## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref.  image: 2461119.68287475 20.03.2026 04:23:10.378   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_23-23-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits
First image: 2461119.68287475 20.03.2026 04:23:10.378   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_23-23-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits
Last  image: 2461199.66187946 08.06.2026 03:52:56.385   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-07_CI_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_234044_TTUQ1b1x1_1626063_R8KN8iEB/fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_22-52-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0059.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.:  -7.63
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 4 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA  10.0             # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH   10.0             #  or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0             #  or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL     55000.0         # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN            0.37            # detector gain in e-/ADU
Total objects detected (at least 2 times):  6847
Objects passed selection criteria:  6826
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max):    2.2    2.0    2    4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max):    2.2    2.0    2    4
Average stars detected per image: 4000.25
Average stars matched: 3909.25 (97.7251 %)
Memory usage VmPeak:   113096 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on  Sun Jun  7 22:21:29 CDT 2026
VaST build number  1.0rc89-90-g333d5534
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-06-07)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on  Sun Jun  7 23:44:03 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
ERROR running VaST on the field Leo-04-Q1b1x1 (wrong field? clouds? very bad focus?)

######## Processing parameters ########
AAVSO_COMMENT_STRING= NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
ASTCHECK_ASTEROID_SEARCH_RADIUS_ARCSEC= 
BAD_REGION_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst
CAMERA_SETTINGS= TTUQ1b1x1
CHECK_POINTING_ACCURACY= yes
DARK_FRAMES_DIR_OR_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks
EXCLUSION_LIST= ../exclusion_list_TTUQ1.txt
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MAX_APERTURE_STAR_SIZE_PIX= 12.5
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MAX_ELONGATION_AminusB_PIX= 0.55
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MIN_APERTURE_STAR_SIZE_PIX= 2.0
FILTER_BRIGHT_MAG_CUTOFF_TRANSIENT_SEARCH= -5
FILTER_FAINT_MAG_CUTOFF_TRANSIENT_SEARCH= 15.0
FLAT_FIELD_DIR_OR_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats
FRAME_EDGE_OFFSET_PIX= 100
GAIA_BAND_FOR_CATALOGED_SOURCE_CHECK= 
MAX_NEW_TO_REF_MEAN_IMG_VALUE_RATIO= 100
MAX_NEW_IMG_MEAN_VALUE= 25000
MAX_SD_RATIO_OF_SECOND_EPOCH_IMGS= 0.18
MAX_SD_RATIO_OF_SECOND_EPOCH_IMGS_SOFT_LIMIT= 0.12
MPC_CODE= V36
NMW_CALIBRATION= /var/www/nmw_calibration
NUMBER_OF_DETECTED_TRANSIENTS_BEFORE_FILTERING_HARD_LIMIT= 8000
NUMBER_OF_DETECTED_TRANSIENTS_BEFORE_FILTERING_SOFT_LIMIT= 4000
OMP_NUM_THREADS= 
ONLINE_MPCHECKER_BUTTON_ASTEROID_SEARCH_RADIUS_ARCMIN= 
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION= 
REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES= yes
SEXTRACTOR_CONFIG_BRIGHTSTARPASS= default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
SEXTRACTOR_CONFIG_FILES= default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
STARMATCH_RADIUS_PIX= 3.5
SYSREM_ITERATIONS= 0
TELESCOP= 
TELESCOP_NAME_KNOWN_TO_VaST_FOR_FOV_DETERMINATION= 
UCAC5_PLATESOLVE_ITERATIONS= 2
FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE= no
#######################################
HOSTNAME= tau
USER= 
HOME= 
#######################################
SExtractor catalog cache: enabled, directory /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/vast_sextractor_cache
Reference image directory is set to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs
VIZIER_SITE=vizier.cds.unistra.fr
GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=vizquery (lib/vizquery -> VizieR vizier.cds.unistra.fr)
INFO: MAKE_PNG_PLOTS is set to yes
FITS_FILE_EXT=fits
CALIBRATION_STATUS_PREFIX=
Fields in the data directory: 
Leo-04-Q1b1x1
#######################################
########### Starting Leo-04-Q1b1x1 ###########
Processing Leo-04-Q1b1x1
server tau has sufficient free disk space available: 289920 MB at /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir
server tau has sufficient free disk space available: 289920 MB at .
Checking input images (2 new)
REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE= /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_23-23-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits
REFERENCE_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE= /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-03-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0138.fits
Small preview (one of the new images): 

Large previews of the second-epoch (new) images:

MAKE_PNG_PLOTS=yes


renamed 'Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_22-52-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0058.png' -> 'transient_report/Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_22-52-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0058.fits_preview.png'

Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_22-52-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0058.fits


renamed 'Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_22-52-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0059.png' -> 'transient_report/Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_22-52-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0059.fits_preview.png'

Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_22-52-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0059.fits




Read-check the input FITS images... read-check OK
Blank image check the input FITS images... blank-image-check OK
Read date check the input FITS images... read-date-check OK
Mean value check the input FITS images... OK, at least two new images have mean values below the threshold.
----------------------------------------------
INFO: REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 560.5437
INFO:         REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_SD= 523.0623
INFO:    SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 1808.9543
INFO:            SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_SD= 372.0540
INFO:   SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 1807.9577
INFO:           SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE_SD= 397.6170
----------------------------------------------
INFO:      ref_to_second_epoch_img_mean_ratio= 3.22714
INFO:                  SECOND_EPOCH__SD_ratio= 0.064
----------------------------------------------
Calibration settings: DARK_FRAMES_DIR_OR_FILE=/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks FLAT_FIELD_DIR_OR_FILE=/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats
EXPTIME =                 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration
SET-TEMP=                  0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint
CCD-TEMP=                  0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature
FOCTEMP =     29.2999992370605 / [degC] Focuser temperature
AMBTEMP =                 28.4 / [degC] Ambient air temperature
Exploring image header: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-07_CI_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_234044_TTUQ1b1x1_1626063_R8KN8iEB/Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_22-52-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0058.fits 
CCD-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-07_CI_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_234044_TTUQ1b1x1_1626063_R8KN8iEB/Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_22-52-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0058.fits
SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-07_CI_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_234044_TTUQ1b1x1_1626063_R8KN8iEB/Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_22-52-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0058.fits
Header: 74 keys total, 33 keys left
Record 0: "" status=0
Record 1: "SIMPLE  =                    T / C# FITS" status=0
Record 2: "BITPIX  =                   16" status=0
Record 3: "NAXIS   =                    2 / Dimensionality" status=0
Record 4: "NAXIS1  =                 9576" status=0
Record 5: "NAXIS2  =                 6388" status=0
Record 6: "BZERO   =                32768" status=0
Record 7: "EXTEND  =                    T / Extensions are permitted" status=0
Record 8: "IMAGETYP= 'LIGHT'              / Type of exposure" status=0
Record 9: "EXPOSURE=                 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0
Record 10: "EXPTIME =                 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0
Record 11: "DATE-LOC= '2026-06-07T22:52:04.1398627' / Time of observation (local)" status=0
Record 12: "DATE-OBS= '2026-06-08T03:52:04.1398627' / Time of observation (UTC)" status=0
Record 13: "MJD-OBS =     61199.1611590162 / Modified Julian Date of observation" status=0
Record 14: "DATE-AVG= '2026-06-08T03:52:14.0435478' / Averaged midpoint time (UTC)" status=0
Record 15: "MJD-AVG =     61199.1612736457 / Modified Julian Date of averaged midpoint" status=0
Record 16: "XBINNING=                    1 / X axis binning factor" status=0
Record 17: "YBINNING=                    1 / Y axis binning factor" status=0
Record 18: "GAIN    =                   30 / Sensor gain" status=0
Record 19: "OFFSET  =                   30 / Sensor gain offset" status=0
Record 20: "XPIXSZ  =                 3.76 / [um] Pixel X axis size" status=0
Record 21: "YPIXSZ  =                 3.76 / [um] Pixel Y axis size" status=0
Record 22: "INSTRUME= 'QHY600M'            / Imaging instrument name" status=0
Record 23: "CAMERAID= 'QHY600M-33d3d743814b8b447' / Imaging instrument identifier" status=0
Record 24: "SET-TEMP=                  0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint" status=0
Record 25: "CCD-TEMP=                  0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature" status=0
Record 26: "READOUTM= '2CMS-0'             / Sensor readout mode" status=0
Record 27: "USBLIMIT=                   50 / Camera-specific USB setting" status=0
Record 28: "TELESCOP= 'QHY600M-TTU1'       / Name of telescope" status=0
Record 29: "FOCALLEN=                135.0 / [mm] Focal length" status=0
Record 30: "FOCRATIO=                  2.2 / Focal ratio" status=0
Record 31: "RA      =     146.666081061632 / [deg] RA of telescope" status=0
Record 32: "DEC     =     14.0002275731218 / [deg] Declination of telescope" status=0
Record 33: "CENTALT =     27.7619444444444 / [deg] Altitude of telescope" status=0
Record 34: "CENTAZ  =     268.527222222222 / [deg] Azimuth of telescope" status=0
Record 35: "AIRMASS =     2.13940877675785 / Airmass at frame center (Gueymard 1993)" status=0
Record 36: "PIERSIDE= 'East'               / Telescope pointing state" status=0
Record 37: "SITEELEV=               1015.0 / [m] Observation site elevation" status=0
Record 38: "SITELAT =     33.7480555555556 / [deg] Observation site latitude" status=0
Record 39: "SITELONG=    -101.958333333333 / [deg] Observation site longitude" status=0
Record 40: "OBSERVER= 'Sokolovsky'         / Observer name" status=0
Record 41: "OBSERVAT= 'TTU Skyview'        / Observatory name" status=0
Record 42: "SITENAME= ''                   / Observatory site name" status=0
Record 43: "FWHEEL  = 'Simulator'          / Filter Wheel name" status=0
Record 44: "FILTER  = 'CV'                 / Active filter name" status=0
Record 45: "OBJECT  = 'Leo-04'             / Name of the object of interest" status=0
Record 46: "OBJCTRA = '09 46 40'           / [H M S] RA of imaged object" status=0
Record 47: "OBJCTDEC= '+14 00 00'          / [D M S] Declination of imaged object" status=0
Record 48: "OBJCTROT=                  0.0 / [deg] planned rotation of imaged object" status=0
Record 49: "FOCNAME = 'ZWO Focuser'        / Focusing equipment name" status=0
Record 50: "FOCPOS  =                29512 / [step] Focuser position" status=0
Record 51: "FOCUSPOS=                29512 / [step] Focuser position" status=0
Record 52: "FOCUSSZ =                  0.0 / [um] Focuser step size" status=0
Record 53: "FOCTEMP =     29.2999992370605 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0
Record 54: "FOCUSTEM=     29.2999992370605 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0
Record 55: "DEWPOINT=                 13.9 / [degC] Dew point" status=0
Record 56: "HUMIDITY=                 41.0 / [percent] Relative humidity" status=0
Record 57: "PRESSURE=                893.3 / [hPa] Air pressure" status=0
Record 58: "AMBTEMP =                 28.4 / [degC] Ambient air temperature" status=0
Record 59: "WINDDIR =                 48.0 / [deg] Wind direction: 0=N, 180=S, 90=E, 270=W" status=0
Record 60: "WINDGUST=            18.401472 / [kph] Wind gust" status=0
Record 61: "WINDSPD =            13.301064 / [kph] Wind speed" status=0
Record 62: "ROWORDER= 'TOP-DOWN'           / FITS Image Orientation" status=0
Record 63: "EQUINOX =               2000.0 / Equinox of celestial coordinate system" status=0
Record 64: "SWCREATE= 'N.I.N.A. 3.2.0.9001 (x64)' / Software that created this file" status=0
Record 65: "QHY_EXP =            20.000096 / [s] Actual exposure time" status=0
Record 66: "QHY_PP  =              13888.0 / [ps] pixelPeriod" status=0
Record 67: "QHY_LP  =              85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0
Record 68: "GPS_LP  =              85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0
Record 69: "QHY_FP  =           20000160.0 / [us] framePeriod" status=0
Record 70: "QHY_CPL =               6120.0 / clocksPerLine" status=0
Record 71: "QHY_LPF =             235295.0 / linesPerFrame" status=0
Record 72: "QHY_AET =           20000096.0 / [us] actualExposureTime" status=0
Record 73: "QHY_LEM =                    T / isLongExposureMode" status=0
Record 74: "QHY_OFF0=             3767.777 / [us] RollingShutterEndOffset row 0" status=0
Allocating memory for image, dark and result arrays...
Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-07_CI_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_234044_TTUQ1b1x1_1626063_R8KN8iEB/Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_22-52-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0058.fits 9576 6388  16 bitpix
SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-07_CI_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_234044_TTUQ1b1x1_1626063_R8KN8iEB/Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_22-52-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0058.fits
SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_5C_20s_2026-05-30.fit
CCD-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-07_CI_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_234044_TTUQ1b1x1_1626063_R8KN8iEB/Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_22-52-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0058.fits
CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_5C_20s_2026-05-30.fit
Reading dark frame /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_5C_20s_2026-05-30.fit 9576 6388  16 bitpix
Dark frame is subtracted, output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-07_CI_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_234044_TTUQ1b1x1_1626063_R8KN8iEB/d_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_22-52-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0058.fits :)

