This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_221919_TTUQ1b1x1_3439420_KRYdFBGO
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 02.1306 2461193.6306 12.89 12:45:45.33 -08:11:20.4
300.50074 54.65592 galactic Vir Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.9" and 7.1 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.55 Pandora 1 0 1 13.1 0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-46-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0165.fits at 12:45:45.33 -08:11:20.4: 15.81 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-43-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131.fits at 12:45:45.33 -08:11:20.4: 15.79 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 06 02.1306* 12 45 45.33 -08 11 20.4 12.9 U Vir 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461193.6306,12.89,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260602.1306 12.89CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 02.1306 2461193.6306 12.78 13:19:12.11 -08:21:29.6
314.63477 53.88147 galactic Vir Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.3" and 7.3 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.374 Burgundia 1 -0 1 13.0 0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-46-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0165.fits at 13:19:12.11 -08:21:29.6: 15.49 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-43-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131.fits at 13:19:12.11 -08:21:29.6: 15.44 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 06 02.1306* 13 19 12.11 -08 21 29.6 12.8 U Vir 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461193.6306,12.78,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260602.1306 12.78CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 02.1306 2461193.6306 13.27 12:29:54.82 -09:52:20.9
294.17580 52.63295 galactic Vir Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.4" and 7.1 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.241 Germania 1 -1 1 13.3 -0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-46-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0165.fits at 12:29:54.82 -09:52:20.9: 15.71 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-43-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131.fits at 12:29:54.82 -09:52:20.9: 15.67 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 06 02.1306* 12 29 54.82 -09 52 20.9 13.3 U Vir 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461193.6306,13.27,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260602.1306 13.27CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 02.1306 2461193.6306 13.35 12:56:57.23 -07:46:50.6
305.31831 55.06547 galactic Vir Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.4" and 7.1 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.233 Asterope 1 0 1 13.2 0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-46-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0165.fits at 12:56:57.23 -07:46:50.6: 15.71 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-43-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131.fits at 12:56:57.23 -07:46:50.6: 15.78 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 06 02.1306* 12 56 57.23 -07 46 50.6 13.3 U Vir 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461193.6306,13.35,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260602.1306 13.35CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 02.1306 2461193.6306 14.18 12:24:04.67 -07:25:12.0
291.10279 54.82213 galactic Vir Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.7" and 7.0 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.509 Iolanda 0 -0 0 14.1 0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-46-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0165.fits at 12:24:04.67 -07:25:12.0: 15.63 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-43-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131.fits at 12:24:04.67 -07:25:12.0: 15.64 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 06 02.1306* 12 24 04.67 -07 25 12.0 14.2 U Vir 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461193.6306,14.18,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260602.1306 14.18CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 02.1306 2461193.6306 13.03 13:04:31.01 -06:10:03.1
308.83740 56.55418 galactic Vir Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.5" and 7.1 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.178 Belisana -1 -0 1 13.5 0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-46-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0165.fits at 13:04:31.01 -06:10:03.1: 14.36 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-43-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131.fits at 13:04:31.01 -06:10:03.1: 14.48 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.41 +/- 0.08
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 06 02.1306* 13 04 31.01 -06 10 03.1 13.0 U Vir 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461193.6306,13.03,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260602.1306 13.03CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461171.69917867 11.05.2026 04:46:39.037 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-46-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0165.fits
First image: 2461171.69917867 11.05.2026 04:46:39.037 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-46-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0165.fits
Last image: 2461193.63089800 02.06.2026 03:08:19.587 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_221919_TTUQ1b1x1_3439420_KRYdFBGO/fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_22-08-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 0
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.73
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 3 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 5145
Objects passed selection criteria: 5143
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.6 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.6 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 4909.5
Average stars matched: 4820.5 (98.1872 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 111372 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Mon Jun 1 15:05:05 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-85-g6dfb2809
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-06-01)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Mon Jun 1 22:23:32 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461171.69917867 11.05.2026 04:46:39.037 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-46-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0165.fits
First image: 2461171.69917867 11.05.2026 04:46:39.037 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-46-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0165.fits
Last image: 2461193.63089800 02.06.2026 03:08:19.587 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_221919_TTUQ1b1x1_3439420_KRYdFBGO/fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_22-08-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 46
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.47
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 10 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 31599
Objects passed selection criteria: 31538
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.6 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.6 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 30117.5
Average stars matched: 28818.2 (95.6861 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 133780 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Mon Jun 1 15:05:05 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-85-g6dfb2809
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-06-01)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Mon Jun 1 22:25:01 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 3.5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-46-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0165.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-43-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_221919_TTUQ1b1x1_3439420_KRYdFBGO/fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_22-07-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0032.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_221919_TTUQ1b1x1_3439420_KRYdFBGO/fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_22-08-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-46-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0165.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-43-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-46-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0165.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-43-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_221919_TTUQ1b1x1_3439420_KRYdFBGO/fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_22-07-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0032.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_221919_TTUQ1b1x1_3439420_KRYdFBGO/fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_22-08-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461193.63037145
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-46-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0165.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-46-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0165.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-46-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0165.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-46-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0165.fits'
wcs_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-43-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-43-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-43-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-43-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131.fits'
wcs_fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_22-07-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0032.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_22-07-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0032.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_22-07-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0032.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_22-07-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0032.fits'
wcs_fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_22-08-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_22-08-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_22-08-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_22-08-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033.fits'
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-46-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0165.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-46-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0165.fits
Image size: 937.0'x624.1' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 12:51:26.357 -09:59:47.89 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.87"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_22-07-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0032.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_22-07-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0032.fits
Image size: 941.0'x626.7' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 12:51:35.906 -09:57:36.08 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 12:51:26.357 -09:59:47.89
Second-epoch image center 12:51:35.906 -09:57:36.08
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0536 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_22-08-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_22-08-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033.fits
