Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images: 
                   2026 06 02.1275  2461193.6275  14.65  09:59:34.26 +27:06:02.2
202.80184  51.94988 galactic  Leo  Second-epoch detections are separated by 8.7" and 0.5 pix   
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
 online_id        | target                       | 09:59:34.26 +27:06:02.2 (user input)  | T                | P                    |  (position from user input)                                                  
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0366.fits at 09:59:34.26 +27:06:02.2:  16.26 +/- 99.00  upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0367.fits at 09:59:34.26 +27:06:02.2:  16.27 +/- 99.00  upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.                         Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!
Search this object in SIMBAD.
Search this object in VizieR catalogs.  WISE atlas  Aladin Lite  SNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.

Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0366.fits


fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-03-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0027.fits


fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-03-46_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0028.fits

# Set SExtractor parameters file
cp default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 default.sex
# Plate-solve the FITS images
export TELESCOP=''
for i in /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0366.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_220929_TTUQ2b1x1_3140825_3j2abF5H/fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-03-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0027.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_220929_TTUQ2b1x1_3140825_3j2abF5H/fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-03-46_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0028.fits ;do util/wcs_image_calibration.sh $i ;done
# Display the solved FITS images
ds9 -frame lock wcs  wcs_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0366.fits  wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-03-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0027.fits -crosshair 4915.96777 4953.89893 image    wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-03-46_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0028.fits -crosshair 4915.46338 4954.03809 image   

./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 4 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0366.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0367.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_220929_TTUQ2b1x1_3140825_3j2abF5H/fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-03-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0027.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_220929_TTUQ2b1x1_3140825_3j2abF5H/fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-03-46_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0028.fits  && util/transients/search_for_transients_single_field.sh

REFERENCE_IMAGES=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs  util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_220929_TTUQ2b1x1_3140825_3j2abF5H

Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code! The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter. Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code. The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:

     TAU0008  C2026 06 02.12753 09 59 34.26 +27 06 02.2          14.7 R      V36

Position measured on individual images:

     TAU0008  C2026 06 02.12733 09 59 34.03 +27 05 59.1          14.6 R      V36
     TAU0008  C2026 06 02.12774 09 59 34.49 +27 06 05.3          14.7 R      V36

You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services:
MPChecker (in case the button does not work)
NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets)
sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work)
fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)

Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP. Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!

TCP 2026 06 02.1275*  09 59 34.26 +27 06 02.2  14.7 U             Leo       9 0

Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!

 **** AAVSO file format ****

#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
target,2461193.6275,14.65,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS


 **** VSNET file format ****

# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829   <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746    12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732    12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
target 20260602.1275 14.65CV NMW


The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs

The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to  vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp

Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images: 
                   2026 06 02.1275  2461193.6275  14.79  10:05:48.02 +26:23:59.6
204.35139  53.19010 galactic  Leo  Second-epoch detections are separated by 8.2" and 0.4 pix   
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
 online_id        | target                       | 10:05:48.02 +26:23:59.6 (user input)  | T                | P                    |  (position from user input)                                                  
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0366.fits at 10:05:48.02 +26:23:59.6:  16.20 +/- 99.00  upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0367.fits at 10:05:48.02 +26:23:59.6:  16.19 +/- 99.00  upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.                         Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!
Search this object in SIMBAD.
Search this object in VizieR catalogs.  WISE atlas  Aladin Lite  SNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.

Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0366.fits


fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-03-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0027.fits


fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-03-46_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0028.fits

# Set SExtractor parameters file
cp default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 default.sex
# Plate-solve the FITS images
export TELESCOP=''
for i in /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0366.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_220929_TTUQ2b1x1_3140825_3j2abF5H/fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-03-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0027.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_220929_TTUQ2b1x1_3140825_3j2abF5H/fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-03-46_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0028.fits ;do util/wcs_image_calibration.sh $i ;done
# Display the solved FITS images
ds9 -frame lock wcs  wcs_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0366.fits  wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-03-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0027.fits -crosshair 4073.97485 5381.00830 image    wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-03-46_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0028.fits -crosshair 4074.31958 5380.83545 image   

./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 4 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0366.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0367.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_220929_TTUQ2b1x1_3140825_3j2abF5H/fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-03-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0027.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_220929_TTUQ2b1x1_3140825_3j2abF5H/fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-03-46_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0028.fits  && util/transients/search_for_transients_single_field.sh

REFERENCE_IMAGES=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs  util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_220929_TTUQ2b1x1_3140825_3j2abF5H

Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code! The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter. Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code. The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:

     TAU0008  C2026 06 02.12753 10 05 48.02 +26 23 59.6          14.8 R      V36

Position measured on individual images:

     TAU0008  C2026 06 02.12733 10 05 47.98 +26 23 55.6          14.7 R      V36
     TAU0008  C2026 06 02.12774 10 05 48.06 +26 24 03.7          14.9 R      V36

You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services:
MPChecker (in case the button does not work)
NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets)
sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work)
fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)

Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP. Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!

TCP 2026 06 02.1275*  10 05 48.02 +26 23 59.6  14.8 U             Leo       9 0

Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!

 **** AAVSO file format ****

#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
target,2461193.6275,14.79,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS


 **** VSNET file format ****

# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829   <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746    12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732    12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
target 20260602.1275 14.79CV NMW


The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs

The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to  vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp

Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images: 
                   2026 06 02.1275  2461193.6275  14.95  10:01:53.46 +30:26:53.8
197.47822  52.91787 galactic  LMi  Second-epoch detections are separated by 5.8" and 0.4 pix   
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
 online_id        | target                       | 10:01:53.46 +30:26:53.8 (user input)  | T                | P                    |  (position from user input)                                                  
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0366.fits at 10:01:53.46 +30:26:53.8:  16.37 +/- 99.00  upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0367.fits at 10:01:53.46 +30:26:53.8:  16.34 +/- 99.00  upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.                         Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!
Search this object in SIMBAD.
Search this object in VizieR catalogs.  WISE atlas  Aladin Lite  SNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.

Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0366.fits


fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-03-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0027.fits


fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-03-46_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0028.fits

# Set SExtractor parameters file
cp default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 default.sex
# Plate-solve the FITS images
export TELESCOP=''
for i in /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0366.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_220929_TTUQ2b1x1_3140825_3j2abF5H/fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-03-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0027.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_220929_TTUQ2b1x1_3140825_3j2abF5H/fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-03-46_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0028.fits ;do util/wcs_image_calibration.sh $i ;done
# Display the solved FITS images
ds9 -frame lock wcs  wcs_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0366.fits  wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-03-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0027.fits -crosshair 4597.69434 2930.68530 image    wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-03-46_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0028.fits -crosshair 4597.99512 2930.90186 image   

./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 4 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0366.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0367.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_220929_TTUQ2b1x1_3140825_3j2abF5H/fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-03-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0027.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_220929_TTUQ2b1x1_3140825_3j2abF5H/fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-03-46_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0028.fits  && util/transients/search_for_transients_single_field.sh

REFERENCE_IMAGES=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs  util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_220929_TTUQ2b1x1_3140825_3j2abF5H

Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code! The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter. Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code. The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:

     TAU0008  C2026 06 02.12753 10 01 53.46 +30 26 53.8          14.9 R      V36

Position measured on individual images:

     TAU0008  C2026 06 02.12733 10 01 53.41 +30 26 50.9          14.9 R      V36
     TAU0008  C2026 06 02.12774 10 01 53.50 +30 26 56.6          14.9 R      V36

You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services:
MPChecker (in case the button does not work)
NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets)
sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work)
fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)

Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP. Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!

TCP 2026 06 02.1275*  10 01 53.46 +30 26 53.8  14.9 U             LMi       9 0

Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!

 **** AAVSO file format ****

#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
target,2461193.6275,14.95,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS


 **** VSNET file format ****

# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829   <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746    12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732    12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
target 20260602.1275 14.95CV NMW


The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs

The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to  vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp

## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref.  image: 2461058.84609446 18.01.2026 08:18:12.561   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0366.fits
First image: 2461058.84609446 18.01.2026 08:18:12.561   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0366.fits
Last  image: 2461193.62774134 02.06.2026 03:03:46.852   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_220929_TTUQ2b1x1_3140825_3j2abF5H/fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-03-46_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0028.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 3
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.:  -7.43
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 3 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA  10.0             # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH   10.0             #  or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0             #  or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL     55000.0         # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN            0.37            # detector gain in e-/ADU
Total objects detected (at least 2 times):  6454
Objects passed selection criteria:  6426
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max):    2.8    2.0    2    4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max):    2.8    2.0    2    4
Average stars detected per image: 4692.5
Average stars matched: 4374.5 (93.2232 %)
Memory usage VmPeak:   112128 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on  Mon Jun  1 15:05:05 CDT 2026
VaST build number  1.0rc89-85-g6dfb2809
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-06-01)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on  Mon Jun  1 22:11:45 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref.  image: 2461058.84609446 18.01.2026 08:18:12.561   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0366.fits
First image: 2461058.84609446 18.01.2026 08:18:12.561   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0366.fits
Last  image: 2461193.62774134 02.06.2026 03:03:46.852   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_220929_TTUQ2b1x1_3140825_3j2abF5H/fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-03-46_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0028.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 96
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.:  -7.17
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 10 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA  2.0             # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH   3.0             #  or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0             #  or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL     57000.0         # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN            0.83            # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
Total objects detected (at least 2 times):  34394
Objects passed selection criteria:  34272
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max):    2.9    2.0    2    4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max):    2.9    2.0    2    4
Average stars detected per image: 25852.2
Average stars matched: 23859.2 (92.2908 %)
Memory usage VmPeak:   134676 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on  Mon Jun  1 15:05:05 CDT 2026
VaST build number  1.0rc89-85-g6dfb2809
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-06-01)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on  Mon Jun  1 22:12:56 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################

######## Processing parameters ########
AAVSO_COMMENT_STRING= NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
ASTCHECK_ASTEROID_SEARCH_RADIUS_ARCSEC= 
BAD_REGION_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/TTUQ2_bad_region.lst
CAMERA_SETTINGS= TTUQ2b1x1
CHECK_POINTING_ACCURACY= yes
DARK_FRAMES_DIR_OR_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks
EXCLUSION_LIST= ../exclusion_list_TTUQ2.txt
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MAX_APERTURE_STAR_SIZE_PIX= 12.5
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MAX_ELONGATION_AminusB_PIX= 0.55
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MIN_APERTURE_STAR_SIZE_PIX= 2.0
FILTER_BRIGHT_MAG_CUTOFF_TRANSIENT_SEARCH= -5
FILTER_FAINT_MAG_CUTOFF_TRANSIENT_SEARCH= 15.0
FLAT_FIELD_DIR_OR_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats
FRAME_EDGE_OFFSET_PIX= 600
GAIA_BAND_FOR_CATALOGED_SOURCE_CHECK= 
MAX_NEW_TO_REF_MEAN_IMG_VALUE_RATIO= 100
MAX_NEW_IMG_MEAN_VALUE= 25000
MAX_SD_RATIO_OF_SECOND_EPOCH_IMGS= 0.18
MAX_SD_RATIO_OF_SECOND_EPOCH_IMGS_SOFT_LIMIT= 0.12
MPC_CODE= V36
NMW_CALIBRATION= /var/www/nmw_calibration
NUMBER_OF_DETECTED_TRANSIENTS_BEFORE_FILTERING_HARD_LIMIT= 8000
NUMBER_OF_DETECTED_TRANSIENTS_BEFORE_FILTERING_SOFT_LIMIT= 4000
OMP_NUM_THREADS= 
ONLINE_MPCHECKER_BUTTON_ASTEROID_SEARCH_RADIUS_ARCMIN= 
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION= 
REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES= yes
SEXTRACTOR_CONFIG_BRIGHTSTARPASS= default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
SEXTRACTOR_CONFIG_FILES= default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
STARMATCH_RADIUS_PIX= 4
SYSREM_ITERATIONS= 0
TELESCOP= 
TELESCOP_NAME_KNOWN_TO_VaST_FOR_FOV_DETERMINATION= 
UCAC5_PLATESOLVE_ITERATIONS= 2
FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE= no
#######################################
HOSTNAME= tau
USER= 
HOME= 
#######################################
SExtractor catalog cache: enabled, directory /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/vast_sextractor_cache
Reference image directory is set to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs
VIZIER_SITE=vizier.cds.unistra.fr
GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=vizquery (lib/vizquery -> VizieR vizier.cds.unistra.fr)
INFO: MAKE_PNG_PLOTS is set to yes
FITS_FILE_EXT=fits
CALIBRATION_STATUS_PREFIX=
Fields in the data directory: 
Leo-01-Q2b1x1
#######################################
########### Starting Leo-01-Q2b1x1 ###########
Processing Leo-01-Q2b1x1
server tau has sufficient free disk space available: 592199 MB at /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir
server tau has sufficient free disk space available: 592199 MB at .
Checking input images (2 new)
REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE= /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0366.fits
REFERENCE_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE= /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0367.fits
Small preview (one of the new images): 

