This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_004122_TTUQ1b1x1_2076953_Q6eZyFJg
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 08.2360 2461199.7360 11.74 14:20:16.11 -12:48:21.1
334.11721 44.62036 galactic Vir Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.5" and 1.5 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.116 Sirona 2 -1 2 11.9 -0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-45-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0200.fits at 14:20:16.11 -12:48:21.1: 15.59 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-46-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201.fits at 14:20:16.11 -12:48:21.1: 15.60 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 06 08.2360* 14 20 16.11 -12 48 21.1 11.7 U Vir 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461199.7360,11.74,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260608.2360 11.74CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 08.2360 2461199.7360 12.53 14:05:44.65 -10:21:37.3
331.09982 48.40542 galactic Vir Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.5" and 1.5 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.79 Eurynome 1 -0 1 12.5 -0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-45-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0200.fits at 14:05:44.65 -10:21:37.3: 15.65 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-46-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201.fits at 14:05:44.65 -10:21:37.3: 15.66 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 06 08.2360* 14 05 44.65 -10 21 37.3 12.5 U Vir 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461199.7360,12.53,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260608.2360 12.53CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 08.2360 2461199.7360 12.84 14:29:31.26 -11:42:12.0
337.63857 44.45861 galactic Lib Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.5" and 1.4 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.144 Vibilia 2 -0 2 12.9 -0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-45-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0200.fits at 14:29:31.26 -11:42:12.0: 15.85 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-46-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201.fits at 14:29:31.26 -11:42:12.0: 15.81 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461199.7360,12.84,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260608.2360 12.84CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 08.2360 2461199.7360 12.89 14:56:09.76 -13:23:00.9
343.63521 39.43414 galactic Lib Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.8" and 1.4 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.694 Ekard 3 -1 3 13.2 0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-45-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0200.fits at 14:56:09.76 -13:23:00.9: 15.40 +/- 0.31 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-46-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201.fits at 14:56:09.76 -13:23:00.9: 15.53 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.40 +/- 0.31
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461199.7360,12.89,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260608.2360 12.89CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 08.2360 2461199.7360 13.15 14:43:27.30 -05:32:21.3
346.77426 47.56959 galactic Vir Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.5" and 1.5 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.498 Tokio 3 -1 3 13.1 -0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-45-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0200.fits at 14:43:27.30 -05:32:21.3: 15.91 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-46-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201.fits at 14:43:27.30 -05:32:21.3: 15.80 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 06 08.2360* 14 43 27.30 -05 32 21.3 13.2 U Vir 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461199.7360,13.15,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260608.2360 13.15CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 08.2360 2461199.7360 13.90 14:46:24.83 -14:06:16.9
340.57781 40.21634 galactic Lib Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.0" and 1.2 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.394 Arduina 3 -1 3 14.0 0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-45-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0200.fits at 14:46:24.83 -14:06:16.9: 15.67 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-46-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201.fits at 14:46:24.83 -14:06:16.9: 15.68 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461199.7360,13.90,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260608.2360 13.90CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 08.2360 2461199.7360 14.16 14:32:00.26 -08:26:59.8
340.87030 46.87973 galactic Vir Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.2" and 1.7 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.758 Mancunia 1 0 1 14.1 -0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-45-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0200.fits at 14:32:00.26 -08:26:59.8: 15.87 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-46-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201.fits at 14:32:00.26 -08:26:59.8: 15.90 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 06 08.2360* 14 32 00.26 -08 26 59.8 14.2 U Vir 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461199.7360,14.16,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260608.2360 14.16CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 08.2360 2461199.7360 14.55 14:30:16.74 -13:50:14.3
336.35387 42.52995 galactic Lib Second-epoch detections are separated by 7.6" and 0.5 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
online_id | target | 14:30:16.74 -13:50:14.3 (user input) | T | P | (position from user input)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-45-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0200.fits at 14:30:16.74 -13:50:14.3: 15.76 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-46-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201.fits at 14:30:16.74 -13:50:14.3: 15.76 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
target,2461199.7360,14.55,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
target 20260608.2360 14.55CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 08.2360 2461199.7360 14.53 14:32:59.22 -12:07:14.2
338.34118 43.65984 galactic Lib Second-epoch detections are separated by 2.6" and 1.7 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.1137 Raissa 2 -1 2 14.6 0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-45-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0200.fits at 14:32:59.22 -12:07:14.2: 15.86 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-46-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201.fits at 14:32:59.22 -12:07:14.2: 15.83 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461199.7360,14.53,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260608.2360 14.53CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 08.2360 2461199.7360 14.55 14:44:41.92 -10:59:38.2
342.48444 43.01303 galactic Lib Second-epoch detections are separated by 2.7" and 1.8 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.562 Salome 2 0 2 14.8 0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-45-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0200.fits at 14:44:41.92 -10:59:38.2: 15.80 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-46-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201.fits at 14:44:41.92 -10:59:38.2: 15.85 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461199.7360,14.55,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260608.2360 14.55CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461177.74013294 17.05.2026 05:45:37.486 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-45-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0200.fits
First image: 2461177.74013294 17.05.2026 05:45:37.486 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-45-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0200.fits
Last image: 2461199.73619602 08.06.2026 05:39:57.336 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_004122_TTUQ1b1x1_2076953_Q6eZyFJg/fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-39-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0122.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 10
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.75
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 6 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 7163
Objects passed selection criteria: 7159
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.7 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.7 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 6828
Average stars matched: 6516 (95.4306 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 112732 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Sun Jun 7 22:21:29 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-90-g333d5534
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-06-07)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Mon Jun 8 00:46:43 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461177.74013294 17.05.2026 05:45:37.486 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-45-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0200.fits
First image: 2461177.74013294 17.05.2026 05:45:37.486 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-45-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0200.fits
Last image: 2461199.73619602 08.06.2026 05:39:57.336 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_004122_TTUQ1b1x1_2076953_Q6eZyFJg/fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-39-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0122.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 99
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.42
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 24 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 42347
Objects passed selection criteria: 42259
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.6 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.6 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 39944.2
Average stars matched: 38823.8 (97.1948 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 143712 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Sun Jun 7 22:21:29 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-90-g333d5534
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-06-07)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Mon Jun 8 00:49:03 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 3.5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-45-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0200.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-46-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_004122_TTUQ1b1x1_2076953_Q6eZyFJg/fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-39-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_004122_TTUQ1b1x1_2076953_Q6eZyFJg/fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-39-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0122.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-45-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0200.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-46-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-45-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0200.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-46-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_004122_TTUQ1b1x1_2076953_Q6eZyFJg/fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-39-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_004122_TTUQ1b1x1_2076953_Q6eZyFJg/fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-39-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0122.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461199.73578868
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
'asassn_transients_list.txt' -> '../asassn_transients_list.txt'
wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-45-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0200.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-45-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0200.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-45-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0200.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-45-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0200.fits'
wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-46-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-46-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-46-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-46-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201.fits'
wcs_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-39-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-39-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-39-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-39-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121.fits'
wcs_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-39-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0122.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-39-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0122.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-39-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0122.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-39-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0122.fits'
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-45-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0200.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-45-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0200.fits
Image size: 941.2'x626.8' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 14:34:13.532 -10:00:24.81 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-39-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-39-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121.fits
Image size: 940.9'x626.6' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 14:34:26.866 -09:57:37.09 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 14:34:13.532 -10:00:24.81
Second-epoch image center 14:34:26.866 -09:57:37.09
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0719 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-39-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0122.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-39-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0122.fits
Image size: 940.9'x626.6' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 14:34:27.368 -09:57:32.87 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 14:34:13.532 -10:00:24.81
