NMW transient search results

This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-07_CI_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_232244_TTUQ1b1x1_278956_7q9DkiqK

The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.

Processing fields Lup-01-Q1b1x1

Date (UTC) JD(UTC) mag. R.A. & Dec.(J2000) X & Y (pix) Image
Discovery image 1   2026 06 08.17216    2461199.67216    9.76    16:04:59.54 -30:08:50.0   8021 5630   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-07_CI_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_232244_TTUQ1b1x1_278956_7q9DkiqK/fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-07-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0074.fits
Discovery image 2   2026 06 08.17266    2461199.67266    9.76    16:04:59.50 -30:08:49.9   8015 5635   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-07_CI_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_232244_TTUQ1b1x1_278956_7q9DkiqK/fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-08-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0075.fits
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images: 
                   2026 06 08.1724  2461199.6724   9.76  16:04:59.52 -30:08:50.0
345.30062  16.38387 galactic  Lup  Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.5" and 8.0 pix   
The object was found in VSX
16"  Gaia DR3 6040061097343507712  
Type: ROT
#   Max.           Min./Amp.       JD0           Period
    13.410   G            13.450   G                                                 G                            
The object was found in astcheck.  
29 Amphitrite               4     -1       4   9.8    -0   -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits at 16:04:59.52 -30:08:50.0:  14.25 +/- 0.24  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_00-35-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits at 16:04:59.52 -30:08:50.0:  14.39 +/- 99.00  upperlimit
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  14.25 +/- 0.24
Check this position in TNS.                         Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!
Search this object in SIMBAD.
Search this object in VizieR catalogs.  WISE atlas  Aladin Lite
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.

Full images (clouds? trees? ice on chip?)   Lup-01-Q1b1x1 field processing log
Platesolve and blink FITS with VaST+ds9 VaST command line Re-run transient search script Stub MPC report (for online MPChecker) Stub TOCP report Stub variable star reports

Date (UTC) JD(UTC) mag. R.A. & Dec.(J2000) X & Y (pix) Image
Discovery image 1   2026 06 08.17216    2461199.67216    13.03    16:08:05.66 -30:30:15.9   8429 5413   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-07_CI_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_232244_TTUQ1b1x1_278956_7q9DkiqK/fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-07-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0074.fits
Discovery image 2   2026 06 08.17266    2461199.67266    13.03    16:08:05.50 -30:30:14.4   8423 5419   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-07_CI_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_232244_TTUQ1b1x1_278956_7q9DkiqK/fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-08-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0075.fits
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images: 
                   2026 06 08.1724  2461199.6724  13.03  16:08:05.58 -30:30:15.1
345.54157  15.66166 galactic  Sco  Second-epoch detections are separated by 2.6" and 8.3 pix   
The object was found in VSX
13"  Gaia DR3 6037043109730202496  
Type: ROT
#   Max.           Min./Amp.       JD0           Period
    14.830   G            14.870   G                                                 G                            
The object was found in astcheck.  
195 Eurykleia                3     -3       4  13.4    -0   -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits at 16:08:05.58 -30:30:15.1:  14.83 +/- 99.00  upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_00-35-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits at 16:08:05.58 -30:30:15.1:  14.46 +/- 99.00  upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.                         Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!
Search this object in SIMBAD.
Search this object in VizieR catalogs.  WISE atlas  Aladin Lite
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.

Full images (clouds? trees? ice on chip?)   Lup-01-Q1b1x1 field processing log
Platesolve and blink FITS with VaST+ds9 VaST command line Re-run transient search script Stub MPC report (for online MPChecker) Stub TOCP report Stub variable star reports

Processing complete!

Total number of candidates identified: 2

Processing log:

Filtering log:

######## Processing parameters ########
AAVSO_COMMENT_STRING= NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
ASTCHECK_ASTEROID_SEARCH_RADIUS_ARCSEC= 
BAD_REGION_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst
CAMERA_SETTINGS= TTUQ1b1x1
CHECK_POINTING_ACCURACY= yes
DARK_FRAMES_DIR_OR_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks
EXCLUSION_LIST= ../exclusion_list_TTUQ1.txt
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MAX_APERTURE_STAR_SIZE_PIX= 12.5
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MAX_ELONGATION_AminusB_PIX= 0.55
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MIN_APERTURE_STAR_SIZE_PIX= 2.0
FILTER_BRIGHT_MAG_CUTOFF_TRANSIENT_SEARCH= -5
FILTER_FAINT_MAG_CUTOFF_TRANSIENT_SEARCH= 15.0
FLAT_FIELD_DIR_OR_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats
FRAME_EDGE_OFFSET_PIX= 100
GAIA_BAND_FOR_CATALOGED_SOURCE_CHECK= 
MAX_NEW_TO_REF_MEAN_IMG_VALUE_RATIO= 100
MAX_NEW_IMG_MEAN_VALUE= 25000
MAX_SD_RATIO_OF_SECOND_EPOCH_IMGS= 0.18
MAX_SD_RATIO_OF_SECOND_EPOCH_IMGS_SOFT_LIMIT= 0.12
MPC_CODE= V36
NMW_CALIBRATION= /var/www/nmw_calibration
NUMBER_OF_DETECTED_TRANSIENTS_BEFORE_FILTERING_HARD_LIMIT= 8000
NUMBER_OF_DETECTED_TRANSIENTS_BEFORE_FILTERING_SOFT_LIMIT= 4000
OMP_NUM_THREADS= 
ONLINE_MPCHECKER_BUTTON_ASTEROID_SEARCH_RADIUS_ARCMIN= 
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION= 
REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES= yes
SEXTRACTOR_CONFIG_BRIGHTSTARPASS= default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
SEXTRACTOR_CONFIG_FILES= default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
STARMATCH_RADIUS_PIX= 3.5
SYSREM_ITERATIONS= 0
TELESCOP= 
TELESCOP_NAME_KNOWN_TO_VaST_FOR_FOV_DETERMINATION= 
UCAC5_PLATESOLVE_ITERATIONS= 2
FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE= no
#######################################
HOSTNAME= tau
USER= 
HOME= 
#######################################
SExtractor catalog cache: enabled, directory /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/vast_sextractor_cache
Reference image directory is set to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs
VIZIER_SITE=vizier.cds.unistra.fr
GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=vizquery (lib/vizquery -> VizieR vizier.cds.unistra.fr)
INFO: MAKE_PNG_PLOTS is set to yes
FITS_FILE_EXT=fits
CALIBRATION_STATUS_PREFIX=
Fields in the data directory: 
Lup-01-Q1b1x1
#######################################
########### Starting Lup-01-Q1b1x1 ###########
Processing Lup-01-Q1b1x1
server tau has sufficient free disk space available: 297882 MB at /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir
server tau has sufficient free disk space available: 297882 MB at .
Checking input images (2 new)
REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE= /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits
REFERENCE_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE= /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_00-35-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits
Small preview (one of the new images): 
Large previews of the second-epoch (new) images:
MAKE_PNG_PLOTS=yes
renamed 'Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-07-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0074.png' -> 'transient_report/Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-07-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0074.fits_preview.png'
Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-07-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0074.fits

renamed 'Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-08-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0075.png' -> 'transient_report/Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-08-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0075.fits_preview.png'
Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-08-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0075.fits


Read-check the input FITS images... read-check OK Blank image check the input FITS images... blank-image-check OK Read date check the input FITS images... read-date-check OK Mean value check the input FITS images... OK, at least two new images have mean values below the threshold. ---------------------------------------------- INFO: REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 2929.6199 INFO: REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_SD= 815.1864 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 4181.9379 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_SD= 1149.2685 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 4227.9642 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE_SD= 1102.2508 ---------------------------------------------- INFO: ref_to_second_epoch_img_mean_ratio= 1.42747 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__SD_ratio= 0.043 ---------------------------------------------- Calibration settings: DARK_FRAMES_DIR_OR_FILE=/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks FLAT_FIELD_DIR_OR_FILE=/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration SET-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint CCD-TEMP= -0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature FOCTEMP = 29.2999992370605 / [degC] Focuser temperature AMBTEMP = 28.0 / [degC] Ambient air temperature Exploring image header: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-07_CI_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_232244_TTUQ1b1x1_278956_7q9DkiqK/Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-07-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0074.fits CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-07_CI_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_232244_TTUQ1b1x1_278956_7q9DkiqK/Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-07-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0074.fits SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-07_CI_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_232244_TTUQ1b1x1_278956_7q9DkiqK/Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-07-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0074.fits Header: 74 keys total, 33 keys left Record 0: "" status=0 Record 1: "SIMPLE = T / C# FITS" status=0 Record 2: "BITPIX = 16" status=0 Record 3: "NAXIS = 2 / Dimensionality" status=0 Record 4: "NAXIS1 = 9576" status=0 Record 5: "NAXIS2 = 6388" status=0 Record 6: "BZERO = 32768" status=0 Record 7: "EXTEND = T / Extensions are permitted" status=0 Record 8: "IMAGETYP= 'LIGHT' / Type of exposure" status=0 Record 9: "EXPOSURE= 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0 Record 10: "EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0 Record 11: "DATE-LOC= '2026-06-07T23:07:44.4297626' / Time of observation (local)" status=0 Record 12: "DATE-OBS= '2026-06-08T04:07:44.4297626' / Time of observation (UTC)" status=0 Record 13: "MJD-OBS = 61199.1720420024 / Modified Julian Date of observation" status=0 Record 14: "DATE-AVG= '2026-06-08T04:07:54.3334489' / Averaged midpoint time (UTC)" status=0 Record 15: "MJD-AVG = 61199.1721566319 / Modified Julian Date of averaged midpoint" status=0 Record 16: "XBINNING= 1 / X axis binning factor" status=0 Record 17: "YBINNING= 1 / Y axis binning factor" status=0 Record 18: "GAIN = 30 / Sensor gain" status=0 Record 19: "OFFSET = 30 / Sensor gain offset" status=0 Record 20: "XPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel X axis size" status=0 Record 21: "YPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel Y axis size" status=0 Record 22: "INSTRUME= 'QHY600M' / Imaging instrument name" status=0 Record 23: "CAMERAID= 'QHY600M-33d3d743814b8b447' / Imaging instrument identifier" status=0 Record 24: "SET-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint" status=0 Record 25: "CCD-TEMP= -0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature" status=0 Record 26: "READOUTM= '2CMS-0' / Sensor readout mode" status=0 Record 27: "USBLIMIT= 50 / Camera-specific USB setting" status=0 Record 28: "TELESCOP= 'QHY600M-TTU1' / Name of telescope" status=0 Record 29: "FOCALLEN= 135.0 / [mm] Focal length" status=0 Record 30: "FOCRATIO= 2.2 / Focal ratio" status=0 Record 31: "RA = 234.78064863461 / [deg] RA of telescope" status=0 Record 32: "DEC = -33.9997895669112 / [deg] Declination of telescope" status=0 Record 33: "CENTALT = 19.9591666666667 / [deg] Altitude of telescope" status=0 Record 34: "CENTAZ = 163.691388888889 / [deg] Azimuth of telescope" status=0 Record 35: "AIRMASS = 2.90776615543334 / Airmass at frame center (Gueymard 1993)" status=0 Record 36: "PIERSIDE= 'West' / Telescope pointing state" status=0 Record 37: "SITEELEV= 1015.0 / [m] Observation site elevation" status=0 Record 38: "SITELAT = 33.7480555555556 / [deg] Observation site latitude" status=0 Record 39: "SITELONG= -101.958333333333 / [deg] Observation site longitude" status=0 Record 40: "OBSERVER= 'Sokolovsky' / Observer name" status=0 Record 41: "OBSERVAT= 'TTU Skyview' / Observatory name" status=0 Record 42: "SITENAME= '' / Observatory site name" status=0 Record 43: "FWHEEL = 'Simulator' / Filter Wheel name" status=0 Record 44: "FILTER = 'CV' / Active filter name" status=0 Record 45: "OBJECT = 'Lup-01' / Name of the object of interest" status=0 Record 46: "OBJCTRA = '15 39 08' / [H M S] RA of imaged object" status=0 Record 47: "OBJCTDEC= '-34 00 00' / [D M S] Declination of imaged object" status=0 Record 48: "OBJCTROT= 0.0 / [deg] planned rotation of imaged object" status=0 Record 49: "FOCNAME = 'ZWO Focuser' / Focusing equipment name" status=0 Record 50: "FOCPOS = 29493 / [step] Focuser position" status=0 Record 51: "FOCUSPOS= 29493 / [step] Focuser position" status=0 Record 52: "FOCUSSZ = 0.0 / [um] Focuser step size" status=0 Record 53: "FOCTEMP = 29.2999992370605 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0 Record 54: "FOCUSTEM= 29.2999992370605 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0 Record 55: "DEWPOINT= 15.3 / [degC] Dew point" status=0 Record 56: "HUMIDITY= 46.0 / [percent] Relative humidity" status=0 Record 57: "PRESSURE= 893.4 / [hPa] Air pressure" status=0 Record 58: "AMBTEMP = 28.0 / [degC] Ambient air temperature" status=0 Record 59: "WINDDIR = 27.0 / [deg] Wind direction: 0=N, 180=S, 90=E, 270=W" status=0 Record 60: "WINDGUST= 27.702216 / [kph] Wind gust" status=0 Record 61: "WINDSPD = 13.701096 / [kph] Wind speed" status=0 Record 62: "ROWORDER= 'TOP-DOWN' / FITS Image Orientation" status=0 Record 63: "EQUINOX = 2000.0 / Equinox of celestial coordinate system" status=0 Record 64: "SWCREATE= 'N.I.N.A. 3.2.0.9001 (x64)' / Software that created this file" status=0 Record 65: "QHY_EXP = 20.000096 / [s] Actual exposure time" status=0 Record 66: "QHY_PP = 13888.0 / [ps] pixelPeriod" status=0 Record 67: "QHY_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0 Record 68: "GPS_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0 Record 69: "QHY_FP = 20000160.0 / [us] framePeriod" status=0 Record 70: "QHY_CPL = 6120.0 / clocksPerLine" status=0 Record 71: "QHY_LPF = 235295.0 / linesPerFrame" status=0 Record 72: "QHY_AET = 20000096.0 / [us] actualExposureTime" status=0 Record 73: "QHY_LEM = T / isLongExposureMode" status=0 Record 74: "QHY_OFF0= 3767.777 / [us] RollingShutterEndOffset row 0" status=0 Allocating memory for image, dark and result arrays... Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-07_CI_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_232244_TTUQ1b1x1_278956_7q9DkiqK/Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-07-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0074.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-07_CI_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_232244_TTUQ1b1x1_278956_7q9DkiqK/Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-07-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0074.fits SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_5C_20s_2026-05-30.fit CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-07_CI_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_232244_TTUQ1b1x1_278956_7q9DkiqK/Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-07-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0074.fits CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_5C_20s_2026-05-30.fit Reading dark frame /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_5C_20s_2026-05-30.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix Dark frame is subtracted, output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-07_CI_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_232244_TTUQ1b1x1_278956_7q9DkiqK/d_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-07-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0074.fits :) Spent 0.519622 seconds renamed 'mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_5C_20s_2026-05-30.png' -> 'transient_report/dark.png' try_to_calibrate_the_input_frame(): selected flat field /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-05-30.fit from directory /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats MegaDivider v7 Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-07_CI_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_232244_TTUQ1b1x1_278956_7q9DkiqK/d_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-07-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0074.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix Reading flat /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-05-30.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix Avarage count on flat field image: 31267.409145 Minimal real count (from overscan): 5 Output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-07_CI_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_232244_TTUQ1b1x1_278956_7q9DkiqK/fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-07-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0074.fits :) No overscan detected - all values seem high! (left_median=21677.0, right_median=21704.0) renamed 'mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-05-30.png' -> 'transient_report/flat.png' Using calibrated image CALIBRATED_SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-07_CI_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_232244_TTUQ1b1x1_278956_7q9DkiqK/fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-07-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0074.fits EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration SET-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint CCD-TEMP= -0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature FOCTEMP = 29.2999992370605 / [degC] Focuser temperature AMBTEMP = 28.0 / [degC] Ambient air temperature Exploring image header: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-07_CI_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_232244_TTUQ1b1x1_278956_7q9DkiqK/Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-08-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0075.fits CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-07_CI_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_232244_TTUQ1b1x1_278956_7q9DkiqK/Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-08-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0075.fits SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-07_CI_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_232244_TTUQ1b1x1_278956_7q9DkiqK/Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-08-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0075.fits Header: 74 keys total, 33 keys left Record 0: "" status=0 Record 1: "SIMPLE = T / C# FITS" status=0 Record 2: "BITPIX = 16" status=0 Record 3: "NAXIS = 2 / Dimensionality" status=0 Record 4: "NAXIS1 = 9576" status=0 Record 5: "NAXIS2 = 6388" status=0 Record 6: "BZERO = 32768" status=0 Record 7: "EXTEND = T / Extensions are permitted" status=0 Record 8: "IMAGETYP= 'LIGHT' / Type of exposure" status=0 Record 9: "EXPOSURE= 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0 Record 10: "EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0 Record 11: "DATE-LOC= '2026-06-07T23:08:28.0444413' / Time of observation (local)" status=0 Record 12: "DATE-OBS= '2026-06-08T04:08:28.0444413' / Time of observation (UTC)" status=0 Record 13: "MJD-OBS = 61199.1725468053 / Modified Julian Date of observation" status=0 Record 14: "DATE-AVG= '2026-06-08T04:08:37.9687543' / Averaged midpoint time (UTC)" status=0 Record 15: "MJD-AVG = 61199.1726616668 / Modified Julian Date of averaged midpoint" status=0 Record 16: "XBINNING= 1 / X axis binning factor" status=0 Record 17: "YBINNING= 1 / Y axis binning factor" status=0 Record 18: "GAIN = 30 / Sensor gain" status=0 Record 19: "OFFSET = 30 / Sensor gain offset" status=0 Record 20: "XPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel X axis size" status=0 Record 21: "YPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel Y axis size" status=0 Record 22: "INSTRUME= 'QHY600M' / Imaging instrument name" status=0 Record 23: "CAMERAID= 'QHY600M-33d3d743814b8b447' / Imaging instrument identifier" status=0 Record 24: "SET-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint" status=0 Record 25: "CCD-TEMP= -0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature" status=0 Record 26: "READOUTM= '2CMS-0' / Sensor readout mode" status=0 Record 27: "USBLIMIT= 50 / Camera-specific USB setting" status=0 Record 28: "TELESCOP= 'QHY600M-TTU1' / Name of telescope" status=0 Record 29: "FOCALLEN= 135.0 / [mm] Focal length" status=0 Record 30: "FOCRATIO= 2.2 / Focal ratio" status=0 Record 31: "RA = 234.780648641319 / [deg] RA of telescope" status=0 Record 32: "DEC = -33.9997895550725 / [deg] Declination of telescope" status=0 Record 33: "CENTALT = 20.0016666666667 / [deg] Altitude of telescope" status=0 Record 34: "CENTAZ = 163.846666666667 / [deg] Azimuth of telescope" status=0 Record 35: "AIRMASS = 2.90194252547746 / Airmass at frame center (Gueymard 1993)" status=0 Record 36: "PIERSIDE= 'West' / Telescope pointing state" status=0 Record 37: "SITEELEV= 1015.0 / [m] Observation site elevation" status=0 Record 38: "SITELAT = 33.7480555555556 / [deg] Observation site latitude" status=0 Record 39: "SITELONG= -101.958333333333 / [deg] Observation site longitude" status=0 Record 40: "OBSERVER= 'Sokolovsky' / Observer name" status=0 Record 41: "OBSERVAT= 'TTU Skyview' / Observatory name" status=0 Record 42: "SITENAME= '' / Observatory site name" status=0 Record 43: "FWHEEL = 'Simulator' / Filter Wheel name" status=0 Record 44: "FILTER = 'CV' / Active filter name" status=0 Record 45: "OBJECT = 'Lup-01' / Name of the object of interest" status=0 Record 46: "OBJCTRA = '15 39 08' / [H M S] RA of imaged object" status=0 Record 47: "OBJCTDEC= '-34 00 00' / [D M S] Declination of imaged object" status=0 Record 48: "OBJCTROT= 0.0 / [deg] planned rotation of imaged object" status=0 Record 49: "FOCNAME = 'ZWO Focuser' / Focusing equipment name" status=0 Record 50: "FOCPOS = 29493 / [step] Focuser position" status=0 Record 51: "FOCUSPOS= 29493 / [step] Focuser position" status=0 Record 52: "FOCUSSZ = 0.0 / [um] Focuser step size" status=0 Record 53: "FOCTEMP = 29.2999992370605 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0 Record 54: "FOCUSTEM= 29.2999992370605 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0 Record 55: "DEWPOINT= 15.3 / [degC] Dew point" status=0 Record 56: "HUMIDITY= 46.0 / [percent] Relative humidity" status=0 Record 57: "PRESSURE= 893.4 / [hPa] Air pressure" status=0 Record 58: "AMBTEMP = 28.0 / [degC] Ambient air temperature" status=0 Record 59: "WINDDIR = 27.0 / [deg] Wind direction: 0=N, 180=S, 90=E, 270=W" status=0 Record 60: "WINDGUST= 27.702216 / [kph] Wind gust" status=0 Record 61: "WINDSPD = 13.701096 / [kph] Wind speed" status=0 Record 62: "ROWORDER= 'TOP-DOWN' / FITS Image Orientation" status=0 Record 63: "EQUINOX = 2000.0 / Equinox of celestial coordinate system" status=0 Record 64: "SWCREATE= 'N.I.N.A. 3.2.0.9001 (x64)' / Software that created this file" status=0 Record 65: "QHY_EXP = 20.000096 / [s] Actual exposure time" status=0 Record 66: "QHY_PP = 13888.0 / [ps] pixelPeriod" status=0 Record 67: "QHY_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0 Record 68: "GPS_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0 Record 69: "QHY_FP = 20000160.0 / [us] framePeriod" status=0 Record 70: "QHY_CPL = 6120.0 / clocksPerLine" status=0 Record 71: "QHY_LPF = 235295.0 / linesPerFrame" status=0 Record 72: "QHY_AET = 20000096.0 / [us] actualExposureTime" status=0 Record 73: "QHY_LEM = T / isLongExposureMode" status=0 Record 74: "QHY_OFF0= 3767.777 / [us] RollingShutterEndOffset row 0" status=0 Allocating memory for image, dark and result arrays... Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-07_CI_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_232244_TTUQ1b1x1_278956_7q9DkiqK/Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-08-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0075.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-07_CI_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_232244_TTUQ1b1x1_278956_7q9DkiqK/Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-08-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0075.fits SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_5C_20s_2026-05-30.fit CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-07_CI_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_232244_TTUQ1b1x1_278956_7q9DkiqK/Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-08-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0075.fits CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_5C_20s_2026-05-30.fit Reading dark frame /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_5C_20s_2026-05-30.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix Dark frame is subtracted, output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-07_CI_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_232244_TTUQ1b1x1_278956_7q9DkiqK/d_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-08-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0075.fits :) Spent 0.548353 seconds renamed 'mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_5C_20s_2026-05-30.png' -> 'transient_report/dark.png' try_to_calibrate_the_input_frame(): selected flat field /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-05-30.fit from directory /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats MegaDivider v7 Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-07_CI_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_232244_TTUQ1b1x1_278956_7q9DkiqK/d_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-08-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0075.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix Reading flat /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-05-30.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix Avarage count on flat field image: 31267.409145 Minimal real count (from overscan): 5 Output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-07_CI_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_232244_TTUQ1b1x1_278956_7q9DkiqK/fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-08-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0075.fits :) No overscan detected - all values seem high! (left_median=21677.0, right_median=21704.0) renamed 'mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-05-30.png' -> 'transient_report/flat.png' Using calibrated image CALIBRATED_SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-07_CI_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_232244_TTUQ1b1x1_278956_7q9DkiqK/fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-08-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0075.fits Dark frame used to calibrate the second-epoch images:

Flat field used to calibrate the second-epoch images:

after the calibration attempt: SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-07_CI_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_232244_TTUQ1b1x1_278956_7q9DkiqK/fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-07-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0074.fits SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-07_CI_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_232244_TTUQ1b1x1_278956_7q9DkiqK/fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-08-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0075.fits Previews of the CALIBRATED second-epoch images:

fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-07-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0074.fits


fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-08-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0075.fits


Updating neverexclude_list.txt '/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt' Choosing bad regions list '/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst' wait *------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------* 'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex' Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 3.5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_00-35-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-07_CI_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_232244_TTUQ1b1x1_278956_7q9DkiqK/fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-07-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0074.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-07_CI_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_232244_TTUQ1b1x1_278956_7q9DkiqK/fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-08-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0075.fits SExtractor catalog cache: saved Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits.cat to cache SExtractor catalog cache: saved Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_00-35-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits.cat to cache VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_00-35-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-07_CI_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_232244_TTUQ1b1x1_278956_7q9DkiqK/fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-07-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0074.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-07_CI_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_232244_TTUQ1b1x1_278956_7q9DkiqK/fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-08-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0075.fits Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461199.67215774 Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt '../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt' Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt '../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt' Plate-solving the images '../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt' wcs_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits exists and is non-empty Saving wcs_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits to local_wcs_cache/ 'wcs_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits' wcs_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_00-35-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits exists and is non-empty Saving wcs_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_00-35-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits to local_wcs_cache/ 'wcs_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_00-35-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_00-35-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits' wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-07-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0074.fits exists and is non-empty Saving wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-07-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0074.fits to local_wcs_cache/ 'wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-07-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0074.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-07-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0074.fits' wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-08-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0075.fits exists and is non-empty Saving wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-08-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0075.fits to local_wcs_cache/ 'wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-08-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0075.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-08-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0075.fits' ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits (1st reference image) verification OK: wcs_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits Image size: 941.5'x627.5' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 15:39:05.481 -33:59:45.44 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9" ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-07-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0074.fits (1st new image) verification OK: wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-07-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0074.fits Image size: 940.9'x627.2' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 15:39:14.932 -34:00:22.52 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy) Reference image center 15:39:05.481 -33:59:45.44 Second-epoch image center 15:39:14.932 -34:00:22.52 Angular distance between the image centers 0.0342 deg. Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg. ################################### ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-08-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0075.fits (2nd new image) verification OK: wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-08-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0075.fits Image size: 940.9'x627.2' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 15:39:17.527 -34:00:53.31 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy) Reference image center 15:39:05.481 -33:59:45.44 Second-epoch image center 15:39:17.527 -34:00:53.31 Angular distance between the image centers 0.0457 deg. ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images) Second-epoch first image center 15:39:14.932 -34:00:22.52 Second-epoch second image center 15:39:17.527 -34:00:53.31 Angular distance between the image centers 0.01239 deg. ################################### Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5... Preparing for ar aprallel run Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits &> /tmp/tmp.WiwqR1mEQJ Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_00-35-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits &> /tmp/tmp.qCrMscN8r8 Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_00-35-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-07_CI_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_232244_TTUQ1b1x1_278956_7q9DkiqK/fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-07-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0074.fits &> /tmp/tmp.liUYb0xGYO Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-07_CI_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_232244_TTUQ1b1x1_278956_7q9DkiqK/fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-07-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0074.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-07_CI_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_232244_TTUQ1b1x1_278956_7q9DkiqK/fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-08-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0075.fits &> /tmp/tmp.mFt6aS70We Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-07_CI_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_232244_TTUQ1b1x1_278956_7q9DkiqK/fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-08-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0075.fits Calibrating the magnitude scale Found non-empty wcs_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits ____ Start of magnitude calibration ____ PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits and wcs_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits.cat wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race) Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2 Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits and wcs_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits.cat Found non-empty wcs_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits and wcs_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits.cat The reference image (wcs_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits) and catalog (wcs_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits.cat) found 'wcs_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits.cat' -> 'wcsmag.cat' Read 7114 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 224.4099 to 244.4457 deg, Dec -39.4422 to -28.0332 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 224.4099 to 244.4457 deg, Dec -39.4422 to -28.0332 deg Loaded 10950 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 5601 out of 5758 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 5758 out of 7114 detected stars. The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.637500 a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.637500 From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -8.48 Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.16 Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes Working... Please, PLEASE, be patient!!! All lightcurves processed! =) Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.16
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:

Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V) Read 7114 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 224.4099 to 244.4457 deg, Dec -39.4422 to -28.0332 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 224.4099 to 244.4457 deg, Dec -39.4422 to -28.0332 deg Loaded 10950 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 5601 out of 5758 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 5758 out of 7114 detected stars. util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits:

Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits (aperture=6.2) Read 5203 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 224.8428 to 244.7163 deg, Dec -39.2748 to -28.4901 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 224.8428 to 244.7163 deg, Dec -39.2748 to -28.4901 deg Loaded 10256 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4327 out of 4402 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 4402 out of 5203 detected stars. util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_00-35-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_00-35-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits:

Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_00-35-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_00-35-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits (aperture=6.3) ____ End of magnitude calibration ____ Applying consolidated magnitude filters... Preparing the exclusion lists for this field Done with filtering Found 19 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 8000) Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars: 2.3 pix Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits 2.5 pix Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_00-35-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits 3.4 pix fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-07-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0074.fits 3.4 pix fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-08-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0075.fits 2.3 pix wcs_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits 2.5 pix wcs_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_00-35-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits Limiting magnitude estimates: 14.2 mag. Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits 13.7 mag. Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_00-35-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits 13.4 mag. fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-07-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0074.fits 13.4 mag. fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-08-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0075.fits All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 13.4 (SNR ) 10.9 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50). This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image. The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here. The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images. This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list. The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag. Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver wait ############ /tmp/tmp.WiwqR1mEQJ (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The guess is based on the existing WCS header. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-07_CI_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_232244_TTUQ1b1x1_278956_7q9DkiqK/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits 573.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good. The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good... '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits' -> 'wcs_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits' FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits.cat SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=539, passed=7114 Got 7114 stars (including 6567 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits.cat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 7114 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.5' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.5 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013076 (47.1 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010461 (37.7 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 252 to 311 (Dec -39.4 to -28.0) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 962 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 960 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 948 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 960 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7015 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 252 to 311 (Dec -39.4 to -28.0) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 962 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 959 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7015 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 959 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7014 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45" Excluding outliers - 959 stars left (next iteration limit 1056) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits N_match=959 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.450 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.400 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.490 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.436 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.466 n_q1=257 n_q2=216 n_q3=212 n_q4=274 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.089 The image catalog is written to wcs_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits.cat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits.cat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits -region wcs_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits.cat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations ############ /tmp/tmp.qCrMscN8r8 (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_00-35-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks The guess is based on the existing WCS header. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-07_CI_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_232244_TTUQ1b1x1_278956_7q9DkiqK/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_00-35-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits 572.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_00-35-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_00-35-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_00-35-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_00-35-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_00-35-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good. The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_00-35-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good... '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_00-35-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits' -> 'wcs_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_00-35-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits' FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_00-35-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_00-35-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_00-35-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_00-35-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_00-35-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_00-35-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_00-35-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_00-35-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_00-35-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_00-35-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits.cat SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=287, passed=5203 Got 5203 stars (including 4912 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_00-35-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits.cat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 5203 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.4' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.4 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013019 (46.9 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010416 (37.5 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 253 to 309 (Dec -39.3 to -28.5) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 960 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 958 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 943 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.55" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 958 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5103 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.57" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 253 to 309 (Dec -39.3 to -28.5) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 960 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 958 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5104 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.58" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 958 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5104 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.60" Excluding outliers - 958 stars left (next iteration limit 1053) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_00-35-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits N_match=958 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.576 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.506 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.897 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.621 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.543 n_q1=245 n_q2=214 n_q3=201 n_q4=298 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.558 The image catalog is written to wcs_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_00-35-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits.cat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_00-35-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits.cat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_00-35-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits -region wcs_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_00-35-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits.cat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_00-35-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations ############ /tmp/tmp.liUYb0xGYO (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um Internal estimated FoV 605.3' The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-07_CI_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_232244_TTUQ1b1x1_278956_7q9DkiqK/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-07_CI_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_232244_TTUQ1b1x1_278956_7q9DkiqK/fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-07-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0074.fits 605.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-07_CI_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_232244_TTUQ1b1x1_278956_7q9DkiqK/fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-07-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0074.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-07_CI_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_232244_TTUQ1b1x1_278956_7q9DkiqK/fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-07-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0074.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-07_CI_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_232244_TTUQ1b1x1_278956_7q9DkiqK/fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-07-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0074.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-07_CI_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_232244_TTUQ1b1x1_278956_7q9DkiqK/fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-07-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0074.fits It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve! FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-07_CI_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_232244_TTUQ1b1x1_278956_7q9DkiqK/fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-07-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0074.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-07-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0074.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-07-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0074.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-07-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0074.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-07-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0074.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-07-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0074.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-07-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0074.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-07-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0074.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-07_CI_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_232244_TTUQ1b1x1_278956_7q9DkiqK/fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-07-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0074.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-07-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0074.fits.cat SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=281, passed=5367 Got 5367 stars (including 5083 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-07-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0074.fits.cat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 5367 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 940.9' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 940.9 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013068 (47.0 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010454 (37.6 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 252 to 311 (Dec -39.4 to -28.0) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 958 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 955 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 939 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 955 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5272 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 252 to 311 (Dec -39.4 to -28.0) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 958 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 955 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5270 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.46" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 955 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5270 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.48" Excluding outliers - 955 stars left (next iteration limit 1050) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-07-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0074.fits N_match=955 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.436 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.538 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.584 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.359 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.373 n_q1=233 n_q2=203 n_q3=211 n_q4=308 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.340 The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-07-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0074.fits.cat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-07-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0074.fits.cat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-07_CI_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_232244_TTUQ1b1x1_278956_7q9DkiqK/fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-07-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0074.fits -region wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-07-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0074.fits.cat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-07-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0074.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations ############ /tmp/tmp.mFt6aS70We (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um Internal estimated FoV 605.3' The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-07_CI_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_232244_TTUQ1b1x1_278956_7q9DkiqK/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-07_CI_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_232244_TTUQ1b1x1_278956_7q9DkiqK/fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-08-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0075.fits 605.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-07_CI_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_232244_TTUQ1b1x1_278956_7q9DkiqK/fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-08-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0075.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-07_CI_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_232244_TTUQ1b1x1_278956_7q9DkiqK/fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-08-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0075.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-07_CI_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_232244_TTUQ1b1x1_278956_7q9DkiqK/fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-08-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0075.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-07_CI_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_232244_TTUQ1b1x1_278956_7q9DkiqK/fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-08-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0075.fits It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve! FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-07_CI_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_232244_TTUQ1b1x1_278956_7q9DkiqK/fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-08-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0075.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-08-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0075.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-08-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0075.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-08-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0075.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-08-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0075.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-08-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0075.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-08-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0075.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-08-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0075.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-07_CI_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_232244_TTUQ1b1x1_278956_7q9DkiqK/fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-08-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0075.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-08-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0075.fits.cat SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=269, passed=5200 Got 5200 stars (including 4924 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-08-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0075.fits.cat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 5200 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 940.9' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 940.9 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013068 (47.0 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010454 (37.6 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 252 to 311 (Dec -39.4 to -28.0) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 959 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 956 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 936 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 956 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5098 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.46" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 252 to 311 (Dec -39.4 to -28.0) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 959 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 956 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5100 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.46" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 956 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5100 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.49" Excluding outliers - 956 stars left (next iteration limit 1051) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-08-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0075.fits N_match=956 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.450 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.546 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.668 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.346 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.347 n_q1=233 n_q2=210 n_q3=199 n_q4=314 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.483 The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-08-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0075.fits.cat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-08-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0075.fits.cat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-07_CI_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_232244_TTUQ1b1x1_278956_7q9DkiqK/fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-08-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0075.fits -region wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-08-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0075.fits.cat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-08-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0075.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations ################################### # Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above) ref1=Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits sigma_overall=0.450 worst_q_ratio=1.089 ref2=Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_00-35-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits sigma_overall=0.576 worst_q_ratio=1.558 new1=fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-07-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0074.fits sigma_overall=0.436 worst_q_ratio=1.340 new2=fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-08-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0075.fits sigma_overall=0.450 worst_q_ratio=1.483 reference average sigma_overall=0.513 worst_q_ratio=1.3235 warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference ###################################
Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: numpy/matplotlib unavailable (No module named 'matplotlib') -- falling back to the C plotter plot_astrometric_residuals_xy: PGPLOT /PNG device reported success but no file appeared at wcs_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239_astrometric_residuals.png -- no plot produced WARNING: no astrometric residual plot produced for wcs_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits -- both lib/plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py and lib/plot_astrometric_residuals_xy failed to create wcs_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239_astrometric_residuals.png (see messages above) plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: numpy/matplotlib unavailable (No module named 'matplotlib') -- falling back to the C plotter plot_astrometric_residuals_xy: wrote wcs_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_00-35-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001_astrometric_residuals.png (958 matched stars from wcs_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_00-35-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: numpy/matplotlib unavailable (No module named 'matplotlib') -- falling back to the C plotter plot_astrometric_residuals_xy: PGPLOT /PNG device reported success but no file appeared at wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-07-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0074_astrometric_residuals.png -- no plot produced WARNING: no astrometric residual plot produced for wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-07-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0074.fits -- both lib/plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py and lib/plot_astrometric_residuals_xy failed to create wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-07-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0074_astrometric_residuals.png (see messages above) plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: numpy/matplotlib unavailable (No module named 'matplotlib') -- falling back to the C plotter plot_astrometric_residuals_xy: PGPLOT /PNG device reported success but no file appeared at wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-08-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0075_astrometric_residuals.png -- no plot produced WARNING: no astrometric residual plot produced for wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-08-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0075.fits -- both lib/plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py and lib/plot_astrometric_residuals_xy failed to create wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-08-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0075_astrometric_residuals.png (see messages above) Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-07-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0074.fits INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image) 'wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-07-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0074.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-07_CI_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_232244_TTUQ1b1x1_278956_7q9DkiqK/wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-07-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0074.fits' Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-08-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0075.fits INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image) 'wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-08-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0075.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-07_CI_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_232244_TTUQ1b1x1_278956_7q9DkiqK/wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-08-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0075.fits' Preparing the HTML report for the field Lup-01-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 Forced photometry on wcs_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits at 15:31:15.99 -31:07:15.8: 11.33 +/- 0.01 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits at 15:42:11.97 -32:06:58.1: 11.42 +/- 0.01 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits at 15:31:18.71 -32:41:47.0: 11.30 +/- 0.01 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits at 15:49:23.84 -32:07:29.3: 11.43 +/- 0.01 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits at 15:58:59.55 -32:55:21.2: 11.56 +/- 0.02 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits at 16:04:59.52 -30:08:50.0: 14.25 +/- 0.24 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits at 15:52:24.30 -31:27:02.3: 11.48 +/- 0.02 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits at 15:47:18.98 -32:49:01.0: 11.27 +/- 0.01 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits at 16:02:11.16 -32:43:44.7: 11.43 +/- 0.02 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits at 15:54:25.12 -31:59:44.3: 11.46 +/- 0.02 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_00-35-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits at 15:31:15.99 -31:07:15.8: 11.30 +/- 0.02 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_00-35-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits at 15:47:18.98 -32:49:01.0: 11.25 +/- 0.02 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_00-35-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits at 15:31:18.71 -32:41:47.0: 11.27 +/- 0.02 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.32 +/- 0.01 Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.29 +/- 0.01 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:31:15.99 -31:07:15.8: ref_mag=11.32 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.0391 delta=0.28 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.26 +/- 0.01 Forced photometry on wcs_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_00-35-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits at 15:42:11.97 -32:06:58.1: 11.40 +/- 0.02 detection Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:31:18.71 -32:41:47.0: ref_mag=11.29 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.1615 delta=0.13 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:47:18.98 -32:49:01.0: ref_mag=11.26 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.0424 delta=0.22 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_00-35-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits at 15:52:24.30 -31:27:02.3: 11.35 +/- 0.02 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_00-35-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits at 15:49:23.84 -32:07:29.3: 11.32 +/- 0.02 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_00-35-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits at 16:04:59.52 -30:08:50.0: 14.39 +/- 99.00 upperlimit Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.41 +/- 0.01 Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.43 +/- 0.01 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:42:11.97 -32:06:58.1: ref_mag=11.41 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.2401 delta=0.17 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.25 +/- 0.24 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:52:24.30 -31:27:02.3: ref_mag=11.43 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.2076 delta=0.22 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.39 +/- 0.01 Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 16:04:59.52 -30:08:50.0: ref_mag=14.25 +/- 0.24 new_mean_mag=9.7585 delta=4.49 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:49:23.84 -32:07:29.3: ref_mag=11.39 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.2153 delta=0.17 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_00-35-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits at 15:58:59.55 -32:55:21.2: 11.49 +/- 0.02 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.53 +/- 0.01 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:58:59.55 -32:55:21.2: ref_mag=11.53 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.2286 delta=0.31 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_00-35-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits at 15:54:25.12 -31:59:44.3: 11.39 +/- 0.02 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_00-35-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits at 16:02:11.16 -32:43:44.7: 11.34 +/- 0.02 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.43 +/- 0.01 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:54:25.12 -31:59:44.3: ref_mag=11.43 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.2597 delta=0.17 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.40 +/- 0.01 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:02:11.16 -32:43:44.7: ref_mag=11.40 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.2385 delta=0.16 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits at 15:58:33.48 -31:44:45.6: 11.45 +/- 0.02 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits at 15:36:36.92 -31:06:56.2: 11.60 +/- 0.02 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits at 16:10:11.77 -30:03:36.5: 11.61 +/- 0.02 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_00-35-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits at 15:36:36.92 -31:06:56.2: 11.48 +/- 0.02 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_00-35-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits at 15:58:33.48 -31:44:45.6: 11.37 +/- 0.02 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_00-35-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits at 16:10:11.77 -30:03:36.5: 11.51 +/- 0.03 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.55 +/- 0.01 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:36:36.92 -31:06:56.2: ref_mag=11.55 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.2895 delta=0.26 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.42 +/- 0.01 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:58:33.48 -31:44:45.6: ref_mag=11.42 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.2097 delta=0.21 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.57 +/- 0.02 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:10:11.77 -30:03:36.5: ref_mag=11.57 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=11.2960 delta=0.28 (need > 0.90) Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out20212.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 6s Pre-generating preview images in parallel... Done pre-generating preview images. Pre-generating finding charts in parallel... Done pre-generating finding charts. make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 1s xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 20212_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-08-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0075 Preparing report for the candidate 20212_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-08-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0075 xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 20215_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-08-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0075 The candidate 20215_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-08-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0075 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 06 08.17266    2461199.67266    11.00    15:47:28.75 -32:47:30.4   5780 3983   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-07_CI_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_232244_TTUQ1b1x1_278956_7q9DkiqK/fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-08-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0075.fits **** FOUND 15:47:28.74 -32:47:30.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 20218_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-08-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0075 The candidate 20218_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-08-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0075 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 06 08.17216    2461199.67216    11.05    15:31:16.00 -31:07:16.0   3657 4857   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-07_CI_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_232244_TTUQ1b1x1_278956_7q9DkiqK/fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-07-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0074.fits Discovery image 2   2026 06 08.17266    2461199.67266    11.03    15:31:15.99 -31:07:15.6   3651 4862   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-07_CI_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_232244_TTUQ1b1x1_278956_7q9DkiqK/fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-08-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0075.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 20220_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-08-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0075 The candidate 20220_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-08-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0075 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 06 08.17216    2461199.67216    11.06    15:47:18.96 -32:49:01.0   5766 3962   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-07_CI_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_232244_TTUQ1b1x1_278956_7q9DkiqK/fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-07-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0074.fits Discovery image 2   2026 06 08.17266    2461199.67266    11.02    15:47:18.99 -32:49:01.0   5760 3967   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-07_CI_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_232244_TTUQ1b1x1_278956_7q9DkiqK/fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-08-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0075.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 20222_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-08-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0075 The candidate 20222_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-08-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0075 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 06 08.17266    2461199.67266    11.12    15:06:53.17 -37:23:32.9   1025 0755   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-07_CI_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_232244_TTUQ1b1x1_278956_7q9DkiqK/fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-08-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0075.fits **** FOUND 15:06:53.17 -37:23:32.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 20224_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-08-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0075 The candidate 20224_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-08-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0075 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 06 08.17216    2461199.67216    11.13    15:31:18.70 -32:41:47.0   3738 3911   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-07_CI_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_232244_TTUQ1b1x1_278956_7q9DkiqK/fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-07-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0074.fits Discovery image 2   2026 06 08.17266    2461199.67266    11.20    15:31:18.71 -32:41:47.1   3733 3915   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-07_CI_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_232244_TTUQ1b1x1_278956_7q9DkiqK/fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-08-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0075.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 20231_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-08-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0075 The candidate 20231_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-08-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0075 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 06 08.17216    2461199.67216    11.21    15:52:24.30 -31:27:02.1   6388 4809   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-07_CI_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_232244_TTUQ1b1x1_278956_7q9DkiqK/fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-07-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0074.fits Discovery image 2   2026 06 08.17266    2461199.67266    11.21    15:52:24.30 -31:27:02.5   6382 4814   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-07_CI_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_232244_TTUQ1b1x1_278956_7q9DkiqK/fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-08-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0075.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 20232_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-08-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0075 The candidate 20232_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-08-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0075 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 06 08.17216    2461199.67216    11.22    15:49:23.85 -32:07:29.3   6014 4389   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-07_CI_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_232244_TTUQ1b1x1_278956_7q9DkiqK/fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-07-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0074.fits Discovery image 2   2026 06 08.17266    2461199.67266    11.21    15:49:23.84 -32:07:29.4   6009 4394   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-07_CI_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_232244_TTUQ1b1x1_278956_7q9DkiqK/fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-08-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0075.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 20234_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-08-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0075 The candidate 20234_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-08-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0075 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 06 08.17216    2461199.67216    11.23    15:58:59.57 -32:55:21.0   7248 3940   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-07_CI_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_232244_TTUQ1b1x1_278956_7q9DkiqK/fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-07-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0074.fits Discovery image 2   2026 06 08.17266    2461199.67266    11.23    15:58:59.53 -32:55:21.4   7243 3945   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-07_CI_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_232244_TTUQ1b1x1_278956_7q9DkiqK/fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-08-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0075.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 20236_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-08-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0075 The candidate 20236_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-08-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0075 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 06 08.17216    2461199.67216    11.23    15:42:11.95 -32:06:58.2   5096 4352   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-07_CI_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_232244_TTUQ1b1x1_278956_7q9DkiqK/fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-07-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0074.fits Discovery image 2   2026 06 08.17266    2461199.67266    11.25    15:42:11.98 -32:06:58.0   5091 4357   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-07_CI_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_232244_TTUQ1b1x1_278956_7q9DkiqK/fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-08-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0075.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 20237_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-08-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0075 The candidate 20237_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-08-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0075 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 06 08.17216    2461199.67216    11.23    16:02:11.17 -32:43:44.4   7655 4062   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-07_CI_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_232244_TTUQ1b1x1_278956_7q9DkiqK/fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-07-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0074.fits Discovery image 2   2026 06 08.17266    2461199.67266    11.24    16:02:11.16 -32:43:44.9   7649 4067   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-07_CI_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_232244_TTUQ1b1x1_278956_7q9DkiqK/fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-08-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0075.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 20238_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-08-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0075 The candidate 20238_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-08-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0075 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 06 08.17216    2461199.67216    11.26    15:54:25.12 -31:59:44.4   6655 4487   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-07_CI_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_232244_TTUQ1b1x1_278956_7q9DkiqK/fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-07-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0074.fits Discovery image 2   2026 06 08.17266    2461199.67266    11.26    15:54:25.12 -31:59:44.3   6649 4492   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-07_CI_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_232244_TTUQ1b1x1_278956_7q9DkiqK/fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-08-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0075.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 20239_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-08-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0075 The candidate 20239_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-08-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0075 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 06 08.17216    2461199.67216    11.26    15:58:33.47 -31:44:45.3   7184 4650   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-07_CI_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_232244_TTUQ1b1x1_278956_7q9DkiqK/fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-07-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0074.fits Discovery image 2   2026 06 08.17266    2461199.67266    11.17    15:58:33.48 -31:44:45.9   7179 4655   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-07_CI_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_232244_TTUQ1b1x1_278956_7q9DkiqK/fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-08-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0075.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 20241_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-08-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0075 The candidate 20241_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-08-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0075 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 06 08.17266    2461199.67266    11.27    15:54:20.60 -30:42:05.0   6621 5274   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-07_CI_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_232244_TTUQ1b1x1_278956_7q9DkiqK/fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-08-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0075.fits **** FOUND 15:54:20.60 -30:42:04.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 20244_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-08-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0075 The candidate 20244_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-08-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0075 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 06 08.17216    2461199.67216    11.30    16:10:11.77 -30:03:36.6   8712 5684   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-07_CI_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_232244_TTUQ1b1x1_278956_7q9DkiqK/fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-07-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0074.fits Discovery image 2   2026 06 08.17266    2461199.67266    11.29    16:10:11.77 -30:03:36.4   8705 5689   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-07_CI_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_232244_TTUQ1b1x1_278956_7q9DkiqK/fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-08-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0075.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 20245_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-08-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0075 The candidate 20245_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-08-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0075 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 06 08.17266    2461199.67266    11.28    15:48:15.51 -29:33:01.5   5804 5943   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-07_CI_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_232244_TTUQ1b1x1_278956_7q9DkiqK/fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-08-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0075.fits **** FOUND 15:48:15.51 -29:33:01.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 20247_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-08-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0075 The candidate 20247_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-08-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0075 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 06 08.17216    2461199.67216    11.30    15:36:36.92 -31:06:56.2   4345 4910   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-07_CI_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_232244_TTUQ1b1x1_278956_7q9DkiqK/fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-07-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0074.fits Discovery image 2   2026 06 08.17266    2461199.67266    11.28    15:36:36.93 -31:06:56.3   4339 4915   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-07_CI_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_232244_TTUQ1b1x1_278956_7q9DkiqK/fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-08-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0075.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 20254_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-08-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0075 The candidate 20254_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-08-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0075 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 06 08.17266    2461199.67266    11.34    15:52:33.35 -29:56:28.5   6377 5727   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-07_CI_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_232244_TTUQ1b1x1_278956_7q9DkiqK/fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-08-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0075.fits **** FOUND 15:52:33.33 -29:56:28.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 03630_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-08-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0075 The candidate 03630_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-08-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0075 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 06 08.17266    2461199.67266    10.37    15:36:35.34 -33:50:23.6   4446 3278   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-07_CI_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_232244_TTUQ1b1x1_278956_7q9DkiqK/fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-08-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0075.fits **** FOUND 15:36:35.33 -33:50:23.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 1s make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 8s Prepared the HTML report for the field Lup-01-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 *------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------* #### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt #### 16:04:59.52 -30:08:50.0 wait *------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------* 'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex' Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 3.5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_00-35-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-07_CI_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_232244_TTUQ1b1x1_278956_7q9DkiqK/fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-07-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0074.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-07_CI_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_232244_TTUQ1b1x1_278956_7q9DkiqK/fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-08-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0075.fits SExtractor catalog cache: saved Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits.cat to cache SExtractor catalog cache: saved Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_00-35-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits.cat to cache VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_00-35-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-07_CI_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_232244_TTUQ1b1x1_278956_7q9DkiqK/fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-07-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0074.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-07_CI_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_232244_TTUQ1b1x1_278956_7q9DkiqK/fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-08-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0075.fits Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_00-35-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-07-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0074.fits Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-08-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0075.fits Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/exclusion_list.txt Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images Plate-solving the images wcs_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits exists and is non-empty wcs_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_00-35-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits exists and is non-empty wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-07-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0074.fits exists and is non-empty wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-08-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0075.fits exists and is non-empty ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits (1st reference image) verification OK: wcs_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits Image size: 941.5'x627.5' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 15:39:05.481 -33:59:45.44 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9" ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-07-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0074.fits (1st new image) verification OK: wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-07-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0074.fits Image size: 940.9'x627.2' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 15:39:14.932 -34:00:22.52 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy) Reference image center 15:39:05.481 -33:59:45.44 Second-epoch image center 15:39:14.932 -34:00:22.52 Angular distance between the image centers 0.0342 deg. Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg. ################################### ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-08-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0075.fits (2nd new image) verification OK: wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-08-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0075.fits Image size: 940.9'x627.2' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 15:39:17.527 -34:00:53.31 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy) Reference image center 15:39:05.481 -33:59:45.44 Second-epoch image center 15:39:17.527 -34:00:53.31 Angular distance between the image centers 0.0457 deg. ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images) Second-epoch first image center 15:39:14.932 -34:00:22.52 Second-epoch second image center 15:39:17.527 -34:00:53.31 Angular distance between the image centers 0.01239 deg. ################################### Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5... Preparing for ar aprallel run Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits &> /tmp/tmp.FFjSGzjqcp Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_00-35-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits &> /tmp/tmp.RrQavGkpru Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_00-35-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-07_CI_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_232244_TTUQ1b1x1_278956_7q9DkiqK/fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-07-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0074.fits &> /tmp/tmp.KPJkynXLUe Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-07_CI_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_232244_TTUQ1b1x1_278956_7q9DkiqK/fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-07-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0074.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-07_CI_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_232244_TTUQ1b1x1_278956_7q9DkiqK/fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-08-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0075.fits &> /tmp/tmp.Jk4A3AOaC6 Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-07_CI_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_232244_TTUQ1b1x1_278956_7q9DkiqK/fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-08-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0075.fits Calibrating the magnitude scale Found non-empty wcs_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits ____ Start of magnitude calibration ____ PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits and wcs_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits.cat wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race) Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2 Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits and wcs_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits.cat Found non-empty wcs_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits and wcs_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits.cat The reference image (wcs_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits) and catalog (wcs_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits.cat) found 'wcs_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits.cat' -> 'wcsmag.cat' Read 70289 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 224.3696 to 244.4457 deg, Dec -39.4764 to -27.9540 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 224.3696 to 244.4457 deg, Dec -39.4764 to -27.9540 deg Loaded 11081 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 7807 out of 8626 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 8626 out of 70289 detected stars. The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.435700 a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.435700 From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -8.13 Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.31 Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes Working... Please, PLEASE, be patient!!! All lightcurves processed! =) Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.31
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:

Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V) Read 70289 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 224.3696 to 244.4457 deg, Dec -39.4764 to -27.9540 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 224.3696 to 244.4457 deg, Dec -39.4764 to -27.9540 deg Loaded 11081 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 7807 out of 8626 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 8626 out of 70289 detected stars. util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits:

Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits (aperture=4.5) Read 47285 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 224.7645 to 244.7886 deg, Dec -39.2834 to -28.4769 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 224.7645 to 244.7886 deg, Dec -39.2834 to -28.4769 deg Loaded 10340 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 8144 out of 8674 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 8674 out of 47285 detected stars. util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_00-35-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_00-35-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits:

Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_00-35-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_00-35-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits (aperture=4.8) ____ End of magnitude calibration ____ Applying consolidated magnitude filters... Preparing the exclusion lists for this field Done with filtering Found 92 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 8000) Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars: 2.1 pix Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits 2.4 pix Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_00-35-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits 3.1 pix fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-07-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0074.fits 3.1 pix fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-08-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0075.fits 2.1 pix wcs_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits 2.4 pix wcs_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_00-35-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits Limiting magnitude estimates: 14.3 mag. Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits 13.8 mag. Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_00-35-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits 13.7 mag. fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-07-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0074.fits 13.7 mag. fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-08-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0075.fits All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 13.7 (SNR ) 13.1 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50). This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image. The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here. The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images. This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list. The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag. Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver wait ############ /tmp/tmp.FFjSGzjqcp (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The guess is based on the existing WCS header. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-07_CI_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_232244_TTUQ1b1x1_278956_7q9DkiqK/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits 573.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good. The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good... '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits' -> 'wcs_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits' FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits.cat SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=10, blended=3491, passed=70279 Got 70279 stars (including 66700 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits.cat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 70279 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.5' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.5 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013076 (47.1 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010461 (37.7 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 252 to 312 (Dec -39.5 to -28.0) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 960 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 958 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 944 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 958 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 69314 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.46" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 252 to 312 (Dec -39.5 to -28.0) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 960 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 958 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 69315 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.46" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 958 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 69314 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45" Excluding outliers - 958 stars left (next iteration limit 1053) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits N_match=958 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.438 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.366 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.492 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.395 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.478 n_q1=260 n_q2=227 n_q3=215 n_q4=256 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.125 The image catalog is written to wcs_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits.cat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits.cat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits -region wcs_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits.cat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations ############ /tmp/tmp.RrQavGkpru (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_00-35-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks The guess is based on the existing WCS header. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-07_CI_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_232244_TTUQ1b1x1_278956_7q9DkiqK/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_00-35-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits 572.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_00-35-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_00-35-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_00-35-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_00-35-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_00-35-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good. The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_00-35-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good... '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_00-35-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits' -> 'wcs_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_00-35-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits' FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_00-35-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_00-35-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_00-35-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_00-35-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_00-35-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_00-35-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_00-35-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_00-35-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_00-35-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_00-35-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits.cat SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=1840, passed=47285 Got 47285 stars (including 45378 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_00-35-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits.cat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 47285 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.4' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.4 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013019 (46.9 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010416 (37.5 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 253 to 309 (Dec -39.3 to -28.5) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 959 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 957 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 937 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.55" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 957 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 46474 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.55" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 253 to 309 (Dec -39.3 to -28.5) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 960 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 957 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 46474 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.55" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 957 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 46474 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.57" Excluding outliers - 957 stars left (next iteration limit 1052) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_00-35-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits N_match=957 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.575 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.497 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.765 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.522 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.547 n_q1=248 n_q2=217 n_q3=187 n_q4=305 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.330 The image catalog is written to wcs_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_00-35-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits.cat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_00-35-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits.cat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_00-35-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits -region wcs_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_00-35-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits.cat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_00-35-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations ############ /tmp/tmp.KPJkynXLUe (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um Internal estimated FoV 605.3' The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-07_CI_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_232244_TTUQ1b1x1_278956_7q9DkiqK/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-07_CI_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_232244_TTUQ1b1x1_278956_7q9DkiqK/fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-07-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0074.fits 605.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-07_CI_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_232244_TTUQ1b1x1_278956_7q9DkiqK/fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-07-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0074.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-07_CI_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_232244_TTUQ1b1x1_278956_7q9DkiqK/fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-07-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0074.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-07_CI_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_232244_TTUQ1b1x1_278956_7q9DkiqK/fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-07-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0074.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-07_CI_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_232244_TTUQ1b1x1_278956_7q9DkiqK/fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-07-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0074.fits It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve! FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-07_CI_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_232244_TTUQ1b1x1_278956_7q9DkiqK/fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-07-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0074.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-07-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0074.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-07-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0074.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-07-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0074.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-07-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0074.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-07-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0074.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-07-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0074.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-07-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0074.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-07_CI_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_232244_TTUQ1b1x1_278956_7q9DkiqK/fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-07-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0074.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-07-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0074.fits.cat SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=5, blended=1675, passed=39662 Got 39662 stars (including 37951 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-07-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0074.fits.cat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 39662 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 940.9' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 940.9 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013068 (47.0 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010454 (37.6 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 252 to 311 (Dec -39.4 to -28.0) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 957 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 952 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 930 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 952 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 39025 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 252 to 311 (Dec -39.4 to -28.0) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 957 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 952 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 39027 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 952 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 39027 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.48" Excluding outliers - 952 stars left (next iteration limit 1047) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-07-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0074.fits N_match=952 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.442 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.574 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.637 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.349 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.374 n_q1=214 n_q2=192 n_q3=226 n_q4=320 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.441 The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-07-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0074.fits.cat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-07-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0074.fits.cat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-07_CI_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_232244_TTUQ1b1x1_278956_7q9DkiqK/fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-07-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0074.fits -region wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-07-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0074.fits.cat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-07-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0074.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations ############ /tmp/tmp.Jk4A3AOaC6 (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um Internal estimated FoV 605.3' The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-07_CI_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_232244_TTUQ1b1x1_278956_7q9DkiqK/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-07_CI_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_232244_TTUQ1b1x1_278956_7q9DkiqK/fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-08-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0075.fits 605.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-07_CI_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_232244_TTUQ1b1x1_278956_7q9DkiqK/fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-08-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0075.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-07_CI_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_232244_TTUQ1b1x1_278956_7q9DkiqK/fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-08-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0075.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-07_CI_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_232244_TTUQ1b1x1_278956_7q9DkiqK/fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-08-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0075.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-07_CI_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_232244_TTUQ1b1x1_278956_7q9DkiqK/fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-08-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0075.fits It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve! FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-07_CI_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_232244_TTUQ1b1x1_278956_7q9DkiqK/fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-08-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0075.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-08-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0075.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-08-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0075.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-08-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0075.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-08-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0075.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-08-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0075.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-08-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0075.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-08-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0075.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-07_CI_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_232244_TTUQ1b1x1_278956_7q9DkiqK/fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-08-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0075.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-08-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0075.fits.cat SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=5, blended=1670, passed=38932 Got 38932 stars (including 37217 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-08-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0075.fits.cat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 38932 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 940.9' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 940.9 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013068 (47.0 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010454 (37.6 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 252 to 311 (Dec -39.4 to -28.0) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 957 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 953 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 932 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.46" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 953 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 38220 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 252 to 311 (Dec -39.4 to -28.0) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 957 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 953 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 38220 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 953 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 38219 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.46" Excluding outliers - 953 stars left (next iteration limit 1048) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-08-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0075.fits N_match=953 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.440 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.547 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.621 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.356 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.364 n_q1=218 n_q2=196 n_q3=209 n_q4=330 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.413 The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-08-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0075.fits.cat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-08-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0075.fits.cat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-07_CI_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_232244_TTUQ1b1x1_278956_7q9DkiqK/fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-08-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0075.fits -region wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-08-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0075.fits.cat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-08-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0075.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL) Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-07-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0074.fits INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image) The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-07_CI_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_232244_TTUQ1b1x1_278956_7q9DkiqK/wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-07-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0074.fits Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-08-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0075.fits INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image) The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-07_CI_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_232244_TTUQ1b1x1_278956_7q9DkiqK/wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-08-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0075.fits Preparing the HTML report for the field Lup-01-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL Forced photometry on wcs_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits at 16:03:23.25 -30:33:29.5: 13.45 +/- 0.09 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits at 16:12:28.51 -32:34:19.3: 12.10 +/- 0.03 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits at 15:02:18.96 -37:46:23.3: 12.19 +/- 0.04 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits at 15:12:51.08 -38:07:44.6: 12.52 +/- 0.06 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits at 15:08:00.06 -35:39:54.2: 12.30 +/- 0.04 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits at 16:07:38.28 -29:27:49.7: 12.31 +/- 0.04 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits at 15:41:05.45 -35:26:35.0: 12.58 +/- 0.04 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits at 15:36:45.53 -28:51:33.6: 11.39 +/- 0.01 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_00-35-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits at 16:03:23.25 -30:33:29.5: 13.24 +/- 0.12 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.37 +/- 0.07 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:03:23.25 -30:33:29.5: ref_mag=13.37 +/- 0.07 new_mean_mag=13.4253 delta=-0.06 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_00-35-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits at 15:12:51.08 -38:07:44.6: 12.56 +/- 0.08 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_00-35-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits at 16:12:28.51 -32:34:19.3: 12.07 +/- 0.04 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.54 +/- 0.05 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:12:51.08 -38:07:44.6: ref_mag=12.54 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=12.0890 delta=0.45 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_00-35-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits at 15:08:00.06 -35:39:54.2: 12.33 +/- 0.06 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.09 +/- 0.03 Forced photometry on wcs_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_00-35-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits at 16:07:38.28 -29:27:49.7: 12.17 +/- 0.05 detection Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:12:28.51 -32:34:19.3: ref_mag=12.09 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=12.2131 delta=-0.12 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_00-35-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits at 15:41:05.45 -35:26:35.0: 12.54 +/- 0.06 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.26 +/- 0.03 Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.31 +/- 0.03 Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.56 +/- 0.03 Forced photometry on wcs_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_00-35-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits at 15:02:18.96 -37:46:23.3: 12.22 +/- 0.06 detection Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:08:00.06 -35:39:54.2: ref_mag=12.31 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=12.1836 delta=0.12 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:07:38.28 -29:27:49.7: ref_mag=12.26 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=12.2665 delta=-0.01 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:41:05.45 -35:26:35.0: ref_mag=12.56 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=12.4300 delta=0.13 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_00-35-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits at 15:36:45.53 -28:51:33.6: 11.31 +/- 0.02 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.19 +/- 0.03 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:02:18.96 -37:46:23.3: ref_mag=12.19 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=12.0637 delta=0.13 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.36 +/- 0.01 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:36:45.53 -28:51:33.6: ref_mag=11.36 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.5087 delta=-0.14 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits at 15:34:53.27 -29:03:16.5: 12.95 +/- 0.05 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits at 16:11:55.21 -29:17:16.3: 13.67 +/- 0.14 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits at 15:38:21.87 -29:03:02.6: 13.17 +/- 0.08 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits at 15:27:57.80 -33:32:32.8: 12.96 +/- 0.06 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits at 16:08:05.58 -30:30:15.1: 14.83 +/- 99.00 upperlimit Forced photometry on wcs_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_00-35-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits at 16:08:05.58 -30:30:15.1: 14.46 +/- 99.00 upperlimit Forced photometry on wcs_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_00-35-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits at 15:34:53.27 -29:03:16.5: 12.85 +/- 0.07 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_00-35-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits at 16:11:55.21 -29:17:16.3: 13.48 +/- 0.17 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.92 +/- 0.04 Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.60 +/- 0.11 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:34:53.27 -29:03:16.5: ref_mag=12.92 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.0366 delta=-0.12 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:11:55.21 -29:17:16.3: ref_mag=13.60 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=13.2324 delta=0.36 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_00-35-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits at 15:27:57.80 -33:32:32.8: 13.17 +/- 0.11 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.01 +/- 0.05 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:27:57.80 -33:32:32.8: ref_mag=13.01 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=12.7942 delta=0.22 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits at 