NMW transient search results

This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_LMi-02-Q1b1x1_223114_TTUQ1b1x1_3779705_grIgYIvQ

The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.

Processing fields LMi-02-Q1b1x1

Processing complete!

Total number of candidates identified: 0

Processing log:

Filtering log:

######## Processing parameters ########
AAVSO_COMMENT_STRING= NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
ASTCHECK_ASTEROID_SEARCH_RADIUS_ARCSEC= 
BAD_REGION_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst
CAMERA_SETTINGS= TTUQ1b1x1
CHECK_POINTING_ACCURACY= yes
DARK_FRAMES_DIR_OR_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks
EXCLUSION_LIST= ../exclusion_list_TTUQ1.txt
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MAX_APERTURE_STAR_SIZE_PIX= 12.5
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MAX_ELONGATION_AminusB_PIX= 0.55
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MIN_APERTURE_STAR_SIZE_PIX= 2.0
FILTER_BRIGHT_MAG_CUTOFF_TRANSIENT_SEARCH= -5
FILTER_FAINT_MAG_CUTOFF_TRANSIENT_SEARCH= 15.0
FLAT_FIELD_DIR_OR_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats
FRAME_EDGE_OFFSET_PIX= 100
GAIA_BAND_FOR_CATALOGED_SOURCE_CHECK= 
MAX_NEW_TO_REF_MEAN_IMG_VALUE_RATIO= 100
MAX_NEW_IMG_MEAN_VALUE= 25000
MAX_SD_RATIO_OF_SECOND_EPOCH_IMGS= 0.18
MAX_SD_RATIO_OF_SECOND_EPOCH_IMGS_SOFT_LIMIT= 0.12
MPC_CODE= V36
NMW_CALIBRATION= /var/www/nmw_calibration
NUMBER_OF_DETECTED_TRANSIENTS_BEFORE_FILTERING_HARD_LIMIT= 8000
NUMBER_OF_DETECTED_TRANSIENTS_BEFORE_FILTERING_SOFT_LIMIT= 4000
OMP_NUM_THREADS= 
ONLINE_MPCHECKER_BUTTON_ASTEROID_SEARCH_RADIUS_ARCMIN= 
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION= 
REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES= yes
SEXTRACTOR_CONFIG_BRIGHTSTARPASS= default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
SEXTRACTOR_CONFIG_FILES= default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
STARMATCH_RADIUS_PIX= 3.5
SYSREM_ITERATIONS= 0
TELESCOP= 
TELESCOP_NAME_KNOWN_TO_VaST_FOR_FOV_DETERMINATION= 
UCAC5_PLATESOLVE_ITERATIONS= 2
FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE= no
#######################################
HOSTNAME= tau
USER= 
HOME= 
#######################################
SExtractor catalog cache: enabled, directory /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/vast_sextractor_cache
Reference image directory is set to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs
VIZIER_SITE=vizier.cds.unistra.fr
GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=vizquery (lib/vizquery -> VizieR vizier.cds.unistra.fr)
INFO: MAKE_PNG_PLOTS is set to yes
FITS_FILE_EXT=fits
CALIBRATION_STATUS_PREFIX=
Fields in the data directory: 
LMi-02-Q1b1x1
#######################################
########### Starting LMi-02-Q1b1x1 ###########
Processing LMi-02-Q1b1x1
server tau has sufficient free disk space available: 582130 MB at /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir
server tau has sufficient free disk space available: 582130 MB at .
Checking input images (2 new)
REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE= /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/LMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_01-26-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0335.fits
REFERENCE_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE= /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/LMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_01-27-03_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0336.fits
Small preview (one of the new images): 
Large previews of the second-epoch (new) images:
MAKE_PNG_PLOTS=yes
renamed 'LMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_22-26-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0052.png' -> 'transient_report/LMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_22-26-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0052.fits_preview.png'
LMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_22-26-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0052.fits

renamed 'LMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_22-27-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0053.png' -> 'transient_report/LMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_22-27-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0053.fits_preview.png'
LMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_22-27-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0053.fits


