NMW transient search results

This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-04_CI_Boo-04-Q1b1x1_023030_TTUQ1b1x1_2938824_vPJQ1Luy

The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.

Processing fields Boo-04-Q1b1x1

Processing complete!

Total number of candidates identified: 0

Processing log:

Filtering log:

######## Processing parameters ########
AAVSO_COMMENT_STRING= NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
ASTCHECK_ASTEROID_SEARCH_RADIUS_ARCSEC= 
BAD_REGION_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst
CAMERA_SETTINGS= TTUQ1b1x1
CHECK_POINTING_ACCURACY= yes
DARK_FRAMES_DIR_OR_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks
EXCLUSION_LIST= ../exclusion_list_TTUQ1.txt
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MAX_APERTURE_STAR_SIZE_PIX= 12.5
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MAX_ELONGATION_AminusB_PIX= 0.55
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MIN_APERTURE_STAR_SIZE_PIX= 2.0
FILTER_BRIGHT_MAG_CUTOFF_TRANSIENT_SEARCH= -5
FILTER_FAINT_MAG_CUTOFF_TRANSIENT_SEARCH= 15.0
FLAT_FIELD_DIR_OR_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats
FRAME_EDGE_OFFSET_PIX= 100
GAIA_BAND_FOR_CATALOGED_SOURCE_CHECK= 
MAX_NEW_TO_REF_MEAN_IMG_VALUE_RATIO= 100
MAX_NEW_IMG_MEAN_VALUE= 25000
MAX_SD_RATIO_OF_SECOND_EPOCH_IMGS= 0.18
MAX_SD_RATIO_OF_SECOND_EPOCH_IMGS_SOFT_LIMIT= 0.12
MPC_CODE= V36
NMW_CALIBRATION= /var/www/nmw_calibration
NUMBER_OF_DETECTED_TRANSIENTS_BEFORE_FILTERING_HARD_LIMIT= 8000
NUMBER_OF_DETECTED_TRANSIENTS_BEFORE_FILTERING_SOFT_LIMIT= 4000
OMP_NUM_THREADS= 
ONLINE_MPCHECKER_BUTTON_ASTEROID_SEARCH_RADIUS_ARCMIN= 
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION= 
REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES= yes
SEXTRACTOR_CONFIG_BRIGHTSTARPASS= default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
SEXTRACTOR_CONFIG_FILES= default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
STARMATCH_RADIUS_PIX= 3.5
SYSREM_ITERATIONS= 0
TELESCOP= 
TELESCOP_NAME_KNOWN_TO_VaST_FOR_FOV_DETERMINATION= 
UCAC5_PLATESOLVE_ITERATIONS= 2
FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE= no
#######################################
HOSTNAME= tau
USER= 
HOME= 
#######################################
SExtractor catalog cache: enabled, directory /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/vast_sextractor_cache
Reference image directory is set to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs
VIZIER_SITE=vizier.cds.unistra.fr
GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=vizquery (lib/vizquery -> VizieR vizier.cds.unistra.fr)
INFO: MAKE_PNG_PLOTS is set to yes
FITS_FILE_EXT=fits
CALIBRATION_STATUS_PREFIX=
Fields in the data directory: 
Boo-04-Q1b1x1
#######################################
########### Starting Boo-04-Q1b1x1 ###########
Processing Boo-04-Q1b1x1
server tau has sufficient free disk space available: 461650 MB at /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir
server tau has sufficient free disk space available: 461650 MB at .
Checking input images (2 new)
REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE= /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_01-51-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0297.fits
REFERENCE_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE= /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_01-39-59_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1621.fits
Small preview (one of the new images): 
Large previews of the second-epoch (new) images:
MAKE_PNG_PLOTS=yes
renamed 'Boo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_01-57-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0233.png' -> 'transient_report/Boo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_01-57-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0233.fits_preview.png'
Boo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_01-57-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0233.fits

renamed 'Boo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_01-57-38_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.png' -> 'transient_report/Boo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_01-57-38_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits_preview.png'
Boo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_01-57-38_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits


Read-check the input FITS images... read-check OK Blank image check the input FITS images... blank-image-check OK Read date check the input FITS images... read-date-check OK Mean value check the input FITS images... OK, at least two new images have mean values below the threshold. ---------------------------------------------- INFO: REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 267.7435 INFO: REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_SD= 439.4841 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 1584.2407 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_SD= 521.7773 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 1588.3716 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE_SD= 522.1316 ---------------------------------------------- INFO: ref_to_second_epoch_img_mean_ratio= 5.91701 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__SD_ratio= 0.001 ---------------------------------------------- Calibration settings: DARK_FRAMES_DIR_OR_FILE=/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks FLAT_FIELD_DIR_OR_FILE=/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration SET-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint CCD-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature FOCTEMP = 21.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature AMBTEMP = 19.3 / [degC] Ambient air temperature Exploring image header: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-04_CI_Boo-04-Q1b1x1_023030_TTUQ1b1x1_2938824_vPJQ1Luy/Boo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_01-57-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0233.fits CCD-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-04_CI_Boo-04-Q1b1x1_023030_TTUQ1b1x1_2938824_vPJQ1Luy/Boo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_01-57-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0233.fits SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-04_CI_Boo-04-Q1b1x1_023030_TTUQ1b1x1_2938824_vPJQ1Luy/Boo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_01-57-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0233.fits Header: 74 keys total, 33 keys left Record 0: "" status=0 Record 1: "SIMPLE = T / C# FITS" status=0 Record 2: "BITPIX = 16" status=0 Record 3: "NAXIS = 2 / Dimensionality" status=0 Record 4: "NAXIS1 = 9576" status=0 Record 5: "NAXIS2 = 6388" status=0 Record 6: "BZERO = 32768" status=0 Record 7: "EXTEND = T / Extensions are permitted" status=0 Record 8: "IMAGETYP= 'LIGHT' / Type of exposure" status=0 Record 9: "EXPOSURE= 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0 Record 10: "EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0 Record 11: "DATE-LOC= '2026-06-04T01:57:01.7522788' / Time of observation (local)" status=0 Record 12: "DATE-OBS= '2026-06-04T06:57:01.7522788' / Time of observation (UTC)" status=0 Record 13: "MJD-OBS = 61195.289603611 / Modified Julian Date of observation" status=0 Record 14: "DATE-AVG= '2026-06-04T06:57:11.6554915' / Averaged midpoint time (UTC)" status=0 Record 15: "MJD-AVG = 61195.2897182293 / Modified Julian Date of averaged midpoint" status=0 Record 16: "XBINNING= 1 / X axis binning factor" status=0 Record 17: "YBINNING= 1 / Y axis binning factor" status=0 Record 18: "GAIN = 30 / Sensor gain" status=0 Record 19: "OFFSET = 30 / Sensor gain offset" status=0 Record 20: "XPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel X axis size" status=0 Record 21: "YPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel Y axis size" status=0 Record 22: "INSTRUME= 'QHY600M' / Imaging instrument name" status=0 Record 23: "CAMERAID= 'QHY600M-33d3d743814b8b447' / Imaging instrument identifier" status=0 Record 24: "SET-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint" status=0 Record 25: "CCD-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature" status=0 Record 26: "READOUTM= '2CMS-0' / Sensor readout mode" status=0 Record 27: "USBLIMIT= 50 / Camera-specific USB setting" status=0 Record 28: "TELESCOP= 'QHY600M-TTU1' / Name of telescope" status=0 Record 29: "FOCALLEN= 135.0 / [mm] Focal length" status=0 Record 30: "FOCRATIO= 2.2 / Focal ratio" status=0 Record 31: "RA = 212.723890946777 / [deg] RA of telescope" status=0 Record 32: "DEC = 37.9997026204184 / [deg] Declination of telescope" status=0 Record 33: "CENTALT = 55.8913888888889 / [deg] Altitude of telescope" status=0 Record 34: "CENTAZ = 289.283333333333 / [deg] Azimuth of telescope" status=0 Record 35: "AIRMASS = 1.20716171119435 / Airmass at frame center (Gueymard 1993)" status=0 Record 36: "PIERSIDE= 'East' / Telescope pointing state" status=0 Record 37: "SITEELEV= 1015.0 / [m] Observation site elevation" status=0 Record 38: "SITELAT = 33.7480555555556 / [deg] Observation site latitude" status=0 Record 39: "SITELONG= -101.958333333333 / [deg] Observation site longitude" status=0 Record 40: "OBSERVER= 'Sokolovsky' / Observer name" status=0 Record 41: "OBSERVAT= 'TTU Skyview' / Observatory name" status=0 Record 42: "SITENAME= '' / Observatory site name" status=0 Record 43: "FWHEEL = 'Simulator' / Filter Wheel name" status=0 Record 44: "FILTER = 'CV' / Active filter name" status=0 Record 45: "OBJECT = 'Boo-04' / Name of the object of interest" status=0 Record 46: "OBJCTRA = '14 10 54' / [H M S] RA of imaged object" status=0 Record 47: "OBJCTDEC= '+38 00 00' / [D M S] Declination of imaged object" status=0 Record 48: "OBJCTROT= 0.0 / [deg] planned rotation of imaged object" status=0 Record 49: "FOCNAME = 'ZWO Focuser' / Focusing equipment name" status=0 Record 50: "FOCPOS = 29428 / [step] Focuser position" status=0 Record 51: "FOCUSPOS= 29428 / [step] Focuser position" status=0 Record 52: "FOCUSSZ = 0.0 / [um] Focuser step size" status=0 Record 53: "FOCTEMP = 21.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0 Record 54: "FOCUSTEM= 21.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0 Record 55: "DEWPOINT= 16.1 / [degC] Dew point" status=0 Record 56: "HUMIDITY= 82.0 / [percent] Relative humidity" status=0 Record 57: "PRESSURE= 903.39 / [hPa] Air pressure" status=0 Record 58: "AMBTEMP = 19.3 / [degC] Ambient air temperature" status=0 Record 59: "WINDDIR = 14.0 / [deg] Wind direction: 0=N, 180=S, 90=E, 270=W" status=0 Record 60: "WINDGUST= 3.600288 / [kph] Wind gust" status=0 Record 61: "WINDSPD = 1.800144 / [kph] Wind speed" status=0 Record 62: "ROWORDER= 'TOP-DOWN' / FITS Image Orientation" status=0 Record 63: "EQUINOX = 2000.0 / Equinox of celestial coordinate system" status=0 Record 64: "SWCREATE= 'N.I.N.A. 3.2.0.9001 (x64)' / Software that created this file" status=0 Record 65: "QHY_EXP = 20.000096 / [s] Actual exposure time" status=0 Record 66: "QHY_PP = 13888.0 / [ps] pixelPeriod" status=0 Record 67: "QHY_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0 Record 68: "GPS_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0 Record 69: "QHY_FP = 20000160.0 / [us] framePeriod" status=0 Record 70: "QHY_CPL = 6120.0 / clocksPerLine" status=0 Record 71: "QHY_LPF = 235295.0 / linesPerFrame" status=0 Record 72: "QHY_AET = 20000096.0 / [us] actualExposureTime" status=0 Record 73: "QHY_LEM = T / isLongExposureMode" status=0 Record 74: "QHY_OFF0= 3767.777 / [us] RollingShutterEndOffset row 0" status=0 Allocating memory for image, dark and result arrays... Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-04_CI_Boo-04-Q1b1x1_023030_TTUQ1b1x1_2938824_vPJQ1Luy/Boo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_01-57-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0233.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-04_CI_Boo-04-Q1b1x1_023030_TTUQ1b1x1_2938824_vPJQ1Luy/Boo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_01-57-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0233.fits SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_5C_20s_2026-05-30.fit CCD-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-04_CI_Boo-04-Q1b1x1_023030_TTUQ1b1x1_2938824_vPJQ1Luy/Boo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_01-57-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0233.fits CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_5C_20s_2026-05-30.fit Reading dark frame /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_5C_20s_2026-05-30.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix Dark frame is subtracted, output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-04_CI_Boo-04-Q1b1x1_023030_TTUQ1b1x1_2938824_vPJQ1Luy/d_Boo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_01-57-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0233.fits :) Spent 0.870752 seconds renamed 'mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_5C_20s_2026-05-30.png' -> 'transient_report/dark.png' try_to_calibrate_the_input_frame(): selected flat field /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-05-30.fit from directory /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats MegaDivider v7 Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-04_CI_Boo-04-Q1b1x1_023030_TTUQ1b1x1_2938824_vPJQ1Luy/d_Boo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_01-57-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0233.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix Reading flat /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-05-30.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix Avarage count on flat field image: 31267.409145 Minimal real count (from overscan): 5 Output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-04_CI_Boo-04-Q1b1x1_023030_TTUQ1b1x1_2938824_vPJQ1Luy/fd_Boo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_01-57-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0233.fits :) No overscan detected - all values seem high! (left_median=21677.0, right_median=21704.0) renamed 'mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-05-30.png' -> 'transient_report/flat.png' Using calibrated image CALIBRATED_SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-04_CI_Boo-04-Q1b1x1_023030_TTUQ1b1x1_2938824_vPJQ1Luy/fd_Boo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_01-57-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0233.fits EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration SET-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint CCD-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature FOCTEMP = 21.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature AMBTEMP = 19.3 / [degC] Ambient air temperature Exploring image header: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-04_CI_Boo-04-Q1b1x1_023030_TTUQ1b1x1_2938824_vPJQ1Luy/Boo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_01-57-38_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits CCD-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-04_CI_Boo-04-Q1b1x1_023030_TTUQ1b1x1_2938824_vPJQ1Luy/Boo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_01-57-38_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-04_CI_Boo-04-Q1b1x1_023030_TTUQ1b1x1_2938824_vPJQ1Luy/Boo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_01-57-38_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits Header: 74 keys total, 33 keys left Record 0: "" status=0 Record 1: "SIMPLE = T / C# FITS" status=0 Record 2: "BITPIX = 16" status=0 Record 3: "NAXIS = 2 / Dimensionality" status=0 Record 4: "NAXIS1 = 9576" status=0 Record 5: "NAXIS2 = 6388" status=0 Record 6: "BZERO = 32768" status=0 Record 7: "EXTEND = T / Extensions are permitted" status=0 Record 8: "IMAGETYP= 'LIGHT' / Type of exposure" status=0 Record 9: "EXPOSURE= 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0 Record 10: "EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0 Record 11: "DATE-LOC= '2026-06-04T01:57:38.1105140' / Time of observation (local)" status=0 Record 12: "DATE-OBS= '2026-06-04T06:57:38.1105140' / Time of observation (UTC)" status=0 Record 13: "MJD-OBS = 61195.2900244212 / Modified Julian Date of observation" status=0 Record 14: "DATE-AVG= '2026-06-04T06:57:48.0107363' / Averaged midpoint time (UTC)" status=0 Record 15: "MJD-AVG = 61195.2901390046 / Modified Julian Date of averaged midpoint" status=0 Record 16: "XBINNING= 1 / X axis binning factor" status=0 Record 17: "YBINNING= 1 / Y axis binning factor" status=0 Record 18: "GAIN = 30 / Sensor gain" status=0 Record 19: "OFFSET = 30 / Sensor gain offset" status=0 Record 20: "XPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel X axis size" status=0 Record 21: "YPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel Y axis size" status=0 Record 22: "INSTRUME= 'QHY600M' / Imaging instrument name" status=0 Record 23: "CAMERAID= 'QHY600M-33d3d743814b8b447' / Imaging instrument identifier" status=0 Record 24: "SET-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint" status=0 Record 25: "CCD-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature" status=0 Record 26: "READOUTM= '2CMS-0' / Sensor readout mode" status=0 Record 27: "USBLIMIT= 50 / Camera-specific USB setting" status=0 Record 28: "TELESCOP= 'QHY600M-TTU1' / Name of telescope" status=0 Record 29: "FOCALLEN= 135.0 / [mm] Focal length" status=0 Record 30: "FOCRATIO= 2.2 / Focal ratio" status=0 Record 31: "RA = 212.723890954186 / [deg] RA of telescope" status=0 Record 32: "DEC = 37.9997026015579 / [deg] Declination of telescope" status=0 Record 33: "CENTALT = 55.7733333333333 / [deg] Altitude of telescope" status=0 Record 34: "CENTAZ = 289.306111111111 / [deg] Azimuth of telescope" status=0 Record 35: "AIRMASS = 1.20884683037852 / Airmass at frame center (Gueymard 1993)" status=0 Record 36: "PIERSIDE= 'East' / Telescope pointing state" status=0 Record 37: "SITEELEV= 1015.0 / [m] Observation site elevation" status=0 Record 38: "SITELAT = 33.7480555555556 / [deg] Observation site latitude" status=0 Record 39: "SITELONG= -101.958333333333 / [deg] Observation site longitude" status=0 Record 40: "OBSERVER= 'Sokolovsky' / Observer name" status=0 Record 41: "OBSERVAT= 'TTU Skyview' / Observatory name" status=0 Record 42: "SITENAME= '' / Observatory site name" status=0 Record 43: "FWHEEL = 'Simulator' / Filter Wheel name" status=0 Record 44: "FILTER = 'CV' / Active filter name" status=0 Record 45: "OBJECT = 'Boo-04' / Name of the object of interest" status=0 Record 46: "OBJCTRA = '14 10 54' / [H M S] RA of imaged object" status=0 Record 47: "OBJCTDEC= '+38 00 00' / [D M S] Declination of imaged object" status=0 Record 48: "OBJCTROT= 0.0 / [deg] planned rotation of imaged object" status=0 Record 49: "FOCNAME = 'ZWO Focuser' / Focusing equipment name" status=0 Record 50: "FOCPOS = 29428 / [step] Focuser position" status=0 Record 51: "FOCUSPOS= 29428 / [step] Focuser position" status=0 Record 52: "FOCUSSZ = 0.0 / [um] Focuser step size" status=0 Record 53: "FOCTEMP = 21.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0 Record 54: "FOCUSTEM= 21.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0 Record 55: "DEWPOINT= 16.1 / [degC] Dew point" status=0 Record 56: "HUMIDITY= 82.0 / [percent] Relative humidity" status=0 Record 57: "PRESSURE= 903.39 / [hPa] Air pressure" status=0 Record 58: "AMBTEMP = 19.3 / [degC] Ambient air temperature" status=0 Record 59: "WINDDIR = 14.0 / [deg] Wind direction: 0=N, 180=S, 90=E, 270=W" status=0 Record 60: "WINDGUST= 3.600288 / [kph] Wind gust" status=0 Record 61: "WINDSPD = 1.800144 / [kph] Wind speed" status=0 Record 62: "ROWORDER= 'TOP-DOWN' / FITS Image Orientation" status=0 Record 63: "EQUINOX = 2000.0 / Equinox of celestial coordinate system" status=0 Record 64: "SWCREATE= 'N.I.N.A. 3.2.0.9001 (x64)' / Software that created this file" status=0 Record 65: "QHY_EXP = 20.000096 / [s] Actual exposure time" status=0 Record 66: "QHY_PP = 13888.0 / [ps] pixelPeriod" status=0 Record 67: "QHY_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0 Record 68: "GPS_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0 Record 69: "QHY_FP = 20000160.0 / [us] framePeriod" status=0 Record 70: "QHY_CPL = 6120.0 / clocksPerLine" status=0 Record 71: "QHY_LPF = 235295.0 / linesPerFrame" status=0 Record 72: "QHY_AET = 20000096.0 / [us] actualExposureTime" status=0 Record 73: "QHY_LEM = T / isLongExposureMode" status=0 Record 74: "QHY_OFF0= 3767.777 / [us] RollingShutterEndOffset row 0" status=0 Allocating memory for image, dark and result arrays... Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-04_CI_Boo-04-Q1b1x1_023030_TTUQ1b1x1_2938824_vPJQ1Luy/Boo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_01-57-38_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-04_CI_Boo-04-Q1b1x1_023030_TTUQ1b1x1_2938824_vPJQ1Luy/Boo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_01-57-38_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_5C_20s_2026-05-30.fit CCD-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-04_CI_Boo-04-Q1b1x1_023030_TTUQ1b1x1_2938824_vPJQ1Luy/Boo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_01-57-38_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_5C_20s_2026-05-30.fit Reading dark frame /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_5C_20s_2026-05-30.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix Dark frame is subtracted, output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-04_CI_Boo-04-Q1b1x1_023030_TTUQ1b1x1_2938824_vPJQ1Luy/d_Boo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_01-57-38_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits :) Spent 0.796313 seconds renamed 'mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_5C_20s_2026-05-30.png' -> 'transient_report/dark.png' try_to_calibrate_the_input_frame(): selected flat field /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-05-30.fit from directory /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats MegaDivider v7 Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-04_CI_Boo-04-Q1b1x1_023030_TTUQ1b1x1_2938824_vPJQ1Luy/d_Boo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_01-57-38_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix Reading flat /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-05-30.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix Avarage count on flat field image: 31267.409145 Minimal real count (from overscan): 5 Output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-04_CI_Boo-04-Q1b1x1_023030_TTUQ1b1x1_2938824_vPJQ1Luy/fd_Boo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_01-57-38_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits :) No overscan detected - all values seem high! (left_median=21677.0, right_median=21704.0) renamed 'mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-05-30.png' -> 'transient_report/flat.png' Using calibrated image CALIBRATED_SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-04_CI_Boo-04-Q1b1x1_023030_TTUQ1b1x1_2938824_vPJQ1Luy/fd_Boo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_01-57-38_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits Dark frame used to calibrate the second-epoch images:

Flat field used to calibrate the second-epoch images:

after the calibration attempt: SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-04_CI_Boo-04-Q1b1x1_023030_TTUQ1b1x1_2938824_vPJQ1Luy/fd_Boo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_01-57-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0233.fits SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-04_CI_Boo-04-Q1b1x1_023030_TTUQ1b1x1_2938824_vPJQ1Luy/fd_Boo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_01-57-38_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits Previews of the CALIBRATED second-epoch images:

fd_Boo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_01-57-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0233.fits


fd_Boo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_01-57-38_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits


Updating neverexclude_list.txt '/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt' Choosing bad regions list '/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst' wait *------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------* 'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex' Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 3.5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_01-51-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0297.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_01-39-59_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1621.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-04_CI_Boo-04-Q1b1x1_023030_TTUQ1b1x1_2938824_vPJQ1Luy/fd_Boo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_01-57-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0233.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-04_CI_Boo-04-Q1b1x1_023030_TTUQ1b1x1_2938824_vPJQ1Luy/fd_Boo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_01-57-38_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits SExtractor catalog cache: saved Boo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_01-51-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0297.fits.cat to cache SExtractor catalog cache: saved Boo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_01-39-59_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1621.fits.cat to cache VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_01-51-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0297.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_01-39-59_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1621.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-04_CI_Boo-04-Q1b1x1_023030_TTUQ1b1x1_2938824_vPJQ1Luy/fd_Boo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_01-57-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0233.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-04_CI_Boo-04-Q1b1x1_023030_TTUQ1b1x1_2938824_vPJQ1Luy/fd_Boo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_01-57-38_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461195.78971935 Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt '../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt' Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt '../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt' Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt '../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt' Plate-solving the images wcs_Boo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_01-51-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0297.fits exists and is non-empty Saving wcs_Boo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_01-51-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0297.fits to local_wcs_cache/ 'wcs_Boo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_01-51-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0297.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Boo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_01-51-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0297.fits' wcs_Boo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_01-39-59_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1621.fits exists and is non-empty Saving wcs_Boo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_01-39-59_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1621.fits to local_wcs_cache/ 'wcs_Boo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_01-39-59_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1621.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Boo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_01-39-59_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1621.fits' wcs_fd_Boo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_01-57-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0233.fits exists and is non-empty Saving wcs_fd_Boo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_01-57-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0233.fits to local_wcs_cache/ 'wcs_fd_Boo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_01-57-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0233.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Boo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_01-57-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0233.fits' wcs_fd_Boo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_01-57-38_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits exists and is non-empty Saving wcs_fd_Boo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_01-57-38_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits to local_wcs_cache/ 'wcs_fd_Boo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_01-57-38_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Boo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_01-57-38_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits' ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Boo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_01-51-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0297.fits (1st reference image) verification OK: wcs_Boo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_01-51-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0297.fits Image size: 937.3'x624.1' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 14:10:53.396 +38:00:25.91 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### The image scale is 5.87"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8" ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Boo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_01-57-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0233.fits (1st new image) verification OK: wcs_fd_Boo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_01-57-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0233.fits Image size: 940.9'x626.5' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.88"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 14:10:59.300 +37:59:22.50 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy) Reference image center 14:10:53.396 +38:00:25.91 Second-epoch image center 14:10:59.300 +37:59:22.50 Angular distance between the image centers 0.0262 deg. Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg. ################################### ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Boo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_01-57-38_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits (2nd new image) verification OK: wcs_fd_Boo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_01-57-38_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits Image size: 940.9'x626.5' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.88"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 14:10:59.180 +37:59:10.52 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy) Reference image center 14:10:53.396 +38:00:25.91 Second-epoch image center 14:10:59.180 +37:59:10.52 Angular distance between the image centers 0.0283 deg. ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images) Second-epoch first image center 14:10:59.300 +37:59:22.50 Second-epoch second image center 14:10:59.180 +37:59:10.52 Angular distance between the image centers 0.00335 deg. ################################### Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5... Preparing for ar aprallel run Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_01-51-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0297.fits &> /tmp/tmp.zfekbkUzoQ Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_01-51-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0297.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_01-39-59_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1621.fits &> /tmp/tmp.d7AV60SxGS Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_01-39-59_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1621.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-04_CI_Boo-04-Q1b1x1_023030_TTUQ1b1x1_2938824_vPJQ1Luy/fd_Boo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_01-57-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0233.fits &> /tmp/tmp.PlDPHGy4jO Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-04_CI_Boo-04-Q1b1x1_023030_TTUQ1b1x1_2938824_vPJQ1Luy/fd_Boo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_01-57-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0233.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-04_CI_Boo-04-Q1b1x1_023030_TTUQ1b1x1_2938824_vPJQ1Luy/fd_Boo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_01-57-38_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits &> /tmp/tmp.2vnRygU4ek Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-04_CI_Boo-04-Q1b1x1_023030_TTUQ1b1x1_2938824_vPJQ1Luy/fd_Boo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_01-57-38_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits Calibrating the magnitude scale Found non-empty wcs_Boo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_01-51-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0297.fits ____ Start of magnitude calibration ____ PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Boo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_01-51-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0297.fits and wcs_Boo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_01-51-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0297.fits.cat wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race) Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2 Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Boo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_01-51-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0297.fits and wcs_Boo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_01-51-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0297.fits.cat Found non-empty wcs_Boo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_01-51-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0297.fits and wcs_Boo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_01-51-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0297.fits.cat The reference image (wcs_Boo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_01-51-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0297.fits) and catalog (wcs_Boo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_01-51-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0297.fits.cat) found 'wcs_Boo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_01-51-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0297.fits.cat' -> 'wcsmag.cat' Read 6969 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 202.1592 to 223.3611 deg, Dec +32.4730 to +43.2688 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 202.1592 to 223.3611 deg, Dec 32.4730 to 43.2688 deg Loaded 4579 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3468 out of 3575 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 3575 out of 6969 detected stars. The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.739600 a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.739600 From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.20 Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.54 Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes Working... Please, PLEASE, be patient!!! All lightcurves processed! =) Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.54
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:

Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V) Read 6969 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 202.1592 to 223.3611 deg, Dec +32.4730 to +43.2688 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 202.1592 to 223.3611 deg, Dec 32.4730 to 43.2688 deg Loaded 4579 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3468 out of 3575 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 3575 out of 6969 detected stars. util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Boo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_01-51-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0297.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Boo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_01-51-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0297.fits:

Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Boo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_01-51-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0297.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Boo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_01-51-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0297.fits (aperture=6.5) Read 5741 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 202.1593 to 223.3258 deg, Dec +32.4730 to +43.2527 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 202.1593 to 223.3258 deg, Dec 32.4730 to 43.2527 deg Loaded 4565 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3469 out of 3554 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 3554 out of 5741 detected stars. util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Boo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_01-39-59_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1621.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Boo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_01-39-59_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1621.fits:

Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Boo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_01-39-59_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1621.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Boo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_01-39-59_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1621.fits (aperture=6.4) ____ End of magnitude calibration ____ Applying consolidated magnitude filters... Preparing the exclusion lists for this field Done with filtering Found 0 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 8000) Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars: 2.3 pix Boo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_01-51-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0297.fits 2.3 pix Boo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_01-39-59_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1621.fits 4.1 pix fd_Boo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_01-57-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0233.fits 4.0 pix fd_Boo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_01-57-38_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits 2.3 pix wcs_Boo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_01-51-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0297.fits 2.3 pix wcs_Boo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_01-39-59_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1621.fits Limiting magnitude estimates: 15.5 mag. Boo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_01-51-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0297.fits 15.3 mag. Boo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_01-39-59_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1621.fits 14.6 mag. fd_Boo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_01-57-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0233.fits 14.6 mag. fd_Boo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_01-57-38_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.6 (SNR ) 12.0 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50). This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image. The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here. The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images. This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list. The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag. Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver wait ############ /tmp/tmp.zfekbkUzoQ (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_01-51-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0297.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks The guess is based on the existing WCS header. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-04_CI_Boo-04-Q1b1x1_023030_TTUQ1b1x1_2938824_vPJQ1Luy/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_01-51-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0297.fits 571.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_01-51-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0297.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_01-51-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0297.fits WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_01-51-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0297.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_01-51-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0297.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_01-51-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0297.fits It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good. The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_01-51-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0297.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good... '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_01-51-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0297.fits' -> 'wcs_Boo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_01-51-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0297.fits' FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_01-51-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0297.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Boo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_01-51-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0297.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Boo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_01-51-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0297.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_Boo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_01-51-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0297.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Boo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_01-51-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0297.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_Boo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_01-51-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0297.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Boo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_01-51-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0297.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Boo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_01-51-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0297.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_01-51-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0297.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_Boo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_01-51-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0297.fits.cat SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=360, passed=6969 Got 6969 stars (including 6597 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Boo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_01-51-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0297.fits.cat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 6969 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.3' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.3 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013018 (46.9 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010414 (37.5 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 612 to 668 (Dec 32.5 to 43.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 972 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 972 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 964 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 972 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6870 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 612 to 668 (Dec 32.5 to 43.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 972 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 972 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6870 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 972 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6870 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40" Excluding outliers - 972 stars left (next iteration limit 1069) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Boo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_01-51-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0297.fits N_match=972 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.436 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.341 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.492 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.395 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.503 n_q1=249 n_q2=222 n_q3=245 n_q4=256 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.154 The image catalog is written to wcs_Boo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_01-51-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0297.fits.cat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Boo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_01-51-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0297.fits.cat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_01-51-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0297.fits -region wcs_Boo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_01-51-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0297.fits.cat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Boo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_01-51-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0297.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations ############ /tmp/tmp.d7AV60SxGS (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_01-39-59_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1621.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks The guess is based on the existing WCS header. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-04_CI_Boo-04-Q1b1x1_023030_TTUQ1b1x1_2938824_vPJQ1Luy/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_01-39-59_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1621.fits 571.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_01-39-59_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1621.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_01-39-59_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1621.fits WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_01-39-59_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1621.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_01-39-59_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1621.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_01-39-59_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1621.fits It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good. The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_01-39-59_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1621.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good... '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_01-39-59_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1621.fits' -> 'wcs_Boo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_01-39-59_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1621.fits' FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_01-39-59_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1621.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Boo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_01-39-59_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1621.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Boo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_01-39-59_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1621.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_Boo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_01-39-59_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1621.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Boo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_01-39-59_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1621.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_Boo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_01-39-59_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1621.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Boo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_01-39-59_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1621.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Boo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_01-39-59_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1621.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_01-39-59_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1621.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_Boo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_01-39-59_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1621.fits.cat SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=296, passed=5741 Got 5741 stars (including 5440 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Boo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_01-39-59_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1621.fits.cat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 5741 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.2' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.2 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013017 (46.9 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010413 (37.5 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 612 to 668 (Dec 32.5 to 43.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 972 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 972 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 963 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 972 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5659 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 612 to 668 (Dec 32.5 to 43.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 972 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 972 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5658 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 972 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5658 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37" Excluding outliers - 972 stars left (next iteration limit 1069) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Boo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_01-39-59_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1621.fits N_match=972 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.393 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.322 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.472 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.380 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.432 n_q1=255 n_q2=217 n_q3=248 n_q4=252 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.202 The image catalog is written to wcs_Boo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_01-39-59_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1621.fits.cat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Boo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_01-39-59_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1621.fits.cat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_01-39-59_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1621.fits -region wcs_Boo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_01-39-59_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1621.fits.cat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Boo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_01-39-59_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1621.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations ############ /tmp/tmp.PlDPHGy4jO (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um Internal estimated FoV 605.3' The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-04_CI_Boo-04-Q1b1x1_023030_TTUQ1b1x1_2938824_vPJQ1Luy/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-04_CI_Boo-04-Q1b1x1_023030_TTUQ1b1x1_2938824_vPJQ1Luy/fd_Boo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_01-57-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0233.fits 605.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-04_CI_Boo-04-Q1b1x1_023030_TTUQ1b1x1_2938824_vPJQ1Luy/fd_Boo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_01-57-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0233.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-04_CI_Boo-04-Q1b1x1_023030_TTUQ1b1x1_2938824_vPJQ1Luy/fd_Boo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_01-57-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0233.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-04_CI_Boo-04-Q1b1x1_023030_TTUQ1b1x1_2938824_vPJQ1Luy/fd_Boo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_01-57-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0233.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-04_CI_Boo-04-Q1b1x1_023030_TTUQ1b1x1_2938824_vPJQ1Luy/fd_Boo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_01-57-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0233.fits It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve! FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-04_CI_Boo-04-Q1b1x1_023030_TTUQ1b1x1_2938824_vPJQ1Luy/fd_Boo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_01-57-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0233.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Boo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_01-57-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0233.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Boo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_01-57-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0233.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Boo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_01-57-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0233.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Boo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_01-57-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0233.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_fd_Boo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_01-57-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0233.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Boo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_01-57-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0233.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Boo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_01-57-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0233.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-04_CI_Boo-04-Q1b1x1_023030_TTUQ1b1x1_2938824_vPJQ1Luy/fd_Boo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_01-57-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0233.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Boo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_01-57-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0233.fits.cat SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=182, passed=4500 Got 4500 stars (including 4316 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Boo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_01-57-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0233.fits.cat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 4500 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 940.9' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 940.9 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013068 (47.0 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010454 (37.6 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 609 to 668 (Dec 32.0 to 43.4) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 969 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 969 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 950 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 969 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4438 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 609 to 668 (Dec 32.0 to 43.4) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 969 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 969 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4438 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 969 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4438 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30" Excluding outliers - 969 stars left (next iteration limit 1065) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Boo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_01-57-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0233.fits N_match=969 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.307 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.357 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.343 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.265 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.281 n_q1=262 n_q2=223 n_q3=254 n_q4=230 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.161 The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Boo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_01-57-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0233.fits.cat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Boo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_01-57-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0233.fits.cat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-04_CI_Boo-04-Q1b1x1_023030_TTUQ1b1x1_2938824_vPJQ1Luy/fd_Boo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_01-57-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0233.fits -region wcs_fd_Boo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_01-57-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0233.fits.cat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Boo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_01-57-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0233.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations ############ /tmp/tmp.2vnRygU4ek (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um Internal estimated FoV 605.3' The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-04_CI_Boo-04-Q1b1x1_023030_TTUQ1b1x1_2938824_vPJQ1Luy/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-04_CI_Boo-04-Q1b1x1_023030_TTUQ1b1x1_2938824_vPJQ1Luy/fd_Boo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_01-57-38_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits 605.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-04_CI_Boo-04-Q1b1x1_023030_TTUQ1b1x1_2938824_vPJQ1Luy/fd_Boo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_01-57-38_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-04_CI_Boo-04-Q1b1x1_023030_TTUQ1b1x1_2938824_vPJQ1Luy/fd_Boo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_01-57-38_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-04_CI_Boo-04-Q1b1x1_023030_TTUQ1b1x1_2938824_vPJQ1Luy/fd_Boo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_01-57-38_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-04_CI_Boo-04-Q1b1x1_023030_TTUQ1b1x1_2938824_vPJQ1Luy/fd_Boo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_01-57-38_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve! FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-04_CI_Boo-04-Q1b1x1_023030_TTUQ1b1x1_2938824_vPJQ1Luy/fd_Boo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_01-57-38_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Boo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_01-57-38_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Boo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_01-57-38_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Boo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_01-57-38_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Boo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_01-57-38_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_fd_Boo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_01-57-38_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Boo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_01-57-38_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Boo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_01-57-38_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-04_CI_Boo-04-Q1b1x1_023030_TTUQ1b1x1_2938824_vPJQ1Luy/fd_Boo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_01-57-38_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Boo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_01-57-38_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits.cat SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=181, passed=4477 Got 4477 stars (including 4296 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Boo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_01-57-38_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits.cat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 4477 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 940.9' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 940.9 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013068 (47.0 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010454 (37.6 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 609 to 668 (Dec 32.0 to 43.4) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 970 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 969 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 950 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 969 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4416 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 609 to 668 (Dec 32.0 to 43.4) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 970 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 969 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4415 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 969 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4415 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30" Excluding outliers - 969 stars left (next iteration limit 1065) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Boo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_01-57-38_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits N_match=969 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.296 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.315 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.319 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.256 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.288 n_q1=260 n_q2=225 n_q3=253 n_q4=231 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.078 The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Boo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_01-57-38_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits.cat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Boo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_01-57-38_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits.cat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-04_CI_Boo-04-Q1b1x1_023030_TTUQ1b1x1_2938824_vPJQ1Luy/fd_Boo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_01-57-38_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits -region wcs_fd_Boo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_01-57-38_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits.cat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Boo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_01-57-38_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations ################################### # Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above) ref1=Boo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_01-51-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0297.fits sigma_overall=0.436 worst_q_ratio=1.154 ref2=Boo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_01-39-59_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1621.fits sigma_overall=0.393 worst_q_ratio=1.202 new1=fd_Boo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_01-57-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0233.fits sigma_overall=0.307 worst_q_ratio=1.161 new2=fd_Boo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_01-57-38_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits sigma_overall=0.296 worst_q_ratio=1.078 reference average sigma_overall=0.4145 worst_q_ratio=1.178 warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference ###################################
Distribution of catalog-matched stars across the image:
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy: wrote wcs_Boo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_01-51-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0297_astrometric_residuals.png (972 matched stars from wcs_Boo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_01-51-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0297.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy: wrote wcs_Boo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_01-39-59_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1621_astrometric_residuals.png (972 matched stars from wcs_Boo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_01-39-59_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1621.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy: wrote wcs_fd_Boo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_01-57-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0233_astrometric_residuals.png (969 matched stars from wcs_fd_Boo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_01-57-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0233.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388) plot_astrometric_residuals_xy: wrote wcs_fd_Boo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_01-57-38_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0234_astrometric_residuals.png (969 matched stars from wcs_fd_Boo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_01-57-38_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388) Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Boo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_01-57-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0233.fits INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image) 'wcs_fd_Boo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_01-57-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0233.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-04_CI_Boo-04-Q1b1x1_023030_TTUQ1b1x1_2938824_vPJQ1Luy/wcs_fd_Boo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_01-57-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0233.fits' Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Boo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_01-57-38_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image) 'wcs_fd_Boo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_01-57-38_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-04_CI_Boo-04-Q1b1x1_023030_TTUQ1b1x1_2938824_vPJQ1Luy/wcs_fd_Boo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_01-57-38_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits' Preparing the HTML report for the field Boo-04-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 No candidates found here Prepared the HTML report for the field Boo-04-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 *------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------* #### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt #### wait *------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------* 'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex' Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 3.5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_01-51-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0297.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_01-39-59_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1621.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-04_CI_Boo-04-Q1b1x1_023030_TTUQ1b1x1_2938824_vPJQ1Luy/fd_Boo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_01-57-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0233.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-04_CI_Boo-04-Q1b1x1_023030_TTUQ1b1x1_2938824_vPJQ1Luy/fd_Boo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_01-57-38_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits SExtractor catalog cache: saved Boo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_01-51-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0297.fits.cat to cache SExtractor catalog cache: saved Boo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_01-39-59_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1621.fits.cat to cache VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_01-51-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0297.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_01-39-59_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1621.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-04_CI_Boo-04-Q1b1x1_023030_TTUQ1b1x1_2938824_vPJQ1Luy/fd_Boo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_01-57-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0233.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-04_CI_Boo-04-Q1b1x1_023030_TTUQ1b1x1_2938824_vPJQ1Luy/fd_Boo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_01-57-38_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Boo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_01-51-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0297.fits Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Boo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_01-39-59_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1621.fits Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Boo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_01-57-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0233.fits Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Boo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_01-57-38_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/exclusion_list.txt Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images Plate-solving the images wcs_Boo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_01-51-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0297.fits exists and is non-empty wcs_Boo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_01-39-59_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1621.fits exists and is non-empty wcs_fd_Boo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_01-57-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0233.fits exists and is non-empty wcs_fd_Boo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_01-57-38_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits exists and is non-empty ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Boo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_01-51-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0297.fits (1st reference image) verification OK: wcs_Boo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_01-51-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0297.fits Image size: 937.3'x624.1' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 14:10:53.396 +38:00:25.91 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### The image scale is 5.87"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8" ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Boo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_01-57-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0233.fits (1st new image) verification OK: wcs_fd_Boo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_01-57-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0233.fits Image size: 940.9'x626.5' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.88"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 14:10:59.300 +37:59:22.50 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy) Reference image center 14:10:53.396 +38:00:25.91 Second-epoch image center 14:10:59.300 +37:59:22.50 Angular distance between the image centers 0.0262 deg. Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg. ################################### ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Boo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_01-57-38_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits (2nd new image) verification OK: wcs_fd_Boo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_01-57-38_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits Image size: 940.9'x626.5' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.88"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 14:10:59.180 +37:59:10.52 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy) Reference image center 14:10:53.396 +38:00:25.91 Second-epoch image center 14:10:59.180 +37:59:10.52 Angular distance between the image centers 0.0283 deg. ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images) Second-epoch first image center 14:10:59.300 +37:59:22.50 Second-epoch second image center 14:10:59.180 +37:59:10.52 Angular distance between the image centers 0.00335 deg. ################################### Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5... Preparing for ar aprallel run Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_01-51-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0297.fits &> /tmp/tmp.ycE4x9EAf7 Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_01-51-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0297.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_01-39-59_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1621.fits &> /tmp/tmp.kfpHirDutr Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_01-39-59_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1621.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-04_CI_Boo-04-Q1b1x1_023030_TTUQ1b1x1_2938824_vPJQ1Luy/fd_Boo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_01-57-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0233.fits &> /tmp/tmp.PhUNzbw2ot Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-04_CI_Boo-04-Q1b1x1_023030_TTUQ1b1x1_2938824_vPJQ1Luy/fd_Boo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_01-57-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0233.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-04_CI_Boo-04-Q1b1x1_023030_TTUQ1b1x1_2938824_vPJQ1Luy/fd_Boo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_01-57-38_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits &> /tmp/tmp.VL7PEGEaWZ Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-04_CI_Boo-04-Q1b1x1_023030_TTUQ1b1x1_2938824_vPJQ1Luy/fd_Boo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_01-57-38_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits Calibrating the magnitude scale Found non-empty wcs_Boo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_01-51-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0297.fits ____ Start of magnitude calibration ____ PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Boo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_01-51-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0297.fits and wcs_Boo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_01-51-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0297.fits.cat wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race) Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2 Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Boo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_01-51-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0297.fits and wcs_Boo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_01-51-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0297.fits.cat Found non-empty wcs_Boo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_01-51-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0297.fits and wcs_Boo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_01-51-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0297.fits.cat The reference image (wcs_Boo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_01-51-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0297.fits) and catalog (wcs_Boo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_01-51-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0297.fits.cat) found 'wcs_Boo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_01-51-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0297.fits.cat' -> 'wcsmag.cat' Read 33828 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 202.1591 to 223.3611 deg, Dec +32.4150 to +43.2703 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 202.1591 to 223.3611 deg, Dec 32.4150 to 43.2703 deg Loaded 4612 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3303 out of 3579 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 3579 out of 33828 detected stars. The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.633000 a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.633000 From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -6.94 Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.69 Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes Working... Please, PLEASE, be patient!!! All lightcurves processed! =) Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.69
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:

Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V) Read 33828 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 202.1591 to 223.3611 deg, Dec +32.4150 to +43.2703 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 202.1591 to 223.3611 deg, Dec 32.4150 to 43.2703 deg Loaded 4612 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3303 out of 3579 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 3579 out of 33828 detected stars. util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Boo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_01-51-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0297.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Boo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_01-51-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0297.fits:

Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Boo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_01-51-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0297.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Boo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_01-51-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0297.fits (aperture=5.1) Read 29344 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 202.1592 to 223.3842 deg, Dec +32.4482 to +43.2802 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 202.1592 to 223.3842 deg, Dec 32.4482 to 43.2802 deg Loaded 4599 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3321 out of 3583 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 3583 out of 29344 detected stars. util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Boo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_01-39-59_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1621.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Boo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_01-39-59_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1621.fits:

Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Boo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_01-39-59_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1621.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Boo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_01-39-59_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1621.fits (aperture=5.1) ____ End of magnitude calibration ____ Applying consolidated magnitude filters... Preparing the exclusion lists for this field Done with filtering Found 26 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 8000) Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars: 2.2 pix Boo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_01-51-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0297.fits 2.2 pix Boo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_01-39-59_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1621.fits 3.7 pix fd_Boo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_01-57-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0233.fits 3.6 pix fd_Boo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_01-57-38_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits 2.2 pix wcs_Boo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_01-51-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0297.fits 2.2 pix wcs_Boo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_01-39-59_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1621.fits Limiting magnitude estimates: 15.7 mag. Boo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_01-51-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0297.fits 15.4 mag. Boo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_01-39-59_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1621.fits 14.6 mag. fd_Boo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_01-57-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0233.fits 14.6 mag. fd_Boo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_01-57-38_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.6 (SNR ) 14.0 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50). This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image. The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here. The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images. This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list. The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag. Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver wait ############ /tmp/tmp.ycE4x9EAf7 (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_01-51-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0297.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks The guess is based on the existing WCS header. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-04_CI_Boo-04-Q1b1x1_023030_TTUQ1b1x1_2938824_vPJQ1Luy/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_01-51-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0297.fits 571.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_01-51-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0297.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_01-51-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0297.fits WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_01-51-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0297.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_01-51-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0297.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_01-51-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0297.fits It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good. The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_01-51-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0297.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good... '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_01-51-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0297.fits' -> 'wcs_Boo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_01-51-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0297.fits' FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_01-51-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0297.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Boo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_01-51-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0297.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Boo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_01-51-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0297.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_Boo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_01-51-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0297.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Boo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_01-51-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0297.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_Boo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_01-51-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0297.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Boo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_01-51-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0297.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Boo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_01-51-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0297.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_01-51-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0297.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_Boo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_01-51-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0297.fits.cat SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=27, blended=1418, passed=33801 Got 33801 stars (including 32351 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Boo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_01-51-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0297.fits.cat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 33801 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.3' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.3 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013018 (46.9 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010414 (37.5 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 612 to 668 (Dec 32.4 to 43.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 973 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 973 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 966 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 973 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 33401 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 612 to 668 (Dec 32.4 to 43.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 973 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 973 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 33400 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 973 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 33400 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42" Excluding outliers - 973 stars left (next iteration limit 1070) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Boo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_01-51-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0297.fits N_match=973 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.454 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.378 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.494 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.404 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.491 n_q1=251 n_q2=224 n_q3=241 n_q4=257 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.087 The image catalog is written to wcs_Boo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_01-51-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0297.fits.cat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Boo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_01-51-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0297.fits.cat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_01-51-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0297.fits -region wcs_Boo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_01-51-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0297.fits.cat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Boo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_01-51-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0297.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations ############ /tmp/tmp.kfpHirDutr (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_01-39-59_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1621.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks The guess is based on the existing WCS header. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-04_CI_Boo-04-Q1b1x1_023030_TTUQ1b1x1_2938824_vPJQ1Luy/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_01-39-59_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1621.fits 571.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_01-39-59_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1621.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_01-39-59_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1621.fits WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_01-39-59_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1621.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_01-39-59_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1621.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_01-39-59_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1621.fits It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good. The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_01-39-59_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1621.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good... '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_01-39-59_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1621.fits' -> 'wcs_Boo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_01-39-59_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1621.fits' FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_01-39-59_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1621.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Boo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_01-39-59_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1621.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Boo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_01-39-59_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1621.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_Boo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_01-39-59_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1621.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Boo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_01-39-59_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1621.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_Boo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_01-39-59_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1621.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Boo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_01-39-59_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1621.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Boo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_01-39-59_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1621.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_01-39-59_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1621.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_Boo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_01-39-59_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1621.fits.cat SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=14, blended=1045, passed=29330 Got 29330 stars (including 28250 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Boo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_01-39-59_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1621.fits.cat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 29330 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.2' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.2 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013017 (46.9 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010413 (37.5 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 612 to 668 (Dec 32.4 to 43.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 972 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 972 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 964 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 972 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 29020 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 612 to 668 (Dec 32.4 to 43.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 972 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 972 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 29020 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 972 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 29020 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38" Excluding outliers - 972 stars left (next iteration limit 1069) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Boo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_01-39-59_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1621.fits N_match=972 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.407 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.332 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.458 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.376 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.462 n_q1=258 n_q2=225 n_q3=238 n_q4=251 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.135 The image catalog is written to wcs_Boo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_01-39-59_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1621.fits.cat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Boo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_01-39-59_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1621.fits.cat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_01-39-59_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1621.fits -region wcs_Boo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_01-39-59_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1621.fits.cat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Boo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_01-39-59_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1621.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations ############ /tmp/tmp.PhUNzbw2ot (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um Internal estimated FoV 605.3' The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-04_CI_Boo-04-Q1b1x1_023030_TTUQ1b1x1_2938824_vPJQ1Luy/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-04_CI_Boo-04-Q1b1x1_023030_TTUQ1b1x1_2938824_vPJQ1Luy/fd_Boo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_01-57-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0233.fits 605.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-04_CI_Boo-04-Q1b1x1_023030_TTUQ1b1x1_2938824_vPJQ1Luy/fd_Boo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_01-57-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0233.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-04_CI_Boo-04-Q1b1x1_023030_TTUQ1b1x1_2938824_vPJQ1Luy/fd_Boo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_01-57-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0233.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-04_CI_Boo-04-Q1b1x1_023030_TTUQ1b1x1_2938824_vPJQ1Luy/fd_Boo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_01-57-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0233.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-04_CI_Boo-04-Q1b1x1_023030_TTUQ1b1x1_2938824_vPJQ1Luy/fd_Boo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_01-57-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0233.fits It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve! FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-04_CI_Boo-04-Q1b1x1_023030_TTUQ1b1x1_2938824_vPJQ1Luy/fd_Boo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_01-57-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0233.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Boo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_01-57-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0233.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Boo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_01-57-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0233.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Boo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_01-57-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0233.