Spent 0.626718 seconds 
renamed 'mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_5C_20s_2026-05-30.png' -> 'transient_report/dark.png'
try_to_calibrate_the_input_frame(): selected flat field /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-05-30.fit from directory /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats
MegaDivider v7
Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-07_CI_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_234044_TTUQ1b1x1_1626063_R8KN8iEB/d_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_22-52-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0058.fits 9576 6388  16 bitpix
Reading flat /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-05-30.fit 9576 6388  16 bitpix
Avarage count on flat field image: 31267.409145
Minimal real count (from overscan): 5
Output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-07_CI_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_234044_TTUQ1b1x1_1626063_R8KN8iEB/fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_22-52-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0058.fits :)


No overscan detected - all values seem high! (left_median=21677.0, right_median=21704.0)
renamed 'mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-05-30.png' -> 'transient_report/flat.png'
Using calibrated image CALIBRATED_SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-07_CI_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_234044_TTUQ1b1x1_1626063_R8KN8iEB/fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_22-52-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0058.fits
EXPTIME =                 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration
SET-TEMP=                  0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint
CCD-TEMP=                 -0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature
FOCTEMP =     29.2999992370605 / [degC] Focuser temperature
AMBTEMP =                 28.4 / [degC] Ambient air temperature
Exploring image header: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-07_CI_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_234044_TTUQ1b1x1_1626063_R8KN8iEB/Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_22-52-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0059.fits 
CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-07_CI_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_234044_TTUQ1b1x1_1626063_R8KN8iEB/Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_22-52-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0059.fits
SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-07_CI_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_234044_TTUQ1b1x1_1626063_R8KN8iEB/Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_22-52-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0059.fits
Header: 74 keys total, 33 keys left
Record 0: "" status=0
Record 1: "SIMPLE  =                    T / C# FITS" status=0
Record 2: "BITPIX  =                   16" status=0
Record 3: "NAXIS   =                    2 / Dimensionality" status=0
Record 4: "NAXIS1  =                 9576" status=0
Record 5: "NAXIS2  =                 6388" status=0
Record 6: "BZERO   =                32768" status=0
Record 7: "EXTEND  =                    T / Extensions are permitted" status=0
Record 8: "IMAGETYP= 'LIGHT'              / Type of exposure" status=0
Record 9: "EXPOSURE=                 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0
Record 10: "EXPTIME =                 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0
Record 11: "DATE-LOC= '2026-06-07T22:52:56.3853361' / Time of observation (local)" status=0
Record 12: "DATE-OBS= '2026-06-08T03:52:56.3853361' / Time of observation (UTC)" status=0
Record 13: "MJD-OBS =     61199.1617637151 / Modified Julian Date of observation" status=0
Record 14: "DATE-AVG= '2026-06-08T03:53:06.2891632' / Averaged midpoint time (UTC)" status=0
Record 15: "MJD-AVG =     61199.1618783451 / Modified Julian Date of averaged midpoint" status=0
Record 16: "XBINNING=                    1 / X axis binning factor" status=0
Record 17: "YBINNING=                    1 / Y axis binning factor" status=0
Record 18: "GAIN    =                   30 / Sensor gain" status=0
Record 19: "OFFSET  =                   30 / Sensor gain offset" status=0
Record 20: "XPIXSZ  =                 3.76 / [um] Pixel X axis size" status=0
Record 21: "YPIXSZ  =                 3.76 / [um] Pixel Y axis size" status=0
Record 22: "INSTRUME= 'QHY600M'            / Imaging instrument name" status=0
Record 23: "CAMERAID= 'QHY600M-33d3d743814b8b447' / Imaging instrument identifier" status=0
Record 24: "SET-TEMP=                  0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint" status=0
Record 25: "CCD-TEMP=                 -0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature" status=0
Record 26: "READOUTM= '2CMS-0'             / Sensor readout mode" status=0
Record 27: "USBLIMIT=                   50 / Camera-specific USB setting" status=0
Record 28: "TELESCOP= 'QHY600M-TTU1'       / Name of telescope" status=0
Record 29: "FOCALLEN=                135.0 / [mm] Focal length" status=0
Record 30: "FOCRATIO=                  2.2 / Focal ratio" status=0
Record 31: "RA      =     146.666081099396 / [deg] RA of telescope" status=0
Record 32: "DEC     =     14.0002275592018 / [deg] Declination of telescope" status=0
Record 33: "CENTALT =     27.5813888888889 / [deg] Altitude of telescope" status=0
Record 34: "CENTAZ  =     268.650277777778 / [deg] Azimuth of telescope" status=0
Record 35: "AIRMASS =     2.15218595595384 / Airmass at frame center (Gueymard 1993)" status=0
Record 36: "PIERSIDE= 'East'               / Telescope pointing state" status=0
Record 37: "SITEELEV=               1015.0 / [m] Observation site elevation" status=0
Record 38: "SITELAT =     33.7480555555556 / [deg] Observation site latitude" status=0
Record 39: "SITELONG=    -101.958333333333 / [deg] Observation site longitude" status=0
Record 40: "OBSERVER= 'Sokolovsky'         / Observer name" status=0
Record 41: "OBSERVAT= 'TTU Skyview'        / Observatory name" status=0
Record 42: "SITENAME= ''                   / Observatory site name" status=0
Record 43: "FWHEEL  = 'Simulator'          / Filter Wheel name" status=0
Record 44: "FILTER  = 'CV'                 / Active filter name" status=0
Record 45: "OBJECT  = 'Leo-04'             / Name of the object of interest" status=0
Record 46: "OBJCTRA = '09 46 40'           / [H M S] RA of imaged object" status=0
Record 47: "OBJCTDEC= '+14 00 00'          / [D M S] Declination of imaged object" status=0
Record 48: "OBJCTROT=                  0.0 / [deg] planned rotation of imaged object" status=0
Record 49: "FOCNAME = 'ZWO Focuser'        / Focusing equipment name" status=0
Record 50: "FOCPOS  =                29512 / [step] Focuser position" status=0
Record 51: "FOCUSPOS=                29512 / [step] Focuser position" status=0
Record 52: "FOCUSSZ =                  0.0 / [um] Focuser step size" status=0
Record 53: "FOCTEMP =     29.2999992370605 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0
Record 54: "FOCUSTEM=     29.2999992370605 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0
Record 55: "DEWPOINT=                 13.9 / [degC] Dew point" status=0
Record 56: "HUMIDITY=                 41.0 / [percent] Relative humidity" status=0
Record 57: "PRESSURE=                893.3 / [hPa] Air pressure" status=0
Record 58: "AMBTEMP =                 28.4 / [degC] Ambient air temperature" status=0
Record 59: "WINDDIR =                 48.0 / [deg] Wind direction: 0=N, 180=S, 90=E, 270=W" status=0
Record 60: "WINDGUST=            18.401472 / [kph] Wind gust" status=0
Record 61: "WINDSPD =            13.301064 / [kph] Wind speed" status=0
Record 62: "ROWORDER= 'TOP-DOWN'           / FITS Image Orientation" status=0
Record 63: "EQUINOX =               2000.0 / Equinox of celestial coordinate system" status=0
Record 64: "SWCREATE= 'N.I.N.A. 3.2.0.9001 (x64)' / Software that created this file" status=0
Record 65: "QHY_EXP =            20.000096 / [s] Actual exposure time" status=0
Record 66: "QHY_PP  =              13888.0 / [ps] pixelPeriod" status=0
Record 67: "QHY_LP  =              85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0
Record 68: "GPS_LP  =              85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0
Record 69: "QHY_FP  =           20000160.0 / [us] framePeriod" status=0
Record 70: "QHY_CPL =               6120.0 / clocksPerLine" status=0
Record 71: "QHY_LPF =             235295.0 / linesPerFrame" status=0
Record 72: "QHY_AET =           20000096.0 / [us] actualExposureTime" status=0
Record 73: "QHY_LEM =                    T / isLongExposureMode" status=0
Record 74: "QHY_OFF0=             3767.777 / [us] RollingShutterEndOffset row 0" status=0
Allocating memory for image, dark and result arrays...
Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-07_CI_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_234044_TTUQ1b1x1_1626063_R8KN8iEB/Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_22-52-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0059.fits 9576 6388  16 bitpix
SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-07_CI_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_234044_TTUQ1b1x1_1626063_R8KN8iEB/Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_22-52-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0059.fits
SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_5C_20s_2026-05-30.fit
CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-07_CI_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_234044_TTUQ1b1x1_1626063_R8KN8iEB/Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_22-52-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0059.fits
CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_5C_20s_2026-05-30.fit
Reading dark frame /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_5C_20s_2026-05-30.fit 9576 6388  16 bitpix
Dark frame is subtracted, output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-07_CI_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_234044_TTUQ1b1x1_1626063_R8KN8iEB/d_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_22-52-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0059.fits :)

