This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_221531_TTUQ2b1x1_3284722_3hSre0Jv
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 02.1336 2461193.6336 12.51 11:28:55.33 +05:44:43.5
256.67632 60.97254 galactic Leo Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.2" and 8.3 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.65 Cybele -1 1 1 12.6 0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits at 11:28:55.33 +05:44:43.5: 15.79 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-29-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0148.fits at 11:28:55.33 +05:44:43.5: 15.78 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 06 02.1336* 11 28 55.33 +05 44 43.5 12.5 U Leo 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461193.6336,12.51,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260602.1336 12.51CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 02.1336 2461193.6336 12.54 11:11:48.06 +04:26:15.3
252.21276 57.14635 galactic Leo Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.4" and 8.4 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.19 Fortuna -1 0 1 12.7 0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits at 11:11:48.06 +04:26:15.3: 15.93 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-29-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0148.fits at 11:11:48.06 +04:26:15.3: 15.96 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 06 02.1336* 11 11 48.06 +04 26 15.3 12.5 U Leo 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461193.6336,12.54,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260602.1336 12.54CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 02.1336 2461193.6336 13.32 11:02:13.27 +03:32:29.5
250.28337 54.83388 galactic Leo Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.3" and 8.2 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.270 Anahita -2 0 2 13.6 -0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits at 11:02:13.27 +03:32:29.5: 15.96 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-29-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0148.fits at 11:02:13.27 +03:32:29.5: 15.90 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 06 02.1336* 11 02 13.27 +03 32 29.5 13.3 U Leo 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461193.6336,13.32,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260602.1336 13.32CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 02.1336 2461193.6336 13.62 11:31:04.52 +09:15:35.1
252.42926 63.93726 galactic Leo Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.7" and 8.1 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.595 Polyxena -0 1 1 13.9 -0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits at 11:31:04.52 +09:15:35.1: 15.52 +/- 0.29 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-29-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0148.fits at 11:31:04.52 +09:15:35.1: 15.80 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.52 +/- 0.29
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 06 02.1336* 11 31 04.52 +09 15 35.1 13.6 U Leo 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461193.6336,13.62,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260602.1336 13.62CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 02.1336 2461193.6336 13.59 10:53:02.02 +05:36:10.5
244.97381 54.55319 galactic Leo Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.0" and 8.3 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.356 Liguria -4 1 4 13.7 0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits at 10:53:02.02 +05:36:10.5: 15.48 +/- 0.24 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-29-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0148.fits at 10:53:02.02 +05:36:10.5: 15.72 +/- 0.31 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.57 +/- 0.19
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 06 02.1336* 10 53 02.02 +05 36 10.5 13.6 U Leo 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461193.6336,13.59,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260602.1336 13.59CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 02.1336 2461193.6336 13.81 11:06:12.54 +09:25:11.8
243.43647 59.50628 galactic Leo Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.5" and 8.3 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.140 Siwa -1 1 2 13.9 -0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits at 11:06:12.54 +09:25:11.8: 15.90 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-29-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0148.fits at 11:06:12.54 +09:25:11.8: 15.95 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 06 02.1336* 11 06 12.54 +09 25 11.8 13.8 U Leo 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461193.6336,13.81,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260602.1336 13.81CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 02.1336 2461193.6336 14.04 11:14:53.62 +03:31:55.5
254.38610 57.00645 galactic Leo Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.3" and 8.2 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.189 Phthia -1 1 2 14.2 -0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits at 11:14:53.62 +03:31:55.5: 15.83 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-29-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0148.fits at 11:14:53.62 +03:31:55.5: 15.90 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 06 02.1336* 11 14 53.62 +03 31 55.5 14.0 U Leo 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461193.6336,14.04,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260602.1336 14.04CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 02.1336 2461193.6336 14.43 11:06:40.72 +08:04:22.2
245.59496 58.73099 galactic Leo Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.8" and 8.4 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.90 Antiope -2 1 3 14.6 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits at 11:06:40.72 +08:04:22.2: 15.99 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-29-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0148.fits at 11:06:40.72 +08:04:22.2: 15.94 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 06 02.1336* 11 06 40.72 +08 04 22.2 14.4 U Leo 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461193.6336,14.43,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260602.1336 14.43CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461149.73290969 19.04.2026 05:35:13.397 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits
First image: 2461149.73290969 19.04.2026 05:35:13.397 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits
Last image: 2461193.63388580 02.06.2026 03:12:37.733 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_221531_TTUQ2b1x1_3284722_3hSre0Jv/fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-12-37_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0038.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 3
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.65
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 4 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 4041
Objects passed selection criteria: 4041
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.7 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.7 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 3860
Average stars matched: 3789.75 (98.1801 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 110692 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Mon Jun 1 15:05:05 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-85-g6dfb2809
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-06-01)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Mon Jun 1 22:17:43 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461149.73290969 19.04.2026 05:35:13.397 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits
First image: 2461149.73290969 19.04.2026 05:35:13.397 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits
Last image: 2461193.63388580 02.06.2026 03:12:37.733 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_221531_TTUQ2b1x1_3284722_3hSre0Jv/fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-12-37_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0038.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 41
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.35
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 11 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 22518
Objects passed selection criteria: 22470
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.7 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.7 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 21741.2
Average stars matched: 20961.2 (96.4123 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 127816 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Mon Jun 1 15:05:05 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-85-g6dfb2809
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-06-01)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Mon Jun 1 22:19:09 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/TTUQ2_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 4 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-29-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0148.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_221531_TTUQ2b1x1_3284722_3hSre0Jv/fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-11-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0037.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_221531_TTUQ2b1x1_3284722_3hSre0Jv/fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-12-37_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0038.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-29-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0148.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-29-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0148.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_221531_TTUQ2b1x1_3284722_3hSre0Jv/fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-11-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0037.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_221531_TTUQ2b1x1_3284722_3hSre0Jv/fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-12-37_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0038.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461193.63330122
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits'
wcs_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-29-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0148.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-29-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0148.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-29-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0148.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-29-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0148.fits'
wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-11-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0037.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-11-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0037.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-11-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0037.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-11-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0037.fits'
wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-12-37_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0038.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-12-37_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0038.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-12-37_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0038.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-12-37_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0038.fits'
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits
Image size: 937.4'x624.2' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 11:08:41.744 +05:57:39.30 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.87"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-11-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0037.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-11-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0037.fits
Image size: 936.9'x624.0' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 11:08:34.411 +06:00:03.58 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 11:08:41.744 +05:57:39.30
Second-epoch image center 11:08:34.411 +06:00:03.58
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0503 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-12-37_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0038.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-12-37_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0038.fits
Image size: 936.9'x624.0' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 11:08:31.909 +06:00:35.16 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 11:08:41.744 +05:57:39.30
Second-epoch image center 11:08:31.909 +06:00:35.16
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0636 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 11:08:34.411 +06:00:03.58
Second-epoch second image center 11:08:31.909 +06:00:35.16
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01358 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits &> /tmp/tmp.q1Uf3t4qPC
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-29-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0148.fits &> /tmp/tmp.KPOQvhb3Q6
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-29-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0148.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_221531_TTUQ2b1x1_3284722_3hSre0Jv/fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-11-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0037.fits &> /tmp/tmp.xlbl2BvTGy
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_221531_TTUQ2b1x1_3284722_3hSre0Jv/fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-11-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0037.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_221531_TTUQ2b1x1_3284722_3hSre0Jv/fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-12-37_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0038.fits &> /tmp/tmp.0n5pwMrgWh
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_221531_TTUQ2b1x1_3284722_3hSre0Jv/fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-12-37_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0038.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits and wcs_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits.cat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits and wcs_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits.cat
Found non-empty wcs_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits and wcs_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits.cat
The reference image (wcs_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits) and catalog (wcs_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits.cat) found
'wcs_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits.cat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 5626 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 159.1365 to 175.0745 deg, Dec +0.5737 to +11.2590 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 159.1365 to 175.0745 deg, Dec 0.5737 to 11.2590 deg
Loaded 3954 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3201 out of 3312 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3312 out of 5626 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.762800
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.762800
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.65
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.11
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.11
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 5626 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 159.1365 to 175.0745 deg, Dec +0.5737 to +11.2590 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 159.1365 to 175.0745 deg, Dec 0.5737 to 11.2590 deg
Loaded 3954 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3201 out of 3312 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3312 out of 5626 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits (aperture=6.5)
Read 5579 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 159.1771 to 175.0846 deg, Dec +0.7335 to +11.2823 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 159.1771 to 175.0846 deg, Dec 0.7335 to 11.2823 deg
Loaded 3902 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3209 out of 3301 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3301 out of 5579 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-29-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0148.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-29-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0148.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-29-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0148.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-29-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0148.fits (aperture=6.2)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 3 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 8000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.4 pix Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits
2.3 pix Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-29-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0148.fits
2.3 pix fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-11-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0037.fits
2.3 pix fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-12-37_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0038.fits
2.4 pix wcs_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits
2.3 pix wcs_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-29-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0148.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.1 mag. Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits
15.1 mag. Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-29-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0148.fits
14.9 mag. fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-11-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0037.fits
14.9 mag. fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-12-37_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0038.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.9 (SNR ) 11.9 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.q1Uf3t4qPC (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-01_CI_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_221531_TTUQ2b1x1_3284722_3hSre0Jv/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits 570.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits' -> 'wcs_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=364, passed=5626
Got 5626 stars (including 5255 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 5626 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013019 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010416 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 452 to 508 (Dec 0.6 to 11.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 943 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 943 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 930 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.47"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 943 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5542 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.46"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 452 to 508 (Dec 0.6 to 11.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 943 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 943 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5543 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.46"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 943 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5543 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.47"
Excluding outliers - 943 stars left (next iteration limit 1037)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits N_match=943 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.504 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.515 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.520 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.509 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.476 n_q1=239 n_q2=269 n_q3=213 n_q4=222 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.031