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Boo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_01-57-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0233.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_fd_Boo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_01-57-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0233.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Boo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_01-57-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0233.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Boo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_01-57-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0233.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-04_CI_Boo-04-Q1b1x1_023030_TTUQ1b1x1_2938824_vPJQ1Luy/fd_Boo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_01-57-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0233.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Boo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_01-57-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0233.fits.cat SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=5, blended=573, passed=18317 Got 18317 stars (including 17721 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Boo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_01-57-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0233.fits.cat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 18317 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 940.9' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 940.9 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013068 (47.0 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010454 (37.6 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 609 to 668 (Dec 31.9 to 43.4) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 968 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 968 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 954 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 968 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 18083 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 609 to 668 (Dec 31.9 to 43.4) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 968 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 968 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 18081 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 968 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 18081 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30" Excluding outliers - 968 stars left (next iteration limit 1064) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Boo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_01-57-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0233.fits N_match=968 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.307 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.336 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.343 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.266 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.308 n_q1=263 n_q2=221 n_q3=253 n_q4=231 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.119 The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Boo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_01-57-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0233.fits.cat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Boo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_01-57-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0233.fits.cat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-04_CI_Boo-04-Q1b1x1_023030_TTUQ1b1x1_2938824_vPJQ1Luy/fd_Boo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_01-57-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0233.fits -region wcs_fd_Boo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_01-57-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0233.fits.cat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Boo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_01-57-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0233.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations ############ /tmp/tmp.VL7PEGEaWZ (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um Internal estimated FoV 605.3' The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-04_CI_Boo-04-Q1b1x1_023030_TTUQ1b1x1_2938824_vPJQ1Luy/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-04_CI_Boo-04-Q1b1x1_023030_TTUQ1b1x1_2938824_vPJQ1Luy/fd_Boo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_01-57-38_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits 605.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-04_CI_Boo-04-Q1b1x1_023030_TTUQ1b1x1_2938824_vPJQ1Luy/fd_Boo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_01-57-38_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-04_CI_Boo-04-Q1b1x1_023030_TTUQ1b1x1_2938824_vPJQ1Luy/fd_Boo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_01-57-38_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-04_CI_Boo-04-Q1b1x1_023030_TTUQ1b1x1_2938824_vPJQ1Luy/fd_Boo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_01-57-38_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-04_CI_Boo-04-Q1b1x1_023030_TTUQ1b1x1_2938824_vPJQ1Luy/fd_Boo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_01-57-38_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve! FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-04_CI_Boo-04-Q1b1x1_023030_TTUQ1b1x1_2938824_vPJQ1Luy/fd_Boo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_01-57-38_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Boo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_01-57-38_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Boo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_01-57-38_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Boo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_01-57-38_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Boo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_01-57-38_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_fd_Boo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_01-57-38_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Boo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_01-57-38_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Boo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_01-57-38_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-04_CI_Boo-04-Q1b1x1_023030_TTUQ1b1x1_2938824_vPJQ1Luy/fd_Boo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_01-57-38_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Boo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_01-57-38_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits.cat SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=5, blended=575, passed=18206 Got 18206 stars (including 17607 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Boo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_01-57-38_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits.cat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 18206 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 940.9' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 940.9 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013068 (47.0 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010454 (37.6 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 609 to 668 (Dec 31.9 to 43.4) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 969 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 969 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 954 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 969 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 17995 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 609 to 668 (Dec 31.9 to 43.4) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 969 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 969 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 17994 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 969 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 17994 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30" Excluding outliers - 969 stars left (next iteration limit 1065) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Boo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_01-57-38_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits N_match=969 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.299 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.319 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.346 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.250 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.291 n_q1=258 n_q2=223 n_q3=256 n_q4=232 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.156 The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Boo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_01-57-38_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits.cat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Boo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_01-57-38_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits.cat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-04_CI_Boo-04-Q1b1x1_023030_TTUQ1b1x1_2938824_vPJQ1Luy/fd_Boo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_01-57-38_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits -region wcs_fd_Boo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_01-57-38_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits.cat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Boo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_01-57-38_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL) Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Boo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_01-57-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0233.fits INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image) The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-04_CI_Boo-04-Q1b1x1_023030_TTUQ1b1x1_2938824_vPJQ1Luy/wcs_fd_Boo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_01-57-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0233.fits Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Boo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_01-57-38_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image) The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-04_CI_Boo-04-Q1b1x1_023030_TTUQ1b1x1_2938824_vPJQ1Luy/wcs_fd_Boo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_01-57-38_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits Preparing the HTML report for the field Boo-04-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL Forced photometry on wcs_Boo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_01-51-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0297.fits at 14:42:08.32 +39:24:19.8: 11.48 +/- 0.01 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Boo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_01-51-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0297.fits at 14:44:44.93 +34:10:24.0: 13.76 +/- 0.05 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Boo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_01-51-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0297.fits at 13:34:42.70 +35:02:58.0: 13.92 +/- 0.05 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Boo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_01-51-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0297.fits at 13:59:44.52 +42:04:05.3: 13.45 +/- 0.03 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Boo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_01-39-59_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1621.fits at 14:44:44.93 +34:10:24.0: 13.85 +/- 0.06 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Boo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_01-39-59_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1621.fits at 14:42:08.32 +39:24:19.8: 11.49 +/- 0.01 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Boo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_01-39-59_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1621.fits at 13:34:42.70 +35:02:58.0: 13.69 +/- 0.05 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.79 +/- 0.04 Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.49 +/- 0.00 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:44:44.93 +34:10:24.0: ref_mag=13.79 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.7749 delta=0.01 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:42:08.32 +39:24:19.8: ref_mag=11.49 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=11.5082 delta=-0.02 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.81 +/- 0.03 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 13:34:42.70 +35:02:58.0: ref_mag=13.81 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.7154 delta=0.09 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Boo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_01-51-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0297.fits at 14:40:33.36 +39:53:08.5: 13.48 +/- 0.03 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Boo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_01-51-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0297.fits at 14:16:36.52 +37:46:15.8: 13.95 +/- 0.05 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Boo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_01-39-59_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1621.fits at 13:59:44.52 +42:04:05.3: 13.40 +/- 0.04 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.43 +/- 0.03 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 13:59:44.52 +42:04:05.3: ref_mag=13.43 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.2621 delta=0.17 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Boo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_01-39-59_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1621.fits at 14:40:33.36 +39:53:08.5: 13.38 +/- 0.04 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.44 +/- 0.02 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:40:33.36 +39:53:08.5: ref_mag=13.44 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.6024 delta=-0.16 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Boo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_01-39-59_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1621.fits at 14:16:36.52 +37:46:15.8: 13.87 +/- 0.06 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.92 +/- 0.04 Forced photometry on wcs_Boo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_01-51-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0297.fits at 13:31:04.46 +42:07:10.2: 13.66 +/- 0.05 detection Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:16:36.52 +37:46:15.8: ref_mag=13.92 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.8114 delta=0.11 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Boo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_01-39-59_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1621.fits at 13:31:04.46 +42:07:10.2: 13.73 +/- 0.07 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.69 +/- 0.04 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 13:31:04.46 +42:07:10.2: ref_mag=13.69 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.2291 delta=0.46 (need > 0.90) make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 2s Pre-generating preview images in parallel... Done pre-generating preview images. Pre-generating finding charts in parallel... Done pre-generating finding charts. make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 0s xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 50887_fd_Boo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_01-57-38_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0234 The candidate 50887_fd_Boo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_01-57-38_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0234 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 06 04.29014    2461195.79014    14.32    13:34:01.46 +37:29:32.6   9215 3557   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-04_CI_Boo-04-Q1b1x1_023030_TTUQ1b1x1_2938824_vPJQ1Luy/fd_Boo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_01-57-38_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.6") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 50888_fd_Boo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_01-57-38_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0234 The candidate 50888_fd_Boo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_01-57-38_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0234 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 06 04.28972    2461195.78972    13.97    13:34:42.66 +35:02:58.4   9184 5050   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-04_CI_Boo-04-Q1b1x1_023030_TTUQ1b1x1_2938824_vPJQ1Luy/fd_Boo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_01-57-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0233.fits Discovery image 2   2026 06 04.29014    2461195.79014    13.59    13:34:42.74 +35:02:57.6   9184 5048   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-04_CI_Boo-04-Q1b1x1_023030_TTUQ1b1x1_2938824_vPJQ1Luy/fd_Boo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_01-57-38_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 50895_fd_Boo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_01-57-38_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0234 The candidate 50895_fd_Boo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_01-57-38_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0234 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 06 04.29014    2461195.79014    13.46    13:37:31.20 +40:32:55.3   8741 1714   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-04_CI_Boo-04-Q1b1x1_023030_TTUQ1b1x1_2938824_vPJQ1Luy/fd_Boo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_01-57-38_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits **** FOUND 13:37:31.16 +40:32:54.