This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-07_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_050524_TTUQ2b1x1_310430_ui9g0P5d
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 07.3855 2461198.8855 12.96 17:01:23.33 -11:20:09.5
9.24667 18.26850 galactic Oph Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.5" and 7.8 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.412 Elisabetha 2 -2 2 12.8 0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits at 17:01:23.33 -11:20:09.5: 15.75 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits at 17:01:23.33 -11:20:09.5: 15.60 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461198.8855,12.96,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260607.3855 12.96CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 07.3855 2461198.8855 13.66 16:51:53.90 -11:36:14.2
7.62609 20.03916 galactic Oph Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.5" and 7.8 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.740 Cantabia 1 -1 1 13.4 -0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits at 16:51:53.90 -11:36:14.2: 15.69 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits at 16:51:53.90 -11:36:14.2: 15.50 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461198.8855,13.66,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260607.3855 13.66CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 07.3855 2461198.8855 14.38 17:17:01.01 -08:43:28.4
13.72799 16.44481 galactic Oph Second-epoch detections are separated by 3.7" and 8.3 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.1980 Tezcatlipoca 5 -1 5 14.4 -0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits at 17:17:01.01 -08:43:28.4: 15.88 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits at 17:17:01.01 -08:43:28.4: 15.64 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461198.8855,14.38,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260607.3855 14.38CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 07.3855 2461198.8855 13.17 17:03:23.22 -09:20:07.4
11.29447 18.95964 galactic Oph Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.9" and 7.7 pix
The object was found in VSX 0" ASASSN-V J170323.22-092007.9
Type: L
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
13.510 V 14.170 V
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits at 17:03:23.22 -09:20:07.4: 14.20 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits at 17:03:23.22 -09:20:07.4: 14.28 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.23 +/- 0.07
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ASASSN-V J170323.22-092007.9,2461198.8855,13.17,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ASASSN-V J170323.22-092007.9 20260607.3855 13.17CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461174.80897943 14.05.2026 07:24:45.823 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits
First image: 2461174.80897943 14.05.2026 07:24:45.823 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits
Last image: 2461198.88573297 07.06.2026 09:15:17.329 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-07_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_050524_TTUQ2b1x1_310430_ui9g0P5d/fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-15-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0091.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 10
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.85
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 7 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 5993
Objects passed selection criteria: 5978
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.0 3.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.0 3.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 4802
Average stars matched: 4384.75 (91.3109 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 111832 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Mon Jun 1 15:05:05 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-85-g6dfb2809
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-06-01)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Sun Jun 7 07:52:33 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461174.80897943 14.05.2026 07:24:45.823 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits
First image: 2461174.80897943 14.05.2026 07:24:45.823 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits
Last image: 2461198.88573297 07.06.2026 09:15:17.329 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-07_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_050524_TTUQ2b1x1_310430_ui9g0P5d/fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-15-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0091.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 99
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.46
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 46 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 60539
Objects passed selection criteria: 60424
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.0 3.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.0 3.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 49128.5
Average stars matched: 44063.2 (89.6898 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 157084 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Mon Jun 1 15:05:05 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-85-g6dfb2809
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-06-01)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Sun Jun 7 07:56:23 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/TTUQ2_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 4 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-07_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_050524_TTUQ2b1x1_310430_ui9g0P5d/fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-14-31_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0090.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-07_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_050524_TTUQ2b1x1_310430_ui9g0P5d/fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-15-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0091.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-07_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_050524_TTUQ2b1x1_310430_ui9g0P5d/fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-14-31_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0090.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-07_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_050524_TTUQ2b1x1_310430_ui9g0P5d/fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-15-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0091.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461198.88520796
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits'
wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits'
wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-14-31_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0090.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-14-31_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0090.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-14-31_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0090.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-14-31_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0090.fits'
wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-15-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0091.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-15-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0091.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-15-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0091.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-15-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0091.fits'
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits
Image size: 937.3'x624.3' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 17:08:38.023 -09:59:09.18 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.87"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-14-31_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0090.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-14-31_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0090.fits
Image size: 937.1'x624.1' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 17:08:34.701 -09:59:54.95 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 17:08:38.023 -09:59:09.18
Second-epoch image center 17:08:34.701 -09:59:54.95
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0186 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-15-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0091.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-15-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0091.fits
Image size: 937.1'x624.1' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 17:08:37.688 -09:59:41.27 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 17:08:38.023 -09:59:09.18
Second-epoch image center 17:08:37.688 -09:59:41.27
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0090 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 17:08:34.701 -09:59:54.95
Second-epoch second image center 17:08:37.688 -09:59:41.27
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01283 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits &> /tmp/tmp.cZPKcnVl09
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits &> /tmp/tmp.587jq7eSsu
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-07_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_050524_TTUQ2b1x1_310430_ui9g0P5d/fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-14-31_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0090.fits &> /tmp/tmp.mGjV1nLEUL
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-07_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_050524_TTUQ2b1x1_310430_ui9g0P5d/fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-14-31_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0090.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-07_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_050524_TTUQ2b1x1_310430_ui9g0P5d/fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-15-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0091.fits &> /tmp/tmp.RN1jeD0hUM
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-07_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_050524_TTUQ2b1x1_310430_ui9g0P5d/fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-15-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0091.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits and wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits.cat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits and wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits.cat
Found non-empty wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits and wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits.cat
The reference image (wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits) and catalog (wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits.cat) found
'wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits.cat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 7619 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 249.0959 to 265.2508 deg, Dec -15.2525 to -4.6764 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 249.0959 to 265.2508 deg, Dec -15.2525 to -4.6764 deg
Loaded 4104 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3395 out of 3508 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3508 out of 7619 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.817900
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.817900
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.85
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.97
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.97