The image catalog is written to wcs_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits -region wcs_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.KPOQvhb3Q6 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-01_CI_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_221531_TTUQ2b1x1_3284722_3hSre0Jv/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-29-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0148.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-29-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0148.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-29-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0148.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-29-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0148.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-29-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0148.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-29-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0148.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-29-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0148.fits' -> 'wcs_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-29-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0148.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-29-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0148.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-29-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0148.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-29-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0148.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-29-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0148.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-29-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0148.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-29-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0148.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-29-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0148.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-29-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0148.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-29-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0148.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-29-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0148.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=3, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=329, passed=5576
Got 5576 stars (including 5240 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-29-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0148.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 5576 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013017 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010413 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 453 to 508 (Dec 0.7 to 11.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 943 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 943 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 931 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 943 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5497 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 453 to 508 (Dec 0.7 to 11.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 943 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 943 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5495 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 943 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5495 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
Excluding outliers - 943 stars left (next iteration limit 1037)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-29-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0148.fits N_match=943 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.490 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.432 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.577 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.395 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.595 n_q1=234 n_q2=264 n_q3=219 n_q4=226 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.214
The image catalog is written to wcs_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-29-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0148.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-29-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0148.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-29-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0148.fits -region wcs_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-29-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0148.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-29-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0148.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.xlbl2BvTGy (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-01_CI_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_221531_TTUQ2b1x1_3284722_3hSre0Jv/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_221531_TTUQ2b1x1_3284722_3hSre0Jv/fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-11-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0037.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_221531_TTUQ2b1x1_3284722_3hSre0Jv/fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-11-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0037.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_221531_TTUQ2b1x1_3284722_3hSre0Jv/fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-11-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0037.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_221531_TTUQ2b1x1_3284722_3hSre0Jv/fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-11-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0037.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_221531_TTUQ2b1x1_3284722_3hSre0Jv/fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-11-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0037.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_221531_TTUQ2b1x1_3284722_3hSre0Jv/fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-11-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0037.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-11-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0037.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-11-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0037.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-11-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0037.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-11-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0037.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-11-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0037.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-11-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0037.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-11-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0037.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_221531_TTUQ2b1x1_3284722_3hSre0Jv/fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-11-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0037.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-11-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0037.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=287, passed=4624
Got 4624 stars (including 4333 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-11-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0037.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 4624 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 936.9'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 936.9 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013013 (46.8 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010410 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 453 to 508 (Dec 0.7 to 11.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 949 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 949 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 937 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 949 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4566 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 453 to 508 (Dec 0.7 to 11.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 949 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 949 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4569 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 949 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4569 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Excluding outliers - 949 stars left (next iteration limit 1043)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-11-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0037.fits N_match=949 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.470 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.347 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.589 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.409 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.598 n_q1=244 n_q2=258 n_q3=213 n_q4=234 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.272
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-11-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0037.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-11-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0037.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_221531_TTUQ2b1x1_3284722_3hSre0Jv/fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-11-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0037.fits -region wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-11-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0037.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-11-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0037.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.0n5pwMrgWh (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-01_CI_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_221531_TTUQ2b1x1_3284722_3hSre0Jv/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_221531_TTUQ2b1x1_3284722_3hSre0Jv/fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-12-37_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0038.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_221531_TTUQ2b1x1_3284722_3hSre0Jv/fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-12-37_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0038.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_221531_TTUQ2b1x1_3284722_3hSre0Jv/fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-12-37_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0038.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_221531_TTUQ2b1x1_3284722_3hSre0Jv/fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-12-37_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0038.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_221531_TTUQ2b1x1_3284722_3hSre0Jv/fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-12-37_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0038.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_221531_TTUQ2b1x1_3284722_3hSre0Jv/fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-12-37_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0038.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-12-37_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0038.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-12-37_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0038.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-12-37_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0038.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-12-37_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0038.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-12-37_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0038.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-12-37_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0038.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-12-37_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0038.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_221531_TTUQ2b1x1_3284722_3hSre0Jv/fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-12-37_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0038.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-12-37_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0038.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=8, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=319, passed=4665
