## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref.  image: 2461093.74107906 22.02.2026 05:46:59.231   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-46-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0236.fits
First image: 2461093.74107906 22.02.2026 05:46:59.231   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-46-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0236.fits
Last  image: 2461195.72063838 04.06.2026 05:17:33.156   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-04_CI_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_002813_TTUQ1b1x1_2440574_vsB72YSr/fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_00-17-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0120.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 4
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.:  -7.46
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 6 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA  10.0             # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH   10.0             #  or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0             #  or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL     55000.0         # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN            0.37            # detector gain in e-/ADU
Total objects detected (at least 2 times):  7510
Objects passed selection criteria:  7474
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max):    3.0    3.0    2    4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max):    3.0    3.0    2    4
Average stars detected per image: 5909.25
Average stars matched: 5745.75 (97.2332 %)
Memory usage VmPeak:   113212 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on  Mon Jun  1 15:05:05 CDT 2026
VaST build number  1.0rc89-85-g6dfb2809
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-06-01)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on  Thu Jun  4 00:34:18 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref.  image: 2461093.74107906 22.02.2026 05:46:59.231   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-46-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0236.fits
First image: 2461093.74107906 22.02.2026 05:46:59.231   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-46-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0236.fits
Last  image: 2461195.72063838 04.06.2026 05:17:33.156   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-04_CI_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_002813_TTUQ1b1x1_2440574_vsB72YSr/fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_00-17-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0120.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 28
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.:  -7.20
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 19 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA  2.0             # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH   3.0             #  or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0             #  or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL     57000.0         # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN            0.83            # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
Total objects detected (at least 2 times):  38809
Objects passed selection criteria:  38710
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max):    3.1    4.0    2    4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max):    3.1    4.0    2    4
Average stars detected per image: 31759.5
Average stars matched: 30742.2 (96.797 %)
Memory usage VmPeak:   140388 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on  Mon Jun  1 15:05:05 CDT 2026
VaST build number  1.0rc89-85-g6dfb2809
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-06-01)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on  Thu Jun  4 00:36:45 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################

######## Processing parameters ########
AAVSO_COMMENT_STRING= NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
ASTCHECK_ASTEROID_SEARCH_RADIUS_ARCSEC= 
BAD_REGION_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst
CAMERA_SETTINGS= TTUQ1b1x1
CHECK_POINTING_ACCURACY= yes
DARK_FRAMES_DIR_OR_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks
EXCLUSION_LIST= ../exclusion_list_TTUQ1.txt
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MAX_APERTURE_STAR_SIZE_PIX= 12.5
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MAX_ELONGATION_AminusB_PIX= 0.55
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MIN_APERTURE_STAR_SIZE_PIX= 2.0
FILTER_BRIGHT_MAG_CUTOFF_TRANSIENT_SEARCH= -5
FILTER_FAINT_MAG_CUTOFF_TRANSIENT_SEARCH= 15.0
FLAT_FIELD_DIR_OR_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats
FRAME_EDGE_OFFSET_PIX= 100
GAIA_BAND_FOR_CATALOGED_SOURCE_CHECK= 
MAX_NEW_TO_REF_MEAN_IMG_VALUE_RATIO= 100
MAX_NEW_IMG_MEAN_VALUE= 25000
MAX_SD_RATIO_OF_SECOND_EPOCH_IMGS= 0.18
MAX_SD_RATIO_OF_SECOND_EPOCH_IMGS_SOFT_LIMIT= 0.12
MPC_CODE= V36
NMW_CALIBRATION= /var/www/nmw_calibration
NUMBER_OF_DETECTED_TRANSIENTS_BEFORE_FILTERING_HARD_LIMIT= 8000
NUMBER_OF_DETECTED_TRANSIENTS_BEFORE_FILTERING_SOFT_LIMIT= 4000
OMP_NUM_THREADS= 
ONLINE_MPCHECKER_BUTTON_ASTEROID_SEARCH_RADIUS_ARCMIN= 
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION= 
REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES= yes
SEXTRACTOR_CONFIG_BRIGHTSTARPASS= default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
SEXTRACTOR_CONFIG_FILES= default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
STARMATCH_RADIUS_PIX= 3.5
SYSREM_ITERATIONS= 0
TELESCOP= 
TELESCOP_NAME_KNOWN_TO_VaST_FOR_FOV_DETERMINATION= 
UCAC5_PLATESOLVE_ITERATIONS= 2
FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE= no
#######################################
HOSTNAME= tau
USER= 
HOME= 
#######################################
SExtractor catalog cache: enabled, directory /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/vast_sextractor_cache
Reference image directory is set to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs
VIZIER_SITE=vizier.cds.unistra.fr
GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=vizquery (lib/vizquery -> VizieR vizier.cds.unistra.fr)
INFO: MAKE_PNG_PLOTS is set to yes
FITS_FILE_EXT=fits
CALIBRATION_STATUS_PREFIX=
Fields in the data directory: 
LMi-01-Q1b1x1
#######################################
########### Starting LMi-01-Q1b1x1 ###########
Processing LMi-01-Q1b1x1
server tau has sufficient free disk space available: 519860 MB at /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir
server tau has sufficient free disk space available: 519860 MB at .
Checking input images (2 new)
REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE= /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-46-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0236.fits
REFERENCE_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE= /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-47-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits
Small preview (one of the new images): 

Large previews of the second-epoch (new) images:

MAKE_PNG_PLOTS=yes


renamed 'LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_00-16-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119.png' -> 'transient_report/LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_00-16-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119.fits_preview.png'

LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_00-16-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119.fits


renamed 'LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_00-17-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0120.png' -> 'transient_report/LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_00-17-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0120.fits_preview.png'

LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_00-17-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0120.fits




Read-check the input FITS images... read-check OK
Blank image check the input FITS images... blank-image-check OK
Read date check the input FITS images... read-date-check OK
Mean value check the input FITS images... OK, at least two new images have mean values below the threshold.
----------------------------------------------
INFO: REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 446.3853
INFO:         REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_SD= 557.4480
INFO:    SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 1740.1196
INFO:            SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_SD= 542.9149
INFO:   SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 1754.3454
INFO:           SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE_SD= 544.5108
----------------------------------------------
INFO:      ref_to_second_epoch_img_mean_ratio= 3.89825
INFO:                  SECOND_EPOCH__SD_ratio= 0.003
----------------------------------------------
Calibration settings: DARK_FRAMES_DIR_OR_FILE=/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks FLAT_FIELD_DIR_OR_FILE=/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats
EXPTIME =                 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration
SET-TEMP=                  0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint
CCD-TEMP=                 -0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature
FOCTEMP =     22.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature
AMBTEMP =                 20.3 / [degC] Ambient air temperature
Exploring image header: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-04_CI_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_002813_TTUQ1b1x1_2440574_vsB72YSr/LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_00-16-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119.fits 
CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-04_CI_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_002813_TTUQ1b1x1_2440574_vsB72YSr/LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_00-16-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119.fits
SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-04_CI_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_002813_TTUQ1b1x1_2440574_vsB72YSr/LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_00-16-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119.fits
Header: 74 keys total, 33 keys left
Record 0: "" status=0
Record 1: "SIMPLE  =                    T / C# FITS" status=0
Record 2: "BITPIX  =                   16" status=0
Record 3: "NAXIS   =                    2 / Dimensionality" status=0
Record 4: "NAXIS1  =                 9576" status=0
Record 5: "NAXIS2  =                 6388" status=0
Record 6: "BZERO   =                32768" status=0
Record 7: "EXTEND  =                    T / Extensions are permitted" status=0
Record 8: "IMAGETYP= 'LIGHT'              / Type of exposure" status=0
Record 9: "EXPOSURE=                 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0
Record 10: "EXPTIME =                 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0
Record 11: "DATE-LOC= '2026-06-04T00:16:53.5745258' / Time of observation (local)" status=0
Record 12: "DATE-OBS= '2026-06-04T05:16:53.5745258' / Time of observation (UTC)" status=0
Record 13: "MJD-OBS =     61195.2200645139 / Modified Julian Date of observation" status=0
Record 14: "DATE-AVG= '2026-06-04T05:17:03.4765507' / Averaged midpoint time (UTC)" status=0
Record 15: "MJD-AVG =     61195.2201791205 / Modified Julian Date of averaged midpoint" status=0
Record 16: "XBINNING=                    1 / X axis binning factor" status=0
Record 17: "YBINNING=                    1 / Y axis binning factor" status=0
Record 18: "GAIN    =                   30 / Sensor gain" status=0
Record 19: "OFFSET  =                   30 / Sensor gain offset" status=0
Record 20: "XPIXSZ  =                 3.76 / [um] Pixel X axis size" status=0
Record 21: "YPIXSZ  =                 3.76 / [um] Pixel Y axis size" status=0
Record 22: "INSTRUME= 'QHY600M'            / Imaging instrument name" status=0
Record 23: "CAMERAID= 'QHY600M-33d3d743814b8b447' / Imaging instrument identifier" status=0
Record 24: "SET-TEMP=                  0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint" status=0
Record 25: "CCD-TEMP=                 -0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature" status=0
Record 26: "READOUTM= '2CMS-0'             / Sensor readout mode" status=0
Record 27: "USBLIMIT=                   50 / Camera-specific USB setting" status=0
Record 28: "TELESCOP= 'QHY600M-TTU1'       / Name of telescope" status=0
Record 29: "FOCALLEN=                135.0 / [mm] Focal length" status=0
Record 30: "FOCRATIO=                  2.2 / Focal ratio" status=0
Record 31: "RA      =      147.26919570187 / [deg] RA of telescope" status=0
Record 32: "DEC     =     38.0001901528317 / [deg] Declination of telescope" status=0
Record 33: "CENTALT =     25.3736111111111 / [deg] Altitude of telescope" status=0
Record 34: "CENTAZ  =     300.026666666667 / [deg] Azimuth of telescope" status=0
Record 35: "AIRMASS =     2.32360041450441 / Airmass at frame center (Gueymard 1993)" status=0
Record 36: "PIERSIDE= 'East'               / Telescope pointing state" status=0
Record 37: "SITEELEV=               1015.0 / [m] Observation site elevation" status=0
Record 38: "SITELAT =     33.7480555555556 / [deg] Observation site latitude" status=0
Record 39: "SITELONG=    -101.958333333333 / [deg] Observation site longitude" status=0
Record 40: "OBSERVER= 'Sokolovsky'         / Observer name" status=0
Record 41: "OBSERVAT= 'TTU Skyview'        / Observatory name" status=0
Record 42: "SITENAME= ''                   / Observatory site name" status=0
Record 43: "FWHEEL  = 'Simulator'          / Filter Wheel name" status=0
Record 44: "FILTER  = 'CV'                 / Active filter name" status=0
Record 45: "OBJECT  = 'LMi-01'             / Name of the object of interest" status=0
Record 46: "OBJCTRA = '09 49 06'           / [H M S] RA of imaged object" status=0
Record 47: "OBJCTDEC= '+38 00 00'          / [D M S] Declination of imaged object" status=0
Record 48: "OBJCTROT=                  0.0 / [deg] planned rotation of imaged object" status=0
Record 49: "FOCNAME = 'ZWO Focuser'        / Focusing equipment name" status=0
Record 50: "FOCPOS  =                29468 / [step] Focuser position" status=0
Record 51: "FOCUSPOS=                29468 / [step] Focuser position" status=0
Record 52: "FOCUSSZ =                  0.0 / [um] Focuser step size" status=0
Record 53: "FOCTEMP =     22.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0
Record 54: "FOCUSTEM=     22.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0
Record 55: "DEWPOINT=                 15.9 / [degC] Dew point" status=0
Record 56: "HUMIDITY=                 76.0 / [percent] Relative humidity" status=0
Record 57: "PRESSURE=               903.01 / [hPa] Air pressure" status=0
Record 58: "AMBTEMP =                 20.3 / [degC] Ambient air temperature" status=0
Record 59: "WINDDIR =                 20.0 / [deg] Wind direction: 0=N, 180=S, 90=E, 270=W" status=0
Record 60: "WINDGUST=             9.400752 / [kph] Wind gust" status=0
Record 61: "WINDSPD =             5.400432 / [kph] Wind speed" status=0
Record 62: "ROWORDER= 'TOP-DOWN'           / FITS Image Orientation" status=0
Record 63: "EQUINOX =               2000.0 / Equinox of celestial coordinate system" status=0
Record 64: "SWCREATE= 'N.I.N.A. 3.2.0.9001 (x64)' / Software that created this file" status=0
Record 65: "QHY_EXP =            20.000096 / [s] Actual exposure time" status=0
Record 66: "QHY_PP  =              13888.0 / [ps] pixelPeriod" status=0
Record 67: "QHY_LP  =              85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0
Record 68: "GPS_LP  =              85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0
Record 69: "QHY_FP  =           20000160.0 / [us] framePeriod" status=0
Record 70: "QHY_CPL =               6120.0 / clocksPerLine" status=0
Record 71: "QHY_LPF =             235295.0 / linesPerFrame" status=0
Record 72: "QHY_AET =           20000096.0 / [us] actualExposureTime" status=0
Record 73: "QHY_LEM =                    T / isLongExposureMode" status=0
Record 74: "QHY_OFF0=             3767.777 / [us] RollingShutterEndOffset row 0" status=0
Allocating memory for image, dark and result arrays...
Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-04_CI_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_002813_TTUQ1b1x1_2440574_vsB72YSr/LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_00-16-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119.fits 9576 6388  16 bitpix
SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-04_CI_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_002813_TTUQ1b1x1_2440574_vsB72YSr/LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_00-16-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119.fits
SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_5C_20s_2026-05-30.fit
CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-04_CI_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_002813_TTUQ1b1x1_2440574_vsB72YSr/LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_00-16-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119.fits
CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_5C_20s_2026-05-30.fit
Reading dark frame /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_5C_20s_2026-05-30.fit 9576 6388  16 bitpix
Dark frame is subtracted, output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-04_CI_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_002813_TTUQ1b1x1_2440574_vsB72YSr/d_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_00-16-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119.fits :)

