This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-07_CI_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_222644_TTUQ1b1x1_4084025_xkrhKGj5
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 08.1366 2461199.6366 13.06 06:17:04.82 +62:35:14.6
151.92749 20.09554 galactic Cam Second-epoch detections are separated by 2.3" and 5.2 pix
The object was found in VSX 1" ASASSN-V J061704.97+623515.0
Type: EA
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
14.170 g Y 1.770 g 2459310.75200 4.037000000000
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0255.fits at 06:17:04.82 +62:35:14.6: 14.52 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits at 06:17:04.82 +62:35:14.6: 14.51 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.51 +/- 0.06
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ASASSN-V J061704.97+623515.0,2461199.6366,13.06,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ASASSN-V J061704.97+623515.0 20260608.1366 13.06CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 08.1366 2461199.6366 12.63 05:56:07.96 +60:07:26.7
153.28450 16.82450 galactic Cam Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.3" and 4.8 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
online_id | target | 05:56:07.96 +60:07:26.7 (user input) | T | P | (position from user input) SpType: G3 (LAMOST DR5) J-Ks=0.468+/-0.031 (K)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0255.fits at 05:56:07.96 +60:07:26.7: 13.56 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits at 05:56:07.96 +60:07:26.7: 13.52 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.54 +/- 0.03
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
target,2461199.6366,12.63,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
target 20260608.1366 12.63CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 08.1366 2461199.6366 12.71 06:50:30.48 +64:46:25.1
150.80361 24.26503 galactic Cam Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.5" and 5.0 pix
The object was found in VSX 0" V0460 Cam
Type: EW
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
13.200 R1 13.600 R1 2453746.67400 0.360433400000
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0255.fits at 06:50:30.48 +64:46:25.1: 13.62 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits at 06:50:30.48 +64:46:25.1: 13.72 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.67 +/- 0.03
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
V0460 Cam,2461199.6366,12.71,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
V0460 Cam 20260608.1366 12.71CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 08.1366 2461199.6366 13.36 06:41:51.82 +65:19:52.8
149.98035 23.50668 galactic Cam Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.4" and 5.0 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
online_id | target | 06:41:51.82 +65:19:52.8 (user input) | T | P | (position from user input) J-Ks=0.390+/-0.033 (G)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0255.fits at 06:41:51.82 +65:19:52.8: 14.39 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits at 06:41:51.82 +65:19:52.8: 14.36 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.37 +/- 0.05
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
target,2461199.6366,13.36,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
target 20260608.1366 13.36CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 08.1366 2461199.6366 12.64 05:55:19.31 +60:08:05.5
153.22887 16.73806 galactic Cam Second-epoch detections are separated by 2.0" and 4.4 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
online_id | target | 05:55:19.31 +60:08:05.5 (user input) | T | P | (position from user input) J-Ks=0.382+/-0.030 (G)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0255.fits at 05:55:19.31 +60:08:05.5: 13.53 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits at 05:55:19.31 +60:08:05.5: 13.63 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.58 +/- 0.03
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
target,2461199.6366,12.64,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
target 20260608.1366 12.64CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 08.1366 2461199.6366 13.05 06:44:23.43 +63:22:52.0
152.11312 23.29045 galactic Cam Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.5" and 4.9 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
online_id | target | 06:44:23.43 +63:22:52.0 (user input) | T | P | (position from user input)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0255.fits at 06:44:23.43 +63:22:52.0: 13.96 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits at 06:44:23.43 +63:22:52.0: 14.08 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.01 +/- 0.03
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
target,2461199.6366,13.05,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
target 20260608.1366 13.05CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 08.1366 2461199.6366 12.49 05:55:29.98 +58:23:10.0
154.87959 15.99629 galactic Cam Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.4" and 4.9 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
online_id | target | 05:55:29.98 +58:23:10.0 (user input) | T | P | (position from user input) J-Ks=0.662+/-0.027 (K)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0255.fits at 05:55:29.98 +58:23:10.0: 13.38 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits at 05:55:29.98 +58:23:10.0: 13.46 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.42 +/- 0.03
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
target,2461199.6366,12.49,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
target 20260608.1366 12.49CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 08.1366 2461199.6366 12.35 05:54:51.70 +58:15:55.9
154.95381 15.86799 galactic Cam Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.6" and 4.7 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
online_id | target | 05:54:51.70 +58:15:55.9 (user input) | T | P | (position from user input) J-Ks=0.815+/-0.028 (M)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0255.fits at 05:54:51.70 +58:15:55.9: 13.35 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits at 05:54:51.70 +58:15:55.9: 13.28 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.31 +/- 0.03
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
target,2461199.6366,12.35,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
target 20260608.1366 12.35CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 08.1366 2461199.6366 13.29 06:44:36.72 +65:56:52.8
149.39941 23.92821 galactic Cam Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.5" and 4.8 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
online_id | target | 06:44:36.72 +65:56:52.8 (user input) | T | P | (position from user input) J-Ks=0.318+/-0.034 (F)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0255.fits at 06:44:36.72 +65:56:52.8: 14.21 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits at 06:44:36.72 +65:56:52.8: 14.41 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.30 +/- 0.05
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
target,2461199.6366,13.29,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
target 20260608.1366 13.29CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 08.1366 2461199.6366 12.68 05:55:48.69 +59:09:28.6
154.17515 16.37003 galactic Cam Second-epoch detections are separated by 3.2" and 4.3 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
online_id | target | 05:55:48.69 +59:09:28.6 (user input) | T | P | (position from user input) SpType: K1 (LAMOST DR5) J-Ks=0.730+/-0.030 (K)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0255.fits at 05:55:48.69 +59:09:28.6: 13.72 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits at 05:55:48.69 +59:09:28.6: 13.69 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.71 +/- 0.03
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
target,2461199.6366,12.68,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
target 20260608.1366 12.68CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 08.1366 2461199.6366 13.19 06:45:28.16 +63:41:00.9
151.82594 23.48139 galactic Cam Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.0" and 5.1 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
online_id | target | 06:45:28.16 +63:41:00.9 (user input) | T | P | (position from user input) J-Ks=0.421+/-0.033 (G)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0255.fits at 06:45:28.16 +63:41:00.9: 14.18 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits at 06:45:28.16 +63:41:00.9: 14.19 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.19 +/- 0.04
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
target,2461199.6366,13.19,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
target 20260608.1366 13.19CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 08.1366 2461199.6366 13.18 06:47:37.92 +64:31:04.1
151.00158 23.90785 galactic Cam Second-epoch detections are separated by 3.8" and 5.0 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
online_id | target | 06:47:37.92 +64:31:04.1 (user input) | T | P | (position from user input)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0255.fits at 06:47:37.92 +64:31:04.1: 14.40 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits at 06:47:37.92 +64:31:04.1: 14.30 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.34 +/- 0.05
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
target,2461199.6366,13.18,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
target 20260608.1366 13.18CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 08.1366 2461199.6366 12.61 05:54:27.82 +58:38:36.6
154.57723 15.98815 galactic Cam Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.6" and 4.9 pix
The object was found in VSX23" ZTF J055430.65+583831.6
Type: EW
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
17.920 r Y 0.655 r 2458556.67900 0.250146200000
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0255.fits at 05:54:27.82 +58:38:36.6: 13.70 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits at 05:54:27.82 +58:38:36.6: 13.73 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.72 +/- 0.04
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ZTF J055430.65+583831.6,2461199.6366,12.61,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ZTF J055430.65+583831.6 20260608.1366 12.61CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461082.77034590 11.02.2026 06:29:07.886 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0255.fits
First image: 2461082.77034590 11.02.2026 06:29:07.886 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0255.fits
Last image: 2461199.63681605 08.06.2026 03:16:50.907 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-07_CI_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_222644_TTUQ1b1x1_4084025_xkrhKGj5/fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_22-16-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 4
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.54
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 4 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 14084
Objects passed selection criteria: 13993
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.5 2.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.5 2.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 9254.5
