This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-07_CI_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_231936_TTUQ2b1x1_4144839_bYooAfQz
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 08.1619 2461199.6619 11.05 18:12:24.65 -06:18:12.4
22.83007 5.73034 galactic Ser Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.8" and 0.9 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.51 Nemausa 4 -1 4 10.9 -0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits at 18:12:24.65 -06:18:12.4: 15.40 +/- 0.34 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits at 18:12:24.65 -06:18:12.4: 15.37 +/- 0.34 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.39 +/- 0.24
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 06 08.1619* 18 12 24.65 -06 18 12.4 11.1 U Ser 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461199.6619,11.05,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260608.1619 11.05CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 08.1619 2461199.6619 11.61 18:14:40.94 -07:58:16.1
21.62170 4.44578 galactic Ser Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.7" and 0.7 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.216 Kleopatra 2 -2 2 11.6 -0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits at 18:14:40.94 -07:58:16.1: 15.67 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits at 18:14:40.94 -07:58:16.1: 15.28 +/- 0.26 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.28 +/- 0.26
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 06 08.1619* 18 14 40.94 -07 58 16.1 11.6 U Ser 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461199.6619,11.61,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260608.1619 11.61CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461199.6619,13.66,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260608.1619 13.66CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 08.1619 2461199.6619 13.62 17:53:35.41 -13:42:26.6
14.06236 6.19318 galactic Ser Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.6" and 1.0 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.527 Euryanthe 3 -2 3 13.7 0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits at 17:53:35.41 -13:42:26.6: 15.38 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits at 17:53:35.41 -13:42:26.6: 15.39 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 06 08.1619* 17 53 35.41 -13 42 26.6 13.6 U Ser 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461199.6619,13.62,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260608.1619 13.62CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461176.83459459 16.05.2026 08:01:38.973 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits
First image: 2461176.83459459 16.05.2026 08:01:38.973 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits
Last image: 2461199.66214861 08.06.2026 03:53:19.640 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-07_CI_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_231936_TTUQ2b1x1_4144839_bYooAfQz/fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_22-53-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0077.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 2
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.93
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 3 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 6168
Objects passed selection criteria: 6156
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.0 3.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.0 3.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 4900.5
Average stars matched: 4771 (97.3574 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 113312 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Sun Jun 7 22:21:29 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-90-g333d5534
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-06-07)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Sun Jun 7 23:21:54 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461176.83459459 16.05.2026 08:01:38.973 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits
First image: 2461176.83459459 16.05.2026 08:01:38.973 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits
Last image: 2461199.66214861 08.06.2026 03:53:19.640 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-07_CI_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_231936_TTUQ2b1x1_4144839_bYooAfQz/fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_22-53-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0077.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 106
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.58
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 22 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 64075
Objects passed selection criteria: 63982
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.1 3.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.1 3.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 54000.2
Average stars matched: 51831.2 (95.9834 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 172928 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Sun Jun 7 22:21:29 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-90-g333d5534
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-06-07)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Sun Jun 7 23:24:19 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/TTUQ2_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 4 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-07_CI_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_231936_TTUQ2b1x1_4144839_bYooAfQz/fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_22-52-43_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0076.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-07_CI_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_231936_TTUQ2b1x1_4144839_bYooAfQz/fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_22-53-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0077.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-07_CI_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_231936_TTUQ2b1x1_4144839_bYooAfQz/fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_22-52-43_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0076.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-07_CI_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_231936_TTUQ2b1x1_4144839_bYooAfQz/fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_22-53-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0077.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461199.66173418
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits'
wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits'
wcs_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_22-52-43_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0076.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_22-52-43_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0076.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_22-52-43_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0076.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_22-52-43_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0076.fits'
wcs_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_22-53-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0077.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_22-53-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0077.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_22-53-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0077.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_22-53-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0077.fits'
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits
Image size: 937.4'x624.3' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 17:59:59.128 -09:59:33.92 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.87"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_22-52-43_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0076.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_22-52-43_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0076.fits
Image size: 938.4'x624.3' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.88"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 18:00:03.679 -10:00:19.29 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 17:59:59.128 -09:59:33.92
Second-epoch image center 18:00:03.679 -10:00:19.29
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0225 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_22-53-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0077.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_22-53-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0077.fits
Image size: 938.4'x624.3' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.88"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 18:00:03.945 -10:00:17.04 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 17:59:59.128 -09:59:33.92
Second-epoch image center 18:00:03.945 -10:00:17.04
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0231 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 18:00:03.679 -10:00:19.29
Second-epoch second image center 18:00:03.945 -10:00:17.04
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00126 deg.
