######## Processing parameters ########
AAVSO_COMMENT_STRING= NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
ASTCHECK_ASTEROID_SEARCH_RADIUS_ARCSEC=
BAD_REGION_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst
CAMERA_SETTINGS= TTUQ1b1x1
CHECK_POINTING_ACCURACY= yes
DARK_FRAMES_DIR_OR_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks
EXCLUSION_LIST= ../exclusion_list_TTUQ1.txt
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MAX_APERTURE_STAR_SIZE_PIX= 12.5
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MAX_ELONGATION_AminusB_PIX= 0.55
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MIN_APERTURE_STAR_SIZE_PIX= 2.0
FILTER_BRIGHT_MAG_CUTOFF_TRANSIENT_SEARCH= -5
FILTER_FAINT_MAG_CUTOFF_TRANSIENT_SEARCH= 15.0
FLAT_FIELD_DIR_OR_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats
FRAME_EDGE_OFFSET_PIX= 100
GAIA_BAND_FOR_CATALOGED_SOURCE_CHECK=
MAX_NEW_TO_REF_MEAN_IMG_VALUE_RATIO= 100
MAX_NEW_IMG_MEAN_VALUE= 25000
MAX_SD_RATIO_OF_SECOND_EPOCH_IMGS= 0.18
MAX_SD_RATIO_OF_SECOND_EPOCH_IMGS_SOFT_LIMIT= 0.12
MPC_CODE= V36
NMW_CALIBRATION= /var/www/nmw_calibration
NUMBER_OF_DETECTED_TRANSIENTS_BEFORE_FILTERING_HARD_LIMIT= 8000
NUMBER_OF_DETECTED_TRANSIENTS_BEFORE_FILTERING_SOFT_LIMIT= 4000
OMP_NUM_THREADS=
ONLINE_MPCHECKER_BUTTON_ASTEROID_SEARCH_RADIUS_ARCMIN=
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=
REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES= yes
SEXTRACTOR_CONFIG_BRIGHTSTARPASS= default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
SEXTRACTOR_CONFIG_FILES= default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
STARMATCH_RADIUS_PIX= 3.5
SYSREM_ITERATIONS= 0
TELESCOP=
TELESCOP_NAME_KNOWN_TO_VaST_FOR_FOV_DETERMINATION=
UCAC5_PLATESOLVE_ITERATIONS= 2
FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE= no
#######################################
HOSTNAME= tau
USER=
HOME=
#######################################
SExtractor catalog cache: enabled, directory /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/vast_sextractor_cache
Reference image directory is set to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs
VIZIER_SITE=vizier.cds.unistra.fr
GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=vizquery (lib/vizquery -> VizieR vizier.cds.unistra.fr)
INFO: MAKE_PNG_PLOTS is set to yes
FITS_FILE_EXT=fits
CALIBRATION_STATUS_PREFIX=
Fields in the data directory:
And-05-Q1b1x1
#######################################
########### Starting And-05-Q1b1x1 ###########
Processing And-05-Q1b1x1
server tau has sufficient free disk space available: 608531 MB at /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir
server tau has sufficient free disk space available: 608531 MB at .
Checking input images (2 new)
REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE= /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/And-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-44-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0192.fits
REFERENCE_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE= /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/And-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-44-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0193.fits
Small preview (one of the new images): 
Large previews of the second-epoch (new) images:
MAKE_PNG_PLOTS=yes
renamed 'And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_05-08-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0191.png' -> 'transient_report/And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_05-08-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0191.fits_preview.png'
And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_05-08-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0191.fits

renamed 'And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_05-09-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0192.png' -> 'transient_report/And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_05-09-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0192.fits_preview.png'
And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_05-09-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0192.fits

Read-check the input FITS images... read-check OK
Blank image check the input FITS images... blank-image-check OK
Read date check the input FITS images... read-date-check OK
Mean value check the input FITS images... OK, at least two new images have mean values below the threshold.
----------------------------------------------
INFO: REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 561.8439
INFO: REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_SD= 714.7484
INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 3462.2657
INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_SD= 916.1861
INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 3457.7838
INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE_SD= 915.7022
----------------------------------------------
INFO: ref_to_second_epoch_img_mean_ratio= 6.16233
INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__SD_ratio= 0.001
----------------------------------------------
Calibration settings: DARK_FRAMES_DIR_OR_FILE=/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks FLAT_FIELD_DIR_OR_FILE=/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats
EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration
SET-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint
CCD-TEMP= -0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature
FOCTEMP = 18.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature
AMBTEMP = 17.3 / [degC] Ambient air temperature
Exploring image header: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_And-05-Q1b1x1_053321_TTUQ1b1x1_106498_eObhr7PT/And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_05-08-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0191.fits
CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_And-05-Q1b1x1_053321_TTUQ1b1x1_106498_eObhr7PT/And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_05-08-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0191.fits
SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_And-05-Q1b1x1_053321_TTUQ1b1x1_106498_eObhr7PT/And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_05-08-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0191.fits
Header: 74 keys total, 33 keys left
Record 0: "" status=0
Record 1: "SIMPLE = T / C# FITS" status=0
Record 2: "BITPIX = 16" status=0
Record 3: "NAXIS = 2 / Dimensionality" status=0
Record 4: "NAXIS1 = 9576" status=0
Record 5: "NAXIS2 = 6388" status=0
Record 6: "BZERO = 32768" status=0
Record 7: "EXTEND = T / Extensions are permitted" status=0
Record 8: "IMAGETYP= 'LIGHT' / Type of exposure" status=0
Record 9: "EXPOSURE= 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0
Record 10: "EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0
Record 11: "DATE-LOC= '2026-06-01T05:08:40.0946493' / Time of observation (local)" status=0
Record 12: "DATE-OBS= '2026-06-01T10:08:40.0946493' / Time of observation (UTC)" status=0
Record 13: "MJD-OBS = 61192.4226862732 / Modified Julian Date of observation" status=0
Record 14: "DATE-AVG= '2026-06-01T10:08:49.9916756' / Averaged midpoint time (UTC)" status=0
Record 15: "MJD-AVG = 61192.4228008217 / Modified Julian Date of averaged midpoint" status=0
Record 16: "XBINNING= 1 / X axis binning factor" status=0
Record 17: "YBINNING= 1 / Y axis binning factor" status=0
Record 18: "GAIN = 30 / Sensor gain" status=0
Record 19: "OFFSET = 30 / Sensor gain offset" status=0
Record 20: "XPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel X axis size" status=0
Record 21: "YPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel Y axis size" status=0
Record 22: "INSTRUME= 'QHY600M' / Imaging instrument name" status=0
Record 23: "CAMERAID= 'QHY600M-33d3d743814b8b447' / Imaging instrument identifier" status=0
Record 24: "SET-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint" status=0
Record 25: "CCD-TEMP= -0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature" status=0
Record 26: "READOUTM= '2CMS-0' / Sensor readout mode" status=0
Record 27: "USBLIMIT= 50 / Camera-specific USB setting" status=0
Record 28: "TELESCOP= 'QHY600M-TTU1' / Name of telescope" status=0
Record 29: "FOCALLEN= 135.0 / [mm] Focal length" status=0
Record 30: "FOCRATIO= 2.2 / Focal ratio" status=0
Record 31: "RA = 16.3617268372127 / [deg] RA of telescope" status=0
Record 32: "DEC = 38.0000383651959 / [deg] Declination of telescope" status=0
Record 33: "CENTALT = 29.7036111111111 / [deg] Altitude of telescope" status=0
Record 34: "CENTAZ = 61.7097222222222 / [deg] Azimuth of telescope" status=0
Record 35: "AIRMASS = 2.01217480768192 / Airmass at frame center (Gueymard 1993)" status=0
Record 36: "PIERSIDE= 'West' / Telescope pointing state" status=0
Record 37: "SITEELEV= 1015.0 / [m] Observation site elevation" status=0
Record 38: "SITELAT = 33.7480555555556 / [deg] Observation site latitude" status=0
Record 39: "SITELONG= -101.958333333333 / [deg] Observation site longitude" status=0
Record 40: "OBSERVER= 'Sokolovsky' / Observer name" status=0
Record 41: "OBSERVAT= 'TTU Skyview' / Observatory name" status=0
Record 42: "SITENAME= '' / Observatory site name" status=0
Record 43: "FWHEEL = 'Simulator' / Filter Wheel name" status=0
Record 44: "FILTER = 'CV' / Active filter name" status=0
Record 45: "OBJECT = 'And-05' / Name of the object of interest" status=0
Record 46: "OBJCTRA = '01 05 27' / [H M S] RA of imaged object" status=0
Record 47: "OBJCTDEC= '+38 00 00' / [D M S] Declination of imaged object" status=0
Record 48: "OBJCTROT= 0.0 / [deg] planned rotation of imaged object" status=0
Record 49: "FOCNAME = 'ZWO Focuser' / Focusing equipment name" status=0
Record 50: "FOCPOS = 29442 / [step] Focuser position" status=0
Record 51: "FOCUSPOS= 29442 / [step] Focuser position" status=0
Record 52: "FOCUSSZ = 0.0 / [um] Focuser step size" status=0
Record 53: "FOCTEMP = 18.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0
Record 54: "FOCUSTEM= 18.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0
Record 55: "DEWPOINT= 12.8 / [degC] Dew point" status=0
Record 56: "HUMIDITY= 75.0 / [percent] Relative humidity" status=0
Record 57: "PRESSURE= 898.61 / [hPa] Air pressure" status=0
Record 58: "AMBTEMP = 17.3 / [degC] Ambient air temperature" status=0
Record 59: "WINDDIR = 90.0 / [deg] Wind direction: 0=N, 180=S, 90=E, 270=W" status=0
Record 60: "WINDGUST= 11.200896 / [kph] Wind gust" status=0
Record 61: "WINDSPD = 9.700776 / [kph] Wind speed" status=0
Record 62: "ROWORDER= 'TOP-DOWN' / FITS Image Orientation" status=0
Record 63: "EQUINOX = 2000.0 / Equinox of celestial coordinate system" status=0
Record 64: "SWCREATE= 'N.I.N.A. 3.2.0.9001 (x64)' / Software that created this file" status=0
Record 65: "QHY_EXP = 20.000096 / [s] Actual exposure time" status=0
Record 66: "QHY_PP = 13888.0 / [ps] pixelPeriod" status=0
Record 67: "QHY_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0
Record 68: "GPS_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0
Record 69: "QHY_FP = 20000160.0 / [us] framePeriod" status=0
Record 70: "QHY_CPL = 6120.0 / clocksPerLine" status=0
Record 71: "QHY_LPF = 235295.0 / linesPerFrame" status=0
Record 72: "QHY_AET = 20000096.0 / [us] actualExposureTime" status=0
Record 73: "QHY_LEM = T / isLongExposureMode" status=0
Record 74: "QHY_OFF0= 3767.777 / [us] RollingShutterEndOffset row 0" status=0
Allocating memory for image, dark and result arrays...
Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_And-05-Q1b1x1_053321_TTUQ1b1x1_106498_eObhr7PT/And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_05-08-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0191.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix
SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_And-05-Q1b1x1_053321_TTUQ1b1x1_106498_eObhr7PT/And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_05-08-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0191.fits
SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_5C_20s_2026-05-30.fit
CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_And-05-Q1b1x1_053321_TTUQ1b1x1_106498_eObhr7PT/And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_05-08-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0191.fits
CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_5C_20s_2026-05-30.fit
Reading dark frame /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_5C_20s_2026-05-30.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix
Dark frame is subtracted, output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_And-05-Q1b1x1_053321_TTUQ1b1x1_106498_eObhr7PT/d_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_05-08-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0191.fits :)
Spent 0.487628 seconds
renamed 'mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_5C_20s_2026-05-30.png' -> 'transient_report/dark.png'
try_to_calibrate_the_input_frame(): selected flat field /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-05-30.fit from directory /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats
MegaDivider v7
Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_And-05-Q1b1x1_053321_TTUQ1b1x1_106498_eObhr7PT/d_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_05-08-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0191.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix
Reading flat /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-05-30.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix
Avarage count on flat field image: 31267.409145
Minimal real count (from overscan): 5
Output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_And-05-Q1b1x1_053321_TTUQ1b1x1_106498_eObhr7PT/fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_05-08-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0191.fits :)
No overscan detected - all values seem high! (left_median=21677.0, right_median=21704.0)
renamed 'mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-05-30.png' -> 'transient_report/flat.png'
Using calibrated image CALIBRATED_SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_And-05-Q1b1x1_053321_TTUQ1b1x1_106498_eObhr7PT/fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_05-08-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0191.fits
EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration
SET-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint
CCD-TEMP= -0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature
FOCTEMP = 18.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature
AMBTEMP = 17.3 / [degC] Ambient air temperature
Exploring image header: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_And-05-Q1b1x1_053321_TTUQ1b1x1_106498_eObhr7PT/And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_05-09-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0192.fits
CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_And-05-Q1b1x1_053321_TTUQ1b1x1_106498_eObhr7PT/And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_05-09-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0192.fits
SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_And-05-Q1b1x1_053321_TTUQ1b1x1_106498_eObhr7PT/And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_05-09-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0192.fits
Header: 74 keys total, 33 keys left
Record 0: "" status=0
Record 1: "SIMPLE = T / C# FITS" status=0
Record 2: "BITPIX = 16" status=0
Record 3: "NAXIS = 2 / Dimensionality" status=0
Record 4: "NAXIS1 = 9576" status=0
Record 5: "NAXIS2 = 6388" status=0
Record 6: "BZERO = 32768" status=0
Record 7: "EXTEND = T / Extensions are permitted" status=0
Record 8: "IMAGETYP= 'LIGHT' / Type of exposure" status=0
Record 9: "EXPOSURE= 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0
Record 10: "EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0
Record 11: "DATE-LOC= '2026-06-01T05:09:14.0697419' / Time of observation (local)" status=0
Record 12: "DATE-OBS= '2026-06-01T10:09:14.0697419' / Time of observation (UTC)" status=0
Record 13: "MJD-OBS = 61192.4230795023 / Modified Julian Date of observation" status=0
Record 14: "DATE-AVG= '2026-06-01T10:09:23.9726065' / Averaged midpoint time (UTC)" status=0
Record 15: "MJD-AVG = 61192.4231941202 / Modified Julian Date of averaged midpoint" status=0
Record 16: "XBINNING= 1 / X axis binning factor" status=0
Record 17: "YBINNING= 1 / Y axis binning factor" status=0
Record 18: "GAIN = 30 / Sensor gain" status=0
Record 19: "OFFSET = 30 / Sensor gain offset" status=0
Record 20: "XPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel X axis size" status=0
Record 21: "YPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel Y axis size" status=0
Record 22: "INSTRUME= 'QHY600M' / Imaging instrument name" status=0
Record 23: "CAMERAID= 'QHY600M-33d3d743814b8b447' / Imaging instrument identifier" status=0
Record 24: "SET-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint" status=0
Record 25: "CCD-TEMP= -0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature" status=0
Record 26: "READOUTM= '2CMS-0' / Sensor readout mode" status=0
Record 27: "USBLIMIT= 50 / Camera-specific USB setting" status=0
Record 28: "TELESCOP= 'QHY600M-TTU1' / Name of telescope" status=0
Record 29: "FOCALLEN= 135.0 / [mm] Focal length" status=0
Record 30: "FOCRATIO= 2.2 / Focal ratio" status=0
Record 31: "RA = 16.3617267713163 / [deg] RA of telescope" status=0
Record 32: "DEC = 38.0000383568132 / [deg] Declination of telescope" status=0
Record 33: "CENTALT = 29.8063888888889 / [deg] Altitude of telescope" status=0
Record 34: "CENTAZ = 61.7561111111111 / [deg] Azimuth of telescope" status=0
Record 35: "AIRMASS = 2.00592067851318 / Airmass at frame center (Gueymard 1993)" status=0
Record 36: "PIERSIDE= 'West' / Telescope pointing state" status=0
Record 37: "SITEELEV= 1015.0 / [m] Observation site elevation" status=0
Record 38: "SITELAT = 33.7480555555556 / [deg] Observation site latitude" status=0
Record 39: "SITELONG= -101.958333333333 / [deg] Observation site longitude" status=0
Record 40: "OBSERVER= 'Sokolovsky' / Observer name" status=0
Record 41: "OBSERVAT= 'TTU Skyview' / Observatory name" status=0
Record 42: "SITENAME= '' / Observatory site name" status=0
Record 43: "FWHEEL = 'Simulator' / Filter Wheel name" status=0
Record 44: "FILTER = 'CV' / Active filter name" status=0
Record 45: "OBJECT = 'And-05' / Name of the object of interest" status=0
Record 46: "OBJCTRA = '01 05 27' / [H M S] RA of imaged object" status=0
Record 47: "OBJCTDEC= '+38 00 00' / [D M S] Declination of imaged object" status=0
Record 48: "OBJCTROT= 0.0 / [deg] planned rotation of imaged object" status=0
Record 49: "FOCNAME = 'ZWO Focuser' / Focusing equipment name" status=0
Record 50: "FOCPOS = 29442 / [step] Focuser position" status=0
Record 51: "FOCUSPOS= 29442 / [step] Focuser position" status=0
Record 52: "FOCUSSZ = 0.0 / [um] Focuser step size" status=0
Record 53: "FOCTEMP = 18.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0
Record 54: "FOCUSTEM= 18.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0
Record 55: "DEWPOINT= 12.8 / [degC] Dew point" status=0
Record 56: "HUMIDITY= 75.0 / [percent] Relative humidity" status=0
Record 57: "PRESSURE= 898.61 / [hPa] Air pressure" status=0
Record 58: "AMBTEMP = 17.3 / [degC] Ambient air temperature" status=0
Record 59: "WINDDIR = 90.0 / [deg] Wind direction: 0=N, 180=S, 90=E, 270=W" status=0
Record 60: "WINDGUST= 11.200896 / [kph] Wind gust" status=0
Record 61: "WINDSPD = 9.700776 / [kph] Wind speed" status=0
Record 62: "ROWORDER= 'TOP-DOWN' / FITS Image Orientation" status=0
Record 63: "EQUINOX = 2000.0 / Equinox of celestial coordinate system" status=0
Record 64: "SWCREATE= 'N.I.N.A. 3.2.0.9001 (x64)' / Software that created this file" status=0
Record 65: "QHY_EXP = 20.000096 / [s] Actual exposure time" status=0
Record 66: "QHY_PP = 13888.0 / [ps] pixelPeriod" status=0
Record 67: "QHY_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0
Record 68: "GPS_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0
Record 69: "QHY_FP = 20000160.0 / [us] framePeriod" status=0
Record 70: "QHY_CPL = 6120.0 / clocksPerLine" status=0
Record 71: "QHY_LPF = 235295.0 / linesPerFrame" status=0
Record 72: "QHY_AET = 20000096.0 / [us] actualExposureTime" status=0
Record 73: "QHY_LEM = T / isLongExposureMode" status=0
Record 74: "QHY_OFF0= 3767.777 / [us] RollingShutterEndOffset row 0" status=0
Allocating memory for image, dark and result arrays...
Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_And-05-Q1b1x1_053321_TTUQ1b1x1_106498_eObhr7PT/And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_05-09-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0192.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix
SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_And-05-Q1b1x1_053321_TTUQ1b1x1_106498_eObhr7PT/And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_05-09-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0192.fits
SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_5C_20s_2026-05-30.fit
CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_And-05-Q1b1x1_053321_TTUQ1b1x1_106498_eObhr7PT/And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_05-09-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0192.fits
CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_5C_20s_2026-05-30.fit
Reading dark frame /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_5C_20s_2026-05-30.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix
Dark frame is subtracted, output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_And-05-Q1b1x1_053321_TTUQ1b1x1_106498_eObhr7PT/d_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_05-09-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0192.fits :)
Spent 0.503692 seconds
renamed 'mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_5C_20s_2026-05-30.png' -> 'transient_report/dark.png'
try_to_calibrate_the_input_frame(): selected flat field /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-05-30.fit from directory /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats
MegaDivider v7
Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_And-05-Q1b1x1_053321_TTUQ1b1x1_106498_eObhr7PT/d_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_05-09-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0192.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix
Reading flat /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-05-30.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix
Avarage count on flat field image: 31267.409145
Minimal real count (from overscan): 5
Output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_And-05-Q1b1x1_053321_TTUQ1b1x1_106498_eObhr7PT/fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_05-09-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0192.fits :)
No overscan detected - all values seem high! (left_median=21677.0, right_median=21704.0)
renamed 'mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-05-30.png' -> 'transient_report/flat.png'
Using calibrated image CALIBRATED_SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_And-05-Q1b1x1_053321_TTUQ1b1x1_106498_eObhr7PT/fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_05-09-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0192.fits
Dark frame used to calibrate the second-epoch images:

Flat field used to calibrate the second-epoch images:

after the calibration attempt:
SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_And-05-Q1b1x1_053321_TTUQ1b1x1_106498_eObhr7PT/fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_05-08-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0191.fits
SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_And-05-Q1b1x1_053321_TTUQ1b1x1_106498_eObhr7PT/fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_05-09-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0192.fits
Previews of the CALIBRATED second-epoch images:
fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_05-08-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0191.fits

fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_05-09-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0192.fits

Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 3.5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/And-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-44-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0192.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/And-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-44-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0193.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_And-05-Q1b1x1_053321_TTUQ1b1x1_106498_eObhr7PT/fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_05-08-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0191.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_And-05-Q1b1x1_053321_TTUQ1b1x1_106498_eObhr7PT/fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_05-09-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0192.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved And-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-44-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0192.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved And-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-44-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0193.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/And-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-44-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0192.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/And-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-44-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0193.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_And-05-Q1b1x1_053321_TTUQ1b1x1_106498_eObhr7PT/fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_05-08-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0191.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_And-05-Q1b1x1_053321_TTUQ1b1x1_106498_eObhr7PT/fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_05-09-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0192.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461192.92280201
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
'tocp_transients_list.txt' -> '../tocp_transients_list.txt'
'tns_transients_list.txt' -> '../tns_transients_list.txt'
wcs_And-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-44-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0192.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_And-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-44-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0192.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_And-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-44-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0192.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_And-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-44-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0192.fits'
wcs_And-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-44-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0193.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_And-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-44-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0193.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_And-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-44-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0193.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_And-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-44-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0193.fits'
wcs_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_05-08-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0191.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_05-08-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0191.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_05-08-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0191.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_05-08-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0191.fits'
wcs_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_05-09-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0192.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_05-09-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0192.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_05-09-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0192.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_05-09-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0192.fits'
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_And-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-44-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0192.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_And-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-44-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0192.fits
Image size: 941.5'x626.9' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 01:05:28.265 +37:59:54.28 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_05-08-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0191.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_05-08-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0191.fits
Image size: 941.7'x626.6' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 01:05:12.125 +38:01:30.71 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 01:05:28.265 +37:59:54.28
Second-epoch image center 01:05:12.125 +38:01:30.71
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0594 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_05-09-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0192.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_05-09-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0192.fits
Image size: 941.7'x626.6' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 01:05:12.023 +38:01:30.68 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 01:05:28.265 +37:59:54.28
Second-epoch image center 01:05:12.023 +38:01:30.68
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0597 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 01:05:12.125 +38:01:30.71
Second-epoch second image center 01:05:12.023 +38:01:30.68
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00034 deg.