Average stars matched: 9022.75 (97.4958 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 119112 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Sun Jun 7 22:21:29 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-90-g333d5534
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-06-07)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Sun Jun 7 22:29:02 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461082.77034590 11.02.2026 06:29:07.886 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0255.fits
First image: 2461082.77034590 11.02.2026 06:29:07.886 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0255.fits
Last image: 2461199.63681605 08.06.2026 03:16:50.907 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-07_CI_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_222644_TTUQ1b1x1_4084025_xkrhKGj5/fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_22-16-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 67
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.26
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 19 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 88302
Objects passed selection criteria: 88049
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.7 2.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.7 2.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 62714.5
Average stars matched: 60311.5 (96.1684 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 2033312 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Sun Jun 7 22:21:29 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-90-g333d5534
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-06-07)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Sun Jun 7 22:31:00 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 3.5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0255.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-07_CI_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_222644_TTUQ1b1x1_4084025_xkrhKGj5/fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_22-16-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0032.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-07_CI_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_222644_TTUQ1b1x1_4084025_xkrhKGj5/fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_22-16-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0255.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0255.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-07_CI_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_222644_TTUQ1b1x1_4084025_xkrhKGj5/fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_22-16-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0032.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-07_CI_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_222644_TTUQ1b1x1_4084025_xkrhKGj5/fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_22-16-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461199.63636361
Plate-solving the images
'tocp_transients_list.txt' -> '../tocp_transients_list.txt'
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
'asassn_transients_list.txt' -> '../asassn_transients_list.txt'
wcs_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0255.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0255.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0255.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0255.fits'
wcs_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits'
wcs_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_22-16-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0032.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_22-16-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0032.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_22-16-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0032.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_22-16-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0032.fits'
wcs_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_22-16-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_22-16-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_22-16-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_22-16-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033.fits'
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0255.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0255.fits
Image size: 941.6'x627.0' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 06:51:27.730 +61:59:54.29 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_22-16-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0032.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_22-16-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0032.fits
Image size: 941.8'x626.7' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 06:51:47.633 +61:59:19.76 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 06:51:27.730 +61:59:54.29
Second-epoch image center 06:51:47.633 +61:59:19.76
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0401 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_22-16-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_22-16-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033.fits
Image size: 941.8'x626.7' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 06:51:48.657 +61:59:48.99 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 06:51:27.730 +61:59:54.29
Second-epoch image center 06:51:48.657 +61:59:48.99
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0410 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 06:51:47.633 +61:59:19.76
Second-epoch second image center 06:51:48.657 +61:59:48.99
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00836 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0255.fits &> /tmp/tmp.E3RNx2j8Zh
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0255.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits &> /tmp/tmp.zs559QE463
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-07_CI_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_222644_TTUQ1b1x1_4084025_xkrhKGj5/fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_22-16-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0032.fits &> /tmp/tmp.yIFCIiv6OV
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-07_CI_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_222644_TTUQ1b1x1_4084025_xkrhKGj5/fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_22-16-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0032.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-07_CI_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_222644_TTUQ1b1x1_4084025_xkrhKGj5/fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_22-16-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033.fits &> /tmp/tmp.W3uRoG1JQp
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-07_CI_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_222644_TTUQ1b1x1_4084025_xkrhKGj5/fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_22-16-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0255.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0255.fits and wcs_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0255.fits.cat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0255.fits and wcs_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0255.fits.cat
Found non-empty wcs_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0255.fits and wcs_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0255.fits.cat
The reference image (wcs_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0255.fits) and catalog (wcs_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0255.fits.cat) found
'wcs_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0255.fits.cat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 14996 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 84.1384 to 122.8213 deg, Dec +55.3698 to +67.4016 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 84.1384 to 122.8213 deg, Dec 55.3698 to 67.4016 deg
Loaded 12993 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 7789 out of 8335 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 8335 out of 14996 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.880200
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.880200
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.54
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.34
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.34
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 14996 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 84.1384 to 122.8213 deg, Dec +55.3698 to +67.4016 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 84.1384 to 122.8213 deg, Dec 55.3698 to 67.4016 deg
Loaded 12993 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 7789 out of 8335 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 8335 out of 14996 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0255.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0255.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0255.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0255.fits (aperture=6.1)
Read 14938 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 84.1384 to 122.8216 deg, Dec +55.3699 to +67.4016 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 84.1384 to 122.8216 deg, Dec 55.3699 to 67.4016 deg
Loaded 12993 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 7742 out of 8307 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 8307 out of 14938 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits (aperture=6.1)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 1 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 8000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.2 pix Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0255.fits
2.2 pix Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits
2.2 pix fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_22-16-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0032.fits
2.2 pix fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_22-16-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033.fits
2.2 pix wcs_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0255.fits
2.2 pix wcs_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.3 mag. Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0255.fits
15.4 mag. Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits
13.2 mag. fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_22-16-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0032.fits