Got 4665 stars (including 4338 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-12-37_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0038.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 4665 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 936.9'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 936.9 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013013 (46.8 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010410 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 453 to 508 (Dec 0.7 to 11.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 944 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 944 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 930 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 944 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4596 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 453 to 508 (Dec 0.7 to 11.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 944 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 944 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4594 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 944 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4594 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Excluding outliers - 944 stars left (next iteration limit 1038)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-12-37_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0038.fits N_match=944 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.464 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.340 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.598 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.415 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.579 n_q1=239 n_q2=252 n_q3=221 n_q4=232 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.287
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-12-37_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0038.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-12-37_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0038.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_221531_TTUQ2b1x1_3284722_3hSre0Jv/fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-12-37_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0038.fits -region wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-12-37_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0038.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-12-37_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0038.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits sigma_overall=0.504 worst_q_ratio=1.031
ref2=Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-29-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0148.fits sigma_overall=0.490 worst_q_ratio=1.214
new1=fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-11-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0037.fits sigma_overall=0.470 worst_q_ratio=1.272
new2=fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-12-37_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0038.fits sigma_overall=0.464 worst_q_ratio=1.287
reference average sigma_overall=0.497 worst_q_ratio=1.1225
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
Distribution of catalog-matched stars across the image:
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy: wrote wcs_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0503_astrometric_residuals.png (943 matched stars from wcs_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy: wrote wcs_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-29-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0148_astrometric_residuals.png (943 matched stars from wcs_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-29-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0148.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy: wrote wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-11-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0037_astrometric_residuals.png (949 matched stars from wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-11-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0037.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy: wrote wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-12-37_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0038_astrometric_residuals.png (944 matched stars from wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-12-37_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0038.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-11-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0037.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-11-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0037.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_221531_TTUQ2b1x1_3284722_3hSre0Jv/wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-11-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0037.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-12-37_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0038.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-12-37_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0038.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_221531_TTUQ2b1x1_3284722_3hSre0Jv/wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-12-37_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0038.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Leo-07-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits at 11:02:11.89 +08:43:28.0: 12.26 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits at 11:07:24.09 +05:40:35.8: 12.23 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits at 11:07:35.65 +06:31:44.4: 12.08 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-29-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0148.fits at 11:07:24.09 +05:40:35.8: 12.19 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-29-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0148.fits at 11:07:35.65 +06:31:44.4: 12.06 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-29-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0148.fits at 11:02:11.89 +08:43:28.0: 12.30 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.21 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.07 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 11:07:24.09 +05:40:35.8: ref_mag=12.21 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.1810 delta=0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 11:07:35.65 +06:31:44.4: ref_mag=12.07 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.0314 delta=0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.28 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 11:02:11.89 +08:43:28.0: ref_mag=12.28 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.2489 delta=0.03 (need > 0.90)
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 0s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 1s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20245_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-12-37_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0038
The candidate 20245_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-12-37_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0038 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20246_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-12-37_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0038
The candidate 20246_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-12-37_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0038 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20247_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-12-37_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0038
The candidate 20247_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-12-37_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0038 did not pass the final checks
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 1s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Leo-07-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 4 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-29-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0148.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_221531_TTUQ2b1x1_3284722_3hSre0Jv/fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-11-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0037.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_221531_TTUQ2b1x1_3284722_3hSre0Jv/fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-12-37_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0038.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-29-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0148.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-29-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0148.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_221531_TTUQ2b1x1_3284722_3hSre0Jv/fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-11-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0037.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_221531_TTUQ2b1x1_3284722_3hSre0Jv/fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-12-37_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0038.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-29-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0148.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-11-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0037.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-12-37_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0038.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/exclusion_list.txt