Large previews of the second-epoch (new) images:

MAKE_PNG_PLOTS=yes


renamed 'Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-03-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0027.png' -> 'transient_report/Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-03-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0027.fits_preview.png'

Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-03-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0027.fits


renamed 'Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-03-46_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0028.png' -> 'transient_report/Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-03-46_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0028.fits_preview.png'

Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-03-46_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0028.fits




Read-check the input FITS images... read-check OK
Blank image check the input FITS images... blank-image-check OK
Read date check the input FITS images... read-date-check OK
Mean value check the input FITS images... OK, at least two new images have mean values below the threshold.
----------------------------------------------
INFO: REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 457.7779
INFO:         REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_SD= 508.8111
INFO:    SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 1497.5489
INFO:            SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_SD= 504.6500
INFO:   SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 1462.0960
INFO:           SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE_SD= 488.0186
----------------------------------------------
INFO:      ref_to_second_epoch_img_mean_ratio= 3.27134
INFO:                  SECOND_EPOCH__SD_ratio= 0.034
----------------------------------------------
Calibration settings: DARK_FRAMES_DIR_OR_FILE=/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks FLAT_FIELD_DIR_OR_FILE=/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats
EXPTIME =                 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration
SET-TEMP=                  5.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint
CCD-TEMP=                  4.9 / [degC] CCD temperature
FOCTEMP =                 28.0 / [degC] Focuser temperature
AMBTEMP =                 28.4 / [degC] Ambient air temperature
Exploring image header: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_220929_TTUQ2b1x1_3140825_3j2abF5H/Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-03-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0027.fits 
CCD-TEMP= 4.900000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_220929_TTUQ2b1x1_3140825_3j2abF5H/Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-03-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0027.fits
SET-TEMP= 5.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_220929_TTUQ2b1x1_3140825_3j2abF5H/Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-03-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0027.fits
Header: 74 keys total, 33 keys left
Record 0: "" status=0
Record 1: "SIMPLE  =                    T / C# FITS" status=0
Record 2: "BITPIX  =                   16" status=0
Record 3: "NAXIS   =                    2 / Dimensionality" status=0
Record 4: "NAXIS1  =                 9576" status=0
Record 5: "NAXIS2  =                 6388" status=0
Record 6: "BZERO   =                32768" status=0
Record 7: "EXTEND  =                    T / Extensions are permitted" status=0
Record 8: "IMAGETYP= 'LIGHT'              / Type of exposure" status=0
Record 9: "EXPOSURE=                 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0
Record 10: "EXPTIME =                 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0
Record 11: "DATE-LOC= '2026-06-01T22:03:11.1700950' / Time of observation (local)" status=0
Record 12: "DATE-OBS= '2026-06-02T03:03:11.1700950' / Time of observation (UTC)" status=0
Record 13: "MJD-OBS =     61193.1272126157 / Modified Julian Date of observation" status=0
Record 14: "DATE-AVG= '2026-06-02T03:03:21.0728713' / Averaged midpoint time (UTC)" status=0
Record 15: "MJD-AVG =     61193.1273272224 / Modified Julian Date of averaged midpoint" status=0
Record 16: "XBINNING=                    1 / X axis binning factor" status=0
Record 17: "YBINNING=                    1 / Y axis binning factor" status=0
Record 18: "GAIN    =                   30 / Sensor gain" status=0
Record 19: "OFFSET  =                   30 / Sensor gain offset" status=0
Record 20: "XPIXSZ  =                 3.76 / [um] Pixel X axis size" status=0
Record 21: "YPIXSZ  =                 3.76 / [um] Pixel Y axis size" status=0
Record 22: "INSTRUME= 'QHY600M'            / Imaging instrument name" status=0
Record 23: "CAMERAID= 'QHY600M-84137c4dbbbd119a9' / Imaging instrument identifier" status=0
Record 24: "SET-TEMP=                  5.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint" status=0
Record 25: "CCD-TEMP=                  4.9 / [degC] CCD temperature" status=0
Record 26: "READOUTM= '2CMS-0'             / Sensor readout mode" status=0
Record 27: "USBLIMIT=                   50 / Camera-specific USB setting" status=0
Record 28: "TELESCOP= 'QHY600M-TTU2'       / Name of telescope" status=0
Record 29: "FOCALLEN=                135.0 / [mm] Focal length" status=0
Record 30: "FOCRATIO=                  2.2 / Focal ratio" status=0
Record 31: "RA      =     149.996986775051 / [deg] RA of telescope" status=0
Record 32: "DEC     =     29.9995398975275 / [deg] Declination of telescope" status=0
Record 33: "CENTALT =     52.5663888888889 / [deg] Altitude of telescope" status=0
Record 34: "CENTAZ  =     276.471944444444 / [deg] Azimuth of telescope" status=0
Record 35: "AIRMASS =     1.25858315421906 / Airmass at frame center (Gueymard 1993)" status=0
Record 36: "PIERSIDE= 'East'               / Telescope pointing state" status=0
Record 37: "SITEELEV=               1009.5 / [m] Observation site elevation" status=0
Record 38: "SITELAT =           33.7482925 / [deg] Observation site latitude" status=0
Record 39: "SITELONG=          -101.958319 / [deg] Observation site longitude" status=0
Record 40: "OBSERVER= 'Sokolovsky'         / Observer name" status=0
Record 41: "OBSERVAT= 'TTU Skyview'        / Observatory name" status=0
Record 42: "SITENAME= ''                   / Observatory site name" status=0
Record 43: "FWHEEL  = 'Simulator'          / Filter Wheel name" status=0
Record 44: "FILTER  = 'CV'                 / Active filter name" status=0
Record 45: "OBJECT  = 'Leo-01'             / Name of the object of interest" status=0
Record 46: "OBJCTRA = '10 00 00'           / [H M S] RA of imaged object" status=0
Record 47: "OBJCTDEC= '+30 00 00'          / [D M S] Declination of imaged object" status=0
Record 48: "OBJCTROT=                  0.0 / [deg] planned rotation of imaged object" status=0
Record 49: "FOCNAME = 'ZWO Focuser'        / Focusing equipment name" status=0
Record 50: "FOCPOS  =                20429 / [step] Focuser position" status=0
Record 51: "FOCUSPOS=                20429 / [step] Focuser position" status=0
Record 52: "FOCUSSZ =                  0.0 / [um] Focuser step size" status=0
Record 53: "FOCTEMP =                 28.0 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0
Record 54: "FOCUSTEM=                 28.0 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0
Record 55: "DEWPOINT=                  7.6 / [degC] Dew point" status=0
Record 56: "HUMIDITY=                 27.0 / [percent] Relative humidity" status=0
Record 57: "PRESSURE=                900.0 / [hPa] Air pressure" status=0
Record 58: "AMBTEMP =                 28.4 / [degC] Ambient air temperature" status=0
Record 59: "WINDDIR =                 21.0 / [deg] Wind direction: 0=N, 180=S, 90=E, 270=W" status=0
Record 60: "WINDGUST=             22.00176 / [kph] Wind gust" status=0
Record 61: "WINDSPD =            11.200896 / [kph] Wind speed" status=0
Record 62: "ROWORDER= 'TOP-DOWN'           / FITS Image Orientation" status=0
Record 63: "EQUINOX =               2000.0 / Equinox of celestial coordinate system" status=0
Record 64: "SWCREATE= 'N.I.N.A. 3.2.0.9001 (x64)' / Software that created this file" status=0
Record 65: "QHY_EXP =            20.000096 / [s] Actual exposure time" status=0
Record 66: "QHY_PP  =              13888.0 / [ps] pixelPeriod" status=0
Record 67: "QHY_LP  =              85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0
Record 68: "GPS_LP  =              85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0
Record 69: "QHY_FP  =           20000160.0 / [us] framePeriod" status=0
Record 70: "QHY_CPL =               6120.0 / clocksPerLine" status=0
Record 71: "QHY_LPF =             235295.0 / linesPerFrame" status=0
Record 72: "QHY_AET =           20000096.0 / [us] actualExposureTime" status=0
Record 73: "QHY_LEM =                    T / isLongExposureMode" status=0
Record 74: "QHY_OFF0=             3767.777 / [us] RollingShutterEndOffset row 0" status=0
Allocating memory for image, dark and result arrays...
Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_220929_TTUQ2b1x1_3140825_3j2abF5H/Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-03-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0027.fits 9576 6388  16 bitpix
SET-TEMP= 5.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_220929_TTUQ2b1x1_3140825_3j2abF5H/Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-03-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0027.fits
SET-TEMP= 5.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_5C_20s_2026-05-30.fit
CCD-TEMP= 4.900000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_220929_TTUQ2b1x1_3140825_3j2abF5H/Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-03-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0027.fits
CCD-TEMP= 4.800000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_5C_20s_2026-05-30.fit
Reading dark frame /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_5C_20s_2026-05-30.fit 9576 6388  16 bitpix
Dark frame is subtracted, output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_220929_TTUQ2b1x1_3140825_3j2abF5H/d_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-03-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0027.fits :)

Spent 0.531033 seconds 
renamed 'mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_5C_20s_2026-05-30.png' -> 'transient_report/dark.png'
try_to_calibrate_the_input_frame(): selected flat field /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ2b1x1_2026-05-30.fit from directory /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats
MegaDivider v7
Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_220929_TTUQ2b1x1_3140825_3j2abF5H/d_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-03-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0027.fits 9576 6388  16 bitpix
Reading flat /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ2b1x1_2026-05-30.fit 9576 6388  16 bitpix
Avarage count on flat field image: 20659.746399
Minimal real count (from overscan): 5
Output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_220929_TTUQ2b1x1_3140825_3j2abF5H/fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-03-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0027.fits :)