16:07:03.87 -39:08:12.0: 14.03 +/- 0.23 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_00-35-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits at 16:07:03.87 -39:08:12.0: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:07:03.87 -39:08:12.0: at least one reference image reported edge (off-image or aperture/annulus past image boundary); cannot perform the forced-photometry cross-check Forced photometry on wcs_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_00-35-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits at 15:38:21.87 -29:03:02.6: 12.93 +/- 0.09 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.06 +/- 0.06 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:38:21.87 -29:03:02.6: ref_mag=13.06 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=13.0654 delta=-0.01 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits at 15:32:39.53 -29:18:56.9: 13.88 +/- 0.12 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits at 15:54:21.21 -36:56:07.5: 14.15 +/- 0.19 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_00-35-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits at 15:32:39.53 -29:18:56.9: 14.16 +/- 0.24 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits at 16:03:59.61 -30:00:24.0: 13.87 +/- 0.14 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.94 +/- 0.11 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:32:39.53 -29:18:56.9: ref_mag=13.94 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=13.2136 delta=0.72 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_00-35-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits at 15:54:21.21 -36:56:07.5: 13.84 +/- 0.22 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_00-35-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits at 16:03:59.61 -30:00:24.0: 13.96 +/- 0.22 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.01 +/- 0.14 Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 15:54:21.21 -36:56:07.5: ref_mag=14.01 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=12.9959 delta=1.01 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.89 +/- 0.12 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:03:59.61 -30:00:24.0: ref_mag=13.89 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=13.4103 delta=0.48 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits at 16:14:57.06 -31:02:15.0: 13.80 +/- 0.15 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits at 16:16:20.78 -34:26:30.1: 13.49 +/- 0.12 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits at 16:07:47.49 -29:39:44.7: 13.54 +/- 0.11 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_00-35-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits at 16:14:57.06 -31:02:15.0: 13.81 +/- 0.22 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.80 +/- 0.12 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:14:57.06 -31:02:15.0: ref_mag=13.80 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=13.4398 delta=0.36 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_00-35-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits at 16:16:20.78 -34:26:30.1: 13.39 +/- 0.16 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.46 +/- 0.10 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:16:20.78 -34:26:30.1: ref_mag=13.46 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=13.2731 delta=0.18 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_00-35-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits at 16:07:47.49 -29:39:44.7: 13.32 +/- 0.13 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits at 15:58:07.12 -30:28:03.7: 13.56 +/- 0.11 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.45 +/- 0.09 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:07:47.49 -29:39:44.7: ref_mag=13.45 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=13.4542 delta=-0.01 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits at 15:17:08.31 -37:48:39.7: 13.41 +/- 0.11 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits at 16:07:42.06 -30:14:58.4: 13.94 +/- 0.16 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_00-35-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits at 15:58:07.12 -30:28:03.7: 13.33 +/- 0.13 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.47 +/- 0.08 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:58:07.12 -30:28:03.7: ref_mag=13.47 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=13.4816 delta=-0.01 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits at 16:03:50.88 -29:07:39.0: 14.16 +/- 0.18 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_00-35-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits at 15:17:08.31 -37:48:39.7: 13.99 +/- 0.28 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.49 +/- 0.10 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:17:08.31 -37:48:39.7: ref_mag=13.49 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=12.9048 delta=0.59 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits at 15:49:52.34 -29:12:35.0: 14.15 +/- 0.16 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_00-35-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits at 16:07:42.06 -30:14:58.4: 13.74 +/- 0.19 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.86 +/- 0.12 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:07:42.06 -30:14:58.4: ref_mag=13.86 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=13.5819 delta=0.28 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits at 16:12:43.22 -30:26:38.1: 14.12 +/- 0.20 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits at 16:11:24.21 -34:07:29.4: 14.16 +/- 0.21 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_00-35-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits at 15:49:52.34 -29:12:35.0: 13.47 +/- 0.13 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits at 16:06:05.45 -30:17:22.7: 13.94 +/- 0.15 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.75 +/- 0.10 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:49:52.34 -29:12:35.0: ref_mag=13.75 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=13.6374 delta=0.11 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_00-35-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits at 16:03:50.88 -29:07:39.0: 13.66 +/- 0.17 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.89 +/- 0.13 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:03:50.88 -29:07:39.0: ref_mag=13.89 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=13.7006 delta=0.19 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits at 15:50:28.02 -31:52:40.1: 13.94 +/- 0.14 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_00-35-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits at 16:12:43.22 -30:26:38.1: 13.88 +/- 0.23 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_00-35-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits at 16:11:24.21 -34:07:29.4: 14.08 +/- 0.28 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.01 +/- 0.15 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:12:43.22 -30:26:38.1: ref_mag=14.01 +/- 0.15 new_mean_mag=13.7023 delta=0.31 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.13 +/- 0.17 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:11:24.21 -34:07:29.4: ref_mag=14.13 +/- 0.17 new_mean_mag=13.2428 delta=0.89 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_00-35-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits at 16:06:05.45 -30:17:22.7: 14.33 +/- 0.33 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits at 16:05:36.55 -29:54:26.4: 13.96 +/- 0.15 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.01 +/- 0.14 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:06:05.45 -30:17:22.7: ref_mag=14.01 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=13.7110 delta=0.30 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_00-35-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits at 15:50:28.02 -31:52:40.1: 13.64 +/- 0.16 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.81 +/- 0.10 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:50:28.02 -31:52:40.1: ref_mag=13.81 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=13.5228 delta=0.29 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_00-35-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits at 16:05:36.55 -29:54:26.4: 13.74 +/- 0.18 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.87 +/- 0.12 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:05:36.55 -29:54:26.4: ref_mag=13.87 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=13.7210 delta=0.14 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits at 15:40:15.52 -29:02:01.1: 14.34 +/- 0.19 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits at 16:10:19.14 -29:54:54.0: 13.75 +/- 0.14 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits at 15:28:17.63 -29:24:57.2: 13.84 +/- 0.13 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits at 15:47:39.90 -29:17:46.1: 13.96 +/- 0.15 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits at 15:58:09.78 -31:53:52.1: 14.52 +/- 0.25 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits at 16:00:15.83 -29:27:04.3: 14.59 +/- 0.27 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_00-35-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits at 15:40:15.52 -29:02:01.1: 14.07 +/- 0.22 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.22 +/- 0.14 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:40:15.52 -29:02:01.1: ref_mag=14.22 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=13.7241 delta=0.50 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_00-35-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits at 15:28:17.63 -29:24:57.2: 14.00 +/- 0.22 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.88 +/- 0.11 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:28:17.63 -29:24:57.2: ref_mag=13.88 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=13.6889 delta=0.19 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_00-35-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits at 16:10:19.14 -29:54:54.0: 13.55 +/- 0.17 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_00-35-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits at 15:47:39.90 -29:17:46.1: 13.96 +/- 0.21 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.96 +/- 0.12 Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.67 +/- 0.11 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:47:39.90 -29:17:46.1: ref_mag=13.96 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=13.7443 delta=0.22 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:10:19.14 -29:54:54.0: ref_mag=13.67 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=13.5659 delta=0.10 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits at 16:14:06.61 -29:22:41.8: 14.07 +/- 0.20 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_00-35-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits at 15:58:09.78 -31:53:52.1: 14.32 +/- 0.30 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.44 +/- 0.19 Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 15:58:09.78 -31:53:52.1: ref_mag=14.44 +/- 0.19 new_mean_mag=13.4916 delta=0.95 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_00-35-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits at 16:00:15.83 -29:27:04.3: 14.33 +/- 0.31 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.48 +/- 0.20 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:00:15.83 -29:27:04.3: ref_mag=14.48 +/- 0.20 new_mean_mag=13.8076 delta=0.68 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits at 15:58:52.60 -30:32:40.7: 13.79 +/- 0.12 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_00-35-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits at 16:14:06.61 -29:22:41.8: 13.60 +/- 0.19 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.82 +/- 0.14 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:14:06.61 -29:22:41.8: ref_mag=13.82 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=13.6894 delta=0.13 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits at 15:23:05.32 -29:42:30.1: 13.91 +/- 0.13 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits at 15:24:41.93 -29:01:24.9: 13.90 +/- 0.13 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits at 15:44:19.08 -31:09:27.7: 13.83 +/- 0.12 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_00-35-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits at 15:58:52.60 -30:32:40.7: 13.84 +/- 0.20 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.80 +/- 0.10 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:58:52.60 -30:32:40.7: ref_mag=13.80 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=13.7388 delta=0.07 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits at 16:14:12.44 -30:13:36.2: 13.70 +/- 0.14 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits at 15:48:02.53 -29:25:00.7: 14.29 +/- 0.19 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_00-35-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits at 15:24:41.93 -29:01:24.9: 13.76 +/- 0.17 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.85 +/- 0.10 Forced photometry on wcs_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits at 16:05:14.26 -29:33:28.9: 14.14 +/- 0.18 detection Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:24:41.93 -29:01:24.9: ref_mag=13.85 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=13.7323 delta=0.12 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_00-35-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits at 15:23:05.32 -29:42:30.1: 13.97 +/- 0.20 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.93 +/- 0.11 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:23:05.32 -29:42:30.1: ref_mag=13.93 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=13.6595 delta=0.27 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_00-35-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits at 15:44:19.08 -31:09:27.7: 13.99 +/- 0.21 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.87 +/- 0.10 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:44:19.08 -31:09:27.7: ref_mag=13.87 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=13.6282 delta=0.24 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_00-35-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits at 16:14:12.44 -30:13:36.2: 13.72 +/- 0.22 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.71 +/- 0.12 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:14:12.44 -30:13:36.2: ref_mag=13.71 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=13.9078 delta=-0.20 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits at 15:57:53.36 -31:41:15.1: 14.09 +/- 0.17 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_00-35-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits at 15:48:02.53 -29:25:00.7: 14.30 +/- 0.30 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.29 +/- 0.16 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:48:02.53 -29:25:00.7: ref_mag=14.29 +/- 0.16 new_mean_mag=13.7913 delta=0.50 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits at 15:43:32.67 -38:13:04.0: 14.14 +/- 0.22 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_00-35-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits at 16:05:14.26 -29:33:28.9: 13.81 +/- 0.20 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.99 +/- 0.13 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:05:14.26 -29:33:28.9: ref_mag=13.99 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=13.9152 delta=0.08 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_00-35-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits at 15:57:53.36 -31:41:15.1: 14.30 +/- 0.31 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits at 15:58:38.18 -30:28:23.8: 13.99 +/- 0.15 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits at 15:47:07.95 -30:28:47.6: 14.32 +/- 0.18 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits at 15:54:14.78 -30:35:12.1: 13.98 +/- 0.15 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_00-35-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits at 15:43:32.67 -38:13:04.0: 13.97 +/- 0.27 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.07 +/- 0.17 Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.14 +/- 0.15 Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 15:43:32.67 -38:13:04.0: ref_mag=14.07 +/- 0.17 new_mean_mag=13.0927 delta=0.98 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:57:53.36 -31:41:15.1: ref_mag=14.14 +/- 0.15 new_mean_mag=13.7283 delta=0.41 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_00-35-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits at 15:58:38.18 -30:28:23.8: 13.62 +/- 0.17 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.83 +/- 0.12 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:58:38.18 -30:28:23.8: ref_mag=13.83 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=13.8629 delta=-0.03 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_00-35-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits at 15:47:07.95 -30:28:47.6: 14.31 +/- 0.27 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.32 +/- 0.15 Forced photometry on wcs_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_00-35-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits at 15:54:14.78 -30:35:12.1: 13.89 +/- 0.20 detection Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:47:07.95 -30:28:47.6: ref_mag=14.32 +/- 0.15 new_mean_mag=13.8485 delta=0.47 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.95 +/- 0.12 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:54:14.78 -30:35:12.1: ref_mag=13.95 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=13.8287 delta=0.12 (need > 0.90) Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out82429.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out82533.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out82599.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out82388.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 10s Pre-generating preview images in parallel... Done pre-generating preview images. Pre-generating finding charts in parallel... Done pre-generating finding charts. make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 1s xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 82329_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-08-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0075 The candidate 82329_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-08-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0075 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 06 08.17216    2461199.67216    13.43    16:03:23.15 -30:33:29.3   7809 5378   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-07_CI_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_232244_TTUQ1b1x1_278956_7q9DkiqK/fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-07-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0074.fits Discovery image 2   2026 06 08.17266    2461199.67266    13.42    16:03:23.36 -30:33:29.8   7803 5383   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-07_CI_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_232244_TTUQ1b1x1_278956_7q9DkiqK/fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-08-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0075.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 82331_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-08-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0075 The candidate 82331_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-08-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0075 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 06 08.17266    2461199.67266    13.33    15:55:39.72 -29:47:43.0   6783 5828   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-07_CI_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_232244_TTUQ1b1x1_278956_7q9DkiqK/fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-08-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0075.fits **** FOUND 15:55:39.65 -29:47:44.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 82340_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-08-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0075 The candidate 82340_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-08-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0075 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 06 08.17216    2461199.67216    12.68    15:41:05.54 -35:26:36.2   5066 2346   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-07_CI_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_232244_TTUQ1b1x1_278956_7q9DkiqK/fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-07-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0074.fits Discovery image 2   2026 06 08.17266    2461199.67266    12.30    15:41:05.37 -35:26:33.8   5060 2351   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-07_CI_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_232244_TTUQ1b1x1_278956_7q9DkiqK/fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-08-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0075.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 82343_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-08-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0075 The candidate 82343_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-08-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0075 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 06 08.17216    2461199.67216    12.39    15:08:00.03 -35:39:54.9   1024 1811   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-07_CI_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_232244_TTUQ1b1x1_278956_7q9DkiqK/fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-07-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0074.fits Discovery image 2   2026 06 08.17266    2461199.67266    12.10    15:08:00.08 -35:39:53.5   1018 1815   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-07_CI_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_232244_TTUQ1b1x1_278956_7q9DkiqK/fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-08-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0075.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 82344_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-08-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0075 The candidate 82344_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-08-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0075 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 06 08.17216    2461199.67216    12.16    15:12:51.13 -38:07:45.4   1805 0408   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-07_CI_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_232244_TTUQ1b1x1_278956_7q9DkiqK/fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-07-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0074.fits Discovery image 2   2026 06 08.17266    2461199.67266    12.03    15:12:51.04 -38:07:43.8   1800 0413   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-07_CI_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_232244_TTUQ1b1x1_278956_7q9DkiqK/fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-08-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0075.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 82348_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-08-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0075 The candidate 82348_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-08-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0075 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 06 08.17266    2461199.67266    12.78    15:43:39.56 -29:09:05.0   5188 6157   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-07_CI_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_232244_TTUQ1b1x1_278956_7q9DkiqK/fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-08-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0075.fits **** FOUND 15:43:39.56 -29:09:04.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 82350_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-08-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0075 The candidate 82350_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-08-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0075 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 06 08.17216    2461199.67216    12.02    15:02:19.06 -37:46:22.9   0512 0435   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-07_CI_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_232244_TTUQ1b1x1_278956_7q9DkiqK/fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-07-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0074.fits Discovery image 2   2026 06 08.17266    2461199.67266    12.17    15:02:18.85 -37:46:23.7   0506 0439   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-07_CI_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_232244_TTUQ1b1x1_278956_7q9DkiqK/fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-08-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0075.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 82351_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-08-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0075 The candidate 82351_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-08-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0075 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 06 08.17216    2461199.67216    12.16    16:12:28.45 -32:34:19.2   8980 4151   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-07_CI_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_232244_TTUQ1b1x1_278956_7q9DkiqK/fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-07-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0074.fits Discovery image 2   2026 06 08.17266    2461199.67266    12.28    16:12:28.57 -32:34:19.4   8974 4156   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-07_CI_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_232244_TTUQ1b1x1_278956_7q9DkiqK/fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-08-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0075.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 82357_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-08-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0075 The candidate 82357_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-08-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0075 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 06 08.17216    2461199.67216    11.53    15:36:45.52 -28:51:33.4   4273 6275   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-07_CI_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_232244_TTUQ1b1x1_278956_7q9DkiqK/fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-07-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0074.fits Discovery image 2   2026 06 08.17266    2461199.67266    11.49    15:36:45.53 -28:51:33.8   4267 6280   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-07_CI_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_232244_TTUQ1b1x1_278956_7q9DkiqK/fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-08-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0075.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 82364_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-08-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0075 The candidate 82364_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-08-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0075 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 06 08.17216    2461199.67216    12.30    16:07:38.28 -29:27:49.9   8376 6048   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-07_CI_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_232244_TTUQ1b1x1_278956_7q9DkiqK/fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-07-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0074.fits Discovery image 2   2026 06 08.17266    2461199.67266    12.23    16:07:38.28 -29:27:49.4   8370 6053   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-07_CI_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_232244_TTUQ1b1x1_278956_7q9DkiqK/fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-08-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0075.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 82374_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-08-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0075 The candidate 82374_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-08-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0075 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 06 08.17266    2461199.67266    12.93    16:15:36.77 -29:50:47.1   9433 5813   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-07_CI_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_232244_TTUQ1b1x1_278956_7q9DkiqK/fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-08-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0075.fits **** FOUND 16:15:36.78 -29:50:46.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 82377_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-08-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0075 The candidate 82377_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-08-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0075 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 06 08.17266    2461199.67266    12.11    15:30:44.34 -38:20:39.9   3935 0517   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-07_CI_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_232244_TTUQ1b1x1_278956_7q9DkiqK/fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-08-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0075.fits **** FOUND 15:30:44.29 -38:20:39.