NMW transient search results

This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-04_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_013220_TTUQ1b1x1_2725388_RnkSeO80

The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.

Processing fields UMa-01-Q1b1x1

Processing complete!

Total number of candidates identified: 0

Processing log:

Filtering log:

######## Processing parameters ########
AAVSO_COMMENT_STRING= NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
ASTCHECK_ASTEROID_SEARCH_RADIUS_ARCSEC= 
BAD_REGION_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst
CAMERA_SETTINGS= TTUQ1b1x1
CHECK_POINTING_ACCURACY= yes
DARK_FRAMES_DIR_OR_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks
EXCLUSION_LIST= ../exclusion_list_TTUQ1.txt
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MAX_APERTURE_STAR_SIZE_PIX= 12.5
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MAX_ELONGATION_AminusB_PIX= 0.55
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MIN_APERTURE_STAR_SIZE_PIX= 2.0
FILTER_BRIGHT_MAG_CUTOFF_TRANSIENT_SEARCH= -5
FILTER_FAINT_MAG_CUTOFF_TRANSIENT_SEARCH= 15.0
FLAT_FIELD_DIR_OR_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats
FRAME_EDGE_OFFSET_PIX= 100
GAIA_BAND_FOR_CATALOGED_SOURCE_CHECK= 
MAX_NEW_TO_REF_MEAN_IMG_VALUE_RATIO= 100
MAX_NEW_IMG_MEAN_VALUE= 25000
MAX_SD_RATIO_OF_SECOND_EPOCH_IMGS= 0.18
MAX_SD_RATIO_OF_SECOND_EPOCH_IMGS_SOFT_LIMIT= 0.12
MPC_CODE= V36
NMW_CALIBRATION= /var/www/nmw_calibration
NUMBER_OF_DETECTED_TRANSIENTS_BEFORE_FILTERING_HARD_LIMIT= 8000
NUMBER_OF_DETECTED_TRANSIENTS_BEFORE_FILTERING_SOFT_LIMIT= 4000
OMP_NUM_THREADS= 
ONLINE_MPCHECKER_BUTTON_ASTEROID_SEARCH_RADIUS_ARCMIN= 
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION= 
REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES= yes
SEXTRACTOR_CONFIG_BRIGHTSTARPASS= default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
SEXTRACTOR_CONFIG_FILES= default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
STARMATCH_RADIUS_PIX= 3.5
SYSREM_ITERATIONS= 0
TELESCOP= 
TELESCOP_NAME_KNOWN_TO_VaST_FOR_FOV_DETERMINATION= 
UCAC5_PLATESOLVE_ITERATIONS= 2
FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE= no
#######################################
HOSTNAME= tau
USER= 
HOME= 
#######################################
SExtractor catalog cache: enabled, directory /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/vast_sextractor_cache
Reference image directory is set to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs
VIZIER_SITE=vizier.cds.unistra.fr
GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=vizquery (lib/vizquery -> VizieR vizier.cds.unistra.fr)
INFO: MAKE_PNG_PLOTS is set to yes
FITS_FILE_EXT=fits
CALIBRATION_STATUS_PREFIX=
Fields in the data directory: 
UMa-01-Q1b1x1
#######################################
########### Starting UMa-01-Q1b1x1 ###########
Processing UMa-01-Q1b1x1
server tau has sufficient free disk space available: 494280 MB at /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir
server tau has sufficient free disk space available: 494280 MB at .
Checking input images (2 new)
REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE= /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits
REFERENCE_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE= /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits
Small preview (one of the new images): 
Large previews of the second-epoch (new) images:
MAKE_PNG_PLOTS=yes
renamed 'UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_01-11-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0181.png' -> 'transient_report/UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_01-11-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0181.fits_preview.png'
UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_01-11-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0181.fits

renamed 'UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_01-12-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0182.png' -> 'transient_report/UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_01-12-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0182.fits_preview.png'
UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_01-12-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0182.fits