Read-check the input FITS images... read-check OK Blank image check the input FITS images... blank-image-check OK Read date check the input FITS images... read-date-check OK Mean value check the input FITS images... OK, at least two new images have mean values below the threshold. ---------------------------------------------- INFO: REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 450.0666 INFO: REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_SD= 486.9298 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 1681.1907 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_SD= 415.4636 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 1646.8041 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE_SD= 398.0711 ---------------------------------------------- INFO: ref_to_second_epoch_img_mean_ratio= 3.73543 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__SD_ratio= 0.044 ---------------------------------------------- Calibration settings: DARK_FRAMES_DIR_OR_FILE=/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks FLAT_FIELD_DIR_OR_FILE=/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration SET-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint CCD-TEMP= -0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature FOCTEMP = 29.2999992370605 / [degC] Focuser temperature AMBTEMP = 28.1 / [degC] Ambient air temperature Exploring image header: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_LMi-02-Q1b1x1_223114_TTUQ1b1x1_3779705_grIgYIvQ/LMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_22-26-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0052.fits CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_LMi-02-Q1b1x1_223114_TTUQ1b1x1_3779705_grIgYIvQ/LMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_22-26-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0052.fits SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_LMi-02-Q1b1x1_223114_TTUQ1b1x1_3779705_grIgYIvQ/LMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_22-26-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0052.fits Header: 74 keys total, 33 keys left Record 0: "" status=0 Record 1: "SIMPLE = T / C# FITS" status=0 Record 2: "BITPIX = 16" status=0 Record 3: "NAXIS = 2 / Dimensionality" status=0 Record 4: "NAXIS1 = 9576" status=0 Record 5: "NAXIS2 = 6388" status=0 Record 6: "BZERO = 32768" status=0 Record 7: "EXTEND = T / Extensions are permitted" status=0 Record 8: "IMAGETYP= 'LIGHT' / Type of exposure" status=0 Record 9: "EXPOSURE= 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0 Record 10: "EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0 Record 11: "DATE-LOC= '2026-06-01T22:26:20.0931591' / Time of observation (local)" status=0 Record 12: "DATE-OBS= '2026-06-02T03:26:20.0931591' / Time of observation (UTC)" status=0 Record 13: "MJD-OBS = 61193.1432881136 / Modified Julian Date of observation" status=0 Record 14: "DATE-AVG= '2026-06-02T03:26:29.9933267' / Averaged midpoint time (UTC)" status=0 Record 15: "MJD-AVG = 61193.1434026966 / Modified Julian Date of averaged midpoint" status=0 Record 16: "XBINNING= 1 / X axis binning factor" status=0 Record 17: "YBINNING= 1 / Y axis binning factor" status=0 Record 18: "GAIN = 30 / Sensor gain" status=0 Record 19: "OFFSET = 30 / Sensor gain offset" status=0 Record 20: "XPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel X axis size" status=0 Record 21: "YPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel Y axis size" status=0 Record 22: "INSTRUME= 'QHY600M' / Imaging instrument name" status=0 Record 23: "CAMERAID= 'QHY600M-33d3d743814b8b447' / Imaging instrument identifier" status=0 Record 24: "SET-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint" status=0 Record 25: "CCD-TEMP= -0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature" status=0 Record 26: "READOUTM= '2CMS-0' / Sensor readout mode" status=0 Record 27: "USBLIMIT= 50 / Camera-specific USB setting" status=0 Record 28: "TELESCOP= 'QHY600M-TTU1' / Name of telescope" status=0 Record 29: "FOCALLEN= 135.0 / [mm] Focal length" status=0 Record 30: "FOCRATIO= 2.2 / Focal ratio" status=0 Record 31: "RA = 164.99908139306 / [deg] RA of telescope" status=0 Record 32: "DEC = 29.9996372858068 / [deg] Declination of telescope" status=0 Record 33: "CENTALT = 60.1705555555556 / [deg] Altitude of telescope" status=0 Record 34: "CENTAZ = 272.208333333333 / [deg] Azimuth of telescope" status=0 Record 35: "AIRMASS = 1.15228278469746 / Airmass at frame center (Gueymard 1993)" status=0 Record 36: "PIERSIDE= 'East' / Telescope pointing state" status=0 Record 37: "SITEELEV= 1015.0 / [m] Observation site elevation" status=0 Record 38: "SITELAT = 33.7480555555556 / [deg] Observation site latitude" status=0 Record 39: "SITELONG= -101.958333333333 / [deg] Observation site longitude" status=0 Record 40: "OBSERVER= 'Sokolovsky' / Observer name" status=0 Record 41: "OBSERVAT= 'TTU Skyview' / Observatory name" status=0 Record 42: "SITENAME= '' / Observatory site name" status=0 Record 43: "FWHEEL = 'Simulator' / Filter Wheel name" status=0 Record 44: "FILTER = 'CV' / Active filter name" status=0 Record 45: "OBJECT = 'LMi-02' / Name of the object of interest" status=0 Record 46: "OBJCTRA = '11 00 00' / [H M S] RA of imaged object" status=0 Record 47: "OBJCTDEC= '+30 00 00' / [D M S] Declination of imaged object" status=0 Record 48: "OBJCTROT= 0.0 / [deg] planned rotation of imaged object" status=0 Record 49: "FOCNAME = 'ZWO Focuser' / Focusing equipment name" status=0 Record 50: "FOCPOS = 29451 / [step] Focuser position" status=0 Record 51: "FOCUSPOS= 29451 / [step] Focuser position" status=0 Record 52: "FOCUSSZ = 0.0 / [um] Focuser step size" status=0 Record 53: "FOCTEMP = 29.2999992370605 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0 Record 54: "FOCUSTEM= 29.2999992370605 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0 Record 55: "DEWPOINT= 7.3 / [degC] Dew point" status=0 Record 56: "HUMIDITY= 27.0 / [percent] Relative humidity" status=0 Record 57: "PRESSURE= 900.31 / [hPa] Air pressure" status=0 Record 58: "AMBTEMP = 28.1 / [degC] Ambient air temperature" status=0 Record 59: "WINDDIR = 15.0 / [deg] Wind direction: 0=N, 180=S, 90=E, 270=W" status=0 Record 60: "WINDGUST= 20.201616 / [kph] Wind gust" status=0 Record 61: "WINDSPD = 13.00104 / [kph] Wind speed" status=0 Record 62: "ROWORDER= 'TOP-DOWN' / FITS Image Orientation" status=0 Record 63: "EQUINOX = 2000.0 / Equinox of celestial coordinate system" status=0 Record 64: "SWCREATE= 'N.I.N.A. 3.2.0.9001 (x64)' / Software that created this file" status=0 Record 65: "QHY_EXP = 20.000096 / [s] Actual exposure time" status=0 Record 66: "QHY_PP = 13888.0 / [ps] pixelPeriod" status=0 Record 67: "QHY_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0 Record 68: "GPS_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0 Record 69: "QHY_FP = 20000160.0 / [us] framePeriod" status=0 Record 70: "QHY_CPL = 6120.0 / clocksPerLine" status=0 Record 71: "QHY_LPF = 235295.0 / linesPerFrame" status=0 Record 72: "QHY_AET = 20000096.0 / [us] actualExposureTime" status=0 Record 73: "QHY_LEM = T / isLongExposureMode" status=0 Record 74: "QHY_OFF0= 3767.777 / [us] RollingShutterEndOffset row 0" status=0 Allocating memory for image, dark and result arrays... Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_LMi-02-Q1b1x1_223114_TTUQ1b1x1_3779705_grIgYIvQ/LMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_22-26-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0052.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_LMi-02-Q1b1x1_223114_TTUQ1b1x1_3779705_grIgYIvQ/LMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_22-26-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0052.fits SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_5C_20s_2026-05-30.fit CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_LMi-02-Q1b1x1_223114_TTUQ1b1x1_3779705_grIgYIvQ/LMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_22-26-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0052.fits CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_5C_20s_2026-05-30.fit Reading dark frame /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_5C_20s_2026-05-30.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix Dark frame is subtracted, output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_LMi-02-Q1b1x1_223114_TTUQ1b1x1_3779705_grIgYIvQ/d_LMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_22-26-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0052.fits :) Spent 0.499930 seconds renamed 'mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_5C_20s_2026-05-30.png' -> 'transient_report/dark.png' try_to_calibrate_the_input_frame(): selected flat field /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-05-30.fit from directory /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats MegaDivider v7 Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_LMi-02-Q1b1x1_223114_TTUQ1b1x1_3779705_grIgYIvQ/d_LMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_22-26-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0052.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix Reading flat /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-05-30.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix Avarage count on flat field image: 31267.409145 Minimal real count (from overscan): 5 Output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_LMi-02-Q1b1x1_223114_TTUQ1b1x1_3779705_grIgYIvQ/fd_LMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_22-26-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0052.fits :) No overscan detected - all values seem high! (left_median=21677.0, right_median=21704.0) renamed 'mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-05-30.png' -> 'transient_report/flat.png' Using calibrated image CALIBRATED_SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_LMi-02-Q1b1x1_223114_TTUQ1b1x1_3779705_grIgYIvQ/fd_LMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_22-26-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0052.fits EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration SET-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint CCD-TEMP= -0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature FOCTEMP = 29.2999992370605 / [degC] Focuser temperature AMBTEMP = 28.1 / [degC] Ambient air temperature Exploring image header: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_LMi-02-Q1b1x1_223114_TTUQ1b1x1_3779705_grIgYIvQ/LMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_22-27-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0053.fits CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_LMi-02-Q1b1x1_223114_TTUQ1b1x1_3779705_grIgYIvQ/LMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_22-27-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0053.fits SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_LMi-02-Q1b1x1_223114_TTUQ1b1x1_3779705_grIgYIvQ/LMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_22-27-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0053.fits Header: 74 keys total, 33 keys left Record 0: "" status=0 Record 1: "SIMPLE = T / C# FITS" status=0 Record 2: "BITPIX = 16" status=0 Record 3: "NAXIS = 2 / Dimensionality" status=0 Record 4: "NAXIS1 = 9576" status=0 Record 5: "NAXIS2 = 6388" status=0 Record 6: "BZERO = 32768" status=0 Record 7: "EXTEND = T / Extensions are permitted" status=0 Record 8: "IMAGETYP= 'LIGHT' / Type of exposure" status=0 Record 9: "EXPOSURE= 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0 Record 10: "EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0 Record 11: "DATE-LOC= '2026-06-01T22:27:10.4052368' / Time of observation (local)" status=0 Record 12: "DATE-OBS= '2026-06-02T03:27:10.4052368' / Time of observation (UTC)" status=0 Record 13: "MJD-OBS = 61193.1438704282 / Modified Julian Date of observation" status=0 Record 14: "DATE-AVG= '2026-06-02T03:27:20.3095214' / Averaged midpoint time (UTC)" status=0 Record 15: "MJD-AVG = 61193.1439850577 / Modified Julian Date of averaged midpoint" status=0 Record 16: "XBINNING= 1 / X axis binning factor" status=0 Record 17: "YBINNING= 1 / Y axis binning factor" status=0 Record 18: "GAIN = 30 / Sensor gain" status=0 Record 19: "OFFSET = 30 / Sensor gain offset" status=0 Record 20: "XPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel X axis size" status=0 Record 21: "YPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel Y axis size" status=0 Record 22: "INSTRUME= 'QHY600M' / Imaging instrument name" status=0 Record 23: "CAMERAID= 'QHY600M-33d3d743814b8b447' / Imaging instrument identifier" status=0 Record 24: "SET-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint" status=0 Record 25: "CCD-TEMP= -0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature" status=0 Record 26: "READOUTM= '2CMS-0' / Sensor readout mode" status=0 Record 27: "USBLIMIT= 50 / Camera-specific USB setting" status=0 Record 28: "TELESCOP= 'QHY600M-TTU1' / Name of telescope" status=0 Record 29: "FOCALLEN= 135.0 / [mm] Focal length" status=0 Record 30: "FOCRATIO= 2.2 / Focal ratio" status=0 Record 31: "RA = 164.999081410283 / [deg] RA of telescope" status=0 Record 32: "DEC = 29.999637282494 / [deg] Declination of telescope" status=0 Record 33: "CENTALT = 59.9969444444444 / [deg] Altitude of telescope" status=0 Record 34: "CENTAZ = 272.3125 / [deg] Azimuth of telescope" status=0 Record 35: "AIRMASS = 1.15428875475538 / Airmass at frame center (Gueymard 1993)" status=0 Record 36: "PIERSIDE= 'East' / Telescope pointing state" status=0 Record 37: "SITEELEV= 1015.0 / [m] Observation site elevation" status=0 Record 38: "SITELAT = 33.7480555555556 / [deg] Observation site latitude" status=0 Record 39: "SITELONG= -101.958333333333 / [deg] Observation site longitude" status=0 Record 40: "OBSERVER= 'Sokolovsky' / Observer name" status=0 Record 41: "OBSERVAT= 'TTU Skyview' / Observatory name" status=0 Record 42: "SITENAME= '' / Observatory site name" status=0 Record 43: "FWHEEL = 'Simulator' / Filter Wheel name" status=0 Record 44: "FILTER = 'CV' / Active filter name" status=0 Record 45: "OBJECT = 'LMi-02' / Name of the object of interest" status=0 Record 46: "OBJCTRA = '11 00 00' / [H M S] RA of imaged object" status=0 Record 47: "OBJCTDEC= '+30 00 00' / [D M S] Declination of imaged object" status=0 Record 48: "OBJCTROT= 0.0 / [deg] planned rotation of imaged object" status=0 Record 49: "FOCNAME = 'ZWO Focuser' / Focusing equipment name" status=0 Record 50: "FOCPOS = 29451 / [step] Focuser position" status=0 Record 51: "FOCUSPOS= 29451 / [step] Focuser position" status=0 Record 52: "FOCUSSZ = 0.0 / [um] Focuser step size" status=0 Record 53: "FOCTEMP = 29.2999992370605 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0 Record 54: "FOCUSTEM= 29.2999992370605 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0 Record 55: "DEWPOINT= 7.3 / [degC] Dew point" status=0 Record 56: "HUMIDITY= 27.0 / [percent] Relative humidity" status=0 Record 57: "PRESSURE= 900.31 / [hPa] Air pressure" status=0 Record 58: "AMBTEMP = 28.1 / [degC] Ambient air temperature" status=0 Record 59: "WINDDIR = 15.0 / [deg] Wind direction: 0=N, 180=S, 90=E, 270=W" status=0 Record 60: "WINDGUST= 20.201616 / [kph] Wind gust" status=0 Record 61: "WINDSPD = 13.00104 / [kph] Wind speed" status=0 Record 62: "ROWORDER= 'TOP-DOWN' / FITS Image Orientation" status=0 Record 63: "EQUINOX = 2000.0 / Equinox of celestial coordinate system" status=0 Record 64: "SWCREATE= 'N.I.N.A. 3.2.0.9001 (x64)' / Software that created this file" status=0 Record 65: "QHY_EXP = 20.000096 / [s] Actual exposure time" status=0 Record 66: "QHY_PP = 13888.0 / [ps] pixelPeriod" status=0 Record 67: "QHY_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0 Record 68: "GPS_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0 Record 69: "QHY_FP = 20000160.0 / [us] framePeriod" status=0 Record 70: "QHY_CPL = 6120.0 / clocksPerLine" status=0 Record 71: "QHY_LPF = 235295.0 / linesPerFrame" status=0 Record 72: "QHY_AET = 20000096.0 / [us] actualExposureTime" status=0 Record 73: "QHY_LEM = T / isLongExposureMode" status=0 Record 74: "QHY_OFF0= 3767.777 / [us] RollingShutterEndOffset row 0" status=0 Allocating memory for image, dark and result arrays... Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_LMi-02-Q1b1x1_223114_TTUQ1b1x1_3779705_grIgYIvQ/LMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_22-27-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0053.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_LMi-02-Q1b1x1_223114_TTUQ1b1x1_3779705_grIgYIvQ/LMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_22-27-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0053.fits SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_5C_20s_2026-05-30.fit CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_LMi-02-Q1b1x1_223114_TTUQ1b1x1_3779705_grIgYIvQ/LMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_22-27-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0053.fits CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_5C_20s_2026-05-30.fit Reading dark frame /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_5C_20s_2026-05-30.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix Dark frame is subtracted, output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_LMi-02-Q1b1x1_223114_TTUQ1b1x1_3779705_grIgYIvQ/d_LMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_22-27-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0053.fits :) Spent 0.495867 seconds renamed 'mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_5C_20s_2026-05-30.png' -> 'transient_report/dark.png' try_to_calibrate_the_input_frame(): selected flat field /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-05-30.fit from directory /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats MegaDivider v7 Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_LMi-02-Q1b1x1_223114_TTUQ1b1x1_3779705_grIgYIvQ/d_LMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_22-27-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0053.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix Reading flat /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-05-30.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix Avarage count on flat field image: 31267.409145 Minimal real count (from overscan): 5 Output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_LMi-02-Q1b1x1_223114_TTUQ1b1x1_3779705_grIgYIvQ/fd_LMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_22-27-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0053.fits :) No overscan detected - all values seem high! (left_median=21677.0, right_median=21704.0) renamed 'mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-05-30.png' -> 'transient_report/flat.png' Using calibrated image CALIBRATED_SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_LMi-02-Q1b1x1_223114_TTUQ1b1x1_3779705_grIgYIvQ/fd_LMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_22-27-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0053.fits Dark frame used to calibrate the second-epoch images:

Flat field used to calibrate the second-epoch images:

after the calibration attempt: SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_LMi-02-Q1b1x1_223114_TTUQ1b1x1_3779705_grIgYIvQ/fd_LMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_22-26-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0052.fits SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_LMi-02-Q1b1x1_223114_TTUQ1b1x1_3779705_grIgYIvQ/fd_LMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_22-27-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0053.fits Previews of the CALIBRATED second-epoch images:

fd_LMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_22-26-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0052.fits


fd_LMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_22-27-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0053.fits