Spent 0.820627 seconds 
renamed 'mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_5C_20s_2026-05-30.png' -> 'transient_report/dark.png'
try_to_calibrate_the_input_frame(): selected flat field /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-05-30.fit from directory /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats
MegaDivider v7
Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-04_CI_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_002813_TTUQ1b1x1_2440574_vsB72YSr/d_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_00-16-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119.fits 9576 6388  16 bitpix
Reading flat /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-05-30.fit 9576 6388  16 bitpix
Avarage count on flat field image: 31267.409145
Minimal real count (from overscan): 5
Output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-04_CI_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_002813_TTUQ1b1x1_2440574_vsB72YSr/fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_00-16-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119.fits :)


No overscan detected - all values seem high! (left_median=21677.0, right_median=21704.0)
renamed 'mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-05-30.png' -> 'transient_report/flat.png'
Using calibrated image CALIBRATED_SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-04_CI_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_002813_TTUQ1b1x1_2440574_vsB72YSr/fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_00-16-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119.fits
EXPTIME =                 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration
SET-TEMP=                  0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint
CCD-TEMP=                 -0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature
FOCTEMP =     22.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature
AMBTEMP =                 20.3 / [degC] Ambient air temperature
Exploring image header: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-04_CI_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_002813_TTUQ1b1x1_2440574_vsB72YSr/LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_00-17-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0120.fits 
CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-04_CI_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_002813_TTUQ1b1x1_2440574_vsB72YSr/LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_00-17-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0120.fits
SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-04_CI_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_002813_TTUQ1b1x1_2440574_vsB72YSr/LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_00-17-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0120.fits
Header: 74 keys total, 33 keys left
Record 0: "" status=0
Record 1: "SIMPLE  =                    T / C# FITS" status=0
Record 2: "BITPIX  =                   16" status=0
Record 3: "NAXIS   =                    2 / Dimensionality" status=0
Record 4: "NAXIS1  =                 9576" status=0
Record 5: "NAXIS2  =                 6388" status=0
Record 6: "BZERO   =                32768" status=0
Record 7: "EXTEND  =                    T / Extensions are permitted" status=0
Record 8: "IMAGETYP= 'LIGHT'              / Type of exposure" status=0
Record 9: "EXPOSURE=                 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0
Record 10: "EXPTIME =                 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0
Record 11: "DATE-LOC= '2026-06-04T00:17:33.1566697' / Time of observation (local)" status=0
Record 12: "DATE-OBS= '2026-06-04T05:17:33.1566697' / Time of observation (UTC)" status=0
Record 13: "MJD-OBS =     61195.2205226389 / Modified Julian Date of observation" status=0
Record 14: "DATE-AVG= '2026-06-04T05:17:43.0588963' / Averaged midpoint time (UTC)" status=0
Record 15: "MJD-AVG =     61195.2206372456 / Modified Julian Date of averaged midpoint" status=0
Record 16: "XBINNING=                    1 / X axis binning factor" status=0
Record 17: "YBINNING=                    1 / Y axis binning factor" status=0
Record 18: "GAIN    =                   30 / Sensor gain" status=0
Record 19: "OFFSET  =                   30 / Sensor gain offset" status=0
Record 20: "XPIXSZ  =                 3.76 / [um] Pixel X axis size" status=0
Record 21: "YPIXSZ  =                 3.76 / [um] Pixel Y axis size" status=0
Record 22: "INSTRUME= 'QHY600M'            / Imaging instrument name" status=0
Record 23: "CAMERAID= 'QHY600M-33d3d743814b8b447' / Imaging instrument identifier" status=0
Record 24: "SET-TEMP=                  0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint" status=0
Record 25: "CCD-TEMP=                 -0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature" status=0
Record 26: "READOUTM= '2CMS-0'             / Sensor readout mode" status=0
Record 27: "USBLIMIT=                   50 / Camera-specific USB setting" status=0
Record 28: "TELESCOP= 'QHY600M-TTU1'       / Name of telescope" status=0
Record 29: "FOCALLEN=                135.0 / [mm] Focal length" status=0
Record 30: "FOCRATIO=                  2.2 / Focal ratio" status=0
Record 31: "RA      =     147.269195717437 / [deg] RA of telescope" status=0
Record 32: "DEC     =     38.0001901541155 / [deg] Declination of telescope" status=0
Record 33: "CENTALT =     25.2530555555556 / [deg] Altitude of telescope" status=0
Record 34: "CENTAZ  =     300.086944444444 / [deg] Azimuth of telescope" status=0
Record 35: "AIRMASS =     2.33384679967867 / Airmass at frame center (Gueymard 1993)" status=0
Record 36: "PIERSIDE= 'East'               / Telescope pointing state" status=0
Record 37: "SITEELEV=               1015.0 / [m] Observation site elevation" status=0
Record 38: "SITELAT =     33.7480555555556 / [deg] Observation site latitude" status=0
Record 39: "SITELONG=    -101.958333333333 / [deg] Observation site longitude" status=0
Record 40: "OBSERVER= 'Sokolovsky'         / Observer name" status=0
Record 41: "OBSERVAT= 'TTU Skyview'        / Observatory name" status=0
Record 42: "SITENAME= ''                   / Observatory site name" status=0
Record 43: "FWHEEL  = 'Simulator'          / Filter Wheel name" status=0
Record 44: "FILTER  = 'CV'                 / Active filter name" status=0
Record 45: "OBJECT  = 'LMi-01'             / Name of the object of interest" status=0
Record 46: "OBJCTRA = '09 49 06'           / [H M S] RA of imaged object" status=0
Record 47: "OBJCTDEC= '+38 00 00'          / [D M S] Declination of imaged object" status=0
Record 48: "OBJCTROT=                  0.0 / [deg] planned rotation of imaged object" status=0
Record 49: "FOCNAME = 'ZWO Focuser'        / Focusing equipment name" status=0
Record 50: "FOCPOS  =                29468 / [step] Focuser position" status=0
Record 51: "FOCUSPOS=                29468 / [step] Focuser position" status=0
Record 52: "FOCUSSZ =                  0.0 / [um] Focuser step size" status=0
Record 53: "FOCTEMP =     22.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0
Record 54: "FOCUSTEM=     22.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0
Record 55: "DEWPOINT=                 15.9 / [degC] Dew point" status=0
Record 56: "HUMIDITY=                 76.0 / [percent] Relative humidity" status=0
Record 57: "PRESSURE=               903.01 / [hPa] Air pressure" status=0
Record 58: "AMBTEMP =                 20.3 / [degC] Ambient air temperature" status=0
Record 59: "WINDDIR =                 20.0 / [deg] Wind direction: 0=N, 180=S, 90=E, 270=W" status=0
Record 60: "WINDGUST=             9.400752 / [kph] Wind gust" status=0
Record 61: "WINDSPD =             5.400432 / [kph] Wind speed" status=0
Record 62: "ROWORDER= 'TOP-DOWN'           / FITS Image Orientation" status=0
Record 63: "EQUINOX =               2000.0 / Equinox of celestial coordinate system" status=0
Record 64: "SWCREATE= 'N.I.N.A. 3.2.0.9001 (x64)' / Software that created this file" status=0
Record 65: "QHY_EXP =            20.000096 / [s] Actual exposure time" status=0
Record 66: "QHY_PP  =              13888.0 / [ps] pixelPeriod" status=0
Record 67: "QHY_LP  =              85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0
Record 68: "GPS_LP  =              85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0
Record 69: "QHY_FP  =           20000160.0 / [us] framePeriod" status=0
Record 70: "QHY_CPL =               6120.0 / clocksPerLine" status=0
Record 71: "QHY_LPF =             235295.0 / linesPerFrame" status=0
Record 72: "QHY_AET =           20000096.0 / [us] actualExposureTime" status=0
Record 73: "QHY_LEM =                    T / isLongExposureMode" status=0
Record 74: "QHY_OFF0=             3767.777 / [us] RollingShutterEndOffset row 0" status=0
Allocating memory for image, dark and result arrays...
Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-04_CI_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_002813_TTUQ1b1x1_2440574_vsB72YSr/LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_00-17-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0120.fits 9576 6388  16 bitpix
SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-04_CI_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_002813_TTUQ1b1x1_2440574_vsB72YSr/LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_00-17-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0120.fits
SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_5C_20s_2026-05-30.fit
CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-04_CI_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_002813_TTUQ1b1x1_2440574_vsB72YSr/LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_00-17-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0120.fits
CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_5C_20s_2026-05-30.fit
Reading dark frame /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_5C_20s_2026-05-30.fit 9576 6388  16 bitpix
Dark frame is subtracted, output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-04_CI_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_002813_TTUQ1b1x1_2440574_vsB72YSr/d_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_00-17-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0120.fits :)