Second-epoch image center 14:34:27.368 -09:57:32.87
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0742 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 14:34:26.866 -09:57:37.09
Second-epoch second image center 14:34:27.368 -09:57:32.87
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00237 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-45-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0200.fits &> /tmp/tmp.RzjjWKoWNE
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-45-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0200.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-46-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201.fits &> /tmp/tmp.faD1jHivnA
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-46-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_004122_TTUQ1b1x1_2076953_Q6eZyFJg/fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-39-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121.fits &> /tmp/tmp.Lx12WvnaaG
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_004122_TTUQ1b1x1_2076953_Q6eZyFJg/fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-39-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_004122_TTUQ1b1x1_2076953_Q6eZyFJg/fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-39-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0122.fits &> /tmp/tmp.6hZInSpas2
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_004122_TTUQ1b1x1_2076953_Q6eZyFJg/fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-39-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0122.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-45-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0200.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-45-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0200.fits and wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-45-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0200.fits.cat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-45-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0200.fits and wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-45-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0200.fits.cat
Found non-empty wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-45-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0200.fits and wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-45-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0200.fits.cat
The reference image (wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-45-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0200.fits) and catalog (wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-45-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0200.fits.cat) found
'wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-45-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0200.fits.cat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 6505 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 210.1784 to 226.7337 deg, Dec -15.6102 to -4.3286 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 210.1784 to 226.7337 deg, Dec -15.6102 to -4.3286 deg
Loaded 4925 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3653 out of 3795 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3795 out of 6505 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.748900
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.748900
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.75
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.00
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.00
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 6505 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 210.1784 to 226.7337 deg, Dec -15.6102 to -4.3286 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 210.1784 to 226.7337 deg, Dec -15.6102 to -4.3286 deg
Loaded 4925 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3653 out of 3795 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3795 out of 6505 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-45-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0200.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-45-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0200.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-45-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0200.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-45-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0200.fits (aperture=6.1)
Read 6495 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 210.1250 to 226.7332 deg, Dec -15.6102 to -4.3286 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 210.1250 to 226.7332 deg, Dec -15.6102 to -4.3286 deg
Loaded 4942 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3664 out of 3804 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3804 out of 6495 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-46-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-46-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-46-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-46-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201.fits (aperture=6.1)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 10 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 8000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.1 pix Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-45-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0200.fits
2.1 pix Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-46-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201.fits
3.5 pix fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-39-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121.fits
3.5 pix fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-39-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0122.fits
2.1 pix wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-45-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0200.fits
2.1 pix wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-46-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.0 mag. Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-45-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0200.fits
15.0 mag. Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-46-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201.fits
14.8 mag. fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-39-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121.fits
14.8 mag. fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-39-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0122.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.8 (SNR ) 12.0 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.RzjjWKoWNE (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-08_CI_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_004122_TTUQ1b1x1_2076953_Q6eZyFJg/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-45-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0200.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-45-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0200.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-45-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0200.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-45-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0200.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-45-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0200.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-45-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0200.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-45-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0200.fits' -> 'wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-45-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0200.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-45-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0200.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-45-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0200.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-45-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0200.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-45-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0200.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-45-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0200.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-45-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0200.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-45-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0200.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-45-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0200.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-45-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0200.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-45-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0200.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=484, passed=6505
Got 6505 stars (including 6011 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-45-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0200.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 6505 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013072 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010458 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 371 to 430 (Dec -15.6 to -4.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 972 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 971 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 957 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 971 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6423 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 371 to 430 (Dec -15.6 to -4.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 972 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 971 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6421 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 971 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6421 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Excluding outliers - 971 stars left (next iteration limit 1068)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-45-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0200.fits N_match=971 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.361 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.359 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.377 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.349 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.347 n_q1=221 n_q2=224 n_q3=275 n_q4=251 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.045
The image catalog is written to wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-45-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0200.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-45-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0200.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-45-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0200.fits -region wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-45-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0200.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-45-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0200.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.faD1jHivnA (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-08_CI_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_004122_TTUQ1b1x1_2076953_Q6eZyFJg/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-46-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-46-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-46-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-46-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-46-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-46-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-46-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201.fits' -> 'wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-46-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-46-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-46-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-46-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-46-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-46-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-46-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-46-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-46-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-46-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-46-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=473, passed=6495
Got 6495 stars (including 6011 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-46-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 6495 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013072 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010458 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 371 to 430 (Dec -15.6 to -4.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 972 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 971 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 958 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 971 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6403 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 371 to 430 (Dec -15.6 to -4.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 972 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 971 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6405 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 971 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6405 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Excluding outliers - 971 stars left (next iteration limit 1068)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-46-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201.fits N_match=971 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.338 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.377 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.365 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.283 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.338 n_q1=221 n_q2=222 n_q3=275 n_q4=253 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.114