No overscan detected - all values seem high! (left_median=14784.5, right_median=14894.5)
renamed 'mff_TTUQ2b1x1_2026-05-30.png' -> 'transient_report/flat.png'
Using calibrated image CALIBRATED_SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_220929_TTUQ2b1x1_3140825_3j2abF5H/fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-03-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0027.fits
EXPTIME =                 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration
SET-TEMP=                  5.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint
CCD-TEMP=                  5.0 / [degC] CCD temperature
FOCTEMP =     27.8999996185303 / [degC] Focuser temperature
AMBTEMP =                 28.4 / [degC] Ambient air temperature
Exploring image header: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_220929_TTUQ2b1x1_3140825_3j2abF5H/Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-03-46_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0028.fits 
CCD-TEMP= 5.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_220929_TTUQ2b1x1_3140825_3j2abF5H/Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-03-46_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0028.fits
SET-TEMP= 5.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_220929_TTUQ2b1x1_3140825_3j2abF5H/Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-03-46_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0028.fits
Header: 74 keys total, 33 keys left
Record 0: "" status=0
Record 1: "SIMPLE  =                    T / C# FITS" status=0
Record 2: "BITPIX  =                   16" status=0
Record 3: "NAXIS   =                    2 / Dimensionality" status=0
Record 4: "NAXIS1  =                 9576" status=0
Record 5: "NAXIS2  =                 6388" status=0
Record 6: "BZERO   =                32768" status=0
Record 7: "EXTEND  =                    T / Extensions are permitted" status=0
Record 8: "IMAGETYP= 'LIGHT'              / Type of exposure" status=0
Record 9: "EXPOSURE=                 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0
Record 10: "EXPTIME =                 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0
Record 11: "DATE-LOC= '2026-06-01T22:03:46.8529172' / Time of observation (local)" status=0
Record 12: "DATE-OBS= '2026-06-02T03:03:46.8529172' / Time of observation (UTC)" status=0
Record 13: "MJD-OBS =     61193.1276256018 / Modified Julian Date of observation" status=0
Record 14: "DATE-AVG= '2026-06-02T03:03:56.7571603' / Averaged midpoint time (UTC)" status=0
Record 15: "MJD-AVG =      61193.127740243 / Modified Julian Date of averaged midpoint" status=0
Record 16: "XBINNING=                    1 / X axis binning factor" status=0
Record 17: "YBINNING=                    1 / Y axis binning factor" status=0
Record 18: "GAIN    =                   30 / Sensor gain" status=0
Record 19: "OFFSET  =                   30 / Sensor gain offset" status=0
Record 20: "XPIXSZ  =                 3.76 / [um] Pixel X axis size" status=0
Record 21: "YPIXSZ  =                 3.76 / [um] Pixel Y axis size" status=0
Record 22: "INSTRUME= 'QHY600M'            / Imaging instrument name" status=0
Record 23: "CAMERAID= 'QHY600M-84137c4dbbbd119a9' / Imaging instrument identifier" status=0
Record 24: "SET-TEMP=                  5.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint" status=0
Record 25: "CCD-TEMP=                  5.0 / [degC] CCD temperature" status=0
Record 26: "READOUTM= '2CMS-0'             / Sensor readout mode" status=0
Record 27: "USBLIMIT=                   50 / Camera-specific USB setting" status=0
Record 28: "TELESCOP= 'QHY600M-TTU2'       / Name of telescope" status=0
Record 29: "FOCALLEN=                135.0 / [mm] Focal length" status=0
Record 30: "FOCRATIO=                  2.2 / Focal ratio" status=0
Record 31: "RA      =     149.996986785295 / [deg] RA of telescope" status=0
Record 32: "DEC     =     29.9995398989657 / [deg] Declination of telescope" status=0
Record 33: "CENTALT =     52.4422222222222 / [deg] Altitude of telescope" status=0
Record 34: "CENTAZ  =     276.536944444444 / [deg] Azimuth of telescope" status=0
Record 35: "AIRMASS =     1.26067154743371 / Airmass at frame center (Gueymard 1993)" status=0
Record 36: "PIERSIDE= 'East'               / Telescope pointing state" status=0
Record 37: "SITEELEV=               1009.5 / [m] Observation site elevation" status=0
Record 38: "SITELAT =           33.7482925 / [deg] Observation site latitude" status=0
Record 39: "SITELONG=          -101.958319 / [deg] Observation site longitude" status=0
Record 40: "OBSERVER= 'Sokolovsky'         / Observer name" status=0
Record 41: "OBSERVAT= 'TTU Skyview'        / Observatory name" status=0
Record 42: "SITENAME= ''                   / Observatory site name" status=0
Record 43: "FWHEEL  = 'Simulator'          / Filter Wheel name" status=0
Record 44: "FILTER  = 'CV'                 / Active filter name" status=0
Record 45: "OBJECT  = 'Leo-01'             / Name of the object of interest" status=0
Record 46: "OBJCTRA = '10 00 00'           / [H M S] RA of imaged object" status=0
Record 47: "OBJCTDEC= '+30 00 00'          / [D M S] Declination of imaged object" status=0
Record 48: "OBJCTROT=                  0.0 / [deg] planned rotation of imaged object" status=0
Record 49: "FOCNAME = 'ZWO Focuser'        / Focusing equipment name" status=0
Record 50: "FOCPOS  =                20429 / [step] Focuser position" status=0
Record 51: "FOCUSPOS=                20429 / [step] Focuser position" status=0
Record 52: "FOCUSSZ =                  0.0 / [um] Focuser step size" status=0
Record 53: "FOCTEMP =     27.8999996185303 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0
Record 54: "FOCUSTEM=     27.8999996185303 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0
Record 55: "DEWPOINT=                  7.6 / [degC] Dew point" status=0
Record 56: "HUMIDITY=                 27.0 / [percent] Relative humidity" status=0
Record 57: "PRESSURE=                900.0 / [hPa] Air pressure" status=0
Record 58: "AMBTEMP =                 28.4 / [degC] Ambient air temperature" status=0
Record 59: "WINDDIR =                 21.0 / [deg] Wind direction: 0=N, 180=S, 90=E, 270=W" status=0
Record 60: "WINDGUST=             22.00176 / [kph] Wind gust" status=0
Record 61: "WINDSPD =            11.200896 / [kph] Wind speed" status=0
Record 62: "ROWORDER= 'TOP-DOWN'           / FITS Image Orientation" status=0
Record 63: "EQUINOX =               2000.0 / Equinox of celestial coordinate system" status=0
Record 64: "SWCREATE= 'N.I.N.A. 3.2.0.9001 (x64)' / Software that created this file" status=0
Record 65: "QHY_EXP =            20.000096 / [s] Actual exposure time" status=0
Record 66: "QHY_PP  =              13888.0 / [ps] pixelPeriod" status=0
Record 67: "QHY_LP  =              85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0
Record 68: "GPS_LP  =              85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0
Record 69: "QHY_FP  =           20000160.0 / [us] framePeriod" status=0
Record 70: "QHY_CPL =               6120.0 / clocksPerLine" status=0
Record 71: "QHY_LPF =             235295.0 / linesPerFrame" status=0
Record 72: "QHY_AET =           20000096.0 / [us] actualExposureTime" status=0
Record 73: "QHY_LEM =                    T / isLongExposureMode" status=0
Record 74: "QHY_OFF0=             3767.777 / [us] RollingShutterEndOffset row 0" status=0
Allocating memory for image, dark and result arrays...
Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_220929_TTUQ2b1x1_3140825_3j2abF5H/Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-03-46_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0028.fits 9576 6388  16 bitpix
SET-TEMP= 5.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_220929_TTUQ2b1x1_3140825_3j2abF5H/Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-03-46_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0028.fits
SET-TEMP= 5.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_5C_20s_2026-05-30.fit
CCD-TEMP= 5.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_220929_TTUQ2b1x1_3140825_3j2abF5H/Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-03-46_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0028.fits
CCD-TEMP= 4.800000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_5C_20s_2026-05-30.fit
Reading dark frame /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_5C_20s_2026-05-30.fit 9576 6388  16 bitpix
Dark frame is subtracted, output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_220929_TTUQ2b1x1_3140825_3j2abF5H/d_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-03-46_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0028.fits :)

Spent 0.530277 seconds 
renamed 'mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_5C_20s_2026-05-30.png' -> 'transient_report/dark.png'
try_to_calibrate_the_input_frame(): selected flat field /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ2b1x1_2026-05-30.fit from directory /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats
MegaDivider v7
Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_220929_TTUQ2b1x1_3140825_3j2abF5H/d_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-03-46_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0028.fits 9576 6388  16 bitpix
Reading flat /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ2b1x1_2026-05-30.fit 9576 6388  16 bitpix
Avarage count on flat field image: 20659.746399
Minimal real count (from overscan): 5
Output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_220929_TTUQ2b1x1_3140825_3j2abF5H/fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-03-46_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0028.fits :)


No overscan detected - all values seem high! (left_median=14784.5, right_median=14894.5)
renamed 'mff_TTUQ2b1x1_2026-05-30.png' -> 'transient_report/flat.png'
Using calibrated image CALIBRATED_SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_220929_TTUQ2b1x1_3140825_3j2abF5H/fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-03-46_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0028.fits
Dark frame used to calibrate the second-epoch images:



Flat field used to calibrate the second-epoch images:



after the calibration attempt:
SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_220929_TTUQ2b1x1_3140825_3j2abF5H/fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-03-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0027.fits
SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_220929_TTUQ2b1x1_3140825_3j2abF5H/fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-03-46_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0028.fits
Previews of the CALIBRATED second-epoch images:


fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-03-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0027.fits



fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-03-46_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0028.fits




Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/TTUQ2_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1

  ./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 4 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0366.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0367.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_220929_TTUQ2b1x1_3140825_3j2abF5H/fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-03-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0027.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_220929_TTUQ2b1x1_3140825_3j2abF5H/fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-03-46_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0028.fits
  
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0366.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0367.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0366.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0367.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_220929_TTUQ2b1x1_3140825_3j2abF5H/fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-03-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0027.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_220929_TTUQ2b1x1_3140825_3j2abF5H/fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-03-46_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0028.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461193.62732836
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0366.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0366.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0366.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0366.fits'
wcs_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0367.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0367.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0367.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0367.fits'
wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-03-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0027.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-03-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0027.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-03-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0027.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-03-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0027.fits'
wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-03-46_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0028.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-03-46_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0028.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-03-46_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0028.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-03-46_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0028.fits'
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0366.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0366.fits
util/fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh: line 144: echo: write error: Broken pipe
Image size: 941.7'x627.1'  15.7(deg)x10.5(deg)  9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 10:00:00.900 +29:59:47.24 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-03-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0027.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-03-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0027.fits
Image size: 937.0'x624.0'  15.6(deg)x10.4(deg)  9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 10:00:25.992 +30:00:30.93 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 10:00:00.900 +29:59:47.24
Second-epoch image center 10:00:25.992 +30:00:30.93
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0914 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg.  Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-03-46_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0028.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-03-46_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0028.fits
Image size: 937.0'x624.0'  15.6(deg)x10.4(deg)  9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 10:00:26.232 +30:00:37.88 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 10:00:00.900 +29:59:47.24
Second-epoch image center 10:00:26.232 +30:00:37.88
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0925 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center  10:00:25.992 +30:00:30.93
Second-epoch second image center 10:00:26.232 +30:00:37.88
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00212 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running  util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2  /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0366.fits &> /tmp/tmp.98Lptoqx1c
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0366.fits
Running  util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2  /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0367.fits &> /tmp/tmp.4UdX7l634C
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0367.fits
Running  util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2  /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_220929_TTUQ2b1x1_3140825_3j2abF5H/fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-03-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0027.fits &> /tmp/tmp.SfMrCumRwn
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_220929_TTUQ2b1x1_3140825_3j2abF5H/fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-03-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0027.fits
Running  util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2  /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_220929_TTUQ2b1x1_3140825_3j2abF5H/fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-03-46_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0028.fits &> /tmp/tmp.tx2h0RvqXT
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_220929_TTUQ2b1x1_3140825_3j2abF5H/fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-03-46_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0028.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0366.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0366.fits and wcs_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0366.fits.cat 
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0366.fits and wcs_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0366.fits.cat 
Found non-empty wcs_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0366.fits and wcs_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0366.fits.cat
The reference image (wcs_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0366.fits) and catalog (wcs_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0366.fits.cat) found
'wcs_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0366.fits.cat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 7484 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 140.2252 to 159.2854 deg, Dec +24.2123 to +35.3396 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 140.2252 to 159.2854 deg, Dec 24.2123 to 35.3396 deg
Loaded 5544 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4029 out of 4262 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 4262 out of 7484 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.909500
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.909500
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.:  -7.43
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.:  15.48

Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed!  =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.:  15.48

Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:


Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 7484 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 140.2252 to 159.2854 deg, Dec +24.2123 to +35.3396 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 140.2252 to 159.2854 deg, Dec 24.2123 to 35.3396 deg
Loaded 5544 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4029 out of 4262 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 4262 out of 7484 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0366.fits via Tycho-2

Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0366.fits:


Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0366.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0366.fits (aperture=6.1)
Read 7488 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 140.2252 to 159.2854 deg, Dec +24.2124 to +35.3396 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 140.2252 to 159.2854 deg, Dec 24.2124 to 35.3396 deg
Loaded 5544 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4039 out of 4263 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 4263 out of 7488 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0367.fits via Tycho-2

Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0367.fits:


Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0367.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0367.fits (aperture=6.1)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 0 candidate transients before the final filtering.  (Hard limit: 8000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
 2.1 pix  Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0366.fits
 2.1 pix  Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0367.fits
 2.4 pix  fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-03-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0027.fits
 2.3 pix  fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-03-46_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0028.fits
 2.1 pix  wcs_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0366.fits
 2.1 pix  wcs_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0367.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
 15.5 mag.  Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0366.fits
 15.5 mag.  Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0367.fits
 14.7 mag.  fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-03-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0027.fits
 14.8 mag.  fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-03-46_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0028.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate:  14.7 (SNR )  11.8 (80% of stars)  with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of  following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50). 
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image. 
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.98Lptoqx1c (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0366.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-01_CI_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_220929_TTUQ2b1x1_3140825_3j2abF5H/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0366.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0366.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0366.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0366.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0366.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0366.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0366.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0366.fits' -> 'wcs_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0366.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0366.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0366.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0366.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0366.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0366.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0366.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0366.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0366.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0366.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0366.fits.cat 
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=536, passed=7484
Got 7484 stars (including 6942 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0366.fits.cat 
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 7484 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.7'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.7 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013079 (47.1 arcsec)
                    catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
                    catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010463 (37.7 arcsec)

ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 571 to 628 (Dec 24.2 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 917 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 916 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 903 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29" 
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 916 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7360 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30" 

ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 571 to 628 (Dec 24.2 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 917 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 916 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7359 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29" 
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 916 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7358 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27" 
Excluding outliers - 916 stars left (next iteration limit 1007)
Stop iterations.


