## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref.  image: 2461058.82250781 18.01.2026 07:44:14.675   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits
First image: 2461058.82250781 18.01.2026 07:44:14.675   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits
Last  image: 2461193.62559758 02.06.2026 03:00:41.631   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_220518_TTUQ1b1x1_3006342_4DRRFlyR/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_22-00-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0023.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 1
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.:  -7.43
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 3 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA  10.0             # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH   10.0             #  or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0             #  or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL     55000.0         # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN            0.37            # detector gain in e-/ADU
Total objects detected (at least 2 times):  8053
Objects passed selection criteria:  8030
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max):    3.1    4.0    2    4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max):    3.1    4.0    2    4
Average stars detected per image: 6515.25
Average stars matched: 6322.5 (97.0416 %)
Memory usage VmPeak:   113612 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on  Mon Jun  1 15:05:05 CDT 2026
VaST build number  1.0rc89-85-g6dfb2809
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-06-01)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on  Mon Jun  1 22:07:33 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref.  image: 2461058.82250781 18.01.2026 07:44:14.675   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits
First image: 2461058.82250781 18.01.2026 07:44:14.675   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits
Last  image: 2461193.62559758 02.06.2026 03:00:41.631   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_220518_TTUQ1b1x1_3006342_4DRRFlyR/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_22-00-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0023.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 20
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.:  -7.18
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 13 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA  2.0             # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH   3.0             #  or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0             #  or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL     57000.0         # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN            0.83            # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
Total objects detected (at least 2 times):  41830
Objects passed selection criteria:  41733
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max):    3.1    4.0    2    4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max):    3.1    4.0    2    4
Average stars detected per image: 34438
Average stars matched: 33275.8 (96.6251 %)
Memory usage VmPeak:   142876 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on  Mon Jun  1 15:05:05 CDT 2026
VaST build number  1.0rc89-85-g6dfb2809
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-06-01)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on  Mon Jun  1 22:09:10 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################

######## Processing parameters ########
AAVSO_COMMENT_STRING= NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
ASTCHECK_ASTEROID_SEARCH_RADIUS_ARCSEC= 
BAD_REGION_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst
CAMERA_SETTINGS= TTUQ1b1x1
CHECK_POINTING_ACCURACY= yes
DARK_FRAMES_DIR_OR_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks
EXCLUSION_LIST= ../exclusion_list_TTUQ1.txt
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MAX_APERTURE_STAR_SIZE_PIX= 12.5
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MAX_ELONGATION_AminusB_PIX= 0.55
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MIN_APERTURE_STAR_SIZE_PIX= 2.0
FILTER_BRIGHT_MAG_CUTOFF_TRANSIENT_SEARCH= -5
FILTER_FAINT_MAG_CUTOFF_TRANSIENT_SEARCH= 15.0
FLAT_FIELD_DIR_OR_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats
FRAME_EDGE_OFFSET_PIX= 100
GAIA_BAND_FOR_CATALOGED_SOURCE_CHECK= 
MAX_NEW_TO_REF_MEAN_IMG_VALUE_RATIO= 100
MAX_NEW_IMG_MEAN_VALUE= 25000
MAX_SD_RATIO_OF_SECOND_EPOCH_IMGS= 0.18
MAX_SD_RATIO_OF_SECOND_EPOCH_IMGS_SOFT_LIMIT= 0.12
MPC_CODE= V36
NMW_CALIBRATION= /var/www/nmw_calibration
NUMBER_OF_DETECTED_TRANSIENTS_BEFORE_FILTERING_HARD_LIMIT= 8000
NUMBER_OF_DETECTED_TRANSIENTS_BEFORE_FILTERING_SOFT_LIMIT= 4000
OMP_NUM_THREADS= 
ONLINE_MPCHECKER_BUTTON_ASTEROID_SEARCH_RADIUS_ARCMIN= 
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION= 
REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES= yes
SEXTRACTOR_CONFIG_BRIGHTSTARPASS= default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
SEXTRACTOR_CONFIG_FILES= default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
STARMATCH_RADIUS_PIX= 3.5
SYSREM_ITERATIONS= 0
TELESCOP= 
TELESCOP_NAME_KNOWN_TO_VaST_FOR_FOV_DETERMINATION= 
UCAC5_PLATESOLVE_ITERATIONS= 2
FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE= no
#######################################
HOSTNAME= tau
USER= 
HOME= 
#######################################
SExtractor catalog cache: enabled, directory /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/vast_sextractor_cache
Reference image directory is set to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs
VIZIER_SITE=vizier.cds.unistra.fr
GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=vizquery (lib/vizquery -> VizieR vizier.cds.unistra.fr)
INFO: MAKE_PNG_PLOTS is set to yes
FITS_FILE_EXT=fits
CALIBRATION_STATUS_PREFIX=
Fields in the data directory: 
UMa-09-Q1b1x1
#######################################
########### Starting UMa-09-Q1b1x1 ###########
Processing UMa-09-Q1b1x1
server tau has sufficient free disk space available: 594270 MB at /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir
server tau has sufficient free disk space available: 594270 MB at .
Checking input images (2 new)
REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE= /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits
REFERENCE_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE= /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits
Small preview (one of the new images): 

Large previews of the second-epoch (new) images:

MAKE_PNG_PLOTS=yes


renamed 'UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_21-59-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0022.png' -> 'transient_report/UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_21-59-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0022.fits_preview.png'

UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_21-59-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0022.fits


renamed 'UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_22-00-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0023.png' -> 'transient_report/UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_22-00-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0023.fits_preview.png'

UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_22-00-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0023.fits




Read-check the input FITS images... read-check OK
Blank image check the input FITS images... blank-image-check OK
Read date check the input FITS images... read-date-check OK
Mean value check the input FITS images... OK, at least two new images have mean values below the threshold.
----------------------------------------------
INFO: REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 449.0147
INFO:         REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_SD= 524.3424
INFO:    SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 2018.6448
INFO:            SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_SD= 611.8009
INFO:   SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 1933.3950
INFO:           SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE_SD= 601.2331
----------------------------------------------
INFO:      ref_to_second_epoch_img_mean_ratio= 4.49572
INFO:                  SECOND_EPOCH__SD_ratio= 0.018
----------------------------------------------
Calibration settings: DARK_FRAMES_DIR_OR_FILE=/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks FLAT_FIELD_DIR_OR_FILE=/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats
EXPTIME =                 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration
SET-TEMP=                  0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint
CCD-TEMP=                 -0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature
FOCTEMP =     29.2999992370605 / [degC] Focuser temperature
AMBTEMP =                 28.4 / [degC] Ambient air temperature
Exploring image header: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_220518_TTUQ1b1x1_3006342_4DRRFlyR/UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_21-59-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0022.fits 
CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_220518_TTUQ1b1x1_3006342_4DRRFlyR/UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_21-59-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0022.fits
SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_220518_TTUQ1b1x1_3006342_4DRRFlyR/UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_21-59-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0022.fits
Header: 74 keys total, 33 keys left
Record 0: "" status=0
Record 1: "SIMPLE  =                    T / C# FITS" status=0
Record 2: "BITPIX  =                   16" status=0
Record 3: "NAXIS   =                    2 / Dimensionality" status=0
Record 4: "NAXIS1  =                 9576" status=0
Record 5: "NAXIS2  =                 6388" status=0
Record 6: "BZERO   =                32768" status=0
Record 7: "EXTEND  =                    T / Extensions are permitted" status=0
Record 8: "IMAGETYP= 'LIGHT'              / Type of exposure" status=0
Record 9: "EXPOSURE=                 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0
Record 10: "EXPTIME =                 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0
Record 11: "DATE-LOC= '2026-06-01T21:59:54.0669530' / Time of observation (local)" status=0
Record 12: "DATE-OBS= '2026-06-02T02:59:54.0669530' / Time of observation (UTC)" status=0
Record 13: "MJD-OBS =     61193.1249313196 / Modified Julian Date of observation" status=0
Record 14: "DATE-AVG= '2026-06-02T03:00:03.9745032' / Averaged midpoint time (UTC)" status=0
Record 15: "MJD-AVG =     61193.1250459952 / Modified Julian Date of averaged midpoint" status=0
Record 16: "XBINNING=                    1 / X axis binning factor" status=0
Record 17: "YBINNING=                    1 / Y axis binning factor" status=0
Record 18: "GAIN    =                   30 / Sensor gain" status=0
Record 19: "OFFSET  =                   30 / Sensor gain offset" status=0
Record 20: "XPIXSZ  =                 3.76 / [um] Pixel X axis size" status=0
Record 21: "YPIXSZ  =                 3.76 / [um] Pixel Y axis size" status=0
Record 22: "INSTRUME= 'QHY600M'            / Imaging instrument name" status=0
Record 23: "CAMERAID= 'QHY600M-33d3d743814b8b447' / Imaging instrument identifier" status=0
Record 24: "SET-TEMP=                  0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint" status=0
Record 25: "CCD-TEMP=                 -0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature" status=0
Record 26: "READOUTM= '2CMS-0'             / Sensor readout mode" status=0
Record 27: "USBLIMIT=                   50 / Camera-specific USB setting" status=0
Record 28: "TELESCOP= 'QHY600M-TTU1'       / Name of telescope" status=0
Record 29: "FOCALLEN=                135.0 / [mm] Focal length" status=0
Record 30: "FOCRATIO=                  2.2 / Focal ratio" status=0
Record 31: "RA      =     143.996231287163 / [deg] RA of telescope" status=0
Record 32: "DEC     =     45.9997944966025 / [deg] Declination of telescope" status=0
Record 33: "CENTALT =     50.9352777777778 / [deg] Altitude of telescope" status=0
Record 34: "CENTAZ  =     303.156944444444 / [deg] Azimuth of telescope" status=0
Record 35: "AIRMASS =     1.28706745022611 / Airmass at frame center (Gueymard 1993)" status=0
Record 36: "PIERSIDE= 'East'               / Telescope pointing state" status=0
Record 37: "SITEELEV=               1015.0 / [m] Observation site elevation" status=0
Record 38: "SITELAT =     33.7480555555556 / [deg] Observation site latitude" status=0
Record 39: "SITELONG=    -101.958333333333 / [deg] Observation site longitude" status=0
Record 40: "OBSERVER= 'Sokolovsky'         / Observer name" status=0
Record 41: "OBSERVAT= 'TTU Skyview'        / Observatory name" status=0
Record 42: "SITENAME= ''                   / Observatory site name" status=0
Record 43: "FWHEEL  = 'Simulator'          / Filter Wheel name" status=0
Record 44: "FILTER  = 'CV'                 / Active filter name" status=0
Record 45: "OBJECT  = 'UMa-09'             / Name of the object of interest" status=0
Record 46: "OBJCTRA = '09 36 00'           / [H M S] RA of imaged object" status=0
Record 47: "OBJCTDEC= '+46 00 00'          / [D M S] Declination of imaged object" status=0
Record 48: "OBJCTROT=                  0.0 / [deg] planned rotation of imaged object" status=0
Record 49: "FOCNAME = 'ZWO Focuser'        / Focusing equipment name" status=0
Record 50: "FOCPOS  =                29469 / [step] Focuser position" status=0
Record 51: "FOCUSPOS=                29469 / [step] Focuser position" status=0
Record 52: "FOCUSSZ =                  0.0 / [um] Focuser step size" status=0
Record 53: "FOCTEMP =     29.2999992370605 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0
Record 54: "FOCUSTEM=     29.2999992370605 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0
Record 55: "DEWPOINT=                  7.6 / [degC] Dew point" status=0
Record 56: "HUMIDITY=                 27.0 / [percent] Relative humidity" status=0
Record 57: "PRESSURE=                900.0 / [hPa] Air pressure" status=0
Record 58: "AMBTEMP =                 28.4 / [degC] Ambient air temperature" status=0
Record 59: "WINDDIR =                 21.0 / [deg] Wind direction: 0=N, 180=S, 90=E, 270=W" status=0
Record 60: "WINDGUST=             22.00176 / [kph] Wind gust" status=0
Record 61: "WINDSPD =            11.200896 / [kph] Wind speed" status=0
Record 62: "ROWORDER= 'TOP-DOWN'           / FITS Image Orientation" status=0
Record 63: "EQUINOX =               2000.0 / Equinox of celestial coordinate system" status=0
Record 64: "SWCREATE= 'N.I.N.A. 3.2.0.9001 (x64)' / Software that created this file" status=0
Record 65: "QHY_EXP =            20.000096 / [s] Actual exposure time" status=0
Record 66: "QHY_PP  =              13888.0 / [ps] pixelPeriod" status=0
Record 67: "QHY_LP  =              85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0
Record 68: "GPS_LP  =              85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0
Record 69: "QHY_FP  =           20000160.0 / [us] framePeriod" status=0
Record 70: "QHY_CPL =               6120.0 / clocksPerLine" status=0
Record 71: "QHY_LPF =             235295.0 / linesPerFrame" status=0
Record 72: "QHY_AET =           20000096.0 / [us] actualExposureTime" status=0
Record 73: "QHY_LEM =                    T / isLongExposureMode" status=0
Record 74: "QHY_OFF0=             3767.777 / [us] RollingShutterEndOffset row 0" status=0
Allocating memory for image, dark and result arrays...
Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_220518_TTUQ1b1x1_3006342_4DRRFlyR/UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_21-59-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0022.fits 9576 6388  16 bitpix
SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_220518_TTUQ1b1x1_3006342_4DRRFlyR/UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_21-59-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0022.fits
SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_5C_20s_2026-05-30.fit
CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_220518_TTUQ1b1x1_3006342_4DRRFlyR/UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_21-59-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0022.fits
CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_5C_20s_2026-05-30.fit
Reading dark frame /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_5C_20s_2026-05-30.fit 9576 6388  16 bitpix
Dark frame is subtracted, output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_220518_TTUQ1b1x1_3006342_4DRRFlyR/d_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_21-59-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0022.fits :)

