This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-04_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_002252_TTUQ2b1x1_2104827_EA2gijkT
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 04.1994 2461195.6994 11.74 16:43:31.90 -13:25:55.6
4.77427 20.64023 galactic Oph Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.6" and 0.9 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.48 Doris 1 -1 1 11.8 -0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits at 16:43:31.90 -13:25:55.6: 15.23 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits at 16:43:31.90 -13:25:55.6: 15.12 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461195.6994,11.74,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260604.1994 11.74CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 04.1994 2461195.6994 12.16 17:00:52.34 -05:51:26.7
14.05799 21.35881 galactic Oph Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.2" and 0.9 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.258 Tyche 2 -0 2 12.0 -0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits at 17:00:52.34 -05:51:26.7: 15.75 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits at 17:00:52.34 -05:51:26.7: 15.53 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461195.6994,12.16,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260604.1994 12.16CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 04.1994 2461195.6994 12.84 17:04:21.74 -11:10:42.9
9.80889 17.74847 galactic Oph Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.1" and 0.9 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.412 Elisabetha 2 -1 2 12.8 0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits at 17:04:21.74 -11:10:42.9: 15.80 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits at 17:04:21.74 -11:10:42.9: 15.56 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461195.6994,12.84,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260604.1994 12.84CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 04.1994 2461195.6994 13.37 16:54:35.21 -11:32:34.8
8.07708 19.53202 galactic Oph Second-epoch detections are separated by 2.0" and 0.9 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.740 Cantabia 1 -1 2 13.4 -0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits at 16:54:35.21 -11:32:34.8: 15.77 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits at 16:54:35.21 -11:32:34.8: 15.56 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461195.6994,13.37,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260604.1994 13.37CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461174.80897943 14.05.2026 07:24:45.823 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits
First image: 2461174.80897943 14.05.2026 07:24:45.823 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits
Last image: 2461195.69956948 04.06.2026 04:47:12.803 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-04_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_002252_TTUQ2b1x1_2104827_EA2gijkT/fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-03_23-47-12_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0075.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 4
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.85
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 5 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 4519
Objects passed selection criteria: 4515
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.6 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.6 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 4346
Average stars matched: 4325 (99.5168 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 111480 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Mon Jun 1 15:05:05 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-85-g6dfb2809
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-06-01)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Thu Jun 4 00:33:58 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461174.80897943 14.05.2026 07:24:45.823 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits
First image: 2461174.80897943 14.05.2026 07:24:45.823 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits
Last image: 2461195.69956948 04.06.2026 04:47:12.803 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-04_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_002252_TTUQ2b1x1_2104827_EA2gijkT/fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-03_23-47-12_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0075.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 109
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.46
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 44 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 48571
Objects passed selection criteria: 48480
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.6 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.6 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 46612.8
Average stars matched: 45703.8 (98.0499 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 153788 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Mon Jun 1 15:05:05 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-85-g6dfb2809
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-06-01)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Thu Jun 4 00:37:29 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/TTUQ2_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 4 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-04_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_002252_TTUQ2b1x1_2104827_EA2gijkT/fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-03_23-46-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0074.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-04_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_002252_TTUQ2b1x1_2104827_EA2gijkT/fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-03_23-47-12_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0075.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-04_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_002252_TTUQ2b1x1_2104827_EA2gijkT/fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-03_23-46-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0074.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-04_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_002252_TTUQ2b1x1_2104827_EA2gijkT/fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-03_23-47-12_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0075.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461195.69928256
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
'asassn_transients_list.txt' -> '../asassn_transients_list.txt'
'tns_transients_list.txt' -> '../tns_transients_list.txt'
wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits'
wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits'
wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-03_23-46-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0074.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-03_23-46-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0074.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-03_23-46-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0074.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-03_23-46-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0074.fits'
wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-03_23-47-12_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0075.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-03_23-47-12_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0075.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-03_23-47-12_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0075.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-03_23-47-12_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0075.fits'
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits
Image size: 937.3'x624.3' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 17:08:38.023 -09:59:09.18 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.87"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-03_23-46-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0074.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-03_23-46-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0074.fits
Image size: 937.4'x624.3' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 17:08:38.503 -09:59:56.27 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 17:08:38.023 -09:59:09.18
Second-epoch image center 17:08:38.503 -09:59:56.27
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0132 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-03_23-47-12_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0075.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-03_23-47-12_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0075.fits
Image size: 937.4'x624.3' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 17:08:38.273 -09:59:52.35 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 17:08:38.023 -09:59:09.18
Second-epoch image center 17:08:38.273 -09:59:52.35
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0120 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 17:08:38.503 -09:59:56.27
Second-epoch second image center 17:08:38.273 -09:59:52.35
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00144 deg.
###################################
ERROR: no shift applied between second-epoch images! The distance between image centers is 0.00144 deg. (min. required shift: 0.00164 deg.)