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 7619 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 249.0959 to 265.2508 deg, Dec -15.2525 to -4.6764 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 249.0959 to 265.2508 deg, Dec -15.2525 to -4.6764 deg
Loaded 4104 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3395 out of 3508 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3508 out of 7619 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits (aperture=6.3)
Read 6368 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 249.0956 to 265.2325 deg, Dec -15.2667 to -4.7383 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 249.0956 to 265.2325 deg, Dec -15.2667 to -4.7383 deg
Loaded 4081 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3316 out of 3413 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3413 out of 6368 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits (aperture=6.3)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 6 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 8000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.4 pix Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits
2.4 pix Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits
2.4 pix fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-14-31_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0090.fits
2.4 pix fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-15-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0091.fits
2.4 pix wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits
2.4 pix wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.0 mag. Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits
14.8 mag. Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits
14.6 mag. fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-14-31_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0090.fits
14.7 mag. fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-15-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0091.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.6 (SNR ) 11.8 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.cZPKcnVl09 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-07_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_050524_TTUQ2b1x1_310430_ui9g0P5d/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits' -> 'wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=425, passed=7619
Got 7619 stars (including 7188 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 7619 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013018 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010414 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 938 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 936 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 921 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.54"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 936 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7489 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.52"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 938 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 936 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7492 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.53"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 936 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7492 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.54"
Excluding outliers - 936 stars left (next iteration limit 1029)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits N_match=936 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.565 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.413 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.922 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.432 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.568 n_q1=178 n_q2=358 n_q3=211 n_q4=189 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.632
The image catalog is written to wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits -region wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.587jq7eSsu (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-07_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_050524_TTUQ2b1x1_310430_ui9g0P5d/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits' -> 'wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=363, passed=6368
Got 6368 stars (including 5993 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 6368 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013018 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010414 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 942 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 939 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 927 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.53"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 939 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6258 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.53"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 942 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 939 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6256 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.54"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 939 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6256 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.55"
Excluding outliers - 939 stars left (next iteration limit 1032)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits N_match=939 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.558 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.417 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.846 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.469 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.530 n_q1=180 n_q2=359 n_q3=207 n_q4=193 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.517
The image catalog is written to wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits -region wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.mGjV1nLEUL (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-07_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_050524_TTUQ2b1x1_310430_ui9g0P5d/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-07_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_050524_TTUQ2b1x1_310430_ui9g0P5d/fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-14-31_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0090.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-07_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_050524_TTUQ2b1x1_310430_ui9g0P5d/fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-14-31_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0090.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-07_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_050524_TTUQ2b1x1_310430_ui9g0P5d/fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-14-31_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0090.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-07_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_050524_TTUQ2b1x1_310430_ui9g0P5d/fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-14-31_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0090.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-07_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_050524_TTUQ2b1x1_310430_ui9g0P5d/fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-14-31_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0090.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-07_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_050524_TTUQ2b1x1_310430_ui9g0P5d/fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-14-31_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0090.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-14-31_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0090.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-14-31_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0090.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-14-31_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0090.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-14-31_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0090.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-14-31_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0090.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-14-31_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0090.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-14-31_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0090.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-07_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_050524_TTUQ2b1x1_310430_ui9g0P5d/fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-14-31_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0090.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-14-31_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0090.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=363, passed=5689
Got 5689 stars (including 5318 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-14-31_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0090.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 5689 stars from the SExtractor catalog
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-07_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_050524_TTUQ2b1x1_310430_ui9g0P5d/util/fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh: line 144: echo: write error: Broken pipe
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.1'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.1 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013015 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010412 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 937 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 934 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 923 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.58"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 934 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5574 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.58"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 937 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 934 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5574 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.59"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 934 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5574 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.63"
Excluding outliers - 934 stars left (next iteration limit 1027)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-14-31_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0090.fits N_match=934 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.634 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.477 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.667 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.587 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.987 n_q1=197 n_q2=225 n_q3=334 n_q4=178 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.557