Spent 0.533197 seconds 
renamed 'mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_5C_20s_2026-05-30.png' -> 'transient_report/dark.png'
try_to_calibrate_the_input_frame(): selected flat field /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-05-30.fit from directory /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats
MegaDivider v7
Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_220518_TTUQ1b1x1_3006342_4DRRFlyR/d_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_21-59-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0022.fits 9576 6388  16 bitpix
Reading flat /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-05-30.fit 9576 6388  16 bitpix
Avarage count on flat field image: 31267.409145
Minimal real count (from overscan): 5
Output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_220518_TTUQ1b1x1_3006342_4DRRFlyR/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_21-59-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0022.fits :)


No overscan detected - all values seem high! (left_median=21677.0, right_median=21704.0)
renamed 'mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-05-30.png' -> 'transient_report/flat.png'
Using calibrated image CALIBRATED_SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_220518_TTUQ1b1x1_3006342_4DRRFlyR/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_21-59-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0022.fits
EXPTIME =                 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration
SET-TEMP=                  0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint
CCD-TEMP=                 -0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature
FOCTEMP =     29.2999992370605 / [degC] Focuser temperature
AMBTEMP =                 28.4 / [degC] Ambient air temperature
Exploring image header: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_220518_TTUQ1b1x1_3006342_4DRRFlyR/UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_22-00-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0023.fits 
CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_220518_TTUQ1b1x1_3006342_4DRRFlyR/UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_22-00-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0023.fits
SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_220518_TTUQ1b1x1_3006342_4DRRFlyR/UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_22-00-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0023.fits
Header: 74 keys total, 33 keys left
Record 0: "" status=0
Record 1: "SIMPLE  =                    T / C# FITS" status=0
Record 2: "BITPIX  =                   16" status=0
Record 3: "NAXIS   =                    2 / Dimensionality" status=0
Record 4: "NAXIS1  =                 9576" status=0
Record 5: "NAXIS2  =                 6388" status=0
Record 6: "BZERO   =                32768" status=0
Record 7: "EXTEND  =                    T / Extensions are permitted" status=0
Record 8: "IMAGETYP= 'LIGHT'              / Type of exposure" status=0
Record 9: "EXPOSURE=                 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0
Record 10: "EXPTIME =                 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0
Record 11: "DATE-LOC= '2026-06-01T22:00:41.6313427' / Time of observation (local)" status=0
Record 12: "DATE-OBS= '2026-06-02T03:00:41.6313427' / Time of observation (UTC)" status=0
Record 13: "MJD-OBS =     61193.1254818402 / Modified Julian Date of observation" status=0
Record 14: "DATE-AVG= '2026-06-02T03:00:51.5351465' / Averaged midpoint time (UTC)" status=0
Record 15: "MJD-AVG =     61193.1255964697 / Modified Julian Date of averaged midpoint" status=0
Record 16: "XBINNING=                    1 / X axis binning factor" status=0
Record 17: "YBINNING=                    1 / Y axis binning factor" status=0
Record 18: "GAIN    =                   30 / Sensor gain" status=0
Record 19: "OFFSET  =                   30 / Sensor gain offset" status=0
Record 20: "XPIXSZ  =                 3.76 / [um] Pixel X axis size" status=0
Record 21: "YPIXSZ  =                 3.76 / [um] Pixel Y axis size" status=0
Record 22: "INSTRUME= 'QHY600M'            / Imaging instrument name" status=0
Record 23: "CAMERAID= 'QHY600M-33d3d743814b8b447' / Imaging instrument identifier" status=0
Record 24: "SET-TEMP=                  0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint" status=0
Record 25: "CCD-TEMP=                 -0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature" status=0
Record 26: "READOUTM= '2CMS-0'             / Sensor readout mode" status=0
Record 27: "USBLIMIT=                   50 / Camera-specific USB setting" status=0
Record 28: "TELESCOP= 'QHY600M-TTU1'       / Name of telescope" status=0
Record 29: "FOCALLEN=                135.0 / [mm] Focal length" status=0
Record 30: "FOCRATIO=                  2.2 / Focal ratio" status=0
Record 31: "RA      =     143.996231308168 / [deg] RA of telescope" status=0
Record 32: "DEC     =     45.9997945064795 / [deg] Declination of telescope" status=0
Record 33: "CENTALT =     50.7961111111111 / [deg] Altitude of telescope" status=0
Record 34: "CENTAZ  =     303.156388888889 / [deg] Azimuth of telescope" status=0
Record 35: "AIRMASS =     1.28960612531975 / Airmass at frame center (Gueymard 1993)" status=0
Record 36: "PIERSIDE= 'East'               / Telescope pointing state" status=0
Record 37: "SITEELEV=               1015.0 / [m] Observation site elevation" status=0
Record 38: "SITELAT =     33.7480555555556 / [deg] Observation site latitude" status=0
Record 39: "SITELONG=    -101.958333333333 / [deg] Observation site longitude" status=0
Record 40: "OBSERVER= 'Sokolovsky'         / Observer name" status=0
Record 41: "OBSERVAT= 'TTU Skyview'        / Observatory name" status=0
Record 42: "SITENAME= ''                   / Observatory site name" status=0
Record 43: "FWHEEL  = 'Simulator'          / Filter Wheel name" status=0
Record 44: "FILTER  = 'CV'                 / Active filter name" status=0
Record 45: "OBJECT  = 'UMa-09'             / Name of the object of interest" status=0
Record 46: "OBJCTRA = '09 36 00'           / [H M S] RA of imaged object" status=0
Record 47: "OBJCTDEC= '+46 00 00'          / [D M S] Declination of imaged object" status=0
Record 48: "OBJCTROT=                  0.0 / [deg] planned rotation of imaged object" status=0
Record 49: "FOCNAME = 'ZWO Focuser'        / Focusing equipment name" status=0
Record 50: "FOCPOS  =                29469 / [step] Focuser position" status=0
Record 51: "FOCUSPOS=                29469 / [step] Focuser position" status=0
Record 52: "FOCUSSZ =                  0.0 / [um] Focuser step size" status=0
Record 53: "FOCTEMP =     29.2999992370605 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0
Record 54: "FOCUSTEM=     29.2999992370605 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0
Record 55: "DEWPOINT=                  7.6 / [degC] Dew point" status=0
Record 56: "HUMIDITY=                 27.0 / [percent] Relative humidity" status=0
Record 57: "PRESSURE=                900.0 / [hPa] Air pressure" status=0
Record 58: "AMBTEMP =                 28.4 / [degC] Ambient air temperature" status=0
Record 59: "WINDDIR =                 21.0 / [deg] Wind direction: 0=N, 180=S, 90=E, 270=W" status=0
Record 60: "WINDGUST=             22.00176 / [kph] Wind gust" status=0
Record 61: "WINDSPD =            11.200896 / [kph] Wind speed" status=0
Record 62: "ROWORDER= 'TOP-DOWN'           / FITS Image Orientation" status=0
Record 63: "EQUINOX =               2000.0 / Equinox of celestial coordinate system" status=0
Record 64: "SWCREATE= 'N.I.N.A. 3.2.0.9001 (x64)' / Software that created this file" status=0
Record 65: "QHY_EXP =            20.000096 / [s] Actual exposure time" status=0
Record 66: "QHY_PP  =              13888.0 / [ps] pixelPeriod" status=0
Record 67: "QHY_LP  =              85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0
Record 68: "GPS_LP  =              85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0
Record 69: "QHY_FP  =           20000160.0 / [us] framePeriod" status=0
Record 70: "QHY_CPL =               6120.0 / clocksPerLine" status=0
Record 71: "QHY_LPF =             235295.0 / linesPerFrame" status=0
Record 72: "QHY_AET =           20000096.0 / [us] actualExposureTime" status=0
Record 73: "QHY_LEM =                    T / isLongExposureMode" status=0
Record 74: "QHY_OFF0=             3767.777 / [us] RollingShutterEndOffset row 0" status=0
Allocating memory for image, dark and result arrays...
Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_220518_TTUQ1b1x1_3006342_4DRRFlyR/UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_22-00-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0023.fits 9576 6388  16 bitpix
SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_220518_TTUQ1b1x1_3006342_4DRRFlyR/UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_22-00-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0023.fits
SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_5C_20s_2026-05-30.fit
CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_220518_TTUQ1b1x1_3006342_4DRRFlyR/UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_22-00-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0023.fits
CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_5C_20s_2026-05-30.fit
Reading dark frame /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_5C_20s_2026-05-30.fit 9576 6388  16 bitpix
Dark frame is subtracted, output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_220518_TTUQ1b1x1_3006342_4DRRFlyR/d_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_22-00-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0023.fits :)

