NMW transient search results

This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-03_CI_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_223638_TTUQ1b1x1_3168689_dIzQJw3L

The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.

Processing fields Oph-05-Q1b1x1

Date (UTC) JD(UTC) mag. R.A. & Dec.(J2000) X & Y (pix) Image
Discovery image 1   2026 06 04.14963    2461195.64963    12.76    17:04:24.59 -11:10:33.6   4242 2450   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-03_CI_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_223638_TTUQ1b1x1_3168689_dIzQJw3L/fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_22-35-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0046.fits
Discovery image 2   2026 06 04.15015    2461195.65015    12.76    17:04:24.55 -11:10:34.1   4247 2455   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-03_CI_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_223638_TTUQ1b1x1_3168689_dIzQJw3L/fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_22-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0047.fits
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images: 
                   2026 06 04.1499  2461195.6499  12.76  17:04:24.57 -11:10:33.8
  9.81780  17.74021 galactic  Oph  Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.8" and 7.5 pix   
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.  
412 Elisabetha               2     -0       2  12.8     0   -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits at 17:04:24.57 -11:10:33.8:  15.75 +/- 99.00  upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits at 17:04:24.57 -11:10:33.8:  15.57 +/- 99.00  upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.                         Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!
Search this object in SIMBAD.
Search this object in VizieR catalogs.  WISE atlas  Aladin Lite  SNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.

Full images (clouds? trees? ice on chip?)   Oph-05-Q1b1x1 field processing log
Platesolve and blink FITS with VaST+ds9 VaST command line Re-run transient search script Stub MPC report (for online MPChecker) Stub TOCP report Stub variable star reports

Processing complete!

Total number of candidates identified: 1

Processing log:

Filtering log:

######## Processing parameters ########
AAVSO_COMMENT_STRING= NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
ASTCHECK_ASTEROID_SEARCH_RADIUS_ARCSEC= 
BAD_REGION_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst
CAMERA_SETTINGS= TTUQ1b1x1
CHECK_POINTING_ACCURACY= yes
DARK_FRAMES_DIR_OR_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks
EXCLUSION_LIST= ../exclusion_list_TTUQ1.txt
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MAX_APERTURE_STAR_SIZE_PIX= 12.5
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MAX_ELONGATION_AminusB_PIX= 0.55
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MIN_APERTURE_STAR_SIZE_PIX= 2.0
FILTER_BRIGHT_MAG_CUTOFF_TRANSIENT_SEARCH= -5
FILTER_FAINT_MAG_CUTOFF_TRANSIENT_SEARCH= 15.0
FLAT_FIELD_DIR_OR_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats
FRAME_EDGE_OFFSET_PIX= 100
GAIA_BAND_FOR_CATALOGED_SOURCE_CHECK= 
MAX_NEW_TO_REF_MEAN_IMG_VALUE_RATIO= 100
MAX_NEW_IMG_MEAN_VALUE= 25000
MAX_SD_RATIO_OF_SECOND_EPOCH_IMGS= 0.18
MAX_SD_RATIO_OF_SECOND_EPOCH_IMGS_SOFT_LIMIT= 0.12
MPC_CODE= V36
NMW_CALIBRATION= /var/www/nmw_calibration
NUMBER_OF_DETECTED_TRANSIENTS_BEFORE_FILTERING_HARD_LIMIT= 8000
NUMBER_OF_DETECTED_TRANSIENTS_BEFORE_FILTERING_SOFT_LIMIT= 4000
OMP_NUM_THREADS= 
ONLINE_MPCHECKER_BUTTON_ASTEROID_SEARCH_RADIUS_ARCMIN= 
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION= 
REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES= yes
SEXTRACTOR_CONFIG_BRIGHTSTARPASS= default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
SEXTRACTOR_CONFIG_FILES= default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
STARMATCH_RADIUS_PIX= 3.5
SYSREM_ITERATIONS= 0
TELESCOP= 
TELESCOP_NAME_KNOWN_TO_VaST_FOR_FOV_DETERMINATION= 
UCAC5_PLATESOLVE_ITERATIONS= 2
FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE= no
#######################################
HOSTNAME= tau
USER= 
HOME= 
#######################################
SExtractor catalog cache: enabled, directory /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/vast_sextractor_cache
Reference image directory is set to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs
VIZIER_SITE=vizier.cds.unistra.fr
GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=vizquery (lib/vizquery -> VizieR vizier.cds.unistra.fr)
INFO: MAKE_PNG_PLOTS is set to yes
FITS_FILE_EXT=fits
CALIBRATION_STATUS_PREFIX=
Fields in the data directory: 
Oph-05-Q1b1x1
#######################################
########### Starting Oph-05-Q1b1x1 ###########
Processing Oph-05-Q1b1x1
server tau has sufficient free disk space available: 550783 MB at /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir
server tau has sufficient free disk space available: 550783 MB at .
Checking input images (2 new)
REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE= /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits
REFERENCE_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE= /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits
Small preview (one of the new images): 
Large previews of the second-epoch (new) images:
MAKE_PNG_PLOTS=yes
renamed 'Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_22-35-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0046.png' -> 'transient_report/Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_22-35-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0046.fits_preview.png'
Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_22-35-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0046.fits

renamed 'Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_22-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0047.png' -> 'transient_report/Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_22-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0047.fits_preview.png'
Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_22-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0047.fits