Spent 0.704236 seconds 
renamed 'mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_5C_20s_2026-05-30.png' -> 'transient_report/dark.png'
try_to_calibrate_the_input_frame(): selected flat field /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-05-30.fit from directory /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats
MegaDivider v7
Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-07_CI_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_234044_TTUQ1b1x1_1626063_R8KN8iEB/d_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_22-52-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0059.fits 9576 6388  16 bitpix
Reading flat /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-05-30.fit 9576 6388  16 bitpix
Avarage count on flat field image: 31267.409145
Minimal real count (from overscan): 5
Output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-07_CI_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_234044_TTUQ1b1x1_1626063_R8KN8iEB/fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_22-52-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0059.fits :)


No overscan detected - all values seem high! (left_median=21677.0, right_median=21704.0)
renamed 'mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-05-30.png' -> 'transient_report/flat.png'
Using calibrated image CALIBRATED_SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-07_CI_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_234044_TTUQ1b1x1_1626063_R8KN8iEB/fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_22-52-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0059.fits
Dark frame used to calibrate the second-epoch images:



Flat field used to calibrate the second-epoch images:



after the calibration attempt:
SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-07_CI_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_234044_TTUQ1b1x1_1626063_R8KN8iEB/fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_22-52-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0058.fits
SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-07_CI_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_234044_TTUQ1b1x1_1626063_R8KN8iEB/fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_22-52-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0059.fits
Previews of the CALIBRATED second-epoch images:


fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_22-52-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0058.fits



fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_22-52-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0059.fits




Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1

  ./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 3.5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_23-23-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-03-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0138.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-07_CI_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_234044_TTUQ1b1x1_1626063_R8KN8iEB/fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_22-52-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0058.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-07_CI_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_234044_TTUQ1b1x1_1626063_R8KN8iEB/fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_22-52-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0059.fits
  
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_23-23-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-03-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0138.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_23-23-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-03-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0138.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-07_CI_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_234044_TTUQ1b1x1_1626063_R8KN8iEB/fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_22-52-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0058.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-07_CI_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_234044_TTUQ1b1x1_1626063_R8KN8iEB/fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_22-52-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0059.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461199.66127476
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_23-23-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_23-23-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_23-23-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_23-23-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits'
wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-03-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0138.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-03-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0138.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-03-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0138.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-03-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0138.fits'
wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_22-52-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0058.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_22-52-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0058.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_22-52-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0058.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_22-52-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0058.fits'
wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_22-52-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0059.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_22-52-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0059.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_22-52-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0059.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_22-52-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0059.fits'
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_23-23-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_23-23-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits
Image size: 937.2'x624.1'  15.6(deg)x10.4(deg)  9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 09:46:31.742 +14:00:33.63 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 
###################################
The image scale is 5.87"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_22-52-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0058.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_22-52-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0058.fits
Image size: 941.6'x626.7'  15.7(deg)x10.4(deg)  9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 09:46:50.959 +14:00:54.86 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 09:46:31.742 +14:00:33.63
Second-epoch image center 09:46:50.959 +14:00:54.86
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0779 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg.  Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_22-52-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0059.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_22-52-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0059.fits
Image size: 941.6'x626.7'  15.7(deg)x10.4(deg)  9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 09:46:48.137 +14:01:04.65 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 09:46:31.742 +14:00:33.63
Second-epoch image center 09:46:48.137 +14:01:04.65
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0668 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center  09:46:50.959 +14:00:54.86
Second-epoch second image center 09:46:48.137 +14:01:04.65
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01173 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running  util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2  /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_23-23-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits &> /tmp/tmp.NCgXnwJA9D
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_23-23-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits
Running  util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2  /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-03-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0138.fits &> /tmp/tmp.ZPNEC5fIYK
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-03-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0138.fits
Running  util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2  /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-07_CI_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_234044_TTUQ1b1x1_1626063_R8KN8iEB/fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_22-52-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0058.fits &> /tmp/tmp.v9hnwhXi7n
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-07_CI_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_234044_TTUQ1b1x1_1626063_R8KN8iEB/fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_22-52-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0058.fits
Running  util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2  /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-07_CI_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_234044_TTUQ1b1x1_1626063_R8KN8iEB/fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_22-52-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0059.fits &> /tmp/tmp.Xbfvdf1HPv
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-07_CI_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_234044_TTUQ1b1x1_1626063_R8KN8iEB/fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_22-52-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0059.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_23-23-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_23-23-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits and wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_23-23-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits.cat 
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_23-23-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits and wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_23-23-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits.cat 
Found non-empty wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_23-23-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits and wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_23-23-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits.cat
The reference image (wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_23-23-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits) and catalog (wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_23-23-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits.cat) found
'wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_23-23-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits.cat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 7795 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 138.4789 to 154.9675 deg, Dec +8.5563 to +19.3047 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 138.4789 to 154.9675 deg, Dec 8.5563 to 19.3047 deg
Loaded 4793 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3886 out of 4074 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 4074 out of 7795 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.915650
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.915650
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.:  -7.63
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.:  15.29

Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed!  =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.:  15.29

Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:


Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 7795 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 138.4789 to 154.9675 deg, Dec +8.5563 to +19.3047 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 138.4789 to 154.9675 deg, Dec 8.5563 to 19.3047 deg
Loaded 4793 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3886 out of 4074 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 4074 out of 7795 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_23-23-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits via Tycho-2

Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_23-23-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits:


Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_23-23-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_23-23-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits (aperture=6.6)
Read 7228 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 138.4295 to 155.2660 deg, Dec +8.1771 to +19.5842 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 138.4295 to 155.2660 deg, Dec 8.1771 to 19.5842 deg
Loaded 5215 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3899 out of 4084 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 4084 out of 7228 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-03-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0138.fits via Tycho-2

Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-03-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0138.fits:


Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-03-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0138.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-03-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0138.fits (aperture=6.2)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 0 candidate transients before the final filtering.  (Hard limit: 8000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
 2.4 pix  Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_23-23-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits
 2.1 pix  Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-03-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0138.fits
 2.2 pix  fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_22-52-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0058.fits
 2.3 pix  fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_22-52-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0059.fits
 2.4 pix  wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_23-23-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits
 2.1 pix  wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-03-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0138.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
 15.3 mag.  Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_23-23-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits
 15.3 mag.  Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-03-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0138.fits
 12.8 mag.  fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_22-52-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0058.fits
 13.1 mag.  fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_22-52-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0059.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate:  12.8 (SNR )   9.9 (80% of stars)  with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of  following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50). 
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image. 
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.NCgXnwJA9D (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_23-23-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-07_CI_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_234044_TTUQ1b1x1_1626063_R8KN8iEB/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_23-23-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits 570.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_23-23-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_23-23-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_23-23-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_23-23-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_23-23-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_23-23-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_23-23-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits' -> 'wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_23-23-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_23-23-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_23-23-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_23-23-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_23-23-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_23-23-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_23-23-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_23-23-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_23-23-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_23-23-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_23-23-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits.cat 
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=485, passed=7795
Got 7795 stars (including 7304 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_23-23-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits.cat 
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 7795 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013017 (46.9 arcsec)
                    catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
                    catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010413 (37.5 arcsec)

ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 492 to 548 (Dec 8.6 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 906 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 906 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 883 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44" 
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 906 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7515 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44" 

ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 492 to 548 (Dec 8.6 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 906 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 906 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7517 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44" 
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 906 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7517 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44" 
Excluding outliers - 906 stars left (next iteration limit 996)
Stop iterations.


 The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)

WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_23-23-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits N_match=906 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.455 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.362 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.579 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.419 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.483 n_q1=277 n_q2=221 n_q3=218 n_q4=190 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.272
The image catalog is written to wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_23-23-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_23-23-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
 ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_23-23-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits -region wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_23-23-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_23-23-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.ZPNEC5fIYK (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-07_CI_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_234044_TTUQ1b1x1_1626063_R8KN8iEB/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-03-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0138.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-03-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0138.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-03-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0138.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-03-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0138.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-03-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0138.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-03-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0138.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-03-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0138.fits' -> 'wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-03-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0138.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-03-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0138.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-03-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0138.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-03-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0138.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-03-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0138.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-03-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0138.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-03-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0138.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-03-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0138.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-03-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0138.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-03-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0138.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-03-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0138.fits.cat 
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=490, passed=7228
Got 7228 stars (including 6724 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-03-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0138.fits.cat 
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 7228 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013075 (47.1 arcsec)
                    catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
                    catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010460 (37.7 arcsec)

ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 490 to 549 (Dec 8.2 to 19.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 912 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 912 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 897 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31" 
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 912 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6991 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30" 

ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 490 to 549 (Dec 8.2 to 19.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 912 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 912 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6991 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30" 
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 912 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6991 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28" 
Excluding outliers - 912 stars left (next iteration limit 1003)
Stop iterations.


 The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)

WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-03-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0138.fits N_match=912 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.309 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.368 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.322 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.294 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.291 n_q1=202 n_q2=221 n_q3=206 n_q4=283 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.190
The image catalog is written to wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-03-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0138.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-03-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0138.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
 ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-03-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0138.fits -region wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-03-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0138.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-03-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0138.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.v9hnwhXi7n (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-07_CI_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_234044_TTUQ1b1x1_1626063_R8KN8iEB/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-07_CI_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_234044_TTUQ1b1x1_1626063_R8KN8iEB/fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_22-52-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0058.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-07_CI_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_234044_TTUQ1b1x1_1626063_R8KN8iEB/fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_22-52-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0058.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-07_CI_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_234044_TTUQ1b1x1_1626063_R8KN8iEB/fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_22-52-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0058.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-07_CI_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_234044_TTUQ1b1x1_1626063_R8KN8iEB/fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_22-52-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0058.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-07_CI_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_234044_TTUQ1b1x1_1626063_R8KN8iEB/fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_22-52-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0058.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-07_CI_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_234044_TTUQ1b1x1_1626063_R8KN8iEB/fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_22-52-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0058.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_22-52-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0058.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_22-52-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0058.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_22-52-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0058.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_22-52-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0058.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_22-52-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0058.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_22-52-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0058.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_22-52-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0058.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-07_CI_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_234044_TTUQ1b1x1_1626063_R8KN8iEB/fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_22-52-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0058.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_22-52-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0058.fits.cat 
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=16, passed=508
Got 508 stars (including 492 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_22-52-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0058.fits.cat 
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 508 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec)
                    catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
                    catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec)

ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 491 to 547 (Dec 8.2 to 19.1)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 417 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 416 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 347 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37" 
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 416 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 421 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37" 

ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 491 to 547 (Dec 8.2 to 19.1)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 417 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 416 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 422 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36" 
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 416 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 422 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37" 
Excluding outliers - 416 stars left (next iteration limit 457)
Stop iterations.