###################################
ERROR: no shift applied between second-epoch images! The distance between image centers is 0.00126 deg. (min. required shift: 0.00164 deg.)
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits &> /tmp/tmp.q7ojg6mfhZ
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits &> /tmp/tmp.cDrvC6AseA
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-07_CI_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_231936_TTUQ2b1x1_4144839_bYooAfQz/fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_22-52-43_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0076.fits &> /tmp/tmp.CZB59DAVC2
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-07_CI_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_231936_TTUQ2b1x1_4144839_bYooAfQz/fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_22-52-43_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0076.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-07_CI_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_231936_TTUQ2b1x1_4144839_bYooAfQz/fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_22-53-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0077.fits &> /tmp/tmp.VkOJYCLmYp
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-07_CI_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_231936_TTUQ2b1x1_4144839_bYooAfQz/fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_22-53-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0077.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits and wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits.cat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits and wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits.cat
Found non-empty wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits and wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits.cat
The reference image (wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits) and catalog (wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits.cat) found
'wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits.cat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 10482 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 261.9712 to 278.0974 deg, Dec -15.2568 to -4.6948 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 261.9712 to 278.0974 deg, Dec -15.2568 to -4.6948 deg
Loaded 6275 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4878 out of 5154 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 5154 out of 10482 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.707650
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.707650
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.93
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.78
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.78
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 10482 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 261.9712 to 278.0974 deg, Dec -15.2568 to -4.6948 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 261.9712 to 278.0974 deg, Dec -15.2568 to -4.6948 deg
Loaded 6275 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4878 out of 5154 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 5154 out of 10482 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits (aperture=6.3)
Read 10473 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 261.9847 to 278.0962 deg, Dec -15.2534 to -4.6915 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 261.9847 to 278.0962 deg, Dec -15.2534 to -4.6915 deg
Loaded 6271 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4878 out of 5146 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 5146 out of 10473 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits (aperture=6.3)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 2 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 8000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.5 pix Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits
2.5 pix Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits
2.6 pix fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_22-52-43_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0076.fits
2.6 pix fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_22-53-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0077.fits
2.5 pix wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits
2.5 pix wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
14.8 mag. Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits
14.8 mag. Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits
14.0 mag. fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_22-52-43_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0076.fits
14.0 mag. fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_22-53-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0077.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.0 (SNR ) 11.2 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.q7ojg6mfhZ (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-07_CI_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_231936_TTUQ2b1x1_4144839_bYooAfQz/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits' -> 'wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=794, passed=10482
Got 10482 stars (including 9676 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 10482 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013019 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010416 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 917 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 915 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 877 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.57"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 915 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 9859 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.60"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 917 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 915 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 9858 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.61"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 915 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 9858 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.65"
Excluding outliers - 915 stars left (next iteration limit 1006)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits N_match=915 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.694 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.545 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.824 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.623 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.542 n_q1=231 n_q2=415 n_q3=133 n_q4=136 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.187
The image catalog is written to wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits -region wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.cDrvC6AseA (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-07_CI_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_231936_TTUQ2b1x1_4144839_bYooAfQz/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits' -> 'wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=789, passed=10473
Got 10473 stars (including 9672 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 10473 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013019 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010416 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 921 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 919 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 879 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.57"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 919 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 9900 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.60"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 921 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 919 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 9905 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.60"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 919 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 9906 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.64"
Excluding outliers - 919 stars left (next iteration limit 1010)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits N_match=919 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.680 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.593 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.898 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.664 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.504 n_q1=234 n_q2=412 n_q3=132 n_q4=141 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.320
