This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-07_CI_Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_233439_TTUQ1b1x1_955334_9gWXndjY
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 08.1705 2461199.6705 11.88 19:50:37.84 +26:42:45.2
63.20347 0.10977 galactic Vul Second-epoch detections are separated by 2.3" and 9.4 pix
The object was found in VSX13" Gaia DR3 2027137603532157056
Type: ROT
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
14.990 G 15.030 G K
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_05-20-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0295.fits at 19:50:37.84 +26:42:45.2: 12.76 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-22-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1307.fits at 19:50:37.84 +26:42:45.2: 12.94 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.86 +/- 0.02
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
Gaia DR3 2027137603532157056,2461199.6705,11.88,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
Gaia DR3 2027137603532157056 20260608.1705 11.88CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 08.1705 2461199.6705 12.13 19:58:56.89 +24:54:19.7
62.62220 -2.42628 galactic Vul Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.7" and 10.3 pix
The object was found in VSX 1" ASASSN-V J195856.83+245419.2
Type: SR
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
14.850 g Y 0.160 g 2458410.52500 309.000000000000
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_05-20-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0295.fits at 19:58:56.89 +24:54:19.7: 13.01 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-22-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1307.fits at 19:58:56.89 +24:54:19.7: 13.14 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.09 +/- 0.02
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ASASSN-V J195856.83+245419.2,2461199.6705,12.13,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ASASSN-V J195856.83+245419.2 20260608.1705 12.13CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 08.1705 2461199.6705 12.21 19:58:26.31 +33:07:17.2
69.56699 1.96791 galactic Cyg Second-epoch detections are separated by 2.8" and 8.6 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
online_id | ATO J299.6204+33.1227 | 19:58:26.31 +33:07:17.2 (user input) | dubious (ATLAS) | (ATLAS) | (position from user input) J-Ks=0.276+/-0.028 (F)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_05-20-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0295.fits at 19:58:26.31 +33:07:17.2: 13.16 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-22-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1307.fits at 19:58:26.31 +33:07:17.2: 14.03 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.36 +/- 0.05
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ATO J299.6204+33.1227,2461199.6705,12.21,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ATO J299.6204+33.1227 20260608.1705 12.21CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 08.1705 2461199.6705 11.89 19:56:53.26 +31:43:23.4
68.20241 1.51856 galactic Cyg Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.4" and 9.1 pix
The object was found in VSX 2" ZTF J195653.16+314322.0
Type: SR
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
15.762 g Y 0.666 g 2458316.24510 389.522373800000 C-N
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_05-20-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0295.fits at 19:56:53.26 +31:43:23.4: 13.04 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-22-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1307.fits at 19:56:53.26 +31:43:23.4: 13.11 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.09 +/- 0.02
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ZTF J195653.16+314322.0,2461199.6705,11.89,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ZTF J195653.16+314322.0 20260608.1705 11.89CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 08.1705 2461199.6705 11.68 19:58:12.31 +25:57:26.2
63.43190 -1.73368 galactic Vul Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.2" and 9.8 pix
The object was found in VSX 2" ASASSN-V J195812.28+255728.4
Type: SRS
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
13.150 V 13.240 V 2457481.13200 20.059000000000
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_05-20-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0295.fits at 19:58:12.31 +25:57:26.2: 12.52 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-22-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1307.fits at 19:58:12.31 +25:57:26.2: 12.64 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.60 +/- 0.01
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ASASSN-V J195812.28+255728.4,2461199.6705,11.68,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ASASSN-V J195812.28+255728.4 20260608.1705 11.68CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 08.1705 2461199.6705 12.07 19:59:10.07 +33:23:29.5
69.87712 1.97921 galactic Cyg Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.2" and 9.1 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
online_id | Gaia DR3 2034402076891269632 | 19:59:13.41 +33:23:50.4 (Gaia DR3) | S (local) | (local) | Gaia3var=NOT_AVAILABLE J-Ks=0.425+/-0.030 (G)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_05-20-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0295.fits at 19:59:10.07 +33:23:29.5: 13.01 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-22-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1307.fits at 19:59:10.07 +33:23:29.5: 15.41 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.01 +/- 0.05
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
Gaia DR3 2034402076891269632,2461199.6705,12.07,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
Gaia DR3 2034402076891269632 20260608.1705 12.07CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 08.1705 2461199.6705 12.24 19:58:39.58 +26:45:30.7
64.16850 -1.40171 galactic Vul Second-epoch detections are separated by 2.1" and 10.2 pix
The object was found in VSX 1" NSVS J1958395+264530
Type: SR
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
15.801 g Y 0.276 g 2458643.06990 82.728501600000
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_05-20-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0295.fits at 19:58:39.58 +26:45:30.7: 13.53 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-22-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1307.fits at 19:58:39.58 +26:45:30.7: 13.73 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.64 +/- 0.03
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
NSVS J1958395+264530,2461199.6705,12.24,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
NSVS J1958395+264530 20260608.1705 12.24CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 08.1705 2461199.6705 12.13 19:57:43.17 +32:15:44.5
68.75480 1.64866 galactic Cyg Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.3" and 8.9 pix
The object was found in VSX 1" ASASSN-V J195743.18+321545.6
Type: L
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
13.690 V 13.810 V
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_05-20-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0295.fits at 19:57:43.17 +32:15:44.5: 13.23 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-22-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1307.fits at 19:57:43.17 +32:15:44.5: 15.08 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.32 +/- 0.04
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ASASSN-V J195743.18+321545.6,2461199.6705,12.13,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ASASSN-V J195743.18+321545.6 20260608.1705 12.13CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 08.1705 2461199.6705 12.35 19:56:22.04 +32:04:17.7
68.44291 1.79387 galactic Cyg Second-epoch detections are separated by 2.9" and 8.6 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
online_id | ATO J299.1012+32.0810 | 19:56:22.04 +32:04:17.7 (user input) | dubious (ATLAS) | (ATLAS) | (position from user input) J-Ks=1.065+/-0.025 (M)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_05-20-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0295.fits at 19:56:22.04 +32:04:17.7: 13.42 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-22-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1307.fits at 19:56:22.04 +32:04:17.7: 14.46 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.59 +/- 0.05
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ATO J299.1012+32.0810,2461199.6705,12.35,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ATO J299.1012+32.0810 20260608.1705 12.35CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 08.1705 2461199.6705 11.67 20:02:53.85 +25:11:43.8
63.34031 -3.03427 galactic Vul Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.7" and 10.2 pix
The object was found in VSX 1" NSVS 8409565
Type: L
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
10.750 R1 11.100 R1
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_05-20-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0295.fits at 20:02:53.85 +25:11:43.8: 12.62 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-22-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1307.fits at 20:02:53.85 +25:11:43.8: 12.56 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.58 +/- 0.01
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
NSVS 8409565,2461199.6705,11.67,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
NSVS 8409565 20260608.1705 11.67CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 08.1705 2461199.6705 11.95 19:57:29.12 +32:15:51.9
68.73076 1.69199 galactic Cyg Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.4" and 8.8 pix
The object was found in VSX21" ZTF J195727.67+321540.8
Type: EA
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
18.463 r Y 0.197 r 2458340.80570 1.648807600000
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_05-20-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0295.fits at 19:57:29.12 +32:15:51.9: 12.88 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-22-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1307.fits at 19:57:29.12 +32:15:51.9: 15.04 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.94 +/- 0.03
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ZTF J195727.67+321540.8,2461199.6705,11.95,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ZTF J195727.67+321540.8 20260608.1705 11.95CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 08.1705 2461199.6705 12.06 19:57:27.43 +33:01:11.3
69.37295 2.09034 galactic Cyg Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.1" and 8.9 pix
The object was found in VSX14" Gaia DR3 2034378192525454080
Type: E
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
17.430 G 17.650 G 2.652530000000
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_05-20-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0295.fits at 19:57:27.43 +33:01:11.3: 13.10 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-22-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1307.fits at 19:57:27.43 +33:01:11.3: 15.64 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.10 +/- 0.04
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
Gaia DR3 2034378192525454080,2461199.6705,12.06,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
Gaia DR3 2034378192525454080 20260608.1705 12.06CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 08.1705 2461199.6705 12.34 20:01:18.33 +27:45:44.0
65.33175 -1.37438 galactic Vul Second-epoch detections are separated by 2.1" and 9.9 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
online_id | target | 20:01:18.33 +27:45:44.0 (user input) | T | P | (position from user input) J-Ks=0.893+/-0.028 (M)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_05-20-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0295.fits at 20:01:18.33 +27:45:44.0: 13.26 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-22-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1307.fits at 20:01:18.33 +27:45:44.0: 13.41 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.34 +/- 0.03
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
target,2461199.6705,12.34,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
target 20260608.1705 12.34CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 08.1705 2461199.6705 12.05 19:58:50.91 +33:45:28.1
70.15463 2.22756 galactic Cyg Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.5" and 9.0 pix
The object was found in VSX24" Gaia DR3 2034475160035565312
Type: E
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
18.300 G 19.080 G 1.515890000000
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_05-20-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0295.fits at 19:58:50.91 +33:45:28.1: 12.92 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-22-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1307.fits at 19:58:50.91 +33:45:28.1: 15.13 +/- 0.22 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.99 +/- 0.04
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
Gaia DR3 2034475160035565312,2461199.6705,12.05,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
Gaia DR3 2034475160035565312 20260608.1705 12.05CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 08.1705 2461199.6705 11.89 19:59:07.71 +26:58:54.0
64.41342 -1.37395 galactic Vul Second-epoch detections are separated by 2.4" and 9.6 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
online_id | Gaia DR3 2027301293326220032 | 19:59:06.67 +26:59:22.4 (Gaia DR3) | T | P | Gaia3var=NOT_AVAILABLE J-Ks=1.155+/-0.030 (M)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_05-20-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0295.fits at 19:59:07.71 +26:58:54.0: 12.69 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-22-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1307.fits at 19:59:07.71 +26:58:54.0: 12.92 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.82 +/- 0.02
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
Gaia DR3 2027301293326220032,2461199.6705,11.89,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
Gaia DR3 2027301293326220032 20260608.1705 11.89CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 08.1705 2461199.6705 12.21 19:56:22.82 +31:16:51.8
67.76831 1.38130 galactic Cyg Second-epoch detections are separated by 7.0" and 9.7 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
online_id | target | 19:56:22.82 +31:16:51.8 (user input) | T | P | (position from user input)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_05-20-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0295.fits at 19:56:22.82 +31:16:51.8: 13.17 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-22-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1307.fits at 19:56:22.82 +31:16:51.8: 13.13 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.14 +/- 0.03
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
target,2461199.6705,12.21,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
target 20260608.1705 12.21CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 08.1705 2461199.6705 12.06 20:00:23.87 +27:24:03.6
64.91865 -1.39392 galactic Vul Second-epoch detections are separated by 2.2" and 9.9 pix
The object was found in VSX 2" ASASSN-V J200023.80+272405.1
Type: SRS
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
13.750 V 13.900 V 2457200.88000 24.294000000000
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_05-20-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0295.fits at 20:00:23.87 +27:24:03.6: 12.97 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-22-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1307.fits at 20:00:23.87 +27:24:03.6: 13.20 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.09 +/- 0.02
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ASASSN-V J200023.80+272405.1,2461199.6705,12.06,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ASASSN-V J200023.80+272405.1 20260608.1705 12.06CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 08.1705 2461199.6705 12.03 19:58:24.73 +34:15:54.9
70.54047 2.56971 galactic Cyg Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.4" and 8.8 pix
The object was found in VSX 1" HAT 199-02186
Type: SR
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
14.468 g Y 0.223 g 2458428.80310 108.299013200000
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_05-20-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0295.fits at 19:58:24.73 +34:15:54.9: 13.14 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-22-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1307.fits at 19:58:24.73 +34:15:54.9: 14.58 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.29 +/- 0.04
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
HAT 199-02186,2461199.6705,12.03,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
HAT 199-02186 20260608.1705 12.03CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 08.1705 2461199.6705 12.30 20:00:03.46 +27:41:22.0
65.12433 -1.17804 galactic Vul Second-epoch detections are separated by 3.1" and 10.4 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
online_id | ATO J300.0137+27.6895 | 20:00:03.31 +27:41:22.2 (Gaia DR3) | dubious (ATLAS) | (ATLAS) | Gaia3var=NOT_AVAILABLE SpType: K7 (LAMOST DR5) J-Ks=1.257+/-0.034 (M)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_05-20-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0295.fits at 20:00:03.46 +27:41:22.0: 13.28 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-22-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1307.fits at 20:00:03.46 +27:41:22.0: 13.40 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.36 +/- 0.03
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ATO J300.0137+27.6895,2461199.6705,12.30,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ATO J300.0137+27.6895 20260608.1705 12.30CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 08.1705 2461199.6705 11.84 20:32:07.30 +28:38:41.2
69.85433 -6.52361 galactic Vul Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.7" and 10.8 pix
The object was found in VSX 2" ASASSN-V J203207.36+283839.8
Type: L
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
13.010 V 13.410 V
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_05-20-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0295.fits at 20:32:07.30 +28:38:41.2: 12.69 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-22-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1307.fits at 20:32:07.30 +28:38:41.2: 15.57 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.69 +/- 0.03
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ASASSN-V J203207.36+283839.8,2461199.6705,11.84,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ASASSN-V J203207.36+283839.8 20260608.1705 11.84CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 08.1705 2461199.6705 12.14 19:59:29.16 +26:30:04.2
64.04596 -1.69383 galactic Vul Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.4" and 10.0 pix
The object was found in VSX 1" NSVS 8404514
Type: SR
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
15.592 g Y 0.341 g 2458384.95200 93.229514400000
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_05-20-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0295.fits at 19:59:29.16 +26:30:04.2: 13.08 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-22-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1307.fits at 19:59:29.16 +26:30:04.2: 13.45 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.27 +/- 0.03
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
NSVS 8404514,2461199.6705,12.14,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
NSVS 8404514 20260608.1705 12.14CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 08.1705 2461199.6705 11.94 19:57:52.10 +33:12:25.1
69.57770 2.11433 galactic Cyg Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.4" and 8.8 pix
The object was found in VSX 2" ASASSN-V J195751.94+331225.1
Type: SR
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
13.210 V 13.470 V 2457677.00000 524.000000000000
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_05-20-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0295.fits at 19:57:52.10 +33:12:25.1: 12.87 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-22-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1307.fits at 19:57:52.10 +33:12:25.1: 15.41 +/- 0.29 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.91 +/- 0.04
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ASASSN-V J195751.94+331225.1,2461199.6705,11.94,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ASASSN-V J195751.94+331225.1 20260608.1705 11.94CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 08.1705 2461199.6705 12.11 19:59:00.28 +34:08:29.6
70.49894 2.40063 galactic Cyg Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.2" and 8.8 pix
The object was found in VSX 1" ASASSN-V J195900.25+340829.1
Type: SRS
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
13.340 V 13.430 V 2457566.94100 18.386000000000
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_05-20-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0295.fits at 19:59:00.28 +34:08:29.6: 13.07 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-22-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1307.fits at 19:59:00.28 +34:08:29.6: 15.57 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.07 +/- 0.04
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ASASSN-V J195900.25+340829.1,2461199.6705,12.11,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ASASSN-V J195900.25+340829.1 20260608.1705 12.11CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 08.1705 2461199.6705 12.06 19:58:04.40 +33:01:40.9
69.44731 1.98439 galactic Cyg Second-epoch detections are separated by 2.2" and 8.9 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
online_id | Gaia DR3 2034367304824794752 | 19:58:04.33 +33:01:40.9 (Gaia DR3) | T | P | Gaia3var=NOT_AVAILABLE J-Ks=1.214+/-0.028 (M)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_05-20-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0295.fits at 19:58:04.40 +33:01:40.9: 13.07 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-22-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1307.fits at 19:58:04.40 +33:01:40.9: 14.73 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.18 +/- 0.04
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
Gaia DR3 2034367304824794752,2461199.6705,12.06,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
Gaia DR3 2034367304824794752 20260608.1705 12.06CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 08.1705 2461199.6705 11.95 19:58:31.54 +33:17:54.0
69.72745 2.04477 galactic Cyg Second-epoch detections are separated by 2.7" and 9.1 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
online_id | ATO J299.6287+33.3042 | 19:58:31.54 +33:17:54.0 (user input) | dubious (ATLAS) | (ATLAS) | (position from user input) J-Ks=0.354+/-0.028 (G)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_05-20-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0295.fits at 19:58:31.54 +33:17:54.0: 12.85 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-22-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1307.fits at 19:58:31.54 +33:17:54.0: 15.42 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.85 +/- 0.05
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ATO J299.6287+33.3042,2461199.6705,11.95,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ATO J299.6287+33.3042 20260608.1705 11.95CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 08.1705 2461199.6705 12.08 19:57:25.14 +33:11:05.3
69.50978 2.18303 galactic Cyg Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.5" and 9.1 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
online_id | ATO J299.3517+33.1772 | 19:57:25.14 +33:11:05.3 (user input) | dubious (ATLAS) | (ATLAS) | (position from user input) J-Ks=0.689+/-0.028 (K)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_05-20-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0295.fits at 19:57:25.14 +33:11:05.3: 13.05 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-22-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1307.fits at 19:57:25.14 +33:11:05.3: 15.42 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.05 +/- 0.04
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ATO J299.3517+33.1772,2461199.6705,12.08,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ATO J299.3517+33.1772 20260608.1705 12.08CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 08.1705 2461199.6705 12.16 19:57:56.81 +33:02:39.8
69.44744 2.01555 galactic Cyg Second-epoch detections are separated by 2.0" and 9.1 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
online_id | ATO J299.4846+33.0401 | 19:57:56.81 +33:02:39.8 (user input) | dubious (ATLAS) | (ATLAS) | (position from user input) J-Ks=0.323+/-0.034 (G)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_05-20-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0295.fits at 19:57:56.81 +33:02:39.8: 13.20 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-22-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1307.fits at 19:57:56.81 +33:02:39.8: 14.97 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.29 +/- 0.04
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ATO J299.4846+33.0401,2461199.6705,12.16,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ATO J299.4846+33.0401 20260608.1705 12.16CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 08.1705 2461199.6705 12.19 19:56:27.94 +32:08:41.4
68.51637 1.81408 galactic Cyg Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.8" and 8.9 pix
The object was found in VSX 8" Gaia DR3 2034030235771274240
Type: E
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
18.830 G 19.080 G 0.383396000000
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_05-20-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0295.fits at 19:56:27.94 +32:08:41.4: 13.18 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-22-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1307.fits at 19:56:27.94 +32:08:41.4: 14.29 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.38 +/- 0.04