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 50898_fd_Boo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_01-57-38_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0234 The candidate 50898_fd_Boo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_01-57-38_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0234 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 06 04.28972    2461195.78972    13.79    14:44:44.94 +34:10:27.2   0423 5050   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-04_CI_Boo-04-Q1b1x1_023030_TTUQ1b1x1_2938824_vPJQ1Luy/fd_Boo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_01-57-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0233.fits Discovery image 2   2026 06 04.29014    2461195.79014    13.76    14:44:44.92 +34:10:20.9   0423 5049   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-04_CI_Boo-04-Q1b1x1_023030_TTUQ1b1x1_2938824_vPJQ1Luy/fd_Boo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_01-57-38_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 50978_fd_Boo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_01-57-38_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0234 The candidate 50978_fd_Boo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_01-57-38_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0234 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 06 04.28972    2461195.78972    11.52    14:42:08.34 +39:24:19.9   1223 1954   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-04_CI_Boo-04-Q1b1x1_023030_TTUQ1b1x1_2938824_vPJQ1Luy/fd_Boo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_01-57-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0233.fits Discovery image 2   2026 06 04.29014    2461195.79014    11.50    14:42:08.31 +39:24:19.8   1223 1952   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-04_CI_Boo-04-Q1b1x1_023030_TTUQ1b1x1_2938824_vPJQ1Luy/fd_Boo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_01-57-38_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 50986_fd_Boo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_01-57-38_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0234 The candidate 50986_fd_Boo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_01-57-38_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0234 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 06 04.29014    2461195.79014    11.56    13:38:52.96 +40:32:06.5   8582 1727   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-04_CI_Boo-04-Q1b1x1_023030_TTUQ1b1x1_2938824_vPJQ1Luy/fd_Boo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_01-57-38_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.0") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 50991_fd_Boo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_01-57-38_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0234 The candidate 50991_fd_Boo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_01-57-38_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0234 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 06 04.29014    2461195.79014    11.66    13:33:02.33 +37:25:49.0   9337 3591   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-04_CI_Boo-04-Q1b1x1_023030_TTUQ1b1x1_2938824_vPJQ1Luy/fd_Boo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_01-57-38_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.9") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 50993_fd_Boo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_01-57-38_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0234 The candidate 50993_fd_Boo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_01-57-38_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0234 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 06 04.29014    2461195.79014    11.68    14:03:38.38 +40:32:01.9   5727 1708   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-04_CI_Boo-04-Q1b1x1_023030_TTUQ1b1x1_2938824_vPJQ1Luy/fd_Boo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_01-57-38_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.0") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 51050_fd_Boo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_01-57-38_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0234 The candidate 51050_fd_Boo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_01-57-38_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0234 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 06 04.29014    2461195.79014    12.32    14:16:18.46 +40:10:09.9   4262 1839   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-04_CI_Boo-04-Q1b1x1_023030_TTUQ1b1x1_2938824_vPJQ1Luy/fd_Boo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_01-57-38_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.0") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 51087_fd_Boo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_01-57-38_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0234 The candidate 51087_fd_Boo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_01-57-38_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0234 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 06 04.29014    2461195.79014    12.69    14:20:07.91 +33:12:28.0   3451 5989   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-04_CI_Boo-04-Q1b1x1_023030_TTUQ1b1x1_2938824_vPJQ1Luy/fd_Boo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_01-57-38_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.2") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 51099_fd_Boo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_01-57-38_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0234 The candidate 51099_fd_Boo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_01-57-38_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0234 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 06 04.29014    2461195.79014    12.85    13:45:19.70 +41:42:45.3   7831 1026   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-04_CI_Boo-04-Q1b1x1_023030_TTUQ1b1x1_2938824_vPJQ1Luy/fd_Boo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_01-57-38_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits **** FOUND 13:45:19.53 +41:42:46.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 51104_fd_Boo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_01-57-38_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0234 The candidate 51104_fd_Boo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_01-57-38_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0234 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 06 04.29014    2461195.79014    12.66    13:48:55.06 +37:56:15.2   7411 3314   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-04_CI_Boo-04-Q1b1x1_023030_TTUQ1b1x1_2938824_vPJQ1Luy/fd_Boo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_01-57-38_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.9") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 51143_fd_Boo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_01-57-38_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0234 The candidate 51143_fd_Boo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_01-57-38_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0234 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 06 04.29014    2461195.79014    13.02    13:49:50.32 +36:35:59.9   7295 4121   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-04_CI_Boo-04-Q1b1x1_023030_TTUQ1b1x1_2938824_vPJQ1Luy/fd_Boo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_01-57-38_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits **** FOUND 13:49:50.30 +36:36:00.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 51199_fd_Boo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_01-57-38_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0234 The candidate 51199_fd_Boo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_01-57-38_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0234 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 06 04.29014    2461195.79014    13.34    13:35:02.46 +36:05:44.2   9120 4411   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-04_CI_Boo-04-Q1b1x1_023030_TTUQ1b1x1_2938824_vPJQ1Luy/fd_Boo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_01-57-38_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.9") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 51204_fd_Boo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_01-57-38_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0234 The candidate 51204_fd_Boo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_01-57-38_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0234 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 06 04.28972    2461195.78972    13.26    13:59:44.56 +42:04:06.5   6206 0798   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-04_CI_Boo-04-Q1b1x1_023030_TTUQ1b1x1_2938824_vPJQ1Luy/fd_Boo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_01-57-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0233.fits Discovery image 2   2026 06 04.29014    2461195.79014    13.27    13:59:44.48 +42:04:04.1   6206 0796   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-04_CI_Boo-04-Q1b1x1_023030_TTUQ1b1x1_2938824_vPJQ1Luy/fd_Boo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_01-57-38_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 51227_fd_Boo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_01-57-38_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0234 The candidate 51227_fd_Boo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_01-57-38_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0234 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 06 04.29014    2461195.79014    13.24    14:06:05.71 +42:55:31.5   5520 0248   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-04_CI_Boo-04-Q1b1x1_023030_TTUQ1b1x1_2938824_vPJQ1Luy/fd_Boo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_01-57-38_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.9") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 51234_fd_Boo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_01-57-38_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0234 The candidate 51234_fd_Boo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_01-57-38_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0234 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 06 04.29014    2461195.79014    13.48    14:27:27.99 +40:10:08.3   2981 1717   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-04_CI_Boo-04-Q1b1x1_023030_TTUQ1b1x1_2938824_vPJQ1Luy/fd_Boo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_01-57-38_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits **** FOUND 14:27:27.96 +40:10:08.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 51254_fd_Boo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_01-57-38_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0234 The candidate 51254_fd_Boo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_01-57-38_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0234 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 06 04.28972    2461195.78972    13.52    14:40:33.34 +39:53:08.8   1449 1693   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-04_CI_Boo-04-Q1b1x1_023030_TTUQ1b1x1_2938824_vPJQ1Luy/fd_Boo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_01-57-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0233.fits Discovery image 2   2026 06 04.29014    2461195.79014    13.74    14:40:33.38 +39:53:08.2   1449 1691   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-04_CI_Boo-04-Q1b1x1_023030_TTUQ1b1x1_2938824_vPJQ1Luy/fd_Boo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_01-57-38_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 51262_fd_Boo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_01-57-38_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0234 The candidate 51262_fd_Boo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_01-57-38_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0234 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 06 04.29014    2461195.79014    13.35    13:38:42.62 +38:23:48.6   8631 3024   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-04_CI_Boo-04-Q1b1x1_023030_TTUQ1b1x1_2938824_vPJQ1Luy/fd_Boo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_01-57-38_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits **** FOUND 13:38:42.66 +38:23:47.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 51283_fd_Boo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_01-57-38_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0234 The candidate 51283_fd_Boo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_01-57-38_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0234 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 06 04.29014    2461195.79014    13.38    13:42:14.67 +40:57:48.9   8188 1476   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-04_CI_Boo-04-Q1b1x1_023030_TTUQ1b1x1_2938824_vPJQ1Luy/fd_Boo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_01-57-38_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.0") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 51309_fd_Boo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_01-57-38_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0234 The candidate 51309_fd_Boo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_01-57-38_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0234 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 06 04.29014    2461195.79014    13.83    14:10:57.37 +41:16:52.1   4919 1213   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-04_CI_Boo-04-Q1b1x1_023030_TTUQ1b1x1_2938824_vPJQ1Luy/fd_Boo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_01-57-38_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.1") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 51332_fd_Boo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_01-57-38_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0234 The candidate 51332_fd_Boo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_01-57-38_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0234 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 06 04.28972    2461195.78972    13.81    14:16:36.62 +37:46:15.5   4113 3279   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-04_CI_Boo-04-Q1b1x1_023030_TTUQ1b1x1_2938824_vPJQ1Luy/fd_Boo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_01-57-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0233.fits Discovery image 2   2026 06 04.29014    2461195.79014    13.82    14:16:36.42 +37:46:16.1   4114 3277   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-04_CI_Boo-04-Q1b1x1_023030_TTUQ1b1x1_2938824_vPJQ1Luy/fd_Boo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_01-57-38_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 51357_fd_Boo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_01-57-38_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0234 The candidate 51357_fd_Boo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_01-57-38_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0234 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 06 04.29014    2461195.79014    14.13    14:10:56.71 +38:41:45.3   4821 2769   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-04_CI_Boo-04-Q1b1x1_023030_TTUQ1b1x1_2938824_vPJQ1Luy/fd_Boo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_01-57-38_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.9") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 51398_fd_Boo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_01-57-38_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0234 The candidate 51398_fd_Boo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_01-57-38_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0234 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 06 04.29014    2461195.79014    13.83    14:36:15.61 +33:42:34.5   1452 5473   