NMW transient search results

This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-03_CI_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_233819_TTUQ1b1x1_3728550_n5ru7lmT

The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.

Processing fields Leo-01-Q1b1x1

Processing complete!

Total number of candidates identified: 0

Processing log:

Filtering log:

######## Processing parameters ########
AAVSO_COMMENT_STRING= NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
ASTCHECK_ASTEROID_SEARCH_RADIUS_ARCSEC= 
BAD_REGION_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst
CAMERA_SETTINGS= TTUQ1b1x1
CHECK_POINTING_ACCURACY= yes
DARK_FRAMES_DIR_OR_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks
EXCLUSION_LIST= ../exclusion_list_TTUQ1.txt
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MAX_APERTURE_STAR_SIZE_PIX= 12.5
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MAX_ELONGATION_AminusB_PIX= 0.55
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MIN_APERTURE_STAR_SIZE_PIX= 2.0
FILTER_BRIGHT_MAG_CUTOFF_TRANSIENT_SEARCH= -5
FILTER_FAINT_MAG_CUTOFF_TRANSIENT_SEARCH= 15.0
FLAT_FIELD_DIR_OR_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats
FRAME_EDGE_OFFSET_PIX= 100
GAIA_BAND_FOR_CATALOGED_SOURCE_CHECK= 
MAX_NEW_TO_REF_MEAN_IMG_VALUE_RATIO= 100
MAX_NEW_IMG_MEAN_VALUE= 25000
MAX_SD_RATIO_OF_SECOND_EPOCH_IMGS= 0.18
MAX_SD_RATIO_OF_SECOND_EPOCH_IMGS_SOFT_LIMIT= 0.12
MPC_CODE= V36
NMW_CALIBRATION= /var/www/nmw_calibration
NUMBER_OF_DETECTED_TRANSIENTS_BEFORE_FILTERING_HARD_LIMIT= 8000
NUMBER_OF_DETECTED_TRANSIENTS_BEFORE_FILTERING_SOFT_LIMIT= 4000
OMP_NUM_THREADS= 
ONLINE_MPCHECKER_BUTTON_ASTEROID_SEARCH_RADIUS_ARCMIN= 
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION= 
REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES= yes
SEXTRACTOR_CONFIG_BRIGHTSTARPASS= default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
SEXTRACTOR_CONFIG_FILES= default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
STARMATCH_RADIUS_PIX= 3.5
SYSREM_ITERATIONS= 0
TELESCOP= 
TELESCOP_NAME_KNOWN_TO_VaST_FOR_FOV_DETERMINATION= 
UCAC5_PLATESOLVE_ITERATIONS= 2
FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE= no
#######################################
HOSTNAME= tau
USER= 
HOME= 
#######################################
SExtractor catalog cache: enabled, directory /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/vast_sextractor_cache
Reference image directory is set to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs
VIZIER_SITE=vizier.cds.unistra.fr
GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=vizquery (lib/vizquery -> VizieR vizier.cds.unistra.fr)
INFO: MAKE_PNG_PLOTS is set to yes
FITS_FILE_EXT=fits
CALIBRATION_STATUS_PREFIX=
Fields in the data directory: 
Leo-01-Q1b1x1
#######################################
########### Starting Leo-01-Q1b1x1 ###########
Processing Leo-01-Q1b1x1
server tau has sufficient free disk space available: 540803 MB at /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir
server tau has sufficient free disk space available: 540803 MB at .
Checking input images (2 new)
REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE= /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0366.fits
REFERENCE_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE= /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0367.fits
Small preview (one of the new images): 
Large previews of the second-epoch (new) images:
MAKE_PNG_PLOTS=yes
renamed 'Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_23-36-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067.png' -> 'transient_report/Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_23-36-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067.fits_preview.png'
Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_23-36-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067.fits

renamed 'Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_23-36-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0068.png' -> 'transient_report/Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_23-36-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0068.fits_preview.png'
Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_23-36-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0068.fits