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
Gaia DR3 2034030235771274240,2461199.6705,12.19,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
Gaia DR3 2034030235771274240 20260608.1705 12.19CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 08.1705 2461199.6705 11.72 19:56:50.90 +26:21:16.6
63.61246 -1.26677 galactic Vul Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.6" and 9.9 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
online_id | ATO J299.2093+26.3439 | 19:56:50.86 +26:21:17.5 (Gaia DR3) | dubious (ATLAS) | (ATLAS) | Gaia3var=NOT_AVAILABLE J-Ks=1.267+/-0.031 (Very red! L if it's a dwarf)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_05-20-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0295.fits at 19:56:50.90 +26:21:16.6: 12.52 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-22-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1307.fits at 19:56:50.90 +26:21:16.6: 12.62 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.58 +/- 0.01
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ATO J299.2093+26.3439,2461199.6705,11.72,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ATO J299.2093+26.3439 20260608.1705 11.72CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 08.1705 2461199.6705 11.68 19:48:59.19 +26:45:21.2
63.05426 0.44797 galactic Vul Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.2" and 9.5 pix
The object was found in VSX 4" Gaia DR3 2027798478723119616
Type: L
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
16.900 G 17.100 G M
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_05-20-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0295.fits at 19:48:59.19 +26:45:21.2: 12.51 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-22-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1307.fits at 19:48:59.19 +26:45:21.2: 12.63 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.58 +/- 0.02
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
Gaia DR3 2027798478723119616,2461199.6705,11.68,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
Gaia DR3 2027798478723119616 20260608.1705 11.68CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 08.1705 2461199.6705 11.51 19:58:28.36 +33:30:23.5
69.89932 2.16295 galactic Cyg Second-epoch detections are separated by 6.9" and 7.9 pix
The object was found in VSX 4" ASASSN-V J195828.64+333023.3
Type: SRS
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
12.610 V 12.710 V 2458048.71500 24.913000000000
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_05-20-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0295.fits at 19:58:28.36 +33:30:23.5: 12.41 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-22-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1307.fits at 19:58:28.36 +33:30:23.5: 15.35 +/- 0.36 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.42 +/- 0.02
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ASASSN-V J195828.64+333023.3,2461199.6705,11.51,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ASASSN-V J195828.64+333023.3 20260608.1705 11.51CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 08.1705 2461199.6705 12.14 19:58:18.16 +34:34:50.9
70.79821 2.75354 galactic Cyg Second-epoch detections are separated by 3.0" and 8.4 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
online_id | ATO J299.5714+34.5830 | 19:58:18.16 +34:34:50.9 (user input) | dubious (ATLAS) | (ATLAS) | (position from user input) J-Ks=0.370+/-0.029 (G)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_05-20-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0295.fits at 19:58:18.16 +34:34:50.9: 13.16 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-22-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1307.fits at 19:58:18.16 +34:34:50.9: 14.06 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.40 +/- 0.04
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ATO J299.5714+34.5830,2461199.6705,12.14,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ATO J299.5714+34.5830 20260608.1705 12.14CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461153.93110167 23.04.2026 10:20:37.184 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_05-20-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0295.fits
First image: 2461153.93110167 23.04.2026 10:20:37.184 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_05-20-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0295.fits
Last image: 2461199.67156850 08.06.2026 04:06:53.518 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-07_CI_Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_233439_TTUQ1b1x1_955334_9gWXndjY/fd_Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-06-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 42
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.66
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 8 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 27077
Objects passed selection criteria: 27035
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.3 2.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.3 2.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 18868
Average stars matched: 15806 (83.7715 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 133932 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Sun Jun 7 22:21:29 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-90-g333d5534
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-06-07)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Sun Jun 7 23:44:09 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461153.93110167 23.04.2026 10:20:37.184 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_05-20-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0295.fits
First image: 2461153.93110167 23.04.2026 10:20:37.184 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_05-20-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0295.fits
Last image: 2461199.67156850 08.06.2026 04:06:53.518 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-07_CI_Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_233439_TTUQ1b1x1_955334_9gWXndjY/fd_Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-06-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 441
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.41
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 50 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 220375
Objects passed selection criteria: 219843
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.4 2.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.4 2.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 150779
Average stars matched: 133420 (88.4868 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 2052816 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Sun Jun 7 22:21:29 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-90-g333d5534
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-06-07)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Sun Jun 7 23:53:43 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 3.5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_05-20-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0295.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-22-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1307.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-07_CI_Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_233439_TTUQ1b1x1_955334_9gWXndjY/fd_Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-03-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0072.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-07_CI_Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_233439_TTUQ1b1x1_955334_9gWXndjY/fd_Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-06-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_05-20-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0295.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-22-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1307.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_05-20-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0295.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-22-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1307.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-07_CI_Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_233439_TTUQ1b1x1_955334_9gWXndjY/fd_Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-03-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0072.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-07_CI_Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_233439_TTUQ1b1x1_955334_9gWXndjY/fd_Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-06-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461199.66935093
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
wcs_Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_05-20-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0295.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_05-20-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0295.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_05-20-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0295.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_05-20-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0295.fits'
wcs_Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-22-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1307.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-22-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1307.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-22-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1307.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-22-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1307.fits'
wcs_fd_Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-03-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0072.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-03-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0072.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-03-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0072.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-03-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0072.fits'
wcs_fd_Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-06-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-06-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-06-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-06-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073.fits'
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_05-20-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0295.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_05-20-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0295.fits
Image size: 941.3'x626.7' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 19:59:57.518 +30:00:20.70 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-03-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0072.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-03-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0072.fits
Image size: 942.8'x626.7' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.91"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 19:59:56.375 +29:58:59.24 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 19:59:57.518 +30:00:20.70
Second-epoch image center 19:59:56.375 +29:58:59.24
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0230 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-06-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-06-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073.fits
Image size: 942.5'x626.6' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.91"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 19:59:53.095 +29:59:35.23 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 19:59:57.518 +30:00:20.70
Second-epoch image center 19:59:53.095 +29:59:35.23
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0204 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 19:59:56.375 +29:58:59.24
Second-epoch second image center 19:59:53.095 +29:59:35.23
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01549 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_05-20-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0295.fits &> /tmp/tmp.Kts9KvMeHk
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_05-20-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0295.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-22-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1307.fits &> /tmp/tmp.6B0gjMClo5
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-22-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1307.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-07_CI_Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_233439_TTUQ1b1x1_955334_9gWXndjY/fd_Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-03-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0072.fits &> /tmp/tmp.rsoLMqJNOD
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-07_CI_Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_233439_TTUQ1b1x1_955334_9gWXndjY/fd_Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-03-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0072.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-07_CI_Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_233439_TTUQ1b1x1_955334_9gWXndjY/fd_Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-06-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073.fits &> /tmp/tmp.xQbW5O22rm
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-07_CI_Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_233439_TTUQ1b1x1_955334_9gWXndjY/fd_Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-06-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_05-20-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0295.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_05-20-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0295.fits and wcs_Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_05-20-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0295.fits.cat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_05-20-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0295.fits and wcs_Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_05-20-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0295.fits.cat
Found non-empty wcs_Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_05-20-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0295.fits and wcs_Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_05-20-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0295.fits.cat
The reference image (wcs_Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_05-20-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0295.fits) and catalog (wcs_Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_05-20-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0295.fits.cat) found
'wcs_Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_05-20-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0295.fits.cat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 28379 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 290.8214 to 309.8689 deg, Dec +24.0214 to +35.4814 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 290.8214 to 309.8689 deg, Dec 24.0214 to 35.4814 deg
Loaded 31154 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 18708 out of 20092 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 20092 out of 28379 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.401500
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.401500
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.66
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.74
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.74
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 28379 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 290.8214 to 309.8689 deg, Dec +24.0214 to +35.4814 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 290.8214 to 309.8689 deg, Dec 24.0214 to 35.4814 deg
Loaded 31154 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 18708 out of 20092 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 20092 out of 28379 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_05-20-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0295.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_05-20-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0295.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_05-20-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0295.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_05-20-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0295.fits (aperture=5.9)
Read 39325 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 290.4924 to 309.4256 deg, Dec +24.5288 to +35.2245 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 290.4924 to 309.4256 deg, Dec 24.5288 to 35.2245 deg
Loaded 29374 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 5974 out of 6636 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 6636 out of 39325 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-22-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1307.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-22-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1307.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-22-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1307.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-22-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1307.fits (aperture=6.4)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 7 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 8000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.2 pix Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_05-20-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0295.fits
2.3 pix Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-22-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1307.fits
2.4 pix fd_Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-03-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0072.fits
3.0 pix fd_Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-06-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073.fits
2.2 pix wcs_Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_05-20-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0295.fits
2.3 pix wcs_Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-22-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1307.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
14.7 mag. Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_05-20-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0295.fits
15.0 mag. Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-22-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1307.fits
12.4 mag. fd_Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-03-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0072.fits
11.9 mag. fd_Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-06-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 11.9 (SNR ) 10.1 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.Kts9KvMeHk (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-07_CI_Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_233439_TTUQ1b1x1_955334_9gWXndjY/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_05-20-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0295.fits 574.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_05-20-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0295.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_05-20-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0295.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_05-20-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0295.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_05-20-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0295.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_05-20-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0295.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_05-20-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0295.fits' -> 'wcs_Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_05-20-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0295.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_05-20-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0295.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_05-20-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0295.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_05-20-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0295.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_05-20-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0295.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_05-20-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0295.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_05-20-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0295.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_05-20-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0295.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_05-20-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0295.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_05-20-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0295.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_05-20-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0295.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=2658, passed=28379
Got 28379 stars (including 25678 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_05-20-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0295.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 28379 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013074 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010459 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 629 (Dec 24.0 to 35.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 934 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 928 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 913 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 928 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 27533 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 629 (Dec 24.0 to 35.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 935 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 928 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 27533 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 928 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 27532 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44"
Excluding outliers - 928 stars left (next iteration limit 1020)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_05-20-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0295.fits N_match=928 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.398 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.354 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.438 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.383 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.423 n_q1=239 n_q2=188 n_q3=262 n_q4=239 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.100
The image catalog is written to wcs_Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_05-20-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0295.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_05-20-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0295.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_05-20-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0295.fits -region wcs_Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_05-20-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0295.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_05-20-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0295.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.6B0gjMClo5 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-22-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1307.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-07_CI_Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_233439_TTUQ1b1x1_955334_9gWXndjY/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-22-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1307.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-22-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1307.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-22-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1307.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-22-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1307.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-22-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1307.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-22-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1307.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-22-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1307.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-22-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1307.fits' -> 'wcs_Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-22-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1307.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-22-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1307.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-22-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1307.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-22-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1307.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-22-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1307.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-22-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1307.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-22-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1307.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-22-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1307.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-22-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1307.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-22-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1307.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-22-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1307.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=5000, passed=39325