13.3 mag. fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_22-16-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 13.2 (SNR ) 10.7 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.E3RNx2j8Zh (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-07_CI_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_222644_TTUQ1b1x1_4084025_xkrhKGj5/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0255.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0255.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0255.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0255.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0255.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0255.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0255.fits' -> 'wcs_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0255.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0255.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0255.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0255.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0255.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0255.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0255.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0255.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0255.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0255.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0255.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=1166, passed=14996
Got 14996 stars (including 13804 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0255.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 14996 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 726 to 789 (Dec 55.4 to 67.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 972 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 971 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 952 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 971 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 14689 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 726 to 789 (Dec 55.4 to 67.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 971 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 971 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 14687 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 971 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 14687 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Excluding outliers - 971 stars left (next iteration limit 1068)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0255.fits N_match=971 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.388 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.511 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.397 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.351 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.321 n_q1=202 n_q2=259 n_q3=219 n_q4=291 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.319
The image catalog is written to wcs_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0255.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0255.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0255.fits -region wcs_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0255.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0255.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.zs559QE463 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-07_CI_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_222644_TTUQ1b1x1_4084025_xkrhKGj5/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits' -> 'wcs_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=1174, passed=14938
Got 14938 stars (including 13741 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 14938 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 726 to 789 (Dec 55.4 to 67.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 972 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 971 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 952 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 971 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 14592 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 726 to 789 (Dec 55.4 to 67.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 971 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 971 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 14590 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 971 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 14590 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Excluding outliers - 971 stars left (next iteration limit 1068)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits N_match=971 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.420 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.503 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.433 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.408 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.355 n_q1=200 n_q2=258 n_q3=216 n_q4=297 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.197
The image catalog is written to wcs_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits -region wcs_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.yIFCIiv6OV (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-07_CI_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_222644_TTUQ1b1x1_4084025_xkrhKGj5/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-07_CI_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_222644_TTUQ1b1x1_4084025_xkrhKGj5/fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_22-16-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0032.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-07_CI_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_222644_TTUQ1b1x1_4084025_xkrhKGj5/fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_22-16-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0032.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-07_CI_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_222644_TTUQ1b1x1_4084025_xkrhKGj5/fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_22-16-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0032.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-07_CI_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_222644_TTUQ1b1x1_4084025_xkrhKGj5/fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_22-16-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0032.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-07_CI_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_222644_TTUQ1b1x1_4084025_xkrhKGj5/fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_22-16-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0032.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-07_CI_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_222644_TTUQ1b1x1_4084025_xkrhKGj5/fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_22-16-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0032.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_22-16-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0032.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_22-16-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0032.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_22-16-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0032.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_22-16-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0032.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_22-16-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0032.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_22-16-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0032.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_22-16-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0032.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-07_CI_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_222644_TTUQ1b1x1_4084025_xkrhKGj5/fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_22-16-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0032.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_22-16-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0032.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=208, passed=3709
Got 3709 stars (including 3497 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_22-16-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0032.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 3709 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.8'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.8 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013081 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010464 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 728 to 788 (Dec 55.8 to 67.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 960 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 958 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 947 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 958 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3660 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 728 to 788 (Dec 55.8 to 67.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 960 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 957 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3659 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 957 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3659 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
Excluding outliers - 957 stars left (next iteration limit 1053)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_22-16-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0032.fits N_match=957 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.413 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.342 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.453 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.393 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.446 n_q1=262 n_q2=244 n_q3=192 n_q4=259 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.097
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_22-16-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0032.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_22-16-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0032.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-07_CI_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_222644_TTUQ1b1x1_4084025_xkrhKGj5/fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_22-16-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0032.fits -region wcs_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_22-16-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0032.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_22-16-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0032.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.W3uRoG1JQp (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-07_CI_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_222644_TTUQ1b1x1_4084025_xkrhKGj5/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-07_CI_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_222644_TTUQ1b1x1_4084025_xkrhKGj5/fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_22-16-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-07_CI_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_222644_TTUQ1b1x1_4084025_xkrhKGj5/fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_22-16-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-07_CI_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_222644_TTUQ1b1x1_4084025_xkrhKGj5/fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_22-16-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-07_CI_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_222644_TTUQ1b1x1_4084025_xkrhKGj5/fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_22-16-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-07_CI_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_222644_TTUQ1b1x1_4084025_xkrhKGj5/fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_22-16-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-07_CI_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_222644_TTUQ1b1x1_4084025_xkrhKGj5/fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_22-16-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_22-16-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_22-16-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_22-16-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_22-16-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_22-16-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_22-16-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_22-16-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-07_CI_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_222644_TTUQ1b1x1_4084025_xkrhKGj5/fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_22-16-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_22-16-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=205, passed=3591