Updating neverexclude_list.txt '/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt' Choosing bad regions list '/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst' wait *------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------* 'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex' Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 3.5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/LMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_01-26-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0335.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/LMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_01-27-03_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0336.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_LMi-02-Q1b1x1_223114_TTUQ1b1x1_3779705_grIgYIvQ/fd_LMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_22-26-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0052.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_LMi-02-Q1b1x1_223114_TTUQ1b1x1_3779705_grIgYIvQ/fd_LMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_22-27-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0053.fits SExtractor catalog cache: saved LMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_01-26-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0335.fits.cat to cache SExtractor catalog cache: saved LMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_01-27-03_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0336.fits.cat to cache VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/LMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_01-26-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0335.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/LMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_01-27-03_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0336.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_LMi-02-Q1b1x1_223114_TTUQ1b1x1_3779705_grIgYIvQ/fd_LMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_22-26-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0052.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_LMi-02-Q1b1x1_223114_TTUQ1b1x1_3779705_grIgYIvQ/fd_LMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_22-27-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0053.fits Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461193.64340385 Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt '../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt' Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt '../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt' Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt '../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt' Plate-solving the images wcs_LMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_01-26-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0335.fits exists and is non-empty Saving wcs_LMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_01-26-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0335.fits to local_wcs_cache/ 'wcs_LMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_01-26-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0335.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_LMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_01-26-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0335.fits' wcs_LMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_01-27-03_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0336.fits exists and is non-empty Saving wcs_LMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_01-27-03_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0336.fits to local_wcs_cache/ 'wcs_LMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_01-27-03_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0336.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_LMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_01-27-03_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0336.fits' wcs_fd_LMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_22-26-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0052.fits exists and is non-empty Saving wcs_fd_LMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_22-26-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0052.fits to local_wcs_cache/ 'wcs_fd_LMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_22-26-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0052.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_LMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_22-26-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0052.fits' wcs_fd_LMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_22-27-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0053.fits exists and is non-empty Saving wcs_fd_LMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_22-27-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0053.fits to local_wcs_cache/ 'wcs_fd_LMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_22-27-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0053.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_LMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_22-27-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0053.fits' ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_LMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_01-26-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0335.fits (1st reference image) verification OK: wcs_LMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_01-26-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0335.fits Image size: 941.7'x627.1' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 11:00:00.428 +30:00:07.99 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9" ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_LMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_22-26-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0052.fits (1st new image) verification OK: wcs_fd_LMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_22-26-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0052.fits Image size: 940.8'x626.4' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.89"/pix along the X axis and 5.88"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 11:00:23.221 +30:02:10.79 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy) Reference image center 11:00:00.428 +30:00:07.99 Second-epoch image center 11:00:23.221 +30:02:10.79 Angular distance between the image centers 0.0890 deg. Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg. ################################### ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_LMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_22-27-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0053.fits (2nd new image) verification OK: wcs_fd_LMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_22-27-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0053.fits Image size: 940.8'x626.4' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.89"/pix along the X axis and 5.88"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 11:00:20.740 +30:02:31.08 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy) Reference image center 11:00:00.428 +30:00:07.99 Second-epoch image center 11:00:20.740 +30:02:31.08 Angular distance between the image centers 0.0834 deg. ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images) Second-epoch first image center 11:00:23.221 +30:02:10.79 Second-epoch second image center 11:00:20.740 +30:02:31.08 Angular distance between the image centers 0.01058 deg. ################################### Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5... Preparing for ar aprallel run Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/LMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_01-26-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0335.fits &> /tmp/tmp.ACPNOgjJmb Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/LMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_01-26-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0335.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/LMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_01-27-03_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0336.fits &> /tmp/tmp.aFCQElnwSZ Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/LMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_01-27-03_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0336.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_LMi-02-Q1b1x1_223114_TTUQ1b1x1_3779705_grIgYIvQ/fd_LMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_22-26-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0052.fits &> /tmp/tmp.rBqhbX4R07 Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_LMi-02-Q1b1x1_223114_TTUQ1b1x1_3779705_grIgYIvQ/fd_LMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_22-26-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0052.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_LMi-02-Q1b1x1_223114_TTUQ1b1x1_3779705_grIgYIvQ/fd_LMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_22-27-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0053.fits &> /tmp/tmp.7ZmlfMyK1B Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_LMi-02-Q1b1x1_223114_TTUQ1b1x1_3779705_grIgYIvQ/fd_LMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_22-27-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0053.fits Calibrating the magnitude scale Found non-empty wcs_LMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_01-26-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0335.fits ____ Start of magnitude calibration ____ PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_LMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_01-26-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0335.fits and wcs_LMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_01-26-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0335.fits.cat wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race) Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2 Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_LMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_01-26-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0335.fits and wcs_LMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_01-26-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0335.fits.cat Found non-empty wcs_LMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_01-26-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0335.fits and wcs_LMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_01-26-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0335.fits.cat The reference image (wcs_LMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_01-26-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0335.fits) and catalog (wcs_LMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_01-26-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0335.fits.cat) found 'wcs_LMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_01-26-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0335.fits.cat' -> 'wcsmag.cat' Read 6277 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 155.3267 to 174.2388 deg, Dec +24.1798 to +35.3464 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 155.3267 to 174.2388 deg, Dec 24.1798 to 35.3464 deg Loaded 4197 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3040 out of 3199 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 3199 out of 6277 detected stars. The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.924700 a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.924700 From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.47 Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.45 Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes Working... Please, PLEASE, be patient!!! All lightcurves processed! =) Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.45
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:

Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V) Read 6277 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 155.3267 to 174.2388 deg, Dec +24.1798 to +35.3464 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 155.3267 to 174.2388 deg, Dec 24.1798 to 35.3464 deg Loaded 4197 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3040 out of 3199 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 3199 out of 6277 detected stars. util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_LMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_01-26-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0335.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_LMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_01-26-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0335.fits:

Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_LMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_01-26-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0335.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_LMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_01-26-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0335.fits (aperture=6.4) Read 6257 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 155.3266 to 174.2863 deg, Dec +24.1798 to +35.3468 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 155.3266 to 174.2863 deg, Dec 24.1798 to 35.3468 deg Loaded 4207 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3048 out of 3197 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 3197 out of 6257 detected stars. util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_LMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_01-27-03_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0336.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_LMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_01-27-03_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0336.fits:

Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_LMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_01-27-03_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0336.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_LMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_01-27-03_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0336.fits (aperture=6.4) ____ End of magnitude calibration ____ Applying consolidated magnitude filters... Preparing the exclusion lists for this field Done with filtering Found 0 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 8000) Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars: 2.2 pix LMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_01-26-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0335.fits 2.2 pix LMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_01-27-03_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0336.fits 4.0 pix fd_LMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_22-26-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0052.fits 4.0 pix fd_LMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_22-27-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0053.fits 2.2 pix wcs_LMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_01-26-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0335.fits 2.2 pix wcs_LMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_01-27-03_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0336.fits Limiting magnitude estimates: 15.5 mag. LMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_01-26-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0335.fits 15.5 mag. LMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_01-27-03_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0336.fits 13.1 mag. fd_LMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_22-26-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0052.fits 13.2 mag. fd_LMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_22-27-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0053.fits All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 13.1 (SNR ) 11.1 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50). This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image. The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here. The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images. This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list. The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag. Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver wait ############ /tmp/tmp.ACPNOgjJmb (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The guess is based on the existing WCS header. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-01_CI_LMi-02-Q1b1x1_223114_TTUQ1b1x1_3779705_grIgYIvQ/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/LMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_01-26-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0335.fits 573.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/LMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_01-26-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0335.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/LMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_01-26-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0335.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/LMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_01-26-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0335.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/LMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_01-26-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0335.fits It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good. The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/LMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_01-26-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0335.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good... '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/LMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_01-26-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0335.fits' -> 'wcs_LMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_01-26-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0335.fits' FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/LMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_01-26-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0335.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_LMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_01-26-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0335.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_LMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_01-26-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0335.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_LMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_01-26-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0335.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_LMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_01-26-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0335.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_LMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_01-26-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0335.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_LMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_01-26-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0335.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_LMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_01-26-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0335.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/LMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_01-26-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0335.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_LMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_01-26-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0335.fits.cat SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=426, passed=6277 Got 6277 stars (including 5840 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_LMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_01-26-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0335.fits.cat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 6277 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.7' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.7 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013079 (47.1 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010463 (37.7 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 628 (Dec 24.2 to 35.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 959 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 958 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 951 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 958 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6219 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 628 (Dec 24.2 to 35.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 959 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 958 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6217 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 958 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6217 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39" Excluding outliers - 958 stars left (next iteration limit 1053) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=LMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_01-26-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0335.fits N_match=958 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.430 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.539 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.411 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.442 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.357 n_q1=236 n_q2=232 n_q3=269 n_q4=221 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.255 The image catalog is written to wcs_LMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_01-26-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0335.fits.cat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_LMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_01-26-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0335.fits.cat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/LMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_01-26-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0335.fits -region wcs_LMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_01-26-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0335.fits.cat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_LMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_01-26-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0335.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations ############ /tmp/tmp.aFCQElnwSZ (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The guess is based on the existing WCS header. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-01_CI_LMi-02-Q1b1x1_223114_TTUQ1b1x1_3779705_grIgYIvQ/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/LMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_01-27-03_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0336.fits 573.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/LMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_01-27-03_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0336.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/LMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_01-27-03_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0336.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/LMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_01-27-03_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0336.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/LMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_01-27-03_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0336.fits It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good. The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/LMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_01-27-03_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0336.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good... '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/LMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_01-27-03_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0336.fits' -> 'wcs_LMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_01-27-03_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0336.fits' FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/LMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_01-27-03_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0336.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_LMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_01-27-03_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0336.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_LMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_01-27-03_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0336.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_LMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_01-27-03_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0336.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_LMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_01-27-03_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0336.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_LMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_01-27-03_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0336.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_LMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_01-27-03_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0336.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_LMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_01-27-03_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0336.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/LMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_01-27-03_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0336.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_LMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_01-27-03_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0336.fits.cat SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=417, passed=6257 Got 6257 stars (including 5831 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_LMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_01-27-03_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0336.fits.cat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 6257 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.7' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.7 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013079 (47.1 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010463 (37.7 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 628 (Dec 24.2 to 35.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 961 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 960 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 951 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 960 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6197 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 628 (Dec 24.2 to 35.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 961 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 960 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6197 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 960 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6197 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35" Excluding outliers - 960 stars left (next iteration limit 1056) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=LMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_01-27-03_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0336.fits N_match=960 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.380 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.419 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.388 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.411 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.321 n_q1=233 n_q2=232 n_q3=274 n_q4=221 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.101 The image catalog is written to wcs_LMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_01-27-03_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0336.fits.cat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_LMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_01-27-03_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0336.fits.cat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/LMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_01-27-03_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0336.fits -region wcs_LMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_01-27-03_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0336.fits.cat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_LMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_01-27-03_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0336.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations ############ /tmp/tmp.rBqhbX4R07 (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um Internal estimated FoV 605.3' The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-01_CI_LMi-02-Q1b1x1_223114_TTUQ1b1x1_3779705_grIgYIvQ/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_LMi-02-Q1b1x1_223114_TTUQ1b1x1_3779705_grIgYIvQ/fd_LMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_22-26-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0052.fits 605.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_LMi-02-Q1b1x1_223114_TTUQ1b1x1_3779705_grIgYIvQ/fd_LMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_22-26-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0052.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_LMi-02-Q1b1x1_223114_TTUQ1b1x1_3779705_grIgYIvQ/fd_LMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_22-26-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0052.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_LMi-02-Q1b1x1_223114_TTUQ1b1x1_3779705_grIgYIvQ/fd_LMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_22-26-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0052.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_LMi-02-Q1b1x1_223114_TTUQ1b1x1_3779705_grIgYIvQ/fd_LMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_22-26-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0052.fits It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve! FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_LMi-02-Q1b1x1_223114_TTUQ1b1x1_3779705_grIgYIvQ/fd_LMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_22-26-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0052.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_LMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_22-26-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0052.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_LMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_22-26-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0052.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_LMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_22-26-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0052.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_LMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_22-26-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0052.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_fd_LMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_22-26-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0052.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_LMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_22-26-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0052.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_LMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_22-26-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0052.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_LMi-02-Q1b1x1_223114_TTUQ1b1x1_3779705_grIgYIvQ/fd_LMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_22-26-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0052.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_LMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_22-26-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0052.fits.cat SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=76, passed=2268 Got 2268 stars (including 2192 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_LMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_22-26-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0052.fits.cat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 2268 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 940.8' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 940.8 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013067 (47.0 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010453 (37.6 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 629 (Dec 24.1 to 35.4) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 956 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 951 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 944 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 951 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 2245 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 629 (Dec 24.1 to 35.4) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 958 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 953 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 2244 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 953 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 2244 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28" Excluding outliers - 953 stars left (next iteration limit 1046) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_LMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_22-26-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0052.fits N_match=953 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.296 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.356 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.393 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.237 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.282 n_q1=177 n_q2=225 n_q3=264 n_q4=287 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.326 The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_LMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_22-26-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0052.fits.cat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_LMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_22-26-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0052.fits.cat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_LMi-02-Q1b1x1_223114_TTUQ1b1x1_3779705_grIgYIvQ/fd_LMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_22-26-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0052.fits -region wcs_fd_LMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_22-26-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0052.fits.cat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_LMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_22-26-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0052.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations ############ /tmp/tmp.7ZmlfMyK1B (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um Internal estimated FoV 605.3' The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-01_CI_LMi-02-Q1b1x1_223114_TTUQ1b1x1_3779705_grIgYIvQ/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_LMi-02-Q1b1x1_223114_TTUQ1b1x1_3779705_grIgYIvQ/fd_LMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_22-27-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0053.fits 605.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_LMi-02-Q1b1x1_223114_TTUQ1b1x1_3779705_grIgYIvQ/fd_LMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_22-27-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0053.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_LMi-02-Q1b1x1_223114_TTUQ1b1x1_3779705_grIgYIvQ/fd_LMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_22-27-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0053.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_LMi-02-Q1b1x1_223114_TTUQ1b1x1_3779705_grIgYIvQ/fd_LMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_22-27-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0053.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_LMi-02-Q1b1x1_223114_TTUQ1b1x1_3779705_grIgYIvQ/fd_LMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_22-27-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0053.fits It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve! FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_LMi-02-Q1b1x1_223114_TTUQ1b1x1_3779705_grIgYIvQ/fd_LMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_22-27-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0053.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_LMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_22-27-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0053.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_LMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_22-27-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0053.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_LMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_22-27-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0053.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_LMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_22-27-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0053.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_fd_LMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_22-27-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0053.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_LMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_22-27-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0053.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_LMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_22-27-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0053.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_LMi-02-Q1b1x1_223114_TTUQ1b1x1_3779705_grIgYIvQ/fd_LMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_22-27-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0053.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_LMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_22-27-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0053.fits.cat SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=75, passed=2322 Got 2322 stars (including 2244 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_LMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_22-27-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0053.fits.cat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 2322 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 940.8' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 940.8 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013067 (47.0 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010453 (37.6 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 629 (Dec 24.1 to 35.4) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 956 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 951 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 942 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 951 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 2296 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 629 (Dec 24.1 to 35.4) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 958 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 953 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 2298 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 953 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 2299 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27" Excluding outliers - 953 stars left (next iteration limit 1046) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_LMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_22-27-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0053.fits N_match=953 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.299 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.342 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.360 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.249 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.284 n_q1=179 n_q2=224 n_q3=265 n_q4=285 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.204 The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_LMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_22-27-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0053.fits.cat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_LMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_22-27-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0053.fits.cat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_LMi-02-Q1b1x1_223114_TTUQ1b1x1_3779705_grIgYIvQ/fd_LMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_22-27-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0053.fits -region wcs_fd_LMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_22-27-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0053.fits.cat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_LMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_22-27-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0053.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations ################################### # Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above) ref1=LMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_01-26-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0335.fits sigma_overall=0.430 worst_q_ratio=1.255 ref2=LMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_01-27-03_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0336.fits sigma_overall=0.380 worst_q_ratio=1.101 new1=fd_LMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_22-26-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0052.fits sigma_overall=0.296 worst_q_ratio=1.326 new2=fd_LMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_22-27-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0053.fits sigma_overall=0.299 worst_q_ratio=1.204 reference average sigma_overall=0.405 worst_q_ratio=1.178 warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference ###################################
Distribution of catalog-matched stars across the image:
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy: wrote wcs_LMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_01-26-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0335_astrometric_residuals.png (958 matched stars from wcs_LMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_01-26-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0335.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388) plot_astrometric_residuals_xy: wrote wcs_LMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_01-27-03_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0336_astrometric_residuals.png (960 matched stars from wcs_LMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_01-27-03_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0336.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388) plot_astrometric_residuals_xy: wrote wcs_fd_LMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_22-26-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0052_astrometric_residuals.png (953 matched stars from wcs_fd_LMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_22-26-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0052.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388) plot_astrometric_residuals_xy: wrote wcs_fd_LMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_22-27-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0053_astrometric_residuals.png (953 matched stars from wcs_fd_LMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_22-27-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0053.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388) Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_LMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_22-26-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0052.fits INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image) 'wcs_fd_LMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_22-26-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0052.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_LMi-02-Q1b1x1_223114_TTUQ1b1x1_3779705_grIgYIvQ/wcs_fd_LMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_22-26-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0052.fits' Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_LMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_22-27-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0053.fits INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image) 'wcs_fd_LMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_22-27-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0053.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_LMi-02-Q1b1x1_223114_TTUQ1b1x1_3779705_grIgYIvQ/wcs_fd_LMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_22-27-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0053.fits' Preparing the HTML report for the field LMi-02-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 No candidates found here Prepared the HTML report for the field LMi-02-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 *------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------* #### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt #### wait *------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------* 'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex' Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 3.5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/LMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_01-26-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0335.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/LMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_01-27-03_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0336.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_LMi-02-Q1b1x1_223114_TTUQ1b1x1_3779705_grIgYIvQ/fd_LMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_22-26-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0052.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_LMi-02-Q1b1x1_223114_TTUQ1b1x1_3779705_grIgYIvQ/fd_LMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_22-27-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0053.fits SExtractor catalog cache: saved LMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_01-26-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0335.fits.cat to cache SExtractor catalog cache: saved LMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_01-27-03_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0336.fits.cat to cache VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/LMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_01-26-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0335.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/LMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_01-27-03_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0336.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_LMi-02-Q1b1x1_223114_TTUQ1b1x1_3779705_grIgYIvQ/fd_LMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_22-26-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0052.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_LMi-02-Q1b1x1_223114_TTUQ1b1x1_3779705_grIgYIvQ/fd_LMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_22-27-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0053.fits Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_LMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_01-26-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0335.fits Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_LMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_01-27-03_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0336.fits Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_LMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_22-26-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0052.fits Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_LMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_22-27-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0053.fits Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/exclusion_list.txt Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images Plate-solving the images wcs_LMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_01-26-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0335.fits exists and is non-empty wcs_LMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_01-27-03_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0336.fits exists and is non-empty wcs_fd_LMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_22-26-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0052.fits exists and is non-empty wcs_fd_LMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_22-27-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0053.fits exists and is non-empty ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_LMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_01-26-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0335.fits (1st reference image) verification OK: wcs_LMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_01-26-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0335.fits Image size: 941.7'x627.1' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 11:00:00.428 +30:00:07.99 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9" ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_LMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_22-26-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0052.fits (1st new image) verification OK: wcs_fd_LMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_22-26-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0052.fits Image size: 940.8'x626.4' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.89"/pix along the X axis and 5.88"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 11:00:23.221 +30:02:10.79 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy) Reference image center 11:00:00.428 +30:00:07.99 Second-epoch image center 11:00:23.221 +30:02:10.79 Angular distance between the image centers 0.0890 deg. Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg. ################################### ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_LMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_22-27-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0053.fits (2nd new image) verification OK: wcs_fd_LMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_22-27-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0053.fits Image size: 940.8'x626.4' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.89"/pix along the X axis and 5.88"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 11:00:20.740 +30:02:31.08 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy) Reference image center 11:00:00.428 +30:00:07.99 Second-epoch image center 11:00:20.740 +30:02:31.08 Angular distance between the image centers 0.0834 deg. ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images) Second-epoch first image center 11:00:23.221 +30:02:10.79 Second-epoch second image center 11:00:20.740 +30:02:31.08 Angular distance between the image centers 0.01058 deg. ################################### Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5... Preparing for ar aprallel run Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/LMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_01-26-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0335.fits &> /tmp/tmp.Vs5RJTer22 Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/LMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_01-26-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0335.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/LMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_01-27-03_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0336.fits &> /tmp/tmp.hJRrmk8nr2 Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/LMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_01-27-03_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0336.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_LMi-02-Q1b1x1_223114_TTUQ1b1x1_3779705_grIgYIvQ/fd_LMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_22-26-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0052.fits &> /tmp/tmp.dafd3hYxLq Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_LMi-02-Q1b1x1_223114_TTUQ1b1x1_3779705_grIgYIvQ/fd_LMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_22-26-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0052.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_LMi-02-Q1b1x1_223114_TTUQ1b1x1_3779705_grIgYIvQ/fd_LMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_22-27-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0053.fits &> /tmp/tmp.TenjuJfTTp Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_LMi-02-Q1b1x1_223114_TTUQ1b1x1_3779705_grIgYIvQ/fd_LMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_22-27-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0053.fits Calibrating the magnitude scale Found non-empty wcs_LMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_01-26-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0335.fits ____ Start of magnitude calibration ____ PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_LMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_01-26-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0335.fits and wcs_LMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_01-26-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0335.fits.cat wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race) Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2 Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_LMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_01-26-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0335.fits and wcs_LMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_01-26-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0335.fits.cat Found non-empty wcs_LMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_01-26-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0335.fits and wcs_LMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_01-26-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0335.fits.cat The reference image (wcs_LMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_01-26-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0335.fits) and catalog (wcs_LMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_01-26-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0335.fits.cat) found 'wcs_LMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_01-26-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0335.fits.cat' -> 'wcsmag.cat' Read 31758 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 155.1987 to 174.3209 deg, Dec +24.1798 to +35.3640 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 155.1987 to 174.3209 deg, Dec 24.1798 to 35.3640 deg Loaded 4256 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 2918 out of 3226 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 3226 out of 31758 detected stars. The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.821600 a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.821600 From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.23 Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.59 Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes Working... Please, PLEASE, be patient!!! All lightcurves processed! =) Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.59
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:

Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V) Read 31758 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 155.1987 to 174.3209 deg, Dec +24.1798 to +35.3640 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 155.1987 to 174.3209 deg, Dec 24.1798 to 35.3640 deg Loaded 4256 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 2918 out of 3226 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 3226 out of 31758 detected stars. util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_LMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_01-26-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0335.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_LMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_01-26-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0335.fits:

Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_LMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_01-26-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0335.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_LMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_01-26-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0335.fits (aperture=5.1) Read 31789 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 155.2201 to 174.3325 deg, Dec +24.1798 to +35.3641 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 155.2201 to 174.3325 deg, Dec 24.1798 to 35.3641 deg Loaded 4254 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 2901 out of 3226 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 3226 out of 31789 detected stars. util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_LMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_01-27-03_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0336.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_LMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_01-27-03_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0336.fits:

Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_LMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_01-27-03_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0336.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_LMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_01-27-03_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0336.fits (aperture=5.1) ____ End of magnitude calibration ____ Applying consolidated magnitude filters... Preparing the exclusion lists for this field Done with filtering Found 18 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 8000) Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars: 2.0 pix LMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_01-26-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0335.fits 2.1 pix LMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_01-27-03_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0336.fits 3.5 pix fd_LMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_22-26-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0052.fits 3.5 pix fd_LMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_22-27-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0053.fits 2.0 pix wcs_LMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_01-26-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0335.fits 2.1 pix wcs_LMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_01-27-03_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0336.fits Limiting magnitude estimates: 15.6 mag. LMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_01-26-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0335.fits 15.6 mag. LMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_01-27-03_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0336.fits 13.6 mag. fd_LMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_22-26-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0052.fits 13.6 mag. fd_LMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_22-27-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0053.fits All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 13.6 (SNR ) 13.2 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50). This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image. The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here. The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images. This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list. The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag. Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver wait ############ /tmp/tmp.Vs5RJTer22 (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The guess is based on the existing WCS header. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-01_CI_LMi-02-Q1b1x1_223114_TTUQ1b1x1_3779705_grIgYIvQ/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/LMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_01-26-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0335.fits 573.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/LMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_01-26-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0335.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/LMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_01-26-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0335.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/LMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_01-26-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0335.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/LMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_01-26-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0335.fits It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good. The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/LMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_01-26-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0335.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good... '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/LMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_01-26-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0335.fits' -> 'wcs_LMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_01-26-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0335.fits' FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/LMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_01-26-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0335.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_LMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_01-26-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0335.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_LMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_01-26-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0335.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_LMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_01-26-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0335.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_LMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_01-26-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0335.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_LMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_01-26-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0335.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_LMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_01-26-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0335.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_LMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_01-26-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0335.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/LMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_01-26-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0335.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_LMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_01-26-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0335.fits.cat SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=34, blended=1326, passed=31724 Got 31724 stars (including 30337 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_LMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_01-26-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0335.fits.cat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 31724 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.7' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.7 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013079 (47.1 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010463 (37.7 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 628 (Dec 24.2 to 35.4) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 958 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 958 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 950 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 958 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 31441 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 628 (Dec 24.2 to 35.4) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 958 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 958 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 31442 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 958 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 31442 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39" Excluding outliers - 958 stars left (next iteration limit 1053) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=LMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_01-26-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0335.fits N_match=958 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.416 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.529 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.369 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.425 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.338 n_q1=235 n_q2=227 n_q3=271 n_q4=225 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.272 The image catalog is written to wcs_LMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_01-26-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0335.fits.cat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_LMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_01-26-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0335.fits.cat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/LMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_01-26-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0335.fits -region wcs_LMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_01-26-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0335.fits.cat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_LMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_01-26-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0335.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations ############ /tmp/tmp.hJRrmk8nr2 (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The guess is based on the existing WCS header. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-01_CI_LMi-02-Q1b1x1_223114_TTUQ1b1x1_3779705_grIgYIvQ/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/LMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_01-27-03_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0336.fits 573.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/LMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_01-27-03_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0336.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/LMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_01-27-03_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0336.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/LMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_01-27-03_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0336.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/LMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_01-27-03_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0336.fits It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good. The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/LMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_01-27-03_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0336.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good... '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/LMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_01-27-03_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0336.fits' -> 'wcs_LMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_01-27-03_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0336.fits' FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/LMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_01-27-03_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0336.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_LMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_01-27-03_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0336.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_LMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_01-27-03_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0336.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_LMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_01-27-03_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0336.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_LMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_01-27-03_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0336.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_LMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_01-27-03_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0336.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_LMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_01-27-03_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0336.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_LMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_01-27-03_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0336.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/LMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_01-27-03_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0336.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_LMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_01-27-03_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0336.fits.cat SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=24, blended=1398, passed=31765 Got 31765 stars (including 30305 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_LMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_01-27-03_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0336.fits.cat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 31765 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.7' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.7 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013079 (47.1 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010463 (37.7 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 628 (Dec 24.2 to 35.4) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 959 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 959 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 954 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 959 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 31540 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 628 (Dec 24.2 to 35.4) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 959 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 959 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 31539 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 959 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 31539 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37" Excluding outliers - 959 stars left (next iteration limit 1054) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=LMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_01-27-03_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0336.fits N_match=959 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.382 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.420 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.350 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.448 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.319 n_q1=238 n_q2=231 n_q3=265 n_q4=225 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.172 The image catalog is written to wcs_LMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_01-27-03_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0336.fits.cat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_LMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_01-27-03_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0336.fits.cat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/LMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_01-27-03_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0336.fits -region wcs_LMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_01-27-03_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0336.fits.cat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_LMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_01-27-03_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0336.