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-14-31_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0090.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-14-31_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0090.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-07_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_050524_TTUQ2b1x1_310430_ui9g0P5d/fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-14-31_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0090.fits -region wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-14-31_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0090.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-14-31_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0090.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.RN1jeD0hUM (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-07_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_050524_TTUQ2b1x1_310430_ui9g0P5d/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-07_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_050524_TTUQ2b1x1_310430_ui9g0P5d/fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-15-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0091.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-07_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_050524_TTUQ2b1x1_310430_ui9g0P5d/fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-15-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0091.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-07_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_050524_TTUQ2b1x1_310430_ui9g0P5d/fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-15-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0091.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-07_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_050524_TTUQ2b1x1_310430_ui9g0P5d/fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-15-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0091.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-07_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_050524_TTUQ2b1x1_310430_ui9g0P5d/fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-15-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0091.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-07_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_050524_TTUQ2b1x1_310430_ui9g0P5d/fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-15-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0091.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-15-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0091.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-15-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0091.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-15-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0091.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-15-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0091.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-15-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0091.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-15-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0091.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-15-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0091.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-07_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_050524_TTUQ2b1x1_310430_ui9g0P5d/fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-15-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0091.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-15-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0091.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=353, passed=5619
Got 5619 stars (including 5261 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-15-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0091.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 5619 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.1'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.1 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013015 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010412 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 938 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 935 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 923 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.59"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 935 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5507 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.60"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 938 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 935 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5509 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.61"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 935 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5509 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.67"
Excluding outliers - 935 stars left (next iteration limit 1028)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-15-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0091.fits N_match=935 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.666 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.493 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.742 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.613 sigma_q4_arcsec=1.039 n_q1=196 n_q2=225 n_q3=339 n_q4=175 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.561
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-15-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0091.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-15-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0091.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-07_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_050524_TTUQ2b1x1_310430_ui9g0P5d/fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-15-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0091.fits -region wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-15-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0091.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-15-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0091.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits sigma_overall=0.565 worst_q_ratio=1.632
ref2=Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits sigma_overall=0.558 worst_q_ratio=1.517
new1=fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-14-31_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0090.fits sigma_overall=0.634 worst_q_ratio=1.557
new2=fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-15-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0091.fits sigma_overall=0.666 worst_q_ratio=1.561
reference average sigma_overall=0.5615 worst_q_ratio=1.5745
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
Distribution of catalog-matched stars across the image:
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy: wrote wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081_astrometric_residuals.png (936 matched stars from wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy: wrote wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049_astrometric_residuals.png (939 matched stars from wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy: wrote wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-14-31_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0090_astrometric_residuals.png (934 matched stars from wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-14-31_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0090.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy: wrote wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-15-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0091_astrometric_residuals.png (935 matched stars from wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-15-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0091.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-14-31_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0090.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-14-31_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0090.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-07_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_050524_TTUQ2b1x1_310430_ui9g0P5d/wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-14-31_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0090.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-15-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0091.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-15-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0091.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-07_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_050524_TTUQ2b1x1_310430_ui9g0P5d/wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-15-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0091.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Oph-05-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits at 17:04:56.92 -09:46:09.6: 11.98 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits at 17:07:31.82 -05:51:56.3: 12.45 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits at 17:00:09.44 -11:49:19.7: 12.13 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits at 17:07:31.82 -05:51:56.3: 12.50 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits at 17:04:56.92 -09:46:09.6: 12.01 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.47 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:07:31.82 -05:51:56.3: ref_mag=12.47 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.0657 delta=0.41 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.99 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:04:56.92 -09:46:09.6: ref_mag=11.99 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.9729 delta=0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits at 17:00:09.44 -11:49:19.7: 12.16 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.14 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:00:09.44 -11:49:19.7: ref_mag=12.14 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.0484 delta=0.09 (need > 0.90)
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 2s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 1s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21166_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-15-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0091
The candidate 21166_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-15-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0091 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:58:31.54 -13:46:31.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21317_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-15-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0091
The candidate 21317_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-15-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0091 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21353_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-15-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0091
The candidate 21353_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-15-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0091 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:54:00.05 -09:25:21.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21411_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-15-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0091
The candidate 21411_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-15-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0091 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:00:48.94 -10:01:56.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21412_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-15-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0091
The candidate 21412_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-15-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0091 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21432_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-15-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0091
The candidate 21432_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-15-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0091 did not pass the final checks