The image catalog is written to wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-46-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-46-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-46-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201.fits -region wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-46-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-46-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.Lx12WvnaaG (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-08_CI_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_004122_TTUQ1b1x1_2076953_Q6eZyFJg/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_004122_TTUQ1b1x1_2076953_Q6eZyFJg/fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-39-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_004122_TTUQ1b1x1_2076953_Q6eZyFJg/fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-39-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_004122_TTUQ1b1x1_2076953_Q6eZyFJg/fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-39-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_004122_TTUQ1b1x1_2076953_Q6eZyFJg/fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-39-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_004122_TTUQ1b1x1_2076953_Q6eZyFJg/fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-39-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_004122_TTUQ1b1x1_2076953_Q6eZyFJg/fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-39-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-39-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-39-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-39-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-39-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-39-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-39-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-39-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_004122_TTUQ1b1x1_2076953_Q6eZyFJg/fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-39-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-39-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=325, passed=7238
Got 7238 stars (including 6906 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-39-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 7238 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 940.9'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 940.9 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013068 (47.0 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010454 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 372 to 431 (Dec -15.5 to -4.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 970 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 970 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 960 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 970 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7145 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 372 to 431 (Dec -15.5 to -4.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 970 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 970 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7143 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 970 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7143 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Excluding outliers - 970 stars left (next iteration limit 1067)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-39-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121.fits N_match=970 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.346 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.390 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.365 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.308 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.362 n_q1=219 n_q2=229 n_q3=273 n_q4=249 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.126
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-39-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-39-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_004122_TTUQ1b1x1_2076953_Q6eZyFJg/fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-39-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121.fits -region wcs_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-39-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-39-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.6hZInSpas2 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-08_CI_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_004122_TTUQ1b1x1_2076953_Q6eZyFJg/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_004122_TTUQ1b1x1_2076953_Q6eZyFJg/fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-39-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0122.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_004122_TTUQ1b1x1_2076953_Q6eZyFJg/fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-39-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0122.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_004122_TTUQ1b1x1_2076953_Q6eZyFJg/fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-39-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0122.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_004122_TTUQ1b1x1_2076953_Q6eZyFJg/fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-39-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0122.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_004122_TTUQ1b1x1_2076953_Q6eZyFJg/fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-39-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0122.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_004122_TTUQ1b1x1_2076953_Q6eZyFJg/fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-39-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0122.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-39-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0122.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-39-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0122.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-39-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0122.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-39-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0122.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-39-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0122.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-39-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0122.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-39-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0122.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_004122_TTUQ1b1x1_2076953_Q6eZyFJg/fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-39-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0122.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-39-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0122.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=329, passed=7268
Got 7268 stars (including 6931 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-39-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0122.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 7268 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 940.9'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 940.9 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013068 (47.0 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010454 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 372 to 431 (Dec -15.5 to -4.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 971 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 970 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 958 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 970 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7166 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 372 to 431 (Dec -15.5 to -4.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 971 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 970 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7168 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 970 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7168 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Excluding outliers - 970 stars left (next iteration limit 1067)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-39-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0122.fits N_match=970 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.345 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.384 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.359 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.318 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.361 n_q1=219 n_q2=226 n_q3=275 n_q4=250 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.114
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-39-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0122.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-39-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0122.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_004122_TTUQ1b1x1_2076953_Q6eZyFJg/fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-39-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0122.fits -region wcs_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-39-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0122.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-39-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0122.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-45-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0200.fits sigma_overall=0.361 worst_q_ratio=1.045
ref2=Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-46-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201.fits sigma_overall=0.338 worst_q_ratio=1.114
new1=fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-39-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121.fits sigma_overall=0.346 worst_q_ratio=1.126
new2=fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-39-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0122.fits sigma_overall=0.345 worst_q_ratio=1.114
reference average sigma_overall=0.3495 worst_q_ratio=1.0795
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: numpy/matplotlib unavailable (No module named 'matplotlib') -- falling back to the C plotter
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy: PGPLOT /PNG device reported success but no file appeared at wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-45-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0200_astrometric_residuals.png -- no plot produced
WARNING: no astrometric residual plot produced for wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-45-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0200.fits -- both lib/plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py and lib/plot_astrometric_residuals_xy failed to create wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-45-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0200_astrometric_residuals.png (see messages above)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: numpy/matplotlib unavailable (No module named 'matplotlib') -- falling back to the C plotter
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy: PGPLOT /PNG device reported success but no file appeared at wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-46-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201_astrometric_residuals.png -- no plot produced
WARNING: no astrometric residual plot produced for wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-46-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201.fits -- both lib/plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py and lib/plot_astrometric_residuals_xy failed to create wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-46-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201_astrometric_residuals.png (see messages above)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: numpy/matplotlib unavailable (No module named 'matplotlib') -- falling back to the C plotter
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy: PGPLOT /PNG device reported success but no file appeared at wcs_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-39-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121_astrometric_residuals.png -- no plot produced
WARNING: no astrometric residual plot produced for wcs_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-39-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121.fits -- both lib/plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py and lib/plot_astrometric_residuals_xy failed to create wcs_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-39-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121_astrometric_residuals.png (see messages above)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: numpy/matplotlib unavailable (No module named 'matplotlib') -- falling back to the C plotter
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy: PGPLOT /PNG device reported success but no file appeared at wcs_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-39-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0122_astrometric_residuals.png -- no plot produced
WARNING: no astrometric residual plot produced for wcs_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-39-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0122.fits -- both lib/plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py and lib/plot_astrometric_residuals_xy failed to create wcs_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-39-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0122_astrometric_residuals.png (see messages above)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-39-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-39-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_004122_TTUQ1b1x1_2076953_Q6eZyFJg/wcs_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-39-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-39-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0122.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-39-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0122.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_004122_TTUQ1b1x1_2076953_Q6eZyFJg/wcs_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-39-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0122.