Got 3591 stars (including 3383 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_22-16-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 3591 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.8'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.8 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013081 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010464 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 728 to 788 (Dec 55.6 to 67.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 960 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 958 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 954 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 958 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3538 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 728 to 788 (Dec 55.6 to 67.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 960 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 958 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3537 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 958 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3537 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Excluding outliers - 958 stars left (next iteration limit 1053)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_22-16-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033.fits N_match=958 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.376 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.328 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.430 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.321 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.429 n_q1=255 n_q2=262 n_q3=202 n_q4=239 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.144
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_22-16-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_22-16-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-07_CI_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_222644_TTUQ1b1x1_4084025_xkrhKGj5/fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_22-16-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033.fits -region wcs_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_22-16-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_22-16-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0255.fits sigma_overall=0.388 worst_q_ratio=1.319
ref2=Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits sigma_overall=0.420 worst_q_ratio=1.197
new1=fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_22-16-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0032.fits sigma_overall=0.413 worst_q_ratio=1.097
new2=fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_22-16-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033.fits sigma_overall=0.376 worst_q_ratio=1.144
reference average sigma_overall=0.404 worst_q_ratio=1.258
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: numpy/matplotlib unavailable (No module named 'matplotlib') -- falling back to the C plotter
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy: PGPLOT /PNG device reported success but no file appeared at wcs_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0255_astrometric_residuals.png -- no plot produced
WARNING: no astrometric residual plot produced for wcs_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0255.fits -- both lib/plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py and lib/plot_astrometric_residuals_xy failed to create wcs_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0255_astrometric_residuals.png (see messages above)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: numpy/matplotlib unavailable (No module named 'matplotlib') -- falling back to the C plotter
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy: PGPLOT /PNG device reported success but no file appeared at wcs_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0256_astrometric_residuals.png -- no plot produced
WARNING: no astrometric residual plot produced for wcs_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits -- both lib/plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py and lib/plot_astrometric_residuals_xy failed to create wcs_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0256_astrometric_residuals.png (see messages above)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: numpy/matplotlib unavailable (No module named 'matplotlib') -- falling back to the C plotter
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy: PGPLOT /PNG device reported success but no file appeared at wcs_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_22-16-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0032_astrometric_residuals.png -- no plot produced
WARNING: no astrometric residual plot produced for wcs_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_22-16-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0032.fits -- both lib/plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py and lib/plot_astrometric_residuals_xy failed to create wcs_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_22-16-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0032_astrometric_residuals.png (see messages above)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: numpy/matplotlib unavailable (No module named 'matplotlib') -- falling back to the C plotter
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy: PGPLOT /PNG device reported success but no file appeared at wcs_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_22-16-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033_astrometric_residuals.png -- no plot produced
WARNING: no astrometric residual plot produced for wcs_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_22-16-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033.fits -- both lib/plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py and lib/plot_astrometric_residuals_xy failed to create wcs_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_22-16-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033_astrometric_residuals.png (see messages above)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_22-16-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0032.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_22-16-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0032.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-07_CI_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_222644_TTUQ1b1x1_4084025_xkrhKGj5/wcs_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_22-16-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0032.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_22-16-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_22-16-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-07_CI_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_222644_TTUQ1b1x1_4084025_xkrhKGj5/wcs_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_22-16-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Cam-10-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 0s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 0s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20832_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_22-16-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033
The candidate 20832_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_22-16-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:36:04.12 +66:28:11.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_tycho2.txt ****
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 0s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Cam-10-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 3.5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0255.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-07_CI_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_222644_TTUQ1b1x1_4084025_xkrhKGj5/fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_22-16-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0032.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-07_CI_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_222644_TTUQ1b1x1_4084025_xkrhKGj5/fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_22-16-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0255.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0255.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-07_CI_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_222644_TTUQ1b1x1_4084025_xkrhKGj5/fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_22-16-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0032.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-07_CI_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_222644_TTUQ1b1x1_4084025_xkrhKGj5/fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_22-16-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0255.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_22-16-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0032.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_22-16-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/exclusion_list.txt
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0255.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_22-16-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0032.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_22-16-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0255.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0255.fits
Image size: 941.6'x627.0' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 06:51:27.730 +61:59:54.29 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_22-16-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0032.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_22-16-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0032.fits
Image size: 941.8'x626.7' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 06:51:47.633 +61:59:19.76 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 06:51:27.730 +61:59:54.29
Second-epoch image center 06:51:47.633 +61:59:19.76
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0401 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_22-16-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_22-16-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033.fits