 The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)

WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0366.fits N_match=916 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.268 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.342 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.274 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.256 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.224 n_q1=240 n_q2=204 n_q3=230 n_q4=242 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.275
The image catalog is written to wcs_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0366.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0366.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
 ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0366.fits -region wcs_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0366.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0366.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.4UdX7l634C (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0367.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-01_CI_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_220929_TTUQ2b1x1_3140825_3j2abF5H/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0367.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0367.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0367.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0367.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0367.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0367.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0367.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0367.fits' -> 'wcs_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0367.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0367.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0367.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0367.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0367.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0367.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0367.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0367.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0367.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0367.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0367.fits.cat 
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=531, passed=7488
Got 7488 stars (including 6948 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0367.fits.cat 
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 7488 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.7'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.7 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013079 (47.1 arcsec)
                    catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
                    catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010463 (37.7 arcsec)

ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 571 to 628 (Dec 24.2 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 917 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 916 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 906 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29" 
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 916 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7351 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29" 

ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 571 to 628 (Dec 24.2 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 917 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 916 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7351 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29" 
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 916 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7351 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26" 
Excluding outliers - 916 stars left (next iteration limit 1007)
Stop iterations.


 The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)

WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0367.fits N_match=916 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.275 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.363 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.249 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.276 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.232 n_q1=240 n_q2=209 n_q3=228 n_q4=239 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.319
The image catalog is written to wcs_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0367.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0367.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
 ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0367.fits -region wcs_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0367.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0367.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.SfMrCumRwn (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-01_CI_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_220929_TTUQ2b1x1_3140825_3j2abF5H/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_220929_TTUQ2b1x1_3140825_3j2abF5H/fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-03-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0027.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_220929_TTUQ2b1x1_3140825_3j2abF5H/fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-03-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0027.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_220929_TTUQ2b1x1_3140825_3j2abF5H/fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-03-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0027.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_220929_TTUQ2b1x1_3140825_3j2abF5H/fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-03-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0027.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_220929_TTUQ2b1x1_3140825_3j2abF5H/fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-03-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0027.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_220929_TTUQ2b1x1_3140825_3j2abF5H/fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-03-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0027.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-03-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0027.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-03-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0027.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-03-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0027.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-03-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0027.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-03-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0027.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-03-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0027.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-03-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0027.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_220929_TTUQ2b1x1_3140825_3j2abF5H/fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-03-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0027.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-03-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0027.fits.cat 
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=1, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=307, passed=4709
Got 4709 stars (including 4400 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-03-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0027.fits.cat 
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 4709 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.0'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.0 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013014 (46.9 arcsec)
                    catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
                    catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010411 (37.5 arcsec)

ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 572 to 628 (Dec 24.5 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 913 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 912 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 899 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41" 
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 912 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4658 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42" 

ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 572 to 628 (Dec 24.5 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 914 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 913 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4660 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43" 
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 913 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4660 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.46" 
Excluding outliers - 913 stars left (next iteration limit 1003)
Stop iterations.


 The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)

WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-03-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0027.fits N_match=913 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.450 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.304 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.563 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.357 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.580 n_q1=219 n_q2=234 n_q3=187 n_q4=273 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.289
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-03-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0027.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-03-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0027.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
 ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_220929_TTUQ2b1x1_3140825_3j2abF5H/fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-03-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0027.fits -region wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-03-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0027.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-03-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0027.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.tx2h0RvqXT (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-01_CI_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_220929_TTUQ2b1x1_3140825_3j2abF5H/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_220929_TTUQ2b1x1_3140825_3j2abF5H/fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-03-46_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0028.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_220929_TTUQ2b1x1_3140825_3j2abF5H/fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-03-46_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0028.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_220929_TTUQ2b1x1_3140825_3j2abF5H/fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-03-46_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0028.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_220929_TTUQ2b1x1_3140825_3j2abF5H/fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-03-46_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0028.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_220929_TTUQ2b1x1_3140825_3j2abF5H/fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-03-46_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0028.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_220929_TTUQ2b1x1_3140825_3j2abF5H/fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-03-46_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0028.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-03-46_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0028.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-03-46_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0028.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-03-46_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0028.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-03-46_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0028.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-03-46_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0028.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-03-46_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0028.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-03-46_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0028.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_220929_TTUQ2b1x1_3140825_3j2abF5H/fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-03-46_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0028.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-03-46_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0028.fits.cat 
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=304, passed=4745
Got 4745 stars (including 4437 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-03-46_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0028.fits.cat 
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 4745 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.0'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.0 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013014 (46.9 arcsec)
                    catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
                    catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010411 (37.5 arcsec)

ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 572 to 628 (Dec 24.5 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 915 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 913 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 902 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41" 
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 913 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4684 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43" 

ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 572 to 628 (Dec 24.5 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 916 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 914 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4684 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44" 
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 914 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4684 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.47" 
Excluding outliers - 914 stars left (next iteration limit 1004)
Stop iterations.


 The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)

WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-03-46_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0028.fits N_match=914 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.462 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.324 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.579 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.402 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.565 n_q1=216 n_q2=236 n_q3=192 n_q4=270 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.253
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-03-46_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0028.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-03-46_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0028.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
 ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_220929_TTUQ2b1x1_3140825_3j2abF5H/fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-03-46_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0028.fits -region wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-03-46_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0028.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-03-46_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0028.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0366.fits sigma_overall=0.268 worst_q_ratio=1.275
ref2=Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0367.fits sigma_overall=0.275 worst_q_ratio=1.319
new1=fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-03-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0027.fits sigma_overall=0.450 worst_q_ratio=1.289
new2=fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-03-46_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0028.fits sigma_overall=0.462 worst_q_ratio=1.253
reference average sigma_overall=0.2715 worst_q_ratio=1.297
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################

Distribution of catalog-matched stars across the image:

plot_astrometric_residuals_xy: wrote wcs_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0366_astrometric_residuals.png (916 matched stars from wcs_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0366.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy: wrote wcs_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0367_astrometric_residuals.png (916 matched stars from wcs_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0367.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy: wrote wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-03-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0027_astrometric_residuals.png (913 matched stars from wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-03-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0027.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy: wrote wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-03-46_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0028_astrometric_residuals.png (914 matched stars from wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-03-46_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0028.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-03-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0027.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-03-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0027.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_220929_TTUQ2b1x1_3140825_3j2abF5H/wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-03-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0027.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-03-46_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0028.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-03-46_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0028.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_220929_TTUQ2b1x1_3140825_3j2abF5H/wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-03-46_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0028.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Leo-01-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
No candidates found here
Prepared the HTML report for the field Leo-01-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL

  ./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 4 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0366.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0367.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_220929_TTUQ2b1x1_3140825_3j2abF5H/fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-03-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0027.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_220929_TTUQ2b1x1_3140825_3j2abF5H/fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-03-46_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0028.fits
  
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0366.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0367.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0366.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0367.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_220929_TTUQ2b1x1_3140825_3j2abF5H/fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-03-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0027.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_220929_TTUQ2b1x1_3140825_3j2abF5H/fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-03-46_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0028.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0366.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0367.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-03-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0027.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-03-46_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0028.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/exclusion_list.txt
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0366.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0367.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-03-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0027.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-03-46_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0028.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0366.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0366.fits
Image size: 941.7'x627.1'  15.7(deg)x10.5(deg)  9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 10:00:00.900 +29:59:47.24 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-03-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0027.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-03-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0027.fits
Image size: 937.0'x624.0'  15.6(deg)x10.4(deg)  9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 10:00:25.992 +30:00:30.93 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 10:00:00.900 +29:59:47.24
Second-epoch image center 10:00:25.992 +30:00:30.93
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0914 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg.  Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-03-46_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0028.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-03-46_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0028.fits
util/fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh: line 144: echo: write error: Broken pipe
Image size: 937.0'x624.0'  15.6(deg)x10.4(deg)  9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 10:00:26.232 +30:00:37.88 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 10:00:00.900 +29:59:47.24
Second-epoch image center 10:00:26.232 +30:00:37.88
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0925 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center  10:00:25.992 +30:00:30.93
Second-epoch second image center 10:00:26.232 +30:00:37.88
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00212 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running  util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2  /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0366.fits &> /tmp/tmp.HhAjDstpmr
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0366.fits
Running  util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2  /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0367.fits &> /tmp/tmp.1yznOO9I7f
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0367.fits
Running  util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2  /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_220929_TTUQ2b1x1_3140825_3j2abF5H/fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-03-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0027.fits &> /tmp/tmp.tykBUkRZBR
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_220929_TTUQ2b1x1_3140825_3j2abF5H/fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-03-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0027.fits
Running  util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2  /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_220929_TTUQ2b1x1_3140825_3j2abF5H/fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-03-46_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0028.fits &> /tmp/tmp.1Bt5wrVeQQ
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_220929_TTUQ2b1x1_3140825_3j2abF5H/fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-03-46_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0028.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0366.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0366.fits and wcs_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0366.fits.cat 
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0366.fits and wcs_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0366.fits.cat 
Found non-empty wcs_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0366.fits and wcs_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0366.fits.cat
The reference image (wcs_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0366.fits) and catalog (wcs_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0366.fits.cat) found
'wcs_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0366.fits.cat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 38246 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 140.2252 to 159.3222 deg, Dec +24.1766 to +35.3613 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 140.2252 to 159.3222 deg, Dec 24.1766 to 35.3613 deg
Loaded 5586 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3889 out of 4321 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 4321 out of 38246 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.808000
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.808000
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.:  -7.17
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.:  15.64

Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed!  =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.:  15.64

Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:


Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 38246 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 140.2252 to 159.3222 deg, Dec +24.1766 to +35.3613 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 140.2252 to 159.3222 deg, Dec 24.1766 to 35.3613 deg
Loaded 5586 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3889 out of 4321 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 4321 out of 38246 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0366.fits via Tycho-2

Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0366.fits:


Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0366.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0366.fits (aperture=4.9)
Read 38277 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 140.2252 to 159.3238 deg, Dec +24.1766 to +35.3559 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 140.2252 to 159.3238 deg, Dec 24.1766 to 35.3559 deg
Loaded 5585 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3878 out of 4316 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 4316 out of 38277 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0367.fits via Tycho-2

Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0367.fits:


Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0367.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0367.fits (aperture=4.9)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 58 candidate transients before the final filtering.  (Hard limit: 8000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
 2.0 pix  Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0366.fits
 2.0 pix  Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0367.fits
 2.2 pix  fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-03-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0027.fits
 2.2 pix  fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-03-46_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0028.fits
 2.0 pix  wcs_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0366.fits
 2.0 pix  wcs_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0367.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
 15.6 mag.  Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0366.fits
 15.6 mag.  Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0367.fits
 14.9 mag.  fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-03-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0027.fits
 14.9 mag.  fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-03-46_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0028.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate:  14.9 (SNR )  14.3 (80% of stars)  with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of  following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50). 
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image. 
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.HhAjDstpmr (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0366.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-01_CI_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_220929_TTUQ2b1x1_3140825_3j2abF5H/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0366.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0366.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0366.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0366.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0366.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0366.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0366.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0366.fits' -> 'wcs_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0366.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0366.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0366.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0366.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0366.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0366.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0366.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0366.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0366.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0366.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0366.fits.cat 
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=9, blended=1709, passed=38237
Got 38237 stars (including 36470 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0366.fits.cat 
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 38237 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.7'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.7 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013079 (47.1 arcsec)
                    catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
                    catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010463 (37.7 arcsec)

ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 628 (Dec 24.2 to 35.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 914 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 914 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 899 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30" 
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 914 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 37629 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32" 

ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 628 (Dec 24.2 to 35.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 914 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 914 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 37629 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32" 
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 914 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 37629 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29" 
Excluding outliers - 914 stars left (next iteration limit 1005)
Stop iterations.