Read-check the input FITS images... read-check OK Blank image check the input FITS images... blank-image-check OK Read date check the input FITS images... read-date-check OK Mean value check the input FITS images... OK, at least two new images have mean values below the threshold. ---------------------------------------------- INFO: REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 533.1221 INFO: REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_SD= 561.4736 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 2148.1269 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_SD= 634.0503 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 2154.0460 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE_SD= 633.4864 ---------------------------------------------- INFO: ref_to_second_epoch_img_mean_ratio= 4.02933 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__SD_ratio= 0.001 ---------------------------------------------- Calibration settings: DARK_FRAMES_DIR_OR_FILE=/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks FLAT_FIELD_DIR_OR_FILE=/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration SET-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint CCD-TEMP= -0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature FOCTEMP = 21.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature AMBTEMP = 19.7 / [degC] Ambient air temperature Exploring image header: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-04_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_013220_TTUQ1b1x1_2725388_RnkSeO80/UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_01-11-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0181.fits CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-04_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_013220_TTUQ1b1x1_2725388_RnkSeO80/UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_01-11-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0181.fits SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-04_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_013220_TTUQ1b1x1_2725388_RnkSeO80/UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_01-11-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0181.fits Header: 74 keys total, 33 keys left Record 0: "" status=0 Record 1: "SIMPLE = T / C# FITS" status=0 Record 2: "BITPIX = 16" status=0 Record 3: "NAXIS = 2 / Dimensionality" status=0 Record 4: "NAXIS1 = 9576" status=0 Record 5: "NAXIS2 = 6388" status=0 Record 6: "BZERO = 32768" status=0 Record 7: "EXTEND = T / Extensions are permitted" status=0 Record 8: "IMAGETYP= 'LIGHT' / Type of exposure" status=0 Record 9: "EXPOSURE= 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0 Record 10: "EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0 Record 11: "DATE-LOC= '2026-06-04T01:11:41.5457674' / Time of observation (local)" status=0 Record 12: "DATE-OBS= '2026-06-04T06:11:41.5457674' / Time of observation (UTC)" status=0 Record 13: "MJD-OBS = 61195.258119734 / Modified Julian Date of observation" status=0 Record 14: "DATE-AVG= '2026-06-04T06:11:51.4494499' / Averaged midpoint time (UTC)" status=0 Record 15: "MJD-AVG = 61195.2582343635 / Modified Julian Date of averaged midpoint" status=0 Record 16: "XBINNING= 1 / X axis binning factor" status=0 Record 17: "YBINNING= 1 / Y axis binning factor" status=0 Record 18: "GAIN = 30 / Sensor gain" status=0 Record 19: "OFFSET = 30 / Sensor gain offset" status=0 Record 20: "XPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel X axis size" status=0 Record 21: "YPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel Y axis size" status=0 Record 22: "INSTRUME= 'QHY600M' / Imaging instrument name" status=0 Record 23: "CAMERAID= 'QHY600M-33d3d743814b8b447' / Imaging instrument identifier" status=0 Record 24: "SET-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint" status=0 Record 25: "CCD-TEMP= -0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature" status=0 Record 26: "READOUTM= '2CMS-0' / Sensor readout mode" status=0 Record 27: "USBLIMIT= 50 / Camera-specific USB setting" status=0 Record 28: "TELESCOP= 'QHY600M-TTU1' / Name of telescope" status=0 Record 29: "FOCALLEN= 135.0 / [mm] Focal length" status=0 Record 30: "FOCRATIO= 2.2 / Focal ratio" status=0 Record 31: "RA = 143.99913118987 / [deg] RA of telescope" status=0 Record 32: "DEC = 69.9999439996956 / [deg] Declination of telescope" status=0 Record 33: "CENTALT = 28.4269444444444 / [deg] Altitude of telescope" status=0 Record 34: "CENTAZ = 337.291944444444 / [deg] Azimuth of telescope" status=0 Record 35: "AIRMASS = 2.09379811748893 / Airmass at frame center (Gueymard 1993)" status=0 Record 36: "PIERSIDE= 'East' / Telescope pointing state" status=0 Record 37: "SITEELEV= 1015.0 / [m] Observation site elevation" status=0 Record 38: "SITELAT = 33.7480555555556 / [deg] Observation site latitude" status=0 Record 39: "SITELONG= -101.958333333333 / [deg] Observation site longitude" status=0 Record 40: "OBSERVER= 'Sokolovsky' / Observer name" status=0 Record 41: "OBSERVAT= 'TTU Skyview' / Observatory name" status=0 Record 42: "SITENAME= '' / Observatory site name" status=0 Record 43: "FWHEEL = 'Simulator' / Filter Wheel name" status=0 Record 44: "FILTER = 'CV' / Active filter name" status=0 Record 45: "OBJECT = 'UMa-01' / Name of the object of interest" status=0 Record 46: "OBJCTRA = '09 36 00' / [H M S] RA of imaged object" status=0 Record 47: "OBJCTDEC= '+70 00 00' / [D M S] Declination of imaged object" status=0 Record 48: "OBJCTROT= 0.0 / [deg] planned rotation of imaged object" status=0 Record 49: "FOCNAME = 'ZWO Focuser' / Focusing equipment name" status=0 Record 50: "FOCPOS = 29466 / [step] Focuser position" status=0 Record 51: "FOCUSPOS= 29466 / [step] Focuser position" status=0 Record 52: "FOCUSSZ = 0.0 / [um] Focuser step size" status=0 Record 53: "FOCTEMP = 21.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0 Record 54: "FOCUSTEM= 21.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0 Record 55: "DEWPOINT= 16.0 / [degC] Dew point" status=0 Record 56: "HUMIDITY= 79.0 / [percent] Relative humidity" status=0 Record 57: "PRESSURE= 902.71 / [hPa] Air pressure" status=0 Record 58: "AMBTEMP = 19.7 / [degC] Ambient air temperature" status=0 Record 59: "WINDDIR = 4.0 / [deg] Wind direction: 0=N, 180=S, 90=E, 270=W" status=0 Record 60: "WINDGUST= 7.200576 / [kph] Wind gust" status=0 Record 61: "WINDSPD = 3.200256 / [kph] Wind speed" status=0 Record 62: "ROWORDER= 'TOP-DOWN' / FITS Image Orientation" status=0 Record 63: "EQUINOX = 2000.0 / Equinox of celestial coordinate system" status=0 Record 64: "SWCREATE= 'N.I.N.A. 3.2.0.9001 (x64)' / Software that created this file" status=0 Record 65: "QHY_EXP = 20.000096 / [s] Actual exposure time" status=0 Record 66: "QHY_PP = 13888.0 / [ps] pixelPeriod" status=0 Record 67: "QHY_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0 Record 68: "GPS_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0 Record 69: "QHY_FP = 20000160.0 / [us] framePeriod" status=0 Record 70: "QHY_CPL = 6120.0 / clocksPerLine" status=0 Record 71: "QHY_LPF = 235295.0 / linesPerFrame" status=0 Record 72: "QHY_AET = 20000096.0 / [us] actualExposureTime" status=0 Record 73: "QHY_LEM = T / isLongExposureMode" status=0 Record 74: "QHY_OFF0= 3767.777 / [us] RollingShutterEndOffset row 0" status=0 Allocating memory for image, dark and result arrays... Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-04_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_013220_TTUQ1b1x1_2725388_RnkSeO80/UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_01-11-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0181.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-04_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_013220_TTUQ1b1x1_2725388_RnkSeO80/UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_01-11-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0181.fits SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_5C_20s_2026-05-30.fit CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-04_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_013220_TTUQ1b1x1_2725388_RnkSeO80/UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_01-11-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0181.fits CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_5C_20s_2026-05-30.fit Reading dark frame /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_5C_20s_2026-05-30.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix Dark frame is subtracted, output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-04_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_013220_TTUQ1b1x1_2725388_RnkSeO80/d_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_01-11-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0181.fits :) Spent 0.749349 seconds renamed 'mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_5C_20s_2026-05-30.png' -> 'transient_report/dark.png' try_to_calibrate_the_input_frame(): selected flat field /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-05-30.fit from directory /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats MegaDivider v7 Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-04_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_013220_TTUQ1b1x1_2725388_RnkSeO80/d_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_01-11-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0181.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix Reading flat /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-05-30.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix Avarage count on flat field image: 31267.409145 Minimal real count (from overscan): 5 Output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-04_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_013220_TTUQ1b1x1_2725388_RnkSeO80/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_01-11-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0181.fits :) No overscan detected - all values seem high! (left_median=21677.0, right_median=21704.0) renamed 'mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-05-30.png' -> 'transient_report/flat.png' Using calibrated image CALIBRATED_SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-04_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_013220_TTUQ1b1x1_2725388_RnkSeO80/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_01-11-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0181.fits EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration SET-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint CCD-TEMP= -0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature FOCTEMP = 21.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature AMBTEMP = 19.7 / [degC] Ambient air temperature Exploring image header: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-04_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_013220_TTUQ1b1x1_2725388_RnkSeO80/UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_01-12-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0182.fits CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-04_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_013220_TTUQ1b1x1_2725388_RnkSeO80/UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_01-12-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0182.fits SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-04_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_013220_TTUQ1b1x1_2725388_RnkSeO80/UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_01-12-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0182.fits Header: 74 keys total, 33 keys left Record 0: "" status=0 Record 1: "SIMPLE = T / C# FITS" status=0 Record 2: "BITPIX = 16" status=0 Record 3: "NAXIS = 2 / Dimensionality" status=0 Record 4: "NAXIS1 = 9576" status=0 Record 5: "NAXIS2 = 6388" status=0 Record 6: "BZERO = 32768" status=0 Record 7: "EXTEND = T / Extensions are permitted" status=0 Record 8: "IMAGETYP= 'LIGHT' / Type of exposure" status=0 Record 9: "EXPOSURE= 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0 Record 10: "EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0 Record 11: "DATE-LOC= '2026-06-04T01:12:33.7642908' / Time of observation (local)" status=0 Record 12: "DATE-OBS= '2026-06-04T06:12:33.7642908' / Time of observation (UTC)" status=0 Record 13: "MJD-OBS = 61195.2587241204 / Modified Julian Date of observation" status=0 Record 14: "DATE-AVG= '2026-06-04T06:12:43.6658506' / Averaged midpoint time (UTC)" status=0 Record 15: "MJD-AVG = 61195.2588387155 / Modified Julian Date of averaged midpoint" status=0 Record 16: "XBINNING= 1 / X axis binning factor" status=0 Record 17: "YBINNING= 1 / Y axis binning factor" status=0 Record 18: "GAIN = 30 / Sensor gain" status=0 Record 19: "OFFSET = 30 / Sensor gain offset" status=0 Record 20: "XPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel X axis size" status=0 Record 21: "YPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel Y axis size" status=0 Record 22: "INSTRUME= 'QHY600M' / Imaging instrument name" status=0 Record 23: "CAMERAID= 'QHY600M-33d3d743814b8b447' / Imaging instrument identifier" status=0 Record 24: "SET-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint" status=0 Record 25: "CCD-TEMP= -0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature" status=0 Record 26: "READOUTM= '2CMS-0' / Sensor readout mode" status=0 Record 27: "USBLIMIT= 50 / Camera-specific USB setting" status=0 Record 28: "TELESCOP= 'QHY600M-TTU1' / Name of telescope" status=0 Record 29: "FOCALLEN= 135.0 / [mm] Focal length" status=0 Record 30: "FOCRATIO= 2.2 / Focal ratio" status=0 Record 31: "RA = 143.999131267562 / [deg] RA of telescope" status=0 Record 32: "DEC = 69.9999440172141 / [deg] Declination of telescope" status=0 Record 33: "CENTALT = 28.3575 / [deg] Altitude of telescope" status=0 Record 34: "CENTAZ = 337.3225 / [deg] Azimuth of telescope" status=0 Record 35: "AIRMASS = 2.09845743278257 / Airmass at frame center (Gueymard 1993)" status=0 Record 36: "PIERSIDE= 'East' / Telescope pointing state" status=0 Record 37: "SITEELEV= 1015.0 / [m] Observation site elevation" status=0 Record 38: "SITELAT = 33.7480555555556 / [deg] Observation site latitude" status=0 Record 39: "SITELONG= -101.958333333333 / [deg] Observation site longitude" status=0 Record 40: "OBSERVER= 'Sokolovsky' / Observer name" status=0 Record 41: "OBSERVAT= 'TTU Skyview' / Observatory name" status=0 Record 42: "SITENAME= '' / Observatory site name" status=0 Record 43: "FWHEEL = 'Simulator' / Filter Wheel name" status=0 Record 44: "FILTER = 'CV' / Active filter name" status=0 Record 45: "OBJECT = 'UMa-01' / Name of the object of interest" status=0 Record 46: "OBJCTRA = '09 36 00' / [H M S] RA of imaged object" status=0 Record 47: "OBJCTDEC= '+70 00 00' / [D M S] Declination of imaged object" status=0 Record 48: "OBJCTROT= 0.0 / [deg] planned rotation of imaged object" status=0 Record 49: "FOCNAME = 'ZWO Focuser' / Focusing equipment name" status=0 Record 50: "FOCPOS = 29466 / [step] Focuser position" status=0 Record 51: "FOCUSPOS= 29466 / [step] Focuser position" status=0 Record 52: "FOCUSSZ = 0.0 / [um] Focuser step size" status=0 Record 53: "FOCTEMP = 21.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0 Record 54: "FOCUSTEM= 21.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0 Record 55: "DEWPOINT= 16.0 / [degC] Dew point" status=0 Record 56: "HUMIDITY= 79.0 / [percent] Relative humidity" status=0 Record 57: "PRESSURE= 902.71 / [hPa] Air pressure" status=0 Record 58: "AMBTEMP = 19.7 / [degC] Ambient air temperature" status=0 Record 59: "WINDDIR = 4.0 / [deg] Wind direction: 0=N, 180=S, 90=E, 270=W" status=0 Record 60: "WINDGUST= 7.200576 / [kph] Wind gust" status=0 Record 61: "WINDSPD = 3.200256 / [kph] Wind speed" status=0 Record 62: "ROWORDER= 'TOP-DOWN' / FITS Image Orientation" status=0 Record 63: "EQUINOX = 2000.0 / Equinox of celestial coordinate system" status=0 Record 64: "SWCREATE= 'N.I.N.A. 3.2.0.9001 (x64)' / Software that created this file" status=0 Record 65: "QHY_EXP = 20.000096 / [s] Actual exposure time" status=0 Record 66: "QHY_PP = 13888.0 / [ps] pixelPeriod" status=0 Record 67: "QHY_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0 Record 68: "GPS_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0 Record 69: "QHY_FP = 20000160.0 / [us] framePeriod" status=0 Record 70: "QHY_CPL = 6120.0 / clocksPerLine" status=0 Record 71: "QHY_LPF = 235295.0 / linesPerFrame" status=0 Record 72: "QHY_AET = 20000096.0 / [us] actualExposureTime" status=0 Record 73: "QHY_LEM = T / isLongExposureMode" status=0 Record 74: "QHY_OFF0= 3767.777 / [us] RollingShutterEndOffset row 0" status=0 Allocating memory for image, dark and result arrays... Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-04_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_013220_TTUQ1b1x1_2725388_RnkSeO80/UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_01-12-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0182.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-04_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_013220_TTUQ1b1x1_2725388_RnkSeO80/UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_01-12-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0182.fits SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_5C_20s_2026-05-30.fit CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-04_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_013220_TTUQ1b1x1_2725388_RnkSeO80/UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_01-12-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0182.fits CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_5C_20s_2026-05-30.fit Reading dark frame /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_5C_20s_2026-05-30.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix Dark frame is subtracted, output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-04_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_013220_TTUQ1b1x1_2725388_RnkSeO80/d_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_01-12-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0182.fits :) Spent 0.767144 seconds renamed 'mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_5C_20s_2026-05-30.png' -> 'transient_report/dark.png' try_to_calibrate_the_input_frame(): selected flat field /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-05-30.fit from directory /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats MegaDivider v7 Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-04_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_013220_TTUQ1b1x1_2725388_RnkSeO80/d_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_01-12-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0182.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix Reading flat /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-05-30.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix Avarage count on flat field image: 31267.409145 Minimal real count (from overscan): 5 Output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-04_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_013220_TTUQ1b1x1_2725388_RnkSeO80/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_01-12-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0182.fits :) No overscan detected - all values seem high! (left_median=21677.0, right_median=21704.0) renamed 'mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-05-30.png' -> 'transient_report/flat.png' Using calibrated image CALIBRATED_SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-04_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_013220_TTUQ1b1x1_2725388_RnkSeO80/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_01-12-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0182.fits Dark frame used to calibrate the second-epoch images:

Flat field used to calibrate the second-epoch images:

after the calibration attempt: SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-04_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_013220_TTUQ1b1x1_2725388_RnkSeO80/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_01-11-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0181.fits SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-04_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_013220_TTUQ1b1x1_2725388_RnkSeO80/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_01-12-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0182.fits Previews of the CALIBRATED second-epoch images:

fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_01-11-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0181.fits


fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_01-12-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0182.fits


Updating neverexclude_list.txt '/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt' Choosing bad regions list '/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst' wait *------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------* 'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex' Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 3.5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-04_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_013220_TTUQ1b1x1_2725388_RnkSeO80/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_01-11-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0181.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-04_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_013220_TTUQ1b1x1_2725388_RnkSeO80/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_01-12-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0182.fits SExtractor catalog cache: saved UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits.cat to cache SExtractor catalog cache: saved UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits.cat to cache VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-04_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_013220_TTUQ1b1x1_2725388_RnkSeO80/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_01-11-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0181.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-04_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_013220_TTUQ1b1x1_2725388_RnkSeO80/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_01-12-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0182.fits Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461195.75823547 Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt '../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt' Plate-solving the images 'asassn_transients_list.txt' -> '../asassn_transients_list.txt' 'tns_transients_list.txt' -> '../tns_transients_list.txt' wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits exists and is non-empty Saving wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits to local_wcs_cache/ 'wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits' wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits exists and is non-empty Saving wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits to local_wcs_cache/ 'wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits' wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_01-11-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0181.fits exists and is non-empty Saving wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_01-11-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0181.fits to local_wcs_cache/ 'wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_01-11-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0181.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_01-11-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0181.fits' wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_01-12-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0182.fits exists and is non-empty Saving wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_01-12-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0182.fits to local_wcs_cache/ 'wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_01-12-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0182.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_01-12-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0182.fits' ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits (1st reference image) verification OK: wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits Image size: 941.5'x627.1' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 09:36:20.400 +69:59:16.84 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9" ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_01-11-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0181.fits (1st new image) verification OK: wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_01-11-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0181.fits Image size: 941.8'x626.7' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 09:36:43.414 +70:00:29.02 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy) Reference image center 09:36:20.400 +69:59:16.84 Second-epoch image center 09:36:43.414 +70:00:29.02 Angular distance between the image centers 0.0384 deg. Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg. ################################### ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_01-12-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0182.fits (2nd new image) verification OK: wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_01-12-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0182.fits Image size: 941.8'x626.7' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 09:36:40.813 +70:01:07.77 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy) Reference image center 09:36:20.400 +69:59:16.84 Second-epoch image center 09:36:40.813 +70:01:07.77 Angular distance between the image centers 0.0424 deg. ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images) Second-epoch first image center 09:36:43.414 +70:00:29.02 Second-epoch second image center 09:36:40.813 +70:01:07.77 Angular distance between the image centers 0.01138 deg. ################################### Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5... Preparing for ar aprallel run Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits &> /tmp/tmp.5ltiB01vRB Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits &> /tmp/tmp.Mo33Fex1Xm Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-04_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_013220_TTUQ1b1x1_2725388_RnkSeO80/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_01-11-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0181.fits &> /tmp/tmp.R0fFJTLC7a Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-04_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_013220_TTUQ1b1x1_2725388_RnkSeO80/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_01-11-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0181.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-04_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_013220_TTUQ1b1x1_2725388_RnkSeO80/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_01-12-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0182.fits &> /tmp/tmp.fJQV6r93bD Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-04_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_013220_TTUQ1b1x1_2725388_RnkSeO80/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_01-12-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0182.fits Calibrating the magnitude scale Found non-empty wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits ____ Start of magnitude calibration ____ PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits and wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits.cat wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race) Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2 Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits and wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits.cat Found non-empty wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits and wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits.cat The reference image (wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits) and catalog (wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits.cat) found 'wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits.cat' -> 'wcsmag.cat' Read 8779 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 117.0365 to 171.9949 deg, Dec +62.9088 to +75.4797 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 117.0365 to 171.9949 deg, Dec 62.9088 to 75.4797 deg Loaded 9303 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 5118 out of 5414 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 5414 out of 8779 detected stars. The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.870000 a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.870000 From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.53 Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.34 Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes Working... Please, PLEASE, be patient!!! All lightcurves processed! =) Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.34
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:

Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V) Read 8779 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 117.0365 to 171.9949 deg, Dec +62.9088 to +75.4797 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 117.0365 to 171.9949 deg, Dec 62.9088 to 75.4797 deg Loaded 9303 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 5118 out of 5414 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 5414 out of 8779 detected stars. util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits:

Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits (aperture=6.1) Read 8894 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 117.0365 to 171.9944 deg, Dec +62.9087 to +75.4796 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 117.0365 to 171.9944 deg, Dec 62.9087 to 75.4796 deg Loaded 9303 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 5136 out of 5418 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 5418 out of 8894 detected stars. util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits:

Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits (aperture=6.1) ____ End of magnitude calibration ____ Applying consolidated magnitude filters... Preparing the exclusion lists for this field Done with filtering Found 3 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 8000) Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars: 2.1 pix UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits 2.1 pix UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits 2.2 pix fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_01-11-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0181.fits 2.2 pix fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_01-12-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0182.fits 2.1 pix wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits 2.1 pix wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits Limiting magnitude estimates: 15.3 mag. UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits 15.4 mag. UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits 14.4 mag. fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_01-11-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0181.fits 14.4 mag. fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_01-12-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0182.fits All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.4 (SNR ) 11.5 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50). This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image. The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here. The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images. This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list. The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag. Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver wait ############ /tmp/tmp.5ltiB01vRB (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The guess is based on the existing WCS header. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-04_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_013220_TTUQ1b1x1_2725388_RnkSeO80/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits 573.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good. The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good... '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits' -> 'wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits' FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits.cat SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=680, passed=8779 Got 8779 stars (including 8092 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits.cat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 8779 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.5' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.5 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013076 (47.1 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010461 (37.7 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 764 to 829 (Dec 62.9 to 75.5) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 968 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 968 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 956 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 968 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8707 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 764 to 829 (Dec 62.9 to 75.5) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 968 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 968 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8706 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 968 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8706 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36" Excluding outliers - 968 stars left (next iteration limit 1064) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits N_match=968 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.394 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.524 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.369 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.417 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.326 n_q1=198 n_q2=294 n_q3=212 n_q4=264 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.330 The image catalog is written to wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits.cat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits.cat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits -region wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits.cat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations ############ /tmp/tmp.Mo33Fex1Xm (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The guess is based on the existing WCS header. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-04_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_013220_TTUQ1b1x1_2725388_RnkSeO80/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits 573.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good. The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good... '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits' -> 'wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits' FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits.cat SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=664, passed=8894 Got 8894 stars (including 8220 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits.cat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 8894 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.5' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.5 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013076 (47.1 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010461 (37.7 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 764 to 829 (Dec 62.9 to 75.5) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 970 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 970 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 948 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 970 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8779 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 764 to 829 (Dec 62.9 to 75.5) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 970 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 970 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8781 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 970 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8781 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35" Excluding outliers - 970 stars left (next iteration limit 1067) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits N_match=970 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.395 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.504 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.375 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.417 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.319 n_q1=199 n_q2=283 n_q3=224 n_q4=264 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.274 The image catalog is written to wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits.cat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits.cat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits -region wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits.cat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations ############ /tmp/tmp.R0fFJTLC7a (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um Internal estimated FoV 605.3' The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-04_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_013220_TTUQ1b1x1_2725388_RnkSeO80/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-04_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_013220_TTUQ1b1x1_2725388_RnkSeO80/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_01-11-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0181.fits 605.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-04_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_013220_TTUQ1b1x1_2725388_RnkSeO80/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_01-11-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0181.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-04_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_013220_TTUQ1b1x1_2725388_RnkSeO80/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_01-11-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0181.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-04_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_013220_TTUQ1b1x1_2725388_RnkSeO80/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_01-11-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0181.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-04_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_013220_TTUQ1b1x1_2725388_RnkSeO80/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_01-11-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0181.fits It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve! FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-04_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_013220_TTUQ1b1x1_2725388_RnkSeO80/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_01-11-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0181.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_01-11-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0181.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_01-11-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0181.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_01-11-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0181.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_01-11-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0181.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_01-11-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0181.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_01-11-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0181.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_01-11-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0181.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-04_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_013220_TTUQ1b1x1_2725388_RnkSeO80/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_01-11-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0181.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_01-11-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0181.fits.cat SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=366, passed=4799 Got 4799 stars (including 4425 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_01-11-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0181.fits.cat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 4799 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.8' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.8 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013081 (47.1 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010464 (37.7 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 766 to 828 (Dec 63.4 to 75.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 965 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 964 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 957 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 964 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4742 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 766 to 828 (Dec 63.4 to 75.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 965 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 964 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4742 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 964 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4742 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31" Excluding outliers - 964 stars left (next iteration limit 1060) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_01-11-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0181.fits N_match=964 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.335 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.340 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.358 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.298 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.332 n_q1=222 n_q2=284 n_q3=232 n_q4=226 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.068 The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_01-11-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0181.fits.cat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_01-11-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0181.fits.cat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-04_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_013220_TTUQ1b1x1_2725388_RnkSeO80/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_01-11-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0181.fits -region wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_01-11-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0181.fits.cat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_01-11-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0181.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations ############ /tmp/tmp.fJQV6r93bD (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um Internal estimated FoV 605.3' The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-04_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_013220_TTUQ1b1x1_2725388_RnkSeO80/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-04_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_013220_TTUQ1b1x1_2725388_RnkSeO80/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_01-12-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0182.fits 605.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-04_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_013220_TTUQ1b1x1_2725388_RnkSeO80/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_01-12-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0182.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-04_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_013220_TTUQ1b1x1_2725388_RnkSeO80/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_01-12-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0182.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-04_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_013220_TTUQ1b1x1_2725388_RnkSeO80/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_01-12-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0182.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-04_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_013220_TTUQ1b1x1_2725388_RnkSeO80/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_01-12-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0182.fits It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve! FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-04_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_013220_TTUQ1b1x1_2725388_RnkSeO80/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_01-12-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0182.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_01-12-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0182.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_01-12-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0182.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_01-12-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0182.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_01-12-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0182.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_01-12-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0182.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_01-12-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0182.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_01-12-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0182.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-04_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_013220_TTUQ1b1x1_2725388_RnkSeO80/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_01-12-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0182.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_01-12-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0182.fits.cat SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=365, passed=4758 Got 4758 stars (including 4386 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_01-12-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0182.fits.cat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 4758 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.8' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.8 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013081 (47.1 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010464 (37.7 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 766 to 828 (Dec 63.4 to 75.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 965 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 964 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 954 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 964 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4700 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 766 to 828 (Dec 63.4 to 75.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 965 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 964 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4704 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 964 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4704 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32" Excluding outliers - 964 stars left (next iteration limit 1060) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_01-12-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0182.fits N_match=964 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.356 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.404 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.376 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.306 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.334 n_q1=220 n_q2=281 n_q3=233 n_q4=230 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.135 The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_01-12-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0182.fits.cat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_01-12-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0182.fits.cat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-04_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_013220_TTUQ1b1x1_2725388_RnkSeO80/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_01-12-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0182.fits -region wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_01-12-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0182.fits.cat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_01-12-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0182.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations ################################### # Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above) ref1=UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits sigma_overall=0.394 worst_q_ratio=1.330 ref2=UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits sigma_overall=0.395 worst_q_ratio=1.274 new1=fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_01-11-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0181.fits sigma_overall=0.335 worst_q_ratio=1.068 new2=fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_01-12-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0182.fits sigma_overall=0.356 worst_q_ratio=1.135 reference average sigma_overall=0.3945 worst_q_ratio=1.302 warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference ###################################
Distribution of catalog-matched stars across the image:
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy: wrote wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292_astrometric_residuals.png (968 matched stars from wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388) plot_astrometric_residuals_xy: wrote wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293_astrometric_residuals.png (970 matched stars from wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388) plot_astrometric_residuals_xy: wrote wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_01-11-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0181_astrometric_residuals.png (964 matched stars from wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_01-11-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0181.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388) plot_astrometric_residuals_xy: wrote wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_01-12-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0182_astrometric_residuals.png (964 matched stars from wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_01-12-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0182.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388) Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_01-11-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0181.fits INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image) 'wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_01-11-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0181.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-04_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_013220_TTUQ1b1x1_2725388_RnkSeO80/wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_01-11-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0181.fits' Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_01-12-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0182.fits INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image) 'wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_01-12-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0182.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-04_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_013220_TTUQ1b1x1_2725388_RnkSeO80/wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_01-12-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0182.fits' Preparing the HTML report for the field UMa-01-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 1s Pre-generating preview images in parallel... Done pre-generating preview images. Pre-generating finding charts in parallel... Done pre-generating finding charts. make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 0s xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 04047_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_01-12-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0182 The candidate 04047_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_01-12-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0182 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 3   2026 06 04.25884    2461195.75884    8.05    10:44:37.76 +68:46:31.9   1110 3215   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-04_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_013220_TTUQ1b1x1_2725388_RnkSeO80/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_01-12-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0182.fits **** FOUND 10:44:37.77 +68:46:31.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 01412_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_01-12-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0182 The candidate 01412_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_01-12-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0182 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 3   2026 06 04.25884    2461195.75884    10.39    08:03:59.98 +73:24:29.9   8869 0612   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-04_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_013220_TTUQ1b1x1_2725388_RnkSeO80/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_01-12-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0182.fits **** FOUND 08:03:59.98 +73:24:30.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 01377_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_01-12-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0182 The candidate 01377_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_01-12-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0182 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 3   2026 06 04.25884    2461195.75884    9.60    10:55:40.13 +71:52:07.7   1244 1261   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-04_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_013220_TTUQ1b1x1_2725388_RnkSeO80/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_01-12-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0182.fits **** FOUND 10:55:40.12 +71:52:07.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 1s Prepared the HTML report for the field UMa-01-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 *------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------* #### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt #### wait *------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------* 'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex' Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 3.5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-04_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_013220_TTUQ1b1x1_2725388_RnkSeO80/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_01-11-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0181.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-04_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_013220_TTUQ1b1x1_2725388_RnkSeO80/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_01-12-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0182.fits SExtractor catalog cache: saved UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits.cat to cache SExtractor catalog cache: saved UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits.cat to cache VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-04_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_013220_TTUQ1b1x1_2725388_RnkSeO80/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_01-11-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0181.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-04_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_013220_TTUQ1b1x1_2725388_RnkSeO80/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_01-12-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0182.fits Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_01-11-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0181.fits Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_01-12-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0182.fits Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/exclusion_list.txt Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images Plate-solving the images wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits exists and is non-empty wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits exists and is non-empty wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_01-11-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0181.fits exists and is non-empty wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_01-12-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0182.fits exists and is non-empty ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits (1st reference image) verification OK: wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits Image size: 941.5'x627.1' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 09:36:20.400 +69:59:16.84 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9" ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_01-11-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0181.fits (1st new image) verification OK: wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_01-11-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0181.fits Image size: 941.8'x626.7' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 09:36:43.414 +70:00:29.02 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy) Reference image center 09:36:20.400 +69:59:16.84 Second-epoch image center 09:36:43.414 +70:00:29.02 Angular distance between the image centers 0.0384 deg. Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg. ################################### ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_01-12-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0182.fits (2nd new image) verification OK: wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_01-12-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0182.fits Image size: 941.8'x626.7' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 09:36:40.813 +70:01:07.77 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy) Reference image center 09:36:20.400 +69:59:16.84 Second-epoch image center 09:36:40.813 +70:01:07.77 Angular distance between the image centers 0.0424 deg. ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images) Second-epoch first image center 09:36:43.414 +70:00:29.02 Second-epoch second image center 09:36:40.813 +70:01:07.77 Angular distance between the image centers 0.01138 deg. ################################### Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5... Preparing for ar aprallel run Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits &> /tmp/tmp.To8SRpCDaW Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits &> /tmp/tmp.V1yWgZYYtX Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-04_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_013220_TTUQ1b1x1_2725388_RnkSeO80/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_01-11-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0181.fits &> /tmp/tmp.gfQPc5a58R Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-04_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_013220_TTUQ1b1x1_2725388_RnkSeO80/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_01-11-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0181.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-04_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_013220_TTUQ1b1x1_2725388_RnkSeO80/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_01-12-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0182.fits &> /tmp/tmp.12TvUwpf5t Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-04_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_013220_TTUQ1b1x1_2725388_RnkSeO80/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_01-12-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0182.fits Calibrating the magnitude scale Found non-empty wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits ____ Start of magnitude calibration ____ PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits and wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits.cat wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race) Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2 Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits and wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits.cat Found non-empty wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits and wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits.cat The reference image (wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits) and catalog (wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits.cat) found 'wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits.cat' -> 'wcsmag.cat' Read 51532 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 116.7773 to 172.6837 deg, Dec +62.8130 to +75.4851 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 116.7773 to 172.6837 deg, Dec 62.8130 to 75.4851 deg Loaded 9545 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4868 out of 5492 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 5492 out of 51532 detected stars. The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.754250 a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.754250 From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.25 Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.50 Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes Working... Please, PLEASE, be patient!!! All lightcurves processed! =) Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.50
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:

Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V) Read 51532 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 116.7773 to 172.6837 deg, Dec +62.8130 to +75.4851 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 116.7773 to 172.6837 deg, Dec 62.8130 to 75.4851 deg Loaded 9545 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4868 out of 5492 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 5492 out of 51532 detected stars. util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits:

Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits (aperture=4.7) Read 51887 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 116.7032 to 172.5255 deg, Dec +62.8134 to +75.4919 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 116.7032 to 172.5255 deg, Dec 62.8134 to 75.4919 deg Loaded 9544 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4857 out of 5495 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 5495 out of 51887 detected stars. util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits:

Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits (aperture=4.7) ____ End of magnitude calibration ____ Applying consolidated magnitude filters... Preparing the exclusion lists for this field Done with filtering Found 26 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 8000) Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars: 1.9 pix UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits 1.9 pix UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits 2.1 pix fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_01-11-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0181.fits 2.1 pix fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_01-12-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0182.fits 1.9 pix wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits 1.9 pix wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits Limiting magnitude estimates: 15.5 mag. UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits 15.5 mag. UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits 14.6 mag. fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_01-11-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0181.fits 14.6 mag. fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_01-12-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0182.fits All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.6 (SNR ) 14.1 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50). This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image. The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here. The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images. This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list. The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag. Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver wait ############ /tmp/tmp.To8SRpCDaW (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The guess is based on the existing WCS header. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-04_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_013220_TTUQ1b1x1_2725388_RnkSeO80/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits 573.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good. The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good... '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits' -> 'wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits' FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits.cat SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=13, blended=2624, passed=51519 Got 51519 stars (including 48800 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits.cat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 51519 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.5' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.5 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013076 (47.1 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010461 (37.7 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 764 to 829 (Dec 62.8 to 75.5) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 968 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 968 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 956 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 968 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 51062 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 764 to 829 (Dec 62.8 to 75.5) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 968 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 968 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 51060 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 968 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 51061 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38" Excluding outliers - 968 stars left (next iteration limit 1064) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits N_match=968 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.412 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.539 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.361 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.456 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.319 n_q1=207 n_q2=283 n_q3=214 n_q4=264 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.307 The image catalog is written to wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits.cat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits.cat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits -region wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits.cat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations ############ /tmp/tmp.V1yWgZYYtX (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The guess is based on the existing WCS header. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-04_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_013220_TTUQ1b1x1_2725388_RnkSeO80/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits 573.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good. The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good... '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits' -> 'wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits' FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits.cat SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=24, blended=2687, passed=51863 Got 51863 stars (including 49079 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits.cat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 51863 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.5' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.5 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013076 (47.1 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010461 (37.7 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 764 to 829 (Dec 62.8 to 75.5) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 970 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 970 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 962 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 970 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 51368 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 764 to 829 (Dec 62.8 to 75.5) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 970 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 970 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 51366 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 970 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 51366 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36" Excluding outliers - 970 stars left (next iteration limit 1067) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits N_match=970 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.388 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.462 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.360 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.398 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.327 n_q1=214 n_q2=275 n_q3=217 n_q4=264 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.189 The image catalog is written to wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits.cat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits.cat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits -region wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits.cat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations ############ /tmp/tmp.gfQPc5a58R (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um Internal estimated FoV 605.3' The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-04_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_013220_TTUQ1b1x1_2725388_RnkSeO80/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-04_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_013220_TTUQ1b1x1_2725388_RnkSeO80/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_01-11-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0181.fits 605.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-04_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_013220_TTUQ1b1x1_2725388_RnkSeO80/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_01-11-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0181.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-04_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_013220_TTUQ1b1x1_2725388_RnkSeO80/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_01-11-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0181.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-04_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_013220_TTUQ1b1x1_2725388_RnkSeO80/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_01-11-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0181.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-04_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_013220_TTUQ1b1x1_2725388_RnkSeO80/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_01-11-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0181.fits It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve! FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-04_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_013220_TTUQ1b1x1_2725388_RnkSeO80/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_01-11-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0181.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_01-11-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0181.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_01-11-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0181.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_01-11-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0181.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_01-11-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0181.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_01-11-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0181.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_01-11-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0181.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_01-11-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0181.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-04_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_013220_TTUQ1b1x1_2725388_RnkSeO80/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_01-11-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0181.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_01-11-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0181.fits.cat SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=3, blended=955, passed=30056 Got 30056 stars (including 29054 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_01-11-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0181.fits.cat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 30056 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.8' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.8 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013081 (47.1 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010464 (37.7 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 766 to 828 (Dec 63.3 to 75.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 964 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 964 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 955 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 964 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 29733 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 766 to 828 (Dec 63.3 to 75.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 964 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 964 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 29733 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 964 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 29733 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32" Excluding outliers - 964 stars left (next iteration limit 1060) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_01-11-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0181.fits N_match=964 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.346 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.377 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.371 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.294 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.317 n_q1=227 n_q2=278 n_q3=231 n_q4=228 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.088 The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_01-11-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0181.fits.cat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_01-11-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0181.fits.cat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-04_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_013220_TTUQ1b1x1_2725388_RnkSeO80/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_01-11-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0181.fits -region wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_01-11-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0181.fits.cat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_01-11-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0181.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations ############ /tmp/tmp.12TvUwpf5t (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um Internal estimated FoV 605.3' The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-04_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_013220_TTUQ1b1x1_2725388_RnkSeO80/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-04_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_013220_TTUQ1b1x1_2725388_RnkSeO80/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_01-12-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0182.fits 605.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-04_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_013220_TTUQ1b1x1_2725388_RnkSeO80/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_01-12-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0182.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-04_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_013220_TTUQ1b1x1_2725388_RnkSeO80/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_01-12-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0182.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-04_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_013220_TTUQ1b1x1_2725388_RnkSeO80/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_01-12-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0182.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-04_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_013220_TTUQ1b1x1_2725388_RnkSeO80/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_01-12-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0182.fits It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve! FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-04_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_013220_TTUQ1b1x1_2725388_RnkSeO80/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_01-12-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0182.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_01-12-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0182.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_01-12-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0182.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_01-12-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0182.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_01-12-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0182.