Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ASASSN-V J061230.65+874718.3,2461195.8073,12.57,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ASASSN-V J061230.65+874718.3 20260604.3073 12.57CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
######## Processing parameters ########
AAVSO_COMMENT_STRING= NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
ASTCHECK_ASTEROID_SEARCH_RADIUS_ARCSEC=
BAD_REGION_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst
CAMERA_SETTINGS= TTUQ1b1x1
CHECK_POINTING_ACCURACY= yes
DARK_FRAMES_DIR_OR_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks
EXCLUSION_LIST= ../exclusion_list_TTUQ1.txt
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MAX_APERTURE_STAR_SIZE_PIX= 12.5
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MAX_ELONGATION_AminusB_PIX= 0.55
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MIN_APERTURE_STAR_SIZE_PIX= 2.0
FILTER_BRIGHT_MAG_CUTOFF_TRANSIENT_SEARCH= -5
FILTER_FAINT_MAG_CUTOFF_TRANSIENT_SEARCH= 15.0
FLAT_FIELD_DIR_OR_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats
FRAME_EDGE_OFFSET_PIX= 100
GAIA_BAND_FOR_CATALOGED_SOURCE_CHECK=
MAX_NEW_TO_REF_MEAN_IMG_VALUE_RATIO= 100
MAX_NEW_IMG_MEAN_VALUE= 25000
MAX_SD_RATIO_OF_SECOND_EPOCH_IMGS= 0.18
MAX_SD_RATIO_OF_SECOND_EPOCH_IMGS_SOFT_LIMIT= 0.12
MPC_CODE= V36
NMW_CALIBRATION= /var/www/nmw_calibration
NUMBER_OF_DETECTED_TRANSIENTS_BEFORE_FILTERING_HARD_LIMIT= 8000
NUMBER_OF_DETECTED_TRANSIENTS_BEFORE_FILTERING_SOFT_LIMIT= 4000
OMP_NUM_THREADS=
ONLINE_MPCHECKER_BUTTON_ASTEROID_SEARCH_RADIUS_ARCMIN=
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=
REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES= yes
SEXTRACTOR_CONFIG_BRIGHTSTARPASS= default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
SEXTRACTOR_CONFIG_FILES= default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
STARMATCH_RADIUS_PIX= 3.5
SYSREM_ITERATIONS= 0
TELESCOP=
TELESCOP_NAME_KNOWN_TO_VaST_FOR_FOV_DETERMINATION=
UCAC5_PLATESOLVE_ITERATIONS= 2
FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE= no
#######################################
HOSTNAME= tau
USER=
HOME=
#######################################
SExtractor catalog cache: enabled, directory /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/vast_sextractor_cache
Reference image directory is set to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs
VIZIER_SITE=vizier.cds.unistra.fr
GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=vizquery (lib/vizquery -> VizieR vizier.cds.unistra.fr)
INFO: MAKE_PNG_PLOTS is set to yes
FITS_FILE_EXT=fits
CALIBRATION_STATUS_PREFIX=
Fields in the data directory:
Cam-02-Q1b1x1
#######################################
########### Starting Cam-02-Q1b1x1 ###########
Processing Cam-02-Q1b1x1
server tau has sufficient free disk space available: 449679 MB at /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir
server tau has sufficient free disk space available: 449679 MB at .
Checking input images (2 new)
REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE= /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-57-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0100.fits
REFERENCE_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE= /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-58-44_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0101.fits
Small preview (one of the new images): 
Large previews of the second-epoch (new) images:
MAKE_PNG_PLOTS=yes
renamed 'Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_02-21-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0265.png' -> 'transient_report/Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_02-21-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0265.fits_preview.png'
Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_02-21-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0265.fits

renamed 'Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_02-22-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0266.png' -> 'transient_report/Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_02-22-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0266.fits_preview.png'
Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_02-22-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0266.fits

Read-check the input FITS images... read-check OK
Blank image check the input FITS images... blank-image-check OK
Read date check the input FITS images... read-date-check OK
Mean value check the input FITS images... OK, at least two new images have mean values below the threshold.
----------------------------------------------
INFO: REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 1673.3123
INFO: REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_SD= 554.0867
INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 2147.6973
INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_SD= 629.4619
INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 2151.8542
INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE_SD= 631.0369
----------------------------------------------
INFO: ref_to_second_epoch_img_mean_ratio= 1.2835
INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__SD_ratio= 0.002
----------------------------------------------
Calibration settings: DARK_FRAMES_DIR_OR_FILE=/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks FLAT_FIELD_DIR_OR_FILE=/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats
EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration
SET-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint
CCD-TEMP= -0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature
FOCTEMP = 21.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature
AMBTEMP = 19.3 / [degC] Ambient air temperature
Exploring image header: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-04_CI_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_025619_TTUQ1b1x1_86085_JwycB1mR/Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_02-21-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0265.fits
CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-04_CI_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_025619_TTUQ1b1x1_86085_JwycB1mR/Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_02-21-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0265.fits
SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-04_CI_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_025619_TTUQ1b1x1_86085_JwycB1mR/Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_02-21-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0265.fits
Header: 74 keys total, 33 keys left
Record 0: "" status=0
Record 1: "SIMPLE = T / C# FITS" status=0
Record 2: "BITPIX = 16" status=0
Record 3: "NAXIS = 2 / Dimensionality" status=0
Record 4: "NAXIS1 = 9576" status=0
Record 5: "NAXIS2 = 6388" status=0
Record 6: "BZERO = 32768" status=0
Record 7: "EXTEND = T / Extensions are permitted" status=0
Record 8: "IMAGETYP= 'LIGHT' / Type of exposure" status=0
Record 9: "EXPOSURE= 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0
Record 10: "EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0
Record 11: "DATE-LOC= '2026-06-04T02:21:57.8001766' / Time of observation (local)" status=0
Record 12: "DATE-OBS= '2026-06-04T07:21:57.8001766' / Time of observation (UTC)" status=0
Record 13: "MJD-OBS = 61195.3069189815 / Modified Julian Date of observation" status=0
Record 14: "DATE-AVG= '2026-06-04T07:22:07.7044941' / Averaged midpoint time (UTC)" status=0
Record 15: "MJD-AVG = 61195.307033611 / Modified Julian Date of averaged midpoint" status=0
Record 16: "XBINNING= 1 / X axis binning factor" status=0
Record 17: "YBINNING= 1 / Y axis binning factor" status=0
Record 18: "GAIN = 30 / Sensor gain" status=0
Record 19: "OFFSET = 30 / Sensor gain offset" status=0
Record 20: "XPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel X axis size" status=0
Record 21: "YPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel Y axis size" status=0
Record 22: "INSTRUME= 'QHY600M' / Imaging instrument name" status=0
Record 23: "CAMERAID= 'QHY600M-33d3d743814b8b447' / Imaging instrument identifier" status=0
Record 24: "SET-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint" status=0
Record 25: "CCD-TEMP= -0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature" status=0
Record 26: "READOUTM= '2CMS-0' / Sensor readout mode" status=0
Record 27: "USBLIMIT= 50 / Camera-specific USB setting" status=0
Record 28: "TELESCOP= 'QHY600M-TTU1' / Name of telescope" status=0
Record 29: "FOCALLEN= 135.0 / [mm] Focal length" status=0
Record 30: "FOCRATIO= 2.2 / Focal ratio" status=0
Record 31: "RA = 179.998894741399 / [deg] RA of telescope" status=0
Record 32: "DEC = 84.999800128672 / [deg] Declination of telescope" status=0
Record 33: "CENTALT = 34.4002777777778 / [deg] Altitude of telescope" status=0
Record 34: "CENTAZ = 353.840555555556 / [deg] Azimuth of telescope" status=0
Record 35: "AIRMASS = 1.7664013656828 / Airmass at frame center (Gueymard 1993)" status=0
Record 36: "PIERSIDE= 'East' / Telescope pointing state" status=0
Record 37: "SITEELEV= 1015.0 / [m] Observation site elevation" status=0
Record 38: "SITELAT = 33.7480555555556 / [deg] Observation site latitude" status=0
Record 39: "SITELONG= -101.958333333333 / [deg] Observation site longitude" status=0
Record 40: "OBSERVER= 'Sokolovsky' / Observer name" status=0
Record 41: "OBSERVAT= 'TTU Skyview' / Observatory name" status=0
Record 42: "SITENAME= '' / Observatory site name" status=0
Record 43: "FWHEEL = 'Simulator' / Filter Wheel name" status=0
Record 44: "FILTER = 'CV' / Active filter name" status=0
Record 45: "OBJECT = 'Cam-02' / Name of the object of interest" status=0
Record 46: "OBJCTRA = '12 00 00' / [H M S] RA of imaged object" status=0
Record 47: "OBJCTDEC= '+85 00 00' / [D M S] Declination of imaged object" status=0
Record 48: "OBJCTROT= 0.0 / [deg] planned rotation of imaged object" status=0
Record 49: "FOCNAME = 'ZWO Focuser' / Focusing equipment name" status=0
Record 50: "FOCPOS = 29428 / [step] Focuser position" status=0
Record 51: "FOCUSPOS= 29428 / [step] Focuser position" status=0
Record 52: "FOCUSSZ = 0.0 / [um] Focuser step size" status=0
Record 53: "FOCTEMP = 21.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0
Record 54: "FOCUSTEM= 21.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0
Record 55: "DEWPOINT= 16.5 / [degC] Dew point" status=0
Record 56: "HUMIDITY= 84.0 / [percent] Relative humidity" status=0
Record 57: "PRESSURE= 902.91 / [hPa] Air pressure" status=0
Record 58: "AMBTEMP = 19.3 / [degC] Ambient air temperature" status=0
Record 59: "WINDDIR = 1.0 / [deg] Wind direction: 0=N, 180=S, 90=E, 270=W" status=0
Record 60: "WINDGUST= 9.400752 / [kph] Wind gust" status=0
Record 61: "WINDSPD = 7.200576 / [kph] Wind speed" status=0
Record 62: "ROWORDER= 'TOP-DOWN' / FITS Image Orientation" status=0
Record 63: "EQUINOX = 2000.0 / Equinox of celestial coordinate system" status=0
Record 64: "SWCREATE= 'N.I.N.A. 3.2.0.9001 (x64)' / Software that created this file" status=0
Record 65: "QHY_EXP = 20.000096 / [s] Actual exposure time" status=0
Record 66: "QHY_PP = 13888.0 / [ps] pixelPeriod" status=0
Record 67: "QHY_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0
Record 68: "GPS_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0
Record 69: "QHY_FP = 20000160.0 / [us] framePeriod" status=0
Record 70: "QHY_CPL = 6120.0 / clocksPerLine" status=0
Record 71: "QHY_LPF = 235295.0 / linesPerFrame" status=0
Record 72: "QHY_AET = 20000096.0 / [us] actualExposureTime" status=0
Record 73: "QHY_LEM = T / isLongExposureMode" status=0
Record 74: "QHY_OFF0= 3767.777 / [us] RollingShutterEndOffset row 0" status=0
Allocating memory for image, dark and result arrays...
Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-04_CI_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_025619_TTUQ1b1x1_86085_JwycB1mR/Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_02-21-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0265.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix
SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-04_CI_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_025619_TTUQ1b1x1_86085_JwycB1mR/Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_02-21-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0265.fits
SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_5C_20s_2026-05-30.fit
CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-04_CI_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_025619_TTUQ1b1x1_86085_JwycB1mR/Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_02-21-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0265.fits
CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_5C_20s_2026-05-30.fit
Reading dark frame /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_5C_20s_2026-05-30.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix
Dark frame is subtracted, output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-04_CI_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_025619_TTUQ1b1x1_86085_JwycB1mR/d_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_02-21-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0265.fits :)
Spent 0.938923 seconds
renamed 'mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_5C_20s_2026-05-30.png' -> 'transient_report/dark.png'
try_to_calibrate_the_input_frame(): selected flat field /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-05-30.fit from directory /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats
MegaDivider v7
Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-04_CI_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_025619_TTUQ1b1x1_86085_JwycB1mR/d_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_02-21-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0265.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix
Reading flat /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-05-30.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix
Avarage count on flat field image: 31267.409145
Minimal real count (from overscan): 5
Output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-04_CI_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_025619_TTUQ1b1x1_86085_JwycB1mR/fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_02-21-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0265.fits :)
No overscan detected - all values seem high! (left_median=21677.0, right_median=21704.0)
renamed 'mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-05-30.png' -> 'transient_report/flat.png'
Using calibrated image CALIBRATED_SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-04_CI_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_025619_TTUQ1b1x1_86085_JwycB1mR/fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_02-21-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0265.fits
EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration
SET-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint
CCD-TEMP= -0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature
FOCTEMP = 21.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature
AMBTEMP = 19.3 / [degC] Ambient air temperature
Exploring image header: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-04_CI_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_025619_TTUQ1b1x1_86085_JwycB1mR/Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_02-22-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0266.fits
CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-04_CI_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_025619_TTUQ1b1x1_86085_JwycB1mR/Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_02-22-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0266.fits
SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-04_CI_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_025619_TTUQ1b1x1_86085_JwycB1mR/Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_02-22-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0266.fits
Header: 74 keys total, 33 keys left
Record 0: "" status=0
Record 1: "SIMPLE = T / C# FITS" status=0
Record 2: "BITPIX = 16" status=0
Record 3: "NAXIS = 2 / Dimensionality" status=0
Record 4: "NAXIS1 = 9576" status=0
Record 5: "NAXIS2 = 6388" status=0
Record 6: "BZERO = 32768" status=0
Record 7: "EXTEND = T / Extensions are permitted" status=0
Record 8: "IMAGETYP= 'LIGHT' / Type of exposure" status=0
Record 9: "EXPOSURE= 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0
Record 10: "EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0
Record 11: "DATE-LOC= '2026-06-04T02:22:37.8885703' / Time of observation (local)" status=0
Record 12: "DATE-OBS= '2026-06-04T07:22:37.8885703' / Time of observation (UTC)" status=0
Record 13: "MJD-OBS = 61195.3073829631 / Modified Julian Date of observation" status=0
Record 14: "DATE-AVG= '2026-06-04T07:22:47.7903124' / Averaged midpoint time (UTC)" status=0
Record 15: "MJD-AVG = 61195.3074975694 / Modified Julian Date of averaged midpoint" status=0
Record 16: "XBINNING= 1 / X axis binning factor" status=0
Record 17: "YBINNING= 1 / Y axis binning factor" status=0
Record 18: "GAIN = 30 / Sensor gain" status=0
Record 19: "OFFSET = 30 / Sensor gain offset" status=0
Record 20: "XPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel X axis size" status=0
Record 21: "YPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel Y axis size" status=0
Record 22: "INSTRUME= 'QHY600M' / Imaging instrument name" status=0
Record 23: "CAMERAID= 'QHY600M-33d3d743814b8b447' / Imaging instrument identifier" status=0
Record 24: "SET-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint" status=0
Record 25: "CCD-TEMP= -0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature" status=0
Record 26: "READOUTM= '2CMS-0' / Sensor readout mode" status=0
Record 27: "USBLIMIT= 50 / Camera-specific USB setting" status=0
Record 28: "TELESCOP= 'QHY600M-TTU1' / Name of telescope" status=0
Record 29: "FOCALLEN= 135.0 / [mm] Focal length" status=0
Record 30: "FOCRATIO= 2.2 / Focal ratio" status=0
Record 31: "RA = 179.998895118653 / [deg] RA of telescope" status=0
Record 32: "DEC = 84.9998001262172 / [deg] Declination of telescope" status=0
Record 33: "CENTALT = 34.3855555555556 / [deg] Altitude of telescope" status=0
Record 34: "CENTAZ = 353.838888888889 / [deg] Azimuth of telescope" status=0
Record 35: "AIRMASS = 1.76706057660462 / Airmass at frame center (Gueymard 1993)" status=0
Record 36: "PIERSIDE= 'East' / Telescope pointing state" status=0
Record 37: "SITEELEV= 1015.0 / [m] Observation site elevation" status=0
Record 38: "SITELAT = 33.7480555555556 / [deg] Observation site latitude" status=0
Record 39: "SITELONG= -101.958333333333 / [deg] Observation site longitude" status=0
Record 40: "OBSERVER= 'Sokolovsky' / Observer name" status=0
Record 41: "OBSERVAT= 'TTU Skyview' / Observatory name" status=0
Record 42: "SITENAME= '' / Observatory site name" status=0
Record 43: "FWHEEL = 'Simulator' / Filter Wheel name" status=0
Record 44: "FILTER = 'CV' / Active filter name" status=0
Record 45: "OBJECT = 'Cam-02' / Name of the object of interest" status=0
Record 46: "OBJCTRA = '12 00 00' / [H M S] RA of imaged object" status=0
Record 47: "OBJCTDEC= '+85 00 00' / [D M S] Declination of imaged object" status=0
Record 48: "OBJCTROT= 0.0 / [deg] planned rotation of imaged object" status=0
Record 49: "FOCNAME = 'ZWO Focuser' / Focusing equipment name" status=0
Record 50: "FOCPOS = 29428 / [step] Focuser position" status=0
Record 51: "FOCUSPOS= 29428 / [step] Focuser position" status=0
Record 52: "FOCUSSZ = 0.0 / [um] Focuser step size" status=0
Record 53: "FOCTEMP = 21.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0
Record 54: "FOCUSTEM= 21.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0
Record 55: "DEWPOINT= 16.5 / [degC] Dew point" status=0
Record 56: "HUMIDITY= 84.0 / [percent] Relative humidity" status=0
Record 57: "PRESSURE= 902.91 / [hPa] Air pressure" status=0
Record 58: "AMBTEMP = 19.3 / [degC] Ambient air temperature" status=0
Record 59: "WINDDIR = 1.0 / [deg] Wind direction: 0=N, 180=S, 90=E, 270=W" status=0
Record 60: "WINDGUST= 9.400752 / [kph] Wind gust" status=0
Record 61: "WINDSPD = 7.200576 / [kph] Wind speed" status=0
Record 62: "ROWORDER= 'TOP-DOWN' / FITS Image Orientation" status=0
Record 63: "EQUINOX = 2000.0 / Equinox of celestial coordinate system" status=0
Record 64: "SWCREATE= 'N.I.N.A. 3.2.0.9001 (x64)' / Software that created this file" status=0
Record 65: "QHY_EXP = 20.000096 / [s] Actual exposure time" status=0
Record 66: "QHY_PP = 13888.0 / [ps] pixelPeriod" status=0
Record 67: "QHY_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0
Record 68: "GPS_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0
Record 69: "QHY_FP = 20000160.0 / [us] framePeriod" status=0
Record 70: "QHY_CPL = 6120.0 / clocksPerLine" status=0
Record 71: "QHY_LPF = 235295.0 / linesPerFrame" status=0
Record 72: "QHY_AET = 20000096.0 / [us] actualExposureTime" status=0
Record 73: "QHY_LEM = T / isLongExposureMode" status=0
Record 74: "QHY_OFF0= 3767.777 / [us] RollingShutterEndOffset row 0" status=0
Allocating memory for image, dark and result arrays...
Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-04_CI_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_025619_TTUQ1b1x1_86085_JwycB1mR/Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_02-22-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0266.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix
SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-04_CI_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_025619_TTUQ1b1x1_86085_JwycB1mR/Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_02-22-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0266.fits
SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_5C_20s_2026-05-30.fit
CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-04_CI_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_025619_TTUQ1b1x1_86085_JwycB1mR/Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_02-22-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0266.fits
CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_5C_20s_2026-05-30.fit
Reading dark frame /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_5C_20s_2026-05-30.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix
Dark frame is subtracted, output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-04_CI_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_025619_TTUQ1b1x1_86085_JwycB1mR/d_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_02-22-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0266.fits :)
Spent 0.773024 seconds
renamed 'mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_5C_20s_2026-05-30.png' -> 'transient_report/dark.png'
try_to_calibrate_the_input_frame(): selected flat field /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-05-30.fit from directory /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats
MegaDivider v7
Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-04_CI_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_025619_TTUQ1b1x1_86085_JwycB1mR/d_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_02-22-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0266.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix
Reading flat /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-05-30.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix
Avarage count on flat field image: 31267.409145
Minimal real count (from overscan): 5
Output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-04_CI_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_025619_TTUQ1b1x1_86085_JwycB1mR/fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_02-22-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0266.fits :)
No overscan detected - all values seem high! (left_median=21677.0, right_median=21704.0)
renamed 'mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-05-30.png' -> 'transient_report/flat.png'
Using calibrated image CALIBRATED_SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-04_CI_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_025619_TTUQ1b1x1_86085_JwycB1mR/fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_02-22-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0266.fits
Dark frame used to calibrate the second-epoch images:

Flat field used to calibrate the second-epoch images:

after the calibration attempt:
SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-04_CI_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_025619_TTUQ1b1x1_86085_JwycB1mR/fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_02-21-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0265.fits
SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-04_CI_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_025619_TTUQ1b1x1_86085_JwycB1mR/fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_02-22-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0266.fits
Previews of the CALIBRATED second-epoch images:
fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_02-21-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0265.fits

fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_02-22-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0266.fits

Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 3.5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-57-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0100.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-58-44_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0101.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-04_CI_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_025619_TTUQ1b1x1_86085_JwycB1mR/fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_02-21-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0265.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-04_CI_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_025619_TTUQ1b1x1_86085_JwycB1mR/fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_02-22-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0266.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-57-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0100.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-58-44_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0101.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-57-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0100.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-58-44_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0101.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-04_CI_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_025619_TTUQ1b1x1_86085_JwycB1mR/fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_02-21-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0265.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-04_CI_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_025619_TTUQ1b1x1_86085_JwycB1mR/fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_02-22-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0266.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461195.80703472
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-57-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0100.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-57-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0100.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-57-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0100.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-57-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0100.fits'
wcs_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-58-44_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0101.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-58-44_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0101.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-58-44_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0101.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-58-44_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0101.fits'
wcs_fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_02-21-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0265.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_02-21-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0265.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_02-21-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0265.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_02-21-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0265.fits'
wcs_fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_02-22-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0266.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_02-22-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0266.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_02-22-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0266.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_02-22-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0266.fits'
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-57-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0100.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-57-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0100.fits
Image size: 937.4'x624.3' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 11:59:47.919 +85:00:19.06 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.87"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_02-21-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0265.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_02-21-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0265.fits
Image size: 941.4'x626.5' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.88"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 12:02:35.436 +85:01:22.22 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 11:59:47.919 +85:00:19.06
Second-epoch image center 12:02:35.436 +85:01:22.22
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0631 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_02-22-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0266.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_02-22-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0266.fits
Image size: 941.4'x626.5' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.88"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 12:02:38.863 +85:01:26.09 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 11:59:47.919 +85:00:19.06
Second-epoch image center 12:02:38.863 +85:01:26.09
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0646 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 12:02:35.436 +85:01:22.22
Second-epoch second image center 12:02:38.863 +85:01:26.09
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00164 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-57-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0100.fits &> /tmp/tmp.uq98biDN4f
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-57-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0100.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-58-44_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0101.fits &> /tmp/tmp.TzCglzexxL
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-58-44_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0101.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-04_CI_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_025619_TTUQ1b1x1_86085_JwycB1mR/fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_02-21-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0265.fits &> /tmp/tmp.nkIdgD38So
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-04_CI_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_025619_TTUQ1b1x1_86085_JwycB1mR/fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_02-21-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0265.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-04_CI_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_025619_TTUQ1b1x1_86085_JwycB1mR/fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_02-22-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0266.fits &> /tmp/tmp.eSF4YXBwcY
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-04_CI_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_025619_TTUQ1b1x1_86085_JwycB1mR/fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_02-22-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0266.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-57-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0100.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-57-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0100.fits and wcs_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-57-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0100.fits.cat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-57-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0100.fits and wcs_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-57-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0100.fits.cat
Found non-empty wcs_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-57-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0100.fits and wcs_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-57-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0100.fits.cat
The reference image (wcs_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-57-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0100.fits) and catalog (wcs_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-57-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0100.fits.cat) found
'wcs_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-57-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0100.fits.cat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 6845 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 25.3944 to 319.1803 deg, Dec +77.2234 to +89.8325 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 25.3944 to 319.1803 deg, Dec 77.2234 to 89.8325 deg
Loaded 21377 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 5428 out of 5651 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 5651 out of 6845 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.852450
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.852450
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -8.21
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.64
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.64
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:

Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 6845 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 25.3944 to 319.1803 deg, Dec +77.2234 to +89.8325 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 25.3944 to 319.1803 deg, Dec 77.2234 to 89.8325 deg
Loaded 21377 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 5428 out of 5651 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 5651 out of 6845 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-57-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0100.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-57-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0100.fits:

Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-57-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0100.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-57-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0100.fits (aperture=6.5)
Read 6849 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 25.3790 to 319.1648 deg, Dec +77.2234 to +89.8325 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 25.3790 to 319.1648 deg, Dec 77.2234 to 89.8325 deg
Loaded 21376 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 5418 out of 5646 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 5646 out of 6849 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-58-44_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0101.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-58-44_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0101.fits:

Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-58-44_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0101.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-58-44_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0101.fits (aperture=6.5)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 7 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 8000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.4 pix Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-57-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0100.fits
2.4 pix Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-58-44_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0101.fits
4.1 pix fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_02-21-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0265.fits
4.1 pix fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_02-22-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0266.fits
2.4 pix wcs_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-57-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0100.fits
2.4 pix wcs_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-58-44_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0101.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
14.6 mag. Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-57-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0100.fits
14.6 mag. Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-58-44_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0101.fits
14.2 mag. fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_02-21-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0265.fits
14.2 mag. fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_02-22-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0266.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.2 (SNR ) 11.6 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.uq98biDN4f (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-57-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0100.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-04_CI_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_025619_TTUQ1b1x1_86085_JwycB1mR/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-57-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0100.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-57-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0100.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-57-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0100.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-57-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0100.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-57-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0100.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-57-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0100.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-57-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0100.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-57-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0100.fits' -> 'wcs_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-57-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0100.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-57-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0100.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-57-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0100.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-57-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0100.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-57-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0100.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-57-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0100.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-57-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0100.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-57-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0100.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-57-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0100.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-57-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0100.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-57-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0100.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=531, passed=6845