###################################
ERROR: no shift applied between second-epoch images! The distance between image centers is 0.00034 deg. (min. required shift: 0.00164 deg.)
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/And-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-44-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0192.fits &> /tmp/tmp.o3MJQSJAOP
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/And-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-44-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0192.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/And-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-44-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0193.fits &> /tmp/tmp.K597GrvV7x
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/And-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-44-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0193.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_And-05-Q1b1x1_053321_TTUQ1b1x1_106498_eObhr7PT/fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_05-08-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0191.fits &> /tmp/tmp.aXHOeRF0Dq
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_And-05-Q1b1x1_053321_TTUQ1b1x1_106498_eObhr7PT/fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_05-08-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0191.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_And-05-Q1b1x1_053321_TTUQ1b1x1_106498_eObhr7PT/fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_05-09-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0192.fits &> /tmp/tmp.cn5UbkuqtT
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_And-05-Q1b1x1_053321_TTUQ1b1x1_106498_eObhr7PT/fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_05-09-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0192.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_And-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-44-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0192.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_And-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-44-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0192.fits and wcs_And-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-44-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0192.fits.cat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_And-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-44-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0192.fits and wcs_And-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-44-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0192.fits.cat
Found non-empty wcs_And-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-44-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0192.fits and wcs_And-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-44-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0192.fits.cat
The reference image (wcs_And-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-44-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0192.fits) and catalog (wcs_And-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-44-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0192.fits.cat) found
'wcs_And-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-44-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0192.fits.cat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 16528 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 5.9063 to 27.2264 deg, Dec +32.1623 to +43.3177 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 5.9063 to 27.2264 deg, Dec 32.1623 to 43.3177 deg
Loaded 12094 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 8624 out of 9264 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 9264 out of 16528 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.931050
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.931050
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.55
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.38
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.38
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:

Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 16528 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 5.9063 to 27.2264 deg, Dec +32.1623 to +43.3177 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 5.9063 to 27.2264 deg, Dec 32.1623 to 43.3177 deg
Loaded 12094 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 8624 out of 9264 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 9264 out of 16528 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_And-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-44-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0192.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_And-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-44-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0192.fits:

Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_And-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-44-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0192.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_And-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-44-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0192.fits (aperture=6.0)
Read 16565 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 5.9060 to 27.2094 deg, Dec +32.1622 to +43.3177 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 5.9060 to 27.2094 deg, Dec 32.1622 to 43.3177 deg
Loaded 12085 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 8682 out of 9331 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 9331 out of 16565 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_And-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-44-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0193.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_And-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-44-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0193.fits:

Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_And-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-44-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0193.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_And-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-44-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0193.fits (aperture=6.0)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 5 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 8000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.0 pix And-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-44-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0192.fits
2.0 pix And-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-44-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0193.fits
3.5 pix fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_05-08-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0191.fits
3.5 pix fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_05-09-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0192.fits
2.0 pix wcs_And-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-44-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0192.fits
2.0 pix wcs_And-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-44-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0193.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.4 mag. And-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-44-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0192.fits
15.4 mag. And-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-44-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0193.fits
14.0 mag. fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_05-08-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0191.fits
14.0 mag. fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_05-09-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0192.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.0 (SNR ) 11.4 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.o3MJQSJAOP (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-01_CI_And-05-Q1b1x1_053321_TTUQ1b1x1_106498_eObhr7PT/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/And-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-44-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0192.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/And-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-44-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0192.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/And-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-44-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0192.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/And-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-44-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0192.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/And-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-44-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0192.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/And-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-44-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0192.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/And-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-44-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0192.fits' -> 'wcs_And-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-44-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0192.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/And-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-44-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0192.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_And-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-44-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0192.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_And-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-44-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0192.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_And-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-44-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0192.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_And-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-44-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0192.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_And-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-44-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0192.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_And-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-44-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0192.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_And-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-44-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0192.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/And-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-44-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0192.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_And-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-44-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0192.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=22, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=1369, passed=16506
Got 16506 stars (including 15118 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_And-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-44-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0192.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 16506 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013076 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010461 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 610 to 668 (Dec 32.2 to 43.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 949 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 948 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 935 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 948 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 16126 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 610 to 668 (Dec 32.2 to 43.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 949 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 948 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 16129 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 948 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 16129 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Excluding outliers - 948 stars left (next iteration limit 1042)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=And-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-44-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0192.fits N_match=948 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.312 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.406 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.309 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.287 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.277 n_q1=231 n_q2=283 n_q3=181 n_q4=253 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.300
The image catalog is written to wcs_And-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-44-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0192.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_And-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-44-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0192.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/And-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-44-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0192.fits -region wcs_And-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-44-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0192.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_And-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-44-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0192.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.K597GrvV7x (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-01_CI_And-05-Q1b1x1_053321_TTUQ1b1x1_106498_eObhr7PT/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/And-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-44-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0193.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/And-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-44-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0193.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/And-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-44-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0193.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/And-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-44-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0193.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/And-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-44-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0193.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/And-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-44-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0193.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/And-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-44-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0193.fits' -> 'wcs_And-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-44-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0193.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/And-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-44-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0193.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_And-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-44-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0193.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_And-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-44-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0193.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_And-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-44-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0193.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_And-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-44-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0193.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_And-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-44-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0193.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_And-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-44-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0193.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_And-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-44-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0193.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/And-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-44-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0193.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_And-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-44-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0193.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=1334, passed=16565
Got 16565 stars (including 15211 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_And-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-44-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0193.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 16565 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013076 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010461 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 610 to 668 (Dec 32.2 to 43.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 947 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 945 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 930 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 945 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 16204 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 610 to 668 (Dec 32.2 to 43.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 947 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 945 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 16205 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 945 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 16205 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
Excluding outliers - 945 stars left (next iteration limit 1039)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=And-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-44-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0193.fits N_match=945 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.318 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.392 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.312 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.315 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.271 n_q1=225 n_q2=282 n_q3=186 n_q4=252 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.231
The image catalog is written to wcs_And-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-44-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0193.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_And-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-44-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0193.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/And-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-44-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0193.fits -region wcs_And-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-44-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0193.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_And-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-44-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0193.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.aXHOeRF0Dq (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-01_CI_And-05-Q1b1x1_053321_TTUQ1b1x1_106498_eObhr7PT/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_And-05-Q1b1x1_053321_TTUQ1b1x1_106498_eObhr7PT/fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_05-08-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0191.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_And-05-Q1b1x1_053321_TTUQ1b1x1_106498_eObhr7PT/fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_05-08-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0191.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_And-05-Q1b1x1_053321_TTUQ1b1x1_106498_eObhr7PT/fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_05-08-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0191.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_And-05-Q1b1x1_053321_TTUQ1b1x1_106498_eObhr7PT/fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_05-08-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0191.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_And-05-Q1b1x1_053321_TTUQ1b1x1_106498_eObhr7PT/fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_05-08-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0191.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_And-05-Q1b1x1_053321_TTUQ1b1x1_106498_eObhr7PT/fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_05-08-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0191.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_05-08-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0191.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_05-08-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0191.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_05-08-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0191.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_05-08-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0191.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_05-08-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0191.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_05-08-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0191.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_05-08-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0191.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_And-05-Q1b1x1_053321_TTUQ1b1x1_106498_eObhr7PT/fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_05-08-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0191.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_05-08-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0191.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=371, passed=7418
Got 7418 stars (including 7044 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_05-08-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0191.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 7418 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.7'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.7 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013079 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010463 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 610 to 669 (Dec 32.0 to 43.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 946 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 943 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 932 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 943 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7264 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 610 to 669 (Dec 32.0 to 43.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 946 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 943 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7264 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 943 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7264 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Excluding outliers - 943 stars left (next iteration limit 1037)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_05-08-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0191.fits N_match=943 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.335 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.330 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.391 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.291 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.341 n_q1=231 n_q2=211 n_q3=258 n_q4=243 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.166
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_05-08-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0191.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_05-08-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0191.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_And-05-Q1b1x1_053321_TTUQ1b1x1_106498_eObhr7PT/fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_05-08-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0191.fits -region wcs_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_05-08-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0191.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_05-08-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0191.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.cn5UbkuqtT (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-01_CI_And-05-Q1b1x1_053321_TTUQ1b1x1_106498_eObhr7PT/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_And-05-Q1b1x1_053321_TTUQ1b1x1_106498_eObhr7PT/fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_05-09-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0192.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_And-05-Q1b1x1_053321_TTUQ1b1x1_106498_eObhr7PT/fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_05-09-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0192.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_And-05-Q1b1x1_053321_TTUQ1b1x1_106498_eObhr7PT/fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_05-09-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0192.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_And-05-Q1b1x1_053321_TTUQ1b1x1_106498_eObhr7PT/fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_05-09-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0192.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_And-05-Q1b1x1_053321_TTUQ1b1x1_106498_eObhr7PT/fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_05-09-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0192.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_And-05-Q1b1x1_053321_TTUQ1b1x1_106498_eObhr7PT/fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_05-09-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0192.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_05-09-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0192.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_05-09-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0192.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_05-09-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0192.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_05-09-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0192.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_05-09-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0192.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_05-09-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0192.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_05-09-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0192.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_And-05-Q1b1x1_053321_TTUQ1b1x1_106498_eObhr7PT/fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_05-09-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0192.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_05-09-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0192.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=370, passed=7469