Read-check the input FITS images... read-check OK Blank image check the input FITS images... blank-image-check OK Read date check the input FITS images... read-date-check OK Mean value check the input FITS images... OK, at least two new images have mean values below the threshold. ---------------------------------------------- INFO: REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 457.7779 INFO: REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_SD= 508.8111 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 1252.9881 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_SD= 491.5321 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 1249.9513 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE_SD= 480.6164 ---------------------------------------------- INFO: ref_to_second_epoch_img_mean_ratio= 2.73711 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__SD_ratio= 0.023 ---------------------------------------------- Calibration settings: DARK_FRAMES_DIR_OR_FILE=/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks FLAT_FIELD_DIR_OR_FILE=/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration SET-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint CCD-TEMP= -0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature FOCTEMP = 22.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature AMBTEMP = 20.9 / [degC] Ambient air temperature Exploring image header: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-03_CI_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_233819_TTUQ1b1x1_3728550_n5ru7lmT/Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_23-36-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067.fits CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-03_CI_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_233819_TTUQ1b1x1_3728550_n5ru7lmT/Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_23-36-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067.fits SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-03_CI_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_233819_TTUQ1b1x1_3728550_n5ru7lmT/Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_23-36-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067.fits Header: 74 keys total, 33 keys left Record 0: "" status=0 Record 1: "SIMPLE = T / C# FITS" status=0 Record 2: "BITPIX = 16" status=0 Record 3: "NAXIS = 2 / Dimensionality" status=0 Record 4: "NAXIS1 = 9576" status=0 Record 5: "NAXIS2 = 6388" status=0 Record 6: "BZERO = 32768" status=0 Record 7: "EXTEND = T / Extensions are permitted" status=0 Record 8: "IMAGETYP= 'LIGHT' / Type of exposure" status=0 Record 9: "EXPOSURE= 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0 Record 10: "EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0 Record 11: "DATE-LOC= '2026-06-03T23:36:07.7428060' / Time of observation (local)" status=0 Record 12: "DATE-OBS= '2026-06-04T04:36:07.7428060' / Time of observation (UTC)" status=0 Record 13: "MJD-OBS = 61195.1917562732 / Modified Julian Date of observation" status=0 Record 14: "DATE-AVG= '2026-06-04T04:36:17.6454448' / Averaged midpoint time (UTC)" status=0 Record 15: "MJD-AVG = 61195.191870891 / Modified Julian Date of averaged midpoint" status=0 Record 16: "XBINNING= 1 / X axis binning factor" status=0 Record 17: "YBINNING= 1 / Y axis binning factor" status=0 Record 18: "GAIN = 30 / Sensor gain" status=0 Record 19: "OFFSET = 30 / Sensor gain offset" status=0 Record 20: "XPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel X axis size" status=0 Record 21: "YPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel Y axis size" status=0 Record 22: "INSTRUME= 'QHY600M' / Imaging instrument name" status=0 Record 23: "CAMERAID= 'QHY600M-33d3d743814b8b447' / Imaging instrument identifier" status=0 Record 24: "SET-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint" status=0 Record 25: "CCD-TEMP= -0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature" status=0 Record 26: "READOUTM= '2CMS-0' / Sensor readout mode" status=0 Record 27: "USBLIMIT= 50 / Camera-specific USB setting" status=0 Record 28: "TELESCOP= 'QHY600M-TTU1' / Name of telescope" status=0 Record 29: "FOCALLEN= 135.0 / [mm] Focal length" status=0 Record 30: "FOCRATIO= 2.2 / Focal ratio" status=0 Record 31: "RA = 149.997038492014 / [deg] RA of telescope" status=0 Record 32: "DEC = 29.9998182308915 / [deg] Declination of telescope" status=0 Record 33: "CENTALT = 32.0191666666667 / [deg] Altitude of telescope" status=0 Record 34: "CENTAZ = 286.782222222222 / [deg] Azimuth of telescope" status=0 Record 35: "AIRMASS = 1.88146689326077 / Airmass at frame center (Gueymard 1993)" status=0 Record 36: "PIERSIDE= 'East' / Telescope pointing state" status=0 Record 37: "SITEELEV= 1015.0 / [m] Observation site elevation" status=0 Record 38: "SITELAT = 33.7480555555556 / [deg] Observation site latitude" status=0 Record 39: "SITELONG= -101.958333333333 / [deg] Observation site longitude" status=0 Record 40: "OBSERVER= 'Sokolovsky' / Observer name" status=0 Record 41: "OBSERVAT= 'TTU Skyview' / Observatory name" status=0 Record 42: "SITENAME= '' / Observatory site name" status=0 Record 43: "FWHEEL = 'Simulator' / Filter Wheel name" status=0 Record 44: "FILTER = 'CV' / Active filter name" status=0 Record 45: "OBJECT = 'Leo-01' / Name of the object of interest" status=0 Record 46: "OBJCTRA = '10 00 00' / [H M S] RA of imaged object" status=0 Record 47: "OBJCTDEC= '+30 00 00' / [D M S] Declination of imaged object" status=0 Record 48: "OBJCTROT= 0.0 / [deg] planned rotation of imaged object" status=0 Record 49: "FOCNAME = 'ZWO Focuser' / Focusing equipment name" status=0 Record 50: "FOCPOS = 29468 / [step] Focuser position" status=0 Record 51: "FOCUSPOS= 29468 / [step] Focuser position" status=0 Record 52: "FOCUSSZ = 0.0 / [um] Focuser step size" status=0 Record 53: "FOCTEMP = 22.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0 Record 54: "FOCUSTEM= 22.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0 Record 55: "DEWPOINT= 15.9 / [degC] Dew point" status=0 Record 56: "HUMIDITY= 73.0 / [percent] Relative humidity" status=0 Record 57: "PRESSURE= 902.91 / [hPa] Air pressure" status=0 Record 58: "AMBTEMP = 20.9 / [degC] Ambient air temperature" status=0 Record 59: "WINDDIR = 353.0 / [deg] Wind direction: 0=N, 180=S, 90=E, 270=W" status=0 Record 60: "WINDGUST= 16.601328 / [kph] Wind gust" status=0 Record 61: "WINDSPD = 13.701096 / [kph] Wind speed" status=0 Record 62: "ROWORDER= 'TOP-DOWN' / FITS Image Orientation" status=0 Record 63: "EQUINOX = 2000.0 / Equinox of celestial coordinate system" status=0 Record 64: "SWCREATE= 'N.I.N.A. 3.2.0.9001 (x64)' / Software that created this file" status=0 Record 65: "QHY_EXP = 20.000096 / [s] Actual exposure time" status=0 Record 66: "QHY_PP = 13888.0 / [ps] pixelPeriod" status=0 Record 67: "QHY_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0 Record 68: "GPS_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0 Record 69: "QHY_FP = 20000160.0 / [us] framePeriod" status=0 Record 70: "QHY_CPL = 6120.0 / clocksPerLine" status=0 Record 71: "QHY_LPF = 235295.0 / linesPerFrame" status=0 Record 72: "QHY_AET = 20000096.0 / [us] actualExposureTime" status=0 Record 73: "QHY_LEM = T / isLongExposureMode" status=0 Record 74: "QHY_OFF0= 3767.777 / [us] RollingShutterEndOffset row 0" status=0 Allocating memory for image, dark and result arrays... Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-03_CI_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_233819_TTUQ1b1x1_3728550_n5ru7lmT/Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_23-36-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-03_CI_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_233819_TTUQ1b1x1_3728550_n5ru7lmT/Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_23-36-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067.fits SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_5C_20s_2026-05-30.fit CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-03_CI_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_233819_TTUQ1b1x1_3728550_n5ru7lmT/Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_23-36-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067.fits CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_5C_20s_2026-05-30.fit Reading dark frame /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_5C_20s_2026-05-30.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix Dark frame is subtracted, output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-03_CI_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_233819_TTUQ1b1x1_3728550_n5ru7lmT/d_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_23-36-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067.fits :) Spent 0.639525 seconds renamed 'mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_5C_20s_2026-05-30.png' -> 'transient_report/dark.png' try_to_calibrate_the_input_frame(): selected flat field /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-05-30.fit from directory /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats MegaDivider v7 Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-03_CI_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_233819_TTUQ1b1x1_3728550_n5ru7lmT/d_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_23-36-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix Reading flat /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-05-30.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix Avarage count on flat field image: 31267.409145 Minimal real count (from overscan): 5 Output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-03_CI_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_233819_TTUQ1b1x1_3728550_n5ru7lmT/fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_23-36-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067.fits :) No overscan detected - all values seem high! (left_median=21677.0, right_median=21704.0) renamed 'mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-05-30.png' -> 'transient_report/flat.png' Using calibrated image CALIBRATED_SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-03_CI_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_233819_TTUQ1b1x1_3728550_n5ru7lmT/fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_23-36-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067.fits EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration SET-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint CCD-TEMP= -0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature FOCTEMP = 22.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature AMBTEMP = 20.9 / [degC] Ambient air temperature Exploring image header: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-03_CI_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_233819_TTUQ1b1x1_3728550_n5ru7lmT/Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_23-36-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0068.fits CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-03_CI_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_233819_TTUQ1b1x1_3728550_n5ru7lmT/Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_23-36-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0068.fits SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-03_CI_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_233819_TTUQ1b1x1_3728550_n5ru7lmT/Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_23-36-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0068.fits Header: 74 keys total, 33 keys left Record 0: "" status=0 Record 1: "SIMPLE = T / C# FITS" status=0 Record 2: "BITPIX = 16" status=0 Record 3: "NAXIS = 2 / Dimensionality" status=0 Record 4: "NAXIS1 = 9576" status=0 Record 5: "NAXIS2 = 6388" status=0 Record 6: "BZERO = 32768" status=0 Record 7: "EXTEND = T / Extensions are permitted" status=0 Record 8: "IMAGETYP= 'LIGHT' / Type of exposure" status=0 Record 9: "EXPOSURE= 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0 Record 10: "EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0 Record 11: "DATE-LOC= '2026-06-03T23:36:56.9628822' / Time of observation (local)" status=0 Record 12: "DATE-OBS= '2026-06-04T04:36:56.9628822' / Time of observation (UTC)" status=0 Record 13: "MJD-OBS = 61195.1923259492 / Modified Julian Date of observation" status=0 Record 14: "DATE-AVG= '2026-06-04T04:37:06.8682501' / Averaged midpoint time (UTC)" status=0 Record 15: "MJD-AVG = 61195.192440602 / Modified Julian Date of averaged midpoint" status=0 Record 16: "XBINNING= 1 / X axis binning factor" status=0 Record 17: "YBINNING= 1 / Y axis binning factor" status=0 Record 18: "GAIN = 30 / Sensor gain" status=0 Record 19: "OFFSET = 30 / Sensor gain offset" status=0 Record 20: "XPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel X axis size" status=0 Record 21: "YPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel Y axis size" status=0 Record 22: "INSTRUME= 'QHY600M' / Imaging instrument name" status=0 Record 23: "CAMERAID= 'QHY600M-33d3d743814b8b447' / Imaging instrument identifier" status=0 Record 24: "SET-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint" status=0 Record 25: "CCD-TEMP= -0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature" status=0 Record 26: "READOUTM= '2CMS-0' / Sensor readout mode" status=0 Record 27: "USBLIMIT= 50 / Camera-specific USB setting" status=0 Record 28: "TELESCOP= 'QHY600M-TTU1' / Name of telescope" status=0 Record 29: "FOCALLEN= 135.0 / [mm] Focal length" status=0 Record 30: "FOCRATIO= 2.2 / Focal ratio" status=0 Record 31: "RA = 149.997038508967 / [deg] RA of telescope" status=0 Record 32: "DEC = 29.999818228838 / [deg] Declination of telescope" status=0 Record 33: "CENTALT = 31.8525 / [deg] Altitude of telescope" status=0 Record 34: "CENTAZ = 286.867222222222 / [deg] Azimuth of telescope" status=0 Record 35: "AIRMASS = 1.89020696321932 / Airmass at frame center (Gueymard 1993)" status=0 Record 36: "PIERSIDE= 'East' / Telescope pointing state" status=0 Record 37: "SITEELEV= 1015.0 / [m] Observation site elevation" status=0 Record 38: "SITELAT = 33.7480555555556 / [deg] Observation site latitude" status=0 Record 39: "SITELONG= -101.958333333333 / [deg] Observation site longitude" status=0 Record 40: "OBSERVER= 'Sokolovsky' / Observer name" status=0 Record 41: "OBSERVAT= 'TTU Skyview' / Observatory name" status=0 Record 42: "SITENAME= '' / Observatory site name" status=0 Record 43: "FWHEEL = 'Simulator' / Filter Wheel name" status=0 Record 44: "FILTER = 'CV' / Active filter name" status=0 Record 45: "OBJECT = 'Leo-01' / Name of the object of interest" status=0 Record 46: "OBJCTRA = '10 00 00' / [H M S] RA of imaged object" status=0 Record 47: "OBJCTDEC= '+30 00 00' / [D M S] Declination of imaged object" status=0 Record 48: "OBJCTROT= 0.0 / [deg] planned rotation of imaged object" status=0 Record 49: "FOCNAME = 'ZWO Focuser' / Focusing equipment name" status=0 Record 50: "FOCPOS = 29468 / [step] Focuser position" status=0 Record 51: "FOCUSPOS= 29468 / [step] Focuser position" status=0 Record 52: "FOCUSSZ = 0.0 / [um] Focuser step size" status=0 Record 53: "FOCTEMP = 22.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0 Record 54: "FOCUSTEM= 22.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0 Record 55: "DEWPOINT= 15.9 / [degC] Dew point" status=0 Record 56: "HUMIDITY= 73.0 / [percent] Relative humidity" status=0 Record 57: "PRESSURE= 902.91 / [hPa] Air pressure" status=0 Record 58: "AMBTEMP = 20.9 / [degC] Ambient air temperature" status=0 Record 59: "WINDDIR = 353.0 / [deg] Wind direction: 0=N, 180=S, 90=E, 270=W" status=0 Record 60: "WINDGUST= 16.601328 / [kph] Wind gust" status=0 Record 61: "WINDSPD = 13.701096 / [kph] Wind speed" status=0 Record 62: "ROWORDER= 'TOP-DOWN' / FITS Image Orientation" status=0 Record 63: "EQUINOX = 2000.0 / Equinox of celestial coordinate system" status=0 Record 64: "SWCREATE= 'N.I.N.A. 3.2.0.9001 (x64)' / Software that created this file" status=0 Record 65: "QHY_EXP = 20.000096 / [s] Actual exposure time" status=0 Record 66: "QHY_PP = 13888.0 / [ps] pixelPeriod" status=0 Record 67: "QHY_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0 Record 68: "GPS_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0 Record 69: "QHY_FP = 20000160.0 / [us] framePeriod" status=0 Record 70: "QHY_CPL = 6120.0 / clocksPerLine" status=0 Record 71: "QHY_LPF = 235295.0 / linesPerFrame" status=0 Record 72: "QHY_AET = 20000096.0 / [us] actualExposureTime" status=0 Record 73: "QHY_LEM = T / isLongExposureMode" status=0 Record 74: "QHY_OFF0= 3767.777 / [us] RollingShutterEndOffset row 0" status=0 Allocating memory for image, dark and result arrays... Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-03_CI_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_233819_TTUQ1b1x1_3728550_n5ru7lmT/Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_23-36-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0068.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-03_CI_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_233819_TTUQ1b1x1_3728550_n5ru7lmT/Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_23-36-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0068.fits SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_5C_20s_2026-05-30.fit CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-03_CI_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_233819_TTUQ1b1x1_3728550_n5ru7lmT/Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_23-36-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0068.fits CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_5C_20s_2026-05-30.fit Reading dark frame /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_5C_20s_2026-05-30.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix Dark frame is subtracted, output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-03_CI_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_233819_TTUQ1b1x1_3728550_n5ru7lmT/d_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_23-36-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0068.fits :) Spent 0.639985 seconds renamed 'mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_5C_20s_2026-05-30.png' -> 'transient_report/dark.png' try_to_calibrate_the_input_frame(): selected flat field /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-05-30.fit from directory /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats MegaDivider v7 Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-03_CI_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_233819_TTUQ1b1x1_3728550_n5ru7lmT/d_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_23-36-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0068.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix Reading flat /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-05-30.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix Avarage count on flat field image: 31267.409145 Minimal real count (from overscan): 5 Output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-03_CI_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_233819_TTUQ1b1x1_3728550_n5ru7lmT/fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_23-36-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0068.fits :) No overscan detected - all values seem high! (left_median=21677.0, right_median=21704.0) renamed 'mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-05-30.png' -> 'transient_report/flat.png' Using calibrated image CALIBRATED_SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-03_CI_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_233819_TTUQ1b1x1_3728550_n5ru7lmT/fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_23-36-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0068.fits Dark frame used to calibrate the second-epoch images:

Flat field used to calibrate the second-epoch images:

after the calibration attempt: SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-03_CI_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_233819_TTUQ1b1x1_3728550_n5ru7lmT/fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_23-36-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067.fits SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-03_CI_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_233819_TTUQ1b1x1_3728550_n5ru7lmT/fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_23-36-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0068.fits Previews of the CALIBRATED second-epoch images:

fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_23-36-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067.fits


fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_23-36-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0068.fits


Updating neverexclude_list.txt '/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt' Choosing bad regions list '/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst' wait *------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------* 'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex' Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 3.5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0366.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0367.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-03_CI_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_233819_TTUQ1b1x1_3728550_n5ru7lmT/fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_23-36-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-03_CI_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_233819_TTUQ1b1x1_3728550_n5ru7lmT/fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_23-36-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0068.fits SExtractor catalog cache: saved Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0366.fits.cat to cache SExtractor catalog cache: saved Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0367.fits.cat to cache VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0366.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0367.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-03_CI_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_233819_TTUQ1b1x1_3728550_n5ru7lmT/fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_23-36-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-03_CI_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_233819_TTUQ1b1x1_3728550_n5ru7lmT/fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_23-36-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0068.fits Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461195.69187201 Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt '../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt' Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt '../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt' Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt '../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt' Plate-solving the images wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0366.fits exists and is non-empty Saving wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0366.fits to local_wcs_cache/ 'wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0366.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0366.fits' wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0367.fits exists and is non-empty Saving wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0367.fits to local_wcs_cache/ 'wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0367.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0367.fits' wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_23-36-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067.fits exists and is non-empty Saving wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_23-36-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067.fits to local_wcs_cache/ 'wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_23-36-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_23-36-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067.fits' wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_23-36-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0068.fits exists and is non-empty Saving wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_23-36-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0068.fits to local_wcs_cache/ 'wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_23-36-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0068.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_23-36-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0068.fits' ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0366.fits (1st reference image) verification OK: wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0366.fits Image size: 941.7'x627.1' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 10:00:00.900 +29:59:47.24 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9" ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_23-36-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067.fits (1st new image) verification OK: wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_23-36-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067.fits Image size: 941.4'x626.6' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 10:00:13.870 +29:58:34.22 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy) Reference image center 10:00:00.900 +29:59:47.24 Second-epoch image center 10:00:13.870 +29:58:34.22 Angular distance between the image centers 0.0510 deg. Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg. ################################### ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_23-36-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0068.fits (2nd new image) verification OK: wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_23-36-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0068.fits Image size: 941.4'x626.6' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 10:00:11.428 +29:59:03.73 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy) Reference image center 10:00:00.900 +29:59:47.24 Second-epoch image center 10:00:11.428 +29:59:03.73 Angular distance between the image centers 0.0399 deg. ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images) Second-epoch first image center 10:00:13.870 +29:58:34.22 Second-epoch second image center 10:00:11.428 +29:59:03.73 Angular distance between the image centers 0.01204 deg. ################################### Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5... Preparing for ar aprallel run Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0366.fits &> /tmp/tmp.hi43I0miEU Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0366.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0367.fits &> /tmp/tmp.ru5ufCFHuC Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0367.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-03_CI_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_233819_TTUQ1b1x1_3728550_n5ru7lmT/fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_23-36-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067.fits &> /tmp/tmp.q80KgZK5Jw Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-03_CI_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_233819_TTUQ1b1x1_3728550_n5ru7lmT/fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_23-36-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-03_CI_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_233819_TTUQ1b1x1_3728550_n5ru7lmT/fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_23-36-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0068.fits &> /tmp/tmp.Ltmdrfbqe2 Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-03_CI_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_233819_TTUQ1b1x1_3728550_n5ru7lmT/fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_23-36-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0068.fits Calibrating the magnitude scale Found non-empty wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0366.fits ____ Start of magnitude calibration ____ PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0366.fits and wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0366.fits.cat wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race) Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2 Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0366.fits and wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0366.fits.cat Found non-empty wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0366.fits and wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0366.fits.cat The reference image (wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0366.fits) and catalog (wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0366.fits.cat) found 'wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0366.fits.cat' -> 'wcsmag.cat' Read 7484 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 140.2252 to 159.2854 deg, Dec +24.2123 to +35.3396 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 140.2252 to 159.2854 deg, Dec 24.2123 to 35.3396 deg Loaded 5544 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4029 out of 4262 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 4262 out of 7484 detected stars. The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.915600 a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.915600 From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.45 Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.47 Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes Working... Please, PLEASE, be patient!!! All lightcurves processed! =) Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.47
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:

Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V) Read 7484 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 140.2252 to 159.2854 deg, Dec +24.2123 to +35.3396 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 140.2252 to 159.2854 deg, Dec 24.2123 to 35.3396 deg Loaded 5544 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4029 out of 4262 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 4262 out of 7484 detected stars. util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0366.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0366.fits:

Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0366.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0366.fits (aperture=6.2) Read 7488 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 140.2252 to 159.2854 deg, Dec +24.2124 to +35.3396 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 140.2252 to 159.2854 deg, Dec 24.2124 to 35.3396 deg Loaded 5544 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4039 out of 4263 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 4263 out of 7488 detected stars. util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0367.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0367.fits:

Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0367.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0367.fits (aperture=6.2) ____ End of magnitude calibration ____ Applying consolidated magnitude filters... Preparing the exclusion lists for this field Done with filtering Found 5 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 8000) Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars: 2.1 pix Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0366.fits 2.1 pix Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0367.fits 2.6 pix fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_23-36-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067.fits 2.6 pix fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_23-36-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0068.fits 2.1 pix wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0366.fits 2.1 pix wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0367.fits Limiting magnitude estimates: 15.5 mag. Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0366.fits 15.5 mag. Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0367.fits 14.8 mag. fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_23-36-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067.fits 14.8 mag. fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_23-36-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0068.fits All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.8 (SNR ) 12.0 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50). This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image. The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here. The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images. This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list. The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag. Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver wait ############ /tmp/tmp.hi43I0miEU (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The guess is based on the existing WCS header. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-03_CI_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_233819_TTUQ1b1x1_3728550_n5ru7lmT/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0366.fits 573.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0366.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0366.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0366.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0366.fits It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good. The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0366.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good... '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0366.fits' -> 'wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0366.fits' FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0366.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0366.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0366.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0366.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0366.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0366.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0366.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0366.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0366.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0366.fits.cat SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=536, passed=7484 Got 7484 stars (including 6942 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0366.fits.cat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 7484 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.7' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.7 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013079 (47.1 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010463 (37.7 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 571 to 628 (Dec 24.2 to 35.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 917 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 916 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 903 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 916 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7363 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 571 to 628 (Dec 24.2 to 35.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 917 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 916 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7364 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 916 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7363 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27" Excluding outliers - 916 stars left (next iteration limit 1007) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0366.fits N_match=916 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.270 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.344 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.275 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.257 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.225 n_q1=240 n_q2=204 n_q3=230 n_q4=242 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.274 The image catalog is written to wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0366.fits.cat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0366.fits.cat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0366.fits -region wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0366.fits.cat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0366.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations ############ /tmp/tmp.ru5ufCFHuC (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The guess is based on the existing WCS header. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-03_CI_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_233819_TTUQ1b1x1_3728550_n5ru7lmT/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0367.fits 573.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0367.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0367.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0367.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0367.fits It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good. The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0367.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good... '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0367.fits' -> 'wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0367.fits' FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0367.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0367.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0367.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0367.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0367.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0367.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0367.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0367.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0367.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0367.fits.cat SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=531, passed=7488 Got 7488 stars (including 6948 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0367.fits.cat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 7488 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.7' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.7 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013079 (47.1 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010463 (37.7 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 571 to 628 (Dec 24.2 to 35.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 917 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 916 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 906 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 916 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7351 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 571 to 628 (Dec 24.2 to 35.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 917 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 916 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7349 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 916 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7349 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26" Excluding outliers - 916 stars left (next iteration limit 1007) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0367.fits N_match=916 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.275 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.363 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.249 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.276 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.233 n_q1=240 n_q2=209 n_q3=228 n_q4=239 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.319 The image catalog is written to wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0367.fits.cat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0367.fits.cat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0367.fits -region wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0367.fits.cat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0367.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations ############ /tmp/tmp.q80KgZK5Jw (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um Internal estimated FoV 605.3' The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-03_CI_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_233819_TTUQ1b1x1_3728550_n5ru7lmT/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-03_CI_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_233819_TTUQ1b1x1_3728550_n5ru7lmT/fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_23-36-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067.fits 605.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-03_CI_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_233819_TTUQ1b1x1_3728550_n5ru7lmT/fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_23-36-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-03_CI_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_233819_TTUQ1b1x1_3728550_n5ru7lmT/fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_23-36-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-03_CI_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_233819_TTUQ1b1x1_3728550_n5ru7lmT/fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_23-36-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-03_CI_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_233819_TTUQ1b1x1_3728550_n5ru7lmT/fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_23-36-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067.fits It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve! FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-03_CI_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_233819_TTUQ1b1x1_3728550_n5ru7lmT/fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_23-36-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_23-36-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_23-36-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_23-36-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_23-36-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_23-36-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_23-36-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_23-36-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-03_CI_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_233819_TTUQ1b1x1_3728550_n5ru7lmT/fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_23-36-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_23-36-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067.fits.cat SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=7, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=298, passed=5422 Got 5422 stars (including 5114 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_23-36-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067.fits.cat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 5422 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.4' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.4 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013075 (47.1 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010460 (37.7 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 628 (Dec 24.1 to 35.4) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 909 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 908 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 892 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 908 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5328 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 628 (Dec 24.1 to 35.4) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 909 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 908 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5327 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 908 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5327 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32" Excluding outliers - 908 stars left (next iteration limit 998) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_23-36-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067.fits N_match=908 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.339 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.326 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.351 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.299 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.345 n_q1=222 n_q2=226 n_q3=197 n_q4=263 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.034 The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_23-36-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067.fits.cat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_23-36-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067.fits.cat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-03_CI_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_233819_TTUQ1b1x1_3728550_n5ru7lmT/fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_23-36-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067.fits -region wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_23-36-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067.fits.cat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_23-36-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations ############ /tmp/tmp.Ltmdrfbqe2 (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um Internal estimated FoV 605.3' The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-03_CI_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_233819_TTUQ1b1x1_3728550_n5ru7lmT/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-03_CI_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_233819_TTUQ1b1x1_3728550_n5ru7lmT/fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_23-36-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0068.fits 605.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-03_CI_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_233819_TTUQ1b1x1_3728550_n5ru7lmT/fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_23-36-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0068.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-03_CI_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_233819_TTUQ1b1x1_3728550_n5ru7lmT/fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_23-36-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0068.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-03_CI_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_233819_TTUQ1b1x1_3728550_n5ru7lmT/fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_23-36-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0068.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-03_CI_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_233819_TTUQ1b1x1_3728550_n5ru7lmT/fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_23-36-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0068.fits It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve! FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-03_CI_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_233819_TTUQ1b1x1_3728550_n5ru7lmT/fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_23-36-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0068.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_23-36-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0068.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_23-36-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0068.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_23-36-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0068.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_23-36-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0068.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_23-36-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0068.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_23-36-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0068.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_23-36-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0068.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-03_CI_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_233819_TTUQ1b1x1_3728550_n5ru7lmT/fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_23-36-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0068.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_23-36-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0068.fits.cat SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=298, passed=5423 Got 5423 stars (including 5118 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_23-36-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0068.fits.cat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 5423 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.4' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.4 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013075 (47.1 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010460 (37.7 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 628 (Dec 24.1 to 35.4) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 908 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 907 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 893 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 907 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5309 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 628 (Dec 24.1 to 35.4) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 908 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 907 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5309 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 907 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5309 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30" Excluding outliers - 907 stars left (next iteration limit 997) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_23-36-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0068.fits N_match=907 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.318 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.307 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.337 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.274 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.337 n_q1=222 n_q2=227 n_q3=196 n_q4=262 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.060 The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_23-36-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0068.fits.cat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_23-36-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0068.fits.cat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-03_CI_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_233819_TTUQ1b1x1_3728550_n5ru7lmT/fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_23-36-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0068.fits -region wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_23-36-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0068.fits.cat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_23-36-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0068.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations ################################### # Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above) ref1=Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0366.fits sigma_overall=0.270 worst_q_ratio=1.274 ref2=Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0367.fits sigma_overall=0.275 worst_q_ratio=1.319 new1=fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_23-36-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067.fits sigma_overall=0.339 worst_q_ratio=1.034 new2=fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_23-36-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0068.fits sigma_overall=0.318 worst_q_ratio=1.060 reference average sigma_overall=0.2725 worst_q_ratio=1.2965 warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference ###################################
Distribution of catalog-matched stars across the image:
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy: wrote wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0366_astrometric_residuals.png (916 matched stars from wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0366.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388) plot_astrometric_residuals_xy: wrote wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0367_astrometric_residuals.png (916 matched stars from wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0367.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388) plot_astrometric_residuals_xy: wrote wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_23-36-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067_astrometric_residuals.png (908 matched stars from wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_23-36-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388) plot_astrometric_residuals_xy: wrote wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_23-36-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0068_astrometric_residuals.png (907 matched stars from wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_23-36-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0068.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388) Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_23-36-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067.fits INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image) 'wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_23-36-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-03_CI_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_233819_TTUQ1b1x1_3728550_n5ru7lmT/wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_23-36-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067.fits' Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_23-36-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0068.fits INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image) 'wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_23-36-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0068.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-03_CI_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_233819_TTUQ1b1x1_3728550_n5ru7lmT/wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_23-36-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0068.fits' Preparing the HTML report for the field Leo-01-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0366.fits at 10:27:01.30 +29:40:16.3: 99.00 +/- 99.00 saturated Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0367.fits at 10:27:01.30 +29:40:16.3: 99.00 +/- 99.00 saturated Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:27:01.30 +29:40:16.3: the source is saturated (present but too bright to measure) on at least one reference image -- likely a star-matching failure rather than a new transient make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 0s Pre-generating preview images in parallel... Done pre-generating preview images. Pre-generating finding charts in parallel... Done pre-generating finding charts. make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 1s xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 20401_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_23-36-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0068 The candidate 20401_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_23-36-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0068 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 06 04.19187    2461195.69187    10.35    10:27:01.27 +29:40:16.6   1274 3064   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-03_CI_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_233819_TTUQ1b1x1_3728550_n5ru7lmT/fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_23-36-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067.fits Discovery image 2   2026 06 04.19244    2461195.69244    10.53    10:27:01.34 +29:40:15.9   1269 3068   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-03_CI_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_233819_TTUQ1b1x1_3728550_n5ru7lmT/fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_23-36-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0068.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 20502_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_23-36-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0068 The candidate 20502_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_23-36-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0068 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 06 04.19244    2461195.69244    11.58    09:39:25.65 +34:14:51.7   7541 0715   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-03_CI_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_233819_TTUQ1b1x1_3728550_n5ru7lmT/fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_23-36-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0068.fits **** FOUND 09:39:25.64 +34:14:51.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 06370_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_23-36-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0068 The candidate 06370_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_23-36-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0068 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 3   2026 06 04.19244    2461195.69244    7.73    09:45:34.45 +34:30:39.1   6774 0544   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-03_CI_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_233819_TTUQ1b1x1_3728550_n5ru7lmT/fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_23-36-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0068.fits **** FOUND 09:45:34.44 +34:30:39.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 07245_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_23-36-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0068 The candidate 07245_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_23-36-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0068 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 3   2026 06 04.19244    2461195.69244    8.00    09:53:43.22 +34:55:33.7   5771 0258   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-03_CI_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_233819_TTUQ1b1x1_3728550_n5ru7lmT/fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_23-36-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0068.fits **** FOUND 09:53:43.22 +34:55:33.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 01345_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_23-36-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0068 The candidate 01345_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_23-36-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0068 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 3   2026 06 04.19244    2461195.69244    11.01    10:02:40.96 +26:41:36.6   4333 5154   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-03_CI_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_233819_TTUQ1b1x1_3728550_n5ru7lmT/fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_23-36-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0068.fits **** FOUND 10:02:40.94 +26:41:36.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 1s Prepared the HTML report for the field Leo-01-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 *------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------* #### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt #### wait *------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------* 'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex' Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 3.5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0366.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0367.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-03_CI_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_233819_TTUQ1b1x1_3728550_n5ru7lmT/fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_23-36-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-03_CI_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_233819_TTUQ1b1x1_3728550_n5ru7lmT/fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_23-36-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0068.fits SExtractor catalog cache: saved Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0366.fits.cat to cache SExtractor catalog cache: saved Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0367.fits.cat to cache VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0366.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0367.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-03_CI_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_233819_TTUQ1b1x1_3728550_n5ru7lmT/fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_23-36-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-03_CI_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_233819_TTUQ1b1x1_3728550_n5ru7lmT/fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_23-36-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0068.fits Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0366.fits Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0367.fits Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_23-36-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067.fits Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_23-36-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0068.fits Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/exclusion_list.txt Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images Plate-solving the images wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0366.fits exists and is non-empty wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0367.fits exists and is non-empty wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_23-36-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067.fits exists and is non-empty wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_23-36-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0068.fits exists and is non-empty ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0366.fits (1st reference image) verification OK: wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0366.fits Image size: 941.7'x627.1' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 10:00:00.900 +29:59:47.24 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9" ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_23-36-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067.fits (1st new image) verification OK: wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_23-36-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067.fits Image size: 941.4'x626.6' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 10:00:13.870 +29:58:34.22 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy) Reference image center 10:00:00.900 +29:59:47.24 Second-epoch image center 10:00:13.870 +29:58:34.22 Angular distance between the image centers 0.0510 deg. Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg. ################################### ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_23-36-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0068.fits (2nd new image) verification OK: wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_23-36-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0068.fits util/fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh: line 144: echo: write error: Broken pipe Image size: 941.4'x626.6' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 10:00:11.428 +29:59:03.73 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy) Reference image center 10:00:00.900 +29:59:47.24 Second-epoch image center 10:00:11.428 +29:59:03.73 Angular distance between the image centers 0.0399 deg. ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images) Second-epoch first image center 10:00:13.870 +29:58:34.22 Second-epoch second image center 10:00:11.428 +29:59:03.73 Angular distance between the image centers 0.01204 deg. ################################### Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5... Preparing for ar aprallel run Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0366.fits &> /tmp/tmp.ll8D7BYROC Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0366.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0367.fits &> /tmp/tmp.V2k2q1GXcb Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0367.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-03_CI_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_233819_TTUQ1b1x1_3728550_n5ru7lmT/fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_23-36-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067.fits &> /tmp/tmp.eSU3lCx04q Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-03_CI_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_233819_TTUQ1b1x1_3728550_n5ru7lmT/fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_23-36-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-03_CI_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_233819_TTUQ1b1x1_3728550_n5ru7lmT/fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_23-36-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0068.fits &> /tmp/tmp.L4JLun4MRC Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-03_CI_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_233819_TTUQ1b1x1_3728550_n5ru7lmT/fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_23-36-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0068.fits Calibrating the magnitude scale Found non-empty wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0366.fits ____ Start of magnitude calibration ____ PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0366.fits and wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0366.fits.cat wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race) Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2 Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0366.fits and wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0366.fits.cat Found non-empty wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0366.fits and wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0366.fits.cat The reference image (wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0366.fits) and catalog (wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0366.fits.cat) found 'wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0366.fits.cat' -> 'wcsmag.cat' Read 38246 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 140.2252 to 159.3222 deg, Dec +24.1766 to +35.3613 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 140.2252 to 159.3222 deg, Dec 24.1766 to 35.3613 deg Loaded 5586 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3889 out of 4321 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 4321 out of 38246 detected stars. The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.818400 a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.818400 From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.22 Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.60 Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes Working... Please, PLEASE, be patient!!! All lightcurves processed! =) Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.60
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:

Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V) Read 38246 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 140.2252 to 159.3222 deg, Dec +24.1766 to +35.3613 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 140.2252 to 159.3222 deg, Dec 24.1766 to 35.3613 deg Loaded 5586 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3889 out of 4321 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 4321 out of 38246 detected stars. util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0366.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0366.fits:

Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0366.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0366.fits (aperture=5.0) Read 38277 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 140.2252 to 159.3238 deg, Dec +24.1766 to +35.3559 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 140.2252 to 159.3238 deg, Dec 24.1766 to 35.3559 deg Loaded 5585 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3878 out of 4316 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 4316 out of 38277 detected stars. util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0367.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0367.fits:

Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0367.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0367.fits (aperture=5.0) ____ End of magnitude calibration ____ Applying consolidated magnitude filters... Preparing the exclusion lists for this field Done with filtering Found 23 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 8000) Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars: 2.0 pix Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0366.fits 2.0 pix Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0367.fits 2.5 pix fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_23-36-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067.fits 2.5 pix fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_23-36-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0068.fits 2.0 pix wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0366.fits 2.0 pix wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0367.fits Limiting magnitude estimates: 15.6 mag. Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0366.fits 15.6 mag. Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0367.fits 14.9 mag. fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_23-36-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067.fits 14.9 mag. fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_23-36-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0068.fits All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.9 (SNR ) 14.3 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50). This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image. The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here. The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images. This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list. The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag. Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver wait ############ /tmp/tmp.ll8D7BYROC (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The guess is based on the existing WCS header. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-03_CI_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_233819_TTUQ1b1x1_3728550_n5ru7lmT/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0366.fits 573.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0366.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0366.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0366.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0366.fits It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good. The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0366.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good... '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0366.fits' -> 'wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0366.fits' FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0366.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0366.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0366.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0366.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0366.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0366.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0366.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0366.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0366.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0366.fits.cat SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=13, blended=1709, passed=38233 Got 38233 stars (including 36466 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0366.fits.cat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 38233 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.7' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.7 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013079 (47.1 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010463 (37.7 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 628 (Dec 24.2 to 35.4) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 914 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 914 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 899 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 914 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 37629 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 628 (Dec 24.2 to 35.4) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 914 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 914 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 37629 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 914 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 37629 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29" Excluding outliers - 914 stars left (next iteration limit 1005) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0366.fits N_match=914 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.281 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.340 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.281 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.267 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.222 n_q1=246 n_q2=205 n_q3=222 n_q4=241 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.208 The image catalog is written to wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0366.fits.cat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0366.fits.cat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0366.fits -region wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0366.fits.cat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0366.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations ############ /tmp/tmp.V2k2q1GXcb (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The guess is based on the existing WCS header. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-03_CI_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_233819_TTUQ1b1x1_3728550_n5ru7lmT/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0367.fits 573.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0367.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0367.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0367.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0367.fits It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good. The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0367.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good... '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0367.fits' -> 'wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0367.fits' FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0367.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0367.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0367.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0367.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0367.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0367.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0367.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0367.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0367.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0367.fits.cat SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=19, blended=1697, passed=38258 Got 38258 stars (including 36498 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0367.fits.cat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 38258 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.7' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.7 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013079 (47.1 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010463 (37.7 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 628 (Dec 24.2 to 35.4) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 913 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 913 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 900 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 913 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 37698 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 628 (Dec 24.2 to 35.4) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 913 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 913 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 37699 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 913 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 37699 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28" Excluding outliers - 913 stars left (next iteration limit 1004) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0367.fits N_match=913 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.280 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.345 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.246 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.283 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.244 n_q1=236 n_q2=209 n_q3=227 n_q4=241 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.234 The image catalog is written to wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0367.fits.cat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0367.fits.cat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0367.fits -region wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0367.fits.cat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0367.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations ############ /tmp/tmp.eSU3lCx04q (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um Internal estimated FoV 605.3' The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-03_CI_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_233819_TTUQ1b1x1_3728550_n5ru7lmT/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-03_CI_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_233819_TTUQ1b1x1_3728550_n5ru7lmT/fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_23-36-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067.fits 605.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-03_CI_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_233819_TTUQ1b1x1_3728550_n5ru7lmT/fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_23-36-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-03_CI_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_233819_TTUQ1b1x1_3728550_n5ru7lmT/fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_23-36-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-03_CI_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_233819_TTUQ1b1x1_3728550_n5ru7lmT/fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_23-36-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-03_CI_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_233819_TTUQ1b1x1_3728550_n5ru7lmT/fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_23-36-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067.fits It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve! FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-03_CI_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_233819_TTUQ1b1x1_3728550_n5ru7lmT/fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_23-36-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_23-36-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_23-36-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_23-36-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_23-36-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_23-36-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_23-36-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_23-36-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-03_CI_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_233819_TTUQ1b1x1_3728550_n5ru7lmT/fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_23-36-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_23-36-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067.fits.cat SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=12, blended=1094, passed=27244 Got 27244 stars (including 26114 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_23-36-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067.fits.cat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 27244 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.4' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.4 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013075 (47.1 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010460 (37.7 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 629 (Dec 24.0 to 35.4) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 906 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 906 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 887 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 906 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 26730 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 629 (Dec 24.0 to 35.4) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 906 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 906 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 26731 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 906 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 26731 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34" Excluding outliers - 906 stars left (next iteration limit 996) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_23-36-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067.fits N_match=906 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.357 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.345 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.364 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.330 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.327 n_q1=219 n_q2=222 n_q3=200 n_q4=265 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.020 The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_23-36-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067.fits.cat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_23-36-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067.fits.cat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-03_CI_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_233819_TTUQ1b1x1_3728550_n5ru7lmT/fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_23-36-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067.fits -region wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_23-36-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067.fits.cat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_23-36-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations ############ /tmp/tmp.L4JLun4MRC (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um Internal estimated FoV 605.3' The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-03_CI_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_233819_TTUQ1b1x1_3728550_n5ru7lmT/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-03_CI_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_233819_TTUQ1b1x1_3728550_n5ru7lmT/fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_23-36-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0068.fits 605.