Got 6845 stars (including 6311 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-57-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0100.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 6845 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013019 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010416 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 180.0302 through 0 to 179.9717, gap 179.9717 to 180.0302
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 836 to 900 (Dec 77.2 to 89.8)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 976 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 974 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 962 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.51"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 974 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6798 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.50"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 180.0230 through 0 to 179.9717, gap 179.9717 to 180.0230
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 836 to 900 (Dec 77.2 to 89.8)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 976 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 974 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6798 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.49"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 974 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6798 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44"
Excluding outliers - 974 stars left (next iteration limit 1071)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-57-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0100.fits N_match=974 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.474 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.410 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.539 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.475 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.505 n_q1=254 n_q2=251 n_q3=224 n_q4=245 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.137
The image catalog is written to wcs_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-57-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0100.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-57-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0100.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-57-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0100.fits -region wcs_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-57-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0100.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-57-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0100.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.TzCglzexxL (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-58-44_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0101.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-04_CI_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_025619_TTUQ1b1x1_86085_JwycB1mR/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-58-44_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0101.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-58-44_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0101.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-58-44_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0101.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-58-44_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0101.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-58-44_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0101.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-58-44_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0101.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-58-44_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0101.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-58-44_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0101.fits' -> 'wcs_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-58-44_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0101.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-58-44_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0101.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-58-44_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0101.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-58-44_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0101.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-58-44_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0101.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-58-44_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0101.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-58-44_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0101.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-58-44_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0101.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-58-44_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0101.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-58-44_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0101.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-58-44_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0101.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=534, passed=6849
Got 6849 stars (including 6309 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-58-44_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0101.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 6849 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013019 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010416 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 180.0288 through 0 to 179.9723, gap 179.9723 to 180.0288
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 836 to 900 (Dec 77.2 to 89.8)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 976 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 974 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 967 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.50"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 974 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6803 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.49"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 180.0220 through 0 to 179.9722, gap 179.9722 to 180.0220
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 836 to 900 (Dec 77.2 to 89.8)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 976 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 974 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6800 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.49"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 974 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6800 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44"
Excluding outliers - 974 stars left (next iteration limit 1071)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-58-44_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0101.fits N_match=974 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.473 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.372 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.537 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.516 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.527 n_q1=250 n_q2=256 n_q3=224 n_q4=244 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.134
The image catalog is written to wcs_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-58-44_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0101.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-58-44_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0101.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-58-44_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0101.fits -region wcs_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-58-44_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0101.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-58-44_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0101.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.nkIdgD38So (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-04_CI_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_025619_TTUQ1b1x1_86085_JwycB1mR/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-04_CI_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_025619_TTUQ1b1x1_86085_JwycB1mR/fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_02-21-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0265.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-04_CI_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_025619_TTUQ1b1x1_86085_JwycB1mR/fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_02-21-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0265.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-04_CI_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_025619_TTUQ1b1x1_86085_JwycB1mR/fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_02-21-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0265.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-04_CI_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_025619_TTUQ1b1x1_86085_JwycB1mR/fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_02-21-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0265.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-04_CI_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_025619_TTUQ1b1x1_86085_JwycB1mR/fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_02-21-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0265.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-04_CI_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_025619_TTUQ1b1x1_86085_JwycB1mR/fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_02-21-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0265.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_02-21-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0265.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_02-21-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0265.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_02-21-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0265.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_02-21-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0265.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_02-21-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0265.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_02-21-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0265.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_02-21-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0265.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-04_CI_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_025619_TTUQ1b1x1_86085_JwycB1mR/fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_02-21-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0265.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_02-21-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0265.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=297, passed=6413
Got 6413 stars (including 6111 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_02-21-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0265.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 6413 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013075 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010460 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 180.0280 through 0 to 179.9706, gap 179.9706 to 180.0280
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 835 to 900 (Dec 77.0 to 89.8)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 975 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 973 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 963 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 973 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6309 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 180.0249 through 0 to 179.9712, gap 179.9712 to 180.0249
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 835 to 900 (Dec 77.0 to 89.8)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 975 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 973 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6311 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 973 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6311 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Excluding outliers - 973 stars left (next iteration limit 1070)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_02-21-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0265.fits N_match=973 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.325 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.376 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.379 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.258 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.357 n_q1=246 n_q2=242 n_q3=238 n_q4=247 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.165
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_02-21-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0265.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_02-21-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0265.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-04_CI_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_025619_TTUQ1b1x1_86085_JwycB1mR/fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_02-21-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0265.fits -region wcs_fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_02-21-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0265.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_02-21-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0265.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.eSF4YXBwcY (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-04_CI_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_025619_TTUQ1b1x1_86085_JwycB1mR/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-04_CI_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_025619_TTUQ1b1x1_86085_JwycB1mR/fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_02-22-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0266.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-04_CI_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_025619_TTUQ1b1x1_86085_JwycB1mR/fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_02-22-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0266.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-04_CI_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_025619_TTUQ1b1x1_86085_JwycB1mR/fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_02-22-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0266.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-04_CI_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_025619_TTUQ1b1x1_86085_JwycB1mR/fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_02-22-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0266.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-04_CI_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_025619_TTUQ1b1x1_86085_JwycB1mR/fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_02-22-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0266.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-04_CI_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_025619_TTUQ1b1x1_86085_JwycB1mR/fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_02-22-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0266.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_02-22-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0266.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_02-22-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0266.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_02-22-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0266.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_02-22-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0266.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_02-22-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0266.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_02-22-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0266.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_02-22-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0266.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-04_CI_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_025619_TTUQ1b1x1_86085_JwycB1mR/fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_02-22-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0266.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_02-22-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0266.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=305, passed=6483
Got 6483 stars (including 6174 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_02-22-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0266.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 6483 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013075 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010460 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 180.0275 through 0 to 179.9709, gap 179.9709 to 180.0275
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 835 to 900 (Dec 77.0 to 89.8)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 974 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 972 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 964 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 972 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6382 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 180.0261 through 0 to 179.9715, gap 179.9715 to 180.0261
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 835 to 900 (Dec 77.0 to 89.8)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 974 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 972 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6384 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 972 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6384 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Excluding outliers - 972 stars left (next iteration limit 1069)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_02-22-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0266.fits N_match=972 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.328 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.381 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.358 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.282 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.323 n_q1=243 n_q2=240 n_q3=237 n_q4=252 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.163
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_02-22-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0266.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_02-22-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0266.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-04_CI_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_025619_TTUQ1b1x1_86085_JwycB1mR/fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_02-22-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0266.fits -region wcs_fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_02-22-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0266.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_02-22-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0266.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-57-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0100.fits sigma_overall=0.474 worst_q_ratio=1.137
ref2=Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-58-44_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0101.fits sigma_overall=0.473 worst_q_ratio=1.134
new1=fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_02-21-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0265.fits sigma_overall=0.325 worst_q_ratio=1.165
new2=fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_02-22-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0266.fits sigma_overall=0.328 worst_q_ratio=1.163
reference average sigma_overall=0.4735 worst_q_ratio=1.1355
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
Distribution of catalog-matched stars across the image:
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy: wrote wcs_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-57-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0100_astrometric_residuals.png (974 matched stars from wcs_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-57-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0100.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy: wrote wcs_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-58-44_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0101_astrometric_residuals.png (974 matched stars from wcs_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-58-44_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0101.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy: wrote wcs_fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_02-21-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0265_astrometric_residuals.png (973 matched stars from wcs_fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_02-21-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0265.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy: wrote wcs_fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_02-22-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0266_astrometric_residuals.png (972 matched stars from wcs_fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_02-22-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0266.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_02-21-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0265.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_02-21-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0265.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-04_CI_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_025619_TTUQ1b1x1_86085_JwycB1mR/wcs_fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_02-21-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0265.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_02-22-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0266.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_02-22-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0266.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-04_CI_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_025619_TTUQ1b1x1_86085_JwycB1mR/wcs_fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_02-22-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0266.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Cam-02-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-57-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0100.fits at 14:36:52.27 +82:00:58.4: 12.21 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-58-44_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0101.fits at 14:36:52.27 +82:00:58.4: 12.24 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.22 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:36:52.27 +82:00:58.4: ref_mag=12.22 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=11.7494 delta=0.47 (need > 0.90)
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 1s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 0s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20441_fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_02-22-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0266
The candidate 20441_fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_02-22-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0266 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 06 04.30750 | 2461195.80750 | 11.57 | 17:39:17.04 +85:06:52.0 | 2042 0287 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-04_CI_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_025619_TTUQ1b1x1_86085_JwycB1mR/fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_02-22-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0266.fits |
**** FOUND 17:39:17.12 +85:06:52.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20458_fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_02-22-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0266
The candidate 20458_fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_02-22-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0266 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 06 04.30750 | 2461195.80750 | 11.78 | 14:54:26.34 +86:43:37.1 | 3558 1550 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-04_CI_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_025619_TTUQ1b1x1_86085_JwycB1mR/fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_02-22-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0266.fits |
**** FOUND 14:54:26.18 +86:43:37.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20461_fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_02-22-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0266
The candidate 20461_fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_02-22-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0266 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 06 04.30750 | 2461195.80750 | 11.69 | 11:49:50.14 +85:39:07.7 | 4962 2824 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-04_CI_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_025619_TTUQ1b1x1_86085_JwycB1mR/fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_02-22-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0266.fits |
**** FOUND 11:49:50.25 +85:39:07.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20466_fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_02-22-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0266
The candidate 20466_fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_02-22-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0266 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 1 | 2026 06 04.30703 | 2461195.80703 | 11.76 | 14:36:52.24 +82:00:58.2 | 1742 3753 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-04_CI_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_025619_TTUQ1b1x1_86085_JwycB1mR/fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_02-21-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0265.fits |
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 06 04.30750 | 2461195.80750 | 11.74 | 14:36:52.30 +82:00:58.5 | 1742 3754 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-04_CI_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_025619_TTUQ1b1x1_86085_JwycB1mR/fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_02-22-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0266.fits |
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20472_fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_02-22-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0266
The candidate 20472_fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_02-22-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0266 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 06 04.30750 | 2461195.80750 | 11.81 | 06:05:53.60 +84:10:00.8 | 8532 0493 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-04_CI_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_025619_TTUQ1b1x1_86085_JwycB1mR/fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_02-22-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0266.fits |
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.3 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 03383_fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_02-22-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0266