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits &> /tmp/tmp.JLwu9dkJub
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits &> /tmp/tmp.oCry54Mu9x
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-04_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_002252_TTUQ2b1x1_2104827_EA2gijkT/fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-03_23-46-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0074.fits &> /tmp/tmp.oI3G7RUg6n
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-04_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_002252_TTUQ2b1x1_2104827_EA2gijkT/fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-03_23-46-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0074.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-04_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_002252_TTUQ2b1x1_2104827_EA2gijkT/fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-03_23-47-12_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0075.fits &> /tmp/tmp.XhhU26oVNI
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-04_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_002252_TTUQ2b1x1_2104827_EA2gijkT/fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-03_23-47-12_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0075.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits and wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits.cat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits and wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits.cat
Found non-empty wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits and wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits.cat
The reference image (wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits) and catalog (wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits.cat) found
'wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits.cat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 7619 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 249.0959 to 265.2508 deg, Dec -15.2525 to -4.6764 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 249.0959 to 265.2508 deg, Dec -15.2525 to -4.6764 deg
Loaded 4104 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3395 out of 3508 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3508 out of 7619 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.817900
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.817900
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.85
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.97
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.97
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 7619 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 249.0959 to 265.2508 deg, Dec -15.2525 to -4.6764 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 249.0959 to 265.2508 deg, Dec -15.2525 to -4.6764 deg
Loaded 4104 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3395 out of 3508 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3508 out of 7619 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits (aperture=6.3)
Read 6368 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 249.0956 to 265.2325 deg, Dec -15.2667 to -4.7383 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 249.0956 to 265.2325 deg, Dec -15.2667 to -4.7383 deg
Loaded 4081 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3316 out of 3413 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3413 out of 6368 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits (aperture=6.3)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 2 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 8000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.4 pix Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits
2.4 pix Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits
2.4 pix fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-03_23-46-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0074.fits
2.4 pix fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-03_23-47-12_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0075.fits
2.4 pix wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits
2.4 pix wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.0 mag. Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits
14.8 mag. Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits
14.6 mag. fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-03_23-46-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0074.fits
14.6 mag. fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-03_23-47-12_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0075.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.6 (SNR ) 11.7 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.JLwu9dkJub (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-04_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_002252_TTUQ2b1x1_2104827_EA2gijkT/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits' -> 'wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=425, passed=7619
Got 7619 stars (including 7188 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 7619 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013018 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010414 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 938 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 936 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 921 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.54"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 936 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7489 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.52"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 938 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 936 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7492 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.53"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 936 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7492 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.54"
Excluding outliers - 936 stars left (next iteration limit 1029)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits N_match=936 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.565 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.413 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.922 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.432 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.568 n_q1=178 n_q2=358 n_q3=211 n_q4=189 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.632
The image catalog is written to wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits -region wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.oCry54Mu9x (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-04_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_002252_TTUQ2b1x1_2104827_EA2gijkT/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits' -> 'wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=363, passed=6368
Got 6368 stars (including 5993 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 6368 stars from the SExtractor catalog
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-04_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_002252_TTUQ2b1x1_2104827_EA2gijkT/util/fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh: line 144: echo: write error: Broken pipe
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013018 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010414 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 942 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 939 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 927 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.53"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 939 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6258 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.53"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 942 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 939 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6256 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.54"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 939 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6256 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.55"
Excluding outliers - 939 stars left (next iteration limit 1032)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits N_match=939 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.558 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.417 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.846 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.469 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.530 n_q1=180 n_q2=359 n_q3=207 n_q4=193 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.517
The image catalog is written to wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits -region wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.oI3G7RUg6n (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-04_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_002252_TTUQ2b1x1_2104827_EA2gijkT/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-04_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_002252_TTUQ2b1x1_2104827_EA2gijkT/fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-03_23-46-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0074.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-04_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_002252_TTUQ2b1x1_2104827_EA2gijkT/fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-03_23-46-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0074.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-04_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_002252_TTUQ2b1x1_2104827_EA2gijkT/fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-03_23-46-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0074.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-04_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_002252_TTUQ2b1x1_2104827_EA2gijkT/fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-03_23-46-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0074.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-04_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_002252_TTUQ2b1x1_2104827_EA2gijkT/fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-03_23-46-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0074.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-04_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_002252_TTUQ2b1x1_2104827_EA2gijkT/fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-03_23-46-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0074.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-03_23-46-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0074.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-03_23-46-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0074.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-03_23-46-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0074.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-03_23-46-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0074.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-03_23-46-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0074.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-03_23-46-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0074.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-03_23-46-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0074.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-04_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_002252_TTUQ2b1x1_2104827_EA2gijkT/fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-03_23-46-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0074.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-03_23-46-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0074.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=354, passed=5430
Got 5430 stars (including 5071 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-03_23-46-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0074.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 5430 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013019 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010416 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 941 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 939 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 925 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.58"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 939 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5340 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.56"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 941 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 939 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5339 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.57"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 939 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5339 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.60"
Excluding outliers - 939 stars left (next iteration limit 1032)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-03_23-46-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0074.fits N_match=939 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.627 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.482 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.846 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.541 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.564 n_q1=175 n_q2=363 n_q3=204 n_q4=197 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.349