Read-check the input FITS images... read-check OK Blank image check the input FITS images... blank-image-check OK Read date check the input FITS images... read-date-check OK Mean value check the input FITS images... OK, at least two new images have mean values below the threshold. ---------------------------------------------- INFO: REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 886.1700 INFO: REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_SD= 448.6127 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 3648.2274 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_SD= 1535.9145 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 3349.3549 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE_SD= 1323.6070 ---------------------------------------------- INFO: ref_to_second_epoch_img_mean_ratio= 4.11685 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__SD_ratio= 0.160 ERROR: passing clouds (SD ratio=0.160 soft threshold=0.12) ---------------------------------------------- Calibration settings: DARK_FRAMES_DIR_OR_FILE=/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks FLAT_FIELD_DIR_OR_FILE=/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration SET-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint CCD-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature FOCTEMP = 23.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature AMBTEMP = 21.2 / [degC] Ambient air temperature Exploring image header: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-03_CI_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_223638_TTUQ1b1x1_3168689_dIzQJw3L/Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_22-35-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0046.fits CCD-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-03_CI_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_223638_TTUQ1b1x1_3168689_dIzQJw3L/Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_22-35-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0046.fits SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-03_CI_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_223638_TTUQ1b1x1_3168689_dIzQJw3L/Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_22-35-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0046.fits Header: 74 keys total, 33 keys left Record 0: "" status=0 Record 1: "SIMPLE = T / C# FITS" status=0 Record 2: "BITPIX = 16" status=0 Record 3: "NAXIS = 2 / Dimensionality" status=0 Record 4: "NAXIS1 = 9576" status=0 Record 5: "NAXIS2 = 6388" status=0 Record 6: "BZERO = 32768" status=0 Record 7: "EXTEND = T / Extensions are permitted" status=0 Record 8: "IMAGETYP= 'LIGHT' / Type of exposure" status=0 Record 9: "EXPOSURE= 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0 Record 10: "EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0 Record 11: "DATE-LOC= '2026-06-03T22:35:17.7261924' / Time of observation (local)" status=0 Record 12: "DATE-OBS= '2026-06-04T03:35:17.7261924' / Time of observation (UTC)" status=0 Record 13: "MJD-OBS = 61195.1495107175 / Modified Julian Date of observation" status=0 Record 14: "DATE-AVG= '2026-06-04T03:35:27.6285807' / Averaged midpoint time (UTC)" status=0 Record 15: "MJD-AVG = 61195.1496253242 / Modified Julian Date of averaged midpoint" status=0 Record 16: "XBINNING= 1 / X axis binning factor" status=0 Record 17: "YBINNING= 1 / Y axis binning factor" status=0 Record 18: "GAIN = 30 / Sensor gain" status=0 Record 19: "OFFSET = 30 / Sensor gain offset" status=0 Record 20: "XPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel X axis size" status=0 Record 21: "YPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel Y axis size" status=0 Record 22: "INSTRUME= 'QHY600M' / Imaging instrument name" status=0 Record 23: "CAMERAID= 'QHY600M-33d3d743814b8b447' / Imaging instrument identifier" status=0 Record 24: "SET-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint" status=0 Record 25: "CCD-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature" status=0 Record 26: "READOUTM= '2CMS-0' / Sensor readout mode" status=0 Record 27: "USBLIMIT= 50 / Camera-specific USB setting" status=0 Record 28: "TELESCOP= 'QHY600M-TTU1' / Name of telescope" status=0 Record 29: "FOCALLEN= 135.0 / [mm] Focal length" status=0 Record 30: "FOCRATIO= 2.2 / Focal ratio" status=0 Record 31: "RA = 257.141159843076 / [deg] RA of telescope" status=0 Record 32: "DEC = -9.9998879452886 / [deg] Declination of telescope" status=0 Record 33: "CENTALT = 23.3486111111111 / [deg] Altitude of telescope" status=0 Record 34: "CENTAZ = 121.109166666667 / [deg] Azimuth of telescope" status=0 Record 35: "AIRMASS = 2.51003676108121 / Airmass at frame center (Gueymard 1993)" status=0 Record 36: "PIERSIDE= 'West' / Telescope pointing state" status=0 Record 37: "SITEELEV= 1015.0 / [m] Observation site elevation" status=0 Record 38: "SITELAT = 33.7480555555556 / [deg] Observation site latitude" status=0 Record 39: "SITELONG= -101.958333333333 / [deg] Observation site longitude" status=0 Record 40: "OBSERVER= 'Sokolovsky' / Observer name" status=0 Record 41: "OBSERVAT= 'TTU Skyview' / Observatory name" status=0 Record 42: "SITENAME= '' / Observatory site name" status=0 Record 43: "FWHEEL = 'Simulator' / Filter Wheel name" status=0 Record 44: "FILTER = 'CV' / Active filter name" status=0 Record 45: "OBJECT = 'Oph-05' / Name of the object of interest" status=0 Record 46: "OBJCTRA = '17 08 34' / [H M S] RA of imaged object" status=0 Record 47: "OBJCTDEC= '-10 00 00' / [D M S] Declination of imaged object" status=0 Record 48: "OBJCTROT= 0.0 / [deg] planned rotation of imaged object" status=0 Record 49: "FOCNAME = 'ZWO Focuser' / Focusing equipment name" status=0 Record 50: "FOCPOS = 29502 / [step] Focuser position" status=0 Record 51: "FOCUSPOS= 29502 / [step] Focuser position" status=0 Record 52: "FOCUSSZ = 0.0 / [um] Focuser step size" status=0 Record 53: "FOCTEMP = 23.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0 Record 54: "FOCUSTEM= 23.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0 Record 55: "DEWPOINT= 15.7 / [degC] Dew point" status=0 Record 56: "HUMIDITY= 71.0 / [percent] Relative humidity" status=0 Record 57: "PRESSURE= 903.49 / [hPa] Air pressure" status=0 Record 58: "AMBTEMP = 21.2 / [degC] Ambient air temperature" status=0 Record 59: "WINDDIR = 15.0 / [deg] Wind direction: 0=N, 180=S, 90=E, 270=W" status=0 Record 60: "WINDGUST= 5.400432 / [kph] Wind gust" status=0 Record 61: "WINDSPD = 2.200176 / [kph] Wind speed" status=0 Record 62: "ROWORDER= 'TOP-DOWN' / FITS Image Orientation" status=0 Record 63: "EQUINOX = 2000.0 / Equinox of celestial coordinate system" status=0 Record 64: "SWCREATE= 'N.I.N.A. 3.2.0.9001 (x64)' / Software that created this file" status=0 Record 65: "QHY_EXP = 20.000096 / [s] Actual exposure time" status=0 Record 66: "QHY_PP = 13888.0 / [ps] pixelPeriod" status=0 Record 67: "QHY_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0 Record 68: "GPS_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0 Record 69: "QHY_FP = 20000160.0 / [us] framePeriod" status=0 Record 70: "QHY_CPL = 6120.0 / clocksPerLine" status=0 Record 71: "QHY_LPF = 235295.0 / linesPerFrame" status=0 Record 72: "QHY_AET = 20000096.0 / [us] actualExposureTime" status=0 Record 73: "QHY_LEM = T / isLongExposureMode" status=0 Record 74: "QHY_OFF0= 3767.777 / [us] RollingShutterEndOffset row 0" status=0 Allocating memory for image, dark and result arrays... Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-03_CI_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_223638_TTUQ1b1x1_3168689_dIzQJw3L/Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_22-35-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0046.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-03_CI_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_223638_TTUQ1b1x1_3168689_dIzQJw3L/Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_22-35-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0046.fits SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_5C_20s_2026-05-30.fit CCD-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-03_CI_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_223638_TTUQ1b1x1_3168689_dIzQJw3L/Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_22-35-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0046.fits CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_5C_20s_2026-05-30.fit Reading dark frame /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_5C_20s_2026-05-30.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix Dark frame is subtracted, output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-03_CI_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_223638_TTUQ1b1x1_3168689_dIzQJw3L/d_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_22-35-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0046.fits :) Spent 0.609141 seconds renamed 'mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_5C_20s_2026-05-30.png' -> 'transient_report/dark.png' try_to_calibrate_the_input_frame(): selected flat field /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-05-30.fit from directory /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats MegaDivider v7 Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-03_CI_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_223638_TTUQ1b1x1_3168689_dIzQJw3L/d_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_22-35-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0046.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix Reading flat /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-05-30.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix Avarage count on flat field image: 31267.409145 Minimal real count (from overscan): 5 Output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-03_CI_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_223638_TTUQ1b1x1_3168689_dIzQJw3L/fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_22-35-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0046.fits :) No overscan detected - all values seem high! (left_median=21677.0, right_median=21704.0) renamed 'mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-05-30.png' -> 'transient_report/flat.png' Using calibrated image CALIBRATED_SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-03_CI_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_223638_TTUQ1b1x1_3168689_dIzQJw3L/fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_22-35-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0046.fits EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration SET-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint CCD-TEMP= -0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature FOCTEMP = 23.