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 3s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Oph-05-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 4 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-07_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_050524_TTUQ2b1x1_310430_ui9g0P5d/fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-14-31_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0090.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-07_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_050524_TTUQ2b1x1_310430_ui9g0P5d/fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-15-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0091.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-07_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_050524_TTUQ2b1x1_310430_ui9g0P5d/fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-14-31_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0090.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-07_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_050524_TTUQ2b1x1_310430_ui9g0P5d/fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-15-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0091.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-14-31_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0090.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-15-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0091.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/exclusion_list.txt
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-14-31_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0090.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-15-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0091.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits
Image size: 937.3'x624.3' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 17:08:38.023 -09:59:09.18 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.87"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-14-31_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0090.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-14-31_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0090.fits
Image size: 937.1'x624.1' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 17:08:34.701 -09:59:54.95 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 17:08:38.023 -09:59:09.18
Second-epoch image center 17:08:34.701 -09:59:54.95
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0186 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-15-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0091.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-15-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0091.fits
Image size: 937.1'x624.1' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 17:08:37.688 -09:59:41.27 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 17:08:38.023 -09:59:09.18
Second-epoch image center 17:08:37.688 -09:59:41.27
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0090 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 17:08:34.701 -09:59:54.95
Second-epoch second image center 17:08:37.688 -09:59:41.27
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01283 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits &> /tmp/tmp.VwJPuQrZfV
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits &> /tmp/tmp.oKPie4Pb9i
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-07_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_050524_TTUQ2b1x1_310430_ui9g0P5d/fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-14-31_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0090.fits &> /tmp/tmp.CeyBIPdSHf
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-07_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_050524_TTUQ2b1x1_310430_ui9g0P5d/fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-14-31_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0090.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-07_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_050524_TTUQ2b1x1_310430_ui9g0P5d/fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-15-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0091.fits &> /tmp/tmp.wjPEM0oD4b
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-07_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_050524_TTUQ2b1x1_310430_ui9g0P5d/fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-15-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0091.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits and wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits.cat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits and wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits.cat
Found non-empty wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits and wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits.cat
The reference image (wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits) and catalog (wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits.cat) found
'wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits.cat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 72440 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 249.0959 to 265.2606 deg, Dec -15.2524 to -4.6668 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 249.0959 to 265.2606 deg, Dec -15.2524 to -4.6668 deg
Loaded 4113 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3162 out of 3606 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3606 out of 72440 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.626150
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.626150
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.46
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.17
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.17
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 72440 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 249.0959 to 265.2606 deg, Dec -15.2524 to -4.6668 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 249.0959 to 265.2606 deg, Dec -15.2524 to -4.6668 deg
Loaded 4113 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3162 out of 3606 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3606 out of 72440 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits (aperture=4.5)
Read 62008 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 249.0757 to 265.2415 deg, Dec -15.2678 to -4.6866 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 249.0757 to 265.2415 deg, Dec -15.2678 to -4.6866 deg
Loaded 4114 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3200 out of 3606 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3606 out of 62008 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits (aperture=4.5)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 62 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 8000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.2 pix Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits
2.2 pix Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits
2.3 pix fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-14-31_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0090.fits
2.3 pix fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-15-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0091.fits
2.2 pix wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits
2.2 pix wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.2 mag. Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits
14.9 mag. Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits
14.8 mag. fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-14-31_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0090.fits
14.8 mag. fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-15-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0091.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.8 (SNR ) 14.2 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.VwJPuQrZfV (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-07_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_050524_TTUQ2b1x1_310430_ui9g0P5d/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits' -> 'wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=16, blended=4399, passed=72424
Got 72424 stars (including 67929 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 72424 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013018 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010414 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 940 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 938 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 927 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.55"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 938 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 71572 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.52"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 940 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 938 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 71572 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.52"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 938 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 71572 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.56"
Excluding outliers - 938 stars left (next iteration limit 1031)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits N_match=938 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.588 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.416 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.916 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.488 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.569 n_q1=198 n_q2=342 n_q3=199 n_q4=199 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.557
The image catalog is written to wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits -region wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.oKPie4Pb9i (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-07_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_050524_TTUQ2b1x1_310430_ui9g0P5d/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits' -> 'wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=6, blended=3287, passed=62002
Got 62002 stars (including 58624 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 62002 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013018 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010414 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 941 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 938 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 926 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.53"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 938 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 61294 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.52"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 941 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 938 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 61293 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.52"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 938 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 61292 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.55"
Excluding outliers - 938 stars left (next iteration limit 1031)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits N_match=938 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.568 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.442 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.811 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.477 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.532 n_q1=195 n_q2=353 n_q3=194 n_q4=196 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.428