The image catalog is written to wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits -region wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.CZB59DAVC2 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-07_CI_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_231936_TTUQ2b1x1_4144839_bYooAfQz/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-07_CI_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_231936_TTUQ2b1x1_4144839_bYooAfQz/fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_22-52-43_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0076.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-07_CI_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_231936_TTUQ2b1x1_4144839_bYooAfQz/fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_22-52-43_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0076.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-07_CI_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_231936_TTUQ2b1x1_4144839_bYooAfQz/fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_22-52-43_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0076.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-07_CI_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_231936_TTUQ2b1x1_4144839_bYooAfQz/fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_22-52-43_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0076.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-07_CI_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_231936_TTUQ2b1x1_4144839_bYooAfQz/fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_22-52-43_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0076.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-07_CI_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_231936_TTUQ2b1x1_4144839_bYooAfQz/fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_22-52-43_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0076.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_22-52-43_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0076.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_22-52-43_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0076.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_22-52-43_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0076.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_22-52-43_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0076.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_22-52-43_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0076.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_22-52-43_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0076.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_22-52-43_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0076.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-07_CI_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_231936_TTUQ2b1x1_4144839_bYooAfQz/fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_22-52-43_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0076.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_22-52-43_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0076.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=260, passed=4644
Got 4644 stars (including 4381 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_22-52-43_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0076.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 4644 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 938.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 938.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013033 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010427 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 924 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 920 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 887 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.58"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 920 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4456 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.61"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 924 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 920 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4454 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.62"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 920 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4454 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.66"
Excluding outliers - 920 stars left (next iteration limit 1012)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_22-52-43_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0076.fits N_match=920 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.712 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.610 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.936 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.584 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.646 n_q1=275 n_q2=366 n_q3=155 n_q4=124 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.315
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_22-52-43_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0076.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_22-52-43_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0076.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-07_CI_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_231936_TTUQ2b1x1_4144839_bYooAfQz/fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_22-52-43_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0076.fits -region wcs_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_22-52-43_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0076.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_22-52-43_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0076.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.VkOJYCLmYp (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-07_CI_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_231936_TTUQ2b1x1_4144839_bYooAfQz/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-07_CI_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_231936_TTUQ2b1x1_4144839_bYooAfQz/fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_22-53-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0077.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-07_CI_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_231936_TTUQ2b1x1_4144839_bYooAfQz/fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_22-53-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0077.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-07_CI_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_231936_TTUQ2b1x1_4144839_bYooAfQz/fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_22-53-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0077.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-07_CI_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_231936_TTUQ2b1x1_4144839_bYooAfQz/fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_22-53-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0077.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-07_CI_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_231936_TTUQ2b1x1_4144839_bYooAfQz/fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_22-53-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0077.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-07_CI_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_231936_TTUQ2b1x1_4144839_bYooAfQz/fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_22-53-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0077.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_22-53-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0077.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_22-53-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0077.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_22-53-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0077.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_22-53-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0077.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_22-53-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0077.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_22-53-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0077.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_22-53-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0077.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-07_CI_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_231936_TTUQ2b1x1_4144839_bYooAfQz/fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_22-53-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0077.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_22-53-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0077.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=272, passed=4670
Got 4670 stars (including 4394 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_22-53-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0077.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 4670 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 938.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 938.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013033 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010427 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 924 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 921 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 884 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.56"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 921 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4467 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.58"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 923 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 921 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4466 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.58"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 921 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4466 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.63"
Excluding outliers - 921 stars left (next iteration limit 1013)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_22-53-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0077.fits N_match=921 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.636 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.598 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.905 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.481 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.513 n_q1=281 n_q2=360 n_q3=159 n_q4=121 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.422