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-03_CI_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_233819_TTUQ1b1x1_3728550_n5ru7lmT/fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_23-36-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0068.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-03_CI_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_233819_TTUQ1b1x1_3728550_n5ru7lmT/fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_23-36-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0068.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-03_CI_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_233819_TTUQ1b1x1_3728550_n5ru7lmT/fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_23-36-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0068.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-03_CI_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_233819_TTUQ1b1x1_3728550_n5ru7lmT/fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_23-36-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0068.fits It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve! FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-03_CI_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_233819_TTUQ1b1x1_3728550_n5ru7lmT/fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_23-36-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0068.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_23-36-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0068.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_23-36-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0068.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_23-36-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0068.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_23-36-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0068.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_23-36-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0068.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_23-36-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0068.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_23-36-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0068.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-03_CI_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_233819_TTUQ1b1x1_3728550_n5ru7lmT/fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_23-36-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0068.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_23-36-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0068.fits.cat SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=10, blended=1029, passed=27185 Got 27185 stars (including 26112 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_23-36-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0068.fits.cat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 27185 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.4' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.4 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013075 (47.1 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010460 (37.7 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 629 (Dec 24.1 to 35.4) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 904 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 904 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 888 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 904 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 26634 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 629 (Dec 24.1 to 35.4) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 904 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 904 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 26633 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 904 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 26633 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32" Excluding outliers - 904 stars left (next iteration limit 994) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_23-36-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0068.fits N_match=904 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.333 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.306 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.338 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.297 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.333 n_q1=221 n_q2=221 n_q3=201 n_q4=261 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.015 The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_23-36-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0068.fits.cat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_23-36-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0068.fits.cat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-03_CI_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_233819_TTUQ1b1x1_3728550_n5ru7lmT/fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_23-36-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0068.fits -region wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_23-36-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0068.fits.cat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_23-36-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0068.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL) Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_23-36-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067.fits INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image) The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-03_CI_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_233819_TTUQ1b1x1_3728550_n5ru7lmT/wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_23-36-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067.fits Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_23-36-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0068.fits INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image) The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-03_CI_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_233819_TTUQ1b1x1_3728550_n5ru7lmT/wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_23-36-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0068.fits Preparing the HTML report for the field Leo-01-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0366.fits at 10:27:01.30 +29:40:16.2: 10.11 +/- 0.00 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0366.fits at 10:16:05.10 +32:00:15.7: 13.12 +/- 0.02 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0366.fits at 10:13:02.50 +32:55:49.8: 13.36 +/- 0.03 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0366.fits at 10:01:29.90 +28:33:22.3: 13.70 +/- 0.04 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0366.fits at 10:20:44.82 +30:39:21.3: 13.31 +/- 0.03 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0367.fits at 10:27:01.30 +29:40:16.2: 10.10 +/- 0.00 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 10.10 +/- 0.00 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:27:01.30 +29:40:16.2: ref_mag=10.10 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=10.4539 delta=-0.35 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0367.fits at 10:13:02.50 +32:55:49.8: 13.40 +/- 0.03 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0367.fits at 10:20:44.82 +30:39:21.3: 13.35 +/- 0.03 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.38 +/- 0.02 Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.33 +/- 0.02 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:13:02.50 +32:55:49.8: ref_mag=13.38 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.4763 delta=-0.09 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:20:44.82 +30:39:21.3: ref_mag=13.33 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.4301 delta=-0.10 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0367.fits at 10:01:29.90 +28:33:22.3: 13.69 +/- 0.04 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0367.fits at 10:16:05.10 +32:00:15.7: 13.13 +/- 0.02 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.70 +/- 0.03 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:01:29.90 +28:33:22.3: ref_mag=13.70 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.5777 delta=0.12 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.12 +/- 0.01 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:16:05.10 +32:00:15.7: ref_mag=13.12 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=13.2969 delta=-0.18 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0366.fits at 10:06:51.79 +28:55:05.5: 14.01 +/- 0.05 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0367.fits at 10:06:51.79 +28:55:05.5: 13.98 +/- 0.05 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.00 +/- 0.04 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:06:51.79 +28:55:05.5: ref_mag=14.00 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.8749 delta=0.12 (need > 0.90) make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 1s Pre-generating preview images in parallel... Done pre-generating preview images. Pre-generating finding charts in parallel... Done pre-generating finding charts. make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 0s xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52435_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_23-36-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0068 The candidate 52435_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_23-36-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0068 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 06 04.19244    2461195.69244    13.69    10:32:17.05 +27:40:07.6   0413 4190   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-03_CI_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_233819_TTUQ1b1x1_3728550_n5ru7lmT/fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_23-36-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0068.fits **** FOUND 10:32:16.98 +27:40:07.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52506_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_23-36-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0068 The candidate 52506_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_23-36-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0068 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 06 04.19187    2461195.69187    10.36    10:27:01.25 +29:40:16.5   1274 3064   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-03_CI_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_233819_TTUQ1b1x1_3728550_n5ru7lmT/fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_23-36-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067.fits Discovery image 2   2026 06 04.19244    2461195.69244    10.58    10:27:01.35 +29:40:16.0   1269 3068   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-03_CI_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_233819_TTUQ1b1x1_3728550_n5ru7lmT/fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_23-36-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0068.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52977_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_23-36-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0068 The candidate 52977_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_23-36-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0068 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 06 04.19244    2461195.69244    13.15    09:47:36.01 +26:13:11.6   6354 5544   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-03_CI_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_233819_TTUQ1b1x1_3728550_n5ru7lmT/fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_23-36-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0068.fits **** FOUND 09:47:36.05 +26:13:11.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 53024_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_23-36-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0068 The candidate 53024_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_23-36-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0068 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 06 04.19187    2461195.69187    13.32    10:16:05.10 +32:00:15.6   2843 1816   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-03_CI_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_233819_TTUQ1b1x1_3728550_n5ru7lmT/fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_23-36-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067.fits Discovery image 2   2026 06 04.19244    2461195.69244    13.28    10:16:05.10 +32:00:15.8   2837 1820   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-03_CI_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_233819_TTUQ1b1x1_3728550_n5ru7lmT/fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_23-36-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0068.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 53045_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_23-36-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0068 The candidate 53045_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_23-36-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0068 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 06 04.19244    2461195.69244    13.38    10:19:27.92 +33:44:31.2   2513 0729   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-03_CI_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_233819_TTUQ1b1x1_3728550_n5ru7lmT/fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_23-36-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0068.fits **** FOUND 10:19:27.94 +33:44:30.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 53069_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_23-36-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0068 The candidate 53069_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_23-36-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0068 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 06 04.19244    2461195.69244    13.38    09:38:40.61 +30:45:31.6   7604 2831   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-03_CI_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_233819_TTUQ1b1x1_3728550_n5ru7lmT/fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_23-36-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0068.fits **** FOUND 09:38:40.66 +30:45:31.