fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-57-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0141.fits
2.4 pix fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-58-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0142.fits
2.2 pix wcs_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits
2.2 pix wcs_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-01-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0262.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.2 mag. Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits
15.1 mag. Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-01-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0262.fits
15.1 mag. fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-57-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0141.fits
15.1 mag. fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-58-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0142.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 15.1 (SNR ) 12.1 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.mfsDalp2cB (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-08_CI_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_010128_TTUQ1b1x1_3841380_cFX2BIGm/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits' -> 'wcs_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=506, passed=6865
Got 6865 stars (including 6349 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 6865 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013076 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010461 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 411 to 470 (Dec -7.8 to 3.8)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 935 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 935 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 923 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 935 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6717 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 411 to 470 (Dec -7.8 to 3.8)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 935 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 935 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6718 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 935 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6718 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Excluding outliers - 935 stars left (next iteration limit 1028)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits N_match=935 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.335 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.365 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.375 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.281 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.330 n_q1=272 n_q2=182 n_q3=211 n_q4=270 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.118
The image catalog is written to wcs_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits -region wcs_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.XyL8ePdefS (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-01-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0262.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-08_CI_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_010128_TTUQ1b1x1_3841380_cFX2BIGm/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-01-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0262.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-01-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0262.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-01-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0262.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-01-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0262.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-01-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0262.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-01-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0262.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-01-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0262.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-01-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0262.fits' -> 'wcs_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-01-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0262.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-01-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0262.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-01-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0262.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-01-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0262.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-01-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0262.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-01-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0262.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-01-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0262.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-01-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0262.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-01-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0262.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-01-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0262.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-01-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0262.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=419, passed=6937
Got 6937 stars (including 6512 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-01-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0262.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 6937 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013017 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010413 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 932 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 932 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 920 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 932 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6806 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 932 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 932 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6806 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 932 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6806 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
Excluding outliers - 932 stars left (next iteration limit 1025)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-01-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0262.fits N_match=932 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.437 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.255 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.582 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.372 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.597 n_q1=255 n_q2=208 n_q3=192 n_q4=277 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.366
The image catalog is written to wcs_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-01-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0262.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-01-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0262.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-01-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0262.fits -region wcs_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-01-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0262.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-01-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0262.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.52e8Vrc9qh (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-08_CI_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_010128_TTUQ1b1x1_3841380_cFX2BIGm/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_010128_TTUQ1b1x1_3841380_cFX2BIGm/fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-57-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0141.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_010128_TTUQ1b1x1_3841380_cFX2BIGm/fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-57-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0141.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_010128_TTUQ1b1x1_3841380_cFX2BIGm/fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-57-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0141.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_010128_TTUQ1b1x1_3841380_cFX2BIGm/fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-57-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0141.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_010128_TTUQ1b1x1_3841380_cFX2BIGm/fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-57-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0141.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_010128_TTUQ1b1x1_3841380_cFX2BIGm/fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-57-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0141.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-57-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0141.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-57-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0141.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-57-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0141.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-57-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0141.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-57-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0141.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-57-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0141.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-57-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0141.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_010128_TTUQ1b1x1_3841380_cFX2BIGm/fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-57-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0141.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-57-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0141.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=356, passed=6537
Got 6537 stars (including 6174 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-57-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0141.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 6537 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.1'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.1 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013071 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010457 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 411 to 470 (Dec -7.6 to 3.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 930 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 930 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 918 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 930 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6370 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 411 to 470 (Dec -7.6 to 3.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 930 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 930 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6371 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 930 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6371 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26"