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_22-53-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0077.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_22-53-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0077.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-07_CI_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_231936_TTUQ2b1x1_4144839_bYooAfQz/fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_22-53-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0077.fits -region wcs_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_22-53-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0077.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_22-53-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0077.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits sigma_overall=0.694 worst_q_ratio=1.187
ref2=Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits sigma_overall=0.680 worst_q_ratio=1.320
new1=fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_22-52-43_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0076.fits sigma_overall=0.712 worst_q_ratio=1.315
new2=fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_22-53-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0077.fits sigma_overall=0.636 worst_q_ratio=1.422
reference average sigma_overall=0.687 worst_q_ratio=1.2535
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: numpy/matplotlib unavailable (No module named 'matplotlib') -- falling back to the C plotter
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy: wrote wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209_astrometric_residuals.png (915 matched stars from wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: numpy/matplotlib unavailable (No module named 'matplotlib') -- falling back to the C plotter
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy: wrote wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0210_astrometric_residuals.png (919 matched stars from wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: numpy/matplotlib unavailable (No module named 'matplotlib') -- falling back to the C plotter
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy: PGPLOT /PNG device reported success but no file appeared at wcs_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_22-52-43_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0076_astrometric_residuals.png -- no plot produced
WARNING: no astrometric residual plot produced for wcs_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_22-52-43_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0076.fits -- both lib/plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py and lib/plot_astrometric_residuals_xy failed to create wcs_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_22-52-43_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0076_astrometric_residuals.png (see messages above)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: numpy/matplotlib unavailable (No module named 'matplotlib') -- falling back to the C plotter
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy: PGPLOT /PNG device reported success but no file appeared at wcs_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_22-53-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0077_astrometric_residuals.png -- no plot produced
WARNING: no astrometric residual plot produced for wcs_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_22-53-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0077.fits -- both lib/plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py and lib/plot_astrometric_residuals_xy failed to create wcs_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_22-53-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0077_astrometric_residuals.png (see messages above)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_22-52-43_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0076.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_22-52-43_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0076.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-07_CI_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_231936_TTUQ2b1x1_4144839_bYooAfQz/wcs_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_22-52-43_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0076.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_22-53-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0077.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_22-53-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0077.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-07_CI_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_231936_TTUQ2b1x1_4144839_bYooAfQz/wcs_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_22-53-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0077.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Oph-06-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits at 18:12:24.65 -06:18:12.4: 15.40 +/- 0.34 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits at 18:12:24.65 -06:18:12.4: 15.37 +/- 0.34 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.39 +/- 0.24
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 18:12:24.65 -06:18:12.4: ref_mag=15.39 +/- 0.24 new_mean_mag=11.0163 delta=4.37 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out20500.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 7s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 1s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20482_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_22-53-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0077
The candidate 20482_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_22-53-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0077 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:35:30.51 -05:55:26.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20500_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_22-53-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0077
Preparing report for the candidate 20500_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_22-53-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0077
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 8s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Oph-06-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
18:12:24.65 -06:18:12.4
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 4 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-07_CI_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_231936_TTUQ2b1x1_4144839_bYooAfQz/fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_22-52-43_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0076.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-07_CI_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_231936_TTUQ2b1x1_4144839_bYooAfQz/fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_22-53-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0077.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-07_CI_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_231936_TTUQ2b1x1_4144839_bYooAfQz/fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_22-52-43_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0076.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-07_CI_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_231936_TTUQ2b1x1_4144839_bYooAfQz/fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_22-53-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0077.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_22-52-43_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0076.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_22-53-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0077.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/exclusion_list.txt
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_22-52-43_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0076.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_22-53-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0077.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits
Image size: 937.4'x624.3' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 17:59:59.128 -09:59:33.92 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.87"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_22-52-43_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0076.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_22-52-43_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0076.fits
Image size: 938.4'x624.3' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.88"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 18:00:03.679 -10:00:19.29 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 17:59:59.128 -09:59:33.92
Second-epoch image center 18:00:03.679 -10:00:19.29
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0225 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_22-53-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0077.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_22-53-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0077.fits
Image size: 938.4'x624.3' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.88"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 18:00:03.945 -10:00:17.04 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 17:59:59.128 -09:59:33.92
Second-epoch image center 18:00:03.945 -10:00:17.04
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0231 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 18:00:03.679 -10:00:19.29
Second-epoch second image center 18:00:03.945 -10:00:17.04
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00126 deg.
###################################
ERROR: no shift applied between second-epoch images! The distance between image centers is 0.00126 deg. (min. required shift: 0.00164 deg.)