Got 39325 stars (including 34298 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-22-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1307.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 39325 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.1'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.1 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013015 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010412 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 572 to 628 (Dec 24.5 to 35.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 754 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 714 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 684 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 2.45"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 709 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 30857 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 2.78"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 572 to 628 (Dec 24.5 to 35.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 804 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 772 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 30878 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 2.76"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 772 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 32367 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 1.59"
Excluding outliers - 772 stars left (next iteration limit 779)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-22-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1307.fits N_match=772 sigma_overall_arcsec=3.415 sigma_q1_arcsec=3.069 sigma_q2_arcsec=2.313 sigma_q3_arcsec=2.144 sigma_q4_arcsec=9.074 n_q1=192 n_q2=232 n_q3=218 n_q4=130 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=2.657
The image catalog is written to wcs_Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-22-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1307.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-22-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1307.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-22-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1307.fits -region wcs_Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-22-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1307.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-22-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1307.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.rsoLMqJNOD (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-07_CI_Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_233439_TTUQ1b1x1_955334_9gWXndjY/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-07_CI_Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_233439_TTUQ1b1x1_955334_9gWXndjY/fd_Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-03-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0072.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-07_CI_Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_233439_TTUQ1b1x1_955334_9gWXndjY/fd_Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-03-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0072.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-07_CI_Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_233439_TTUQ1b1x1_955334_9gWXndjY/fd_Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-03-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0072.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-07_CI_Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_233439_TTUQ1b1x1_955334_9gWXndjY/fd_Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-03-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0072.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-07_CI_Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_233439_TTUQ1b1x1_955334_9gWXndjY/fd_Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-03-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0072.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-07_CI_Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_233439_TTUQ1b1x1_955334_9gWXndjY/fd_Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-03-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0072.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-03-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0072.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-03-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0072.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-03-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0072.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-03-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0072.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-03-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0072.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-03-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0072.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-03-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0072.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-07_CI_Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_233439_TTUQ1b1x1_955334_9gWXndjY/fd_Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-03-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0072.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-03-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0072.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=173, passed=4801
Got 4801 stars (including 4621 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-03-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0072.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 4801 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 942.8'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 942.8 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013094 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010476 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 628 (Dec 24.0 to 35.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 930 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 924 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 906 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 924 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4627 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 628 (Dec 24.0 to 35.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 932 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 925 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4627 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 925 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4627 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
Excluding outliers - 925 stars left (next iteration limit 1016)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-03-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0072.fits N_match=925 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.419 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.330 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.487 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.431 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.485 n_q1=225 n_q2=248 n_q3=214 n_q4=238 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.161
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-03-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0072.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-03-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0072.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-07_CI_Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_233439_TTUQ1b1x1_955334_9gWXndjY/fd_Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-03-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0072.fits -region wcs_fd_Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-03-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0072.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-03-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0072.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.xQbW5O22rm (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-07_CI_Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_233439_TTUQ1b1x1_955334_9gWXndjY/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-07_CI_Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_233439_TTUQ1b1x1_955334_9gWXndjY/fd_Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-06-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-07_CI_Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_233439_TTUQ1b1x1_955334_9gWXndjY/fd_Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-06-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-07_CI_Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_233439_TTUQ1b1x1_955334_9gWXndjY/fd_Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-06-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-07_CI_Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_233439_TTUQ1b1x1_955334_9gWXndjY/fd_Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-06-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-07_CI_Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_233439_TTUQ1b1x1_955334_9gWXndjY/fd_Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-06-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-07_CI_Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_233439_TTUQ1b1x1_955334_9gWXndjY/fd_Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-06-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-06-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-06-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-06-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-06-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-06-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-06-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-06-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-07_CI_Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_233439_TTUQ1b1x1_955334_9gWXndjY/fd_Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-06-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-06-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=78, passed=3449
Got 3449 stars (including 3368 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-06-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 3449 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 942.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 942.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013090 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010472 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 628 (Dec 24.1 to 35.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 925 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 917 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 877 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 917 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3235 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 628 (Dec 24.1 to 35.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 928 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 918 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3235 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 917 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3235 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Excluding outliers - 917 stars left (next iteration limit 1008)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-06-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073.fits N_match=917 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.428 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.448 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.458 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.422 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.382 n_q1=112 n_q2=311 n_q3=119 n_q4=375 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.070
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-06-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-06-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-07_CI_Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_233439_TTUQ1b1x1_955334_9gWXndjY/fd_Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-06-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073.fits -region wcs_fd_Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-06-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-06-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_05-20-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0295.fits sigma_overall=0.398 worst_q_ratio=1.100
ref2=Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-22-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1307.fits sigma_overall=3.415 worst_q_ratio=2.657
new1=fd_Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-03-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0072.fits sigma_overall=0.419 worst_q_ratio=1.161
new2=fd_Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-06-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073.fits sigma_overall=0.428 worst_q_ratio=1.070
reference average sigma_overall=1.9065 worst_q_ratio=1.8785
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: numpy/matplotlib unavailable (No module named 'matplotlib') -- falling back to the C plotter
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy: PGPLOT /PNG device reported success but no file appeared at wcs_Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_05-20-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0295_astrometric_residuals.png -- no plot produced
WARNING: no astrometric residual plot produced for wcs_Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_05-20-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0295.fits -- both lib/plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py and lib/plot_astrometric_residuals_xy failed to create wcs_Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_05-20-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0295_astrometric_residuals.png (see messages above)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: numpy/matplotlib unavailable (No module named 'matplotlib') -- falling back to the C plotter
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy: wrote wcs_Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-22-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1307_astrometric_residuals.png (772 matched stars from wcs_Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-22-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1307.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: numpy/matplotlib unavailable (No module named 'matplotlib') -- falling back to the C plotter
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy: PGPLOT /PNG device reported success but no file appeared at wcs_fd_Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-03-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0072_astrometric_residuals.png -- no plot produced
WARNING: no astrometric residual plot produced for wcs_fd_Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-03-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0072.fits -- both lib/plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py and lib/plot_astrometric_residuals_xy failed to create wcs_fd_Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-03-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0072_astrometric_residuals.png (see messages above)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: numpy/matplotlib unavailable (No module named 'matplotlib') -- falling back to the C plotter
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy: PGPLOT /PNG device reported success but no file appeared at wcs_fd_Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-06-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073_astrometric_residuals.png -- no plot produced
WARNING: no astrometric residual plot produced for wcs_fd_Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-06-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073.fits -- both lib/plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py and lib/plot_astrometric_residuals_xy failed to create wcs_fd_Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-06-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073_astrometric_residuals.png (see messages above)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-03-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0072.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-03-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0072.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-07_CI_Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_233439_TTUQ1b1x1_955334_9gWXndjY/wcs_fd_Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-03-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0072.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-06-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-06-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-07_CI_Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_233439_TTUQ1b1x1_955334_9gWXndjY/wcs_fd_Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-06-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Cyg-08-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_05-20-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0295.fits at 20:31:29.69 +24:26:54.7: 10.02 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_05-20-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0295.fits at 20:31:15.49 +24:32:28.9: 10.70 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-22-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1307.fits at 20:31:29.69 +24:26:54.7: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:31:29.69 +24:26:54.7: at least one reference image reported edge (off-image or aperture/annulus past image boundary); cannot perform the forced-photometry cross-check
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-22-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1307.fits at 20:31:15.49 +24:32:28.9: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:31:15.49 +24:32:28.9: at least one reference image reported edge (off-image or aperture/annulus past image boundary); cannot perform the forced-photometry cross-check
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_05-20-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0295.fits at 20:26:25.88 +24:30:40.9: 11.17 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-22-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1307.fits at 20:26:25.88 +24:30:40.9: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:26:25.88 +24:30:40.9: at least one reference image reported edge (off-image or aperture/annulus past image boundary); cannot perform the forced-photometry cross-check
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 0s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 1s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 42191_fd_Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-06-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073
The candidate 42191_fd_Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-06-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:31:00.13 +26:29:11.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 42193_fd_Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-06-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073
The candidate 42193_fd_Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-06-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:31:46.42 +34:27:10.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 42205_fd_Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-06-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073
The candidate 42205_fd_Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-06-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 42218_fd_Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-06-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073
The candidate 42218_fd_Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-06-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:27:03.63 +34:51:37.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_tycho2.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 42222_fd_Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-06-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073
The candidate 42222_fd_Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-06-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 42224_fd_Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-06-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073
The candidate 42224_fd_Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-06-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:26:57.19 +35:10:42.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_tycho2.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 00753_fd_Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-06-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073
The candidate 00753_fd_Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-06-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073 did not pass the final checks
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 1s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Cyg-08-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 3.5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_05-20-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0295.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-22-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1307.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-07_CI_Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_233439_TTUQ1b1x1_955334_9gWXndjY/fd_Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-03-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0072.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-07_CI_Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_233439_TTUQ1b1x1_955334_9gWXndjY/fd_Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-06-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_05-20-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0295.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-22-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1307.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_05-20-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0295.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-22-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1307.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-07_CI_Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_233439_TTUQ1b1x1_955334_9gWXndjY/fd_Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-03-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0072.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-07_CI_Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_233439_TTUQ1b1x1_955334_9gWXndjY/fd_Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-06-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_05-20-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0295.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-22-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1307.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-03-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0072.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-06-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/exclusion_list.txt
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_05-20-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0295.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-22-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1307.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-03-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0072.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-06-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_05-20-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0295.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_05-20-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0295.fits
Image size: 941.3'x626.7' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 19:59:57.518 +30:00:20.70 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-03-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0072.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-03-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0072.fits
Image size: 942.8'x626.7' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.91"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 19:59:56.375 +29:58:59.24 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 19:59:57.518 +30:00:20.70
Second-epoch image center 19:59:56.375 +29:58:59.24
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0230 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-06-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-06-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073.fits
Image size: 942.5'x626.6' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.91"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 19:59:53.095 +29:59:35.23 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 19:59:57.518 +30:00:20.70
Second-epoch image center 19:59:53.095 +29:59:35.23
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0204 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 19:59:56.375 +29:58:59.24
Second-epoch second image center 19:59:53.095 +29:59:35.23
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01549 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_05-20-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0295.fits &> /tmp/tmp.iUPi3LZwQR
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_05-20-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0295.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-22-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1307.fits &> /tmp/tmp.kqY7osZJOU