Excluding outliers - 930 stars left (next iteration limit 1023)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-57-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0141.fits N_match=930 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.268 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.269 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.296 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.231 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.253 n_q1=268 n_q2=191 n_q3=204 n_q4=267 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.107
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-57-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0141.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-57-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0141.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_010128_TTUQ1b1x1_3841380_cFX2BIGm/fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-57-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0141.fits -region wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-57-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0141.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-57-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0141.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.kz2bai2tAc (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-08_CI_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_010128_TTUQ1b1x1_3841380_cFX2BIGm/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_010128_TTUQ1b1x1_3841380_cFX2BIGm/fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-58-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0142.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_010128_TTUQ1b1x1_3841380_cFX2BIGm/fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-58-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0142.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_010128_TTUQ1b1x1_3841380_cFX2BIGm/fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-58-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0142.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_010128_TTUQ1b1x1_3841380_cFX2BIGm/fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-58-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0142.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_010128_TTUQ1b1x1_3841380_cFX2BIGm/fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-58-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0142.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_010128_TTUQ1b1x1_3841380_cFX2BIGm/fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-58-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0142.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-58-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0142.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-58-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0142.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-58-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0142.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-58-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0142.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-58-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0142.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-58-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0142.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-58-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0142.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_010128_TTUQ1b1x1_3841380_cFX2BIGm/fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-58-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0142.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-58-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0142.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=342, passed=6549
Got 6549 stars (including 6199 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-58-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0142.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 6549 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.1'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.1 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013071 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010457 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 411 to 470 (Dec -7.6 to 3.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 931 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 931 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 920 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 931 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6384 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 411 to 470 (Dec -7.6 to 3.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 931 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 931 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6385 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 931 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6385 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26"
Excluding outliers - 931 stars left (next iteration limit 1024)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-58-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0142.fits N_match=931 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.281 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.280 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.329 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.283 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.263 n_q1=263 n_q2=195 n_q3=208 n_q4=265 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.172
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-58-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0142.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-58-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0142.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_010128_TTUQ1b1x1_3841380_cFX2BIGm/fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-58-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0142.fits -region wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-58-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0142.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-58-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0142.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits sigma_overall=0.335 worst_q_ratio=1.118
ref2=Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-01-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0262.fits sigma_overall=0.437 worst_q_ratio=1.366
new1=fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-57-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0141.fits sigma_overall=0.268 worst_q_ratio=1.107
new2=fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-58-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0142.fits sigma_overall=0.281 worst_q_ratio=1.172
reference average sigma_overall=0.386 worst_q_ratio=1.242
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: numpy/matplotlib unavailable (No module named 'matplotlib') -- falling back to the C plotter
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy: PGPLOT /PNG device reported success but no file appeared at wcs_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267_astrometric_residuals.png -- no plot produced
WARNING: no astrometric residual plot produced for wcs_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits -- both lib/plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py and lib/plot_astrometric_residuals_xy failed to create wcs_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267_astrometric_residuals.png (see messages above)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: numpy/matplotlib unavailable (No module named 'matplotlib') -- falling back to the C plotter
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy: wrote wcs_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-01-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0262_astrometric_residuals.png (932 matched stars from wcs_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-01-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0262.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: numpy/matplotlib unavailable (No module named 'matplotlib') -- falling back to the C plotter
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy: PGPLOT /PNG device reported success but no file appeared at wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-57-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0141_astrometric_residuals.png -- no plot produced
WARNING: no astrometric residual plot produced for wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-57-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0141.fits -- both lib/plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py and lib/plot_astrometric_residuals_xy failed to create wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-57-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0141_astrometric_residuals.png (see messages above)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: numpy/matplotlib unavailable (No module named 'matplotlib') -- falling back to the C plotter
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy: PGPLOT /PNG device reported success but no file appeared at wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-58-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0142_astrometric_residuals.png -- no plot produced
WARNING: no astrometric residual plot produced for wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-58-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0142.fits -- both lib/plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py and lib/plot_astrometric_residuals_xy failed to create wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-58-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0142_astrometric_residuals.png (see messages above)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-57-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0141.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-57-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0141.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_010128_TTUQ1b1x1_3841380_cFX2BIGm/wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-57-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0141.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-58-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0142.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-58-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0142.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_010128_TTUQ1b1x1_3841380_cFX2BIGm/wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-58-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0142.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Vir-09-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
No candidates found here