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits &> /tmp/tmp.Uy2bsgwYT6
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits &> /tmp/tmp.3HSoDwtSEH
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-07_CI_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_231936_TTUQ2b1x1_4144839_bYooAfQz/fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_22-52-43_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0076.fits &> /tmp/tmp.1WWek4ddAJ
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-07_CI_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_231936_TTUQ2b1x1_4144839_bYooAfQz/fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_22-52-43_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0076.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-07_CI_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_231936_TTUQ2b1x1_4144839_bYooAfQz/fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_22-53-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0077.fits &> /tmp/tmp.Bfg8sCYFV5
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-07_CI_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_231936_TTUQ2b1x1_4144839_bYooAfQz/fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_22-53-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0077.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits and wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits.cat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits and wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits.cat
Found non-empty wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits and wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits.cat
The reference image (wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits) and catalog (wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits.cat) found
'wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits.cat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 98551 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 261.9293 to 278.0974 deg, Dec -15.2608 to -4.6871 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 261.9293 to 278.0974 deg, Dec -15.2608 to -4.6871 deg
Loaded 6295 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4581 out of 5549 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 5549 out of 98551 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.509900
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.509900
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.58
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.93
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.93
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 98551 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 261.9293 to 278.0974 deg, Dec -15.2608 to -4.6871 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 261.9293 to 278.0974 deg, Dec -15.2608 to -4.6871 deg
Loaded 6295 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4581 out of 5549 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 5549 out of 98551 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits (aperture=4.5)
Read 98094 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 261.9349 to 278.1088 deg, Dec -15.2533 to -4.6750 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 261.9349 to 278.1088 deg, Dec -15.2533 to -4.6750 deg
Loaded 6299 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4565 out of 5541 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 5541 out of 98094 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits (aperture=4.5)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 63 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 8000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.2 pix Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits
2.2 pix Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits
2.3 pix fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_22-52-43_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0076.fits
2.3 pix fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_22-53-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0077.fits
2.2 pix wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits
2.2 pix wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
14.9 mag. Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits
14.9 mag. Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits
14.2 mag. fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_22-52-43_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0076.fits
14.2 mag. fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_22-53-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0077.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.2 (SNR ) 13.7 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.Uy2bsgwYT6 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-07_CI_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_231936_TTUQ2b1x1_4144839_bYooAfQz/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits' -> 'wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=11, blended=8119, passed=98540
Got 98540 stars (including 90269 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 98540 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013019 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010416 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 929 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 928 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 899 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.58"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 928 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 93677 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.55"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 929 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 928 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 93677 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.55"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 928 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 93677 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.59"
Excluding outliers - 928 stars left (next iteration limit 1020)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits N_match=928 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.653 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.518 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.808 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.555 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.572 n_q1=246 n_q2=390 n_q3=140 n_q4=152 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.237
The image catalog is written to wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits -region wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.3HSoDwtSEH (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-07_CI_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_231936_TTUQ2b1x1_4144839_bYooAfQz/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-07_CI_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_231936_TTUQ2b1x1_4144839_bYooAfQz/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh: line 136: echo: write error: Broken pipe
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits' -> 'wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=15, blended=8187, passed=98079
Got 98079 stars (including 89711 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 98079 stars from the SExtractor catalog
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-07_CI_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_231936_TTUQ2b1x1_4144839_bYooAfQz/util/fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh: line 144: echo: write error: Broken pipe
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-07_CI_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_231936_TTUQ2b1x1_4144839_bYooAfQz/util/fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh: line 144: echo: write error: Broken pipe
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013019 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010416 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 929 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 928 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 895 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.58"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 928 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 93464 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.54"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 929 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 928 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 93466 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.54"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 928 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 93468 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.57"
Excluding outliers - 928 stars left (next iteration limit 1020)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits N_match=928 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.654 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.544 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.823 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.629 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.564 n_q1=238 n_q2=390 n_q3=141 n_q4=159 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.257
The image catalog is written to wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits -region wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.1WWek4ddAJ (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-07_CI_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_231936_TTUQ2b1x1_4144839_bYooAfQz/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-07_CI_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_231936_TTUQ2b1x1_4144839_bYooAfQz/fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_22-52-43_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0076.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-07_CI_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_231936_TTUQ2b1x1_4144839_bYooAfQz/fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_22-52-43_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0076.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-07_CI_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_231936_TTUQ2b1x1_4144839_bYooAfQz/fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_22-52-43_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0076.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-07_CI_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_231936_TTUQ2b1x1_4144839_bYooAfQz/fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_22-52-43_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0076.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-07_CI_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_231936_TTUQ2b1x1_4144839_bYooAfQz/fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_22-52-43_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0076.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-07_CI_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_231936_TTUQ2b1x1_4144839_bYooAfQz/fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_22-52-43_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0076.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_22-52-43_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0076.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_22-52-43_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0076.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_22-52-43_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0076.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_22-52-43_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0076.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_22-52-43_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0076.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_22-52-43_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0076.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_22-52-43_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0076.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-07_CI_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_231936_TTUQ2b1x1_4144839_bYooAfQz/fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_22-52-43_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0076.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_22-52-43_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0076.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=5, blended=2192, passed=45834