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 82380_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-08-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0075 The candidate 82380_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-08-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0075 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 06 08.17266    2461199.67266    12.68    15:41:33.49 -29:12:13.1   4913 6110   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-07_CI_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_232244_TTUQ1b1x1_278956_7q9DkiqK/fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-08-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0075.fits **** FOUND 15:41:33.49 -29:12:13.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 82382_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-08-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0075 The candidate 82382_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-08-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0075 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 06 08.17266    2461199.67266    12.87    15:16:07.64 -30:43:49.2   1668 4911   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-07_CI_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_232244_TTUQ1b1x1_278956_7q9DkiqK/fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-08-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0075.fits **** FOUND 15:16:07.63 -30:43:48.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 82383_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-08-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0075 The candidate 82383_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-08-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0075 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 06 08.17266    2461199.67266    12.98    16:13:07.70 -29:37:23.7   9103 5953   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-07_CI_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_232244_TTUQ1b1x1_278956_7q9DkiqK/fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-08-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0075.fits **** FOUND 16:13:07.64 -29:37:22.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 82384_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-08-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0075 The candidate 82384_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-08-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0075 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 06 08.17266    2461199.67266    12.52    15:47:59.81 -30:58:33.0   5803 5079   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-07_CI_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_232244_TTUQ1b1x1_278956_7q9DkiqK/fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-08-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0075.fits **** FOUND 15:47:59.82 -30:58:32.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 82388_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-08-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0075 Preparing report for the candidate 82388_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-08-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0075 xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 82389_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-08-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0075 The candidate 82389_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-08-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0075 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 06 08.17216    2461199.67216    13.02    15:38:21.71 -29:02:58.8   4492 6173   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-07_CI_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_232244_TTUQ1b1x1_278956_7q9DkiqK/fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-07-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0074.fits Discovery image 2   2026 06 08.17266    2461199.67266    13.15    15:38:22.03 -29:03:06.3   4487 6177   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-07_CI_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_232244_TTUQ1b1x1_278956_7q9DkiqK/fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-08-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0075.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 82390_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-08-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0075 The candidate 82390_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-08-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0075 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 06 08.17266    2461199.67266    12.66    15:54:55.18 -39:08:47.1   6809 0178   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-07_CI_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_232244_TTUQ1b1x1_278956_7q9DkiqK/fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-08-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0075.fits **** FOUND 15:54:55.04 -39:08:49.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 82391_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-08-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0075 The candidate 82391_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-08-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0075 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 06 08.17216    2461199.67216    12.99    15:34:53.28 -29:03:16.8   4034 6140   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-07_CI_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_232244_TTUQ1b1x1_278956_7q9DkiqK/fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-07-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0074.fits Discovery image 2   2026 06 08.17266    2461199.67266    13.10    15:34:53.27 -29:03:16.2   4028 6145   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-07_CI_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_232244_TTUQ1b1x1_278956_7q9DkiqK/fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-08-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0075.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 82398_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-08-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0075 The candidate 82398_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-08-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0075 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 06 08.17216    2461199.67216    13.20    16:11:55.21 -29:17:16.6   8952 6155   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-07_CI_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_232244_TTUQ1b1x1_278956_7q9DkiqK/fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-07-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0074.fits Discovery image 2   2026 06 08.17266    2461199.67266    13.27    16:11:55.21 -29:17:16.0   8946 6160   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-07_CI_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_232244_TTUQ1b1x1_278956_7q9DkiqK/fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-08-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0075.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 82400_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-08-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0075 The candidate 82400_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-08-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0075 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 06 08.17266    2461199.67266    13.43    16:10:38.96 -29:10:03.8   8776 6235   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-07_CI_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_232244_TTUQ1b1x1_278956_7q9DkiqK/fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-08-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0075.fits **** FOUND 16:10:38.91 -29:10:05.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 82405_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-08-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0075 The candidate 82405_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-08-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0075 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 06 08.17216    2461199.67216    12.79    15:27:57.77 -33:32:32.3   3360 3368   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-07_CI_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_232244_TTUQ1b1x1_278956_7q9DkiqK/fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-07-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0074.fits Discovery image 2   2026 06 08.17266    2461199.67266    12.79    15:27:57.83 -33:32:33.4   3354 3373   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-07_CI_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_232244_TTUQ1b1x1_278956_7q9DkiqK/fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-08-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0075.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 82406_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-08-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0075 The candidate 82406_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-08-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0075 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 06 08.17266    2461199.67266    13.17    16:13:19.29 -29:16:25.3   9135 6168   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-07_CI_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_232244_TTUQ1b1x1_278956_7q9DkiqK/fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-08-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0075.fits **** FOUND 16:13:19.35 -29:16:25.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 82409_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-08-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0075 The candidate 82409_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-08-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0075 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 06 08.17266    2461199.67266    12.42    15:17:02.48 -38:00:20.4   2290 0552   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-07_CI_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_232244_TTUQ1b1x1_278956_7q9DkiqK/fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-08-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0075.fits **** FOUND 15:17:02.53 -38:00:21.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 82410_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-08-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0075 The candidate 82410_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-08-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0075 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 06 08.17266    2461199.67266    12.61    15:24:02.23 -36:59:30.0   3064 1257   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-07_CI_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_232244_TTUQ1b1x1_278956_7q9DkiqK/fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-08-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0075.fits **** FOUND 15:24:02.25 -36:59:29.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 82411_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-08-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0075 The candidate 82411_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-08-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0075 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 06 08.17266    2461199.67266    13.06    15:51:06.70 -31:35:17.3   6218 4725   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-07_CI_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_232244_TTUQ1b1x1_278956_7q9DkiqK/fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-08-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0075.fits **** FOUND 15:51:06.65 -31:35:18.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 82412_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-08-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0075 The candidate 82412_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-08-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0075 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 06 08.17266    2461199.67266    12.65    15:47:58.47 -37:26:39.6   5952 1186   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-07_CI_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_232244_TTUQ1b1x1_278956_7q9DkiqK/fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-08-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0075.fits **** FOUND 15:47:58.48 -37:26:39.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 82413_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-08-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0075 The candidate 82413_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-08-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0075 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 06 08.17266    2461199.67266    13.29    15:57:19.25 -34:25:50.3   7044 3033   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-07_CI_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_232244_TTUQ1b1x1_278956_7q9DkiqK/fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-08-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0075.fits **** FOUND 15:57:19.23 -34:25:51.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 82414_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-08-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0075 The candidate 82414_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-08-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0075 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 06 08.17216    2461199.67216    13.16    15:32:39.55 -29:18:56.7   3752 5961   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-07_CI_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_232244_TTUQ1b1x1_278956_7q9DkiqK/fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-07-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0074.fits Discovery image 2   2026 06 08.17266    2461199.67266    13.30    15:32:39.52 -29:18:57.1   3746 5965   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-07_CI_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_232244_TTUQ1b1x1_278956_7q9DkiqK/fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-08-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0075.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 82420_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-08-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0075 The candidate 82420_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-08-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0075 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 06 08.17216    2461199.67216    12.70    16:07:03.88 -39:08:11.4   8252 0179   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-07_CI_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_232244_TTUQ1b1x1_278956_7q9DkiqK/fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-07-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0074.fits Discovery image 2   2026 06 08.17266    2461199.67266    12.64    16:07:03.86 -39:08:12.5   8246 0184   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-07_CI_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_232244_TTUQ1b1x1_278956_7q9DkiqK/fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-08-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0075.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 82426_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-08-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0075 The candidate 82426_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-08-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0075 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 06 08.17266    2461199.67266    13.31    15:58:27.50 -31:45:13.7   7166 4650   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-07_CI_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_232244_TTUQ1b1x1_278956_7q9DkiqK/fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-08-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0075.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.2") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 82427_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-08-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0075 The candidate 82427_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-08-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0075 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 06 08.17216    2461199.67216    13.41    16:03:59.58 -30:00:25.3   7889 5714   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-07_CI_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_232244_TTUQ1b1x1_278956_7q9DkiqK/fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-07-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0074.fits Discovery image 2   2026 06 08.17266    2461199.67266    13.41    16:03:59.63 -30:00:22.7   7883 5720   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-07_CI_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_232244_TTUQ1b1x1_278956_7q9DkiqK/fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-08-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0075.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 82429_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-08-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0075 The candidate 82429_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-08-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0075 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 06 08.17266    2461199.67266    13.00    15:54:21.13 -36:56:07.3   6710 1516   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-07_CI_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_232244_TTUQ1b1x1_278956_7q9DkiqK/fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-08-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0075.fits **** FOUND 15:54:21.21 -36:56:07.5 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=12.99, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=13.97)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.803 6010403145575346816 238.58869803163 -36.93498738837 12.0535 10.3523 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.803#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9# xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 82431_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-08-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0075 The candidate 82431_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-08-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0075 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 06 08.17216    2461199.67216    13.46    16:07:47.46 -29:39:45.5   8395 5927   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-07_CI_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_232244_TTUQ1b1x1_278956_7q9DkiqK/fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-07-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0074.fits Discovery image 2   2026 06 08.17266    2461199.67266    13.45    16:07:47.52 -29:39:43.8   8389 5932   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-07_CI_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_232244_TTUQ1b1x1_278956_7q9DkiqK/fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-08-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0075.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 82432_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-08-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0075 The candidate 82432_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-08-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0075 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 06 08.17216    2461199.67216    13.20    16:16:20.82 -34:26:32.5   9447 3005   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-07_CI_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_232244_TTUQ1b1x1_278956_7q9DkiqK/fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-07-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0074.fits Discovery image 2   2026 06 08.17266    2461199.67266    13.39    16:16:20.75 -34:26:27.7   9441 3011   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-07_CI_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_232244_TTUQ1b1x1_278956_7q9DkiqK/fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-08-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0075.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 82438_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-08-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0075 The candidate 82438_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-08-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0075 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 06 08.17216    2461199.67216    13.44    16:14:57.16 -31:02:14.4   9328 5081   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-07_CI_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_232244_TTUQ1b1x1_278956_7q9DkiqK/fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-07-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0074.fits Discovery image 2   2026 06 08.17266    2461199.67266    13.44    16:14:56.96 -31:02:15.6   9322 5086   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-07_CI_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_232244_TTUQ1b1x1_278956_7q9DkiqK/fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-08-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0075.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 82439_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-08-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0075 The candidate 82439_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-08-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0075 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 06 08.17266    2461199.67266    13.49    16:11:04.27 -29:27:18.6   8830 6058   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-07_CI_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_232244_TTUQ1b1x1_278956_7q9DkiqK/fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-08-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0075.fits **** FOUND 16:11:04.26 -29:27:18.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 82442_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-08-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0075 The candidate 82442_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-08-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0075 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 06 08.17266    2461199.67266    13.04    15:47:28.97 -32:25:44.0   5772 4201   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-07_CI_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_232244_TTUQ1b1x1_278956_7q9DkiqK/fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-08-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0075.fits **** FOUND 15:47:28.79 -32:25:45.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 82447_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-08-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0075 The candidate 82447_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-08-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0075 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 06 08.17266    2461199.67266    13.60    16:14:47.67 -29:28:21.3   9330 6044   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-07_CI_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_232244_TTUQ1b1x1_278956_7q9DkiqK/fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-08-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0075.fits **** FOUND 16:14:47.83 -29:28:19.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 82453_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-08-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0075 The candidate 82453_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-08-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0075 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 06 08.17266    2461199.67266    12.70    15:07:46.50 -36:42:40.2   1077 1182   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-07_CI_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_232244_TTUQ1b1x1_278956_7q9DkiqK/fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-08-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0075.fits **** FOUND 15:07:46.50 -36:42:42.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 82454_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-08-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0075 The candidate 82454_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-08-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0075 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 06 08.17216    2461199.67216    12.90    15:17:08.37 -37:48:39.5   2294 0666   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-07_CI_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_232244_TTUQ1b1x1_278956_7q9DkiqK/fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-07-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0074.fits Discovery image 2   2026 06 08.17266    2461199.67266    12.92    15:17:08.25 -37:48:39.9   2288 0671   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-07_CI_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_232244_TTUQ1b1x1_278956_7q9DkiqK/fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-08-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0075.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 82457_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-08-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0075 The candidate 82457_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-08-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0075 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 06 08.17216    2461199.67216    13.46    15:58:07.05 -30:28:04.3   7118 5423   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-07_CI_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_232244_TTUQ1b1x1_278956_7q9DkiqK/fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-07-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0074.fits Discovery image 2   2026 06 08.17266    2461199.67266    13.51    15:58:07.19 -30:28:03.0   7112 5428   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-07_CI_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_232244_TTUQ1b1x1_278956_7q9DkiqK/fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-08-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0075.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 82467_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-08-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0075 The candidate 82467_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-08-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0075 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 06 08.17266    2461199.67266    13.21    15:31:36.49 -35:16:14.4   3892 2375   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-07_CI_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_232244_TTUQ1b1x1_278956_7q9DkiqK/fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-08-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0075.fits **** FOUND 15:31:36.53 -35:16:15.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 82468_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-08-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0075 The candidate 82468_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-08-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0075 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 06 08.17216    2461199.67216    13.57    16:07:42.04 -30:14:57.5   8379 5569   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-07_CI_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_232244_TTUQ1b1x1_278956_7q9DkiqK/fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-07-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0074.fits Discovery image 2   2026 06 08.17266    2461199.67266    13.59    16:07:42.08 -30:14:59.3   8373 5574   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-07_CI_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_232244_TTUQ1b1x1_278956_7q9DkiqK/fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-08-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0075.