Spent 0.600034 seconds 
renamed 'mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_5C_20s_2026-05-30.png' -> 'transient_report/dark.png'
try_to_calibrate_the_input_frame(): selected flat field /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-05-30.fit from directory /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats
MegaDivider v7
Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_220518_TTUQ1b1x1_3006342_4DRRFlyR/d_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_22-00-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0023.fits 9576 6388  16 bitpix
Reading flat /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-05-30.fit 9576 6388  16 bitpix
Avarage count on flat field image: 31267.409145
Minimal real count (from overscan): 5
Output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_220518_TTUQ1b1x1_3006342_4DRRFlyR/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_22-00-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0023.fits :)


No overscan detected - all values seem high! (left_median=21677.0, right_median=21704.0)
renamed 'mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-05-30.png' -> 'transient_report/flat.png'
Using calibrated image CALIBRATED_SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_220518_TTUQ1b1x1_3006342_4DRRFlyR/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_22-00-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0023.fits
Dark frame used to calibrate the second-epoch images:



Flat field used to calibrate the second-epoch images:



after the calibration attempt:
SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_220518_TTUQ1b1x1_3006342_4DRRFlyR/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_21-59-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0022.fits
SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_220518_TTUQ1b1x1_3006342_4DRRFlyR/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_22-00-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0023.fits
Previews of the CALIBRATED second-epoch images:


fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_21-59-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0022.fits



fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_22-00-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0023.fits




Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1

  ./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 3.5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_220518_TTUQ1b1x1_3006342_4DRRFlyR/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_21-59-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0022.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_220518_TTUQ1b1x1_3006342_4DRRFlyR/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_22-00-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0023.fits
  
SExtractor catalog cache: saved UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_220518_TTUQ1b1x1_3006342_4DRRFlyR/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_21-59-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0022.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_220518_TTUQ1b1x1_3006342_4DRRFlyR/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_22-00-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0023.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461193.62504706
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits'
wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits'
wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_21-59-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0022.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_21-59-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0022.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_21-59-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0022.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_21-59-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0022.fits'
wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_22-00-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0023.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_22-00-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0023.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_22-00-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0023.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_22-00-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0023.fits'
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits
Image size: 941.7'x627.1'  15.7(deg)x10.5(deg)  9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 09:36:00.662 +46:00:08.08 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_21-59-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0022.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_21-59-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0022.fits
Image size: 941.1'x626.5'  15.7(deg)x10.4(deg)  9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.88"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 09:36:27.215 +46:01:59.91 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 09:36:00.662 +46:00:08.08
Second-epoch image center 09:36:27.215 +46:01:59.91
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0829 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg.  Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_22-00-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0023.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_22-00-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0023.fits
util/fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh: line 144: echo: write error: Broken pipe
Image size: 941.1'x626.5'  15.7(deg)x10.4(deg)  9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.88"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 09:36:25.896 +46:01:29.14 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 09:36:00.662 +46:00:08.08
Second-epoch image center 09:36:25.896 +46:01:29.14
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0764 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center  09:36:27.215 +46:01:59.91
Second-epoch second image center 09:36:25.896 +46:01:29.14
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00936 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running  util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2  /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits &> /tmp/tmp.Ji7L6tCVY9
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits
Running  util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2  /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits &> /tmp/tmp.nArEJxuqSs
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits
Running  util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2  /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_220518_TTUQ1b1x1_3006342_4DRRFlyR/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_21-59-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0022.fits &> /tmp/tmp.rGpVzzrsw1
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_220518_TTUQ1b1x1_3006342_4DRRFlyR/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_21-59-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0022.fits
Running  util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2  /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_220518_TTUQ1b1x1_3006342_4DRRFlyR/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_22-00-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0023.fits &> /tmp/tmp.kxZqjorfWh
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_220518_TTUQ1b1x1_3006342_4DRRFlyR/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_22-00-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0023.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits and wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits.cat 
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits and wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits.cat 
Found non-empty wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits and wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits.cat
The reference image (wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits) and catalog (wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits.cat) found
'wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits.cat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 8167 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 131.3127 to 155.8106 deg, Dec +39.8609 to +51.4112 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 131.3127 to 155.8106 deg, Dec 39.8609 to 51.4112 deg
Loaded 5369 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3785 out of 3992 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3992 out of 8167 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.906500
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.906500
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.:  -7.43
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.:  15.48

Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed!  =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.:  15.48

Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:


Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 8167 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 131.3127 to 155.8106 deg, Dec +39.8609 to +51.4112 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 131.3127 to 155.8106 deg, Dec 39.8609 to 51.4112 deg
Loaded 5369 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3785 out of 3992 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3992 out of 8167 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits via Tycho-2

Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits:


Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits (aperture=6.2)
Read 8217 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 131.3128 to 155.8106 deg, Dec +39.8864 to +51.4195 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 131.3128 to 155.8106 deg, Dec 39.8864 to 51.4195 deg
Loaded 5366 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3787 out of 3997 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3997 out of 8217 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits via Tycho-2

Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits:


Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits (aperture=6.2)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 1 candidate transients before the final filtering.  (Hard limit: 8000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
 2.1 pix  UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits
 2.1 pix  UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits
 2.7 pix  fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_21-59-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0022.fits
 2.7 pix  fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_22-00-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0023.fits
 2.1 pix  wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits
 2.1 pix  wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
 15.5 mag.  UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits
 15.5 mag.  UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits
 14.5 mag.  fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_21-59-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0022.fits
 14.6 mag.  fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_22-00-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0023.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate:  14.5 (SNR )  11.8 (80% of stars)  with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of  following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50). 
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image. 
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.Ji7L6tCVY9 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-01_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_220518_TTUQ1b1x1_3006342_4DRRFlyR/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits' -> 'wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits.cat 
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=568, passed=8167
Got 8167 stars (including 7592 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits.cat 
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 8167 stars from the SExtractor catalog
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-01_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_220518_TTUQ1b1x1_3006342_4DRRFlyR/util/fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh: line 144: echo: write error: Broken pipe
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.7'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.7 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013079 (47.1 arcsec)
                    catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
                    catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010463 (37.7 arcsec)

ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 649 to 709 (Dec 39.9 to 51.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 975 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 975 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 959 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36" 
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 975 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8061 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35" 

ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 649 to 709 (Dec 39.9 to 51.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 975 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 975 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8061 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35" 
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 975 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8061 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36" 
Excluding outliers - 975 stars left (next iteration limit 1072)
Stop iterations.


 The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)

WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits N_match=975 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.367 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.468 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.375 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.329 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.330 n_q1=213 n_q2=265 n_q3=256 n_q4=241 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.274
The image catalog is written to wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
 ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits -region wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.nArEJxuqSs (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-01_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_220518_TTUQ1b1x1_3006342_4DRRFlyR/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits' -> 'wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits.cat 
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=561, passed=8217
Got 8217 stars (including 7647 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits.cat 
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 8217 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.7'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.7 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013079 (47.1 arcsec)
                    catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
                    catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010463 (37.7 arcsec)

ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 649 to 709 (Dec 39.9 to 51.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 975 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 975 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 968 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35" 
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 975 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8160 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34" 

ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 649 to 709 (Dec 39.9 to 51.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 975 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 975 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8159 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34" 
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 975 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8159 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33" 
Excluding outliers - 975 stars left (next iteration limit 1072)
Stop iterations.