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-03_23-46-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0074.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-03_23-46-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0074.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-04_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_002252_TTUQ2b1x1_2104827_EA2gijkT/fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-03_23-46-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0074.fits -region wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-03_23-46-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0074.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-03_23-46-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0074.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.XhhU26oVNI (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-04_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_002252_TTUQ2b1x1_2104827_EA2gijkT/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-04_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_002252_TTUQ2b1x1_2104827_EA2gijkT/fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-03_23-47-12_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0075.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-04_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_002252_TTUQ2b1x1_2104827_EA2gijkT/fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-03_23-47-12_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0075.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-04_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_002252_TTUQ2b1x1_2104827_EA2gijkT/fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-03_23-47-12_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0075.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-04_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_002252_TTUQ2b1x1_2104827_EA2gijkT/fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-03_23-47-12_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0075.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-04_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_002252_TTUQ2b1x1_2104827_EA2gijkT/fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-03_23-47-12_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0075.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-04_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_002252_TTUQ2b1x1_2104827_EA2gijkT/fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-03_23-47-12_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0075.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-03_23-47-12_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0075.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-03_23-47-12_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0075.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-03_23-47-12_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0075.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-03_23-47-12_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0075.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-03_23-47-12_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0075.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-03_23-47-12_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0075.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-03_23-47-12_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0075.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-04_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_002252_TTUQ2b1x1_2104827_EA2gijkT/fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-03_23-47-12_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0075.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-03_23-47-12_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0075.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=346, passed=5408
Got 5408 stars (including 5055 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-03_23-47-12_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0075.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 5408 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013019 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010416 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 940 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 938 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 925 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.58"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 938 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5316 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.58"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 940 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 938 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5318 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.59"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 938 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5318 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.61"
Excluding outliers - 938 stars left (next iteration limit 1031)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-03_23-47-12_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0075.fits N_match=938 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.589 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.487 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.788 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.460 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.553 n_q1=176 n_q2=364 n_q3=204 n_q4=194 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.336
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-03_23-47-12_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0075.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-03_23-47-12_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0075.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-04_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_002252_TTUQ2b1x1_2104827_EA2gijkT/fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-03_23-47-12_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0075.fits -region wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-03_23-47-12_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0075.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-03_23-47-12_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0075.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits sigma_overall=0.565 worst_q_ratio=1.632
ref2=Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits sigma_overall=0.558 worst_q_ratio=1.517
new1=fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-03_23-46-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0074.fits sigma_overall=0.627 worst_q_ratio=1.349
new2=fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-03_23-47-12_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0075.fits sigma_overall=0.589 worst_q_ratio=1.336
reference average sigma_overall=0.5615 worst_q_ratio=1.5745
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
Distribution of catalog-matched stars across the image:
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy: wrote wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081_astrometric_residuals.png (936 matched stars from wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy: wrote wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049_astrometric_residuals.png (939 matched stars from wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy: wrote wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-03_23-46-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0074_astrometric_residuals.png (939 matched stars from wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-03_23-46-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0074.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy: wrote wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-03_23-47-12_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0075_astrometric_residuals.png (938 matched stars from wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-03_23-47-12_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0075.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-03_23-46-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0074.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-03_23-46-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0074.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-04_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_002252_TTUQ2b1x1_2104827_EA2gijkT/wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-03_23-46-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0074.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-03_23-47-12_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0075.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-03_23-47-12_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0075.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-04_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_002252_TTUQ2b1x1_2104827_EA2gijkT/wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-03_23-47-12_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0075.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Oph-05-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits at 17:03:17.29 -05:50:32.1: 11.84 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits at 16:43:31.90 -13:25:55.6: 15.23 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits at 17:03:17.29 -05:50:32.1: 11.85 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.84 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:03:17.29 -05:50:32.1: ref_mag=11.84 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.1111 delta=-0.27 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits at 16:43:31.90 -13:25:55.6: 15.12 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out20071.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 9s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 1s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20063_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-03_23-47-12_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0075
The candidate 20063_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-03_23-47-12_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0075 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20071_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-03_23-47-12_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0075
Preparing report for the candidate 20071_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-03_23-47-12_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0075
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 10s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Oph-05-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
16:43:31.90 -13:25:55.6
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 4 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-04_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_002252_TTUQ2b1x1_2104827_EA2gijkT/fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-03_23-46-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0074.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-04_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_002252_TTUQ2b1x1_2104827_EA2gijkT/fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-03_23-47-12_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0075.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-04_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_002252_TTUQ2b1x1_2104827_EA2gijkT/fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-03_23-46-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0074.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-04_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_002252_TTUQ2b1x1_2104827_EA2gijkT/fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-03_23-47-12_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0075.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-03_23-46-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0074.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-03_23-47-12_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0075.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/exclusion_list.txt
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-03_23-46-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0074.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-03_23-47-12_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0075.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits
Image size: 937.3'x624.3' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 17:08:38.023 -09:59:09.18 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.87"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-03_23-46-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0074.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-03_23-46-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0074.fits
Image size: 937.4'x624.3' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 17:08:38.503 -09:59:56.27 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 17:08:38.023 -09:59:09.18
Second-epoch image center 17:08:38.503 -09:59:56.27
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0132 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-03_23-47-12_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0075.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-03_23-47-12_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0075.fits
Image size: 937.4'x624.3' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 17:08:38.273 -09:59:52.35 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 17:08:38.023 -09:59:09.18
Second-epoch image center 17:08:38.273 -09:59:52.35
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0120 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 17:08:38.503 -09:59:56.27
Second-epoch second image center 17:08:38.273 -09:59:52.35
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00144 deg.
###################################
ERROR: no shift applied between second-epoch images! The distance between image centers is 0.00144 deg. (min. required shift: 0.00164 deg.)