Spent 0.966685 seconds 
renamed 'mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_5C_20s_2026-05-30.png' -> 'transient_report/dark.png'
try_to_calibrate_the_input_frame(): selected flat field /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-05-30.fit from directory /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats
MegaDivider v7
Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-04_CI_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_002813_TTUQ1b1x1_2440574_vsB72YSr/d_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_00-17-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0120.fits 9576 6388  16 bitpix
Reading flat /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-05-30.fit 9576 6388  16 bitpix
Avarage count on flat field image: 31267.409145
Minimal real count (from overscan): 5
Output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-04_CI_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_002813_TTUQ1b1x1_2440574_vsB72YSr/fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_00-17-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0120.fits :)


No overscan detected - all values seem high! (left_median=21677.0, right_median=21704.0)
renamed 'mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-05-30.png' -> 'transient_report/flat.png'
Using calibrated image CALIBRATED_SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-04_CI_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_002813_TTUQ1b1x1_2440574_vsB72YSr/fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_00-17-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0120.fits
Dark frame used to calibrate the second-epoch images:



Flat field used to calibrate the second-epoch images:



after the calibration attempt:
SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-04_CI_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_002813_TTUQ1b1x1_2440574_vsB72YSr/fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_00-16-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119.fits
SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-04_CI_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_002813_TTUQ1b1x1_2440574_vsB72YSr/fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_00-17-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0120.fits
Previews of the CALIBRATED second-epoch images:


fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_00-16-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119.fits



fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_00-17-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0120.fits




Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1

  ./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 3.5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-46-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0236.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-47-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-04_CI_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_002813_TTUQ1b1x1_2440574_vsB72YSr/fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_00-16-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-04_CI_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_002813_TTUQ1b1x1_2440574_vsB72YSr/fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_00-17-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0120.fits
  
SExtractor catalog cache: saved LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-46-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0236.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-47-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-46-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0236.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-47-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-04_CI_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_002813_TTUQ1b1x1_2440574_vsB72YSr/fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_00-16-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-04_CI_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_002813_TTUQ1b1x1_2440574_vsB72YSr/fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_00-17-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0120.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461195.72018025
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-46-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0236.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-46-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0236.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-46-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0236.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-46-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0236.fits'
wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-47-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-47-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-47-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-47-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits'
wcs_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_00-16-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_00-16-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_00-16-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_00-16-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119.fits'
wcs_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_00-17-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0120.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_00-17-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0120.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_00-17-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0120.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_00-17-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0120.fits'
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-46-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0236.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-46-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0236.fits
Image size: 941.6'x627.1'  15.7(deg)x10.5(deg)  9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 09:49:05.463 +38:00:01.89 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_00-16-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_00-16-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119.fits
Image size: 941.8'x626.6'  15.7(deg)x10.4(deg)  9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 09:49:21.038 +38:00:59.84 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 09:49:05.463 +38:00:01.89
Second-epoch image center 09:49:21.038 +38:00:59.84
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0536 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg.  Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_00-17-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0120.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_00-17-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0120.fits
Image size: 941.8'x626.6'  15.7(deg)x10.4(deg)  9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 09:49:19.467 +38:01:20.28 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 09:49:05.463 +38:00:01.89
Second-epoch image center 09:49:19.467 +38:01:20.28
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0509 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center  09:49:21.038 +38:00:59.84
Second-epoch second image center 09:49:19.467 +38:01:20.28
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00767 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running  util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2  /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-46-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0236.fits &> /tmp/tmp.B0Upx1vQRn
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-46-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0236.fits
Running  util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2  /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-47-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits &> /tmp/tmp.Bpozuxpq9F
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-47-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits
Running  util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2  /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-04_CI_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_002813_TTUQ1b1x1_2440574_vsB72YSr/fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_00-16-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119.fits &> /tmp/tmp.41volXLZTk
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-04_CI_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_002813_TTUQ1b1x1_2440574_vsB72YSr/fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_00-16-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119.fits
Running  util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2  /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-04_CI_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_002813_TTUQ1b1x1_2440574_vsB72YSr/fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_00-17-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0120.fits &> /tmp/tmp.zCSxIkCHlP
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-04_CI_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_002813_TTUQ1b1x1_2440574_vsB72YSr/fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_00-17-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0120.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-46-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0236.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-46-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0236.fits and wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-46-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0236.fits.cat 
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-46-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0236.fits and wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-46-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0236.fits.cat 
Found non-empty wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-46-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0236.fits and wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-46-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0236.fits.cat
The reference image (wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-46-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0236.fits) and catalog (wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-46-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0236.fits.cat) found
'wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-46-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0236.fits.cat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 7740 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 136.3433 to 157.6109 deg, Dec +32.0100 to +43.3731 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 136.3433 to 157.6109 deg, Dec 32.0100 to 43.3731 deg
Loaded 5376 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3731 out of 3967 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3967 out of 7740 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.916600
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.916600
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.:  -7.46
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.:  15.46

Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed!  =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.:  15.46

Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:


Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 7740 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 136.3433 to 157.6109 deg, Dec +32.0100 to +43.3731 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 136.3433 to 157.6109 deg, Dec 32.0100 to 43.3731 deg
Loaded 5376 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3731 out of 3967 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3967 out of 7740 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-46-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0236.fits via Tycho-2

Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-46-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0236.fits:


Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-46-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0236.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-46-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0236.fits (aperture=6.4)
Read 7724 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 136.3436 to 157.6108 deg, Dec +32.0331 to +43.3964 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 136.3436 to 157.6108 deg, Dec 32.0331 to 43.3964 deg
Loaded 5377 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3728 out of 3970 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3970 out of 7724 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-47-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits via Tycho-2

Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-47-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits:


Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-47-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-47-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits (aperture=6.4)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 4 candidate transients before the final filtering.  (Hard limit: 8000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
 2.2 pix  LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-46-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0236.fits
 2.2 pix  LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-47-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits
 2.5 pix  fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_00-16-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119.fits
 2.5 pix  fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_00-17-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0120.fits
 2.2 pix  wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-46-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0236.fits
 2.2 pix  wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-47-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
 15.5 mag.  LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-46-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0236.fits
 15.5 mag.  LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-47-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits
 14.5 mag.  fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_00-16-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119.fits
 14.4 mag.  fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_00-17-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0120.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate:  14.4 (SNR )  11.6 (80% of stars)  with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of  following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50). 
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image. 
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.B0Upx1vQRn (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-04_CI_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_002813_TTUQ1b1x1_2440574_vsB72YSr/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-46-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0236.fits 570.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-46-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0236.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-46-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0236.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-46-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0236.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-46-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0236.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-46-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0236.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-46-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0236.fits' -> 'wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-46-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0236.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-46-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0236.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-46-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0236.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-46-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0236.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-46-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0236.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-46-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0236.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-46-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0236.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-46-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0236.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-46-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0236.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-46-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0236.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-46-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0236.fits.cat 
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=564, passed=7740
Got 7740 stars (including 7160 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-46-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0236.fits.cat 
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 7740 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec)
                    catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
                    catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec)

ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 610 to 668 (Dec 32.0 to 43.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 943 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 943 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 929 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36" 
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 943 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7632 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36" 

ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 610 to 668 (Dec 32.0 to 43.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 943 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 943 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7630 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36" 
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 943 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7630 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37" 
Excluding outliers - 943 stars left (next iteration limit 1037)
Stop iterations.


 The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)

WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-46-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0236.fits N_match=943 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.383 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.432 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.438 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.402 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.296 n_q1=235 n_q2=215 n_q3=244 n_q4=249 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.143
The image catalog is written to wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-46-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0236.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-46-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0236.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
 ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-46-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0236.fits -region wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-46-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0236.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-46-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0236.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.Bpozuxpq9F (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-04_CI_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_002813_TTUQ1b1x1_2440574_vsB72YSr/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-47-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits 570.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-47-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-47-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-47-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-47-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-47-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-47-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits' -> 'wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-47-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-47-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-47-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-47-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-47-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-47-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-47-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-47-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-47-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-47-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-47-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits.cat 
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=572, passed=7724
Got 7724 stars (including 7147 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-47-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits.cat 
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 7724 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec)
                    catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
                    catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec)

ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 610 to 668 (Dec 32.0 to 43.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 940 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 940 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 926 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38" 
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 940 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7638 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38" 

ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 610 to 668 (Dec 32.0 to 43.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 940 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 940 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7638 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38" 
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 940 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7638 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38" 
Excluding outliers - 940 stars left (next iteration limit 1034)
Stop iterations.


 The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)

WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-47-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits N_match=940 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.402 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.491 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.378 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.418 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.347 n_q1=230 n_q2=211 n_q3=252 n_q4=247 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.220
The image catalog is written to wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-47-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-47-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
 ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-47-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits -region wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-47-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-47-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.41volXLZTk (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-04_CI_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_002813_TTUQ1b1x1_2440574_vsB72YSr/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-04_CI_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_002813_TTUQ1b1x1_2440574_vsB72YSr/fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_00-16-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-04_CI_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_002813_TTUQ1b1x1_2440574_vsB72YSr/fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_00-16-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-04_CI_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_002813_TTUQ1b1x1_2440574_vsB72YSr/fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_00-16-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-04_CI_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_002813_TTUQ1b1x1_2440574_vsB72YSr/fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_00-16-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-04_CI_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_002813_TTUQ1b1x1_2440574_vsB72YSr/fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_00-16-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-04_CI_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_002813_TTUQ1b1x1_2440574_vsB72YSr/fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_00-16-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_00-16-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_00-16-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_00-16-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_00-16-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_00-16-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_00-16-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_00-16-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-04_CI_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_002813_TTUQ1b1x1_2440574_vsB72YSr/fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_00-16-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_00-16-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119.fits.cat 
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=254, passed=4176
Got 4176 stars (including 3919 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_00-16-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119.fits.cat 
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 4176 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.8'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.8 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013081 (47.1 arcsec)
                    catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
                    catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010464 (37.7 arcsec)

ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 610 to 669 (Dec 32.0 to 43.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 942 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 942 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 938 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31" 
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 942 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4142 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31" 

ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 610 to 669 (Dec 32.0 to 43.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 942 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 942 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4142 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31" 
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 942 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4142 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32" 
Excluding outliers - 942 stars left (next iteration limit 1036)
Stop iterations.


 The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)

WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_00-16-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119.fits N_match=942 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.342 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.330 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.374 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.293 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.351 n_q1=242 n_q2=253 n_q3=213 n_q4=234 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.095
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_00-16-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_00-16-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
 ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-04_CI_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_002813_TTUQ1b1x1_2440574_vsB72YSr/fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_00-16-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119.fits -region wcs_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_00-16-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_00-16-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.zCSxIkCHlP (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-04_CI_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_002813_TTUQ1b1x1_2440574_vsB72YSr/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-04_CI_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_002813_TTUQ1b1x1_2440574_vsB72YSr/fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_00-17-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0120.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-04_CI_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_002813_TTUQ1b1x1_2440574_vsB72YSr/fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_00-17-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0120.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-04_CI_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_002813_TTUQ1b1x1_2440574_vsB72YSr/fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_00-17-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0120.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-04_CI_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_002813_TTUQ1b1x1_2440574_vsB72YSr/fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_00-17-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0120.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-04_CI_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_002813_TTUQ1b1x1_2440574_vsB72YSr/fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_00-17-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0120.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-04_CI_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_002813_TTUQ1b1x1_2440574_vsB72YSr/fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_00-17-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0120.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_00-17-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0120.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_00-17-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0120.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_00-17-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0120.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_00-17-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0120.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_00-17-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0120.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_00-17-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0120.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_00-17-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0120.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-04_CI_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_002813_TTUQ1b1x1_2440574_vsB72YSr/fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_00-17-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0120.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_00-17-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0120.fits.cat 
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=264, passed=4142
Got 4142 stars (including 3872 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_00-17-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0120.fits.cat 
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 4142 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.8'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.8 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013081 (47.1 arcsec)
                    catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
                    catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010464 (37.7 arcsec)

ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 610 to 669 (Dec 32.0 to 43.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 941 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 941 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 938 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32" 
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 941 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4105 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32" 

ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 610 to 669 (Dec 32.0 to 43.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 941 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 941 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4105 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32" 
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 941 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4105 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32" 
Excluding outliers - 941 stars left (next iteration limit 1035)
Stop iterations.