The image catalog is written to wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits -region wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.CeyBIPdSHf (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-07_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_050524_TTUQ2b1x1_310430_ui9g0P5d/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-07_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_050524_TTUQ2b1x1_310430_ui9g0P5d/fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-14-31_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0090.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-07_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_050524_TTUQ2b1x1_310430_ui9g0P5d/fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-14-31_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0090.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-07_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_050524_TTUQ2b1x1_310430_ui9g0P5d/fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-14-31_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0090.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-07_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_050524_TTUQ2b1x1_310430_ui9g0P5d/fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-14-31_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0090.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-07_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_050524_TTUQ2b1x1_310430_ui9g0P5d/fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-14-31_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0090.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-07_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_050524_TTUQ2b1x1_310430_ui9g0P5d/fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-14-31_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0090.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-14-31_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0090.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-14-31_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0090.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-14-31_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0090.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-14-31_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0090.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-14-31_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0090.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-14-31_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0090.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-14-31_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0090.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-07_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_050524_TTUQ2b1x1_310430_ui9g0P5d/fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-14-31_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0090.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-14-31_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0090.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=3, blended=2979, passed=52866
Got 52866 stars (including 49808 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-14-31_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0090.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 52866 stars from the SExtractor catalog
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-07_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_050524_TTUQ2b1x1_310430_ui9g0P5d/util/fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh: line 144: echo: write error: Broken pipe
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.1'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.1 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013015 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010412 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 933 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 930 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 917 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.57"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 930 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 51993 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.55"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 933 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 930 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 51991 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.55"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 930 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 51992 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.60"
Excluding outliers - 930 stars left (next iteration limit 1023)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-14-31_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0090.fits N_match=930 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.640 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.520 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.639 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.615 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.957 n_q1=216 n_q2=200 n_q3=352 n_q4=162 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.495
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-14-31_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0090.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-14-31_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0090.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-07_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_050524_TTUQ2b1x1_310430_ui9g0P5d/fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-14-31_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0090.fits -region wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-14-31_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0090.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-14-31_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0090.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.wjPEM0oD4b (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-07_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_050524_TTUQ2b1x1_310430_ui9g0P5d/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-07_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_050524_TTUQ2b1x1_310430_ui9g0P5d/fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-15-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0091.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-07_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_050524_TTUQ2b1x1_310430_ui9g0P5d/fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-15-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0091.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-07_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_050524_TTUQ2b1x1_310430_ui9g0P5d/fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-15-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0091.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-07_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_050524_TTUQ2b1x1_310430_ui9g0P5d/fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-15-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0091.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-07_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_050524_TTUQ2b1x1_310430_ui9g0P5d/fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-15-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0091.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-07_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_050524_TTUQ2b1x1_310430_ui9g0P5d/fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-15-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0091.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-15-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0091.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-15-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0091.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-15-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0091.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-15-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0091.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-15-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0091.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-15-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0091.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-15-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0091.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-07_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_050524_TTUQ2b1x1_310430_ui9g0P5d/fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-15-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0091.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-15-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0091.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=3, blended=3011, passed=53105
Got 53105 stars (including 50027 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-15-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0091.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 53105 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.1'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.1 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013015 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010412 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 934 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 931 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 915 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.58"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 931 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 52352 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.56"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 934 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 931 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 52354 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.56"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 931 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 52354 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.63"
Excluding outliers - 931 stars left (next iteration limit 1024)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-15-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0091.fits N_match=931 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.668 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.519 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.699 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.597 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.973 n_q1=214 n_q2=202 n_q3=350 n_q4=165 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.456