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-29-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0148.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-11-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0037.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-12-37_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0038.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits
util/fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh: line 144: echo: write error: Broken pipe
util/fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh: line 144: echo: write error: Broken pipe
Image size: 937.4'x624.2' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 11:08:41.744 +05:57:39.30 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.87"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-11-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0037.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-11-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0037.fits
Image size: 936.9'x624.0' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 11:08:34.411 +06:00:03.58 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 11:08:41.744 +05:57:39.30
Second-epoch image center 11:08:34.411 +06:00:03.58
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0503 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-12-37_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0038.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-12-37_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0038.fits
Image size: 936.9'x624.0' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 11:08:31.909 +06:00:35.16 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 11:08:41.744 +05:57:39.30
Second-epoch image center 11:08:31.909 +06:00:35.16
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0636 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 11:08:34.411 +06:00:03.58
Second-epoch second image center 11:08:31.909 +06:00:35.16
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01358 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits &> /tmp/tmp.pteFlhC32P
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-29-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0148.fits &> /tmp/tmp.3WuZYDMZB3
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-29-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0148.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_221531_TTUQ2b1x1_3284722_3hSre0Jv/fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-11-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0037.fits &> /tmp/tmp.oPYYMLd3WK
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_221531_TTUQ2b1x1_3284722_3hSre0Jv/fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-11-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0037.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_221531_TTUQ2b1x1_3284722_3hSre0Jv/fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-12-37_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0038.fits &> /tmp/tmp.jLfn5C9dKU
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_221531_TTUQ2b1x1_3284722_3hSre0Jv/fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-12-37_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0038.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits and wcs_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits.cat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits and wcs_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits.cat
Found non-empty wcs_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits and wcs_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits.cat
The reference image (wcs_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits) and catalog (wcs_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits.cat) found
'wcs_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits.cat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 29706 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 159.1354 to 175.0757 deg, Dec +0.5737 to +11.2606 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 159.1354 to 175.0757 deg, Dec 0.5737 to 11.2606 deg
Loaded 3956 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3140 out of 3393 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3393 out of 29706 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.633700
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.633700
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.35
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.28
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.28
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 29706 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 159.1354 to 175.0757 deg, Dec +0.5737 to +11.2606 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 159.1354 to 175.0757 deg, Dec 0.5737 to 11.2606 deg
Loaded 3956 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3140 out of 3393 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3393 out of 29706 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits (aperture=5.0)
Read 29098 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 159.1771 to 175.0866 deg, Dec +0.7306 to +11.2850 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 159.1771 to 175.0866 deg, Dec 0.7306 to 11.2850 deg
Loaded 3903 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3156 out of 3385 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3385 out of 29098 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-29-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0148.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-29-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0148.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-29-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0148.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-29-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0148.fits (aperture=4.9)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 26 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 8000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.2 pix Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits
2.2 pix Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-29-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0148.fits
2.2 pix fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-11-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0037.fits
2.2 pix fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-12-37_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0038.fits
2.2 pix wcs_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits
2.2 pix wcs_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-29-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0148.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.3 mag. Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits
15.3 mag. Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-29-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0148.fits
15.0 mag. fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-11-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0037.fits
15.0 mag. fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-12-37_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0038.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 15.0 (SNR ) 14.4 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.pteFlhC32P (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-01_CI_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_221531_TTUQ2b1x1_3284722_3hSre0Jv/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits 570.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits' -> 'wcs_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=15, blended=1187, passed=29691
Got 29691 stars (including 28463 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 29691 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013019 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010416 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 452 to 508 (Dec 0.6 to 11.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 946 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 946 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 937 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.46"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 946 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 29432 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 452 to 508 (Dec 0.6 to 11.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 946 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 946 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 29432 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 946 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 29432 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45"
Excluding outliers - 946 stars left (next iteration limit 1040)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits N_match=946 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.482 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.434 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.508 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.476 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.475 n_q1=228 n_q2=272 n_q3=220 n_q4=226 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.053
The image catalog is written to wcs_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits -region wcs_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.3WuZYDMZB3 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-01_CI_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_221531_TTUQ2b1x1_3284722_3hSre0Jv/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-29-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0148.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-29-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0148.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-29-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0148.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-29-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0148.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-29-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0148.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-29-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0148.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-29-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0148.fits' -> 'wcs_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-29-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0148.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-29-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0148.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-29-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0148.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-29-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0148.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-29-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0148.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-29-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0148.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-29-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0148.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-29-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0148.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-29-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0148.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-29-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0148.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-29-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0148.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=12, blended=1226, passed=29086