Image size: 941.0'x626.7' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 12:51:37.025 -09:58:15.16 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 12:51:26.357 -09:59:47.89
Second-epoch image center 12:51:37.025 -09:58:15.16
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0508 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 12:51:35.906 -09:57:36.08
Second-epoch second image center 12:51:37.025 -09:58:15.16
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01179 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-46-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0165.fits &> /tmp/tmp.Ww0vf2gesf
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-46-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0165.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-43-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131.fits &> /tmp/tmp.TxdcDaloo2
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-43-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_221919_TTUQ1b1x1_3439420_KRYdFBGO/fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_22-07-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0032.fits &> /tmp/tmp.yp60avKqCD
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_221919_TTUQ1b1x1_3439420_KRYdFBGO/fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_22-07-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0032.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_221919_TTUQ1b1x1_3439420_KRYdFBGO/fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_22-08-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033.fits &> /tmp/tmp.Grz2PXpI54
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_221919_TTUQ1b1x1_3439420_KRYdFBGO/fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_22-08-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-46-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0165.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-46-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0165.fits and wcs_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-46-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0165.fits.cat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-46-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0165.fits and wcs_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-46-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0165.fits.cat
Found non-empty wcs_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-46-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0165.fits and wcs_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-46-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0165.fits.cat
The reference image (wcs_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-46-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0165.fits) and catalog (wcs_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-46-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0165.fits.cat) found
'wcs_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-46-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0165.fits.cat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 5827 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 184.8401 to 200.9286 deg, Dec -15.2484 to -4.6963 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 184.8401 to 200.9286 deg, Dec -15.2484 to -4.6963 deg
Loaded 4122 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3369 out of 3460 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3460 out of 5827 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.702900
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.702900
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.73
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.97
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.97
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 5827 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 184.8401 to 200.9286 deg, Dec -15.2484 to -4.6963 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 184.8401 to 200.9286 deg, Dec -15.2484 to -4.6963 deg
Loaded 4122 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3369 out of 3460 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3460 out of 5827 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-46-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0165.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-46-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0165.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-46-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0165.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-46-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0165.fits (aperture=6.4)
Read 5203 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 184.5002 to 200.9925 deg, Dec -15.6191 to -4.2997 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 184.5002 to 200.9925 deg, Dec -15.6191 to -4.2997 deg
Loaded 4564 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3310 out of 3416 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3416 out of 5203 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-43-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-43-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-43-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-43-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131.fits (aperture=6.1)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 0 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 8000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.2 pix Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-46-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0165.fits
2.1 pix Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-43-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131.fits
2.3 pix fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_22-07-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0032.fits
2.3 pix fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_22-08-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033.fits
2.2 pix wcs_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-46-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0165.fits
2.1 pix wcs_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-43-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.0 mag. Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-46-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0165.fits
14.9 mag. Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-43-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131.fits
14.7 mag. fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_22-07-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0032.fits
14.7 mag. fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_22-08-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.7 (SNR ) 11.7 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.Ww0vf2gesf (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-46-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0165.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-01_CI_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_221919_TTUQ1b1x1_3439420_KRYdFBGO/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-46-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0165.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-46-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0165.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-46-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0165.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-46-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0165.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-46-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0165.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-46-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0165.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-46-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0165.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-46-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0165.fits' -> 'wcs_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-46-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0165.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-46-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0165.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-46-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0165.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-46-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0165.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-46-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0165.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-46-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0165.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-46-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0165.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-46-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0165.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-46-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0165.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-46-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0165.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-46-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0165.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=386, passed=5827
Got 5827 stars (including 5438 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-46-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0165.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 5827 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.0'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.0 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013014 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010411 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.2 to -4.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 981 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 981 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 976 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 981 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5786 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.2 to -4.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 981 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 981 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5787 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 981 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5787 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44"
Excluding outliers - 981 stars left (next iteration limit 1079)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-46-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0165.fits N_match=981 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.485 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.342 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.602 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.389 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.646 n_q1=230 n_q2=264 n_q3=238 n_q4=249 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.332
