This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-03_CI_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_232323_TTUQ1b1x1_3264414_7r0vPwSE
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 04.1814 2461195.6814 11.75 16:43:32.82 -13:25:58.3
4.77598 20.63678 galactic Oph Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.9" and 9.0 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.48 Doris 2 -1 2 11.8 -0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits at 16:43:32.82 -13:25:58.3: 15.22 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits at 16:43:32.82 -13:25:58.3: 15.09 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461195.6814,11.75,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260604.1814 11.75CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 04.1814 2461195.6814 12.09 17:00:53.36 -05:51:33.5
14.05869 21.35422 galactic Oph Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.6" and 10.0 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.258 Tyche 2 -1 3 12.0 -0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits at 17:00:53.36 -05:51:33.5: 15.59 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits at 17:00:53.36 -05:51:33.5: 15.39 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461195.6814,12.09,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260604.1814 12.09CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 04.1814 2461195.6814 12.87 17:04:22.79 -11:10:39.8
9.81213 17.74537 galactic Oph Second-epoch detections are separated by 2.0" and 9.4 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.412 Elisabetha 2 -1 3 12.8 0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits at 17:04:22.79 -11:10:39.8: 15.78 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits at 17:04:22.79 -11:10:39.8: 15.56 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461195.6814,12.87,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260604.1814 12.87CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 04.1814 2461195.6814 13.54 16:54:36.18 -11:32:35.3
8.07933 19.52867 galactic Oph Second-epoch detections are separated by 2.7" and 9.0 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.740 Cantabia 2 -3 3 13.4 -0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits at 16:54:36.18 -11:32:35.3: 15.76 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits at 16:54:36.18 -11:32:35.3: 15.53 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461195.6814,13.54,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260604.1814 13.54CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 04.1814 2461195.6814 13.62 17:38:11.48 -12:41:55.9
13.02401 9.93577 galactic Ser Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.8" and 10.8 pix
The object was found in VSX 7" NSVS J1738120-124156
Type: M
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
10.282 R1 Y 2.193 R1 350.000000000000
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits at 17:38:11.48 -12:41:55.9: 15.15 +/- 0.28 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits at 17:38:11.48 -12:41:55.9: 14.94 +/- 0.27 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.04 +/- 0.19
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 06 04.1814* 17 38 11.48 -12 41 55.9 13.6 U Ser 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
NSVS J1738120-124156,2461195.6814,13.62,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
NSVS J1738120-124156 20260604.1814 13.62CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 04.1814 2461195.6814 13.31 17:03:23.21 -09:20:08.2
11.29425 18.95955 galactic Oph Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.3" and 10.0 pix
The object was found in VSX 0" ASASSN-V J170323.22-092007.9
Type: L
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
13.510 V 14.170 V
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits at 17:03:23.21 -09:20:08.2: 14.20 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits at 17:03:23.21 -09:20:08.2: 14.30 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.24 +/- 0.07
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ASASSN-V J170323.22-092007.9,2461195.6814,13.31,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ASASSN-V J170323.22-092007.9 20260604.1814 13.31CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461174.80897943 14.05.2026 07:24:45.823 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits
First image: 2461174.80897943 14.05.2026 07:24:45.823 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits
Last image: 2461195.68250763 04.06.2026 04:22:38.659 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-03_CI_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_232323_TTUQ1b1x1_3264414_7r0vPwSE/fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_23-22-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0052.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 11
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.89
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 4 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 6768
Objects passed selection criteria: 6765
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.5 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.5 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 6281.75
Average stars matched: 6160.75 (98.0738 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 112676 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Mon Jun 1 15:05:05 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-85-g6dfb2809
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-06-01)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Wed Jun 3 23:24:50 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461174.80897943 14.05.2026 07:24:45.823 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits
First image: 2461174.80897943 14.05.2026 07:24:45.823 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits
Last image: 2461195.68250763 04.06.2026 04:22:38.659 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-03_CI_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_232323_TTUQ1b1x1_3264414_7r0vPwSE/fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_23-22-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0052.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 131
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.52
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 26 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 64095
Objects passed selection criteria: 64002
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.4 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.4 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 58288.8
Average stars matched: 56449 (96.8437 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 166720 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Mon Jun 1 15:05:05 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-85-g6dfb2809
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-06-01)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Wed Jun 3 23:27:10 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 3.5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-03_CI_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_232323_TTUQ1b1x1_3264414_7r0vPwSE/fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_23-19-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0051.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-03_CI_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_232323_TTUQ1b1x1_3264414_7r0vPwSE/fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_23-22-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0052.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-03_CI_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_232323_TTUQ1b1x1_3264414_7r0vPwSE/fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_23-19-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0051.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-03_CI_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_232323_TTUQ1b1x1_3264414_7r0vPwSE/fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_23-22-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0052.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461195.68027104
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits'
wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits'
wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_23-19-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0051.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_23-19-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0051.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_23-19-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0051.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_23-19-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0051.fits'
wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_23-22-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0052.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_23-22-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0052.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_23-22-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0052.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_23-22-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0052.fits'
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits
Image size: 937.3'x624.3' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 17:08:38.023 -09:59:09.18 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.87"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_23-19-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0051.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_23-19-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0051.fits
Image size: 941.4'x626.7' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 17:08:21.165 -09:59:28.40 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 17:08:38.023 -09:59:09.18
Second-epoch image center 17:08:21.165 -09:59:28.40
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0694 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_23-22-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0052.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_23-22-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0052.fits
Image size: 941.1'x626.7' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 17:08:17.879 -10:00:03.50 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 17:08:38.023 -09:59:09.18
Second-epoch image center 17:08:17.879 -10:00:03.50
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0840 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 17:08:21.165 -09:59:28.40
Second-epoch second image center 17:08:17.879 -10:00:03.50
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01664 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits &> /tmp/tmp.oMmKM3ZgUN
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits &> /tmp/tmp.AR6xoFdLrF
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-03_CI_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_232323_TTUQ1b1x1_3264414_7r0vPwSE/fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_23-19-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0051.fits &> /tmp/tmp.Dq8lxhWdjC
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-03_CI_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_232323_TTUQ1b1x1_3264414_7r0vPwSE/fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_23-19-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0051.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-03_CI_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_232323_TTUQ1b1x1_3264414_7r0vPwSE/fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_23-22-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0052.fits &> /tmp/tmp.ASeFMOBM2l
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-03_CI_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_232323_TTUQ1b1x1_3264414_7r0vPwSE/fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_23-22-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0052.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits and wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits.cat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits and wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits.cat
Found non-empty wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits and wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits.cat
The reference image (wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits) and catalog (wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits.cat) found
'wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits.cat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 7619 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 249.0959 to 265.2508 deg, Dec -15.2525 to -4.6764 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 249.0959 to 265.2508 deg, Dec -15.2525 to -4.6764 deg
Loaded 4104 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3395 out of 3508 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3508 out of 7619 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.830900
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.830900
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.89
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.94
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.94
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 7619 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 249.0959 to 265.2508 deg, Dec -15.2525 to -4.6764 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 249.0959 to 265.2508 deg, Dec -15.2525 to -4.6764 deg
Loaded 4104 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3395 out of 3508 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3508 out of 7619 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits (aperture=6.5)
Read 6368 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 249.0956 to 265.2325 deg, Dec -15.2667 to -4.7383 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 249.0956 to 265.2325 deg, Dec -15.2667 to -4.7383 deg
Loaded 4081 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3316 out of 3413 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3413 out of 6368 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits (aperture=6.4)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 11 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 8000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.4 pix Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits
2.4 pix Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits
2.4 pix fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_23-19-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0051.fits
3.5 pix fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_23-22-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0052.fits
2.4 pix wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits
2.4 pix wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
14.9 mag. Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits
14.8 mag. Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits
14.6 mag. fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_23-19-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0051.fits
14.4 mag. fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_23-22-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0052.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.4 (SNR ) 11.8 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.oMmKM3ZgUN (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-03_CI_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_232323_TTUQ1b1x1_3264414_7r0vPwSE/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits' -> 'wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=425, passed=7619