 The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)

WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0366.fits N_match=914 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.281 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.342 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.285 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.263 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.219 n_q1=246 n_q2=205 n_q3=223 n_q4=240 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.217
The image catalog is written to wcs_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0366.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0366.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
 ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0366.fits -region wcs_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0366.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0366.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.1yznOO9I7f (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0367.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-01_CI_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_220929_TTUQ2b1x1_3140825_3j2abF5H/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0367.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0367.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0367.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0367.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0367.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0367.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0367.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0367.fits' -> 'wcs_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0367.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0367.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0367.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0367.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0367.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0367.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0367.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0367.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0367.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0367.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0367.fits.cat 
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=13, blended=1697, passed=38264
Got 38264 stars (including 36504 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0367.fits.cat 
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 38264 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.7'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.7 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013079 (47.1 arcsec)
                    catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
                    catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010463 (37.7 arcsec)

ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 628 (Dec 24.2 to 35.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 913 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 913 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 900 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31" 
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 913 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 37704 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31" 

ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 628 (Dec 24.2 to 35.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 913 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 913 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 37704 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31" 
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 913 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 37704 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28" 
Excluding outliers - 913 stars left (next iteration limit 1004)
Stop iterations.


 The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)

WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0367.fits N_match=913 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.280 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.347 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.244 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.283 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.244 n_q1=236 n_q2=209 n_q3=227 n_q4=241 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.240
The image catalog is written to wcs_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0367.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0367.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
 ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0367.fits -region wcs_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0367.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0367.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.tykBUkRZBR (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-01_CI_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_220929_TTUQ2b1x1_3140825_3j2abF5H/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_220929_TTUQ2b1x1_3140825_3j2abF5H/fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-03-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0027.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_220929_TTUQ2b1x1_3140825_3j2abF5H/fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-03-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0027.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_220929_TTUQ2b1x1_3140825_3j2abF5H/fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-03-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0027.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_220929_TTUQ2b1x1_3140825_3j2abF5H/fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-03-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0027.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_220929_TTUQ2b1x1_3140825_3j2abF5H/fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-03-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0027.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_220929_TTUQ2b1x1_3140825_3j2abF5H/fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-03-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0027.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-03-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0027.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-03-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0027.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-03-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0027.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-03-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0027.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-03-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0027.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-03-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0027.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-03-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0027.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_220929_TTUQ2b1x1_3140825_3j2abF5H/fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-03-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0027.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-03-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0027.fits.cat 
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=12, blended=1038, passed=24188
Got 24188 stars (including 23123 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-03-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0027.fits.cat 
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 24188 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.0'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.0 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013014 (46.9 arcsec)
                    catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
                    catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010411 (37.5 arcsec)

ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 572 to 628 (Dec 24.5 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 912 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 912 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 902 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41" 
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 912 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 23890 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38" 

ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 572 to 628 (Dec 24.5 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 912 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 912 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 23886 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38" 
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 912 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 23886 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42" 
Excluding outliers - 912 stars left (next iteration limit 1003)
Stop iterations.


 The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)

WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-03-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0027.fits N_match=912 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.450 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.325 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.547 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.366 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.566 n_q1=223 n_q2=224 n_q3=197 n_q4=268 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.257
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-03-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0027.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-03-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0027.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
 ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_220929_TTUQ2b1x1_3140825_3j2abF5H/fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-03-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0027.fits -region wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-03-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0027.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-03-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0027.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.1Bt5wrVeQQ (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-01_CI_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_220929_TTUQ2b1x1_3140825_3j2abF5H/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_220929_TTUQ2b1x1_3140825_3j2abF5H/fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-03-46_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0028.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_220929_TTUQ2b1x1_3140825_3j2abF5H/fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-03-46_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0028.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_220929_TTUQ2b1x1_3140825_3j2abF5H/fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-03-46_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0028.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_220929_TTUQ2b1x1_3140825_3j2abF5H/fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-03-46_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0028.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_220929_TTUQ2b1x1_3140825_3j2abF5H/fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-03-46_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0028.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_220929_TTUQ2b1x1_3140825_3j2abF5H/fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-03-46_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0028.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-03-46_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0028.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-03-46_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0028.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-03-46_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0028.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-03-46_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0028.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-03-46_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0028.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-03-46_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0028.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-03-46_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0028.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_220929_TTUQ2b1x1_3140825_3j2abF5H/fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-03-46_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0028.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-03-46_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0028.fits.cat 
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=6, blended=1063, passed=24449
Got 24449 stars (including 23354 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-03-46_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0028.fits.cat 
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 24449 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.0'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.0 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013014 (46.9 arcsec)
                    catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
                    catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010411 (37.5 arcsec)

ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 572 to 628 (Dec 24.5 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 912 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 912 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 900 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39" 
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 912 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 24146 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38" 

ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 572 to 628 (Dec 24.5 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 912 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 912 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 24145 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38" 
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 912 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 24145 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40" 
Excluding outliers - 912 stars left (next iteration limit 1003)
Stop iterations.


 The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)

WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-03-46_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0028.fits N_match=912 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.456 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.342 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.540 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.415 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.538 n_q1=227 n_q2=224 n_q3=200 n_q4=261 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.185
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-03-46_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0028.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-03-46_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0028.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
 ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_220929_TTUQ2b1x1_3140825_3j2abF5H/fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-03-46_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0028.fits -region wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-03-46_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0028.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-03-46_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0028.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-03-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0027.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_220929_TTUQ2b1x1_3140825_3j2abF5H/wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-03-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0027.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-03-46_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0028.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_220929_TTUQ2b1x1_3140825_3j2abF5H/wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-03-46_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0028.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Leo-01-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0366.fits at 10:16:05.18 +32:00:15.8:  13.10 +/- 0.02  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0367.fits at 10:16:05.18 +32:00:15.8:  13.11 +/- 0.02  detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  13.10 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:16:05.18 +32:00:15.8: ref_mag=13.10 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=13.2851 delta=-0.18 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0366.fits at 09:59:34.26 +27:06:02.2:  16.26 +/- 99.00  upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0366.fits at 10:05:48.02 +26:23:59.6:  16.20 +/- 99.00  upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0366.fits at 10:01:53.46 +30:26:53.8:  16.37 +/- 99.00  upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0367.fits at 09:59:34.26 +27:06:02.2:  16.27 +/- 99.00  upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0367.fits at 10:05:48.02 +26:23:59.6:  16.19 +/- 99.00  upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0367.fits at 10:01:53.46 +30:26:53.8:  16.34 +/- 99.00  upperlimit
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out56943.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out57009.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out57350.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 16s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 3s
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52341_fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-03-46_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0028
The candidate 52341_fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-03-46_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0028 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 06 02.12774    2461193.62774    10.54    09:42:06.47 +32:37:41.9   7119 1546   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_220929_TTUQ2b1x1_3140825_3j2abF5H/fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-03-46_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0028.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53291_fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-03-46_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0028
The candidate 53291_fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-03-46_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0028 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 06 02.12774    2461193.62774    12.54    09:59:09.14 +27:21:10.9   4971 4801   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_220929_TTUQ2b1x1_3140825_3j2abF5H/fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-03-46_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0028.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53453_fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-03-46_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0028
The candidate 53453_fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-03-46_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0028 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 06 02.12774    2461193.62774    12.90    09:50:33.31 +26:05:52.6   6148 5544   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_220929_TTUQ2b1x1_3140825_3j2abF5H/fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-03-46_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0028.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53702_fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-03-46_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0028
The candidate 53702_fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-03-46_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0028 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 06 02.12774    2461193.62774    13.00    09:44:38.01 +26:20:16.0   6950 5374   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_220929_TTUQ2b1x1_3140825_3j2abF5H/fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-03-46_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0028.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53789_fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-03-46_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0028
The candidate 53789_fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-03-46_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0028 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 06 02.12774    2461193.62774    13.10    09:55:25.18 +27:35:08.4   5470 4654   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_220929_TTUQ2b1x1_3140825_3j2abF5H/fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-03-46_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0028.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54232_fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-03-46_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0028
The candidate 54232_fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-03-46_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0028 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 06 02.12774    2461193.62774    13.35    09:56:15.01 +27:00:45.8   5364 5003   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_220929_TTUQ2b1x1_3140825_3j2abF5H/fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-03-46_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0028.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54281_fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-03-46_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0028
The candidate 54281_fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-03-46_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0028 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 06 02.12733    2461193.62733    13.38    10:16:05.16 +32:00:15.7   2772 1963   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_220929_TTUQ2b1x1_3140825_3j2abF5H/fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-03-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0027.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 06 02.12774    2461193.62774    13.22    10:16:05.21 +32:00:15.9   2773 1964   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_220929_TTUQ2b1x1_3140825_3j2abF5H/fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-03-46_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0028.fits

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54495_fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-03-46_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0028
The candidate 54495_fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-03-46_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0028 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 06 02.12774    2461193.62774    13.51    10:13:02.44 +32:55:49.2   3176 1413   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_220929_TTUQ2b1x1_3140825_3j2abF5H/fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-03-46_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0028.fits

**** FOUND  10:13:02.46 +32:55:49.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54564_fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-03-46_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0028
The candidate 54564_fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-03-46_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0028 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 06 02.12774    2461193.62774    13.74    10:00:32.84 +30:10:28.6   4774 3096   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_220929_TTUQ2b1x1_3140825_3j2abF5H/fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-03-46_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0028.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54673_fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-03-46_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0028
The candidate 54673_fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-03-46_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0028 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 06 02.12774    2461193.62774    13.79    09:43:19.55 +33:34:12.8   6939 0981   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_220929_TTUQ2b1x1_3140825_3j2abF5H/fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-03-46_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0028.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54690_fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-03-46_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0028
The candidate 54690_fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-03-46_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0028 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 06 02.12774    2461193.62774    13.65    10:07:12.03 +26:30:33.3   3885 5314   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_220929_TTUQ2b1x1_3140825_3j2abF5H/fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-03-46_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0028.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54772_fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-03-46_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0028
The candidate 54772_fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-03-46_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0028 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 06 02.12774    2461193.62774    13.56    10:15:28.14 +28:05:55.9   2789 4332   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_220929_TTUQ2b1x1_3140825_3j2abF5H/fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-03-46_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0028.fits

**** FOUND  10:15:28.06 +28:05:55.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55011_fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-03-46_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0028
The candidate 55011_fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-03-46_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0028 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 06 02.12774    2461193.62774    13.64    10:01:29.82 +28:33:21.8   4653 4075   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_220929_TTUQ2b1x1_3140825_3j2abF5H/fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-03-46_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0028.fits

**** FOUND  10:01:29.82 +28:33:21.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55033_fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-03-46_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0028
The candidate 55033_fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-03-46_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0028 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 06 02.12774    2461193.62774    13.76    09:48:04.77 +31:15:11.6   6382 2412   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_220929_TTUQ2b1x1_3140825_3j2abF5H/fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-03-46_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0028.fits

**** FOUND  09:48:04.80 +31:15:12.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55061_fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-03-46_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0028
The candidate 55061_fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-03-46_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0028 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 06 02.12774    2461193.62774    14.07    09:43:56.64 +30:20:34.9   6941 2942   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_220929_TTUQ2b1x1_3140825_3j2abF5H/fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-03-46_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0028.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55185_fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-03-46_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0028
The candidate 55185_fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-03-46_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0028 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 06 02.12774    2461193.62774    13.89    10:15:12.64 +31:28:46.1   2877 2286   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_220929_TTUQ2b1x1_3140825_3j2abF5H/fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-03-46_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0028.fits

**** FOUND  10:15:12.75 +31:28:46.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55320_fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-03-46_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0028
The candidate 55320_fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-03-46_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0028 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 06 02.12774    2461193.62774    13.92    10:11:37.23 +30:26:43.3   3330 2923   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_220929_TTUQ2b1x1_3140825_3j2abF5H/fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-03-46_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0028.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55380_fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-03-46_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0028
The candidate 55380_fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-03-46_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0028 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 06 02.12774    2461193.62774    14.02    10:05:00.40 +29:44:36.5   4191 3357   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_220929_TTUQ2b1x1_3140825_3j2abF5H/fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-03-46_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0028.fits