Prepared the HTML report for the field Vir-09-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 3.5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-01-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0262.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_010128_TTUQ1b1x1_3841380_cFX2BIGm/fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-57-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0141.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_010128_TTUQ1b1x1_3841380_cFX2BIGm/fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-58-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0142.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-01-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0262.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-01-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0262.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_010128_TTUQ1b1x1_3841380_cFX2BIGm/fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-57-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0141.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_010128_TTUQ1b1x1_3841380_cFX2BIGm/fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-58-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0142.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-01-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0262.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-57-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0141.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-58-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0142.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/exclusion_list.txt
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-01-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0262.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-57-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0141.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-58-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0142.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits
Image size: 941.5'x626.9' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 14:34:24.038 -02:00:26.77 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-57-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0141.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-57-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0141.fits
Image size: 941.1'x626.7' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 14:34:26.817 -01:58:22.01 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 14:34:24.038 -02:00:26.77
Second-epoch image center 14:34:26.817 -01:58:22.01
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0365 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-58-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0142.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-58-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0142.fits
Image size: 941.1'x626.7' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 14:34:29.760 -01:58:21.97 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 14:34:24.038 -02:00:26.77
Second-epoch image center 14:34:29.760 -01:58:21.97
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0421 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 14:34:26.817 -01:58:22.01
Second-epoch second image center 14:34:29.760 -01:58:21.97
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01226 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits &> /tmp/tmp.bKlk9jkwtD
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-01-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0262.fits &> /tmp/tmp.d5fQgY5bhg
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-01-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0262.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_010128_TTUQ1b1x1_3841380_cFX2BIGm/fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-57-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0141.fits &> /tmp/tmp.ZPhcbJOoPr
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_010128_TTUQ1b1x1_3841380_cFX2BIGm/fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-57-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0141.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_010128_TTUQ1b1x1_3841380_cFX2BIGm/fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-58-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0142.fits &> /tmp/tmp.PPV4hwBX8e
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_010128_TTUQ1b1x1_3841380_cFX2BIGm/fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-58-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0142.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits and wcs_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits.cat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits and wcs_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits.cat
Found non-empty wcs_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits and wcs_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits.cat
The reference image (wcs_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits) and catalog (wcs_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits.cat) found
'wcs_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits.cat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 43198 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 210.3729 to 226.8089 deg, Dec -7.7694 to +3.7692 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 210.3729 to 226.8089 deg, Dec -7.7694 to 3.7692 deg
Loaded 4538 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3208 out of 3567 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3567 out of 43198 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.725950
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.725950
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.36
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.37
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.37
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 43198 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 210.3729 to 226.8089 deg, Dec -7.7694 to +3.7692 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 210.3729 to 226.8089 deg, Dec -7.7694 to 3.7692 deg
Loaded 4538 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3208 out of 3567 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3567 out of 43198 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits (aperture=4.8)
Read 39131 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 210.7070 to 226.4491 deg, Dec -7.2616 to +3.2687 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 210.7070 to 226.4491 deg, Dec -7.2616 to 3.2687 deg
Loaded 3946 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3223 out of 3509 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3509 out of 39131 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-01-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0262.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-01-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0262.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-01-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0262.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-01-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0262.fits (aperture=5.0)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 59 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 8000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.1 pix Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits
2.1 pix Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-01-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0262.fits
2.3 pix fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-57-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0141.fits
2.3 pix fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-58-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0142.fits
2.1 pix wcs_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits
2.1 pix wcs_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-01-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0262.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.4 mag. Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits
15.3 mag. Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-01-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0262.fits
15.2 mag. fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-57-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0141.fits
15.2 mag. fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-58-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0142.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 15.2 (SNR ) 14.6 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.bKlk9jkwtD (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-08_CI_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_010128_TTUQ1b1x1_3841380_cFX2BIGm/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits' -> 'wcs_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=31, blended=1997, passed=43167
Got 43167 stars (including 41100 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 43167 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013076 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010461 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 411 to 470 (Dec -7.8 to 3.8)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 930 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 930 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 920 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 930 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 42183 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 411 to 470 (Dec -7.8 to 3.8)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 930 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 930 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 42183 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 930 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 42183 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Excluding outliers - 930 stars left (next iteration limit 1023)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits N_match=930 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.334 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.364 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.364 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.286 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.310 n_q1=265 n_q2=181 n_q3=216 n_q4=268 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.090
The image catalog is written to wcs_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits -region wcs_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.d5fQgY5bhg (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-01-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0262.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-08_CI_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_010128_TTUQ1b1x1_3841380_cFX2BIGm/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-01-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0262.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-01-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0262.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-01-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0262.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-01-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0262.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-01-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0262.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-01-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0262.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-01-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0262.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-01-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0262.fits' -> 'wcs_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-01-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0262.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-01-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0262.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-01-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0262.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-01-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0262.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-01-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0262.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-01-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0262.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-01-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0262.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-01-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0262.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-01-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0262.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-01-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0262.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-01-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0262.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=7, blended=2022, passed=39124