Got 7619 stars (including 7188 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 7619 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013018 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010414 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 939 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 937 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 922 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.53"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 937 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7489 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.52"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 939 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 937 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7489 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.53"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 937 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7489 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.54"
Excluding outliers - 937 stars left (next iteration limit 1030)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits N_match=937 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.568 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.416 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.927 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.432 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.573 n_q1=177 n_q2=358 n_q3=213 n_q4=189 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.633
The image catalog is written to wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits -region wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.AR6xoFdLrF (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-03_CI_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_232323_TTUQ1b1x1_3264414_7r0vPwSE/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits' -> 'wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=363, passed=6368
Got 6368 stars (including 5993 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 6368 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013018 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010414 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 942 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 939 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 927 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.53"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 939 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6258 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.53"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 942 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 939 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6257 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.54"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 939 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6257 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.55"
Excluding outliers - 939 stars left (next iteration limit 1032)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits N_match=939 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.558 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.417 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.846 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.469 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.530 n_q1=180 n_q2=359 n_q3=207 n_q4=193 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.517
The image catalog is written to wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits -region wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.Dq8lxhWdjC (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-03_CI_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_232323_TTUQ1b1x1_3264414_7r0vPwSE/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-03_CI_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_232323_TTUQ1b1x1_3264414_7r0vPwSE/fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_23-19-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0051.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-03_CI_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_232323_TTUQ1b1x1_3264414_7r0vPwSE/fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_23-19-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0051.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-03_CI_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_232323_TTUQ1b1x1_3264414_7r0vPwSE/fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_23-19-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0051.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-03_CI_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_232323_TTUQ1b1x1_3264414_7r0vPwSE/fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_23-19-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0051.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-03_CI_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_232323_TTUQ1b1x1_3264414_7r0vPwSE/fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_23-19-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0051.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-03_CI_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_232323_TTUQ1b1x1_3264414_7r0vPwSE/fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_23-19-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0051.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_23-19-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0051.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_23-19-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0051.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_23-19-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0051.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_23-19-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0051.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_23-19-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0051.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_23-19-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0051.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_23-19-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0051.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-03_CI_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_232323_TTUQ1b1x1_3264414_7r0vPwSE/fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_23-19-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0051.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_23-19-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0051.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=332, passed=5393
Got 5393 stars (including 5049 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_23-19-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0051.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 5393 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013075 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010460 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 372 to 430 (Dec -15.6 to -4.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 940 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 935 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 919 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 935 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5308 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 372 to 430 (Dec -15.6 to -4.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 940 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 935 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5309 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 935 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5309 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Excluding outliers - 935 stars left (next iteration limit 1028)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_23-19-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0051.fits N_match=935 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.370 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.378 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.400 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.300 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.406 n_q1=183 n_q2=342 n_q3=228 n_q4=182 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.099
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_23-19-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0051.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_23-19-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0051.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-03_CI_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_232323_TTUQ1b1x1_3264414_7r0vPwSE/fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_23-19-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0051.fits -region wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_23-19-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0051.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_23-19-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0051.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.ASeFMOBM2l (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-03_CI_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_232323_TTUQ1b1x1_3264414_7r0vPwSE/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-03_CI_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_232323_TTUQ1b1x1_3264414_7r0vPwSE/fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_23-22-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0052.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-03_CI_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_232323_TTUQ1b1x1_3264414_7r0vPwSE/fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_23-22-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0052.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-03_CI_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_232323_TTUQ1b1x1_3264414_7r0vPwSE/fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_23-22-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0052.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-03_CI_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_232323_TTUQ1b1x1_3264414_7r0vPwSE/fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_23-22-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0052.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-03_CI_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_232323_TTUQ1b1x1_3264414_7r0vPwSE/fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_23-22-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0052.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-03_CI_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_232323_TTUQ1b1x1_3264414_7r0vPwSE/fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_23-22-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0052.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_23-22-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0052.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_23-22-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0052.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_23-22-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0052.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_23-22-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0052.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_23-22-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0052.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_23-22-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0052.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_23-22-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0052.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-03_CI_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_232323_TTUQ1b1x1_3264414_7r0vPwSE/fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_23-22-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0052.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_23-22-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0052.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=258, passed=5938
Got 5938 stars (including 5672 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_23-22-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0052.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 5938 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.1'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.1 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013071 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010457 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 371 to 430 (Dec -15.6 to -4.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 936 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 933 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 922 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 933 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5864 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 371 to 430 (Dec -15.6 to -4.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 936 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 933 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5862 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 933 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5862 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
Excluding outliers - 933 stars left (next iteration limit 1026)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_23-22-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0052.fits N_match=933 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.383 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.434 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.547 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.256 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.338 n_q1=179 n_q2=336 n_q3=232 n_q4=186 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.428
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_23-22-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0052.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_23-22-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0052.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-03_CI_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_232323_TTUQ1b1x1_3264414_7r0vPwSE/fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_23-22-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0052.fits -region wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_23-22-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0052.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_23-22-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0052.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits sigma_overall=0.568 worst_q_ratio=1.633
ref2=Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits sigma_overall=0.558 worst_q_ratio=1.517
new1=fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_23-19-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0051.fits sigma_overall=0.370 worst_q_ratio=1.099
new2=fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_23-22-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0052.fits sigma_overall=0.383 worst_q_ratio=1.428
reference average sigma_overall=0.563 worst_q_ratio=1.575
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
Distribution of catalog-matched stars across the image:
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy: wrote wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081_astrometric_residuals.png (937 matched stars from wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy: wrote wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049_astrometric_residuals.png (939 matched stars from wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy: wrote wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_23-19-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0051_astrometric_residuals.png (935 matched stars from wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_23-19-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0051.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy: wrote wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_23-22-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0052_astrometric_residuals.png (933 matched stars from wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_23-22-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0052.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_23-19-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0051.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_23-19-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0051.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-03_CI_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_232323_TTUQ1b1x1_3264414_7r0vPwSE/wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_23-19-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0051.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_23-22-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0052.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_23-22-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0052.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-03_CI_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_232323_TTUQ1b1x1_3264414_7r0vPwSE/wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_23-22-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0052.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Oph-05-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits at 17:02:41.09 -11:03:55.2: 12.03 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits at 16:43:32.82 -13:25:58.3: 15.22 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits at 16:50:32.25 -04:59:21.2: 12.20 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits at 17:04:56.97 -09:46:09.2: 11.98 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits at 17:00:53.36 -05:51:33.5: 15.59 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits at 16:43:32.82 -13:25:58.3: 15.09 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits at 17:02:41.09 -11:03:55.2: 12.06 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.04 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:02:41.09 -11:03:55.2: ref_mag=12.04 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.0019 delta=0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits at 17:04:56.97 -09:46:09.2: 12.01 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits at 16:50:32.25 -04:59:21.2: 12.18 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.19 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.99 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:50:32.25 -04:59:21.2: ref_mag=12.19 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.1094 delta=0.08 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:04:56.97 -09:46:09.2: ref_mag=11.99 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.9756 delta=0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits at 17:00:53.36 -05:51:33.5: 15.39 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out20288.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out20385.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 7s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 2s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20201_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_23-22-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0052
The candidate 20201_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_23-22-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0052 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:42:27.05 -06:23:48.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20288_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_23-22-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0052
Preparing report for the candidate 20288_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_23-22-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0052
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20300_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_23-22-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0052
The candidate 20300_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_23-22-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0052 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:58:31.51 -13:46:33.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20328_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_23-22-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0052
The candidate 20328_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_23-22-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0052 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:53:06.96 -04:55:46.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20359_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_23-22-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0052
The candidate 20359_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_23-22-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0052 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20360_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_23-22-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0052
The candidate 20360_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_23-22-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0052 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20363_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_23-22-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0052
The candidate 20363_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_23-22-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0052 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:37:46.01 -11:05:38.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20364_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_23-22-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0052
The candidate 20364_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_23-22-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0052 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:26:07.63 -14:16:58.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20371_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_23-22-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0052
The candidate 20371_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_23-22-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0052 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:41:59.28 -06:29:01.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20382_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_23-22-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0052
The candidate 20382_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_23-22-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0052 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20385_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_23-22-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0052
Preparing report for the candidate 20385_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_23-22-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0052
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 9s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Oph-05-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
16:43:32.82 -13:25:58.3
17:00:53.36 -05:51:33.5
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 3.5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-03_CI_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_232323_TTUQ1b1x1_3264414_7r0vPwSE/fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_23-19-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0051.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-03_CI_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_232323_TTUQ1b1x1_3264414_7r0vPwSE/fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_23-22-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0052.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-03_CI_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_232323_TTUQ1b1x1_3264414_7r0vPwSE/fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_23-19-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0051.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-03_CI_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_232323_TTUQ1b1x1_3264414_7r0vPwSE/fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_23-22-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0052.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_23-19-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0051.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_23-22-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0052.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/exclusion_list.txt
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_23-19-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0051.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_23-22-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0052.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits
Image size: 937.3'x624.3' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 17:08:38.023 -09:59:09.18 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.87"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_23-19-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0051.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_23-19-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0051.fits
Image size: 941.4'x626.7' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 17:08:21.165 -09:59:28.40 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 17:08:38.023 -09:59:09.18
Second-epoch image center 17:08:21.165 -09:59:28.40
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0694 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_23-22-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0052.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_23-22-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0052.fits
Image size: 941.1'x626.7' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 17:08:17.879 -10:00:03.50 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 17:08:38.023 -09:59:09.18
Second-epoch image center 17:08:17.879 -10:00:03.50
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0840 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 17:08:21.165 -09:59:28.40
Second-epoch second image center 17:08:17.879 -10:00:03.50
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01664 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits &> /tmp/tmp.F9N16ymuYz
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits &> /tmp/tmp.t55GzwR0A5
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-03_CI_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_232323_TTUQ1b1x1_3264414_7r0vPwSE/fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_23-19-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0051.fits &> /tmp/tmp.3Jf5Y7j6rH
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-03_CI_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_232323_TTUQ1b1x1_3264414_7r0vPwSE/fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_23-19-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0051.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-03_CI_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_232323_TTUQ1b1x1_3264414_7r0vPwSE/fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_23-22-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0052.fits &> /tmp/tmp.GU8ejiqz6i
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-03_CI_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_232323_TTUQ1b1x1_3264414_7r0vPwSE/fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_23-22-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0052.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits and wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits.cat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits and wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits.cat
Found non-empty wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits and wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits.cat
The reference image (wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits) and catalog (wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits.cat) found
'wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits.cat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 72440 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 249.0959 to 265.2606 deg, Dec -15.2524 to -4.6668 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 249.0959 to 265.2606 deg, Dec -15.2524 to -4.6668 deg
Loaded 4113 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3162 out of 3606 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3606 out of 72440 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.641150
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.641150
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.52
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.12
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.12
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 72440 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 249.0959 to 265.2606 deg, Dec -15.2524 to -4.6668 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 249.0959 to 265.2606 deg, Dec -15.2524 to -4.6668 deg
Loaded 4113 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3162 out of 3606 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3606 out of 72440 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits (aperture=4.6)
Read 62008 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 249.0757 to 265.2415 deg, Dec -15.2678 to -4.6866 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 249.0757 to 265.2415 deg, Dec -15.2678 to -4.6866 deg
Loaded 4114 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3200 out of 3606 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3606 out of 62008 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits (aperture=4.6)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 115 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 8000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.2 pix Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits
2.2 pix Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits
2.2 pix fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_23-19-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0051.fits
3.0 pix fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_23-22-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0052.fits
2.2 pix wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits
2.2 pix wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.1 mag. Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits
14.9 mag. Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits
14.8 mag. fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_23-19-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0051.fits
14.6 mag. fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_23-22-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0052.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.6 (SNR ) 14.0 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.F9N16ymuYz (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-03_CI_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_232323_TTUQ1b1x1_3264414_7r0vPwSE/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits' -> 'wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=20, blended=4399, passed=72420
Got 72420 stars (including 67925 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 72420 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013018 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010414 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 940 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 938 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 927 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.56"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 938 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 71593 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.53"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 940 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 938 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 71592 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.53"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 938 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 71592 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.57"