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature AMBTEMP = 21.2 / [degC] Ambient air temperature Exploring image header: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-03_CI_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_223638_TTUQ1b1x1_3168689_dIzQJw3L/Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_22-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0047.fits CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-03_CI_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_223638_TTUQ1b1x1_3168689_dIzQJw3L/Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_22-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0047.fits SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-03_CI_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_223638_TTUQ1b1x1_3168689_dIzQJw3L/Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_22-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0047.fits Header: 74 keys total, 33 keys left Record 0: "" status=0 Record 1: "SIMPLE = T / C# FITS" status=0 Record 2: "BITPIX = 16" status=0 Record 3: "NAXIS = 2 / Dimensionality" status=0 Record 4: "NAXIS1 = 9576" status=0 Record 5: "NAXIS2 = 6388" status=0 Record 6: "BZERO = 32768" status=0 Record 7: "EXTEND = T / Extensions are permitted" status=0 Record 8: "IMAGETYP= 'LIGHT' / Type of exposure" status=0 Record 9: "EXPOSURE= 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0 Record 10: "EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0 Record 11: "DATE-LOC= '2026-06-03T22:36:02.8019117' / Time of observation (local)" status=0 Record 12: "DATE-OBS= '2026-06-04T03:36:02.8019117' / Time of observation (UTC)" status=0 Record 13: "MJD-OBS = 61195.1500324188 / Modified Julian Date of observation" status=0 Record 14: "DATE-AVG= '2026-06-04T03:36:12.7029640' / Averaged midpoint time (UTC)" status=0 Record 15: "MJD-AVG = 61195.1501470138 / Modified Julian Date of averaged midpoint" status=0 Record 16: "XBINNING= 1 / X axis binning factor" status=0 Record 17: "YBINNING= 1 / Y axis binning factor" status=0 Record 18: "GAIN = 30 / Sensor gain" status=0 Record 19: "OFFSET = 30 / Sensor gain offset" status=0 Record 20: "XPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel X axis size" status=0 Record 21: "YPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel Y axis size" status=0 Record 22: "INSTRUME= 'QHY600M' / Imaging instrument name" status=0 Record 23: "CAMERAID= 'QHY600M-33d3d743814b8b447' / Imaging instrument identifier" status=0 Record 24: "SET-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint" status=0 Record 25: "CCD-TEMP= -0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature" status=0 Record 26: "READOUTM= '2CMS-0' / Sensor readout mode" status=0 Record 27: "USBLIMIT= 50 / Camera-specific USB setting" status=0 Record 28: "TELESCOP= 'QHY600M-TTU1' / Name of telescope" status=0 Record 29: "FOCALLEN= 135.0 / [mm] Focal length" status=0 Record 30: "FOCRATIO= 2.2 / Focal ratio" status=0 Record 31: "RA = 257.141159804621 / [deg] RA of telescope" status=0 Record 32: "DEC = -9.9998879496113 / [deg] Declination of telescope" status=0 Record 33: "CENTALT = 23.4855555555556 / [deg] Altitude of telescope" status=0 Record 34: "CENTAZ = 121.251666666667 / [deg] Azimuth of telescope" status=0 Record 35: "AIRMASS = 2.49639786867478 / Airmass at frame center (Gueymard 1993)" status=0 Record 36: "PIERSIDE= 'West' / Telescope pointing state" status=0 Record 37: "SITEELEV= 1015.0 / [m] Observation site elevation" status=0 Record 38: "SITELAT = 33.7480555555556 / [deg] Observation site latitude" status=0 Record 39: "SITELONG= -101.958333333333 / [deg] Observation site longitude" status=0 Record 40: "OBSERVER= 'Sokolovsky' / Observer name" status=0 Record 41: "OBSERVAT= 'TTU Skyview' / Observatory name" status=0 Record 42: "SITENAME= '' / Observatory site name" status=0 Record 43: "FWHEEL = 'Simulator' / Filter Wheel name" status=0 Record 44: "FILTER = 'CV' / Active filter name" status=0 Record 45: "OBJECT = 'Oph-05' / Name of the object of interest" status=0 Record 46: "OBJCTRA = '17 08 34' / [H M S] RA of imaged object" status=0 Record 47: "OBJCTDEC= '-10 00 00' / [D M S] Declination of imaged object" status=0 Record 48: "OBJCTROT= 0.0 / [deg] planned rotation of imaged object" status=0 Record 49: "FOCNAME = 'ZWO Focuser' / Focusing equipment name" status=0 Record 50: "FOCPOS = 29502 / [step] Focuser position" status=0 Record 51: "FOCUSPOS= 29502 / [step] Focuser position" status=0 Record 52: "FOCUSSZ = 0.0 / [um] Focuser step size" status=0 Record 53: "FOCTEMP = 23.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0 Record 54: "FOCUSTEM= 23.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0 Record 55: "DEWPOINT= 15.7 / [degC] Dew point" status=0 Record 56: "HUMIDITY= 71.0 / [percent] Relative humidity" status=0 Record 57: "PRESSURE= 903.49 / [hPa] Air pressure" status=0 Record 58: "AMBTEMP = 21.2 / [degC] Ambient air temperature" status=0 Record 59: "WINDDIR = 15.0 / [deg] Wind direction: 0=N, 180=S, 90=E, 270=W" status=0 Record 60: "WINDGUST= 5.400432 / [kph] Wind gust" status=0 Record 61: "WINDSPD = 2.200176 / [kph] Wind speed" status=0 Record 62: "ROWORDER= 'TOP-DOWN' / FITS Image Orientation" status=0 Record 63: "EQUINOX = 2000.0 / Equinox of celestial coordinate system" status=0 Record 64: "SWCREATE= 'N.I.N.A. 3.2.0.9001 (x64)' / Software that created this file" status=0 Record 65: "QHY_EXP = 20.000096 / [s] Actual exposure time" status=0 Record 66: "QHY_PP = 13888.0 / [ps] pixelPeriod" status=0 Record 67: "QHY_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0 Record 68: "GPS_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0 Record 69: "QHY_FP = 20000160.0 / [us] framePeriod" status=0 Record 70: "QHY_CPL = 6120.0 / clocksPerLine" status=0 Record 71: "QHY_LPF = 235295.0 / linesPerFrame" status=0 Record 72: "QHY_AET = 20000096.0 / [us] actualExposureTime" status=0 Record 73: "QHY_LEM = T / isLongExposureMode" status=0 Record 74: "QHY_OFF0= 3767.777 / [us] RollingShutterEndOffset row 0" status=0 Allocating memory for image, dark and result arrays... Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-03_CI_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_223638_TTUQ1b1x1_3168689_dIzQJw3L/Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_22-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0047.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-03_CI_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_223638_TTUQ1b1x1_3168689_dIzQJw3L/Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_22-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0047.fits SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_5C_20s_2026-05-30.fit CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-03_CI_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_223638_TTUQ1b1x1_3168689_dIzQJw3L/Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_22-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0047.fits CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_5C_20s_2026-05-30.fit Reading dark frame /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_5C_20s_2026-05-30.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix Dark frame is subtracted, output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-03_CI_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_223638_TTUQ1b1x1_3168689_dIzQJw3L/d_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_22-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0047.fits :) Spent 0.606550 seconds renamed 'mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_5C_20s_2026-05-30.png' -> 'transient_report/dark.png' try_to_calibrate_the_input_frame(): selected flat field /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-05-30.fit from directory /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats MegaDivider v7 Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-03_CI_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_223638_TTUQ1b1x1_3168689_dIzQJw3L/d_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_22-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0047.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix Reading flat /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-05-30.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix Avarage count on flat field image: 31267.409145 Minimal real count (from overscan): 5 Output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-03_CI_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_223638_TTUQ1b1x1_3168689_dIzQJw3L/fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_22-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0047.fits :) No overscan detected - all values seem high! (left_median=21677.0, right_median=21704.0) renamed 'mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-05-30.png' -> 'transient_report/flat.png' Using calibrated image CALIBRATED_SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-03_CI_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_223638_TTUQ1b1x1_3168689_dIzQJw3L/fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_22-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0047.fits Dark frame used to calibrate the second-epoch images:

Flat field used to calibrate the second-epoch images:

after the calibration attempt: SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-03_CI_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_223638_TTUQ1b1x1_3168689_dIzQJw3L/fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_22-35-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0046.fits SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-03_CI_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_223638_TTUQ1b1x1_3168689_dIzQJw3L/fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_22-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0047.fits Previews of the CALIBRATED second-epoch images:

fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_22-35-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0046.fits


fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_22-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0047.fits