Got 7469 stars (including 7094 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_05-09-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0192.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 7469 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.7'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.7 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013079 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010463 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 610 to 669 (Dec 32.0 to 43.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 946 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 944 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 934 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 944 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7317 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 610 to 669 (Dec 32.0 to 43.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 946 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 942 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7317 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 942 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7315 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Excluding outliers - 942 stars left (next iteration limit 1038)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_05-09-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0192.fits N_match=942 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.366 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.371 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.418 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.330 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.376 n_q1=234 n_q2=208 n_q3=258 n_q4=242 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.141
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_05-09-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0192.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_05-09-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0192.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_And-05-Q1b1x1_053321_TTUQ1b1x1_106498_eObhr7PT/fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_05-09-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0192.fits -region wcs_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_05-09-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0192.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_05-09-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0192.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=And-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-44-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0192.fits sigma_overall=0.312 worst_q_ratio=1.300
ref2=And-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-44-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0193.fits sigma_overall=0.318 worst_q_ratio=1.231
new1=fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_05-08-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0191.fits sigma_overall=0.335 worst_q_ratio=1.166
new2=fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_05-09-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0192.fits sigma_overall=0.366 worst_q_ratio=1.141
reference average sigma_overall=0.315 worst_q_ratio=1.2655
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
Distribution of catalog-matched stars across the image:
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy: wrote wcs_And-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-44-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0192_astrometric_residuals.png (948 matched stars from wcs_And-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-44-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0192.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy: wrote wcs_And-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-44-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0193_astrometric_residuals.png (945 matched stars from wcs_And-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-44-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0193.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy: wrote wcs_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_05-08-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0191_astrometric_residuals.png (943 matched stars from wcs_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_05-08-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0191.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy: wrote wcs_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_05-09-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0192_astrometric_residuals.png (942 matched stars from wcs_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_05-09-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0192.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_05-08-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0191.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_05-08-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0191.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_And-05-Q1b1x1_053321_TTUQ1b1x1_106498_eObhr7PT/wcs_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_05-08-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0191.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_05-09-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0192.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_05-09-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0192.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_And-05-Q1b1x1_053321_TTUQ1b1x1_106498_eObhr7PT/wcs_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_05-09-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0192.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field And-05-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 0s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 0s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21055_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_05-09-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0192
The candidate 21055_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_05-09-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0192 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 06 01.42320 | 2461192.92320 | 10.83 | 00:42:30.85 +41:10:10.5 | 2100 5021 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_And-05-Q1b1x1_053321_TTUQ1b1x1_106498_eObhr7PT/fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_05-09-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0192.fits |
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.3 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21066_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_05-09-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0192
The candidate 21066_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_05-09-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0192 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 06 01.42320 | 2461192.92320 | 10.98 | 01:04:35.58 +41:17:56.9 | 4605 5161 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_And-05-Q1b1x1_053321_TTUQ1b1x1_106498_eObhr7PT/fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_05-09-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0192.fits |
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.3 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21067_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_05-09-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0192
The candidate 21067_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_05-09-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0192 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 06 01.42320 | 2461192.92320 | 10.89 | 01:09:30.93 +35:34:28.1 | 5402 1755 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_And-05-Q1b1x1_053321_TTUQ1b1x1_106498_eObhr7PT/fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_05-09-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0192.fits |
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.2 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 15052_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_05-09-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0192
The candidate 15052_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_05-09-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0192 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 3 | 2026 06 01.42320 | 2461192.92320 | 9.92 | 00:51:23.37 +34:22:37.5 | 3198 0927 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_And-05-Q1b1x1_053321_TTUQ1b1x1_106498_eObhr7PT/fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_05-09-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0192.fits |
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.2 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 12652_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_05-09-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0192
The candidate 12652_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_05-09-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0192 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 3 | 2026 06 01.42320 | 2461192.92320 | 10.96 | 01:17:44.85 +35:30:55.3 | 6411 1800 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_And-05-Q1b1x1_053321_TTUQ1b1x1_106498_eObhr7PT/fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_05-09-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0192.fits |
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.2 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 0s
Prepared the HTML report for the field And-05-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 3.5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/And-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-44-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0192.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/And-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-44-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0193.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_And-05-Q1b1x1_053321_TTUQ1b1x1_106498_eObhr7PT/fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_05-08-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0191.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_And-05-Q1b1x1_053321_TTUQ1b1x1_106498_eObhr7PT/fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_05-09-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0192.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved And-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-44-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0192.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved And-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-44-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0193.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/And-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-44-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0192.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/And-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-44-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0193.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_And-05-Q1b1x1_053321_TTUQ1b1x1_106498_eObhr7PT/fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_05-08-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0191.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_And-05-Q1b1x1_053321_TTUQ1b1x1_106498_eObhr7PT/fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_05-09-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0192.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_And-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-44-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0192.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_And-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-44-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0193.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_05-08-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0191.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_05-09-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0192.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/exclusion_list.txt
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_And-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-44-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0192.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_And-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-44-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0193.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_05-08-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0191.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_05-09-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0192.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_And-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-44-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0192.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_And-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-44-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0192.fits
Image size: 941.5'x626.9' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 01:05:28.265 +37:59:54.28 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_05-08-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0191.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_05-08-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0191.fits
Image size: 941.7'x626.6' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 01:05:12.125 +38:01:30.71 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 01:05:28.265 +37:59:54.28
Second-epoch image center 01:05:12.125 +38:01:30.71
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0594 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_05-09-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0192.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_05-09-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0192.fits
Image size: 941.7'x626.6' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 01:05:12.023 +38:01:30.68 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 01:05:28.265 +37:59:54.28
Second-epoch image center 01:05:12.023 +38:01:30.68
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0597 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 01:05:12.125 +38:01:30.71
Second-epoch second image center 01:05:12.023 +38:01:30.68
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00034 deg.
###################################
ERROR: no shift applied between second-epoch images! The distance between image centers is 0.00034 deg. (min. required shift: 0.00164 deg.)
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/And-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-44-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0192.fits &> /tmp/tmp.LhZ86aKmmW
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/And-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-44-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0192.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/And-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-44-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0193.fits &> /tmp/tmp.iLKPCIyYyv
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/And-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-44-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0193.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_And-05-Q1b1x1_053321_TTUQ1b1x1_106498_eObhr7PT/fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_05-08-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0191.fits &> /tmp/tmp.bgpKJCAidr
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_And-05-Q1b1x1_053321_TTUQ1b1x1_106498_eObhr7PT/fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_05-08-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0191.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_And-05-Q1b1x1_053321_TTUQ1b1x1_106498_eObhr7PT/fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_05-09-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0192.fits &> /tmp/tmp.vjyx6C9mah
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_And-05-Q1b1x1_053321_TTUQ1b1x1_106498_eObhr7PT/fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_05-09-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0192.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_And-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-44-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0192.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_And-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-44-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0192.fits and wcs_And-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-44-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0192.fits.cat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_And-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-44-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0192.fits and wcs_And-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-44-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0192.fits.cat
Found non-empty wcs_And-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-44-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0192.fits and wcs_And-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-44-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0192.fits.cat
The reference image (wcs_And-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-44-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0192.fits) and catalog (wcs_And-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-44-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0192.fits.cat) found
'wcs_And-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-44-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0192.fits.cat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 99677 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 5.8657 to 27.2719 deg, Dec +32.1466 to +43.3228 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 5.8657 to 27.2719 deg, Dec 32.1466 to 43.3228 deg
Loaded 12160 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 7564 out of 9417 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 9417 out of 99677 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.813800
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.813800
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.28
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.53
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.53
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:

Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 99677 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 5.8657 to 27.2719 deg, Dec +32.1466 to +43.3228 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 5.8657 to 27.2719 deg, Dec 32.1466 to 43.3228 deg
Loaded 12160 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 7564 out of 9417 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 9417 out of 99677 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_And-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-44-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0192.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_And-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-44-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0192.fits:

Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_And-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-44-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0192.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_And-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-44-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0192.fits (aperture=4.7)
Read 100358 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 5.8619 to 27.2367 deg, Dec +32.1468 to +43.3220 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 5.8619 to 27.2367 deg, Dec 32.1468 to 43.3220 deg
Loaded 12146 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 7601 out of 9500 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 9500 out of 100358 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_And-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-44-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0193.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_And-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-44-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0193.fits:

Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_And-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-44-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0193.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_And-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-44-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0193.fits (aperture=4.7)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 45 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 8000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
1.9 pix And-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-44-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0192.fits
1.9 pix And-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-44-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0193.fits
3.4 pix fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_05-08-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0191.fits
3.4 pix fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_05-09-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0192.fits
1.9 pix wcs_And-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-44-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0192.fits
1.9 pix wcs_And-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-44-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0193.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.5 mag. And-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-44-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0192.fits
15.5 mag. And-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-44-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0193.fits
14.1 mag. fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_05-08-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0191.fits
14.1 mag. fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_05-09-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0192.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.1 (SNR ) 13.4 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.LhZ86aKmmW (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-01_CI_And-05-Q1b1x1_053321_TTUQ1b1x1_106498_eObhr7PT/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/And-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-44-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0192.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/And-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-44-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0192.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/And-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-44-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0192.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/And-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-44-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0192.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/And-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-44-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0192.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/And-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-44-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0192.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/And-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-44-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0192.fits' -> 'wcs_And-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-44-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0192.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/And-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-44-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0192.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_And-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-44-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0192.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_And-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-44-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0192.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_And-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-44-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0192.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_And-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-44-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0192.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_And-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-44-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0192.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_And-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-44-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0192.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_And-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-44-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0192.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/And-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-44-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0192.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_And-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-44-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0192.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=21, blended=8225, passed=99656