Got 29086 stars (including 27828 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-29-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0148.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 29086 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013017 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010413 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 453 to 508 (Dec 0.7 to 11.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 949 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 949 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 936 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 949 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 28816 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 453 to 508 (Dec 0.7 to 11.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 949 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 949 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 28814 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 949 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 28814 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
Excluding outliers - 949 stars left (next iteration limit 1043)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-29-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0148.fits N_match=949 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.480 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.367 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.560 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.424 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.569 n_q1=235 n_q2=261 n_q3=225 n_q4=228 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.186
The image catalog is written to wcs_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-29-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0148.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-29-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0148.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-29-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0148.fits -region wcs_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-29-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0148.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-29-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0148.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.oPYYMLd3WK (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-01_CI_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_221531_TTUQ2b1x1_3284722_3hSre0Jv/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_221531_TTUQ2b1x1_3284722_3hSre0Jv/fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-11-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0037.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_221531_TTUQ2b1x1_3284722_3hSre0Jv/fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-11-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0037.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_221531_TTUQ2b1x1_3284722_3hSre0Jv/fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-11-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0037.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_221531_TTUQ2b1x1_3284722_3hSre0Jv/fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-11-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0037.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_221531_TTUQ2b1x1_3284722_3hSre0Jv/fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-11-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0037.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_221531_TTUQ2b1x1_3284722_3hSre0Jv/fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-11-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0037.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-11-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0037.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-11-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0037.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-11-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0037.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-11-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0037.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-11-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0037.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-11-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0037.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-11-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0037.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_221531_TTUQ2b1x1_3284722_3hSre0Jv/fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-11-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0037.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-11-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0037.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=7, blended=1161, passed=24207
Got 24207 stars (including 23013 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-11-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0037.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 24207 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 936.9'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 936.9 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013013 (46.8 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010410 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 453 to 508 (Dec 0.7 to 11.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 947 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 947 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 933 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 947 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 23879 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 453 to 508 (Dec 0.7 to 11.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 947 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 947 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 23876 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 947 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 23876 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
Excluding outliers - 947 stars left (next iteration limit 1041)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-11-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0037.fits N_match=947 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.451 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.347 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.542 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.386 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.570 n_q1=250 n_q2=249 n_q3=227 n_q4=221 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.264
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-11-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0037.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-11-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0037.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_221531_TTUQ2b1x1_3284722_3hSre0Jv/fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-11-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0037.fits -region wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-11-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0037.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-11-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0037.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.jLfn5C9dKU (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-01_CI_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_221531_TTUQ2b1x1_3284722_3hSre0Jv/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_221531_TTUQ2b1x1_3284722_3hSre0Jv/fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-12-37_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0038.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_221531_TTUQ2b1x1_3284722_3hSre0Jv/fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-12-37_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0038.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_221531_TTUQ2b1x1_3284722_3hSre0Jv/fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-12-37_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0038.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_221531_TTUQ2b1x1_3284722_3hSre0Jv/fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-12-37_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0038.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_221531_TTUQ2b1x1_3284722_3hSre0Jv/fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-12-37_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0038.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_221531_TTUQ2b1x1_3284722_3hSre0Jv/fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-12-37_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0038.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-12-37_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0038.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-12-37_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0038.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-12-37_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0038.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-12-37_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0038.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-12-37_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0038.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-12-37_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0038.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-12-37_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0038.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_221531_TTUQ2b1x1_3284722_3hSre0Jv/fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-12-37_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0038.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-12-37_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0038.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=2, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=5, blended=1185, passed=24133