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-22-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1307.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-07_CI_Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_233439_TTUQ1b1x1_955334_9gWXndjY/fd_Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-03-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0072.fits &> /tmp/tmp.bB4lq2X9rI
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-07_CI_Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_233439_TTUQ1b1x1_955334_9gWXndjY/fd_Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-03-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0072.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-07_CI_Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_233439_TTUQ1b1x1_955334_9gWXndjY/fd_Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-06-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073.fits &> /tmp/tmp.UJwrsR3Eih
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-07_CI_Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_233439_TTUQ1b1x1_955334_9gWXndjY/fd_Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-06-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_05-20-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0295.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_05-20-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0295.fits and wcs_Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_05-20-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0295.fits.cat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_05-20-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0295.fits and wcs_Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_05-20-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0295.fits.cat
Found non-empty wcs_Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_05-20-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0295.fits and wcs_Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_05-20-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0295.fits.cat
The reference image (wcs_Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_05-20-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0295.fits) and catalog (wcs_Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_05-20-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0295.fits.cat) found
'wcs_Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_05-20-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0295.fits.cat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 237119 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 290.8153 to 309.8987 deg, Dec +24.0075 to +35.4841 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 290.8153 to 309.8987 deg, Dec 24.0075 to 35.4841 deg
Loaded 31239 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 17210 out of 24351 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 24351 out of 237119 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.250000
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.250000
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.41
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.84
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.84
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 237119 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 290.8153 to 309.8987 deg, Dec +24.0075 to +35.4841 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 290.8153 to 309.8987 deg, Dec 24.0075 to 35.4841 deg
Loaded 31239 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 17210 out of 24351 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 24351 out of 237119 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_05-20-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0295.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_05-20-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0295.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_05-20-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0295.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_05-20-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0295.fits (aperture=4.6)
Read 288011 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 290.4522 to 309.4255 deg, Dec +24.4835 to +35.2303 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 290.4522 to 309.4255 deg, Dec 24.4835 to 35.2303 deg
Loaded 29560 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4533 out of 7105 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 7105 out of 288011 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-22-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1307.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-22-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1307.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-22-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1307.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-22-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1307.fits (aperture=4.8)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 118 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 8000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.2 pix Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_05-20-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0295.fits
2.2 pix Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-22-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1307.fits
2.2 pix fd_Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-03-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0072.fits
2.8 pix fd_Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-06-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073.fits
2.2 pix wcs_Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_05-20-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0295.fits
2.2 pix wcs_Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-22-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1307.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
14.8 mag. Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_05-20-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0295.fits
15.2 mag. Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-22-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1307.fits
12.8 mag. fd_Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-03-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0072.fits
12.7 mag. fd_Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-06-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 12.7 (SNR ) 12.3 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.iUPi3LZwQR (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-07_CI_Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_233439_TTUQ1b1x1_955334_9gWXndjY/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_05-20-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0295.fits 574.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_05-20-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0295.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_05-20-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0295.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_05-20-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0295.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_05-20-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0295.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_05-20-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0295.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_05-20-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0295.fits' -> 'wcs_Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_05-20-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0295.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_05-20-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0295.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_05-20-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0295.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_05-20-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0295.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_05-20-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0295.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_05-20-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0295.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_05-20-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0295.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_05-20-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0295.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_05-20-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0295.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_05-20-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0295.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_05-20-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0295.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=21, blended=36633, passed=237098
Got 237098 stars (including 200143 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_05-20-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0295.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 237098 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013074 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010459 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 629 (Dec 24.0 to 35.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 942 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 940 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 923 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 940 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 230505 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 629 (Dec 24.0 to 35.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 942 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 940 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 230506 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 940 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 230505 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
Excluding outliers - 940 stars left (next iteration limit 1034)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_05-20-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0295.fits N_match=940 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.389 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.333 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.432 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.381 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.374 n_q1=260 n_q2=195 n_q3=239 n_q4=246 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.111
The image catalog is written to wcs_Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_05-20-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0295.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_05-20-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0295.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_05-20-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0295.fits -region wcs_Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_05-20-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0295.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_05-20-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0295.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.kqY7osZJOU (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-22-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1307.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-07_CI_Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_233439_TTUQ1b1x1_955334_9gWXndjY/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-22-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1307.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-22-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1307.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-22-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1307.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-22-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1307.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-22-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1307.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-22-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1307.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-22-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1307.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-22-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1307.fits' -> 'wcs_Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-22-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1307.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-22-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1307.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-22-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1307.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-22-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1307.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-22-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1307.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-22-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1307.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-22-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1307.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-22-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1307.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-22-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1307.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-22-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1307.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-22-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1307.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=11, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=77, blended=60081, passed=287923
Got 287923 stars (including 227519 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-22-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1307.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 287923 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.1'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.1 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013015 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010412 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 572 to 628 (Dec 24.5 to 35.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 741 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 712 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 684 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 2.33"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 706 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 236287 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 2.65"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 572 to 628 (Dec 24.5 to 35.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 791 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 764 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 236304 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 2.64"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 764 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 243617 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 1.41"
Excluding outliers - 764 stars left (next iteration limit 776)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-22-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1307.fits N_match=764 sigma_overall_arcsec=3.317 sigma_q1_arcsec=2.524 sigma_q2_arcsec=2.062 sigma_q3_arcsec=2.105 sigma_q4_arcsec=10.232 n_q1=221 n_q2=233 n_q3=197 n_q4=113 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=3.085
The image catalog is written to wcs_Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-22-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1307.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-22-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1307.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-22-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1307.fits -region wcs_Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-22-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1307.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-22-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1307.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.bB4lq2X9rI (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-07_CI_Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_233439_TTUQ1b1x1_955334_9gWXndjY/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-07_CI_Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_233439_TTUQ1b1x1_955334_9gWXndjY/fd_Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-03-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0072.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-07_CI_Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_233439_TTUQ1b1x1_955334_9gWXndjY/fd_Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-03-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0072.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-07_CI_Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_233439_TTUQ1b1x1_955334_9gWXndjY/fd_Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-03-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0072.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-07_CI_Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_233439_TTUQ1b1x1_955334_9gWXndjY/fd_Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-03-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0072.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-07_CI_Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_233439_TTUQ1b1x1_955334_9gWXndjY/fd_Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-03-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0072.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-07_CI_Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_233439_TTUQ1b1x1_955334_9gWXndjY/fd_Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-03-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0072.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-03-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0072.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-03-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0072.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-03-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0072.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-03-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0072.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-03-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0072.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-03-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0072.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-03-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0072.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-07_CI_Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_233439_TTUQ1b1x1_955334_9gWXndjY/fd_Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-03-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0072.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-03-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0072.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=4, blended=2108, passed=52544
Got 52544 stars (including 50353 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-03-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0072.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 52544 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 942.8'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 942.8 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013094 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010476 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 629 (Dec 24.0 to 35.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 935 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 930 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 915 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 930 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 50735 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 629 (Dec 24.0 to 35.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 936 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 930 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 50736 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 930 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 50736 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Excluding outliers - 930 stars left (next iteration limit 1023)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-03-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0072.fits N_match=930 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.408 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.332 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.457 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.425 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.454 n_q1=229 n_q2=245 n_q3=212 n_q4=244 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.121
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-03-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0072.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-03-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0072.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-07_CI_Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_233439_TTUQ1b1x1_955334_9gWXndjY/fd_Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-03-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0072.fits -region wcs_fd_Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-03-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0072.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-03-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0072.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.UJwrsR3Eih (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-07_CI_Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_233439_TTUQ1b1x1_955334_9gWXndjY/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-07_CI_Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_233439_TTUQ1b1x1_955334_9gWXndjY/fd_Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-06-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-07_CI_Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_233439_TTUQ1b1x1_955334_9gWXndjY/fd_Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-06-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-07_CI_Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_233439_TTUQ1b1x1_955334_9gWXndjY/fd_Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-06-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-07_CI_Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_233439_TTUQ1b1x1_955334_9gWXndjY/fd_Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-06-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-07_CI_Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_233439_TTUQ1b1x1_955334_9gWXndjY/fd_Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-06-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-07_CI_Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_233439_TTUQ1b1x1_955334_9gWXndjY/fd_Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-06-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-06-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-06-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-06-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-06-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-06-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-06-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-06-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-07_CI_Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_233439_TTUQ1b1x1_955334_9gWXndjY/fd_Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-06-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-06-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=4, blended=950, passed=28512
Got 28512 stars (including 27527 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-06-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 28512 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 942.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 942.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013090 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010472 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 629 (Dec 24.0 to 35.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 926 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 918 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 880 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 918 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 26450 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 629 (Dec 24.0 to 35.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 929 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 919 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 26449 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 918 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 26446 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
Excluding outliers - 918 stars left (next iteration limit 1009)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-06-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073.fits N_match=918 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.434 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.444 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.469 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.454 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.365 n_q1=118 n_q2=298 n_q3=122 n_q4=380 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.079