Got 99656 stars (including 91263 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_And-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-44-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0192.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 99656 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013076 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010461 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 610 to 668 (Dec 32.1 to 43.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 945 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 943 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 936 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 943 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 97957 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 610 to 668 (Dec 32.1 to 43.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 945 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 943 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 97957 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 943 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 97957 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Excluding outliers - 943 stars left (next iteration limit 1037)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=And-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-44-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0192.fits N_match=943 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.303 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.385 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.302 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.273 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.264 n_q1=225 n_q2=256 n_q3=212 n_q4=250 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.271
The image catalog is written to wcs_And-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-44-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0192.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_And-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-44-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0192.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/And-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-44-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0192.fits -region wcs_And-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-44-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0192.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_And-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-44-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0192.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.iLKPCIyYyv (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-01_CI_And-05-Q1b1x1_053321_TTUQ1b1x1_106498_eObhr7PT/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/And-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-44-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0193.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/And-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-44-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0193.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/And-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-44-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0193.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/And-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-44-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0193.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/And-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-44-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0193.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/And-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-44-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0193.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/And-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-44-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0193.fits' -> 'wcs_And-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-44-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0193.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/And-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-44-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0193.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_And-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-44-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0193.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_And-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-44-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0193.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_And-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-44-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0193.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_And-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-44-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0193.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_And-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-44-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0193.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_And-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-44-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0193.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_And-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-44-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0193.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/And-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-44-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0193.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_And-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-44-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0193.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=15, blended=8395, passed=100343
Got 100343 stars (including 91781 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_And-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-44-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0193.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 100343 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013076 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010461 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 610 to 668 (Dec 32.1 to 43.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 944 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 943 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 936 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 943 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 98950 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 610 to 668 (Dec 32.1 to 43.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 944 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 942 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 98950 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 942 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 98950 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Excluding outliers - 942 stars left (next iteration limit 1037)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=And-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-44-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0193.fits N_match=942 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.330 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.408 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.303 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.332 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.259 n_q1=221 n_q2=256 n_q3=212 n_q4=253 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.238
The image catalog is written to wcs_And-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-44-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0193.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_And-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-44-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0193.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/And-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-44-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0193.fits -region wcs_And-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-44-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0193.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_And-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-44-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0193.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.bgpKJCAidr (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-01_CI_And-05-Q1b1x1_053321_TTUQ1b1x1_106498_eObhr7PT/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_And-05-Q1b1x1_053321_TTUQ1b1x1_106498_eObhr7PT/fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_05-08-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0191.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_And-05-Q1b1x1_053321_TTUQ1b1x1_106498_eObhr7PT/fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_05-08-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0191.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_And-05-Q1b1x1_053321_TTUQ1b1x1_106498_eObhr7PT/fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_05-08-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0191.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_And-05-Q1b1x1_053321_TTUQ1b1x1_106498_eObhr7PT/fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_05-08-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0191.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_And-05-Q1b1x1_053321_TTUQ1b1x1_106498_eObhr7PT/fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_05-08-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0191.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_And-05-Q1b1x1_053321_TTUQ1b1x1_106498_eObhr7PT/fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_05-08-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0191.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_05-08-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0191.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_05-08-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0191.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_05-08-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0191.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_05-08-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0191.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_05-08-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0191.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_05-08-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0191.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_05-08-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0191.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_And-05-Q1b1x1_053321_TTUQ1b1x1_106498_eObhr7PT/fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_05-08-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0191.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_05-08-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0191.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=4, blended=1597, passed=37568
Got 37568 stars (including 35930 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_05-08-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0191.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 37568 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.7'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.7 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013079 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010463 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 610 to 669 (Dec 32.0 to 43.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 939 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 936 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 925 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 936 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 36867 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 610 to 669 (Dec 32.0 to 43.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 939 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 936 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 36868 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 936 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 36868 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Excluding outliers - 936 stars left (next iteration limit 1029)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_05-08-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0191.fits N_match=936 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.336 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.319 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.420 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.327 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.325 n_q1=230 n_q2=204 n_q3=255 n_q4=247 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.252
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_05-08-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0191.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_05-08-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0191.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_And-05-Q1b1x1_053321_TTUQ1b1x1_106498_eObhr7PT/fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_05-08-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0191.fits -region wcs_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_05-08-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0191.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_05-08-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0191.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.vjyx6C9mah (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-01_CI_And-05-Q1b1x1_053321_TTUQ1b1x1_106498_eObhr7PT/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_And-05-Q1b1x1_053321_TTUQ1b1x1_106498_eObhr7PT/fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_05-09-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0192.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_And-05-Q1b1x1_053321_TTUQ1b1x1_106498_eObhr7PT/fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_05-09-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0192.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_And-05-Q1b1x1_053321_TTUQ1b1x1_106498_eObhr7PT/fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_05-09-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0192.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_And-05-Q1b1x1_053321_TTUQ1b1x1_106498_eObhr7PT/fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_05-09-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0192.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_And-05-Q1b1x1_053321_TTUQ1b1x1_106498_eObhr7PT/fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_05-09-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0192.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_And-05-Q1b1x1_053321_TTUQ1b1x1_106498_eObhr7PT/fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_05-09-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0192.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_05-09-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0192.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_05-09-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0192.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_05-09-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0192.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_05-09-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0192.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_05-09-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0192.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_05-09-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0192.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_05-09-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0192.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_And-05-Q1b1x1_053321_TTUQ1b1x1_106498_eObhr7PT/fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_05-09-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0192.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_05-09-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0192.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=2, blended=1545, passed=37282
Got 37282 stars (including 35697 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_05-09-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0192.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 37282 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.7'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.7 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013079 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010463 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 610 to 669 (Dec 32.0 to 43.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 940 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 937 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 927 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 937 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 36666 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 610 to 669 (Dec 32.0 to 43.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 940 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 938 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 36666 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 938 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 36667 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Excluding outliers - 938 stars left (next iteration limit 1030)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_05-09-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0192.fits N_match=938 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.376 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.410 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.404 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.336 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.383 n_q1=228 n_q2=206 n_q3=254 n_q4=250 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.091
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_05-09-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0192.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_05-09-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0192.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_And-05-Q1b1x1_053321_TTUQ1b1x1_106498_eObhr7PT/fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_05-09-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0192.fits -region wcs_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_05-09-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0192.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_05-09-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0192.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_05-08-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0191.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_And-05-Q1b1x1_053321_TTUQ1b1x1_106498_eObhr7PT/wcs_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_05-08-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0191.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_05-09-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0192.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_And-05-Q1b1x1_053321_TTUQ1b1x1_106498_eObhr7PT/wcs_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_05-09-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0192.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field And-05-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_And-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-44-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0192.fits at 00:29:36.71 +35:43:32.4: 13.39 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_And-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-44-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0193.fits at 00:29:36.71 +35:43:32.4: 13.42 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.41 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:29:36.71 +35:43:32.4: ref_mag=13.41 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.2838 delta=0.12 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_And-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-44-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0192.fits at 00:55:14.27 +38:13:12.4: 13.41 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_And-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-44-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0193.fits at 00:55:14.27 +38:13:12.4: 13.41 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.41 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:55:14.27 +38:13:12.4: ref_mag=13.41 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.2807 delta=0.13 (need > 0.90)
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 1s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 0s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 117834_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_05-09-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0192
The candidate 117834_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_05-09-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0192 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 06 01.42320 | 2461192.92320 | 13.74 | 01:03:20.61 +40:43:35.7 | 4483 4808 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_And-05-Q1b1x1_053321_TTUQ1b1x1_106498_eObhr7PT/fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_05-09-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0192.fits |
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.1 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 117845_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_05-09-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0192
The candidate 117845_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_05-09-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0192 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 1 | 2026 06 01.42280 | 2461192.92280 | 13.34 | 00:29:36.91 +35:43:32.6 | 0491 1751 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_And-05-Q1b1x1_053321_TTUQ1b1x1_106498_eObhr7PT/fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_05-08-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0191.fits |
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 06 01.42320 | 2461192.92320 | 13.25 | 00:29:36.52 +35:43:32.3 | 0490 1751 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_And-05-Q1b1x1_053321_TTUQ1b1x1_106498_eObhr7PT/fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_05-09-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0192.fits |
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 117850_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_05-09-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0192
The candidate 117850_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_05-09-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0192 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 06 01.42320 | 2461192.92320 | 13.22 | 00:51:56.42 +40:34:47.5 | 3183 4671 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_And-05-Q1b1x1_053321_TTUQ1b1x1_106498_eObhr7PT/fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_05-09-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0192.fits |
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.2 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 117901_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_05-09-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0192
The candidate 117901_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_05-09-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0192 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 06 01.42320 | 2461192.92320 | 10.81 | 00:36:12.20 +43:12:00.1 | 1398 6272 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_And-05-Q1b1x1_053321_TTUQ1b1x1_106498_eObhr7PT/fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_05-09-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0192.fits |
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 117918_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_05-09-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0192
The candidate 117918_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_05-09-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0192 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 06 01.42320 | 2461192.92320 | 10.99 | 01:09:30.89 +35:34:27.5 | 5402 1755 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_And-05-Q1b1x1_053321_TTUQ1b1x1_106498_eObhr7PT/fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_05-09-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0192.fits |
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.2 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 117980_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_05-09-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0192
The candidate 117980_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_05-09-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0192 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 06 01.42320 | 2461192.92320 | 11.64 | 01:12:07.87 +35:27:24.4 | 5727 1708 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_And-05-Q1b1x1_053321_TTUQ1b1x1_106498_eObhr7PT/fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_05-09-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0192.fits |
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 117987_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_05-09-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0192
The candidate 117987_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_05-09-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0192 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 06 01.42320 | 2461192.92320 | 11.83 | 01:10:31.88 +41:54:06.2 | 5250 5569 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_And-05-Q1b1x1_053321_TTUQ1b1x1_106498_eObhr7PT/fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_05-09-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0192.fits |
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 118014_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_05-09-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0192
The candidate 118014_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_05-09-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0192 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 06 01.42320 | 2461192.92320 | 12.04 | 01:09:34.90 +35:34:33.8 | 5410 1757 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_And-05-Q1b1x1_053321_TTUQ1b1x1_106498_eObhr7PT/fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_05-09-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0192.fits |
**** FOUND 01:09:34.76 +35:34:33.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bbsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 118027_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_05-09-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0192
The candidate 118027_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_05-09-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0192 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 06 01.42320 | 2461192.92320 | 12.28 | 00:56:07.24 +43:01:43.1 | 3611 6167 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_And-05-Q1b1x1_053321_TTUQ1b1x1_106498_eObhr7PT/fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_05-09-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0192.fits |