The image catalog is written to wcs_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-46-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0165.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-46-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0165.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-46-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0165.fits -region wcs_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-46-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0165.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-46-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0165.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.TxdcDaloo2 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-01_CI_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_221919_TTUQ1b1x1_3439420_KRYdFBGO/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-43-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131.fits 574.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-43-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-43-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-43-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-43-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-43-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-43-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131.fits' -> 'wcs_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-43-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-43-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-43-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-43-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-43-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-43-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-43-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-43-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-43-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-43-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-43-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=380, passed=5203
Got 5203 stars (including 4817 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-43-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 5203 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013072 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010458 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 371 to 430 (Dec -15.6 to -4.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 979 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 979 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 976 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 979 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5156 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 371 to 430 (Dec -15.6 to -4.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 979 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 979 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5154 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 979 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5154 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
Excluding outliers - 979 stars left (next iteration limit 1076)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-43-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131.fits N_match=979 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.305 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.293 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.357 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.257 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.287 n_q1=229 n_q2=247 n_q3=264 n_q4=239 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.170
The image catalog is written to wcs_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-43-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-43-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-43-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131.fits -region wcs_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-43-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-43-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.yp60avKqCD (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-01_CI_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_221919_TTUQ1b1x1_3439420_KRYdFBGO/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_221919_TTUQ1b1x1_3439420_KRYdFBGO/fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_22-07-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0032.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_221919_TTUQ1b1x1_3439420_KRYdFBGO/fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_22-07-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0032.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_221919_TTUQ1b1x1_3439420_KRYdFBGO/fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_22-07-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0032.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_221919_TTUQ1b1x1_3439420_KRYdFBGO/fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_22-07-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0032.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_221919_TTUQ1b1x1_3439420_KRYdFBGO/fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_22-07-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0032.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_221919_TTUQ1b1x1_3439420_KRYdFBGO/fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_22-07-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0032.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_22-07-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0032.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_22-07-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0032.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_22-07-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0032.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_22-07-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0032.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_22-07-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0032.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_22-07-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0032.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_22-07-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0032.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_221919_TTUQ1b1x1_3439420_KRYdFBGO/fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_22-07-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0032.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_22-07-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0032.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=4, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=303, passed=4363
Got 4363 stars (including 4049 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_22-07-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0032.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 4363 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.0'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.0 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013069 (47.0 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010456 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 372 to 430 (Dec -15.6 to -4.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 980 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 980 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 973 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 980 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4312 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 372 to 430 (Dec -15.6 to -4.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 980 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 980 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4312 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 980 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4312 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
Excluding outliers - 980 stars left (next iteration limit 1078)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_22-07-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0032.fits N_match=980 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.290 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.271 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.333 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.254 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.299 n_q1=232 n_q2=271 n_q3=239 n_q4=238 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.146
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_22-07-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0032.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_22-07-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0032.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_221919_TTUQ1b1x1_3439420_KRYdFBGO/fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_22-07-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0032.fits -region wcs_fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_22-07-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0032.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_22-07-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0032.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.Grz2PXpI54 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-01_CI_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_221919_TTUQ1b1x1_3439420_KRYdFBGO/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_221919_TTUQ1b1x1_3439420_KRYdFBGO/fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_22-08-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_221919_TTUQ1b1x1_3439420_KRYdFBGO/fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_22-08-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_221919_TTUQ1b1x1_3439420_KRYdFBGO/fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_22-08-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_221919_TTUQ1b1x1_3439420_KRYdFBGO/fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_22-08-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_221919_TTUQ1b1x1_3439420_KRYdFBGO/fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_22-08-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_221919_TTUQ1b1x1_3439420_KRYdFBGO/fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_22-08-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_22-08-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_22-08-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_22-08-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_22-08-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_22-08-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_22-08-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_22-08-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_221919_TTUQ1b1x1_3439420_KRYdFBGO/fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_22-08-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_22-08-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=314, passed=4409
Got 4409 stars (including 4087 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_22-08-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 4409 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.0'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.0 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013069 (47.0 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010456 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 372 to 430 (Dec -15.6 to -4.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 980 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 980 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 975 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 980 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4371 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 372 to 430 (Dec -15.6 to -4.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 980 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 980 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4369 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 980 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4369 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Excluding outliers - 980 stars left (next iteration limit 1078)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_22-08-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033.fits N_match=980 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.325 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.335 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.367 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.301 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.308 n_q1=233 n_q2=265 n_q3=239 n_q4=243 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.130