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 82474_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-08-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0075 The candidate 82474_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-08-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0075 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 06 08.17216    2461199.67216    13.59    15:49:52.36 -29:12:34.9   6016 6154   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-07_CI_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_232244_TTUQ1b1x1_278956_7q9DkiqK/fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-07-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0074.fits Discovery image 2   2026 06 08.17266    2461199.67266    13.72    15:49:52.32 -29:12:35.1   6010 6159   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-07_CI_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_232244_TTUQ1b1x1_278956_7q9DkiqK/fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-08-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0075.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 82476_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-08-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0075 The candidate 82476_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-08-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0075 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 06 08.17216    2461199.67216    13.70    16:03:50.83 -29:07:39.0   7871 6250   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-07_CI_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_232244_TTUQ1b1x1_278956_7q9DkiqK/fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-07-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0074.fits Discovery image 2   2026 06 08.17266    2461199.67266    13.70    16:03:50.94 -29:07:38.9   7865 6256   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-07_CI_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_232244_TTUQ1b1x1_278956_7q9DkiqK/fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-08-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0075.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 82485_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-08-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0075 The candidate 82485_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-08-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0075 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 06 08.17216    2461199.67216    13.37    16:11:24.23 -34:07:29.1   8823 3212   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-07_CI_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_232244_TTUQ1b1x1_278956_7q9DkiqK/fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-07-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0074.fits Discovery image 2   2026 06 08.17266    2461199.67266    13.17    16:11:24.19 -34:07:29.8   8817 3217   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-07_CI_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_232244_TTUQ1b1x1_278956_7q9DkiqK/fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-08-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0075.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 82486_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-08-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0075 The candidate 82486_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-08-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0075 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 06 08.17216    2461199.67216    13.67    16:12:43.13 -30:26:37.6   9042 5447   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-07_CI_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_232244_TTUQ1b1x1_278956_7q9DkiqK/fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-07-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0074.fits Discovery image 2   2026 06 08.17266    2461199.67266    13.75    16:12:43.30 -30:26:38.6   9036 5452   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-07_CI_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_232244_TTUQ1b1x1_278956_7q9DkiqK/fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-08-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0075.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 82488_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-08-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0075 The candidate 82488_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-08-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0075 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 06 08.17216    2461199.67216    13.64    16:06:05.57 -30:17:25.0   8166 5543   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-07_CI_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_232244_TTUQ1b1x1_278956_7q9DkiqK/fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-07-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0074.fits Discovery image 2   2026 06 08.17266    2461199.67266    13.84    16:06:05.32 -30:17:20.5   8159 5549   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-07_CI_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_232244_TTUQ1b1x1_278956_7q9DkiqK/fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-08-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0075.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 82489_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-08-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0075 The candidate 82489_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-08-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0075 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 06 08.17216    2461199.67216    13.44    15:50:27.98 -31:52:40.0   6146 4543   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-07_CI_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_232244_TTUQ1b1x1_278956_7q9DkiqK/fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-07-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0074.fits Discovery image 2   2026 06 08.17266    2461199.67266    13.64    15:50:28.06 -31:52:40.1   6140 4548   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-07_CI_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_232244_TTUQ1b1x1_278956_7q9DkiqK/fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-08-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0075.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 82494_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-08-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0075 The candidate 82494_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-08-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0075 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 06 08.17216    2461199.67216    13.70    16:05:36.52 -29:54:28.0   8103 5776   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-07_CI_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_232244_TTUQ1b1x1_278956_7q9DkiqK/fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-07-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0074.fits Discovery image 2   2026 06 08.17266    2461199.67266    13.75    16:05:36.58 -29:54:24.7   8097 5782   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-07_CI_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_232244_TTUQ1b1x1_278956_7q9DkiqK/fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-08-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0075.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 82496_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-08-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0075 The candidate 82496_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-08-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0075 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 06 08.17266    2461199.67266    13.83    15:54:53.95 -29:07:23.0   6674 6235   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-07_CI_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_232244_TTUQ1b1x1_278956_7q9DkiqK/fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-08-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0075.fits **** FOUND 15:54:54.03 -29:07:24.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 82500_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-08-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0075 The candidate 82500_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-08-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0075 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 06 08.17266    2461199.67266    12.82    15:28:26.87 -37:33:32.8   3623 0967   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-07_CI_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_232244_TTUQ1b1x1_278956_7q9DkiqK/fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-08-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0075.fits **** FOUND 15:28:26.84 -37:33:33.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 82501_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-08-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0075 The candidate 82501_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-08-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0075 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 06 08.17266    2461199.67266    13.45    15:48:44.91 -29:32:31.4   5869 5951   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-07_CI_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_232244_TTUQ1b1x1_278956_7q9DkiqK/fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-08-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0075.fits **** FOUND 15:48:44.80 -29:32:31.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 82503_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-08-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0075 The candidate 82503_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-08-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0075 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 06 08.17216    2461199.67216    13.63    15:40:15.58 -29:02:00.1   4742 6199   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-07_CI_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_232244_TTUQ1b1x1_278956_7q9DkiqK/fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-07-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0074.fits Discovery image 2   2026 06 08.17266    2461199.67266    13.95    15:40:15.47 -29:02:02.0   4736 6203   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-07_CI_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_232244_TTUQ1b1x1_278956_7q9DkiqK/fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-08-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0075.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 82508_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-08-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0075 The candidate 82508_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-08-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0075 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 06 08.17266    2461199.67266    13.42    15:57:25.58 -33:38:46.9   7050 3506   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-07_CI_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_232244_TTUQ1b1x1_278956_7q9DkiqK/fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-08-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0075.fits **** FOUND 15:57:25.63 -33:38:45.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 82509_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-08-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0075 The candidate 82509_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-08-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0075 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 06 08.17216    2461199.67216    13.64    16:10:19.14 -29:54:55.1   8730 5772   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-07_CI_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_232244_TTUQ1b1x1_278956_7q9DkiqK/fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-07-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0074.fits Discovery image 2   2026 06 08.17266    2461199.67266    13.53    16:10:19.15 -29:54:52.8   8723 5778   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-07_CI_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_232244_TTUQ1b1x1_278956_7q9DkiqK/fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-08-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0075.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 82520_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-08-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0075 The candidate 82520_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-08-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0075 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 06 08.17216    2461199.67216    13.71    15:47:39.81 -29:17:45.7   5726 6089   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-07_CI_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_232244_TTUQ1b1x1_278956_7q9DkiqK/fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-07-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0074.fits Discovery image 2   2026 06 08.17266    2461199.67266    13.81    15:47:39.99 -29:17:46.4   5721 6094   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-07_CI_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_232244_TTUQ1b1x1_278956_7q9DkiqK/fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-08-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0075.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 82531_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-08-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0075 The candidate 82531_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-08-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0075 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 06 08.17216    2461199.67216    13.64    15:28:17.64 -29:24:57.9   3183 5855   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-07_CI_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_232244_TTUQ1b1x1_278956_7q9DkiqK/fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-07-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0074.fits Discovery image 2   2026 06 08.17266    2461199.67266    13.80    15:28:17.63 -29:24:56.4   3177 5860   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-07_CI_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_232244_TTUQ1b1x1_278956_7q9DkiqK/fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-08-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0075.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 82533_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-08-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0075 The candidate 82533_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-08-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0075 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 06 08.17266    2461199.67266    13.43    15:58:09.71 -31:53:52.3   7129 4562   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-07_CI_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_232244_TTUQ1b1x1_278956_7q9DkiqK/fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-08-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0075.fits **** FOUND 15:58:09.78 -31:53:52.1 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.51, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.49)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.089 6039391838356902912 239.54109857927 -31.89786842600 12.4287 10.9594 VARIABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.089#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9# xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 82539_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-08-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0075 The candidate 82539_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-08-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0075 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 06 08.17216    2461199.67216    13.79    16:00:15.68 -29:27:06.0   7394 6046   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-07_CI_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_232244_TTUQ1b1x1_278956_7q9DkiqK/fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-07-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0074.fits Discovery image 2   2026 06 08.17266    2461199.67266    13.83    16:00:15.99 -29:27:02.5   7389 6052   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-07_CI_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_232244_TTUQ1b1x1_278956_7q9DkiqK/fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-08-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0075.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 82544_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-08-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0075 The candidate 82544_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-08-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0075 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 06 08.17266    2461199.67266    13.67    15:43:57.84 -30:09:46.9   5258 5546   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-07_CI_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_232244_TTUQ1b1x1_278956_7q9DkiqK/fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-08-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0075.fits **** FOUND 15:43:57.92 -30:09:46.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 82547_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-08-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0075 The candidate 82547_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-08-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0075 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 06 08.17266    2461199.67266    13.94    15:41:57.00 -29:59:33.8   4990 5635   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-07_CI_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_232244_TTUQ1b1x1_278956_7q9DkiqK/fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-08-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0075.fits **** FOUND 15:41:57.03 -29:59:33.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 82548_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-08-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0075 The candidate 82548_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-08-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0075 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 06 08.17216    2461199.67216    13.71    16:14:06.63 -29:22:42.1   9245 6097   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-07_CI_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_232244_TTUQ1b1x1_278956_7q9DkiqK/fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-07-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0074.fits Discovery image 2   2026 06 08.17266    2461199.67266    13.68    16:14:06.59 -29:22:41.4   9239 6102   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-07_CI_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_232244_TTUQ1b1x1_278956_7q9DkiqK/fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-08-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0075.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 82550_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-08-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0075 The candidate 82550_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-08-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0075 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 06 08.17266    2461199.67266    13.77    16:15:05.64 -30:05:01.7   9359 5668   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-07_CI_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_232244_TTUQ1b1x1_278956_7q9DkiqK/fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-08-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0075.fits **** FOUND 16:15:05.61 -30:05:02.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 82555_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-08-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0075 The candidate 82555_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-08-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0075 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 06 08.17216    2461199.67216    13.73    15:58:52.61 -30:32:41.9   7217 5378   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-07_CI_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_232244_TTUQ1b1x1_278956_7q9DkiqK/fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-07-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0074.fits Discovery image 2   2026 06 08.17266    2461199.67266    13.74    15:58:52.59 -30:32:39.5   7212 5383   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-07_CI_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_232244_TTUQ1b1x1_278956_7q9DkiqK/fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-08-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0075.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 82556_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-08-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0075 The candidate 82556_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-08-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0075 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 06 08.17216    2461199.67216    13.60    15:23:05.27 -29:42:29.9   2516 5617   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-07_CI_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_232244_TTUQ1b1x1_278956_7q9DkiqK/fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-07-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0074.fits Discovery image 2   2026 06 08.17266    2461199.67266    13.76    15:23:05.37 -29:42:30.4   2510 5621   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-07_CI_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_232244_TTUQ1b1x1_278956_7q9DkiqK/fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-08-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0075.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 82560_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-08-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0075 The candidate 82560_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-08-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0075 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 06 08.17216    2461199.67216    13.67    15:24:41.98 -29:01:23.5   2687 6051   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-07_CI_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_232244_TTUQ1b1x1_278956_7q9DkiqK/fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-07-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0074.fits Discovery image 2   2026 06 08.17266    2461199.67266    13.85    15:24:41.87 -29:01:26.4   2681 6056   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-07_CI_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_232244_TTUQ1b1x1_278956_7q9DkiqK/fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-08-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0075.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 82562_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-08-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0075 The candidate 82562_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-08-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0075 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 06 08.17216    2461199.67216    13.62    15:44:19.13 -31:09:28.5   5339 4943   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-07_CI_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_232244_TTUQ1b1x1_278956_7q9DkiqK/fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-07-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0074.fits Discovery image 2   2026 06 08.17266    2461199.67266    13.63    15:44:19.04 -31:09:26.8   5333 4948   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-07_CI_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_232244_TTUQ1b1x1_278956_7q9DkiqK/fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-08-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0075.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 82564_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-08-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0075 The candidate 82564_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-08-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0075 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 06 08.17216    2461199.67216    13.83    16:14:12.36 -30:13:36.1   9244 5577   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-07_CI_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_232244_TTUQ1b1x1_278956_7q9DkiqK/fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-07-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0074.fits Discovery image 2   2026 06 08.17266    2461199.67266    14.03    16:14:12.52 -30:13:36.3   9238 5583   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-07_CI_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_232244_TTUQ1b1x1_278956_7q9DkiqK/fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-08-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0075.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 82568_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-08-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0075 The candidate 82568_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-08-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0075 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 06 08.17266    2461199.67266    13.90    16:04:27.57 -30:08:45.4   7945 5635   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-07_CI_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_232244_TTUQ1b1x1_278956_7q9DkiqK/fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-08-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0075.fits **** FOUND 16:04:27.49 -30:08:44.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 82570_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-08-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0075 The candidate 82570_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-08-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0075 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 06 08.17216    2461199.67216    13.79    15:48:02.50 -29:25:00.6   5779 6018   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-07_CI_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_232244_TTUQ1b1x1_278956_7q9DkiqK/fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-07-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0074.fits Discovery image 2   2026 06 08.17266    2461199.67266    13.79    15:48:02.56 -29:25:00.9   5773 6023   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-07_CI_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_232244_TTUQ1b1x1_278956_7q9DkiqK/fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-08-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0075.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 82572_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-08-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0075 The candidate 82572_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-08-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0075 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 06 08.17216    2461199.67216    13.90    16:05:14.19 -29:33:28.7   8055 5989   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-07_CI_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_232244_TTUQ1b1x1_278956_7q9DkiqK/fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-07-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0074.fits Discovery image 2   2026 06 08.17266    2461199.67266    13.94    16:05:14.33 -29:33:29.1   8049 5994   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-07_CI_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_232244_TTUQ1b1x1_278956_7q9DkiqK/fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-08-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0075.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 82594_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-08-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0075 The candidate 82594_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-08-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0075 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 06 08.17216    2461199.67216    13.73    15:57:53.30 -31:41:14.3   7098 4684   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-07_CI_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_232244_TTUQ1b1x1_278956_7q9DkiqK/fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-07-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0074.fits Discovery image 2   2026 06 08.17266    2461199.67266    13.73    15:57:53.43 -31:41:15.9   7092 4689   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-07_CI_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_232244_TTUQ1b1x1_278956_7q9DkiqK/fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-08-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0075.