 The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)

WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits N_match=975 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.361 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.454 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.378 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.362 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.296 n_q1=208 n_q2=265 n_q3=262 n_q4=240 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.257
The image catalog is written to wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
 ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits -region wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.rGpVzzrsw1 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-01_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_220518_TTUQ1b1x1_3006342_4DRRFlyR/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_220518_TTUQ1b1x1_3006342_4DRRFlyR/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_21-59-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0022.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_220518_TTUQ1b1x1_3006342_4DRRFlyR/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_21-59-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0022.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_220518_TTUQ1b1x1_3006342_4DRRFlyR/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_21-59-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0022.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_220518_TTUQ1b1x1_3006342_4DRRFlyR/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_21-59-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0022.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_220518_TTUQ1b1x1_3006342_4DRRFlyR/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_21-59-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0022.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_220518_TTUQ1b1x1_3006342_4DRRFlyR/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_21-59-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0022.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_21-59-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0022.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_21-59-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0022.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_21-59-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0022.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_21-59-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0022.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_21-59-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0022.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_21-59-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0022.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_21-59-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0022.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_220518_TTUQ1b1x1_3006342_4DRRFlyR/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_21-59-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0022.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_21-59-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0022.fits.cat 
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=287, passed=4872
Got 4872 stars (including 4581 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_21-59-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0022.fits.cat 
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 4872 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.1'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.1 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013071 (47.1 arcsec)
                    catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
                    catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010457 (37.6 arcsec)

ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 650 to 709 (Dec 40.1 to 51.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 975 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 975 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 965 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29" 
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 975 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4794 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28" 

ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 650 to 709 (Dec 40.1 to 51.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 976 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 976 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4796 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28" 
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 976 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4798 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27" 
Excluding outliers - 976 stars left (next iteration limit 1072)
Stop iterations.


 The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)

WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_21-59-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0022.fits N_match=976 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.273 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.272 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.314 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.244 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.284 n_q1=229 n_q2=278 n_q3=240 n_q4=229 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.150
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_21-59-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0022.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_21-59-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0022.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
 ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_220518_TTUQ1b1x1_3006342_4DRRFlyR/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_21-59-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0022.fits -region wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_21-59-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0022.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_21-59-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0022.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.kxZqjorfWh (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-01_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_220518_TTUQ1b1x1_3006342_4DRRFlyR/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_220518_TTUQ1b1x1_3006342_4DRRFlyR/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_22-00-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0023.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_220518_TTUQ1b1x1_3006342_4DRRFlyR/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_22-00-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0023.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_220518_TTUQ1b1x1_3006342_4DRRFlyR/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_22-00-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0023.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_220518_TTUQ1b1x1_3006342_4DRRFlyR/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_22-00-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0023.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_220518_TTUQ1b1x1_3006342_4DRRFlyR/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_22-00-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0023.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_220518_TTUQ1b1x1_3006342_4DRRFlyR/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_22-00-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0023.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_22-00-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0023.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_22-00-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0023.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_22-00-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0023.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_22-00-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0023.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_22-00-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0023.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_22-00-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0023.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_22-00-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0023.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_220518_TTUQ1b1x1_3006342_4DRRFlyR/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_22-00-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0023.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_22-00-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0023.fits.cat 
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=275, passed=4963
Got 4963 stars (including 4684 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_22-00-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0023.fits.cat 
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 4963 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.1'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.1 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013071 (47.1 arcsec)
                    catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
                    catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010457 (37.6 arcsec)

ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 650 to 708 (Dec 40.1 to 51.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 976 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 976 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 969 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29" 
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 976 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4905 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29" 

ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 650 to 708 (Dec 40.1 to 51.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 977 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 977 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4905 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28" 
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 977 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4906 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28" 
Excluding outliers - 977 stars left (next iteration limit 1073)
Stop iterations.


 The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)

WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_22-00-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0023.fits N_match=977 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.291 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.269 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.359 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.245 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.278 n_q1=234 n_q2=267 n_q3=245 n_q4=231 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.234
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_22-00-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0023.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_22-00-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0023.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
 ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_220518_TTUQ1b1x1_3006342_4DRRFlyR/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_22-00-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0023.fits -region wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_22-00-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0023.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_22-00-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0023.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits sigma_overall=0.367 worst_q_ratio=1.274
ref2=UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits sigma_overall=0.361 worst_q_ratio=1.257
new1=fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_21-59-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0022.fits sigma_overall=0.273 worst_q_ratio=1.150
new2=fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_22-00-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0023.fits sigma_overall=0.291 worst_q_ratio=1.234
reference average sigma_overall=0.364 worst_q_ratio=1.2655
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################

Distribution of catalog-matched stars across the image:

plot_astrometric_residuals_xy: wrote wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332_astrometric_residuals.png (975 matched stars from wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy: wrote wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333_astrometric_residuals.png (975 matched stars from wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy: wrote wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_21-59-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0022_astrometric_residuals.png (976 matched stars from wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_21-59-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0022.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy: wrote wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_22-00-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0023_astrometric_residuals.png (977 matched stars from wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_22-00-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0023.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_21-59-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0022.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_21-59-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0022.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_220518_TTUQ1b1x1_3006342_4DRRFlyR/wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_21-59-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0022.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_22-00-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0023.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_22-00-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0023.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_220518_TTUQ1b1x1_3006342_4DRRFlyR/wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_22-00-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0023.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field UMa-09-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 0s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 1s
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20691_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_22-00-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0023
The candidate 20691_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_22-00-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0023 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 06 02.12560    2461193.62560    11.94    09:08:47.90 +42:09:21.5   7749 5588   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_220518_TTUQ1b1x1_3006342_4DRRFlyR/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_22-00-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0023.fits

**** FOUND  09:08:47.92 +42:09:21.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 1s
Prepared the HTML report for the field UMa-09-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL

  ./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 3.5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_220518_TTUQ1b1x1_3006342_4DRRFlyR/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_21-59-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0022.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_220518_TTUQ1b1x1_3006342_4DRRFlyR/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_22-00-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0023.fits
  
SExtractor catalog cache: saved UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_220518_TTUQ1b1x1_3006342_4DRRFlyR/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_21-59-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0022.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_220518_TTUQ1b1x1_3006342_4DRRFlyR/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_22-00-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0023.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_21-59-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0022.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_22-00-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0023.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/exclusion_list.txt
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_21-59-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0022.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_22-00-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0023.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits
Image size: 941.7'x627.1'  15.7(deg)x10.5(deg)  9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 09:36:00.662 +46:00:08.08 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_21-59-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0022.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_21-59-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0022.fits
Image size: 941.1'x626.5'  15.7(deg)x10.4(deg)  9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.88"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 09:36:27.215 +46:01:59.91 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 09:36:00.662 +46:00:08.08
Second-epoch image center 09:36:27.215 +46:01:59.91
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0829 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg.  Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_22-00-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0023.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_22-00-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0023.fits
Image size: 941.1'x626.5'  15.7(deg)x10.4(deg)  9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.88"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 09:36:25.896 +46:01:29.14 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 09:36:00.662 +46:00:08.08
Second-epoch image center 09:36:25.896 +46:01:29.14
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0764 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center  09:36:27.215 +46:01:59.91
Second-epoch second image center 09:36:25.896 +46:01:29.14
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00936 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running  util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2  /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits &> /tmp/tmp.voIeDo5KWG
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits
Running  util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2  /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits &> /tmp/tmp.IXuX6YkzQG
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits
Running  util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2  /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_220518_TTUQ1b1x1_3006342_4DRRFlyR/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_21-59-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0022.fits &> /tmp/tmp.d6OTJNmPGI
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_220518_TTUQ1b1x1_3006342_4DRRFlyR/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_21-59-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0022.fits
Running  util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2  /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_220518_TTUQ1b1x1_3006342_4DRRFlyR/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_22-00-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0023.fits &> /tmp/tmp.L5YWbsRMvC
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_220518_TTUQ1b1x1_3006342_4DRRFlyR/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_22-00-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0023.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits and wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits.cat 
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits and wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits.cat 
Found non-empty wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits and wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits.cat
The reference image (wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits) and catalog (wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits.cat) found
'wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits.cat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 43830 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 131.1885 to 155.9231 deg, Dec +39.8074 to +51.4128 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 131.1885 to 155.9231 deg, Dec 39.8074 to 51.4128 deg
Loaded 5468 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3562 out of 4004 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 4004 out of 43830 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.804800
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.804800
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.:  -7.18
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.:  15.62

Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed!  =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.:  15.62

Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:


Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 43830 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 131.1885 to 155.9231 deg, Dec +39.8074 to +51.4128 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 131.1885 to 155.9231 deg, Dec 39.8074 to 51.4128 deg
Loaded 5468 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3562 out of 4004 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 4004 out of 43830 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits via Tycho-2

Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits:


Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits (aperture=4.9)
Read 43644 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 131.2455 to 155.9231 deg, Dec +39.8196 to +51.4197 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 131.2455 to 155.9231 deg, Dec 39.8196 to 51.4197 deg
Loaded 5437 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3556 out of 4005 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 4005 out of 43644 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits via Tycho-2

Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits:


Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits (aperture=4.9)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 19 candidate transients before the final filtering.  (Hard limit: 8000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
 1.9 pix  UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits
 2.0 pix  UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits
 2.6 pix  fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_21-59-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0022.fits
 2.6 pix  fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_22-00-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0023.fits
 1.9 pix  wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits
 2.0 pix  wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
 15.6 mag.  UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits
 15.6 mag.  UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits
 14.6 mag.  fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_21-59-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0022.fits
 14.7 mag.  fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_22-00-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0023.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate:  14.6 (SNR )  14.1 (80% of stars)  with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of  following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50). 
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image. 
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.voIeDo5KWG (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-01_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_220518_TTUQ1b1x1_3006342_4DRRFlyR/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits' -> 'wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits.cat 
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=22, blended=2151, passed=43808
Got 43808 stars (including 41580 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits.cat 
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 43808 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.7'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.7 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013079 (47.1 arcsec)
                    catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
                    catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010463 (37.7 arcsec)

ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 649 to 709 (Dec 39.8 to 51.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 975 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 975 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 967 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34" 
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 975 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 43431 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35" 

ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 649 to 709 (Dec 39.8 to 51.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 975 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 975 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 43432 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35" 
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 975 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 43432 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35" 
Excluding outliers - 975 stars left (next iteration limit 1072)
Stop iterations.