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.3 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 118044_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_05-09-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0192
The candidate 118044_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_05-09-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0192 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 06 01.42320 | 2461192.92320 | 12.37 | 01:01:58.72 +42:31:22.4 | 4273 5886 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_And-05-Q1b1x1_053321_TTUQ1b1x1_106498_eObhr7PT/fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_05-09-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0192.fits |
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 118063_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_05-09-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0192
The candidate 118063_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_05-09-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0192 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 06 01.42320 | 2461192.92320 | 12.48 | 00:52:59.85 +38:32:16.7 | 3336 3443 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_And-05-Q1b1x1_053321_TTUQ1b1x1_106498_eObhr7PT/fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_05-09-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0192.fits |
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.3 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 118127_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_05-09-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0192
The candidate 118127_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_05-09-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0192 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 06 01.42320 | 2461192.92320 | 12.78 | 00:32:08.33 +35:00:19.8 | 0791 1305 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_And-05-Q1b1x1_053321_TTUQ1b1x1_106498_eObhr7PT/fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_05-09-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0192.fits |
**** FOUND 00:32:08.37 +35:00:21.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 118129_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_05-09-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0192
The candidate 118129_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_05-09-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0192 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 06 01.42320 | 2461192.92320 | 12.69 | 01:24:29.99 +39:05:00.2 | 7001 4024 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_And-05-Q1b1x1_053321_TTUQ1b1x1_106498_eObhr7PT/fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_05-09-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0192.fits |
**** FOUND 01:24:29.94 +39:05:01.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 118133_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_05-09-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0192
The candidate 118133_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_05-09-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0192 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 06 01.42320 | 2461192.92320 | 12.88 | 00:56:36.99 +38:30:48.6 | 3763 3441 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_And-05-Q1b1x1_053321_TTUQ1b1x1_106498_eObhr7PT/fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_05-09-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0192.fits |
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.3 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 118150_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_05-09-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0192
The candidate 118150_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_05-09-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0192 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 06 01.42320 | 2461192.92320 | 13.05 | 00:35:10.02 +36:48:30.3 | 1198 2393 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_And-05-Q1b1x1_053321_TTUQ1b1x1_106498_eObhr7PT/fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_05-09-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0192.fits |
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.1 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 118160_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_05-09-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0192
The candidate 118160_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_05-09-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0192 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 06 01.42320 | 2461192.92320 | 12.90 | 00:27:04.99 +38:47:44.1 | 0259 3630 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_And-05-Q1b1x1_053321_TTUQ1b1x1_106498_eObhr7PT/fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_05-09-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0192.fits |
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.3 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 118173_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_05-09-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0192
The candidate 118173_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_05-09-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0192 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 06 01.42320 | 2461192.92320 | 12.91 | 01:13:17.08 +41:12:46.1 | 5591 5178 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_And-05-Q1b1x1_053321_TTUQ1b1x1_106498_eObhr7PT/fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_05-09-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0192.fits |
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 118210_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_05-09-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0192
The candidate 118210_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_05-09-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0192 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 06 01.42320 | 2461192.92320 | 13.12 | 00:49:55.29 +38:43:29.0 | 2971 3548 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_And-05-Q1b1x1_053321_TTUQ1b1x1_106498_eObhr7PT/fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_05-09-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0192.fits |
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.2 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 118220_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_05-09-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0192
The candidate 118220_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_05-09-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0192 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 06 01.42320 | 2461192.92320 | 13.40 | 00:37:03.22 +40:14:56.2 | 1464 4472 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_And-05-Q1b1x1_053321_TTUQ1b1x1_106498_eObhr7PT/fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_05-09-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0192.fits |
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 118228_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_05-09-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0192
The candidate 118228_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_05-09-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0192 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 06 01.42320 | 2461192.92320 | 13.05 | 00:56:31.90 +43:00:16.6 | 3657 6154 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_And-05-Q1b1x1_053321_TTUQ1b1x1_106498_eObhr7PT/fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_05-09-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0192.fits |
**** FOUND 00:56:31.82 +43:00:16.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 118235_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_05-09-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0192
The candidate 118235_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_05-09-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0192 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 06 01.42320 | 2461192.92320 | 12.83 | 01:41:04.03 +41:47:02.9 | 8691 5913 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_And-05-Q1b1x1_053321_TTUQ1b1x1_106498_eObhr7PT/fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_05-09-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0192.fits |
**** FOUND 01:41:03.93 +41:47:03.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 118241_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_05-09-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0192
The candidate 118241_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_05-09-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0192 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 06 01.42320 | 2461192.92320 | 13.00 | 00:36:05.11 +39:18:01.8 | 1341 3900 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_And-05-Q1b1x1_053321_TTUQ1b1x1_106498_eObhr7PT/fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_05-09-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0192.fits |
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.3 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 118272_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_05-09-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0192
The candidate 118272_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_05-09-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0192 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 06 01.42320 | 2461192.92320 | 13.08 | 00:43:47.20 +33:18:46.3 | 2246 0263 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_And-05-Q1b1x1_053321_TTUQ1b1x1_106498_eObhr7PT/fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_05-09-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0192.fits |
**** FOUND 00:43:47.17 +33:18:46.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 118278_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_05-09-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0192
The candidate 118278_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_05-09-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0192 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 06 01.42320 | 2461192.92320 | 13.13 | 01:15:36.43 +40:44:12.5 | 5879 4914 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_And-05-Q1b1x1_053321_TTUQ1b1x1_106498_eObhr7PT/fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_05-09-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0192.fits |
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.2 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 118327_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_05-09-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0192
The candidate 118327_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_05-09-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0192 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 06 01.42320 | 2461192.92320 | 13.32 | 00:36:46.98 +37:31:41.3 | 1403 2825 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_And-05-Q1b1x1_053321_TTUQ1b1x1_106498_eObhr7PT/fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_05-09-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0192.fits |
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.1 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 118335_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_05-09-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0192
The candidate 118335_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_05-09-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0192 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 06 01.42320 | 2461192.92320 | 13.22 | 00:49:38.08 +38:11:21.7 | 2943 3225 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_And-05-Q1b1x1_053321_TTUQ1b1x1_106498_eObhr7PT/fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_05-09-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0192.fits |
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.3 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 118338_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_05-09-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0192
The candidate 118338_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_05-09-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0192 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 06 01.42320 | 2461192.92320 | 13.13 | 01:00:42.48 +33:46:02.5 | 4376 0600 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_And-05-Q1b1x1_053321_TTUQ1b1x1_106498_eObhr7PT/fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_05-09-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0192.fits |
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.2 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 118339_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_05-09-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0192
The candidate 118339_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_05-09-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0192 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 06 01.42320 | 2461192.92320 | 13.13 | 00:41:16.57 +39:26:49.3 | 1952 3979 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_And-05-Q1b1x1_053321_TTUQ1b1x1_106498_eObhr7PT/fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_05-09-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0192.fits |
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.3 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 118348_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_05-09-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0192
The candidate 118348_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_05-09-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0192 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 06 01.42320 | 2461192.92320 | 13.42 | 00:50:01.30 +39:14:35.9 | 2977 3861 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_And-05-Q1b1x1_053321_TTUQ1b1x1_106498_eObhr7PT/fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_05-09-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0192.fits |
**** FOUND 00:50:01.33 +39:14:37.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 118368_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_05-09-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0192
The candidate 118368_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_05-09-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0192 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 1 | 2026 06 01.42280 | 2461192.92280 | 13.28 | 00:55:14.30 +38:13:10.6 | 3606 3259 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_And-05-Q1b1x1_053321_TTUQ1b1x1_106498_eObhr7PT/fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_05-08-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0191.fits |
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 06 01.42320 | 2461192.92320 | 13.29 | 00:55:14.24 +38:13:14.1 | 3606 3259 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_And-05-Q1b1x1_053321_TTUQ1b1x1_106498_eObhr7PT/fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_05-09-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0192.fits |
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 118369_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_05-09-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0192
The candidate 118369_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_05-09-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0192 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 06 01.42320 | 2461192.92320 | 13.47 | 01:23:56.60 +39:54:24.3 | 6882 4511 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_And-05-Q1b1x1_053321_TTUQ1b1x1_106498_eObhr7PT/fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_05-09-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0192.fits |
**** FOUND 01:23:56.53 +39:54:24.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 118372_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_05-09-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0192
The candidate 118372_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_05-09-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0192 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 06 01.42320 | 2461192.92320 | 13.25 | 01:07:05.90 +38:40:01.5 | 4989 3595 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_And-05-Q1b1x1_053321_TTUQ1b1x1_106498_eObhr7PT/fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_05-09-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0192.fits |
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.1 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 118389_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_05-09-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0192
The candidate 118389_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_05-09-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0192 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 06 01.42320 | 2461192.92320 | 13.16 | 01:00:24.54 +34:52:19.4 | 4308 1267 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_And-05-Q1b1x1_053321_TTUQ1b1x1_106498_eObhr7PT/fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_05-09-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0192.fits |
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 118390_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_05-09-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0192
The candidate 118390_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_05-09-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0192 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 06 01.42320 | 2461192.92320 | 13.37 | 00:53:05.16 +38:31:49.8 | 3346 3439 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_And-05-Q1b1x1_053321_TTUQ1b1x1_106498_eObhr7PT/fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_05-09-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0192.fits |
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 118398_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_05-09-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0192
The candidate 118398_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_05-09-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0192 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 06 01.42320 | 2461192.92320 | 13.48 | 00:42:42.84 +42:35:09.1 | 2123 5882 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_And-05-Q1b1x1_053321_TTUQ1b1x1_106498_eObhr7PT/fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_05-09-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0192.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 118427_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_05-09-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0192
The candidate 118427_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_05-09-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0192 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 06 01.42320 | 2461192.92320 | 13.48 | 00:30:00.73 +33:03:39.4 | 0477 0121 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_And-05-Q1b1x1_053321_TTUQ1b1x1_106498_eObhr7PT/fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_05-09-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0192.fits |
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 118440_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_05-09-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0192
The candidate 118440_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_05-09-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0192 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 06 01.42320 | 2461192.92320 | 13.49 | 01:31:41.44 +34:40:13.4 | 8188 1476 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_And-05-Q1b1x1_053321_TTUQ1b1x1_106498_eObhr7PT/fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_05-09-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0192.fits |
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 118444_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_05-09-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0192
The candidate 118444_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_05-09-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0192 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 06 01.42320 | 2461192.92320 | 13.37 | 01:05:25.79 +39:13:08.1 | 4774 3914 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_And-05-Q1b1x1_053321_TTUQ1b1x1_106498_eObhr7PT/fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_05-09-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0192.fits |
**** FOUND 01:05:25.82 +39:13:07.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 118450_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_05-09-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0192
The candidate 118450_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_05-09-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0192 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 06 01.42320 | 2461192.92320 | 13.43 | 00:45:48.61 +40:16:01.6 | 2480 4474 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_And-05-Q1b1x1_053321_TTUQ1b1x1_106498_eObhr7PT/fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_05-09-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0192.fits |
**** FOUND 00:45:48.57 +40:16:02.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 118457_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_05-09-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0192
The candidate 118457_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_05-09-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0192 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 06 01.42320 | 2461192.92320 | 13.40 | 01:05:21.85 +39:16:12.9 | 4765 3945 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_And-05-Q1b1x1_053321_TTUQ1b1x1_106498_eObhr7PT/fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_05-09-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0192.fits |
**** FOUND 01:05:21.74 +39:16:12.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 118472_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_05-09-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0192
The candidate 118472_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_05-09-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0192 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 06 01.42320 | 2461192.92320 | 13.19 | 01:42:41.98 +39:14:13.0 | 9120 4411 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_And-05-Q1b1x1_053321_TTUQ1b1x1_106498_eObhr7PT/fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_05-09-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0192.fits |
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.2 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 89141_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_05-09-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0192
The candidate 89141_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_05-09-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0192 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 3 | 2026 06 01.42320 | 2461192.92320 | 10.97 | 01:17:44.84 +35:30:55.2 | 6411 1800 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_And-05-Q1b1x1_053321_TTUQ1b1x1_106498_eObhr7PT/fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_05-09-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0192.fits |
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.2 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 74381_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_05-09-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0192
The candidate 74381_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_05-09-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0192 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 3 | 2026 06 01.42320 | 2461192.92320 | 9.99 | 00:51:23.37 +34:22:37.5 | 3198 0927 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_And-05-Q1b1x1_053321_TTUQ1b1x1_106498_eObhr7PT/fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_05-09-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0192.fits |
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.2 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 22436_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_05-09-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0192
The candidate 22436_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_05-09-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0192 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 3 | 2026 06 01.42320 | 2461192.92320 | 10.96 | 01:04:35.57 +41:17:57.4 | 4605 5161 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_And-05-Q1b1x1_053321_TTUQ1b1x1_106498_eObhr7PT/fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_05-09-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0192.fits |
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.2 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 58021_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_05-09-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0192
The candidate 58021_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_05-09-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0192 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 3 | 2026 06 01.42320 | 2461192.92320 | 12.81 | 01:02:22.97 +37:55:05.2 | 4459 3113 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-01_CI_And-05-Q1b1x1_053321_TTUQ1b1x1_106498_eObhr7PT/fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-01_05-09-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0192.fits |
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 1s
Prepared the HTML report for the field And-05-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
########### Completed And-05-Q1b1x1 ###########
The analysis was running at tau
We are allowed to update the exclusion list at tau host
Found ../exclusion_list_TTUQ1.txt
#### The exclusion list before filtering-out asteroids, bad pixels and adding Gaia sources ####
###################################################################################
renamed 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt_noasteroids' -> 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt'
renamed 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt_nohotpixels' -> 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt'
# Count candidates with no identification (that also don't look like hot pix)
Found 0 unidentified candidates (excluding asteroids, hot pixels and known variable stars).