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Lib-01-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-45-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0200.fits at 14:34:39.83 -05:44:01.6: 12.06 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-45-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0200.fits at 14:37:32.89 -07:26:34.7: 12.04 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-45-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0200.fits at 14:20:16.11 -12:48:21.1: 15.59 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-45-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0200.fits at 14:31:50.55 -09:20:59.0: 12.01 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-45-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0200.fits at 14:25:44.77 -09:33:07.9: 12.30 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-45-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0200.fits at 14:36:30.60 -10:29:17.0: 11.89 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-45-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0200.fits at 14:39:13.93 -09:11:37.6: 12.05 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-45-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0200.fits at 14:51:42.96 -05:20:54.0: 12.32 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-46-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201.fits at 14:20:16.11 -12:48:21.1: 15.60 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-46-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201.fits at 14:37:32.89 -07:26:34.7: 12.07 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-46-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201.fits at 14:51:42.96 -05:20:54.0: 12.34 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-46-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201.fits at 14:36:30.60 -10:29:17.0: 11.92 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-46-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201.fits at 14:25:44.77 -09:33:07.9: 12.28 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-46-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201.fits at 14:31:50.55 -09:20:59.0: 12.01 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-46-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201.fits at 14:34:39.83 -05:44:01.6: 12.04 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-46-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201.fits at 14:39:13.93 -09:11:37.6: 12.08 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.05 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.33 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:37:32.89 -07:26:34.7: ref_mag=12.05 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.0516 delta=0.00 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.29 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.90 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.05 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.07 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:51:42.96 -05:20:54.0: ref_mag=12.33 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.0868 delta=0.24 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.01 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:25:44.77 -09:33:07.9: ref_mag=12.29 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.0883 delta=0.20 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:36:30.60 -10:29:17.0: ref_mag=11.90 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.9088 delta=-0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:34:39.83 -05:44:01.6: ref_mag=12.05 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.0559 delta=-0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:39:13.93 -09:11:37.6: ref_mag=12.07 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.0423 delta=0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:31:50.55 -09:20:59.0: ref_mag=12.01 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.0150 delta=-0.00 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out20400.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 7s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 1s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20393_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-39-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0122
The candidate 20393_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-39-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0122 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 14:16:48.56 -06:17:14.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20400_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-39-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0122
Preparing report for the candidate 20400_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-39-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0122
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20407_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-39-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0122
The candidate 20407_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-39-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0122 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20410_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-39-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0122
The candidate 20410_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-39-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0122 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20411_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-39-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0122
The candidate 20411_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-39-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0122 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 14:35:18.05 -08:57:05.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20414_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-39-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0122
The candidate 20414_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-39-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0122 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20416_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-39-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0122
The candidate 20416_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-39-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0122 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20417_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-39-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0122
The candidate 20417_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-39-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0122 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20418_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-39-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0122
The candidate 20418_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-39-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0122 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20419_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-39-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0122
The candidate 20419_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-39-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0122 did not pass the final checks
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 8s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Lib-01-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
14:20:16.11 -12:48:21.1
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 3.5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-45-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0200.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-46-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_004122_TTUQ1b1x1_2076953_Q6eZyFJg/fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-39-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_004122_TTUQ1b1x1_2076953_Q6eZyFJg/fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-39-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0122.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-45-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0200.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-46-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-45-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0200.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-46-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_004122_TTUQ1b1x1_2076953_Q6eZyFJg/fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-39-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_004122_TTUQ1b1x1_2076953_Q6eZyFJg/fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-39-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0122.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-45-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0200.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-46-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-39-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-39-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0122.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/exclusion_list.txt
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-45-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0200.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-46-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-39-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-39-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0122.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-45-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0200.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-45-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0200.fits
Image size: 941.2'x626.8' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 14:34:13.532 -10:00:24.81 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-39-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-39-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121.fits
Image size: 940.9'x626.6' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 14:34:26.866 -09:57:37.09 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 14:34:13.532 -10:00:24.81
Second-epoch image center 14:34:26.866 -09:57:37.09
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0719 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-39-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0122.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-39-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0122.fits
Image size: 940.9'x626.6' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 14:34:27.368 -09:57:32.87 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 14:34:13.532 -10:00:24.81
Second-epoch image center 14:34:27.368 -09:57:32.87
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0742 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 14:34:26.866 -09:57:37.09
Second-epoch second image center 14:34:27.368 -09:57:32.87
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00237 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-45-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0200.fits &> /tmp/tmp.zji9aylQVA
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-45-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0200.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-46-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201.fits &> /tmp/tmp.FSlZTE0UfH
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-46-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_004122_TTUQ1b1x1_2076953_Q6eZyFJg/fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-39-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121.fits &> /tmp/tmp.ZQ3HpHthU4
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_004122_TTUQ1b1x1_2076953_Q6eZyFJg/fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-39-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_004122_TTUQ1b1x1_2076953_Q6eZyFJg/fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-39-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0122.fits &> /tmp/tmp.fEVPsGMB9D
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_004122_TTUQ1b1x1_2076953_Q6eZyFJg/fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-39-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0122.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-45-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0200.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-45-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0200.fits and wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-45-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0200.fits.cat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-45-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0200.fits and wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-45-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0200.fits.cat
Found non-empty wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-45-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0200.fits and wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-45-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0200.fits.cat
The reference image (wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-45-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0200.fits) and catalog (wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-45-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0200.fits.cat) found
'wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-45-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0200.fits.cat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 44976 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 210.1249 to 226.7541 deg, Dec -15.6275 to -4.2266 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 210.1249 to 226.7541 deg, Dec -15.6275 to -4.2266 deg
Loaded 4999 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3584 out of 3962 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3962 out of 44976 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.604400
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.604400
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.42
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.18
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.18
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 44976 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 210.1249 to 226.7541 deg, Dec -15.6275 to -4.2266 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 210.1249 to 226.7541 deg, Dec -15.6275 to -4.2266 deg
Loaded 4999 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3584 out of 3962 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3962 out of 44976 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-45-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0200.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-45-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0200.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-45-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0200.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-45-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0200.fits (aperture=4.5)
Read 44874 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 210.1250 to 226.7538 deg, Dec -15.6278 to -4.2271 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 210.1250 to 226.7538 deg, Dec -15.6278 to -4.2271 deg
Loaded 4999 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3604 out of 3957 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3957 out of 44874 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-46-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-46-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-46-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-46-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201.fits (aperture=4.5)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 84 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 8000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
