NMW transient search results

This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-04_CI_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_022623_TTUQ1b1x1_2564972_eTVtnTil

The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.

Processing fields CVn-01-Q1b1x1

Processing complete!

Total number of candidates identified: 0

Processing log:

Filtering log:

######## Processing parameters ########
AAVSO_COMMENT_STRING= NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
ASTCHECK_ASTEROID_SEARCH_RADIUS_ARCSEC= 
BAD_REGION_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst
CAMERA_SETTINGS= TTUQ1b1x1
CHECK_POINTING_ACCURACY= yes
DARK_FRAMES_DIR_OR_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks
EXCLUSION_LIST= ../exclusion_list_TTUQ1.txt
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MAX_APERTURE_STAR_SIZE_PIX= 12.5
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MAX_ELONGATION_AminusB_PIX= 0.55
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MIN_APERTURE_STAR_SIZE_PIX= 2.0
FILTER_BRIGHT_MAG_CUTOFF_TRANSIENT_SEARCH= -5
FILTER_FAINT_MAG_CUTOFF_TRANSIENT_SEARCH= 15.0
FLAT_FIELD_DIR_OR_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats
FRAME_EDGE_OFFSET_PIX= 100
GAIA_BAND_FOR_CATALOGED_SOURCE_CHECK= 
MAX_NEW_TO_REF_MEAN_IMG_VALUE_RATIO= 100
MAX_NEW_IMG_MEAN_VALUE= 25000
MAX_SD_RATIO_OF_SECOND_EPOCH_IMGS= 0.18
MAX_SD_RATIO_OF_SECOND_EPOCH_IMGS_SOFT_LIMIT= 0.12
MPC_CODE= V36
NMW_CALIBRATION= /var/www/nmw_calibration
NUMBER_OF_DETECTED_TRANSIENTS_BEFORE_FILTERING_HARD_LIMIT= 8000
NUMBER_OF_DETECTED_TRANSIENTS_BEFORE_FILTERING_SOFT_LIMIT= 4000
OMP_NUM_THREADS= 
ONLINE_MPCHECKER_BUTTON_ASTEROID_SEARCH_RADIUS_ARCMIN= 
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION= 
REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES= yes
SEXTRACTOR_CONFIG_BRIGHTSTARPASS= default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
SEXTRACTOR_CONFIG_FILES= default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
STARMATCH_RADIUS_PIX= 3.5
SYSREM_ITERATIONS= 0
TELESCOP= 
TELESCOP_NAME_KNOWN_TO_VaST_FOR_FOV_DETERMINATION= 
UCAC5_PLATESOLVE_ITERATIONS= 2
FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE= no
#######################################
HOSTNAME= tau
USER= 
HOME= 
#######################################
SExtractor catalog cache: enabled, directory /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/vast_sextractor_cache
Reference image directory is set to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs
VIZIER_SITE=vizier.cds.unistra.fr
GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=vizquery (lib/vizquery -> VizieR vizier.cds.unistra.fr)
INFO: MAKE_PNG_PLOTS is set to yes
FITS_FILE_EXT=fits
CALIBRATION_STATUS_PREFIX=
Fields in the data directory: 
CVn-01-Q1b1x1
#######################################
########### Starting CVn-01-Q1b1x1 ###########
Processing CVn-01-Q1b1x1
server tau has sufficient free disk space available: 466967 MB at /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir
server tau has sufficient free disk space available: 466967 MB at .
Checking input images (2 new)
REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE= /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-24-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0255.fits
REFERENCE_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE= /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-25-24_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0256.fits
Small preview (one of the new images): 
Large previews of the second-epoch (new) images:
MAKE_PNG_PLOTS=yes
renamed 'CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_01-44-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219.png' -> 'transient_report/CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_01-44-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219.fits_preview.png'
CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_01-44-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219.fits

renamed 'CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_01-47-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0220.png' -> 'transient_report/CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_01-47-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0220.fits_preview.png'
CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_01-47-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0220.fits