Image size: 941.8'x626.7' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 06:51:48.657 +61:59:48.99 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 06:51:27.730 +61:59:54.29
Second-epoch image center 06:51:48.657 +61:59:48.99
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0410 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 06:51:47.633 +61:59:19.76
Second-epoch second image center 06:51:48.657 +61:59:48.99
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00836 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0255.fits &> /tmp/tmp.0zf5bNRDNT
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0255.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits &> /tmp/tmp.KGW1XGsdpZ
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-07_CI_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_222644_TTUQ1b1x1_4084025_xkrhKGj5/fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_22-16-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0032.fits &> /tmp/tmp.pcm8viETMw
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-07_CI_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_222644_TTUQ1b1x1_4084025_xkrhKGj5/fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_22-16-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0032.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-07_CI_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_222644_TTUQ1b1x1_4084025_xkrhKGj5/fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_22-16-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033.fits &> /tmp/tmp.ineOQ56g5A
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-07_CI_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_222644_TTUQ1b1x1_4084025_xkrhKGj5/fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_22-16-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0255.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0255.fits and wcs_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0255.fits.cat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0255.fits and wcs_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0255.fits.cat
Found non-empty wcs_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0255.fits and wcs_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0255.fits.cat
The reference image (wcs_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0255.fits) and catalog (wcs_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0255.fits.cat) found
'wcs_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0255.fits.cat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 95446 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 84.1384 to 122.8834 deg, Dec +55.3698 to +67.4161 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 84.1384 to 122.8834 deg, Dec 55.3698 to 67.4161 deg
Loaded 13021 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 6966 out of 8475 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 8475 out of 95446 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.757000
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.757000
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.26
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.50
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.50
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 95446 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 84.1384 to 122.8834 deg, Dec +55.3698 to +67.4161 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 84.1384 to 122.8834 deg, Dec 55.3698 to 67.4161 deg
Loaded 13021 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 6966 out of 8475 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 8475 out of 95446 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0255.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0255.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0255.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0255.fits (aperture=4.7)
Read 96840 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 84.1384 to 122.8832 deg, Dec +55.3696 to +67.4163 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 84.1384 to 122.8832 deg, Dec 55.3696 to 67.4163 deg
Loaded 13020 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 6924 out of 8478 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 8478 out of 96840 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits (aperture=4.7)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 51 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 8000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.0 pix Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0255.fits
2.0 pix Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits
2.0 pix fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_22-16-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0032.fits
2.0 pix fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_22-16-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033.fits
2.0 pix wcs_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0255.fits
2.0 pix wcs_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.5 mag. Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0255.fits
15.5 mag. Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits
13.6 mag. fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_22-16-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0032.fits
13.6 mag. fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_22-16-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 13.6 (SNR ) 13.2 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.0zf5bNRDNT (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-07_CI_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_222644_TTUQ1b1x1_4084025_xkrhKGj5/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0255.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0255.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0255.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0255.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0255.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0255.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0255.fits' -> 'wcs_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0255.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0255.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0255.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0255.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0255.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0255.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0255.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0255.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0255.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0255.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0255.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=32, blended=7057, passed=95414
Got 95414 stars (including 88202 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0255.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 95414 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 726 to 789 (Dec 55.4 to 67.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 972 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 971 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 953 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 971 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 93787 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 726 to 789 (Dec 55.4 to 67.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 971 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 971 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 93788 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 971 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 93788 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
Excluding outliers - 971 stars left (next iteration limit 1068)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0255.fits N_match=971 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.395 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.470 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.407 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.400 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.342 n_q1=206 n_q2=249 n_q3=225 n_q4=291 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.190
The image catalog is written to wcs_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0255.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0255.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0255.fits -region wcs_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0255.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0255.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.KGW1XGsdpZ (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-07_CI_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_222644_TTUQ1b1x1_4084025_xkrhKGj5/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits' -> 'wcs_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=29, blended=7337, passed=96811
Got 96811 stars (including 89301 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 96811 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 726 to 789 (Dec 55.4 to 67.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 971 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 970 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 950 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 970 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 95433 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 726 to 789 (Dec 55.4 to 67.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 970 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 970 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 95433 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 970 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 95433 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
Excluding outliers - 970 stars left (next iteration limit 1067)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits N_match=970 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.432 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.524 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.438 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.424 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.369 n_q1=208 n_q2=252 n_q3=224 n_q4=286 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.212