1.9 pix Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-45-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0200.fits
1.9 pix Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-46-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201.fits
3.2 pix fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-39-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121.fits
3.2 pix fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-39-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0122.fits
1.9 pix wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-45-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0200.fits
1.9 pix wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-46-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.2 mag. Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-45-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0200.fits
15.2 mag. Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-46-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201.fits
14.9 mag. fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-39-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121.fits
14.9 mag. fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-39-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0122.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.9 (SNR ) 14.3 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.zji9aylQVA (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-08_CI_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_004122_TTUQ1b1x1_2076953_Q6eZyFJg/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-45-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0200.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-45-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0200.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-45-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0200.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-45-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0200.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-45-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0200.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-45-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0200.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-45-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0200.fits' -> 'wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-45-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0200.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-45-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0200.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-45-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0200.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-45-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0200.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-45-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0200.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-45-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0200.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-45-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0200.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-45-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0200.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-45-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0200.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-45-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0200.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-45-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0200.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=22, blended=1893, passed=44954
Got 44954 stars (including 42983 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-45-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0200.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 44954 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013072 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010458 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 371 to 430 (Dec -15.6 to -4.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 975 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 975 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 965 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 975 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 44495 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 371 to 430 (Dec -15.6 to -4.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 975 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 975 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 44492 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 975 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 44492 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Excluding outliers - 975 stars left (next iteration limit 1072)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-45-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0200.fits N_match=975 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.356 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.326 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.365 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.342 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.337 n_q1=228 n_q2=220 n_q3=278 n_q4=249 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.025
The image catalog is written to wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-45-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0200.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-45-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0200.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-45-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0200.fits -region wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-45-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0200.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-45-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0200.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.FSlZTE0UfH (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-08_CI_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_004122_TTUQ1b1x1_2076953_Q6eZyFJg/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-46-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-46-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-46-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-46-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-46-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-46-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-46-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201.fits' -> 'wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-46-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-46-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-46-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-46-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-46-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-46-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-46-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-46-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-46-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-46-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-46-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=18, blended=1841, passed=44856
Got 44856 stars (including 42929 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-46-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 44856 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013072 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010458 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 371 to 430 (Dec -15.6 to -4.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 974 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 974 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 964 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 974 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 44293 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 371 to 430 (Dec -15.6 to -4.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 974 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 974 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 44294 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 974 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 44294 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Excluding outliers - 974 stars left (next iteration limit 1071)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-46-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201.fits N_match=974 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.328 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.387 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.359 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.303 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.323 n_q1=229 n_q2=218 n_q3=279 n_q4=248 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.179
The image catalog is written to wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-46-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-46-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-46-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201.fits -region wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-46-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-46-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.ZQ3HpHthU4 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-08_CI_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_004122_TTUQ1b1x1_2076953_Q6eZyFJg/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_004122_TTUQ1b1x1_2076953_Q6eZyFJg/fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-39-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_004122_TTUQ1b1x1_2076953_Q6eZyFJg/fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-39-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_004122_TTUQ1b1x1_2076953_Q6eZyFJg/fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-39-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_004122_TTUQ1b1x1_2076953_Q6eZyFJg/fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-39-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_004122_TTUQ1b1x1_2076953_Q6eZyFJg/fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-39-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_004122_TTUQ1b1x1_2076953_Q6eZyFJg/fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-39-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-39-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-39-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-39-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-39-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-39-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-39-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-39-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_004122_TTUQ1b1x1_2076953_Q6eZyFJg/fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-39-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-39-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=19, blended=1297, passed=35539
Got 35539 stars (including 34200 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-39-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 35539 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 940.9'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 940.9 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013068 (47.0 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010454 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 372 to 431 (Dec -15.6 to -4.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 968 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 968 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 956 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 968 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 35137 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 372 to 431 (Dec -15.6 to -4.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 968 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 968 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 35136 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 968 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 35136 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Excluding outliers - 968 stars left (next iteration limit 1064)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-39-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121.fits N_match=968 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.359 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.383 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.375 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.312 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.369 n_q1=216 n_q2=229 n_q3=275 n_q4=248 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.068
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-39-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-39-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_004122_TTUQ1b1x1_2076953_Q6eZyFJg/fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-39-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121.fits -region wcs_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-39-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-39-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.fEVPsGMB9D (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-08_CI_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_004122_TTUQ1b1x1_2076953_Q6eZyFJg/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_004122_TTUQ1b1x1_2076953_Q6eZyFJg/fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-39-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0122.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_004122_TTUQ1b1x1_2076953_Q6eZyFJg/fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-39-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0122.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_004122_TTUQ1b1x1_2076953_Q6eZyFJg/fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-39-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0122.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_004122_TTUQ1b1x1_2076953_Q6eZyFJg/fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-39-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0122.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_004122_TTUQ1b1x1_2076953_Q6eZyFJg/fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-39-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0122.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_004122_TTUQ1b1x1_2076953_Q6eZyFJg/fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-39-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0122.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-39-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0122.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-39-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0122.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-39-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0122.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-39-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0122.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-39-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0122.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-39-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0122.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-39-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0122.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_004122_TTUQ1b1x1_2076953_Q6eZyFJg/fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-39-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0122.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-39-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0122.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=19, blended=1341, passed=35645