The candidate 03383_fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_02-22-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0266 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 3 | 2026 06 04.30750 | 2461195.80750 | 8.36 | 14:17:50.86 +83:49:53.5 | 2722 3142 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-04_CI_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_025619_TTUQ1b1x1_86085_JwycB1mR/fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_02-22-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0266.fits |
**** FOUND 14:17:50.89 +83:49:53.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 04594_fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_02-22-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0266
The candidate 04594_fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_02-22-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0266 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 3 | 2026 06 04.30750 | 2461195.80750 | 9.05 | 08:26:51.40 +85:07:02.8 | 7253 2102 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-04_CI_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_025619_TTUQ1b1x1_86085_JwycB1mR/fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_02-22-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0266.fits |
**** FOUND 08:26:51.32 +85:07:02.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 1s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Cam-02-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 3.5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-57-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0100.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-58-44_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0101.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-04_CI_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_025619_TTUQ1b1x1_86085_JwycB1mR/fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_02-21-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0265.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-04_CI_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_025619_TTUQ1b1x1_86085_JwycB1mR/fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_02-22-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0266.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-57-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0100.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-58-44_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0101.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-57-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0100.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-58-44_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0101.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-04_CI_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_025619_TTUQ1b1x1_86085_JwycB1mR/fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_02-21-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0265.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-04_CI_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_025619_TTUQ1b1x1_86085_JwycB1mR/fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_02-22-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0266.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-57-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0100.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-58-44_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0101.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_02-21-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0265.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_02-22-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0266.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/exclusion_list.txt
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-57-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0100.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-58-44_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0101.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_02-21-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0265.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_02-22-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0266.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-57-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0100.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-57-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0100.fits
Image size: 937.4'x624.3' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 11:59:47.919 +85:00:19.06 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.87"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_02-21-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0265.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_02-21-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0265.fits
Image size: 941.4'x626.5' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.88"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 12:02:35.436 +85:01:22.22 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 11:59:47.919 +85:00:19.06
Second-epoch image center 12:02:35.436 +85:01:22.22
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0631 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_02-22-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0266.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_02-22-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0266.fits
Image size: 941.4'x626.5' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.88"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 12:02:38.863 +85:01:26.09 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 11:59:47.919 +85:00:19.06
Second-epoch image center 12:02:38.863 +85:01:26.09
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0646 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 12:02:35.436 +85:01:22.22
Second-epoch second image center 12:02:38.863 +85:01:26.09
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00164 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-57-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0100.fits &> /tmp/tmp.GpfB8ZJYtR
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-57-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0100.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-58-44_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0101.fits &> /tmp/tmp.U6TL0fkbJ2
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-58-44_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0101.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-04_CI_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_025619_TTUQ1b1x1_86085_JwycB1mR/fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_02-21-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0265.fits &> /tmp/tmp.WTfqASJgNn
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-04_CI_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_025619_TTUQ1b1x1_86085_JwycB1mR/fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_02-21-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0265.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-04_CI_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_025619_TTUQ1b1x1_86085_JwycB1mR/fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_02-22-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0266.fits &> /tmp/tmp.V4PWnMEMM6
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-04_CI_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_025619_TTUQ1b1x1_86085_JwycB1mR/fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_02-22-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0266.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-57-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0100.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-57-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0100.fits and wcs_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-57-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0100.fits.cat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-57-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0100.fits and wcs_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-57-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0100.fits.cat
Found non-empty wcs_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-57-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0100.fits and wcs_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-57-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0100.fits.cat
The reference image (wcs_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-57-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0100.fits) and catalog (wcs_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-57-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0100.fits.cat) found
'wcs_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-57-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0100.fits.cat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 41486 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 13.5216 to 354.2318 deg, Dec +77.0895 to +89.9631 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 13.5216 to 354.2318 deg, Dec 77.0895 to 89.9631 deg
Loaded 25696 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 6023 out of 6569 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 6569 out of 41486 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.703100
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.703100
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.90
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.80
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.80
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:

Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 41486 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 13.5216 to 354.2318 deg, Dec +77.0895 to +89.9631 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 13.5216 to 354.2318 deg, Dec 77.0895 to 89.9631 deg
Loaded 25696 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 6023 out of 6569 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 6569 out of 41486 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-57-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0100.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-57-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0100.fits:

Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-57-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0100.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-57-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0100.fits (aperture=4.9)
Read 41325 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 13.7948 to 354.2929 deg, Dec +77.0889 to +89.9622 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 13.7948 to 354.2929 deg, Dec 77.0889 to 89.9622 deg
Loaded 25681 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 6007 out of 6568 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 6568 out of 41325 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-58-44_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0101.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-58-44_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0101.fits:

Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-58-44_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0101.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-58-44_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0101.fits (aperture=4.9)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 59 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 8000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.1 pix Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-57-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0100.fits
2.2 pix Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-58-44_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0101.fits
3.7 pix fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_02-21-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0265.fits
3.7 pix fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_02-22-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0266.fits
2.1 pix wcs_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-57-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0100.fits
2.2 pix wcs_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-58-44_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0101.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
14.8 mag. Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-57-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0100.fits
14.8 mag. Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-58-44_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0101.fits
14.2 mag. fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_02-21-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0265.fits
14.2 mag. fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_02-22-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0266.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.2 (SNR ) 13.6 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.GpfB8ZJYtR (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-57-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0100.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-04_CI_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_025619_TTUQ1b1x1_86085_JwycB1mR/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-57-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0100.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-57-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0100.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-57-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0100.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-57-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0100.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-57-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0100.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-57-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0100.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-57-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0100.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-57-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0100.fits' -> 'wcs_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-57-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0100.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-57-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0100.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-57-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0100.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-57-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0100.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-57-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0100.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-57-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0100.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-57-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0100.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-57-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0100.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-57-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0100.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-57-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0100.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-57-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0100.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=17, blended=1816, passed=41469
Got 41469 stars (including 39594 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-57-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0100.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 41469 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013019 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010416 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 180.0093 through 0 to 179.9961, gap 179.9961 to 180.0093
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 835 to 900 (Dec 77.1 to 90.0)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 977 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 977 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 967 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.54"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 977 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 41121 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.51"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 180.0091 through 0 to 179.9963, gap 179.9963 to 180.0091
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 835 to 900 (Dec 77.1 to 90.0)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 977 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 977 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 41122 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.51"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 977 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 41122 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44"
Excluding outliers - 977 stars left (next iteration limit 1074)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-57-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0100.fits N_match=977 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.495 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.456 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.537 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.501 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.497 n_q1=255 n_q2=252 n_q3=218 n_q4=252 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.086
The image catalog is written to wcs_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-57-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0100.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-57-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0100.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-57-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0100.fits -region wcs_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-57-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0100.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-57-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0100.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.U6TL0fkbJ2 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-58-44_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0101.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-04_CI_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_025619_TTUQ1b1x1_86085_JwycB1mR/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-58-44_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0101.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-58-44_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0101.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-58-44_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0101.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-58-44_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0101.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-58-44_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0101.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-58-44_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0101.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-58-44_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0101.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-58-44_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0101.fits' -> 'wcs_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-58-44_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0101.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-58-44_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0101.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-58-44_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0101.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-58-44_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0101.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-58-44_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0101.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-58-44_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0101.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-58-44_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0101.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-58-44_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0101.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-58-44_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0101.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-58-44_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0101.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-58-44_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0101.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=17, blended=1852, passed=41308
Got 41308 stars (including 39383 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-58-44_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0101.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 41308 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013019 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010416 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 180.0072 through 0 to 179.9944, gap 179.9944 to 180.0072
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 835 to 900 (Dec 77.1 to 90.0)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 977 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 977 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 967 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.54"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 977 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 40899 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.51"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 180.0001 through 0 to 179.9976, gap 179.9976 to 180.0001
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 835 to 900 (Dec 77.1 to 90.0)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 977 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 977 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 40899 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.51"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 977 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 40899 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45"
Excluding outliers - 977 stars left (next iteration limit 1074)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-58-44_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0101.fits N_match=977 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.486 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.390 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.539 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.532 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.518 n_q1=257 n_q2=257 n_q3=213 n_q4=250 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.109
The image catalog is written to wcs_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-58-44_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0101.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-58-44_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0101.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-58-44_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0101.fits -region wcs_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-58-44_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0101.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-58-44_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0101.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.WTfqASJgNn (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-04_CI_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_025619_TTUQ1b1x1_86085_JwycB1mR/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-04_CI_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_025619_TTUQ1b1x1_86085_JwycB1mR/fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_02-21-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0265.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-04_CI_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_025619_TTUQ1b1x1_86085_JwycB1mR/fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_02-21-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0265.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-04_CI_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_025619_TTUQ1b1x1_86085_JwycB1mR/fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_02-21-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0265.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-04_CI_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_025619_TTUQ1b1x1_86085_JwycB1mR/fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_02-21-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0265.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-04_CI_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_025619_TTUQ1b1x1_86085_JwycB1mR/fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_02-21-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0265.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-04_CI_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_025619_TTUQ1b1x1_86085_JwycB1mR/fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_02-21-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0265.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_02-21-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0265.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_02-21-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0265.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_02-21-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0265.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_02-21-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0265.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_02-21-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0265.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_02-21-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0265.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_02-21-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0265.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-04_CI_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_025619_TTUQ1b1x1_86085_JwycB1mR/fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_02-21-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0265.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_02-21-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0265.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=8, blended=1058, passed=28126
Got 28126 stars (including 27043 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_02-21-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0265.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 28126 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013075 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010460 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 180.0038 through 0 to 179.9942, gap 179.9942 to 180.0038
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 834 to 900 (Dec 77.0 to 89.9)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 973 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 972 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 966 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 972 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 27674 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 180.0051 through 0 to 179.9947, gap 179.9947 to 180.0051