Updating neverexclude_list.txt '/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt' Choosing bad regions list '/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst' wait *------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------* 'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex' Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 3.5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-03_CI_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_223638_TTUQ1b1x1_3168689_dIzQJw3L/fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_22-35-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0046.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-03_CI_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_223638_TTUQ1b1x1_3168689_dIzQJw3L/fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_22-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0047.fits SExtractor catalog cache: saved Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits.cat to cache SExtractor catalog cache: saved Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits.cat to cache VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-03_CI_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_223638_TTUQ1b1x1_3168689_dIzQJw3L/fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_22-35-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0046.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-03_CI_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_223638_TTUQ1b1x1_3168689_dIzQJw3L/fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_22-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0047.fits Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461195.64962646 Plate-solving the images 'asassn_transients_list.txt' -> '../asassn_transients_list.txt' 'tocp_transients_list.txt' -> '../tocp_transients_list.txt' 'tns_transients_list.txt' -> '../tns_transients_list.txt' wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits exists and is non-empty Saving wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits to local_wcs_cache/ 'wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits' wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits exists and is non-empty Saving wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits to local_wcs_cache/ 'wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits' wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_22-35-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0046.fits exists and is non-empty Saving wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_22-35-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0046.fits to local_wcs_cache/ 'wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_22-35-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0046.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_22-35-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0046.fits' wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_22-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0047.fits exists and is non-empty Saving wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_22-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0047.fits to local_wcs_cache/ 'wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_22-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0047.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_22-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0047.fits' ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits (1st reference image) verification OK: wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits Image size: 937.3'x624.3' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 17:08:38.023 -09:59:09.18 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### The image scale is 5.87"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8" ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_22-35-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0046.fits (1st new image) verification OK: wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_22-35-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0046.fits Image size: 942.0'x626.8' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 17:08:25.261 -09:59:50.40 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy) Reference image center 17:08:38.023 -09:59:09.18 Second-epoch image center 17:08:25.261 -09:59:50.40 Angular distance between the image centers 0.0536 deg. Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg. ################################### ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_22-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0047.fits (2nd new image) verification OK: wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_22-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0047.fits Image size: 942.0'x626.8' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 17:08:22.952 -10:00:20.59 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy) Reference image center 17:08:38.023 -09:59:09.18 Second-epoch image center 17:08:22.952 -10:00:20.59 Angular distance between the image centers 0.0649 deg. ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images) Second-epoch first image center 17:08:25.261 -09:59:50.40 Second-epoch second image center 17:08:22.952 -10:00:20.59 Angular distance between the image centers 0.01265 deg. ################################### Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5... Preparing for ar aprallel run Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits &> /tmp/tmp.4qkHrhL5V4 Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits &> /tmp/tmp.HMzaRswAtA Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-03_CI_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_223638_TTUQ1b1x1_3168689_dIzQJw3L/fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_22-35-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0046.fits &> /tmp/tmp.nH8Ygs61v2 Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-03_CI_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_223638_TTUQ1b1x1_3168689_dIzQJw3L/fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_22-35-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0046.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-03_CI_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_223638_TTUQ1b1x1_3168689_dIzQJw3L/fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_22-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0047.fits &> /tmp/tmp.FLiAxFTgb0 Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-03_CI_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_223638_TTUQ1b1x1_3168689_dIzQJw3L/fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_22-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0047.fits Calibrating the magnitude scale Found non-empty wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits ____ Start of magnitude calibration ____ PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits and wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits.cat wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race) Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2 Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits and wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits.cat Found non-empty wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits and wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits.cat The reference image (wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits) and catalog (wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits.cat) found 'wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits.cat' -> 'wcsmag.cat' Read 7619 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 249.0959 to 265.2508 deg, Dec -15.2525 to -4.6764 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 249.0959 to 265.2508 deg, Dec -15.2525 to -4.6764 deg Loaded 4104 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3395 out of 3508 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 3508 out of 7619 detected stars. The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.830900 a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.830900 From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.89 Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.94 Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes Working... Please, PLEASE, be patient!!! All lightcurves processed! =) Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.94
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:

Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V) Read 7619 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 249.0959 to 265.2508 deg, Dec -15.2525 to -4.6764 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 249.0959 to 265.2508 deg, Dec -15.2525 to -4.6764 deg Loaded 4104 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3395 out of 3508 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 3508 out of 7619 detected stars. util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits:

Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits (aperture=6.5) Read 6368 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 249.0956 to 265.2325 deg, Dec -15.2667 to -4.7383 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 249.0956 to 265.2325 deg, Dec -15.2667 to -4.7383 deg Loaded 4081 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3316 out of 3413 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 3413 out of 6368 detected stars. util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits:

Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits (aperture=6.4) ____ End of magnitude calibration ____ Applying consolidated magnitude filters... Preparing the exclusion lists for this field Done with filtering Found 3 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 8000) Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars: 2.4 pix Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits 2.4 pix Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits 2.3 pix fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_22-35-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0046.fits 2.4 pix fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_22-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0047.fits 2.4 pix wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits 2.4 pix wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits Limiting magnitude estimates: 14.9 mag. Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits 14.8 mag. Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits 13.9 mag. fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_22-35-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0046.fits 14.0 mag. fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_22-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0047.fits All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 13.9 (SNR ) 11.1 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50). This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image. The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here. The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images. This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list. The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag. Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver wait ############ /tmp/tmp.4qkHrhL5V4 (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks The guess is based on the existing WCS header. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-03_CI_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_223638_TTUQ1b1x1_3168689_dIzQJw3L/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits 571.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good. The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good... '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits' -> 'wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits' FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits.cat SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=425, passed=7619 Got 7619 stars (including 7188 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits.cat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 7619 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.3' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.3 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013018 (46.9 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010414 (37.5 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.7) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 939 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 937 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 922 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.53" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 937 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7489 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.52" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.7) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 939 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 937 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7489 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.53" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 937 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7489 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.54" Excluding outliers - 937 stars left (next iteration limit 1030) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits N_match=937 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.568 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.416 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.927 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.432 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.573 n_q1=177 n_q2=358 n_q3=213 n_q4=189 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.633 The image catalog is written to wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits.cat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits.cat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits -region wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits.cat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations ############ /tmp/tmp.HMzaRswAtA (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks The guess is based on the existing WCS header. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-03_CI_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_223638_TTUQ1b1x1_3168689_dIzQJw3L/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits 571.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good. The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good... '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits' -> 'wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits' FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits.cat SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=363, passed=6368 Got 6368 stars (including 5993 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits.cat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 6368 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.3' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.3 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013018 (46.9 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010414 (37.5 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.7) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 942 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 939 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 927 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.53" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 939 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6258 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.53" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.7) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 942 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 939 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6257 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.54" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 939 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6257 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.55" Excluding outliers - 939 stars left (next iteration limit 1032) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits N_match=939 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.558 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.417 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.846 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.469 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.530 n_q1=180 n_q2=359 n_q3=207 n_q4=193 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.517 The image catalog is written to wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits.cat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits.cat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits -region wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits.cat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations ############ /tmp/tmp.nH8Ygs61v2 (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um Internal estimated FoV 605.3' The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-03_CI_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_223638_TTUQ1b1x1_3168689_dIzQJw3L/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-03_CI_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_223638_TTUQ1b1x1_3168689_dIzQJw3L/fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_22-35-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0046.fits 605.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-03_CI_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_223638_TTUQ1b1x1_3168689_dIzQJw3L/fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_22-35-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0046.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-03_CI_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_223638_TTUQ1b1x1_3168689_dIzQJw3L/fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_22-35-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0046.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-03_CI_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_223638_TTUQ1b1x1_3168689_dIzQJw3L/fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_22-35-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0046.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-03_CI_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_223638_TTUQ1b1x1_3168689_dIzQJw3L/fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_22-35-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0046.fits It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve! FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-03_CI_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_223638_TTUQ1b1x1_3168689_dIzQJw3L/fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_22-35-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0046.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_22-35-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0046.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_22-35-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0046.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_22-35-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0046.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_22-35-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0046.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_22-35-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0046.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_22-35-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0046.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_22-35-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0046.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-03_CI_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_223638_TTUQ1b1x1_3168689_dIzQJw3L/fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_22-35-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0046.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_22-35-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0046.fits.cat SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=162, passed=2045 Got 2045 stars (including 1883 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_22-35-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0046.fits.cat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 2045 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 942.0' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 942.0 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013083 (47.1 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010467 (37.7 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 372 to 429 (Dec -15.6 to -4.4) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 937 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 934 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 907 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 934 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 1982 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 372 to 429 (Dec -15.6 to -4.4) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 938 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 935 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 1983 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 935 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 1983 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44" Excluding outliers - 935 stars left (next iteration limit 1027) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_22-35-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0046.fits N_match=935 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.475 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.503 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.514 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.410 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.427 n_q1=142 n_q2=325 n_q3=213 n_q4=255 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.083 The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_22-35-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0046.fits.cat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_22-35-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0046.fits.cat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-03_CI_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_223638_TTUQ1b1x1_3168689_dIzQJw3L/fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_22-35-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0046.fits -region wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_22-35-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0046.fits.cat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_22-35-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0046.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations ############ /tmp/tmp.FLiAxFTgb0 (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um Internal estimated FoV 605.3' The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-03_CI_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_223638_TTUQ1b1x1_3168689_dIzQJw3L/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-03_CI_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_223638_TTUQ1b1x1_3168689_dIzQJw3L/fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_22-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0047.fits 605.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-03_CI_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_223638_TTUQ1b1x1_3168689_dIzQJw3L/fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_22-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0047.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-03_CI_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_223638_TTUQ1b1x1_3168689_dIzQJw3L/fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_22-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0047.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-03_CI_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_223638_TTUQ1b1x1_3168689_dIzQJw3L/fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_22-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0047.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-03_CI_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_223638_TTUQ1b1x1_3168689_dIzQJw3L/fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_22-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0047.fits It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve! FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-03_CI_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_223638_TTUQ1b1x1_3168689_dIzQJw3L/fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_22-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0047.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_22-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0047.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_22-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0047.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_22-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0047.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_22-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0047.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_22-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0047.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_22-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0047.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_22-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0047.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-03_CI_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_223638_TTUQ1b1x1_3168689_dIzQJw3L/fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_22-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0047.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_22-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0047.fits.cat SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=197, passed=2465 Got 2465 stars (including 2266 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_22-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0047.fits.cat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 2465 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 942.0' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 942.0 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013083 (47.1 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010467 (37.7 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 372 to 430 (Dec -15.6 to -4.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 934 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 931 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 913 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 931 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 2386 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 372 to 430 (Dec -15.6 to -4.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 934 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 931 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 2384 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 931 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 2384 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40" Excluding outliers - 931 stars left (next iteration limit 1024) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_22-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0047.fits N_match=931 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.406 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.486 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.400 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.321 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.471 n_q1=139 n_q2=309 n_q3=240 n_q4=243 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.197 The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_22-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0047.fits.cat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_22-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0047.fits.cat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-03_CI_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_223638_TTUQ1b1x1_3168689_dIzQJw3L/fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_22-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0047.fits -region wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_22-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0047.fits.cat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_22-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0047.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations ################################### # Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above) ref1=Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits sigma_overall=0.568 worst_q_ratio=1.633 ref2=Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits sigma_overall=0.558 worst_q_ratio=1.517 new1=fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_22-35-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0046.fits sigma_overall=0.475 worst_q_ratio=1.083 new2=fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_22-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0047.fits sigma_overall=0.406 worst_q_ratio=1.197 reference average sigma_overall=0.563 worst_q_ratio=1.575 warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference ###################################
Distribution of catalog-matched stars across the image:
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy: wrote wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081_astrometric_residuals.png (937 matched stars from wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy: wrote wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049_astrometric_residuals.png (939 matched stars from wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy: wrote wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_22-35-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0046_astrometric_residuals.png (935 matched stars from wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_22-35-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0046.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388) plot_astrometric_residuals_xy: wrote wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_22-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0047_astrometric_residuals.png (931 matched stars from wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_22-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0047.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388) Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_22-35-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0046.fits INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image) 'wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_22-35-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0046.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-03_CI_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_223638_TTUQ1b1x1_3168689_dIzQJw3L/wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_22-35-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0046.fits' Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_22-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0047.fits INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image) 'wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_22-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0047.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-03_CI_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_223638_TTUQ1b1x1_3168689_dIzQJw3L/wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_22-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0047.fits' Preparing the HTML report for the field Oph-05-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 0s Pre-generating preview images in parallel... Done pre-generating preview images. Pre-generating finding charts in parallel... Done pre-generating finding charts. make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 0s xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 20145_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_22-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0047 The candidate 20145_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_22-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0047 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 06 04.15015    2461195.65015    10.80    17:38:17.43 -15:02:16.8   9365 0357   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-03_CI_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_223638_TTUQ1b1x1_3168689_dIzQJw3L/fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_22-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0047.fits **** FOUND 17:38:17.45 -15:02:17.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 20150_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_22-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0047 The candidate 20150_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_22-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0047 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 06 04.15015    2461195.65015    10.91    17:38:27.43 -15:04:14.5   9391 0338   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-03_CI_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_223638_TTUQ1b1x1_3168689_dIzQJw3L/fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_22-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0047.fits **** FOUND 17:38:27.44 -15:04:15.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 20178_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_22-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0047 The candidate 20178_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_22-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0047 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 06 04.15015    2461195.65015    11.10    17:38:34.50 -14:49:09.2   9402 0493   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-03_CI_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_223638_TTUQ1b1x1_3168689_dIzQJw3L/fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_22-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0047.fits **** FOUND 17:38:34.51 -14:49:09.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 1s make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 1s Prepared the HTML report for the field Oph-05-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 *------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------* #### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt #### wait *------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------* 'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex' Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 3.5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-03_CI_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_223638_TTUQ1b1x1_3168689_dIzQJw3L/fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_22-35-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0046.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-03_CI_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_223638_TTUQ1b1x1_3168689_dIzQJw3L/fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_22-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0047.fits SExtractor catalog cache: saved Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits.cat to cache SExtractor catalog cache: saved Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits.cat to cache VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-03_CI_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_223638_TTUQ1b1x1_3168689_dIzQJw3L/fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_22-35-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0046.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-03_CI_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_223638_TTUQ1b1x1_3168689_dIzQJw3L/fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_22-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0047.fits Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_22-35-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0046.fits Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_22-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0047.fits Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/exclusion_list.txt Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images Plate-solving the images wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits exists and is non-empty wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits exists and is non-empty wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_22-35-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0046.fits exists and is non-empty wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_22-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0047.fits exists and is non-empty ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits (1st reference image) verification OK: wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits Image size: 937.3'x624.3' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 17:08:38.023 -09:59:09.18 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### The image scale is 5.87"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8" ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_22-35-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0046.fits (1st new image) verification OK: wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_22-35-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0046.fits Image size: 942.0'x626.8' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 17:08:25.261 -09:59:50.40 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy) Reference image center 17:08:38.023 -09:59:09.18 Second-epoch image center 17:08:25.261 -09:59:50.40 Angular distance between the image centers 0.0536 deg. Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg. ################################### ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_22-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0047.fits (2nd new image) verification OK: wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_22-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0047.fits Image size: 942.0'x626.8' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 17:08:22.952 -10:00:20.59 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy) Reference image center 17:08:38.023 -09:59:09.18 Second-epoch image center 17:08:22.952 -10:00:20.59 Angular distance between the image centers 0.0649 deg. ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images) Second-epoch first image center 17:08:25.261 -09:59:50.40 Second-epoch second image center 17:08:22.952 -10:00:20.59 Angular distance between the image centers 0.01265 deg. ################################### Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5... Preparing for ar aprallel run Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits &> /tmp/tmp.8Un0Y6tpsu Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits &> /tmp/tmp.93MLWt1ZxO Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-03_CI_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_223638_TTUQ1b1x1_3168689_dIzQJw3L/fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_22-35-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0046.fits &> /tmp/tmp.hjxGAR7MSL Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-03_CI_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_223638_TTUQ1b1x1_3168689_dIzQJw3L/fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_22-35-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0046.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-03_CI_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_223638_TTUQ1b1x1_3168689_dIzQJw3L/fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_22-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0047.fits &> /tmp/tmp.UIusmrLNQh Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-03_CI_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_223638_TTUQ1b1x1_3168689_dIzQJw3L/fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_22-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0047.fits Calibrating the magnitude scale Found non-empty wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits ____ Start of magnitude calibration ____ PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits and wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits.cat wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race) Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2 Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits and wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits.cat Found non-empty wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits and wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits.cat The reference image (wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits) and catalog (wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits.cat) found 'wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits.cat' -> 'wcsmag.cat' Read 72440 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 249.0959 to 265.2606 deg, Dec -15.2524 to -4.6668 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 249.0959 to 265.2606 deg, Dec -15.2524 to -4.6668 deg Loaded 4113 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3162 out of 3606 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 3606 out of 72440 detected stars. The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.641150 a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.641150 From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.52 Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.12 Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes Working... Please, PLEASE, be patient!!! All lightcurves processed! =) Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.12
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:

Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V) Read 72440 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 249.0959 to 265.2606 deg, Dec -15.2524 to -4.6668 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 249.0959 to 265.2606 deg, Dec -15.2524 to -4.6668 deg Loaded 4113 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3162 out of 3606 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 3606 out of 72440 detected stars. util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits:

Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits (aperture=4.6) Read 62008 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 249.0757 to 265.2415 deg, Dec -15.2678 to -4.6866 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 249.0757 to 265.2415 deg, Dec -15.2678 to -4.6866 deg Loaded 4114 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3200 out of 3606 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 3606 out of 62008 detected stars. util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits:

Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits (aperture=4.6) ____ End of magnitude calibration ____ Applying consolidated magnitude filters... Preparing the exclusion lists for this field Done with filtering Found 43 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 8000) Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars: 2.2 pix Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits 2.2 pix Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits 2.1 pix fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_22-35-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0046.fits 2.1 pix fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_22-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0047.fits 2.2 pix wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits 2.2 pix wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits Limiting magnitude estimates: 15.1 mag. Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits 14.9 mag. Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits 14.3 mag. fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_22-35-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0046.fits 14.3 mag. fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_22-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0047.fits All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.3 (SNR ) 13.8 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50). This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image. The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here. The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images. This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list. The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag. Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver wait ############ /tmp/tmp.8Un0Y6tpsu (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks The guess is based on the existing WCS header. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-03_CI_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_223638_TTUQ1b1x1_3168689_dIzQJw3L/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits 571.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good. The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good... '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits' -> 'wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits' FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits.cat SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=20, blended=4399, passed=72420 Got 72420 stars (including 67925 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits.cat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 72420 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.3' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.3 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013018 (46.9 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010414 (37.5 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.7) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 940 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 938 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 927 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.56" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 938 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 71593 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.53" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.7) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 940 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 938 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 71592 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.53" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 938 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 71592 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.57" Excluding outliers - 938 stars left (next iteration limit 1031) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits N_match=938 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.590 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.421 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.894 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.502 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.571 n_q1=197 n_q2=343 n_q3=200 n_q4=198 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.515 The image catalog is written to wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits.cat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits.cat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits -region wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits.cat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations ############ /tmp/tmp.93MLWt1ZxO (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks The guess is based on the existing WCS header. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-03_CI_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_223638_TTUQ1b1x1_3168689_dIzQJw3L/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits 571.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good. The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good... '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits' -> 'wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits' FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits.cat SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=10, blended=3287, passed=61998 Got 61998 stars (including 58620 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits.cat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 61998 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.3' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.3 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013018 (46.9 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010414 (37.5 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.7) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 938 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 935 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 923 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.54" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 935 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 61292 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.52" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.7) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 938 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 935 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 61292 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.52" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 935 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 61291 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.54" Excluding outliers - 935 stars left (next iteration limit 1028) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits N_match=935 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.578 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.453 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.828 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.483 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.528 n_q1=194 n_q2=352 n_q3=194 n_q4=195 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.433 The image catalog is written to wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits.cat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits.cat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits -region wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits.cat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations ############ /tmp/tmp.hjxGAR7MSL (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um Internal estimated FoV 605.3' The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-03_CI_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_223638_TTUQ1b1x1_3168689_dIzQJw3L/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-03_CI_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_223638_TTUQ1b1x1_3168689_dIzQJw3L/fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_22-35-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0046.fits 605.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-03_CI_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_223638_TTUQ1b1x1_3168689_dIzQJw3L/fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_22-35-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0046.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-03_CI_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_223638_TTUQ1b1x1_3168689_dIzQJw3L/fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_22-35-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0046.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-03_CI_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_223638_TTUQ1b1x1_3168689_dIzQJw3L/fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_22-35-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0046.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-03_CI_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_223638_TTUQ1b1x1_3168689_dIzQJw3L/fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_22-35-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0046.fits It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve! FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-03_CI_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_223638_TTUQ1b1x1_3168689_dIzQJw3L/fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_22-35-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0046.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_22-35-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0046.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_22-35-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0046.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_22-35-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0046.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_22-35-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0046.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_22-35-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0046.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_22-35-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0046.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_22-35-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0046.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-03_CI_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_223638_TTUQ1b1x1_3168689_dIzQJw3L/fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_22-35-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0046.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_22-35-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0046.fits.cat SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=26, blended=1118, passed=27910 Got 27910 stars (including 26748 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_22-35-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0046.fits.cat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 27910 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 942.0' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 942.0 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013083 (47.1 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010467 (37.7 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 371 to 430 (Dec -15.6 to -4.2) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 940 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 937 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 908 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 937 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 27365 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 371 to 430 (Dec -15.6 to -4.2) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 940 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 937 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 27364 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 937 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 27364 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42" Excluding outliers - 937 stars left (next iteration limit 1030) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_22-35-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0046.fits N_match=937 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.461 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.482 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.506 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.361 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.417 n_q1=141 n_q2=324 n_q3=212 n_q4=260 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.098 The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_22-35-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0046.fits.cat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_22-35-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0046.fits.cat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-03_CI_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_223638_TTUQ1b1x1_3168689_dIzQJw3L/fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_22-35-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0046.fits -region wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_22-35-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0046.fits.cat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_22-35-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0046.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations ############ /tmp/tmp.UIusmrLNQh (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um Internal estimated FoV 605.3' The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-03_CI_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_223638_TTUQ1b1x1_3168689_dIzQJw3L/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-03_CI_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_223638_TTUQ1b1x1_3168689_dIzQJw3L/fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_22-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0047.fits 605.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-03_CI_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_223638_TTUQ1b1x1_3168689_dIzQJw3L/fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_22-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0047.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-03_CI_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_223638_TTUQ1b1x1_3168689_dIzQJw3L/fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_22-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0047.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-03_CI_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_223638_TTUQ1b1x1_3168689_dIzQJw3L/fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_22-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0047.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-03_CI_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_223638_TTUQ1b1x1_3168689_dIzQJw3L/fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_22-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0047.fits It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve! FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-03_CI_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_223638_TTUQ1b1x1_3168689_dIzQJw3L/fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_22-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0047.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_22-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0047.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_22-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0047.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_22-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0047.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_22-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0047.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_22-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0047.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_22-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0047.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_22-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0047.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-03_CI_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_223638_TTUQ1b1x1_3168689_dIzQJw3L/fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_22-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0047.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_22-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0047.fits.cat SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=29, blended=1018, passed=30242 Got 30242 stars (including 29184 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_22-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0047.fits.cat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 30242 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 942.0' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 942.0 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013083 (47.1 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010467 (37.7 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 371 to 430 (Dec -15.6 to -4.2) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 936 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 933 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 918 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 933 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 29773 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 371 to 430 (Dec -15.6 to -4.2) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 936 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 933 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 29771 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 933 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 29771 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41" Excluding outliers - 933 stars left (next iteration limit 1026) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_22-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0047.fits N_match=933 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.408 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.465 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.393 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.312 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.473 n_q1=147 n_q2=303 n_q3=241 n_q4=242 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.160 The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_22-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0047.fits.cat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_22-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0047.fits.cat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-03_CI_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_223638_TTUQ1b1x1_3168689_dIzQJw3L/fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_22-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0047.fits -region wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_22-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0047.fits.cat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_22-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0047.