 The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)

WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits N_match=975 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.360 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.461 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.352 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.338 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.304 n_q1=208 n_q2=259 n_q3=261 n_q4=247 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.282
The image catalog is written to wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
 ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits -region wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.IXuX6YkzQG (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-01_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_220518_TTUQ1b1x1_3006342_4DRRFlyR/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits' -> 'wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits.cat 
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=14, blended=2132, passed=43630
Got 43630 stars (including 41415 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits.cat 
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 43630 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.7'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.7 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013079 (47.1 arcsec)
                    catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
                    catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010463 (37.7 arcsec)

ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 649 to 709 (Dec 39.8 to 51.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 975 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 975 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 966 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34" 
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 975 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 43293 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34" 

ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 649 to 709 (Dec 39.8 to 51.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 975 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 975 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 43291 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34" 
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 975 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 43291 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33" 
Excluding outliers - 975 stars left (next iteration limit 1072)
Stop iterations.


 The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)

WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits N_match=975 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.350 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.392 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.356 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.350 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.275 n_q1=207 n_q2=259 n_q3=262 n_q4=247 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.120
The image catalog is written to wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
 ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits -region wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.d6OTJNmPGI (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-01_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_220518_TTUQ1b1x1_3006342_4DRRFlyR/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_220518_TTUQ1b1x1_3006342_4DRRFlyR/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_21-59-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0022.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_220518_TTUQ1b1x1_3006342_4DRRFlyR/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_21-59-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0022.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_220518_TTUQ1b1x1_3006342_4DRRFlyR/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_21-59-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0022.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_220518_TTUQ1b1x1_3006342_4DRRFlyR/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_21-59-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0022.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_220518_TTUQ1b1x1_3006342_4DRRFlyR/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_21-59-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0022.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_220518_TTUQ1b1x1_3006342_4DRRFlyR/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_21-59-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0022.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_21-59-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0022.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_21-59-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0022.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_21-59-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0022.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_21-59-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0022.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_21-59-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0022.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_21-59-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0022.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_21-59-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0022.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_220518_TTUQ1b1x1_3006342_4DRRFlyR/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_21-59-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0022.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_21-59-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0022.fits.cat 
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=12, blended=1094, passed=25760
Got 25760 stars (including 24630 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_21-59-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0022.fits.cat 
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 25760 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.1'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.1 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013071 (47.1 arcsec)
                    catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
                    catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010457 (37.6 arcsec)

ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 649 to 709 (Dec 39.9 to 51.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 978 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 978 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 972 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29" 
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 978 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 25523 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29" 

ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 649 to 709 (Dec 39.9 to 51.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 978 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 978 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 25523 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29" 
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 978 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 25523 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28" 
Excluding outliers - 978 stars left (next iteration limit 1075)
Stop iterations.


 The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)

WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_21-59-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0022.fits N_match=978 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.278 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.265 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.326 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.250 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.271 n_q1=232 n_q2=275 n_q3=247 n_q4=224 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.171
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_21-59-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0022.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_21-59-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0022.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
 ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_220518_TTUQ1b1x1_3006342_4DRRFlyR/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_21-59-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0022.fits -region wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_21-59-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0022.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_21-59-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0022.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.L5YWbsRMvC (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-01_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_220518_TTUQ1b1x1_3006342_4DRRFlyR/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_220518_TTUQ1b1x1_3006342_4DRRFlyR/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_22-00-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0023.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_220518_TTUQ1b1x1_3006342_4DRRFlyR/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_22-00-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0023.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_220518_TTUQ1b1x1_3006342_4DRRFlyR/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_22-00-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0023.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_220518_TTUQ1b1x1_3006342_4DRRFlyR/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_22-00-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0023.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_220518_TTUQ1b1x1_3006342_4DRRFlyR/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_22-00-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0023.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_220518_TTUQ1b1x1_3006342_4DRRFlyR/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_22-00-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0023.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_22-00-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0023.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_22-00-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0023.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_22-00-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0023.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_22-00-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0023.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_22-00-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0023.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_22-00-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0023.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_22-00-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0023.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_220518_TTUQ1b1x1_3006342_4DRRFlyR/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_22-00-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0023.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_22-00-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0023.fits.cat 
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=10, blended=733, passed=25808
Got 25808 stars (including 25043 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_22-00-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0023.fits.cat 
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 25808 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.1'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.1 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013071 (47.1 arcsec)
                    catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
                    catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010457 (37.6 arcsec)

ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 649 to 708 (Dec 39.9 to 51.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 975 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 975 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 971 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31" 
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 975 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 25598 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30" 

ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 649 to 708 (Dec 39.9 to 51.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 975 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 975 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 25596 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30" 
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 975 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 25596 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29" 
Excluding outliers - 975 stars left (next iteration limit 1072)
Stop iterations.


 The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)

WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_22-00-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0023.fits N_match=975 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.300 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.268 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.361 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.249 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.284 n_q1=229 n_q2=267 n_q3=249 n_q4=230 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.204
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_22-00-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0023.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_22-00-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0023.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
 ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_220518_TTUQ1b1x1_3006342_4DRRFlyR/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_22-00-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0023.fits -region wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_22-00-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0023.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_22-00-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0023.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_21-59-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0022.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_220518_TTUQ1b1x1_3006342_4DRRFlyR/wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_21-59-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0022.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_22-00-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0023.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_220518_TTUQ1b1x1_3006342_4DRRFlyR/wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_22-00-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0023.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field UMa-09-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits at 09:57:53.52 +45:29:26.7:  13.17 +/- 0.02  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits at 10:00:07.03 +42:15:42.7:  12.99 +/- 0.02  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits at 09:45:44.43 +50:09:06.8:  13.43 +/- 0.03  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits at 09:50:21.16 +43:59:04.6:  13.78 +/- 0.04  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits at 09:33:43.00 +47:30:51.1:  14.14 +/- 0.05  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits at 09:57:53.52 +45:29:26.7:  13.21 +/- 0.02  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits at 10:00:07.03 +42:15:42.7:  12.91 +/- 0.02  detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  13.19 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 09:57:53.52 +45:29:26.7: ref_mag=13.19 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.5112 delta=-0.32 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  12.95 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits at 09:45:44.43 +50:09:06.8:  13.42 +/- 0.03  detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:00:07.03 +42:15:42.7: ref_mag=12.95 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=13.2958 delta=-0.35 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  13.43 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 09:45:44.43 +50:09:06.8: ref_mag=13.43 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.7192 delta=-0.29 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits at 09:50:21.16 +43:59:04.6:  13.80 +/- 0.05  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits at 09:33:43.00 +47:30:51.1:  14.06 +/- 0.05  detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  13.79 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 09:50:21.16 +43:59:04.6: ref_mag=13.79 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.8908 delta=-0.10 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  14.10 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 09:33:43.00 +47:30:51.1: ref_mag=14.10 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=14.0077 delta=0.09 (need > 0.90)
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 1s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 0s
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52861_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_22-00-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0023
The candidate 52861_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_22-00-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0023 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 06 02.12505    2461193.62505    13.80    09:45:44.46 +50:09:07.9   4042 0646   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_220518_TTUQ1b1x1_3006342_4DRRFlyR/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_21-59-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0022.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 06 02.12560    2461193.62560    13.68    09:45:44.39 +50:09:05.7   4041 0641   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_220518_TTUQ1b1x1_3006342_4DRRFlyR/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_22-00-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0023.fits

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53080_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_22-00-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0023
The candidate 53080_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_22-00-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0023 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 06 02.12560    2461193.62560    11.74    10:18:52.41 +46:46:24.8   0447 2183   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_220518_TTUQ1b1x1_3006342_4DRRFlyR/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_22-00-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0023.fits

**** FOUND  10:18:52.41 +46:46:24.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53301_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_22-00-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0023
The candidate 53301_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_22-00-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0023 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 06 02.12560    2461193.62560    12.56    09:29:07.10 +50:00:38.3   5642 0829   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_220518_TTUQ1b1x1_3006342_4DRRFlyR/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_22-00-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0023.fits

**** FOUND  09:29:07.11 +50:00:38.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53482_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_22-00-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0023
The candidate 53482_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_22-00-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0023 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 06 02.12560    2461193.62560    13.02    09:34:17.03 +49:03:27.0   5110 1383   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_220518_TTUQ1b1x1_3006342_4DRRFlyR/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_22-00-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0023.fits

**** FOUND  09:34:17.00 +49:03:26.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53528_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_22-00-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0023
The candidate 53528_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_22-00-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0023 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 06 02.12505    2461193.62505    13.22    10:00:07.07 +42:15:42.4   2015 5216   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_220518_TTUQ1b1x1_3006342_4DRRFlyR/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_21-59-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0022.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 06 02.12560    2461193.62560    13.40    10:00:06.99 +42:15:43.0   2014 5211   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_220518_TTUQ1b1x1_3006342_4DRRFlyR/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_22-00-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0023.fits

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53634_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_22-00-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0023
The candidate 53634_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_22-00-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0023 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 06 02.12560    2461193.62560    13.36    09:05:24.32 +48:33:35.8   7985 1697   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_220518_TTUQ1b1x1_3006342_4DRRFlyR/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_22-00-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0023.fits

**** FOUND  09:05:24.30 +48:33:38.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53719_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_22-00-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0023
The candidate 53719_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_22-00-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0023 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 06 02.12560    2461193.62560    13.63    10:09:47.08 +41:13:35.1   0827 5680   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_220518_TTUQ1b1x1_3006342_4DRRFlyR/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_22-00-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0023.fits

**** FOUND  10:09:47.09 +41:13:34.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53740_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_22-00-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0023
The candidate 53740_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_22-00-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0023 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 06 02.12560    2461193.62560    13.67    10:05:53.75 +45:37:28.8   1681 3106   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_220518_TTUQ1b1x1_3006342_4DRRFlyR/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_22-00-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0023.fits