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 834 to 900 (Dec 77.0 to 89.9)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 973 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 972 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 27673 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 972 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 27673 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Excluding outliers - 972 stars left (next iteration limit 1069)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_02-21-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0265.fits N_match=972 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.349 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.378 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.397 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.285 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.382 n_q1=246 n_q2=239 n_q3=233 n_q4=254 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.139
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_02-21-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0265.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_02-21-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0265.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-04_CI_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_025619_TTUQ1b1x1_86085_JwycB1mR/fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_02-21-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0265.fits -region wcs_fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_02-21-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0265.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_02-21-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0265.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.V4PWnMEMM6 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-04_CI_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_025619_TTUQ1b1x1_86085_JwycB1mR/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-04_CI_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_025619_TTUQ1b1x1_86085_JwycB1mR/fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_02-22-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0266.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-04_CI_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_025619_TTUQ1b1x1_86085_JwycB1mR/fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_02-22-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0266.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-04_CI_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_025619_TTUQ1b1x1_86085_JwycB1mR/fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_02-22-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0266.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-04_CI_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_025619_TTUQ1b1x1_86085_JwycB1mR/fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_02-22-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0266.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-04_CI_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_025619_TTUQ1b1x1_86085_JwycB1mR/fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_02-22-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0266.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-04_CI_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_025619_TTUQ1b1x1_86085_JwycB1mR/fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_02-22-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0266.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_02-22-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0266.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_02-22-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0266.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_02-22-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0266.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_02-22-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0266.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_02-22-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0266.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_02-22-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0266.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_02-22-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0266.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-04_CI_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_025619_TTUQ1b1x1_86085_JwycB1mR/fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_02-22-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0266.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_02-22-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0266.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=9, blended=1076, passed=28108
Got 28108 stars (including 27007 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_02-22-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0266.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 28108 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013075 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010460 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 180.0222 through 0 to 179.9936, gap 179.9936 to 180.0222
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 834 to 900 (Dec 77.0 to 89.9)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 973 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 972 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 966 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 972 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 27683 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 180.0251 through 0 to 179.9952, gap 179.9952 to 180.0251
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 834 to 900 (Dec 77.0 to 89.9)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 973 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 972 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 27683 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 972 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 27683 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Excluding outliers - 972 stars left (next iteration limit 1069)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_02-22-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0266.fits N_match=972 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.351 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.387 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.382 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.322 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.321 n_q1=241 n_q2=239 n_q3=236 n_q4=256 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.103
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_02-22-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0266.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_02-22-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0266.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-04_CI_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_025619_TTUQ1b1x1_86085_JwycB1mR/fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_02-22-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0266.fits -region wcs_fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_02-22-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0266.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_02-22-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0266.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_02-21-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0265.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-04_CI_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_025619_TTUQ1b1x1_86085_JwycB1mR/wcs_fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_02-21-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0265.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_02-22-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0266.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-04_CI_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_025619_TTUQ1b1x1_86085_JwycB1mR/wcs_fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_02-22-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0266.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Cam-02-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-57-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0100.fits at 09:36:29.63 +81:21:22.3: 12.80 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-57-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0100.fits at 14:38:16.30 +87:13:03.7: 12.79 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-57-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0100.fits at 15:53:25.56 +83:05:48.9: 13.31 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-58-44_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0101.fits at 09:36:29.63 +81:21:22.3: 12.90 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.84 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 09:36:29.63 +81:21:22.3: ref_mag=12.84 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=12.8243 delta=0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-58-44_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0101.fits at 14:38:16.30 +87:13:03.7: 12.72 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.76 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:38:16.30 +87:13:03.7: ref_mag=12.76 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=12.8814 delta=-0.13 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-58-44_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0101.fits at 15:53:25.56 +83:05:48.9: 13.39 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.35 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:53:25.56 +83:05:48.9: ref_mag=13.35 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=13.3457 delta=0.00 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-57-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0100.fits at 17:50:08.71 +82:31:36.4: 14.11 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-58-44_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0101.fits at 17:50:08.71 +82:31:36.4: 14.25 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.17 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:50:08.71 +82:31:36.4: ref_mag=14.17 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=13.8845 delta=0.29 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-57-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0100.fits at 06:12:34.56 +87:47:19.6: 13.43 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-58-44_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0101.fits at 06:12:34.56 +87:47:19.6: 13.63 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.51 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 06:12:34.56 +87:47:19.6: ref_mag=13.51 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=12.5746 delta=0.94 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out26837.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 6s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 1s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53373_fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_02-22-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0266
The candidate 53373_fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_02-22-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0266 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 06 04.30750 | 2461195.80750 | 13.06 | 14:32:59.92 +78:10:58.1 | 0243 5564 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-04_CI_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_025619_TTUQ1b1x1_86085_JwycB1mR/fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_02-22-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0266.fits |
**** FOUND 14:32:59.81 +78:10:57.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53377_fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_02-22-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0266
The candidate 53377_fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_02-22-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0266 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 06 04.30750 | 2461195.80750 | 11.89 | 15:21:40.51 +80:00:48.2 | 0119 3779 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-04_CI_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_025619_TTUQ1b1x1_86085_JwycB1mR/fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_02-22-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0266.fits |
**** FOUND 15:21:40.58 +80:00:47.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53414_fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_02-22-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0266
The candidate 53414_fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_02-22-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0266 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 06 04.30750 | 2461195.80750 | 10.62 | 13:49:26.70 +78:20:32.6 | 1398 6272 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-04_CI_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_025619_TTUQ1b1x1_86085_JwycB1mR/fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_02-22-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0266.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53458_fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_02-22-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0266
The candidate 53458_fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_02-22-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0266 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 06 04.30750 | 2461195.80750 | 11.44 | 07:18:49.84 +83:34:19.3 | 8582 1727 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-04_CI_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_025619_TTUQ1b1x1_86085_JwycB1mR/fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_02-22-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0266.fits |
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53464_fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_02-22-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0266
The candidate 53464_fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_02-22-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0266 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 06 04.30750 | 2461195.80750 | 11.56 | 10:03:16.03 +87:13:44.1 | 5727 1708 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-04_CI_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_025619_TTUQ1b1x1_86085_JwycB1mR/fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_02-22-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0266.fits |
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53491_fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_02-22-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0266
The candidate 53491_fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_02-22-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0266 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 06 04.30750 | 2461195.80750 | 11.92 | 16:07:06.32 +82:49:38.7 | 1063 2025 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-04_CI_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_025619_TTUQ1b1x1_86085_JwycB1mR/fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_02-22-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0266.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53495_fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_02-22-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0266
The candidate 53495_fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_02-22-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0266 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 06 04.30750 | 2461195.80750 | 11.94 | 11:31:22.76 +81:19:33.4 | 5342 5422 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-04_CI_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_025619_TTUQ1b1x1_86085_JwycB1mR/fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_02-22-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0266.fits |
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53561_fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_02-22-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0266
The candidate 53561_fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_02-22-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0266 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 06 04.30750 | 2461195.80750 | 12.71 | 16:15:44.26 +87:33:49.7 | 3644 0767 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-04_CI_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_025619_TTUQ1b1x1_86085_JwycB1mR/fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_02-22-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0266.fits |
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53581_fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_02-22-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0266
The candidate 53581_fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_02-22-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0266 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 06 04.30750 | 2461195.80750 | 12.66 | 09:15:05.25 +83:28:38.4 | 7411 3314 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-04_CI_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_025619_TTUQ1b1x1_86085_JwycB1mR/fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_02-22-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0266.fits |
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53603_fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_02-22-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0266
The candidate 53603_fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_02-22-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0266 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 1 | 2026 06 04.30703 | 2461195.80703 | 12.80 | 09:36:29.28 +81:21:21.7 | 7798 4610 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-04_CI_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_025619_TTUQ1b1x1_86085_JwycB1mR/fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_02-21-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0265.fits |
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 06 04.30750 | 2461195.80750 | 12.85 | 09:36:29.98 +81:21:23.0 | 7799 4610 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-04_CI_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_025619_TTUQ1b1x1_86085_JwycB1mR/fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_02-22-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0266.fits |
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53608_fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_02-22-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0266
The candidate 53608_fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_02-22-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0266 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 1 | 2026 06 04.30703 | 2461195.80703 | 12.88 | 14:38:17.16 +87:13:02.2 | 3858 1430 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-04_CI_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_025619_TTUQ1b1x1_86085_JwycB1mR/fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_02-21-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0265.fits |
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 06 04.30750 | 2461195.80750 | 12.88 | 14:38:15.44 +87:13:05.2 | 3858 1431 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-04_CI_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_025619_TTUQ1b1x1_86085_JwycB1mR/fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_02-22-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0266.fits |
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53630_fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_02-22-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0266
The candidate 53630_fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_02-22-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0266 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 06 04.30750 | 2461195.80750 | 12.94 | 11:54:10.01 +87:50:30.0 | 4957 1504 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-04_CI_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_025619_TTUQ1b1x1_86085_JwycB1mR/fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_02-22-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0266.fits |
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53672_fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_02-22-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0266
The candidate 53672_fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_02-22-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0266 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 06 04.30750 | 2461195.80750 | 12.97 | 14:16:26.27 +77:52:16.2 | 0529 6043 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-04_CI_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_025619_TTUQ1b1x1_86085_JwycB1mR/fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_02-22-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0266.fits |
**** FOUND 14:16:26.22 +77:52:16.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53690_fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_02-22-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0266
The candidate 53690_fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_02-22-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0266 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 06 04.30750 | 2461195.80750 | 13.15 | 10:51:03.20 +82:25:56.9 | 6088 4634 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-04_CI_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_025619_TTUQ1b1x1_86085_JwycB1mR/fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_02-22-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0266.fits |
**** FOUND 10:51:03.21 +82:25:56.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53695_fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_02-22-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0266
The candidate 53695_fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_02-22-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0266 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 1 | 2026 06 04.30703 | 2461195.80703 | 13.33 | 15:53:25.23 +83:05:48.1 | 1325 2178 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-04_CI_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_025619_TTUQ1b1x1_86085_JwycB1mR/fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_02-21-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0265.fits |
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 06 04.30750 | 2461195.80750 | 13.36 | 15:53:25.90 +83:05:49.6 | 1326 2179 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-04_CI_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_025619_TTUQ1b1x1_86085_JwycB1mR/fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_02-22-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0266.fits |
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53696_fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_02-22-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0266
The candidate 53696_fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_02-22-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0266 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 06 04.30750 | 2461195.80750 | 13.55 | 14:01:22.27 +78:03:11.2 | 0987 6227 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-04_CI_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_025619_TTUQ1b1x1_86085_JwycB1mR/fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_02-22-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0266.fits |
**** FOUND 14:01:22.57 +78:03:09.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53702_fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_02-22-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0266
The candidate 53702_fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_02-22-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0266 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 06 04.30750 | 2461195.80750 | 13.18 | 12:40:24.01 +88:21:57.5 | 4771 1160 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-04_CI_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_025619_TTUQ1b1x1_86085_JwycB1mR/fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_02-22-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0266.fits |
**** FOUND 12:40:23.87 +88:21:57.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53707_fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_02-22-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0266
The candidate 53707_fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_02-22-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0266 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 06 04.30750 | 2461195.80750 | 13.56 | 14:38:54.25 +79:13:12.6 | 0543 4973 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-04_CI_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_025619_TTUQ1b1x1_86085_JwycB1mR/fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_02-22-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0266.fits |
**** FOUND 14:38:54.05 +79:13:10.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53728_fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_02-22-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0266
The candidate 53728_fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_02-22-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0266 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 06 04.30750 | 2461195.80750 | 13.36 | 08:48:40.74 +80:16:40.5 | 9120 4411 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-04_CI_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_025619_TTUQ1b1x1_86085_JwycB1mR/fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_02-22-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0266.fits |
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53753_fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_02-22-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0266
The candidate 53753_fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_02-22-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0266 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 06 04.30750 | 2461195.80750 | 13.66 | 15:42:28.73 +80:53:15.9 | 0269 3047 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-04_CI_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_025619_TTUQ1b1x1_86085_JwycB1mR/fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_02-22-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0266.fits |
**** FOUND 15:42:28.89 +80:53:15.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53755_fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_02-22-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0266
The candidate 53755_fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_02-22-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0266 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 06 04.30750 | 2461195.80750 | 13.45 | 16:06:35.81 +81:26:58.6 | 0303 2389 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-04_CI_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_025619_TTUQ1b1x1_86085_JwycB1mR/fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_02-22-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0266.fits |
**** FOUND 16:06:35.61 +81:26:58.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53761_fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_02-22-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0266
The candidate 53761_fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_02-22-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0266 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 06 04.30750 | 2461195.80750 | 13.71 | 09:44:04.02 +82:55:27.8 | 7168 3880 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-04_CI_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_025619_TTUQ1b1x1_86085_JwycB1mR/fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_02-22-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0266.fits |
**** FOUND 09:44:03.73 +82:55:27.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53770_fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_02-22-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0266
The candidate 53770_fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_02-22-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0266 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 06 04.30750 | 2461195.80750 | 13.84 | 14:29:51.96 +78:08:38.7 | 0302 5646 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-04_CI_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_025619_TTUQ1b1x1_86085_JwycB1mR/fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_02-22-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0266.fits |