Excluding outliers - 938 stars left (next iteration limit 1031)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits N_match=938 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.590 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.421 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.894 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.502 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.571 n_q1=197 n_q2=343 n_q3=200 n_q4=198 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.515
The image catalog is written to wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits -region wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.t55GzwR0A5 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-03_CI_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_232323_TTUQ1b1x1_3264414_7r0vPwSE/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits' -> 'wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=10, blended=3287, passed=61998
Got 61998 stars (including 58620 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 61998 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013018 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010414 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 938 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 935 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 923 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.54"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 935 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 61292 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.52"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 938 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 935 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 61292 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.52"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 935 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 61291 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.54"
Excluding outliers - 935 stars left (next iteration limit 1028)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits N_match=935 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.578 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.453 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.828 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.483 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.528 n_q1=194 n_q2=352 n_q3=194 n_q4=195 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.433
The image catalog is written to wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits -region wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.3Jf5Y7j6rH (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-03_CI_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_232323_TTUQ1b1x1_3264414_7r0vPwSE/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-03_CI_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_232323_TTUQ1b1x1_3264414_7r0vPwSE/fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_23-19-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0051.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-03_CI_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_232323_TTUQ1b1x1_3264414_7r0vPwSE/fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_23-19-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0051.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-03_CI_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_232323_TTUQ1b1x1_3264414_7r0vPwSE/fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_23-19-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0051.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-03_CI_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_232323_TTUQ1b1x1_3264414_7r0vPwSE/fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_23-19-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0051.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-03_CI_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_232323_TTUQ1b1x1_3264414_7r0vPwSE/fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_23-19-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0051.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-03_CI_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_232323_TTUQ1b1x1_3264414_7r0vPwSE/fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_23-19-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0051.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_23-19-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0051.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_23-19-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0051.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_23-19-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0051.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_23-19-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0051.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_23-19-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0051.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_23-19-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0051.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_23-19-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0051.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-03_CI_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_232323_TTUQ1b1x1_3264414_7r0vPwSE/fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_23-19-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0051.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_23-19-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0051.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=14, blended=2282, passed=57016
Got 57016 stars (including 54630 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_23-19-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0051.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 57016 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013075 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010460 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 372 to 430 (Dec -15.6 to -4.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 939 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 936 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 924 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 936 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 56401 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 372 to 430 (Dec -15.6 to -4.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 939 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 936 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 56406 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 936 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 56408 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Excluding outliers - 936 stars left (next iteration limit 1029)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_23-19-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0051.fits N_match=936 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.384 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.378 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.413 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.326 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.397 n_q1=191 n_q2=331 n_q3=230 n_q4=184 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.076
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_23-19-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0051.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_23-19-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0051.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-03_CI_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_232323_TTUQ1b1x1_3264414_7r0vPwSE/fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_23-19-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0051.fits -region wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_23-19-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0051.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_23-19-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0051.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.GU8ejiqz6i (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-03_CI_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_232323_TTUQ1b1x1_3264414_7r0vPwSE/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-03_CI_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_232323_TTUQ1b1x1_3264414_7r0vPwSE/fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_23-22-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0052.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-03_CI_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_232323_TTUQ1b1x1_3264414_7r0vPwSE/fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_23-22-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0052.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-03_CI_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_232323_TTUQ1b1x1_3264414_7r0vPwSE/fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_23-22-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0052.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-03_CI_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_232323_TTUQ1b1x1_3264414_7r0vPwSE/fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_23-22-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0052.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-03_CI_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_232323_TTUQ1b1x1_3264414_7r0vPwSE/fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_23-22-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0052.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-03_CI_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_232323_TTUQ1b1x1_3264414_7r0vPwSE/fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_23-22-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0052.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_23-22-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0052.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_23-22-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0052.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_23-22-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0052.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_23-22-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0052.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_23-22-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0052.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_23-22-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0052.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_23-22-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0052.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-03_CI_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_232323_TTUQ1b1x1_3264414_7r0vPwSE/fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_23-22-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0052.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_23-22-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0052.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=7, blended=1916, passed=43833
Got 43833 stars (including 41862 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_23-22-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0052.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 43833 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.1'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.1 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013071 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010457 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 371 to 430 (Dec -15.6 to -4.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 934 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 931 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 922 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 931 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 43288 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 371 to 430 (Dec -15.6 to -4.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 934 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 931 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 43287 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 931 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 43287 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Excluding outliers - 931 stars left (next iteration limit 1024)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_23-22-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0052.fits N_match=931 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.386 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.423 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.531 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.257 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.358 n_q1=174 n_q2=310 n_q3=252 n_q4=195 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.376
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_23-22-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0052.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_23-22-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0052.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-03_CI_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_232323_TTUQ1b1x1_3264414_7r0vPwSE/fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_23-22-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0052.fits -region wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_23-22-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0052.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_23-22-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0052.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_23-19-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0051.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-03_CI_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_232323_TTUQ1b1x1_3264414_7r0vPwSE/wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_23-19-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0051.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_23-22-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0052.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-03_CI_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_232323_TTUQ1b1x1_3264414_7r0vPwSE/wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_23-22-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0052.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Oph-05-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits at 17:00:50.23 -08:42:54.7: 14.33 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits at 17:36:42.77 -14:00:16.8: 13.40 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits at 17:37:25.48 -12:03:02.9: 13.32 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits at 16:58:37.39 -04:44:34.9: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits at 17:00:50.23 -08:42:54.7: 14.36 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.34 +/- 0.07
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits at 17:36:42.77 -14:00:16.8: 13.35 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:00:50.23 -08:42:54.7: ref_mag=14.34 +/- 0.07 new_mean_mag=14.3813 delta=-0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits at 17:37:25.48 -12:03:02.9: 13.35 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.38 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:36:42.77 -14:00:16.8: ref_mag=13.38 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=13.2931 delta=0.08 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.33 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:37:25.48 -12:03:02.9: ref_mag=13.33 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.4567 delta=-0.12 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits at 17:04:22.79 -11:10:39.8: 15.78 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits at 16:58:37.39 -04:44:34.9: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:58:37.39 -04:44:34.9: at least one reference image reported edge (off-image or aperture/annulus past image boundary); cannot perform the forced-photometry cross-check