Got 35645 stars (including 34260 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-39-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0122.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 35645 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 940.9'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 940.9 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013068 (47.0 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010454 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 372 to 431 (Dec -15.6 to -4.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 969 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 969 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 959 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 969 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 35224 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 372 to 431 (Dec -15.6 to -4.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 969 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 969 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 35225 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 969 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 35225 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Excluding outliers - 969 stars left (next iteration limit 1065)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-39-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0122.fits N_match=969 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.355 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.393 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.360 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.315 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.365 n_q1=219 n_q2=231 n_q3=273 n_q4=246 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.106
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-39-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0122.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-39-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0122.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_004122_TTUQ1b1x1_2076953_Q6eZyFJg/fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-39-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0122.fits -region wcs_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-39-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0122.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-39-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0122.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-39-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_004122_TTUQ1b1x1_2076953_Q6eZyFJg/wcs_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-39-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-39-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0122.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-08_CI_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_004122_TTUQ1b1x1_2076953_Q6eZyFJg/wcs_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-39-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0122.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Lib-01-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-45-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0200.fits at 15:01:41.55 -07:21:49.0: 14.51 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-45-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0200.fits at 14:05:44.65 -10:21:37.3: 15.65 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-45-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0200.fits at 14:29:31.26 -11:42:12.0: 15.85 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-45-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0200.fits at 14:56:09.76 -13:23:00.9: 15.40 +/- 0.31 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-46-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201.fits at 14:05:44.65 -10:21:37.3: 15.66 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-46-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201.fits at 15:01:41.55 -07:21:49.0: 14.38 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.44 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:01:41.55 -07:21:49.0: ref_mag=14.44 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=14.4073 delta=0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-45-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0200.fits at 14:43:27.30 -05:32:21.3: 15.91 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-46-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201.fits at 14:29:31.26 -11:42:12.0: 15.81 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-46-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201.fits at 14:56:09.76 -13:23:00.9: 15.53 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.40 +/- 0.31
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 14:56:09.76 -13:23:00.9: ref_mag=15.40 +/- 0.31 new_mean_mag=12.8910 delta=2.51 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-46-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201.fits at 14:43:27.30 -05:32:21.3: 15.80 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-45-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0200.fits at 14:46:24.83 -14:06:16.9: 15.67 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-45-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0200.fits at 14:36:35.04 -12:28:56.3: 13.84 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-45-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0200.fits at 14:33:05.24 -14:59:37.6: 13.82 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-46-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201.fits at 14:36:35.04 -12:28:56.3: 13.86 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-46-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201.fits at 14:46:24.83 -14:06:16.9: 15.68 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.85 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:36:35.04 -12:28:56.3: ref_mag=13.85 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=13.8922 delta=-0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-45-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0200.fits at 14:32:00.26 -08:26:59.8: 15.87 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-46-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201.fits at 14:33:05.24 -14:59:37.6: 13.91 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.86 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:33:05.24 -14:59:37.6: ref_mag=13.86 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=13.9443 delta=-0.09 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-45-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0200.fits at 14:18:10.89 -09:47:20.2: 14.00 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-46-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201.fits at 14:32:00.26 -08:26:59.8: 15.90 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-45-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0200.fits at 15:01:24.21 -15:19:34.0: 14.35 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-46-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201.fits at 14:18:10.89 -09:47:20.2: 14.19 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.08 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:18:10.89 -09:47:20.2: ref_mag=14.08 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=14.1166 delta=-0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-46-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201.fits at 15:01:24.21 -15:19:34.0: 14.52 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.42 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:01:24.21 -15:19:34.0: ref_mag=14.42 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=13.9238 delta=0.50 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-45-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0200.fits at 14:52:36.75 -11:51:00.5: 14.78 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-45-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0200.fits at 14:34:29.58 -13:49:00.0: 14.67 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-45-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0200.fits at 14:15:14.71 -07:39:46.8: 14.34 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-46-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201.fits at 14:52:36.75 -11:51:00.5: 14.65 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-46-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201.fits at 14:34:29.58 -13:49:00.0: 14.63 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.71 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.65 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:52:36.75 -11:51:00.5: ref_mag=14.71 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.3608 delta=0.35 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:34:29.58 -13:49:00.0: ref_mag=14.65 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=14.4279 delta=0.22 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-45-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0200.fits at 14:09:38.35 -05:54:13.8: 14.94 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-46-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201.fits at 14:15:14.71 -07:39:46.8: 14.15 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.23 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:15:14.71 -07:39:46.8: ref_mag=14.23 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=14.2663 delta=-0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-46-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201.fits at 14:09:38.35 -05:54:13.8: 15.19 +/- 0.22 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.04 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:09:38.35 -05:54:13.8: ref_mag=15.04 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=14.4248 delta=0.61 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-45-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0200.fits at 14:30:16.74 -13:50:14.3: 15.76 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-45-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0200.fits at 14:10:40.03 -07:49:55.1: 14.94 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-46-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201.fits at 14:10:40.03 -07:49:55.1: 14.66 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.77 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:10:40.03 -07:49:55.1: ref_mag=14.77 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.5424 delta=0.23 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-46-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201.fits at 14:30:16.74 -13:50:14.3: 15.76 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-45-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0200.fits at 14:36:34.56 -12:28:36.9: 14.53 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-46-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201.fits at 14:36:34.56 -12:28:36.9: 14.26 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.37 +/- 0.08
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:36:34.56 -12:28:36.9: ref_mag=14.37 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=14.2376 delta=0.13 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-45-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0200.fits at 14:53:57.41 -10:41:45.3: 15.10 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-46-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201.fits at 14:53:57.41 -10:41:45.3: 15.32 +/- 0.27 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.19 +/- 0.17
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:53:57.41 -10:41:45.3: ref_mag=15.19 +/- 0.17 new_mean_mag=14.5040 delta=0.68 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-45-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0200.fits at 14:42:35.25 -12:02:20.4: 14.88 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-46-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201.fits at 14:42:35.25 -12:02:20.4: 14.72 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.79 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:42:35.25 -12:02:20.4: ref_mag=14.79 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.4909 delta=0.30 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-45-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0200.fits at 14:58:56.50 -12:36:02.8: 14.62 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-45-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0200.fits at 14:32:59.22 -12:07:14.2: 15.86 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-45-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0200.fits at 15:04:27.99 -07:45:48.9: 14.90 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-46-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201.fits at 14:58:56.50 -12:36:02.8: 14.92 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-46-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201.fits at 14:32:59.22 -12:07:14.2: 15.83 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.73 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:58:56.50 -12:36:02.8: ref_mag=14.73 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.5005 delta=0.23 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-46-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201.fits at 15:04:27.99 -07:45:48.9: 14.91 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.90 +/- 0.15