**** FOUND  10:05:00.37 +29:44:35.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55417_fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-03-46_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0028
The candidate 55417_fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-03-46_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0028 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 06 02.12774    2461193.62774    13.95    10:17:47.03 +30:29:25.8   2525 2875   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_220929_TTUQ2b1x1_3140825_3j2abF5H/fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-03-46_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0028.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55558_fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-03-46_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0028
The candidate 55558_fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-03-46_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0028 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 06 02.12774    2461193.62774    14.09    09:46:20.21 +33:49:47.4   6552 0840   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_220929_TTUQ2b1x1_3140825_3j2abF5H/fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-03-46_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0028.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55579_fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-03-46_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0028
The candidate 55579_fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-03-46_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0028 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 06 02.12774    2461193.62774    14.17    09:50:45.67 +26:02:06.1   6121 5583   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_220929_TTUQ2b1x1_3140825_3j2abF5H/fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-03-46_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0028.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55663_fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-03-46_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0028
The candidate 55663_fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-03-46_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0028 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 06 02.12774    2461193.62774    14.40    10:19:21.67 +26:56:00.9   2241 5026   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_220929_TTUQ2b1x1_3140825_3j2abF5H/fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-03-46_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0028.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55673_fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-03-46_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0028
The candidate 55673_fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-03-46_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0028 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 06 02.12774    2461193.62774    14.41    10:15:18.02 +26:02:01.8   2777 5588   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_220929_TTUQ2b1x1_3140825_3j2abF5H/fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-03-46_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0028.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55757_fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-03-46_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0028
The candidate 55757_fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-03-46_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0028 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 06 02.12774    2461193.62774    14.07    09:51:17.43 +33:26:47.7   5933 1095   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_220929_TTUQ2b1x1_3140825_3j2abF5H/fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-03-46_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0028.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55776_fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-03-46_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0028
The candidate 55776_fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-03-46_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0028 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 06 02.12774    2461193.62774    13.93    10:06:51.83 +28:55:05.6   3943 3855   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_220929_TTUQ2b1x1_3140825_3j2abF5H/fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-03-46_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0028.fits

**** FOUND  10:06:51.85 +28:55:05.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55856_fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-03-46_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0028
The candidate 55856_fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-03-46_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0028 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 06 02.12774    2461193.62774    14.39    09:45:40.83 +29:14:33.8   6739 3617   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_220929_TTUQ2b1x1_3140825_3j2abF5H/fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-03-46_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0028.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55913_fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-03-46_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0028
The candidate 55913_fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-03-46_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0028 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 06 02.12774    2461193.62774    14.31    10:18:14.05 +28:50:24.0   2433 3873   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_220929_TTUQ2b1x1_3140825_3j2abF5H/fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-03-46_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0028.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55958_fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-03-46_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0028
The candidate 55958_fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-03-46_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0028 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 06 02.12774    2461193.62774    14.47    10:13:22.11 +34:06:21.9   3150 0697   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_220929_TTUQ2b1x1_3140825_3j2abF5H/fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-03-46_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0028.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.1 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56016_fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-03-46_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0028
The candidate 56016_fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-03-46_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0028 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 06 02.12774    2461193.62774    14.10    10:10:41.65 +31:10:10.6   3458 2487   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_220929_TTUQ2b1x1_3140825_3j2abF5H/fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-03-46_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0028.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56033_fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-03-46_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0028
The candidate 56033_fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-03-46_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0028 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 06 02.12774    2461193.62774    14.55    09:45:34.69 +27:31:19.1   6793 4659   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_220929_TTUQ2b1x1_3140825_3j2abF5H/fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-03-46_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0028.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56072_fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-03-46_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0028
The candidate 56072_fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-03-46_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0028 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 06 02.12774    2461193.62774    14.45    10:14:06.37 +33:01:38.3   3042 1351   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_220929_TTUQ2b1x1_3140825_3j2abF5H/fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-03-46_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0028.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56207_fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-03-46_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0028
The candidate 56207_fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-03-46_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0028 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 06 02.12774    2461193.62774    14.75    09:48:07.02 +30:14:55.2   6397 3020   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_220929_TTUQ2b1x1_3140825_3j2abF5H/fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-03-46_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0028.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.3 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56230_fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-03-46_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0028
The candidate 56230_fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-03-46_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0028 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 06 02.12774    2461193.62774    14.61    10:08:29.25 +29:29:27.5   3732 3506   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_220929_TTUQ2b1x1_3140825_3j2abF5H/fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-03-46_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0028.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.2 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56231_fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-03-46_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0028
The candidate 56231_fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-03-46_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0028 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 06 02.12774    2461193.62774    14.46    09:47:53.63 +34:10:32.9   6349 0637   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_220929_TTUQ2b1x1_3140825_3j2abF5H/fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-03-46_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0028.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.3 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56336_fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-03-46_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0028
The candidate 56336_fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-03-46_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0028 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 06 02.12774    2461193.62774    14.33    09:58:54.42 +29:09:48.2   4994 3705   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_220929_TTUQ2b1x1_3140825_3j2abF5H/fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-03-46_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0028.fits

**** FOUND  09:58:54.44 +29:09:48.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56353_fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-03-46_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0028
The candidate 56353_fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-03-46_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0028 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 06 02.12774    2461193.62774    14.34    09:42:51.22 +33:15:29.4   7007 1168   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_220929_TTUQ2b1x1_3140825_3j2abF5H/fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-03-46_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0028.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.2 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56397_fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-03-46_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0028
The candidate 56397_fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-03-46_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0028 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 06 02.12774    2461193.62774    14.65    09:49:10.43 +28:59:03.6   6282 3789   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_220929_TTUQ2b1x1_3140825_3j2abF5H/fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-03-46_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0028.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.2 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56417_fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-03-46_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0028
The candidate 56417_fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-03-46_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0028 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 06 02.12774    2461193.62774    14.64    10:08:53.00 +25:52:19.0   3652 5700   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_220929_TTUQ2b1x1_3140825_3j2abF5H/fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-03-46_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0028.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.0") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56457_fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-03-46_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0028
The candidate 56457_fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-03-46_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0028 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 06 02.12774    2461193.62774    14.70    10:16:36.96 +30:36:34.2   2680 2808   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_220929_TTUQ2b1x1_3140825_3j2abF5H/fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-03-46_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0028.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.5") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56479_fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-03-46_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0028
The candidate 56479_fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-03-46_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0028 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 06 02.12774    2461193.62774    14.44    10:11:54.43 +33:45:26.2   3330 0914   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_220929_TTUQ2b1x1_3140825_3j2abF5H/fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-03-46_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0028.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56484_fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-03-46_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0028
The candidate 56484_fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-03-46_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0028 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 06 02.12774    2461193.62774    14.40    09:51:49.03 +34:07:25.0   5857 0685   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_220929_TTUQ2b1x1_3140825_3j2abF5H/fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-03-46_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0028.fits