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-04_CI_Boo-04-Q1b1x1_023030_TTUQ1b1x1_2938824_vPJQ1Luy/fd_Boo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_01-57-38_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.1") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 51445_fd_Boo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_01-57-38_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0234 The candidate 51445_fd_Boo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_01-57-38_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0234 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 06 04.29014    2461195.79014    14.51    14:43:22.88 +39:14:44.9   1063 2025   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-04_CI_Boo-04-Q1b1x1_023030_TTUQ1b1x1_2938824_vPJQ1Luy/fd_Boo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_01-57-38_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.2") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 02160_fd_Boo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_01-57-38_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0234 The candidate 02160_fd_Boo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_01-57-38_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0234 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 06 04.28972    2461195.78972    13.32    13:31:04.48 +42:07:08.5   9455 0725   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-04_CI_Boo-04-Q1b1x1_023030_TTUQ1b1x1_2938824_vPJQ1Luy/fd_Boo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_01-57-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0233.fits Discovery image 3   2026 06 04.29014    2461195.79014    13.16    13:31:04.43 +42:07:11.9   9455 0722   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-04_CI_Boo-04-Q1b1x1_023030_TTUQ1b1x1_2938824_vPJQ1Luy/fd_Boo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_01-57-38_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 2s Prepared the HTML report for the field Boo-04-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL *------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------* #### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt #### ########### Completed Boo-04-Q1b1x1 ########### The analysis was running at tau We are allowed to update the exclusion list at tau host Found ../exclusion_list_TTUQ1.txt #### The exclusion list before filtering-out asteroids, bad pixels and adding Gaia sources #### ################################################################################### renamed 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt_noasteroids' -> 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt' renamed 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt_nohotpixels' -> 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt' # Count candidates with no identification (that also don't look like hot pix) Found 0 unidentified candidates (excluding asteroids, hot pixels and known variable stars). ################################################################################### 0 candidates found (excluding asteroids and hot pixels) This does not look like a test run ################################################################################### exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt NOT FOUND exclusion_list_apass.txt NOT FOUND IS_THIS_TEST_RUN=NO ALLOW_EXCLUSION_LIST_UPDATE= YES #### Nothing to add to the exclusion list #### The observatory MPC code is V36 ############################################################ Positions of planets computed with util/planet_finder/main.py for JD(UT)2461195.78971935 -observatory V36 06:18:30.77 +25:30:28.9 Mercury (-0.2mag) 07:23:03.85 +24:03:27.8 Venus (-4.0mag) 02:38:17.87 +14:48:48.9 Mars (1.3mag) 07:45:13.34 +21:39:24.0 Jupiter (-1.9mag) 00:48:13.73 +02:42:22.9 Saturn (0.9mag) 03:59:16.44 +20:22:46.0 Uranus (5.8mag) 00:15:53.99 +00:15:26.5 Neptune (7.8mag) 20:33:33.63 -23:03:07.2 Pluto (14.5mag) 19:57:50.70 -24:29:52.8 Moon (-11.6mag) -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 363 Jun 4 02:39 planets.txt ############################################################ Positions of selected moons from JPL HORIZONS for JD(UT)2461195.78971935: 07:45:07.87 +21:39:40.7 Io (6.0mag) 07:45:07.67 +21:39:42.6 Europa (6.2mag) 07:45:30.56 +21:38:36.0 Ganymede (5.6mag) 07:45:41.55 +21:38:06.7 Callisto (6.8mag) 07:45:44.92 +21:15:30.7 Himalia (15.6mag) 07:45:15.44 +21:39:17.1 Thebe (16.5mag) 07:45:50.67 +21:32:41.9 Elara (17.5mag) 07:47:11.68 +21:53:13.4 Pasiphae (17.7mag) 07:51:58.49 +21:40:49.5 Carme (18.8mag) 00:48:09.00 +02:42:52.3 Titan (8.7mag) 00:48:09.53 +02:42:28.8 Rhea (10.0mag) 00:48:46.44 +02:44:03.3 Iapetus (11.4mag) 00:48:01.68 +02:42:32.5 Hyperion (14.7mag) 00:49:00.71 +02:44:53.0 Phoebe (16.7mag) -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 569 Jun 4 02:39 moons.txt ############################################################ Positions of selected spacecraft from JPL HORIZONS for JD(UT)2461195.78971935: 17:24:12.14 -34:52:19.9 JWST 18:20:03.13 +29:28:41.4 Chandra 19:41:48.63 +11:12:12.9 XMM-Newton -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 96 Jun 4 02:39 spacecraft.txt ############################################################ Positions of bright comets computed with util/comet_finder/main.py for JD(UT)2461195.78971935 -observatory V36 18:46:04.00 -32:21:49.9 13.6mag P/2010 H2 (Vales) 05:49:38.77 -68:06:40.3 17.4mag C/2014 UN271 (Bernardinelli-Bernstein) 05:47:37.69 +31:55:05.0 17.5mag C/2017 K2 (PANSTARRS) 17:16:17.70 +15:08:32.0 17.8mag C/2021 G2 (ATLAS) 20:38:19.98 -50:54:49.6 17.2mag P/2021 N1 (ZTF) 23:13:24.28 +31:26:17.0 17.2mag C/2022 E2 (ATLAS) 05:29:14.70 +26:56:55.2 16.4mag C/2022 N2 (PANSTARRS) 09:26:58.41 +31:12:53.4 16.6mag C/2022 QE78 (ATLAS) 08:48:29.63 +03:44:10.8 17.7mag C/2022 R6 (PANSTARRS) 18:30:44.35 +21:30:48.8 17.7mag C/2023 A3 (Tsuchinshan-ATLAS) 15:20:48.97 -11:00:27.1 17.6mag P/2023 B1 (PANSTARRS) 22:15:28.57 +66:16:55.2 17.7mag C/2023 H5 (Lemmon) 17:55:55.73 -06:19:05.5 13.7mag C/2023 R1 (PANSTARRS) 13:21:06.22 +83:52:09.3 17.9mag C/2023 X2 (Lemmon) 07:05:05.72 +64:10:59.0 17.6mag C/2024 A1 (ATLAS) 06:41:17.07 +27:28:03.1 13.5mag C/2024 E1 (Wierzchos) 15:40:23.64 +13:10:03.3 17.4mag C/2024 G6 (ATLAS) 20:15:27.05 +29:57:43.6 14.0mag C/2024 J3 (ATLAS) 04:14:06.53 -16:18:15.5 16.0mag C/2024 T5 (ATLAS) 06:02:15.31 +35:10:32.9 17.9mag C/2025 J1 (Borisov) 11:37:10.16 +52:57:39.9 17.3mag C/2025 L1 (ATLAS) 06:39:52.16 -10:41:25.7 13.7mag C/2025 R3 (PANSTARRS) 09:21:04.09 +23:22:57.0 18.0mag C/2025 V2 (Rankin) 12:39:53.09 +04:41:34.6 17.2mag C/2025 Y1 (ATLAS) 18:18:27.86 +74:14:48.3 18.0mag C/2026 A2 (Bok) 01:53:42.50 +43:07:38.9 16.0mag C/2026 B2 (Sun-Gao) 11:10:40.37 -05:10:15.4 16.4mag A/2026 E1 20:16:30.63 -08:20:31.1 8.9mag 10P/Tempel 11:01:09.68 -00:55:12.8 16.0mag 29P/Schwassmann-Wachmann 10:57:51.72 -02:40:59.8 17.9mag 43P/Wolf-Harrington 03:05:39.76 +25:06:59.2 17.6mag 47P/Ashbrook-Jackson 08:51:38.93 +24:52:23.2 16.9mag 63P/Wild 00:23:29.22 -06:37:49.2 15.7mag 65P/Gunn 06:30:48.43 +32:59:45.0 16.8mag 76P/West-Kohoutek-Ikemura 02:59:45.84 +16:42:07.2 13.9mag 78P/Gehrels 01:12:08.81 +03:58:49.0 15.5mag 88P/Howell 04:42:03.37 +29:58:24.3 15.2mag 93P/Lovas 02:32:01.54 +26:58:52.5 17.7mag 114P/Wiseman-Skiff 06:41:16.65 +33:09:42.8 15.6mag 123P/West-Hartley 09:43:25.45 +16:18:55.8 16.5mag 124P/Mrkos 03:52:35.63 +18:58:50.4 16.4mag 128P/Shoemaker-Holt 04:25:46.99 +18:53:32.0 17.7mag 131P/Mueller 05:41:11.35 +19:04:18.5 14.1mag 141P/Machholz 05:43:41.81 +17:24:57.1 14.1mag 141P-A/Machholz 04:34:12.13 +15:34:28.0 11.2mag 141P-D/Machholz 02:54:53.52 -25:15:21.0 17.0mag 161P/Hartley-IRAS 03:28:49.27 +22:12:28.3 14.9mag 162P/SidingSpring 19:36:38.02 +00:37:08.9 17.1mag 169P/NEAT 00:07:46.57 +01:41:11.7 17.9mag 220P/McNaught 16:55:12.68 -08:41:27.3 16.3mag 235P/LINEAR 07:25:48.33 +35:38:19.7 17.5mag 240P/NEAT 00:22:08.48 -04:06:26.7 16.5mag 260P/McNaught 03:53:43.42 +31:45:07.3 17.6mag 295P/LINEAR 23:25:09.99 -14:56:19.3 17.6mag 320P/McNaught 15:17:03.73 +08:12:59.1 17.4mag 391P/Kowalski 08:04:04.06 +20:50:37.9 17.9mag 450P/LONEOS 06:53:36.09 +41:58:14.3 17.8mag 493P/LONEOS -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 2.8K Jun 4 02:39 comets.txt ############################################################ List of recent ASAS-SN transients from https://www.astronomy.ohio-state.edu/asassn/transients.html : 20:07:38.15 -21:07:05.40 SN2026mho 2026-05-25.18 -1.12 11:29:42.55 +79:01:03.10 AT2026min 2026-05-24.21 16.63 11:44:32.95 -68:48:30.00 ASASSN-26no 2026-05-24 8.41 19:00:42.82 -48:31:01.60 ASASSN-26dp 2026-05-22.31 -3.28 14:23:56.59 -58:37:47.40 ASASSN-26dn 2026-05-20.01 14.59 11:24:54.06 +47:57:01.60 AT2026nma 2026-05-20.29 15.46 21:27:08.58 +33:24:38.10 AT2026lli 2026-05-19.34 15.86 00:31:01.41 -13:38:51.70 AT2026nad 2026-05-19.39 15.34 15:16:06.61 -79:16:32.40 ASASSN-26dm 2026-05-19.03 14.44 11:24:25.21 -59:23:19.10 ASASSN-26dl 2026-05-18.02 13.55 13:45:51.52 -53:16:01.00 ASASSN-26dk 2026-05-18.16 12.96 02:05:49.69 -30:29:09.60 ASASSN-26dh 2026-05-18.43 15.37 17:50:22.87 -39:42:33.90 ASASSN-26dj 2026-05-17.05 15.7 01:13:11.60 -33:25:16.10 ASASSN-26dg 2026-05-13.41 16.8 16:44:31.77 -27:15:18.40 AT2026mhn 2026-05-12.33 15.8 09:46:31.08 -33:41:51.00 ASASSN-26di 2026-05-12.14 14.63 21:23:11.57 -19:09:45.00 AT2026kwu 2026-05-12.26 16.9 14:20:14.30 -30:20:51.90 AT2026ktm 2026-05-12.06 17.21 14:41:39.01 -37:13:46.40 AT2026lkm 2026-05-11.18 16.89 12:59:50.45 -10:58:38.80 SN2026kep 2026-05-9.06 17.5 13:37:29.61 -29:50:30.90 AT2026lkd 2026-05-9.09 17.23 09:46:42.01 -14:52:03.60 SN2026kmo 2026-05-8.99 17.51 15:03:05.28 +22:02:03.40 AT2026lxf 2026-05-8.07 13.88 10:23:49.41 -20:57:25.30 ASASSN-26df 2026-05-8.21 16.52 22:14:40.56 +05:04:51.60 2026lda 2026-05-7.56 16.2 21:35:33.81 -14:05:16.30 ASASSN-26de 2026-05-6.29 14.51 16:21:48.82 -61:36:13.20 ASASSN-26dd 2026-05-5.21 15.15 14:26:40.22 -24:48:37.50 AT2026lig 2026-05-4.27 14.63 13:17:51.04 +30:25:13.50 SN2026kcp 2026-05-4.46 16.43 11:27:55.57 -13:38:56.90 SN2026kza 2026-05-1.08 15.59 22:28:27.10 +30:17:54.30 SN 2026fov 2026-04-29.6 14.36 21:00:10.71 -32:17:03.90 AT2026kis 2026-04-27.36 16.15 14:32:57.37 -58:13:26.40 ASASSN-26dc 2026-04-27.27 13.42 15:32:05.35 -43:54:34.60 ASASSN-26db 2026-04-27.37 16.06 16:34:34.97 -54:34:58.00 ASASSN-26da 2026-04-25.32 16.11 10:06:55.04 -01:13:49.70 SN2026jsg 2026-04-24.99 16.28 15:15:57.17 +56:18:32.80 SN2026kid 2026-04-24.52 -3.65 07:58:28.45 +57:03:42.40 AT2026kcf 2026-04-24.2 16.89 11:38:21.80 -50:43:06.50 SN2026jkb 2026-04-24.24 15.38 10:06:11.41 -39:41:04.20 AT2026dil 2026-04-24.2 16.85 14:21:40.08 +13:13:46.30 SN2026jlm 2026-04-22.16 15.12 10:53:55.52 -16:06:06.00 ASASSN-26cz 2026-04-22.28 16.29 20:07:38.15 -21:07:05.40 2026-05-25.18 -1.12 13:45:02.03 +15:17:14.50 ASASSN-26cy 2026-04-21.27 15.78 13:20:52.22 -35:57:03.60 AT2026jcm 2026-04-19.01 16.65 13:36:15.66 -36:53:48.40 SN 2026iqy 2026-04-18.92 17.31 06:34:01.33 -40:07:34.00 ASASSN-26cx 2026-04-19.07 16.16 23:33:57.97 -45:12:11.90 SN 2026idu 2026-04-19.41 15.9 12:10:50.92 +66:55:31.20 SN 2026icv 2026-04-17.14 16.03 21:36:59.06 -60:43:35.90 ASASSN-26cv 2026-04-17.35 -1.18 08:13:26.26 -27:07:30.50 ASASSN-26cw 2026-04-17.07 -1.01 14:49:14.13 -27:29:20.60 ASASSN-26cu 2026-04-16.06 14.03 17:21:59.44 -38:54:04.60 ASASSN-26ct 2026-04-14.4 15.15 15:25:54.99 +07:49:24.50 SN2026huo 2026-04-12.14 16.96 20:07:38.15 -21:07:05.40 2026-05-25.18 -1.12 12:23:20.40 +04:53:39.10 AT2026ixd 2026-04-12.14 17.65 17:46:09.76 -61:19:50.40 SN2026icy 2026-04-12.2 17.03 09:25:46.42 +02:13:46.30 SN2026gud 2026-04-11.98 16.49 16:52:15.46 -60:27:45.90 ASASSN-26cs 2026-04-12.4 15.5 04:20:55.37 -51:15:31.10 ASASSN-26cr 2026-04-12.01 15.37 22:25:39.35 +36:45:06.90 AT2026ihl 2026-04-10.48 14.21 19:40:44.94 +00:41:03.80 AT2026imw 2026-04-10.32 16.06 19:52:04.70 +05:53:33.50 ASASSN-26cq 2026-04-9.31 14.98 16:08:18.39 -64:11:08.80 ASASSN-26cp 2026-04-9.29 13.32 09:22:22.90 -61:02:43.70 SN2026idh 2026-04-7.97 16.34 05:06:54.12 -19:42:26.40 AT2026imr 2026-04-8 17.49 07:14:55.34 -36:03:21.40 AT2026hei 2026-04-8.12 16.7 21:35:33.14 -19:01:34.80 AT2026ihm 2026-04-8.36 16.7 04:28:24.08 -32:25:35.30 AT2026imo 2026-04-8.02 16.81 05:10:35.79 -39:38:40.80 SN 2026hnn 2026-04-7.04 17.07 09:54:32.04 -01:17:25.80 ASASSN-26cn 2026-04-7.01 15.58 07:46:24.43 -77:29:35.90 ASASSN-26co 2026-04-7.15 14.93 05:00:45.52 -29:51:06.20 AT2026hvw 2026-04-6.03 16.51 19:49:33.10 -23:37:11.00 ASASSN-26cl 2026-04-5.29 14.98 19:32:43.55 -22:39:33.40 ASASSN-26cm 2026-04-4.3 13.88 18:08:57.38 +76:48:23.60 ASASSN-26ck 2026-04-2.37 15.38 16:16:36.10 +44:52:30.20 AT2026hyy 2026-04-2.58 13.81 21:55:23.31 -34:48:53.90 ASASSN-26cj 2026-03-30.4 -1.47 11:19:50.70 -27:51:49.80 SN2026gvk 2026-03-30 15.48 11:53:57.02 -23:09:46.20 SN2026gzx 2026-03-28.75 15.27 07:13:46.14 -33:10:15.70 ASASSN-26ci 2026-03-28.15 15.14 09:03:36.09 -67:58:13.00 SN2026hkg 2026-03-28.19 15.82 07:03:00.72 +39:14:43.00 SN2026fin 2026-03-28.27 15.82 05:35:42.80 -63:44:05.50 ASASSN-26ch 2026-03-27.86 13.02 11:23:19.04 +34:22:38.00 SN2026fwt 2026-03-27.3 16.56 19:03:49.79 +37:04:05.20 ASASSN-26ce 2026-03-26.56 16.3 20:26:56.07 -52:54:06.50 AT2026hiy 2026-03-26.35 16.95 05:25:54.76 -30:15:35.80 ASASSN-26cg 2026-03-25.07 16.88 06:57:16.49 -26:54:37.20 SN2026fzb 2026-03-25.14 15.8 14:37:38.23 -43:00:52.30 ASASSN-26cd 2026-03-24.24 12.52 17:34:53.03 +06:04:29.70 AT2026gzl 2026-03-23.27 15.82 08:30:02.60 -35:12:47.50 ASASSN-26cf 2026-03-23.2 14.82 16:54:25.33 +37:49:56.60 SN 2026evz 2026-03-21.32 17.54 17:06:19.20 -18:54:19.50 ASASSN-26bx 2026-03-21.25 16.39 19:01:16.28 -29:29:23.10 ASASSN-26bw 2026-03-21.33 15.81 08:46:05.75 +10:47:39.80 ASASSN-26ca 2026-03-21.13 14.27 12:14:58.16 +63:47:16.20 SN 2026fvx 2026-03-21.12 15.6 18:02:55.90 -75:23:02.60 ASASSN-26bz 2026-03-21.32 16.16 12:16:02.88 -53:16:33.80 ASASSN-26cc 2026-03-20.04 15.48 13:08:21.85 +29:13:44.20 SN 2026fmh 2026-03-20.16 -0.33 -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 5.6K Jun 4 02:39 asassn_transients_list.txt ############################################################ Truncated list of TOCP transients from http://www.cbat.eps.harvard.edu/unconf/tocp.html : 17:57:19.56 -28:08:14.7 TCP J17571956-2808147 2026-03-19.7972 14.5mag 08:46:05.73 +10:47:39.7 TCP J08460573+1047397 2026-03-21.1936 14.5mag 09:55:38.83 +69:05:21.7 PNV J09553883+6905217 2026-04-01.893 19.4mag 19:32:43.67 -22:39:30.7 TCP J19324367-2239307 2026-04-05.4395 13.6mag 16:16:36.03 +44:52:28.9 TCP J16163603+4452289 2026-04-05.6655 14.2mag 00:43:38.36 +41:15:32.4 PNV J00433836+4115324 2026-04-08.079 17.2mag 15:41:11.68 +59:18:26.8 TCP J15411168+5918268 2026-04-12.9625 19.2mag 00:43:35.02 +41:46:28.0 PNV J00433502+4146280 2026-04-23.056 15.9mag 00:42:55.64 +41:14:12.2 PNV J00425564+4114122 2026-04-24.042 16.2mag 21:14:03.38 +56:46:44.1 TCP J21140338+5646441 2026-05-05.3534 16.7mag 15:03:05.19 +22:02:04.1 TCP J15030519+2202041 2026-05-08.3260 13.9mag 07:15:18.25 +47:53:16.7 TCP J07151825+4753167 2026-05-09.1599 14.4mag 16:00:18.44 -22:30:10.6 TCP J16001844-2230106 2026-05-09.6135 13.3mag 00:42:47.45 +41:16:58.5 PNV J00424745+4116585 2026-05-10.030 16.8mag 09:55:02.89 +69:02:13.8 PNV J09550289+6902138 2026-05-18.925 20.7mag 00:43:01.82 +41:18:16.6 PNV J00430182+4118166 2026-05-21.8651 18.83Cmag 00:42:51.20 +41:16:59.4 PNV J00425120+4116594 2022-10-26.135 19.3mag 12:24:25.10 +28:47:12.0 TCP J12242510+2847120 2026-05-31.6015 14.8mag 00:56:07.13 +43:01:40.6 TCP J00560713+4301406 2026-06-01.4135 12.2mag 00:42:41.64 +41:15:16.2 PNV J00424164+4115162 2026-06-02.029 17.4mag -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 189K Jun 4 02:39 tocp_transients_list.txt ############################################################ Truncated list of recent TNS transients from https://www.wis-tns.org/ : 21:55:42.596 -05:09:21.87 AT 2026nls 2026-05-23.44 19.9712 12:20:32.725 +19:21:21.55 AT 2026nlr 2026-05-22.24 20.3755 22:11:38.972 +01:58:18.38 AT 2026nlq 2026-05-21.46 20.412 14:13:39.867 -00:12:14.17 AT 2026nlp 2026-05-20.35 20.1718 20:29:49.048 +01:20:48.06 AT 2026nlo 2026-05-19.39 20.2943 01:58:34.577 +44:34:32.49 AT 2026nln 2026-05-23.48 17.464 00:09:19.630 +10:35:22.07 AT 2026nlm 2026-05-20.48 18.9664 00:31:41.797 +26:10:30.85 AT 2026nll 2026-05-23.48 19.3138 16:14:03.050 +15:19:38.66 AT 2026nlk 2026-05-16.86 20.93 18:17:15.360 +39:41:22.36 AT 2026nlj 2026-05-10.79 21.53 18:22:21.260 +38:36:15.52 AT 2026nli 2026-05-10.79 21.62 16:23:29.410 +22:48:47.18 AT 2026nlh 2026-05-09.79 20.01 15:19:37.260 +16:28:58.23 AT 2026nlg 2026-05-05.84 20.81 14:31:09.520 +24:03:04.31 AT 2026nlf 2026-04-30.86 19.85 15:33:35.050 +31:50:53.87 AT 2026nle 2026-04-19.90 20.71 15:15:31.740 +19:01:13.96 AT 2026nld 2026-04-19.89 20.52 14:33:02.080 +03:34:42.30 AT 2026nlc 2026-05-21.70 21.81 14:21:55.000 -01:06:15.74 AT 2026nlb 2026-05-21.70 21.58 14:21:48.580 +02:02:28.28 AT 2026nla 2026-05-21.70 21.97 14:34:15.890 +04:48:10.98 AT 2026nkz 2026-05-21.66 22.11 -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 30K Jun 4 02:39 tns_transients_list.txt

Profiling:

CPU temperature: 91 C