Got 39124 stars (including 37053 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-01-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0262.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 39124 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013017 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010413 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 922 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 922 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 911 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 922 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 38264 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 922 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 922 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 38261 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 922 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 38261 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Excluding outliers - 922 stars left (next iteration limit 1014)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-01-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0262.fits N_match=922 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.422 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.276 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.566 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.392 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.568 n_q1=268 n_q2=192 n_q3=205 n_q4=257 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.347
The image catalog is written to wcs_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-01-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0262.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-01-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0262.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-01-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0262.fits -region wcs_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-01-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0262.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-01-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0262.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.ZPhcbJOoPr (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-08_CI_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_010128_TTUQ1b1x1_3841380_cFX2BIGm/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_010128_TTUQ1b1x1_3841380_cFX2BIGm/fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-57-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0141.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_010128_TTUQ1b1x1_3841380_cFX2BIGm/fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-57-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0141.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_010128_TTUQ1b1x1_3841380_cFX2BIGm/fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-57-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0141.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_010128_TTUQ1b1x1_3841380_cFX2BIGm/fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-57-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0141.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_010128_TTUQ1b1x1_3841380_cFX2BIGm/fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-57-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0141.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_010128_TTUQ1b1x1_3841380_cFX2BIGm/fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-57-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0141.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-57-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0141.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-57-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0141.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-57-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0141.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-57-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0141.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-57-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0141.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-57-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0141.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-57-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0141.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_010128_TTUQ1b1x1_3841380_cFX2BIGm/fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-57-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0141.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-57-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0141.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=6, blended=1327, passed=38381
Got 38381 stars (including 36993 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-57-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0141.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 38381 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.1'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.1 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013071 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010457 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 411 to 470 (Dec -7.6 to 3.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 930 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 930 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 917 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 930 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 37315 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 411 to 470 (Dec -7.6 to 3.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 930 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 930 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 37317 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 930 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 37317 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
Excluding outliers - 930 stars left (next iteration limit 1023)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-57-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0141.fits N_match=930 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.258 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.241 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.338 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.249 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.260 n_q1=273 n_q2=186 n_q3=205 n_q4=266 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.309
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-57-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0141.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-57-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0141.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_010128_TTUQ1b1x1_3841380_cFX2BIGm/fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-57-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0141.fits -region wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-57-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0141.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-57-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0141.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.PPV4hwBX8e (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-08_CI_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_010128_TTUQ1b1x1_3841380_cFX2BIGm/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_010128_TTUQ1b1x1_3841380_cFX2BIGm/fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-58-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0142.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_010128_TTUQ1b1x1_3841380_cFX2BIGm/fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-58-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0142.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_010128_TTUQ1b1x1_3841380_cFX2BIGm/fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-58-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0142.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_010128_TTUQ1b1x1_3841380_cFX2BIGm/fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-58-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0142.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_010128_TTUQ1b1x1_3841380_cFX2BIGm/fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-58-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0142.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_010128_TTUQ1b1x1_3841380_cFX2BIGm/fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-58-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0142.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-58-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0142.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-58-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0142.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-58-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0142.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-58-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0142.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-58-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0142.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-58-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0142.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-58-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0142.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_010128_TTUQ1b1x1_3841380_cFX2BIGm/fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-58-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0142.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-58-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0142.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=16, blended=1344, passed=38574