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits at 16:54:36.18 -11:32:35.3: 15.76 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits at 17:04:22.79 -11:10:39.8: 15.56 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits at 17:35:24.49 -14:34:05.7: 14.07 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits at 17:36:01.58 -14:05:38.8: 14.56 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits at 16:54:36.18 -11:32:35.3: 15.53 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits at 17:21:39.75 -11:02:15.3: 13.58 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits at 17:38:11.48 -12:41:55.9: 15.15 +/- 0.28 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits at 16:43:42.20 -12:25:27.1: 14.17 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits at 17:11:51.47 -09:53:04.6: 13.84 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits at 17:35:24.49 -14:34:05.7: 13.92 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits at 17:36:01.58 -14:05:38.8: 14.68 +/- 0.24 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.00 +/- 0.08
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:35:24.49 -14:34:05.7: ref_mag=14.00 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=13.5879 delta=0.41 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.60 +/- 0.15
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 17:36:01.58 -14:05:38.8: ref_mag=14.60 +/- 0.15 new_mean_mag=13.4127 delta=1.19 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits at 17:21:39.75 -11:02:15.3: 13.58 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.58 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:21:39.75 -11:02:15.3: ref_mag=13.58 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.7176 delta=-0.13 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits at 17:38:11.48 -12:41:55.9: 14.94 +/- 0.27 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits at 16:43:42.20 -12:25:27.1: 14.32 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.04 +/- 0.19
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.22 +/- 0.08
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:43:42.20 -12:25:27.1: ref_mag=14.22 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=13.9970 delta=0.23 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 17:38:11.48 -12:41:55.9: ref_mag=15.04 +/- 0.19 new_mean_mag=13.6087 delta=1.43 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits at 17:11:51.47 -09:53:04.6: 13.79 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.82 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:11:51.47 -09:53:04.6: ref_mag=13.82 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.0004 delta=-0.18 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits at 17:36:32.39 -14:12:47.8: 14.84 +/- 0.25 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits at 16:38:35.24 -06:30:35.9: 14.54 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits at 16:38:29.81 -06:05:08.9: 14.53 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits at 17:36:32.39 -14:12:47.8: 14.81 +/- 0.27 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.82 +/- 0.18
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:36:32.39 -14:12:47.8: ref_mag=14.82 +/- 0.18 new_mean_mag=13.9510 delta=0.87 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits at 16:41:22.34 -05:51:26.2: 14.38 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits at 16:38:35.24 -06:30:35.9: 14.27 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits at 16:38:52.48 -10:28:38.4: 14.25 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.39 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:38:35.24 -06:30:35.9: ref_mag=14.39 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.1887 delta=0.20 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits at 16:38:29.81 -06:05:08.9: 14.62 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.56 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:38:29.81 -06:05:08.9: ref_mag=14.56 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.1833 delta=0.38 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits at 16:41:22.34 -05:51:26.2: 14.39 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.38 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:41:22.34 -05:51:26.2: ref_mag=14.38 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.1222 delta=0.26 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits at 16:38:52.48 -10:28:38.4: 14.23 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.24 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:38:52.48 -10:28:38.4: ref_mag=14.24 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=14.0324 delta=0.21 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits at 17:34:35.58 -08:01:15.5: 14.28 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits at 17:22:39.63 -15:09:26.9: 15.53 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits at 16:40:47.78 -05:53:43.7: 14.20 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits at 17:34:35.58 -08:01:15.5: 14.11 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.19 +/- 0.08
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:34:35.58 -08:01:15.5: ref_mag=14.19 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=14.0811 delta=0.11 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits at 16:56:19.62 -07:39:23.6: 14.72 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits at 17:22:39.63 -15:09:26.9: 15.35 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits at 16:40:47.78 -05:53:43.7: 14.30 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.24 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:40:47.78 -05:53:43.7: ref_mag=14.24 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=14.2446 delta=-0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits at 16:56:19.62 -07:39:23.6: 14.86 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.77 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:56:19.62 -07:39:23.6: ref_mag=14.77 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=13.9597 delta=0.81 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits at 16:40:59.98 -06:08:45.9: 14.48 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits at 16:37:30.95 -08:11:23.0: 14.45 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits at 16:44:19.46 -10:20:00.9: 14.73 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits at 16:40:59.98 -06:08:45.9: 14.49 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.48 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:40:59.98 -06:08:45.9: ref_mag=14.48 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.3091 delta=0.17 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits at 16:37:30.95 -08:11:23.0: 14.59 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.49 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:37:30.95 -08:11:23.0: ref_mag=14.49 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.1905 delta=0.30 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits at 16:39:11.09 -05:55:54.4: 14.94 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits at 16:39:02.09 -06:07:21.8: 14.51 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits at 16:44:19.46 -10:20:00.9: 14.67 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.70 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:44:19.46 -10:20:00.9: ref_mag=14.70 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.3209 delta=0.38 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits at 16:39:11.09 -05:55:54.4: 14.52 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.70 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits at 16:39:02.09 -06:07:21.8: 14.71 +/- 0.23 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:39:11.09 -05:55:54.4: ref_mag=14.70 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=14.3652 delta=0.34 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.58 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits at 16:45:09.73 -04:57:16.0: 14.64 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:39:02.09 -06:07:21.8: ref_mag=14.58 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=14.2100 delta=0.37 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits at 16:41:06.23 -04:50:52.3: 14.64 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits at 17:21:03.91 -14:39:34.2: 15.58 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits at 16:45:09.73 -04:57:16.0: 14.74 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.68 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:45:09.73 -04:57:16.0: ref_mag=14.68 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.3766 delta=0.30 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits at 16:42:36.57 -05:20:58.5: 14.99 +/- 0.23 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits at 16:41:06.23 -04:50:52.3: 14.70 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits at 17:21:03.91 -14:39:34.2: 15.36 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.66 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:41:06.23 -04:50:52.3: ref_mag=14.66 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.3701 delta=0.29 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits at 17:03:28.81 -05:22:34.3: 14.69 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits at 16:52:54.78 -08:13:51.7: 14.43 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits at 16:42:36.57 -05:20:58.5: 14.50 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.68 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:42:36.57 -05:20:58.5: ref_mag=14.68 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=14.3851 delta=0.29 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits at 16:52:54.78 -08:13:51.7: 14.32 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.38 +/- 0.08
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:52:54.78 -08:13:51.7: ref_mag=14.38 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=14.2832 delta=0.09 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits at 17:03:28.81 -05:22:34.3: 14.48 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.58 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:03:28.81 -05:22:34.3: ref_mag=14.58 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.4030 delta=0.17 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits at 16:39:35.37 -07:41:48.7: 14.74 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits at 16:54:08.68 -07:06:08.1: 14.90 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits at 16:39:35.37 -07:41:48.7: 14.56 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.65 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:39:35.37 -07:41:48.7: ref_mag=14.65 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.4198 delta=0.23 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits at 16:45:28.98 -04:44:26.0: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits at 16:54:08.68 -07:06:08.1: 15.11 +/- 0.23 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.98 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:54:08.68 -07:06:08.1: ref_mag=14.98 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=14.3653 delta=0.61 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits at 16:55:25.73 -08:23:19.9: 14.53 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits at 16:44:04.29 -06:01:42.2: 14.58 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits at 16:45:28.98 -04:44:26.0: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:45:28.98 -04:44:26.0: at least one reference image reported edge (off-image or aperture/annulus past image boundary); cannot perform the forced-photometry cross-check
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits at 16:55:25.73 -08:23:19.9: 14.45 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits at 16:44:04.29 -06:01:42.2: 15.21 +/- 0.32 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.50 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:55:25.73 -08:23:19.9: ref_mag=14.50 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=14.4383 delta=0.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.69 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:44:04.29 -06:01:42.2: ref_mag=14.69 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.5835 delta=0.11 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits at 16:50:38.61 -05:19:36.6: 14.56 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits at 16:49:25.61 -06:52:49.0: 14.93 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits at 16:50:38.61 -05:19:36.6: 14.66 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.60 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:50:38.61 -05:19:36.6: ref_mag=14.60 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.4934 delta=0.10 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits at 16:45:04.17 -06:04:53.1: 14.41 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits at 16:47:32.25 -05:17:10.5: 14.60 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits at 16:49:25.61 -06:52:49.0: 15.34 +/- 0.31 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.03 +/- 0.15
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:49:25.61 -06:52:49.0: ref_mag=15.03 +/- 0.15 new_mean_mag=14.5273 delta=0.50 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits at 16:50:13.58 -04:47:18.7: 14.91 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits at 16:45:04.17 -06:04:53.1: 15.09 +/- 0.27 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits at 16:47:32.25 -05:17:10.5: 14.71 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.52 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:45:04.17 -06:04:53.1: ref_mag=14.52 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.3577 delta=0.16 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.64 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:47:32.25 -05:17:10.5: ref_mag=14.64 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.4114 delta=0.23 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits at 16:55:25.63 -05:05:57.1: 14.57 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits at 16:50:13.58 -04:47:18.7: 14.88 +/- 0.22 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.90 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:50:13.58 -04:47:18.7: ref_mag=14.90 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=14.4140 delta=0.48 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits at 16:50:30.94 -07:49:17.9: 14.58 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits at 16:54:52.53 -05:35:03.5: 15.14 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits at 16:55:25.63 -05:05:57.1: 14.87 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.66 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:55:25.63 -05:05:57.1: ref_mag=14.66 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.4088 delta=0.25 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits at 16:50:30.94 -07:49:17.9: 14.70 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.63 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:50:30.94 -07:49:17.9: ref_mag=14.63 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.5123 delta=0.11 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits at 17:05:30.54 -07:22:21.7: 15.24 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits at 16:43:21.92 -10:07:00.8: 14.38 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits at 16:54:52.53 -05:35:03.5: 14.82 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.96 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:54:52.53 -05:35:03.5: ref_mag=14.96 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=14.4878 delta=0.47 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits at 16:52:26.07 -07:53:33.8: 14.78 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits at 17:05:30.54 -07:22:21.7: 15.00 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits at 16:43:21.92 -10:07:00.8: 14.67 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.12 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:05:30.54 -07:22:21.7: ref_mag=15.12 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=14.6651 delta=0.46 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.46 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:43:21.92 -10:07:00.8: ref_mag=14.46 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.2892 delta=0.17 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits at 16:53:12.04 -04:45:38.9: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits at 16:53:00.65 -06:40:15.6: 14.74 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits at 16:52:26.07 -07:53:33.8: 14.55 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.66 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:52:26.07 -07:53:33.8: ref_mag=14.66 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.3194 delta=0.34 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits at 16:42:55.74 -06:04:12.0: 14.74 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits at 16:44:32.52 -07:06:48.1: 14.79 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits at 16:53:12.04 -04:45:38.9: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:53:12.04 -04:45:38.9: at least one reference image reported edge (off-image or aperture/annulus past image boundary); cannot perform the forced-photometry cross-check