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations ############ /tmp/tmp.dafd3hYxLq (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um Internal estimated FoV 605.3' The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-01_CI_LMi-02-Q1b1x1_223114_TTUQ1b1x1_3779705_grIgYIvQ/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_LMi-02-Q1b1x1_223114_TTUQ1b1x1_3779705_grIgYIvQ/fd_LMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_22-26-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0052.fits 605.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_LMi-02-Q1b1x1_223114_TTUQ1b1x1_3779705_grIgYIvQ/fd_LMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_22-26-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0052.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_LMi-02-Q1b1x1_223114_TTUQ1b1x1_3779705_grIgYIvQ/fd_LMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_22-26-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0052.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_LMi-02-Q1b1x1_223114_TTUQ1b1x1_3779705_grIgYIvQ/fd_LMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_22-26-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0052.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_LMi-02-Q1b1x1_223114_TTUQ1b1x1_3779705_grIgYIvQ/fd_LMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_22-26-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0052.fits It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve! FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_LMi-02-Q1b1x1_223114_TTUQ1b1x1_3779705_grIgYIvQ/fd_LMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_22-26-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0052.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_LMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_22-26-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0052.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_LMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_22-26-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0052.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_LMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_22-26-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0052.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_LMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_22-26-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0052.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_fd_LMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_22-26-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0052.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_LMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_22-26-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0052.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_LMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_22-26-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0052.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_LMi-02-Q1b1x1_223114_TTUQ1b1x1_3779705_grIgYIvQ/fd_LMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_22-26-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0052.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_LMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_22-26-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0052.fits.cat SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=14, blended=232, passed=10767 Got 10767 stars (including 10522 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_LMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_22-26-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0052.fits.cat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 10767 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 940.8' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 940.8 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013067 (47.0 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010453 (37.6 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 629 (Dec 24.1 to 35.5) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 958 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 957 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 951 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 957 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 10683 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 629 (Dec 24.1 to 35.5) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 958 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 957 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 10684 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 957 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 10684 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27" Excluding outliers - 957 stars left (next iteration limit 1052) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_LMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_22-26-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0052.fits N_match=957 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.297 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.339 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.384 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.225 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.279 n_q1=178 n_q2=221 n_q3=268 n_q4=290 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.294 The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_LMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_22-26-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0052.fits.cat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_LMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_22-26-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0052.fits.cat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_LMi-02-Q1b1x1_223114_TTUQ1b1x1_3779705_grIgYIvQ/fd_LMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_22-26-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0052.fits -region wcs_fd_LMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_22-26-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0052.fits.cat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_LMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_22-26-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0052.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations ############ /tmp/tmp.TenjuJfTTp (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um Internal estimated FoV 605.3' The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-01_CI_LMi-02-Q1b1x1_223114_TTUQ1b1x1_3779705_grIgYIvQ/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_LMi-02-Q1b1x1_223114_TTUQ1b1x1_3779705_grIgYIvQ/fd_LMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_22-27-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0053.fits 605.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_LMi-02-Q1b1x1_223114_TTUQ1b1x1_3779705_grIgYIvQ/fd_LMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_22-27-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0053.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_LMi-02-Q1b1x1_223114_TTUQ1b1x1_3779705_grIgYIvQ/fd_LMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_22-27-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0053.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_LMi-02-Q1b1x1_223114_TTUQ1b1x1_3779705_grIgYIvQ/fd_LMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_22-27-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0053.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_LMi-02-Q1b1x1_223114_TTUQ1b1x1_3779705_grIgYIvQ/fd_LMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_22-27-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0053.fits It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve! FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_LMi-02-Q1b1x1_223114_TTUQ1b1x1_3779705_grIgYIvQ/fd_LMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_22-27-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0053.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_LMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_22-27-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0053.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_LMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_22-27-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0053.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_LMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_22-27-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0053.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_LMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_22-27-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0053.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_fd_LMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_22-27-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0053.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_LMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_22-27-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0053.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_LMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_22-27-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0053.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_LMi-02-Q1b1x1_223114_TTUQ1b1x1_3779705_grIgYIvQ/fd_LMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_22-27-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0053.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_LMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_22-27-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0053.fits.cat SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=12, blended=224, passed=11002 Got 11002 stars (including 10770 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_LMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_22-27-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0053.fits.cat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 11002 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 940.8' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 940.8 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013067 (47.0 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010453 (37.6 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 629 (Dec 24.1 to 35.5) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 956 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 954 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 945 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 954 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 10922 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 629 (Dec 24.1 to 35.5) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 956 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 954 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 10924 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 954 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 10924 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26" Excluding outliers - 954 stars left (next iteration limit 1049) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_LMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_22-27-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0053.fits N_match=954 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.295 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.319 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.375 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.251 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.285 n_q1=178 n_q2=224 n_q3=268 n_q4=284 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.270 The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_LMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_22-27-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0053.fits.cat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_LMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_22-27-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0053.fits.cat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_LMi-02-Q1b1x1_223114_TTUQ1b1x1_3779705_grIgYIvQ/fd_LMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_22-27-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0053.fits -region wcs_fd_LMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_22-27-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0053.fits.cat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_LMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_22-27-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0053.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL) Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_LMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_22-26-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0052.fits INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image) The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_LMi-02-Q1b1x1_223114_TTUQ1b1x1_3779705_grIgYIvQ/wcs_fd_LMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_22-26-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0052.fits Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_LMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_22-27-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0053.fits INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image) The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_LMi-02-Q1b1x1_223114_TTUQ1b1x1_3779705_grIgYIvQ/wcs_fd_LMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_22-27-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0053.fits Preparing the HTML report for the field LMi-02-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL Forced photometry on wcs_LMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_01-26-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0335.fits at 11:33:17.32 +34:17:18.1: 12.86 +/- 0.02 detection Forced photometry on wcs_LMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_01-26-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0335.fits at 10:47:24.30 +29:57:48.9: 13.15 +/- 0.02 detection Forced photometry on wcs_LMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_01-26-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0335.fits at 10:41:32.73 +27:20:17.0: 13.31 +/- 0.03 detection Forced photometry on wcs_LMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_01-26-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0335.fits at 10:47:24.04 +26:52:52.2: 13.51 +/- 0.04 detection Forced photometry on wcs_LMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_01-26-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0335.fits at 10:29:12.74 +26:52:15.7: 13.38 +/- 0.03 detection Forced photometry on wcs_LMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_01-26-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0335.fits at 11:12:34.14 +25:42:57.0: 13.18 +/- 0.02 detection Forced photometry on wcs_LMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_01-27-03_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0336.fits at 10:47:24.30 +29:57:48.9: 13.22 +/- 0.03 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.18 +/- 0.02 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:47:24.30 +29:57:48.9: ref_mag=13.18 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.0308 delta=0.15 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_LMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_01-27-03_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0336.fits at 11:33:17.32 +34:17:18.1: 12.82 +/- 0.02 detection Forced photometry on wcs_LMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_01-27-03_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0336.fits at 10:41:32.73 +27:20:17.0: 