 The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)

WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_22-52-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0058.fits N_match=416 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.444 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.457 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.756 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.388 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.409 n_q1=143 n_q2=25 n_q3=212 n_q4=36 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.703
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_22-52-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0058.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_22-52-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0058.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
 ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-07_CI_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_234044_TTUQ1b1x1_1626063_R8KN8iEB/fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_22-52-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0058.fits -region wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_22-52-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0058.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_22-52-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0058.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.Xbfvdf1HPv (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-07_CI_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_234044_TTUQ1b1x1_1626063_R8KN8iEB/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-07_CI_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_234044_TTUQ1b1x1_1626063_R8KN8iEB/fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_22-52-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0059.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-07_CI_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_234044_TTUQ1b1x1_1626063_R8KN8iEB/fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_22-52-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0059.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-07_CI_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_234044_TTUQ1b1x1_1626063_R8KN8iEB/fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_22-52-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0059.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-07_CI_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_234044_TTUQ1b1x1_1626063_R8KN8iEB/fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_22-52-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0059.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-07_CI_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_234044_TTUQ1b1x1_1626063_R8KN8iEB/fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_22-52-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0059.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-07_CI_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_234044_TTUQ1b1x1_1626063_R8KN8iEB/fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_22-52-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0059.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_22-52-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0059.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_22-52-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0059.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_22-52-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0059.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_22-52-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0059.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_22-52-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0059.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_22-52-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0059.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_22-52-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0059.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-07_CI_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_234044_TTUQ1b1x1_1626063_R8KN8iEB/fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_22-52-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0059.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_22-52-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0059.fits.cat 
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=29, passed=569
Got 569 stars (including 539 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_22-52-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0059.fits.cat 
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 569 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec)
                    catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
                    catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec)

ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 491 to 548 (Dec 8.2 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 462 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 462 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 413 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36" 
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 462 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 505 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35" 

ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 491 to 548 (Dec 8.2 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 462 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 461 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 505 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32" 
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 461 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 505 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31" 
Excluding outliers - 461 stars left (next iteration limit 508)
Stop iterations.


 The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)

WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_22-52-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0059.fits N_match=461 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.413 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.383 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.942 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.348 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.454 n_q1=155 n_q2=21 n_q3=239 n_q4=46 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=2.281
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_22-52-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0059.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_22-52-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0059.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
 ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-07_CI_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_234044_TTUQ1b1x1_1626063_R8KN8iEB/fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_22-52-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0059.fits -region wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_22-52-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0059.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_22-52-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0059.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_23-23-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits sigma_overall=0.455 worst_q_ratio=1.272
ref2=Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-03-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0138.fits sigma_overall=0.309 worst_q_ratio=1.190
new1=fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_22-52-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0058.fits sigma_overall=0.444 worst_q_ratio=1.703
new2=fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_22-52-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0059.fits sigma_overall=0.413 worst_q_ratio=2.281
reference average sigma_overall=0.382 worst_q_ratio=1.231
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################

Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):

plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: numpy/matplotlib unavailable (No module named 'matplotlib') -- falling back to the C plotter
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy: PGPLOT /PNG device reported success but no file appeared at wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_23-23-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0155_astrometric_residuals.png -- no plot produced
WARNING: no astrometric residual plot produced for wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_23-23-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits -- both lib/plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py and lib/plot_astrometric_residuals_xy failed to create wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_23-23-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0155_astrometric_residuals.png (see messages above)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: numpy/matplotlib unavailable (No module named 'matplotlib') -- falling back to the C plotter
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy: PGPLOT /PNG device reported success but no file appeared at wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-03-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0138_astrometric_residuals.png -- no plot produced
WARNING: no astrometric residual plot produced for wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-03-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0138.fits -- both lib/plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py and lib/plot_astrometric_residuals_xy failed to create wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-03-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0138_astrometric_residuals.png (see messages above)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: numpy/matplotlib unavailable (No module named 'matplotlib') -- falling back to the C plotter
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy: PGPLOT /PNG device reported success but no file appeared at wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_22-52-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0058_astrometric_residuals.png -- no plot produced
WARNING: no astrometric residual plot produced for wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_22-52-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0058.fits -- both lib/plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py and lib/plot_astrometric_residuals_xy failed to create wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_22-52-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0058_astrometric_residuals.png (see messages above)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: numpy/matplotlib unavailable (No module named 'matplotlib') -- falling back to the C plotter
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy: PGPLOT /PNG device reported success but no file appeared at wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_22-52-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0059_astrometric_residuals.png -- no plot produced
WARNING: no astrometric residual plot produced for wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_22-52-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0059.fits -- both lib/plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py and lib/plot_astrometric_residuals_xy failed to create wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_22-52-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0059_astrometric_residuals.png (see messages above)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_22-52-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0058.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_22-52-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0058.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-07_CI_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_234044_TTUQ1b1x1_1626063_R8KN8iEB/wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_22-52-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0058.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_22-52-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0059.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_22-52-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0059.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-07_CI_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_234044_TTUQ1b1x1_1626063_R8KN8iEB/wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_22-52-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0059.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Leo-04-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
No candidates found here
Prepared the HTML report for the field Leo-04-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL

  ./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 3.5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_23-23-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-03-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0138.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-07_CI_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_234044_TTUQ1b1x1_1626063_R8KN8iEB/fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_22-52-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0058.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-07_CI_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_234044_TTUQ1b1x1_1626063_R8KN8iEB/fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_22-52-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0059.fits
  
Last  image: 2461199.66127476 08.06.2026 03:52:04.139 UTC
ERROR running VaST on the field Leo-04-Q1b1x1 (wrong field? clouds? very bad focus? -- transient_factory_test31.txt)
____ VaST output ____

--==VaST 1.0rc90==--

Parsing command line arguments...
opt 'r': assuming no rotation larger than 15.0 degrees!
opt 'F': Will NOT create flag images for SExtractor
opt '5': 3.500000 pix is the new fixed star matching radius!
opt 'b': Using 500 reference stars for image matching!
opt '3': Will try to select best aperture for each source!
opt 'y': 0 SysRem iterations will be conducted!
opt 't 4': robust linear magnitude calibration (vary zero-point and slope)
opt 'x': 99 is the maximum acceptable SExtractor flag!
WARNING: disabling the mag-size filter in order not to reject blended stars.
opt 'u': Stick with UTC time system, no conversion to TT will be done!
opt 'f': Run ./find_candidates manually!
opt 'k': "JD" keyword in FITS image header will be ignored!
INFO from vast_remove_directory(): Could not open directory: symlinks_to_images
INFO from vast_remove_directory(): Could not open directory: converted_images
INFO from vast_remove_directory(): Could not open directory: unpacked_images

Checking the list of input images specified on the command line ...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_23-23-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks

Looking for the list of input images with time corrections in vast_list_of_input_images_with_time_corrections.txt ... list not found.
This is OK if you specify the input images on the command line, not through this text file.
Checking write permissions for the current directory (/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-07_CI_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_234044_TTUQ1b1x1_1626063_R8KN8iEB)...  OK
Found a system-wide installation of SExtractor
Cleaning old outNNNNN.dat files.
Done with cleaning!

 VaST was started with the following command line: 
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 3.5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_23-23-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-03-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0138.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-07_CI_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_234044_TTUQ1b1x1_1626063_R8KN8iEB/fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_22-52-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0058.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-07_CI_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_234044_TTUQ1b1x1_1626063_R8KN8iEB/fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_22-52-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0059.fits 


Preparing to process 4 input FITS images...