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_22-08-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_22-08-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_221919_TTUQ1b1x1_3439420_KRYdFBGO/fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_22-08-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033.fits -region wcs_fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_22-08-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_22-08-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-46-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0165.fits sigma_overall=0.485 worst_q_ratio=1.332
ref2=Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-43-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131.fits sigma_overall=0.305 worst_q_ratio=1.170
new1=fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_22-07-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0032.fits sigma_overall=0.290 worst_q_ratio=1.146
new2=fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_22-08-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033.fits sigma_overall=0.325 worst_q_ratio=1.130
reference average sigma_overall=0.395 worst_q_ratio=1.251
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
Distribution of catalog-matched stars across the image:
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy: wrote wcs_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-46-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0165_astrometric_residuals.png (981 matched stars from wcs_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-46-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0165.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy: wrote wcs_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-43-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131_astrometric_residuals.png (979 matched stars from wcs_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-43-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy: wrote wcs_fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_22-07-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0032_astrometric_residuals.png (980 matched stars from wcs_fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_22-07-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0032.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy: wrote wcs_fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_22-08-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033_astrometric_residuals.png (980 matched stars from wcs_fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_22-08-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_22-07-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0032.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_22-07-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0032.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_221919_TTUQ1b1x1_3439420_KRYdFBGO/wcs_fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_22-07-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0032.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_22-08-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_22-08-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_221919_TTUQ1b1x1_3439420_KRYdFBGO/wcs_fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_22-08-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Vir-11-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
No candidates found here
Prepared the HTML report for the field Vir-11-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 3.5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-46-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0165.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-43-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_221919_TTUQ1b1x1_3439420_KRYdFBGO/fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_22-07-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0032.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_221919_TTUQ1b1x1_3439420_KRYdFBGO/fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_22-08-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-46-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0165.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-43-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-46-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0165.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-43-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_221919_TTUQ1b1x1_3439420_KRYdFBGO/fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_22-07-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0032.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_221919_TTUQ1b1x1_3439420_KRYdFBGO/fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_22-08-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-46-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0165.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-43-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_22-07-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0032.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_22-08-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/exclusion_list.txt
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-46-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0165.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-43-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_22-07-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0032.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_22-08-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-46-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0165.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-46-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0165.fits
Image size: 937.0'x624.1' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 12:51:26.357 -09:59:47.89 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.87"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_22-07-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0032.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_22-07-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0032.fits
util/fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh: line 144: echo: write error: Broken pipe
Image size: 941.0'x626.7' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 12:51:35.906 -09:57:36.08 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 12:51:26.357 -09:59:47.89
Second-epoch image center 12:51:35.906 -09:57:36.08
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0536 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_22-08-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_22-08-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033.fits
Image size: 941.0'x626.7' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 12:51:37.025 -09:58:15.16 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 12:51:26.357 -09:59:47.89
Second-epoch image center 12:51:37.025 -09:58:15.16
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0508 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 12:51:35.906 -09:57:36.08
Second-epoch second image center 12:51:37.025 -09:58:15.16
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01179 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-46-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0165.fits &> /tmp/tmp.YuK6eoGKyE
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-46-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0165.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-43-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131.fits &> /tmp/tmp.ruj5CAvpo8
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-43-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_221919_TTUQ1b1x1_3439420_KRYdFBGO/fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_22-07-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0032.fits &> /tmp/tmp.kjgkswoyG8
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_221919_TTUQ1b1x1_3439420_KRYdFBGO/fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_22-07-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0032.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_221919_TTUQ1b1x1_3439420_KRYdFBGO/fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_22-08-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033.fits &> /tmp/tmp.6dnQeYRVHi
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_221919_TTUQ1b1x1_3439420_KRYdFBGO/fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_22-08-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-46-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0165.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-46-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0165.fits and wcs_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-46-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0165.fits.cat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-46-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0165.fits and wcs_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-46-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0165.fits.cat
Found non-empty wcs_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-46-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0165.fits and wcs_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-46-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0165.fits.cat
The reference image (wcs_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-46-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0165.fits) and catalog (wcs_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-46-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0165.fits.cat) found
'wcs_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-46-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0165.fits.cat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 32542 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 184.8050 to 200.9482 deg, Dec -15.2565 to -4.6935 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 184.8050 to 200.9482 deg, Dec -15.2565 to -4.6935 deg
Loaded 4143 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3362 out of 3556 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3556 out of 32542 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.581000
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.581000
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.47
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.11
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.11
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 32542 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 184.8050 to 200.9482 deg, Dec -15.2565 to -4.6935 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 184.8050 to 200.9482 deg, Dec -15.2565 to -4.6935 deg
Loaded 4143 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3362 out of 3556 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3556 out of 32542 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-46-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0165.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-46-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0165.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-46-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0165.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-46-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0165.fits (aperture=5.0)