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL) Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_22-35-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0046.fits INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image) The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-03_CI_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_223638_TTUQ1b1x1_3168689_dIzQJw3L/wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_22-35-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0046.fits Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_22-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0047.fits INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image) The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-03_CI_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_223638_TTUQ1b1x1_3168689_dIzQJw3L/wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_22-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0047.fits Preparing the HTML report for the field Oph-05-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits at 17:23:45.93 -11:45:42.1: 13.42 +/- 0.05 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits at 17:16:54.90 -12:31:03.3: 12.99 +/- 0.03 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits at 17:31:42.23 -12:26:21.2: 13.39 +/- 0.05 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits at 17:00:30.58 -12:15:49.5: 12.40 +/- 0.02 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits at 16:58:37.40 -04:44:34.9: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits at 17:04:24.57 -11:10:33.8: 15.75 +/- 99.00 upperlimit Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits at 17:21:39.05 -11:02:51.0: 13.01 +/- 0.03 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits at 17:31:42.23 -12:26:21.2: 13.23 +/- 0.05 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits at 17:23:45.93 -11:45:42.1: 13.39 +/- 0.06 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.31 +/- 0.03 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:31:42.23 -12:26:21.2: ref_mag=13.31 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.4941 delta=-0.18 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits at 16:58:37.40 -04:44:34.9: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:58:37.40 -04:44:34.9: at least one reference image reported edge (off-image or aperture/annulus past image boundary); cannot perform the forced-photometry cross-check Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits at 17:16:54.90 -12:31:03.3: 12.99 +/- 0.04 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits at 17:00:30.58 -12:15:49.5: 12.46 +/- 0.02 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.41 +/- 0.04 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:23:45.93 -11:45:42.1: ref_mag=13.41 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.6560 delta=-0.25 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.99 +/- 0.02 Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.42 +/- 0.01 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:16:54.90 -12:31:03.3: ref_mag=12.99 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.2107 delta=-0.22 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:00:30.58 -12:15:49.5: ref_mag=12.42 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.7229 delta=-0.30 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits at 17:02:58.60 -06:22:16.9: 13.11 +/- 0.03 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits at 16:55:09.57 -08:21:01.0: 13.20 +/- 0.04 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits at 17:21:39.05 -11:02:51.0: 13.06 +/- 0.04 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits at 17:04:24.57 -11:10:33.8: 15.57 +/- 99.00 upperlimit Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.03 +/- 0.03 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:21:39.05 -11:02:51.0: ref_mag=13.03 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=12.9348 delta=0.09 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits at 17:02:58.60 -06:22:16.9: 13.13 +/- 0.04 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.12 +/- 0.03 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:02:58.60 -06:22:16.9: ref_mag=13.12 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.0879 delta=0.03 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits at 16:55:09.57 -08:21:01.0: 13.29 +/- 0.05 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.23 +/- 0.03 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:55:09.57 -08:21:01.0: ref_mag=13.23 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.0363 delta=0.20 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits at 17:34:50.11 -12:14:49.0: 13.02 +/- 0.04 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits at 17:34:50.11 -12:14:49.0: 13.01 +/- 0.04 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.02 +/- 0.03 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:34:50.11 -12:14:49.0: ref_mag=13.02 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.0437 delta=-0.03 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits at 16:46:01.75 -08:47:13.9: 13.40 +/- 0.04 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits at 17:21:39.82 -11:02:14.0: 13.61 +/- 0.06 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_02-24-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits at 17:11:02.00 -06:39:11.8: 14.70 +/- 0.13 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits at 16:46:01.75 -08:47:13.9: 13.26 +/- 0.05 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits at 17:21:39.82 -11:02:14.0: 13.60 +/- 0.07 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.33 +/- 0.03 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:46:01.75 -08:47:13.9: ref_mag=13.33 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.6120 delta=-0.28 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-42-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits at 17:11:02.00 -06:39:11.8: 14.91 +/- 0.19 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.61 +/- 0.04 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:21:39.82 -11:02:14.0: ref_mag=13.61 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.6682 delta=-0.06 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.76 +/- 0.11 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:11:02.00 -06:39:11.8: ref_mag=14.76 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.4934 delta=0.27 (need > 0.90) Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out86121.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 7s Pre-generating preview images in parallel... Done pre-generating preview images. Pre-generating finding charts in parallel... Done pre-generating finding charts. make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 0s xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 85769_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_22-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0047 The candidate 85769_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_22-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0047 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 06 04.14963    2461195.64963    13.69    17:31:42.31 -12:26:20.5   8312 1903   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-03_CI_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_223638_TTUQ1b1x1_3168689_dIzQJw3L/fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_22-35-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0046.fits Discovery image 2   2026 06 04.15015    2461195.65015    13.38    17:31:42.15 -12:26:22.0   8317 1908   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-03_CI_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_223638_TTUQ1b1x1_3168689_dIzQJw3L/fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_22-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0047.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 85770_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_22-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0047 The candidate 85770_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_22-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0047 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 06 04.14963    2461195.64963    13.66    17:23:45.87 -11:45:42.8   7114 2260   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-03_CI_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_223638_TTUQ1b1x1_3168689_dIzQJw3L/fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_22-35-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0046.fits Discovery image 2   2026 06 04.15015    2461195.65015    13.65    17:23:45.99 -11:45:41.4   7120 2266   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-03_CI_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_223638_TTUQ1b1x1_3168689_dIzQJw3L/fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_22-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0047.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 85781_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_22-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0047 The candidate 85781_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_22-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0047 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 06 04.14963    2461195.64963    13.14    17:16:54.91 -12:31:03.2   6128 1754   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-03_CI_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_223638_TTUQ1b1x1_3168689_dIzQJw3L/fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_22-35-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0046.fits Discovery image 2   2026 06 04.15015    2461195.65015    13.30    17:16:54.90 -12:31:03.4   6133 1759   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-03_CI_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_223638_TTUQ1b1x1_3168689_dIzQJw3L/fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_22-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0047.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 85782_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_22-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0047 The candidate 85782_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_22-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0047 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 06 04.15015    2461195.65015    12.90    17:32:51.83 -06:14:07.2   8333 5675   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-03_CI_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_223638_TTUQ1b1x1_3168689_dIzQJw3L/fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_22-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0047.fits **** FOUND 17:32:51.87 -06:14:06.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 85784_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_22-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0047 The candidate 85784_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_22-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0047 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 06 04.15015    2461195.65015    13.19    16:54:45.09 -05:17:32.6   2567 5903   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-03_CI_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_223638_TTUQ1b1x1_3168689_dIzQJw3L/fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_22-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0047.fits **** FOUND 16:54:45.13 -05:17:32.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 85786_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_22-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0047 The candidate 85786_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_22-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0047 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 06 04.15015    2461195.65015    12.77    17:38:02.65 -11:36:12.8   9245 2451   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-03_CI_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_223638_TTUQ1b1x1_3168689_dIzQJw3L/fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_22-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0047.fits **** FOUND 17:38:02.60 -11:36:12.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 85787_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_22-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0047 The candidate 85787_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_22-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0047 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 06 04.14963    2461195.64963    12.73    17:00:30.66 -12:15:49.2   3711 1757   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-03_CI_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_223638_TTUQ1b1x1_3168689_dIzQJw3L/fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_22-35-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0046.fits Discovery image 2   2026 06 04.15015    2461195.65015    12.72    17:00:30.51 -12:15:49.7   3716 1762   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-03_CI_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_223638_TTUQ1b1x1_3168689_dIzQJw3L/fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_22-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0047.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 85810_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_22-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0047 The candidate 85810_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_22-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0047 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 06 04.14963    2461195.64963    10.41    16:58:37.38 -04:44:34.8   3121 6269   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-03_CI_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_223638_TTUQ1b1x1_3168689_dIzQJw3L/fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_22-35-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0046.fits Discovery image 2   2026 06 04.15015    2461195.65015    10.49    16:58:37.41 -04:44:35.0   3126 6275   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-03_CI_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_223638_TTUQ1b1x1_3168689_dIzQJw3L/fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_22-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0047.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 85842_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_22-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0047 The candidate 85842_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_22-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0047 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 06 04.15015    2461195.65015    10.78    17:38:27.47 -15:04:14.9   9391 0338   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-03_CI_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_223638_TTUQ1b1x1_3168689_dIzQJw3L/fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_22-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0047.fits **** FOUND 17:38:27.47 -15:04:15.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 85843_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_22-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0047 The candidate 85843_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_22-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0047 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 06 04.15015    2461195.65015    10.68    17:38:17.47 -15:02:17.2   9365 0357   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-03_CI_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_223638_TTUQ1b1x1_3168689_dIzQJw3L/fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_22-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0047.fits **** FOUND 17:38:17.47 -15:02:17.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 85852_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_22-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0047 The candidate 85852_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_22-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0047 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 06 04.15015    2461195.65015    11.45    17:38:30.34 -14:35:13.2   9386 0634   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-03_CI_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_223638_TTUQ1b1x1_3168689_dIzQJw3L/fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_22-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0047.fits **** FOUND 17:38:30.24 -14:35:13.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 86039_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_22-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0047 The candidate 86039_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_22-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0047 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 06 04.15015    2461195.65015    12.74    17:37:27.10 -14:52:58.4   9236 0449   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-03_CI_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_223638_TTUQ1b1x1_3168689_dIzQJw3L/fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_22-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0047.fits **** FOUND 17:37:27.08 -14:52:58.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 86074_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_22-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0047 The candidate 86074_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_22-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0047 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 06 04.15015    2461195.65015    12.51    17:38:41.13 -14:48:39.9   9418 0498   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-03_CI_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_223638_TTUQ1b1x1_3168689_dIzQJw3L/fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_22-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0047.fits **** FOUND 17:38:41.11 -14:48:40.