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:04:27.99 -07:45:48.9: ref_mag=14.90 +/- 0.15 new_mean_mag=14.6412 delta=0.26 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-45-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0200.fits at 14:45:30.47 -12:49:54.1: 15.01 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-45-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0200.fits at 14:44:41.92 -10:59:38.2: 15.80 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-46-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201.fits at 14:45:30.47 -12:49:54.1: 14.96 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.99 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:45:30.47 -12:49:54.1: ref_mag=14.99 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.5861 delta=0.40 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-46-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201.fits at 14:44:41.92 -10:59:38.2: 15.85 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-45-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0200.fits at 14:23:09.90 -11:06:49.3: 15.34 +/- 0.23 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-46-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201.fits at 14:23:09.90 -11:06:49.3: 15.12 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.21 +/- 0.15
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:23:09.90 -11:06:49.3: ref_mag=15.21 +/- 0.15 new_mean_mag=14.7413 delta=0.47 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-45-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0200.fits at 14:59:17.12 -09:36:09.1: 15.16 +/- 0.24 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-46-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201.fits at 14:59:17.12 -09:36:09.1: 14.75 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.88 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:59:17.12 -09:36:09.1: ref_mag=14.88 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.5660 delta=0.31 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out53722.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out53740.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out53747.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out53782.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out53868.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out53902.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out53958.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out54032.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out54043.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 22s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 7s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53661_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-39-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0122
The candidate 53661_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-39-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0122 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53673_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-39-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0122
The candidate 53673_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-39-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0122 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53689_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-39-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0122
The candidate 53689_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-39-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0122 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53690_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-39-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0122
The candidate 53690_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-39-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0122 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 14:20:16.12 -12:48:21.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_local.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53700_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-39-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0122
The candidate 53700_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-39-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0122 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53705_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-39-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0122
The candidate 53705_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-39-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0122 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53706_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-39-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0122
The candidate 53706_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-39-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0122 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53711_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-39-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0122
The candidate 53711_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-39-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0122 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53715_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-39-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0122
The candidate 53715_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-39-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0122 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.1 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53722_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-39-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0122
Preparing report for the candidate 53722_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-39-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0122
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53728_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-39-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0122
The candidate 53728_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-39-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0122 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53733_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-39-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0122
The candidate 53733_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-39-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0122 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53734_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-39-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0122
The candidate 53734_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-39-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0122 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53740_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-39-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0122
Preparing report for the candidate 53740_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-39-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0122
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53742_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-39-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0122
The candidate 53742_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-39-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0122 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 14:06:37.73 -14:10:43.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53747_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-39-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0122
Preparing report for the candidate 53747_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-39-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0122
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53756_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-39-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0122
The candidate 53756_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-39-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0122 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53766_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-39-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0122
The candidate 53766_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-39-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0122 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 14:17:11.30 -05:44:42.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53773_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-39-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0122
The candidate 53773_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-39-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0122 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53781_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-39-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0122
The candidate 53781_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-39-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0122 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53782_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-39-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0122
Preparing report for the candidate 53782_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-39-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0122
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53784_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-39-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0122
The candidate 53784_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-39-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0122 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53788_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-39-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0122
The candidate 53788_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-39-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0122 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 15:00:51.16 -08:31:11.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53789_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-39-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0122
The candidate 53789_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-39-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0122 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53793_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-39-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0122
The candidate 53793_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-39-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0122 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 14:22:36.63 -07:47:37.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53820_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-39-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0122
The candidate 53820_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-39-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0122 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 14:13:48.60 -11:49:45.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53838_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-39-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0122
The candidate 53838_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-39-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0122 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 14:59:45.82 -14:58:16.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53843_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-39-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0122
The candidate 53843_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-39-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0122 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 14:12:44.58 -06:20:41.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53847_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-39-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0122
The candidate 53847_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-39-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0122 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53852_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-39-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0122
The candidate 53852_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-39-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0122 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 14:06:55.26 -05:27:37.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53854_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-39-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0122
The candidate 53854_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-39-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0122 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53863_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-39-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0122
The candidate 53863_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-39-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0122 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53868_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-39-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0122
Preparing report for the candidate 53868_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-39-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0122
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53869_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-39-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0122
The candidate 53869_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-39-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0122 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53871_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-39-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0122
The candidate 53871_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-39-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0122 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 14:38:15.37 -13:05:00.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53877_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-39-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0122
The candidate 53877_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-39-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0122 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53884_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-39-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0122
The candidate 53884_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-39-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0122 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53885_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-39-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0122
The candidate 53885_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-39-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0122 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53893_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-39-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0122