The image catalog is written to wcs_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits -region wcs_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.pcm8viETMw (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-07_CI_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_222644_TTUQ1b1x1_4084025_xkrhKGj5/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-07_CI_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_222644_TTUQ1b1x1_4084025_xkrhKGj5/fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_22-16-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0032.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-07_CI_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_222644_TTUQ1b1x1_4084025_xkrhKGj5/fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_22-16-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0032.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-07_CI_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_222644_TTUQ1b1x1_4084025_xkrhKGj5/fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_22-16-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0032.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-07_CI_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_222644_TTUQ1b1x1_4084025_xkrhKGj5/fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_22-16-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0032.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-07_CI_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_222644_TTUQ1b1x1_4084025_xkrhKGj5/fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_22-16-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0032.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-07_CI_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_222644_TTUQ1b1x1_4084025_xkrhKGj5/fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_22-16-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0032.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_22-16-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0032.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_22-16-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0032.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_22-16-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0032.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_22-16-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0032.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_22-16-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0032.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_22-16-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0032.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_22-16-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0032.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-07_CI_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_222644_TTUQ1b1x1_4084025_xkrhKGj5/fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_22-16-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0032.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_22-16-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0032.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=5, blended=872, passed=30681
Got 30681 stars (including 29750 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_22-16-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0032.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 30681 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.8'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.8 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013081 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010464 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 727 to 788 (Dec 55.6 to 67.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 964 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 963 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 953 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 963 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 30381 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 727 to 788 (Dec 55.6 to 67.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 964 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 962 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 30381 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 962 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 30381 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
Excluding outliers - 962 stars left (next iteration limit 1059)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_22-16-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0032.fits N_match=962 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.413 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.331 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.455 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.382 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.445 n_q1=266 n_q2=250 n_q3=194 n_q4=252 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.102
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_22-16-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0032.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_22-16-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0032.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-07_CI_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_222644_TTUQ1b1x1_4084025_xkrhKGj5/fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_22-16-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0032.fits -region wcs_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_22-16-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0032.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_22-16-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0032.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.ineOQ56g5A (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-07_CI_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_222644_TTUQ1b1x1_4084025_xkrhKGj5/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-07_CI_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_222644_TTUQ1b1x1_4084025_xkrhKGj5/fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_22-16-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-07_CI_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_222644_TTUQ1b1x1_4084025_xkrhKGj5/fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_22-16-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-07_CI_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_222644_TTUQ1b1x1_4084025_xkrhKGj5/fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_22-16-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-07_CI_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_222644_TTUQ1b1x1_4084025_xkrhKGj5/fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_22-16-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-07_CI_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_222644_TTUQ1b1x1_4084025_xkrhKGj5/fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_22-16-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-07_CI_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_222644_TTUQ1b1x1_4084025_xkrhKGj5/fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_22-16-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_22-16-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_22-16-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_22-16-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_22-16-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_22-16-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_22-16-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_22-16-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-07_CI_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_222644_TTUQ1b1x1_4084025_xkrhKGj5/fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_22-16-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_22-16-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=3, blended=926, passed=29608
Got 29608 stars (including 28633 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_22-16-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 29608 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.8'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.8 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013081 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010464 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 727 to 788 (Dec 55.6 to 67.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 962 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 960 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 955 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 960 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 29185 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 727 to 788 (Dec 55.6 to 67.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 961 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 959 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 29185 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 959 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 29185 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Excluding outliers - 959 stars left (next iteration limit 1056)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_22-16-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033.fits N_match=959 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.367 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.302 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.417 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.317 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.433 n_q1=267 n_q2=255 n_q3=205 n_q4=232 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.179
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_22-16-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_22-16-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-07_CI_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_222644_TTUQ1b1x1_4084025_xkrhKGj5/fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_22-16-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033.fits -region wcs_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_22-16-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_22-16-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_22-16-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0032.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-07_CI_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_222644_TTUQ1b1x1_4084025_xkrhKGj5/wcs_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_22-16-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0032.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_22-16-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-07_CI_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_222644_TTUQ1b1x1_4084025_xkrhKGj5/wcs_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_22-16-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Cam-10-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0255.fits at 06:56:44.41 +62:45:23.8: 13.18 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0255.fits at 07:38:01.32 +61:31:00.3: 12.49 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0255.fits at 05:55:30.54 +64:19:00.8: 12.46 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0255.fits at 06:21:08.81 +56:52:30.0: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits at 06:56:44.41 +62:45:23.8: 13.17 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.18 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:56:44.41 +62:45:23.8: ref_mag=13.18 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.1647 delta=0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0255.fits at 06:22:24.23 +62:07:20.9: 12.85 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits at 07:38:01.32 +61:31:00.3: 12.53 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.51 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:38:01.32 +61:31:00.3: ref_mag=12.51 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.4050 delta=0.11 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits at 05:55:30.54 +64:19:00.8: 12.47 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits at 06:21:08.81 +56:52:30.0: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:21:08.81 +56:52:30.0: at least one reference image reported edge (off-image or aperture/annulus past image boundary); cannot perform the forced-photometry cross-check