Read 33325 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 184.4476 to 201.0198 deg, Dec -15.6249 to -4.2566 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 184.4476 to 201.0198 deg, Dec -15.6249 to -4.2566 deg
Loaded 4603 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3434 out of 3658 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3658 out of 33325 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-43-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-43-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-43-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-43-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131.fits (aperture=4.6)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 41 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 8000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.1 pix Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-46-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0165.fits
2.0 pix Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-43-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131.fits
2.2 pix fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_22-07-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0032.fits
2.2 pix fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_22-08-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033.fits
2.1 pix wcs_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-46-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0165.fits
2.0 pix wcs_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-43-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.1 mag. Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-46-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0165.fits
15.1 mag. Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-43-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131.fits
14.8 mag. fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_22-07-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0032.fits
14.8 mag. fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_22-08-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.8 (SNR ) 14.2 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.YuK6eoGKyE (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-46-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0165.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-01_CI_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_221919_TTUQ1b1x1_3439420_KRYdFBGO/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-46-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0165.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-46-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0165.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-46-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0165.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-46-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0165.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-46-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0165.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-46-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0165.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-46-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0165.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-46-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0165.fits' -> 'wcs_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-46-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0165.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-46-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0165.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-46-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0165.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-46-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0165.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-46-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0165.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-46-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0165.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-46-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0165.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-46-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0165.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-46-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0165.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-46-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0165.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-46-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0165.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=14, blended=1542, passed=32528
Got 32528 stars (including 30932 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-46-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0165.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 32528 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.0'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.0 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013014 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010411 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 982 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 982 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 977 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 982 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 32273 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 982 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 982 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 32273 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 982 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 32272 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44"
Excluding outliers - 982 stars left (next iteration limit 1080)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-46-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0165.fits N_match=982 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.483 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.362 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.590 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.364 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.632 n_q1=232 n_q2=258 n_q3=256 n_q4=236 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.307
The image catalog is written to wcs_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-46-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0165.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-46-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0165.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-46-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0165.fits -region wcs_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-46-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0165.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-46-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0165.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.ruj5CAvpo8 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-01_CI_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_221919_TTUQ1b1x1_3439420_KRYdFBGO/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-43-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131.fits 574.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-43-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-43-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-43-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-43-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-43-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-43-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131.fits' -> 'wcs_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-43-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-43-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-43-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-43-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-43-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-43-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-43-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-43-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-43-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-43-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-43-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=20, blended=1204, passed=33305
Got 33305 stars (including 32038 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-43-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 33305 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013072 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010458 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 371 to 430 (Dec -15.6 to -4.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 978 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 978 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 974 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 978 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 33004 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 371 to 430 (Dec -15.6 to -4.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 978 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 978 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 33004 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 978 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 33004 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
Excluding outliers - 978 stars left (next iteration limit 1075)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-43-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131.fits N_match=978 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.298 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.295 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.337 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.263 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.289 n_q1=221 n_q2=257 n_q3=268 n_q4=232 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.131
The image catalog is written to wcs_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-43-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-43-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-43-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131.fits -region wcs_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-43-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-43-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.kjgkswoyG8 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-01_CI_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_221919_TTUQ1b1x1_3439420_KRYdFBGO/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_221919_TTUQ1b1x1_3439420_KRYdFBGO/fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_22-07-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0032.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_221919_TTUQ1b1x1_3439420_KRYdFBGO/fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_22-07-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0032.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_221919_TTUQ1b1x1_3439420_KRYdFBGO/fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_22-07-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0032.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_221919_TTUQ1b1x1_3439420_KRYdFBGO/fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_22-07-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0032.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_221919_TTUQ1b1x1_3439420_KRYdFBGO/fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_22-07-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0032.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_221919_TTUQ1b1x1_3439420_KRYdFBGO/fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_22-07-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0032.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_22-07-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0032.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_22-07-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0032.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_22-07-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0032.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_22-07-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0032.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_22-07-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0032.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_22-07-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0032.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_22-07-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0032.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_221919_TTUQ1b1x1_3439420_KRYdFBGO/fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_22-07-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0032.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_22-07-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0032.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=7, blended=820, passed=27364