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-15-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0091.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-15-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0091.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-07_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_050524_TTUQ2b1x1_310430_ui9g0P5d/fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-15-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0091.fits -region wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-15-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0091.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-15-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0091.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-14-31_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0090.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-07_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_050524_TTUQ2b1x1_310430_ui9g0P5d/wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-14-31_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0090.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-15-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0091.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-07_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_050524_TTUQ2b1x1_310430_ui9g0P5d/wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-15-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0091.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Oph-05-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits at 17:02:14.30 -06:53:50.2: 14.74 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits at 17:20:26.16 -09:21:55.5: 14.51 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits at 17:01:23.33 -11:20:09.5: 15.75 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits at 17:24:16.23 -14:07:08.3: 14.48 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits at 17:07:25.88 -06:26:06.9: 14.27 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits at 17:20:37.87 -13:15:45.5: 13.94 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits at 17:02:14.30 -06:53:50.2: 14.69 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits at 17:07:25.88 -06:26:06.9: 14.22 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits at 17:24:16.23 -14:07:08.3: 14.36 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.72 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.42 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:24:16.23 -14:07:08.3: ref_mag=14.42 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=14.6127 delta=-0.19 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:02:14.30 -06:53:50.2: ref_mag=14.72 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.4342 delta=0.29 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.25 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:07:25.88 -06:26:06.9: ref_mag=14.25 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=14.3006 delta=-0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits at 17:08:36.08 -07:06:01.0: 14.48 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits at 17:20:26.16 -09:21:55.5: 14.56 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits at 16:52:05.57 -08:52:06.5: 13.26 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.53 +/- 0.08
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:20:26.16 -09:21:55.5: ref_mag=14.53 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=14.5359 delta=-0.00 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits at 17:01:23.33 -11:20:09.5: 15.60 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits at 17:20:37.87 -13:15:45.5: 13.97 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.95 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:20:37.87 -13:15:45.5: ref_mag=13.95 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=14.1916 delta=-0.24 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits at 17:08:36.08 -07:06:01.0: 14.29 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.38 +/- 0.07
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:08:36.08 -07:06:01.0: ref_mag=14.38 +/- 0.07 new_mean_mag=14.4560 delta=-0.07 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits at 16:52:05.57 -08:52:06.5: 13.30 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.27 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:52:05.57 -08:52:06.5: ref_mag=13.27 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.2325 delta=0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits at 16:51:53.90 -11:36:14.2: 15.69 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits at 17:09:51.44 -06:37:48.8: 13.57 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits at 16:51:53.90 -11:36:14.2: 15.50 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits at 17:08:54.53 -09:41:45.7: 15.23 +/- 0.22 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits at 17:26:55.73 -12:20:27.5: 14.44 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits at 17:24:32.84 -13:55:42.2: 14.88 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits at 17:09:51.44 -06:37:48.8: 13.62 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.59 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:09:51.44 -06:37:48.8: ref_mag=13.59 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.8598 delta=-0.27 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits at 17:08:54.53 -09:41:45.7: 15.61 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.23 +/- 0.22
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 17:08:54.53 -09:41:45.7: ref_mag=15.23 +/- 0.22 new_mean_mag=14.0155 delta=1.22 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits at 17:26:55.73 -12:20:27.5: 99.00 +/- 99.00 bad_region
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits at 17:06:47.16 -05:45:51.5: 14.86 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.44 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits at 17:17:01.01 -08:43:28.4: 15.88 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:26:55.73 -12:20:27.5: ref_mag=14.44 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.2057 delta=0.24 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits at 17:17:51.06 -08:09:40.1: 14.86 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits at 17:24:32.84 -13:55:42.2: 14.53 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits at 17:06:34.59 -12:57:31.2: 14.93 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.69 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:24:32.84 -13:55:42.2: ref_mag=14.69 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.2736 delta=0.41 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits at 17:17:01.01 -08:43:28.4: 15.64 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits at 17:06:47.16 -05:45:51.5: 14.77 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.82 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:06:47.16 -05:45:51.5: ref_mag=14.82 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.5134 delta=0.31 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits at 17:17:51.06 -08:09:40.1: 14.47 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.64 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:17:51.06 -08:09:40.1: ref_mag=14.64 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.5090 delta=0.13 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits at 17:06:34.59 -12:57:31.2: 14.91 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.92 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:06:34.59 -12:57:31.2: ref_mag=14.92 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=14.4293 delta=0.49 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits at 17:18:42.37 -12:10:00.3: 14.43 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits at 17:18:13.94 -06:35:01.4: 14.96 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits at 17:05:43.22 -06:33:47.7: 14.88 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits at 17:18:42.37 -12:10:00.3: 14.48 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.45 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:18:42.37 -12:10:00.3: ref_mag=14.45 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=14.4047 delta=0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits at 17:18:13.94 -06:35:01.4: 14.97 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.97 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:18:13.94 -06:35:01.4: ref_mag=14.97 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.5272 delta=0.44 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits at 17:19:37.92 -13:30:03.7: 14.55 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits at 17:20:15.96 -14:13:44.6: 14.81 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits at 17:05:43.22 -06:33:47.7: 14.86 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.87 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:05:43.22 -06:33:47.7: ref_mag=14.87 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.6285 delta=0.24 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits at 17:20:15.96 -14:13:44.6: 14.69 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.76 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:20:15.96 -14:13:44.6: ref_mag=14.76 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.5987 delta=0.16 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits at 17:14:25.36 -13:29:45.7: 14.68 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits at 17:22:36.22 -12:09:24.0: 14.93 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits at 17:19:37.92 -13:30:03.7: 14.74 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.61 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:19:37.92 -13:30:03.7: ref_mag=14.61 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.4742 delta=0.13 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits at 17:05:12.46 -06:12:26.0: 15.23 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits at 17:22:36.22 -12:09:24.0: 14.59 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.74 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:22:36.22 -12:09:24.0: ref_mag=14.74 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.4948 delta=0.24 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits at 17:14:25.36 -13:29:45.7: 14.37 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits at 17:18:46.69 -12:38:43.3: 14.46 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.50 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:14:25.36 -13:29:45.7: ref_mag=14.50 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.4793 delta=0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits at 16:59:12.09 -10:32:16.9: 15.50 +/- 0.27 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits at 17:25:47.99 -11:10:33.7: 14.97 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits at 17:05:12.46 -06:12:26.0: 15.25 +/- 0.26 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.24 +/- 0.16
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:05:12.46 -06:12:26.0: ref_mag=15.24 +/- 0.16 new_mean_mag=14.5868 delta=0.65 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits at 17:18:46.69 -12:38:43.3: 14.64 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.52 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:18:46.69 -12:38:43.3: ref_mag=14.52 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.5657 delta=-0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits at 16:59:12.09 -10:32:16.9: 15.59 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.50 +/- 0.27
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 16:59:12.09 -10:32:16.9: ref_mag=15.50 +/- 0.27 new_mean_mag=14.5334 delta=0.97 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits at 17:25:47.99 -11:10:33.7: 15.50 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.97 +/- 0.18
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:25:47.99 -11:10:33.7: ref_mag=14.97 +/- 0.18 new_mean_mag=14.6889 delta=0.28 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits at 17:10:34.48 -13:00:37.9: 14.95 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits at 17:20:47.31 -13:59:23.9: 14.51 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits at 17:20:47.31 -13:59:23.9: 14.54 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.52 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:20:47.31 -13:59:23.9: ref_mag=14.52 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.5801 delta=-0.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits at 17:10:34.48 -13:00:37.9: 15.25 +/- 0.28 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.04 +/- 0.15