 The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)

WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_00-17-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0120.fits N_match=941 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.328 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.335 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.383 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.304 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.310 n_q1=248 n_q2=256 n_q3=209 n_q4=228 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.166
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_00-17-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0120.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_00-17-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0120.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
 ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-04_CI_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_002813_TTUQ1b1x1_2440574_vsB72YSr/fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_00-17-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0120.fits -region wcs_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_00-17-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0120.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_00-17-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0120.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-46-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0236.fits sigma_overall=0.383 worst_q_ratio=1.143
ref2=LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-47-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits sigma_overall=0.402 worst_q_ratio=1.220
new1=fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_00-16-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119.fits sigma_overall=0.342 worst_q_ratio=1.095
new2=fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_00-17-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0120.fits sigma_overall=0.328 worst_q_ratio=1.166
reference average sigma_overall=0.3925 worst_q_ratio=1.1815
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################

Distribution of catalog-matched stars across the image:

plot_astrometric_residuals_xy: wrote wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-46-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0236_astrometric_residuals.png (943 matched stars from wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-46-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0236.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy: wrote wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-47-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0237_astrometric_residuals.png (940 matched stars from wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-47-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy: wrote wcs_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_00-16-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119_astrometric_residuals.png (942 matched stars from wcs_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_00-16-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy: wrote wcs_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_00-17-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0120_astrometric_residuals.png (941 matched stars from wcs_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_00-17-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0120.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_00-16-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_00-16-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-04_CI_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_002813_TTUQ1b1x1_2440574_vsB72YSr/wcs_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_00-16-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_00-17-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0120.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_00-17-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0120.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-04_CI_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_002813_TTUQ1b1x1_2440574_vsB72YSr/wcs_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_00-17-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0120.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field LMi-01-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
Forced photometry on wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-46-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0236.fits at 10:20:07.48 +32:51:08.0:  99.00 +/- 99.00  edge
Forced photometry on wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-47-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits at 10:20:07.48 +32:51:08.0:  99.00 +/- 99.00  edge
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:20:07.48 +32:51:08.0: at least one reference image reported edge (off-image or aperture/annulus past image boundary); cannot perform the forced-photometry cross-check
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 1s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 1s
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20522_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_00-17-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0120
The candidate 20522_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_00-17-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0120 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 06 04.22018    2461195.72018    10.99    10:20:07.48 +32:51:07.9   0689 5935   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-04_CI_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_002813_TTUQ1b1x1_2440574_vsB72YSr/fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_00-16-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 06 04.22064    2461195.72064    10.93    10:20:07.47 +32:51:08.1   0685 5938   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-04_CI_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_002813_TTUQ1b1x1_2440574_vsB72YSr/fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_00-17-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0120.fits

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20595_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_00-17-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0120
The candidate 20595_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_00-17-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0120 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 06 04.22064    2461195.72064    11.72    09:39:25.62 +34:14:52.8   5883 5526   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-04_CI_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_002813_TTUQ1b1x1_2440574_vsB72YSr/fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_00-17-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0120.fits

**** FOUND  09:39:25.61 +34:14:52.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 01302_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_00-17-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0120
The candidate 01302_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_00-17-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0120 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 3     2026 06 04.22064    2461195.72064    7.94    09:45:34.30 +34:30:42.5   5125 5333   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-04_CI_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_002813_TTUQ1b1x1_2440574_vsB72YSr/fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_00-17-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0120.fits

**** FOUND  09:45:34.29 +34:30:42.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 01580_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_00-17-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0120
The candidate 01580_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_00-17-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0120 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 3     2026 06 04.22064    2461195.72064    8.17    09:53:43.17 +34:55:35.4   4134 5021   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-04_CI_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_002813_TTUQ1b1x1_2440574_vsB72YSr/fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_00-17-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0120.fits

**** FOUND  09:53:43.17 +34:55:35.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 2s
Prepared the HTML report for the field LMi-01-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL

  ./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 3.5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-46-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0236.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-47-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-04_CI_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_002813_TTUQ1b1x1_2440574_vsB72YSr/fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_00-16-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-04_CI_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_002813_TTUQ1b1x1_2440574_vsB72YSr/fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_00-17-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0120.fits
  
SExtractor catalog cache: saved LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-46-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0236.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-47-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-46-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0236.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-47-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-04_CI_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_002813_TTUQ1b1x1_2440574_vsB72YSr/fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_00-16-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-04_CI_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_002813_TTUQ1b1x1_2440574_vsB72YSr/fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_00-17-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0120.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-46-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0236.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-47-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_00-16-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_00-17-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0120.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/exclusion_list.txt
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-46-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0236.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-47-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_00-16-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_00-17-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0120.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-46-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0236.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-46-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0236.fits
Image size: 941.6'x627.1'  15.7(deg)x10.5(deg)  9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 09:49:05.463 +38:00:01.89 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_00-16-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_00-16-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119.fits
Image size: 941.8'x626.6'  15.7(deg)x10.4(deg)  9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 09:49:21.038 +38:00:59.84 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 09:49:05.463 +38:00:01.89
Second-epoch image center 09:49:21.038 +38:00:59.84
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0536 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg.  Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_00-17-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0120.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_00-17-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0120.fits
Image size: 941.8'x626.6'  15.7(deg)x10.4(deg)  9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 09:49:19.467 +38:01:20.28 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 09:49:05.463 +38:00:01.89
Second-epoch image center 09:49:19.467 +38:01:20.28
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0509 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center  09:49:21.038 +38:00:59.84
Second-epoch second image center 09:49:19.467 +38:01:20.28
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00767 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running  util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2  /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-46-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0236.fits &> /tmp/tmp.1Xlupgg19l
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-46-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0236.fits
Running  util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2  /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-47-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits &> /tmp/tmp.W9ojijflX6
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-47-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits
Running  util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2  /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-04_CI_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_002813_TTUQ1b1x1_2440574_vsB72YSr/fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_00-16-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119.fits &> /tmp/tmp.hznw3KIbOG
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-04_CI_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_002813_TTUQ1b1x1_2440574_vsB72YSr/fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_00-16-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119.fits
Running  util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2  /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-04_CI_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_002813_TTUQ1b1x1_2440574_vsB72YSr/fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_00-17-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0120.fits &> /tmp/tmp.KRrcBxifAy
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-04_CI_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_002813_TTUQ1b1x1_2440574_vsB72YSr/fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_00-17-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0120.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-46-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0236.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-46-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0236.fits and wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-46-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0236.fits.cat 
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-46-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0236.fits and wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-46-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0236.fits.cat 
Found non-empty wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-46-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0236.fits and wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-46-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0236.fits.cat
The reference image (wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-46-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0236.fits) and catalog (wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-46-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0236.fits.cat) found
'wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-46-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0236.fits.cat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 40745 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 136.3395 to 157.6198 deg, Dec +31.9971 to +43.3850 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 136.3395 to 157.6198 deg, Dec 31.9971 to 43.3850 deg
Loaded 5394 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3545 out of 3992 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3992 out of 40745 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.803100
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.803100
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.:  -7.20
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.:  15.60

Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed!  =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.:  15.60

Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:


Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 40745 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 136.3395 to 157.6198 deg, Dec +31.9971 to +43.3850 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 136.3395 to 157.6198 deg, Dec 31.9971 to 43.3850 deg
Loaded 5394 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3545 out of 3992 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3992 out of 40745 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-46-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0236.fits via Tycho-2

Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-46-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0236.fits:


Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-46-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0236.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-46-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0236.fits (aperture=5.0)
Read 40814 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 136.3396 to 157.6197 deg, Dec +32.0331 to +43.3967 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 136.3396 to 157.6197 deg, Dec 32.0331 to 43.3967 deg
Loaded 5381 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3541 out of 3990 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3990 out of 40814 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-47-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits via Tycho-2

Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-47-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits:


Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-47-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-47-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits (aperture=5.0)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 28 candidate transients before the final filtering.  (Hard limit: 8000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
 2.0 pix  LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-46-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0236.fits
 2.0 pix  LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-47-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits
 2.4 pix  fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_00-16-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119.fits
 2.4 pix  fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_00-17-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0120.fits
 2.0 pix  wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-46-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0236.fits
 2.0 pix  wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-47-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
 15.6 mag.  LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-46-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0236.fits
 15.6 mag.  LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-47-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits
 14.6 mag.  fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_00-16-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119.fits
 14.6 mag.  fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_00-17-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0120.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate:  14.6 (SNR )  14.0 (80% of stars)  with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of  following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50). 
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image. 
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.1Xlupgg19l (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-04_CI_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_002813_TTUQ1b1x1_2440574_vsB72YSr/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-46-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0236.fits 570.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-46-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0236.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-46-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0236.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-46-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0236.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-46-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0236.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-46-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0236.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-46-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0236.fits' -> 'wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-46-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0236.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-46-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0236.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-46-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0236.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-46-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0236.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-46-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0236.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-46-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0236.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-46-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0236.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-46-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0236.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-46-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0236.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-46-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0236.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-46-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0236.fits.cat 
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=19, blended=1991, passed=40726
Got 40726 stars (including 38650 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-46-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0236.fits.cat 
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 40726 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec)
                    catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
                    catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec)

ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 609 to 668 (Dec 32.0 to 43.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 940 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 940 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 926 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36" 
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 940 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 40287 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37" 

ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 609 to 668 (Dec 32.0 to 43.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 940 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 940 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 40289 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37" 
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 940 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 40289 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38" 
Excluding outliers - 940 stars left (next iteration limit 1034)
Stop iterations.


 The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)

WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-46-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0236.fits N_match=940 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.378 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.431 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.410 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.379 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.312 n_q1=231 n_q2=212 n_q3=243 n_q4=254 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.142
The image catalog is written to wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-46-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0236.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-46-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0236.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
 ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-46-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0236.fits -region wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-46-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0236.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-46-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0236.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.W9ojijflX6 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-04_CI_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_002813_TTUQ1b1x1_2440574_vsB72YSr/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-47-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits 570.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-47-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-47-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-47-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-47-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-47-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-47-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits' -> 'wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-47-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-47-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-47-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-47-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-47-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-47-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-47-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-47-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-47-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-47-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-47-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits.cat 
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=22, blended=2016, passed=40792
Got 40792 stars (including 38709 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-47-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits.cat 
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 40792 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec)
                    catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
                    catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec)

ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 610 to 668 (Dec 32.0 to 43.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 939 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 939 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 924 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38" 
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 939 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 40421 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39" 

ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 610 to 668 (Dec 32.0 to 43.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 939 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 939 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 40421 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39" 
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 939 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 40421 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39" 
Excluding outliers - 939 stars left (next iteration limit 1032)
Stop iterations.