The candidate 53893_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-39-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0122 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53894_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-39-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0122
The candidate 53894_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-39-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0122 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53902_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-39-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0122
Preparing report for the candidate 53902_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-39-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0122
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53908_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-39-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0122
The candidate 53908_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-39-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0122 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53909_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-39-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0122
The candidate 53909_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-39-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0122 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53916_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-39-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0122
The candidate 53916_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-39-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0122 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 15:00:17.46 -14:18:42.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53918_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-39-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0122
The candidate 53918_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-39-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0122 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53919_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-39-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0122
The candidate 53919_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-39-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0122 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53920_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-39-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0122
The candidate 53920_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-39-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0122 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 15:03:25.07 -14:44:46.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53928_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-39-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0122
The candidate 53928_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-39-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0122 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53941_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-39-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0122
The candidate 53941_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-39-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0122 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53948_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-39-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0122
The candidate 53948_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-39-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0122 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53950_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-39-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0122
The candidate 53950_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-39-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0122 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53953_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-39-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0122
The candidate 53953_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-39-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0122 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53955_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-39-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0122
The candidate 53955_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-39-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0122 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53958_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-39-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0122
Preparing report for the candidate 53958_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-39-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0122
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53971_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-39-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0122
The candidate 53971_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-39-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0122 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53972_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-39-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0122
The candidate 53972_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-39-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0122 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 14:10:00.34 -12:55:23.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53975_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-39-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0122
The candidate 53975_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-39-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0122 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53977_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-39-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0122
The candidate 53977_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-39-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0122 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.1 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53979_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-39-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0122
The candidate 53979_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-39-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0122 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.1 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53982_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-39-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0122
The candidate 53982_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-39-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0122 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53989_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-39-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0122
The candidate 53989_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-39-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0122 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53995_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-39-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0122
The candidate 53995_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-39-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0122 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54000_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-39-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0122
The candidate 54000_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-39-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0122 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54018_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-39-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0122
The candidate 54018_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-39-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0122 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54022_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-39-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0122
The candidate 54022_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-39-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0122 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.1 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54027_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-39-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0122
The candidate 54027_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-39-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0122 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54031_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-39-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0122
The candidate 54031_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-39-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0122 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54032_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-39-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0122
Preparing report for the candidate 54032_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-39-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0122
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54040_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-39-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0122
The candidate 54040_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-39-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0122 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54042_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-39-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0122
The candidate 54042_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-39-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0122 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54043_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-39-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0122
Preparing report for the candidate 54043_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-39-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0122
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54046_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-39-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0122
The candidate 54046_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-39-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0122 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54047_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-39-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0122
The candidate 54047_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-39-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0122 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54049_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-39-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0122
The candidate 54049_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-39-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0122 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.1 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54050_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-39-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0122
The candidate 54050_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-39-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0122 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 14:27:48.88 -14:25:44.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54055_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-39-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0122
The candidate 54055_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-39-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0122 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54060_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-39-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0122
The candidate 54060_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-39-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0122 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.1 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54062_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-39-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0122
The candidate 54062_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-39-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0122 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.2 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54065_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-39-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0122
The candidate 54065_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-39-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0122 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.1 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54071_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-39-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0122
The candidate 54071_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-39-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0122 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.1 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54081_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-39-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0122
The candidate 54081_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-39-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0122 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54085_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-39-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0122
The candidate 54085_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-39-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0122 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 27336_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-39-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0122
The candidate 27336_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-39-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0122 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 14:32:59.93 -10:56:03.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 08017_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-39-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0122
The candidate 08017_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_00-39-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0122 did not pass the final checks