Got 45834 stars (including 43569 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_22-52-43_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0076.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 45834 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 938.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 938.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013033 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010427 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 926 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 922 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 897 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.57"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 922 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 44200 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.53"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 926 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 922 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 44199 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.53"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 922 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 44199 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.57"
Excluding outliers - 922 stars left (next iteration limit 1014)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_22-52-43_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0076.fits N_match=922 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.648 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.585 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.861 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.576 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.594 n_q1=296 n_q2=328 n_q3=166 n_q4=132 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.330
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_22-52-43_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0076.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_22-52-43_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0076.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-07_CI_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_231936_TTUQ2b1x1_4144839_bYooAfQz/fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_22-52-43_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0076.fits -region wcs_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_22-52-43_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0076.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_22-52-43_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0076.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.Bfg8sCYFV5 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-07_CI_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_231936_TTUQ2b1x1_4144839_bYooAfQz/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-07_CI_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_231936_TTUQ2b1x1_4144839_bYooAfQz/fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_22-53-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0077.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-07_CI_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_231936_TTUQ2b1x1_4144839_bYooAfQz/fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_22-53-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0077.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-07_CI_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_231936_TTUQ2b1x1_4144839_bYooAfQz/fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_22-53-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0077.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-07_CI_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_231936_TTUQ2b1x1_4144839_bYooAfQz/fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_22-53-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0077.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-07_CI_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_231936_TTUQ2b1x1_4144839_bYooAfQz/fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_22-53-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0077.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-07_CI_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_231936_TTUQ2b1x1_4144839_bYooAfQz/fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_22-53-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0077.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_22-53-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0077.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_22-53-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0077.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_22-53-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0077.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_22-53-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0077.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_22-53-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0077.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_22-53-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0077.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_22-53-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0077.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-07_CI_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_231936_TTUQ2b1x1_4144839_bYooAfQz/fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_22-53-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0077.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_22-53-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0077.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=1, blended=2243, passed=46279
Got 46279 stars (including 43962 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_22-53-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0077.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 46279 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 938.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 938.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013033 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010427 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 926 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 923 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 891 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.55"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 923 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 44412 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.52"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 926 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 923 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 44416 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.52"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 923 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 44416 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.54"
Excluding outliers - 923 stars left (next iteration limit 1015)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_22-53-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0077.fits N_match=923 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.614 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.605 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.805 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.486 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.538 n_q1=303 n_q2=326 n_q3=167 n_q4=127 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.311
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_22-53-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0077.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_22-53-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0077.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-07_CI_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_231936_TTUQ2b1x1_4144839_bYooAfQz/fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_22-53-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0077.fits -region wcs_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_22-53-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0077.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_22-53-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0077.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_22-52-43_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0076.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-07_CI_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_231936_TTUQ2b1x1_4144839_bYooAfQz/wcs_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_22-52-43_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0076.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_22-53-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0077.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-07_CI_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_231936_TTUQ2b1x1_4144839_bYooAfQz/wcs_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_22-53-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0077.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Oph-06-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits at 17:45:42.30 -13:25:19.3: 14.13 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits at 17:50:04.63 -12:30:21.7: 14.04 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits at 18:14:40.94 -07:58:16.1: 15.67 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits at 17:46:43.85 -13:38:50.7: 12.78 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits at 17:48:44.24 -12:49:15.0: 13.32 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits at 17:47:43.44 -12:57:17.7: 12.00 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits at 17:46:43.85 -13:38:50.7: 12.86 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits at 17:48:44.24 -12:49:15.0: 13.27 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.82 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits at 17:45:42.30 -13:25:19.3: 14.32 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:46:43.85 -13:38:50.7: ref_mag=12.82 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.0508 delta=-0.23 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits at 18:14:40.94 -07:58:16.1: 15.28 +/- 0.26 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.29 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits at 17:50:04.63 -12:30:21.7: 13.93 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.21 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:48:44.24 -12:49:15.0: ref_mag=13.29 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.2712 delta=0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:45:42.30 -13:25:19.3: ref_mag=14.21 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=13.7831 delta=0.43 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.28 +/- 0.26
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.98 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 18:14:40.94 -07:58:16.1: ref_mag=15.28 +/- 0.26 new_mean_mag=11.5888 delta=3.69 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:50:04.63 -12:30:21.7: ref_mag=13.98 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=13.8780 delta=0.10 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits at 17:47:43.44 -12:57:17.7: 11.98 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.99 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:47:43.44 -12:57:17.7: ref_mag=11.99 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.9614 delta=0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits at 17:33:30.23 -11:48:33.6: 13.34 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits at 17:51:41.06 -06:50:46.2: 13.56 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits at 18:04:59.31 -11:30:16.1: 13.44 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits at 17:33:30.23 -11:48:33.6: 13.34 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.34 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:33:30.23 -11:48:33.6: ref_mag=13.34 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.4445 delta=-0.10 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits at 17:56:32.28 -06:32:36.0: 13.54 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits at 17:51:41.06 -06:50:46.2: 13.52 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits at 18:04:59.31 -11:30:16.1: 13.33 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.54 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.38 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:51:41.06 -06:50:46.2: ref_mag=13.54 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=13.5206 delta=0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 18:04:59.31 -11:30:16.1: ref_mag=13.38 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.3451 delta=0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits at 17:59:25.00 -13:01:53.0: 13.45 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits at 17:53:35.41 -13:42:26.6: 15.38 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits at 17:32:11.46 -11:07:56.8: 13.89 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits at 17:56:32.28 -06:32:36.0: 13.51 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.52 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:56:32.28 -06:32:36.0: ref_mag=13.52 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=13.6335 delta=-0.11 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits at 17:53:35.41 -13:42:26.6: 15.39 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits at 17:59:25.00 -13:01:53.0: 13.46 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.46 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:59:25.00 -13:01:53.0: ref_mag=13.46 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.4732 delta=-0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits at 17:32:11.46 -11:07:56.8: 13.88 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.89 +/- 0.07