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 82599_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-08-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0075 The candidate 82599_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-08-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0075 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 06 08.17266    2461199.67266    12.98    15:43:32.70 -38:13:02.7   5445 0696   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-07_CI_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_232244_TTUQ1b1x1_278956_7q9DkiqK/fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-08-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0075.fits **** FOUND 15:43:32.67 -38:13:04.0 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.14, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.12)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.065 6009562362779802624 235.88647047660 -38.21765996121 12.5650 11.1497 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.065#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9# xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 82617_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-08-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0075 The candidate 82617_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-08-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0075 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 06 08.17216    2461199.67216    13.84    15:58:38.21 -30:28:23.8   7186 5421   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-07_CI_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_232244_TTUQ1b1x1_278956_7q9DkiqK/fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-07-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0074.fits Discovery image 2   2026 06 08.17266    2461199.67266    13.89    15:58:38.15 -30:28:23.8   7180 5426   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-07_CI_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_232244_TTUQ1b1x1_278956_7q9DkiqK/fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-08-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0075.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 82624_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-08-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0075 The candidate 82624_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-08-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0075 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 06 08.17216    2461199.67216    13.85    15:47:07.88 -30:28:46.5   5685 5369   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-07_CI_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_232244_TTUQ1b1x1_278956_7q9DkiqK/fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-07-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0074.fits Discovery image 2   2026 06 08.17266    2461199.67266    13.85    15:47:08.02 -30:28:48.7   5679 5374   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-07_CI_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_232244_TTUQ1b1x1_278956_7q9DkiqK/fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-08-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0075.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 82628_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-08-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0075 The candidate 82628_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-08-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0075 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 06 08.17216    2461199.67216    13.84    15:54:14.81 -30:35:13.7   6613 5338   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-07_CI_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_232244_TTUQ1b1x1_278956_7q9DkiqK/fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-07-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0074.fits Discovery image 2   2026 06 08.17266    2461199.67266    13.82    15:54:14.74 -30:35:10.5   6607 5344   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-07_CI_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_232244_TTUQ1b1x1_278956_7q9DkiqK/fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-08-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0075.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 58877_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-08-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0075 The candidate 58877_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-08-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0075 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 3   2026 06 08.17266    2461199.67266    11.77    15:51:24.14 -32:51:17.1   6278 3963   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-07_CI_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_232244_TTUQ1b1x1_278956_7q9DkiqK/fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-08-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0075.fits **** FOUND 15:51:24.14 -32:51:17.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 01796_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-08-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0075 The candidate 01796_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-08-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0075 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 3   2026 06 08.17266    2461199.67266    10.77    15:24:14.14 -38:44:36.6   3189 0203   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-07_CI_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_232244_TTUQ1b1x1_278956_7q9DkiqK/fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-08-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0075.fits **** FOUND 15:24:14.15 -38:44:36.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52231_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-08-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0075 The candidate 52231_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-08-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0075 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 3   2026 06 08.17266    2461199.67266    9.97    16:04:59.51 -30:08:49.9   8015 5635   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-07_CI_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_232244_TTUQ1b1x1_278956_7q9DkiqK/fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-08-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0075.fits **** FOUND 16:04:59.52 -30:08:50.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_local.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 35279_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-08-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0075 The candidate 35279_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-08-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0075 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 3   2026 06 08.17266    2461199.67266    10.39    15:36:35.33 -33:50:23.7   4446 3278   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-07_CI_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_232244_TTUQ1b1x1_278956_7q9DkiqK/fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-08-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0075.fits **** FOUND 15:36:35.32 -33:50:23.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 26709_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-08-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0075 The candidate 26709_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-08-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0075 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 3   2026 06 08.17266    2461199.67266    10.63    15:40:11.44 -35:15:22.6   4944 2457   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-07_CI_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_232244_TTUQ1b1x1_278956_7q9DkiqK/fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-08-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0075.fits **** FOUND 15:40:11.42 -35:15:22.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 81396_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-08-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0075 The candidate 81396_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-08-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0075 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 3   2026 06 08.17266    2461199.67266    11.81    15:55:38.19 -29:15:41.6   6773 6153   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-07_CI_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_232244_TTUQ1b1x1_278956_7q9DkiqK/fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-08-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0075.fits **** FOUND 15:55:38.18 -29:15:41.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 25975_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-08-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0075 The candidate 25975_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-08-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0075 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 3   2026 06 08.17266    2461199.67266    11.25    15:13:13.36 -34:51:36.8   1601 2385   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-07_CI_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_232244_TTUQ1b1x1_278956_7q9DkiqK/fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-08-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0075.fits **** FOUND 15:13:13.34 -34:51:36.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 81338_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-08-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0075 The candidate 81338_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-08-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0075 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 3   2026 06 08.17266    2461199.67266    11.70    15:01:10.23 -36:01:00.7   0206 1476   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-07_CI_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_232244_TTUQ1b1x1_278956_7q9DkiqK/fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-08-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0075.fits **** FOUND 15:01:10.22 -36:01:00.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 81335_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-08-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0075 The candidate 81335_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-08-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0075 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 3   2026 06 08.17266    2461199.67266    11.21    15:26:26.70 -38:06:08.3   3414 0617   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-07_CI_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_232244_TTUQ1b1x1_278956_7q9DkiqK/fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-08-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0075.fits **** FOUND 15:26:26.68 -38:06:08.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 08809_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-08-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0075 The candidate 08809_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-08-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0075 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 06 08.17266    2461199.67266    12.29    15:19:15.38 -37:38:07.2   2530 0807   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-07_CI_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_232244_TTUQ1b1x1_278956_7q9DkiqK/fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-08-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0075.fits **** FOUND 15:19:15.38 -37:38:07.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 19295_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-08-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0075 The candidate 19295_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-08-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0075 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 06 08.17266    2461199.67266    10.91    15:25:47.67 -36:13:54.3   3233 1735   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-07_CI_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_232244_TTUQ1b1x1_278956_7q9DkiqK/fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-08-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0075.fits **** FOUND 15:25:47.71 -36:13:53.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 80886_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-08-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0075 The candidate 80886_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-08-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0075 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 3   2026 06 08.17266    2461199.67266    10.98    15:38:51.08 -35:44:12.5   4798 2159   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-07_CI_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_232244_TTUQ1b1x1_278956_7q9DkiqK/fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-08-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0075.fits **** FOUND 15:38:51.06 -35:44:12.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 21823_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-08-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0075 The candidate 21823_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-08-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0075 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 3   2026 06 08.17266    2461199.67266    11.85    15:35:40.48 -36:01:39.2   4422 1958   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-07_CI_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_232244_TTUQ1b1x1_278956_7q9DkiqK/fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_23-08-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0075.fits **** FOUND 15:35:40.46 -36:01:39.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 11s Prepared the HTML report for the field Lup-01-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL *------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------* #### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt #### 16:04:59.52 -30:08:50.0 16:08:05.58 -30:30:15.1 ########### Completed Lup-01-Q1b1x1 ########### The analysis was running at tau We are allowed to update the exclusion list at tau host Found ../exclusion_list_TTUQ1.txt #### The exclusion list before filtering-out asteroids, bad pixels and adding Gaia sources #### 16:04:59.52 -30:08:50.0 16:08:05.58 -30:30:15.1 ################################################################################### 16:04:59.52 -30:08:50.0 -- asteroid (will NOT add it to exclusion list) 16:08:05.58 -30:30:15.1 -- asteroid (will NOT add it to exclusion list) renamed 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt_noasteroids' -> 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt' renamed 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt_nohotpixels' -> 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt' # Count candidates with no identification (that also don't look like hot pix) Found 0 unidentified candidates (excluding asteroids, hot pixels and known variable stars). ################################################################################### 0 candidates found (excluding asteroids and hot pixels) This does not look like a test run ################################################################################### Adding identified Gaia sources from exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt exclusion_list_apass.txt NOT FOUND IS_THIS_TEST_RUN= NO ALLOW_EXCLUSION_LIST_UPDATE= YES #### Adding the following to the exclusion list #### 15:54:21.21 -36:56:07.5 15:58:09.78 -31:53:52.1 15:43:32.67 -38:13:04.0 #################################################### The observatory MPC code is V36 ############################################################ Positions of planets computed with util/planet_finder/main.py for JD(UT)2461199.67215774 -observatory V36 06:43:37.02 +25:00:18.0 Mercury (0.1mag) 07:42:45.23 +23:23:00.1 Venus (-4.0mag) 02:49:33.09 +15:42:34.5 Mars (1.3mag) 07:48:25.26 +21:31:29.7 Jupiter (-1.9mag) 00:49:22.11 +02:48:39.1 Saturn (0.9mag) 04:00:12.13 +20:25:27.0 Uranus (5.8mag) 00:16:08.47 +00:16:47.9 Neptune (7.8mag) 20:33:21.47 -23:04:32.4 Pluto (14.5mag) 23:02:14.96 -05:46:10.7 Moon (-10.4mag) -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 362 Jun 7 23:25 planets.txt ############################################################ Positions of selected moons from JPL HORIZONS for JD(UT)2461199.67215774: 07:48:25.86 +21:31:30.0 Io (6.0mag) 07:48:25.23 +21:31:31.9 Europa (6.2mag) 07:48:09.36 +21:32:17.0 Ganymede (5.6mag) 07:48:44.02 +21:30:29.1 Callisto (6.7mag) 07:48:42.69 +21:07:47.2 Himalia (15.6mag) 07:48:29.85 +21:31:15.5 Thebe (16.5mag) 07:48:42.16 +21:23:14.3 Elara (17.5mag) 07:50:35.89 +21:43:12.2 Pasiphae (17.7mag) 07:55:00.40 +21:33:12.0 Carme (18.9mag) 00:49:12.65 +02:48:38.0 Titan (8.7mag) 00:49:19.10 +02:48:52.3 Rhea (9.9mag) 00:49:54.39 +02:50:48.3 Iapetus (11.3mag) 00:49:18.02 +02:48:16.1 Hyperion (14.7mag) 00:50:04.40 +02:50:35.8 Phoebe (16.7mag) -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 568 Jun 7 23:25 moons.txt ############################################################ Positions of selected spacecraft from JPL HORIZONS for JD(UT)2461199.67215774: 17:26:43.88 -35:14:50.1 JWST 14:30:34.23 +57:30:00.0 Chandra 18:35:30.47 -23:56:33.7 XMM-Newton -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 96 Jun 7 23:25 spacecraft.txt ############################################################ Positions of bright comets computed with util/comet_finder/main.py for JD(UT)2461199.67215774 -observatory V36 18:43:31.59 -32:39:08.6 13.6mag P/2010 H2 (Vales) 05:53:26.93 -68:03:51.4 17.4mag C/2014 UN271 (Bernardinelli-Bernstein) 05:49:03.06 +31:58:03.9 17.5mag C/2017 K2 (PANSTARRS) 17:14:44.49 +15:21:03.0 17.8mag C/2021 G2 (ATLAS) 21:12:04.63 -49:29:57.9 16.9mag P/2021 N1 (ZTF) 23:12:38.32 +31:35:28.3 17.2mag C/2022 E2 (ATLAS) 05:34:00.89 +26:58:31.4 16.5mag C/2022 N2 (PANSTARRS) 09:29:42.70 +31:05:00.4 16.6mag C/2022 QE78 (ATLAS) 08:50:32.04 +03:55:51.2 17.7mag C/2022 R6 (PANSTARRS) 18:28:14.22 +21:36:07.0 17.8mag C/2023 A3 (Tsuchinshan-ATLAS) 15:19:22.88 -11:00:31.0 17.6mag P/2023 B1 (PANSTARRS) 22:14:26.38 +66:31:38.0 17.7mag C/2023 H5 (Lemmon) 17:46:26.58 -06:41:13.4 13.7mag C/2023 R1 (PANSTARRS) 13:18:06.50 +82:59:54.5 17.9mag C/2023 X2 (Lemmon) 07:10:22.99 +64:18:30.1 17.7mag C/2024 A1 (ATLAS) 06:47:14.22 +27:49:56.4 13.6mag C/2024 E1 (Wierzchos) 15:37:18.40 +13:31:28.1 17.4mag C/2024 G6 (ATLAS) 20:13:03.66 +31:07:43.4 14.0mag C/2024 J3 (ATLAS) 04:18:00.20 -15:57:10.8 16.0mag C/2024 T5 (ATLAS) 06:05:53.42 +34:29:43.6 17.9mag C/2025 J1 (Borisov) 11:34:54.98 +52:45:01.6 17.4mag C/2025 L1 (ATLAS) 06:44:54.91 -10:52:07.6 14.1mag C/2025 R3 (PANSTARRS) 09:24:08.60 +23:20:25.2 17.9mag C/2025 V2 (Rankin) 12:39:42.12 +04:41:28.1 17.2mag C/2025 Y1 (ATLAS) 18:12:55.38 +75:07:39.1 17.9mag C/2026 A2 (Bok) 02:00:37.56 +43:24:49.3 16.1mag C/2026 B2 (Sun-Gao) 11:11:18.46 -03:44:28.4 16.5mag A/2026 E1 20:23:36.60 -08:34:04.5 8.7mag 10P/Tempel 11:02:00.00 -00:58:03.6 16.0mag 29P/Schwassmann-Wachmann 03:11:41.15 +25:38:33.7 17.7mag 47P/Ashbrook-Jackson 08:59:55.92 +23:46:32.1 16.9mag 63P/Wild 00:26:54.46 -06:22:08.1 15.7mag 65P/Gunn 06:43:22.02 +33:25:40.1 16.9mag 76P/West-Kohoutek-Ikemura 03:09:07.59 +17:12:49.7 13.8mag 78P/Gehrels 01:20:42.59 +04:50:40.1 15.6mag 88P/Howell 04:54:34.06 +30:18:05.0 15.2mag 93P/Lovas 02:42:53.19 +27:37:21.0 17.6mag 114P/Wiseman-Skiff 06:50:29.62 +33:02:20.6 15.6mag 123P/West-Hartley 09:50:08.39 +14:38:49.7 16.5mag 124P/Mrkos 03:58:59.88 +19:14:56.3 16.4mag 128P/Shoemaker-Holt 04:33:31.11 +19:05:00.6 17.7mag 131P/Mueller 05:58:12.86 +18:40:04.8 14.6mag 141P/Machholz 06:00:51.04 +17:40:26.9 14.6mag 141P-A/Machholz 04:53:58.59 +16:10:14.3 11.6mag 141P-D/Machholz 02:57:39.72 -24:42:09.7 16.8mag 161P/Hartley-IRAS 03:41:28.36 +23:48:02.2 14.9mag 162P/SidingSpring 19:36:38.25 +01:43:21.6 16.9mag 169P/NEAT 00:18:16.51 +02:27:39.5 17.9mag 220P/McNaught 16:52:12.05 -08:28:36.8 16.4mag 235P/LINEAR 07:34:36.35 +35:29:34.4 17.5mag 240P/NEAT 00:32:17.47 -02:28:43.1 16.4mag 260P/McNaught 04:04:09.77 +32:28:37.0 17.6mag 295P/LINEAR 23:52:06.49 -09:44:20.8 17.6mag 320P/McNaught 15:15:14.92 +08:06:02.1 17.4mag 391P/Kowalski 08:07:07.13 +20:44:52.8 17.9mag 450P/LONEOS 06:59:56.14 +41:41:53.3 17.8mag 493P/LONEOS -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 2.7K Jun 7 23:25 comets.txt ############################################################ List of recent ASAS-SN transients from https://www.astronomy.ohio-state.edu/asassn/transients.html : 20:07:38.15 -21:07:05.40 SN2026mho 2026-05-25.18 -1.12 11:29:42.55 +79:01:03.10 AT2026min 2026-05-24.21 16.63 11:44:32.95 -68:48:30.00 ASASSN-26no 2026-05-24 8.41 19:00:42.82 -48:31:01.60 ASASSN-26dp 2026-05-22.31 -3.28 14:23:56.59 -58:37:47.40 ASASSN-26dn 2026-05-20.01 14.59 11:24:54.06 +47:57:01.60 AT2026nma 2026-05-20.29 15.46 21:27:08.58 +33:24:38.10 AT2026lli 2026-05-19.34 15.86 00:31:01.41 -13:38:51.70 AT2026nad 2026-05-19.39 15.34 15:16:06.61 -79:16:32.40 ASASSN-26dm 2026-05-19.03 14.44 11:24:25.21 -59:23:19.10 ASASSN-26dl 2026-05-18.02 13.55 13:45:51.52 -53:16:01.00 ASASSN-26dk 2026-05-18.16 12.96 02:05:49.69 -30:29:09.60 ASASSN-26dh 2026-05-18.43 15.37 17:50:22.87 -39:42:33.90 ASASSN-26dj 2026-05-17.05 15.7 01:13:11.60 -33:25:16.10 ASASSN-26dg 2026-05-13.41 16.8 16:44:31.77 -27:15:18.40 AT2026mhn 2026-05-12.33 15.8 09:46:31.08 -33:41:51.00 ASASSN-26di 2026-05-12.14 14.63 21:23:11.57 -19:09:45.00 AT2026kwu 2026-05-12.26 16.9 14:20:14.30 -30:20:51.90 AT2026ktm 2026-05-12.06 17.21 14:41:39.01 -37:13:46.40 AT2026lkm 2026-05-11.18 16.89 12:59:50.45 -10:58:38.80 SN2026kep 2026-05-9.06 17.5 13:37:29.61 -29:50:30.90 AT2026lkd 2026-05-9.09 17.23 09:46:42.01 -14:52:03.60 SN2026kmo 2026-05-8.99 17.51 15:03:05.28 +22:02:03.40 AT2026lxf 2026-05-8.07 13.88 10:23:49.41 -20:57:25.30 ASASSN-26df 2026-05-8.21 16.52 22:14:40.56 +05:04:51.60 2026lda 2026-05-7.56 16.2 21:35:33.81 -14:05:16.30 ASASSN-26de 2026-05-6.29 14.51 16:21:48.82 -61:36:13.20 ASASSN-26dd 2026-05-5.21 15.15 14:26:40.22 -24:48:37.50 AT2026lig 2026-05-4.27 14.63 13:17:51.04 +30:25:13.50 SN2026kcp 2026-05-4.46 16.43 11:27:55.57 -13:38:56.90 SN2026kza 2026-05-1.08 15.59 22:28:27.10 +30:17:54.30 SN 2026fov 2026-04-29.6 14.36 21:00:10.71 -32:17:03.90 AT2026kis 2026-04-27.36 16.15 14:32:57.37 -58:13:26.40 ASASSN-26dc 2026-04-27.27 13.42 15:32:05.35 -43:54:34.60 ASASSN-26db 2026-04-27.37 16.06 16:34:34.97 -54:34:58.00 ASASSN-26da 2026-04-25.32 16.11 10:06:55.04 -01:13:49.70 SN2026jsg 2026-04-24.99 16.28 15:15:57.17 +56:18:32.80 SN2026kid 2026-04-24.52 -3.65 07:58:28.45 +57:03:42.40 AT2026kcf 2026-04-24.2 16.89 11:38:21.80 -50:43:06.50 SN2026jkb 2026-04-24.24 15.38 10:06:11.41 -39:41:04.20 AT2026dil 2026-04-24.2 16.85 14:21:40.08 +13:13:46.30 SN2026jlm 2026-04-22.16 15.12 10:53:55.52 -16:06:06.00 ASASSN-26cz 2026-04-22.28 16.29 20:07:38.15 -21:07:05.40 2026-05-25.18 -1.12 13:45:02.03 +15:17:14.50 ASASSN-26cy 2026-04-21.27 15.78 13:20:52.22 -35:57:03.60 AT2026jcm 2026-04-19.01 16.65 13:36:15.66 -36:53:48.40 SN 2026iqy 2026-04-18.92 17.31 06:34:01.33 -40:07:34.00 ASASSN-26cx 2026-04-19.07 16.16 23:33:57.97 -45:12:11.90 SN 2026idu 2026-04-19.41 15.9 12:10:50.92 +66:55:31.20 SN 2026icv 2026-04-17.14 16.03 21:36:59.06 -60:43:35.90 ASASSN-26cv 2026-04-17.35 -1.18 08:13:26.26 -27:07:30.50 ASASSN-26cw 2026-04-17.07 -1.01 14:49:14.13 -27:29:20.60 ASASSN-26cu 2026-04-16.06 14.03 17:21:59.44 -38:54:04.60 ASASSN-26ct 2026-04-14.4 15.15 15:25:54.99 +07:49:24.50 SN2026huo 2026-04-12.14 16.96 20:07:38.15 -21:07:05.40 2026-05-25.18 -1.12 12:23:20.40 +04:53:39.10 AT2026ixd 2026-04-12.14 17.65 17:46:09.76 -61:19:50.40 SN2026icy 2026-04-12.2 17.03 09:25:46.42 +02:13:46.30 SN2026gud 2026-04-11.98 16.49 16:52:15.46 -60:27:45.90 ASASSN-26cs 2026-04-12.4 15.5 04:20:55.37 -51:15:31.10 ASASSN-26cr 2026-04-12.01 15.37 22:25:39.35 +36:45:06.90 AT2026ihl 2026-04-10.48 14.21 19:40:44.94 +00:41:03.80 AT2026imw 2026-04-10.32 16.06 19:52:04.70 +05:53:33.50 ASASSN-26cq 2026-04-9.31 14.98 16:08:18.39 -64:11:08.80 ASASSN-26cp 2026-04-9.29 13.32 09:22:22.90 -61:02:43.70 SN2026idh 2026-04-7.97 16.34 05:06:54.12 -19:42:26.40 AT2026imr 2026-04-8 17.49 07:14:55.34 -36:03:21.40 AT2026hei 2026-04-8.12 16.7 21:35:33.14 -19:01:34.80 AT2026ihm 2026-04-8.36 16.7 04:28:24.08 -32:25:35.30 AT2026imo 2026-04-8.02 16.81 05:10:35.79 -39:38:40.80 SN 2026hnn 2026-04-7.04 17.07 09:54:32.04 -01:17:25.80 ASASSN-26cn 2026-04-7.01 15.58 07:46:24.43 -77:29:35.90 ASASSN-26co 2026-04-7.15 14.93 05:00:45.52 -29:51:06.20 AT2026hvw 2026-04-6.03 16.51 19:49:33.10 -23:37:11.00 ASASSN-26cl 2026-04-5.29 14.98 19:32:43.55 -22:39:33.40 ASASSN-26cm 2026-04-4.3 13.88 18:08:57.38 +76:48:23.60 ASASSN-26ck 2026-04-2.37 15.38 16:16:36.10 +44:52:30.20 AT2026hyy 2026-04-2.58 13.81 21:55:23.31 -34:48:53.90 ASASSN-26cj 2026-03-30.4 -1.47 11:19:50.70 -27:51:49.80 SN2026gvk 2026-03-30 15.48 11:53:57.02 -23:09:46.20 SN2026gzx 2026-03-28.75 15.27 07:13:46.14 -33:10:15.70 ASASSN-26ci 2026-03-28.15 15.14 09:03:36.09 -67:58:13.00 SN2026hkg 2026-03-28.19 15.82 07:03:00.72 +39:14:43.00 SN2026fin 2026-03-28.27 15.82 05:35:42.80 -63:44:05.50 ASASSN-26ch 2026-03-27.86 13.02 11:23:19.04 +34:22:38.00 SN2026fwt 2026-03-27.3 16.56 19:03:49.79 +37:04:05.20 ASASSN-26ce 2026-03-26.56 16.3 20:26:56.07 -52:54:06.50 AT2026hiy 2026-03-26.35 16.95 05:25:54.76 -30:15:35.80 ASASSN-26cg 2026-03-25.07 16.88 06:57:16.49 -26:54:37.20 SN2026fzb 2026-03-25.14 15.8 14:37:38.23 -43:00:52.30 ASASSN-26cd 2026-03-24.24 12.52 17:34:53.03 +06:04:29.70 AT2026gzl 2026-03-23.27 15.82 08:30:02.60 -35:12:47.50 ASASSN-26cf 2026-03-23.2 14.82 16:54:25.33 +37:49:56.60 SN 2026evz 2026-03-21.32 17.54 17:06:19.20 -18:54:19.50 ASASSN-26bx 2026-03-21.25 16.39 19:01:16.28 -29:29:23.10 ASASSN-26bw 2026-03-21.33 15.81 08:46:05.75 +10:47:39.80 ASASSN-26ca 2026-03-21.13 14.27 12:14:58.16 +63:47:16.20 SN 2026fvx 2026-03-21.12 15.6 18:02:55.90 -75:23:02.60 ASASSN-26bz 2026-03-21.32 16.16 12:16:02.88 -53:16:33.80 ASASSN-26cc 2026-03-20.04 15.48 13:08:21.85 +29:13:44.20 SN 2026fmh 2026-03-20.16 -0.33 -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 5.6K Jun 7 23:25 asassn_transients_list.txt ############################################################ Truncated list of TOCP transients from http://www.cbat.eps.harvard.edu/unconf/tocp.html : 09:55:38.83 +69:05:21.7 PNV J09553883+6905217 2026-04-01.893 19.4mag 19:32:43.67 -22:39:30.7 TCP J19324367-2239307 2026-04-05.4395 13.6mag 16:16:36.03 +44:52:28.9 TCP J16163603+4452289 2026-04-05.6655 14.2mag 00:43:38.36 +41:15:32.4 PNV J00433836+4115324 2026-04-08.079 17.2mag 15:41:11.68 +59:18:26.8 TCP J15411168+5918268 2026-04-12.9625 19.2mag 00:43:35.02 +41:46:28.0 PNV J00433502+4146280 2026-04-23.056 15.9mag 00:42:55.64 +41:14:12.2 PNV J00425564+4114122 2026-04-24.042 16.2mag 21:14:03.38 +56:46:44.1 TCP J21140338+5646441 2026-05-05.3534 16.7mag 15:03:05.19 +22:02:04.1 TCP J15030519+2202041 2026-05-08.3260 13.9mag 07:15:18.25 +47:53:16.7 TCP J07151825+4753167 2026-05-09.1599 14.4mag 16:00:18.44 -22:30:10.6 TCP J16001844-2230106 2026-05-09.6135 13.3mag 00:42:47.45 +41:16:58.5 PNV J00424745+4116585 2026-05-10.030 16.8mag 09:55:02.89 +69:02:13.8 PNV J09550289+6902138 2026-05-18.925 20.7mag 00:43:01.82 +41:18:16.6 PNV J00430182+4118166 2026-05-21.8651 18.83Cmag 00:42:51.20 +41:16:59.4 PNV J00425120+4116594 2022-10-26.135 19.3mag 12:24:25.10 +28:47:12.0 TCP J12242510+2847120 2026-05-31.6015 14.8mag 00:56:07.13 +43:01:40.6 TCP J00560713+4301406 2026-06-01.4135 12.2mag 00:42:41.64 +41:15:16.2 PNV J00424164+4115162 2026-06-02.029 17.4mag 00:42:38.68 +41:15:58.2 PNV J00423868+4115582 2026-06-05.1224 19.97Umag 19:00:42.95 -48:31:01.7 PNV J19004295-4831017 2026-05-25.0752 14.2mag -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 189K Jun 7 23:25 tocp_transients_list.txt ############################################################ Truncated list of recent TNS transients from https://www.wis-tns.org/ : 16:39:35.110 +15:17:58.28 AT 2026nsc 2026-05-09.80 20.76 16:42:48.680 +20:27:18.30 AT 2026nsb 2026-05-09.80 20.54 13:34:03.440 +31:37:31.73 AT 2026nsa 2026-05-07.80 21.26 13:50:28.150 +02:34:54.72 AT 2026nrz 2026-05-22.72 21.54 13:43:59.750 +03:47:21.63 AT 2026nry 2026-05-22.69 22.05 13:17:26.150 -01:26:00.12 AT 2026nrx 2026-05-21.64 21.7 00:35:20.216 -08:28:38.64 AT 2026nrw 2026-05-19.42 18.74 23:50:43.016 -01:09:12.25 AT 2026nrv 2026-05-23.48 19.5028 22:36:47.715 +37:31:34.81 AT 2026nru 2026-05-22.43 19.4626 23:58:04.247 +20:56:44.66 AT 2026nrt 2026-05-23.48 20.1237 16:08:58.229 +36:53:23.76 AT 2026nrs 2026-05-21.36 20.3819 19:44:04.734 +84:44:44.91 SN 2026nrr 2026-05-25.47 17.808 21:42:24.388 -20:21:08.51 SN 2026nrq 2026-05-25.56 18.623 22:03:20.669 -84:55:27.45 AT 2026nrp 2026-05-22.30 19.244 23:07:53.376 -39:04:26.84 AT 2026nro 2026-05-22.38 19.567 00:40:07.848 -39:10:21.32 AT 2026nrn 2026-05-12.41 18.737 23:05:28.381 -21:25:50.28 AT 2026nrm 2026-05-25.58 18.887 19:27:28.750 -48:42:52.35 AT 2026nrl 2026-05-22.24 19.107 12:33:38.422 +12:02:05.88 AT 2026nrk 2026-05-25.29 21.322 12:32:27.199 +02:39:54.51 AT 2026nrj 2026-05-25.29 21.0728 -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 30K Jun 7 23:25 tns_transients_list.txt

Profiling:

CPU temperature: 80 C