**** FOUND 14:29:51.99 +78:08:38.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53781_fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_02-22-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0266
The candidate 53781_fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_02-22-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0266 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 06 04.30750 | 2461195.80750 | 13.76 | 17:07:21.48 +82:47:15.2 | 0686 0939 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-04_CI_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_025619_TTUQ1b1x1_86085_JwycB1mR/fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_02-22-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0266.fits |
**** FOUND 17:07:21.31 +82:47:14.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53791_fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_02-22-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0266
The candidate 53791_fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_02-22-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0266 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 06 04.30750 | 2461195.80750 | 13.45 | 10:04:06.04 +83:37:55.3 | 6654 3668 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-04_CI_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_025619_TTUQ1b1x1_86085_JwycB1mR/fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_02-22-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0266.fits |
**** FOUND 10:04:06.44 +83:37:54.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53798_fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_02-22-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0266
The candidate 53798_fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_02-22-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0266 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 06 04.30750 | 2461195.80750 | 13.76 | 14:52:16.56 +78:59:32.3 | 0168 4804 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-04_CI_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_025619_TTUQ1b1x1_86085_JwycB1mR/fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_02-22-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0266.fits |
**** FOUND 14:52:16.24 +78:59:31.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53813_fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_02-22-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0266
The candidate 53813_fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_02-22-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0266 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 06 04.30750 | 2461195.80750 | 13.80 | 15:03:46.79 +79:33:19.0 | 0203 4331 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-04_CI_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_025619_TTUQ1b1x1_86085_JwycB1mR/fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_02-22-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0266.fits |
**** FOUND 15:03:46.90 +79:33:18.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53816_fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_02-22-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0266
The candidate 53816_fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_02-22-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0266 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 06 04.30750 | 2461195.80750 | 13.66 | 12:05:00.03 +88:19:07.2 | 4919 1213 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-04_CI_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_025619_TTUQ1b1x1_86085_JwycB1mR/fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_02-22-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0266.fits |
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53817_fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_02-22-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0266
The candidate 53817_fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_02-22-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0266 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 06 04.30750 | 2461195.80750 | 13.78 | 17:16:11.99 +82:26:36.0 | 0449 0798 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-04_CI_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_025619_TTUQ1b1x1_86085_JwycB1mR/fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_02-22-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0266.fits |
**** FOUND 17:16:12.89 +82:26:36.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53824_fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_02-22-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0266
The candidate 53824_fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_02-22-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0266 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 06 04.30750 | 2461195.80750 | 13.80 | 14:56:40.96 +79:10:13.8 | 0160 4637 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-04_CI_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_025619_TTUQ1b1x1_86085_JwycB1mR/fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_02-22-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0266.fits |
**** FOUND 14:56:40.20 +79:10:13.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53828_fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_02-22-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0266
The candidate 53828_fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_02-22-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0266 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 06 04.30750 | 2461195.80750 | 13.63 | 14:30:13.31 +77:40:57.7 | 0106 5855 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-04_CI_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_025619_TTUQ1b1x1_86085_JwycB1mR/fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_02-22-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0266.fits |
**** FOUND 14:30:13.57 +77:40:57.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53830_fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_02-22-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0266
The candidate 53830_fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_02-22-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0266 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 06 04.30750 | 2461195.80750 | 13.67 | 16:44:39.24 +81:43:36.5 | 0158 1536 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-04_CI_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_025619_TTUQ1b1x1_86085_JwycB1mR/fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_02-22-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0266.fits |
**** FOUND 16:44:38.40 +81:43:36.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53835_fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_02-22-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0266
The candidate 53835_fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_02-22-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0266 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 06 04.30750 | 2461195.80750 | 14.09 | 07:13:45.57 +84:19:41.0 | 8188 1476 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-04_CI_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_025619_TTUQ1b1x1_86085_JwycB1mR/fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_02-22-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0266.fits |
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53836_fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_02-22-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0266
The candidate 53836_fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_02-22-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0266 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 06 04.30750 | 2461195.80750 | 13.95 | 14:19:13.07 +78:21:56.8 | 0647 5748 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-04_CI_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_025619_TTUQ1b1x1_86085_JwycB1mR/fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_02-22-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0266.fits |
**** FOUND 14:19:13.41 +78:21:57.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53837_fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_02-22-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0266
The candidate 53837_fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_02-22-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0266 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 06 04.30750 | 2461195.80750 | 13.99 | 08:18:20.13 +80:55:06.6 | 9337 3591 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-04_CI_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_025619_TTUQ1b1x1_86085_JwycB1mR/fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_02-22-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0266.fits |
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.3 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53845_fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_02-22-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0266
The candidate 53845_fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_02-22-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0266 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 06 04.30750 | 2461195.80750 | 13.91 | 14:18:59.26 +77:23:26.5 | 0279 6228 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-04_CI_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_025619_TTUQ1b1x1_86085_JwycB1mR/fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_02-22-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0266.fits |
**** FOUND 14:18:59.03 +77:23:25.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53847_fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_02-22-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0266
The candidate 53847_fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_02-22-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0266 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 06 04.30750 | 2461195.80750 | 13.90 | 14:24:34.10 +77:21:29.1 | 0120 6128 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-04_CI_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_025619_TTUQ1b1x1_86085_JwycB1mR/fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_02-22-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0266.fits |
**** FOUND 14:24:33.86 +77:21:29.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53848_fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_02-22-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0266
The candidate 53848_fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_02-22-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0266 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 06 04.30750 | 2461195.80750 | 13.86 | 14:14:32.76 +77:40:27.9 | 0504 6177 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-04_CI_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_025619_TTUQ1b1x1_86085_JwycB1mR/fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_02-22-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0266.fits |
**** FOUND 14:14:33.37 +77:40:25.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53849_fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_02-22-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0266
The candidate 53849_fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_02-22-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0266 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 1 | 2026 06 04.30703 | 2461195.80703 | 13.90 | 17:50:07.98 +82:31:36.9 | 0451 0115 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-04_CI_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_025619_TTUQ1b1x1_86085_JwycB1mR/fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_02-21-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0265.fits |
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 06 04.30750 | 2461195.80750 | 13.87 | 17:50:09.45 +82:31:35.9 | 0451 0116 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-04_CI_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_025619_TTUQ1b1x1_86085_JwycB1mR/fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_02-22-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0266.fits |
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53850_fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_02-22-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0266
The candidate 53850_fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_02-22-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0266 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 06 04.30750 | 2461195.80750 | 13.83 | 14:42:46.31 +78:35:55.4 | 0196 5173 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-04_CI_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_025619_TTUQ1b1x1_86085_JwycB1mR/fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_02-22-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0266.fits |
**** FOUND 14:42:46.85 +78:35:56.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53855_fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_02-22-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0266
The candidate 53855_fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_02-22-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0266 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 06 04.30750 | 2461195.80750 | 13.99 | 14:37:40.94 +78:57:54.6 | 0462 5112 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-04_CI_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_025619_TTUQ1b1x1_86085_JwycB1mR/fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_02-22-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0266.fits |
**** FOUND 14:37:41.10 +78:57:53.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53857_fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_02-22-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0266
The candidate 53857_fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_02-22-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0266 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 06 04.30750 | 2461195.80750 | 13.88 | 14:06:22.11 +78:04:58.5 | 0866 6124 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-04_CI_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_025619_TTUQ1b1x1_86085_JwycB1mR/fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_02-22-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0266.fits |
**** FOUND 14:06:21.89 +78:04:59.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53860_fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_02-22-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0266
The candidate 53860_fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_02-22-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0266 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 06 04.30750 | 2461195.80750 | 13.86 | 14:37:22.70 +78:09:02.9 | 0127 5487 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-04_CI_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_025619_TTUQ1b1x1_86085_JwycB1mR/fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_02-22-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0266.fits |
**** FOUND 14:37:22.97 +78:09:04.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53868_fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_02-22-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0266
The candidate 53868_fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_02-22-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0266 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 06 04.30750 | 2461195.80750 | 13.69 | 16:27:10.03 +81:50:59.9 | 0351 1876 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-04_CI_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_025619_TTUQ1b1x1_86085_JwycB1mR/fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_02-22-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0266.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53892_fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_02-22-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0266
The candidate 53892_fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_02-22-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0266 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 06 04.30750 | 2461195.80750 | 14.13 | 15:12:23.19 +79:41:05.7 | 0112 4099 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-04_CI_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_025619_TTUQ1b1x1_86085_JwycB1mR/fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_02-22-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0266.fits |
**** FOUND 15:12:23.35 +79:41:05.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53894_fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_02-22-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0266
The candidate 53894_fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_02-22-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0266 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 06 04.30750 | 2461195.80750 | 14.02 | 14:30:15.12 +77:57:38.7 | 0218 5724 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-04_CI_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_025619_TTUQ1b1x1_86085_JwycB1mR/fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_02-22-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0266.fits |
**** FOUND 14:30:15.02 +77:57:38.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53896_fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_02-22-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0266
The candidate 53896_fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_02-22-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0266 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 06 04.30750 | 2461195.80750 | 13.88 | 13:56:52.67 +78:28:54.5 | 1249 6081 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-04_CI_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_025619_TTUQ1b1x1_86085_JwycB1mR/fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_02-22-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0266.fits |
**** FOUND 13:56:52.39 +78:28:55.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53899_fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_02-22-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0266
The candidate 53899_fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_02-22-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0266 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 06 04.30750 | 2461195.80750 | 14.06 | 14:18:38.56 +78:21:25.8 | 0658 5763 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-04_CI_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_025619_TTUQ1b1x1_86085_JwycB1mR/fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_02-22-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0266.fits |
**** FOUND 14:18:38.64 +78:21:26.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53902_fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_02-22-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0266
The candidate 53902_fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_02-22-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0266 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 06 04.30750 | 2461195.80750 | 14.01 | 14:24:50.07 +78:22:29.6 | 0515 5637 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-04_CI_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_025619_TTUQ1b1x1_86085_JwycB1mR/fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_02-22-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0266.fits |
**** FOUND 14:24:49.56 +78:22:27.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53909_fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_02-22-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0266
The candidate 53909_fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_02-22-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0266 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 06 04.30750 | 2461195.80750 | 14.01 | 14:08:59.00 +77:42:28.4 | 0663 6266 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-04_CI_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_025619_TTUQ1b1x1_86085_JwycB1mR/fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_02-22-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0266.fits |
**** FOUND 14:08:59.24 +77:42:27.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53912_fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_02-22-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0266
The candidate 53912_fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_02-22-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0266 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 06 04.30750 | 2461195.80750 | 14.13 | 15:28:22.84 +80:32:18.6 | 0280 3453 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-04_CI_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_025619_TTUQ1b1x1_86085_JwycB1mR/fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_02-22-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0266.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53932_fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_02-22-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0266
The candidate 53932_fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_02-22-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0266 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 06 04.30750 | 2461195.80750 | 14.05 | 14:49:02.12 +79:06:00.1 | 0282 4825 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-04_CI_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_025619_TTUQ1b1x1_86085_JwycB1mR/fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_02-22-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0266.fits |
**** FOUND 14:49:02.20 +79:05:59.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53933_fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_02-22-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0266
The candidate 53933_fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_02-22-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0266 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 06 04.30750 | 2461195.80750 | 14.16 | 14:43:34.08 +78:30:50.2 | 0142 5194 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-04_CI_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_025619_TTUQ1b1x1_86085_JwycB1mR/fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_02-22-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0266.fits |
**** FOUND 14:43:33.85 +78:30:49.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53937_fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_02-22-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0266
The candidate 53937_fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_02-22-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0266 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 06 04.30750 | 2461195.80750 | 14.10 | 15:10:41.12 +79:40:38.5 | 0138 4138 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-04_CI_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_025619_TTUQ1b1x1_86085_JwycB1mR/fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_02-22-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0266.fits |
**** FOUND 15:10:41.01 +79:40:38.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53945_fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_02-22-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0266
The candidate 53945_fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_02-22-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0266 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 06 04.30750 | 2461195.80750 | 13.96 | 13:37:15.60 +79:46:52.9 | 2136 5671 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-04_CI_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_025619_TTUQ1b1x1_86085_JwycB1mR/fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_02-22-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0266.fits |
**** FOUND 13:37:15.78 +79:46:53.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53957_fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_02-22-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0266
The candidate 53957_fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_02-22-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0266 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 06 04.30750 | 2461195.80750 | 14.22 | 12:02:29.07 +85:44:01.8 | 4821 2769 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-04_CI_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_025619_TTUQ1b1x1_86085_JwycB1mR/fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_02-22-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0266.fits |
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 26837_fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_02-22-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0266
Preparing report for the candidate 26837_fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_02-22-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0266
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20356_fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_02-22-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0266
The candidate 20356_fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_02-22-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0266 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 3 | 2026 06 04.30750 | 2461195.80750 | 8.37 | 14:17:50.81 +83:49:53.6 | 2722 3142 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-04_CI_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_025619_TTUQ1b1x1_86085_JwycB1mR/fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_02-22-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0266.fits |
**** FOUND 14:17:50.86 +83:49:53.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 39800_fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_02-22-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0266
The candidate 39800_fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_02-22-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0266 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 3 | 2026 06 04.30750 | 2461195.80750 | 9.06 | 08:26:51.45 +85:07:02.8 | 7253 2102 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-04_CI_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_025619_TTUQ1b1x1_86085_JwycB1mR/fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_02-22-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0266.fits |
**** FOUND 08:26:51.33 +85:07:02.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 7s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Cam-02-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
06:12:34.56 +87:47:19.6
########### Completed Cam-02-Q1b1x1 ###########
The analysis was running at tau
We are allowed to update the exclusion list at tau host
Found ../exclusion_list_TTUQ1.txt
#### The exclusion list before filtering-out asteroids, bad pixels and adding Gaia sources ####
06:12:34.56 +87:47:19.6
###################################################################################
06:12:34.56 +87:47:19.6 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
renamed 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt_noasteroids' -> 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt'
06:12:34.56 +87:47:19.6 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
renamed 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt_nohotpixels' -> 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt'
# Count candidates with no identification (that also don't look like hot pix)
06:12:34.56 +87:47:19.6 -- a known variable star
Found 0 unidentified candidates (excluding asteroids, hot pixels and known variable stars).