Got 27364 stars (including 26485 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_22-07-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0032.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 27364 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.0'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.0 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013069 (47.0 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010456 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 372 to 431 (Dec -15.6 to -4.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 979 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 979 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 973 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 979 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 27120 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 372 to 431 (Dec -15.6 to -4.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 979 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 979 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 27120 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 979 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 27120 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
Excluding outliers - 979 stars left (next iteration limit 1076)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_22-07-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0032.fits N_match=979 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.284 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.276 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.310 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.260 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.293 n_q1=226 n_q2=278 n_q3=237 n_q4=238 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.090
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_22-07-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0032.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_22-07-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0032.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_221919_TTUQ1b1x1_3439420_KRYdFBGO/fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_22-07-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0032.fits -region wcs_fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_22-07-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0032.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_22-07-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0032.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.6dnQeYRVHi (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-01_CI_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_221919_TTUQ1b1x1_3439420_KRYdFBGO/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_221919_TTUQ1b1x1_3439420_KRYdFBGO/fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_22-08-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_221919_TTUQ1b1x1_3439420_KRYdFBGO/fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_22-08-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_221919_TTUQ1b1x1_3439420_KRYdFBGO/fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_22-08-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_221919_TTUQ1b1x1_3439420_KRYdFBGO/fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_22-08-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_221919_TTUQ1b1x1_3439420_KRYdFBGO/fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_22-08-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_221919_TTUQ1b1x1_3439420_KRYdFBGO/fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_22-08-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_22-08-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_22-08-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_22-08-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_22-08-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_22-08-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_22-08-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_22-08-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_221919_TTUQ1b1x1_3439420_KRYdFBGO/fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_22-08-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_22-08-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=10, blended=870, passed=28267
Got 28267 stars (including 27344 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_22-08-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 28267 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.0'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.0 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013069 (47.0 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010456 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 372 to 430 (Dec -15.6 to -4.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 979 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 979 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 976 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 979 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 28054 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 372 to 430 (Dec -15.6 to -4.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 979 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 979 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 28052 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 979 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 28052 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Excluding outliers - 979 stars left (next iteration limit 1076)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_22-08-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033.fits N_match=979 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.326 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.345 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.349 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.285 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.313 n_q1=232 n_q2=268 n_q3=242 n_q4=237 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.069
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_22-08-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_22-08-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_221919_TTUQ1b1x1_3439420_KRYdFBGO/fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_22-08-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033.fits -region wcs_fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_22-08-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_22-08-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_22-07-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0032.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_221919_TTUQ1b1x1_3439420_KRYdFBGO/wcs_fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_22-07-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0032.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_22-08-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_221919_TTUQ1b1x1_3439420_KRYdFBGO/wcs_fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_22-08-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Vir-11-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-46-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0165.fits at 12:27:42.88 -07:35:25.8: 12.29 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-46-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0165.fits at 13:19:12.11 -08:21:29.6: 15.49 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-46-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0165.fits at 12:46:54.82 -11:38:11.8: 13.20 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-46-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0165.fits at 12:45:45.33 -08:11:20.4: 15.81 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-46-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0165.fits at 12:29:54.82 -09:52:20.9: 15.71 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-46-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0165.fits at 12:47:02.48 -13:52:09.7: 12.32 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-46-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0165.fits at 12:21:02.21 -14:27:40.9: 13.18 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-46-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0165.fits at 12:54:47.10 -10:25:48.2: 13.55 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-46-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0165.fits at 12:56:57.23 -07:46:50.6: 15.71 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-46-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0165.fits at 12:33:00.28 -14:14:23.0: 13.64 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-43-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131.fits at 12:27:42.88 -07:35:25.8: 12.45 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.35 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 12:27:42.88 -07:35:25.8: ref_mag=12.35 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.4694 delta=-0.12 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-43-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131.fits at 13:19:12.11 -08:21:29.6: 15.44 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-43-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131.fits at 12:45:45.33 -08:11:20.4: 15.79 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-43-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131.fits at 12:46:54.82 -11:38:11.8: 13.33 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-43-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131.fits at 12:29:54.82 -09:52:20.9: 15.67 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.25 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 12:46:54.82 -11:38:11.8: ref_mag=13.25 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.4821 delta=-0.23 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-43-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131.fits at 12:47:02.48 -13:52:09.7: 12.36 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.34 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 12:47:02.48 -13:52:09.7: ref_mag=12.34 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.4654 delta=-0.12 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-43-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131.fits at 12:33:00.28 -14:14:23.0: 13.59 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-43-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131.fits at 12:21:02.21 -14:27:40.9: 13.26 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.61 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 