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_01-12-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0182.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_01-12-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0182.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_01-12-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0182.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-04_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_013220_TTUQ1b1x1_2725388_RnkSeO80/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_01-12-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0182.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_01-12-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0182.fits.cat SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=5, blended=927, passed=29983 Got 29983 stars (including 29013 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_01-12-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0182.fits.cat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 29983 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.8' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.8 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013081 (47.1 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010464 (37.7 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 766 to 828 (Dec 63.3 to 75.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 964 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 964 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 956 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 964 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 29678 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 766 to 828 (Dec 63.3 to 75.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 964 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 964 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 29678 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 964 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 29678 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34" Excluding outliers - 964 stars left (next iteration limit 1060) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_01-12-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0182.fits N_match=964 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.368 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.389 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.378 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.319 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.352 n_q1=231 n_q2=273 n_q3=230 n_q4=230 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.057 The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_01-12-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0182.fits.cat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_01-12-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0182.fits.cat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-04_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_013220_TTUQ1b1x1_2725388_RnkSeO80/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_01-12-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0182.fits -region wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_01-12-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0182.fits.cat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_01-12-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0182.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL) Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_01-11-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0181.fits INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image) The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-04_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_013220_TTUQ1b1x1_2725388_RnkSeO80/wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_01-11-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0181.fits Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_01-12-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0182.fits INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image) The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-04_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_013220_TTUQ1b1x1_2725388_RnkSeO80/wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_01-12-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0182.fits Preparing the HTML report for the field UMa-01-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits at 08:59:18.77 +67:23:44.6: 13.11 +/- 0.03 detection Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits at 09:08:13.54 +73:56:49.7: 13.35 +/- 0.03 detection Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits at 08:58:45.24 +72:03:53.2: 13.00 +/- 0.02 detection Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits at 10:11:31.85 +64:32:31.7: 13.29 +/- 0.04 detection Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits at 08:45:45.92 +69:15:02.6: 13.81 +/- 0.04 detection Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits at 08:59:18.77 +67:23:44.6: 13.07 +/- 0.02 detection Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits at 09:08:13.54 +73:56:49.7: 13.43 +/- 0.03 detection Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits at 08:45:45.92 +69:15:02.6: 13.77 +/- 0.04 detection Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits at 08:58:45.24 +72:03:53.2: 13.04 +/- 0.02 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.09 +/- 0.02 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 08:59:18.77 +67:23:44.6: ref_mag=13.09 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.1640 delta=-0.07 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.39 +/- 0.02 Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.02 +/- 0.02 Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.79 +/- 0.03 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 09:08:13.54 +73:56:49.7: ref_mag=13.39 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.9091 delta=-0.52 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 08:58:45.24 +72:03:53.2: ref_mag=13.02 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.3637 delta=-0.34 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 08:45:45.92 +69:15:02.6: ref_mag=13.79 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.9556 delta=-0.17 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits at 10:11:31.85 +64:32:31.7: 13.27 +/- 0.03 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.28 +/- 0.03 Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits at 09:34:45.50 +69:51:31.9: 13.64 +/- 0.04 detection Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:11:31.85 +64:32:31.7: ref_mag=13.28 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.3371 delta=-0.05 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits at 09:34:45.50 +69:51:31.9: 13.64 +/- 0.04 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.64 +/- 0.03 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 09:34:45.50 +69:51:31.9: ref_mag=13.64 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.6049 delta=0.04 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits at 09:54:39.03 +68:36:13.6: 13.67 +/- 0.04 detection Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits at 09:25:02.24 +70:57:51.9: 13.79 +/- 0.04 detection Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits at 08:56:30.30 +72:53:02.0: 13.93 +/- 0.05 detection Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits at 10:01:52.45 +72:25:24.3: 13.80 +/- 0.05 detection Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits at 09:25:02.24 +70:57:51.9: 13.75 +/- 0.04 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.77 +/- 0.03 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 09:25:02.24 +70:57:51.9: ref_mag=13.77 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=14.1715 delta=-0.40 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits at 10:01:52.45 +72:25:24.3: 13.70 +/- 0.04 detection Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits at 09:54:39.03 +68:36:13.6: 13.61 +/- 0.04 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.74 +/- 0.03 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:01:52.45 +72:25:24.3: ref_mag=13.74 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=14.0359 delta=-0.29 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.64 +/- 0.03 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 09:54:39.03 +68:36:13.6: ref_mag=13.64 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.9640 delta=-0.33 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits at 08:56:30.30 +72:53:02.0: 13.97 +/- 0.05 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.95 +/- 0.04 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 08:56:30.30 +72:53:02.0: ref_mag=13.95 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.9853 delta=-0.04 (need > 0.90) make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 5s Pre-generating preview images in parallel... Done pre-generating preview images. Pre-generating finding charts in parallel... Done pre-generating finding charts. make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 0s xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 65380_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_01-12-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0182 The candidate 65380_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_01-12-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0182 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 06 04.25884    2461195.75884    13.93    08:56:11.14 +74:54:45.3   6557 0202   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-04_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_013220_TTUQ1b1x1_2725388_RnkSeO80/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_01-12-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0182.fits **** FOUND 08:56:10.90 +74:54:45.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 65381_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_01-12-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0182 The candidate 65381_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_01-12-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0182 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 06 04.25824    2461195.75824    14.00    08:45:45.90 +69:15:02.5   7476 3528   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-04_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_013220_TTUQ1b1x1_2725388_RnkSeO80/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_01-11-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0181.fits Discovery image 2   2026 06 04.25884    2461195.75884    13.94    08:45:45.94 +69:15:02.7   7473 3535   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-04_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_013220_TTUQ1b1x1_2725388_RnkSeO80/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_01-12-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0182.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 65383_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_01-12-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0182 The candidate 65383_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_01-12-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0182 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 06 04.25824    2461195.75824    13.88    09:08:13.13 +73:56:49.7   6119 0823   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-04_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_013220_TTUQ1b1x1_2725388_RnkSeO80/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_01-11-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0181.fits Discovery image 2   2026 06 04.25884    2461195.75884    13.93    09:08:13.95 +73:56:49.7   6117 0829   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-04_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_013220_TTUQ1b1x1_2725388_RnkSeO80/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_01-12-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0182.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 65473_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_01-12-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0182 The candidate 65473_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_01-12-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0182 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 06 04.25884    2461195.75884    10.90    10:01:20.66 +74:13:23.2   3935 0551   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-04_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_013220_TTUQ1b1x1_2725388_RnkSeO80/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_01-12-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0182.fits **** FOUND 10:01:20.63 +74:13:23.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 66020_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_01-12-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0182 The candidate 66020_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_01-12-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0182 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 06 04.25824    2461195.75824    13.33    10:11:31.82 +64:32:31.6   2346 6205   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-04_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_013220_TTUQ1b1x1_2725388_RnkSeO80/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_01-11-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0181.fits Discovery image 2   2026 06 04.25884    2461195.75884    13.34    10:11:31.87 +64:32:31.9   2343 6211   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-04_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_013220_TTUQ1b1x1_2725388_RnkSeO80/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_01-12-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0182.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 66030_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_01-12-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0182 The candidate 66030_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_01-12-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0182 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 06 04.25884    2461195.75884    13.29    09:06:33.99 +73:11:42.4   6215 1279   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-04_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_013220_TTUQ1b1x1_2725388_RnkSeO80/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_01-12-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0182.fits **** FOUND 09:06:33.93 +73:11:42.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 66075_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_01-12-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0182 The candidate 66075_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_01-12-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0182 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 06 04.25884    2461195.75884    13.11    08:31:20.54 +66:19:28.3   8609 5137   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-04_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_013220_TTUQ1b1x1_2725388_RnkSeO80/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_01-12-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0182.fits **** FOUND 08:31:20.44 +66:19:28.