Got 38574 stars (including 37168 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-58-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0142.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 38574 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.1'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.1 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013071 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010457 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 411 to 470 (Dec -7.6 to 3.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 931 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 931 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 920 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 931 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 37640 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 411 to 470 (Dec -7.6 to 3.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 931 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 931 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 37638 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 931 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 37638 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
Excluding outliers - 931 stars left (next iteration limit 1024)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-58-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0142.fits N_match=931 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.285 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.277 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.347 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.284 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.261 n_q1=266 n_q2=190 n_q3=210 n_q4=265 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.216
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-58-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0142.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-58-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0142.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_010128_TTUQ1b1x1_3841380_cFX2BIGm/fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-58-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0142.fits -region wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-58-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0142.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-58-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0142.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-57-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0141.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_010128_TTUQ1b1x1_3841380_cFX2BIGm/wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-57-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0141.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-58-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0142.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_010128_TTUQ1b1x1_3841380_cFX2BIGm/wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-58-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0142.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Vir-09-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits at 14:32:44.90 +03:07:46.2: 13.82 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits at 14:55:08.37 -01:45:52.9: 14.03 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits at 14:52:52.68 -01:12:41.8: 13.85 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits at 14:45:16.20 -07:10:19.5: 13.67 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits at 14:42:34.51 -03:33:18.2: 14.57 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits at 14:43:26.82 -05:32:23.2: 15.90 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits at 14:58:51.86 -06:29:09.1: 14.32 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits at 14:41:52.58 -03:30:29.9: 13.74 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits at 14:58:22.23 -02:17:57.2: 13.20 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits at 14:45:08.29 -05:28:45.8: 14.59 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-01-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0262.fits at 14:42:34.51 -03:33:18.2: 14.64 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-01-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0262.fits at 14:55:08.37 -01:45:52.9: 13.91 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-01-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0262.fits at 14:32:44.90 +03:07:46.2: 13.89 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-01-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0262.fits at 14:52:52.68 -01:12:41.8: 13.85 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.60 +/- 0.07
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.96 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.85 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:42:34.51 -03:33:18.2: ref_mag=14.60 +/- 0.07 new_mean_mag=14.6949 delta=-0.09 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.85 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:32:44.90 +03:07:46.2: ref_mag=13.85 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.9509 delta=-0.10 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:55:08.37 -01:45:52.9: ref_mag=13.96 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.0083 delta=-0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:52:52.68 -01:12:41.8: ref_mag=13.85 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.7934 delta=0.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-01-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0262.fits at 14:58:51.86 -06:29:09.1: 14.40 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-01-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0262.fits at 14:43:26.82 -05:32:23.2: 15.86 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.36 +/- 0.08
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-01-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0262.fits at 14:45:16.20 -07:10:19.5: 13.53 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:58:51.86 -06:29:09.1: ref_mag=14.36 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=14.6455 delta=-0.29 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-01-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0262.fits at 14:45:08.29 -05:28:45.8: 14.69 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.59 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:45:16.20 -07:10:19.5: ref_mag=13.59 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.6750 delta=-0.08 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.63 +/- 0.08
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:45:08.29 -05:28:45.8: ref_mag=14.63 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=14.7165 delta=-0.08 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-01-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0262.fits at 14:41:52.58 -03:30:29.9: 13.60 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.67 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:41:52.58 -03:30:29.9: ref_mag=13.67 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.7444 delta=-0.08 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-01-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0262.fits at 14:58:22.23 -02:17:57.2: 13.11 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.16 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:58:22.23 -02:17:57.2: ref_mag=13.16 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.3301 delta=-0.17 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits at 14:36:43.57 +00:59:06.7: 13.92 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits at 14:06:38.41 -05:31:48.0: 14.07 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits at 14:43:03.62 -02:22:46.6: 14.06 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits at 14:50:14.69 -03:53:04.7: 13.75 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits at 14:53:07.88 -07:14:43.4: 14.05 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-01-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0262.fits at 14:53:07.88 -07:14:43.4: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:53:07.88 -07:14:43.4: at least one reference image reported edge (off-image or aperture/annulus past image boundary); cannot perform the forced-photometry cross-check
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits at 14:59:03.86 -00:56:51.3: 14.98 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits at 14:21:46.03 +01:44:46.0: 15.04 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-01-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0262.fits at 14:43:03.62 -02:22:46.6: 14.27 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-01-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0262.fits at 14:36:43.57 +00:59:06.7: 14.13 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.14 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits at 15:00:58.82 -06:03:40.2: 14.74 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:43:03.62 -02:22:46.6: ref_mag=14.14 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.2303 delta=-0.09 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.99 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-01-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0262.fits at 14:06:38.41 -05:31:48.0: 14.39 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:36:43.57 +00:59:06.7: ref_mag=13.99 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=14.2680 delta=-0.28 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.17 +/- 0.07
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:06:38.41 -05:31:48.0: ref_mag=14.17 +/- 0.07 new_mean_mag=14.0504 delta=0.12 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-01-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0262.fits at 14:59:03.86 -00:56:51.3: 14.88 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-01-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0262.fits at 14:50:14.69 -03:53:04.7: 13.83 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.93 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.79 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:59:03.86 -00:56:51.3: ref_mag=14.93 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.4739 delta=0.46 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:50:14.69 -03:53:04.7: ref_mag=13.79 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=14.0003 delta=-0.21 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-01-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0262.fits at 14:21:46.03 +01:44:46.0: 15.04 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.04 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:21:46.03 +01:44:46.0: ref_mag=15.04 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.6769 delta=0.36 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-01-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0262.fits at 15:00:58.82 -06:03:40.2: 14.84 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits at 14:31:55.85 +02:11:53.9: 14.68 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.78 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:00:58.82 -06:03:40.2: ref_mag=14.78 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.4482 delta=0.34 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits at 14:27:59.59 +00:05:54.0: 15.28 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits at 14:33:30.28 -07:00:19.9: 15.01 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits at 14:59:40.03 -03:48:43.9: 15.26 +/- 0.23 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits at 15:03:22.94 -06:39:46.2: 15.06 +/- 0.24 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits at 15:02:09.17 +00:34:15.8: 14.41 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-01-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0262.fits at 14:31:55.85 +02:11:53.9: 14.45 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.55 +/- 0.07