###################################################################################
1 candidates found (excluding asteroids and hot pixels)
This does not look like a test run
###################################################################################
exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt NOT FOUND
exclusion_list_apass.txt NOT FOUND
IS_THIS_TEST_RUN= NO ALLOW_EXCLUSION_LIST_UPDATE= YES
#### Adding the following to the exclusion list ####
06:12:34.56 +87:47:19.6
####################################################
The observatory MPC code is V36
############################################################
Positions of planets computed with util/planet_finder/main.py for JD(UT)2461195.80703472 -observatory V36
06:18:38.00 +25:30:24.0 Mercury (-0.2mag)
07:23:09.20 +24:03:18.1 Venus (-4.0mag)
02:38:20.90 +14:49:03.6 Mars (1.3mag)
07:45:14.19 +21:39:21.9 Jupiter (-1.9mag)
00:48:14.05 +02:42:24.6 Saturn (0.9mag)
03:59:16.69 +20:22:46.7 Uranus (5.8mag)
00:15:54.06 +00:15:26.9 Neptune (7.8mag)
20:33:33.58 -23:03:07.6 Pluto (14.5mag)
19:58:27.90 -24:27:59.8 Moon (-11.6mag)
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 363 Jun 4 03:02 planets.txt
############################################################
Positions of selected moons from JPL HORIZONS for JD(UT)2461195.80703472:
07:45:08.85 +21:39:38.4 Io (6.0mag)
07:45:08.78 +21:39:39.8 Europa (6.2mag)
07:45:31.51 +21:38:33.6 Ganymede (5.6mag)
07:45:42.50 +21:38:04.3 Callisto (6.8mag)
07:45:45.71 +21:15:28.7 Himalia (15.6mag)
07:45:15.74 +21:39:16.7 Thebe (16.5mag)
07:45:51.44 +21:32:39.3 Elara (17.5mag)
07:47:12.59 +21:53:10.7 Pasiphae (17.7mag)
07:51:59.30 +21:40:47.5 Carme (18.8mag)
00:48:09.25 +02:42:54.0 Titan (8.7mag)
00:48:09.86 +02:42:30.3 Rhea (10.0mag)
00:48:46.76 +02:44:05.2 Iapetus (11.4mag)
00:48:01.99 +02:42:34.1 Hyperion (14.7mag)
00:49:01.00 +02:44:54.6 Phoebe (16.7mag)
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 569 Jun 4 03:02 moons.txt
############################################################
Positions of selected spacecraft from JPL HORIZONS for JD(UT)2461195.80703472:
17:24:07.19 -34:52:31.3 JWST
18:20:35.12 +29:04:43.3 Chandra
19:57:52.37 +19:16:36.4 XMM-Newton
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 96 Jun 4 03:02 spacecraft.txt
############################################################
Positions of bright comets computed with util/comet_finder/main.py for JD(UT)2461195.80703472 -observatory V36
18:46:03.33 -32:21:54.7 13.6mag P/2010 H2 (Vales)
05:49:39.79 -68:06:39.5 17.4mag C/2014 UN271 (Bernardinelli-Bernstein)
05:47:38.08 +31:55:05.8 17.5mag C/2017 K2 (PANSTARRS)
17:16:17.27 +15:08:35.5 17.8mag C/2021 G2 (ATLAS)
20:38:28.32 -50:54:35.8 17.2mag P/2021 N1 (ZTF)
23:13:24.10 +31:26:19.6 17.2mag C/2022 E2 (ATLAS)
05:29:15.99 +26:56:55.7 16.4mag C/2022 N2 (PANSTARRS)
09:26:59.14 +31:12:51.3 16.6mag C/2022 QE78 (ATLAS)
08:48:30.17 +03:44:14.1 17.7mag C/2022 R6 (PANSTARRS)
18:30:43.68 +21:30:50.4 17.7mag C/2023 A3 (Tsuchinshan-ATLAS)
15:20:48.57 -11:00:27.0 17.6mag P/2023 B1 (PANSTARRS)
22:15:28.35 +66:16:59.4 17.7mag C/2023 H5 (Lemmon)
17:55:53.20 -06:19:11.3 13.7mag C/2023 R1 (PANSTARRS)
13:21:05.09 +83:51:55.4 17.9mag C/2023 X2 (Lemmon)
07:05:07.13 +64:11:00.9 17.6mag C/2024 A1 (ATLAS)
06:41:18.69 +27:28:09.1 13.5mag C/2024 E1 (Wierzchos)
15:40:22.79 +13:10:09.3 17.4mag C/2024 G6 (ATLAS)
20:15:26.44 +29:58:02.6 14.0mag C/2024 J3 (ATLAS)
04:14:07.58 -16:18:09.7 16.0mag C/2024 T5 (ATLAS)
06:02:16.30 +35:10:21.9 17.9mag C/2025 J1 (Borisov)
11:37:09.45 +52:57:36.4 17.3mag C/2025 L1 (ATLAS)
06:39:53.62 -10:41:28.6 13.7mag C/2025 R3 (PANSTARRS)
09:21:04.90 +23:22:56.4 18.0mag C/2025 V2 (Rankin)
12:39:53.02 +04:41:34.7 17.2mag C/2025 Y1 (ATLAS)
18:18:26.45 +74:15:03.1 18.0mag C/2026 A2 (Bok)
01:53:44.40 +43:07:43.8 16.0mag C/2026 B2 (Sun-Gao)
11:10:40.50 -05:09:51.5 16.4mag A/2026 E1
20:16:32.49 -08:20:34.1 8.9mag 10P/Tempel
11:01:09.88 -00:55:13.5 16.0mag 29P/Schwassmann-Wachmann
10:57:52.52 -02:41:01.1 17.9mag 43P/Wolf-Harrington
03:05:41.39 +25:07:07.7 17.6mag 47P/Ashbrook-Jackson
08:51:41.16 +24:52:05.6 16.9mag 63P/Wild
00:23:30.16 -06:37:44.9 15.7mag 65P/Gunn
06:30:51.80 +32:59:52.5 16.8mag 76P/West-Kohoutek-Ikemura
02:59:48.35 +16:42:15.7 13.9mag 78P/Gehrels
01:12:11.15 +03:59:03.2 15.5mag 88P/Howell
04:42:06.74 +29:58:30.1 15.2mag 93P/Lovas
02:32:04.44 +26:59:03.2 17.7mag 114P/Wiseman-Skiff
06:41:19.13 +33:09:41.0 15.6mag 123P/West-Hartley
09:43:27.25 +16:18:28.8 16.5mag 124P/Mrkos
03:52:37.36 +18:58:54.8 16.4mag 128P/Shoemaker-Holt
04:25:49.08 +18:53:35.3 17.7mag 131P/Mueller
05:41:16.02 +19:04:12.7 14.2mag 141P/Machholz
05:43:46.51 +17:25:02.1 14.1mag 141P-A/Machholz
04:34:17.51 +15:34:38.5 11.2mag 141P-D/Machholz
02:54:54.29 -25:15:11.9 17.0mag 161P/Hartley-IRAS
03:28:52.65 +22:12:54.5 14.9mag 162P/SidingSpring
19:36:38.05 +00:37:26.1 17.1mag 169P/NEAT
00:07:49.40 +01:41:24.3 17.9mag 220P/McNaught
16:55:11.82 -08:41:23.5 16.3mag 235P/LINEAR
07:25:50.70 +35:38:17.5 17.5mag 240P/NEAT
00:22:11.20 -04:06:00.9 16.5mag 260P/McNaught
03:53:46.21 +31:45:19.2 17.6mag 295P/LINEAR
23:25:17.77 -14:54:53.8 17.6mag 320P/McNaught
15:17:03.21 +08:12:57.5 17.4mag 391P/Kowalski
08:04:04.87 +20:50:36.3 17.9mag 450P/LONEOS
06:53:37.80 +41:58:09.9 17.8mag 493P/LONEOS
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 2.8K Jun 4 03:02 comets.txt
############################################################
List of recent ASAS-SN transients from https://www.astronomy.ohio-state.edu/asassn/transients.html :
20:07:38.15 -21:07:05.40 SN2026mho 2026-05-25.18 -1.12
11:29:42.55 +79:01:03.10 AT2026min 2026-05-24.21 16.63
11:44:32.95 -68:48:30.00 ASASSN-26no 2026-05-24 8.41
19:00:42.82 -48:31:01.60 ASASSN-26dp 2026-05-22.31 -3.28
14:23:56.59 -58:37:47.40 ASASSN-26dn 2026-05-20.01 14.59
11:24:54.06 +47:57:01.60 AT2026nma 2026-05-20.29 15.46
21:27:08.58 +33:24:38.10 AT2026lli 2026-05-19.34 15.86
00:31:01.41 -13:38:51.70 AT2026nad 2026-05-19.39 15.34
15:16:06.61 -79:16:32.40 ASASSN-26dm 2026-05-19.03 14.44
11:24:25.21 -59:23:19.10 ASASSN-26dl 2026-05-18.02 13.55
13:45:51.52 -53:16:01.00 ASASSN-26dk 2026-05-18.16 12.96
02:05:49.69 -30:29:09.60 ASASSN-26dh 2026-05-18.43 15.37
17:50:22.87 -39:42:33.90 ASASSN-26dj 2026-05-17.05 15.7
01:13:11.60 -33:25:16.10 ASASSN-26dg 2026-05-13.41 16.8
16:44:31.77 -27:15:18.40 AT2026mhn 2026-05-12.33 15.8
09:46:31.08 -33:41:51.00 ASASSN-26di 2026-05-12.14 14.63
21:23:11.57 -19:09:45.00 AT2026kwu 2026-05-12.26 16.9
14:20:14.30 -30:20:51.90 AT2026ktm 2026-05-12.06 17.21
14:41:39.01 -37:13:46.40 AT2026lkm 2026-05-11.18 16.89
12:59:50.45 -10:58:38.80 SN2026kep 2026-05-9.06 17.5
13:37:29.61 -29:50:30.90 AT2026lkd 2026-05-9.09 17.23
09:46:42.01 -14:52:03.60 SN2026kmo 2026-05-8.99 17.51
15:03:05.28 +22:02:03.40 AT2026lxf 2026-05-8.07 13.88
10:23:49.41 -20:57:25.30 ASASSN-26df 2026-05-8.21 16.52
22:14:40.56 +05:04:51.60 2026lda 2026-05-7.56 16.2
21:35:33.81 -14:05:16.30 ASASSN-26de 2026-05-6.29 14.51
16:21:48.82 -61:36:13.20 ASASSN-26dd 2026-05-5.21 15.15
14:26:40.22 -24:48:37.50 AT2026lig 2026-05-4.27 14.63