**** FOUND  09:51:49.03 +34:07:25.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56506_fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-03-46_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0028
The candidate 56506_fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-03-46_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0028 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 06 02.12774    2461193.62774    14.23    10:05:58.69 +32:58:17.1   4075 1403   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_220929_TTUQ2b1x1_3140825_3j2abF5H/fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-03-46_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0028.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56576_fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-03-46_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0028
The candidate 56576_fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-03-46_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0028 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 06 02.12774    2461193.62774    14.23    10:19:36.62 +31:53:42.6   2316 2015   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_220929_TTUQ2b1x1_3140825_3j2abF5H/fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-03-46_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0028.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56595_fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-03-46_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0028
The candidate 56595_fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-03-46_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0028 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 06 02.12774    2461193.62774    14.56    09:41:25.33 +27:27:45.7   7355 4673   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_220929_TTUQ2b1x1_3140825_3j2abF5H/fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-03-46_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0028.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56642_fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-03-46_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0028
The candidate 56642_fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-03-46_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0028 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 06 02.12774    2461193.62774    14.18    10:19:48.09 +29:27:44.2   2238 3489   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_220929_TTUQ2b1x1_3140825_3j2abF5H/fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-03-46_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0028.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56660_fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-03-46_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0028
The candidate 56660_fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-03-46_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0028 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 06 02.12774    2461193.62774    14.54    10:14:57.25 +29:26:52.1   2879 3517   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_220929_TTUQ2b1x1_3140825_3j2abF5H/fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-03-46_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0028.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.1 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56685_fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-03-46_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0028
The candidate 56685_fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-03-46_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0028 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 06 02.12774    2461193.62774    14.69    10:19:52.74 +33:24:40.8   2314 1092   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_220929_TTUQ2b1x1_3140825_3j2abF5H/fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-03-46_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0028.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.1 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56707_fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-03-46_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0028
The candidate 56707_fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-03-46_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0028 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 06 02.12774    2461193.62774    14.89    10:01:18.21 +27:20:46.7   4682 4807   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_220929_TTUQ2b1x1_3140825_3j2abF5H/fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-03-46_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0028.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56943_fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-03-46_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0028
Preparing report for the candidate 56943_fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-03-46_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0028
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 57009_fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-03-46_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0028
Preparing report for the candidate 57009_fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-03-46_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0028
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 57078_fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-03-46_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0028
The candidate 57078_fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-03-46_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0028 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 06 02.12774    2461193.62774    14.83    10:13:26.00 +33:53:08.5   3139 0831   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_220929_TTUQ2b1x1_3140825_3j2abF5H/fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-03-46_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0028.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.9") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 57188_fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-03-46_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0028
The candidate 57188_fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-03-46_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0028 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 06 02.12774    2461193.62774    14.53    09:39:37.84 +31:26:22.8   7473 2251   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_220929_TTUQ2b1x1_3140825_3j2abF5H/fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-03-46_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0028.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.1") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 57190_fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-03-46_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0028
The candidate 57190_fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-03-46_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0028 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 06 02.12774    2461193.62774    14.68    10:06:07.60 +31:07:48.8   4049 2518   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_220929_TTUQ2b1x1_3140825_3j2abF5H/fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-03-46_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0028.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.1 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 57213_fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-03-46_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0028
The candidate 57213_fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-03-46_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0028 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 06 02.12774    2461193.62774    14.75    09:49:35.95 +30:15:35.8   6203 3019   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_220929_TTUQ2b1x1_3140825_3j2abF5H/fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-03-46_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0028.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.2 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 57308_fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-03-46_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0028
The candidate 57308_fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-03-46_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0028 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 06 02.12774    2461193.62774    14.79    10:19:12.38 +31:53:06.9   2368 2023   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_220929_TTUQ2b1x1_3140825_3j2abF5H/fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-03-46_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0028.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.3 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 57323_fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-03-46_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0028
The candidate 57323_fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-03-46_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0028 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 06 02.12774    2461193.62774    14.73    09:44:28.94 +30:56:22.0   6856 2584   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_220929_TTUQ2b1x1_3140825_3j2abF5H/fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-03-46_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0028.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.2 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 57350_fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-03-46_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0028
Preparing report for the candidate 57350_fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-03-46_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0028
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51316_fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-03-46_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0028
The candidate 51316_fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-03-46_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0028 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 3     2026 06 02.12774    2461193.62774    13.59    10:05:00.83 +32:46:35.4   4197 1522   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_220929_TTUQ2b1x1_3140825_3j2abF5H/fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-01_22-03-46_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0028.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 19s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Leo-01-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
09:59:34.26 +27:06:02.2
10:05:48.02 +26:23:59.6
10:01:53.46 +30:26:53.8
########### Completed Leo-01-Q2b1x1 ###########
The analysis was running at tau
We are allowed to update the exclusion list at tau host
Found ../exclusion_list_TTUQ2.txt
#### The exclusion list before filtering-out asteroids, bad pixels and adding Gaia sources ####
09:59:34.26 +27:06:02.2
10:05:48.02 +26:23:59.6
10:01:53.46 +30:26:53.8
###################################################################################
09:59:34.26 +27:06:02.2  -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
10:05:48.02 +26:23:59.6  -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
10:01:53.46 +30:26:53.8  -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
renamed 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt_noasteroids' -> 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt'
09:59:34.26 +27:06:02.2  -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
10:01:53.46 +30:26:53.8  -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
10:05:48.02 +26:23:59.6  -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
renamed 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt_nohotpixels' -> 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt'
# Count candidates with no identification (that also don't look like hot pix)
09:59:34.26 +27:06:02.2  -- not a known variable star
10:01:53.46 +30:26:53.8  -- not a known variable star
10:05:48.02 +26:23:59.6  -- not a known variable star
Found 3 unidentified candidates (excluding asteroids, hot pixels and known variable stars).
###################################################################################
3 candidates found (excluding asteroids and hot pixels)
This does not look like a test run
###################################################################################
exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt NOT FOUND
exclusion_list_apass.txt NOT FOUND
IS_THIS_TEST_RUN= NO   ALLOW_EXCLUSION_LIST_UPDATE= YES
#### Adding the following to the exclusion list ####
09:59:34.26 +27:06:02.2
10:01:53.46 +30:26:53.8
10:05:48.02 +26:23:59.6
####################################################
The observatory MPC code is V36
############################################################
Positions of planets computed with util/planet_finder/main.py for JD(UT)2461193.62732836 -observatory V36
06:03:02.62 +25:35:56.7 Mercury (-0.4mag)
07:11:58.42 +24:21:47.2 Venus (-4.0mag)
02:32:02.56 +14:17:51.7 Mars (1.3mag)
07:43:28.10 +21:43:38.7 Jupiter (-1.9mag)
00:47:33.84 +02:38:41.1 Saturn (0.9mag)
03:58:45.17 +20:21:15.3 Uranus (5.8mag)
00:15:45.19 +00:14:36.5 Neptune (7.8mag)
20:33:39.75 -23:02:21.4 Pluto (14.5mag)
18:05:34.06 -28:22:02.1 Moon (-12.2mag)
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 363 Jun  1 22:11 planets.txt
############################################################
Positions of selected moons from JPL HORIZONS for JD(UT)2461193.62732836:
07:43:26.07 +21:43:42.9 Io (6.0mag)
07:43:39.80 +21:43:04.6 Europa (6.1mag)
07:43:18.13 +21:44:11.8 Ganymede (5.6mag)
07:43:37.93 +21:43:18.0 Callisto (6.8mag)
07:44:07.61 +21:19:43.7 Himalia (15.6mag)
07:43:32.77 +21:43:24.6 Thebe (16.5mag)
07:44:16.67 +21:37:53.4 Elara (17.5mag)
07:45:19.39 +21:58:38.5 Pasiphae (17.7mag)
07:50:18.65 +21:44:55.2 Carme (18.8mag)
00:47:38.23 +02:39:06.1 Titan (8.7mag)
00:47:39.20 +02:38:43.3 Rhea (10.0mag)
00:48:05.53 +02:40:01.8 Iapetus (11.4mag)
00:47:25.33 +02:39:07.1 Hyperion (14.7mag)
00:48:23.41 +02:41:29.7 Phoebe (16.7mag)
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 569 Jun  1 22:11 moons.txt
############################################################
Positions of selected spacecraft from JPL HORIZONS for JD(UT)2461193.62732836:
17:23:24.24 -34:31:18.5 JWST
19:25:25.72 +10:23:44.0 Chandra
18:05:57.79 -35:36:01.8 XMM-Newton
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 96 Jun  1 22:11 spacecraft.txt
############################################################
Positions of bright comets computed with util/comet_finder/main.py for JD(UT)2461193.62732836 -observatory V36
18:47:22.69 -32:11:55.5 13.6mag P/2010 H2 (Vales)
05:47:32.59 -68:08:33.3 17.4mag C/2014 UN271 (Bernardinelli-Bernstein)
05:46:50.48 +31:53:28.4 17.5mag C/2017 K2 (PANSTARRS)
17:17:09.38 +15:00:51.3 17.8mag C/2021 G2 (ATLAS)
20:21:14.29 -51:19:33.7 17.4mag P/2021 N1 (ZTF)
23:13:45.41 +31:20:55.4 17.2mag C/2022 E2 (ATLAS)
05:26:34.85 +26:55:50.9 16.4mag C/2022 N2 (PANSTARRS)
09:25:29.57 +31:17:06.3 16.6mag C/2022 QE78 (ATLAS)
08:47:23.43 +03:37:16.5 17.6mag C/2022 R6 (PANSTARRS)
18:32:06.61 +21:27:09.9 17.7mag C/2023 A3 (Tsuchinshan-ATLAS)
15:21:39.01 -11:00:38.7 17.5mag P/2023 B1 (PANSTARRS)
22:15:51.64 +66:08:22.0 17.7mag C/2023 H5 (Lemmon)
18:01:07.01 -06:07:16.0 13.7mag C/2023 R1 (PANSTARRS)
13:23:46.18 +84:20:37.0 17.9mag C/2023 X2 (Lemmon)
07:02:13.73 +64:07:04.2 17.6mag C/2024 A1 (ATLAS)
06:37:55.26 +27:15:04.2 13.4mag C/2024 E1 (Wierzchos)
15:42:08.82 +12:57:18.6 17.4mag C/2024 G6 (ATLAS)
20:16:38.50 +29:18:18.0 14.1mag C/2024 J3 (ATLAS)
04:11:56.29 -16:30:30.3 16.1mag C/2024 T5 (ATLAS)
06:00:13.22 +35:33:33.9 17.9mag C/2025 J1 (Borisov)
11:38:45.79 +53:04:06.8 17.2mag C/2025 L1 (ATLAS)
06:36:46.66 -10:35:14.4 13.5mag C/2025 R3 (PANSTARRS)
09:19:26.23 +23:23:58.3 18.0mag C/2025 V2 (Rankin)
12:40:03.60 +04:41:06.3 17.2mag C/2025 Y1 (ATLAS)
18:21:05.97 +73:43:32.5 18.0mag C/2026 A2 (Bok)
01:49:43.39 +42:57:36.9 15.9mag C/2026 B2 (Sun-Gao)
11:10:27.19 -06:01:01.3 16.4mag A/2026 E1
20:12:32.15 -08:15:10.9 9.1mag 10P/Tempel
11:00:45.09 -00:53:59.8 15.9mag 29P/Schwassmann-Wachmann
10:56:13.38 -02:38:37.8 17.9mag 43P/Wolf-Harrington
03:02:17.79 +24:49:05.7 17.6mag 47P/Ashbrook-Jackson
08:47:02.18 +25:28:34.2 16.9mag 63P/Wild
00:21:30.84 -06:47:05.4 15.7mag 65P/Gunn
06:23:50.20 +32:43:21.9 16.7mag 76P/West-Kohoutek-Ikemura
02:54:33.78 +16:24:15.6 13.9mag 78P/Gehrels
01:07:16.39 +03:29:02.2 15.4mag 88P/Howell
04:35:05.14 +29:45:43.5 15.2mag 93P/Lovas
02:26:04.18 +26:36:34.0 17.8mag 114P/Wiseman-Skiff
06:36:10.64 +33:12:59.4 15.7mag 123P/West-Hartley
09:39:42.93 +17:14:57.8 16.5mag 124P/Mrkos
03:49:01.64 +18:49:27.5 16.4mag 128P/Shoemaker-Holt
04:21:27.82 +18:46:30.7 17.7mag 131P/Mueller
05:31:25.07 +19:15:31.6 13.9mag 141P/Machholz
05:33:53.97 +17:13:35.4 13.8mag 141P-A/Machholz
04:23:01.22 +15:11:28.5 11.1mag 141P-D/Machholz
02:53:19.31 -25:34:29.9 17.1mag 161P/Hartley-IRAS
03:21:51.30 +21:17:34.7 14.9mag 162P/SidingSpring
19:36:24.81 +00:02:05.1 17.2mag 169P/NEAT
00:01:53.67 +01:14:43.9 17.9mag 220P/McNaught
16:56:55.21 -08:49:44.2 16.3mag 235P/LINEAR
07:20:53.19 +35:42:28.0 17.4mag 240P/NEAT
00:16:30.57 -04:59:51.6 16.6mag 260P/McNaught
03:47:59.42 +31:20:00.4 17.6mag 295P/LINEAR
23:08:19.60 -17:57:56.2 17.6mag 320P/McNaught
15:18:07.60 +08:16:01.1 17.4mag 391P/Kowalski
08:02:24.04 +20:53:38.6 17.9mag 450P/LONEOS
06:50:04.34 +42:07:12.5 17.8mag 493P/LONEOS
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 2.8K Jun  1 22:11 comets.txt
############################################################
List of recent ASAS-SN transients from https://www.astronomy.ohio-state.edu/asassn/transients.html :
20:07:38.15 -21:07:05.40  SN2026mho  2026-05-25.18 -1.12
11:29:42.55 +79:01:03.10  AT2026min  2026-05-24.21 16.63
11:44:33.11 -68:48:32.90  ASASSN-26no  2026-05-24.03 8.35
14:23:56.59 -58:37:47.40  ASASSN-26dn  2026-05-20.01 14.59
11:24:54.06 +47:57:01.60  AT2026nma  2026-05-20.29 15.46
21:27:08.58 +33:24:38.10  AT2026lli  2026-05-19.34 15.86
00:31:01.41 -13:38:51.70  AT2026nad  2026-05-19.39 15.34
15:16:06.61 -79:16:32.40  ASASSN-26dm  2026-05-19.03 14.44
11:24:25.21 -59:23:19.10  ASASSN-26dl  2026-05-18.02 13.55
13:45:51.52 -53:16:01.00  ASASSN-26dk  2026-05-18.16 12.96
02:05:49.69 -30:29:09.60  ASASSN-26dh  2026-05-18.43 15.37
17:50:22.87 -39:42:33.90  ASASSN-26dj  2026-05-17.05 15.7
01:13:11.60 -33:25:16.10  ASASSN-26dg  2026-05-13.41 16.8
16:44:31.77 -27:15:18.40  AT2026mhn  2026-05-12.33 15.8
09:46:31.08 -33:41:51.00  ASASSN-26di  2026-05-12.14 14.63
21:23:11.57 -19:09:45.00  AT2026kwu  2026-05-12.26 16.9
14:20:14.30 -30:20:51.90  AT2026ktm  2026-05-12.06 17.21
14:41:39.01 -37:13:46.40  AT2026lkm  2026-05-11.18 16.89
12:59:50.45 -10:58:38.80  SN2026kep  2026-05-9.06 17.5
13:37:29.61 -29:50:30.90  AT2026lkd  2026-05-9.09 17.23
09:46:42.01 -14:52:03.60  SN2026kmo  2026-05-8.99 17.51
15:03:05.18 +22:02:03.40  AT2026lxf  2026-05-8.07 13.94
10:23:49.41 -20:57:25.30  ASASSN-26df  2026-05-8.21 16.52
22:14:40.56 +05:04:51.60  2026lda  2026-05-7.56 16.2
21:35:33.81 -14:05:16.30  ASASSN-26de  2026-05-6.29 14.51
16:21:49.13 -61:36:14.60  ASASSN-26dd  2026-05-5.15 15.93
14:26:40.22 -24:48:37.50  AT2026lig  2026-05-4.27 14.63
13:17:51.04 +30:25:13.50  SN2026kcp  2026-05-4.46 16.43
11:27:55.57 -13:38:56.90  SN2026kza  2026-05-1.08 15.59
22:28:27.10 +30:17:54.30  SN 2026fov  2026-04-29.6 14.36
21:00:10.71 -32:17:03.90  AT2026kis  2026-04-27.36 16.15
14:32:57.37 -58:13:26.40  ASASSN-26dc  2026-04-27.27 13.42
15:32:05.35 -43:54:34.60  ASASSN-26db  2026-04-27.37 16.06
16:34:34.97 -54:34:58.00  ASASSN-26da  2026-04-25.32 16.11
10:06:55.04 -01:13:49.70  SN2026jsg  2026-04-24.99 16.28
15:15:57.17 +56:18:32.80  SN2026kid  2026-04-24.52 -3.65
07:58:28.45 +57:03:42.40  AT2026kcf  2026-04-24.2 16.89
11:38:21.80 -50:43:06.50  SN2026jkb  2026-04-24.24 15.38
10:06:11.41 -39:41:04.20  AT2026dil  2026-04-24.2 16.85
14:21:40.08 +13:13:46.30  SN2026jlm  2026-04-22.16 15.12
10:53:55.43 -16:06:06.50  ASASSN-26cz  2026-04-22.06 16.26
20:07:38.15 -21:07:05.40    2026-05-25.18 -1.12
13:45:02.03 +15:17:14.50  ASASSN-26cy  2026-04-21.27 15.78
13:20:52.22 -35:57:03.60  AT2026jcm  2026-04-19.01 16.65
13:36:15.66 -36:53:48.40  SN 2026iqy  2026-04-18.92 17.31
06:34:01.33 -40:07:34.00  ASASSN-26cx  2026-04-19.07 16.16
23:33:57.97 -45:12:11.90  SN 2026idu  2026-04-19.41 15.9
12:10:50.92 +66:55:31.20  SN 2026icv  2026-04-17.14 16.03
21:36:59.06 -60:43:35.90  ASASSN-26cv  2026-04-17.35 -1.18
08:13:26.26 -27:07:30.50  ASASSN-26cw  2026-04-17.07 -1.01
14:49:14.01 -27:29:20.10  ASASSN-26cu  2026-04-16.29 -2.7
17:21:59.44 -38:54:04.60  ASASSN-26ct  2026-04-14.4 15.15
15:25:54.99 +07:49:24.50  SN2026huo  2026-04-12.14 16.96
20:07:38.15 -21:07:05.40    2026-05-25.18 -1.12
12:23:20.40 +04:53:39.10  AT2026ixd  2026-04-12.14 17.65
17:46:09.76 -61:19:50.40  SN2026icy  2026-04-12.2 17.03
09:25:46.42 +02:13:46.30  SN2026gud  2026-04-11.98 16.49
16:52:15.46 -60:27:45.90  ASASSN-26cs  2026-04-12.4 15.5
04:20:55.37 -51:15:31.10  ASASSN-26cr  2026-04-12.01 15.37
22:25:39.35 +36:45:06.90  AT2026ihl  2026-04-10.48 14.21
19:40:44.94 +00:41:03.80  AT2026imw  2026-04-10.32 16.06
19:52:04.70 +05:53:33.50  ASASSN-26cq  2026-04-9.31 14.98
16:08:18.39 -64:11:08.80  ASASSN-26cp  2026-04-9.14 13.64
09:22:22.90 -61:02:43.70  SN2026idh  2026-04-7.97 16.34
05:06:54.12 -19:42:26.40  AT2026imr  2026-04-8 17.49
07:14:55.34 -36:03:21.40  AT2026hei  2026-04-8.12 16.7
21:35:33.14 -19:01:34.80  AT2026ihm  2026-04-8.36 16.7
04:28:24.08 -32:25:35.30  AT2026imo  2026-04-8.02 16.81
05:10:35.79 -39:38:40.80  SN 2026hnn  2026-04-7.04 17.07
09:54:32.04 -01:17:25.80  ASASSN-26cn  2026-04-7.01 15.58
07:46:24.43 -77:29:36.30  ASASSN-26co  2026-04-7.15 15.11
05:00:45.52 -29:51:06.20  AT2026hvw  2026-04-6.03 16.51
19:49:33.10 -23:37:11.00  ASASSN-26cl  2026-04-5.29 14.98
19:32:43.68 -22:39:32.70  ASASSN-26cm  2026-04-4.27 13.88
18:08:57.38 +76:48:23.60  ASASSN-26ck  2026-04-2.37 15.38
16:16:36.10 +44:52:30.20  AT2026hyy  2026-04-2.58 13.81
21:55:23.31 -34:48:53.90  ASASSN-26cj  2026-03-30.4 -1.47
11:19:50.81 -27:51:50.40  SN2026gvk  2026-03-30 15.28
11:53:57.02 -23:09:46.20  SN2026gzx  2026-03-28.75 15.27
07:13:46.14 -33:10:15.70  ASASSN-26ci  2026-03-28.15 15.14
09:03:36.09 -67:58:13.00  SN2026hkg  2026-03-28.19 15.82
07:03:00.72 +39:14:43.00  SN2026fin  2026-03-28.27 15.82
05:35:42.80 -63:44:05.50  ASASSN-26ch  2026-03-27.86 13.02
11:23:19.04 +34:22:38.00  SN2026fwt  2026-03-27.3 16.56
19:03:49.79 +37:04:05.20  ASASSN-26ce  2026-03-26.56 16.3
20:26:56.07 -52:54:06.50  AT2026hiy  2026-03-26.35 16.95
05:25:54.76 -30:15:35.80  ASASSN-26cg  2026-03-25.07 16.88
06:57:16.49 -26:54:37.20  SN2026fzb  2026-03-25.14 15.8
14:37:38.23 -43:00:52.30  ASASSN-26cd  2026-03-24.24 12.52
17:34:53.03 +06:04:29.70  AT2026gzl  2026-03-23.27 15.82
08:30:02.60 -35:12:47.50  ASASSN-26cf  2026-03-23.2 14.82
16:54:25.33 +37:49:56.60  SN 2026evz  2026-03-21.32 17.54
17:06:19.20 -18:54:19.50  ASASSN-26bx  2026-03-21.25 16.39
19:01:16.28 -29:29:23.10  ASASSN-26bw  2026-03-21.33 15.81
08:46:05.75 +10:47:39.80  ASASSN-26ca  2026-03-21.13 14.27
12:14:58.16 +63:47:16.20  SN 2026fvx  2026-03-21.12 15.6
18:02:55.90 -75:23:02.60  ASASSN-26bz  2026-03-21.32 16.16
12:16:02.87 -53:16:33.70  ASASSN-26cc  2026-03-20.08 3.93
13:08:21.85 +29:13:44.20  SN 2026fmh  2026-03-20.16 -0.33
19:56:38.48 -34:45:21.50  ASASSN-26cb  2026-03-20.35 -3.26
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 5.6K Jun  1 22:11 asassn_transients_list.txt
############################################################
Truncated list of TOCP transients from http://www.cbat.eps.harvard.edu/unconf/tocp.html :
17:57:19.56 -28:08:14.7  TCP J17571956-2808147  2026-03-19.7972  14.5mag
08:46:05.73 +10:47:39.7  TCP J08460573+1047397  2026-03-21.1936  14.5mag
09:55:38.83 +69:05:21.7  PNV J09553883+6905217  2026-04-01.893  19.4mag
19:32:43.67 -22:39:30.7  TCP J19324367-2239307  2026-04-05.4395  13.6mag
16:16:36.03 +44:52:28.9  TCP J16163603+4452289  2026-04-05.6655  14.2mag
00:43:38.36 +41:15:32.4  PNV J00433836+4115324  2026-04-08.079  17.2mag
15:41:11.68 +59:18:26.8  TCP J15411168+5918268  2026-04-12.9625  19.2mag
00:43:35.02 +41:46:28.0  PNV J00433502+4146280  2026-04-23.056  15.9mag
00:42:55.64 +41:14:12.2  PNV J00425564+4114122  2026-04-24.042  16.2mag
21:14:03.38 +56:46:44.1  TCP J21140338+5646441  2026-05-05.3534  16.7mag
15:03:05.19 +22:02:04.1  TCP J15030519+2202041  2026-05-08.3260  13.9mag
07:15:18.25 +47:53:16.7  TCP J07151825+4753167  2026-05-09.1599  14.4mag
16:00:18.44 -22:30:10.6  TCP J16001844-2230106  2026-05-09.6135  13.3mag
00:42:47.45 +41:16:58.5  PNV J00424745+4116585  2026-05-10.030  16.8mag
09:55:02.89 +69:02:13.8  PNV J09550289+6902138  2026-05-18.925  20.7mag
00:43:01.82 +41:18:16.6  PNV J00430182+4118166  2026-05-21.8651  18.83Cmag
00:42:51.20 +41:16:59.4  PNV J00425120+4116594  2022-10-26.135  19.3mag
12:24:25.10 +28:47:12.0  TCP J12242510+2847120  2026-05-31.6015  14.8mag
00:56:07.13 +43:01:40.6  TCP J00560713+4301406  2026-06-01.4135  12.2mag
00:42:41.64 +41:15:16.2  PNV J00424164+4115162  2026-06-02.029  17.4mag
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 189K Jun  1 22:11 tocp_transients_list.txt
############################################################
Truncated list of recent TNS transients from https://www.wis-tns.org/ :
14:43:04.770 +44:26:44.68  AT 2026nhj  2026-05-12.86 21.31
14:48:12.840 +26:16:16.61  AT 2026nhi  2026-05-07.83 20.09
14:39:54.860 +26:23:14.77  AT 2026nhh  2026-05-07.83 21.13
14:29:41.070 +26:50:04.61  AT 2026nhg  2026-05-07.83 20.77
14:03:03.560 -00:52:45.67  AT 2026nhf  2026-05-19.65 21.75
13:27:33.220 -01:52:49.95  AT 2026nhe  2026-05-17.64 20.72
13:18:46.250 +02:28:16.38  AT 2026nhd  2026-05-09.67 22.71
20:47:45.529 -19:53:26.35  AT 2026nhc  2026-05-20.40 19.7848
19:13:38.097 -14:31:38.10  AT 2026nhb  2026-05-14.44 20.7774
15:35:51.801 +19:40:09.90  AT 2026nha  2026-05-07.31 20.0995
15:57:39.574 -25:29:17.95  AT 2026ngz  2026-04-18.41 19.9742
10:51:38.905 -10:28:42.76  AT 2026ngy  2026-05-15.38 20.12
11:36:55.330 -31:38:36.50  AT 2026ngx  2026-05-11.39 20.37
10:39:09.434 -12:00:29.70  AT 2026ngw  2026-05-15.36 19.47
23:31:07.680 +49:32:03.66  AT 2026ngv  2026-05-21.20 19.21
11:15:47.222 -26:40:41.12  AT 2026ngu  2026-05-21.37 19.08
11:22:13.240 -18:01:38.68  AT 2026ngt  2026-05-21.37 19.38
13:49:04.574 +60:57:59.76  AT 2026ngs  2026-05-13.26 20.7824
13:58:24.302 -03:02:49.29  SN 2026ngr  2026-05-15.19 19.8766
16:18:20.038 +32:35:19.31  AT 2026ngq  2026-05-20.15 20.02
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 30K Jun  1 22:11 tns_transients_list.txt