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits &> /tmp/tmp.iLY4vV5UMA
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits &> /tmp/tmp.OL6vJOJCnj
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-04_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_002252_TTUQ2b1x1_2104827_EA2gijkT/fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-03_23-46-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0074.fits &> /tmp/tmp.u9ud3EFwVN
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-04_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_002252_TTUQ2b1x1_2104827_EA2gijkT/fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-03_23-46-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0074.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-04_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_002252_TTUQ2b1x1_2104827_EA2gijkT/fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-03_23-47-12_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0075.fits &> /tmp/tmp.YfedqJfcTX
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-04_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_002252_TTUQ2b1x1_2104827_EA2gijkT/fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-03_23-47-12_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0075.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits and wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits.cat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits and wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits.cat
Found non-empty wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits and wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits.cat
The reference image (wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits) and catalog (wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits.cat) found
'wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits.cat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 72440 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 249.0959 to 265.2606 deg, Dec -15.2524 to -4.6668 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 249.0959 to 265.2606 deg, Dec -15.2524 to -4.6668 deg
Loaded 4113 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3162 out of 3606 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3606 out of 72440 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.626150
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.626150
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.46
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.17
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.17
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 72440 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 249.0959 to 265.2606 deg, Dec -15.2524 to -4.6668 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 249.0959 to 265.2606 deg, Dec -15.2524 to -4.6668 deg
Loaded 4113 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3162 out of 3606 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3606 out of 72440 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits (aperture=4.5)
Read 62008 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 249.0757 to 265.2415 deg, Dec -15.2678 to -4.6866 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 249.0757 to 265.2415 deg, Dec -15.2678 to -4.6866 deg
Loaded 4114 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3200 out of 3606 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3606 out of 62008 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits (aperture=4.5)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 69 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 8000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.2 pix Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits
2.2 pix Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits
2.0 pix fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-03_23-46-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0074.fits
2.0 pix fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-03_23-47-12_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0075.fits
2.2 pix wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits
2.2 pix wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.2 mag. Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits
14.9 mag. Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits
14.8 mag. fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-03_23-46-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0074.fits
14.8 mag. fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-03_23-47-12_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0075.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.8 (SNR ) 14.3 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.iLY4vV5UMA (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-04_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_002252_TTUQ2b1x1_2104827_EA2gijkT/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits' -> 'wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=16, blended=4399, passed=72424
Got 72424 stars (including 67929 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 72424 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013018 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010414 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 940 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 938 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 927 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.55"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 938 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 71572 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.52"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 940 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 938 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 71572 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.52"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 938 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 71572 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.56"
Excluding outliers - 938 stars left (next iteration limit 1031)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits N_match=938 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.588 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.416 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.916 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.488 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.569 n_q1=198 n_q2=342 n_q3=199 n_q4=199 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.557
The image catalog is written to wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits -region wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.OL6vJOJCnj (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-04_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_002252_TTUQ2b1x1_2104827_EA2gijkT/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits' -> 'wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=6, blended=3287, passed=62002
Got 62002 stars (including 58624 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 62002 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013018 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010414 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 941 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 938 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 926 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.53"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 938 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 61294 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.52"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 941 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 938 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 61293 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.52"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 938 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 61292 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.55"
Excluding outliers - 938 stars left (next iteration limit 1031)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits N_match=938 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.568 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.442 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.811 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.477 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.532 n_q1=195 n_q2=353 n_q3=194 n_q4=196 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.428
The image catalog is written to wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits -region wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.u9ud3EFwVN (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-04_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_002252_TTUQ2b1x1_2104827_EA2gijkT/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-04_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_002252_TTUQ2b1x1_2104827_EA2gijkT/fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-03_23-46-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0074.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-04_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_002252_TTUQ2b1x1_2104827_EA2gijkT/fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-03_23-46-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0074.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-04_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_002252_TTUQ2b1x1_2104827_EA2gijkT/fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-03_23-46-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0074.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-04_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_002252_TTUQ2b1x1_2104827_EA2gijkT/fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-03_23-46-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0074.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-04_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_002252_TTUQ2b1x1_2104827_EA2gijkT/fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-03_23-46-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0074.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-04_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_002252_TTUQ2b1x1_2104827_EA2gijkT/fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-03_23-46-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0074.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-03_23-46-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0074.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-03_23-46-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0074.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-03_23-46-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0074.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-03_23-46-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0074.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-03_23-46-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0074.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-03_23-46-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0074.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-03_23-46-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0074.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-04_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_002252_TTUQ2b1x1_2104827_EA2gijkT/fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-03_23-46-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0074.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-03_23-46-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0074.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=9, blended=2696, passed=56461
Got 56461 stars (including 53689 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-03_23-46-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0074.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 56461 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013019 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010416 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 945 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 942 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 925 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.58"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 942 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 55743 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.55"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 945 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 942 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 55746 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.55"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 942 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 55746 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.57"