 The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)

WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-47-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits N_match=939 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.390 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.479 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.363 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.403 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.321 n_q1=233 n_q2=208 n_q3=246 n_q4=252 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.227
The image catalog is written to wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-47-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-47-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
 ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-47-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits -region wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-47-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-47-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.hznw3KIbOG (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-04_CI_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_002813_TTUQ1b1x1_2440574_vsB72YSr/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-04_CI_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_002813_TTUQ1b1x1_2440574_vsB72YSr/fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_00-16-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-04_CI_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_002813_TTUQ1b1x1_2440574_vsB72YSr/fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_00-16-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-04_CI_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_002813_TTUQ1b1x1_2440574_vsB72YSr/fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_00-16-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-04_CI_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_002813_TTUQ1b1x1_2440574_vsB72YSr/fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_00-16-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-04_CI_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_002813_TTUQ1b1x1_2440574_vsB72YSr/fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_00-16-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-04_CI_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_002813_TTUQ1b1x1_2440574_vsB72YSr/fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_00-16-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_00-16-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_00-16-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_00-16-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_00-16-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_00-16-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_00-16-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_00-16-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-04_CI_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_002813_TTUQ1b1x1_2440574_vsB72YSr/fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_00-16-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_00-16-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119.fits.cat 
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=1, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=10, blended=612, passed=23240
Got 23240 stars (including 22583 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_00-16-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119.fits.cat 
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 23240 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.8'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.8 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013081 (47.1 arcsec)
                    catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
                    catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010464 (37.7 arcsec)

ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 610 to 669 (Dec 32.0 to 43.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 941 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 941 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 936 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32" 
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 941 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 23061 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32" 

ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 610 to 669 (Dec 32.0 to 43.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 941 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 941 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 23062 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32" 
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 941 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 23062 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32" 
Excluding outliers - 941 stars left (next iteration limit 1035)
Stop iterations.


 The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)

WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_00-16-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119.fits N_match=941 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.332 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.326 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.382 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.261 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.362 n_q1=245 n_q2=253 n_q3=210 n_q4=233 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.152
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_00-16-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_00-16-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
 ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-04_CI_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_002813_TTUQ1b1x1_2440574_vsB72YSr/fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_00-16-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119.fits -region wcs_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_00-16-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_00-16-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.KRrcBxifAy (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-04_CI_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_002813_TTUQ1b1x1_2440574_vsB72YSr/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-04_CI_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_002813_TTUQ1b1x1_2440574_vsB72YSr/fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_00-17-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0120.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-04_CI_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_002813_TTUQ1b1x1_2440574_vsB72YSr/fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_00-17-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0120.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-04_CI_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_002813_TTUQ1b1x1_2440574_vsB72YSr/fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_00-17-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0120.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-04_CI_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_002813_TTUQ1b1x1_2440574_vsB72YSr/fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_00-17-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0120.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-04_CI_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_002813_TTUQ1b1x1_2440574_vsB72YSr/fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_00-17-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0120.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-04_CI_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_002813_TTUQ1b1x1_2440574_vsB72YSr/fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_00-17-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0120.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_00-17-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0120.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_00-17-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0120.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_00-17-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0120.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_00-17-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0120.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_00-17-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0120.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_00-17-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0120.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_00-17-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0120.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-04_CI_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_002813_TTUQ1b1x1_2440574_vsB72YSr/fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_00-17-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0120.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_00-17-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0120.fits.cat 
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=5, blended=609, passed=23158
Got 23158 stars (including 22511 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_00-17-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0120.fits.cat 
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 23158 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.8'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.8 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013081 (47.1 arcsec)
                    catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
                    catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010464 (37.7 arcsec)

ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 610 to 669 (Dec 32.0 to 43.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 941 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 941 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 937 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32" 
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 941 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 22967 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32" 

ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 610 to 669 (Dec 32.0 to 43.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 941 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 941 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 22966 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32" 
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 941 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 22966 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32" 
Excluding outliers - 941 stars left (next iteration limit 1035)
Stop iterations.


 The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)

WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_00-17-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0120.fits N_match=941 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.334 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.328 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.393 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.289 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.332 n_q1=249 n_q2=254 n_q3=209 n_q4=229 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.179
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_00-17-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0120.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_00-17-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0120.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
 ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-04_CI_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_002813_TTUQ1b1x1_2440574_vsB72YSr/fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_00-17-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0120.fits -region wcs_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_00-17-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0120.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_00-17-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0120.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_00-16-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-04_CI_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_002813_TTUQ1b1x1_2440574_vsB72YSr/wcs_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_00-16-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_00-17-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0120.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-04_CI_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_002813_TTUQ1b1x1_2440574_vsB72YSr/wcs_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_00-17-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0120.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field LMi-01-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-46-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0236.fits at 10:11:39.88 +38:21:01.6:  13.71 +/- 0.04  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-46-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0236.fits at 09:34:51.31 +39:37:38.5:  13.39 +/- 0.03  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-46-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0236.fits at 10:20:07.47 +32:51:08.1:  99.00 +/- 99.00  edge
Forced photometry on wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-46-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0236.fits at 09:59:36.02 +36:33:18.5:  12.96 +/- 0.02  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-46-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0236.fits at 10:05:12.04 +34:10:19.8:  12.45 +/- 0.01  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-47-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits at 09:34:51.31 +39:37:38.5:  13.31 +/- 0.03  detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  13.35 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 09:34:51.31 +39:37:38.5: ref_mag=13.35 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.2901 delta=0.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-47-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits at 10:11:39.88 +38:21:01.6:  13.78 +/- 0.04  detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  13.74 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:11:39.88 +38:21:01.6: ref_mag=13.74 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=14.0482 delta=-0.30 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-47-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits at 09:59:36.02 +36:33:18.5:  12.95 +/- 0.02  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-47-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits at 10:20:07.47 +32:51:08.1:  99.00 +/- 99.00  edge
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:20:07.47 +32:51:08.1: at least one reference image reported edge (off-image or aperture/annulus past image boundary); cannot perform the forced-photometry cross-check
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  12.96 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 09:59:36.02 +36:33:18.5: ref_mag=12.96 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=13.1867 delta=-0.23 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-47-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits at 10:05:12.04 +34:10:19.8:  12.45 +/- 0.01  detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  12.45 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:05:12.04 +34:10:19.8: ref_mag=12.45 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.6551 delta=-0.21 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-46-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0236.fits at 10:10:08.54 +41:03:28.7:  13.42 +/- 0.03  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-46-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0236.fits at 10:01:11.16 +34:38:28.0:  13.44 +/- 0.03  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-46-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0236.fits at 10:06:33.23 +36:10:50.8:  13.57 +/- 0.03  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-46-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0236.fits at 09:51:15.08 +36:29:10.9:  13.66 +/- 0.04  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-47-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits at 10:10:08.54 +41:03:28.7:  13.45 +/- 0.03  detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  13.43 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:10:08.54 +41:03:28.7: ref_mag=13.43 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.6476 delta=-0.21 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-47-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits at 10:01:11.16 +34:38:28.0:  13.43 +/- 0.03  detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  13.44 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:01:11.16 +34:38:28.0: ref_mag=13.44 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.5254 delta=-0.09 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-46-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0236.fits at 09:59:49.17 +38:48:41.9:  14.13 +/- 0.05  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-47-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits at 10:06:33.23 +36:10:50.8:  13.62 +/- 0.03  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-47-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits at 09:51:15.08 +36:29:10.9:  13.55 +/- 0.04  detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  13.60 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  13.60 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 09:51:15.08 +36:29:10.9: ref_mag=13.60 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.6076 delta=-0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:06:33.23 +36:10:50.8: ref_mag=13.60 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.6880 delta=-0.09 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-47-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits at 09:59:49.17 +38:48:41.9:  14.17 +/- 0.06  detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  14.15 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 09:59:49.17 +38:48:41.9: ref_mag=14.15 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=14.1318 delta=0.02 (need > 0.90)
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 2s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 0s
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52801_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_00-17-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0120
The candidate 52801_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_00-17-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0120 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 06 04.22018    2461195.72018    14.05    10:11:39.85 +38:21:01.5   2174 2756   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-04_CI_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_002813_TTUQ1b1x1_2440574_vsB72YSr/fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_00-16-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 06 04.22064    2461195.72064    14.04    10:11:39.91 +38:21:01.7   2171 2759   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-04_CI_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_002813_TTUQ1b1x1_2440574_vsB72YSr/fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_00-17-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0120.fits

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52803_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_00-17-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0120
The candidate 52803_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_00-17-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0120 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 06 04.22064    2461195.72064    13.33    10:26:09.86 +39:10:19.8   0532 2023   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-04_CI_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_002813_TTUQ1b1x1_2440574_vsB72YSr/fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_00-17-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0120.fits

**** FOUND  10:26:09.85 +39:10:20.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52804_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_00-17-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0120
The candidate 52804_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_00-17-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0120 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 06 04.22064    2461195.72064    13.35    10:22:35.44 +36:10:18.9   0678 3891   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-04_CI_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_002813_TTUQ1b1x1_2440574_vsB72YSr/fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_00-17-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0120.fits

**** FOUND  10:22:35.46 +36:10:18.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52923_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_00-17-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0120
The candidate 52923_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_00-17-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0120 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 06 04.22018    2461195.72018    11.07    10:20:07.48 +32:51:08.0   0689 5935   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-04_CI_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_002813_TTUQ1b1x1_2440574_vsB72YSr/fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_00-16-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 06 04.22064    2461195.72064    11.03    10:20:07.47 +32:51:08.2   0685 5938   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-04_CI_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_002813_TTUQ1b1x1_2440574_vsB72YSr/fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_00-17-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0120.fits

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53137_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_00-17-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0120
The candidate 53137_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_00-17-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0120 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 06 04.22064    2461195.72064    12.32    09:18:36.28 +36:47:41.2   8460 4007   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-04_CI_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_002813_TTUQ1b1x1_2440574_vsB72YSr/fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_00-17-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0120.fits

**** FOUND  09:18:36.27 +36:47:41.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bbsc.txt ****
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53183_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_00-17-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0120
The candidate 53183_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_00-17-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0120 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 06 04.22064    2461195.72064    12.53    09:24:16.41 +36:36:17.7   7770 4130   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-04_CI_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_002813_TTUQ1b1x1_2440574_vsB72YSr/fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_00-17-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0120.fits

**** FOUND  09:24:16.40 +36:36:18.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53191_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_00-17-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0120
The candidate 53191_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_00-17-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0120 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 06 04.22018    2461195.72018    12.69    10:05:12.00 +34:10:20.5   2674 5353   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-04_CI_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_002813_TTUQ1b1x1_2440574_vsB72YSr/fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_00-16-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 06 04.22064    2461195.72064    12.63    10:05:12.09 +34:10:19.0   2671 5356   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-04_CI_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_002813_TTUQ1b1x1_2440574_vsB72YSr/fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_00-17-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0120.fits