=== Transient Factory Profiling ===
Started: Mon Jun  1 22:11:26 CDT 2026
=======================================
TIMING SExtractor: 2 seconds
TIMING matching_and_photometry: 0 seconds
TIMING lightcurve_write: 0 seconds
TIMING select_aperture: 1 seconds
    VAST_RUN_default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1: 3s (0.05 min)
    WCS_CACHE_SETUP: 0s (0.00 min)
    WCS_CALIBRATION_AND_EPHEMERIS: 24s (0.40 min)
    PLATE_VERIFY_AND_POINTING: 0s (0.00 min)
    UCAC5_PLATE_SOLVING: 0s (0.00 min)
    MAGNITUDE_CALIBRATION: 33s (0.55 min)
    MAGCAL_SANITY_CHECK: 0s (0.00 min)
      FILTER_MAGNITUDE_CONSOLIDATED: 0s (0.00 min)
      FILTER_FRAME_EDGE: 0s (0.00 min)
      FILTER_SECOND_EPOCH_VERIFY: 0s (0.00 min)
    CANDIDATE_FILTERING_TOTAL: 1s (0.02 min)
    EXCLUSION_LIST_PREPARATION: 0s (0.00 min)
    SEEING_AND_LIMITING_MAG: 0s (0.00 min)
    WAIT_FOR_UCAC5: 0s (0.00 min)
    WCS_IMAGE_ARCHIVING: 0s (0.00 min)
    HTML_REPORT: 0s (0.00 min)
  SE_CONFIG_default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1: 61s (1.02 min)
TIMING SExtractor: 6 seconds
TIMING matching_and_photometry: 0 seconds
TIMING lightcurve_write: 1 seconds
TIMING select_aperture: 1 seconds
    VAST_RUN_default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL: 13s (0.22 min)
    WCS_CACHE_SETUP: 0s (0.00 min)
    WCS_CALIBRATION_AND_EPHEMERIS: 0s (0.00 min)
    PLATE_VERIFY_AND_POINTING: 1s (0.02 min)
    UCAC5_PLATE_SOLVING: 0s (0.00 min)
    MAGNITUDE_CALIBRATION: 48s (0.80 min)
    MAGCAL_SANITY_CHECK: 1s (0.02 min)
      FILTER_MAGNITUDE_CONSOLIDATED: 1s (0.02 min)
      FILTER_FRAME_EDGE: 0s (0.00 min)
      FILTER_SECOND_EPOCH_VERIFY: 0s (0.00 min)
    CANDIDATE_FILTERING_TOTAL: 1s (0.02 min)
    EXCLUSION_LIST_PREPARATION: 0s (0.00 min)
    SEEING_AND_LIMITING_MAG: 1s (0.02 min)
    WAIT_FOR_UCAC5: 0s (0.00 min)
    WCS_IMAGE_ARCHIVING: 0s (0.00 min)
    HTML_REPORT: 19s (0.32 min)
  SE_CONFIG_default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL: 84s (1.40 min)
FIELD_Leo-01-Q2b1x1: 159s (2.65 min)
=======================================
TOTAL_RUNTIME: 161s (2.68 min)
Finished: Mon Jun  1 22:14:07 CDT 2026