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:31:55.85 +02:11:53.9: ref_mag=14.55 +/- 0.07 new_mean_mag=14.5885 delta=-0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits at 15:03:57.25 +00:05:03.0: 15.42 +/- 0.28 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-01-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0262.fits at 14:27:59.59 +00:05:54.0: 15.01 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.12 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:27:59.59 +00:05:54.0: ref_mag=15.12 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.4314 delta=0.69 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits at 14:29:21.19 +01:27:15.1: 15.41 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-01-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0262.fits at 14:33:30.28 -07:00:19.9: 15.01 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.01 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits at 14:08:37.76 +00:25:45.0: 14.73 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:33:30.28 -07:00:19.9: ref_mag=15.01 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.7308 delta=0.28 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-01-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0262.fits at 15:03:22.94 -06:39:46.2: 14.75 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-01-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0262.fits at 14:59:40.03 -03:48:43.9: 14.98 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-01-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0262.fits at 15:02:09.17 +00:34:15.8: 14.68 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.87 +/- 0.15
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.09 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:03:22.94 -06:39:46.2: ref_mag=14.87 +/- 0.15 new_mean_mag=14.6810 delta=0.19 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.51 +/- 0.08
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:59:40.03 -03:48:43.9: ref_mag=15.09 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=14.6760 delta=0.41 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:02:09.17 +00:34:15.8: ref_mag=14.51 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=14.7144 delta=-0.21 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-01-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0262.fits at 15:03:57.25 +00:05:03.0: 14.86 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.02 +/- 0.15
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:03:57.25 +00:05:03.0: ref_mag=15.02 +/- 0.15 new_mean_mag=14.7429 delta=0.28 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-01-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0262.fits at 14:29:21.19 +01:27:15.1: 15.20 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.29 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:29:21.19 +01:27:15.1: ref_mag=15.29 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.7835 delta=0.51 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-01-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0262.fits at 14:08:37.76 +00:25:45.0: 14.81 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits at 15:03:21.91 -02:22:04.1: 15.38 +/- 0.26 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.77 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:08:37.76 +00:25:45.0: ref_mag=14.77 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=14.5848 delta=0.18 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits at 14:54:21.39 -07:15:09.3: 15.08 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-01-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0262.fits at 14:54:21.39 -07:15:09.3: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:54:21.39 -07:15:09.3: at least one reference image reported edge (off-image or aperture/annulus past image boundary); cannot perform the forced-photometry cross-check
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits at 15:05:02.16 +01:15:29.1: 14.80 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits at 15:05:44.47 -00:14:45.1: 14.67 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits at 14:45:04.99 -06:13:14.2: 15.27 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-01-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0262.fits at 15:03:21.91 -02:22:04.1: 15.03 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits at 15:00:43.49 -06:47:31.3: 14.94 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.16 +/- 0.16
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:03:21.91 -02:22:04.1: ref_mag=15.16 +/- 0.16 new_mean_mag=14.8174 delta=0.35 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-01-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0262.fits at 15:05:44.47 -00:14:45.1: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:05:44.47 -00:14:45.1: at least one reference image reported edge (off-image or aperture/annulus past image boundary); cannot perform the forced-photometry cross-check
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits at 14:55:20.76 -03:25:33.4: 15.79 +/- 0.35 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits at 14:08:29.17 +03:09:51.9: 15.11 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-01-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0262.fits at 15:05:02.16 +01:15:29.1: 14.45 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.58 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:05:02.16 +01:15:29.1: ref_mag=14.58 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.7901 delta=-0.21 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits at 14:35:02.74 -00:27:54.4: 16.12 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-01-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0262.fits at 14:45:04.99 -06:13:14.2: 15.04 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.14 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:45:04.99 -06:13:14.2: ref_mag=15.14 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=14.8619 delta=0.28 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-01-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0262.fits at 15:00:43.49 -06:47:31.3: 15.46 +/- 0.32 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.09 +/- 0.17
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:00:43.49 -06:47:31.3: ref_mag=15.09 +/- 0.17 new_mean_mag=14.8001 delta=0.29 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-01-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0262.fits at 14:55:20.76 -03:25:33.4: 15.51 +/- 0.29 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.63 +/- 0.22
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:55:20.76 -03:25:33.4: ref_mag=15.63 +/- 0.22 new_mean_mag=14.8642 delta=0.76 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits at 14:57:35.30 +01:56:14.6: 15.49 +/- 0.28 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-01-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0262.fits at 14:08:29.17 +03:09:51.9: 15.34 +/- 0.24 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.20 +/- 0.15
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:08:29.17 +03:09:51.9: ref_mag=15.20 +/- 0.15 new_mean_mag=14.7978 delta=0.40 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits at 14:47:13.87 -06:27:43.1: 15.12 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits at 14:20:34.14 -02:36:42.0: 16.09 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-01-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0262.fits at 14:35:02.74 -00:27:54.4: 15.98 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-01-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0262.fits at 14:57:35.30 +01:56:14.6: 15.11 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.23 +/- 0.16
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:57:35.30 +01:56:14.6: ref_mag=15.23 +/- 0.16 new_mean_mag=14.9256 delta=0.31 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits at 14:03:43.15 -02:26:02.2: 15.04 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits at 14:56:03.05 +00:34:27.0: 15.15 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-01-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0262.fits at 14:20:34.14 -02:36:42.0: 15.95 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-01-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0262.fits at 14:47:13.87 -06:27:43.1: 15.15 +/- 0.22 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.14 +/- 0.15
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits at 14:35:26.72 +01:09:20.8: 15.69 +/- 0.27 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:47:13.87 -06:27:43.1: ref_mag=15.14 +/- 0.15 new_mean_mag=14.8067 delta=0.33 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits at 14:57:50.35 +02:12:53.3: 15.08 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits at 14:51:35.58 -01:08:03.3: 14.82 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-01-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0262.fits at 14:03:43.15 -02:26:02.2: 15.03 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.04 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:03:43.15 -02:26:02.2: ref_mag=15.04 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.8244 delta=0.21 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-01-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0262.fits at 14:57:50.35 +02:12:53.3: 15.19 +/- 0.22 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-01-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0262.fits at 14:56:03.05 +00:34:27.0: 15.10 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-01-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0262.fits at 14:35:26.72 +01:09:20.8: 15.10 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.12 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:56:03.05 +00:34:27.0: ref_mag=15.12 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=14.8711 delta=0.25 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.13 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.29 +/- 0.15
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:57:50.35 +02:12:53.3: ref_mag=15.13 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=14.9273 delta=0.20 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:35:26.72 +01:09:20.8: ref_mag=15.29 +/- 0.15 new_mean_mag=14.9119 delta=0.38 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits at 14:07:00.35 +02:07:46.8: 15.41 +/- 0.24 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-01-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0262.fits at 14:51:35.58 -01:08:03.3: 14.63 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.71 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:51:35.58 -01:08:03.3: ref_mag=14.71 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=14.8075 delta=-0.09 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits at 15:05:37.46 +02:28:19.1: 14.68 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-01-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0262.fits at 15:05:37.46 +02:28:19.1: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:05:37.46 +02:28:19.1: at least one reference image reported edge (off-image or aperture/annulus past image boundary); cannot perform the forced-photometry cross-check