13.23 +/- 0.03 detection Forced photometry on wcs_LMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_01-27-03_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0336.fits at 10:47:24.04 +26:52:52.2: 13.52 +/- 0.04 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.84 +/- 0.02 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 11:33:17.32 +34:17:18.1: ref_mag=12.84 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.6888 delta=0.15 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.27 +/- 0.02 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:41:32.73 +27:20:17.0: ref_mag=13.27 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.8690 delta=0.40 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.51 +/- 0.03 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:47:24.04 +26:52:52.2: ref_mag=13.51 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.1459 delta=0.37 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_LMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_01-27-03_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0336.fits at 10:29:12.74 +26:52:15.7: 13.35 +/- 0.03 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.36 +/- 0.02 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:29:12.74 +26:52:15.7: ref_mag=13.36 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.1080 delta=0.25 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_LMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_01-27-03_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0336.fits at 11:12:34.14 +25:42:57.0: 13.17 +/- 0.02 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.17 +/- 0.02 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 11:12:34.14 +25:42:57.0: ref_mag=13.17 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.9219 delta=0.25 (need > 0.90) make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 1s Pre-generating preview images in parallel... Done pre-generating preview images. Pre-generating finding charts in parallel... Done pre-generating finding charts. make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 1s xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52171_fd_LMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_22-27-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0053 The candidate 52171_fd_LMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_22-27-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0053 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 06 02.14399    2461193.64399    13.27    11:29:10.22 +28:17:05.7   0896 3903   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_LMi-02-Q1b1x1_223114_TTUQ1b1x1_3779705_grIgYIvQ/fd_LMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_22-27-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0053.fits **** FOUND 11:29:10.31 +28:17:07.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52430_fd_LMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_22-27-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0053 The candidate 52430_fd_LMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_22-27-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0053 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 06 02.14399    2461193.64399    12.74    11:34:32.11 +27:54:09.2   0144 4043   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_LMi-02-Q1b1x1_223114_TTUQ1b1x1_3779705_grIgYIvQ/fd_LMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_22-27-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0053.fits **** FOUND 11:34:32.07 +27:54:08.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52451_fd_LMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_22-27-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0053 The candidate 52451_fd_LMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_22-27-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0053 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 06 02.14399    2461193.64399    12.65    10:59:50.50 +25:18:16.7   4682 6055   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_LMi-02-Q1b1x1_223114_TTUQ1b1x1_3779705_grIgYIvQ/fd_LMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_22-27-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0053.fits **** FOUND 10:59:50.52 +25:18:16.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52456_fd_LMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_22-27-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0053 The candidate 52456_fd_LMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_22-27-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0053 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 06 02.14340    2461193.64340    12.83    10:41:32.77 +27:20:16.6   7215 4926   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_LMi-02-Q1b1x1_223114_TTUQ1b1x1_3779705_grIgYIvQ/fd_LMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_22-26-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0052.fits Discovery image 2   2026 06 02.14399    2461193.64399    12.92    10:41:32.69 +27:20:17.5   7210 4929   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_LMi-02-Q1b1x1_223114_TTUQ1b1x1_3779705_grIgYIvQ/fd_LMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_22-27-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0053.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52501_fd_LMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_22-27-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0053 The candidate 52501_fd_LMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_22-27-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0053 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 06 02.14340    2461193.64340    13.05    10:47:24.05 +26:52:52.2   6419 5179   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_LMi-02-Q1b1x1_223114_TTUQ1b1x1_3779705_grIgYIvQ/fd_LMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_22-26-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0052.fits Discovery image 2   2026 06 02.14399    2461193.64399    13.34    10:47:24.03 +26:52:52.2   6413 5182   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_LMi-02-Q1b1x1_223114_TTUQ1b1x1_3779705_grIgYIvQ/fd_LMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_22-27-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0053.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52511_fd_LMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_22-27-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0053 The candidate 52511_fd_LMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_22-27-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0053 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 06 02.14399    2461193.64399    13.04    10:49:54.66 +27:56:48.0   6099 4525   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_LMi-02-Q1b1x1_223114_TTUQ1b1x1_3779705_grIgYIvQ/fd_LMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_22-27-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0053.fits **** FOUND 10:49:54.64 +27:56:47.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52517_fd_LMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_22-27-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0053 The candidate 52517_fd_LMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_22-27-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0053 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 06 02.14340    2461193.64340    12.98    10:47:24.36 +29:57:47.5   6478 3319   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_LMi-02-Q1b1x1_223114_TTUQ1b1x1_3779705_grIgYIvQ/fd_LMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_22-26-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0052.fits Discovery image 2   2026 06 02.14399    2461193.64399    13.14    10:47:24.25 +29:57:50.2   6473 3321   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_LMi-02-Q1b1x1_223114_TTUQ1b1x1_3779705_grIgYIvQ/fd_LMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_22-27-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0053.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52552_fd_LMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_22-27-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0053 The candidate 52552_fd_LMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_22-27-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0053 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 06 02.14340    2461193.64340    12.70    11:33:17.40 +34:17:15.8   0834 0207   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_LMi-02-Q1b1x1_223114_TTUQ1b1x1_3779705_grIgYIvQ/fd_LMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_22-26-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0052.fits Discovery image 2   2026 06 02.14399    2461193.64399    12.68    11:33:17.24 +34:17:20.5   0829 0209   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_LMi-02-Q1b1x1_223114_TTUQ1b1x1_3779705_grIgYIvQ/fd_LMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_22-27-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0053.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 23528_fd_LMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_22-27-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0053 The candidate 23528_fd_LMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_22-27-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0053 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 3   2026 06 02.14399    2461193.64399    6.28    10:53:19.06 +34:12:42.6   5820 0729   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_LMi-02-Q1b1x1_223114_TTUQ1b1x1_3779705_grIgYIvQ/fd_LMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_22-27-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0053.fits **** FOUND 10:53:19.07 +34:12:42.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bbsc.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 07654_fd_LMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_22-27-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0053 The candidate 07654_fd_LMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_22-27-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0053 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 06 02.14340    2461193.64340    13.08    10:29:12.82 +26:52:16.3   8891 5232   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_LMi-02-Q1b1x1_223114_TTUQ1b1x1_3779705_grIgYIvQ/fd_LMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_22-26-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0052.fits Discovery image 3   2026 06 02.14399    2461193.64399    13.16    10:29:12.67 +26:52:15.1   8885 5236   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_LMi-02-Q1b1x1_223114_TTUQ1b1x1_3779705_grIgYIvQ/fd_LMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_22-27-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0053.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 02576_fd_LMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_22-27-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0053 The candidate 02576_fd_LMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_22-27-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0053 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 06 02.14340    2461193.64340    12.96    11:12:34.18 +25:42:57.0   2974 5678   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_LMi-02-Q1b1x1_223114_TTUQ1b1x1_3779705_grIgYIvQ/fd_LMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_22-26-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0052.fits Discovery image 3   2026 06 02.14399    2461193.64399    12.89    11:12:34.10 +25:42:57.0   2968 5681   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_LMi-02-Q1b1x1_223114_TTUQ1b1x1_3779705_grIgYIvQ/fd_LMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_22-27-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0053.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 17943_fd_LMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_22-27-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0053 The candidate 17943_fd_LMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_22-27-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0053 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 3   2026 06 02.14399    2461193.64399    6.77    10:45:52.16 +30:40:57.5   6687 2894   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_LMi-02-Q1b1x1_223114_TTUQ1b1x1_3779705_grIgYIvQ/fd_LMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_22-27-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0053.fits **** FOUND 10:45:52.17 +30:40:57.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 25769_fd_LMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_22-27-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0053 The candidate 25769_fd_LMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_22-27-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0053 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 3   2026 06 02.14399    2461193.64399    6.47    10:55:44.28 +33:30:21.3   5496 1142   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_LMi-02-Q1b1x1_223114_TTUQ1b1x1_3779705_grIgYIvQ/fd_LMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_22-27-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0053.fits **** FOUND 10:55:44.27 +33:30:21.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 24225_fd_LMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_22-27-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0053 The candidate 24225_fd_LMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_22-27-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0053 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 3   2026 06 02.14399    2461193.64399    6.63    10:54:58.11 +34:02:02.8   5608 0827   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_LMi-02-Q1b1x1_223114_TTUQ1b1x1_3779705_grIgYIvQ/fd_LMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_22-27-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0053.fits **** FOUND 10:54:58.11 +34:02:02.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 30697_fd_LMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_22-27-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0053 The candidate 30697_fd_LMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_22-27-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0053 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 3   2026 06 02.14399    2461193.64399    6.47    11:18:09.64 +31:31:31.1   2561 2116   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_LMi-02-Q1b1x1_223114_TTUQ1b1x1_3779705_grIgYIvQ/fd_LMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_22-27-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0053.fits **** FOUND 11:18:09.64 +31:31:31.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 29407_fd_LMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_22-27-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0053 The candidate 29407_fd_LMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_22-27-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0053 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 3   2026 06 02.14399    2461193.64399    6.45    10:38:43.58 +31:58:36.0   7629 2131   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_LMi-02-Q1b1x1_223114_TTUQ1b1x1_3779705_grIgYIvQ/fd_LMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_22-27-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0053.fits **** FOUND 10:38:43.57 +31:58:36.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 27266_fd_LMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_22-27-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0053 The candidate 27266_fd_LMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_22-27-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0053 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 3   2026 06 02.14399    2461193.64399    6.29    11:18:28.37 +33:05:39.1   2616 1167   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_LMi-02-Q1b1x1_223114_TTUQ1b1x1_3779705_grIgYIvQ/fd_LMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_22-27-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0053.fits **** FOUND 11:18:28.37 +33:05:39.