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 86121_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_22-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0047 Preparing report for the candidate 86121_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_22-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0047 xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 86191_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_22-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0047 The candidate 86191_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_22-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0047 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 06 04.14963    2461195.64963    12.93    17:21:39.08 -11:02:51.7   6780 2675   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-03_CI_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_223638_TTUQ1b1x1_3168689_dIzQJw3L/fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_22-35-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0046.fits Discovery image 2   2026 06 04.15015    2461195.65015    12.94    17:21:39.01 -11:02:50.4   6785 2681   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-03_CI_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_223638_TTUQ1b1x1_3168689_dIzQJw3L/fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_22-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0047.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 86251_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_22-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0047 The candidate 86251_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_22-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0047 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 06 04.14963    2461195.64963    13.09    17:02:58.60 -06:22:17.1   3842 5325   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-03_CI_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_223638_TTUQ1b1x1_3168689_dIzQJw3L/fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_22-35-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0046.fits Discovery image 2   2026 06 04.15015    2461195.65015    13.08    17:02:58.61 -06:22:16.6   3847 5330   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-03_CI_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_223638_TTUQ1b1x1_3168689_dIzQJw3L/fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_22-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0047.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 86253_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_22-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0047 The candidate 86253_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_22-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0047 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 06 04.14963    2461195.64963    13.07    16:55:09.52 -08:21:01.2   2756 4054   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-03_CI_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_223638_TTUQ1b1x1_3168689_dIzQJw3L/fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_22-35-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0046.fits Discovery image 2   2026 06 04.15015    2461195.65015    13.01    16:55:09.63 -08:21:00.8   2762 4059   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-03_CI_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_223638_TTUQ1b1x1_3168689_dIzQJw3L/fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_22-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0047.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 86256_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_22-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0047 The candidate 86256_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_22-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0047 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 06 04.15015    2461195.65015    13.09    17:39:00.27 -14:36:09.2   9461 0627   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-03_CI_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_223638_TTUQ1b1x1_3168689_dIzQJw3L/fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_22-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0047.fits **** FOUND 17:39:00.02 -14:36:07.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 86264_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_22-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0047 The candidate 86264_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_22-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0047 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 06 04.15015    2461195.65015    12.97    17:19:09.35 -12:29:03.2   6462 1796   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-03_CI_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_223638_TTUQ1b1x1_3168689_dIzQJw3L/fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_22-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0047.fits **** FOUND 17:19:09.45 -12:29:03.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 86266_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_22-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0047 The candidate 86266_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_22-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0047 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 06 04.15015    2461195.65015    12.79    17:38:50.13 -14:45:21.2   9439 0532   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-03_CI_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_223638_TTUQ1b1x1_3168689_dIzQJw3L/fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_22-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0047.fits **** FOUND 17:38:50.15 -14:45:22.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 86270_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_22-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0047 The candidate 86270_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_22-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0047 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 06 04.14963    2461195.64963    13.06    17:34:50.05 -12:14:47.6   8774 2038   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-03_CI_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_223638_TTUQ1b1x1_3168689_dIzQJw3L/fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_22-35-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0046.fits Discovery image 2   2026 06 04.15015    2461195.65015    13.02    17:34:50.17 -12:14:50.3   8779 2042   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-03_CI_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_223638_TTUQ1b1x1_3168689_dIzQJw3L/fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_22-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0047.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 86288_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_22-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0047 The candidate 86288_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_22-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0047 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 06 04.15015    2461195.65015    13.32    16:55:44.09 -06:07:19.3   2751 5410   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-03_CI_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_223638_TTUQ1b1x1_3168689_dIzQJw3L/fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_22-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0047.fits **** FOUND 16:55:44.10 -06:07:19.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 86322_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_22-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0047 The candidate 86322_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_22-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0047 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 06 04.15015    2461195.65015    13.18    16:59:54.39 -13:00:44.4   3657 1305   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-03_CI_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_223638_TTUQ1b1x1_3168689_dIzQJw3L/fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_22-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0047.fits **** FOUND 16:59:54.35 -13:00:44.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 86340_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_22-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0047 The candidate 86340_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_22-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0047 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 06 04.15015    2461195.65015    13.60    16:59:34.28 -08:21:50.6   3419 4096   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-03_CI_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_223638_TTUQ1b1x1_3168689_dIzQJw3L/fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_22-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0047.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.3") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 86349_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_22-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0047 The candidate 86349_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_22-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0047 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 06 04.15015    2461195.65015    13.36    16:47:40.68 -09:15:28.2   1684 3431   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-03_CI_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_223638_TTUQ1b1x1_3168689_dIzQJw3L/fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_22-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0047.fits **** FOUND 16:47:40.71 -09:15:28.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 86367_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_22-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0047 The candidate 86367_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_22-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0047 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 06 04.15015    2461195.65015    13.13    16:52:05.55 -08:52:07.3   2327 3715   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-03_CI_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_223638_TTUQ1b1x1_3168689_dIzQJw3L/fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_22-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0047.fits **** FOUND 16:52:05.56 -08:52:06.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 86378_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_22-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0047 The candidate 86378_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_22-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0047 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 06 04.15015    2461195.65015    13.19    17:28:54.51 -15:02:46.2   7975 0308   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-03_CI_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_223638_TTUQ1b1x1_3168689_dIzQJw3L/fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_22-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0047.fits **** FOUND 17:28:54.44 -15:02:48.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 86425_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_22-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0047 The candidate 86425_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_22-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0047 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 06 04.15015    2461195.65015    13.43    17:30:57.35 -07:56:21.1   8087 4625   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-03_CI_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_223638_TTUQ1b1x1_3168689_dIzQJw3L/fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_22-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0047.fits **** FOUND 17:30:57.32 -07:56:21.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 86595_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_22-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0047 The candidate 86595_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_22-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0047 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 06 04.15015    2461195.65015    13.70    17:08:19.56 -05:18:09.1   4608 6027   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-03_CI_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_223638_TTUQ1b1x1_3168689_dIzQJw3L/fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_22-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0047.fits **** FOUND 17:08:19.62 -05:18:10.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 86604_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_22-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0047 The candidate 86604_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_22-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0047 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 06 04.15015    2461195.65015    13.35    17:07:29.51 -12:43:39.9   4758 1551   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-03_CI_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_223638_TTUQ1b1x1_3168689_dIzQJw3L/fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_22-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0047.fits **** FOUND 17:07:29.50 -12:43:40.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 86617_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_22-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0047 The candidate 86617_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_22-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0047 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 06 04.15015    2461195.65015    13.14    17:18:04.30 -12:21:10.4   6298 1867   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-03_CI_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_223638_TTUQ1b1x1_3168689_dIzQJw3L/fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_22-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0047.fits **** FOUND 17:18:04.29 -12:21:10.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 86665_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_22-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0047 The candidate 86665_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_22-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0047 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 06 04.15015    2461195.65015    13.66    16:55:06.92 -05:56:32.1   2650 5512   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-03_CI_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_223638_TTUQ1b1x1_3168689_dIzQJw3L/fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_22-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0047.fits **** FOUND 16:55:07.05 -05:56:33.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 86750_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_22-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0047 The candidate 86750_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_22-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0047 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 06 04.14963    2461195.64963    13.61    16:46:01.66 -08:47:14.4   1409 3690   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-03_CI_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_223638_TTUQ1b1x1_3168689_dIzQJw3L/fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_22-35-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0046.fits Discovery image 2   2026 06 04.15015    2461195.65015    13.62    16:46:01.83 -08:47:13.5   1415 3696   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-03_CI_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_223638_TTUQ1b1x1_3168689_dIzQJw3L/fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_22-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0047.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 86773_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_22-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0047 The candidate 86773_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_22-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0047 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 06 04.15015    2461195.65015    13.90    17:03:49.50 -09:23:17.5   4092 3523   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-03_CI_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_223638_TTUQ1b1x1_3168689_dIzQJw3L/fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_22-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0047.fits **** FOUND 17:03:49.55 -09:23:17.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 86781_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_22-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0047 The candidate 86781_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_22-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0047 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 06 04.14963    2461195.64963    13.67    17:21:39.77 -11:02:15.1   6781 2681   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-03_CI_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_223638_TTUQ1b1x1_3168689_dIzQJw3L/fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_22-35-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0046.fits Discovery image 2   2026 06 04.15015    2461195.65015    13.67    17:21:39.88 -11:02:13.0   6787 2687   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-03_CI_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_223638_TTUQ1b1x1_3168689_dIzQJw3L/fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_22-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0047.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 87113_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_22-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0047 The candidate 87113_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_22-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0047 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 06 04.15015    2461195.65015    14.01    17:09:54.47 -06:37:24.2   4893 5243   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-03_CI_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_223638_TTUQ1b1x1_3168689_dIzQJw3L/fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_22-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0047.fits **** FOUND 17:09:54.53 -06:37:23.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 87338_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_22-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0047 The candidate 87338_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_22-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0047 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 06 04.14963    2461195.64963    14.49    17:11:02.01 -06:39:12.0   5057 5230   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-03_CI_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_223638_TTUQ1b1x1_3168689_dIzQJw3L/fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_22-35-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0046.fits Discovery image 2   2026 06 04.15015    2461195.65015    14.50    17:11:01.99 -06:39:11.6   5062 5235   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-03_CI_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_223638_TTUQ1b1x1_3168689_dIzQJw3L/fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_22-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0047.