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-01-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0262.fits at 14:07:00.35 +02:07:46.8: 15.19 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.28 +/- 0.16
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:07:00.35 +02:07:46.8: ref_mag=15.28 +/- 0.16 new_mean_mag=14.9089 delta=0.38 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits at 14:51:55.83 +00:21:57.5: 14.94 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits at 14:56:06.10 -00:14:45.2: 15.22 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits at 14:07:44.43 -00:37:59.9: 15.33 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits at 14:08:08.14 -00:28:22.4: 14.89 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits at 14:49:06.03 -01:05:42.1: 15.45 +/- 0.23 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-01-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0262.fits at 14:51:55.83 +00:21:57.5: 14.91 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.93 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:51:55.83 +00:21:57.5: ref_mag=14.93 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.9160 delta=0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-01-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0262.fits at 14:56:06.10 -00:14:45.2: 15.31 +/- 0.23 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.26 +/- 0.15
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:56:06.10 -00:14:45.2: ref_mag=15.26 +/- 0.15 new_mean_mag=14.8550 delta=0.40 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits at 14:20:05.47 -04:13:57.5: 15.71 +/- 0.30 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-01-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0262.fits at 14:08:08.14 -00:28:22.4: 15.02 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-01-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0262.fits at 14:07:44.43 -00:37:59.9: 15.02 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.95 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:08:08.14 -00:28:22.4: ref_mag=14.95 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.8474 delta=0.10 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.14 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:07:44.43 -00:37:59.9: ref_mag=15.14 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.9574 delta=0.18 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-01-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0262.fits at 14:49:06.03 -01:05:42.1: 15.44 +/- 0.24 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits at 14:41:00.47 -01:20:43.5: 15.00 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.44 +/- 0.17
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:49:06.03 -01:05:42.1: ref_mag=15.44 +/- 0.17 new_mean_mag=14.9450 delta=0.50 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-01-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0262.fits at 14:20:05.47 -04:13:57.5: 15.15 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.31 +/- 0.16
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:20:05.47 -04:13:57.5: ref_mag=15.31 +/- 0.16 new_mean_mag=14.9610 delta=0.35 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-01-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0262.fits at 14:41:00.47 -01:20:43.5: 14.92 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.96 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:41:00.47 -01:20:43.5: ref_mag=14.96 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.9827 delta=-0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits at 14:58:44.98 -04:56:10.4: 15.14 +/- 0.23 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-01-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0262.fits at 14:58:44.98 -04:56:10.4: 14.97 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.04 +/- 0.15
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:58:44.98 -04:56:10.4: ref_mag=15.04 +/- 0.15 new_mean_mag=14.8626 delta=0.18 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out53513.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out53727.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out53735.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 10s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 3s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53480_fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-58-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0142
The candidate 53480_fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-58-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0142 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53482_fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-58-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0142
The candidate 53482_fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-58-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0142 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53484_fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-58-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0142
The candidate 53484_fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-58-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0142 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53513_fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-58-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0142
Preparing report for the candidate 53513_fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-58-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0142
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53517_fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-58-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0142
The candidate 53517_fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-58-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0142 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53527_fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-58-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0142
The candidate 53527_fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-58-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0142 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53528_fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-58-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0142
The candidate 53528_fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-58-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0142 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53529_fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-58-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0142
The candidate 53529_fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-58-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0142 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53536_fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-58-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0142
The candidate 53536_fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-58-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0142 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53538_fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-58-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0142
The candidate 53538_fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-58-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0142 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53546_fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-58-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0142
The candidate 53546_fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-58-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0142 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53550_fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-58-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0142
The candidate 53550_fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-58-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0142 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 14:08:58.48 -06:09:33.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53555_fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-58-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0142
The candidate 53555_fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-58-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0142 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53561_fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-58-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0142
The candidate 53561_fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-58-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0142 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53563_fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-58-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0142
The candidate 53563_fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-58-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0142 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53575_fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-58-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0142
The candidate 53575_fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-58-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0142 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53594_fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-58-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0142
The candidate 53594_fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-58-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0142 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53595_fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-58-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0142
The candidate 53595_fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-58-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0142 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 14:47:58.71 -03:02:07.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53607_fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-58-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0142
The candidate 53607_fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-58-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0142 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53610_fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-58-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0142
The candidate 53610_fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-58-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0142 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 14:10:20.60 -06:28:08.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53612_fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-58-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0142
The candidate 53612_fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-58-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0142 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53618_fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-58-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0142
The candidate 53618_fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-58-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0142 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 14:15:05.85 +02:49:36.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53619_fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-58-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0142