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:10:34.48 -13:00:37.9: ref_mag=15.04 +/- 0.15 new_mean_mag=14.5718 delta=0.47 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits at 17:20:08.55 -12:09:13.8: 14.80 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits at 17:03:21.72 -07:51:38.6: 14.77 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits at 17:20:08.55 -12:09:13.8: 14.60 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.70 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:20:08.55 -12:09:13.8: ref_mag=14.70 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.7286 delta=-0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits at 17:03:21.72 -07:51:38.6: 14.97 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.83 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:03:21.72 -07:51:38.6: ref_mag=14.83 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.6003 delta=0.23 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits at 17:03:23.22 -09:20:07.4: 14.20 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits at 17:03:23.22 -09:20:07.4: 14.28 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.23 +/- 0.07
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 17:03:23.22 -09:20:07.4: ref_mag=14.23 +/- 0.07 new_mean_mag=13.1720 delta=1.06 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out94749.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out99941.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out45912.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out88449.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out92299.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out97642.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 13s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 4s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 84528_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-15-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0091
The candidate 84528_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-15-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0091 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 84540_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-15-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0091
The candidate 84540_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-15-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0091 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 84541_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-15-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0091
The candidate 84541_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-15-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0091 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 84542_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-15-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0091
The candidate 84542_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-15-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0091 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 84547_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-15-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0091
The candidate 84547_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-15-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0091 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 84549_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-15-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0091
The candidate 84549_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-15-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0091 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 84559_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-15-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0091
The candidate 84559_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-15-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0091 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:00:13.45 -10:37:03.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 84565_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-15-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0091
The candidate 84565_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-15-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0091 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:26:27.65 -13:55:07.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88449_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-15-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0091
Preparing report for the candidate 88449_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-15-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0091
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 89222_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-15-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0091
The candidate 89222_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-15-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0091 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:18:04.25 -12:21:09.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 89272_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-15-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0091
The candidate 89272_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-15-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0091 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:55:44.06 -06:07:19.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 89477_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-15-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0091
The candidate 89477_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-15-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0091 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 90031_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-15-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0091
The candidate 90031_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-15-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0091 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:00:03.67 -07:33:07.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 90807_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-15-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0091
The candidate 90807_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-15-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0091 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:53:52.64 -08:58:17.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 91456_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-15-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0091
The candidate 91456_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-15-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0091 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:21:39.56 -11:02:15.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 91787_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-15-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0091
The candidate 91787_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-15-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0091 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:55:06.96 -05:56:33.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 92280_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-15-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0091
The candidate 92280_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-15-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0091 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:21:37.54 -14:03:37.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 92299_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-15-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0091
Preparing report for the candidate 92299_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-15-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0091
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 92338_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-15-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0091
The candidate 92338_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-15-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0091 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:20:00.55 -08:00:26.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 94181_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-15-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0091
The candidate 94181_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-15-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0091 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:59:13.53 -05:54:09.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 94362_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-15-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0091
The candidate 94362_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-15-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0091 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 94439_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-15-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0091
The candidate 94439_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-15-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0091 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:08:36.93 -07:37:30.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 94748_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-15-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0091
The candidate 94748_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-15-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0091 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:03:07.26 -11:05:32.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 94749_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-15-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0091
The candidate 94749_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-15-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0091 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:08:54.53 -09:41:45.7 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.02, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.00)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 0.840 4335415957966688128 257.22744258912 -09.69606114397 13.5081 11.4416 VARIABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#0.840#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 94886_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-15-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0091
The candidate 94886_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-15-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0091 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:56:19.77 -07:39:22.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 95959_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-15-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0091
The candidate 95959_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-15-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0091 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 96223_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-15-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0091
The candidate 96223_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-15-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0091 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 96522_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-15-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0091
The candidate 96522_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-15-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0091 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:58:56.32 -07:46:25.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 97642_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-15-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0091