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-06-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-06-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-07_CI_Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_233439_TTUQ1b1x1_955334_9gWXndjY/fd_Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-06-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073.fits -region wcs_fd_Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-06-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-06-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-03-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0072.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-07_CI_Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_233439_TTUQ1b1x1_955334_9gWXndjY/wcs_fd_Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-03-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0072.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-06-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-07_CI_Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_233439_TTUQ1b1x1_955334_9gWXndjY/wcs_fd_Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-06-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Cyg-08-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_05-20-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0295.fits at 20:31:32.46 +24:32:03.6: 11.49 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_05-20-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0295.fits at 20:31:15.52 +24:32:28.6: 10.69 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_05-20-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0295.fits at 19:57:15.62 +33:06:46.1: 12.94 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_05-20-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0295.fits at 20:26:21.88 +24:23:52.0: 12.33 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-22-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1307.fits at 20:31:32.46 +24:32:03.6: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:31:32.46 +24:32:03.6: at least one reference image reported edge (off-image or aperture/annulus past image boundary); cannot perform the forced-photometry cross-check
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-22-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1307.fits at 20:26:21.88 +24:23:52.0: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:26:21.88 +24:23:52.0: at least one reference image reported edge (off-image or aperture/annulus past image boundary); cannot perform the forced-photometry cross-check
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-22-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1307.fits at 20:31:15.52 +24:32:28.6: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:31:15.52 +24:32:28.6: at least one reference image reported edge (off-image or aperture/annulus past image boundary); cannot perform the forced-photometry cross-check
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_05-20-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0295.fits at 20:31:42.50 +24:38:55.6: 11.55 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_05-20-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0295.fits at 20:31:25.04 +24:26:59.4: 11.17 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-22-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1307.fits at 20:31:25.04 +24:26:59.4: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:31:25.04 +24:26:59.4: at least one reference image reported edge (off-image or aperture/annulus past image boundary); cannot perform the forced-photometry cross-check
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-22-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1307.fits at 19:57:15.62 +33:06:46.1: 15.59 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.94 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:57:15.62 +33:06:46.1: ref_mag=12.94 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=12.3003 delta=0.64 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_05-20-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0295.fits at 20:31:36.22 +24:18:32.9: 11.76 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-22-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1307.fits at 20:31:36.22 +24:18:32.9: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:31:36.22 +24:18:32.9: at least one reference image reported edge (off-image or aperture/annulus past image boundary); cannot perform the forced-photometry cross-check
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-22-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1307.fits at 20:31:42.50 +24:38:55.6: 11.72 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.65 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_05-20-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0295.fits at 20:31:18.45 +24:21:45.5: 11.60 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:31:42.50 +24:38:55.6: ref_mag=11.65 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.0098 delta=0.64 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_05-20-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0295.fits at 20:32:26.52 +24:34:07.0: 11.88 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_05-20-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0295.fits at 20:31:28.09 +24:21:11.5: 11.76 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-22-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1307.fits at 20:31:18.45 +24:21:45.5: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:31:18.45 +24:21:45.5: at least one reference image reported edge (off-image or aperture/annulus past image boundary); cannot perform the forced-photometry cross-check
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-22-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1307.fits at 20:31:28.09 +24:21:11.5: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:31:28.09 +24:21:11.5: at least one reference image reported edge (off-image or aperture/annulus past image boundary); cannot perform the forced-photometry cross-check
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_05-20-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0295.fits at 20:32:01.78 +24:20:42.0: 12.12 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-22-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1307.fits at 20:32:01.78 +24:20:42.0: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:32:01.78 +24:20:42.0: at least one reference image reported edge (off-image or aperture/annulus past image boundary); cannot perform the forced-photometry cross-check
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_05-20-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0295.fits at 20:31:44.85 +24:17:14.5: 11.96 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-22-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1307.fits at 20:32:26.52 +24:34:07.0: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:32:26.52 +24:34:07.0: at least one reference image reported edge (off-image or aperture/annulus past image boundary); cannot perform the forced-photometry cross-check
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_05-20-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0295.fits at 20:32:03.37 +24:27:37.4: 12.04 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_05-20-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0295.fits at 20:31:58.82 +24:40:35.8: 12.17 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-22-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1307.fits at 20:31:44.85 +24:17:14.5: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:31:44.85 +24:17:14.5: at least one reference image reported edge (off-image or aperture/annulus past image boundary); cannot perform the forced-photometry cross-check
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-22-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1307.fits at 20:32:03.37 +24:27:37.4: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:32:03.37 +24:27:37.4: at least one reference image reported edge (off-image or aperture/annulus past image boundary); cannot perform the forced-photometry cross-check
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_05-20-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0295.fits at 20:31:02.88 +24:19:46.1: 12.32 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-22-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1307.fits at 20:31:58.82 +24:40:35.8: 12.44 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-22-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1307.fits at 20:31:02.88 +24:19:46.1: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:31:02.88 +24:19:46.1: at least one reference image reported edge (off-image or aperture/annulus past image boundary); cannot perform the forced-photometry cross-check
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.30 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 20:31:58.82 +24:40:35.8: ref_mag=12.30 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.3964 delta=0.91 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_05-20-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0295.fits at 20:31:39.10 +24:30:12.4: 12.41 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-22-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1307.fits at 20:31:39.10 +24:30:12.4: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:31:39.10 +24:30:12.4: at least one reference image reported edge (off-image or aperture/annulus past image boundary); cannot perform the forced-photometry cross-check
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_05-20-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0295.fits at 20:32:06.95 +24:48:06.4: 12.36 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_05-20-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0295.fits at 20:31:21.58 +24:16:13.7: 12.56 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_05-20-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0295.fits at 20:30:41.50 +24:31:41.1: 12.37 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_05-20-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0295.fits at 20:32:15.27 +24:19:23.5: 12.53 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-22-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1307.fits at 20:31:21.58 +24:16:13.7: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:31:21.58 +24:16:13.7: at least one reference image reported edge (off-image or aperture/annulus past image boundary); cannot perform the forced-photometry cross-check
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-22-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1307.fits at 20:30:41.50 +24:31:41.1: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:30:41.50 +24:31:41.1: at least one reference image reported edge (off-image or aperture/annulus past image boundary); cannot perform the forced-photometry cross-check
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_05-20-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0295.fits at 20:31:55.85 +24:43:26.5: 12.57 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-22-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1307.fits at 20:32:15.27 +24:19:23.5: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:32:15.27 +24:19:23.5: at least one reference image reported edge (off-image or aperture/annulus past image boundary); cannot perform the forced-photometry cross-check
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_05-20-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0295.fits at 20:31:57.90 +24:27:49.8: 12.41 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-22-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1307.fits at 20:31:57.90 +24:27:49.8: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:31:57.90 +24:27:49.8: at least one reference image reported edge (off-image or aperture/annulus past image boundary); cannot perform the forced-photometry cross-check
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_05-20-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0295.fits at 20:31:54.61 +24:33:12.8: 12.36 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-22-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1307.fits at 20:32:06.95 +24:48:06.4: 12.48 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.43 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:32:06.95 +24:48:06.4: ref_mag=12.43 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=11.6078 delta=0.82 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_05-20-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0295.fits at 20:31:57.51 +24:36:23.2: 12.53 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-22-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1307.fits at 20:31:55.85 +24:43:26.5: 12.76 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.67 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 20:31:55.85 +24:43:26.5: ref_mag=12.67 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=11.6484 delta=1.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_05-20-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0295.fits at 20:27:39.43 +24:36:18.9: 12.52 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-22-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1307.fits at 20:31:54.61 +24:33:12.8: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:31:54.61 +24:33:12.8: at least one reference image reported edge (off-image or aperture/annulus past image boundary); cannot perform the forced-photometry cross-check
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_05-20-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0295.fits at 20:31:09.66 +24:30:21.1: 12.58 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-22-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1307.fits at 20:31:57.51 +24:36:23.2: 12.78 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.67 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:31:57.51 +24:36:23.2: ref_mag=12.67 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=11.8147 delta=0.85 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-22-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1307.fits at 20:31:09.66 +24:30:21.1: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:31:09.66 +24:30:21.1: at least one reference image reported edge (off-image or aperture/annulus past image boundary); cannot perform the forced-photometry cross-check
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-22-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1307.fits at 20:27:39.43 +24:36:18.9: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:27:39.43 +24:36:18.9: at least one reference image reported edge (off-image or aperture/annulus past image boundary); cannot perform the forced-photometry cross-check
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_05-20-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0295.fits at 20:27:17.90 +24:29:31.8: 12.48 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_05-20-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0295.fits at 20:30:34.66 +24:15:33.7: 12.52 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-22-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1307.fits at 20:27:17.90 +24:29:31.8: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:27:17.90 +24:29:31.8: at least one reference image reported edge (off-image or aperture/annulus past image boundary); cannot perform the forced-photometry cross-check
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_05-20-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0295.fits at 20:32:22.20 +24:42:31.8: 12.92 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-22-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1307.fits at 20:30:34.66 +24:15:33.7: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:30:34.66 +24:15:33.7: at least one reference image reported edge (off-image or aperture/annulus past image boundary); cannot perform the forced-photometry cross-check
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_05-20-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0295.fits at 20:31:49.96 +24:43:23.0: 12.96 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_05-20-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0295.fits at 20:27:26.46 +24:19:49.9: 12.55 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-22-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1307.fits at 20:27:26.46 +24:19:49.9: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:27:26.46 +24:19:49.9: at least one reference image reported edge (off-image or aperture/annulus past image boundary); cannot perform the forced-photometry cross-check
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-22-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1307.fits at 20:32:22.20 +24:42:31.8: 13.06 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.00 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 20:32:22.20 +24:42:31.8: ref_mag=13.00 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=12.0034 delta=1.00 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_05-20-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0295.fits at 20:06:56.40 +33:18:17.2: 12.92 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-22-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1307.fits at 20:31:49.96 +24:43:23.0: 13.20 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.09 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 20:31:49.96 +24:43:23.0: ref_mag=13.09 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=12.0118 delta=1.08 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_05-20-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0295.fits at 19:24:57.02 +34:53:24.5: 9.14 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_05-20-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0295.fits at 20:30:59.97 +24:37:36.5: 13.00 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_05-20-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0295.fits at 20:27:41.82 +24:19:31.4: 12.46 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-22-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1307.fits at 20:27:41.82 +24:19:31.4: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:27:41.82 +24:19:31.4: at least one reference image reported edge (off-image or aperture/annulus past image boundary); cannot perform the forced-photometry cross-check
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-22-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1307.fits at 20:06:56.40 +33:18:17.2: 15.48 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.92 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 20:06:56.40 +33:18:17.2: ref_mag=12.92 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=11.8908 delta=1.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_05-20-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0295.fits at 20:31:38.38 +34:18:42.0: 12.31 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_05-20-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0295.fits at 20:03:50.46 +29:59:07.0: 12.49 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-22-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1307.fits at 19:24:57.02 +34:53:24.5: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:24:57.02 +34:53:24.5: at least one reference image reported edge (off-image or aperture/annulus past image boundary); cannot perform the forced-photometry cross-check
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-22-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1307.fits at 20:30:59.97 +24:37:36.5: 13.24 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.13 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 20:30:59.97 +24:37:36.5: ref_mag=13.13 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=12.1686 delta=0.96 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-22-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1307.fits at 20:31:38.38 +34:18:42.0: 15.76 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.31 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:31:38.38 +34:18:42.0: ref_mag=12.31 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=11.9985 delta=0.32 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-22-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1307.fits at 20:03:50.46 +29:59:07.0: 12.66 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.59 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:03:50.46 +29:59:07.0: ref_mag=12.59 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.0070 delta=0.58 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_05-20-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0295.fits at 19:58:09.57 +33:23:46.7: 12.70 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-22-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1307.fits at 19:58:09.57 +33:23:46.7: 15.41 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.70 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:58:09.57 +33:23:46.7: ref_mag=12.70 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=11.9025 delta=0.80 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_05-20-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0295.fits at 19:50:37.84 +26:42:45.2: 12.76 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_05-20-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0295.fits at 19:58:56.89 +24:54:19.7: 13.01 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_05-20-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0295.fits at 19:58:26.31 +33:07:17.2: 13.16 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-22-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1307.fits at 19:50:37.84 +26:42:45.2: 12.94 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.86 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 19:50:37.84 +26:42:45.2: ref_mag=12.86 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=11.7488 delta=1.11 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_05-20-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0295.fits at 19:56:53.26 +31:43:23.4: 13.04 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_05-20-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0295.fits at 19:58:12.31 +25:57:26.2: 12.52 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_05-20-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0295.fits at 19:59:10.07 +33:23:29.5: 13.01 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-22-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1307.fits at 19:58:56.89 +24:54:19.7: 13.14 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_05-20-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0295.fits at 19:58:39.58 +26:45:30.7: 13.53 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-22-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1307.fits at 19:58:26.31 +33:07:17.2: 14.03 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.09 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 19:58:56.89 +24:54:19.7: ref_mag=13.09 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.1321 delta=0.96 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.36 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 19:58:26.31 +33:07:17.2: ref_mag=13.36 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=12.1756 delta=1.18 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-22-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1307.fits at 19:56:53.26 +31:43:23.4: 13.11 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.09 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 19:56:53.26 +31:43:23.4: ref_mag=13.09 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=11.8652 delta=1.22 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-22-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1307.fits at 19:58:12.31 +25:57:26.2: 12.64 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.60 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 19:58:12.31 +25:57:26.2: ref_mag=12.60 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.6596 delta=0.94 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-22-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1307.fits at 19:59:10.07 +33:23:29.5: 15.41 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.01 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 19:59:10.07 +33:23:29.5: ref_mag=13.01 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=12.0090 delta=1.00 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-22-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1307.fits at 19:58:39.58 +26:45:30.7: 13.73 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.64 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 19:58:39.58 +26:45:30.7: ref_mag=13.64 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=12.2587 delta=1.38 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_05-20-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0295.fits at 19:57:43.17 +32:15:44.5: 13.23 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_05-20-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0295.fits at 19:56:22.04 +32:04:17.7: 13.42 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-22-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1307.fits at 19:57:43.17 +32:15:44.5: 15.08 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.32 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 19:57:43.17 +32:15:44.5: ref_mag=13.32 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=12.1147 delta=1.21 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-22-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1307.fits at 19:56:22.04 +32:04:17.7: 14.46 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.59 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 19:56:22.04 +32:04:17.7: ref_mag=13.59 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=12.2740 delta=1.32 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_05-20-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0295.fits at 20:02:53.85 +25:11:43.8: 12.62 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-22-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1307.fits at 20:02:53.85 +25:11:43.8: 12.56 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.58 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 20:02:53.85 +25:11:43.8: ref_mag=12.58 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.6695 delta=0.91 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_05-20-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0295.fits at 20:31:25.21 +24:31:29.3: 12.16 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-22-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1307.fits at 20:31:25.21 +24:31:29.3: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:31:25.21 +24:31:29.3: at least one reference image reported edge (off-image or aperture/annulus past image boundary); cannot perform the forced-photometry cross-check