######## Forcing special settings for the transient detection ########
transient search mode: disabling the mag-size filter as it should be switched off when running a transient search!
transient search mode: disabling the bad image filter as it will not help during the transient search!
transient search mode: will not try to gues image saturation limit
transient search mode: no UTC-to-TT time system conversion will be performed!!!
transient search mode: setting the maximum acceptable SExtractor flag to 3
transient search mode: disabling rejectin of images with elliptical stars
transient search mode: not discarding large sources
################
Excluding image region:   190.0  1039.0   192.0  1041.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   226.0  1548.0   228.0  1550.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   501.0  5912.0   503.0  5914.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   638.0  5545.0   640.0  5547.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   724.0  2731.0   726.0  2733.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   883.0  1376.0   885.0  1378.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   901.0  3972.0   903.0  3974.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1157.0   135.0  1159.0   137.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1198.0  1171.0  1200.0  1173.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1329.0   615.0  1331.0   617.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 43 image regions  (defined in bad_region.lst).
Setting the fixed star match radius of 3.50 pix
We have 4 images to process.
SExtractor catalog cache: restored Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_23-23-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits catalog from cache
SExtractor catalog cache: restored Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-03-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0138.fits catalog from cache
The number of processor cores determined from /proc/cpuinfo is 24.
Running SExtractor in 4 parallel threads...
Using the catalog image00001.cat SExtracted earlier from the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_23-23-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits
Using the catalog image00002.cat SExtracted earlier from the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-03-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0138.fits
The gain value (GAIN=0.830) from default.sex will be used for image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-07_CI_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_234044_TTUQ1b1x1_1626063_R8KN8iEB/fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_22-52-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0058.fits
The above guess is based on the non-default gain value specified in default.sex by user
Parent process says: we are done fork()ing.
Waiting for thread 3 to finish...
autodetect_aperture() is running SExtractor on /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-07_CI_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_234044_TTUQ1b1x1_1626063_R8KN8iEB/fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_22-52-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0058.fits
Excluding image region:   190.0  1039.0   192.0  1041.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   226.0  1548.0   228.0  1550.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   501.0  5912.0   503.0  5914.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   638.0  5545.0   640.0  5547.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   724.0  2731.0   726.0  2733.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   883.0  1376.0   885.0  1378.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   901.0  3972.0   903.0  3974.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1157.0   135.0  1159.0   137.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1198.0  1171.0  1200.0  1173.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1329.0   615.0  1331.0   617.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 43 image regions  (defined in bad_region.lst).
autodetect_aperture() is doing a preliminary SExtractor run to determine an appropriate aperture size
sex -c default.sex  -PARAMETERS_NAME autodetect_aper.param -CATALOG_NAME autodetect_aper_image00003.cat  /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-07_CI_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_234044_TTUQ1b1x1_1626063_R8KN8iEB/fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_22-52-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0058.fits > image00003.cat.sex_log 2>&1
The gain value (GAIN=0.830) from default.sex will be used for image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-07_CI_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_234044_TTUQ1b1x1_1626063_R8KN8iEB/fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_22-52-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0059.fits
The above guess is based on the non-default gain value specified in default.sex by user
autodetect_aperture() is running SExtractor on /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-07_CI_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_234044_TTUQ1b1x1_1626063_R8KN8iEB/fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_22-52-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0059.fits
Excluding image region:   190.0  1039.0   192.0  1041.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   226.0  1548.0   228.0  1550.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   501.0  5912.0   503.0  5914.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   638.0  5545.0   640.0  5547.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   724.0  2731.0   726.0  2733.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   883.0  1376.0   885.0  1378.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   901.0  3972.0   903.0  3974.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1157.0   135.0  1159.0   137.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1198.0  1171.0  1200.0  1173.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1329.0   615.0  1331.0   617.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 43 image regions  (defined in bad_region.lst).
autodetect_aperture() is doing a preliminary SExtractor run to determine an appropriate aperture size
sex -c default.sex  -PARAMETERS_NAME autodetect_aper.param -CATALOG_NAME autodetect_aper_image00004.cat  /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-07_CI_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_234044_TTUQ1b1x1_1626063_R8KN8iEB/fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_22-52-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0059.fits > image00004.cat.sex_log 2>&1
autodetect_aperture() is doing the main SExtractor run
sex  -PARAMETERS_NAME default.param -PHOT_APERTURES 4.4,4.4,4.0,4.9,5.3,5.7 -VERBOSE_TYPE NORMAL -CATALOG_NAME image00003.cat /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-07_CI_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_234044_TTUQ1b1x1_1626063_R8KN8iEB/fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_22-52-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0058.fits > image00003.cat.sex_log 2>&1
autodetect_aperture() is doing the main SExtractor run
sex  -PARAMETERS_NAME default.param -PHOT_APERTURES 4.5,4.5,4.1,5.0,5.4,5.9 -VERBOSE_TYPE NORMAL -CATALOG_NAME image00004.cat /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-07_CI_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_234044_TTUQ1b1x1_1626063_R8KN8iEB/fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_22-52-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0059.fits > image00004.cat.sex_log 2>&1
autodetect_aperture() is done with image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-07_CI_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_234044_TTUQ1b1x1_1626063_R8KN8iEB/fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_22-52-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0058.fits
Waiting for thread 2 to finish...
Waiting for thread 1 to finish...
autodetect_aperture() is done with image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-07_CI_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_234044_TTUQ1b1x1_1626063_R8KN8iEB/fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_22-52-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0059.fits


Done with SExtractor!

TIMING SExtractor: 3 seconds


Matching stars between images!

No manually selected comparison stars file manually_selected_comparison_stars.lst which is fine.
Processing  /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_23-23-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits
9576x6388 FITS image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_23-23-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits
Trying to guess the time system by parsing the comment string 'Time of observation (UTC)'
Time system set from the comment to DATE-OBS keyword: 'Time of observation (UTC)'
The input time system is identified as: UTC (blank if unknown)
Setting observation date using DATE-OBS keyword: 2026-03-20T04:23:10.3786908
Setting observation time using DATE-OBS keyword: 2026-03-20T04:23:10.3786908

Observing time converted to the "standard" FITS header format:
DATE-OBS= 2026-03-20T04:23:10.378
EXPTIME = 20.000

Using the catalog image00001.cat SExtracted earlier from the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_23-23-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits
Exposure 20 sec, 20.03.2026 04:23:10.378 UTC = JD(UTC) 2461119.68287475 mid. exp.
The reference image star  2174.979  3864.355 is rejected, see bad_region.lst
SExtractor output filtering results:
 * passed selection: 40872, (40872 good for image matching)
 * rejected as having no flux measurement: 0
 * rejected as having SNR<3.0: 22
 * rejected inside rectangles defined in bad_region.lst: 1
 * rejected close to frame edge: 190
 * rejected as being too small (<1.3 pix): 0
 * rejected as being too large (>5.1 pix): 0
 * rejected as outliers in mag-size plot: 0
 * rejected as having SExtractor flags > 99 and <= 7: 0
 * rejected as having hopelessly bad SExtractor flags (>7): 139
 * rejected due to an external image flag: 0
 * rejected as having bad PSF fit: 0
---
You may change some of the filtering parameters by editing src/vast_limits.h and re-running 'make'.

Please note: the CCD position-dependent magnitude correction will be applied.
get_detection_limit_sn(): Detection limit: -7.35
Detection limit from the magnitude-SNR relation= -7.4  (5.0 sigma detection)
The simple faintest star detection limit= -6.6
80 percent brightest stars detection limit= -7.9
Selected detection limit= -7.9
Final detection limit= -7.9 (after subtracting MAG_TRANSIENT_ABOVE_THE_REFERENCE_FRAME_LIMIT=0.0)

Parameter box for transient search:    10.04.8 pix): 0
 * rejected as outliers in mag-size plot: 0
 * rejected as having SExtractor flags > 99 and <= 7: 0
 * rejected as having hopelessly bad SExtractor flags (>7): 75
 * rejected due to an external image flag: 0
 * rejected as having bad PSF fit: 0
---
You may change some of the filtering parameters by editing src/vast_limits.h and re-running 'make'.
    41906 * detected, using  512/ 500 * for reference/current image matching, fraction_of_ambiguous_matches= 0.001575, number_of_ambiguous_matches=66 
refining the coordinate transformation... fraction_of_ambiguous_matches= 0.001480, number_of_ambiguous_matches=62 
37104 * matched, fraction_of_ambiguous_matches= 0.001480, number_of_ambiguous_matches=62 
37104 * matched (2nd iteration). fraction_of_ambiguous_matches= 0.001480, number_of_ambiguous_matches=62 
37104 * matched (3rd iteration). Success!
  rotation [degrees] = 177.178
    41906 stars detected, 37104 stars matched
Performing magnitude calibration using automatically selected comparison stars
Expecting to find at least 40 * for magnitude calibration
We have N_good_stars = 35243, N_manually_selected_comparison_stars = 0
Using 35243 stars for magnitude calibration (before filtering).
Iteratively removing outliers from the linear mag-mag relation (unweighted fit)...
After removing outliers in (X,Y,dm) plane, we are left with 35239 stars for magnitude calibration.
Using the linear CCD position-dependent magnitude correction:
 delta_m = -0.00001*X_pix +0.00002*Y_pix -0.04183
Iteratively removing outliers from the mag-mag relation (weighted linear/polynomial fit)...
Computing robust linear magnitude calibration.
Used 33001 stars for magnitude calibration (after filtering).
get_detection_limit_sn(): Detection limit: -7.28
    45674 objects stored in memory (400000 max.)
Magnitude calibration is performed successfully!
Saving observations to the cache... OK
memory:  126944 kB used, 141072 kB peak, 65263848 kB available RAM
processed 2 of 4 images ( 50.0%)



Processing  /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-07_CI_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_234044_TTUQ1b1x1_1626063_R8KN8iEB/fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_22-52-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0058.fits
9576x6388 FITS image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-07_CI_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_234044_TTUQ1b1x1_1626063_R8KN8iEB/fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_22-52-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0058.fits
Trying to guess the time system by parsing the comment string 'Time of observation (UTC)'
Time system set from the comment to DATE-OBS keyword: 'Time of observation (UTC)'
The input time system is identified as: UTC (blank if unknown)
Setting observation date using DATE-OBS keyword: 2026-06-08T03:52:04.1398627
Setting observation time using DATE-OBS keyword: 2026-06-08T03:52:04.1398627

Observing time converted to the "standard" FITS header format:
DATE-OBS= 2026-06-08T03:52:04.139
EXPTIME = 20.000

Using the catalog image00003.cat SExtracted earlier from the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-07_CI_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_234044_TTUQ1b1x1_1626063_R8KN8iEB/fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_22-52-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0058.fits
The star  8497.986   871.981 is rejected, see bad_region.lst
The star  8217.003  3950.091 is rejected, see bad_region.lst
The star  2317.992  4332.003 is rejected, see bad_region.lst
SExtractor output filtering results:
 * passed selection: 4495
 * rejected as having no flux measurement: 0
 * rejected as having SNR<3.0: 1
 * rejected inside rectangles defined in bad_region.lst: 3
 * rejected close to frame edge: 24
 * rejected as being too small (<1.1 pix): 0
 * rejected as being too large (>4.4 pix): 0
 * rejected as outliers in mag-size plot: 0
 * rejected as having SExtractor flags > 99 and <= 7: 0
 * rejected as having hopelessly bad SExtractor flags (>7): 1
 * rejected due to an external image flag: 0
 * rejected as having bad PSF fit: 0
---
You may change some of the filtering parameters by editing src/vast_limits.h and re-running 'make'.
     4495 * detected, using  100/ 500 * for reference/current image matching, fraction_of_ambiguous_matches= 0.000000, number_of_ambiguous_matches=0 
refining the coordinate transformation... fraction_of_ambiguous_matches= 0.000022, number_of_ambiguous_matches=1 
4425 * matched, fraction_of_ambiguous_matches= 0.000022, number_of_ambiguous_matches=1 
4425 * matched (2nd iteration). fraction_of_ambiguous_matches= 0.000022, number_of_ambiguous_matches=1 
4426 * matched (3rd iteration). Success!
  rotation [degrees] = 177.720
     4495 stars detected,  4426 stars matched
Performing magnitude calibration using automatically selected comparison stars
Expecting to find at least 40 * for magnitude calibration
We have N_good_stars = 3805, N_manually_selected_comparison_stars = 0
Using 3805 stars for magnitude calibration (before filtering).
Iteratively removing outliers from the linear mag-mag relation (unweighted fit)...
After removing outliers in (X,Y,dm) plane, we are left with 2813 stars for magnitude calibration.
Using the linear CCD position-dependent magnitude correction:
 delta_m = 0.00016*X_pix -0.00009*Y_pix -0.06832
ERROR in magnitude calibration: fabs(lin_mag_A * X_im_size + lin_mag_C) > MAX_LIN_CORR_MAG
Used 2813 stars for magnitude calibration (after filtering).
get_detection_limit_sn(): Detection limit: -7.62
 ERROR!!! Magnitude calibration failure. Dropping image. 
    45674 objects stored in memory (400000 max.)
memory:  128560 kB used, 141072 kB peak, 65263848 kB available RAM
processed 3 of 4 images ( 75.0%)