**** FOUND  10:05:53.77 +45:37:28.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53772_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_22-00-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0023
The candidate 53772_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_22-00-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0023 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 06 02.12560    2461193.62560    13.60    09:24:02.72 +50:55:40.3   6147 0285   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_220518_TTUQ1b1x1_3006342_4DRRFlyR/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_22-00-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0023.fits

**** FOUND  09:24:02.77 +50:55:39.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53825_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_22-00-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0023
The candidate 53825_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_22-00-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0023 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 06 02.12505    2461193.62505    13.71    09:57:53.52 +45:29:26.5   2514 3310   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_220518_TTUQ1b1x1_3006342_4DRRFlyR/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_21-59-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0022.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 06 02.12560    2461193.62560    13.42    09:57:53.53 +45:29:27.0   2512 3304   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_220518_TTUQ1b1x1_3006342_4DRRFlyR/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_22-00-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0023.fits

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53828_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_22-00-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0023
The candidate 53828_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_22-00-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0023 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 06 02.12560    2461193.62560    13.89    09:29:54.30 +46:11:09.8   5474 3132   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_220518_TTUQ1b1x1_3006342_4DRRFlyR/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_22-00-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0023.fits

**** FOUND  09:29:54.27 +46:11:09.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53866_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_22-00-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0023
The candidate 53866_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_22-00-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0023 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 06 02.12560    2461193.62560    13.60    08:56:24.26 +45:45:51.6   9008 3341   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_220518_TTUQ1b1x1_3006342_4DRRFlyR/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_22-00-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0023.fits

**** FOUND  08:56:24.35 +45:45:50.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53900_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_22-00-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0023
The candidate 53900_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_22-00-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0023 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 06 02.12560    2461193.62560    13.84    09:44:57.47 +43:14:48.9   3755 4798   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_220518_TTUQ1b1x1_3006342_4DRRFlyR/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_22-00-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0023.fits

**** FOUND  09:44:57.51 +43:14:49.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53909_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_22-00-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0023
The candidate 53909_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_22-00-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0023 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 06 02.12560    2461193.62560    13.79    09:27:32.96 +42:47:01.7   5653 5191   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_220518_TTUQ1b1x1_3006342_4DRRFlyR/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_22-00-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0023.fits

**** FOUND  09:27:33.00 +42:47:01.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53963_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_22-00-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0023
The candidate 53963_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_22-00-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0023 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 06 02.12505    2461193.62505    13.89    09:50:21.27 +43:59:03.2   3213 4305   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_220518_TTUQ1b1x1_3006342_4DRRFlyR/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_21-59-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0022.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 06 02.12560    2461193.62560    13.89    09:50:21.06 +43:59:06.0   3211 4299   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_220518_TTUQ1b1x1_3006342_4DRRFlyR/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_22-00-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0023.fits

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54014_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_22-00-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0023
The candidate 54014_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_22-00-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0023 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 06 02.12505    2461193.62505    13.96    09:33:42.97 +47:30:51.2   5120 2321   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_220518_TTUQ1b1x1_3006342_4DRRFlyR/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_21-59-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0022.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 06 02.12560    2461193.62560    14.07    09:33:43.02 +47:30:51.0   5118 2315   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_220518_TTUQ1b1x1_3006342_4DRRFlyR/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_22-00-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0023.fits

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54072_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_22-00-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0023
The candidate 54072_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_22-00-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0023 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 06 02.12560    2461193.62560    13.92    09:50:22.44 +43:58:49.3   3208 4301   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_220518_TTUQ1b1x1_3006342_4DRRFlyR/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_22-00-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0023.fits

**** FOUND  09:50:22.50 +43:58:48.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54092_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_22-00-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0023
The candidate 54092_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_22-00-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0023 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 06 02.12560    2461193.62560    13.96    09:26:16.88 +44:34:23.8   5824 4116   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_220518_TTUQ1b1x1_3006342_4DRRFlyR/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_22-00-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0023.fits

**** FOUND  09:26:16.89 +44:34:22.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 07744_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_22-00-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0023
The candidate 07744_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_22-00-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0023 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 3     2026 06 02.12560    2461193.62560    12.01    09:08:47.92 +42:09:21.8   7749 5588   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_220518_TTUQ1b1x1_3006342_4DRRFlyR/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_22-00-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0023.fits