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53324_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_00-17-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0120
The candidate 53324_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_00-17-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0120 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 06 04.22018    2461195.72018    13.15    09:59:36.05 +36:33:18.6   3500 3982   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-04_CI_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_002813_TTUQ1b1x1_2440574_vsB72YSr/fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_00-16-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 06 04.22064    2461195.72064    13.24    09:59:36.00 +36:33:18.3   3497 3985   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-04_CI_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_002813_TTUQ1b1x1_2440574_vsB72YSr/fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_00-17-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0120.fits

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53377_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_00-17-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0120
The candidate 53377_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_00-17-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0120 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 06 04.22064    2461195.72064    13.09    09:54:05.65 +41:18:23.3   4371 1183   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-04_CI_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_002813_TTUQ1b1x1_2440574_vsB72YSr/fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_00-17-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0120.fits

**** FOUND  09:54:05.68 +41:18:23.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53438_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_00-17-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0120
The candidate 53438_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_00-17-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0120 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 06 04.22018    2461195.72018    13.29    09:34:51.33 +39:37:38.0   6527 2294   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-04_CI_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_002813_TTUQ1b1x1_2440574_vsB72YSr/fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_00-16-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 06 04.22064    2461195.72064    13.29    09:34:51.30 +39:37:39.1   6524 2297   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-04_CI_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_002813_TTUQ1b1x1_2440574_vsB72YSr/fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_00-17-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0120.fits

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53506_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_00-17-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0120
The candidate 53506_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_00-17-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0120 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 06 04.22064    2461195.72064    13.25    09:23:23.44 +33:26:45.0   7897 6049   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-04_CI_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_002813_TTUQ1b1x1_2440574_vsB72YSr/fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_00-17-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0120.fits

**** FOUND  09:23:23.39 +33:26:44.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53514_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_00-17-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0120
The candidate 53514_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_00-17-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0120 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 06 04.22018    2461195.72018    13.52    10:01:11.10 +34:38:27.7   3201 5117   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-04_CI_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_002813_TTUQ1b1x1_2440574_vsB72YSr/fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_00-16-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 06 04.22064    2461195.72064    13.53    10:01:11.22 +34:38:28.3   3197 5120   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-04_CI_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_002813_TTUQ1b1x1_2440574_vsB72YSr/fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_00-17-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0120.fits

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53518_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_00-17-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0120
The candidate 53518_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_00-17-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0120 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 06 04.22064    2461195.72064    13.48    10:02:57.98 +37:52:26.8   3168 3157   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-04_CI_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_002813_TTUQ1b1x1_2440574_vsB72YSr/fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_00-17-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0120.fits

**** FOUND  10:02:58.02 +37:52:26.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53529_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_00-17-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0120
The candidate 53529_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_00-17-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0120 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 06 04.22018    2461195.72018    13.62    10:10:08.54 +41:03:29.1   2544 1152   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-04_CI_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_002813_TTUQ1b1x1_2440574_vsB72YSr/fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_00-16-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 06 04.22064    2461195.72064    13.68    10:10:08.53 +41:03:28.4   2540 1155   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-04_CI_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_002813_TTUQ1b1x1_2440574_vsB72YSr/fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_00-17-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0120.fits

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53546_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_00-17-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0120
The candidate 53546_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_00-17-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0120 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 06 04.22064    2461195.72064    13.57    10:04:15.10 +34:30:32.5   2810 5164   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-04_CI_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_002813_TTUQ1b1x1_2440574_vsB72YSr/fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_00-17-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0120.fits

**** FOUND  10:04:15.20 +34:30:32.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53555_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_00-17-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0120
The candidate 53555_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_00-17-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0120 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 06 04.22064    2461195.72064    13.66    09:52:41.55 +35:07:44.2   4269 4908   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-04_CI_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_002813_TTUQ1b1x1_2440574_vsB72YSr/fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_00-17-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0120.fits

**** FOUND  09:52:41.56 +35:07:43.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53565_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_00-17-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0120
The candidate 53565_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_00-17-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0120 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 06 04.22018    2461195.72018    13.66    10:06:33.24 +36:10:51.1   2637 4127   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-04_CI_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_002813_TTUQ1b1x1_2440574_vsB72YSr/fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_00-16-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 06 04.22064    2461195.72064    13.72    10:06:33.21 +36:10:50.5   2633 4130   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-04_CI_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_002813_TTUQ1b1x1_2440574_vsB72YSr/fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_00-17-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0120.fits

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53572_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_00-17-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0120
The candidate 53572_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_00-17-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0120 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 06 04.22018    2461195.72018    13.59    09:51:15.17 +36:29:10.3   4503 4100   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-04_CI_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_002813_TTUQ1b1x1_2440574_vsB72YSr/fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_00-16-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 06 04.22064    2461195.72064    13.62    09:51:14.99 +36:29:11.4   4500 4103   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-04_CI_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_002813_TTUQ1b1x1_2440574_vsB72YSr/fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_00-17-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0120.fits

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53628_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_00-17-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0120
The candidate 53628_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_00-17-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0120 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 06 04.22064    2461195.72064    13.92    09:44:27.52 +40:46:10.6   5443 1573   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-04_CI_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_002813_TTUQ1b1x1_2440574_vsB72YSr/fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_00-17-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0120.fits

**** FOUND  09:44:27.53 +40:46:10.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53669_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_00-17-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0120
The candidate 53669_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_00-17-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0120 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 06 04.22064    2461195.72064    13.93    10:18:28.62 +37:15:32.2   1273 3309   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-04_CI_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_002813_TTUQ1b1x1_2440574_vsB72YSr/fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_00-17-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0120.fits

**** FOUND  10:18:28.60 +37:15:31.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53710_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_00-17-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0120
The candidate 53710_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_00-17-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0120 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 06 04.22064    2461195.72064    14.07    10:02:55.91 +37:52:05.0   3172 3161   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-04_CI_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_002813_TTUQ1b1x1_2440574_vsB72YSr/fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_00-17-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0120.fits

**** FOUND  10:02:55.92 +37:52:05.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53732_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_00-17-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0120
The candidate 53732_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_00-17-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0120 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 06 04.22064    2461195.72064    13.89    09:48:35.72 +33:25:18.3   4712 5972   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-04_CI_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_002813_TTUQ1b1x1_2440574_vsB72YSr/fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_00-17-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0120.fits

**** FOUND  09:48:35.68 +33:25:17.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53790_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_00-17-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0120
The candidate 53790_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_00-17-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0120 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 06 04.22064    2461195.72064    14.07    09:59:19.24 +42:05:40.5   3822 0659   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-04_CI_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_002813_TTUQ1b1x1_2440574_vsB72YSr/fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_00-17-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0120.fits

**** FOUND  09:59:19.30 +42:05:41.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53795_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_00-17-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0120
The candidate 53795_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_00-17-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0120 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 06 04.22018    2461195.72018    14.11    09:59:49.01 +38:48:42.9   3595 2626   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-04_CI_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_002813_TTUQ1b1x1_2440574_vsB72YSr/fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_00-16-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0119.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 06 04.22064    2461195.72064    14.16    09:59:49.33 +38:48:40.9   3591 2629   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-04_CI_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_002813_TTUQ1b1x1_2440574_vsB72YSr/fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_00-17-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0120.fits

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53808_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_00-17-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0120
The candidate 53808_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_00-17-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0120 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 06 04.22064    2461195.72064    13.88    10:03:34.56 +40:38:01.2   3260 1494   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-04_CI_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_002813_TTUQ1b1x1_2440574_vsB72YSr/fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_00-17-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0120.fits

**** FOUND  10:03:34.52 +40:38:01.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 06169_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_00-17-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0120
The candidate 06169_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_00-17-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0120 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 3     2026 06 04.22064    2461195.72064    8.09    09:45:34.30 +34:30:42.4   5125 5333   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-04_CI_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_002813_TTUQ1b1x1_2440574_vsB72YSr/fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_00-17-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0120.fits

**** FOUND  09:45:34.28 +34:30:42.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 06076_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_00-17-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0120
The candidate 06076_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_00-17-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0120 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 06 04.22064    2461195.72064    11.74    09:39:25.62 +34:14:53.1   5883 5526   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-04_CI_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_002813_TTUQ1b1x1_2440574_vsB72YSr/fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_00-17-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0120.fits

**** FOUND  09:39:25.60 +34:14:52.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 07716_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_00-17-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0120
The candidate 07716_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_00-17-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0120 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 3     2026 06 04.22064    2461195.72064    8.21    09:53:43.18 +34:55:35.3   4134 5021   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-04_CI_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_002813_TTUQ1b1x1_2440574_vsB72YSr/fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-04_00-17-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0120.fits