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:32:11.46 -11:07:56.8: ref_mag=13.89 +/- 0.07 new_mean_mag=13.8362 delta=0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits at 17:34:16.99 -10:32:37.4: 14.01 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits at 17:34:16.99 -10:32:37.4: 13.92 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits at 17:45:53.89 -10:39:30.0: 15.58 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.96 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:34:16.99 -10:32:37.4: ref_mag=13.96 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=13.9740 delta=-0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits at 17:45:53.89 -10:39:30.0: 15.60 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out117016.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out116651.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out116934.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 8s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 2s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 116555_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_22-53-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0077
The candidate 116555_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_22-53-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0077 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 116560_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_22-53-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0077
The candidate 116560_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_22-53-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0077 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 116567_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_22-53-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0077
The candidate 116567_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_22-53-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0077 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:37:09.34 -13:51:08.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 116568_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_22-53-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0077
The candidate 116568_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_22-53-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0077 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:06:42.42 -08:13:10.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 116576_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_22-53-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0077
The candidate 116576_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_22-53-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0077 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:46:27.25 -13:44:11.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 116581_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_22-53-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0077
The candidate 116581_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_22-53-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0077 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 116585_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_22-53-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0077
The candidate 116585_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_22-53-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0077 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 116592_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_22-53-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0077
The candidate 116592_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_22-53-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0077 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:32:53.10 -06:14:12.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 116606_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_22-53-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0077
The candidate 116606_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_22-53-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0077 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:35:30.49 -05:55:25.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 116651_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_22-53-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0077
Preparing report for the candidate 116651_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_22-53-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0077
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 116656_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_22-53-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0077
The candidate 116656_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_22-53-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0077 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 116670_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_22-53-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0077
The candidate 116670_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_22-53-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0077 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 116676_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_22-53-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0077
The candidate 116676_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_22-53-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0077 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 116693_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_22-53-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0077
The candidate 116693_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_22-53-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0077 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:38:01.47 -13:44:55.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 116710_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_22-53-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0077
The candidate 116710_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_22-53-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0077 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 116742_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_22-53-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0077
The candidate 116742_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_22-53-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0077 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:09:24.09 -07:22:16.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 116746_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_22-53-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0077
The candidate 116746_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_22-53-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0077 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:40:32.04 -14:12:25.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 116766_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_22-53-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0077
The candidate 116766_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_22-53-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0077 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 116777_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_22-53-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0077
The candidate 116777_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_22-53-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0077 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:50:06.15 -14:14:24.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 116779_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_22-53-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0077
The candidate 116779_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_22-53-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0077 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:32:54.57 -13:28:14.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 116780_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_22-53-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0077
The candidate 116780_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_22-53-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0077 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:42:15.77 -13:44:05.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 116781_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_22-53-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0077
The candidate 116781_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_22-53-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0077 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:52:29.03 -13:12:42.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 116784_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_22-53-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0077
The candidate 116784_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_22-53-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0077 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.3 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 116790_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_22-53-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0077
The candidate 116790_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_22-53-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0077 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 116791_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_22-53-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0077
The candidate 116791_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_22-53-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0077 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 116800_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_22-53-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0077
The candidate 116800_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_22-53-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0077 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:56:12.53 -07:23:07.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 116810_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_22-53-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0077
The candidate 116810_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_22-53-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0077 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:00:28.56 -07:57:26.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 116822_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_22-53-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0077
The candidate 116822_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_22-53-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0077 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 116831_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_22-53-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0077