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_05-20-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0295.fits at 19:57:29.12 +32:15:51.9: 12.88 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_05-20-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0295.fits at 19:57:27.43 +33:01:11.3: 13.10 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_05-20-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0295.fits at 20:01:18.33 +27:45:44.0: 13.26 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_05-20-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0295.fits at 19:58:50.91 +33:45:28.1: 12.92 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-22-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1307.fits at 19:57:29.12 +32:15:51.9: 15.04 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.94 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 19:57:29.12 +32:15:51.9: ref_mag=12.94 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=11.8974 delta=1.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-22-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1307.fits at 19:57:27.43 +33:01:11.3: 15.64 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.10 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 19:57:27.43 +33:01:11.3: ref_mag=13.10 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=12.0240 delta=1.07 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_05-20-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0295.fits at 19:59:07.71 +26:58:54.0: 12.69 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-22-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1307.fits at 19:58:50.91 +33:45:28.1: 15.13 +/- 0.22 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-22-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1307.fits at 20:01:18.33 +27:45:44.0: 13.41 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.99 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 19:58:50.91 +33:45:28.1: ref_mag=12.99 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=11.9909 delta=1.00 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.34 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 20:01:18.33 +27:45:44.0: ref_mag=13.34 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=12.3159 delta=1.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-22-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1307.fits at 19:59:07.71 +26:58:54.0: 12.92 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.82 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 19:59:07.71 +26:58:54.0: ref_mag=12.82 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=11.8867 delta=0.94 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_05-20-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0295.fits at 19:59:31.73 +34:38:47.0: 12.99 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-22-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1307.fits at 19:59:31.73 +34:38:47.0: 15.80 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.99 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:59:31.73 +34:38:47.0: ref_mag=12.99 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=12.1117 delta=0.88 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_05-20-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0295.fits at 19:56:22.82 +31:16:51.8: 13.17 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-22-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1307.fits at 19:56:22.82 +31:16:51.8: 13.13 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.14 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 19:56:22.82 +31:16:51.8: ref_mag=13.14 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=12.2147 delta=0.93 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_05-20-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0295.fits at 20:00:23.87 +27:24:03.6: 12.97 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-22-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1307.fits at 20:00:23.87 +27:24:03.6: 13.20 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.09 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 20:00:23.87 +27:24:03.6: ref_mag=13.09 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.0715 delta=1.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_05-20-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0295.fits at 20:26:25.89 +24:30:40.9: 11.20 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_05-20-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0295.fits at 19:58:24.73 +34:15:54.9: 13.14 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-22-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1307.fits at 20:26:25.89 +24:30:40.9: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:26:25.89 +24:30:40.9: at least one reference image reported edge (off-image or aperture/annulus past image boundary); cannot perform the forced-photometry cross-check
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-22-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1307.fits at 19:58:24.73 +34:15:54.9: 14.58 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.29 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 19:58:24.73 +34:15:54.9: ref_mag=13.29 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=12.0258 delta=1.26 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_05-20-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0295.fits at 20:00:03.46 +27:41:22.0: 13.28 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-22-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1307.fits at 20:00:03.46 +27:41:22.0: 13.40 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.36 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 20:00:03.46 +27:41:22.0: ref_mag=13.36 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=12.3103 delta=1.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_05-20-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0295.fits at 20:32:07.30 +28:38:41.2: 12.69 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-22-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1307.fits at 20:32:07.30 +28:38:41.2: 15.57 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.69 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 20:32:07.30 +28:38:41.2: ref_mag=12.69 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=11.7175 delta=0.97 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_05-20-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0295.fits at 19:58:11.36 +30:51:57.4: 12.03 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-22-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1307.fits at 19:58:11.36 +30:51:57.4: 11.99 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.01 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:58:11.36 +30:51:57.4: ref_mag=12.01 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.6099 delta=0.40 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_05-20-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0295.fits at 19:59:29.16 +26:30:04.2: 13.08 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-22-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1307.fits at 19:59:29.16 +26:30:04.2: 13.45 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.27 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 19:59:29.16 +26:30:04.2: ref_mag=13.27 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=12.1403 delta=1.12 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_05-20-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0295.fits at 19:57:52.10 +33:12:25.1: 12.87 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-22-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1307.fits at 19:57:52.10 +33:12:25.1: 15.41 +/- 0.29 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.91 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 19:57:52.10 +33:12:25.1: ref_mag=12.91 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=11.8971 delta=1.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_05-20-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0295.fits at 19:59:00.28 +34:08:29.6: 13.07 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-22-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1307.fits at 19:59:00.28 +34:08:29.6: 15.57 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.07 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 19:59:00.28 +34:08:29.6: ref_mag=13.07 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=12.0820 delta=0.99 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_05-20-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0295.fits at 19:58:04.40 +33:01:40.9: 13.07 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-22-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1307.fits at 19:58:04.40 +33:01:40.9: 14.73 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.18 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 19:58:04.40 +33:01:40.9: ref_mag=13.18 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=12.0272 delta=1.16 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_05-20-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0295.fits at 19:58:31.54 +33:17:54.0: 12.85 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_05-20-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0295.fits at 20:24:38.46 +24:35:30.3: 12.55 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-22-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1307.fits at 20:24:38.46 +24:35:30.3: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:24:38.46 +24:35:30.3: at least one reference image reported edge (off-image or aperture/annulus past image boundary); cannot perform the forced-photometry cross-check
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-22-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1307.fits at 19:58:31.54 +33:17:54.0: 15.42 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.85 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 19:58:31.54 +33:17:54.0: ref_mag=12.85 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=11.9351 delta=0.92 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_05-20-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0295.fits at 20:30:20.03 +25:35:52.8: 12.45 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_05-20-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0295.fits at 20:31:09.31 +26:12:35.2: 12.18 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-22-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1307.fits at 20:30:20.03 +25:35:52.8: 12.35 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.38 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:30:20.03 +25:35:52.8: ref_mag=12.38 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.7603 delta=0.62 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-22-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1307.fits at 20:31:09.31 +26:12:35.2: 12.33 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.27 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:31:09.31 +26:12:35.2: ref_mag=12.27 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.5552 delta=0.72 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_05-20-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0295.fits at 19:57:25.14 +33:11:05.3: 13.05 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-22-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1307.fits at 19:57:25.14 +33:11:05.3: 15.42 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.05 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 19:57:25.14 +33:11:05.3: ref_mag=13.05 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=12.0338 delta=1.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_05-20-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0295.fits at 19:57:56.81 +33:02:39.8: 13.20 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_05-20-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0295.fits at 19:56:27.94 +32:08:41.4: 13.18 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-22-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1307.fits at 19:57:56.81 +33:02:39.8: 14.97 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.29 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 19:57:56.81 +33:02:39.8: ref_mag=13.29 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=12.1576 delta=1.13 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-22-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1307.fits at 19:56:27.94 +32:08:41.4: 14.29 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.38 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 19:56:27.94 +32:08:41.4: ref_mag=13.38 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=12.1218 delta=1.26 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_05-20-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0295.fits at 19:56:50.90 +26:21:16.6: 12.52 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-22-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1307.fits at 19:56:50.90 +26:21:16.6: 12.62 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.58 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 19:56:50.90 +26:21:16.6: ref_mag=12.58 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.6077 delta=0.98 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_05-20-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0295.fits at 19:48:59.19 +26:45:21.2: 12.51 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_05-20-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0295.fits at 19:58:28.36 +33:30:23.5: 12.41 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-22-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1307.fits at 19:48:59.19 +26:45:21.2: 12.63 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.58 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 19:48:59.19 +26:45:21.2: ref_mag=12.58 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=11.5722 delta=1.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-22-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1307.fits at 19:58:28.36 +33:30:23.5: 15.35 +/- 0.36 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.42 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 19:58:28.36 +33:30:23.5: ref_mag=12.42 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=11.5045 delta=0.92 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_05-20-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0295.fits at 19:58:18.16 +34:34:50.9: 13.16 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-22-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1307.fits at 19:58:18.16 +34:34:50.9: 14.06 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.40 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 19:58:18.16 +34:34:50.9: ref_mag=13.40 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=12.1188 delta=1.28 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out315792.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out315873.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out315980.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out315983.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out316044.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out316092.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out03152.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out09474.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out144403.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out156008.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out164034.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out165728.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out168949.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out169007.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out186351.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out186745.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out188782.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out191547.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out193941.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out195965.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out196571.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out198036.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out199461.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out21230.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out215009.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out221700.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out224671.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out232553.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out27805.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out31374.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out33098.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out33578.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out36154.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out40516.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out49432.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out55294.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out57278.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out95439.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 48s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 18s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 315581_fd_Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-06-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073
The candidate 315581_fd_Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-06-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 315631_fd_Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-06-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073
The candidate 315631_fd_Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-06-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 315638_fd_Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-06-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073
The candidate 315638_fd_Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-06-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:31:00.12 +26:29:12.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 315639_fd_Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-06-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073
The candidate 315639_fd_Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-06-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:30:45.25 +27:57:53.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bbsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 315672_fd_Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-06-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073
The candidate 315672_fd_Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-06-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 315687_fd_Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-06-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073
The candidate 315687_fd_Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-06-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:29:32.06 +25:07:43.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 315697_fd_Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-06-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073
The candidate 315697_fd_Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-06-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 315717_fd_Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-06-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073
The candidate 315717_fd_Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-06-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:30:02.05 +25:19:22.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 315727_fd_Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-06-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073
The candidate 315727_fd_Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-06-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 315739_fd_Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-06-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073
The candidate 315739_fd_Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-06-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 315742_fd_Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-06-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073
The candidate 315742_fd_Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-06-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 315750_fd_Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-06-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073
The candidate 315750_fd_Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-06-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 315768_fd_Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-06-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073
The candidate 315768_fd_Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-06-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 315770_fd_Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-06-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073
The candidate 315770_fd_Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-06-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 315773_fd_Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-06-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073
The candidate 315773_fd_Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-06-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 315783_fd_Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-06-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073
The candidate 315783_fd_Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-06-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 315790_fd_Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-06-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073
The candidate 315790_fd_Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-06-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 315792_fd_Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-06-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073
The candidate 315792_fd_Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-06-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:31:58.82 +24:40:35.8 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=11.38, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=12.36)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 0.435 1831698655770232832 307.99507462849 +24.67673157099 11.5517 10.7750 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#0.435#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 315808_fd_Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-06-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073
The candidate 315808_fd_Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-06-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:32:57.99 +26:11:02.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 315822_fd_Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-06-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073
The candidate 315822_fd_Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-06-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:32:20.72 +24:50:27.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 315826_fd_Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-06-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073
The candidate 315826_fd_Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-06-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 315837_fd_Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-06-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073
The candidate 315837_fd_Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-06-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:32:16.29 +25:59:20.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 315838_fd_Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-06-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073
The candidate 315838_fd_Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-06-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:32:59.47 +26:13:45.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 315849_fd_Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-06-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073
The candidate 315849_fd_Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-06-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 315851_fd_Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-06-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073
The candidate 315851_fd_Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-06-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 315864_fd_Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-06-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073
The candidate 315864_fd_Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-06-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:32:24.28 +25:58:59.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 315869_fd_Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-06-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073
The candidate 315869_fd_Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-06-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 315871_fd_Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-06-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073