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits at 16:53:00.65 -06:40:15.6: 14.75 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.74 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:53:00.65 -06:40:15.6: ref_mag=14.74 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.4964 delta=0.25 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits at 16:42:55.74 -06:04:12.0: 14.76 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.74 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:42:55.74 -06:04:12.0: ref_mag=14.74 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.4824 delta=0.26 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits at 16:47:00.82 -06:57:59.8: 14.61 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits at 16:52:02.29 -07:31:04.7: 14.85 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits at 16:44:32.52 -07:06:48.1: 14.69 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.74 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:44:32.52 -07:06:48.1: ref_mag=14.74 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.5084 delta=0.23 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits at 16:40:17.48 -06:31:36.5: 14.56 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits at 16:47:00.82 -06:57:59.8: 14.84 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits at 16:52:02.29 -07:31:04.7: 15.21 +/- 0.26 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.68 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.94 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:47:00.82 -06:57:59.8: ref_mag=14.68 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.5642 delta=0.12 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:52:02.29 -07:31:04.7: ref_mag=14.94 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.5028 delta=0.44 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits at 16:40:17.48 -06:31:36.5: 14.63 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.59 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:40:17.48 -06:31:36.5: ref_mag=14.59 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.3741 delta=0.22 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits at 16:48:28.34 -05:16:30.5: 14.71 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits at 16:46:17.47 -08:15:50.9: 14.61 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits at 17:18:58.05 -08:17:55.9: 14.92 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits at 16:48:28.34 -05:16:30.5: 14.83 +/- 0.22 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.76 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:48:28.34 -05:16:30.5: ref_mag=14.76 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=14.6699 delta=0.09 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits at 16:56:38.40 -08:00:23.6: 14.63 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits at 16:51:16.76 -07:45:28.7: 15.17 +/- 0.22 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits at 16:46:17.47 -08:15:50.9: 15.13 +/- 0.27 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits at 16:59:12.11 -10:32:18.6: 15.57 +/- 0.29 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.72 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:46:17.47 -08:15:50.9: ref_mag=14.72 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.5947 delta=0.12 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits at 17:18:58.05 -08:17:55.9: 14.89 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.90 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:18:58.05 -08:17:55.9: ref_mag=14.90 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.6208 delta=0.28 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits at 17:06:30.44 -06:33:29.5: 14.66 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits at 16:56:38.40 -08:00:23.6: 14.60 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.62 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:56:38.40 -08:00:23.6: ref_mag=14.62 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.4857 delta=0.13 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits at 16:51:16.76 -07:45:28.7: 14.90 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.02 +/- 0.15
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:51:16.76 -07:45:28.7: ref_mag=15.02 +/- 0.15 new_mean_mag=14.5163 delta=0.50 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits at 16:59:12.11 -10:32:18.6: 15.58 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.57 +/- 0.29
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 16:59:12.11 -10:32:18.6: ref_mag=15.57 +/- 0.29 new_mean_mag=14.3970 delta=1.18 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits at 17:06:30.44 -06:33:29.5: 14.99 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.75 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:06:30.44 -06:33:29.5: ref_mag=14.75 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.7278 delta=0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits at 17:03:23.21 -09:20:08.2: 14.20 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits at 17:03:23.21 -09:20:08.2: 14.30 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.24 +/- 0.07
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 17:03:23.21 -09:20:08.2: ref_mag=14.24 +/- 0.07 new_mean_mag=13.2899 delta=0.95 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out87195.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out88055.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out88267.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out88779.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out45912.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out86499.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out86949.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out87543.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 10s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 3s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 85778_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_23-22-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0052
The candidate 85778_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_23-22-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0052 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 85780_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_23-22-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0052
The candidate 85780_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_23-22-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0052 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 85785_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_23-22-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0052
The candidate 85785_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_23-22-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0052 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:57:39.00 -08:12:18.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 85809_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_23-22-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0052
The candidate 85809_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_23-22-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0052 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:07:28.62 -06:41:02.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 85847_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_23-22-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0052
The candidate 85847_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_23-22-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0052 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 85852_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_23-22-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0052
The candidate 85852_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_23-22-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0052 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 85855_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_23-22-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0052
The candidate 85855_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_23-22-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0052 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:38:03.41 -13:10:58.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 85857_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_23-22-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0052
The candidate 85857_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_23-22-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0052 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:45:31.49 -13:27:19.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 85859_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_23-22-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0052
The candidate 85859_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_23-22-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0052 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:36:55.57 -14:12:13.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 85867_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_23-22-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0052
The candidate 85867_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_23-22-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0052 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:38:02.64 -11:36:13.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 85870_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_23-22-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0052
The candidate 85870_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_23-22-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0052 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:37:54.82 -14:22:28.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 85871_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_23-22-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0052
The candidate 85871_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_23-22-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0052 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:36:17.55 -11:32:33.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 85874_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_23-22-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0052
The candidate 85874_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_23-22-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0052 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:32:43.57 -14:55:25.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 85925_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_23-22-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0052
The candidate 85925_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_23-22-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0052 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 85971_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_23-22-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0052
The candidate 85971_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_23-22-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0052 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:42:27.05 -06:23:48.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 86066_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_23-22-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0052
The candidate 86066_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_23-22-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0052 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:43:32.82 -13:25:58.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_local.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 86171_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_23-22-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0052
The candidate 86171_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_23-22-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0052 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:00:53.36 -05:51:33.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_local.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 86215_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_23-22-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0052
The candidate 86215_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_23-22-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0052 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:35:12.72 -14:40:37.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 86490_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_23-22-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0052
The candidate 86490_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_23-22-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0052 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:38:56.61 -06:07:10.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 86499_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_23-22-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0052
Preparing report for the candidate 86499_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_23-22-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0052
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 86626_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_23-22-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0052
The candidate 86626_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_23-22-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0052 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:35:38.50 -14:39:27.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 86693_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_23-22-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0052
The candidate 86693_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_23-22-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0052 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:52:05.56 -08:52:07.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 86712_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_23-22-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0052
The candidate 86712_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_23-22-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0052 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:00:03.71 -07:33:08.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 86803_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_23-22-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0052