13:17:51.04 +30:25:13.50 SN2026kcp 2026-05-4.46 16.43
11:27:55.57 -13:38:56.90 SN2026kza 2026-05-1.08 15.59
22:28:27.10 +30:17:54.30 SN 2026fov 2026-04-29.6 14.36
21:00:10.71 -32:17:03.90 AT2026kis 2026-04-27.36 16.15
14:32:57.37 -58:13:26.40 ASASSN-26dc 2026-04-27.27 13.42
15:32:05.35 -43:54:34.60 ASASSN-26db 2026-04-27.37 16.06
16:34:34.97 -54:34:58.00 ASASSN-26da 2026-04-25.32 16.11
10:06:55.04 -01:13:49.70 SN2026jsg 2026-04-24.99 16.28
15:15:57.17 +56:18:32.80 SN2026kid 2026-04-24.52 -3.65
07:58:28.45 +57:03:42.40 AT2026kcf 2026-04-24.2 16.89
11:38:21.80 -50:43:06.50 SN2026jkb 2026-04-24.24 15.38
10:06:11.41 -39:41:04.20 AT2026dil 2026-04-24.2 16.85
14:21:40.08 +13:13:46.30 SN2026jlm 2026-04-22.16 15.12
10:53:55.52 -16:06:06.00 ASASSN-26cz 2026-04-22.28 16.29
20:07:38.15 -21:07:05.40 2026-05-25.18 -1.12
13:45:02.03 +15:17:14.50 ASASSN-26cy 2026-04-21.27 15.78
13:20:52.22 -35:57:03.60 AT2026jcm 2026-04-19.01 16.65
13:36:15.66 -36:53:48.40 SN 2026iqy 2026-04-18.92 17.31
06:34:01.33 -40:07:34.00 ASASSN-26cx 2026-04-19.07 16.16
23:33:57.97 -45:12:11.90 SN 2026idu 2026-04-19.41 15.9
12:10:50.92 +66:55:31.20 SN 2026icv 2026-04-17.14 16.03
21:36:59.06 -60:43:35.90 ASASSN-26cv 2026-04-17.35 -1.18
08:13:26.26 -27:07:30.50 ASASSN-26cw 2026-04-17.07 -1.01
14:49:14.13 -27:29:20.60 ASASSN-26cu 2026-04-16.06 14.03
17:21:59.44 -38:54:04.60 ASASSN-26ct 2026-04-14.4 15.15
15:25:54.99 +07:49:24.50 SN2026huo 2026-04-12.14 16.96
20:07:38.15 -21:07:05.40 2026-05-25.18 -1.12
12:23:20.40 +04:53:39.10 AT2026ixd 2026-04-12.14 17.65
17:46:09.76 -61:19:50.40 SN2026icy 2026-04-12.2 17.03
09:25:46.42 +02:13:46.30 SN2026gud 2026-04-11.98 16.49
16:52:15.46 -60:27:45.90 ASASSN-26cs 2026-04-12.4 15.5
04:20:55.37 -51:15:31.10 ASASSN-26cr 2026-04-12.01 15.37
22:25:39.35 +36:45:06.90 AT2026ihl 2026-04-10.48 14.21
19:40:44.94 +00:41:03.80 AT2026imw 2026-04-10.32 16.06
19:52:04.70 +05:53:33.50 ASASSN-26cq 2026-04-9.31 14.98
16:08:18.39 -64:11:08.80 ASASSN-26cp 2026-04-9.29 13.32
09:22:22.90 -61:02:43.70 SN2026idh 2026-04-7.97 16.34
05:06:54.12 -19:42:26.40 AT2026imr 2026-04-8 17.49
07:14:55.34 -36:03:21.40 AT2026hei 2026-04-8.12 16.7
21:35:33.14 -19:01:34.80 AT2026ihm 2026-04-8.36 16.7
04:28:24.08 -32:25:35.30 AT2026imo 2026-04-8.02 16.81
05:10:35.79 -39:38:40.80 SN 2026hnn 2026-04-7.04 17.07
09:54:32.04 -01:17:25.80 ASASSN-26cn 2026-04-7.01 15.58
07:46:24.43 -77:29:35.90 ASASSN-26co 2026-04-7.15 14.93
05:00:45.52 -29:51:06.20 AT2026hvw 2026-04-6.03 16.51
19:49:33.10 -23:37:11.00 ASASSN-26cl 2026-04-5.29 14.98
19:32:43.55 -22:39:33.40 ASASSN-26cm 2026-04-4.3 13.88
18:08:57.38 +76:48:23.60 ASASSN-26ck 2026-04-2.37 15.38
16:16:36.10 +44:52:30.20 AT2026hyy 2026-04-2.58 13.81
21:55:23.31 -34:48:53.90 ASASSN-26cj 2026-03-30.4 -1.47
11:19:50.70 -27:51:49.80 SN2026gvk 2026-03-30 15.48
11:53:57.02 -23:09:46.20 SN2026gzx 2026-03-28.75 15.27
07:13:46.14 -33:10:15.70 ASASSN-26ci 2026-03-28.15 15.14
09:03:36.09 -67:58:13.00 SN2026hkg 2026-03-28.19 15.82
07:03:00.72 +39:14:43.00 SN2026fin 2026-03-28.27 15.82
05:35:42.80 -63:44:05.50 ASASSN-26ch 2026-03-27.86 13.02
11:23:19.04 +34:22:38.00 SN2026fwt 2026-03-27.3 16.56
19:03:49.79 +37:04:05.20 ASASSN-26ce 2026-03-26.56 16.3
20:26:56.07 -52:54:06.50 AT2026hiy 2026-03-26.35 16.95
05:25:54.76 -30:15:35.80 ASASSN-26cg 2026-03-25.07 16.88
06:57:16.49 -26:54:37.20 SN2026fzb 2026-03-25.14 15.8
14:37:38.23 -43:00:52.30 ASASSN-26cd 2026-03-24.24 12.52
17:34:53.03 +06:04:29.70 AT2026gzl 2026-03-23.27 15.82
08:30:02.60 -35:12:47.50 ASASSN-26cf 2026-03-23.2 14.82
16:54:25.33 +37:49:56.60 SN 2026evz 2026-03-21.32 17.54
17:06:19.20 -18:54:19.50 ASASSN-26bx 2026-03-21.25 16.39
19:01:16.28 -29:29:23.10 ASASSN-26bw 2026-03-21.33 15.81
08:46:05.75 +10:47:39.80 ASASSN-26ca 2026-03-21.13 14.27
12:14:58.16 +63:47:16.20 SN 2026fvx 2026-03-21.12 15.6
18:02:55.90 -75:23:02.60 ASASSN-26bz 2026-03-21.32 16.16
12:16:02.88 -53:16:33.80 ASASSN-26cc 2026-03-20.04 15.48
13:08:21.85 +29:13:44.20 SN 2026fmh 2026-03-20.16 -0.33
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 5.6K Jun 4 03:02 asassn_transients_list.txt
############################################################
Truncated list of TOCP transients from http://www.cbat.eps.harvard.edu/unconf/tocp.html :
17:57:19.56 -28:08:14.7 TCP J17571956-2808147 2026-03-19.7972 14.5mag
08:46:05.73 +10:47:39.7 TCP J08460573+1047397 2026-03-21.1936 14.5mag
09:55:38.83 +69:05:21.7 PNV J09553883+6905217 2026-04-01.893 19.4mag
19:32:43.67 -22:39:30.7 TCP J19324367-2239307 2026-04-05.4395 13.6mag
16:16:36.03 +44:52:28.9 TCP J16163603+4452289 2026-04-05.6655 14.2mag
00:43:38.36 +41:15:32.4 PNV J00433836+4115324 2026-04-08.079 17.2mag
15:41:11.68 +59:18:26.8 TCP J15411168+5918268 2026-04-12.9625 19.2mag
00:43:35.02 +41:46:28.0 PNV J00433502+4146280 2026-04-23.056 15.9mag
00:42:55.64 +41:14:12.2 PNV J00425564+4114122 2026-04-24.042 16.2mag
21:14:03.38 +56:46:44.1 TCP J21140338+5646441 2026-05-05.3534 16.7mag
15:03:05.19 +22:02:04.1 TCP J15030519+2202041 2026-05-08.3260 13.9mag
07:15:18.25 +47:53:16.7 TCP J07151825+4753167 2026-05-09.1599 14.4mag
16:00:18.44 -22:30:10.6 TCP J16001844-2230106 2026-05-09.6135 13.3mag
00:42:47.45 +41:16:58.5 PNV J00424745+4116585 2026-05-10.030 16.8mag
09:55:02.89 +69:02:13.8 PNV J09550289+6902138 2026-05-18.925 20.7mag
00:43:01.82 +41:18:16.6 PNV J00430182+4118166 2026-05-21.8651 18.83Cmag
00:42:51.20 +41:16:59.4 PNV J00425120+4116594 2022-10-26.135 19.3mag
12:24:25.10 +28:47:12.0 TCP J12242510+2847120 2026-05-31.6015 14.8mag
00:56:07.13 +43:01:40.6 TCP J00560713+4301406 2026-06-01.4135 12.2mag
00:42:41.64 +41:15:16.2 PNV J00424164+4115162 2026-06-02.029 17.4mag
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 189K Jun 4 03:02 tocp_transients_list.txt
############################################################
Truncated list of recent TNS transients from https://www.wis-tns.org/ :
21:55:42.596 -05:09:21.87 AT 2026nls 2026-05-23.44 19.9712
12:20:32.725 +19:21:21.55 AT 2026nlr 2026-05-22.24 20.3755
22:11:38.972 +01:58:18.38 AT 2026nlq 2026-05-21.46 20.412
14:13:39.867 -00:12:14.17 AT 2026nlp 2026-05-20.35 20.1718
20:29:49.048 +01:20:48.06 AT 2026nlo 2026-05-19.39 20.2943
01:58:34.577 +44:34:32.49 AT 2026nln 2026-05-23.48 17.464
00:09:19.630 +10:35:22.07 AT 2026nlm 2026-05-20.48 18.9664
00:31:41.797 +26:10:30.85 AT 2026nll 2026-05-23.48 19.3138
16:14:03.050 +15:19:38.66 AT 2026nlk 2026-05-16.86 20.93
18:17:15.360 +39:41:22.36 AT 2026nlj 2026-05-10.79 21.53
18:22:21.260 +38:36:15.52 AT 2026nli 2026-05-10.79 21.62
16:23:29.410 +22:48:47.18 AT 2026nlh 2026-05-09.79 20.01
15:19:37.260 +16:28:58.23 AT 2026nlg 2026-05-05.84 20.81
14:31:09.520 +24:03:04.31 AT 2026nlf 2026-04-30.86 19.85
15:33:35.050 +31:50:53.87 AT 2026nle 2026-04-19.90 20.71
15:15:31.740 +19:01:13.96 AT 2026nld 2026-04-19.89 20.52
14:33:02.080 +03:34:42.30 AT 2026nlc 2026-05-21.70 21.81
14:21:55.000 -01:06:15.74 AT 2026nlb 2026-05-21.70 21.58
14:21:48.580 +02:02:28.28 AT 2026nla 2026-05-21.70 21.97
14:34:15.890 +04:48:10.98 AT 2026nkz 2026-05-21.66 22.11
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 30K Jun 4 03:02 tns_transients_list.txt