The candidate 315871_fd_Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-06-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 315872_fd_Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-06-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073
The candidate 315872_fd_Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-06-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 315873_fd_Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-06-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073
The candidate 315873_fd_Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-06-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:31:55.85 +24:43:26.5 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=11.63, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=12.61)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.107 1831700098879283072 307.98239314284 +24.72391529944 12.0481 11.4174 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.107#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 315888_fd_Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-06-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073
The candidate 315888_fd_Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-06-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 315894_fd_Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-06-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073
The candidate 315894_fd_Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-06-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 315897_fd_Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-06-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073
The candidate 315897_fd_Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-06-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 315911_fd_Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-06-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073
The candidate 315911_fd_Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-06-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 315921_fd_Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-06-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073
The candidate 315921_fd_Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-06-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:30:35.29 +25:31:16.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 315923_fd_Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-06-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073
The candidate 315923_fd_Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-06-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 315927_fd_Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-06-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073
The candidate 315927_fd_Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-06-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:32:39.74 +25:04:59.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 315929_fd_Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-06-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073
The candidate 315929_fd_Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-06-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:32:31.93 +25:00:42.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 315941_fd_Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-06-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073
The candidate 315941_fd_Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-06-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 315969_fd_Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-06-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073
The candidate 315969_fd_Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-06-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 315980_fd_Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-06-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073
The candidate 315980_fd_Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-06-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:32:22.20 +24:42:31.8 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=11.96, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=12.94)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 2.250 1831512907021533824 308.09275680067 +24.70825335840 12.1515 11.1664 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#2.250#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 315983_fd_Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-06-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073
The candidate 315983_fd_Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-06-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:31:49.96 +24:43:23.0 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=11.97, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=12.95)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.866 1831700128932444160 307.95867575279 +24.72328947492 12.1572 11.2245 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.866#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 316013_fd_Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-06-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073
The candidate 316013_fd_Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-06-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 316037_fd_Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-06-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073
The candidate 316037_fd_Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-06-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:31:18.62 +25:39:57.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 316044_fd_Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-06-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073
The candidate 316044_fd_Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-06-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:06:56.40 +33:18:17.2 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=11.89, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=12.87)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 3.064 2055183396387110784 301.73457883670 +33.30400283193 10.9113 9.4639 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#3.064#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 316054_fd_Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-06-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073
The candidate 316054_fd_Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-06-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:30:09.28 +25:22:22.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 316067_fd_Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-06-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073
The candidate 316067_fd_Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-06-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:30:20.41 +25:23:27.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 316081_fd_Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-06-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073
The candidate 316081_fd_Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-06-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 316092_fd_Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-06-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073
The candidate 316092_fd_Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-06-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:30:59.97 +24:37:36.5 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=12.15, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=13.13)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 3.711 1831607014046143360 307.74974333182 +24.62578181013 12.6789 11.8642 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#3.711#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 316095_fd_Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-06-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073
The candidate 316095_fd_Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-06-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:10:39.14 +26:55:53.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 316141_fd_Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-06-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073
The candidate 316141_fd_Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-06-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 316143_fd_Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-06-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073
The candidate 316143_fd_Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-06-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 316219_fd_Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-06-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073
The candidate 316219_fd_Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-06-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 187126_fd_Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-06-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073
The candidate 187126_fd_Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-06-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:56:18.33 +35:04:55.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bbsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191290_fd_Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-06-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073
The candidate 191290_fd_Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-06-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33098_fd_Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-06-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073
Preparing report for the candidate 33098_fd_Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-06-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 03152_fd_Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-06-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073
Preparing report for the candidate 03152_fd_Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-06-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 198036_fd_Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-06-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073
Preparing report for the candidate 198036_fd_Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-06-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 156008_fd_Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-06-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073
Preparing report for the candidate 156008_fd_Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-06-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21230_fd_Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-06-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073
Preparing report for the candidate 21230_fd_Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-06-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191547_fd_Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-06-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073
Preparing report for the candidate 191547_fd_Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-06-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 36154_fd_Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-06-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073
Preparing report for the candidate 36154_fd_Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-06-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 168949_fd_Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-06-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073
Preparing report for the candidate 168949_fd_Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-06-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 177949_fd_Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-06-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073
The candidate 177949_fd_Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-06-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:33:24.86 +31:50:32.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 164034_fd_Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-06-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073
Preparing report for the candidate 164034_fd_Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-06-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 09474_fd_Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-06-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073
Preparing report for the candidate 09474_fd_Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-06-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 08542_fd_Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-06-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073
The candidate 08542_fd_Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-06-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 197073_fd_Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-06-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073
The candidate 197073_fd_Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-06-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:57:53.57 +33:09:36.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 169007_fd_Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-06-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073
Preparing report for the candidate 169007_fd_Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-06-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 186351_fd_Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-06-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073
Preparing report for the candidate 186351_fd_Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-06-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 57278_fd_Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-06-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073
Preparing report for the candidate 57278_fd_Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-06-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 232553_fd_Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-06-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073
Preparing report for the candidate 232553_fd_Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-06-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 40516_fd_Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-06-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073
Preparing report for the candidate 40516_fd_Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-06-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 44361_fd_Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-06-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073
The candidate 44361_fd_Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-06-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:32:56.80 +26:25:41.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 213285_fd_Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-06-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073
The candidate 213285_fd_Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-06-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 41386_fd_Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-06-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073
The candidate 41386_fd_Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-06-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:32:59.73 +26:16:30.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 144403_fd_Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-06-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073
Preparing report for the candidate 144403_fd_Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-06-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 49432_fd_Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-06-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073
Preparing report for the candidate 49432_fd_Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-06-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 221700_fd_Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-06-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073
Preparing report for the candidate 221700_fd_Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-06-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21015_fd_Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-06-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073
The candidate 21015_fd_Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-06-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:57:05.93 +25:58:00.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 06356_fd_Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-06-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073
The candidate 06356_fd_Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-06-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 199349_fd_Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-06-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073
The candidate 199349_fd_Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-06-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:56:45.74 +33:05:15.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55294_fd_Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-06-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073
Preparing report for the candidate 55294_fd_Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-06-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 45868_fd_Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-06-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073
The candidate 45868_fd_Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-06-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 37093_fd_Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-06-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073
The candidate 37093_fd_Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-06-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:30:51.80 +26:06:50.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 95439_fd_Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-06-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073
Preparing report for the candidate 95439_fd_Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-06-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 27195_fd_Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-06-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073
The candidate 27195_fd_Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-06-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:29:15.92 +25:38:44.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 134278_fd_Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-06-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073
The candidate 134278_fd_Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-06-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31374_fd_Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-06-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073
Preparing report for the candidate 31374_fd_Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-06-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 29768_fd_Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-06-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073
The candidate 29768_fd_Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-06-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:31:15.37 +25:43:37.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195965_fd_Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-06-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073
Preparing report for the candidate 195965_fd_Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-06-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 61370_fd_Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-06-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073
The candidate 61370_fd_Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-06-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:01:37.91 +27:55:58.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 224671_fd_Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-06-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073
Preparing report for the candidate 224671_fd_Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-06-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 12403_fd_Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-06-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073
The candidate 12403_fd_Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-06-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:00:04.05 +25:26:19.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 186745_fd_Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-06-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073
Preparing report for the candidate 186745_fd_Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-06-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 193941_fd_Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-06-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073
Preparing report for the candidate 193941_fd_Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-06-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 189376_fd_Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-06-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073
The candidate 189376_fd_Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-06-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:56:10.96 +33:30:34.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 06789_fd_Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-06-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073
The candidate 06789_fd_Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-06-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 99483_fd_Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-06-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073
The candidate 99483_fd_Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-06-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:34:39.23 +28:43:12.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 39090_fd_Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-06-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073
The candidate 39090_fd_Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-06-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 26860_fd_Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-06-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073
The candidate 26860_fd_Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-06-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 37055_fd_Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-06-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073
The candidate 37055_fd_Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-06-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:49:26.03 +26:55:12.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 196571_fd_Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-06-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073
Preparing report for the candidate 196571_fd_Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-06-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 46274_fd_Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-06-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073
The candidate 46274_fd_Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-06-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:32:59.77 +26:30:33.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 80538_fd_Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-06-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073
The candidate 80538_fd_Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-06-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:34:22.64 +27:58:50.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 199461_fd_Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-06-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073
Preparing report for the candidate 199461_fd_Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-06-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 165728_fd_Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-06-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073
Preparing report for the candidate 165728_fd_Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-06-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 22810_fd_Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-06-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073
The candidate 22810_fd_Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-06-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:55:44.65 +26:04:49.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 27805_fd_Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-06-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073
Preparing report for the candidate 27805_fd_Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-06-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33578_fd_Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-06-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073
Preparing report for the candidate 33578_fd_Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-06-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 188782_fd_Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-06-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073
Preparing report for the candidate 188782_fd_Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-06-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 254433_fd_Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-06-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073