**** FOUND  09:53:43.18 +34:55:35.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 1s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 3s
Prepared the HTML report for the field LMi-01-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
########### Completed LMi-01-Q1b1x1 ###########
The analysis was running at tau
We are allowed to update the exclusion list at tau host
Found ../exclusion_list_TTUQ1.txt
#### The exclusion list before filtering-out asteroids, bad pixels and adding Gaia sources ####
###################################################################################
renamed 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt_noasteroids' -> 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt'
renamed 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt_nohotpixels' -> 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt'
# Count candidates with no identification (that also don't look like hot pix)
Found 0 unidentified candidates (excluding asteroids, hot pixels and known variable stars).
###################################################################################
0 candidates found (excluding asteroids and hot pixels)
This does not look like a test run
###################################################################################
exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt NOT FOUND
exclusion_list_apass.txt NOT FOUND
IS_THIS_TEST_RUN=NO  ALLOW_EXCLUSION_LIST_UPDATE= YES
#### Nothing to add to the exclusion list ####
The observatory MPC code is V36
############################################################
Positions of planets computed with util/planet_finder/main.py for JD(UT)2461195.72018025 -observatory V36
06:18:01.71 +25:30:48.4 Mercury (-0.2mag)
07:22:42.42 +24:04:06.8 Venus (-4.0mag)
02:38:05.70 +14:47:49.7 Mars (1.3mag)
07:45:09.92 +21:39:32.5 Jupiter (-1.9mag)
00:48:12.44 +02:42:15.9 Saturn (0.9mag)
03:59:15.42 +20:22:43.1 Uranus (5.8mag)
00:15:53.70 +00:15:25.0 Neptune (7.8mag)
20:33:33.83 -23:03:05.7 Pluto (14.5mag)
19:55:02.73 -24:35:55.8 Moon (-11.6mag)
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 363 Jun  4 00:34 planets.txt
############################################################
Positions of selected moons from JPL HORIZONS for JD(UT)2461195.72018025:
07:45:04.18 +21:39:49.5 Io (6.0mag)
07:45:03.26 +21:39:53.8 Europa (6.2mag)
07:45:26.73 +21:38:46.0 Ganymede (5.6mag)
07:45:37.76 +21:38:16.4 Callisto (6.8mag)
07:45:41.75 +21:15:39.1 Himalia (15.6mag)
07:45:13.86 +21:39:20.0 Thebe (16.5mag)
07:45:47.61 +21:32:52.1 Elara (17.5mag)
07:47:08.03 +21:53:24.1 Pasiphae (17.7mag)
07:51:55.24 +21:40:57.7 Carme (18.8mag)
00:48:08.00 +02:42:45.4 Titan (8.7mag)
00:48:08.21 +02:42:22.9 Rhea (10.0mag)
00:48:45.14 +02:43:55.7 Iapetus (11.4mag)
00:48:00.42 +02:42:26.1 Hyperion (14.7mag)
00:48:59.51 +02:44:46.5 Phoebe (16.7mag)
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 569 Jun  4 00:34 moons.txt
############################################################
Positions of selected spacecraft from JPL HORIZONS for JD(UT)2461195.72018025:
17:24:30.41 -34:50:52.1 JWST
18:17:21.30 +30:53:17.2 Chandra
18:55:31.22 -14:09:18.2 XMM-Newton
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 96 Jun  4 00:34 spacecraft.txt
############################################################
Positions of bright comets computed with util/comet_finder/main.py for JD(UT)2461195.72018025 -observatory V36
18:46:06.67 -32:21:30.6 13.6mag P/2010 H2 (Vales)
05:49:34.67 -68:06:43.8 17.4mag C/2014 UN271 (Bernardinelli-Bernstein)
05:47:36.15 +31:55:02.0 17.5mag C/2017 K2 (PANSTARRS)
17:16:19.40 +15:08:17.6 17.8mag C/2021 G2 (ATLAS)
20:37:46.22 -50:55:43.0 17.3mag P/2021 N1 (ZTF)
23:13:25.00 +31:26:06.6 17.2mag C/2022 E2 (ATLAS)
05:29:09.53 +26:56:53.3 16.4mag C/2022 N2 (PANSTARRS)
09:26:55.52 +31:13:01.9 16.6mag C/2022 QE78 (ATLAS)
08:48:27.47 +03:43:57.8 17.7mag C/2022 R6 (PANSTARRS)
18:30:47.04 +21:30:42.1 17.7mag C/2023 A3 (Tsuchinshan-ATLAS)
15:20:50.59 -11:00:27.4 17.6mag P/2023 B1 (PANSTARRS)
22:15:29.44 +66:16:38.4 17.7mag C/2023 H5 (Lemmon)
17:56:05.89 -06:18:42.3 13.7mag C/2023 R1 (PANSTARRS)
13:21:10.89 +83:53:05.0 17.9mag C/2023 X2 (Lemmon)
07:05:00.08 +64:10:51.6 17.6mag C/2024 A1 (ATLAS)
06:41:10.55 +27:27:38.8 13.5mag C/2024 E1 (Wierzchos)
15:40:27.03 +13:09:39.3 17.4mag C/2024 G6 (ATLAS)
20:15:29.47 +29:56:27.4 14.0mag C/2024 J3 (ATLAS)
04:14:02.30 -16:18:38.8 16.0mag C/2024 T5 (ATLAS)
06:02:11.34 +35:11:17.3 17.9mag C/2025 J1 (Borisov)
11:37:13.06 +52:57:53.7 17.3mag C/2025 L1 (ATLAS)
06:39:46.30 -10:41:14.2 13.7mag C/2025 R3 (PANSTARRS)
09:21:00.88 +23:22:59.5 18.0mag C/2025 V2 (Rankin)
12:39:53.41 +04:41:34.0 17.2mag C/2025 Y1 (ATLAS)
18:18:33.45 +74:13:48.6 18.0mag C/2026 A2 (Bok)
01:53:34.82 +43:07:19.5 16.0mag C/2026 B2 (Sun-Gao)
11:10:39.87 -05:11:51.4 16.4mag A/2026 E1
20:16:23.11 -08:20:18.8 8.9mag 10P/Tempel
11:01:08.85 -00:55:10.3 16.0mag 29P/Schwassmann-Wachmann
10:57:48.53 -02:40:54.8 17.9mag 43P/Wolf-Harrington
03:05:33.22 +25:06:24.8 17.6mag 47P/Ashbrook-Jackson
08:51:30.00 +24:53:33.8 16.9mag 63P/Wild
00:23:25.43 -06:38:06.6 15.7mag 65P/Gunn
06:30:34.88 +32:59:15.1 16.8mag 76P/West-Kohoutek-Ikemura
02:59:35.72 +16:41:33.2 13.9mag 78P/Gehrels
01:11:59.40 +03:57:52.0 15.5mag 88P/Howell
04:41:49.84 +29:58:01.1 15.2mag 93P/Lovas
02:31:49.91 +26:58:09.8 17.7mag 114P/Wiseman-Skiff
06:41:06.73 +33:09:50.0 15.6mag 123P/West-Hartley
09:43:18.27 +16:20:44.2 16.5mag 124P/Mrkos
03:52:28.69 +18:58:32.5 16.4mag 128P/Shoemaker-Holt
04:25:38.60 +18:53:18.9 17.7mag 131P/Mueller
05:40:52.59 +19:04:41.9 14.1mag 141P/Machholz
05:43:22.97 +17:24:37.3 14.1mag 141P-A/Machholz
04:33:50.55 +15:33:45.7 11.2mag 141P-D/Machholz
02:54:50.44 -25:15:57.3 17.0mag 161P/Hartley-IRAS
03:28:35.67 +22:10:43.4 14.9mag 162P/SidingSpring
19:36:37.87 +00:36:00.1 17.1mag 169P/NEAT
00:07:35.18 +01:40:20.9 17.9mag 220P/McNaught
16:55:16.11 -08:41:42.4 16.3mag 235P/LINEAR
07:25:38.80 +35:38:28.6 17.5mag 240P/NEAT
00:21:57.52 -04:08:10.4 16.5mag 260P/McNaught
03:53:32.23 +31:44:19.4 17.6mag 295P/LINEAR
23:24:38.45 -15:02:03.0 17.6mag 320P/McNaught
15:17:05.80 +08:13:05.6 17.4mag 391P/Kowalski
08:04:00.80 +20:50:44.0 17.9mag 450P/LONEOS
06:53:29.24 +41:58:32.0 17.8mag 493P/LONEOS
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 2.8K Jun  4 00:34 comets.txt
############################################################
List of recent ASAS-SN transients from https://www.astronomy.ohio-state.edu/asassn/transients.html :
20:07:38.15 -21:07:05.40  SN2026mho  2026-05-25.18 -1.12
11:29:42.55 +79:01:03.10  AT2026min  2026-05-24.21 16.63
11:44:32.95 -68:48:30.00  ASASSN-26no  2026-05-24 8.41
19:00:42.82 -48:31:01.60  ASASSN-26dp  2026-05-22.31 -3.28
14:23:56.59 -58:37:47.40  ASASSN-26dn  2026-05-20.01 14.59
11:24:54.06 +47:57:01.60  AT2026nma  2026-05-20.29 15.46
21:27:08.58 +33:24:38.10  AT2026lli  2026-05-19.34 15.86
00:31:01.41 -13:38:51.70  AT2026nad  2026-05-19.39 15.34
15:16:06.61 -79:16:32.40  ASASSN-26dm  2026-05-19.03 14.44
11:24:25.21 -59:23:19.10  ASASSN-26dl  2026-05-18.02 13.55
13:45:51.52 -53:16:01.00  ASASSN-26dk  2026-05-18.16 12.96
02:05:49.69 -30:29:09.60  ASASSN-26dh  2026-05-18.43 15.37
17:50:22.87 -39:42:33.90  ASASSN-26dj  2026-05-17.05 15.7
01:13:11.60 -33:25:16.10  ASASSN-26dg  2026-05-13.41 16.8
16:44:31.77 -27:15:18.40  AT2026mhn  2026-05-12.33 15.8
09:46:31.08 -33:41:51.00  ASASSN-26di  2026-05-12.14 14.63
21:23:11.57 -19:09:45.00  AT2026kwu  2026-05-12.26 16.9
14:20:14.30 -30:20:51.90  AT2026ktm  2026-05-12.06 17.21
14:41:39.01 -37:13:46.40  AT2026lkm  2026-05-11.18 16.89
12:59:50.45 -10:58:38.80  SN2026kep  2026-05-9.06 17.5
13:37:29.61 -29:50:30.90  AT2026lkd  2026-05-9.09 17.23
09:46:42.01 -14:52:03.60  SN2026kmo  2026-05-8.99 17.51
15:03:05.28 +22:02:03.40  AT2026lxf  2026-05-8.07 13.88
10:23:49.41 -20:57:25.30  ASASSN-26df  2026-05-8.21 16.52
22:14:40.56 +05:04:51.60  2026lda  2026-05-7.56 16.2
21:35:33.81 -14:05:16.30  ASASSN-26de  2026-05-6.29 14.51
16:21:48.82 -61:36:13.20  ASASSN-26dd  2026-05-5.21 15.15
14:26:40.22 -24:48:37.50  AT2026lig  2026-05-4.27 14.63
13:17:51.04 +30:25:13.50  SN2026kcp  2026-05-4.46 16.43
11:27:55.57 -13:38:56.90  SN2026kza  2026-05-1.08 15.59
22:28:27.10 +30:17:54.30  SN 2026fov  2026-04-29.6 14.36
21:00:10.71 -32:17:03.90  AT2026kis  2026-04-27.36 16.15
14:32:57.37 -58:13:26.40  ASASSN-26dc  2026-04-27.27 13.42
15:32:05.35 -43:54:34.60  ASASSN-26db  2026-04-27.37 16.06
16:34:34.97 -54:34:58.00  ASASSN-26da  2026-04-25.32 16.11
10:06:55.04 -01:13:49.70  SN2026jsg  2026-04-24.99 16.28
15:15:57.17 +56:18:32.80  SN2026kid  2026-04-24.52 -3.65
07:58:28.45 +57:03:42.40  AT2026kcf  2026-04-24.2 16.89
11:38:21.80 -50:43:06.50  SN2026jkb  2026-04-24.24 15.38
10:06:11.41 -39:41:04.20  AT2026dil  2026-04-24.2 16.85
14:21:40.08 +13:13:46.30  SN2026jlm  2026-04-22.16 15.12
10:53:55.52 -16:06:06.00  ASASSN-26cz  2026-04-22.28 16.29
20:07:38.15 -21:07:05.40    2026-05-25.18 -1.12
13:45:02.03 +15:17:14.50  ASASSN-26cy  2026-04-21.27 15.78
13:20:52.22 -35:57:03.60  AT2026jcm  2026-04-19.01 16.65
13:36:15.66 -36:53:48.40  SN 2026iqy  2026-04-18.92 17.31
06:34:01.33 -40:07:34.00  ASASSN-26cx  2026-04-19.07 16.16
23:33:57.97 -45:12:11.90  SN 2026idu  2026-04-19.41 15.9
12:10:50.92 +66:55:31.20  SN 2026icv  2026-04-17.14 16.03
21:36:59.06 -60:43:35.90  ASASSN-26cv  2026-04-17.35 -1.18
08:13:26.26 -27:07:30.50  ASASSN-26cw  2026-04-17.07 -1.01
14:49:14.13 -27:29:20.60  ASASSN-26cu  2026-04-16.06 14.03
17:21:59.44 -38:54:04.60  ASASSN-26ct  2026-04-14.4 15.15
15:25:54.99 +07:49:24.50  SN2026huo  2026-04-12.14 16.96
20:07:38.15 -21:07:05.40    2026-05-25.18 -1.12
12:23:20.40 +04:53:39.10  AT2026ixd  2026-04-12.14 17.65
17:46:09.76 -61:19:50.40  SN2026icy  2026-04-12.2 17.03
09:25:46.42 +02:13:46.30  SN2026gud  2026-04-11.98 16.49
16:52:15.46 -60:27:45.90  ASASSN-26cs  2026-04-12.4 15.5
04:20:55.37 -51:15:31.10  ASASSN-26cr  2026-04-12.01 15.37
22:25:39.35 +36:45:06.90  AT2026ihl  2026-04-10.48 14.21
19:40:44.94 +00:41:03.80  AT2026imw  2026-04-10.32 16.06
19:52:04.70 +05:53:33.50  ASASSN-26cq  2026-04-9.31 14.98
16:08:18.39 -64:11:08.80  ASASSN-26cp  2026-04-9.29 13.32
09:22:22.90 -61:02:43.70  SN2026idh  2026-04-7.97 16.34
05:06:54.12 -19:42:26.40  AT2026imr  2026-04-8 17.49
07:14:55.34 -36:03:21.40  AT2026hei  2026-04-8.12 16.7
21:35:33.14 -19:01:34.80  AT2026ihm  2026-04-8.36 16.7
04:28:24.08 -32:25:35.30  AT2026imo  2026-04-8.02 16.81
05:10:35.79 -39:38:40.80  SN 2026hnn  2026-04-7.04 17.07
09:54:32.04 -01:17:25.80  ASASSN-26cn  2026-04-7.01 15.58
07:46:24.43 -77:29:35.90  ASASSN-26co  2026-04-7.15 14.93
05:00:45.52 -29:51:06.20  AT2026hvw  2026-04-6.03 16.51
19:49:33.10 -23:37:11.00  ASASSN-26cl  2026-04-5.29 14.98
19:32:43.55 -22:39:33.40  ASASSN-26cm  2026-04-4.3 13.88
18:08:57.38 +76:48:23.60  ASASSN-26ck  2026-04-2.37 15.38
16:16:36.10 +44:52:30.20  AT2026hyy  2026-04-2.58 13.81
21:55:23.31 -34:48:53.90  ASASSN-26cj  2026-03-30.4 -1.47
11:19:50.70 -27:51:49.80  SN2026gvk  2026-03-30 15.48
11:53:57.02 -23:09:46.20  SN2026gzx  2026-03-28.75 15.27
07:13:46.14 -33:10:15.70  ASASSN-26ci  2026-03-28.15 15.14
09:03:36.09 -67:58:13.00  SN2026hkg  2026-03-28.19 15.82
07:03:00.72 +39:14:43.00  SN2026fin  2026-03-28.27 15.82
05:35:42.80 -63:44:05.50  ASASSN-26ch  2026-03-27.86 13.02
11:23:19.04 +34:22:38.00  SN2026fwt  2026-03-27.3 16.56
19:03:49.79 +37:04:05.20  ASASSN-26ce  2026-03-26.56 16.3
20:26:56.07 -52:54:06.50  AT2026hiy  2026-03-26.35 16.95
05:25:54.76 -30:15:35.80  ASASSN-26cg  2026-03-25.07 16.88
06:57:16.49 -26:54:37.20  SN2026fzb  2026-03-25.14 15.8
14:37:38.23 -43:00:52.30  ASASSN-26cd  2026-03-24.24 12.52
17:34:53.03 +06:04:29.70  AT2026gzl  2026-03-23.27 15.82
08:30:02.60 -35:12:47.50  ASASSN-26cf  2026-03-23.2 14.82
16:54:25.33 +37:49:56.60  SN 2026evz  2026-03-21.32 17.54
17:06:19.20 -18:54:19.50  ASASSN-26bx  2026-03-21.25 16.39
19:01:16.28 -29:29:23.10  ASASSN-26bw  2026-03-21.33 15.81
08:46:05.75 +10:47:39.80  ASASSN-26ca  2026-03-21.13 14.27
12:14:58.16 +63:47:16.20  SN 2026fvx  2026-03-21.12 15.6
18:02:55.90 -75:23:02.60  ASASSN-26bz  2026-03-21.32 16.16
12:16:02.88 -53:16:33.80  ASASSN-26cc  2026-03-20.04 15.48
13:08:21.85 +29:13:44.20  SN 2026fmh  2026-03-20.16 -0.33
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 5.6K Jun  4 00:34 asassn_transients_list.txt
############################################################
Truncated list of TOCP transients from http://www.cbat.eps.harvard.edu/unconf/tocp.html :
17:57:19.56 -28:08:14.7  TCP J17571956-2808147  2026-03-19.7972  14.5mag
08:46:05.73 +10:47:39.7  TCP J08460573+1047397  2026-03-21.1936  14.5mag
09:55:38.83 +69:05:21.7  PNV J09553883+6905217  2026-04-01.893  19.4mag
19:32:43.67 -22:39:30.7  TCP J19324367-2239307  2026-04-05.4395  13.6mag
16:16:36.03 +44:52:28.9  TCP J16163603+4452289  2026-04-05.6655  14.2mag
00:43:38.36 +41:15:32.4  PNV J00433836+4115324  2026-04-08.079  17.2mag
15:41:11.68 +59:18:26.8  TCP J15411168+5918268  2026-04-12.9625  19.2mag
00:43:35.02 +41:46:28.0  PNV J00433502+4146280  2026-04-23.056  15.9mag
00:42:55.64 +41:14:12.2  PNV J00425564+4114122  2026-04-24.042  16.2mag
21:14:03.38 +56:46:44.1  TCP J21140338+5646441  2026-05-05.3534  16.7mag
15:03:05.19 +22:02:04.1  TCP J15030519+2202041  2026-05-08.3260  13.9mag
07:15:18.25 +47:53:16.7  TCP J07151825+4753167  2026-05-09.1599  14.4mag
16:00:18.44 -22:30:10.6  TCP J16001844-2230106  2026-05-09.6135  13.3mag
00:42:47.45 +41:16:58.5  PNV J00424745+4116585  2026-05-10.030  16.8mag
09:55:02.89 +69:02:13.8  PNV J09550289+6902138  2026-05-18.925  20.7mag
00:43:01.82 +41:18:16.6  PNV J00430182+4118166  2026-05-21.8651  18.83Cmag
00:42:51.20 +41:16:59.4  PNV J00425120+4116594  2022-10-26.135  19.3mag
12:24:25.10 +28:47:12.0  TCP J12242510+2847120  2026-05-31.6015  14.8mag
00:56:07.13 +43:01:40.6  TCP J00560713+4301406  2026-06-01.4135  12.2mag
00:42:41.64 +41:15:16.2  PNV J00424164+4115162  2026-06-02.029  17.4mag
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 189K Jun  4 00:34 tocp_transients_list.txt
############################################################
Truncated list of recent TNS transients from https://www.wis-tns.org/ :
12:20:32.725 +19:21:21.55  AT 2026nlr  2026-05-22.24 20.3755
22:11:38.972 +01:58:18.38  AT 2026nlq  2026-05-21.46 20.412
14:13:39.867 -00:12:14.17  AT 2026nlp  2026-05-20.35 20.1718
20:29:49.048 +01:20:48.06  AT 2026nlo  2026-05-19.39 20.2943
01:58:34.577 +44:34:32.49  AT 2026nln  2026-05-23.48 17.464
00:09:19.630 +10:35:22.07  AT 2026nlm  2026-05-20.48 18.9664
00:31:41.797 +26:10:30.85  AT 2026nll  2026-05-23.48 19.3138
16:14:03.050 +15:19:38.66  AT 2026nlk  2026-05-16.86 20.93
18:17:15.360 +39:41:22.36  AT 2026nlj  2026-05-10.79 21.53
18:22:21.260 +38:36:15.52  AT 2026nli  2026-05-10.79 21.62
16:23:29.410 +22:48:47.18  AT 2026nlh  2026-05-09.79 20.01
15:19:37.260 +16:28:58.23  AT 2026nlg  2026-05-05.84 20.81
14:31:09.520 +24:03:04.31  AT 2026nlf  2026-04-30.86 19.85
15:33:35.050 +31:50:53.87  AT 2026nle  2026-04-19.90 20.71
15:15:31.740 +19:01:13.96  AT 2026nld  2026-04-19.89 20.52
14:33:02.080 +03:34:42.30  AT 2026nlc  2026-05-21.70 21.81
14:21:55.000 -01:06:15.74  AT 2026nlb  2026-05-21.70 21.58
14:21:48.580 +02:02:28.28  AT 2026nla  2026-05-21.70 21.97
14:34:15.890 +04:48:10.98  AT 2026nkz  2026-05-21.66 22.11
13:25:52.490 +02:32:04.69  AT 2026nky  2026-05-21.62 21.92
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 30K Jun  4 00:34 tns_transients_list.txt