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.47 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:55:30.54 +64:19:00.8: ref_mag=12.47 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.6608 delta=-0.19 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0255.fits at 07:36:49.36 +65:34:48.6: 13.77 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits at 06:22:24.23 +62:07:20.9: 12.79 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.82 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:22:24.23 +62:07:20.9: ref_mag=12.82 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.6234 delta=0.19 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits at 07:36:49.36 +65:34:48.6: 13.64 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.69 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:36:49.36 +65:34:48.6: ref_mag=13.69 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=13.2847 delta=0.41 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0255.fits at 06:17:04.82 +62:35:14.6: 14.52 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0255.fits at 05:56:07.96 +60:07:26.7: 13.56 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0255.fits at 06:50:30.48 +64:46:25.1: 13.62 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0255.fits at 06:41:51.82 +65:19:52.8: 14.39 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0255.fits at 06:44:23.43 +63:22:52.0: 13.96 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0255.fits at 05:55:19.31 +60:08:05.5: 13.53 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits at 06:17:04.82 +62:35:14.6: 14.51 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.51 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 06:17:04.82 +62:35:14.6: ref_mag=14.51 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=13.0279 delta=1.49 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0255.fits at 05:55:29.98 +58:23:10.0: 13.38 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits at 05:56:07.96 +60:07:26.7: 13.52 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.54 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits at 06:50:30.48 +64:46:25.1: 13.72 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 05:56:07.96 +60:07:26.7: ref_mag=13.54 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=12.6066 delta=0.93 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.67 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits at 06:41:51.82 +65:19:52.8: 14.36 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 06:50:30.48 +64:46:25.1: ref_mag=13.67 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=12.6940 delta=0.97 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.37 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 06:41:51.82 +65:19:52.8: ref_mag=14.37 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=13.3354 delta=1.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0255.fits at 05:54:00.87 +57:57:11.7: 13.10 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits at 06:44:23.43 +63:22:52.0: 14.08 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.01 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 06:44:23.43 +63:22:52.0: ref_mag=14.01 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.0467 delta=0.97 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits at 05:55:19.31 +60:08:05.5: 13.63 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.58 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 05:55:19.31 +60:08:05.5: ref_mag=13.58 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=12.6282 delta=0.95 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0255.fits at 05:54:51.70 +58:15:55.9: 13.35 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0255.fits at 06:23:13.96 +59:21:00.2: 13.29 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits at 05:55:29.98 +58:23:10.0: 13.46 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.42 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 05:55:29.98 +58:23:10.0: ref_mag=13.42 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=12.4733 delta=0.94 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits at 05:54:00.87 +57:57:11.7: 13.13 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.12 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:54:00.87 +57:57:11.7: ref_mag=13.12 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.3152 delta=0.80 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits at 05:54:51.70 +58:15:55.9: 13.28 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.31 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 05:54:51.70 +58:15:55.9: ref_mag=13.31 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=12.3525 delta=0.96 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits at 06:23:13.96 +59:21:00.2: 13.30 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.30 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:23:13.96 +59:21:00.2: ref_mag=13.30 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.4097 delta=0.89 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0255.fits at 06:44:36.72 +65:56:52.8: 14.21 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0255.fits at 05:55:48.69 +59:09:28.6: 13.72 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits at 06:44:36.72 +65:56:52.8: 14.41 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.30 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 06:44:36.72 +65:56:52.8: ref_mag=14.30 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=13.2914 delta=1.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits at 05:55:48.69 +59:09:28.6: 13.69 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.71 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 05:55:48.69 +59:09:28.6: ref_mag=13.71 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=12.6545 delta=1.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0255.fits at 06:45:28.16 +63:41:00.9: 14.18 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0255.fits at 06:47:37.92 +64:31:04.1: 14.40 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits at 06:45:28.16 +63:41:00.9: 14.19 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.19 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 06:45:28.16 +63:41:00.9: ref_mag=14.19 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.1907 delta=0.99 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits at 06:47:37.92 +64:31:04.1: 14.30 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.34 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 06:47:37.92 +64:31:04.1: ref_mag=14.34 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=13.1545 delta=1.19 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0255.fits at 05:54:27.82 +58:38:36.6: 13.70 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits at 05:54:27.82 +58:38:36.6: 13.73 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.72 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 05:54:27.82 +58:38:36.6: ref_mag=13.72 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=12.5875 delta=1.13 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out11361.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out16651.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out20670.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out23379.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out30971.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out33705.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out41306.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out65569.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out66858.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out77159.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out80426.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out84868.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out92782.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 21s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 5s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 113888_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_22-16-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033
The candidate 113888_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_22-16-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 113892_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_22-16-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033
The candidate 113892_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_22-16-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:56:46.17 +62:12:11.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 113893_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_22-16-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033
The candidate 113893_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_22-16-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:54:33.20 +57:18:45.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 113894_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_22-16-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033
The candidate 113894_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_22-16-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:13:37.96 +65:15:42.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 113895_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_22-16-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033
The candidate 113895_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_22-16-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:36:04.12 +66:28:11.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_tycho2.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 114012_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_22-16-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033
The candidate 114012_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_22-16-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:47:39.96 +66:14:54.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 114050_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_22-16-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033
The candidate 114050_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_22-16-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:06:44.63 +62:19:40.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 114068_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_22-16-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033
The candidate 114068_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_22-16-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:53:13.55 +56:46:50.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 114085_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_22-16-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033
The candidate 114085_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_22-16-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:01:58.32 +63:38:38.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 114121_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_22-16-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033