The candidate 53619_fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-58-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0142 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53621_fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-58-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0142
The candidate 53621_fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-58-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0142 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53654_fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-58-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0142
The candidate 53654_fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-58-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0142 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53656_fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-58-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0142
The candidate 53656_fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-58-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0142 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53658_fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-58-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0142
The candidate 53658_fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-58-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0142 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 14:47:38.21 -07:00:08.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53662_fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-58-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0142
The candidate 53662_fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-58-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0142 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53680_fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-58-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0142
The candidate 53680_fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-58-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0142 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53681_fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-58-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0142
The candidate 53681_fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-58-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0142 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53684_fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-58-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0142
The candidate 53684_fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-58-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0142 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53688_fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-58-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0142
The candidate 53688_fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-58-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0142 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53694_fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-58-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0142
The candidate 53694_fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-58-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0142 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53696_fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-58-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0142
The candidate 53696_fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-58-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0142 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53700_fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-58-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0142
The candidate 53700_fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-58-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0142 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53707_fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-58-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0142
The candidate 53707_fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-58-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0142 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53709_fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-58-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0142
The candidate 53709_fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-58-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0142 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53714_fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-58-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0142
The candidate 53714_fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-58-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0142 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53722_fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-58-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0142
The candidate 53722_fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-58-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0142 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53725_fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-58-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0142
The candidate 53725_fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-58-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0142 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53727_fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-58-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0142
Preparing report for the candidate 53727_fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-58-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0142
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53728_fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-58-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0142
The candidate 53728_fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-58-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0142 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53733_fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-58-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0142
The candidate 53733_fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-58-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0142 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53735_fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-58-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0142
Preparing report for the candidate 53735_fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-58-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0142
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53742_fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-58-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0142
The candidate 53742_fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-58-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0142 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53743_fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-58-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0142
The candidate 53743_fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-58-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0142 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53748_fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-58-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0142
The candidate 53748_fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-58-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0142 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53767_fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-58-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0142
The candidate 53767_fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-58-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0142 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53768_fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-58-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0142
The candidate 53768_fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-58-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0142 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53771_fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-58-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0142
The candidate 53771_fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-58-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0142 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53772_fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-58-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0142
The candidate 53772_fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-58-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0142 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53775_fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-58-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0142
The candidate 53775_fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-58-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0142 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53778_fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-58-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0142
The candidate 53778_fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-58-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0142 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53791_fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-58-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0142
The candidate 53791_fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-58-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0142 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53796_fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-58-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0142
The candidate 53796_fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-58-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0142 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53812_fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-58-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0142
The candidate 53812_fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-58-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0142 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53818_fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-58-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0142
The candidate 53818_fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-58-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0142 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53827_fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-58-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0142
The candidate 53827_fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-58-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0142 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53833_fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-58-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0142
The candidate 53833_fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-58-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0142 did not pass the final checks