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 66078_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_01-12-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0182 The candidate 66078_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_01-12-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0182 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 06 04.25884    2461195.75884    13.38    08:50:43.85 +73:45:55.8   6860 0867   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-04_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_013220_TTUQ1b1x1_2725388_RnkSeO80/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_01-12-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0182.fits **** FOUND 08:50:43.89 +73:45:56.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 66099_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_01-12-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0182 The candidate 66099_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_01-12-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0182 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 06 04.25824    2461195.75824    13.39    08:58:45.47 +72:03:54.0   6622 1924   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-04_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_013220_TTUQ1b1x1_2725388_RnkSeO80/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_01-11-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0181.fits Discovery image 2   2026 06 04.25884    2461195.75884    13.34    08:58:45.01 +72:03:52.4   6620 1931   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-04_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_013220_TTUQ1b1x1_2725388_RnkSeO80/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_01-12-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0182.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 66100_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_01-12-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0182 The candidate 66100_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_01-12-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0182 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 06 04.25824    2461195.75824    13.34    08:59:18.76 +67:23:45.1   6860 4731   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-04_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_013220_TTUQ1b1x1_2725388_RnkSeO80/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_01-11-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0181.fits Discovery image 2   2026 06 04.25884    2461195.75884    13.07    08:59:18.79 +67:23:44.1   6857 4738   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-04_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_013220_TTUQ1b1x1_2725388_RnkSeO80/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_01-12-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0182.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 66122_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_01-12-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0182 The candidate 66122_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_01-12-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0182 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 06 04.25884    2461195.75884    13.52    08:41:40.77 +72:27:33.1   7369 1588   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-04_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_013220_TTUQ1b1x1_2725388_RnkSeO80/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_01-12-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0182.fits **** FOUND 08:41:40.78 +72:27:32.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 66125_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_01-12-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0182 The candidate 66125_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_01-12-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0182 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 06 04.25884    2461195.75884    13.21    08:12:29.42 +68:27:37.7   9366 3611   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-04_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_013220_TTUQ1b1x1_2725388_RnkSeO80/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_01-12-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0182.fits **** FOUND 08:12:29.54 +68:27:39.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 66142_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_01-12-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0182 The candidate 66142_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_01-12-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0182 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 06 04.25884    2461195.75884    13.40    09:13:06.59 +69:38:50.9   6008 3431   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-04_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_013220_TTUQ1b1x1_2725388_RnkSeO80/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_01-12-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0182.fits **** FOUND 09:13:06.49 +69:38:50.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 66149_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_01-12-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0182 The candidate 66149_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_01-12-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0182 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 06 04.25824    2461195.75824    13.58    09:34:45.58 +69:51:31.8   4885 3290   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-04_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_013220_TTUQ1b1x1_2725388_RnkSeO80/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_01-11-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0181.fits Discovery image 2   2026 06 04.25884    2461195.75884    13.64    09:34:45.41 +69:51:31.9   4883 3296   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-04_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_013220_TTUQ1b1x1_2725388_RnkSeO80/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_01-12-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0182.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 66165_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_01-12-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0182 The candidate 66165_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_01-12-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0182 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 06 04.25884    2461195.75884    13.83    10:47:52.53 +65:28:26.4   0242 5044   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-04_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_013220_TTUQ1b1x1_2725388_RnkSeO80/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_01-12-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0182.fits **** FOUND 10:47:52.56 +65:28:26.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 66195_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_01-12-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0182 The candidate 66195_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_01-12-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0182 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 06 04.25884    2461195.75884    13.70    09:22:45.76 +73:33:02.3   5510 1088   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-04_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_013220_TTUQ1b1x1_2725388_RnkSeO80/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_01-12-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0182.fits **** FOUND 09:22:45.88 +73:33:02.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 66210_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_01-12-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0182 The candidate 66210_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_01-12-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0182 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 06 04.25884    2461195.75884    13.73    09:46:28.34 +73:12:08.3   4479 1246   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-04_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_013220_TTUQ1b1x1_2725388_RnkSeO80/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_01-12-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0182.fits **** FOUND 09:46:28.38 +73:12:07.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 66311_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_01-12-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0182 The candidate 66311_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_01-12-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0182 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 06 04.25884    2461195.75884    13.62    08:52:35.09 +67:30:03.8   7239 4633   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-04_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_013220_TTUQ1b1x1_2725388_RnkSeO80/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_01-12-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0182.fits **** FOUND 08:52:35.01 +67:30:03.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 66332_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_01-12-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0182 The candidate 66332_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_01-12-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0182 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 06 04.25884    2461195.75884    13.70    08:26:07.71 +70:06:50.8   8393 2828   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-04_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_013220_TTUQ1b1x1_2725388_RnkSeO80/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_01-12-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0182.fits **** FOUND 08:26:07.60 +70:06:50.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 66374_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_01-12-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0182 The candidate 66374_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_01-12-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0182 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 06 04.25824    2461195.75824    14.01    10:01:52.59 +72:25:25.0   3740 1615   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-04_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_013220_TTUQ1b1x1_2725388_RnkSeO80/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_01-11-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0181.fits Discovery image 2   2026 06 04.25884    2461195.75884    14.07    10:01:52.31 +72:25:23.7   3738 1622   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-04_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_013220_TTUQ1b1x1_2725388_RnkSeO80/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_01-12-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0182.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 66428_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_01-12-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0182 The candidate 66428_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_01-12-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0182 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 06 04.25824    2461195.75824    14.01    08:56:30.23 +72:53:02.0   6675 1421   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-04_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_013220_TTUQ1b1x1_2725388_RnkSeO80/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_01-11-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0181.fits Discovery image 2   2026 06 04.25884    2461195.75884    13.96    08:56:30.37 +72:53:02.1   6672 1427   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-04_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_013220_TTUQ1b1x1_2725388_RnkSeO80/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_01-12-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0182.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 66434_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_01-12-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0182 The candidate 66434_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_01-12-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0182 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 06 04.25824    2461195.75824    14.08    09:54:39.35 +68:36:17.2   3759 3944   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-04_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_013220_TTUQ1b1x1_2725388_RnkSeO80/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_01-11-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0181.fits Discovery image 2   2026 06 04.25884    2461195.75884    13.88    09:54:38.72 +68:36:10.1   3757 3951   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-04_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_013220_TTUQ1b1x1_2725388_RnkSeO80/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_01-12-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0182.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 66484_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_01-12-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0182 The candidate 66484_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_01-12-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0182 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 06 04.25824    2461195.75824    14.16    09:25:02.27 +70:57:53.1   5396 2640   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-04_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_013220_TTUQ1b1x1_2725388_RnkSeO80/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_01-11-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0181.fits Discovery image 2   2026 06 04.25884    2461195.75884    14.19    09:25:02.20 +70:57:50.8   5393 2647   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-04_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_013220_TTUQ1b1x1_2725388_RnkSeO80/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_01-12-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0182.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 08003_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_01-12-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0182 The candidate 08003_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_01-12-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0182 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 3   2026 06 04.25884    2461195.75884    10.35    08:04:00.01 +73:24:29.9   8869 0612   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-04_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_013220_TTUQ1b1x1_2725388_RnkSeO80/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_01-12-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0182.fits **** FOUND 08:04:00.00 +73:24:30.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 07628_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_01-12-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0182 The candidate 07628_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_01-12-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0182 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 3   2026 06 04.25884    2461195.75884    9.93    10:55:40.12 +71:52:07.6   1244 1261   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-04_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_013220_TTUQ1b1x1_2725388_RnkSeO80/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_01-12-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0182.fits **** FOUND 10:55:40.12 +71:52:07.