Got 24133 stars (including 22918 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-12-37_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0038.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 24133 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 936.9'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 936.9 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013013 (46.8 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010410 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 453 to 508 (Dec 0.7 to 11.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 945 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 945 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 932 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 945 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 23717 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 453 to 508 (Dec 0.7 to 11.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 945 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 945 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 23716 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 945 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 23716 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Excluding outliers - 945 stars left (next iteration limit 1039)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-12-37_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0038.fits N_match=945 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.456 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.334 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.577 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.394 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.572 n_q1=256 n_q2=237 n_q3=231 n_q4=221 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.265
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-12-37_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0038.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-12-37_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0038.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_221531_TTUQ2b1x1_3284722_3hSre0Jv/fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-12-37_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0038.fits -region wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-12-37_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0038.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-12-37_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0038.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-11-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0037.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_221531_TTUQ2b1x1_3284722_3hSre0Jv/wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-11-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0037.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-12-37_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0038.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_221531_TTUQ2b1x1_3284722_3hSre0Jv/wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-12-37_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0038.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Leo-07-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits at 11:11:48.06 +04:26:15.3: 15.93 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits at 11:33:01.15 +09:37:21.4: 11.29 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits at 11:02:13.27 +03:32:29.5: 15.96 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits at 11:28:55.33 +05:44:43.5: 15.79 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits at 11:17:48.35 +03:51:37.6: 13.12 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits at 11:17:28.80 +08:03:44.7: 13.99 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits at 11:33:53.34 +06:03:50.6: 14.12 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits at 11:31:04.52 +09:15:35.1: 15.52 +/- 0.29 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits at 10:53:02.02 +05:36:10.5: 15.48 +/- 0.24 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits at 11:06:12.54 +09:25:11.8: 15.90 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-29-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0148.fits at 11:02:13.27 +03:32:29.5: 15.90 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-29-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0148.fits at 11:33:53.34 +06:03:50.6: 14.40 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-29-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0148.fits at 11:28:55.33 +05:44:43.5: 15.78 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-29-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0148.fits at 11:17:48.35 +03:51:37.6: 13.04 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-29-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0148.fits at 11:33:01.15 +09:37:21.4: 11.36 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.23 +/- 0.07
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.07 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 11:33:53.34 +06:03:50.6: ref_mag=14.23 +/- 0.07 new_mean_mag=14.5138 delta=-0.29 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 11:17:48.35 +03:51:37.6: ref_mag=13.07 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.1699 delta=-0.10 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.32 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-29-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0148.fits at 11:17:28.80 +08:03:44.7: 13.93 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 11:33:01.15 +09:37:21.4: ref_mag=11.32 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=11.5200 delta=-0.20 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-29-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0148.fits at 11:11:48.06 +04:26:15.3: 15.96 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.96 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 11:17:28.80 +08:03:44.7: ref_mag=13.96 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=14.0402 delta=-0.08 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-29-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0148.fits at 10:53:02.02 +05:36:10.5: 15.72 +/- 0.31 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.57 +/- 0.19
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 10:53:02.02 +05:36:10.5: ref_mag=15.57 +/- 0.19 new_mean_mag=13.5876 delta=1.99 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-29-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0148.fits at 11:31:04.52 +09:15:35.1: 15.80 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.52 +/- 0.29
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 11:31:04.52 +09:15:35.1: ref_mag=15.52 +/- 0.29 new_mean_mag=13.6196 delta=1.90 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-29-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0148.fits at 11:06:12.54 +09:25:11.8: 15.95 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits at 11:14:53.62 +03:31:55.5: 15.83 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits at 11:11:51.46 +03:47:55.0: 13.95 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits at 11:06:40.72 +08:04:22.2: 15.99 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits at 11:14:52.58 +05:35:22.6: 14.30 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-29-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0148.fits at 11:14:53.62 +03:31:55.5: 15.90 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-29-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0148.fits at 11:11:51.46 +03:47:55.0: 14.05 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-29-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0148.fits at 11:06:40.72 +08:04:22.2: 15.94 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.99 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 11:11:51.46 +03:47:55.0: ref_mag=13.99 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=14.0608 delta=-0.07 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-29-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0148.fits at 11:14:52.58 +05:35:22.6: 14.27 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.28 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 11:14:52.58 +05:35:22.6: ref_mag=14.28 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=14.3369 delta=-0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits at 11:27:49.40 +07:31:00.8: 15.13 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-29-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0148.fits at 11:27:49.40 +07:31:00.8: 15.41 +/- 0.25 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.23 +/- 0.15
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 11:27:49.40 +07:31:00.8: ref_mag=15.23 +/- 0.15 new_mean_mag=14.7622 delta=0.47 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits at 11:16:40.74 +04:42:39.8: 15.11 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits at 11:33:52.96 +02:33:45.3: 15.06 +/- 0.23 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-29-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0148.fits at 11:16:40.74 +04:42:39.8: 15.01 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.06 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 11:16:40.74 +04:42:39.8: ref_mag=15.06 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.6782 delta=0.38 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-29-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0148.fits at 11:33:52.96 +02:33:45.3: 14.96 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.01 +/- 0.15