Excluding outliers - 942 stars left (next iteration limit 1036)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-03_23-46-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0074.fits N_match=942 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.647 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.547 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.799 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.566 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.561 n_q1=187 n_q2=367 n_q3=186 n_q4=202 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.236
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-03_23-46-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0074.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-03_23-46-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0074.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-04_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_002252_TTUQ2b1x1_2104827_EA2gijkT/fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-03_23-46-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0074.fits -region wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-03_23-46-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0074.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-03_23-46-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0074.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.YfedqJfcTX (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-04_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_002252_TTUQ2b1x1_2104827_EA2gijkT/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-04_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_002252_TTUQ2b1x1_2104827_EA2gijkT/fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-03_23-47-12_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0075.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-04_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_002252_TTUQ2b1x1_2104827_EA2gijkT/fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-03_23-47-12_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0075.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-04_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_002252_TTUQ2b1x1_2104827_EA2gijkT/fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-03_23-47-12_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0075.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-04_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_002252_TTUQ2b1x1_2104827_EA2gijkT/fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-03_23-47-12_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0075.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-04_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_002252_TTUQ2b1x1_2104827_EA2gijkT/fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-03_23-47-12_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0075.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-04_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_002252_TTUQ2b1x1_2104827_EA2gijkT/fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-03_23-47-12_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0075.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-03_23-47-12_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0075.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-03_23-47-12_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0075.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-03_23-47-12_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0075.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-03_23-47-12_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0075.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-03_23-47-12_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0075.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-03_23-47-12_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0075.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-03_23-47-12_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0075.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-04_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_002252_TTUQ2b1x1_2104827_EA2gijkT/fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-03_23-47-12_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0075.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-03_23-47-12_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0075.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=8, blended=2670, passed=56107
Got 56107 stars (including 53361 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-03_23-47-12_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0075.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 56107 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013019 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010416 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 941 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 938 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 924 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.58"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 938 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 55285 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.54"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 941 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 938 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 55284 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.54"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 938 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 55284 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.57"
Excluding outliers - 938 stars left (next iteration limit 1031)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-03_23-47-12_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0075.fits N_match=938 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.597 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.479 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.758 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.541 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.565 n_q1=187 n_q2=365 n_q3=189 n_q4=197 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.269
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-03_23-47-12_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0075.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-03_23-47-12_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0075.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-04_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_002252_TTUQ2b1x1_2104827_EA2gijkT/fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-03_23-47-12_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0075.fits -region wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-03_23-47-12_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0075.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-03_23-47-12_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0075.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-03_23-46-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0074.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-04_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_002252_TTUQ2b1x1_2104827_EA2gijkT/wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-03_23-46-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0074.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-03_23-47-12_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0075.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-04_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_002252_TTUQ2b1x1_2104827_EA2gijkT/wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-03_23-47-12_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0075.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Oph-05-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits at 17:21:51.58 -11:29:39.4: 14.73 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits at 17:14:39.93 -11:42:47.4: 14.03 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits at 16:57:27.80 -07:57:34.0: 14.35 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits at 17:13:32.51 -09:26:58.2: 14.05 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits at 16:47:28.34 -12:50:17.4: 14.27 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits at 17:23:59.88 -12:54:11.8: 14.21 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits at 17:20:01.43 -13:19:05.9: 14.49 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits at 16:46:13.59 -07:00:03.4: 13.39 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits at 17:21:51.58 -11:29:39.4: 14.49 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.61 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:21:51.58 -11:29:39.4: ref_mag=14.61 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.4270 delta=0.18 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits at 16:57:27.80 -07:57:34.0: 14.24 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits at 16:46:13.59 -07:00:03.4: 13.56 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits at 17:13:32.51 -09:26:58.2: 14.36 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits at 17:23:59.88 -12:54:11.8: 14.01 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits at 17:14:39.93 -11:42:47.4: 14.05 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.31 +/- 0.07
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits at 16:47:28.34 -12:50:17.4: 14.37 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.45 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:57:27.80 -07:57:34.0: ref_mag=14.31 +/- 0.07 new_mean_mag=14.5577 delta=-0.25 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:46:13.59 -07:00:03.4: ref_mag=13.45 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.5982 delta=-0.15 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.14 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.11 +/- 0.07
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:13:32.51 -09:26:58.2: ref_mag=14.14 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=14.4597 delta=-0.32 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.30 +/- 0.08
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.04 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:23:59.88 -12:54:11.8: ref_mag=14.11 +/- 0.07 new_mean_mag=14.1819 delta=-0.07 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:47:28.34 -12:50:17.4: ref_mag=14.30 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=14.2407 delta=0.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:14:39.93 -11:42:47.4: ref_mag=14.04 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=14.2822 delta=-0.24 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits at 17:20:01.43 -13:19:05.9: 14.37 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits at 17:00:52.34 -05:51:26.7: 15.75 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.43 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:20:01.43 -13:19:05.9: ref_mag=14.43 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=14.4119 delta=0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits at 17:04:21.74 -11:10:42.9: 15.80 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits at 17:00:52.34 -05:51:26.7: 15.53 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits at 17:25:09.01 -07:32:47.0: 13.24 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits at 17:18:04.34 -12:21:10.9: 14.79 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits at 16:54:35.21 -11:32:34.8: 15.77 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits at 17:11:51.36 -09:53:07.2: 13.73 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits at 17:04:21.74 -11:10:42.9: 15.56 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits at 17:18:42.47 -12:09:59.9: 14.42 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits at 17:23:27.39 -11:42:00.3: 14.42 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits at 17:08:03.89 -13:57:01.2: 14.73 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits at 17:25:09.01 -07:32:47.0: 13.23 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.24 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:25:09.01 -07:32:47.0: ref_mag=13.24 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.3243 delta=-0.09 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits at 17:18:04.34 -12:21:10.9: 15.03 +/- 0.22 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.87 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 17:18:04.34 -12:21:10.9: ref_mag=14.87 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=13.4549 delta=1.41 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits at 16:54:35.21 -11:32:34.8: 15.56 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits at 17:11:51.36 -09:53:07.2: 13.73 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.73 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:11:51.36 -09:53:07.2: ref_mag=13.73 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=14.0098 delta=-0.28 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits at 17:24:49.99 -13:03:03.0: 15.04 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits at 17:23:27.39 -11:42:00.3: 14.37 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.40 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:23:27.39 -11:42:00.3: ref_mag=14.40 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=14.3140 delta=0.08 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits at 17:18:42.47 -12:09:59.9: 14.49 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits at 17:08:03.89 -13:57:01.2: 14.98 +/- 0.23 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.44 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.81 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:18:42.47 -12:09:59.9: ref_mag=14.44 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=14.3723 delta=0.07 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:08:03.89 -13:57:01.2: ref_mag=14.81 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.3525 delta=0.46 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits at 17:24:49.99 -13:03:03.0: 14.63 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.80 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:24:49.99 -13:03:03.0: ref_mag=14.80 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.4333 delta=0.37 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits at 17:23:31.76 -12:06:12.2: 14.64 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits at 17:25:06.88 -12:54:58.8: 14.59 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits at 17:11:29.19 -05:44:05.1: 14.35 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits at 17:26:17.02 -12:03:24.2: 14.34 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits at 16:43:01.35 -12:02:20.9: 14.55 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits at 17:23:31.76 -12:06:12.2: 14.34 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.47 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:23:31.76 -12:06:12.2: ref_mag=14.47 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.3177 delta=0.15 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits at 17:25:06.88 -12:54:58.8: 14.77 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.65 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:25:06.88 -12:54:58.8: ref_mag=14.65 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.4972 delta=0.15 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits at 16:41:23.97 -13:48:52.9: 14.70 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits at 17:11:29.19 -05:44:05.1: 14.37 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.36 +/- 0.07
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:11:29.19 -05:44:05.1: ref_mag=14.36 +/- 0.07 new_mean_mag=14.2497 delta=0.11 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits at 17:26:17.02 -12:03:24.2: 14.32 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.34 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:26:17.02 -12:03:24.2: ref_mag=14.34 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=14.3428 delta=-0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits at 16:43:01.35 -12:02:20.9: 14.47 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.51 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:43:01.35 -12:02:20.9: ref_mag=14.51 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.2407 delta=0.27 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits at 16:41:23.97 -13:48:52.9: 14.56 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.63 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:41:23.97 -13:48:52.9: ref_mag=14.63 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.3836 delta=0.25 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits at 17:08:25.64 -12:03:07.4: 14.41 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits at 16:58:09.40 -11:52:44.4: 14.66 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits at 17:24:56.56 -13:26:08.3: 14.42 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits at 17:14:25.17 -13:29:46.2: 14.66 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits at 16:51:10.58 -12:22:06.7: 14.81 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits at 17:08:25.64 -12:03:07.4: 14.48 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.44 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:08:25.64 -12:03:07.4: ref_mag=14.44 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=14.4911 delta=-0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits at 17:21:49.47 -11:26:18.1: 14.47 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits at 16:58:09.40 -11:52:44.4: 14.41 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.52 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:58:09.40 -11:52:44.4: ref_mag=14.52 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.4505 delta=0.07 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits at 17:24:56.56 -13:26:08.3: 14.50 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits at 17:14:25.17 -13:29:46.2: 14.44 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.45 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:24:56.56 -13:26:08.3: ref_mag=14.45 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=14.5028 delta=-0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.55 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:14:25.17 -13:29:46.2: ref_mag=14.55 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.4834 delta=0.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits at 16:51:10.58 -12:22:06.7: 14.80 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.80 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:51:10.58 -12:22:06.7: ref_mag=14.80 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.4219 delta=0.38 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits at 17:21:49.47 -11:26:18.1: 14.69 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.54 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:21:49.47 -11:26:18.1: ref_mag=14.54 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.4498 delta=0.09 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits at 16:59:05.19 -13:53:43.6: 14.80 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits at 16:54:13.67 -13:20:22.6: 14.61 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits at 17:21:52.40 -11:27:44.8: 15.00 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits at 17:21:42.87 -12:44:43.9: 14.78 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits at 16:47:48.74 -06:46:07.7: 14.96 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits at 16:54:13.67 -13:20:22.6: 14.73 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.65 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:54:13.67 -13:20:22.6: ref_mag=14.65 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.4587 delta=0.19 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits at 17:21:42.87 -12:44:43.9: 14.93 +/- 0.22 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits at 16:59:05.19 -13:53:43.6: 14.72 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.83 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits at 17:21:52.40 -11:27:44.8: 14.75 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:21:42.87 -12:44:43.9: ref_mag=14.83 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.6616 delta=0.17 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.77 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.87 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:59:05.19 -13:53:43.6: ref_mag=14.77 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.5549 delta=0.21 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:21:52.40 -11:27:44.8: ref_mag=14.87 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=14.5839 delta=0.29 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits at 16:47:48.74 -06:46:07.7: 15.52 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.96 +/- 0.18
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:47:48.74 -06:46:07.7: ref_mag=14.96 +/- 0.18 new_mean_mag=14.4259 delta=0.53 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits at 17:09:05.86 -14:09:27.4: 14.60 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits at 17:24:05.94 -09:58:51.4: 15.02 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits at 17:19:19.77 -13:12:16.2: 14.84 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits at 17:18:05.87 -14:11:24.0: 14.57 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits at 16:57:44.55 -11:17:14.2: 14.52 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits at 17:02:18.88 -13:46:08.3: 14.89 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits at 17:09:05.86 -14:09:27.4: 14.80 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.66 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:09:05.86 -14:09:27.4: ref_mag=14.66 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.5230 delta=0.14 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits at 17:24:05.94 -09:58:51.4: 14.93 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits at 17:19:19.77 -13:12:16.2: 14.51 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits at 17:01:32.23 -11:50:42.6: 14.78 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.98 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:24:05.94 -09:58:51.4: ref_mag=14.98 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.6737 delta=0.31 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits at 17:18:05.87 -14:11:24.0: 14.75 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.65 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits at 16:57:44.55 -11:17:14.2: 14.74 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:19:19.77 -13:12:16.2: ref_mag=14.65 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.6544 delta=-0.00 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits at 17:02:18.88 -13:46:08.3: 15.02 +/- 0.25 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.63 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:18:05.87 -14:11:24.0: ref_mag=14.63 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.7060 delta=-0.07 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.60 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:57:44.55 -11:17:14.2: ref_mag=14.60 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.4395 delta=0.16 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.93 +/- 0.15
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:02:18.88 -13:46:08.3: ref_mag=14.93 +/- 0.15 new_mean_mag=14.7100 delta=0.22 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits at 17:01:32.23 -11:50:42.6: 14.94 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.83 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:01:32.23 -11:50:42.6: ref_mag=14.83 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.6105 delta=0.22 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits at 17:08:54.61 -09:41:45.5: 15.29 +/- 0.23 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits at 17:19:37.17 -07:12:15.3: 15.22 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits at 17:19:18.88 -13:21:05.1: 14.54 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits at 16:48:18.11 -08:46:40.2: 15.05 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits at 17:10:48.19 -13:41:03.1: 14.60 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits at 17:14:30.21 -10:28:26.5: 15.30 +/- 0.23 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits at 17:08:54.61 -09:41:45.5: 15.61 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.29 +/- 0.23
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:08:54.61 -09:41:45.5: ref_mag=15.29 +/- 0.23 new_mean_mag=14.5284 delta=0.76 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits at 17:19:37.17 -07:12:15.3: 15.56 +/- 0.33 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.32 +/- 0.17
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits at 16:48:18.11 -08:46:40.2: 15.11 +/- 0.27 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:19:37.17 -07:12:15.3: ref_mag=15.32 +/- 0.17 new_mean_mag=14.7263 delta=0.59 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits at 17:19:18.88 -13:21:05.1: 14.64 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.07 +/- 0.17
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits at 17:10:48.19 -13:41:03.1: 14.65 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:48:18.11 -08:46:40.2: ref_mag=15.07 +/- 0.17 new_mean_mag=14.5802 delta=0.49 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.57 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:19:18.88 -13:21:05.1: ref_mag=14.57 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.5334 delta=0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.62 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:10:48.19 -13:41:03.1: ref_mag=14.62 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.7081 delta=-0.09 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits at 17:14:30.21 -10:28:26.5: 15.17 +/- 0.23 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.24 +/- 0.16
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:14:30.21 -10:28:26.5: ref_mag=15.24 +/- 0.16 new_mean_mag=14.6255 delta=0.61 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits at 17:26:13.78 -09:41:44.0: 15.25 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits at 17:26:13.78 -09:41:44.0: 15.04 +/- 0.22 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.15 +/- 0.15