The candidate 254433_fd_Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-06-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:30:41.68 +28:12:34.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 253393_fd_Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-06-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073
The candidate 253393_fd_Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-06-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:56:57.58 +34:09:50.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 23683_fd_Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-06-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073
The candidate 23683_fd_Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-06-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:29:37.65 +25:26:34.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 215009_fd_Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-06-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073
Preparing report for the candidate 215009_fd_Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-06-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 182227_fd_Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-06-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073
The candidate 182227_fd_Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-06-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:57:05.96 +32:49:56.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 160623_fd_Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-06-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073
The candidate 160623_fd_Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-06-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:57:20.46 +31:53:37.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 70172_fd_Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-06-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073
The candidate 70172_fd_Cyg-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-06-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0073 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:32:42.82 +27:36:20.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 3s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 69s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Cyg-08-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
19:58:56.89 +24:54:19.7
20:02:53.85 +25:11:43.8
19:56:22.82 +31:16:51.8
19:56:53.26 +31:43:23.4
19:56:22.04 +32:04:17.7
19:56:27.94 +32:08:41.4
19:57:43.17 +32:15:44.5
19:57:29.12 +32:15:51.9
19:57:27.43 +33:01:11.3
19:58:04.40 +33:01:40.9
19:58:28.36 +33:30:23.5
19:59:10.07 +33:23:29.5
19:58:31.54 +33:17:54.0
19:57:52.10 +33:12:25.1
19:57:25.14 +33:11:05.3
19:58:26.31 +33:07:17.2
19:57:56.81 +33:02:39.8
19:58:12.31 +25:57:26.2
19:58:18.16 +34:34:50.9
19:58:24.73 +34:15:54.9
19:59:00.28 +34:08:29.6
19:58:50.91 +33:45:28.1
19:56:50.90 +26:21:16.6
19:59:29.16 +26:30:04.2
19:50:37.84 +26:42:45.2
19:48:59.19 +26:45:21.2
19:58:39.58 +26:45:30.7
19:59:07.71 +26:58:54.0
20:00:23.87 +27:24:03.6
20:00:03.46 +27:41:22.0
20:01:18.33 +27:45:44.0
20:32:07.30 +28:38:41.2
########### Completed Cyg-08-Q1b1x1 ###########
The analysis was running at tau
We are allowed to update the exclusion list at tau host
Found ../exclusion_list_TTUQ1.txt
#### The exclusion list before filtering-out asteroids, bad pixels and adding Gaia sources ####
19:50:37.84 +26:42:45.2
19:58:56.89 +24:54:19.7
19:58:26.31 +33:07:17.2
19:56:53.26 +31:43:23.4
19:58:12.31 +25:57:26.2
19:59:10.07 +33:23:29.5
19:58:39.58 +26:45:30.7
19:57:43.17 +32:15:44.5
19:56:22.04 +32:04:17.7
20:02:53.85 +25:11:43.8
19:57:29.12 +32:15:51.9
19:57:27.43 +33:01:11.3
20:01:18.33 +27:45:44.0
19:58:50.91 +33:45:28.1
19:59:07.71 +26:58:54.0
19:56:22.82 +31:16:51.8
20:00:23.87 +27:24:03.6
19:58:24.73 +34:15:54.9
20:00:03.46 +27:41:22.0
20:32:07.30 +28:38:41.2
19:59:29.16 +26:30:04.2
19:57:52.10 +33:12:25.1
19:59:00.28 +34:08:29.6
19:58:04.40 +33:01:40.9
19:58:31.54 +33:17:54.0
19:57:25.14 +33:11:05.3
19:57:56.81 +33:02:39.8
19:56:27.94 +32:08:41.4
19:56:50.90 +26:21:16.6
19:48:59.19 +26:45:21.2
19:58:28.36 +33:30:23.5
19:58:18.16 +34:34:50.9
###################################################################################
19:50:37.84 +26:42:45.2 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
19:58:56.89 +24:54:19.7 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
19:58:26.31 +33:07:17.2 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
19:56:53.26 +31:43:23.4 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
19:58:12.31 +25:57:26.2 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
19:59:10.07 +33:23:29.5 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
19:58:39.58 +26:45:30.7 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
19:57:43.17 +32:15:44.5 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
19:56:22.04 +32:04:17.7 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
20:02:53.85 +25:11:43.8 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
19:57:29.12 +32:15:51.9 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
19:57:27.43 +33:01:11.3 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
20:01:18.33 +27:45:44.0 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
19:58:50.91 +33:45:28.1 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
19:59:07.71 +26:58:54.0 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
19:56:22.82 +31:16:51.8 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
20:00:23.87 +27:24:03.6 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
19:58:24.73 +34:15:54.9 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
20:00:03.46 +27:41:22.0 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
20:32:07.30 +28:38:41.2 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
19:59:29.16 +26:30:04.2 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
19:57:52.10 +33:12:25.1 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
19:59:00.28 +34:08:29.6 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
19:58:04.40 +33:01:40.9 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
19:58:31.54 +33:17:54.0 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
19:57:25.14 +33:11:05.3 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
19:57:56.81 +33:02:39.8 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
19:56:27.94 +32:08:41.4 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
19:56:50.90 +26:21:16.6 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
19:48:59.19 +26:45:21.2 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
19:58:28.36 +33:30:23.5 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
19:58:18.16 +34:34:50.9 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
renamed 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt_noasteroids' -> 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt'
19:48:59.19 +26:45:21.2 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
19:50:37.84 +26:42:45.2 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
19:56:22.04 +32:04:17.7 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
19:56:22.82 +31:16:51.8 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
19:56:27.94 +32:08:41.4 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
19:56:50.90 +26:21:16.6 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
19:56:53.26 +31:43:23.4 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
19:57:25.14 +33:11:05.3 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
19:57:27.43 +33:01:11.3 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
19:57:29.12 +32:15:51.9 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
19:57:43.17 +32:15:44.5 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
19:57:52.10 +33:12:25.1 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
19:57:56.81 +33:02:39.8 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
19:58:04.40 +33:01:40.9 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
19:58:12.31 +25:57:26.2 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
19:58:18.16 +34:34:50.9 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
19:58:24.73 +34:15:54.9 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
19:58:26.31 +33:07:17.2 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
19:58:28.36 +33:30:23.5 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
19:58:31.54 +33:17:54.0 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
19:58:39.58 +26:45:30.7 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
19:58:50.91 +33:45:28.1 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
19:58:56.89 +24:54:19.7 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
19:59:00.28 +34:08:29.6 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
19:59:07.71 +26:58:54.0 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
19:59:10.07 +33:23:29.5 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
19:59:29.16 +26:30:04.2 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
20:00:03.46 +27:41:22.0 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
20:00:23.87 +27:24:03.6 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
20:01:18.33 +27:45:44.0 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
20:02:53.85 +25:11:43.8 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
20:32:07.30 +28:38:41.2 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
renamed 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt_nohotpixels' -> 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt'
# Count candidates with no identification (that also don't look like hot pix)
19:48:59.19 +26:45:21.2 -- a known variable star
19:50:37.84 +26:42:45.2 -- a known variable star
19:56:22.04 +32:04:17.7 -- not a known variable star
19:56:22.82 +31:16:51.8 -- not a known variable star
19:56:27.94 +32:08:41.4 -- a known variable star
19:56:50.90 +26:21:16.6 -- not a known variable star
19:56:53.26 +31:43:23.4 -- a known variable star
19:57:25.14 +33:11:05.3 -- not a known variable star
19:57:27.43 +33:01:11.3 -- a known variable star
19:57:29.12 +32:15:51.9 -- a known variable star
19:57:43.17 +32:15:44.5 -- a known variable star
19:57:52.10 +33:12:25.1 -- a known variable star
19:57:56.81 +33:02:39.8 -- not a known variable star
19:58:04.40 +33:01:40.9 -- not a known variable star
19:58:12.31 +25:57:26.2 -- a known variable star
19:58:18.16 +34:34:50.9 -- not a known variable star
19:58:24.73 +34:15:54.9 -- a known variable star
19:58:26.31 +33:07:17.2 -- not a known variable star
19:58:28.36 +33:30:23.5 -- a known variable star
19:58:31.54 +33:17:54.0 -- not a known variable star
19:58:39.58 +26:45:30.7 -- a known variable star
19:58:50.91 +33:45:28.1 -- a known variable star
19:58:56.89 +24:54:19.7 -- a known variable star
19:59:00.28 +34:08:29.6 -- a known variable star
19:59:07.71 +26:58:54.0 -- not a known variable star
19:59:10.07 +33:23:29.5 -- not a known variable star
19:59:29.16 +26:30:04.2 -- a known variable star
20:00:03.46 +27:41:22.0 -- not a known variable star
20:00:23.87 +27:24:03.6 -- a known variable star
20:01:18.33 +27:45:44.0 -- not a known variable star
20:02:53.85 +25:11:43.8 -- a known variable star
20:32:07.30 +28:38:41.2 -- a known variable star
Found 13 unidentified candidates (excluding asteroids, hot pixels and known variable stars).
###################################################################################
32 candidates found (excluding asteroids and hot pixels)
This does not look like a test run
###################################################################################
Adding identified Gaia sources from exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
exclusion_list_apass.txt NOT FOUND
IS_THIS_TEST_RUN= NO ALLOW_EXCLUSION_LIST_UPDATE= YES
#### Adding the following to the exclusion list ####
19:48:59.19 +26:45:21.2
19:50:37.84 +26:42:45.2
19:56:22.04 +32:04:17.7
19:56:22.82 +31:16:51.8
19:56:27.94 +32:08:41.4
19:56:50.90 +26:21:16.6
19:56:53.26 +31:43:23.4
19:57:25.14 +33:11:05.3
19:57:27.43 +33:01:11.3
19:57:29.12 +32:15:51.9
19:57:43.17 +32:15:44.5
19:57:52.10 +33:12:25.1
19:57:56.81 +33:02:39.8
19:58:04.40 +33:01:40.9
19:58:12.31 +25:57:26.2
19:58:18.16 +34:34:50.9
19:58:24.73 +34:15:54.9
19:58:26.31 +33:07:17.2
19:58:28.36 +33:30:23.5
19:58:31.54 +33:17:54.0
19:58:39.58 +26:45:30.7
19:58:50.91 +33:45:28.1
19:58:56.89 +24:54:19.7
19:59:00.28 +34:08:29.6
19:59:07.71 +26:58:54.0
19:59:10.07 +33:23:29.5
19:59:29.16 +26:30:04.2
20:00:03.46 +27:41:22.0
20:00:23.87 +27:24:03.6
20:01:18.33 +27:45:44.0
20:02:53.85 +25:11:43.8
20:32:07.30 +28:38:41.2
20:31:58.82 +24:40:35.8
20:31:55.85 +24:43:26.5
20:32:22.20 +24:42:31.8
20:31:49.96 +24:43:23.0
20:06:56.40 +33:18:17.2
20:30:59.97 +24:37:36.5
####################################################
The observatory MPC code is V36
############################################################
Positions of planets computed with util/planet_finder/main.py for JD(UT)2461199.66935093 -observatory V36
06:43:36.00 +25:00:19.8 Mercury (0.1mag)
07:42:44.38 +23:23:02.1 Venus (-4.0mag)
02:49:32.60 +15:42:32.3 Mars (1.3mag)
07:48:25.12 +21:31:30.0 Jupiter (-1.9mag)
00:49:22.06 +02:48:38.8 Saturn (0.9mag)
04:00:12.09 +20:25:26.9 Uranus (5.8mag)
00:16:08.46 +00:16:47.9 Neptune (7.8mag)
20:33:21.48 -23:04:32.3 Pluto (14.5mag)
23:02:05.03 -05:47:06.8 Moon (-10.4mag)
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 362 Jun 7 23:44 planets.txt
############################################################
Positions of selected moons from JPL HORIZONS for JD(UT)2461199.66935093:
07:48:25.65 +21:31:30.6 Io (6.0mag)
07:48:25.04 +21:31:32.4 Europa (6.2mag)
07:48:09.22 +21:32:17.3 Ganymede (5.6mag)
07:48:43.91 +21:30:29.4 Callisto (6.7mag)
07:48:42.55 +21:07:47.6 Himalia (15.6mag)
07:48:29.69 +21:31:15.9 Thebe (16.5mag)
07:48:42.03 +21:23:14.7 Elara (17.5mag)
07:50:35.74 +21:43:12.6 Pasiphae (17.7mag)
07:55:00.26 +21:33:12.3 Carme (18.9mag)
00:49:12.59 +02:48:37.7 Titan (8.7mag)
00:49:19.06 +02:48:52.0 Rhea (9.9mag)
00:49:54.35 +02:50:48.0 Iapetus (11.3mag)
00:49:17.97 +02:48:15.8 Hyperion (14.7mag)
00:50:04.35 +02:50:35.5 Phoebe (16.7mag)
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 568 Jun 7 23:44 moons.txt
############################################################
Positions of selected spacecraft from JPL HORIZONS for JD(UT)2461199.66935093:
17:26:44.42 -35:14:44.4 JWST
14:29:29.48 +57:32:19.8 Chandra
18:34:05.59 -24:34:59.2 XMM-Newton
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 96 Jun 7 23:44 spacecraft.txt
############################################################
Positions of bright comets computed with util/comet_finder/main.py for JD(UT)2461199.66935093 -observatory V36
18:43:31.71 -32:39:07.9 13.6mag P/2010 H2 (Vales)
05:53:26.77 -68:03:51.5 17.4mag C/2014 UN271 (Bernardinelli-Bernstein)
05:49:03.00 +31:58:03.7 17.5mag C/2017 K2 (PANSTARRS)
17:14:44.56 +15:21:02.5 17.8mag C/2021 G2 (ATLAS)
21:12:03.07 -49:30:02.5 16.9mag P/2021 N1 (ZTF)
23:12:38.36 +31:35:27.9 17.2mag C/2022 E2 (ATLAS)
05:34:00.68 +26:58:31.4 16.5mag C/2022 N2 (PANSTARRS)
09:29:42.58 +31:05:00.8 16.6mag C/2022 QE78 (ATLAS)
08:50:31.95 +03:55:50.7 17.7mag C/2022 R6 (PANSTARRS)
18:28:14.33 +21:36:06.8 17.8mag C/2023 A3 (Tsuchinshan-ATLAS)
15:19:22.94 -11:00:31.0 17.6mag P/2023 B1 (PANSTARRS)
22:14:26.43 +66:31:37.4 17.7mag C/2023 H5 (Lemmon)
17:46:26.99 -06:41:12.4 13.7mag C/2023 R1 (PANSTARRS)
13:18:06.60 +82:59:56.8 17.9mag C/2023 X2 (Lemmon)
07:10:22.76 +64:18:29.8 17.7mag C/2024 A1 (ATLAS)
06:47:13.96 +27:49:55.5 13.6mag C/2024 E1 (Wierzchos)
15:37:18.54 +13:31:27.2 17.4mag C/2024 G6 (ATLAS)
20:13:03.78 +31:07:40.4 14.0mag C/2024 J3 (ATLAS)
04:18:00.03 -15:57:11.7 16.0mag C/2024 T5 (ATLAS)
06:05:53.26 +34:29:45.3 17.9mag C/2025 J1 (Borisov)
11:34:55.07 +52:45:02.2 17.4mag C/2025 L1 (ATLAS)
06:44:54.70 -10:52:07.1 14.1mag C/2025 R3 (PANSTARRS)
09:24:08.46 +23:20:25.3 17.9mag C/2025 V2 (Rankin)
12:39:42.12 +04:41:28.2 17.2mag C/2025 Y1 (ATLAS)
18:12:55.65 +75:07:36.8 17.9mag C/2026 A2 (Bok)
02:00:37.26 +43:24:48.6 16.1mag C/2026 B2 (Sun-Gao)
11:11:18.43 -03:44:32.0 16.5mag A/2026 E1
20:23:36.29 -08:34:03.7 8.7mag 10P/Tempel
11:01:59.96 -00:58:03.4 16.0mag 29P/Schwassmann-Wachmann
03:11:40.88 +25:38:32.4 17.7mag 47P/Ashbrook-Jackson
08:59:55.56 +23:46:35.0 16.9mag 63P/Wild
00:26:54.32 -06:22:08.8 15.7mag 65P/Gunn
06:43:21.47 +33:25:39.1 16.9mag 76P/West-Kohoutek-Ikemura
03:09:07.18 +17:12:48.4 13.8mag 78P/Gehrels
01:20:42.22 +04:50:37.8 15.6mag 88P/Howell
04:54:33.51 +30:18:04.2 15.2mag 93P/Lovas
02:42:52.71 +27:37:19.3 17.6mag 114P/Wiseman-Skiff
06:50:29.22 +33:02:21.0 15.6mag 123P/West-Hartley
09:50:08.10 +14:38:54.1 16.5mag 124P/Mrkos
03:58:59.60 +19:14:55.7 16.4mag 128P/Shoemaker-Holt
04:33:30.77 +19:05:00.1 17.7mag 131P/Mueller
05:58:12.14 +18:40:05.9 14.6mag 141P/Machholz
06:00:50.30 +17:40:26.4 14.6mag 141P-A/Machholz
04:53:57.74 +16:10:12.9 11.6mag 141P-D/Machholz
02:57:39.59 -24:42:11.1 16.8mag 161P/Hartley-IRAS
03:41:27.80 +23:47:58.1 14.9mag 162P/SidingSpring
19:36:38.26 +01:43:18.6 16.9mag 169P/NEAT
00:18:16.05 +02:27:37.5 17.9mag 220P/McNaught
16:52:12.19 -08:28:37.3 16.4mag 235P/LINEAR
07:34:35.97 +35:29:34.9 17.5mag 240P/NEAT
00:32:17.02 -02:28:47.4 16.4mag 260P/McNaught
04:04:09.31 +32:28:35.2 17.6mag 295P/LINEAR
23:52:05.37 -09:44:33.7 17.6mag 320P/McNaught
15:15:15.00 +08:06:02.5 17.4mag 391P/Kowalski
08:07:06.99 +20:44:53.0 17.9mag 450P/LONEOS
06:59:55.87 +41:41:54.1 17.8mag 493P/LONEOS
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 2.7K Jun 7 23:44 comets.txt
############################################################
List of recent ASAS-SN transients from https://www.astronomy.ohio-state.edu/asassn/transients.html :
20:07:38.15 -21:07:05.40 SN2026mho 2026-05-25.18 -1.12
11:29:42.55 +79:01:03.10 AT2026min 2026-05-24.21 16.63
11:44:32.95 -68:48:30.00 ASASSN-26no 2026-05-24 8.41
19:00:42.82 -48:31:01.60 ASASSN-26dp 2026-05-22.31 -3.28
14:23:56.59 -58:37:47.40 ASASSN-26dn 2026-05-20.01 14.59
11:24:54.06 +47:57:01.60 AT2026nma 2026-05-20.29 15.46
21:27:08.58 +33:24:38.10 AT2026lli 2026-05-19.34 15.86
00:31:01.41 -13:38:51.70 AT2026nad 2026-05-19.39 15.34
15:16:06.61 -79:16:32.40 ASASSN-26dm 2026-05-19.03 14.44
11:24:25.21 -59:23:19.10 ASASSN-26dl 2026-05-18.02 13.55
13:45:51.52 -53:16:01.00 ASASSN-26dk 2026-05-18.16 12.96
02:05:49.69 -30:29:09.60 ASASSN-26dh 2026-05-18.43 15.37
17:50:22.87 -39:42:33.90 ASASSN-26dj 2026-05-17.05 15.7
01:13:11.60 -33:25:16.10 ASASSN-26dg 2026-05-13.41 16.8
16:44:31.77 -27:15:18.40 AT2026mhn 2026-05-12.33 15.8
09:46:31.08 -33:41:51.00 ASASSN-26di 2026-05-12.14 14.63
21:23:11.57 -19:09:45.00 AT2026kwu 2026-05-12.26 16.9
14:20:14.30 -30:20:51.90 AT2026ktm 2026-05-12.06 17.21
14:41:39.01 -37:13:46.40 AT2026lkm 2026-05-11.18 16.89
12:59:50.45 -10:58:38.80 SN2026kep 2026-05-9.06 17.5
13:37:29.61 -29:50:30.90 AT2026lkd 2026-05-9.09 17.23
09:46:42.01 -14:52:03.60 SN2026kmo 2026-05-8.99 17.51
15:03:05.28 +22:02:03.40 AT2026lxf 2026-05-8.07 13.88
10:23:49.41 -20:57:25.30 ASASSN-26df 2026-05-8.21 16.52
22:14:40.56 +05:04:51.60 2026lda 2026-05-7.56 16.2
21:35:33.81 -14:05:16.30 ASASSN-26de 2026-05-6.29 14.51
16:21:48.82 -61:36:13.20 ASASSN-26dd 2026-05-5.21 15.15
14:26:40.22 -24:48:37.50 AT2026lig 2026-05-4.27 14.63
13:17:51.04 +30:25:13.50 SN2026kcp 2026-05-4.46 16.43
11:27:55.57 -13:38:56.90 SN2026kza 2026-05-1.08 15.59
22:28:27.10 +30:17:54.30 SN 2026fov 2026-04-29.6 14.36
21:00:10.71 -32:17:03.90 AT2026kis 2026-04-27.36 16.15
14:32:57.37 -58:13:26.40 ASASSN-26dc 2026-04-27.27 13.42
15:32:05.35 -43:54:34.60 ASASSN-26db 2026-04-27.37 16.06
16:34:34.97 -54:34:58.00 ASASSN-26da 2026-04-25.32 16.11
10:06:55.04 -01:13:49.70 SN2026jsg 2026-04-24.99 16.28
15:15:57.17 +56:18:32.80 SN2026kid 2026-04-24.52 -3.65
07:58:28.45 +57:03:42.40 AT2026kcf 2026-04-24.2 16.89
11:38:21.80 -50:43:06.50 SN2026jkb 2026-04-24.24 15.38
10:06:11.41 -39:41:04.20 AT2026dil 2026-04-24.2 16.85
14:21:40.08 +13:13:46.30 SN2026jlm 2026-04-22.16 15.12
10:53:55.52 -16:06:06.00 ASASSN-26cz 2026-04-22.28 16.29
20:07:38.15 -21:07:05.40 2026-05-25.18 -1.12
13:45:02.03 +15:17:14.50 ASASSN-26cy 2026-04-21.27 15.78
13:20:52.22 -35:57:03.60 AT2026jcm 2026-04-19.01 16.65
13:36:15.66 -36:53:48.40 SN 2026iqy 2026-04-18.92 17.31
06:34:01.33 -40:07:34.00 ASASSN-26cx 2026-04-19.07 16.16
23:33:57.97 -45:12:11.90 SN 2026idu 2026-04-19.41 15.9
12:10:50.92 +66:55:31.20 SN 2026icv 2026-04-17.14 16.03
21:36:59.06 -60:43:35.90 ASASSN-26cv 2026-04-17.35 -1.18
08:13:26.26 -27:07:30.50 ASASSN-26cw 2026-04-17.07 -1.01
14:49:14.13 -27:29:20.60 ASASSN-26cu 2026-04-16.06 14.03
17:21:59.44 -38:54:04.60 ASASSN-26ct 2026-04-14.4 15.15
15:25:54.99 +07:49:24.50 SN2026huo 2026-04-12.14 16.96
20:07:38.15 -21:07:05.40 2026-05-25.18 -1.12
12:23:20.40 +04:53:39.10 AT2026ixd 2026-04-12.14 17.65
17:46:09.76 -61:19:50.40 SN2026icy 2026-04-12.2 17.03
09:25:46.42 +02:13:46.30 SN2026gud 2026-04-11.98 16.49
16:52:15.46 -60:27:45.90 ASASSN-26cs 2026-04-12.4 15.5
04:20:55.37 -51:15:31.10 ASASSN-26cr 2026-04-12.01 15.37
22:25:39.35 +36:45:06.90 AT2026ihl 2026-04-10.48 14.21
19:40:44.94 +00:41:03.80 AT2026imw 2026-04-10.32 16.06
19:52:04.70 +05:53:33.50 ASASSN-26cq 2026-04-9.31 14.98
16:08:18.39 -64:11:08.80 ASASSN-26cp 2026-04-9.29 13.32
09:22:22.90 -61:02:43.70 SN2026idh 2026-04-7.97 16.34
05:06:54.12 -19:42:26.40 AT2026imr 2026-04-8 17.49
07:14:55.34 -36:03:21.40 AT2026hei 2026-04-8.12 16.7
21:35:33.14 -19:01:34.80 AT2026ihm 2026-04-8.36 16.7
04:28:24.08 -32:25:35.30 AT2026imo 2026-04-8.02 16.81
05:10:35.79 -39:38:40.80 SN 2026hnn 2026-04-7.04 17.07
09:54:32.04 -01:17:25.80 ASASSN-26cn 2026-04-7.01 15.58
07:46:24.43 -77:29:35.90 ASASSN-26co 2026-04-7.15 14.93
05:00:45.52 -29:51:06.20 AT2026hvw 2026-04-6.03 16.51
19:49:33.10 -23:37:11.00 ASASSN-26cl 2026-04-5.29 14.98
19:32:43.55 -22:39:33.40 ASASSN-26cm 2026-04-4.3 13.88
18:08:57.38 +76:48:23.60 ASASSN-26ck 2026-04-2.37 15.38
16:16:36.10 +44:52:30.20 AT2026hyy 2026-04-2.58 13.81
21:55:23.31 -34:48:53.90 ASASSN-26cj 2026-03-30.4 -1.47
11:19:50.70 -27:51:49.80 SN2026gvk 2026-03-30 15.48
11:53:57.02 -23:09:46.20 SN2026gzx 2026-03-28.75 15.27
07:13:46.14 -33:10:15.70 ASASSN-26ci 2026-03-28.15 15.14
09:03:36.09 -67:58:13.00 SN2026hkg 2026-03-28.19 15.82
07:03:00.72 +39:14:43.00 SN2026fin 2026-03-28.27 15.82
05:35:42.80 -63:44:05.50 ASASSN-26ch 2026-03-27.86 13.02
11:23:19.04 +34:22:38.00 SN2026fwt 2026-03-27.3 16.56
19:03:49.79 +37:04:05.20 ASASSN-26ce 2026-03-26.56 16.3
20:26:56.07 -52:54:06.50 AT2026hiy 2026-03-26.35 16.95
05:25:54.76 -30:15:35.80 ASASSN-26cg 2026-03-25.07 16.88
06:57:16.49 -26:54:37.20 SN2026fzb 2026-03-25.14 15.8
14:37:38.23 -43:00:52.30 ASASSN-26cd 2026-03-24.24 12.52
17:34:53.03 +06:04:29.70 AT2026gzl 2026-03-23.27 15.82
08:30:02.60 -35:12:47.50 ASASSN-26cf 2026-03-23.2 14.82
16:54:25.33 +37:49:56.60 SN 2026evz 2026-03-21.32 17.54
17:06:19.20 -18:54:19.50 ASASSN-26bx 2026-03-21.25 16.39
19:01:16.28 -29:29:23.10 ASASSN-26bw 2026-03-21.33 15.81
08:46:05.75 +10:47:39.80 ASASSN-26ca 2026-03-21.13 14.27
12:14:58.16 +63:47:16.20 SN 2026fvx 2026-03-21.12 15.6
18:02:55.90 -75:23:02.60 ASASSN-26bz 2026-03-21.32 16.16
12:16:02.88 -53:16:33.80 ASASSN-26cc 2026-03-20.04 15.48
13:08:21.85 +29:13:44.20 SN 2026fmh 2026-03-20.16 -0.33
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 5.6K Jun 7 23:44 asassn_transients_list.txt
############################################################
Truncated list of TOCP transients from http://www.cbat.eps.harvard.edu/unconf/tocp.html :
09:55:38.83 +69:05:21.7 PNV J09553883+6905217 2026-04-01.893 19.4mag
19:32:43.67 -22:39:30.7 TCP J19324367-2239307 2026-04-05.4395 13.6mag
16:16:36.03 +44:52:28.9 TCP J16163603+4452289 2026-04-05.6655 14.2mag
00:43:38.36 +41:15:32.4 PNV J00433836+4115324 2026-04-08.079 17.2mag
15:41:11.68 +59:18:26.8 TCP J15411168+5918268 2026-04-12.9625 19.2mag
00:43:35.02 +41:46:28.0 PNV J00433502+4146280 2026-04-23.056 15.9mag
00:42:55.64 +41:14:12.2 PNV J00425564+4114122 2026-04-24.042 16.2mag
21:14:03.38 +56:46:44.1 TCP J21140338+5646441 2026-05-05.3534 16.7mag
15:03:05.19 +22:02:04.1 TCP J15030519+2202041 2026-05-08.3260 13.9mag
07:15:18.25 +47:53:16.7 TCP J07151825+4753167 2026-05-09.1599 14.4mag
16:00:18.44 -22:30:10.6 TCP J16001844-2230106 2026-05-09.6135 13.3mag
00:42:47.45 +41:16:58.5 PNV J00424745+4116585 2026-05-10.030 16.8mag
09:55:02.89 +69:02:13.8 PNV J09550289+6902138 2026-05-18.925 20.7mag
00:43:01.82 +41:18:16.6 PNV J00430182+4118166 2026-05-21.8651 18.83Cmag
00:42:51.20 +41:16:59.4 PNV J00425120+4116594 2022-10-26.135 19.3mag
12:24:25.10 +28:47:12.0 TCP J12242510+2847120 2026-05-31.6015 14.8mag
00:56:07.13 +43:01:40.6 TCP J00560713+4301406 2026-06-01.4135 12.2mag
00:42:41.64 +41:15:16.2 PNV J00424164+4115162 2026-06-02.029 17.4mag
00:42:38.68 +41:15:58.2 PNV J00423868+4115582 2026-06-05.1224 19.97Umag
19:00:42.95 -48:31:01.7 PNV J19004295-4831017 2026-05-25.0752 14.2mag
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 189K Jun 7 23:44 tocp_transients_list.txt
############################################################
Truncated list of recent TNS transients from https://www.wis-tns.org/ :
16:39:35.110 +15:17:58.28 AT 2026nsc 2026-05-09.80 20.76
16:42:48.680 +20:27:18.30 AT 2026nsb 2026-05-09.80 20.54
13:34:03.440 +31:37:31.73 AT 2026nsa 2026-05-07.80 21.26
13:50:28.150 +02:34:54.72 AT 2026nrz 2026-05-22.72 21.54
13:43:59.750 +03:47:21.63 AT 2026nry 2026-05-22.69 22.05
13:17:26.150 -01:26:00.12 AT 2026nrx 2026-05-21.64 21.7
00:35:20.216 -08:28:38.64 AT 2026nrw 2026-05-19.42 18.74
23:50:43.016 -01:09:12.25 AT 2026nrv 2026-05-23.48 19.5028
22:36:47.715 +37:31:34.81 AT 2026nru 2026-05-22.43 19.4626
23:58:04.247 +20:56:44.66 AT 2026nrt 2026-05-23.48 20.1237
16:08:58.229 +36:53:23.76 AT 2026nrs 2026-05-21.36 20.3819
19:44:04.734 +84:44:44.91 SN 2026nrr 2026-05-25.47 17.808
21:42:24.388 -20:21:08.51 SN 2026nrq 2026-05-25.56 18.623
22:03:20.669 -84:55:27.45 AT 2026nrp 2026-05-22.30 19.244
23:07:53.376 -39:04:26.84 AT 2026nro 2026-05-22.38 19.567
00:40:07.848 -39:10:21.32 AT 2026nrn 2026-05-12.41 18.737
23:05:28.381 -21:25:50.28 AT 2026nrm 2026-05-25.58 18.887
19:27:28.750 -48:42:52.35 AT 2026nrl 2026-05-22.24 19.107
12:33:38.422 +12:02:05.88 AT 2026nrk 2026-05-25.29 21.322
12:32:27.199 +02:39:54.51 AT 2026nrj 2026-05-25.29 21.0728
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 30K Jun 7 23:44 tns_transients_list.txt