Read-check the input FITS images... read-check OK Blank image check the input FITS images... blank-image-check OK Read date check the input FITS images... read-date-check OK Mean value check the input FITS images... OK, at least two new images have mean values below the threshold. ---------------------------------------------- INFO: REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 449.7917 INFO: REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_SD= 438.5618 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 1677.3624 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_SD= 504.2469 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 1699.7821 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE_SD= 507.3905 ---------------------------------------------- INFO: ref_to_second_epoch_img_mean_ratio= 3.7292 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__SD_ratio= 0.006 ---------------------------------------------- Calibration settings: DARK_FRAMES_DIR_OR_FILE=/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks FLAT_FIELD_DIR_OR_FILE=/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration SET-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint CCD-TEMP= -0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature FOCTEMP = 21.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature AMBTEMP = 19.1 / [degC] Ambient air temperature Exploring image header: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-04_CI_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_022623_TTUQ1b1x1_2564972_eTVtnTil/CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_01-44-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219.fits CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-04_CI_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_022623_TTUQ1b1x1_2564972_eTVtnTil/CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_01-44-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219.fits SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-04_CI_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_022623_TTUQ1b1x1_2564972_eTVtnTil/CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_01-44-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219.fits Header: 74 keys total, 33 keys left Record 0: "" status=0 Record 1: "SIMPLE = T / C# FITS" status=0 Record 2: "BITPIX = 16" status=0 Record 3: "NAXIS = 2 / Dimensionality" status=0 Record 4: "NAXIS1 = 9576" status=0 Record 5: "NAXIS2 = 6388" status=0 Record 6: "BZERO = 32768" status=0 Record 7: "EXTEND = T / Extensions are permitted" status=0 Record 8: "IMAGETYP= 'LIGHT' / Type of exposure" status=0 Record 9: "EXPOSURE= 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0 Record 10: "EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0 Record 11: "DATE-LOC= '2026-06-04T01:44:13.6772674' / Time of observation (local)" status=0 Record 12: "DATE-OBS= '2026-06-04T06:44:13.6772674' / Time of observation (UTC)" status=0 Record 13: "MJD-OBS = 61195.2807138544 / Modified Julian Date of observation" status=0 Record 14: "DATE-AVG= '2026-06-04T06:44:23.5790145' / Averaged midpoint time (UTC)" status=0 Record 15: "MJD-AVG = 61195.2808284606 / Modified Julian Date of averaged midpoint" status=0 Record 16: "XBINNING= 1 / X axis binning factor" status=0 Record 17: "YBINNING= 1 / Y axis binning factor" status=0 Record 18: "GAIN = 30 / Sensor gain" status=0 Record 19: "OFFSET = 30 / Sensor gain offset" status=0 Record 20: "XPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel X axis size" status=0 Record 21: "YPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel Y axis size" status=0 Record 22: "INSTRUME= 'QHY600M' / Imaging instrument name" status=0 Record 23: "CAMERAID= 'QHY600M-33d3d743814b8b447' / Imaging instrument identifier" status=0 Record 24: "SET-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint" status=0 Record 25: "CCD-TEMP= -0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature" status=0 Record 26: "READOUTM= '2CMS-0' / Sensor readout mode" status=0 Record 27: "USBLIMIT= 50 / Camera-specific USB setting" status=0 Record 28: "TELESCOP= 'QHY600M-TTU1' / Name of telescope" status=0 Record 29: "FOCALLEN= 135.0 / [mm] Focal length" status=0 Record 30: "FOCRATIO= 2.2 / Focal ratio" status=0 Record 31: "RA = 197.996550493258 / [deg] RA of telescope" status=0 Record 32: "DEC = 45.9999584177183 / [deg] Declination of telescope" status=0 Record 33: "CENTALT = 47.9180555555556 / [deg] Altitude of telescope" status=0 Record 34: "CENTAZ = 303.226111111111 / [deg] Azimuth of telescope" status=0 Record 35: "AIRMASS = 1.3462699275387 / Airmass at frame center (Gueymard 1993)" status=0 Record 36: "PIERSIDE= 'East' / Telescope pointing state" status=0 Record 37: "SITEELEV= 1015.0 / [m] Observation site elevation" status=0 Record 38: "SITELAT = 33.7480555555556 / [deg] Observation site latitude" status=0 Record 39: "SITELONG= -101.958333333333 / [deg] Observation site longitude" status=0 Record 40: "OBSERVER= 'Sokolovsky' / Observer name" status=0 Record 41: "OBSERVAT= 'TTU Skyview' / Observatory name" status=0 Record 42: "SITENAME= '' / Observatory site name" status=0 Record 43: "FWHEEL = 'Simulator' / Filter Wheel name" status=0 Record 44: "FILTER = 'CV' / Active filter name" status=0 Record 45: "OBJECT = 'CVn-01' / Name of the object of interest" status=0 Record 46: "OBJCTRA = '13 12 00' / [H M S] RA of imaged object" status=0 Record 47: "OBJCTDEC= '+46 00 00' / [D M S] Declination of imaged object" status=0 Record 48: "OBJCTROT= 0.0 / [deg] planned rotation of imaged object" status=0 Record 49: "FOCNAME = 'ZWO Focuser' / Focusing equipment name" status=0 Record 50: "FOCPOS = 29428 / [step] Focuser position" status=0 Record 51: "FOCUSPOS= 29428 / [step] Focuser position" status=0 Record 52: "FOCUSSZ = 0.0 / [um] Focuser step size" status=0 Record 53: "FOCTEMP = 21.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0 Record 54: "FOCUSTEM= 21.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0 Record 55: "DEWPOINT= 16.2 / [degC] Dew point" status=0 Record 56: "HUMIDITY= 83.0 / [percent] Relative humidity" status=0 Record 57: "PRESSURE= 903.39 / [hPa] Air pressure" status=0 Record 58: "AMBTEMP = 19.1 / [degC] Ambient air temperature" status=0 Record 59: "WINDDIR = 349.0 / [deg] Wind direction: 0=N, 180=S, 90=E, 270=W" status=0 Record 60: "WINDGUST= 0.0 / [kph] Wind gust" status=0 Record 61: "WINDSPD = 0.0 / [kph] Wind speed" status=0 Record 62: "ROWORDER= 'TOP-DOWN' / FITS Image Orientation" status=0 Record 63: "EQUINOX = 2000.0 / Equinox of celestial coordinate system" status=0 Record 64: "SWCREATE= 'N.I.N.A. 3.2.0.9001 (x64)' / Software that created this file" status=0 Record 65: "QHY_EXP = 20.000096 / [s] Actual exposure time" status=0 Record 66: "QHY_PP = 13888.0 / [ps] pixelPeriod" status=0 Record 67: "QHY_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0 Record 68: "GPS_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0 Record 69: "QHY_FP = 20000160.0 / [us] framePeriod" status=0 Record 70: "QHY_CPL = 6120.0 / clocksPerLine" status=0 Record 71: "QHY_LPF = 235295.0 / linesPerFrame" status=0 Record 72: "QHY_AET = 20000096.0 / [us] actualExposureTime" status=0 Record 73: "QHY_LEM = T / isLongExposureMode" status=0 Record 74: "QHY_OFF0= 3767.777 / [us] RollingShutterEndOffset row 0" status=0 Allocating memory for image, dark and result arrays... Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-04_CI_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_022623_TTUQ1b1x1_2564972_eTVtnTil/CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_01-44-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-04_CI_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_022623_TTUQ1b1x1_2564972_eTVtnTil/CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_01-44-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219.fits SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_5C_20s_2026-05-30.fit CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-04_CI_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_022623_TTUQ1b1x1_2564972_eTVtnTil/CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_01-44-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219.fits CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_5C_20s_2026-05-30.fit Reading dark frame /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_5C_20s_2026-05-30.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix Dark frame is subtracted, output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-04_CI_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_022623_TTUQ1b1x1_2564972_eTVtnTil/d_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_01-44-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219.fits :) Spent 0.581009 seconds renamed 'mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_5C_20s_2026-05-30.png' -> 'transient_report/dark.png' try_to_calibrate_the_input_frame(): selected flat field /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-05-30.fit from directory /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats MegaDivider v7 Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-04_CI_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_022623_TTUQ1b1x1_2564972_eTVtnTil/d_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_01-44-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix Reading flat /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-05-30.