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:26:13.78 -09:41:44.0: ref_mag=15.15 +/- 0.15 new_mean_mag=14.7796 delta=0.37 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits at 16:45:30.50 -10:51:15.0: 14.57 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits at 16:48:43.67 -12:03:23.9: 14.97 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits at 16:44:43.18 -09:13:15.5: 15.41 +/- 0.29 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits at 17:02:38.73 -12:37:51.1: 14.88 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits at 17:25:01.64 -10:38:54.0: 14.74 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits at 16:45:30.50 -10:51:15.0: 14.76 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.63 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:45:30.50 -10:51:15.0: ref_mag=14.63 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.3324 delta=0.30 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits at 16:48:43.67 -12:03:23.9: 14.64 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.78 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits at 17:02:38.73 -12:37:51.1: 14.57 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:48:43.67 -12:03:23.9: ref_mag=14.78 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.5633 delta=0.22 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.71 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:02:38.73 -12:37:51.1: ref_mag=14.71 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.4489 delta=0.26 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits at 16:44:43.18 -09:13:15.5: 15.49 +/- 0.35 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.44 +/- 0.22
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 16:44:43.18 -09:13:15.5: ref_mag=15.44 +/- 0.22 new_mean_mag=14.4891 delta=0.95 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits at 17:25:01.64 -10:38:54.0: 14.56 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.65 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 17:25:01.64 -10:38:54.0: ref_mag=14.65 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=13.6197 delta=1.03 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out37287.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out84673.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out85079.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out84631.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out84646.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out84685.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 11s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 2s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 84539_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-03_23-47-12_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0075
The candidate 84539_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-03_23-47-12_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0075 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 84560_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-03_23-47-12_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0075
The candidate 84560_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-03_23-47-12_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0075 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 84571_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-03_23-47-12_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0075
The candidate 84571_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-03_23-47-12_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0075 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 84574_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-03_23-47-12_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0075
The candidate 84574_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-03_23-47-12_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0075 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 84575_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-03_23-47-12_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0075
The candidate 84575_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-03_23-47-12_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0075 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 84576_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-03_23-47-12_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0075
The candidate 84576_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-03_23-47-12_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0075 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 84578_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-03_23-47-12_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0075
The candidate 84578_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-03_23-47-12_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0075 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:17:02.43 -10:21:12.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 84581_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-03_23-47-12_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0075
The candidate 84581_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-03_23-47-12_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0075 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 84587_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-03_23-47-12_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0075
The candidate 84587_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-03_23-47-12_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0075 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 84597_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-03_23-47-12_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0075
The candidate 84597_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-03_23-47-12_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0075 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 84608_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-03_23-47-12_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0075
The candidate 84608_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-03_23-47-12_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0075 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:23:40.75 -12:45:59.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 84626_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-03_23-47-12_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0075
The candidate 84626_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-03_23-47-12_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0075 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 84628_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-03_23-47-12_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0075
The candidate 84628_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-03_23-47-12_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0075 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:43:31.89 -13:25:55.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_local.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 84631_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-03_23-47-12_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0075
Preparing report for the candidate 84631_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-03_23-47-12_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0075
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 84646_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-03_23-47-12_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0075
Preparing report for the candidate 84646_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-03_23-47-12_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0075
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 84647_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-03_23-47-12_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0075
The candidate 84647_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-03_23-47-12_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0075 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:19:54.33 -11:21:31.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 84673_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-03_23-47-12_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0075
The candidate 84673_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-03_23-47-12_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0075 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:18:04.34 -12:21:10.9 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.47, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.45)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.142 4141917854394542336 259.51801592275 -12.35271753749 13.7361 11.6709 VARIABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.142#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 84684_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-03_23-47-12_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0075
The candidate 84684_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-03_23-47-12_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0075 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 84685_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-03_23-47-12_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0075
Preparing report for the candidate 84685_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-03_23-47-12_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0075
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 84698_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-03_23-47-12_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0075
The candidate 84698_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-03_23-47-12_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0075 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:21:39.64 -11:02:16.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 84704_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-03_23-47-12_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0075
The candidate 84704_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-03_23-47-12_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0075 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 84719_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-03_23-47-12_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0075
The candidate 84719_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-03_23-47-12_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0075 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 84730_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-03_23-47-12_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0075
The candidate 84730_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-03_23-47-12_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0075 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 84746_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-03_23-47-12_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0075
The candidate 84746_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-03_23-47-12_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0075 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.3 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 84749_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-03_23-47-12_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0075
The candidate 84749_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-03_23-47-12_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0075 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 84765_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-03_23-47-12_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0075
The candidate 84765_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-03_23-47-12_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0075 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 84788_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-03_23-47-12_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0075
The candidate 84788_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-03_23-47-12_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0075 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 84791_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-03_23-47-12_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0075
The candidate 84791_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-03_23-47-12_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0075 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 84804_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-03_23-47-12_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0075
The candidate 84804_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-03_23-47-12_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0075 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 84811_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-03_23-47-12_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0075
The candidate 84811_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-03_23-47-12_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0075 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 84815_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-03_23-47-12_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0075