Preparing report for the candidate 97642_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-15-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0091
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 98454_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-15-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0091
The candidate 98454_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-15-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0091 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 98608_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-15-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0091
The candidate 98608_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-15-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0091 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 98851_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-15-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0091
The candidate 98851_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-15-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0091 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 98898_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-15-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0091
The candidate 98898_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-15-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0091 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 98916_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-15-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0091
The candidate 98916_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-15-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0091 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 99038_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-15-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0091
The candidate 99038_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-15-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0091 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:16:30.47 -07:15:15.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 99128_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-15-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0091
The candidate 99128_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-15-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0091 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 99190_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-15-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0091
The candidate 99190_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-15-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0091 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:19:18.89 -10:43:40.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 99316_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-15-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0091
The candidate 99316_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-15-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0091 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 99540_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-15-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0091
The candidate 99540_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-15-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0091 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 99572_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-15-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0091
The candidate 99572_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-15-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0091 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 99629_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-15-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0091
The candidate 99629_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-15-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0091 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 99655_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-15-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0091
The candidate 99655_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-15-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0091 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 99744_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-15-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0091
The candidate 99744_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-15-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0091 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 99816_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-15-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0091
The candidate 99816_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-15-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0091 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 99941_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-15-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0091
The candidate 99941_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-15-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0091 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:59:12.09 -10:32:16.9 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.53, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.51)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 0.287 4335851746821783296 254.80035145859 -10.53795142725 13.4689 12.1140 VARIABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#0.287#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 100002_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-15-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0091
The candidate 100002_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-15-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0091 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 100014_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-15-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0091
The candidate 100014_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-15-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0091 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 100080_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-15-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0091
The candidate 100080_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-15-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0091 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:17:03.24 -13:23:15.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 100101_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-15-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0091
The candidate 100101_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-15-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0091 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 100112_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-15-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0091
The candidate 100112_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-15-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0091 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31298_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-15-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0091
The candidate 31298_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-15-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0091 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:04:04.87 -11:28:33.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53981_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-15-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0091
The candidate 53981_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-15-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0091 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:51:17.96 -06:14:42.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 37287_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-15-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0091
The candidate 37287_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-15-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0091 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:25:01.56 -10:38:53.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 64682_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-15-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0091
The candidate 64682_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-15-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0091 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:54:31.36 -07:33:40.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 58746_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-15-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0091
The candidate 58746_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-15-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0091 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:22:45.76 -08:34:01.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20975_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-15-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0091
The candidate 20975_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-15-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0091 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:11:20.09 -12:40:05.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 11406_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-15-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0091
The candidate 11406_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-15-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0091 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:58:31.55 -13:46:31.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 37010_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-15-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0091
The candidate 37010_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-15-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0091 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:54:03.34 -10:42:36.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 38458_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-15-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0091
The candidate 38458_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-15-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0091 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:56:45.90 -10:24:36.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 45266_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-15-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0091
The candidate 45266_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-15-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0091 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:54:00.06 -09:25:21.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 45912_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-15-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0091
Preparing report for the candidate 45912_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-15-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0091
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 67647_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-15-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0091
The candidate 67647_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-07_04-15-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0091 did not pass the final checks