Processing  /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-07_CI_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_234044_TTUQ1b1x1_1626063_R8KN8iEB/fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_22-52-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0059.fits
9576x6388 FITS image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-07_CI_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_234044_TTUQ1b1x1_1626063_R8KN8iEB/fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_22-52-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0059.fits
Trying to guess the time system by parsing the comment string 'Time of observation (UTC)'
Time system set from the comment to DATE-OBS keyword: 'Time of observation (UTC)'
The input time system is identified as: UTC (blank if unknown)
Setting observation date using DATE-OBS keyword: 2026-06-08T03:52:56.3853361
Setting observation time using DATE-OBS keyword: 2026-06-08T03:52:56.3853361

Observing time converted to the "standard" FITS header format:
DATE-OBS= 2026-06-08T03:52:56.385
EXPTIME = 20.000

Using the catalog image00004.cat SExtracted earlier from the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-07_CI_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_234044_TTUQ1b1x1_1626063_R8KN8iEB/fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_22-52-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0059.fits
The star  1158.110   135.961 is rejected, see bad_region.lst
The star  8498.001   871.984 is rejected, see bad_region.lst
The star  2635.894  2107.971 is rejected, see bad_region.lst
The star  8449.977  6167.002 is rejected, see bad_region.lst
The star  2318.005  4331.955 is rejected, see bad_region.lst
The star  8217.011  3949.910 is rejected, see bad_region.lst
The star  2344.997  4748.915 is rejected, see bad_region.lst
SExtractor output filtering results:
 * passed selection: 4745
 * rejected as having no flux measurement: 0
 * rejected as having SNR<3.0: 3
 * rejected inside rectangles defined in bad_region.lst: 7
 * rejected close to frame edge: 32
 * rejected as being too small (<1.1 pix): 0
 * rejected as being too large (>4.5 pix): 0
 * rejected as outliers in mag-size plot: 0
 * rejected as having SExtractor flags > 99 and <= 7: 0
 * rejected as having hopelessly bad SExtractor flags (>7): 4
 * rejected due to an external image flag: 0
 * rejected as having bad PSF fit: 0
---
You may change some of the filtering parameters by editing src/vast_limits.h and re-running 'make'.
     4745 * detected, using  100/ 500 * for reference/current image matching, fraction_of_ambiguous_matches= 0.000022, number_of_ambiguous_matches=1 
refining the coordinate transformation... fraction_of_ambiguous_matches= 0.000022, number_of_ambiguous_matches=1 
4671 * matched, fraction_of_ambiguous_matches= 0.000022, number_of_ambiguous_matches=1 
4671 * matched (2nd iteration). fraction_of_ambiguous_matches= 0.000022, number_of_ambiguous_matches=1 
4671 * matched (3rd iteration). Success!
  rotation [degrees] = 177.714
     4745 stars detected,  4671 stars matched
Performing magnitude calibration using automatically selected comparison stars
Expecting to find at least 40 * for magnitude calibration
We have N_good_stars = 4001, N_manually_selected_comparison_stars = 0
Using 4001 stars for magnitude calibration (before filtering).
Iteratively removing outliers from the linear mag-mag relation (unweighted fit)...
After removing outliers in (X,Y,dm) plane, we are left with 2822 stars for magnitude calibration.
Using the linear CCD position-dependent magnitude correction:
 delta_m = 0.00016*X_pix -0.00009*Y_pix -0.07561
ERROR in magnitude calibration: fabs(lin_mag_A * X_im_size + lin_mag_C) > MAX_LIN_CORR_MAG
Used 2822 stars for magnitude calibration (after filtering).
get_detection_limit_sn(): Detection limit: -7.65
 ERROR!!! Magnitude calibration failure. Dropping image. 
    45674 objects stored in memory (400000 max.)
memory:  128560 kB used, 141072 kB peak, 65263848 kB available RAM
processed 4 of 4 images (100.0%)
TIMING matching_and_photometry: 0 seconds
Done with measurements! =)

Total number of measurements 82778 (82778 measurements stored in RAM)
Freeing up some memory...  Sorting the measurements cached in memory...
Writing lightcurve (outNNNNN.dat) files...
TIMING lightcurve_write: 1 seconds
The lightcurve files have been written, freeing up more memory...
Creating vast_image_details.log ... 

Writing summary file: vast_summary.log ...  OK
Selecting the best aperture for each source
Aperture with index 0 (REFERENCE_APERTURE_DIAMETER +0.00*REFERENCE_APERTURE_DIAMETER) seems best for  5792 stars
Aperture with index 1 (REFERENCE_APERTURE_DIAMETER +0.00*REFERENCE_APERTURE_DIAMETER) seems best for     0 stars
Aperture with index 2 (REFERENCE_APERTURE_DIAMETER -0.10*REFERENCE_APERTURE_DIAMETER) seems best for 13968 stars
Aperture with index 3 (REFERENCE_APERTURE_DIAMETER +0.10*REFERENCE_APERTURE_DIAMETER) seems best for  4624 stars
Aperture with index 4 (REFERENCE_APERTURE_DIAMETER +0.20*REFERENCE_APERTURE_DIAMETER) seems best for  4180 stars
Aperture with index 5 (REFERENCE_APERTURE_DIAMETER +0.30*REFERENCE_APERTURE_DIAMETER) seems best for  8540 stars

done!  =)
TIMING select_aperture: 2 seconds
Computing lightcurve statistics...  Will not compute variability indexes for objects having <1 points in lightcurve
You may disable this by commenting out the line '#define DROP_LIGHTCURVES_WITH_SMALL_NUMBER_OF_POINTS_FROM_ALL_PLOTS' in src/vast_limits.h an re-compiling VaST with 'make'

Computing, please wait a bit
.................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
vast_lightcurve_statistics.log: 36939 objects, the longest string is 386 bytes.
Allocating memory for resorting the file.
Variability index idx00_STD  is enabled
Variability index idx01_wSTD is enabled
Variability index idx08_Npts is enabled
Variability index idx09_MAD  is enabled
Variability index idx11_RoMS is enabled
Variability index idx12_rCh2 is enabled
Variability index idx17_Jtim is enabled
Variability index idx18_Ltim is enabled
Variability index idx21_eta  is enabled
Variability index idx23_S_B  is enabled
Variability index idx25_IQR  is enabled
Computing the expected values of variability indexes and their scatter as a function of magnitude
..........
..........
..........
..........
Wriring the list of candidate variables to vast_autocandidates.log ........................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................



----***** VaST processing WARNING *****----
You asked VaST to process 4 images, but only 1 were actually matched to the reference one.
Please investigate this!



**************************************************************
This error might be a bug, but it is far more likely that it is caused by 
inappropriate input data. A few simple things to check in the diagnostic
messages printed above (or the vast*.log files):
 * How many of the input images are matched?
 * Does the number of detected stars on each image look reasonable?
 * Do images have a sufficient overlap of at least about 20 percent?

You may run
 ./sextract_single_image /path/to/my/image/file.fit
to see how well VaST detects stars with the current SExtractor settings
(star detection settings can be changed in the default.sex configuration
file, see various examples in the VaST directory).

If you cannot identify the problem, please e-mail Kirill Sokolovsky 
Please try to describe the problem in details and, if possible, attach vast_summary.log
file and a few example images. If the images are too big to be sent by e-mail, please 
upload them through a web-form http://scan.sai.msu.ru/upload/
**************************************************************