###################################################################################
0 candidates found (excluding asteroids and hot pixels)
This does not look like a test run
###################################################################################
exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt NOT FOUND
exclusion_list_apass.txt NOT FOUND
IS_THIS_TEST_RUN=NO ALLOW_EXCLUSION_LIST_UPDATE= YES
#### Nothing to add to the exclusion list ####
The observatory MPC code is V36
############################################################
Positions of planets computed with util/planet_finder/main.py for JD(UT)2461192.92280201 -observatory V36
05:57:48.09 +25:35:39.3 Mercury (-0.5mag)
07:08:21.15 +24:27:01.4 Venus (-3.9mag)
02:30:00.86 +14:07:38.0 Mars (1.3mag)
07:42:54.16 +21:44:59.3 Jupiter (-1.9mag)
00:47:20.67 +02:37:27.1 Saturn (0.9mag)
03:58:35.01 +20:20:45.4 Uranus (5.8mag)
00:15:42.26 +00:14:19.4 Neptune (7.8mag)
20:33:41.67 -23:02:07.0 Pluto (14.5mag)
17:22:23.36 -28:37:57.8 Moon (-12.4mag)
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 363 Jun 1 07:14 planets.txt
############################################################
Positions of selected moons from JPL HORIZONS for JD(UT)2461192.92280201:
07:43:01.37 +21:44:40.1 Io (6.0mag)
07:43:00.80 +21:44:42.2 Europa (6.1mag)
07:42:38.44 +21:45:46.0 Ganymede (5.5mag)
07:42:56.11 +21:45:01.3 Callisto (6.8mag)
07:43:36.28 +21:21:04.5 Himalia (15.6mag)
07:42:58.73 +21:44:45.9 Thebe (16.5mag)
07:43:46.39 +21:39:33.3 Elara (17.5mag)
07:44:43.15 +22:00:22.1 Pasiphae (17.7mag)
07:49:46.46 +21:46:13.0 Carme (18.8mag)
00:47:27.76 +02:37:47.2 Titan (8.7mag)
00:47:25.05 +02:37:20.7 Rhea (10.0mag)
00:47:51.81 +02:38:40.9 Iapetus (11.4mag)
00:47:14.49 +02:37:56.0 Hyperion (14.7mag)
00:48:11.05 +02:40:21.6 Phoebe (16.7mag)
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 569 Jun 1 07:14 moons.txt
############################################################
Positions of selected spacecraft from JPL HORIZONS for JD(UT)2461192.92280201:
17:21:34.01 -34:27:45.6 JWST
17:50:42.01 +34:28:27.6 Chandra
09:45:18.50 -55:26:32.2 XMM-Newton
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 96 Jun 1 07:14 spacecraft.txt
############################################################
Positions of bright comets computed with util/comet_finder/main.py for JD(UT)2461192.92280201 -observatory V36
18:47:46.99 -32:08:41.8 13.7mag P/2010 H2 (Vales)
05:46:51.81 -68:09:12.5 17.4mag C/2014 UN271 (Bernardinelli-Bernstein)
05:46:35.22 +31:52:57.2 17.5mag C/2017 K2 (PANSTARRS)
17:17:25.96 +14:58:15.2 17.8mag C/2021 G2 (ATLAS)
20:15:54.17 -51:25:24.2 17.5mag P/2021 N1 (ZTF)
23:13:51.67 +31:19:09.6 17.2mag C/2022 E2 (ATLAS)
05:25:42.89 +26:55:27.8 16.4mag C/2022 N2 (PANSTARRS)
09:25:01.08 +31:18:25.7 16.6mag C/2022 QE78 (ATLAS)
08:47:02.22 +03:34:57.9 17.6mag C/2022 R6 (PANSTARRS)
18:32:33.02 +21:25:52.6 17.7mag C/2023 A3 (Tsuchinshan-ATLAS)
15:21:55.41 -11:00:44.4 17.5mag P/2023 B1 (PANSTARRS)
22:15:57.47 +66:05:34.7 17.7mag C/2023 H5 (Lemmon)
18:02:46.94 -06:03:30.4 13.7mag C/2023 R1 (PANSTARRS)
13:24:48.19 +84:29:45.2 17.9mag C/2023 X2 (Lemmon)
07:01:18.74 +64:05:48.5 17.6mag C/2024 A1 (ATLAS)
06:36:49.32 +27:10:41.1 13.4mag C/2024 E1 (Wierzchos)
15:42:43.17 +12:53:02.0 17.4mag C/2024 G6 (ATLAS)
20:17:00.35 +29:05:25.7 14.1mag C/2024 J3 (ATLAS)
04:11:14.04 -16:34:34.3 16.1mag C/2024 T5 (ATLAS)
05:59:33.58 +35:41:05.3 17.9mag C/2025 J1 (Borisov)
11:39:19.97 +53:06:01.6 17.2mag C/2025 L1 (ATLAS)
06:35:43.64 -10:33:07.7 13.4mag C/2025 R3 (PANSTARRS)
09:18:55.17 +23:24:13.1 18.0mag C/2025 V2 (Rankin)
12:40:07.56 +04:40:51.9 17.2mag C/2025 Y1 (ATLAS)
01:48:24.65 +42:54:18.0 15.9mag C/2026 B2 (Sun-Gao)
11:10:24.08 -06:18:01.6 16.4mag A/2026 E1
20:11:13.66 -08:13:48.2 9.1mag 10P/Tempel
11:00:37.60 -00:53:39.7 15.9mag 29P/Schwassmann-Wachmann
10:55:41.93 -02:37:57.7 17.9mag 43P/Wolf-Harrington
03:01:12.17 +24:43:13.5 17.6mag 47P/Ashbrook-Jackson
08:45:32.19 +25:40:14.2 16.9mag 63P/Wild
00:20:51.85 -06:50:11.7 15.7mag 65P/Gunn
06:21:34.63 +32:37:41.7 16.7mag 76P/West-Kohoutek-Ikemura
02:52:52.62 +16:18:20.0 13.9mag 78P/Gehrels
01:05:40.54 +03:19:12.1 15.4mag 88P/Howell
04:32:49.36 +29:41:19.4 15.2mag 93P/Lovas
02:24:08.99 +26:29:11.3 17.8mag 114P/Wiseman-Skiff
06:34:31.57 +33:13:54.1 15.7mag 123P/West-Hartley
09:38:30.76 +17:33:13.5 16.5mag 124P/Mrkos
03:47:52.20 +18:46:20.4 16.4mag 128P/Shoemaker-Holt
04:20:03.62 +18:44:07.5 17.7mag 131P/Mueller
05:28:11.89 +19:18:47.1 13.8mag 141P/Machholz
05:30:40.75 +17:09:26.1 13.7mag 141P-A/Machholz
04:19:21.83 +15:03:30.7 11.0mag 141P-D/Machholz
02:52:48.75 -25:40:50.8 17.1mag 161P/Hartley-IRAS
03:19:36.36 +20:59:27.4 14.9mag 162P/SidingSpring
19:36:17.99 -00:09:04.5 17.2mag 169P/NEAT
23:59:58.75 +01:06:01.9 17.9mag 220P/McNaught
16:57:28.01 -08:52:36.7 16.3mag 235P/LINEAR
07:19:17.14 +35:43:39.9 17.4mag 240P/NEAT
00:14:41.04 -05:17:06.5 16.6mag 260P/McNaught
03:46:08.50 +31:11:41.7 17.6mag 295P/LINEAR
23:02:34.00 -18:57:56.0 17.6mag 320P/McNaught
15:18:28.59 +08:16:52.5 17.4mag 391P/Kowalski
08:01:51.85 +20:54:34.9 17.9mag 450P/LONEOS
06:48:55.57 +42:10:04.9 17.8mag 493P/LONEOS
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 2.7K Jun 1 07:14 comets.txt
############################################################
List of recent ASAS-SN transients from https://www.astronomy.ohio-state.edu/asassn/transients.html :
20:07:38.15 -21:07:05.40 SN2026mho 2026-05-25.18 -1.12
11:29:42.55 +79:01:03.10 AT2026min 2026-05-24.21 16.63
11:44:33.11 -68:48:32.90 ASASSN-26no 2026-05-24.03 8.35
14:23:56.59 -58:37:47.40 ASASSN-26dn 2026-05-20.01 14.59
11:24:54.06 +47:57:01.60 AT2026nma 2026-05-20.29 15.46
21:27:08.58 +33:24:38.10 AT2026lli 2026-05-19.34 15.86
00:31:01.41 -13:38:51.70 AT2026nad 2026-05-19.39 15.34
15:16:06.61 -79:16:32.40 ASASSN-26dm 2026-05-19.03 14.44
11:24:25.21 -59:23:19.10 ASASSN-26dl 2026-05-18.02 13.55
13:45:51.52 -53:16:01.00 ASASSN-26dk 2026-05-18.16 12.96
02:05:49.69 -30:29:09.60 ASASSN-26dh 2026-05-18.43 15.37
17:50:22.87 -39:42:33.90 ASASSN-26dj 2026-05-17.05 15.7
01:13:11.60 -33:25:16.10 ASASSN-26dg 2026-05-13.41 16.8
16:44:31.77 -27:15:18.40 AT2026mhn 2026-05-12.33 15.8
09:46:31.08 -33:41:51.00 ASASSN-26di 2026-05-12.14 14.63
21:23:11.57 -19:09:45.00 AT2026kwu 2026-05-12.26 16.9
14:20:14.30 -30:20:51.90 AT2026ktm 2026-05-12.06 17.21
14:41:39.01 -37:13:46.40 AT2026lkm 2026-05-11.18 16.89
12:59:50.45 -10:58:38.80 SN2026kep 2026-05-9.06 17.5
13:37:29.61 -29:50:30.90 AT2026lkd 2026-05-9.09 17.23
09:46:42.01 -14:52:03.60 SN2026kmo 2026-05-8.99 17.51
15:03:05.18 +22:02:03.40 AT2026lxf 2026-05-8.07 13.94
10:23:49.41 -20:57:25.30 ASASSN-26df 2026-05-8.21 16.52
22:14:40.56 +05:04:51.60 2026lda 2026-05-7.56 16.2
21:35:33.81 -14:05:16.30 ASASSN-26de 2026-05-6.29 14.51
16:21:49.13 -61:36:14.60 ASASSN-26dd 2026-05-5.15 15.93
14:26:40.22 -24:48:37.50 AT2026lig 2026-05-4.27 14.63
13:17:51.04 +30:25:13.50 SN2026kcp 2026-05-4.46 16.43
11:27:55.57 -13:38:56.90 SN2026kza 2026-05-1.08 15.59
22:28:27.10 +30:17:54.30 SN 2026fov 2026-04-29.6 14.36