The candidate 86803_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_23-22-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0052 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:47:40.67 -09:15:28.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 86851_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_23-22-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0052
The candidate 86851_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_23-22-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0052 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:53:52.60 -08:58:17.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 86916_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_23-22-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0052
The candidate 86916_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_23-22-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0052 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:37:29.50 -11:51:08.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 86949_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_23-22-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0052
Preparing report for the candidate 86949_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_23-22-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0052
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 86985_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_23-22-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0052
The candidate 86985_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_23-22-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0052 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:45:00.71 -07:07:11.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 86992_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_23-22-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0052
The candidate 86992_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_23-22-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0052 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:18:04.30 -12:21:09.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 86998_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_23-22-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0052
The candidate 86998_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_23-22-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0052 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:39:28.49 -10:28:31.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87076_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_23-22-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0052
The candidate 87076_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_23-22-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0052 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:54:44.45 -11:48:19.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87165_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_23-22-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0052
The candidate 87165_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_23-22-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0052 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:55:07.09 -05:56:34.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87195_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_23-22-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0052
The candidate 87195_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_23-22-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0052 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:36:01.58 -14:05:38.8 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.41, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.39)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 2.924 4161397695745823488 264.00729677160 -14.09453668234 12.4738 11.0729 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#2.924#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87304_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_23-22-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0052
The candidate 87304_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_23-22-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0052 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87366_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_23-22-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0052
The candidate 87366_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_23-22-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0052 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:38:24.50 -14:53:44.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87368_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_23-22-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0052
The candidate 87368_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_23-22-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0052 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87507_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_23-22-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0052
The candidate 87507_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_23-22-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0052 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:41:45.97 -10:34:41.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87543_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_23-22-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0052
Preparing report for the candidate 87543_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_23-22-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0052
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87716_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_23-22-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0052
The candidate 87716_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_23-22-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0052 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87734_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_23-22-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0052
The candidate 87734_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_23-22-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0052 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87809_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_23-22-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0052
The candidate 87809_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_23-22-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0052 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:04:56.15 -05:04:51.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87853_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_23-22-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0052
The candidate 87853_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_23-22-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0052 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:46:09.42 -05:39:43.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87890_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_23-22-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0052
The candidate 87890_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_23-22-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0052 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:44:21.26 -08:16:47.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87955_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_23-22-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0052
The candidate 87955_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_23-22-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0052 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87956_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_23-22-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0052
The candidate 87956_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_23-22-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0052 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87970_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_23-22-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0052
The candidate 87970_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_23-22-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0052 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87979_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_23-22-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0052
The candidate 87979_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_23-22-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0052 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:21:37.68 -14:03:37.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88004_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_23-22-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0052
The candidate 88004_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_23-22-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0052 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88012_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_23-22-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0052
The candidate 88012_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_23-22-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0052 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88015_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_23-22-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0052
The candidate 88015_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_23-22-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0052 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:01:00.10 -06:50:40.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88032_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_23-22-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0052
The candidate 88032_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_23-22-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0052 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88033_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_23-22-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0052
The candidate 88033_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_23-22-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0052 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:53:29.13 -04:50:20.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88055_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_23-22-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0052
The candidate 88055_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_23-22-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0052 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:22:39.63 -15:09:26.9 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.95, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.93)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.226 4137727482451059968 260.66541820001 -15.15766158448 14.4910 12.6766 VARIABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.226#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88065_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_23-22-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0052
The candidate 88065_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_23-22-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0052 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88069_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_23-22-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0052
The candidate 88069_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_23-22-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0052 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88071_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_23-22-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0052
The candidate 88071_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_23-22-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0052 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:49:02.06 -07:17:28.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88101_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_23-22-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0052
The candidate 88101_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_23-22-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0052 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:38:36.48 -05:54:42.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88104_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_23-22-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0052
The candidate 88104_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_23-22-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0052 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88132_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_23-22-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0052
The candidate 88132_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_23-22-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0052 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88187_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_23-22-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0052
The candidate 88187_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_23-22-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0052 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:47:48.83 -06:46:09.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88194_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_23-22-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0052
The candidate 88194_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_23-22-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0052 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88210_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_23-22-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0052
The candidate 88210_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_23-22-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0052 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88227_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_23-22-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0052
The candidate 88227_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_23-22-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0052 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88229_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_23-22-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0052
The candidate 88229_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_23-22-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0052 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:29:27.12 -14:01:35.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88232_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_23-22-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0052
The candidate 88232_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_23-22-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0052 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88235_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_23-22-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0052
The candidate 88235_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_23-22-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0052 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88267_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_23-22-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0052
The candidate 88267_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_23-22-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0052 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:21:03.91 -14:39:34.2 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.16, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.14)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.553 4137816538587072128 260.26648111833 -14.65989064843 12.9698 11.0485 VARIABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.553#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88275_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_23-22-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0052