Low percentage of matched images - we'll declare this an unsuccessful VaST run (exit code 1)
_____________________
########### Completed Leo-04-Q1b1x1 ###########
The analysis was running at tau
We are allowed to update the exclusion list at tau host
Found ../exclusion_list_TTUQ1.txt
#### The exclusion list before filtering-out asteroids, bad pixels and adding Gaia sources ####
###################################################################################
renamed 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt_noasteroids' -> 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt'
renamed 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt_nohotpixels' -> 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt'
# Count candidates with no identification (that also don't look like hot pix)
Found 0 unidentified candidates (excluding asteroids, hot pixels and known variable stars).
###################################################################################
0 candidates found (excluding asteroids and hot pixels)
This does not look like a test run
###################################################################################
exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt NOT FOUND
exclusion_list_apass.txt NOT FOUND
IS_THIS_TEST_RUN=NO  ALLOW_EXCLUSION_LIST_UPDATE= YES
#### Nothing to add to the exclusion list ####
The observatory MPC code is V36
############################################################
Positions of planets computed with util/planet_finder/main.py for JD(UT)2461199.66127476 -observatory V36
06:43:33.08 +25:00:25.2 Mercury (0.1mag)
07:42:41.94 +23:23:07.9 Venus (-4.0mag)
02:49:31.18 +15:42:25.7 Mars (1.3mag)
07:48:24.72 +21:31:31.1 Jupiter (-1.9mag)
00:49:21.92 +02:48:38.0 Saturn (0.9mag)
04:00:11.97 +20:25:26.5 Uranus (5.8mag)
00:16:08.43 +00:16:47.7 Neptune (7.8mag)
20:33:21.50 -23:04:32.1 Pluto (14.5mag)
23:01:36.22 -05:49:48.4 Moon (-10.4mag)
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 362 Jun  7 23:44 planets.txt
############################################################
Positions of selected moons from JPL HORIZONS for JD(UT)2461199.66127476:
07:48:25.06 +21:31:32.2 Io (6.0mag)
07:48:24.49 +21:31:33.9 Europa (6.2mag)
07:48:08.83 +21:32:18.2 Ganymede (5.6mag)
07:48:43.58 +21:30:30.2 Callisto (6.7mag)
07:48:42.18 +21:07:48.6 Himalia (15.6mag)
07:48:29.20 +21:31:17.3 Thebe (16.5mag)
07:48:41.67 +21:23:15.9 Elara (17.5mag)
07:50:35.31 +21:43:13.9 Pasiphae (17.7mag)
07:54:59.88 +21:33:13.3 Carme (18.9mag)
00:49:12.44 +02:48:37.1 Titan (8.7mag)
00:49:18.96 +02:48:51.3 Rhea (9.9mag)
00:49:54.21 +02:50:47.2 Iapetus (11.3mag)
00:49:17.80 +02:48:15.1 Hyperion (14.7mag)
00:50:04.22 +02:50:34.8 Phoebe (16.7mag)
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 568 Jun  7 23:44 moons.txt
############################################################
Positions of selected spacecraft from JPL HORIZONS for JD(UT)2461199.66127476:
17:26:45.91 -35:14:27.6 JWST
14:26:18.69 +57:38:38.7 Chandra
18:30:03.01 -26:22:01.3 XMM-Newton
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 96 Jun  7 23:44 spacecraft.txt
############################################################
Positions of bright comets computed with util/comet_finder/main.py for JD(UT)2461199.66127476 -observatory V36
18:43:32.04 -32:39:05.7 13.6mag P/2010 H2 (Vales)
05:53:26.29 -68:03:51.8 17.4mag C/2014 UN271 (Bernardinelli-Bernstein)
05:49:02.82 +31:58:03.4 17.5mag C/2017 K2 (PANSTARRS)
17:14:44.75 +15:21:01.0 17.8mag C/2021 G2 (ATLAS)
21:11:58.59 -49:30:15.9 16.9mag P/2021 N1 (ZTF)
23:12:38.46 +31:35:26.8 17.2mag C/2022 E2 (ATLAS)
05:34:00.08 +26:58:31.2 16.5mag C/2022 N2 (PANSTARRS)
09:29:42.24 +31:05:01.8 16.6mag C/2022 QE78 (ATLAS)
08:50:31.69 +03:55:49.3 17.7mag C/2022 R6 (PANSTARRS)
18:28:14.65 +21:36:06.2 17.8mag C/2023 A3 (Tsuchinshan-ATLAS)
15:19:23.12 -11:00:30.9 17.6mag P/2023 B1 (PANSTARRS)
22:14:26.58 +66:31:35.6 17.7mag C/2023 H5 (Lemmon)
17:46:28.19 -06:41:09.6 13.7mag C/2023 R1 (PANSTARRS)
13:18:06.89 +83:00:03.5 17.9mag C/2023 X2 (Lemmon)
07:10:22.08 +64:18:28.8 17.7mag C/2024 A1 (ATLAS)
06:47:13.22 +27:49:53.0 13.6mag C/2024 E1 (Wierzchos)
15:37:18.92 +13:31:24.6 17.4mag C/2024 G6 (ATLAS)
20:13:04.09 +31:07:31.6 14.0mag C/2024 J3 (ATLAS)
04:17:59.54 -15:57:14.3 16.0mag C/2024 T5 (ATLAS)
06:05:52.80 +34:29:50.4 17.9mag C/2025 J1 (Borisov)
11:34:55.32 +52:45:03.9 17.4mag C/2025 L1 (ATLAS)
06:44:54.10 -10:52:05.9 14.1mag C/2025 R3 (PANSTARRS)
09:24:08.07 +23:20:25.7 17.9mag C/2025 V2 (Rankin)
12:39:42.14 +04:41:28.3 17.2mag C/2025 Y1 (ATLAS)
18:12:56.43 +75:07:30.4 17.9mag C/2026 A2 (Bok)
02:00:36.41 +43:24:46.5 16.1mag C/2026 B2 (Sun-Gao)
11:11:18.34 -03:44:42.2 16.5mag A/2026 E1
20:23:35.40 -08:34:01.6 8.7mag 10P/Tempel
11:01:59.85 -00:58:03.0 16.0mag 29P/Schwassmann-Wachmann
03:11:40.13 +25:38:28.5 17.7mag 47P/Ashbrook-Jackson
08:59:54.53 +23:46:43.4 16.9mag 63P/Wild
00:26:53.89 -06:22:10.7 15.7mag 65P/Gunn
06:43:19.89 +33:25:36.2 16.9mag 76P/West-Kohoutek-Ikemura
03:09:06.00 +17:12:44.7 13.8mag 78P/Gehrels
01:20:41.15 +04:50:31.5 15.6mag 88P/Howell
04:54:31.94 +30:18:02.1 15.2mag 93P/Lovas
02:42:51.33 +27:37:14.7 17.6mag 114P/Wiseman-Skiff
06:50:28.06 +33:02:22.1 15.6mag 123P/West-Hartley
09:50:07.26 +14:39:06.6 16.5mag 124P/Mrkos
03:58:58.80 +19:14:53.7 16.4mag 128P/Shoemaker-Holt
04:33:29.80 +19:04:58.8 17.7mag 131P/Mueller
05:58:10.05 +18:40:09.3 14.6mag 141P/Machholz
06:00:48.19 +17:40:24.9 14.6mag 141P-A/Machholz
04:53:55.29 +16:10:08.9 11.6mag 141P-D/Machholz
02:57:39.24 -24:42:15.2 16.8mag 161P/Hartley-IRAS
03:41:26.20 +23:47:46.5 14.9mag 162P/SidingSpring
19:36:38.30 +01:43:10.1 16.9mag 169P/NEAT
00:18:14.73 +02:27:31.8 17.9mag 220P/McNaught
16:52:12.57 -08:28:38.7 16.4mag 235P/LINEAR
07:34:34.87 +35:29:36.1 17.5mag 240P/NEAT
00:32:15.74 -02:28:59.7 16.4mag 260P/McNaught
04:04:07.99 +32:28:29.9 17.6mag 295P/LINEAR
23:52:02.17 -09:45:10.9 17.6mag 320P/McNaught
15:15:15.22 +08:06:03.5 17.4mag 391P/Kowalski
08:07:06.61 +20:44:53.8 17.9mag 450P/LONEOS
06:59:55.07 +41:41:56.2 17.8mag 493P/LONEOS
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 2.7K Jun  7 23:44 comets.txt
############################################################
List of recent ASAS-SN transients from https://www.astronomy.ohio-state.edu/asassn/transients.html :
20:07:38.15 -21:07:05.40  SN2026mho  2026-05-25.18 -1.12
11:29:42.55 +79:01:03.10  AT2026min  2026-05-24.21 16.63
11:44:32.95 -68:48:30.00  ASASSN-26no  2026-05-24 8.41
19:00:42.82 -48:31:01.60  ASASSN-26dp  2026-05-22.31 -3.28
14:23:56.59 -58:37:47.40  ASASSN-26dn  2026-05-20.01 14.59
11:24:54.06 +47:57:01.60  AT2026nma  2026-05-20.29 15.46
21:27:08.58 +33:24:38.10  AT2026lli  2026-05-19.34 15.86
00:31:01.41 -13:38:51.70  AT2026nad  2026-05-19.39 15.34
15:16:06.61 -79:16:32.40  ASASSN-26dm  2026-05-19.03 14.44
11:24:25.21 -59:23:19.10  ASASSN-26dl  2026-05-18.02 13.55
13:45:51.52 -53:16:01.00  ASASSN-26dk  2026-05-18.16 12.96
02:05:49.69 -30:29:09.60  ASASSN-26dh  2026-05-18.43 15.37
17:50:22.87 -39:42:33.90  ASASSN-26dj  2026-05-17.05 15.7
01:13:11.60 -33:25:16.10  ASASSN-26dg  2026-05-13.41 16.8
16:44:31.77 -27:15:18.40  AT2026mhn  2026-05-12.33 15.8
09:46:31.08 -33:41:51.00  ASASSN-26di  2026-05-12.14 14.63
21:23:11.57 -19:09:45.00  AT2026kwu  2026-05-12.26 16.9
14:20:14.30 -30:20:51.90  AT2026ktm  2026-05-12.06 17.21
14:41:39.01 -37:13:46.40  AT2026lkm  2026-05-11.18 16.89
12:59:50.45 -10:58:38.80  SN2026kep  2026-05-9.06 17.5
13:37:29.61 -29:50:30.90  AT2026lkd  2026-05-9.09 17.23
09:46:42.01 -14:52:03.60  SN2026kmo  2026-05-8.99 17.51
15:03:05.28 +22:02:03.40  AT2026lxf  2026-05-8.07 13.88
10:23:49.41 -20:57:25.30  ASASSN-26df  2026-05-8.21 16.52
22:14:40.56 +05:04:51.60  2026lda  2026-05-7.56 16.2
21:35:33.81 -14:05:16.30  ASASSN-26de  2026-05-6.29 14.51
16:21:48.82 -61:36:13.20  ASASSN-26dd  2026-05-5.21 15.15
14:26:40.22 -24:48:37.50  AT2026lig  2026-05-4.27 14.63
13:17:51.04 +30:25:13.50  SN2026kcp  2026-05-4.46 16.43
11:27:55.57 -13:38:56.90  SN2026kza  2026-05-1.08 15.59
22:28:27.10 +30:17:54.30  SN 2026fov  2026-04-29.6 14.36
21:00:10.71 -32:17:03.90  AT2026kis  2026-04-27.36 16.15
14:32:57.37 -58:13:26.40  ASASSN-26dc  2026-04-27.27 13.42
15:32:05.35 -43:54:34.60  ASASSN-26db  2026-04-27.37 16.06
16:34:34.97 -54:34:58.00  ASASSN-26da  2026-04-25.32 16.11
10:06:55.04 -01:13:49.70  SN2026jsg  2026-04-24.99 16.28
15:15:57.17 +56:18:32.80  SN2026kid  2026-04-24.52 -3.65
07:58:28.45 +57:03:42.40  AT2026kcf  2026-04-24.2 16.89
11:38:21.80 -50:43:06.50  SN2026jkb  2026-04-24.24 15.38
10:06:11.41 -39:41:04.20  AT2026dil  2026-04-24.2 16.85
14:21:40.08 +13:13:46.30  SN2026jlm  2026-04-22.16 15.12
10:53:55.52 -16:06:06.00  ASASSN-26cz  2026-04-22.28 16.29
20:07:38.15 -21:07:05.40    2026-05-25.18 -1.12
13:45:02.03 +15:17:14.50  ASASSN-26cy  2026-04-21.27 15.78
13:20:52.22 -35:57:03.60  AT2026jcm  2026-04-19.01 16.65
13:36:15.66 -36:53:48.40  SN 2026iqy  2026-04-18.92 17.31
06:34:01.33 -40:07:34.00  ASASSN-26cx  2026-04-19.07 16.16
23:33:57.97 -45:12:11.90  SN 2026idu  2026-04-19.41 15.9
12:10:50.92 +66:55:31.20  SN 2026icv  2026-04-17.14 16.03
21:36:59.06 -60:43:35.90  ASASSN-26cv  2026-04-17.35 -1.18
08:13:26.26 -27:07:30.50  ASASSN-26cw  2026-04-17.07 -1.01
14:49:14.13 -27:29:20.60  ASASSN-26cu  2026-04-16.06 14.03
17:21:59.44 -38:54:04.60  ASASSN-26ct  2026-04-14.4 15.15
15:25:54.99 +07:49:24.50  SN2026huo  2026-04-12.14 16.96
20:07:38.15 -21:07:05.40    2026-05-25.18 -1.12
12:23:20.40 +04:53:39.10  AT2026ixd  2026-04-12.14 17.65
17:46:09.76 -61:19:50.40  SN2026icy  2026-04-12.2 17.03
09:25:46.42 +02:13:46.30  SN2026gud  2026-04-11.98 16.49
16:52:15.46 -60:27:45.90  ASASSN-26cs  2026-04-12.4 15.5
04:20:55.37 -51:15:31.10  ASASSN-26cr  2026-04-12.01 15.37
22:25:39.35 +36:45:06.90  AT2026ihl  2026-04-10.48 14.21
19:40:44.94 +00:41:03.80  AT2026imw  2026-04-10.32 16.06
19:52:04.70 +05:53:33.50  ASASSN-26cq  2026-04-9.31 14.98
16:08:18.39 -64:11:08.80  ASASSN-26cp  2026-04-9.29 13.32
09:22:22.90 -61:02:43.70  SN2026idh  2026-04-7.97 16.34
05:06:54.12 -19:42:26.40  AT2026imr  2026-04-8 17.49
07:14:55.34 -36:03:21.40  AT2026hei  2026-04-8.12 16.7
21:35:33.14 -19:01:34.80  AT2026ihm  2026-04-8.36 16.7
04:28:24.08 -32:25:35.30  AT2026imo  2026-04-8.02 16.81
05:10:35.79 -39:38:40.80  SN 2026hnn  2026-04-7.04 17.07
09:54:32.04 -01:17:25.80  ASASSN-26cn  2026-04-7.01 15.58
07:46:24.43 -77:29:35.90  ASASSN-26co  2026-04-7.15 14.93
05:00:45.52 -29:51:06.20  AT2026hvw  2026-04-6.03 16.51
19:49:33.10 -23:37:11.00  ASASSN-26cl  2026-04-5.29 14.98
19:32:43.55 -22:39:33.40  ASASSN-26cm  2026-04-4.3 13.88
18:08:57.38 +76:48:23.60  ASASSN-26ck  2026-04-2.37 15.38
16:16:36.10 +44:52:30.20  AT2026hyy  2026-04-2.58 13.81
21:55:23.31 -34:48:53.90  ASASSN-26cj  2026-03-30.4 -1.47
11:19:50.70 -27:51:49.80  SN2026gvk  2026-03-30 15.48
11:53:57.02 -23:09:46.20  SN2026gzx  2026-03-28.75 15.27
07:13:46.14 -33:10:15.70  ASASSN-26ci  2026-03-28.15 15.14
09:03:36.09 -67:58:13.00  SN2026hkg  2026-03-28.19 15.82
07:03:00.72 +39:14:43.00  SN2026fin  2026-03-28.27 15.82
05:35:42.80 -63:44:05.50  ASASSN-26ch  2026-03-27.86 13.02
11:23:19.04 +34:22:38.00  SN2026fwt  2026-03-27.3 16.56
19:03:49.79 +37:04:05.20  ASASSN-26ce  2026-03-26.56 16.3
20:26:56.07 -52:54:06.50  AT2026hiy  2026-03-26.35 16.95
05:25:54.76 -30:15:35.80  ASASSN-26cg  2026-03-25.07 16.88
06:57:16.49 -26:54:37.20  SN2026fzb  2026-03-25.14 15.8
14:37:38.23 -43:00:52.30  ASASSN-26cd  2026-03-24.24 12.52
17:34:53.03 +06:04:29.70  AT2026gzl  2026-03-23.27 15.82
08:30:02.60 -35:12:47.50  ASASSN-26cf  2026-03-23.2 14.82
16:54:25.33 +37:49:56.60  SN 2026evz  2026-03-21.32 17.54
17:06:19.20 -18:54:19.50  ASASSN-26bx  2026-03-21.25 16.39
19:01:16.28 -29:29:23.10  ASASSN-26bw  2026-03-21.33 15.81
08:46:05.75 +10:47:39.80  ASASSN-26ca  2026-03-21.13 14.27
12:14:58.16 +63:47:16.20  SN 2026fvx  2026-03-21.12 15.6
18:02:55.90 -75:23:02.60  ASASSN-26bz  2026-03-21.32 16.16
12:16:02.88 -53:16:33.80  ASASSN-26cc  2026-03-20.04 15.48
13:08:21.85 +29:13:44.20  SN 2026fmh  2026-03-20.16 -0.33
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 5.6K Jun  7 23:44 asassn_transients_list.txt
############################################################
Truncated list of TOCP transients from http://www.cbat.eps.harvard.edu/unconf/tocp.html :
09:55:38.83 +69:05:21.7  PNV J09553883+6905217  2026-04-01.893  19.4mag
19:32:43.67 -22:39:30.7  TCP J19324367-2239307  2026-04-05.4395  13.6mag
16:16:36.03 +44:52:28.9  TCP J16163603+4452289  2026-04-05.6655  14.2mag
00:43:38.36 +41:15:32.4  PNV J00433836+4115324  2026-04-08.079  17.2mag
15:41:11.68 +59:18:26.8  TCP J15411168+5918268  2026-04-12.9625  19.2mag
00:43:35.02 +41:46:28.0  PNV J00433502+4146280  2026-04-23.056  15.9mag
00:42:55.64 +41:14:12.2  PNV J00425564+4114122  2026-04-24.042  16.2mag
21:14:03.38 +56:46:44.1  TCP J21140338+5646441  2026-05-05.3534  16.7mag
15:03:05.19 +22:02:04.1  TCP J15030519+2202041  2026-05-08.3260  13.9mag
07:15:18.25 +47:53:16.7  TCP J07151825+4753167  2026-05-09.1599  14.4mag
16:00:18.44 -22:30:10.6  TCP J16001844-2230106  2026-05-09.6135  13.3mag
00:42:47.45 +41:16:58.5  PNV J00424745+4116585  2026-05-10.030  16.8mag
09:55:02.89 +69:02:13.8  PNV J09550289+6902138  2026-05-18.925  20.7mag
00:43:01.82 +41:18:16.6  PNV J00430182+4118166  2026-05-21.8651  18.83Cmag
00:42:51.20 +41:16:59.4  PNV J00425120+4116594  2022-10-26.135  19.3mag
12:24:25.10 +28:47:12.0  TCP J12242510+2847120  2026-05-31.6015  14.8mag
00:56:07.13 +43:01:40.6  TCP J00560713+4301406  2026-06-01.4135  12.2mag
00:42:41.64 +41:15:16.2  PNV J00424164+4115162  2026-06-02.029  17.4mag
00:42:38.68 +41:15:58.2  PNV J00423868+4115582  2026-06-05.1224  19.97Umag
19:00:42.95 -48:31:01.7  PNV J19004295-4831017  2026-05-25.0752  14.2mag
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 189K Jun  7 23:44 tocp_transients_list.txt
############################################################
Truncated list of recent TNS transients from https://www.wis-tns.org/ :
16:39:35.110 +15:17:58.28  AT 2026nsc  2026-05-09.80 20.76
16:42:48.680 +20:27:18.30  AT 2026nsb  2026-05-09.80 20.54
13:34:03.440 +31:37:31.73  AT 2026nsa  2026-05-07.80 21.26
13:50:28.150 +02:34:54.72  AT 2026nrz  2026-05-22.72 21.54
13:43:59.750 +03:47:21.63  AT 2026nry  2026-05-22.69 22.05
13:17:26.150 -01:26:00.12  AT 2026nrx  2026-05-21.64 21.7
00:35:20.216 -08:28:38.64  AT 2026nrw  2026-05-19.42 18.74
23:50:43.016 -01:09:12.25  AT 2026nrv  2026-05-23.48 19.5028
22:36:47.715 +37:31:34.81  AT 2026nru  2026-05-22.43 19.4626
23:58:04.247 +20:56:44.66  AT 2026nrt  2026-05-23.48 20.1237
16:08:58.229 +36:53:23.76  AT 2026nrs  2026-05-21.36 20.3819
19:44:04.734 +84:44:44.91  SN 2026nrr  2026-05-25.47 17.808
21:42:24.388 -20:21:08.51  SN 2026nrq  2026-05-25.56 18.623
22:03:20.669 -84:55:27.45  AT 2026nrp  2026-05-22.30 19.244
23:07:53.376 -39:04:26.84  AT 2026nro  2026-05-22.38 19.567
00:40:07.848 -39:10:21.32  AT 2026nrn  2026-05-12.41 18.737
23:05:28.381 -21:25:50.28  AT 2026nrm  2026-05-25.58 18.887
19:27:28.750 -48:42:52.35  AT 2026nrl  2026-05-22.24 19.107
12:33:38.422 +12:02:05.88  AT 2026nrk  2026-05-25.29 21.322
12:32:27.199 +02:39:54.51  AT 2026nrj  2026-05-25.29 21.0728
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 30K Jun  7 23:44 tns_transients_list.txt