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix Avarage count on flat field image: 31267.409145 Minimal real count (from overscan): 5 Output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-04_CI_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_022623_TTUQ1b1x1_2564972_eTVtnTil/fd_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_01-44-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219.fits :) No overscan detected - all values seem high! (left_median=21677.0, right_median=21704.0) renamed 'mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-05-30.png' -> 'transient_report/flat.png' Using calibrated image CALIBRATED_SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-04_CI_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_022623_TTUQ1b1x1_2564972_eTVtnTil/fd_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_01-44-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219.fits EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration SET-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint CCD-TEMP= -0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature FOCTEMP = 21.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature AMBTEMP = 19.1 / [degC] Ambient air temperature Exploring image header: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-04_CI_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_022623_TTUQ1b1x1_2564972_eTVtnTil/CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_01-47-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0220.fits CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-04_CI_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_022623_TTUQ1b1x1_2564972_eTVtnTil/CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_01-47-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0220.fits SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-04_CI_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_022623_TTUQ1b1x1_2564972_eTVtnTil/CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_01-47-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0220.fits Header: 74 keys total, 33 keys left Record 0: "" status=0 Record 1: "SIMPLE = T / C# FITS" status=0 Record 2: "BITPIX = 16" status=0 Record 3: "NAXIS = 2 / Dimensionality" status=0 Record 4: "NAXIS1 = 9576" status=0 Record 5: "NAXIS2 = 6388" status=0 Record 6: "BZERO = 32768" status=0 Record 7: "EXTEND = T / Extensions are permitted" status=0 Record 8: "IMAGETYP= 'LIGHT' / Type of exposure" status=0 Record 9: "EXPOSURE= 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0 Record 10: "EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0 Record 11: "DATE-LOC= '2026-06-04T01:47:17.0834520' / Time of observation (local)" status=0 Record 12: "DATE-OBS= '2026-06-04T06:47:17.0834520' / Time of observation (UTC)" status=0 Record 13: "MJD-OBS = 61195.2828366086 / Modified Julian Date of observation" status=0 Record 14: "DATE-AVG= '2026-06-04T06:47:26.9873480' / Averaged midpoint time (UTC)" status=0 Record 15: "MJD-AVG = 61195.2829512386 / Modified Julian Date of averaged midpoint" status=0 Record 16: "XBINNING= 1 / X axis binning factor" status=0 Record 17: "YBINNING= 1 / Y axis binning factor" status=0 Record 18: "GAIN = 30 / Sensor gain" status=0 Record 19: "OFFSET = 30 / Sensor gain offset" status=0 Record 20: "XPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel X axis size" status=0 Record 21: "YPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel Y axis size" status=0 Record 22: "INSTRUME= 'QHY600M' / Imaging instrument name" status=0 Record 23: "CAMERAID= 'QHY600M-33d3d743814b8b447' / Imaging instrument identifier" status=0 Record 24: "SET-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint" status=0 Record 25: "CCD-TEMP= -0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature" status=0 Record 26: "READOUTM= '2CMS-0' / Sensor readout mode" status=0 Record 27: "USBLIMIT= 50 / Camera-specific USB setting" status=0 Record 28: "TELESCOP= 'QHY600M-TTU1' / Name of telescope" status=0 Record 29: "FOCALLEN= 135.0 / [mm] Focal length" status=0 Record 30: "FOCRATIO= 2.2 / Focal ratio" status=0 Record 31: "RA = 197.996550588121 / [deg] RA of telescope" status=0 Record 32: "DEC = 45.9999583408501 / [deg] Declination of telescope" status=0 Record 33: "CENTALT = 47.3836111111111 / [deg] Altitude of telescope" status=0 Record 34: "CENTAZ = 303.268611111111 / [deg] Azimuth of telescope" status=0 Record 35: "AIRMASS = 1.35772740938494 / Airmass at frame center (Gueymard 1993)" status=0 Record 36: "PIERSIDE= 'East' / Telescope pointing state" status=0 Record 37: "SITEELEV= 1015.0 / [m] Observation site elevation" status=0 Record 38: "SITELAT = 33.7480555555556 / [deg] Observation site latitude" status=0 Record 39: "SITELONG= -101.958333333333 / [deg] Observation site longitude" status=0 Record 40: "OBSERVER= 'Sokolovsky' / Observer name" status=0 Record 41: "OBSERVAT= 'TTU Skyview' / Observatory name" status=0 Record 42: "SITENAME= '' / Observatory site name" status=0 Record 43: "FWHEEL = 'Simulator' / Filter Wheel name" status=0 Record 44: "FILTER = 'CV' / Active filter name" status=0 Record 45: "OBJECT = 'CVn-01' / Name of the object of interest" status=0 Record 46: "OBJCTRA = '13 12 00' / [H M S] RA of imaged object" status=0 Record 47: "OBJCTDEC= '+46 00 00' / [D M S] Declination of imaged object" status=0 Record 48: "OBJCTROT= 0.0 / [deg] planned rotation of imaged object" status=0 Record 49: "FOCNAME = 'ZWO Focuser' / Focusing equipment name" status=0 Record 50: "FOCPOS = 29428 / [step] Focuser position" status=0 Record 51: "FOCUSPOS= 29428 / [step] Focuser position" status=0 Record 52: "FOCUSSZ = 0.0 / [um] Focuser step size" status=0 Record 53: "FOCTEMP = 21.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0 Record 54: "FOCUSTEM= 21.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0 Record 55: "DEWPOINT= 16.2 / [degC] Dew point" status=0 Record 56: "HUMIDITY= 83.0 / [percent] Relative humidity" status=0 Record 57: "PRESSURE= 903.39 / [hPa] Air pressure" status=0 Record 58: "AMBTEMP = 19.1 / [degC] Ambient air temperature" status=0 Record 59: "WINDDIR = 349.0 / [deg] Wind direction: 0=N, 180=S, 90=E, 270=W" status=0 Record 60: "WINDGUST= 0.0 / [kph] Wind gust" status=0 Record 61: "WINDSPD = 0.0 / [kph] Wind speed" status=0 Record 62: "ROWORDER= 'TOP-DOWN' / FITS Image Orientation" status=0 Record 63: "EQUINOX = 2000.0 / Equinox of celestial coordinate system" status=0 Record 64: "SWCREATE= 'N.I.N.A. 3.2.0.9001 (x64)' / Software that created this file" status=0 Record 65: "QHY_EXP = 20.000096 / [s] Actual exposure time" status=0 Record 66: "QHY_PP = 13888.0 / [ps] pixelPeriod" status=0 Record 67: "QHY_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0 Record 68: "GPS_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0 Record 69: "QHY_FP = 20000160.0 / [us] framePeriod" status=0 Record 70: "QHY_CPL = 6120.0 / clocksPerLine" status=0 Record 71: "QHY_LPF = 235295.0 / linesPerFrame" status=0 Record 72: "QHY_AET = 20000096.0 / [us] actualExposureTime" status=0 Record 73: "QHY_LEM = T / isLongExposureMode" status=0 Record 74: "QHY_OFF0= 3767.777 / [us] RollingShutterEndOffset row 0" status=0 Allocating memory for image, dark and result arrays... Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-04_CI_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_022623_TTUQ1b1x1_2564972_eTVtnTil/CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_01-47-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0220.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-04_CI_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_022623_TTUQ1b1x1_2564972_eTVtnTil/CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_01-47-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0220.fits SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_5C_20s_2026-05-30.fit CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-04_CI_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_022623_TTUQ1b1x1_2564972_eTVtnTil/CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_01-47-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0220.fits CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_5C_20s_2026-05-30.fit Reading dark frame /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_5C_20s_2026-05-30.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix Dark frame is subtracted, output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-04_CI_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_022623_TTUQ1b1x1_2564972_eTVtnTil/d_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_01-47-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0220.fits :) Spent 0.663936 seconds renamed 'mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_5C_20s_2026-05-30.png' -> 'transient_report/dark.png' try_to_calibrate_the_input_frame(): selected flat field /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-05-30.fit from directory /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats MegaDivider v7 Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-04_CI_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_022623_TTUQ1b1x1_2564972_eTVtnTil/d_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_01-47-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0220.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix Reading flat /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-05-30.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix Avarage count on flat field image: 31267.409145 Minimal real count (from overscan): 5 Output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-04_CI_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_022623_TTUQ1b1x1_2564972_eTVtnTil/fd_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_01-47-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0220.fits :) No overscan detected - all values seem high! (left_median=21677.0, right_median=21704.0) renamed 'mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-05-30.png' -> 'transient_report/flat.png' Using calibrated image CALIBRATED_SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-04_CI_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_022623_TTUQ1b1x1_2564972_eTVtnTil/fd_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_01-47-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0220.fits Dark frame used to calibrate the second-epoch images:

Flat field used to calibrate the second-epoch images:

after the calibration attempt: SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-04_CI_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_022623_TTUQ1b1x1_2564972_eTVtnTil/fd_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_01-44-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219.fits SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-04_CI_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_022623_TTUQ1b1x1_2564972_eTVtnTil/fd_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_01-47-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0220.fits Previews of the CALIBRATED second-epoch images:

fd_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_01-44-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219.fits


fd_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_01-47-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0220.fits


Updating neverexclude_list.txt '/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt' Choosing bad regions list '/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst' wait *------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------* 'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex' Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 3.5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-24-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0255.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-25-24_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0256.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-04_CI_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_022623_TTUQ1b1x1_2564972_eTVtnTil/fd_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_01-44-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-04_CI_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_022623_TTUQ1b1x1_2564972_eTVtnTil/fd_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_01-47-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0220.fits SExtractor catalog cache: saved CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-24-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0255.fits.cat to cache SExtractor catalog cache: saved CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-25-24_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0256.fits.cat to cache VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-24-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0255.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-25-24_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0256.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-04_CI_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_022623_TTUQ1b1x1_2564972_eTVtnTil/fd_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_01-44-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-04_CI_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_022623_TTUQ1b1x1_2564972_eTVtnTil/fd_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_01-47-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0220.fits Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461195.78082959 Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt '../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt' Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt '../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt' Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt '../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt' Plate-solving the images wcs_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-24-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0255.fits exists and is non-empty Saving wcs_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-24-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0255.fits to local_wcs_cache/ 'wcs_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-24-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0255.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-24-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0255.fits' wcs_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-25-24_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0256.fits exists and is non-empty Saving wcs_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-25-24_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0256.fits to local_wcs_cache/ 'wcs_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-25-24_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0256.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-25-24_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0256.fits' wcs_fd_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_01-44-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219.fits exists and is non-empty Saving wcs_fd_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_01-44-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219.fits to local_wcs_cache/ 'wcs_fd_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_01-44-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_01-44-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219.fits' wcs_fd_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_01-47-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0220.fits exists and is non-empty Saving wcs_fd_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_01-47-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0220.fits to local_wcs_cache/ 'wcs_fd_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_01-47-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0220.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_01-47-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0220.fits' ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-24-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0255.fits (1st reference image) verification OK: wcs_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-24-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0255.fits Image size: 941.3'x626.7' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 13:12:00.629 +45:59:41.30 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9" ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_01-44-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219.fits (1st new image) verification OK: wcs_fd_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_01-44-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219.fits Image size: 941.0'x626.5' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.88"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 13:12:03.751 +45:58:54.96 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy) Reference image center 13:12:00.629 +45:59:41.30 Second-epoch image center 13:12:03.751 +45:58:54.96 Angular distance between the image centers 0.0157 deg. Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg. ################################### ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_01-47-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0220.fits (2nd new image) verification OK: wcs_fd_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_01-47-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0220.fits Image size: 941.0'x626.5' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.88"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 13:12:06.124 +45:59:22.02 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy) Reference image center 13:12:00.629 +45:59:41.30 Second-epoch image center 13:12:06.124 +45:59:22.02 Angular distance between the image centers 0.0168 deg. ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images) Second-epoch first image center 13:12:03.751 +45:58:54.96 Second-epoch second image center 13:12:06.124 +45:59:22.02 Angular distance between the image centers 0.01018 deg. ################################### Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5... Preparing for ar aprallel run Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-24-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0255.fits &> /tmp/tmp.wbHp8MOPHg Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-24-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0255.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-25-24_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0256.fits &> /tmp/tmp.iM4UeQD4TG Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-25-24_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0256.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-04_CI_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_022623_TTUQ1b1x1_2564972_eTVtnTil/fd_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_01-44-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219.fits &> /tmp/tmp.gMSyJ8KcVN Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-04_CI_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_022623_TTUQ1b1x1_2564972_eTVtnTil/fd_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_01-44-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-04_CI_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_022623_TTUQ1b1x1_2564972_eTVtnTil/fd_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_01-47-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0220.fits &> /tmp/tmp.qCU6CQgwrN Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-04_CI_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_022623_TTUQ1b1x1_2564972_eTVtnTil/fd_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_01-47-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0220.fits Calibrating the magnitude scale Found non-empty wcs_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-24-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0255.fits ____ Start of magnitude calibration ____ PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-24-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0255.fits and wcs_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-24-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0255.fits.cat wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race) Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2 Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-24-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0255.fits and wcs_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-24-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0255.fits.cat Found non-empty wcs_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-24-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0255.fits and wcs_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-24-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0255.fits.cat The reference image (wcs_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-24-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0255.fits) and catalog (wcs_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-24-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0255.fits.cat) found 'wcs_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-24-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0255.fits.cat' -> 'wcsmag.cat' Read 5685 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 186.0186 to 210.6841 deg, Dec +39.8627 to +51.3580 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 186.0186 to 210.6841 deg, Dec 39.8627 to 51.3580 deg Loaded 4188 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 2899 out of 3036 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 3036 out of 5685 detected stars. The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.812700 a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.812700 From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.40 Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.41 Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes Working... Please, PLEASE, be patient!!! All lightcurves processed! =) Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.41
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:

Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V) Read 5685 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 186.0186 to 210.6841 deg, Dec +39.8627 to +51.3580 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 186.0186 to 210.6841 deg, Dec 39.8627 to 51.3580 deg Loaded 4188 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 2899 out of 3036 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 3036 out of 5685 detected stars. util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-24-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0255.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-24-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0255.fits:

Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-24-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0255.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-24-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0255.fits (aperture=6.1) Read 5702 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 186.1907 to 210.6839 deg, Dec +39.8627 to +51.3580 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 186.1907 to 210.6839 deg, Dec 39.8627 to 51.3580 deg Loaded 4164 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 2906 out of 3040 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 3040 out of 5702 detected stars. util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-25-24_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0256.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-25-24_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0256.fits:

Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-25-24_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0256.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-25-24_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0256.fits (aperture=6.2) ____ End of magnitude calibration ____ Applying consolidated magnitude filters... Preparing the exclusion lists for this field Done with filtering Found 0 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 8000) Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars: 2.1 pix CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-24-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0255.fits 2.1 pix CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-25-24_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0256.fits 4.1 pix fd_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_01-44-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219.fits 4.2 pix fd_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_01-47-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0220.fits 2.1 pix wcs_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-24-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0255.fits 2.1 pix wcs_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-25-24_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0256.fits Limiting magnitude estimates: 15.4 mag. CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-24-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0255.fits 15.4 mag. CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-25-24_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0256.fits 14.5 mag. fd_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_01-44-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219.fits 14.5 mag. fd_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_01-47-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0220.fits All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.5 (SNR ) 11.9 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50). This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image. The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here. The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images. This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list. The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag. Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver wait ############ /tmp/tmp.wbHp8MOPHg (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The guess is based on the existing WCS header. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-04_CI_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_022623_TTUQ1b1x1_2564972_eTVtnTil/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-24-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0255.fits 574.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-24-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0255.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-24-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0255.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-24-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0255.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-24-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0255.fits It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good. The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-24-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0255.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good... '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-24-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0255.fits' -> 'wcs_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-24-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0255.fits' FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-24-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0255.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-24-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0255.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-24-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0255.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-24-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0255.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-24-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0255.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-24-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0255.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-24-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0255.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-24-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0255.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-24-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0255.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-24-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0255.fits.cat SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=340, passed=5685 Got 5685 stars (including 5338 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-24-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0255.fits.cat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 5685 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.3' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.3 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013074 (47.1 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010459 (37.7 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 649 to 708 (Dec 39.9 to 51.4) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 968 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 968 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 959 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 968 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5596 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 649 to 708 (Dec 39.9 to 51.4) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 968 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 968 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5597 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 968 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5597 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33" Excluding outliers - 968 stars left (next iteration limit 1064) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-24-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0255.fits N_match=968 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.363 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.369 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.430 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.322 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.328 n_q1=259 n_q2=267 n_q3=223 n_q4=219 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.185 The image catalog is written to wcs_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-24-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0255.fits.cat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-24-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0255.fits.cat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-24-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0255.fits -region wcs_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-24-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0255.fits.cat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-24-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0255.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations ############ /tmp/tmp.iM4UeQD4TG (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The guess is based on the existing WCS header. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-04_CI_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_022623_TTUQ1b1x1_2564972_eTVtnTil/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-25-24_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0256.fits 574.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-25-24_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0256.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-25-24_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0256.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-25-24_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0256.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-25-24_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0256.fits It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good. The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-25-24_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0256.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good... '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-25-24_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0256.fits' -> 'wcs_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-25-24_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0256.fits' FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-25-24_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0256.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-25-24_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0256.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-25-24_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0256.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-25-24_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0256.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-25-24_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0256.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-25-24_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0256.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-25-24_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0256.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-25-24_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0256.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-25-24_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0256.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-25-24_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0256.fits.cat SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=330, passed=5702 Got 5702 stars (including 5364 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-25-24_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0256.fits.cat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 5702 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.3' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.3 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013074 (47.1 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010459 (37.7 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 649 to 708 (Dec 39.9 to 51.4) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 968 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 968 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 957 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 968 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5609 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 649 to 708 (Dec 39.9 to 51.4) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 968 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 968 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5609 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 968 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5609 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32" Excluding outliers - 968 stars left (next iteration limit 1064) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-25-24_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0256.fits N_match=968 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.355 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.356 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.463 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.276 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.377 n_q1=254 n_q2=267 n_q3=228 n_q4=219 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.306 The image catalog is written to wcs_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-25-24_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0256.fits.cat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-25-24_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0256.fits.cat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-25-24_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0256.fits -region wcs_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-25-24_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0256.fits.cat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-25-24_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0256.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations ############ /tmp/tmp.gMSyJ8KcVN (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um Internal estimated FoV 605.3' The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-04_CI_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_022623_TTUQ1b1x1_2564972_eTVtnTil/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-04_CI_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_022623_TTUQ1b1x1_2564972_eTVtnTil/fd_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_01-44-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219.fits 605.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-04_CI_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_022623_TTUQ1b1x1_2564972_eTVtnTil/fd_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_01-44-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-04_CI_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_022623_TTUQ1b1x1_2564972_eTVtnTil/fd_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_01-44-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-04_CI_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_022623_TTUQ1b1x1_2564972_eTVtnTil/fd_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_01-44-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-04_CI_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_022623_TTUQ1b1x1_2564972_eTVtnTil/fd_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_01-44-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219.fits It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve! FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-04_CI_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_022623_TTUQ1b1x1_2564972_eTVtnTil/fd_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_01-44-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_01-44-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_01-44-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_01-44-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_01-44-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_fd_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_01-44-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_01-44-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_01-44-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-04_CI_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_022623_TTUQ1b1x1_2564972_eTVtnTil/fd_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_01-44-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_01-44-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219.fits.cat SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=163, passed=4067 Got 4067 stars (including 3902 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_01-44-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219.fits.cat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 4067 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.0' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.0 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013069 (47.0 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010456 (37.6 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 649 to 708 (Dec 39.9 to 51.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 969 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 969 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 966 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 969 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4030 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 649 to 708 (Dec 39.9 to 51.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 969 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 969 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4030 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 969 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4030 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31" Excluding outliers - 969 stars left (next iteration limit 1065) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_01-44-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219.fits N_match=969 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.299 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.325 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.340 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.227 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.304 n_q1=255 n_q2=257 n_q3=225 n_q4=232 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.137 The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_01-44-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219.fits.cat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_01-44-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219.fits.cat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-04_CI_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_022623_TTUQ1b1x1_2564972_eTVtnTil/fd_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_01-44-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219.fits -region wcs_fd_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_01-44-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219.fits.cat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_01-44-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations ############ /tmp/tmp.qCU6CQgwrN (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um Internal estimated FoV 605.3' The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-04_CI_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_022623_TTUQ1b1x1_2564972_eTVtnTil/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-04_CI_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_022623_TTUQ1b1x1_2564972_eTVtnTil/fd_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_01-47-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0220.fits 605.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-04_CI_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_022623_TTUQ1b1x1_2564972_eTVtnTil/fd_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_01-47-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0220.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-04_CI_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_022623_TTUQ1b1x1_2564972_eTVtnTil/fd_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_01-47-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0220.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-04_CI_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_022623_TTUQ1b1x1_2564972_eTVtnTil/fd_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_01-47-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0220.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-04_CI_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_022623_TTUQ1b1x1_2564972_eTVtnTil/fd_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_01-47-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0220.fits It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve! FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-04_CI_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_022623_TTUQ1b1x1_2564972_eTVtnTil/fd_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_01-47-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0220.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_01-47-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0220.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_01-47-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0220.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_01-47-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0220.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_01-47-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0220.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_fd_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_01-47-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0220.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_01-47-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0220.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_01-47-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0220.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-04_CI_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_022623_TTUQ1b1x1_2564972_eTVtnTil/fd_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_01-47-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0220.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_01-47-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0220.fits.cat SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=172, passed=4035 Got 4035 stars (including 3861 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_01-47-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0220.fits.cat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 4035 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.0' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.0 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013069 (47.0 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010456 (37.6 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 649 to 708 (Dec 39.9 to 51.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 970 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 970 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 966 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 970 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4003 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 649 to 708 (Dec 39.9 to 51.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 970 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 970 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4003 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 970 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4003 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31" Excluding outliers - 970 stars left (next iteration limit 1067) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_01-47-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0220.fits N_match=970 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.301 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.318 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.381 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.248 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.300 n_q1=253 n_q2=259 n_q3=228 n_q4=230 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.265 The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_01-47-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0220.fits.cat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_01-47-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0220.fits.cat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-04_CI_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_022623_TTUQ1b1x1_2564972_eTVtnTil/fd_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_01-47-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0220.fits -region wcs_fd_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_01-47-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0220.fits.cat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_01-47-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0220.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations ################################### # Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above) ref1=CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-24-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0255.fits sigma_overall=0.363 worst_q_ratio=1.185 ref2=CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-25-24_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0256.fits sigma_overall=0.355 worst_q_ratio=1.306 new1=fd_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_01-44-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219.fits sigma_overall=0.299 worst_q_ratio=1.137 new2=fd_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_01-47-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0220.fits sigma_overall=0.301 worst_q_ratio=1.265 reference average sigma_overall=0.359 worst_q_ratio=1.2455 warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference ###################################
Distribution of catalog-matched stars across the image:
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy: wrote wcs_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-24-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0255_astrometric_residuals.png (968 matched stars from wcs_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-24-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0255.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388) plot_astrometric_residuals_xy: wrote wcs_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-25-24_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0256_astrometric_residuals.png (968 matched stars from wcs_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-25-24_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0256.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388) plot_astrometric_residuals_xy: wrote wcs_fd_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_01-44-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219_astrometric_residuals.png (969 matched stars from wcs_fd_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_01-44-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388) plot_astrometric_residuals_xy: wrote wcs_fd_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_01-47-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0220_astrometric_residuals.png (970 matched stars from wcs_fd_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_01-47-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0220.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388) Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_01-44-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219.fits INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image) 'wcs_fd_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_01-44-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-04_CI_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_022623_TTUQ1b1x1_2564972_eTVtnTil/wcs_fd_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_01-44-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219.fits' Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_01-47-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0220.fits INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image) 'wcs_fd_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_01-47-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0220.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-04_CI_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_022623_TTUQ1b1x1_2564972_eTVtnTil/wcs_fd_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_01-47-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0220.fits' Preparing the HTML report for the field CVn-01-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 No candidates found here Prepared the HTML report for the field CVn-01-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 *------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------* #### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt #### wait *------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------* 'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex' Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 3.5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-24-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0255.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-25-24_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0256.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-04_CI_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_022623_TTUQ1b1x1_2564972_eTVtnTil/fd_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_01-44-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-04_CI_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_022623_TTUQ1b1x1_2564972_eTVtnTil/fd_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_01-47-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0220.fits SExtractor catalog cache: saved CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-24-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0255.fits.cat to cache SExtractor catalog cache: saved CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-25-24_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0256.fits.cat to cache VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-24-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0255.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-25-24_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0256.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-04_CI_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_022623_TTUQ1b1x1_2564972_eTVtnTil/fd_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_01-44-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-04_CI_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_022623_TTUQ1b1x1_2564972_eTVtnTil/fd_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_01-47-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0220.fits Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-24-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0255.fits Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-25-24_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0256.fits Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_01-44-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219.fits Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_01-47-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0220.fits Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/exclusion_list.txt Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images Plate-solving the images wcs_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-24-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0255.fits exists and is non-empty wcs_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-25-24_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0256.fits exists and is non-empty wcs_fd_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_01-44-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219.fits exists and is non-empty wcs_fd_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_01-47-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0220.fits exists and is non-empty ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-24-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0255.fits (1st reference image) verification OK: wcs_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-24-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0255.fits Image size: 941.3'x626.7' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 13:12:00.629 +45:59:41.30 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9" ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_01-44-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219.fits (1st new image) verification OK: wcs_fd_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_01-44-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219.fits Image size: 941.0'x626.5' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.88"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 13:12:03.751 +45:58:54.96 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy) Reference image center 13:12:00.629 +45:59:41.30 Second-epoch image center 13:12:03.751 +45:58:54.96 Angular distance between the image centers 0.0157 deg. Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg. ################################### ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_01-47-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0220.fits (2nd new image) verification OK: wcs_fd_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_01-47-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0220.fits Image size: 941.0'x626.5' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.88"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 13:12:06.124 +45:59:22.02 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy) Reference image center 13:12:00.629 +45:59:41.30 Second-epoch image center 13:12:06.124 +45:59:22.02 Angular distance between the image centers 0.0168 deg. ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images) Second-epoch first image center 13:12:03.751 +45:58:54.96 Second-epoch second image center 13:12:06.124 +45:59:22.02 Angular distance between the image centers 0.01018 deg. ################################### Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5... Preparing for ar aprallel run Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-24-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0255.fits &> /tmp/tmp.AeJPdsg8c6 Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-24-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0255.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-25-24_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0256.fits &> /tmp/tmp.8eC7Znc9ys Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-25-24_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0256.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-04_CI_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_022623_TTUQ1b1x1_2564972_eTVtnTil/fd_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_01-44-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219.fits &> /tmp/tmp.qJUtJnuJsR Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-04_CI_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_022623_TTUQ1b1x1_2564972_eTVtnTil/fd_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_01-44-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-04_CI_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_022623_TTUQ1b1x1_2564972_eTVtnTil/fd_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_01-47-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0220.fits &> /tmp/tmp.6FciqrY4r9 Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-04_CI_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_022623_TTUQ1b1x1_2564972_eTVtnTil/fd_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_01-47-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0220.fits Calibrating the magnitude scale Found non-empty wcs_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-24-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0255.fits ____ Start of magnitude calibration ____ PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-24-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0255.fits and wcs_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-24-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0255.fits.cat wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race) Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2 Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-24-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0255.fits and wcs_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-24-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0255.fits.cat Found non-empty wcs_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-24-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0255.fits and wcs_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-24-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0255.fits.cat The reference image (wcs_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-24-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0255.fits) and catalog (wcs_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-24-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0255.fits.cat) found 'wcs_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-24-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0255.fits.cat' -> 'wcsmag.cat' Read 30928 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 186.0186 to 210.7306 deg, Dec +39.8627 to +51.3808 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 186.0186 to 210.7306 deg, Dec 39.8627 to 51.3808 deg Loaded 4202 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 2750 out of 3045 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 3045 out of 30928 detected stars. The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.708950 a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.708950 From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.15 Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.56 Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes Working... Please, PLEASE, be patient!!! All lightcurves processed! =) Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.56
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:

Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V) Read 30928 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 186.0186 to 210.7306 deg, Dec +39.8627 to +51.3808 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 186.0186 to 210.7306 deg, Dec 39.8627 to 51.3808 deg Loaded 4202 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 2750 out of 3045 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 3045 out of 30928 detected stars. util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-24-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0255.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-24-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0255.fits:

Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-24-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0255.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-24-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0255.fits (aperture=4.8) Read 30863 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 186.0202 to 210.7324 deg, Dec +39.8627 to +51.3744 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 186.0202 to 210.7324 deg, Dec 39.8627 to 51.3744 deg Loaded 4201 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 2766 out of 3050 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 3050 out of 30863 detected stars. util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-25-24_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0256.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-25-24_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0256.fits:

Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-25-24_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0256.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-25-24_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0256.fits (aperture=4.8) ____ End of magnitude calibration ____ Applying consolidated magnitude filters... Preparing the exclusion lists for this field Done with filtering Found 7 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 8000) Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars: 2.0 pix CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-24-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0255.fits 2.0 pix CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-25-24_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0256.fits 3.7 pix fd_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_01-44-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219.fits 3.7 pix fd_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_01-47-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0220.fits 2.0 pix wcs_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-24-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0255.fits 2.0 pix wcs_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-25-24_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0256.fits Limiting magnitude estimates: 15.6 mag. CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-24-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0255.fits 15.6 mag. CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-25-24_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0256.fits 14.6 mag. fd_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_01-44-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219.fits 14.6 mag. fd_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_01-47-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0220.fits All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.6 (SNR ) 13.9 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50). This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image. The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here. The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images. This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list. The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag. Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver wait ############ /tmp/tmp.AeJPdsg8c6 (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The guess is based on the existing WCS header. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-04_CI_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_022623_TTUQ1b1x1_2564972_eTVtnTil/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-24-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0255.fits 574.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-24-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0255.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-24-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0255.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-24-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0255.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-24-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0255.fits It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good. The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-24-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0255.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good... '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-24-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0255.fits' -> 'wcs_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-24-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0255.fits' FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-24-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0255.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-24-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0255.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-24-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0255.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-24-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0255.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-24-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0255.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-24-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0255.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-24-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0255.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-24-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0255.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-24-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0255.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-24-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0255.fits.cat SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=18, blended=1156, passed=30910 Got 30910 stars (including 29710 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-24-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0255.fits.cat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 30910 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.3' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.3 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013074 (47.1 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010459 (37.7 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 649 to 708 (Dec 39.9 to 51.4) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 967 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 967 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 955 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 967 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 30461 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 649 to 708 (Dec 39.9 to 51.4) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 967 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 967 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 30460 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 967 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 30460 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35" Excluding outliers - 967 stars left (next iteration limit 1063) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-24-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0255.fits N_match=967 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.358 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.357 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.427 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.325 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.304 n_q1=260 n_q2=271 n_q3=213 n_q4=223 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.195 The image catalog is written to wcs_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-24-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0255.fits.cat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-24-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0255.fits.cat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-24-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0255.fits -region wcs_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-24-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0255.fits.cat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-24-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0255.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations ############ /tmp/tmp.8eC7Znc9ys (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The guess is based on the existing WCS header. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-04_CI_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_022623_TTUQ1b1x1_2564972_eTVtnTil/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-25-24_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0256.fits 574.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-25-24_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0256.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-25-24_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0256.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-25-24_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0256.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-25-24_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0256.fits It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good. The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-25-24_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0256.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good... '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-25-24_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0256.fits' -> 'wcs_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-25-24_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0256.fits' FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-25-24_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0256.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-25-24_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0256.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-25-24_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0256.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-25-24_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0256.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-25-24_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0256.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-25-24_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0256.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-25-24_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0256.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-25-24_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0256.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-25-24_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0256.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-25-24_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0256.fits.cat SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=11, blended=1148, passed=30852 Got 30852 stars (including 29655 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-25-24_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0256.fits.cat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 30852 stars from the SExtractor catalog /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-04_CI_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_022623_TTUQ1b1x1_2564972_eTVtnTil/util/fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh: line 144: echo: write error: Broken pipe Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.3' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.3 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013074 (47.1 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010459 (37.7 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 649 to 708 (Dec 39.9 to 51.4) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 969 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 969 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 960 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 969 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 30543 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 649 to 708 (Dec 39.9 to 51.4) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 969 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 969 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 30544 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 969 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 30544 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34" Excluding outliers - 969 stars left (next iteration limit 1065) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-25-24_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0256.fits N_match=969 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.356 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.344 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.440 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.287 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.355 n_q1=254 n_q2=269 n_q3=222 n_q4=224 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.235 The image catalog is written to wcs_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-25-24_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0256.fits.cat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-25-24_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0256.fits.cat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-25-24_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0256.fits -region wcs_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-25-24_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0256.fits.cat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-25-24_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0256.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations ############ /tmp/tmp.qJUtJnuJsR (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um Internal estimated FoV 605.3' The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-04_CI_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_022623_TTUQ1b1x1_2564972_eTVtnTil/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-04_CI_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_022623_TTUQ1b1x1_2564972_eTVtnTil/fd_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_01-44-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219.fits 605.