=== Transient Factory Profiling ===
Started: Thu Jun  4 00:33:36 CDT 2026
=======================================
TIMING SExtractor: 4 seconds
TIMING matching_and_photometry: 0 seconds
TIMING lightcurve_write: 1 seconds
TIMING select_aperture: 1 seconds
    VAST_RUN_default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1: 9s (0.15 min)
    WCS_CACHE_SETUP: 0s (0.00 min)
    WCS_CALIBRATION_AND_EPHEMERIS: 43s (0.72 min)
    PLATE_VERIFY_AND_POINTING: 0s (0.00 min)
    UCAC5_PLATE_SOLVING: 1s (0.02 min)
    MAGNITUDE_CALIBRATION: 65s (1.08 min)
    MAGCAL_SANITY_CHECK: 0s (0.00 min)
      FILTER_MAGNITUDE_CONSOLIDATED: 0s (0.00 min)
      FILTER_FRAME_EDGE: 0s (0.00 min)
      FILTER_SECOND_EPOCH_VERIFY: 0s (0.00 min)
    CANDIDATE_FILTERING_TOTAL: 0s (0.00 min)
    EXCLUSION_LIST_PREPARATION: 0s (0.00 min)
    SEEING_AND_LIMITING_MAG: 0s (0.00 min)
    WAIT_FOR_UCAC5: 1s (0.02 min)
    WCS_IMAGE_ARCHIVING: 0s (0.00 min)
    HTML_REPORT: 2s (0.03 min)
  SE_CONFIG_default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1: 121s (2.02 min)
TIMING SExtractor: 10 seconds
TIMING matching_and_photometry: 1 seconds
TIMING lightcurve_write: 3 seconds
TIMING select_aperture: 4 seconds
    VAST_RUN_default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL: 34s (0.57 min)
    WCS_CACHE_SETUP: 1s (0.02 min)
    WCS_CALIBRATION_AND_EPHEMERIS: 1s (0.02 min)
    PLATE_VERIFY_AND_POINTING: 1s (0.02 min)
    UCAC5_PLATE_SOLVING: 0s (0.00 min)
    MAGNITUDE_CALIBRATION: 114s (1.90 min)
    MAGCAL_SANITY_CHECK: 0s (0.00 min)
      FILTER_MAGNITUDE_CONSOLIDATED: 0s (0.00 min)
      FILTER_FRAME_EDGE: 0s (0.00 min)
      FILTER_SECOND_EPOCH_VERIFY: 1s (0.02 min)
    CANDIDATE_FILTERING_TOTAL: 1s (0.02 min)
    EXCLUSION_LIST_PREPARATION: 0s (0.00 min)
    SEEING_AND_LIMITING_MAG: 1s (0.02 min)
    WAIT_FOR_UCAC5: 0s (0.00 min)
    WCS_IMAGE_ARCHIVING: 0s (0.00 min)
    HTML_REPORT: 3s (0.05 min)
  SE_CONFIG_default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL: 156s (2.60 min)
FIELD_LMi-01-Q1b1x1: 300s (5.00 min)
=======================================
TOTAL_RUNTIME: 311s (5.18 min)
Finished: Thu Jun  4 00:38:47 CDT 2026