The candidate 84815_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-03_23-47-12_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0075 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 84826_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-03_23-47-12_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0075
The candidate 84826_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-03_23-47-12_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0075 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 84833_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-03_23-47-12_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0075
The candidate 84833_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-03_23-47-12_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0075 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 84841_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-03_23-47-12_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0075
The candidate 84841_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-03_23-47-12_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0075 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 84845_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-03_23-47-12_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0075
The candidate 84845_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-03_23-47-12_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0075 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:45:48.80 -13:57:41.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 84856_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-03_23-47-12_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0075
The candidate 84856_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-03_23-47-12_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0075 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 84859_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-03_23-47-12_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0075
The candidate 84859_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-03_23-47-12_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0075 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 84871_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-03_23-47-12_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0075
The candidate 84871_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-03_23-47-12_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0075 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 84872_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-03_23-47-12_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0075
The candidate 84872_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-03_23-47-12_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0075 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 84874_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-03_23-47-12_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0075
The candidate 84874_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-03_23-47-12_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0075 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 84877_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-03_23-47-12_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0075
The candidate 84877_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-03_23-47-12_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0075 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 84881_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-03_23-47-12_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0075
The candidate 84881_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-03_23-47-12_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0075 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 84887_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-03_23-47-12_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0075
The candidate 84887_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-03_23-47-12_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0075 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 84888_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-03_23-47-12_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0075
The candidate 84888_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-03_23-47-12_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0075 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 84891_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-03_23-47-12_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0075
The candidate 84891_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-03_23-47-12_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0075 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 84899_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-03_23-47-12_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0075
The candidate 84899_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-03_23-47-12_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0075 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 84922_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-03_23-47-12_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0075
The candidate 84922_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-03_23-47-12_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0075 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.3 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 84929_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-03_23-47-12_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0075
The candidate 84929_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-03_23-47-12_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0075 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 84933_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-03_23-47-12_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0075
The candidate 84933_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-03_23-47-12_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0075 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:53:24.85 -09:19:05.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 84947_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-03_23-47-12_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0075
The candidate 84947_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-03_23-47-12_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0075 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 84958_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-03_23-47-12_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0075
The candidate 84958_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-03_23-47-12_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0075 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 84960_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-03_23-47-12_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0075
The candidate 84960_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-03_23-47-12_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0075 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 84970_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-03_23-47-12_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0075
The candidate 84970_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-03_23-47-12_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0075 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 84972_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-03_23-47-12_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0075
The candidate 84972_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-03_23-47-12_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0075 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 84973_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-03_23-47-12_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0075
The candidate 84973_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-03_23-47-12_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0075 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 84974_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-03_23-47-12_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0075
The candidate 84974_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-03_23-47-12_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0075 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 84995_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-03_23-47-12_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0075
The candidate 84995_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-03_23-47-12_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0075 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 85001_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-03_23-47-12_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0075
The candidate 85001_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-03_23-47-12_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0075 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 85009_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-03_23-47-12_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0075
The candidate 85009_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-03_23-47-12_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0075 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 85015_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-03_23-47-12_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0075
The candidate 85015_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-03_23-47-12_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0075 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 85018_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-03_23-47-12_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0075
The candidate 85018_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-03_23-47-12_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0075 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 85019_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-03_23-47-12_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0075
The candidate 85019_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-03_23-47-12_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0075 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 85034_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-03_23-47-12_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0075
The candidate 85034_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-03_23-47-12_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0075 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 85036_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-03_23-47-12_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0075
The candidate 85036_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-03_23-47-12_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0075 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 85048_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-03_23-47-12_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0075
The candidate 85048_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-03_23-47-12_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0075 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:14:18.69 -12:18:43.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 85071_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-03_23-47-12_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0075
The candidate 85071_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-03_23-47-12_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0075 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 85079_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-03_23-47-12_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0075
The candidate 85079_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-03_23-47-12_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0075 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:44:43.18 -09:13:15.5 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.49, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.47)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 0.974 4337933087975658368 251.17993340715 -09.22070205970 14.5002 13.6175 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#0.974#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 85084_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-03_23-47-12_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0075
The candidate 85084_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-03_23-47-12_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0075 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 37287_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-03_23-47-12_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0075
The candidate 37287_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-03_23-47-12_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0075 did not pass the final checks