12:33:00.28 -14:14:23.0: ref_mag=13.61 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.6108 delta=0.00 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.21 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-43-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131.fits at 12:56:57.23 -07:46:50.6: 15.78 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 12:21:02.21 -14:27:40.9: ref_mag=13.21 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.3238 delta=-0.11 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-43-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131.fits at 12:54:47.10 -10:25:48.2: 13.42 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.48 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 12:54:47.10 -10:25:48.2: ref_mag=13.48 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.5716 delta=-0.09 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-46-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0165.fits at 12:27:20.55 -09:50:14.1: 13.84 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-46-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0165.fits at 12:28:15.10 -04:57:31.9: 13.98 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-46-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0165.fits at 12:42:40.36 -07:13:29.7: 13.88 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-46-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0165.fits at 12:24:04.67 -07:25:12.0: 15.63 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-46-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0165.fits at 12:27:00.65 -04:51:27.0: 14.87 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-43-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131.fits at 12:27:20.55 -09:50:14.1: 13.74 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.78 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 12:27:20.55 -09:50:14.1: ref_mag=13.78 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=13.8454 delta=-0.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-43-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131.fits at 12:28:15.10 -04:57:31.9: 13.92 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.95 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 12:28:15.10 -04:57:31.9: ref_mag=13.95 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.0259 delta=-0.08 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-43-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131.fits at 12:42:40.36 -07:13:29.7: 13.97 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.92 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 12:42:40.36 -07:13:29.7: ref_mag=13.92 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=13.9982 delta=-0.08 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-46-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0165.fits at 12:21:41.99 -11:10:06.6: 14.78 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-43-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131.fits at 12:24:04.67 -07:25:12.0: 15.64 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-43-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131.fits at 12:27:00.65 -04:51:27.0: 14.59 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.70 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 12:27:00.65 -04:51:27.0: ref_mag=14.70 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.5072 delta=0.19 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-43-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131.fits at 12:21:41.99 -11:10:06.6: 14.62 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-46-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0165.fits at 12:22:38.07 -14:25:34.4: 14.63 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.70 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 12:21:41.99 -11:10:06.6: ref_mag=14.70 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.4376 delta=0.26 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-46-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0165.fits at 12:23:00.89 -04:46:29.0: 14.91 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-46-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0165.fits at 12:22:11.36 -07:29:01.0: 14.89 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-43-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131.fits at 12:22:38.07 -14:25:34.4: 14.61 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.62 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 12:22:38.07 -14:25:34.4: ref_mag=14.62 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.3804 delta=0.24 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-43-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131.fits at 12:23:00.89 -04:46:29.0: 15.03 +/- 0.23 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-43-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131.fits at 12:22:11.36 -07:29:01.0: 14.96 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.96 +/- 0.15
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 12:23:00.89 -04:46:29.0: ref_mag=14.96 +/- 0.15 new_mean_mag=14.5885 delta=0.37 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.92 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 12:22:11.36 -07:29:01.0: ref_mag=14.92 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.6044 delta=0.31 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-46-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0165.fits at 12:21:57.24 -08:10:21.0: 15.17 +/- 0.24 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-46-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0165.fits at 12:28:15.64 -05:12:40.6: 14.63 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-43-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131.fits at 12:21:57.24 -08:10:21.0: 14.51 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.69 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 12:21:57.24 -08:10:21.0: ref_mag=14.69 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.5385 delta=0.15 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-46-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0165.fits at 12:29:44.35 -05:19:36.1: 14.98 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-43-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131.fits at 12:28:15.64 -05:12:40.6: 14.46 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.53 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 12:28:15.64 -05:12:40.6: ref_mag=14.53 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=14.5208 delta=0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-46-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0165.fits at 12:21:00.69 -11:30:59.2: 14.75 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-46-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0165.fits at 12:23:30.66 -07:42:05.7: 14.94 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-43-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131.fits at 12:29:44.35 -05:19:36.1: 14.94 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.96 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 12:29:44.35 -05:19:36.1: ref_mag=14.96 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=14.6321 delta=0.33 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-46-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0165.fits at 12:31:10.79 -05:07:29.6: 14.70 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-46-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0165.fits at 12:29:58.76 -13:16:36.7: 14.99 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-43-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131.fits at 12:21:00.69 -11:30:59.2: 14.79 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-43-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131.fits at 12:23:30.66 -07:42:05.7: 14.81 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.87 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.77 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 12:23:30.66 -07:42:05.7: ref_mag=14.87 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.6105 delta=0.26 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 12:21:00.69 -11:30:59.2: ref_mag=14.77 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.4658 delta=0.30 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-43-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131.fits at 12:31:10.79 -05:07:29.6: 14.84 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-46-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0165.fits at 12:32:47.58 -06:15:06.9: 14.98 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-43-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131.fits at 12:29:58.76 -13:16:36.7: 14.75 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.85 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 12:29:58.76 -13:16:36.7: ref_mag=14.85 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.4852 delta=0.37 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.76 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 12:31:10.79 -05:07:29.6: ref_mag=14.76 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.5747 delta=0.18 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-46-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0165.fits at 12:25:10.42 -13:53:02.3: 15.08 +/- 0.24 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-43-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131.fits at 12:32:47.58 -06:15:06.9: 15.11 +/- 0.22 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.03 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 12:32:47.58 -06:15:06.9: ref_mag=15.03 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=14.7648 delta=0.27 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-46-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0165.fits at 12:24:56.26 -14:26:29.5: 15.22 +/- 0.28 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-46-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0165.fits at 12:26:52.27 -13:45:59.7: 15.15 +/- 0.24 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-43-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131.fits at 12:25:10.42 -13:53:02.3: 14.95 +/- 0.23 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.01 +/- 0.17
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 12:25:10.42 -13:53:02.3: ref_mag=15.01 +/- 0.17 new_mean_mag=14.5631 delta=0.45 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-43-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131.fits at 12:24:56.26 -14:26:29.5: 14.84 +/- 0.22 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.98 +/- 0.17
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 12:24:56.26 -14:26:29.5: ref_mag=14.98 +/- 0.17 new_mean_mag=14.6305 delta=0.35 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-46-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0165.fits at 12:37:39.28 -06:34:06.3: 14.34 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-43-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131.fits at 12:26:52.27 -13:45:59.7: 14.82 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.94 +/- 0.15
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 12:26:52.27 -13:45:59.7: ref_mag=14.94 +/- 0.15 new_mean_mag=14.5459 delta=0.40 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-43-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131.fits at 12:37:39.28 -06:34:06.3: 14.48 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.40 +/- 0.07
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 12:37:39.28 -06:34:06.3: ref_mag=14.40 +/- 0.07 new_mean_mag=14.5363 delta=-0.13 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-46-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0165.fits at 13:04:31.01 -06:10:03.1: 14.36 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-43-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0131.fits at 13:04:31.01 -06:10:03.1: 14.48 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.41 +/- 0.08