21:00:10.71 -32:17:03.90 AT2026kis 2026-04-27.36 16.15
14:32:57.37 -58:13:26.40 ASASSN-26dc 2026-04-27.27 13.42
15:32:05.35 -43:54:34.60 ASASSN-26db 2026-04-27.37 16.06
16:34:34.97 -54:34:58.00 ASASSN-26da 2026-04-25.32 16.11
10:06:55.04 -01:13:49.70 SN2026jsg 2026-04-24.99 16.28
15:15:57.17 +56:18:32.80 SN2026kid 2026-04-24.52 -3.65
07:58:28.45 +57:03:42.40 AT2026kcf 2026-04-24.2 16.89
11:38:21.80 -50:43:06.50 SN2026jkb 2026-04-24.24 15.38
10:06:11.41 -39:41:04.20 AT2026dil 2026-04-24.2 16.85
14:21:40.08 +13:13:46.30 SN2026jlm 2026-04-22.16 15.12
10:53:55.43 -16:06:06.50 ASASSN-26cz 2026-04-22.06 16.26
20:07:38.15 -21:07:05.40 2026-05-25.18 -1.12
13:45:02.03 +15:17:14.50 ASASSN-26cy 2026-04-21.27 15.78
13:20:52.22 -35:57:03.60 AT2026jcm 2026-04-19.01 16.65
13:36:15.66 -36:53:48.40 SN 2026iqy 2026-04-18.92 17.31
06:34:01.33 -40:07:34.00 ASASSN-26cx 2026-04-19.07 16.16
23:33:57.97 -45:12:11.90 SN 2026idu 2026-04-19.41 15.9
12:10:50.92 +66:55:31.20 SN 2026icv 2026-04-17.14 16.03
21:36:59.06 -60:43:35.90 ASASSN-26cv 2026-04-17.35 -1.18
08:13:26.26 -27:07:30.50 ASASSN-26cw 2026-04-17.07 -1.01
14:49:14.01 -27:29:20.10 ASASSN-26cu 2026-04-16.29 -2.7
17:21:59.44 -38:54:04.60 ASASSN-26ct 2026-04-14.4 15.15
15:25:54.99 +07:49:24.50 SN2026huo 2026-04-12.14 16.96
20:07:38.15 -21:07:05.40 2026-05-25.18 -1.12
12:23:20.40 +04:53:39.10 AT2026ixd 2026-04-12.14 17.65
17:46:09.76 -61:19:50.40 SN2026icy 2026-04-12.2 17.03
09:25:46.42 +02:13:46.30 SN2026gud 2026-04-11.98 16.49
16:52:15.46 -60:27:45.90 ASASSN-26cs 2026-04-12.4 15.5
04:20:55.37 -51:15:31.10 ASASSN-26cr 2026-04-12.01 15.37
22:25:39.35 +36:45:06.90 AT2026ihl 2026-04-10.48 14.21
19:40:44.94 +00:41:03.80 AT2026imw 2026-04-10.32 16.06
19:52:04.70 +05:53:33.50 ASASSN-26cq 2026-04-9.31 14.98
16:08:18.39 -64:11:08.80 ASASSN-26cp 2026-04-9.14 13.64
09:22:22.90 -61:02:43.70 SN2026idh 2026-04-7.97 16.34
05:06:54.12 -19:42:26.40 AT2026imr 2026-04-8 17.49
07:14:55.34 -36:03:21.40 AT2026hei 2026-04-8.12 16.7
21:35:33.14 -19:01:34.80 AT2026ihm 2026-04-8.36 16.7
04:28:24.08 -32:25:35.30 AT2026imo 2026-04-8.02 16.81
05:10:35.79 -39:38:40.80 SN 2026hnn 2026-04-7.04 17.07
09:54:32.04 -01:17:25.80 ASASSN-26cn 2026-04-7.01 15.58
07:46:24.43 -77:29:36.30 ASASSN-26co 2026-04-7.15 15.11
05:00:45.52 -29:51:06.20 AT2026hvw 2026-04-6.03 16.51
19:49:33.10 -23:37:11.00 ASASSN-26cl 2026-04-5.29 14.98
19:32:43.68 -22:39:32.70 ASASSN-26cm 2026-04-4.27 13.88
18:08:57.38 +76:48:23.60 ASASSN-26ck 2026-04-2.37 15.38
16:16:36.10 +44:52:30.20 AT2026hyy 2026-04-2.58 13.81
21:55:23.31 -34:48:53.90 ASASSN-26cj 2026-03-30.4 -1.47
11:19:50.81 -27:51:50.40 SN2026gvk 2026-03-30 15.28
11:53:57.02 -23:09:46.20 SN2026gzx 2026-03-28.75 15.27
07:13:46.14 -33:10:15.70 ASASSN-26ci 2026-03-28.15 15.14
09:03:36.09 -67:58:13.00 SN2026hkg 2026-03-28.19 15.82
07:03:00.72 +39:14:43.00 SN2026fin 2026-03-28.27 15.82
05:35:42.80 -63:44:05.50 ASASSN-26ch 2026-03-27.86 13.02
11:23:19.04 +34:22:38.00 SN2026fwt 2026-03-27.3 16.56
19:03:49.79 +37:04:05.20 ASASSN-26ce 2026-03-26.56 16.3
20:26:56.07 -52:54:06.50 AT2026hiy 2026-03-26.35 16.95
05:25:54.76 -30:15:35.80 ASASSN-26cg 2026-03-25.07 16.88
06:57:16.49 -26:54:37.20 SN2026fzb 2026-03-25.14 15.8
14:37:38.23 -43:00:52.30 ASASSN-26cd 2026-03-24.24 12.52
17:34:53.03 +06:04:29.70 AT2026gzl 2026-03-23.27 15.82
08:30:02.60 -35:12:47.50 ASASSN-26cf 2026-03-23.2 14.82
16:54:25.33 +37:49:56.60 SN 2026evz 2026-03-21.32 17.54
17:06:19.20 -18:54:19.50 ASASSN-26bx 2026-03-21.25 16.39
19:01:16.28 -29:29:23.10 ASASSN-26bw 2026-03-21.33 15.81
08:46:05.75 +10:47:39.80 ASASSN-26ca 2026-03-21.13 14.27
12:14:58.16 +63:47:16.20 SN 2026fvx 2026-03-21.12 15.6
18:02:55.90 -75:23:02.60 ASASSN-26bz 2026-03-21.32 16.16
12:16:02.87 -53:16:33.70 ASASSN-26cc 2026-03-20.08 3.93
13:08:21.85 +29:13:44.20 SN 2026fmh 2026-03-20.16 -0.33
19:56:38.48 -34:45:21.50 ASASSN-26cb 2026-03-20.35 -3.26
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 5.6K Jun 1 07:14 asassn_transients_list.txt
############################################################
Truncated list of TOCP transients from http://www.cbat.eps.harvard.edu/unconf/tocp.html :
00:42:36.82 +41:16:05.8 PNV J00423682+4116058 2026-03-12.5744 17.24Cmag
07:26:45.79 -27:45:14.1 TCP J07264579-2745141 2026-03-17.4417 14.8mag
17:57:19.56 -28:08:14.7 TCP J17571956-2808147 2026-03-19.7972 14.5mag
08:46:05.73 +10:47:39.7 TCP J08460573+1047397 2026-03-21.1936 14.5mag
09:55:38.83 +69:05:21.7 PNV J09553883+6905217 2026-04-01.893 19.4mag
19:32:43.67 -22:39:30.7 TCP J19324367-2239307 2026-04-05.4395 13.6mag
16:16:36.03 +44:52:28.9 TCP J16163603+4452289 2026-04-05.6655 14.2mag
00:43:38.36 +41:15:32.4 PNV J00433836+4115324 2026-04-08.079 17.2mag
15:41:11.68 +59:18:26.8 TCP J15411168+5918268 2026-04-12.9625 19.2mag
00:43:35.02 +41:46:28.0 PNV J00433502+4146280 2026-04-23.056 15.9mag
00:42:55.64 +41:14:12.2 PNV J00425564+4114122 2026-04-24.042 16.2mag
21:14:03.38 +56:46:44.1 TCP J21140338+5646441 2026-05-05.3534 16.7mag
15:03:05.19 +22:02:04.1 TCP J15030519+2202041 2026-05-08.3260 13.9mag
07:15:18.25 +47:53:16.7 TCP J07151825+4753167 2026-05-09.1599 14.4mag
16:00:18.44 -22:30:10.6 TCP J16001844-2230106 2026-05-09.6135 13.3mag
00:42:47.45 +41:16:58.5 PNV J00424745+4116585 2026-05-10.030 16.8mag
09:55:02.89 +69:02:13.8 PNV J09550289+6902138 2026-05-18.925 20.7mag
00:43:01.82 +41:18:16.6 PNV J00430182+4118166 2026-05-21.8651 18.83Cmag
00:42:51.20 +41:16:59.4 PNV J00425120+4116594 2022-10-26.135 19.3mag
12:24:25.10 +28:47:12.0 TCP J12242510+2847120 2026-05-31.6015 14.8mag
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 188K Jun 1 07:14 tocp_transients_list.txt
############################################################
Truncated list of recent TNS transients from https://www.wis-tns.org/ :
12:14:03.907 +11:24:16.29 AT 2026ngg 2026-02-25.42 22.0262
15:38:34.889 +28:40:27.66 AT 2026ngf 2026-05-07.31 20.678
20:50:19.905 -32:10:30.32 AT 2026nge 2026-05-20.78 19.62
12:06:37.018 +18:54:32.14 AT 2026ngd 2026-05-18.88 20.11
15:51:50.233 +11:29:30.25 AT 2026ngc 2026-05-20.32 21.06
13:02:13.475 -14:58:05.87 SN 2026ngb 2026-05-19.32 19.77
21:44:03.473 -36:51:39.56 AT 2026nga 2026-05-05.75 19
20:38:09.560 +12:43:44.93 AT 2026nfz 2026-05-17.13 19.7
13:53:52.540 +27:57:44.78 AT 2026nfy 2026-05-20.30 21.05
14:08:26.968 +28:11:01.32 AT 2026nfx 2026-05-20.30 21.04
20:41:11.858 +07:30:47.01 AT 2026nfw 2026-05-20.41 19.6773
21:59:44.032 +01:09:25.15 AT 2026nfv 2026-05-20.41 20.2169
19:55:15.987 -12:13:04.06 SN 2026nfu 2026-05-20.40 19.764
19:11:59.188 -05:59:29.48 AT 2026nft 2026-05-20.40 20.1465
20:49:19.514 -11:14:29.34 AT 2026nfs 2026-05-15.43 20.3991
17:50:32.577 +03:03:50.91 AT 2026nfr 2026-05-14.42 20.7439
09:56:58.256 +03:14:00.41 AT 2026nfq 2026-05-18.98 23.2429
09:58:28.172 +03:37:48.70 AT 2026nfp 2026-05-18.00 23.6388
01:41:52.654 +49:02:23.74 AT 2026nfo 2026-05-15.49 16.6376
19:48:38.478 -15:49:21.40 SN 2026nfn 2026-05-14.45 20.6205
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 30K Jun 1 07:14 tns_transients_list.txt