The candidate 114121_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_22-16-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:46:36.55 +57:11:02.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 114135_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_22-16-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033
The candidate 114135_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_22-16-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:40:21.41 +61:54:41.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 114142_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_22-16-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033
The candidate 114142_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_22-16-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:50:31.00 +64:55:02.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 114155_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_22-16-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033
The candidate 114155_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_22-16-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 114156_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_22-16-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033
The candidate 114156_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_22-16-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:44:12.87 +56:55:55.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 114158_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_22-16-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033
The candidate 114158_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_22-16-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 114183_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_22-16-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033
The candidate 114183_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_22-16-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:44:13.06 +64:40:23.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 114206_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_22-16-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033
The candidate 114206_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_22-16-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 114225_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_22-16-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033
The candidate 114225_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_22-16-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:25:50.32 +58:25:42.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 114230_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_22-16-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033
The candidate 114230_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_22-16-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:38:26.61 +66:15:22.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 114234_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_22-16-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033
The candidate 114234_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_22-16-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:46:01.87 +66:52:47.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 114252_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_22-16-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033
The candidate 114252_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_22-16-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:37:56.15 +61:29:19.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 114264_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_22-16-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033
The candidate 114264_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_22-16-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:58:20.36 +65:16:21.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 114268_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_22-16-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033
The candidate 114268_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_22-16-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 114271_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_22-16-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033
The candidate 114271_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_22-16-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:53:20.40 +56:57:37.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 114278_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_22-16-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033
The candidate 114278_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_22-16-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:45:37.66 +65:09:19.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 114295_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_22-16-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033
The candidate 114295_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_22-16-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:39:22.95 +62:00:26.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 114311_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_22-16-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033
The candidate 114311_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_22-16-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:22:39.68 +66:02:47.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 114368_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_22-16-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033
The candidate 114368_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_22-16-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:06:22.67 +62:51:55.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 114390_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_22-16-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033
The candidate 114390_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_22-16-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 114398_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_22-16-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033
The candidate 114398_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_22-16-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:22:21.75 +59:52:32.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 114508_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_22-16-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033
The candidate 114508_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_22-16-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:23:25.48 +60:58:53.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 114539_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_22-16-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033
The candidate 114539_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_22-16-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:45:50.07 +64:43:39.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 114543_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_22-16-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033
The candidate 114543_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_22-16-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:39:28.99 +66:08:24.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 114546_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_22-16-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033
The candidate 114546_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_22-16-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:23:56.16 +65:42:35.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 41306_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_22-16-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033
Preparing report for the candidate 41306_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_22-16-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 66858_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_22-16-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033
Preparing report for the candidate 66858_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_22-16-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 109893_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_22-16-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033
The candidate 109893_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_22-16-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:48:25.13 +64:29:47.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20670_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_22-16-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033
Preparing report for the candidate 20670_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_22-16-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 19221_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_22-16-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033
The candidate 19221_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_22-16-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:48:19.81 +64:56:30.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 16651_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_22-16-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033
Preparing report for the candidate 16651_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_22-16-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 92782_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_22-16-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033
Preparing report for the candidate 92782_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_22-16-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33705_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_22-16-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033
Preparing report for the candidate 33705_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_22-16-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 65569_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_22-16-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033
Preparing report for the candidate 65569_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_22-16-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 74574_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_22-16-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033
The candidate 74574_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_22-16-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 77159_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_22-16-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033
Preparing report for the candidate 77159_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_22-16-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 84689_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_22-16-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033
The candidate 84689_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-07_22-16-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033 did not pass the final checks