The candidate 88275_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_23-22-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0052 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88279_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_23-22-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0052
The candidate 88279_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_23-22-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0052 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88280_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_23-22-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0052
The candidate 88280_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_23-22-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0052 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88345_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_23-22-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0052
The candidate 88345_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_23-22-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0052 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88364_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_23-22-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0052
The candidate 88364_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_23-22-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0052 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88377_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_23-22-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0052
The candidate 88377_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_23-22-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0052 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88386_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_23-22-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0052
The candidate 88386_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_23-22-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0052 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88392_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_23-22-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0052
The candidate 88392_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_23-22-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0052 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88397_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_23-22-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0052
The candidate 88397_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_23-22-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0052 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88443_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_23-22-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0052
The candidate 88443_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_23-22-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0052 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88450_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_23-22-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0052
The candidate 88450_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_23-22-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0052 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88469_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_23-22-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0052
The candidate 88469_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_23-22-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0052 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88471_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_23-22-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0052
The candidate 88471_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_23-22-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0052 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88475_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_23-22-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0052
The candidate 88475_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_23-22-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0052 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:39:37.81 -06:33:14.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88476_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_23-22-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0052
The candidate 88476_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_23-22-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0052 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88528_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_23-22-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0052
The candidate 88528_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_23-22-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0052 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88543_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_23-22-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0052
The candidate 88543_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_23-22-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0052 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88550_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_23-22-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0052
The candidate 88550_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_23-22-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0052 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88552_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_23-22-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0052
The candidate 88552_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_23-22-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0052 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88553_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_23-22-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0052
The candidate 88553_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_23-22-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0052 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88576_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_23-22-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0052
The candidate 88576_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_23-22-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0052 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88587_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_23-22-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0052
The candidate 88587_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_23-22-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0052 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88588_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_23-22-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0052
The candidate 88588_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_23-22-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0052 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88591_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_23-22-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0052
The candidate 88591_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_23-22-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0052 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88605_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_23-22-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0052
The candidate 88605_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_23-22-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0052 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88612_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_23-22-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0052
The candidate 88612_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_23-22-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0052 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88668_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_23-22-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0052
The candidate 88668_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_23-22-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0052 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88689_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_23-22-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0052
The candidate 88689_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_23-22-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0052 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:50:30.70 -11:41:16.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88694_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_23-22-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0052
The candidate 88694_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_23-22-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0052 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:44:55.07 -06:22:30.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88707_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_23-22-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0052
The candidate 88707_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_23-22-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0052 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88713_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_23-22-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0052
The candidate 88713_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_23-22-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0052 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88730_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_23-22-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0052
The candidate 88730_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_23-22-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0052 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88735_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_23-22-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0052
The candidate 88735_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_23-22-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0052 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:43:28.03 -06:47:53.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88748_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_23-22-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0052
The candidate 88748_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_23-22-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0052 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88767_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_23-22-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0052
The candidate 88767_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_23-22-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0052 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88779_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_23-22-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0052
The candidate 88779_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_23-22-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0052 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:59:12.11 -10:32:18.6 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.43, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.41)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 2.011 4335851746821783296 254.80035145859 -10.53795142725 13.4689 12.1140 VARIABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#2.011#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88785_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_23-22-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0052
The candidate 88785_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_23-22-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0052 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 11406_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_23-22-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0052
The candidate 11406_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_23-22-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0052 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:58:31.52 -13:46:33.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 04858_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_23-22-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0052
The candidate 04858_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_23-22-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0052 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:26:45.73 -14:35:25.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 57575_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_23-22-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0052
The candidate 57575_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_23-22-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0052 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:44:50.53 -06:11:04.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 37287_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_23-22-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0052
The candidate 37287_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_23-22-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0052 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:25:01.69 -10:38:54.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 07280_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_23-22-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0052
The candidate 07280_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_23-22-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0052 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:26:07.62 -14:16:58.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82600_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_23-22-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0052
The candidate 82600_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_23-22-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0052 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:38:28.06 -14:48:24.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 08453_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_23-22-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0052
The candidate 08453_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_23-22-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0052 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:22:51.12 -14:09:45.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 25509_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_23-22-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0052
The candidate 25509_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_23-22-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0052 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:09:01.97 -12:09:21.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20975_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_23-22-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0052
The candidate 20975_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_23-22-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0052 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:11:20.14 -12:40:07.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 41543_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_23-22-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0052
The candidate 41543_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_23-22-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0052 did not pass the final checks