=== Transient Factory Profiling ===
Started: Sun Jun  7 23:43:37 CDT 2026
=======================================
TIMING SExtractor: 3 seconds
TIMING matching_and_photometry: 0 seconds
TIMING lightcurve_write: 0 seconds
TIMING select_aperture: 1 seconds
    VAST_RUN_default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1: 5s (0.08 min)
    WCS_CACHE_SETUP: 0s (0.00 min)
    WCS_CALIBRATION_AND_EPHEMERIS: 34s (0.57 min)
    PLATE_VERIFY_AND_POINTING: 0s (0.00 min)
    UCAC5_PLATE_SOLVING: 0s (0.00 min)
    MAGNITUDE_CALIBRATION: 48s (0.80 min)
    MAGCAL_SANITY_CHECK: 0s (0.00 min)
      FILTER_MAGNITUDE_CONSOLIDATED: 0s (0.00 min)
      FILTER_FRAME_EDGE: 0s (0.00 min)
      FILTER_SECOND_EPOCH_VERIFY: 0s (0.00 min)
    CANDIDATE_FILTERING_TOTAL: 0s (0.00 min)
    EXCLUSION_LIST_PREPARATION: 0s (0.00 min)
    SEEING_AND_LIMITING_MAG: 1s (0.02 min)
    WAIT_FOR_UCAC5: 1s (0.02 min)
    WCS_IMAGE_ARCHIVING: 0s (0.00 min)
    HTML_REPORT: 0s (0.00 min)
  SE_CONFIG_default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1: 89s (1.48 min)
FIELD_Leo-04-Q1b1x1: 123s (2.05 min)
=======================================
TOTAL_RUNTIME: 125s (2.08 min)
Finished: Sun Jun  7 23:45:42 CDT 2026