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 31298_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_22-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0047 The candidate 31298_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_22-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0047 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 3   2026 06 04.15015    2461195.65015    12.92    17:04:04.82 -11:28:34.1   4210 2272   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-03_CI_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_223638_TTUQ1b1x1_3168689_dIzQJw3L/fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_22-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0047.fits **** FOUND 17:04:04.81 -11:28:34.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 04858_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_22-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0047 The candidate 04858_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_22-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0047 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 3   2026 06 04.15015    2461195.65015    12.30    17:26:45.76 -14:35:24.7   7646 0573   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-03_CI_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_223638_TTUQ1b1x1_3168689_dIzQJw3L/fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_22-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0047.fits **** FOUND 17:26:45.78 -14:35:25.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 07280_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_22-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0047 The candidate 07280_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_22-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0047 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 3   2026 06 04.15015    2461195.65015    12.01    17:26:07.61 -14:16:58.7   7543 0756   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-03_CI_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_223638_TTUQ1b1x1_3168689_dIzQJw3L/fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_22-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0047.fits **** FOUND 17:26:07.62 -14:16:58.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 20975_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_22-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0047 The candidate 20975_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_22-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0047 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 3   2026 06 04.15015    2461195.65015    12.82    17:11:20.11 -12:40:05.9   5319 1622   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-03_CI_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_223638_TTUQ1b1x1_3168689_dIzQJw3L/fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_22-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0047.fits **** FOUND 17:11:20.10 -12:40:06.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 37287_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_22-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0047 The candidate 37287_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_22-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0047 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 06 04.15015    2461195.65015    13.43    17:25:01.74 -10:38:53.7   7274 2946   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-03_CI_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_223638_TTUQ1b1x1_3168689_dIzQJw3L/fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_22-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0047.fits **** FOUND 17:25:01.75 -10:38:53.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 41543_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_22-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0047 The candidate 41543_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_22-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0047 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 06 04.15015    2461195.65015    12.75    17:28:32.74 -10:00:48.8   7780 3354   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-03_CI_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_223638_TTUQ1b1x1_3168689_dIzQJw3L/fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-03_22-36-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0047.fits **** FOUND 17:28:32.71 -10:00:49.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 1s make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 8s Prepared the HTML report for the field Oph-05-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL *------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------* #### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt #### 17:04:24.57 -11:10:33.8 ########### Completed Oph-05-Q1b1x1 ########### The analysis was running at tau We are allowed to update the exclusion list at tau host Found ../exclusion_list_TTUQ1.txt #### The exclusion list before filtering-out asteroids, bad pixels and adding Gaia sources #### 17:04:24.57 -11:10:33.8 ################################################################################### 17:04:24.57 -11:10:33.8 -- asteroid (will NOT add it to exclusion list) renamed 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt_noasteroids' -> 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt' renamed 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt_nohotpixels' -> 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt' # Count candidates with no identification (that also don't look like hot pix) Found 0 unidentified candidates (excluding asteroids, hot pixels and known variable stars). ################################################################################### 0 candidates found (excluding asteroids and hot pixels) This does not look like a test run ################################################################################### exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt NOT FOUND exclusion_list_apass.txt NOT FOUND IS_THIS_TEST_RUN=NO ALLOW_EXCLUSION_LIST_UPDATE= YES #### Nothing to add to the exclusion list #### The observatory MPC code is V36 ############################################################ Positions of planets computed with util/planet_finder/main.py for JD(UT)2461195.64962646 -observatory V36 06:17:32.23 +25:31:08.1 Mercury (-0.2mag) 07:22:20.75 +24:04:46.4 Venus (-4.0mag) 02:37:53.35 +14:46:49.8 Mars (1.3mag) 07:45:06.47 +21:39:41.1 Jupiter (-1.9mag) 00:48:11.14 +02:42:08.7 Saturn (0.9mag) 03:59:14.40 +20:22:40.2 Uranus (5.8mag) 00:15:53.42 +00:15:23.4 Neptune (7.8mag) 20:33:34.03 -23:03:04.1 Pluto (14.5mag) 19:51:37.03 -24:40:36.2 Moon (-11.6mag) -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 363 Jun 3 22:38 planets.txt ############################################################ Positions of selected moons from JPL HORIZONS for JD(UT)2461195.64962646: 07:45:00.87 +21:39:57.1 Io (6.0mag) 07:44:58.92 +21:40:04.8 Europa (6.2mag) 07:45:22.80 +21:38:56.3 Ganymede (5.6mag) 07:45:33.91 +21:38:26.3 Callisto (6.8mag) 07:45:38.55 +21:15:47.6 Himalia (15.6mag) 07:45:11.14 +21:39:26.8 Thebe (16.5mag) 07:45:44.52 +21:33:02.5 Elara (17.5mag) 07:47:04.35 +21:53:35.0 Pasiphae (17.7mag) 07:51:51.97 +21:41:06.0 Carme (18.8mag) 00:48:06.97 +02:42:38.4 Titan (8.7mag) 00:48:06.92 +02:42:16.8 Rhea (10.0mag) 00:48:43.82 +02:43:48.0 Iapetus (11.4mag) 00:47:59.14 +02:42:19.6 Hyperion (14.7mag) 00:48:58.30 +02:44:40.0 Phoebe (16.7mag) -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 569 Jun 3 22:38 moons.txt ############################################################ Positions of selected spacecraft from JPL HORIZONS for JD(UT)2461195.64962646: 17:24:43.33 -34:48:24.7 JWST 18:13:15.25 +32:03:42.7 Chandra 18:19:28.11 -30:45:50.4 XMM-Newton -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 96 Jun 3 22:38 spacecraft.txt ############################################################ Positions of bright comets computed with util/comet_finder/main.py for JD(UT)2461195.64962646 -observatory V36 18:46:09.34 -32:21:10.7 13.6mag P/2010 H2 (Vales) 05:49:30.52 -68:06:47.5 17.4mag C/2014 UN271 (Bernardinelli-Bernstein) 05:47:34.60 +31:54:58.9 17.5mag C/2017 K2 (PANSTARRS) 17:16:21.11 +15:08:02.9 17.8mag C/2021 G2 (ATLAS) 20:37:11.55 -50:56:35.9 17.3mag P/2021 N1 (ZTF) 23:13:25.71 +31:25:56.1 17.2mag C/2022 E2 (ATLAS) 05:29:04.29 +26:56:51.5 16.4mag C/2022 N2 (PANSTARRS) 09:26:52.61 +31:13:10.5 16.6mag C/2022 QE78 (ATLAS) 08:48:25.29 +03:43:44.6 17.7mag C/2022 R6 (PANSTARRS) 18:30:49.76 +21:30:35.3 17.7mag C/2023 A3 (Tsuchinshan-ATLAS) 15:20:52.24 -11:00:27.6 17.6mag P/2023 B1 (PANSTARRS) 22:15:30.26 +66:16:21.4 17.7mag C/2023 H5 (Lemmon) 17:56:16.16 -06:18:18.7 13.7mag C/2023 R1 (PANSTARRS) 13:21:15.74 +83:54:01.3 17.9mag C/2023 X2 (Lemmon) 07:04:54.39 +64:10:44.3 17.6mag C/2024 A1 (ATLAS) 06:41:03.97 +27:27:14.3 13.5mag C/2024 E1 (Wierzchos) 15:40:30.48 +13:09:14.8 17.4mag C/2024 G6 (ATLAS) 20:15:31.89 +29:55:10.1 14.0mag C/2024 J3 (ATLAS) 04:13:58.02 -16:19:02.5 16.0mag C/2024 T5 (ATLAS) 06:02:07.33 +35:12:02.5 17.9mag C/2025 J1 (Borisov) 11:37:16.06 +52:58:07.4 17.3mag C/2025 L1 (ATLAS) 06:39:40.39 -10:41:02.7 13.7mag C/2025 R3 (PANSTARRS) 09:20:57.65 +23:23:02.0 18.0mag C/2025 V2 (Rankin) 12:39:53.74 +04:41:33.5 17.2mag C/2025 Y1 (ATLAS) 18:18:39.01 +74:12:47.7 18.0mag C/2026 A2 (Bok) 01:53:27.01 +43:07:00.1 16.0mag C/2026 B2 (Sun-Gao) 11:10:39.41 -05:13:28.9 16.4mag A/2026 E1 20:16:15.34 -08:20:06.3 8.9mag 10P/Tempel 11:01:08.04 -00:55:07.6 16.0mag 29P/Schwassmann-Wachmann 10:57:45.32 -02:40:49.8 17.9mag 43P/Wolf-Harrington 03:05:26.58 +25:05:50.0 17.6mag 47P/Ashbrook-Jackson 08:51:20.98 +24:54:45.5 16.9mag 63P/Wild 00:23:21.55 -06:38:24.4 15.7mag 65P/Gunn 06:30:21.17 +32:58:44.8 16.8mag 76P/West-Kohoutek-Ikemura 02:59:25.45 +16:40:58.8 13.9mag 78P/Gehrels 01:11:49.82 +03:56:54.3 15.5mag 88P/Howell 04:41:36.12 +29:57:37.7 15.2mag 93P/Lovas 02:31:38.10 +26:57:26.7 17.7mag 114P/Wiseman-Skiff 06:40:56.69 +33:09:57.4 15.6mag 123P/West-Hartley 09:43:11.03 +16:22:34.1 16.5mag 124P/Mrkos 03:52:21.66 +18:58:14.5 16.4mag 128P/Shoemaker-Holt 04:25:30.10 +18:53:05.7 17.7mag 131P/Mueller 05:40:33.57 +19:05:05.8 14.1mag 141P/Machholz 05:43:03.88 +17:24:17.2 14.1mag 141P-A/Machholz 04:33:28.66 +15:33:02.9 11.2mag 141P-D/Machholz 02:54:47.30 -25:16:34.5 17.0mag 161P/Hartley-IRAS 03:28:21.89 +22:08:57.1 14.9mag 162P/SidingSpring 19:36:37.61 +00:34:50.3 17.1mag 169P/NEAT 00:07:23.57 +01:39:29.4 17.9mag 220P/McNaught 16:55:19.56 -08:41:57.7 16.3mag 235P/LINEAR 07:25:29.16 +35:38:37.8 17.5mag 240P/NEAT 00:21:46.37 -04:09:55.5 16.5mag 260P/McNaught 03:53:20.88 +31:43:31.0 17.6mag 295P/LINEAR 23:24:06.03 -15:07:52.9 17.6mag 320P/McNaught 15:17:07.91 +08:13:12.0 17.4mag 391P/Kowalski 08:03:57.52 +20:50:50.2 17.9mag 450P/LONEOS 06:53:22.31 +41:58:50.0 17.8mag 493P/LONEOS -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 2.8K Jun 3 22:38 comets.txt ############################################################ List of recent ASAS-SN transients from https://www.astronomy.ohio-state.edu/asassn/transients.html : 20:07:38.15 -21:07:05.40 SN2026mho 2026-05-25.18 -1.12 11:29:42.55 +79:01:03.10 AT2026min 2026-05-24.21 16.63 11:44:32.95 -68:48:30.00 ASASSN-26no 2026-05-24 8.41 19:00:42.82 -48:31:01.60 ASASSN-26dp 2026-05-22.31 -3.28 14:23:56.59 -58:37:47.40 ASASSN-26dn 2026-05-20.01 14.59 11:24:54.06 +47:57:01.60 AT2026nma 2026-05-20.29 15.46 21:27:08.58 +33:24:38.10 AT2026lli 2026-05-19.34 15.86 00:31:01.41 -13:38:51.70 AT2026nad 2026-05-19.39 15.34 15:16:06.61 -79:16:32.40 ASASSN-26dm 2026-05-19.03 14.44 11:24:25.21 -59:23:19.10 ASASSN-26dl 2026-05-18.02 13.55 13:45:51.52 -53:16:01.00 ASASSN-26dk 2026-05-18.16 12.96 02:05:49.69 -30:29:09.60 ASASSN-26dh 2026-05-18.43 15.37 17:50:22.87 -39:42:33.90 ASASSN-26dj 2026-05-17.05 15.7 01:13:11.60 -33:25:16.10 ASASSN-26dg 2026-05-13.41 16.8 16:44:31.77 -27:15:18.40 AT2026mhn 2026-05-12.33 15.8 09:46:31.08 -33:41:51.00 ASASSN-26di 2026-05-12.14 14.63 21:23:11.57 -19:09:45.00 AT2026kwu 2026-05-12.26 16.9 14:20:14.30 -30:20:51.90 AT2026ktm 2026-05-12.06 17.21 14:41:39.01 -37:13:46.40 AT2026lkm 2026-05-11.18 16.89 12:59:50.45 -10:58:38.80 SN2026kep 2026-05-9.06 17.5 13:37:29.61 -29:50:30.90 AT2026lkd 2026-05-9.09 17.23 09:46:42.01 -14:52:03.60 SN2026kmo 2026-05-8.99 17.51 15:03:05.28 +22:02:03.40 AT2026lxf 2026-05-8.07 13.88 10:23:49.41 -20:57:25.30 ASASSN-26df 2026-05-8.21 16.52 22:14:40.56 +05:04:51.60 2026lda 2026-05-7.56 16.2 21:35:33.81 -14:05:16.30 ASASSN-26de 2026-05-6.29 14.51 16:21:48.82 -61:36:13.20 ASASSN-26dd 2026-05-5.21 15.15 14:26:40.22 -24:48:37.50 AT2026lig 2026-05-4.27 14.63 13:17:51.04 +30:25:13.50 SN2026kcp 2026-05-4.46 16.43 11:27:55.57 -13:38:56.90 SN2026kza 2026-05-1.08 15.59 22:28:27.10 +30:17:54.30 SN 2026fov 2026-04-29.6 14.36 21:00:10.71 -32:17:03.90 AT2026kis 2026-04-27.36 16.15 14:32:57.37 -58:13:26.40 ASASSN-26dc 2026-04-27.27 13.42 15:32:05.35 -43:54:34.60 ASASSN-26db 2026-04-27.37 16.06 16:34:34.97 -54:34:58.00 ASASSN-26da 2026-04-25.32 16.11 10:06:55.04 -01:13:49.70 SN2026jsg 2026-04-24.99 16.28 15:15:57.17 +56:18:32.80 SN2026kid 2026-04-24.52 -3.65 07:58:28.45 +57:03:42.40 AT2026kcf 2026-04-24.2 16.89 11:38:21.80 -50:43:06.50 SN2026jkb 2026-04-24.24 15.38 10:06:11.41 -39:41:04.20 AT2026dil 2026-04-24.2 16.85 14:21:40.08 +13:13:46.30 SN2026jlm 2026-04-22.16 15.12 10:53:55.52 -16:06:06.00 ASASSN-26cz 2026-04-22.28 16.29 20:07:38.15 -21:07:05.40 2026-05-25.18 -1.12 13:45:02.03 +15:17:14.50 ASASSN-26cy 2026-04-21.27 15.78 13:20:52.22 -35:57:03.60 AT2026jcm 2026-04-19.01 16.65 13:36:15.66 -36:53:48.40 SN 2026iqy 2026-04-18.92 17.31 06:34:01.33 -40:07:34.00 ASASSN-26cx 2026-04-19.07 16.16 23:33:57.97 -45:12:11.90 SN 2026idu 2026-04-19.41 15.9 12:10:50.92 +66:55:31.20 SN 2026icv 2026-04-17.14 16.03 21:36:59.06 -60:43:35.90 ASASSN-26cv 2026-04-17.35 -1.18 08:13:26.26 -27:07:30.50 ASASSN-26cw 2026-04-17.07 -1.01 14:49:14.13 -27:29:20.60 ASASSN-26cu 2026-04-16.06 14.03 17:21:59.44 -38:54:04.60 ASASSN-26ct 2026-04-14.4 15.15 15:25:54.99 +07:49:24.50 SN2026huo 2026-04-12.14 16.96 20:07:38.15 -21:07:05.40 2026-05-25.18 -1.12 12:23:20.40 +04:53:39.10 AT2026ixd 2026-04-12.14 17.65 17:46:09.76 -61:19:50.40 SN2026icy 2026-04-12.2 17.03 09:25:46.42 +02:13:46.30 SN2026gud 2026-04-11.98 16.49 16:52:15.46 -60:27:45.90 ASASSN-26cs 2026-04-12.4 15.5 04:20:55.37 -51:15:31.10 ASASSN-26cr 2026-04-12.01 15.37 22:25:39.35 +36:45:06.90 AT2026ihl 2026-04-10.48 14.21 19:40:44.94 +00:41:03.80 AT2026imw 2026-04-10.32 16.06 19:52:04.70 +05:53:33.50 ASASSN-26cq 2026-04-9.31 14.98 16:08:18.39 -64:11:08.80 ASASSN-26cp 2026-04-9.29 13.32 09:22:22.90 -61:02:43.70 SN2026idh 2026-04-7.97 16.34 05:06:54.12 -19:42:26.40 AT2026imr 2026-04-8 17.49 07:14:55.34 -36:03:21.40 AT2026hei 2026-04-8.12 16.7 21:35:33.14 -19:01:34.80 AT2026ihm 2026-04-8.36 16.7 04:28:24.08 -32:25:35.30 AT2026imo 2026-04-8.02 16.81 05:10:35.79 -39:38:40.80 SN 2026hnn 2026-04-7.04 17.07 09:54:32.04 -01:17:25.80 ASASSN-26cn 2026-04-7.01 15.58 07:46:24.43 -77:29:35.90 ASASSN-26co 2026-04-7.15 14.93 05:00:45.52 -29:51:06.20 AT2026hvw 2026-04-6.03 16.51 19:49:33.10 -23:37:11.00 ASASSN-26cl 2026-04-5.29 14.98 19:32:43.55 -22:39:33.40 ASASSN-26cm 2026-04-4.3 13.88 18:08:57.38 +76:48:23.60 ASASSN-26ck 2026-04-2.37 15.38 16:16:36.10 +44:52:30.20 AT2026hyy 2026-04-2.58 13.81 21:55:23.31 -34:48:53.90 ASASSN-26cj 2026-03-30.4 -1.47 11:19:50.70 -27:51:49.80 SN2026gvk 2026-03-30 15.48 11:53:57.02 -23:09:46.20 SN2026gzx 2026-03-28.75 15.27 07:13:46.14 -33:10:15.70 ASASSN-26ci 2026-03-28.15 15.14 09:03:36.09 -67:58:13.00 SN2026hkg 2026-03-28.19 15.82 07:03:00.72 +39:14:43.00 SN2026fin 2026-03-28.27 15.82 05:35:42.80 -63:44:05.50 ASASSN-26ch 2026-03-27.86 13.02 11:23:19.04 +34:22:38.00 SN2026fwt 2026-03-27.3 16.56 19:03:49.79 +37:04:05.20 ASASSN-26ce 2026-03-26.56 16.3 20:26:56.07 -52:54:06.50 AT2026hiy 2026-03-26.35 16.95 05:25:54.76 -30:15:35.80 ASASSN-26cg 2026-03-25.07 16.88 06:57:16.49 -26:54:37.20 SN2026fzb 2026-03-25.14 15.8 14:37:38.23 -43:00:52.30 ASASSN-26cd 2026-03-24.24 12.52 17:34:53.03 +06:04:29.70 AT2026gzl 2026-03-23.27 15.82 08:30:02.60 -35:12:47.50 ASASSN-26cf 2026-03-23.2 14.82 16:54:25.33 +37:49:56.60 SN 2026evz 2026-03-21.32 17.54 17:06:19.20 -18:54:19.50 ASASSN-26bx 2026-03-21.25 16.39 19:01:16.28 -29:29:23.10 ASASSN-26bw 2026-03-21.33 15.81 08:46:05.75 +10:47:39.80 ASASSN-26ca 2026-03-21.13 14.27 12:14:58.16 +63:47:16.20 SN 2026fvx 2026-03-21.12 15.6 18:02:55.90 -75:23:02.60 ASASSN-26bz 2026-03-21.32 16.16 12:16:02.88 -53:16:33.80 ASASSN-26cc 2026-03-20.04 15.48 13:08:21.85 +29:13:44.20 SN 2026fmh 2026-03-20.16 -0.33 -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 5.6K Jun 3 22:38 asassn_transients_list.txt ############################################################ Truncated list of TOCP transients from http://www.cbat.eps.harvard.edu/unconf/tocp.html : 17:57:19.56 -28:08:14.7 TCP J17571956-2808147 2026-03-19.7972 14.5mag 08:46:05.73 +10:47:39.7 TCP J08460573+1047397 2026-03-21.1936 14.5mag 09:55:38.83 +69:05:21.7 PNV J09553883+6905217 2026-04-01.893 19.4mag 19:32:43.67 -22:39:30.7 TCP J19324367-2239307 2026-04-05.4395 13.6mag 16:16:36.03 +44:52:28.9 TCP J16163603+4452289 2026-04-05.6655 14.2mag 00:43:38.36 +41:15:32.4 PNV J00433836+4115324 2026-04-08.079 17.2mag 15:41:11.68 +59:18:26.8 TCP J15411168+5918268 2026-04-12.9625 19.2mag 00:43:35.02 +41:46:28.0 PNV J00433502+4146280 2026-04-23.056 15.9mag 00:42:55.64 +41:14:12.2 PNV J00425564+4114122 2026-04-24.042 16.2mag 21:14:03.38 +56:46:44.1 TCP J21140338+5646441 2026-05-05.3534 16.7mag 15:03:05.19 +22:02:04.1 TCP J15030519+2202041 2026-05-08.3260 13.9mag 07:15:18.25 +47:53:16.7 TCP J07151825+4753167 2026-05-09.1599 14.4mag 16:00:18.44 -22:30:10.6 TCP J16001844-2230106 2026-05-09.6135 13.3mag 00:42:47.45 +41:16:58.5 PNV J00424745+4116585 2026-05-10.030 16.8mag 09:55:02.89 +69:02:13.8 PNV J09550289+6902138 2026-05-18.925 20.7mag 00:43:01.82 +41:18:16.6 PNV J00430182+4118166 2026-05-21.8651 18.83Cmag 00:42:51.20 +41:16:59.4 PNV J00425120+4116594 2022-10-26.135 19.3mag 12:24:25.10 +28:47:12.0 TCP J12242510+2847120 2026-05-31.6015 14.8mag 00:56:07.13 +43:01:40.6 TCP J00560713+4301406 2026-06-01.4135 12.2mag 00:42:41.64 +41:15:16.2 PNV J00424164+4115162 2026-06-02.029 17.4mag -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 189K Jun 3 22:38 tocp_transients_list.txt ############################################################ Truncated list of recent TNS transients from https://www.wis-tns.org/ : 00:31:41.797 +26:10:30.85 AT 2026nll 2026-05-23.48 19.3138 16:14:03.050 +15:19:38.66 AT 2026nlk 2026-05-16.86 20.93 18:17:15.360 +39:41:22.36 AT 2026nlj 2026-05-10.79 21.53 18:22:21.260 +38:36:15.52 AT 2026nli 2026-05-10.79 21.62 16:23:29.410 +22:48:47.18 AT 2026nlh 2026-05-09.79 20.01 15:19:37.260 +16:28:58.23 AT 2026nlg 2026-05-05.84 20.81 14:31:09.520 +24:03:04.31 AT 2026nlf 2026-04-30.86 19.85 15:33:35.050 +31:50:53.87 AT 2026nle 2026-04-19.90 20.71 15:15:31.740 +19:01:13.96 AT 2026nld 2026-04-19.89 20.52 14:33:02.080 +03:34:42.30 AT 2026nlc 2026-05-21.70 21.81 14:21:55.000 -01:06:15.74 AT 2026nlb 2026-05-21.70 21.58 14:21:48.580 +02:02:28.28 AT 2026nla 2026-05-21.70 21.97 14:34:15.890 +04:48:10.98 AT 2026nkz 2026-05-21.66 22.11 13:25:52.490 +02:32:04.69 AT 2026nky 2026-05-21.62 21.92 14:32:53.700 -01:18:51.32 AT 2026nkx 2026-05-19.69 22.26 14:01:03.970 +01:30:28.51 AT 2026nkw 2026-05-19.68 21.5 13:50:18.270 +05:00:57.62 AT 2026nkv 2026-05-19.68 22.37 13:28:37.740 -02:21:55.36 AT 2026nku 2026-05-19.67 21.73 13:17:47.380 -01:03:07.48 AT 2026nkt 2026-05-19.67 21.91 14:17:17.810 +03:27:44.75 AT 2026nks 2026-05-17.66 22.82 -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 30K Jun 3 22:38 tns_transients_list.txt

Profiling:

CPU temperature: 90 C