**** FOUND  09:08:47.95 +42:09:21.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 1s
Prepared the HTML report for the field UMa-09-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
########### Completed UMa-09-Q1b1x1 ###########
The analysis was running at tau
We are allowed to update the exclusion list at tau host
Found ../exclusion_list_TTUQ1.txt
#### The exclusion list before filtering-out asteroids, bad pixels and adding Gaia sources ####
###################################################################################
renamed 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt_noasteroids' -> 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt'
renamed 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt_nohotpixels' -> 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt'
# Count candidates with no identification (that also don't look like hot pix)
Found 0 unidentified candidates (excluding asteroids, hot pixels and known variable stars).
###################################################################################
0 candidates found (excluding asteroids and hot pixels)
This does not look like a test run
###################################################################################
exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt NOT FOUND
exclusion_list_apass.txt NOT FOUND
IS_THIS_TEST_RUN=NO  ALLOW_EXCLUSION_LIST_UPDATE= YES
#### Nothing to add to the exclusion list ####
The observatory MPC code is V36
############################################################
Positions of planets computed with util/planet_finder/main.py for JD(UT)2461193.62504706 -observatory V36
06:03:01.61 +25:35:56.8 Mercury (-0.4mag)
07:11:57.72 +24:21:48.3 Venus (-4.0mag)
02:32:02.16 +14:17:49.7 Mars (1.3mag)
07:43:28.00 +21:43:39.0 Jupiter (-1.9mag)
00:47:33.80 +02:38:40.9 Saturn (0.9mag)
03:58:45.14 +20:21:15.2 Uranus (5.8mag)
00:15:45.18 +00:14:36.4 Neptune (7.8mag)
20:33:39.76 -23:02:21.4 Pluto (14.5mag)
18:05:27.23 -28:21:48.7 Moon (-12.2mag)
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 363 Jun  1 22:07 planets.txt
############################################################
Positions of selected moons from JPL HORIZONS for JD(UT)2461193.62504706:
07:43:26.01 +21:43:43.1 Io (6.0mag)
07:43:39.70 +21:43:04.8 Europa (6.1mag)
07:43:18.00 +21:44:12.1 Ganymede (5.6mag)
07:43:37.80 +21:43:18.4 Callisto (6.8mag)
07:44:07.50 +21:19:44.0 Himalia (15.6mag)
07:43:32.66 +21:43:24.9 Thebe (16.5mag)
07:44:16.58 +21:37:53.7 Elara (17.5mag)
07:45:19.27 +21:58:38.9 Pasiphae (17.7mag)
07:50:18.55 +21:44:55.5 Carme (18.8mag)
00:47:38.20 +02:39:05.8 Titan (8.7mag)
00:47:39.16 +02:38:43.1 Rhea (10.0mag)
00:48:05.48 +02:40:01.5 Iapetus (11.4mag)
00:47:25.30 +02:39:06.9 Hyperion (14.7mag)
00:48:23.37 +02:41:29.5 Phoebe (16.7mag)
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 569 Jun  1 22:07 moons.txt
############################################################
Positions of selected spacecraft from JPL HORIZONS for JD(UT)2461193.62504706:
17:23:24.39 -34:31:12.5 JWST
19:24:58.78 +10:31:37.3 Chandra
18:04:50.09 -35:58:12.9 XMM-Newton
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 96 Jun  1 22:07 spacecraft.txt
############################################################
Positions of bright comets computed with util/comet_finder/main.py for JD(UT)2461193.62504706 -observatory V36
18:47:22.77 -32:11:54.9 13.6mag P/2010 H2 (Vales)
05:47:32.46 -68:08:33.4 17.4mag C/2014 UN271 (Bernardinelli-Bernstein)
05:46:50.43 +31:53:28.3 17.5mag C/2017 K2 (PANSTARRS)
17:17:09.44 +15:00:50.7 17.8mag C/2021 G2 (ATLAS)
20:21:13.23 -51:19:34.6 17.4mag P/2021 N1 (ZTF)
23:13:45.43 +31:20:55.0 17.2mag C/2022 E2 (ATLAS)
05:26:34.68 +26:55:50.8 16.4mag C/2022 N2 (PANSTARRS)
09:25:29.48 +31:17:06.6 16.6mag C/2022 QE78 (ATLAS)
08:47:23.36 +03:37:16.1 17.6mag C/2022 R6 (PANSTARRS)
18:32:06.70 +21:27:09.7 17.7mag C/2023 A3 (Tsuchinshan-ATLAS)
15:21:39.06 -11:00:38.7 17.5mag P/2023 B1 (PANSTARRS)
22:15:51.66 +66:08:21.5 17.7mag C/2023 H5 (Lemmon)
18:01:07.33 -06:07:15.3 13.7mag C/2023 R1 (PANSTARRS)
13:23:46.39 +84:20:38.8 17.9mag C/2023 X2 (Lemmon)
07:02:13.55 +64:07:04.0 17.6mag C/2024 A1 (ATLAS)
06:37:55.04 +27:15:03.4 13.4mag C/2024 E1 (Wierzchos)
15:42:08.94 +12:57:17.8 17.4mag C/2024 G6 (ATLAS)
20:16:38.57 +29:18:15.4 14.1mag C/2024 J3 (ATLAS)
04:11:56.15 -16:30:31.1 16.1mag C/2024 T5 (ATLAS)
06:00:13.09 +35:33:35.3 17.9mag C/2025 J1 (Borisov)
11:38:45.90 +53:04:07.2 17.2mag C/2025 L1 (ATLAS)
06:36:46.46 -10:35:14.0 13.5mag C/2025 R3 (PANSTARRS)
09:19:26.13 +23:23:58.3 18.0mag C/2025 V2 (Rankin)
12:40:03.62 +04:41:06.3 17.2mag C/2025 Y1 (ATLAS)
18:21:06.13 +73:43:30.5 18.0mag C/2026 A2 (Bok)
01:49:43.13 +42:57:36.3 15.9mag C/2026 B2 (Sun-Gao)
11:10:27.18 -06:01:04.5 16.4mag A/2026 E1
20:12:31.89 -08:15:10.6 9.1mag 10P/Tempel
11:00:45.07 -00:53:59.8 15.9mag 29P/Schwassmann-Wachmann
10:56:13.28 -02:38:37.7 17.9mag 43P/Wolf-Harrington
03:02:17.58 +24:49:04.6 17.6mag 47P/Ashbrook-Jackson
08:47:01.89 +25:28:36.5 16.9mag 63P/Wild
00:21:30.71 -06:47:06.0 15.7mag 65P/Gunn
06:23:49.76 +32:43:20.8 16.7mag 76P/West-Kohoutek-Ikemura
02:54:33.45 +16:24:14.4 13.9mag 78P/Gehrels
01:07:16.07 +03:29:00.3 15.4mag 88P/Howell
04:35:04.70 +29:45:42.7 15.2mag 93P/Lovas
02:26:03.80 +26:36:32.6 17.8mag 114P/Wiseman-Skiff
06:36:10.31 +33:12:59.6 15.7mag 123P/West-Hartley
09:39:42.70 +17:15:01.4 16.5mag 124P/Mrkos
03:49:01.41 +18:49:26.9 16.4mag 128P/Shoemaker-Holt
04:21:27.55 +18:46:30.3 17.7mag 131P/Mueller
05:31:24.45 +19:15:32.2 13.9mag 141P/Machholz
05:33:53.34 +17:13:34.6 13.8mag 141P-A/Machholz
04:23:00.51 +15:11:27.0 11.1mag 141P-D/Machholz
02:53:19.21 -25:34:31.1 17.1mag 161P/Hartley-IRAS
03:21:50.86 +21:17:31.2 14.9mag 162P/SidingSpring
19:36:24.79 +00:02:02.9 17.2mag 169P/NEAT
00:01:53.29 +01:14:42.2 17.9mag 220P/McNaught
16:56:55.33 -08:49:44.7 16.3mag 235P/LINEAR
07:20:52.88 +35:42:28.3 17.4mag 240P/NEAT
00:16:30.21 -04:59:54.9 16.6mag 260P/McNaught
03:47:59.05 +31:19:58.8 17.6mag 295P/LINEAR
23:08:18.46 -17:58:07.7 17.6mag 320P/McNaught
15:18:07.67 +08:16:01.3 17.4mag 391P/Kowalski
08:02:23.94 +20:53:38.8 17.9mag 450P/LONEOS
06:50:04.11 +42:07:13.1 17.8mag 493P/LONEOS
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 2.8K Jun  1 22:07 comets.txt
############################################################
List of recent ASAS-SN transients from https://www.astronomy.ohio-state.edu/asassn/transients.html :
20:07:38.15 -21:07:05.40  SN2026mho  2026-05-25.18 -1.12
11:29:42.55 +79:01:03.10  AT2026min  2026-05-24.21 16.63
11:44:33.11 -68:48:32.90  ASASSN-26no  2026-05-24.03 8.35
14:23:56.59 -58:37:47.40  ASASSN-26dn  2026-05-20.01 14.59
11:24:54.06 +47:57:01.60  AT2026nma  2026-05-20.29 15.46
21:27:08.58 +33:24:38.10  AT2026lli  2026-05-19.34 15.86
00:31:01.41 -13:38:51.70  AT2026nad  2026-05-19.39 15.34
15:16:06.61 -79:16:32.40  ASASSN-26dm  2026-05-19.03 14.44
11:24:25.21 -59:23:19.10  ASASSN-26dl  2026-05-18.02 13.55
13:45:51.52 -53:16:01.00  ASASSN-26dk  2026-05-18.16 12.96
02:05:49.69 -30:29:09.60  ASASSN-26dh  2026-05-18.43 15.37
17:50:22.87 -39:42:33.90  ASASSN-26dj  2026-05-17.05 15.7
01:13:11.60 -33:25:16.10  ASASSN-26dg  2026-05-13.41 16.8
16:44:31.77 -27:15:18.40  AT2026mhn  2026-05-12.33 15.8
09:46:31.08 -33:41:51.00  ASASSN-26di  2026-05-12.14 14.63
21:23:11.57 -19:09:45.00  AT2026kwu  2026-05-12.26 16.9
14:20:14.30 -30:20:51.90  AT2026ktm  2026-05-12.06 17.21
14:41:39.01 -37:13:46.40  AT2026lkm  2026-05-11.18 16.89
12:59:50.45 -10:58:38.80  SN2026kep  2026-05-9.06 17.5
13:37:29.61 -29:50:30.90  AT2026lkd  2026-05-9.09 17.23
09:46:42.01 -14:52:03.60  SN2026kmo  2026-05-8.99 17.51
15:03:05.18 +22:02:03.40  AT2026lxf  2026-05-8.07 13.94
10:23:49.41 -20:57:25.30  ASASSN-26df  2026-05-8.21 16.52
22:14:40.56 +05:04:51.60  2026lda  2026-05-7.56 16.2
21:35:33.81 -14:05:16.30  ASASSN-26de  2026-05-6.29 14.51
16:21:49.13 -61:36:14.60  ASASSN-26dd  2026-05-5.15 15.93
14:26:40.22 -24:48:37.50  AT2026lig  2026-05-4.27 14.63
13:17:51.04 +30:25:13.50  SN2026kcp  2026-05-4.46 16.43
11:27:55.57 -13:38:56.90  SN2026kza  2026-05-1.08 15.59
22:28:27.10 +30:17:54.30  SN 2026fov  2026-04-29.6 14.36
21:00:10.71 -32:17:03.90  AT2026kis  2026-04-27.36 16.15
14:32:57.37 -58:13:26.40  ASASSN-26dc  2026-04-27.27 13.42
15:32:05.35 -43:54:34.60  ASASSN-26db  2026-04-27.37 16.06
16:34:34.97 -54:34:58.00  ASASSN-26da  2026-04-25.32 16.11
10:06:55.04 -01:13:49.70  SN2026jsg  2026-04-24.99 16.28
15:15:57.17 +56:18:32.80  SN2026kid  2026-04-24.52 -3.65
07:58:28.45 +57:03:42.40  AT2026kcf  2026-04-24.2 16.89
11:38:21.80 -50:43:06.50  SN2026jkb  2026-04-24.24 15.38
10:06:11.41 -39:41:04.20  AT2026dil  2026-04-24.2 16.85
14:21:40.08 +13:13:46.30  SN2026jlm  2026-04-22.16 15.12
10:53:55.43 -16:06:06.50  ASASSN-26cz  2026-04-22.06 16.26
20:07:38.15 -21:07:05.40    2026-05-25.18 -1.12
13:45:02.03 +15:17:14.50  ASASSN-26cy  2026-04-21.27 15.78
13:20:52.22 -35:57:03.60  AT2026jcm  2026-04-19.01 16.65
13:36:15.66 -36:53:48.40  SN 2026iqy  2026-04-18.92 17.31
06:34:01.33 -40:07:34.00  ASASSN-26cx  2026-04-19.07 16.16
23:33:57.97 -45:12:11.90  SN 2026idu  2026-04-19.41 15.9
12:10:50.92 +66:55:31.20  SN 2026icv  2026-04-17.14 16.03
21:36:59.06 -60:43:35.90  ASASSN-26cv  2026-04-17.35 -1.18
08:13:26.26 -27:07:30.50  ASASSN-26cw  2026-04-17.07 -1.01
14:49:14.01 -27:29:20.10  ASASSN-26cu  2026-04-16.29 -2.7
17:21:59.44 -38:54:04.60  ASASSN-26ct  2026-04-14.4 15.15
15:25:54.99 +07:49:24.50  SN2026huo  2026-04-12.14 16.96
20:07:38.15 -21:07:05.40    2026-05-25.18 -1.12
12:23:20.40 +04:53:39.10  AT2026ixd  2026-04-12.14 17.65
17:46:09.76 -61:19:50.40  SN2026icy  2026-04-12.2 17.03
09:25:46.42 +02:13:46.30  SN2026gud  2026-04-11.98 16.49
16:52:15.46 -60:27:45.90  ASASSN-26cs  2026-04-12.4 15.5
04:20:55.37 -51:15:31.10  ASASSN-26cr  2026-04-12.01 15.37
22:25:39.35 +36:45:06.90  AT2026ihl  2026-04-10.48 14.21
19:40:44.94 +00:41:03.80  AT2026imw  2026-04-10.32 16.06
19:52:04.70 +05:53:33.50  ASASSN-26cq  2026-04-9.31 14.98
16:08:18.39 -64:11:08.80  ASASSN-26cp  2026-04-9.14 13.64
09:22:22.90 -61:02:43.70  SN2026idh  2026-04-7.97 16.34
05:06:54.12 -19:42:26.40  AT2026imr  2026-04-8 17.49
07:14:55.34 -36:03:21.40  AT2026hei  2026-04-8.12 16.7
21:35:33.14 -19:01:34.80  AT2026ihm  2026-04-8.36 16.7
04:28:24.08 -32:25:35.30  AT2026imo  2026-04-8.02 16.81
05:10:35.79 -39:38:40.80  SN 2026hnn  2026-04-7.04 17.07
09:54:32.04 -01:17:25.80  ASASSN-26cn  2026-04-7.01 15.58
07:46:24.43 -77:29:36.30  ASASSN-26co  2026-04-7.15 15.11
05:00:45.52 -29:51:06.20  AT2026hvw  2026-04-6.03 16.51
19:49:33.10 -23:37:11.00  ASASSN-26cl  2026-04-5.29 14.98
19:32:43.68 -22:39:32.70  ASASSN-26cm  2026-04-4.27 13.88
18:08:57.38 +76:48:23.60  ASASSN-26ck  2026-04-2.37 15.38
16:16:36.10 +44:52:30.20  AT2026hyy  2026-04-2.58 13.81
21:55:23.31 -34:48:53.90  ASASSN-26cj  2026-03-30.4 -1.47
11:19:50.81 -27:51:50.40  SN2026gvk  2026-03-30 15.28
11:53:57.02 -23:09:46.20  SN2026gzx  2026-03-28.75 15.27
07:13:46.14 -33:10:15.70  ASASSN-26ci  2026-03-28.15 15.14
09:03:36.09 -67:58:13.00  SN2026hkg  2026-03-28.19 15.82
07:03:00.72 +39:14:43.00  SN2026fin  2026-03-28.27 15.82
05:35:42.80 -63:44:05.50  ASASSN-26ch  2026-03-27.86 13.02
11:23:19.04 +34:22:38.00  SN2026fwt  2026-03-27.3 16.56
19:03:49.79 +37:04:05.20  ASASSN-26ce  2026-03-26.56 16.3
20:26:56.07 -52:54:06.50  AT2026hiy  2026-03-26.35 16.95
05:25:54.76 -30:15:35.80  ASASSN-26cg  2026-03-25.07 16.88
06:57:16.49 -26:54:37.20  SN2026fzb  2026-03-25.14 15.8
14:37:38.23 -43:00:52.30  ASASSN-26cd  2026-03-24.24 12.52
17:34:53.03 +06:04:29.70  AT2026gzl  2026-03-23.27 15.82
08:30:02.60 -35:12:47.50  ASASSN-26cf  2026-03-23.2 14.82
16:54:25.33 +37:49:56.60  SN 2026evz  2026-03-21.32 17.54
17:06:19.20 -18:54:19.50  ASASSN-26bx  2026-03-21.25 16.39
19:01:16.28 -29:29:23.10  ASASSN-26bw  2026-03-21.33 15.81
08:46:05.75 +10:47:39.80  ASASSN-26ca  2026-03-21.13 14.27
12:14:58.16 +63:47:16.20  SN 2026fvx  2026-03-21.12 15.6
18:02:55.90 -75:23:02.60  ASASSN-26bz  2026-03-21.32 16.16
12:16:02.87 -53:16:33.70  ASASSN-26cc  2026-03-20.08 3.93
13:08:21.85 +29:13:44.20  SN 2026fmh  2026-03-20.16 -0.33
19:56:38.48 -34:45:21.50  ASASSN-26cb  2026-03-20.35 -3.26
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 5.6K Jun  1 22:07 asassn_transients_list.txt
############################################################
Truncated list of TOCP transients from http://www.cbat.eps.harvard.edu/unconf/tocp.html :
17:57:19.56 -28:08:14.7  TCP J17571956-2808147  2026-03-19.7972  14.5mag
08:46:05.73 +10:47:39.7  TCP J08460573+1047397  2026-03-21.1936  14.5mag
09:55:38.83 +69:05:21.7  PNV J09553883+6905217  2026-04-01.893  19.4mag
19:32:43.67 -22:39:30.7  TCP J19324367-2239307  2026-04-05.4395  13.6mag
16:16:36.03 +44:52:28.9  TCP J16163603+4452289  2026-04-05.6655  14.2mag
00:43:38.36 +41:15:32.4  PNV J00433836+4115324  2026-04-08.079  17.2mag
15:41:11.68 +59:18:26.8  TCP J15411168+5918268  2026-04-12.9625  19.2mag
00:43:35.02 +41:46:28.0  PNV J00433502+4146280  2026-04-23.056  15.9mag
00:42:55.64 +41:14:12.2  PNV J00425564+4114122  2026-04-24.042  16.2mag
21:14:03.38 +56:46:44.1  TCP J21140338+5646441  2026-05-05.3534  16.7mag
15:03:05.19 +22:02:04.1  TCP J15030519+2202041  2026-05-08.3260  13.9mag
07:15:18.25 +47:53:16.7  TCP J07151825+4753167  2026-05-09.1599  14.4mag
16:00:18.44 -22:30:10.6  TCP J16001844-2230106  2026-05-09.6135  13.3mag
00:42:47.45 +41:16:58.5  PNV J00424745+4116585  2026-05-10.030  16.8mag
09:55:02.89 +69:02:13.8  PNV J09550289+6902138  2026-05-18.925  20.7mag
00:43:01.82 +41:18:16.6  PNV J00430182+4118166  2026-05-21.8651  18.83Cmag
00:42:51.20 +41:16:59.4  PNV J00425120+4116594  2022-10-26.135  19.3mag
12:24:25.10 +28:47:12.0  TCP J12242510+2847120  2026-05-31.6015  14.8mag
00:56:07.13 +43:01:40.6  TCP J00560713+4301406  2026-06-01.4135  12.2mag
00:42:41.64 +41:15:16.2  PNV J00424164+4115162  2026-06-02.029  17.4mag
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 189K Jun  1 22:07 tocp_transients_list.txt
############################################################
Truncated list of recent TNS transients from https://www.wis-tns.org/ :
14:43:04.770 +44:26:44.68  AT 2026nhj  2026-05-12.86 21.31
14:48:12.840 +26:16:16.61  AT 2026nhi  2026-05-07.83 20.09
14:39:54.860 +26:23:14.77  AT 2026nhh  2026-05-07.83 21.13
14:29:41.070 +26:50:04.61  AT 2026nhg  2026-05-07.83 20.77
14:03:03.560 -00:52:45.67  AT 2026nhf  2026-05-19.65 21.75
13:27:33.220 -01:52:49.95  AT 2026nhe  2026-05-17.64 20.72
13:18:46.250 +02:28:16.38  AT 2026nhd  2026-05-09.67 22.71
20:47:45.529 -19:53:26.35  AT 2026nhc  2026-05-20.40 19.7848
19:13:38.097 -14:31:38.10  AT 2026nhb  2026-05-14.44 20.7774
15:35:51.801 +19:40:09.90  AT 2026nha  2026-05-07.31 20.0995
15:57:39.574 -25:29:17.95  AT 2026ngz  2026-04-18.41 19.9742
10:51:38.905 -10:28:42.76  AT 2026ngy  2026-05-15.38 20.12
11:36:55.330 -31:38:36.50  AT 2026ngx  2026-05-11.39 20.37
10:39:09.434 -12:00:29.70  AT 2026ngw  2026-05-15.36 19.47
23:31:07.680 +49:32:03.66  AT 2026ngv  2026-05-21.20 19.21
11:15:47.222 -26:40:41.12  AT 2026ngu  2026-05-21.37 19.08
11:22:13.240 -18:01:38.68  AT 2026ngt  2026-05-21.37 19.38
13:49:04.574 +60:57:59.76  AT 2026ngs  2026-05-13.26 20.7824
13:58:24.302 -03:02:49.29  SN 2026ngr  2026-05-15.19 19.8766
16:18:20.038 +32:35:19.31  AT 2026ngq  2026-05-20.15 20.02
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 30K Jun  1 22:07 tns_transients_list.txt