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-04_CI_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_022623_TTUQ1b1x1_2564972_eTVtnTil/fd_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_01-44-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-04_CI_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_022623_TTUQ1b1x1_2564972_eTVtnTil/fd_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_01-44-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-04_CI_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_022623_TTUQ1b1x1_2564972_eTVtnTil/fd_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_01-44-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-04_CI_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_022623_TTUQ1b1x1_2564972_eTVtnTil/fd_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_01-44-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219.fits It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve! FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-04_CI_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_022623_TTUQ1b1x1_2564972_eTVtnTil/fd_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_01-44-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_01-44-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_01-44-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_01-44-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_01-44-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_fd_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_01-44-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_01-44-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_01-44-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-04_CI_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_022623_TTUQ1b1x1_2564972_eTVtnTil/fd_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_01-44-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_01-44-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219.fits.cat SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=5, blended=515, passed=16767 Got 16767 stars (including 16238 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_01-44-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219.fits.cat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 16767 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.0' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.0 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013069 (47.0 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010456 (37.6 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 649 to 708 (Dec 39.9 to 51.4) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 970 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 970 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 966 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 970 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 16640 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 649 to 708 (Dec 39.9 to 51.4) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 970 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 970 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 16640 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 970 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 16640 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31" Excluding outliers - 970 stars left (next iteration limit 1067) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_01-44-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219.fits N_match=970 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.305 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.343 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.342 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.223 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.309 n_q1=254 n_q2=249 n_q3=229 n_q4=238 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.124 The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_01-44-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219.fits.cat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_01-44-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219.fits.cat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-04_CI_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_022623_TTUQ1b1x1_2564972_eTVtnTil/fd_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_01-44-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219.fits -region wcs_fd_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_01-44-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219.fits.cat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_01-44-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations ############ /tmp/tmp.6FciqrY4r9 (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um Internal estimated FoV 605.3' The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-04_CI_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_022623_TTUQ1b1x1_2564972_eTVtnTil/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-04_CI_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_022623_TTUQ1b1x1_2564972_eTVtnTil/fd_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_01-47-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0220.fits 605.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-04_CI_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_022623_TTUQ1b1x1_2564972_eTVtnTil/fd_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_01-47-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0220.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-04_CI_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_022623_TTUQ1b1x1_2564972_eTVtnTil/fd_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_01-47-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0220.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-04_CI_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_022623_TTUQ1b1x1_2564972_eTVtnTil/fd_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_01-47-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0220.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-04_CI_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_022623_TTUQ1b1x1_2564972_eTVtnTil/fd_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_01-47-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0220.fits It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve! FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-04_CI_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_022623_TTUQ1b1x1_2564972_eTVtnTil/fd_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_01-47-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0220.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_01-47-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0220.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_01-47-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0220.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_01-47-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0220.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_01-47-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0220.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_fd_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_01-47-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0220.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_01-47-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0220.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_01-47-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0220.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-04_CI_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_022623_TTUQ1b1x1_2564972_eTVtnTil/fd_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_01-47-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0220.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_01-47-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0220.fits.cat SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=4, blended=543, passed=16452 Got 16452 stars (including 15899 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_01-47-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0220.fits.cat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 16452 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.0' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.0 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013069 (47.0 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010456 (37.6 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 649 to 708 (Dec 39.9 to 51.4) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 970 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 970 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 967 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 970 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 16394 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 649 to 708 (Dec 39.9 to 51.4) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 970 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 970 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 16394 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 970 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 16394 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31" Excluding outliers - 970 stars left (next iteration limit 1067) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_01-47-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0220.fits N_match=970 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.309 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.341 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.381 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.243 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.308 n_q1=254 n_q2=256 n_q3=226 n_q4=234 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.234 The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_01-47-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0220.fits.cat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_01-47-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0220.fits.cat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-04_CI_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_022623_TTUQ1b1x1_2564972_eTVtnTil/fd_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_01-47-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0220.fits -region wcs_fd_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_01-47-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0220.fits.cat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_01-47-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0220.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL) Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_01-44-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219.fits INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image) The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-04_CI_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_022623_TTUQ1b1x1_2564972_eTVtnTil/wcs_fd_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_01-44-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219.fits Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_01-47-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0220.fits INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image) The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-04_CI_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_022623_TTUQ1b1x1_2564972_eTVtnTil/wcs_fd_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_01-47-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0220.fits Preparing the HTML report for the field CVn-01-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL Forced photometry on wcs_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-24-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0255.fits at 13:37:31.93 +42:13:03.8: 13.14 +/- 0.03 detection Forced photometry on wcs_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-25-24_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0256.fits at 13:37:31.93 +42:13:03.8: 13.09 +/- 0.03 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.11 +/- 0.02 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 13:37:31.93 +42:13:03.8: ref_mag=13.11 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.0768 delta=0.04 (need > 0.90) make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 1s Pre-generating preview images in parallel... Done pre-generating preview images. Pre-generating finding charts in parallel... Done pre-generating finding charts. make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 0s xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52074_fd_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_01-47-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0220 The candidate 52074_fd_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_01-47-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0220 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 06 04.28295    2461195.78295    12.75    13:05:47.88 +45:18:08.8   5429 3643   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-04_CI_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_022623_TTUQ1b1x1_2564972_eTVtnTil/fd_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_01-47-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0220.fits **** FOUND 13:05:47.88 +45:18:09.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52075_fd_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_01-47-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0220 The candidate 52075_fd_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_01-47-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0220 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 06 04.28295    2461195.78295    12.83    12:33:56.05 +46:45:24.6   8775 2743   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-04_CI_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_022623_TTUQ1b1x1_2564972_eTVtnTil/fd_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_01-47-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0220.fits **** FOUND 12:33:56.05 +46:45:25.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52085_fd_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_01-47-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0220 The candidate 52085_fd_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_01-47-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0220 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 06 04.28083    2461195.78083    13.09    13:37:31.95 +42:13:04.0   1806 5176   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-04_CI_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_022623_TTUQ1b1x1_2564972_eTVtnTil/fd_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_01-44-13_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0219.fits Discovery image 2   2026 06 04.28295    2461195.78295    13.07    13:37:31.92 +42:13:03.6   1810 5181   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-04_CI_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_022623_TTUQ1b1x1_2564972_eTVtnTil/fd_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_01-47-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0220.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52088_fd_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_01-47-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0220 The candidate 52088_fd_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_01-47-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0220 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 06 04.28295    2461195.78295    13.47    12:39:12.50 +42:43:55.1   8324 5211   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-04_CI_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_022623_TTUQ1b1x1_2564972_eTVtnTil/fd_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_01-47-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0220.fits **** FOUND 12:39:12.44 +42:43:56.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52096_fd_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_01-47-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0220 The candidate 52096_fd_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_01-47-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0220 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 06 04.28295    2461195.78295    13.87    13:20:51.22 +41:44:07.5   3643 5683   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-04_CI_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_022623_TTUQ1b1x1_2564972_eTVtnTil/fd_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_01-47-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0220.fits **** FOUND 13:20:51.25 +41:44:07.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52097_fd_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_01-47-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0220 The candidate 52097_fd_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_01-47-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0220 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 06 04.28295    2461195.78295    13.66    13:29:24.67 +46:21:40.3   3011 2809   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-04_CI_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_022623_TTUQ1b1x1_2564972_eTVtnTil/fd_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_01-47-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0220.fits **** FOUND 13:29:24.70 +46:21:40.