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 13:04:31.01 -06:10:03.1: ref_mag=14.41 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=13.0137 delta=1.40 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out04184.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out54223.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out54226.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out54234.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out54244.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out54323.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 7s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 5s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54157_fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_22-08-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033
The candidate 54157_fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_22-08-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 12:27:00.36 -06:52:14.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54158_fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_22-08-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033
The candidate 54158_fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_22-08-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 12:29:48.68 -05:15:35.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54160_fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_22-08-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033
The candidate 54160_fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_22-08-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54162_fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_22-08-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033
The candidate 54162_fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_22-08-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 12:55:53.40 -13:02:15.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54163_fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_22-08-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033
The candidate 54163_fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_22-08-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 12:30:07.36 -07:48:24.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54209_fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_22-08-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033
The candidate 54209_fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_22-08-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54214_fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_22-08-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033
The candidate 54214_fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_22-08-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54223_fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_22-08-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033
Preparing report for the candidate 54223_fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_22-08-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54226_fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_22-08-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033
Preparing report for the candidate 54226_fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_22-08-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54234_fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_22-08-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033
Preparing report for the candidate 54234_fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_22-08-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54239_fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_22-08-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033
The candidate 54239_fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_22-08-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54244_fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_22-08-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033
Preparing report for the candidate 54244_fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_22-08-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54258_fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_22-08-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033
The candidate 54258_fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_22-08-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54264_fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_22-08-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033
The candidate 54264_fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_22-08-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54282_fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_22-08-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033
The candidate 54282_fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_22-08-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54285_fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_22-08-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033
The candidate 54285_fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_22-08-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54287_fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_22-08-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033
The candidate 54287_fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_22-08-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54323_fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_22-08-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033
Preparing report for the candidate 54323_fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_22-08-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54341_fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_22-08-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033
The candidate 54341_fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_22-08-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54355_fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_22-08-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033
The candidate 54355_fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_22-08-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 12:29:57.89 -07:09:36.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54356_fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_22-08-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033
The candidate 54356_fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_22-08-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54358_fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_22-08-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033
The candidate 54358_fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_22-08-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54372_fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_22-08-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033
The candidate 54372_fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_22-08-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54378_fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_22-08-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033
The candidate 54378_fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_22-08-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54381_fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_22-08-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033
The candidate 54381_fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_22-08-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 12:27:36.24 -08:17:29.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54382_fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_22-08-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033
The candidate 54382_fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_22-08-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54385_fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_22-08-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033
The candidate 54385_fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_22-08-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54402_fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_22-08-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033
The candidate 54402_fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_22-08-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54404_fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_22-08-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033
The candidate 54404_fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_22-08-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 12:23:36.51 -08:53:46.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54414_fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_22-08-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033
The candidate 54414_fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_22-08-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 12:44:10.96 -13:28:52.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54419_fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_22-08-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033
The candidate 54419_fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_22-08-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54420_fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_22-08-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033
The candidate 54420_fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_22-08-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54421_fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_22-08-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033
The candidate 54421_fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_22-08-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54423_fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_22-08-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033
The candidate 54423_fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_22-08-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54425_fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_22-08-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033
The candidate 54425_fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_22-08-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54435_fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_22-08-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033
The candidate 54435_fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_22-08-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54438_fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_22-08-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033
The candidate 54438_fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_22-08-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54443_fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_22-08-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033
The candidate 54443_fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_22-08-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54453_fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_22-08-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033
The candidate 54453_fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_22-08-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21407_fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_22-08-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033
The candidate 21407_fd_Vir-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_22-08-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0033 did not pass the final checks