=== Transient Factory Profiling ===
Started: Mon Jun  1 22:07:12 CDT 2026
=======================================
TIMING SExtractor: 2 seconds
TIMING matching_and_photometry: 0 seconds
TIMING lightcurve_write: 1 seconds
TIMING select_aperture: 0 seconds
    VAST_RUN_default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1: 4s (0.07 min)
    WCS_CACHE_SETUP: 0s (0.00 min)
    WCS_CALIBRATION_AND_EPHEMERIS: 30s (0.50 min)
    PLATE_VERIFY_AND_POINTING: 1s (0.02 min)
    UCAC5_PLATE_SOLVING: 0s (0.00 min)
    MAGNITUDE_CALIBRATION: 44s (0.73 min)
    MAGCAL_SANITY_CHECK: 0s (0.00 min)
      FILTER_MAGNITUDE_CONSOLIDATED: 0s (0.00 min)
      FILTER_FRAME_EDGE: 0s (0.00 min)
      FILTER_SECOND_EPOCH_VERIFY: 0s (0.00 min)
    CANDIDATE_FILTERING_TOTAL: 0s (0.00 min)
    EXCLUSION_LIST_PREPARATION: 0s (0.00 min)
    SEEING_AND_LIMITING_MAG: 0s (0.00 min)
    WAIT_FOR_UCAC5: 1s (0.02 min)
    WCS_IMAGE_ARCHIVING: 0s (0.00 min)
    HTML_REPORT: 1s (0.02 min)
  SE_CONFIG_default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1: 81s (1.35 min)
TIMING SExtractor: 7 seconds
TIMING matching_and_photometry: 2 seconds
TIMING lightcurve_write: 0 seconds
TIMING select_aperture: 2 seconds
    VAST_RUN_default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL: 20s (0.33 min)
    WCS_CACHE_SETUP: 0s (0.00 min)
    WCS_CALIBRATION_AND_EPHEMERIS: 1s (0.02 min)
    PLATE_VERIFY_AND_POINTING: 0s (0.00 min)
    UCAC5_PLATE_SOLVING: 0s (0.00 min)
    MAGNITUDE_CALIBRATION: 59s (0.98 min)
    MAGCAL_SANITY_CHECK: 0s (0.00 min)
      FILTER_MAGNITUDE_CONSOLIDATED: 0s (0.00 min)
      FILTER_FRAME_EDGE: 0s (0.00 min)
      FILTER_SECOND_EPOCH_VERIFY: 1s (0.02 min)
    CANDIDATE_FILTERING_TOTAL: 1s (0.02 min)
    EXCLUSION_LIST_PREPARATION: 0s (0.00 min)
    SEEING_AND_LIMITING_MAG: 0s (0.00 min)
    WAIT_FOR_UCAC5: 0s (0.00 min)
    WCS_IMAGE_ARCHIVING: 0s (0.00 min)
    HTML_REPORT: 1s (0.02 min)
  SE_CONFIG_default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL: 82s (1.37 min)
FIELD_UMa-09-Q1b1x1: 177s (2.95 min)
=======================================
TOTAL_RUNTIME: 181s (3.02 min)
Finished: Mon Jun  1 22:10:13 CDT 2026