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 18065_fd_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_01-47-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0220 The candidate 18065_fd_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_01-47-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0220 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 3   2026 06 04.28295    2461195.78295    10.50    13:05:01.30 +45:30:31.9   5516 3523   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-04_CI_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_022623_TTUQ1b1x1_2564972_eTVtnTil/fd_CVn-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_01-47-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0220.fits **** FOUND 13:05:01.30 +45:30:31.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 1s Prepared the HTML report for the field CVn-01-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL *------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------* #### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt #### ########### Completed CVn-01-Q1b1x1 ########### The analysis was running at tau We are allowed to update the exclusion list at tau host Found ../exclusion_list_TTUQ1.txt #### The exclusion list before filtering-out asteroids, bad pixels and adding Gaia sources #### ################################################################################### renamed 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt_noasteroids' -> 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt' renamed 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt_nohotpixels' -> 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt' # Count candidates with no identification (that also don't look like hot pix) Found 0 unidentified candidates (excluding asteroids, hot pixels and known variable stars). ################################################################################### 0 candidates found (excluding asteroids and hot pixels) This does not look like a test run ################################################################################### exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt NOT FOUND exclusion_list_apass.txt NOT FOUND IS_THIS_TEST_RUN=NO ALLOW_EXCLUSION_LIST_UPDATE= YES #### Nothing to add to the exclusion list #### The observatory MPC code is V36 ############################################################ Positions of planets computed with util/planet_finder/main.py for JD(UT)2461195.78082959 -observatory V36 06:18:27.05 +25:30:31.4 Mercury (-0.2mag) 07:23:01.11 +24:03:32.8 Venus (-4.0mag) 02:38:16.31 +14:48:41.3 Mars (1.3mag) 07:45:12.90 +21:39:25.1 Jupiter (-1.9mag) 00:48:13.56 +02:42:22.0 Saturn (0.9mag) 03:59:16.31 +20:22:45.6 Uranus (5.8mag) 00:15:53.95 +00:15:26.3 Neptune (7.8mag) 20:33:33.66 -23:03:07.0 Pluto (14.5mag) 19:57:30.95 -24:30:46.8 Moon (-11.6mag) -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 363 Jun 4 02:33 planets.txt ############################################################ Positions of selected moons from JPL HORIZONS for JD(UT)2461195.78082959: 07:45:07.37 +21:39:41.9 Io (6.0mag) 07:45:07.10 +21:39:44.1 Europa (6.2mag) 07:45:30.08 +21:38:37.3 Ganymede (5.6mag) 07:45:41.07 +21:38:07.9 Callisto (6.8mag) 07:45:44.52 +21:15:31.8 Himalia (15.6mag) 07:45:15.28 +21:39:17.3 Thebe (16.5mag) 07:45:50.28 +21:32:43.2 Elara (17.5mag) 07:47:11.21 +21:53:14.8 Pasiphae (17.7mag) 07:51:58.07 +21:40:50.6 Carme (18.8mag) 00:48:08.88 +02:42:51.4 Titan (8.7mag) 00:48:09.36 +02:42:28.1 Rhea (10.0mag) 00:48:46.28 +02:44:02.4 Iapetus (11.4mag) 00:48:01.52 +02:42:31.7 Hyperion (14.7mag) 00:49:00.56 +02:44:52.1 Phoebe (16.7mag) -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 569 Jun 4 02:33 moons.txt ############################################################ Positions of selected spacecraft from JPL HORIZONS for JD(UT)2461195.78082959: 17:24:14.65 -34:52:12.4 JWST 18:19:45.72 +29:40:31.1 Chandra 19:34:34.34 +07:19:56.5 XMM-Newton -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 96 Jun 4 02:33 spacecraft.txt ############################################################ Positions of bright comets computed with util/comet_finder/main.py for JD(UT)2461195.78082959 -observatory V36 18:46:04.34 -32:21:47.5 13.6mag P/2010 H2 (Vales) 05:49:38.25 -68:06:40.8 17.4mag C/2014 UN271 (Bernardinelli-Bernstein) 05:47:37.50 +31:55:04.7 17.5mag C/2017 K2 (PANSTARRS) 17:16:17.91 +15:08:30.1 17.8mag C/2021 G2 (ATLAS) 20:38:15.68 -50:54:56.5 17.2mag P/2021 N1 (ZTF) 23:13:24.37 +31:26:15.7 17.2mag C/2022 E2 (ATLAS) 05:29:14.04 +26:56:55.0 16.4mag C/2022 N2 (PANSTARRS) 09:26:58.04 +31:12:54.5 16.6mag C/2022 QE78 (ATLAS) 08:48:29.35 +03:44:09.2 17.7mag C/2022 R6 (PANSTARRS) 18:30:44.70 +21:30:47.9 17.7mag C/2023 A3 (Tsuchinshan-ATLAS) 15:20:49.18 -11:00:27.1 17.6mag P/2023 B1 (PANSTARRS) 22:15:28.68 +66:16:53.1 17.7mag C/2023 H5 (Lemmon) 17:55:57.03 -06:19:02.5 13.7mag C/2023 R1 (PANSTARRS) 13:21:06.81 +83:52:16.4 17.9mag C/2023 X2 (Lemmon) 07:05:05.00 +64:10:58.0 17.6mag C/2024 A1 (ATLAS) 06:41:16.23 +27:28:00.0 13.5mag C/2024 E1 (Wierzchos) 15:40:24.07 +13:10:00.3 17.4mag C/2024 G6 (ATLAS) 20:15:27.36 +29:57:33.9 14.0mag C/2024 J3 (ATLAS) 04:14:05.99 -16:18:18.4 16.0mag C/2024 T5 (ATLAS) 06:02:14.80 +35:10:38.6 17.9mag C/2025 J1 (Borisov) 11:37:10.53 +52:57:41.6 17.3mag C/2025 L1 (ATLAS) 06:39:51.41 -10:41:24.2 13.7mag C/2025 R3 (PANSTARRS) 09:21:03.68 +23:22:57.3 18.0mag C/2025 V2 (Rankin) 12:39:53.13 +04:41:34.5 17.2mag C/2025 Y1 (ATLAS) 18:18:28.58 +74:14:40.7 18.0mag C/2026 A2 (Bok) 01:53:41.52 +43:07:36.4 16.0mag C/2026 B2 (Sun-Gao) 11:10:40.30 -05:10:27.6 16.4mag A/2026 E1 20:16:29.68 -08:20:29.5 8.9mag 10P/Tempel 11:01:09.57 -00:55:12.5 16.0mag 29P/Schwassmann-Wachmann 10:57:51.31 -02:40:59.2 17.9mag 43P/Wolf-Harrington 03:05:38.93 +25:06:54.8 17.6mag 47P/Ashbrook-Jackson 08:51:37.78 +24:52:32.2 16.9mag 63P/Wild 00:23:28.74 -06:37:51.4 15.7mag 65P/Gunn 06:30:46.69 +32:59:41.2 16.8mag 76P/West-Kohoutek-Ikemura 02:59:44.54 +16:42:02.9 13.9mag 78P/Gehrels 01:12:07.61 +03:58:41.7 15.5mag 88P/Howell 04:42:01.64 +29:58:21.3 15.2mag 93P/Lovas 02:32:00.05 +26:58:47.0 17.7mag 114P/Wiseman-Skiff 06:41:15.38 +33:09:43.7 15.6mag 123P/West-Hartley 09:43:24.53 +16:19:09.6 16.5mag 124P/Mrkos 03:52:34.74 +18:58:48.1 16.4mag 128P/Shoemaker-Holt 04:25:45.92 +18:53:30.3 17.7mag 131P/Mueller 05:41:08.95 +19:04:21.5 14.1mag 141P/Machholz 05:43:39.40 +17:24:54.6 14.1mag 141P-A/Machholz 04:34:09.38 +15:34:22.6 11.2mag 141P-D/Machholz 02:54:53.13 -25:15:25.6 17.0mag 161P/Hartley-IRAS 03:28:47.53 +22:12:14.9 14.9mag 162P/SidingSpring 19:36:38.01 +00:37:00.1 17.1mag 169P/NEAT 00:07:45.12 +01:41:05.2 17.9mag 220P/McNaught 16:55:13.12 -08:41:29.2 16.3mag 235P/LINEAR 07:25:47.11 +35:38:20.8 17.5mag 240P/NEAT 00:22:07.08 -04:06:40.0 16.5mag 260P/McNaught 03:53:41.99 +31:45:01.2 17.6mag 295P/LINEAR 23:25:05.98 -14:57:03.2 17.6mag 320P/McNaught 15:17:03.99 +08:13:00.0 17.4mag 391P/Kowalski 08:04:03.64 +20:50:38.6 17.9mag 450P/LONEOS 06:53:35.21 +41:58:16.5 17.8mag 493P/LONEOS -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 2.8K Jun 4 02:33 comets.txt ############################################################ List of recent ASAS-SN transients from https://www.astronomy.ohio-state.edu/asassn/transients.html : 20:07:38.15 -21:07:05.40 SN2026mho 2026-05-25.18 -1.12 11:29:42.55 +79:01:03.10 AT2026min 2026-05-24.21 16.63 11:44:32.95 -68:48:30.00 ASASSN-26no 2026-05-24 8.41 19:00:42.82 -48:31:01.60 ASASSN-26dp 2026-05-22.31 -3.28 14:23:56.59 -58:37:47.40 ASASSN-26dn 2026-05-20.01 14.59 11:24:54.06 +47:57:01.60 AT2026nma 2026-05-20.29 15.46 21:27:08.58 +33:24:38.10 AT2026lli 2026-05-19.34 15.86 00:31:01.41 -13:38:51.70 AT2026nad 2026-05-19.39 15.34 15:16:06.61 -79:16:32.40 ASASSN-26dm 2026-05-19.03 14.44 11:24:25.21 -59:23:19.10 ASASSN-26dl 2026-05-18.02 13.55 13:45:51.52 -53:16:01.00 ASASSN-26dk 2026-05-18.16 12.96 02:05:49.69 -30:29:09.60 ASASSN-26dh 2026-05-18.43 15.37 17:50:22.87 -39:42:33.90 ASASSN-26dj 2026-05-17.05 15.7 01:13:11.60 -33:25:16.10 ASASSN-26dg 2026-05-13.41 16.8 16:44:31.77 -27:15:18.40 AT2026mhn 2026-05-12.33 15.8 09:46:31.08 -33:41:51.00 ASASSN-26di 2026-05-12.14 14.63 21:23:11.57 -19:09:45.00 AT2026kwu 2026-05-12.26 16.9 14:20:14.30 -30:20:51.90 AT2026ktm 2026-05-12.06 17.21 14:41:39.01 -37:13:46.40 AT2026lkm 2026-05-11.18 16.89 12:59:50.45 -10:58:38.80 SN2026kep 2026-05-9.06 17.5 13:37:29.61 -29:50:30.90 AT2026lkd 2026-05-9.09 17.23 09:46:42.01 -14:52:03.60 SN2026kmo 2026-05-8.99 17.51 15:03:05.28 +22:02:03.40 AT2026lxf 2026-05-8.07 13.88 10:23:49.41 -20:57:25.30 ASASSN-26df 2026-05-8.21 16.52 22:14:40.56 +05:04:51.60 2026lda 2026-05-7.56 16.2 21:35:33.81 -14:05:16.30 ASASSN-26de 2026-05-6.29 14.51 16:21:48.82 -61:36:13.20 ASASSN-26dd 2026-05-5.21 15.15 14:26:40.22 -24:48:37.50 AT2026lig 2026-05-4.27 14.63 13:17:51.04 +30:25:13.50 SN2026kcp 2026-05-4.46 16.43 11:27:55.57 -13:38:56.90 SN2026kza 2026-05-1.08 15.59 22:28:27.10 +30:17:54.30 SN 2026fov 2026-04-29.6 14.36 21:00:10.71 -32:17:03.90 AT2026kis 2026-04-27.36 16.15 14:32:57.37 -58:13:26.40 ASASSN-26dc 2026-04-27.27 13.42 15:32:05.35 -43:54:34.60 ASASSN-26db 2026-04-27.37 16.06 16:34:34.97 -54:34:58.00 ASASSN-26da 2026-04-25.32 16.11 10:06:55.04 -01:13:49.70 SN2026jsg 2026-04-24.99 16.28 15:15:57.17 +56:18:32.80 SN2026kid 2026-04-24.52 -3.65 07:58:28.45 +57:03:42.40 AT2026kcf 2026-04-24.2 16.89 11:38:21.80 -50:43:06.50 SN2026jkb 2026-04-24.24 15.38 10:06:11.41 -39:41:04.20 AT2026dil 2026-04-24.2 16.85 14:21:40.08 +13:13:46.30 SN2026jlm 2026-04-22.16 15.12 10:53:55.52 -16:06:06.00 ASASSN-26cz 2026-04-22.28 16.29 20:07:38.15 -21:07:05.40 2026-05-25.18 -1.12 13:45:02.03 +15:17:14.50 ASASSN-26cy 2026-04-21.27 15.78 13:20:52.22 -35:57:03.60 AT2026jcm 2026-04-19.01 16.65 13:36:15.66 -36:53:48.40 SN 2026iqy 2026-04-18.92 17.31 06:34:01.33 -40:07:34.00 ASASSN-26cx 2026-04-19.07 16.16 23:33:57.97 -45:12:11.90 SN 2026idu 2026-04-19.41 15.9 12:10:50.92 +66:55:31.20 SN 2026icv 2026-04-17.14 16.03 21:36:59.06 -60:43:35.90 ASASSN-26cv 2026-04-17.35 -1.18 08:13:26.26 -27:07:30.50 ASASSN-26cw 2026-04-17.07 -1.01 14:49:14.13 -27:29:20.60 ASASSN-26cu 2026-04-16.06 14.03 17:21:59.44 -38:54:04.60 ASASSN-26ct 2026-04-14.4 15.15 15:25:54.99 +07:49:24.50 SN2026huo 2026-04-12.14 16.96 20:07:38.15 -21:07:05.40 2026-05-25.18 -1.12 12:23:20.40 +04:53:39.10 AT2026ixd 2026-04-12.14 17.65 17:46:09.76 -61:19:50.40 SN2026icy 2026-04-12.2 17.03 09:25:46.42 +02:13:46.30 SN2026gud 2026-04-11.98 16.49 16:52:15.46 -60:27:45.90 ASASSN-26cs 2026-04-12.4 15.5 04:20:55.37 -51:15:31.10 ASASSN-26cr 2026-04-12.01 15.37 22:25:39.35 +36:45:06.90 AT2026ihl 2026-04-10.48 14.21 19:40:44.94 +00:41:03.80 AT2026imw 2026-04-10.32 16.06 19:52:04.70 +05:53:33.50 ASASSN-26cq 2026-04-9.31 14.98 16:08:18.39 -64:11:08.80 ASASSN-26cp 2026-04-9.29 13.32 09:22:22.90 -61:02:43.70 SN2026idh 2026-04-7.97 16.34 05:06:54.12 -19:42:26.40 AT2026imr 2026-04-8 17.49 07:14:55.34 -36:03:21.40 AT2026hei 2026-04-8.12 16.7 21:35:33.14 -19:01:34.80 AT2026ihm 2026-04-8.36 16.7 04:28:24.08 -32:25:35.30 AT2026imo 2026-04-8.02 16.81 05:10:35.79 -39:38:40.80 SN 2026hnn 2026-04-7.04 17.07 09:54:32.04 -01:17:25.80 ASASSN-26cn 2026-04-7.01 15.58 07:46:24.43 -77:29:35.90 ASASSN-26co 2026-04-7.15 14.93 05:00:45.52 -29:51:06.20 AT2026hvw 2026-04-6.03 16.51 19:49:33.10 -23:37:11.00 ASASSN-26cl 2026-04-5.29 14.98 19:32:43.55 -22:39:33.40 ASASSN-26cm 2026-04-4.3 13.88 18:08:57.38 +76:48:23.60 ASASSN-26ck 2026-04-2.37 15.38 16:16:36.10 +44:52:30.20 AT2026hyy 2026-04-2.58 13.81 21:55:23.31 -34:48:53.90 ASASSN-26cj 2026-03-30.4 -1.47 11:19:50.70 -27:51:49.80 SN2026gvk 2026-03-30 15.48 11:53:57.02 -23:09:46.20 SN2026gzx 2026-03-28.75 15.27 07:13:46.14 -33:10:15.70 ASASSN-26ci 2026-03-28.15 15.14 09:03:36.09 -67:58:13.00 SN2026hkg 2026-03-28.19 15.82 07:03:00.72 +39:14:43.00 SN2026fin 2026-03-28.27 15.82 05:35:42.80 -63:44:05.50 ASASSN-26ch 2026-03-27.86 13.02 11:23:19.04 +34:22:38.00 SN2026fwt 2026-03-27.3 16.56 19:03:49.79 +37:04:05.20 ASASSN-26ce 2026-03-26.56 16.3 20:26:56.07 -52:54:06.50 AT2026hiy 2026-03-26.35 16.95 05:25:54.76 -30:15:35.80 ASASSN-26cg 2026-03-25.07 16.88 06:57:16.49 -26:54:37.20 SN2026fzb 2026-03-25.14 15.8 14:37:38.23 -43:00:52.30 ASASSN-26cd 2026-03-24.24 12.52 17:34:53.03 +06:04:29.70 AT2026gzl 2026-03-23.27 15.82 08:30:02.60 -35:12:47.50 ASASSN-26cf 2026-03-23.2 14.82 16:54:25.33 +37:49:56.60 SN 2026evz 2026-03-21.32 17.54 17:06:19.20 -18:54:19.50 ASASSN-26bx 2026-03-21.25 16.39 19:01:16.28 -29:29:23.10 ASASSN-26bw 2026-03-21.33 15.81 08:46:05.75 +10:47:39.80 ASASSN-26ca 2026-03-21.13 14.27 12:14:58.16 +63:47:16.20 SN 2026fvx 2026-03-21.12 15.6 18:02:55.90 -75:23:02.60 ASASSN-26bz 2026-03-21.32 16.16 12:16:02.88 -53:16:33.80 ASASSN-26cc 2026-03-20.04 15.48 13:08:21.85 +29:13:44.20 SN 2026fmh 2026-03-20.16 -0.33 -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 5.6K Jun 4 02:33 asassn_transients_list.txt ############################################################ Truncated list of TOCP transients from http://www.cbat.eps.harvard.edu/unconf/tocp.html : 17:57:19.56 -28:08:14.7 TCP J17571956-2808147 2026-03-19.7972 14.5mag 08:46:05.73 +10:47:39.7 TCP J08460573+1047397 2026-03-21.1936 14.5mag 09:55:38.83 +69:05:21.7 PNV J09553883+6905217 2026-04-01.893 19.4mag 19:32:43.67 -22:39:30.7 TCP J19324367-2239307 2026-04-05.4395 13.6mag 16:16:36.03 +44:52:28.9 TCP J16163603+4452289 2026-04-05.6655 14.2mag 00:43:38.36 +41:15:32.4 PNV J00433836+4115324 2026-04-08.079 17.2mag 15:41:11.68 +59:18:26.8 TCP J15411168+5918268 2026-04-12.9625 19.2mag 00:43:35.02 +41:46:28.0 PNV J00433502+4146280 2026-04-23.056 15.9mag 00:42:55.64 +41:14:12.2 PNV J00425564+4114122 2026-04-24.042 16.2mag 21:14:03.38 +56:46:44.1 TCP J21140338+5646441 2026-05-05.3534 16.7mag 15:03:05.19 +22:02:04.1 TCP J15030519+2202041 2026-05-08.3260 13.9mag 07:15:18.25 +47:53:16.7 TCP J07151825+4753167 2026-05-09.1599 14.4mag 16:00:18.44 -22:30:10.6 TCP J16001844-2230106 2026-05-09.6135 13.3mag 00:42:47.45 +41:16:58.5 PNV J00424745+4116585 2026-05-10.030 16.8mag 09:55:02.89 +69:02:13.8 PNV J09550289+6902138 2026-05-18.925 20.7mag 00:43:01.82 +41:18:16.6 PNV J00430182+4118166 2026-05-21.8651 18.83Cmag 00:42:51.20 +41:16:59.4 PNV J00425120+4116594 2022-10-26.135 19.3mag 12:24:25.10 +28:47:12.0 TCP J12242510+2847120 2026-05-31.6015 14.8mag 00:56:07.13 +43:01:40.6 TCP J00560713+4301406 2026-06-01.4135 12.2mag 00:42:41.64 +41:15:16.2 PNV J00424164+4115162 2026-06-02.029 17.4mag -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 189K Jun 4 02:33 tocp_transients_list.txt ############################################################ Truncated list of recent TNS transients from https://www.wis-tns.org/ : 12:20:32.725 +19:21:21.55 AT 2026nlr 2026-05-22.24 20.3755 22:11:38.972 +01:58:18.38 AT 2026nlq 2026-05-21.46 20.412 14:13:39.867 -00:12:14.17 AT 2026nlp 2026-05-20.35 20.1718 20:29:49.048 +01:20:48.06 AT 2026nlo 2026-05-19.39 20.2943 01:58:34.577 +44:34:32.49 AT 2026nln 2026-05-23.48 17.464 00:09:19.630 +10:35:22.07 AT 2026nlm 2026-05-20.48 18.9664 00:31:41.797 +26:10:30.85 AT 2026nll 2026-05-23.48 19.3138 16:14:03.050 +15:19:38.66 AT 2026nlk 2026-05-16.86 20.93 18:17:15.360 +39:41:22.36 AT 2026nlj 2026-05-10.79 21.53 18:22:21.260 +38:36:15.52 AT 2026nli 2026-05-10.79 21.62 16:23:29.410 +22:48:47.18 AT 2026nlh 2026-05-09.79 20.01 15:19:37.260 +16:28:58.23 AT 2026nlg 2026-05-05.84 20.81 14:31:09.520 +24:03:04.31 AT 2026nlf 2026-04-30.86 19.85 15:33:35.050 +31:50:53.87 AT 2026nle 2026-04-19.90 20.71 15:15:31.740 +19:01:13.96 AT 2026nld 2026-04-19.89 20.52 14:33:02.080 +03:34:42.30 AT 2026nlc 2026-05-21.70 21.81 14:21:55.000 -01:06:15.74 AT 2026nlb 2026-05-21.70 21.58 14:21:48.580 +02:02:28.28 AT 2026nla 2026-05-21.70 21.97 14:34:15.890 +04:48:10.98 AT 2026nkz 2026-05-21.66 22.11 13:25:52.490 +02:32:04.69 AT 2026nky 2026-05-21.62 21.92 -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 30K Jun 4 02:33 tns_transients_list.txt

Profiling:

CPU temperature: 89 C