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 53081_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_23-36-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0068 The candidate 53081_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_23-36-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0068 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 06 04.19187    2461195.69187    13.43    10:13:02.53 +32:55:51.0   3280 1295   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-03_CI_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_233819_TTUQ1b1x1_3728550_n5ru7lmT/fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_23-36-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067.fits Discovery image 2   2026 06 04.19244    2461195.69244    13.53    10:13:02.47 +32:55:48.6   3275 1300   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-03_CI_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_233819_TTUQ1b1x1_3728550_n5ru7lmT/fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_23-36-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0068.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 53089_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_23-36-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0068 The candidate 53089_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_23-36-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0068 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 06 04.19187    2461195.69187    13.43    10:20:44.84 +30:39:21.2   2161 2565   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-03_CI_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_233819_TTUQ1b1x1_3728550_n5ru7lmT/fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_23-36-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067.fits Discovery image 2   2026 06 04.19244    2461195.69244    13.43    10:20:44.79 +30:39:21.4   2156 2569   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-03_CI_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_233819_TTUQ1b1x1_3728550_n5ru7lmT/fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_23-36-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0068.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 53095_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_23-36-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0068 The candidate 53095_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_23-36-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0068 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 06 04.19244    2461195.69244    13.25    09:29:39.61 +27:23:43.8   8799 4876   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-03_CI_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_233819_TTUQ1b1x1_3728550_n5ru7lmT/fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_23-36-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0068.fits **** FOUND 09:29:39.64 +27:23:43.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 53161_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_23-36-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0068 The candidate 53161_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_23-36-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0068 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 06 04.19187    2461195.69187    13.56    10:01:29.94 +28:33:22.8   4570 4038   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-03_CI_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_233819_TTUQ1b1x1_3728550_n5ru7lmT/fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_23-36-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067.fits Discovery image 2   2026 06 04.19244    2461195.69244    13.59    10:01:29.86 +28:33:21.9   4564 4042   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-03_CI_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_233819_TTUQ1b1x1_3728550_n5ru7lmT/fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_23-36-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0068.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 53200_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_23-36-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0068 The candidate 53200_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_23-36-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0068 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 06 04.19244    2461195.69244    13.73    09:35:04.04 +26:11:25.9   8062 5605   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-03_CI_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_233819_TTUQ1b1x1_3728550_n5ru7lmT/fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_23-36-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0068.fits **** FOUND 09:35:04.15 +26:11:25.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 53210_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_23-36-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0068 The candidate 53210_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_23-36-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0068 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 06 04.19244    2461195.69244    13.89    09:36:46.05 +31:11:32.2   7856 2571   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-03_CI_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_233819_TTUQ1b1x1_3728550_n5ru7lmT/fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_23-36-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0068.fits **** FOUND 09:36:46.04 +31:11:32.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 53269_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_23-36-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0068 The candidate 53269_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_23-36-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0068 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 06 04.19244    2461195.69244    13.78    09:48:04.84 +31:15:12.4   6392 2505   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-03_CI_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_233819_TTUQ1b1x1_3728550_n5ru7lmT/fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_23-36-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0068.fits **** FOUND 09:48:04.85 +31:15:12.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 53280_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_23-36-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0068 The candidate 53280_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_23-36-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0068 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 06 04.19244    2461195.69244    13.76    10:15:12.55 +31:28:45.9   2920 2147   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-03_CI_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_233819_TTUQ1b1x1_3728550_n5ru7lmT/fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_23-36-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0068.fits **** FOUND 10:15:12.60 +31:28:46.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 53326_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_23-36-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0068 The candidate 53326_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_23-36-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0068 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 06 04.19244    2461195.69244    13.88    09:44:01.61 +25:18:52.7   6826 6111   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-03_CI_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_233819_TTUQ1b1x1_3728550_n5ru7lmT/fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_23-36-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0068.fits **** FOUND 09:44:01.69 +25:18:51.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 53352_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_23-36-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0068 The candidate 53352_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_23-36-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0068 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 06 04.19187    2461195.69187    13.87    10:06:51.81 +28:55:05.3   3879 3772   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-03_CI_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_233819_TTUQ1b1x1_3728550_n5ru7lmT/fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_23-36-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067.fits Discovery image 2   2026 06 04.19244    2461195.69244    13.88    10:06:51.77 +28:55:05.6   3873 3776   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-03_CI_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_233819_TTUQ1b1x1_3728550_n5ru7lmT/fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_23-36-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0068.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 53360_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_23-36-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0068 The candidate 53360_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_23-36-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0068 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 06 04.19244    2461195.69244    13.86    09:39:00.29 +26:15:39.0   7523 5553   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-03_CI_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_233819_TTUQ1b1x1_3728550_n5ru7lmT/fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_23-36-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0068.fits **** FOUND 09:39:00.31 +26:15:37.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 53544_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_23-36-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0068 The candidate 53544_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_23-36-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0068 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 06 04.19244    2461195.69244    14.08    10:05:00.39 +29:44:36.2   4153 3298   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-03_CI_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_233819_TTUQ1b1x1_3728550_n5ru7lmT/fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_23-36-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0068.fits **** FOUND 10:05:00.46 +29:44:36.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 53778_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_23-36-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0068 The candidate 53778_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_23-36-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0068 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 06 04.19244    2461195.69244    14.22    10:22:22.92 +30:48:31.4   1954 2454   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-03_CI_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_233819_TTUQ1b1x1_3728550_n5ru7lmT/fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_23-36-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0068.fits **** FOUND 10:22:22.99 +30:48:31.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 25509_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_23-36-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0068 The candidate 25509_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_23-36-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0068 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 3   2026 06 04.19244    2461195.69244    11.64    09:39:25.66 +34:14:51.7   7541 0715   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-03_CI_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_233819_TTUQ1b1x1_3728550_n5ru7lmT/fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_23-36-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0068.fits **** FOUND 09:39:25.65 +34:14:51.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 23951_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_23-36-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0068 The candidate 23951_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_23-36-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0068 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 3   2026 06 04.19244    2461195.69244    8.09    09:53:43.22 +34:55:33.6   5771 0258   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-03_CI_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_233819_TTUQ1b1x1_3728550_n5ru7lmT/fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_23-36-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0068.fits **** FOUND 09:53:43.21 +34:55:33.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 06509_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_23-36-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0068 The candidate 06509_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_23-36-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0068 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 3   2026 06 04.19244    2461195.69244    11.15    10:02:40.96 +26:41:36.9   4333 5154   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-03_CI_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_233819_TTUQ1b1x1_3728550_n5ru7lmT/fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_23-36-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0068.fits **** FOUND 10:02:40.94 +26:41:36.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 24933_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_23-36-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0068 The candidate 24933_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_23-36-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0068 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 3   2026 06 04.19244    2461195.69244    7.90    09:45:34.44 +34:30:39.1   6774 0544   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-03_CI_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_233819_TTUQ1b1x1_3728550_n5ru7lmT/fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_23-36-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0068.fits **** FOUND 09:45:34.44 +34:30:39.