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 11:33:52.96 +02:33:45.3: ref_mag=15.01 +/- 0.15 new_mean_mag=14.7232 delta=0.28 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits at 11:35:46.65 +10:02:39.1: 15.07 +/- 0.22 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-29-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0148.fits at 11:35:46.65 +10:02:39.1: 14.98 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits at 11:26:50.20 +08:10:33.3: 15.13 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.02 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 11:35:46.65 +10:02:39.1: ref_mag=15.02 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=14.7501 delta=0.27 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-29-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0148.fits at 11:26:50.20 +08:10:33.3: 15.31 +/- 0.22 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.21 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 11:26:50.20 +08:10:33.3: ref_mag=15.21 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=14.8336 delta=0.37 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits at 11:14:54.11 +09:17:34.1: 15.35 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-29-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0148.fits at 11:14:54.11 +09:17:34.1: 15.00 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.13 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 11:14:54.11 +09:17:34.1: ref_mag=15.13 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.7354 delta=0.39 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits at 11:19:03.19 +03:36:35.9: 15.49 +/- 0.27 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-29-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0148.fits at 11:19:03.19 +03:36:35.9: 15.36 +/- 0.23 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.42 +/- 0.18
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 11:19:03.19 +03:36:35.9: ref_mag=15.42 +/- 0.18 new_mean_mag=14.8466 delta=0.57 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out32161.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out32162.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out32176.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out32200.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out32204.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out32210.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out32252.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out32350.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 8s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 6s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32149_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-12-37_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0038
The candidate 32149_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-12-37_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0038 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32152_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-12-37_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0038
The candidate 32152_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-12-37_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0038 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32156_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-12-37_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0038
The candidate 32156_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-12-37_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0038 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32161_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-12-37_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0038
Preparing report for the candidate 32161_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-12-37_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0038
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32162_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-12-37_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0038
Preparing report for the candidate 32162_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-12-37_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0038
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32173_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-12-37_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0038
The candidate 32173_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-12-37_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0038 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32176_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-12-37_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0038
Preparing report for the candidate 32176_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-12-37_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0038
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32177_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-12-37_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0038
The candidate 32177_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-12-37_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0038 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 11:28:23.93 +09:24:27.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32184_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-12-37_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0038
The candidate 32184_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-12-37_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0038 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 11:04:58.19 +07:22:12.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32185_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-12-37_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0038
The candidate 32185_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-12-37_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0038 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 11:21:16.92 +06:01:25.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bbsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32200_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-12-37_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0038
Preparing report for the candidate 32200_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-12-37_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0038
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32204_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-12-37_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0038
Preparing report for the candidate 32204_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-12-37_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0038
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32210_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-12-37_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0038
Preparing report for the candidate 32210_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-12-37_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0038
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32226_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-12-37_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0038
The candidate 32226_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-12-37_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0038 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 11:21:07.42 +07:22:41.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32252_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-12-37_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0038
Preparing report for the candidate 32252_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-12-37_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0038
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32256_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-12-37_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0038
The candidate 32256_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-12-37_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0038 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32350_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-12-37_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0038
Preparing report for the candidate 32350_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-12-37_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0038
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32358_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-12-37_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0038
The candidate 32358_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-12-37_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0038 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32369_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-12-37_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0038
The candidate 32369_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-12-37_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0038 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32371_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-12-37_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0038
The candidate 32371_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-12-37_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0038 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 11:30:04.22 +10:05:32.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32372_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-12-37_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0038
The candidate 32372_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-12-37_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0038 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32384_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-12-37_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0038
The candidate 32384_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-12-37_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0038 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32392_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-12-37_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0038
The candidate 32392_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-12-37_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0038 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32421_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-12-37_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0038
The candidate 32421_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-12-37_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0038 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32430_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-12-37_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0038
The candidate 32430_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-12-37_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0038 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32453_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-12-37_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0038
The candidate 32453_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-12-37_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0038 did not pass the final checks