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bbsc.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 21473_fd_LMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_22-27-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0053 The candidate 21473_fd_LMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_22-27-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0053 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 3   2026 06 02.14399    2461193.64399    6.42    10:25:54.64 +33:47:45.6   9279 1014   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_LMi-02-Q1b1x1_223114_TTUQ1b1x1_3779705_grIgYIvQ/fd_LMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_22-27-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0053.fits **** FOUND 10:25:54.65 +33:47:45.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt **** make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 2s Prepared the HTML report for the field LMi-02-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL *------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------* #### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt #### ########### Completed LMi-02-Q1b1x1 ########### The analysis was running at tau We are allowed to update the exclusion list at tau host Found ../exclusion_list_TTUQ1.txt #### The exclusion list before filtering-out asteroids, bad pixels and adding Gaia sources #### ################################################################################### renamed 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt_noasteroids' -> 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt' renamed 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt_nohotpixels' -> 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt' # Count candidates with no identification (that also don't look like hot pix) Found 0 unidentified candidates (excluding asteroids, hot pixels and known variable stars). ################################################################################### 0 candidates found (excluding asteroids and hot pixels) This does not look like a test run ################################################################################### exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt NOT FOUND exclusion_list_apass.txt NOT FOUND IS_THIS_TEST_RUN=NO ALLOW_EXCLUSION_LIST_UPDATE= YES #### Nothing to add to the exclusion list #### The observatory MPC code is V36 ############################################################ Positions of planets computed with util/planet_finder/main.py for JD(UT)2461193.64340385 -observatory V36 06:03:09.75 +25:35:56.1 Mercury (-0.4mag) 07:12:03.38 +24:21:39.5 Venus (-4.0mag) 02:32:05.36 +14:18:05.6 Mars (1.3mag) 07:43:28.88 +21:43:36.8 Jupiter (-1.9mag) 00:47:34.15 +02:38:42.8 Saturn (0.9mag) 03:58:45.41 +20:21:16.0 Uranus (5.8mag) 00:15:45.26 +00:14:36.9 Neptune (7.8mag) 20:33:39.71 -23:02:21.8 Pluto (14.5mag) 18:06:21.10 -28:23:34.3 Moon (-12.2mag) -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 363 Jun 1 22:34 planets.txt ############################################################ Positions of selected moons from JPL HORIZONS for JD(UT)2461193.64340385: 07:43:26.50 +21:43:42.1 Io (6.0mag) 07:43:40.51 +21:43:02.8 Europa (6.1mag) 07:43:19.10 +21:44:09.4 Ganymede (5.6mag) 07:43:38.88 +21:43:15.6 Callisto (6.8mag) 07:44:08.32 +21:19:41.8 Himalia (15.6mag) 07:43:33.49 +21:43:22.7 Thebe (16.5mag) 07:44:17.37 +21:37:51.0 Elara (17.5mag) 07:45:20.22 +21:58:36.1 Pasiphae (17.7mag) 07:50:19.39 +21:44:53.4 Carme (18.8mag) 00:47:38.47 +02:39:07.9 Titan (8.7mag) 00:47:39.48 +02:38:45.3 Rhea (10.0mag) 00:48:05.85 +02:40:03.6 Iapetus (11.4mag) 00:47:25.59 +02:39:08.7 Hyperion (14.7mag) 00:48:23.69 +02:41:31.2 Phoebe (16.7mag) -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 569 Jun 1 22:34 moons.txt ############################################################ Positions of selected spacecraft from JPL HORIZONS for JD(UT)2461193.64340385: 17:23:22.84 -34:32:00.0 JWST 19:28:37.09 +09:26:03.3 Chandra 18:13:52.62 -32:51:46.5 XMM-Newton -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 96 Jun 1 22:34 spacecraft.txt ############################################################ Positions of bright comets computed with util/comet_finder/main.py for JD(UT)2461193.64340385 -observatory V36 18:47:22.12 -32:12:00.1 13.6mag P/2010 H2 (Vales) 05:47:33.53 -68:08:32.4 17.4mag C/2014 UN271 (Bernardinelli-Bernstein) 05:46:50.83 +31:53:29.1 17.5mag C/2017 K2 (PANSTARRS) 17:17:09.00 +15:00:54.8 17.8mag C/2021 G2 (ATLAS) 20:21:21.73 -51:19:27.1 17.4mag P/2021 N1 (ZTF) 23:13:45.27 +31:20:57.8 17.2mag C/2022 E2 (ATLAS) 05:26:36.04 +26:55:51.3 16.4mag C/2022 N2 (PANSTARRS) 09:25:30.22 +31:17:04.4 16.6mag C/2022 QE78 (ATLAS) 08:47:23.91 +03:37:19.7 17.6mag C/2022 R6 (PANSTARRS) 18:32:06.01 +21:27:11.7 17.7mag C/2023 A3 (Tsuchinshan-ATLAS) 15:21:38.62 -11:00:38.6 17.5mag P/2023 B1 (PANSTARRS) 22:15:51.52 +66:08:26.0 17.7mag C/2023 H5 (Lemmon) 18:01:04.71 -06:07:21.2 13.7mag C/2023 R1 (PANSTARRS) 13:23:44.72 +84:20:24.5 17.9mag C/2023 X2 (Lemmon) 07:02:14.99 +64:07:05.8 17.6mag C/2024 A1 (ATLAS) 06:37:56.77 +27:15:10.0 13.4mag C/2024 E1 (Wierzchos) 15:42:08.03 +12:57:24.5 17.4mag C/2024 G6 (ATLAS) 20:16:37.99 +29:18:35.7 14.1mag C/2024 J3 (ATLAS) 04:11:57.26 -16:30:24.7 16.1mag C/2024 T5 (ATLAS) 06:00:14.13 +35:33:23.5 17.9mag C/2025 J1 (Borisov) 11:38:44.99 +53:04:04.0 17.2mag C/2025 L1 (ATLAS) 06:36:48.10 -10:35:17.1 13.5mag C/2025 R3 (PANSTARRS) 09:19:26.94 +23:23:57.8 18.0mag C/2025 V2 (Rankin) 12:40:03.51 +04:41:06.6 17.2mag C/2025 Y1 (ATLAS) 18:21:04.86 +73:43:46.9 18.0mag C/2026 A2 (Bok) 01:49:45.21 +42:57:41.4 15.9mag C/2026 B2 (Sun-Gao) 11:10:27.25 -06:00:38.1 16.4mag A/2026 E1 20:12:33.95 -08:15:13.1 9.1mag 10P/Tempel 11:00:45.26 -00:54:00.3 15.9mag 29P/Schwassmann-Wachmann 10:56:14.08 -02:38:38.7 17.9mag 43P/Wolf-Harrington 03:02:19.31 +24:49:13.7 17.6mag 47P/Ashbrook-Jackson 08:47:04.23 +25:28:18.1 16.9mag 63P/Wild 00:21:31.74 -06:47:01.2 15.7mag 65P/Gunn 06:23:53.31 +32:43:29.4 16.7mag 76P/West-Kohoutek-Ikemura 02:54:36.11 +16:24:23.6 13.9mag 78P/Gehrels 01:07:18.60 +03:29:15.6 15.4mag 88P/Howell 04:35:08.26 +29:45:49.4 15.2mag 93P/Lovas 02:26:06.84 +26:36:44.0 17.8mag 114P/Wiseman-Skiff 06:36:12.91 +33:12:57.9 15.7mag 123P/West-Hartley 09:39:44.56 +17:14:32.7 16.5mag 124P/Mrkos 03:49:03.24 +18:49:31.7 16.4mag 128P/Shoemaker-Holt 04:21:29.76 +18:46:33.9 17.7mag 131P/Mueller 05:31:29.48 +19:15:26.8 13.9mag 141P/Machholz 05:33:58.39 +17:13:40.8 13.8mag 141P-A/Machholz 04:23:06.25 +15:11:39.2 11.1mag 141P-D/Machholz 02:53:20.03 -25:34:21.2 17.1mag 161P/Hartley-IRAS 03:21:54.41 +21:17:59.4 14.9mag 162P/SidingSpring 19:36:24.95 +00:02:20.5 17.2mag 169P/NEAT 00:01:56.33 +01:14:55.8 17.9mag 220P/McNaught 16:56:54.43 -08:49:40.4 16.3mag 235P/LINEAR 07:20:55.39 +35:42:26.2 17.4mag 240P/NEAT 00:16:33.10 -04:59:27.9 16.6mag 260P/McNaught 03:48:01.97 +31:20:11.7 17.6mag 295P/LINEAR 23:08:27.59 -17:56:34.9 17.6mag 320P/McNaught 15:18:07.11 +08:15:59.9 17.4mag 391P/Kowalski 08:02:24.78 +20:53:37.2 17.9mag 450P/LONEOS 06:50:05.91 +42:07:08.4 17.8mag 493P/LONEOS -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 2.8K Jun 1 22:34 comets.txt ############################################################ List of recent ASAS-SN transients from https://www.astronomy.ohio-state.edu/asassn/transients.html : 20:07:38.15 -21:07:05.40 SN2026mho 2026-05-25.18 -1.12 11:29:42.55 +79:01:03.10 AT2026min 2026-05-24.21 16.63 11:44:33.11 -68:48:32.90 ASASSN-26no 2026-05-24.03 8.35 14:23:56.59 -58:37:47.40 ASASSN-26dn 2026-05-20.01 14.59 11:24:54.06 +47:57:01.60 AT2026nma 2026-05-20.29 15.46 21:27:08.58 +33:24:38.10 AT2026lli 2026-05-19.34 15.86 00:31:01.41 -13:38:51.70 AT2026nad 2026-05-19.39 15.34 15:16:06.61 -79:16:32.40 ASASSN-26dm 2026-05-19.03 14.44 11:24:25.21 -59:23:19.10 ASASSN-26dl 2026-05-18.02 13.55 13:45:51.52 -53:16:01.00 ASASSN-26dk 2026-05-18.16 12.96 02:05:49.69 -30:29:09.60 ASASSN-26dh 2026-05-18.43 15.37 17:50:22.87 -39:42:33.90 ASASSN-26dj 2026-05-17.05 15.7 01:13:11.60 -33:25:16.10 ASASSN-26dg 2026-05-13.41 16.8 16:44:31.77 -27:15:18.40 AT2026mhn 2026-05-12.33 15.8 09:46:31.08 -33:41:51.00 ASASSN-26di 2026-05-12.14 14.63 21:23:11.57 -19:09:45.00 AT2026kwu 2026-05-12.26 16.9 14:20:14.30 -30:20:51.90 AT2026ktm 2026-05-12.06 17.21 14:41:39.01 -37:13:46.40 AT2026lkm 2026-05-11.18 16.89 12:59:50.45 -10:58:38.80 SN2026kep 2026-05-9.06 17.5 13:37:29.61 -29:50:30.90 AT2026lkd 2026-05-9.09 17.23 09:46:42.01 -14:52:03.60 SN2026kmo 2026-05-8.99 17.51 15:03:05.18 +22:02:03.40 AT2026lxf 2026-05-8.07 13.94 10:23:49.41 -20:57:25.30 ASASSN-26df 2026-05-8.21 16.52 22:14:40.56 +05:04:51.60 2026lda 2026-05-7.56 16.2 21:35:33.81 -14:05:16.30 ASASSN-26de 2026-05-6.29 14.51 16:21:49.13 -61:36:14.60 ASASSN-26dd 2026-05-5.15 15.93 14:26:40.22 -24:48:37.50 AT2026lig 2026-05-4.27 14.63 13:17:51.04 +30:25:13.50 SN2026kcp 2026-05-4.46 16.43 11:27:55.57 -13:38:56.90 SN2026kza 2026-05-1.08 15.59 22:28:27.10 +30:17:54.30 SN 2026fov 2026-04-29.6 14.36 21:00:10.71 -32:17:03.90 AT2026kis 2026-04-27.36 16.15 14:32:57.37 -58:13:26.40 ASASSN-26dc 2026-04-27.27 13.42 15:32:05.35 -43:54:34.60 ASASSN-26db 2026-04-27.37 16.06 16:34:34.97 -54:34:58.00 ASASSN-26da 2026-04-25.32 16.11 10:06:55.04 -01:13:49.70 SN2026jsg 2026-04-24.99 16.28 15:15:57.17 +56:18:32.80 SN2026kid 2026-04-24.52 -3.65 07:58:28.45 +57:03:42.40 AT2026kcf 2026-04-24.2 16.89 11:38:21.80 -50:43:06.50 SN2026jkb 2026-04-24.24 15.38 10:06:11.41 -39:41:04.20 AT2026dil 2026-04-24.2 16.85 14:21:40.08 +13:13:46.30 SN2026jlm 2026-04-22.16 15.12 10:53:55.43 -16:06:06.50 ASASSN-26cz 2026-04-22.06 16.26 20:07:38.15 -21:07:05.40 2026-05-25.18 -1.12 13:45:02.03 +15:17:14.50 ASASSN-26cy 2026-04-21.27 15.78 13:20:52.22 -35:57:03.60 AT2026jcm 2026-04-19.01 16.65 13:36:15.66 -36:53:48.40 SN 2026iqy 2026-04-18.92 17.31 06:34:01.33 -40:07:34.00 ASASSN-26cx 2026-04-19.07 16.16 23:33:57.97 -45:12:11.90 SN 2026idu 2026-04-19.41 15.9 12:10:50.92 +66:55:31.20 SN 2026icv 2026-04-17.14 16.03 21:36:59.06 -60:43:35.90 ASASSN-26cv 2026-04-17.35 -1.18 08:13:26.26 -27:07:30.50 ASASSN-26cw 2026-04-17.07 -1.01 14:49:14.01 -27:29:20.10 ASASSN-26cu 2026-04-16.29 -2.7 17:21:59.44 -38:54:04.60 ASASSN-26ct 2026-04-14.4 15.15 15:25:54.99 +07:49:24.50 SN2026huo 2026-04-12.14 16.96 20:07:38.15 -21:07:05.40 2026-05-25.18 -1.12 12:23:20.40 +04:53:39.10 AT2026ixd 2026-04-12.14 17.65 17:46:09.76 -61:19:50.40 SN2026icy 2026-04-12.2 17.03 09:25:46.42 +02:13:46.30 SN2026gud 2026-04-11.98 16.49 16:52:15.46 -60:27:45.90 ASASSN-26cs 2026-04-12.4 15.5 04:20:55.37 -51:15:31.10 ASASSN-26cr 2026-04-12.01 15.37 22:25:39.35 +36:45:06.90 AT2026ihl 2026-04-10.48 14.21 19:40:44.94 +00:41:03.80 AT2026imw 2026-04-10.32 16.06 19:52:04.70 +05:53:33.50 ASASSN-26cq 2026-04-9.31 14.98 16:08:18.39 -64:11:08.80 ASASSN-26cp 2026-04-9.14 13.64 09:22:22.90 -61:02:43.70 SN2026idh 2026-04-7.97 16.34 05:06:54.12 -19:42:26.40 AT2026imr 2026-04-8 17.49 07:14:55.34 -36:03:21.40 AT2026hei 2026-04-8.12 16.7 21:35:33.14 -19:01:34.80 AT2026ihm 2026-04-8.36 16.7 04:28:24.08 -32:25:35.30 AT2026imo 2026-04-8.02 16.81 05:10:35.79 -39:38:40.80 SN 2026hnn 2026-04-7.04 17.07 09:54:32.04 -01:17:25.80 ASASSN-26cn 2026-04-7.01 15.58 07:46:24.43 -77:29:36.30 ASASSN-26co 2026-04-7.15 15.11 05:00:45.52 -29:51:06.20 AT2026hvw 2026-04-6.03 16.51 19:49:33.10 -23:37:11.00 ASASSN-26cl 2026-04-5.29 14.98 19:32:43.68 -22:39:32.70 ASASSN-26cm 2026-04-4.27 13.88 18:08:57.38 +76:48:23.60 ASASSN-26ck 2026-04-2.37 15.38 16:16:36.10 +44:52:30.20 AT2026hyy 2026-04-2.58 13.81 21:55:23.31 -34:48:53.90 ASASSN-26cj 2026-03-30.4 -1.47 11:19:50.81 -27:51:50.40 SN2026gvk 2026-03-30 15.28 11:53:57.02 -23:09:46.20 SN2026gzx 2026-03-28.75 15.27 07:13:46.14 -33:10:15.70 ASASSN-26ci 2026-03-28.15 15.14 09:03:36.09 -67:58:13.00 SN2026hkg 2026-03-28.19 15.82 07:03:00.72 +39:14:43.00 SN2026fin 2026-03-28.27 15.82 05:35:42.80 -63:44:05.50 ASASSN-26ch 2026-03-27.86 13.02 11:23:19.04 +34:22:38.00 SN2026fwt 2026-03-27.3 16.56 19:03:49.79 +37:04:05.20 ASASSN-26ce 2026-03-26.56 16.3 20:26:56.07 -52:54:06.50 AT2026hiy 2026-03-26.35 16.95 05:25:54.76 -30:15:35.80 ASASSN-26cg 2026-03-25.07 16.88 06:57:16.49 -26:54:37.20 SN2026fzb 2026-03-25.14 15.8 14:37:38.23 -43:00:52.30 ASASSN-26cd 2026-03-24.24 12.52 17:34:53.03 +06:04:29.70 AT2026gzl 2026-03-23.27 15.82 08:30:02.60 -35:12:47.50 ASASSN-26cf 2026-03-23.2 14.82 16:54:25.33 +37:49:56.60 SN 2026evz 2026-03-21.32 17.54 17:06:19.20 -18:54:19.50 ASASSN-26bx 2026-03-21.25 16.39 19:01:16.28 -29:29:23.10 ASASSN-26bw 2026-03-21.33 15.81 08:46:05.75 +10:47:39.80 ASASSN-26ca 2026-03-21.13 14.27 12:14:58.16 +63:47:16.20 SN 2026fvx 2026-03-21.12 15.6 18:02:55.90 -75:23:02.60 ASASSN-26bz 2026-03-21.32 16.16 12:16:02.87 -53:16:33.70 ASASSN-26cc 2026-03-20.08 3.93 13:08:21.85 +29:13:44.20 SN 2026fmh 2026-03-20.16 -0.33 19:56:38.48 -34:45:21.50 ASASSN-26cb 2026-03-20.35 -3.26 -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 5.6K Jun 1 22:34 asassn_transients_list.txt ############################################################ Truncated list of TOCP transients from http://www.cbat.eps.harvard.edu/unconf/tocp.html : 17:57:19.56 -28:08:14.7 TCP J17571956-2808147 2026-03-19.7972 14.5mag 08:46:05.73 +10:47:39.7 TCP J08460573+1047397 2026-03-21.1936 14.5mag 09:55:38.83 +69:05:21.7 PNV J09553883+6905217 2026-04-01.893 19.4mag 19:32:43.67 -22:39:30.7 TCP J19324367-2239307 2026-04-05.4395 13.6mag 16:16:36.03 +44:52:28.9 TCP J16163603+4452289 2026-04-05.6655 14.2mag 00:43:38.36 +41:15:32.4 PNV J00433836+4115324 2026-04-08.079 17.2mag 15:41:11.68 +59:18:26.8 TCP J15411168+5918268 2026-04-12.9625 19.2mag 00:43:35.02 +41:46:28.0 PNV J00433502+4146280 2026-04-23.056 15.9mag 00:42:55.64 +41:14:12.2 PNV J00425564+4114122 2026-04-24.042 16.2mag 21:14:03.38 +56:46:44.1 TCP J21140338+5646441 2026-05-05.3534 16.7mag 15:03:05.19 +22:02:04.1 TCP J15030519+2202041 2026-05-08.3260 13.9mag 07:15:18.25 +47:53:16.7 TCP J07151825+4753167 2026-05-09.1599 14.4mag 16:00:18.44 -22:30:10.6 TCP J16001844-2230106 2026-05-09.6135 13.3mag 00:42:47.45 +41:16:58.5 PNV J00424745+4116585 2026-05-10.030 16.8mag 09:55:02.89 +69:02:13.8 PNV J09550289+6902138 2026-05-18.925 20.7mag 00:43:01.82 +41:18:16.6 PNV J00430182+4118166 2026-05-21.8651 18.83Cmag 00:42:51.20 +41:16:59.4 PNV J00425120+4116594 2022-10-26.135 19.3mag 12:24:25.10 +28:47:12.0 TCP J12242510+2847120 2026-05-31.6015 14.8mag 00:56:07.13 +43:01:40.6 TCP J00560713+4301406 2026-06-01.4135 12.2mag 00:42:41.64 +41:15:16.2 PNV J00424164+4115162 2026-06-02.029 17.4mag -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 189K Jun 1 22:34 tocp_transients_list.txt ############################################################ Truncated list of recent TNS transients from https://www.wis-tns.org/ : 14:43:04.770 +44:26:44.68 AT 2026nhj 2026-05-12.86 21.31 14:48:12.840 +26:16:16.61 AT 2026nhi 2026-05-07.83 20.09 14:39:54.860 +26:23:14.77 AT 2026nhh 2026-05-07.83 21.13 14:29:41.070 +26:50:04.61 AT 2026nhg 2026-05-07.83 20.77 14:03:03.560 -00:52:45.67 AT 2026nhf 2026-05-19.65 21.75 13:27:33.220 -01:52:49.95 AT 2026nhe 2026-05-17.64 20.72 13:18:46.250 +02:28:16.38 AT 2026nhd 2026-05-09.67 22.71 20:47:45.529 -19:53:26.35 AT 2026nhc 2026-05-20.40 19.7848 19:13:38.097 -14:31:38.10 AT 2026nhb 2026-05-14.44 20.7774 15:35:51.801 +19:40:09.90 AT 2026nha 2026-05-07.31 20.0995 15:57:39.574 -25:29:17.95 AT 2026ngz 2026-04-18.41 19.9742 10:51:38.905 -10:28:42.76 AT 2026ngy 2026-05-15.38 20.12 11:36:55.330 -31:38:36.50 AT 2026ngx 2026-05-11.39 20.37 10:39:09.434 -12:00:29.70 AT 2026ngw 2026-05-15.36 19.47 23:31:07.680 +49:32:03.66 AT 2026ngv 2026-05-21.20 19.21 11:15:47.222 -26:40:41.12 AT 2026ngu 2026-05-21.37 19.08 11:22:13.240 -18:01:38.68 AT 2026ngt 2026-05-21.37 19.38 13:49:04.574 +60:57:59.76 AT 2026ngs 2026-05-13.26 20.7824 13:58:24.302 -03:02:49.29 SN 2026ngr 2026-05-15.19 19.8766 16:18:20.038 +32:35:19.31 AT 2026ngq 2026-05-20.15 20.02 -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 30K Jun 1 22:34 tns_transients_list.txt

Profiling:

CPU temperature: 105 C - WARNING