The candidate 116831_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_22-53-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0077 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 116833_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_22-53-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0077
The candidate 116833_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_22-53-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0077 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 116855_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_22-53-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0077
The candidate 116855_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_22-53-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0077 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:54:48.85 -06:09:05.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 116858_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_22-53-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0077
The candidate 116858_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_22-53-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0077 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 116860_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_22-53-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0077
The candidate 116860_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_22-53-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0077 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:36:01.89 -14:05:38.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 116865_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_22-53-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0077
The candidate 116865_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_22-53-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0077 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 116875_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_22-53-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0077
The candidate 116875_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_22-53-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0077 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 116882_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_22-53-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0077
Preparing report for the candidate 116882_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_22-53-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0077
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 116895_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_22-53-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0077
The candidate 116895_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_22-53-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0077 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 116898_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_22-53-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0077
The candidate 116898_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_22-53-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0077 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:57:38.09 -11:31:20.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 116902_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_22-53-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0077
The candidate 116902_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_22-53-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0077 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.1 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 116915_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_22-53-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0077
The candidate 116915_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_22-53-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0077 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 116922_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_22-53-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0077
The candidate 116922_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_22-53-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0077 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.1 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 116928_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_22-53-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0077
The candidate 116928_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_22-53-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0077 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:54:01.78 -13:26:14.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 116930_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_22-53-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0077
The candidate 116930_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_22-53-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0077 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:42:12.11 -12:55:11.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 116932_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_22-53-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0077
The candidate 116932_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_22-53-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0077 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 116933_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_22-53-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0077
The candidate 116933_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_22-53-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0077 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 116934_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_22-53-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0077
Preparing report for the candidate 116934_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_22-53-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0077
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 116936_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_22-53-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0077
The candidate 116936_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_22-53-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0077 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:38:07.35 -06:03:58.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 116938_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_22-53-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0077
The candidate 116938_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_22-53-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0077 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 116946_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_22-53-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0077
The candidate 116946_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_22-53-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0077 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.1 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 116953_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_22-53-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0077
The candidate 116953_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_22-53-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0077 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:53:52.80 -08:42:22.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 116954_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_22-53-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0077
The candidate 116954_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_22-53-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0077 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.2 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 116961_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_22-53-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0077
The candidate 116961_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_22-53-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0077 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 116963_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_22-53-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0077
The candidate 116963_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_22-53-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0077 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 116973_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_22-53-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0077
The candidate 116973_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_22-53-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0077 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 116975_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_22-53-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0077
The candidate 116975_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_22-53-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0077 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.1 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 116980_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_22-53-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0077
The candidate 116980_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_22-53-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0077 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.1 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 116983_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_22-53-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0077
The candidate 116983_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_22-53-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0077 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.2 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 117016_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_22-53-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0077
The candidate 117016_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_22-53-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0077 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:45:53.89 -10:39:30.0 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.17, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.15)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.332 4163970007508122752 266.47469541536 -10.65867120021 14.8330 13.7132 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.332#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21982_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_22-53-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0077
The candidate 21982_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_22-53-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0077 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:52:49.30 -13:52:55.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 65523_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_22-53-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0077
The candidate 65523_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_22-53-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0077 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:05:05.45 -10:08:17.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88687_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_22-53-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0077
The candidate 88687_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_22-53-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0077 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:12:24.64 -06:18:12.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_local.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 84098_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_22-53-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0077
The candidate 84098_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_22-53-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0077 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:56:49.52 -06:33:50.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 65235_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_22-53-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0077
The candidate 65235_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_22-53-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0077 did not pass the final checks