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 1s Prepared the HTML report for the field Leo-01-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL *------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------* #### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt #### ########### Completed Leo-01-Q1b1x1 ########### The analysis was running at tau We are allowed to update the exclusion list at tau host Found ../exclusion_list_TTUQ1.txt #### The exclusion list before filtering-out asteroids, bad pixels and adding Gaia sources #### ################################################################################### renamed 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt_noasteroids' -> 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt' renamed 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt_nohotpixels' -> 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt' # Count candidates with no identification (that also don't look like hot pix) Found 0 unidentified candidates (excluding asteroids, hot pixels and known variable stars). ################################################################################### 0 candidates found (excluding asteroids and hot pixels) This does not look like a test run ################################################################################### exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt NOT FOUND exclusion_list_apass.txt NOT FOUND IS_THIS_TEST_RUN=NO ALLOW_EXCLUSION_LIST_UPDATE= YES #### Nothing to add to the exclusion list #### The observatory MPC code is V36 ############################################################ Positions of planets computed with util/planet_finder/main.py for JD(UT)2461195.69187201 -observatory V36 06:17:49.88 +25:30:56.4 Mercury (-0.2mag) 07:22:33.71 +24:04:22.7 Venus (-4.0mag) 02:38:00.74 +14:47:25.6 Mars (1.3mag) 07:45:08.53 +21:39:36.0 Jupiter (-1.9mag) 00:48:11.92 +02:42:13.0 Saturn (0.9mag) 03:59:15.01 +20:22:42.0 Uranus (5.8mag) 00:15:53.59 +00:15:24.3 Neptune (7.8mag) 20:33:33.91 -23:03:05.1 Pluto (14.5mag) 19:53:44.68 -24:37:54.1 Moon (-11.6mag) -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 363 Jun 3 23:40 planets.txt ############################################################ Positions of selected moons from JPL HORIZONS for JD(UT)2461195.69187201: 07:45:02.80 +21:39:52.7 Io (6.0mag) 07:45:01.50 +21:39:58.3 Europa (6.2mag) 07:45:25.16 +21:38:50.1 Ganymede (5.6mag) 07:45:36.21 +21:38:20.4 Callisto (6.8mag) 07:45:40.47 +21:15:42.5 Himalia (15.6mag) 07:45:12.94 +21:39:22.2 Thebe (16.5mag) 07:45:46.37 +21:32:56.3 Elara (17.5mag) 07:47:06.55 +21:53:28.5 Pasiphae (17.7mag) 07:51:53.93 +21:41:01.0 Carme (18.8mag) 00:48:07.59 +02:42:42.6 Titan (8.7mag) 00:48:07.69 +02:42:20.5 Rhea (10.0mag) 00:48:44.61 +02:43:52.6 Iapetus (11.4mag) 00:47:59.90 +02:42:23.5 Hyperion (14.7mag) 00:48:59.03 +02:44:43.9 Phoebe (16.7mag) -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 569 Jun 3 23:40 moons.txt ############################################################ Positions of selected spacecraft from JPL HORIZONS for JD(UT)2461195.69187201: 17:24:36.48 -34:49:59.0 JWST 18:15:54.11 +31:23:05.7 Chandra 18:40:31.72 -21:40:57.5 XMM-Newton -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 96 Jun 3 23:40 spacecraft.txt ############################################################ Positions of bright comets computed with util/comet_finder/main.py for JD(UT)2461195.69187201 -observatory V36 18:46:07.75 -32:21:22.6 13.6mag P/2010 H2 (Vales) 05:49:33.00 -68:06:45.3 17.4mag C/2014 UN271 (Bernardinelli-Bernstein) 05:47:35.53 +31:55:00.7 17.5mag C/2017 K2 (PANSTARRS) 17:16:20.09 +15:08:11.7 17.8mag C/2021 G2 (ATLAS) 20:37:32.36 -50:56:04.3 17.3mag P/2021 N1 (ZTF) 23:13:25.29 +31:26:02.4 17.2mag C/2022 E2 (ATLAS) 05:29:07.43 +26:56:52.6 16.4mag C/2022 N2 (PANSTARRS) 09:26:54.35 +31:13:05.4 16.6mag C/2022 QE78 (ATLAS) 08:48:26.60 +03:43:52.5 17.7mag C/2022 R6 (PANSTARRS) 18:30:48.13 +21:30:39.4 17.7mag C/2023 A3 (Tsuchinshan-ATLAS) 15:20:51.25 -11:00:27.4 17.6mag P/2023 B1 (PANSTARRS) 22:15:29.77 +66:16:31.6 17.7mag C/2023 H5 (Lemmon) 17:56:10.01 -06:18:32.8 13.7mag C/2023 R1 (PANSTARRS) 13:21:12.82 +83:53:27.6 17.9mag C/2023 X2 (Lemmon) 07:04:57.79 +64:10:48.7 17.6mag C/2024 A1 (ATLAS) 06:41:07.91 +27:27:29.0 13.5mag C/2024 E1 (Wierzchos) 15:40:28.42 +13:09:29.5 17.4mag C/2024 G6 (ATLAS) 20:15:30.44 +29:55:56.4 14.0mag C/2024 J3 (ATLAS) 04:14:00.58 -16:18:48.3 16.0mag C/2024 T5 (ATLAS) 06:02:09.73 +35:11:35.4 17.9mag C/2025 J1 (Borisov) 11:37:14.25 +52:57:59.2 17.3mag C/2025 L1 (ATLAS) 06:39:43.92 -10:41:09.6 13.7mag C/2025 R3 (PANSTARRS) 09:20:59.58 +23:23:00.5 18.0mag C/2025 V2 (Rankin) 12:39:53.54 +04:41:33.8 17.2mag C/2025 Y1 (ATLAS) 18:18:35.69 +74:13:24.2 18.0mag C/2026 A2 (Bok) 01:53:31.68 +43:07:11.7 16.0mag C/2026 B2 (Sun-Gao) 11:10:39.68 -05:12:30.5 16.4mag A/2026 E1 20:16:20.01 -08:20:13.8 8.9mag 10P/Tempel 11:01:08.53 -00:55:09.2 16.0mag 29P/Schwassmann-Wachmann 10:57:47.23 -02:40:52.8 17.9mag 43P/Wolf-Harrington 03:05:30.55 +25:06:10.8 17.6mag 47P/Ashbrook-Jackson 08:51:26.37 +24:54:02.6 16.9mag 63P/Wild 00:23:23.87 -06:38:13.8 15.7mag 65P/Gunn 06:30:29.38 +32:59:02.9 16.8mag 76P/West-Kohoutek-Ikemura 02:59:31.60 +16:41:19.4 13.9mag 78P/Gehrels 01:11:55.56 +03:57:28.9 15.5mag 88P/Howell 04:41:44.33 +29:57:51.6 15.2mag 93P/Lovas 02:31:45.17 +26:57:52.5 17.7mag 114P/Wiseman-Skiff 06:41:02.70 +33:09:53.0 15.6mag 123P/West-Hartley 09:43:15.36 +16:21:28.3 16.5mag 124P/Mrkos 03:52:25.87 +18:58:25.3 16.4mag 128P/Shoemaker-Holt 04:25:35.19 +18:53:13.6 17.7mag 131P/Mueller 05:40:44.95 +19:04:51.5 14.1mag 141P/Machholz 05:43:15.31 +17:24:29.2 14.1mag 141P-A/Machholz 04:33:41.76 +15:33:28.5 11.2mag 141P-D/Machholz 02:54:49.18 -25:16:12.2 17.0mag 161P/Hartley-IRAS 03:28:30.14 +22:10:00.8 14.9mag 162P/SidingSpring 19:36:37.78 +00:35:32.0 17.1mag 169P/NEAT 00:07:30.52 +01:40:00.3 17.9mag 220P/McNaught 16:55:17.50 -08:41:48.6 16.3mag 235P/LINEAR 07:25:34.93 +35:38:32.3 17.5mag 240P/NEAT 00:21:53.05 -04:08:52.6 16.5mag 260P/McNaught 03:53:27.67 +31:43:59.9 17.6mag 295P/LINEAR 23:24:25.49 -15:04:23.2 17.6mag 320P/McNaught 15:17:06.65 +08:13:08.2 17.4mag 391P/Kowalski 08:03:59.48 +20:50:46.4 17.9mag 450P/LONEOS 06:53:26.45 +41:58:39.2 17.8mag 493P/LONEOS -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 2.8K Jun 3 23:40 comets.txt ############################################################ List of recent ASAS-SN transients from https://www.astronomy.ohio-state.edu/asassn/transients.html : 20:07:38.15 -21:07:05.40 SN2026mho 2026-05-25.18 -1.12 11:29:42.55 +79:01:03.10 AT2026min 2026-05-24.21 16.63 11:44:32.95 -68:48:30.00 ASASSN-26no 2026-05-24 8.41 19:00:42.82 -48:31:01.60 ASASSN-26dp 2026-05-22.31 -3.28 14:23:56.59 -58:37:47.40 ASASSN-26dn 2026-05-20.01 14.59 11:24:54.06 +47:57:01.60 AT2026nma 2026-05-20.29 15.46 21:27:08.58 +33:24:38.10 AT2026lli 2026-05-19.34 15.86 00:31:01.41 -13:38:51.70 AT2026nad 2026-05-19.39 15.34 15:16:06.61 -79:16:32.40 ASASSN-26dm 2026-05-19.03 14.44 11:24:25.21 -59:23:19.10 ASASSN-26dl 2026-05-18.02 13.55 13:45:51.52 -53:16:01.00 ASASSN-26dk 2026-05-18.16 12.96 02:05:49.69 -30:29:09.60 ASASSN-26dh 2026-05-18.43 15.37 17:50:22.87 -39:42:33.90 ASASSN-26dj 2026-05-17.05 15.7 01:13:11.60 -33:25:16.10 ASASSN-26dg 2026-05-13.41 16.8 16:44:31.77 -27:15:18.40 AT2026mhn 2026-05-12.33 15.8 09:46:31.08 -33:41:51.00 ASASSN-26di 2026-05-12.14 14.63 21:23:11.57 -19:09:45.00 AT2026kwu 2026-05-12.26 16.9 14:20:14.30 -30:20:51.90 AT2026ktm 2026-05-12.06 17.21 14:41:39.01 -37:13:46.40 AT2026lkm 2026-05-11.18 16.89 12:59:50.45 -10:58:38.80 SN2026kep 2026-05-9.06 17.5 13:37:29.61 -29:50:30.90 AT2026lkd 2026-05-9.09 17.23 09:46:42.01 -14:52:03.60 SN2026kmo 2026-05-8.99 17.51 15:03:05.28 +22:02:03.40 AT2026lxf 2026-05-8.07 13.88 10:23:49.41 -20:57:25.30 ASASSN-26df 2026-05-8.21 16.52 22:14:40.56 +05:04:51.60 2026lda 2026-05-7.56 16.2 21:35:33.81 -14:05:16.30 ASASSN-26de 2026-05-6.29 14.51 16:21:48.82 -61:36:13.20 ASASSN-26dd 2026-05-5.21 15.15 14:26:40.22 -24:48:37.50 AT2026lig 2026-05-4.27 14.63 13:17:51.04 +30:25:13.50 SN2026kcp 2026-05-4.46 16.43 11:27:55.57 -13:38:56.90 SN2026kza 2026-05-1.08 15.59 22:28:27.10 +30:17:54.30 SN 2026fov 2026-04-29.6 14.36 21:00:10.71 -32:17:03.90 AT2026kis 2026-04-27.36 16.15 14:32:57.37 -58:13:26.40 ASASSN-26dc 2026-04-27.27 13.42 15:32:05.35 -43:54:34.60 ASASSN-26db 2026-04-27.37 16.06 16:34:34.97 -54:34:58.00 ASASSN-26da 2026-04-25.32 16.11 10:06:55.04 -01:13:49.70 SN2026jsg 2026-04-24.99 16.28 15:15:57.17 +56:18:32.80 SN2026kid 2026-04-24.52 -3.65 07:58:28.45 +57:03:42.40 AT2026kcf 2026-04-24.2 16.89 11:38:21.80 -50:43:06.50 SN2026jkb 2026-04-24.24 15.38 10:06:11.41 -39:41:04.20 AT2026dil 2026-04-24.2 16.85 14:21:40.08 +13:13:46.30 SN2026jlm 2026-04-22.16 15.12 10:53:55.52 -16:06:06.00 ASASSN-26cz 2026-04-22.28 16.29 20:07:38.15 -21:07:05.40 2026-05-25.18 -1.12 13:45:02.03 +15:17:14.50 ASASSN-26cy 2026-04-21.27 15.78 13:20:52.22 -35:57:03.60 AT2026jcm 2026-04-19.01 16.65 13:36:15.66 -36:53:48.40 SN 2026iqy 2026-04-18.92 17.31 06:34:01.33 -40:07:34.00 ASASSN-26cx 2026-04-19.07 16.16 23:33:57.97 -45:12:11.90 SN 2026idu 2026-04-19.41 15.9 12:10:50.92 +66:55:31.20 SN 2026icv 2026-04-17.14 16.03 21:36:59.06 -60:43:35.90 ASASSN-26cv 2026-04-17.35 -1.18 08:13:26.26 -27:07:30.50 ASASSN-26cw 2026-04-17.07 -1.01 14:49:14.13 -27:29:20.60 ASASSN-26cu 2026-04-16.06 14.03 17:21:59.44 -38:54:04.60 ASASSN-26ct 2026-04-14.4 15.15 15:25:54.99 +07:49:24.50 SN2026huo 2026-04-12.14 16.96 20:07:38.15 -21:07:05.40 2026-05-25.18 -1.12 12:23:20.40 +04:53:39.10 AT2026ixd 2026-04-12.14 17.65 17:46:09.76 -61:19:50.40 SN2026icy 2026-04-12.2 17.03 09:25:46.42 +02:13:46.30 SN2026gud 2026-04-11.98 16.49 16:52:15.46 -60:27:45.90 ASASSN-26cs 2026-04-12.4 15.5 04:20:55.37 -51:15:31.10 ASASSN-26cr 2026-04-12.01 15.37 22:25:39.35 +36:45:06.90 AT2026ihl 2026-04-10.48 14.21 19:40:44.94 +00:41:03.80 AT2026imw 2026-04-10.32 16.06 19:52:04.70 +05:53:33.50 ASASSN-26cq 2026-04-9.31 14.98 16:08:18.39 -64:11:08.80 ASASSN-26cp 2026-04-9.29 13.32 09:22:22.90 -61:02:43.70 SN2026idh 2026-04-7.97 16.34 05:06:54.12 -19:42:26.40 AT2026imr 2026-04-8 17.49 07:14:55.34 -36:03:21.40 AT2026hei 2026-04-8.12 16.7 21:35:33.14 -19:01:34.80 AT2026ihm 2026-04-8.36 16.7 04:28:24.08 -32:25:35.30 AT2026imo 2026-04-8.02 16.81 05:10:35.79 -39:38:40.80 SN 2026hnn 2026-04-7.04 17.07 09:54:32.04 -01:17:25.80 ASASSN-26cn 2026-04-7.01 15.58 07:46:24.43 -77:29:35.90 ASASSN-26co 2026-04-7.15 14.93 05:00:45.52 -29:51:06.20 AT2026hvw 2026-04-6.03 16.51 19:49:33.10 -23:37:11.00 ASASSN-26cl 2026-04-5.29 14.98 19:32:43.55 -22:39:33.40 ASASSN-26cm 2026-04-4.3 13.88 18:08:57.38 +76:48:23.60 ASASSN-26ck 2026-04-2.37 15.38 16:16:36.10 +44:52:30.20 AT2026hyy 2026-04-2.58 13.81 21:55:23.31 -34:48:53.90 ASASSN-26cj 2026-03-30.4 -1.47 11:19:50.70 -27:51:49.80 SN2026gvk 2026-03-30 15.48 11:53:57.02 -23:09:46.20 SN2026gzx 2026-03-28.75 15.27 07:13:46.14 -33:10:15.70 ASASSN-26ci 2026-03-28.15 15.14 09:03:36.09 -67:58:13.00 SN2026hkg 2026-03-28.19 15.82 07:03:00.72 +39:14:43.00 SN2026fin 2026-03-28.27 15.82 05:35:42.80 -63:44:05.50 ASASSN-26ch 2026-03-27.86 13.02 11:23:19.04 +34:22:38.00 SN2026fwt 2026-03-27.3 16.56 19:03:49.79 +37:04:05.20 ASASSN-26ce 2026-03-26.56 16.3 20:26:56.07 -52:54:06.50 AT2026hiy 2026-03-26.35 16.95 05:25:54.76 -30:15:35.80 ASASSN-26cg 2026-03-25.07 16.88 06:57:16.49 -26:54:37.20 SN2026fzb 2026-03-25.14 15.8 14:37:38.23 -43:00:52.30 ASASSN-26cd 2026-03-24.24 12.52 17:34:53.03 +06:04:29.70 AT2026gzl 2026-03-23.27 15.82 08:30:02.60 -35:12:47.50 ASASSN-26cf 2026-03-23.2 14.82 16:54:25.33 +37:49:56.60 SN 2026evz 2026-03-21.32 17.54 17:06:19.20 -18:54:19.50 ASASSN-26bx 2026-03-21.25 16.39 19:01:16.28 -29:29:23.10 ASASSN-26bw 2026-03-21.33 15.81 08:46:05.75 +10:47:39.80 ASASSN-26ca 2026-03-21.13 14.27 12:14:58.16 +63:47:16.20 SN 2026fvx 2026-03-21.12 15.6 18:02:55.90 -75:23:02.60 ASASSN-26bz 2026-03-21.32 16.16 12:16:02.88 -53:16:33.80 ASASSN-26cc 2026-03-20.04 15.48 13:08:21.85 +29:13:44.20 SN 2026fmh 2026-03-20.16 -0.33 -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 5.6K Jun 3 23:40 asassn_transients_list.txt ############################################################ Truncated list of TOCP transients from http://www.cbat.eps.harvard.edu/unconf/tocp.html : 17:57:19.56 -28:08:14.7 TCP J17571956-2808147 2026-03-19.7972 14.5mag 08:46:05.73 +10:47:39.7 TCP J08460573+1047397 2026-03-21.1936 14.5mag 09:55:38.83 +69:05:21.7 PNV J09553883+6905217 2026-04-01.893 19.4mag 19:32:43.67 -22:39:30.7 TCP J19324367-2239307 2026-04-05.4395 13.6mag 16:16:36.03 +44:52:28.9 TCP J16163603+4452289 2026-04-05.6655 14.2mag 00:43:38.36 +41:15:32.4 PNV J00433836+4115324 2026-04-08.079 17.2mag 15:41:11.68 +59:18:26.8 TCP J15411168+5918268 2026-04-12.9625 19.2mag 00:43:35.02 +41:46:28.0 PNV J00433502+4146280 2026-04-23.056 15.9mag 00:42:55.64 +41:14:12.2 PNV J00425564+4114122 2026-04-24.042 16.2mag 21:14:03.38 +56:46:44.1 TCP J21140338+5646441 2026-05-05.3534 16.7mag 15:03:05.19 +22:02:04.1 TCP J15030519+2202041 2026-05-08.3260 13.9mag 07:15:18.25 +47:53:16.7 TCP J07151825+4753167 2026-05-09.1599 14.4mag 16:00:18.44 -22:30:10.6 TCP J16001844-2230106 2026-05-09.6135 13.3mag 00:42:47.45 +41:16:58.5 PNV J00424745+4116585 2026-05-10.030 16.8mag 09:55:02.89 +69:02:13.8 PNV J09550289+6902138 2026-05-18.925 20.7mag 00:43:01.82 +41:18:16.6 PNV J00430182+4118166 2026-05-21.8651 18.83Cmag 00:42:51.20 +41:16:59.4 PNV J00425120+4116594 2022-10-26.135 19.3mag 12:24:25.10 +28:47:12.0 TCP J12242510+2847120 2026-05-31.6015 14.8mag 00:56:07.13 +43:01:40.6 TCP J00560713+4301406 2026-06-01.4135 12.2mag 00:42:41.64 +41:15:16.2 PNV J00424164+4115162 2026-06-02.029 17.4mag -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 189K Jun 3 23:40 tocp_transients_list.txt ############################################################ Truncated list of recent TNS transients from https://www.wis-tns.org/ : 00:31:41.797 +26:10:30.85 AT 2026nll 2026-05-23.48 19.3138 16:14:03.050 +15:19:38.66 AT 2026nlk 2026-05-16.86 20.93 18:17:15.360 +39:41:22.36 AT 2026nlj 2026-05-10.79 21.53 18:22:21.260 +38:36:15.52 AT 2026nli 2026-05-10.79 21.62 16:23:29.410 +22:48:47.18 AT 2026nlh 2026-05-09.79 20.01 15:19:37.260 +16:28:58.23 AT 2026nlg 2026-05-05.84 20.81 14:31:09.520 +24:03:04.31 AT 2026nlf 2026-04-30.86 19.85 15:33:35.050 +31:50:53.87 AT 2026nle 2026-04-19.90 20.71 15:15:31.740 +19:01:13.96 AT 2026nld 2026-04-19.89 20.52 14:33:02.080 +03:34:42.30 AT 2026nlc 2026-05-21.70 21.81 14:21:55.000 -01:06:15.74 AT 2026nlb 2026-05-21.70 21.58 14:21:48.580 +02:02:28.28 AT 2026nla 2026-05-21.70 21.97 14:34:15.890 +04:48:10.98 AT 2026nkz 2026-05-21.66 22.11 13:25:52.490 +02:32:04.69 AT 2026nky 2026-05-21.62 21.92 14:32:53.700 -01:18:51.32 AT 2026nkx 2026-05-19.69 22.26 14:01:03.970 +01:30:28.51 AT 2026nkw 2026-05-19.68 21.5 13:50:18.270 +05:00:57.62 AT 2026nkv 2026-05-19.68 22.37 13:28:37.740 -02:21:55.36 AT 2026nku 2026-05-19.67 21.73 13:17:47.380 -01:03:07.48 AT 2026nkt 2026-05-19.67 21.91 14:17:17.810 +03:27:44.75 AT 2026nks 2026-05-17.66 22.82 -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 30K Jun 3 23:40 tns_transients_list.txt

Profiling:

CPU temperature: 91 C