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 23914_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_01-12-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0182 The candidate 23914_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_01-12-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0182 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 3   2026 06 04.25884    2461195.75884    8.34    10:44:37.75 +68:46:31.9   1110 3215   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-04_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_013220_TTUQ1b1x1_2725388_RnkSeO80/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_01-12-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0182.fits **** FOUND 10:44:37.76 +68:46:31.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 5s Prepared the HTML report for the field UMa-01-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL *------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------* #### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt #### ########### Completed UMa-01-Q1b1x1 ########### The analysis was running at tau We are allowed to update the exclusion list at tau host Found ../exclusion_list_TTUQ1.txt #### The exclusion list before filtering-out asteroids, bad pixels and adding Gaia sources #### ################################################################################### renamed 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt_noasteroids' -> 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt' renamed 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt_nohotpixels' -> 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt' # Count candidates with no identification (that also don't look like hot pix) Found 0 unidentified candidates (excluding asteroids, hot pixels and known variable stars). ################################################################################### 0 candidates found (excluding asteroids and hot pixels) This does not look like a test run ################################################################################### exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt NOT FOUND exclusion_list_apass.txt NOT FOUND IS_THIS_TEST_RUN=NO ALLOW_EXCLUSION_LIST_UPDATE= YES #### Nothing to add to the exclusion list #### The observatory MPC code is V36 ############################################################ Positions of planets computed with util/planet_finder/main.py for JD(UT)2461195.75823547 -observatory V36 06:18:17.61 +25:30:37.8 Mercury (-0.2mag) 07:22:54.14 +24:03:45.5 Venus (-4.0mag) 02:38:12.36 +14:48:22.0 Mars (1.3mag) 07:45:11.79 +21:39:27.9 Jupiter (-1.9mag) 00:48:13.15 +02:42:19.7 Saturn (0.9mag) 03:59:15.98 +20:22:44.7 Uranus (5.8mag) 00:15:53.86 +00:15:25.8 Neptune (7.8mag) 20:33:33.72 -23:03:06.5 Pluto (14.5mag) 19:56:38.59 -24:32:53.0 Moon (-11.6mag) -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 363 Jun 4 01:36 planets.txt ############################################################ Positions of selected moons from JPL HORIZONS for JD(UT)2461195.75823547: 07:45:06.14 +21:39:44.8 Io (6.0mag) 07:45:05.65 +21:39:47.7 Europa (6.2mag) 07:45:28.83 +21:38:40.5 Ganymede (5.6mag) 07:45:39.84 +21:38:11.1 Callisto (6.8mag) 07:45:43.48 +21:15:34.5 Himalia (15.6mag) 07:45:14.82 +21:39:18.0 Thebe (16.5mag) 07:45:49.28 +21:32:46.5 Elara (17.5mag) 07:47:10.03 +21:53:18.3 Pasiphae (17.7mag) 07:51:57.02 +21:40:53.2 Carme (18.8mag) 00:48:08.55 +02:42:49.2 Titan (8.7mag) 00:48:08.93 +02:42:26.2 Rhea (10.0mag) 00:48:45.85 +02:43:59.9 Iapetus (11.4mag) 00:48:01.11 +02:42:29.6 Hyperion (14.7mag) 00:49:00.17 +02:44:50.1 Phoebe (16.7mag) -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 569 Jun 4 01:36 moons.txt ############################################################ Positions of selected spacecraft from JPL HORIZONS for JD(UT)2461195.75823547: 17:24:20.86 -34:51:48.3 JWST 18:18:57.70 +30:09:11.1 Chandra 19:18:21.13 -01:38:36.2 XMM-Newton -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 96 Jun 4 01:36 spacecraft.txt ############################################################ Positions of bright comets computed with util/comet_finder/main.py for JD(UT)2461195.75823547 -observatory V36 18:46:05.21 -32:21:41.2 13.6mag P/2010 H2 (Vales) 05:49:36.91 -68:06:41.9 17.4mag C/2014 UN271 (Bernardinelli-Bernstein) 05:47:37.00 +31:55:03.6 17.5mag C/2017 K2 (PANSTARRS) 17:16:18.47 +15:08:25.5 17.8mag C/2021 G2 (ATLAS) 20:38:04.74 -50:55:14.0 17.3mag P/2021 N1 (ZTF) 23:13:24.61 +31:26:12.3 17.2mag C/2022 E2 (ATLAS) 05:29:12.36 +26:56:54.4 16.4mag C/2022 N2 (PANSTARRS) 09:26:57.10 +31:12:57.3 16.6mag C/2022 QE78 (ATLAS) 08:48:28.65 +03:44:04.9 17.7mag C/2022 R6 (PANSTARRS) 18:30:45.57 +21:30:45.8 17.7mag C/2023 A3 (Tsuchinshan-ATLAS) 15:20:49.70 -11:00:27.2 17.6mag P/2023 B1 (PANSTARRS) 22:15:28.97 +66:16:47.6 17.7mag C/2023 H5 (Lemmon) 17:56:00.33 -06:18:55.0 13.7mag C/2023 R1 (PANSTARRS) 13:21:08.32 +83:52:34.5 17.9mag C/2023 X2 (Lemmon) 07:05:03.16 +64:10:55.6 17.6mag C/2024 A1 (ATLAS) 06:41:14.12 +27:27:52.1 13.5mag C/2024 E1 (Wierzchos) 15:40:25.17 +13:09:52.5 17.4mag C/2024 G6 (ATLAS) 20:15:28.15 +29:57:09.1 14.0mag C/2024 J3 (ATLAS) 04:14:04.61 -16:18:26.0 16.0mag C/2024 T5 (ATLAS) 06:02:13.51 +35:10:53.0 17.9mag C/2025 J1 (Borisov) 11:37:11.46 +52:57:46.1 17.3mag C/2025 L1 (ATLAS) 06:39:49.50 -10:41:20.5 13.7mag C/2025 R3 (PANSTARRS) 09:21:02.64 +23:22:58.1 18.0mag C/2025 V2 (Rankin) 12:39:53.23 +04:41:34.3 17.2mag C/2025 Y1 (ATLAS) 18:18:30.40 +74:14:21.3 18.0mag C/2026 A2 (Bok) 01:53:39.02 +43:07:30.1 16.0mag C/2026 B2 (Sun-Gao) 11:10:40.14 -05:10:58.8 16.4mag A/2026 E1 20:16:27.24 -08:20:25.5 8.9mag 10P/Tempel 11:01:09.30 -00:55:11.7 16.0mag 29P/Schwassmann-Wachmann 10:57:50.27 -02:40:57.5 17.9mag 43P/Wolf-Harrington 03:05:36.80 +25:06:43.6 17.6mag 47P/Ashbrook-Jackson 08:51:34.88 +24:52:55.2 16.9mag 63P/Wild 00:23:27.51 -06:37:57.1 15.7mag 65P/Gunn 06:30:42.29 +32:59:31.4 16.8mag 76P/West-Kohoutek-Ikemura 02:59:41.26 +16:41:51.8 13.9mag 78P/Gehrels 01:12:04.55 +03:58:23.2 15.5mag 88P/Howell 04:41:57.24 +29:58:13.7 15.2mag 93P/Lovas 02:31:56.27 +26:58:33.2 17.7mag 114P/Wiseman-Skiff 06:41:12.16 +33:09:46.0 15.6mag 123P/West-Hartley 09:43:22.19 +16:19:44.8 16.5mag 124P/Mrkos 03:52:32.49 +18:58:42.3 16.4mag 128P/Shoemaker-Holt 04:25:43.19 +18:53:26.1 17.7mag 131P/Mueller 05:41:02.85 +19:04:29.1 14.1mag 141P/Machholz 05:43:33.28 +17:24:48.1 14.1mag 141P-A/Machholz 04:34:02.36 +15:34:08.8 11.2mag 141P-D/Machholz 02:54:52.13 -25:15:37.4 17.0mag 161P/Hartley-IRAS 03:28:43.11 +22:11:40.8 14.9mag 162P/SidingSpring 19:36:37.97 +00:36:37.7 17.1mag 169P/NEAT 00:07:41.42 +01:40:48.7 17.9mag 220P/McNaught 16:55:14.23 -08:41:34.2 16.3mag 235P/LINEAR 07:25:44.01 +35:38:23.7 17.5mag 240P/NEAT 00:22:03.52 -04:07:13.7 16.5mag 260P/McNaught 03:53:38.35 +31:44:45.6 17.6mag 295P/LINEAR 23:24:55.76 -14:58:54.8 17.6mag 320P/McNaught 15:17:04.66 +08:13:02.1 17.4mag 391P/Kowalski 08:04:02.58 +20:50:40.6 17.9mag 450P/LONEOS 06:53:32.99 +41:58:22.3 17.8mag 493P/LONEOS -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 2.8K Jun 4 01:36 comets.txt ############################################################ List of recent ASAS-SN transients from https://www.astronomy.ohio-state.edu/asassn/transients.html : 20:07:38.15 -21:07:05.40 SN2026mho 2026-05-25.18 -1.12 11:29:42.55 +79:01:03.10 AT2026min 2026-05-24.21 16.63 11:44:32.95 -68:48:30.00 ASASSN-26no 2026-05-24 8.41 19:00:42.82 -48:31:01.60 ASASSN-26dp 2026-05-22.31 -3.28 14:23:56.59 -58:37:47.40 ASASSN-26dn 2026-05-20.01 14.59 11:24:54.06 +47:57:01.60 AT2026nma 2026-05-20.29 15.46 21:27:08.58 +33:24:38.10 AT2026lli 2026-05-19.34 15.86 00:31:01.41 -13:38:51.70 AT2026nad 2026-05-19.39 15.34 15:16:06.61 -79:16:32.40 ASASSN-26dm 2026-05-19.03 14.44 11:24:25.21 -59:23:19.10 ASASSN-26dl 2026-05-18.02 13.55 13:45:51.52 -53:16:01.00 ASASSN-26dk 2026-05-18.16 12.96 02:05:49.69 -30:29:09.60 ASASSN-26dh 2026-05-18.43 15.37 17:50:22.87 -39:42:33.90 ASASSN-26dj 2026-05-17.05 15.7 01:13:11.60 -33:25:16.10 ASASSN-26dg 2026-05-13.41 16.8 16:44:31.77 -27:15:18.40 AT2026mhn 2026-05-12.33 15.8 09:46:31.08 -33:41:51.00 ASASSN-26di 2026-05-12.14 14.63 21:23:11.57 -19:09:45.00 AT2026kwu 2026-05-12.26 16.9 14:20:14.30 -30:20:51.90 AT2026ktm 2026-05-12.06 17.21 14:41:39.01 -37:13:46.40 AT2026lkm 2026-05-11.18 16.89 12:59:50.45 -10:58:38.80 SN2026kep 2026-05-9.06 17.5 13:37:29.61 -29:50:30.90 AT2026lkd 2026-05-9.09 17.23 09:46:42.01 -14:52:03.60 SN2026kmo 2026-05-8.99 17.51 15:03:05.28 +22:02:03.40 AT2026lxf 2026-05-8.07 13.88 10:23:49.41 -20:57:25.30 ASASSN-26df 2026-05-8.21 16.52 22:14:40.56 +05:04:51.60 2026lda 2026-05-7.56 16.2 21:35:33.81 -14:05:16.30 ASASSN-26de 2026-05-6.29 14.51 16:21:48.82 -61:36:13.20 ASASSN-26dd 2026-05-5.21 15.15 14:26:40.22 -24:48:37.50 AT2026lig 2026-05-4.27 14.63 13:17:51.04 +30:25:13.50 SN2026kcp 2026-05-4.46 16.43 11:27:55.57 -13:38:56.90 SN2026kza 2026-05-1.08 15.59 22:28:27.10 +30:17:54.30 SN 2026fov 2026-04-29.6 14.36 21:00:10.71 -32:17:03.90 AT2026kis 2026-04-27.36 16.15 14:32:57.37 -58:13:26.40 ASASSN-26dc 2026-04-27.27 13.42 15:32:05.35 -43:54:34.60 ASASSN-26db 2026-04-27.37 16.06 16:34:34.97 -54:34:58.00 ASASSN-26da 2026-04-25.32 16.11 10:06:55.04 -01:13:49.70 SN2026jsg 2026-04-24.99 16.28 15:15:57.17 +56:18:32.80 SN2026kid 2026-04-24.52 -3.65 07:58:28.45 +57:03:42.40 AT2026kcf 2026-04-24.2 16.89 11:38:21.80 -50:43:06.50 SN2026jkb 2026-04-24.24 15.38 10:06:11.41 -39:41:04.20 AT2026dil 2026-04-24.2 16.85 14:21:40.08 +13:13:46.30 SN2026jlm 2026-04-22.16 15.12 10:53:55.52 -16:06:06.00 ASASSN-26cz 2026-04-22.28 16.29 20:07:38.15 -21:07:05.40 2026-05-25.18 -1.12 13:45:02.03 +15:17:14.50 ASASSN-26cy 2026-04-21.27 15.78 13:20:52.22 -35:57:03.60 AT2026jcm 2026-04-19.01 16.65 13:36:15.66 -36:53:48.40 SN 2026iqy 2026-04-18.92 17.31 06:34:01.33 -40:07:34.00 ASASSN-26cx 2026-04-19.07 16.16 23:33:57.97 -45:12:11.90 SN 2026idu 2026-04-19.41 15.9 12:10:50.92 +66:55:31.20 SN 2026icv 2026-04-17.14 16.03 21:36:59.06 -60:43:35.90 ASASSN-26cv 2026-04-17.35 -1.18 08:13:26.26 -27:07:30.50 ASASSN-26cw 2026-04-17.07 -1.01 14:49:14.13 -27:29:20.60 ASASSN-26cu 2026-04-16.06 14.03 17:21:59.44 -38:54:04.60 ASASSN-26ct 2026-04-14.4 15.15 15:25:54.99 +07:49:24.50 SN2026huo 2026-04-12.14 16.96 20:07:38.15 -21:07:05.40 2026-05-25.18 -1.12 12:23:20.40 +04:53:39.10 AT2026ixd 2026-04-12.14 17.65 17:46:09.76 -61:19:50.40 SN2026icy 2026-04-12.2 17.03 09:25:46.42 +02:13:46.30 SN2026gud 2026-04-11.98 16.49 16:52:15.46 -60:27:45.90 ASASSN-26cs 2026-04-12.4 15.5 04:20:55.37 -51:15:31.10 ASASSN-26cr 2026-04-12.01 15.37 22:25:39.35 +36:45:06.90 AT2026ihl 2026-04-10.48 14.21 19:40:44.94 +00:41:03.80 AT2026imw 2026-04-10.32 16.06 19:52:04.70 +05:53:33.50 ASASSN-26cq 2026-04-9.31 14.98 16:08:18.39 -64:11:08.80 ASASSN-26cp 2026-04-9.29 13.32 09:22:22.90 -61:02:43.70 SN2026idh 2026-04-7.97 16.34 05:06:54.12 -19:42:26.40 AT2026imr 2026-04-8 17.49 07:14:55.34 -36:03:21.40 AT2026hei 2026-04-8.12 16.7 21:35:33.14 -19:01:34.80 AT2026ihm 2026-04-8.36 16.7 04:28:24.08 -32:25:35.30 AT2026imo 2026-04-8.02 16.81 05:10:35.79 -39:38:40.80 SN 2026hnn 2026-04-7.04 17.07 09:54:32.04 -01:17:25.80 ASASSN-26cn 2026-04-7.01 15.58 07:46:24.43 -77:29:35.90 ASASSN-26co 2026-04-7.15 14.93 05:00:45.52 -29:51:06.20 AT2026hvw 2026-04-6.03 16.51 19:49:33.10 -23:37:11.00 ASASSN-26cl 2026-04-5.29 14.98 19:32:43.55 -22:39:33.40 ASASSN-26cm 2026-04-4.3 13.88 18:08:57.38 +76:48:23.60 ASASSN-26ck 2026-04-2.37 15.38 16:16:36.10 +44:52:30.20 AT2026hyy 2026-04-2.58 13.81 21:55:23.31 -34:48:53.90 ASASSN-26cj 2026-03-30.4 -1.47 11:19:50.70 -27:51:49.80 SN2026gvk 2026-03-30 15.48 11:53:57.02 -23:09:46.20 SN2026gzx 2026-03-28.75 15.27 07:13:46.14 -33:10:15.70 ASASSN-26ci 2026-03-28.15 15.14 09:03:36.09 -67:58:13.00 SN2026hkg 2026-03-28.19 15.82 07:03:00.72 +39:14:43.00 SN2026fin 2026-03-28.27 15.82 05:35:42.80 -63:44:05.50 ASASSN-26ch 2026-03-27.86 13.02 11:23:19.04 +34:22:38.00 SN2026fwt 2026-03-27.3 16.56 19:03:49.79 +37:04:05.20 ASASSN-26ce 2026-03-26.56 16.3 20:26:56.07 -52:54:06.50 AT2026hiy 2026-03-26.35 16.95 05:25:54.76 -30:15:35.80 ASASSN-26cg 2026-03-25.07 16.88 06:57:16.49 -26:54:37.20 SN2026fzb 2026-03-25.14 15.8 14:37:38.23 -43:00:52.30 ASASSN-26cd 2026-03-24.24 12.52 17:34:53.03 +06:04:29.70 AT2026gzl 2026-03-23.27 15.82 08:30:02.60 -35:12:47.50 ASASSN-26cf 2026-03-23.2 14.82 16:54:25.33 +37:49:56.60 SN 2026evz 2026-03-21.32 17.54 17:06:19.20 -18:54:19.50 ASASSN-26bx 2026-03-21.25 16.39 19:01:16.28 -29:29:23.10 ASASSN-26bw 2026-03-21.33 15.81 08:46:05.75 +10:47:39.80 ASASSN-26ca 2026-03-21.13 14.27 12:14:58.16 +63:47:16.20 SN 2026fvx 2026-03-21.12 15.6 18:02:55.90 -75:23:02.60 ASASSN-26bz 2026-03-21.32 16.16 12:16:02.88 -53:16:33.80 ASASSN-26cc 2026-03-20.04 15.48 13:08:21.85 +29:13:44.20 SN 2026fmh 2026-03-20.16 -0.33 -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 5.6K Jun 4 01:36 asassn_transients_list.txt ############################################################ Truncated list of TOCP transients from http://www.cbat.eps.harvard.edu/unconf/tocp.html : 17:57:19.56 -28:08:14.7 TCP J17571956-2808147 2026-03-19.7972 14.5mag 08:46:05.73 +10:47:39.7 TCP J08460573+1047397 2026-03-21.1936 14.5mag 09:55:38.83 +69:05:21.7 PNV J09553883+6905217 2026-04-01.893 19.4mag 19:32:43.67 -22:39:30.7 TCP J19324367-2239307 2026-04-05.4395 13.6mag 16:16:36.03 +44:52:28.9 TCP J16163603+4452289 2026-04-05.6655 14.2mag 00:43:38.36 +41:15:32.4 PNV J00433836+4115324 2026-04-08.079 17.2mag 15:41:11.68 +59:18:26.8 TCP J15411168+5918268 2026-04-12.9625 19.2mag 00:43:35.02 +41:46:28.0 PNV J00433502+4146280 2026-04-23.056 15.9mag 00:42:55.64 +41:14:12.2 PNV J00425564+4114122 2026-04-24.042 16.2mag 21:14:03.38 +56:46:44.1 TCP J21140338+5646441 2026-05-05.3534 16.7mag 15:03:05.19 +22:02:04.1 TCP J15030519+2202041 2026-05-08.3260 13.9mag 07:15:18.25 +47:53:16.7 TCP J07151825+4753167 2026-05-09.1599 14.4mag 16:00:18.44 -22:30:10.6 TCP J16001844-2230106 2026-05-09.6135 13.3mag 00:42:47.45 +41:16:58.5 PNV J00424745+4116585 2026-05-10.030 16.8mag 09:55:02.89 +69:02:13.8 PNV J09550289+6902138 2026-05-18.925 20.7mag 00:43:01.82 +41:18:16.6 PNV J00430182+4118166 2026-05-21.8651 18.83Cmag 00:42:51.20 +41:16:59.4 PNV J00425120+4116594 2022-10-26.135 19.3mag 12:24:25.10 +28:47:12.0 TCP J12242510+2847120 2026-05-31.6015 14.8mag 00:56:07.13 +43:01:40.6 TCP J00560713+4301406 2026-06-01.4135 12.2mag 00:42:41.64 +41:15:16.2 PNV J00424164+4115162 2026-06-02.029 17.4mag -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 189K Jun 4 01:36 tocp_transients_list.txt ############################################################ Truncated list of recent TNS transients from https://www.wis-tns.org/ : 12:20:32.725 +19:21:21.55 AT 2026nlr 2026-05-22.24 20.3755 22:11:38.972 +01:58:18.38 AT 2026nlq 2026-05-21.46 20.412 14:13:39.867 -00:12:14.17 AT 2026nlp 2026-05-20.35 20.1718 20:29:49.048 +01:20:48.06 AT 2026nlo 2026-05-19.39 20.2943 01:58:34.577 +44:34:32.49 AT 2026nln 2026-05-23.48 17.464 00:09:19.630 +10:35:22.07 AT 2026nlm 2026-05-20.48 18.9664 00:31:41.797 +26:10:30.85 AT 2026nll 2026-05-23.48 19.3138 16:14:03.050 +15:19:38.66 AT 2026nlk 2026-05-16.86 20.93 18:17:15.360 +39:41:22.36 AT 2026nlj 2026-05-10.79 21.53 18:22:21.260 +38:36:15.52 AT 2026nli 2026-05-10.79 21.62 16:23:29.410 +22:48:47.18 AT 2026nlh 2026-05-09.79 20.01 15:19:37.260 +16:28:58.23 AT 2026nlg 2026-05-05.84 20.81 14:31:09.520 +24:03:04.31 AT 2026nlf 2026-04-30.86 19.85 15:33:35.050 +31:50:53.87 AT 2026nle 2026-04-19.90 20.71 15:15:31.740 +19:01:13.96 AT 2026nld 2026-04-19.89 20.52 14:33:02.080 +03:34:42.30 AT 2026nlc 2026-05-21.70 21.81 14:21:55.000 -01:06:15.74 AT 2026nlb 2026-05-21.70 21.58 14:21:48.580 +02:02:28.28 AT 2026nla 2026-05-21.70 21.97 14:34:15.890 +04:48:10.98 AT 2026nkz 2026-05-21.66 22.11 13:25:52.490 +02:32:04.69 AT 2026nky 2026-05-21.62 21.92 -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 30K Jun 4 01:36 tns_transients_list.txt

Profiling:

CPU temperature: 89 C